Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Hohmann transfer orbit

A Hohmann transfer orbit is an elliptical trajectory that enables a spacecraft to move between two coplanar circular orbits around the same central body using the minimum amount of propellant, consisting of half an ellipse tangent to both the departure and arrival orbits at their points of tangency.^[1] It requires two impulsive velocity changes: an initial burn to raise the apoapsis or lower the periapsis from the starting circular orbit, followed by a second burn at the opposite end of the ellipse to circularize into the target orbit.^[1] Named after German engineer and scientist Walter Hohmann, who first detailed the concept in his 1925 book Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmelskörper (The Attainability of Celestial Bodies), this method calculates the optimal energy path for such transfers and remains a foundational technique in astrodynamics.^[2]^[1] The geometry of a Hohmann transfer is defined by the semi-major axis a of the ellipse, given by a = (r_1 + r_2)/2, where r_1 and r_2 are the radii of the initial and final circular orbits, respectively; the eccentricity e is then e = (r_2 - r_1)/(r_2 + r_1) for transfers from inner to outer orbits.^[1] The velocity changes, or \Delta v, are computed using the vis-viva equation: at periapsis, \Delta v_p = \sqrt{\mu / r_1} \left( \sqrt{\frac{2 r_2}{r_1 + r_2}} - 1 \right), and at apoapsis, \Delta v_a = \sqrt{\mu / r_2} \left( 1 - \sqrt{\frac{2 r_1}{r_1 + r_2}} \right), where \mu is the standard gravitational parameter of the central body.^[1] The transfer duration is half the orbital period of the ellipse, t = \pi \sqrt{a^3 / \mu}, making it predictable but relatively slow compared to higher-energy paths.^[1] In practice, Hohmann transfers are most commonly applied to interplanetary missions, such as sending spacecraft from Earth's orbit to Mars, where the ellipse has its perihelion at 1 AU (Earth's distance from the Sun) and aphelion at approximately 1.52 AU (Mars' distance), requiring an injection \Delta v of about 3.6 km/s from low Earth orbit and a total transfer time of roughly 259 days.^[3]^[4] This efficiency stems from the fact that the transfer orbit minimizes the total \Delta v needed—typically 20-30% less than other ballistic trajectories—while assuming instantaneous burns and neglecting perturbations like atmospheric drag or non-spherical gravity.^[1]^[3] Although ideal for coplanar, circular orbits, real-world applications often require adjustments for orbital inclinations, eccentricities, or mid-course corrections, as seen in missions like Viking to Mars, which used Hohmann-like Type-I trajectories covering less than 180 degrees around the Sun.^[3]^[1] The method's limitations include longer flight times, which can expose spacecraft to higher radiation doses, and its inapplicability to non-coplanar transfers without additional plane-change maneuvers that increase fuel costs.^[1] Despite these, the Hohmann transfer continues to underpin mission planning for efficient, low-thrust propulsion systems in solar system exploration.^[3]

Fundamentals

Definition and principles

The Hohmann transfer orbit is an orbital maneuver that serves as the minimum-energy trajectory for transferring a spacecraft between two coplanar, concentric circular orbits around a central body, such as a planet or star.^[3] This method employs an intermediate elliptical orbit that is tangent to both the initial and final circular orbits at the points of departure and arrival, respectively, ensuring a smooth transition with two discrete velocity impulses.^[1] Named after German engineer Walter Hohmann, who formalized the approach in his 1925 book Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmelskörper, the technique builds directly on principles of classical celestial mechanics established centuries earlier.^[5] Understanding the Hohmann transfer requires familiarity with foundational concepts like Kepler's three laws of planetary motion, which describe orbits as ellipses with the central body at one focus, equal areas swept in equal times (conserving angular momentum), and the harmonic relation between orbital periods and semi-major axes. Orbital energy, conserved in the two-body problem under Newton's law of universal gravitation, is key to its efficiency; the vis-viva equation quantifies how velocity varies with radial distance and orbital size, revealing that elliptical paths between circular orbits demand the least additional energy input compared to other trajectories.^[1] Geometrically, the transfer ellipse has its perigee tangent to the smaller initial orbit and its apogee tangent to the larger final orbit, with the semi-major axis equal to the average of the two circular radii.^[1] This configuration optimizes energy use because it leverages conservation principles: the initial burn raises the apogee to match the target radius, and the final burn circularizes the orbit, minimizing total propellant expenditure for impulsive maneuvers in isolated gravitational fields.^[3]

Historical development

The foundations of the Hohmann transfer orbit trace back to the early development of orbital mechanics. Johannes Kepler's laws of planetary motion in the early 17th century described elliptical orbits as the natural paths of celestial bodies, while Isaac Newton's 1687 Principia Mathematica provided the gravitational framework unifying these motions under universal laws. These principles enabled later analyses of efficient trajectories. Building on this, Konstantin Tsiolkovsky's 1903 work on the rocket equation and multi-stage propulsion laid groundwork for practical rocketry, emphasizing energy-efficient paths for spaceflight, though not specifically addressing transfer orbits.^[6] In 1925, German civil engineer Walter Hohmann formalized the concept in his book Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmelskörper (The Attainability of Celestial Bodies), proposing an elliptical orbit tangent to both the departure and target circular orbits as the minimum-energy path for interplanetary travel, such as from Earth to Mars or Venus. Hohmann's analysis, influenced by Hermann Oberth's 1923 Die Rakete zu den Planetenräumen on rocketry for planetary exploration, demonstrated that this two-impulse maneuver—accelerating at perigee and decelerating at apogee—minimized propellant needs compared to direct hyperbolic escapes. His work marked a pivotal theoretical advancement in astrodynamics, shifting focus from speculative to calculable interplanetary routes.^[7]^[6] Following its publication, the Hohmann transfer gained adoption during the Space Age, integrating into NASA's trajectory planning for efficient orbital maneuvers as satellite technology emerged in the 1950s. Early applications included raising satellites from low Earth parking orbits to higher altitudes. Over time, it evolved as the benchmark minimum-energy solution in patched conic approximations, simplifying n-body interplanetary problems by treating planetary spheres of influence separately for preliminary designs.^[3]^[8]^[9]

Mathematical formulation

Orbital geometry and parameters

The Hohmann transfer orbit is defined geometrically as an elliptical trajectory connecting two coplanar, concentric circular orbits centered on a primary body, such as a planet, with the initial orbit having radius r_1 and the final orbit having radius r_2 > r_1. The transfer ellipse is tangent to the initial orbit at its perigee and to the final orbit at its apogee, ensuring a smooth transition between the circular paths without radial velocity components at the tangency points. This configuration minimizes the energy required for the maneuver under the constraints of two-body orbital mechanics.^[10]^[11] The semi-major axis a of the transfer ellipse is the arithmetic mean of the two circular orbit radii, given by

a = \frac{r_1 + r_2}{2}.

This value determines the overall scale and energy of the elliptical orbit. The eccentricity e of the transfer orbit, which quantifies its deviation from circularity, is

e = \frac{r_2 - r_1}{r_2 + r_1}.

At the points of tangency, the true anomaly—the angle from perigee measured from the focus—is $0^\circ at perigee (corresponding to the initial orbit) and $180^\circ at apogee (corresponding to the final orbit). These parameters fully specify the shape and orientation of the transfer ellipse relative to the circular orbits.^[10]^[11]^[12] Conservation of specific angular momentum h governs the velocity profiles along the transfer path, remaining constant throughout the unperturbed elliptical orbit due to the central gravitational force producing no torque. At the tangency points, this constancy ensures that the tangential velocities match the required directions for injection into and extraction from the ellipse, with h = r_1 v_\pi where v_\pi is the perigee velocity. The orbital period of the full transfer ellipse is

T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{a^3}{\mu}},

where \mu is the gravitational parameter of the primary body; the actual transfer time is half this period for the 180° traversal from perigee to apogee. This ideal geometry assumes instantaneous impulsive burns at perigee and apogee to alter velocities, neglecting finite thrust durations or perturbations.^[10]^[13]

Delta-v requirements

The delta-v requirements for a Hohmann transfer orbit are determined using the vis-viva equation, which describes the speed of an object in an elliptical orbit as a function of its distance from the central body and the semi-major axis of the orbit:

v = \sqrt{\mu \left( \frac{2}{r} - \frac{1}{a} \right)},

where \mu is the standard gravitational parameter of the central body, r is the radial distance, and a is the semi-major axis.^[10] For the initial circular orbit with radius r_1, the orbital velocity is v_1 = \sqrt{\mu / r_1}. The transfer orbit has semi-major axis a = (r_1 + r_2)/2, where r_2 > r_1 is the radius of the final circular orbit. At perigee (distance r_1), the transfer velocity is v_p = \sqrt{\mu (2/r_1 - 1/a)}, and at apogee (distance r_2), it is v_a = \sqrt{\mu (2/r_2 - 1/a)}. The final circular orbital velocity is v_2 = \sqrt{\mu / r_2}.^[14] The first impulsive burn at perigee raises the apoapsis to r_2, requiring a velocity change of \Delta v_1 = v_p - v_1. The second burn at apogee circularizes the orbit, requiring \Delta v_2 = v_2 - v_a. The total delta-v is then \Delta v = \Delta v_1 + \Delta v_2. These burns are tangential to the orbit, aligning with the velocity vector to maximize efficiency.^[10] To derive these requirements, consider the specific mechanical energy balance. The energy of a circular orbit is \epsilon = - \mu / (2r), so the initial energy is \epsilon_1 = - \mu / (2 r_1) and the final is \epsilon_2 = - \mu / (2 r_2). The transfer orbit energy is \epsilon_t = - \mu / (2 a) = - \mu / (r_1 + r_2), which lies between \epsilon_1 and \epsilon_2. The first burn increases the energy from \epsilon_1 to \epsilon_t by \Delta \epsilon_1 = v_1 \Delta v_1 + (\Delta v_1)^2 / 2 \approx v_1 \Delta v_1 (using the approximation for small \Delta v_1 / v_1), and the second burn increases it from \epsilon_t to \epsilon_2 similarly. The Hohmann choice of a = (r_1 + r_2)/2 minimizes the total \Delta v among two-impulse transfers because it selects the elliptical path tangent to both circular orbits, ensuring the smallest velocity increments needed to bridge the energy gap. This configuration also sets the transfer time to half the orbital period of the transfer ellipse, t = \pi \sqrt{a^3 / \mu}, which corresponds to the phase from perigee to apogee.^[10]^[14] The burns occur at perigee and apogee to exploit the Oberth effect, whereby a fixed delta-v imparts greater energy change when applied at higher speeds, as the kinetic energy gain is m v \Delta v + m (\Delta v)^2 / 2. At perigee, v_p > v_1, amplifying the apoapsis raise; at apogee, the lower v_a < v_2 still optimizes the circularization for the overall transfer.^[15] In practice, the total \Delta v represents about 50% of the initial orbital velocity for transfers spanning an order of magnitude in radius. For example, a Hohmann transfer from low Earth orbit (250 km altitude) to geostationary orbit requires a total \Delta v of approximately 3.9 km/s.^[16]

Transfer types

Type I transfers

Type I transfers in Hohmann orbits are characterized by the spacecraft traversing less than 180° in true anomaly along the transfer ellipse to intersect the target's orbit, resulting in a shorter arc suitable for missions from an inner planet to an outer one, such as Earth to Mars. This configuration aligns the arrival near the opposition phase, where the target planet is on the opposite side of the Sun from the departure planet, minimizing the heliocentric travel angle while maintaining tangential contacts with both circular orbits.^[17] Launch opportunities for Type I transfers are governed by the synodic period of the two planets, which for Earth and Mars is approximately 780 days or 26 months, allowing windows every two years when the relative positions permit an efficient trajectory. At launch, the target planet leads the departure planet by a phase angle of about 44°, ensuring the spacecraft intercepts Mars after it has advanced along its orbit during the journey.^[4] The duration of a Type I transfer corresponds to half the orbital period of the elliptical path, typically around 259 days for an Earth-Mars mission, during which the spacecraft coasts from perigee at Earth's orbit to apogee at Mars' orbit. This timeframe reflects the minimum-energy path tangent to both planetary radii, with the initial impulsive burn at departure raising the apogee to match the target's distance from the Sun.^[4] In interplanetary missions, shorter transfer durations like those in Type I can help reduce overall radiation exposure from galactic cosmic rays and solar particle events compared to longer alternatives. For nearby planetary pairs, these transfers also offer lower total Δv requirements relative to extended-arc options, balancing energy efficiency with temporal constraints in the geometric setup.^[17]

Type II transfers

Type II transfers refer to Hohmann transfer orbits in which the spacecraft follows a trajectory exceeding 180 degrees around the Sun, corresponding to a true anomaly greater than 180 degrees along the elliptical path. This configuration involves the spacecraft completing a longer arc of the transfer ellipse, making it suitable for missions to outer planets such as Jupiter and Saturn departing from Earth. Unlike shorter paths, Type II transfers position the apogee of the ellipse initially beyond the target's orbital position in the heliocentric frame, necessitating an adjusted insertion burn at arrival to ensure tangential rendezvous with the target orbit. Launch opportunities for Type II transfers are dictated by the conjunction phase alignments between Earth and the target planet, where the relative phase angle is approximately 90 degrees for Earth-Jupiter missions. These windows recur every 13 months, aligned with the synodic period of Earth and Jupiter, allowing for periodic mission planning despite the extended geometry. The synodic period arises from the difference in orbital angular velocities, enabling two distinct transfer types per cycle, with Type II providing flexibility when shorter options are unavailable. Travel durations for Type II transfers are longer than those for Type I, typically exceeding 400 days for outer planet destinations; for example, an Earth-Jupiter Type II transfer requires about 998 days. This extended timeframe, while increasing mission complexity, can facilitate integration with gravity assist maneuvers to further optimize trajectories for deeper space exploration. Type II transfers often have similar or slightly varying delta-v compared to Type I, depending on the specific launch window, with neither consistently higher across all cases, though they prove valuable when Type I launch windows conflict with operational constraints such as payload or timing requirements.

Practical applications

Near-Earth orbital maneuvers

Hohmann transfer orbits are commonly employed for repositioning satellites within Earth's sphere of influence, particularly for transfers from low Earth orbit (LEO) at approximately 300 km altitude to geostationary transfer orbit (GTO) with an apogee of around 36,000 km. This maneuver requires a delta-v of about 2.4 km/s to raise the apogee while maintaining the perigee near the initial LEO altitude, enabling efficient payload delivery before a subsequent circularization burn at apogee achieves geostationary orbit (GEO).^[18] Such transfers minimize propellant use for commercial satellite deployments, leveraging the elliptical path tangent to both circular orbits. A prominent example is the Ariane 5 launch vehicle, which injects payloads directly into GTO as the initial phase of a Hohmann transfer to GEO. The rocket's upper stage provides the impulsive burn to establish the elliptical orbit, after which the satellite's onboard propulsion performs the final circularization at apogee, optimizing the overall mission delta-v budget for dual launches. This approach has supported numerous geostationary communication satellite missions since the vehicle's operational debut in 1996. Hohmann transfers also facilitate phasing orbits for station-keeping and rendezvous operations in LEO, such as resupply missions to the International Space Station (ISS). For instance, the Automated Transfer Vehicle (ATV) used a Hohmann-like trajectory to adjust its orbit over several days, aligning with the ISS for docking while conserving fuel compared to more direct paths.^[19] These maneuvers involve timed burns to create relative motion, enabling precise synchronization without excessive delta-v. The first operational use of Hohmann transfer principles for near-Earth maneuvers occurred during the Apollo program in the late 1960s, approximating translunar injection from parking orbit. In Apollo 8 (1968), the S-IVB stage executed a burn akin to a Hohmann transfer to raise apogee beyond the Moon's distance, transitioning from LEO to a lunar trajectory in about three days.^[20] This technique became standard for subsequent Apollo missions, demonstrating its reliability for high-stakes orbital adjustments. In near-Earth applications, atmospheric drag is negligible for Hohmann transfers conducted above approximately 200 km altitude, as the elliptical path avoids significant reentry heating or deceleration. However, non-coplanar transfers introduce complexity, as plane changes during the impulsive burns substantially increase the required delta-v—for example, a 60-degree inclination adjustment can demand over 9 km/s total, far exceeding the baseline Hohmann cost, often necessitating combined maneuvers or alternative strategies.^[21]

Interplanetary trajectories

In interplanetary mission design, the patched conics method approximates complex trajectories by dividing them into segments dominated by a single gravitational body, often incorporating Hohmann transfer ellipses between planetary encounters to minimize energy expenditure. This approach enables efficient combinations of Hohmann legs with gravity assists, as seen in early missions like Mariner 10 to Venus and Mercury. A landmark application occurred with NASA's Mariner 4 mission, launched on November 28, 1964, which executed the first successful Type I Hohmann transfer to Mars, achieving a flyby after a 228-day journey. The trajectory required approximately 3.6 km/s of delta-v from Earth escape to inject into the heliocentric ellipse tangent to Mars' orbit, marking the debut of practical interplanetary Hohmann navigation.^[22]^[3] Mission planners optimize Hohmann departures using porkchop plots, which contour characteristic energy (C3) levels across launch and arrival date grids to identify low-energy windows aligning planetary positions for efficient transfers. These plots facilitate selection of Type I or II opportunities by balancing C3 against flight duration, ensuring Hohmann ellipses fit synodic cycles while minimizing propellant needs.^[23] Contemporary missions continue to leverage Hohmann segments in hybrid architectures; for instance, the Psyche spacecraft, launched in October 2023, employs an initial ballistic Hohmann transfer from Earth to a Mars gravity assist in May 2026, followed by solar electric propulsion for rendezvous with the asteroid Psyche in 2029.^[24] As of November 2025, NASA's Mars exploration planning, including missions like ESCAPADE launched in the 2025 window, incorporates Hohmann transfers for efficient trajectories to Mars orbit, building on traditional energy-efficient paths for sustained solar system access.^[25]

Comparisons and alternatives

Bi-elliptic transfers

The bi-elliptic transfer is a three-impulse orbital maneuver that employs two successive elliptical transfer orbits to transition between two circular orbits, with an intermediate apogee radius r^* positioned far beyond the target orbit radius r_f. This approach can yield lower total delta-v (\Delta v) requirements compared to the Hohmann transfer for sufficiently large orbital radius ratios r_f / r_i > 11.94, where r_i is the initial orbit radius, by exploiting the Oberth effect during the burns.^[26]^[27] The total \Delta v for the bi-elliptic transfer is derived from the velocity changes at each impulse, using the vis-viva equation to compute orbital speeds. The first burn at periapsis raises the orbit to the initial ellipse with semi-major axis a_1 = (r_i + r^*)/2, requiring

\Delta v_1 = \sqrt{\frac{2 \mu r^*}{r_i (r_i + r^*)}} - \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{r_i}},

where \mu is the gravitational parameter. The second burn at the shared apogee adjusts to the second ellipse with semi-major axis a_2 = (r_f + r^*)/2, given by

\Delta v_2 = \sqrt{\frac{2 \mu r_f}{r^* (r_f + r^*)}} - \sqrt{\frac{2 \mu r_i}{r^* (r_i + r^*)}}.

The third burn at the periapsis of the second ellipse circularizes the orbit at r_f, with

\Delta v_3 = \sqrt{\frac{\mu}{r_f}} - \sqrt{\frac{2 \mu r^*}{r_f (r_f + r^*)}}.

Thus, the total \Delta v_{bi} = \Delta v_1 + \Delta v_2 + \Delta v_3, where the optimal r^* is selected to minimize this sum, often approaching infinity for maximum efficiency in large transfers.^[27] Compared to the Hohmann transfer's two-impulse \Delta v, the bi-elliptic maneuver requires an additional burn but achieves savings through higher-speed impulses near periapsis, leveraging the Oberth effect to increase energy gain per unit \Delta v. Analytical studies establish the breakeven radius ratio at approximately 11.94, beyond which bi-elliptic transfers are superior, with maximum advantage for ratios exceeding 15.58; for example, transitioning from a low Earth orbit at r_i \approx 1.03 Earth radii to a high orbit at r_f = 60 Earth radii yields a bi-elliptic \Delta v of about 3.9 km/s versus 4.0 km/s for Hohmann, a roughly 2.5% saving, while transfers to escape trajectories (e.g., from low Earth orbit to hyperbolic escape) can realize 5-10% reductions in total \Delta v for extreme ratios.^[26]^[27] These advantages stem from 1960s analytical optimizations, though practical adoption remains limited due to significantly longer transfer times—often several times that of Hohmann—making it suitable primarily for missions prioritizing fuel efficiency over duration.^[26] The bi-elliptic transfer concept was first proposed by Ary Sternfeld in 1934 as an extension of multi-impulse orbit changes, with subsequent refinements in the mid-20th century through simulations exploring its viability for high-energy transfers.^[28] Despite theoretical promise, it has seen limited real-world use, as the extended transit durations (e.g., 24.75 days for the aforementioned example versus shorter Hohmann times) often outweigh the modest \Delta v benefits in time-constrained applications.^[27]

Low-thrust and advanced methods

Low-thrust transfers utilize electric propulsion systems, such as ion thrusters, to achieve continuous acceleration over extended periods, enabling spacecraft to gradually spiral from lower to higher orbits rather than relying on discrete impulsive burns characteristic of the Hohmann transfer. These systems, including gridded electrostatic ion engines, operate by ionizing a propellant like xenon and accelerating the ions via electric fields, yielding specific impulses exceeding 3,000 seconds—far surpassing the 450 seconds typical of chemical rockets. While the total delta-v required for a low-thrust spiral can exceed that of a Hohmann transfer by up to 40% due to non-optimal tangential thrusting, the dramatically higher exhaust velocity reduces propellant mass consumption by 80-90%, allowing for greater payload capacity or multi-destination missions.^[29]^[30] A seminal example is NASA's Dawn mission, launched in 2007, which employed three NSTAR ion thrusters to propel the spacecraft from Earth orbit to asteroid Vesta, arriving in July 2011 after nearly four years of continuous low-thrust operation totaling over 2.8 billion kilometers of spiraling trajectory. The mission was allocated approximately 247 kg of xenon propellant for the transfer to Vesta (part of a total 425 kg for the full mission achieving 11.5 km/s Δv), enabling subsequent orbit insertion at Vesta and a transfer to Ceres—feats unattainable with equivalent chemical propulsion due to propellant limitations. This approach extended transfer times significantly compared to a Hohmann baseline but demonstrated profound efficiency gains, with the ion system providing thrust levels around 90 mN per engine while drawing 2.3 kW from solar arrays.^[31])^[32] Optimization of low-thrust trajectories often employs shape-based methods, which parameterize the spacecraft's path using analytical functions such as polynomials or Fourier series in spherical coordinates to represent radial, tangential, and normal acceleration components under constant thrust magnitude. These methods generate feasible initial trajectory guesses that satisfy boundary conditions (e.g., initial and final positions, velocities) while minimizing violations of the equations of motion, serving as starting points for refined numerical solvers like indirect methods or genetic algorithms to further reduce time-of-flight or propellant use. In contrast to impulsive approximations, the total delta-v in low-thrust scenarios is computed as the time integral of thrust over mass, Δv = ∫ (T / m) dt, with Edelbaum's approximation providing a closed-form estimate for coplanar transfers by averaging over orbital revolutions and accounting for variable thrust direction efficiency.^[33]^[34]^[35] Advanced techniques extend beyond simple spirals, including the Interplanetary Transport Network (ITN), which leverages the dynamical structure of the solar system—specifically the stable and unstable invariant manifolds emanating from periodic orbits around Lagrange points—to enable near-zero delta-v transfers along chaotic, low-energy pathways. Spacecraft can "hitch a ride" on these gravitational conduits, such as those associated with Earth-Sun L1 and L2 points, requiring only minor impulsive corrections (typically under 1 km/s total) to enter and exit the manifolds for interplanetary routing, as demonstrated in missions like NASA's Genesis (2001-2004), which used L1 halo orbit manifolds for sample return. In ideal cases, these paths exploit heteroclinic connections between manifolds of different systems, theoretically achieving transfers with negligible propulsion, though practical implementations balance time (often years) against fuel savings exceeding 95% relative to Hohmann trajectories.^[36]^[37] Recent advances in the 2020s have focused on scaling solar electric propulsion (SEP) for heavy-lift applications, such as NASA's concepts for cargo transports to Mars using high-power systems like 50-100 kW-class Hall effect thrusters paired with roll-out solar arrays to enable efficient delivery of large payloads over extended transits. These developments build on the Advanced Electric Propulsion System (AEPS, 12 kW-class) tested in the 2020s, with ~90% propellant reduction compared to chemical alternatives; in August 2025, L3Harris delivered AEPS thrusters for the Lunar Gateway, advancing scalability for deep-space missions including Mars.^[38]^[39]^[40]

References

[1]
None
Summary of each segment:
[2]
Walter Hohmann - Pioneers of Flight
In 1925 he published The Attainability of the Heavenly Bodies. He calculated the minimum energy needed to transfer from one orbit to another, which applies to ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[3]
Chapter 4: Trajectories - NASA Science
Nov 4, 2024 · This is called a Hohmann Transfer orbit. The portion of the solar orbit that takes the spacecraft from Earth to Mars is called its trajectory.
[4]
Let's Go to Mars! Calculating Launch Windows – Math Lesson
Sep 25, 2025 · The Hohmann transfer orbit is the ellipse that connects the points in space, Earth at 0 degrees and Mars at 180 degrees, about the ellipse that ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[5]
THE ATTAINABILITY OF HEAVENLY BODIES : HOHMANN, WALTE
May 27, 2011 · This work (originally published in 1925) contributes to recognition of the feasibility of space travel. Treated are problems associated with leaving the earth.
[6]
[PDF] Walter Hohmann's Roads In Space
Walter Hohmann in his seminal Die Erreichbarkeit der Himmel- skörper (Hohmann 1925) created a work in the second category, show- ing how to travel from Earth to ...Missing: citation | Show results with:citation
[7]
Walter Hohmann - Linda Hall Library
Mar 18, 2021 · Hohmann also included a diagram of his transfer orbit, showing that an elliptical trajectory is the most efficient way to move something from ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
[8]
The Apollo Flight Journal - Lunar Orbit Rendezvous - NASA
Feb 10, 2017 · The simplest and most efficient technique used for orbital maneuvering is called the Hohmann transfer. To raise the apogee of an orbit, thrust ...Missing: definition explanation
[9]
[PDF] Conceptual Design of a Communications Relay Satellite for a Lunar ...
Sep 1, 2005 · The Hohmann and bi-elliptic methods provide a useful first approximation of the ∆v needed for lunar transfer. The patched conic method is used ...
[10]
[PDF] Lecture D30 - Orbit Transfers - DSpace@MIT
A Hohmann Transfer is a two-impulse elliptical transfer between two co-planar circular orbits. The transfer itself consists of an elliptical orbit with a ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
[11]
[PDF] Lecture 8: Impulsive Orbital Maneuvers - Matthew M. Peet
The Hohmann transfer is also energy optimal for coaxial elliptic orbits. The only ambiguity is whether to make the initial burn at perigee or apogee. • Need to ...
[12]
[PDF] HOHMANN-HOHMANN AND HOHMANN-PHASING ...
For a Hohmann transfer from an orbit of radius r1 ... that r1 < r2), the semi-major axis of the transfer orbit is given by a = (r1 + r2)/2, so that the velocity ...
[13]
[PDF] Introduction to Orbital Mechanics and Spacecraft Attitudes ... - NASA
Mar 20, 2020 · We will also show that specific mechanical energy and specific angular momentum are conserved for the unperturbed orbit. From this, we will ...
[14]
Hohmann Transfer - Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics
In addition, the definition of the Hohmann transfer is that the transfer orbit at the departure and arrival points should be tangent to the initial and final ...
[15]
[PDF] Using the Two-Burn Escape Maneuver for Fast Transfers in the ...
a = semi-major axis a1 = semi-major axis of the ellipse resulting from the first burn (equal to a2) G = gravitational constant M = mass of the central body r = ...
[16]
Example: Hohmann Transfer - Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics
The total Δ v requirement is the sum of the change required to go from LEO onto the transfer orbit, and the change required to go from the transfer orbit to GEO ...
[17]
[PDF] Interplanetary Mission Design Handbook:
Type I and Type II trajectories have heliocentric travel angles less than and greater than 180° respectively and are discussed in more detail in the Ballistic.
[18]
[PDF] Operational Considerations for Fission Reactors Utilized on Nuclear ...
Jan 1, 2021 · Radiation Exposure Considerations It can also be observed that shorter transit times enabled by the use of NTP on crewed missions to Mars Page ...
[19]
[PDF] Tether Transportation System Study
The transfer from LEO to GEO transfer orbit (GTO) can be accomplished through a single AV of about 2.4 km/s (from a 300-km circular orbit) provided by a ...
[20]
Why does it take so long to rendezvous with the ISS? - ESA's blogs
Jun 11, 2013 · ... Hohmann Transfer). Why does ATV in fact take ten days – more time even than the 5-day upper limit shown in the red curve? ATV takes more ...
[21]
Earth Orbit and Translunar Injection - Apollo 13 Flight Journal - NASA
Nov 14, 2023 · The purpose of the translunar injection is to perform something akin to what is known as a Hohmann transfer to get to the Moon. What this ...
[22]
[PDF] system technology analysis of aeroassisted orbital transfer vehicles ...
plane. (60 plane change would require. 30,700 ft/sec total delta. V. In addition to these impulses another. 300 ft/sec for phasing and. 200 ft/sec for. LEO.
[23]
[PDF] Interplanetary Travel
Interplanetary travel involves basic steps, using the Sun as the central body, extending Hohmann transfer, and using gravity-assist for faster, cheaper travel.
[24]
Automated design of gravity-assist trajectories to Mars and the outer ...
A discussion of Lambert's problem and patched-conic techniques is provided by Battin (1987). ... Voyager II trajectory, does not occur again until the year 2153.
[25]
55 Years Ago: Mariner 4 First to Explore Mars - NASA
Jul 14, 2020 · On the night of July 14-15, 1965, the Mariner 4 spacecraft made history when it completed the first flyby reconnaissance of Mars after a 228-day journey from ...Missing: Hohmann | Show results with:Hohmann
[26]
On the Nature of Earth-Mars Porkchop Plots
Feb 10, 2013 · Porkchop plots are a quick and convenient tool to help mission designers plan ballistic trajectories between two bodies.
[27]
Mission | NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
NASA is targeting a launch no earlier than Oct. 12, 2023 for the Psyche spacecraft. It will launch from NASA's Kennedy Space Center in Florida.Missing: hybrid rendezvous
[28]
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1509405/FULLTEXT01.pdf
[29]
[PDF] 19680026430.pdf - NASA Technical Reports Server
parking orbit is followed by an inclined Hohmann transfer, shows that direct two- impulse ascent is superior for small r2/r1, and inferior i f r2/r1 is large.
[30]
[PDF] Lecture 9: Bi-elliptics and Out-of-Plane Maneuvers - Matthew M. Peet
Feb 27, 2025 · The Hohmann transfer is the energy-optimal 2-impulse transfer. ... – Oberth effect is not relevant because we are not adding energy to the orbit.<|control11|><|separator|>
[31]
[PDF] Combined Heuristic and Statistical Methodologies ... - DiVA portal
Sep 29, 1988 · Bi-elliptic Transfer. First proposed by Ary Sternfeld in the year 1934, this type of maneuver consists of half elliptic transfer orbits.
[32]
The Propulsion We're Supplying, It's Electrifying - NASA
Oct 22, 2020 · It can reduce the amount of fuel, or propellant, needed by up to 90% compared to chemical propulsion systems, saving millions in launch costs ...
[33]
[PDF] Lecture 6 Notes: Analytical approximations for low thrust maneuvers
This ratio is, as expected, always larger than unity, meaning that Hohmann transfers always require a lower Δv. Eq. (8) is shown in the figure below. The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[34]
Ion Propulsion - NASA Science
Nov 2, 2024 · Dawn's futuristic, hyper-efficient ion propulsion system allows Dawn to go into orbit around two different solar system bodies, a first for any spacecraft.Missing: savings | Show results with:savings<|control11|><|separator|>
[35]
Dawn Spacecraft Performance - AIAA ARC
Dec 27, 2019 · Because a firing ion thruster must apply thrust in a specific direction, this resulted in three distinct spacecraft attitudes relative to the ...
[36]
A Shape‐Based Method for Continuous Low‐Thrust Trajectory ...
Apr 10, 2017 · The shape-based method can provide suitable initial guesses for trajectory optimization, which are useful for quickly converging a more accurate trajectory.Introduction · The Optimized Shape-Based... · Transfer Orbit Design with the...
[37]
Analytical solutions for low-thrust orbit transfers - ResearchGate
Jul 14, 2021 · This paper presents analytical solutions for the estimation of the ΔV Δ V \Delta V cost of the transfer of a spacecraft subject to a ...
[38]
(PDF) Low Thrust Circle-To-Circle Orbit Transfer - Academia.edu
In the early 1960's, Edelbaum used a different approach to optimal low thrust transfers between inclined circular orbits, which is described in chapter 14 of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[39]
(PDF) The Interplanetary Transport Network - ResearchGate
Aug 9, 2025 · This is the idea of this work: we want to use, as explained in the introduction, the invariant manifolds in the Interplanetary Transport Network ...
[40]
[PDF] lowEnergyInvariant.pdf - Computer Graphics Research at Caltech
The stable and unstable manifolds are some of the most powerful “gravitational jet streams” in the Solar System which govern the motionsof the celestial bodies ...
[41]
High Power Advanced Solar Electric Propulsion Development ...
NASA is developing 12.5 kW Hall thrusters for the DSG. In the late 2020s, the DSG will be followed by a second vehicle, called the Deep Space Transport (DST), ...Missing: SPS | Show results with:SPS
[42]
Solar Electric Propulsion - NASA
Feb 11, 2020 · In April 2020, the SEP project was tasked with providing three 12-kW thrusters for Gateway's Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). These thrusters ...Missing: cargo 2020s