Hyperoxaluria is a metabolic disorder characterized by excessive urinary excretion of oxalate, typically exceeding 40 mg per 24 hours in adults or 0.45 mmol/1.73 m² per 24 hours in children, which promotes the formation of calcium oxalate kidney stones and can progress to nephrocalcinosis, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease.[1] It arises from an overproduction or increased absorption of oxalate, a byproduct of metabolism derived from both endogenous synthesis in the liver and dietary sources, leading to supersaturation in the urine when unbound to calcium.[1] The condition is broadly classified into primary hyperoxaluria (PH), a group of rare inherited enzymatic defects, and secondary hyperoxaluria, which stems from external factors such as diet or gastrointestinal disorders.[2][1]Primary hyperoxaluria encompasses three main types due to autosomal recessive genetic mutations affecting oxalate metabolism in the liver.[3]PH type 1, the most common and severe form (accounting for 70-80% of cases), results from mutations in the AGXT gene, causing deficiency of the enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT), which leads to elevated glyoxylate conversion to oxalate.[1]PH type 2 involves mutations in the GRHPR gene, impairing glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase and resulting in milder symptoms with urinary oxalate levels often above 75 mg/day.[3]PH type 3, caused by HOGA1 gene mutations, affects 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase and typically presents with recurrent stones in childhood but less progression to renal failure.[1] These genetic forms have a clinical prevalence of approximately 1-3 per million individuals, though genetic estimates suggest up to 1 in 58,000 globally as of 2023, with PH1 being the most frequent at about 1 per 120,000 live births in Europe.[3][4]In contrast, secondary hyperoxaluria is more common and non-genetic, often linked to enteric hyperoxaluria from malabsorptive states like Crohn's disease, short bowel syndrome, or post-bariatric surgery, where fat malabsorption binds calcium in the gut, allowing substantially increased oxalate absorption (up to 50% of dietary oxalate, compared to 5-15% normally).[1] Dietary causes include excessive intake of high-oxalate foods such as spinach, rhubarb, nuts, and chocolate, contributing 10-20% to urinary oxalate under normal conditions but far more in susceptible individuals.[2][1]Symptoms of hyperoxaluria primarily manifest in the urinary tract, including recurrent kidney stones (urolithiasis) causing severe flank pain (renal colic), hematuria, dysuria, frequent urination, nausea, vomiting, fever, and chills during acute episodes.[2] In advanced cases, particularly PH, nephrocalcinosis leads to progressive renal impairment, with up to 80% of PH1 patients developing end-stage renal disease by age 30.[1] Systemic oxalosis, occurring when renal function fails, deposits oxalate in bones (causing pain and fractures), skin (ulcers), heart (arrhythmias), eyes (retinopathy), and nerves (neuropathy), severely impacting quality of life and growth in children.[3][2]Diagnosis relies on 24-hour urine collection showing oxalate >40 mg/day (diagnostic for PH if >75 mg/day), elevated plasmaoxalate (often >30 μmol/L in patients with renal impairment), genetic testing for confirmatory mutations, and imaging like ultrasound or CT to detect stones or nephrocalcinosis.[1] Stone analysis confirming calcium oxalate composition further supports the diagnosis.[3]Treatment strategies focus on reducing oxalate levels and preventing complications, tailored by type. For all forms, high fluid intake (aiming for >3 L urine output daily), low-oxalate diet, and citrate supplementation (e.g., potassium citrate) to inhibit stone formation are foundational.[1] In PH1, pyridoxine (vitamin B6) therapy (5-20 mg/kg/day) benefits about 30% of patients by enhancing residual AGT activity, while RNA interference therapies like lumasiran (approved in 2020) reduce urinary oxalate by an average of 65% via silencing the HAO1 gene.[1] Approved therapies such as nedosiran (Rivfloza, approved 2023), which targets lactate dehydrogenase via RNA interference, are indicated for PH1 in patients aged 9 years and older.[1][3] For secondary cases, addressing underlying gut issues with calcium supplements or cholestyramine to bind oxalate is key.[2] Advanced PH often requires dialysis, combined liver-kidney transplantation (correcting the hepatic defect), or emerging therapies.[3] Early intervention is crucial to preserve renal function and avert oxalosis.[1]
Overview
Definition
Hyperoxaluria is a metabolic disorder characterized by excessive urinary excretion of oxalate, the end product of endogenous oxalate metabolism and dietary absorption. In adults, it is typically defined as urinary oxalate excretion exceeding 40 mg (0.45 mmol) per 24 hours, while in children, the threshold is greater than 0.5 mmol per 1.73 m² body surface area per 24 hours. Normal urinary oxalate excretion in healthy adults ranges from 20 to 40 mg per 24 hours, reflecting the balance between hepatic production, intestinal absorption, and renal clearance.A key distinction exists between hyperoxaluria and oxalosis: while hyperoxaluria refers specifically to elevated oxalate levels in the urine, oxalosis denotes the systemic deposition of calcium oxalate crystals in various tissues, such as the kidneys, heart, bones, and skin, which arises as a complication when renal function declines and plasma oxalate accumulates. Normal plasma oxalate concentrations are typically below 2 µmol/L in individuals with preserved kidney function, serving as a marker to differentiate localized urinary excess from widespread tissue involvement.The condition was first described in the 1920s, with early reports of recurrent calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis linked to idiopathic hyperoxaluria, and the genetic basis of primary forms was elucidated in the late 1980s and 1990s through identification of mutations in key enzymes involved in glyoxylate metabolism.
Epidemiology
Hyperoxaluria encompasses both primary and secondary forms, with primary hyperoxaluria (PH) being a rare genetic disorder. Clinical prevalence is estimated at 1-3 individuals per million population worldwide, though recent genetic analyses (as of 2025) suggest a higher overall prevalence of approximately 1 in 59,000 (about 17 per million) due to underdiagnosis, with type-specific estimates of PH1 at 1 in 209,000 (~5 per million), PH2 at 1 in 863,000 (~1 per million), and PH3 at 1 in 91,000 (~11 per million).[5] The estimated incidence of PH is approximately 1-3 per 100,000 live births, with PH1 accounting for about 1 per 120,000 live births and comprising 70-80% of cases; no significant differences are observed across sexes.[6]PH1 exhibits notable geographic variations, with higher prevalence in regions with high rates of consanguineous marriages, such as parts of North Africa (e.g., Libya) and the Middle East (e.g., Turkey), where consanguinity in affected families can exceed 50%.[7][8] PH typically manifests in childhood, with an infantile form presenting before 1 year of age and a juvenile form between 1 and 18 years; the median age at onset is around 5 years, and distribution is equal between males and females.[9]Secondary hyperoxaluria, in contrast, is more common than the primary form, particularly in populations with predisposing conditions like inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) or post-bariatric surgery.[10] Its incidence has risen since the 2000s, correlating with increased bariatric procedures for obesity management, where hyperoxaluria prevalence can exceed 30% in affected patients due to enteric oxalate absorption.[11] This form predominates in Western countries with higher rates of obesity and surgical interventions.[12]
Pathophysiology
Oxalate Metabolism
Oxalate is an end product of several metabolic pathways in the human body, with endogenous synthesis occurring primarily in the liver through the glyoxylate detoxification pathway localized in peroxisomes. This pathway processes glyoxylate, a toxic intermediate derived from precursors such as glycolate, hydroxyproline, and glycine, to prevent its conversion into oxalate via lactate dehydrogenase. Key enzymes in this process include alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGXT), which catalyzes the transamination of glyoxylate to glycine within peroxisomes, thereby detoxifying it and averting oxalate accumulation. Other critical enzymes are glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR), which operates in the cytosol and mitochondria to reduce glyoxylate to glycolate, and 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase (HOGA1), involved in the mitochondrial breakdown of hydroxyproline-derived intermediates that feed into glyoxylate production. Endogenous oxalatesynthesis typically contributes about 50% of the total urinary oxalate in healthy individuals.Dietary oxalate represents the other major source, accounting for 20-50% of urinary oxalate excretion, with the exact proportion varying based on intake and absorption efficiency. High-oxalate foods such as spinach, rhubarb, beets, nuts, and chocolate are prominent contributors, as they contain soluble oxalate that can be readily absorbed. Intestinal absorption of dietary oxalate primarily occurs in the small intestine and colon, with an average absorption rate of 10-15% in healthy adults on a standard diet; this process is significantly modulated by dietary calcium, which binds oxalate in the gut lumen to form insoluble calcium oxalate complexes that are largely excreted in feces, thereby reducing bioavailability. Factors like low calcium intake or gut dysbiosis can increase absorption, potentially elevating systemic oxalate levels.The kidneys play a central role in oxalateexcretion, filtering nearly all plasma oxalate at the glomerulus due to its low molecular weight and lack of protein binding. Of the filtered load, a substantial portion is reabsorbed in the proximal tubule via passive paracellular diffusion and active transport mechanisms, but the net result is that virtually all absorbed and endogenously produced oxalate is eliminated via urine to maintain homeostasis. Normal 24-hour urinary oxalateexcretion in healthy adults ranges from 10 to 40 mg, reflecting the balance between synthesis, absorption, and renal clearance. Disruptions in the glyoxylate pathway can lead to excessive endogenous oxalate production, contributing to hyperoxaluria. Oxalate's tendency to bind calcium in urine can promote the formation of calcium oxalate crystals, a key step in stone precipitation under supersaturated conditions.
Disease Mechanisms
In primary hyperoxaluria, inherited enzyme deficiencies disrupt glyoxylate metabolism in the liver, leading to accumulation of glyoxylate and its subsequent conversion to oxalate, resulting in hepatic overproduction of oxalate that exceeds the kidneys' excretory capacity.[13] Specific defects include alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGXT) in type 1, glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR) in type 2, and 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase (HOGA1) in type 3, each causing elevated oxalate synthesis from glyoxylate precursors.[1] This overproduction drives urinary oxalate levels above 40-45 mg/day, promoting hyperoxaluria and subsequent renal pathology.[13]In secondary hyperoxaluria, particularly the enteric form, fat malabsorption from conditions such as Crohn's disease or bariatric surgery reduces intraluminal calcium availability in the colon, allowing unbound dietary oxalate to be hyperabsorbed via paracellular and transcellular pathways.[13] This increased colonic uptake elevates systemic oxalate load without endogenous overproduction, often raising urinary oxalate to levels comparable to primary forms.[1]Elevated urinary oxalate concentrations lead to supersaturation of calcium oxalate, where the product of calcium and oxalate concentrations exceeds the solubility product, favoring the formation of calcium oxalate monohydrate crystals that deposit primarily in renal tubules.[13] These crystals initiate nephrolithiasis and nephrocalcinosis by adhering to tubular epithelium, with the supersaturation of calcium oxalate being 10 times more dependent on rises in urinary oxalate than on equimolar rises in urinary calcium.[13]As glomerular filtration rate declines below 30-40 mL/min/1.73 m², plasma oxalate accumulates due to impaired renal clearance, enabling systemic dissemination and deposition of calcium oxalate crystals in extrarenal tissues such as the heart, bones, and blood vessels, a condition known as oxalosis.[14] This progression is more common in primary hyperoxaluria but can occur in severe secondary cases with advanced kidney dysfunction.[13]Crystal deposition triggers crystal-induced nephropathy through direct tubular obstruction, which impairs urine flow and causes epithelial cell injury, compounded by oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species generated via NADPH oxidase and mitochondrial dysfunction.[15] Additionally, crystals activate the NLRP3inflammasome in renal cells and macrophages, releasing proinflammatory cytokines like IL-1β and promoting pyroptosis, fibrosis, and chronic inflammation that accelerate progression to end-stage renal disease.[15]
Classification
Primary Hyperoxaluria
Primary hyperoxaluria (PH) encompasses a group of rare autosomal recessive disorders characterized by hepatic overproduction of oxalate due to defects in glyoxylate metabolism, leading to excessive urinary oxalate excretion and recurrent nephrolithiasis.[16] The condition is classified into three main genetic subtypes—PH1, PH2, and PH3—each resulting from biallelic pathogenic variants in distinct genes encoding key enzymes in the peroxisomal or mitochondrial glyoxylate detoxification pathway.[17]Inheritance follows an autosomal recessive pattern, with estimated carrier frequencies varying by subtype and population: approximately 1:195 for PH1, 1:279 for PH2, and 1:185 for PH3 based on exome sequencing data from diverse cohorts.[18] These frequencies suggest underdiagnosis, particularly in non-European populations, and highlight the need for genetic screening in families with recurrent kidney stones.[19]PH type 1 (PH1), the most prevalent and severe subtype accounting for 70-80% of cases, arises from pathogenic variants in the AGXT gene located on chromosome 2q37.3, which encodes the peroxisomal enzyme alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT).[16] Over 150 mutations have been identified, with common missense variants including p.Gly170Arg (G170R), p.Phe152Ile, and p.Ile244Thr; the G170R mutation is particularly associated with pyridoxine (vitamin B6) responsiveness in 10-50% of PH1 patients, as it enhances residual AGT activity under high cofactor conditions.[16] Clinically, PH1 often presents with infantile nephrocalcinosis and rapid progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in 10-50% of cases by adolescence, though adult-onset milder forms occur.[17] Biochemically, it features markedly elevated urinary oxalate (>0.5 mmol/1.73 m²/24 h) and glycolate excretion, with plasma oxalate levels exceeding 30 µmol/L indicating systemic oxalosis risk.[16]PH type 2 (PH2), representing 5-10% of cases, results from biallelic variants in the GRHPR gene on chromosome 9p13.2, encoding the cytosolic and mitochondrial enzyme glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase (GRHPR).[20] More than 20 mutations are reported, including the founder variant c.103delG (p.Asp35Thrfs*11) prevalent in European and African American populations, leading to absent enzyme activity.[20] This subtype is generally milder than PH1, with recurrent urolithiasis starting in childhood but progression to ESKD in only about 20-30% of patients by adulthood, and rare systemic involvement.[17] Distinctive biochemical markers include elevated urinary L-glycerate (>0.1 mmol/1.73 m²/24 h) alongside hyperoxaluria, aiding differentiation from other PH types, though glycolate levels remain normal.[20]PH type 3 (PH3), comprising 10-20% of cases and often underrecognized, stems from pathogenic variants in the HOGA1 gene on chromosome 10q24.2, which encodes the mitochondrial enzyme 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate aldolase (HOGA1) involved in hydroxyproline metabolism.[21] Common mutations include c.700+5G>T (splice site) and c.944_946del (p.Glu315del), with over 30 variants described, many resulting in enzyme instability or reduced activity.[21] Presentation typically involves calcium oxalate nephrolithiasis in early childhood (median age 1.9 years), but the course is heterogeneous: hyperoxaluria resolves spontaneously in up to 50% by adolescence, while 10-20% progress to chronic kidney disease, and fewer than 5% reach ESKD by age 40, without reported systemic oxalosis.[22] Biochemically, it is marked by elevated urinary oxalate (0.5-1.0 mmol/1.73 m²/24 h) and diagnostic metabolites 4-hydroxy-2-oxoglutarate (HOG) and 2,4-dihydroxyglutarate (DHG), with milder plasma oxalate elevations during progression.[21]Rare variants beyond these three subtypes have been proposed, such as potential PH type IV linked to SCN9A mutations affecting oxalate transport, but this classification remains debated and unestablished in major consensus guidelines as of 2023.[23]
Secondary Hyperoxaluria
Secondary hyperoxaluria refers to elevated urinary oxalate levels resulting from non-genetic factors that increase oxalateabsorption, production, or intake, distinguishing it from inherited metabolic defects.[13] This condition arises primarily from acquired disruptions in oxalatehomeostasis, such as enhanced intestinal absorption or excessive exogenous oxalate load, leading to hyperoxaluria typically exceeding 40 mg/day (0.45 mmol/day) in adults.[24]Enteric hyperoxaluria, a major subtype, occurs in malabsorptive gastrointestinal disorders where fat malabsorption plays a central role. In conditions like Crohn's disease, short bowel syndrome, or post-bariatric surgery (e.g., Roux-en-Y gastric bypass), unabsorbed fatty acids bind dietary calcium in the gut, reducing calcium availability to form insoluble calcium oxalate complexes and thereby increasing the pool of soluble oxalate available for colonic absorption.[25] This heightened absorption can elevate urinary oxalate to levels as high as 100-200 mg/day, contributing to nephrolithiasis or oxalate nephropathy.[26] The prevalence of enteric hyperoxaluria has risen with the increased incidence of bariatric procedures, affecting 20-70% of patients post-surgery, particularly after malabsorptive procedures.[26]Dietary hyperoxaluria stems from excessive consumption of oxalate-rich foods, which can overwhelm normal intestinal degradation and absorption mechanisms. Common sources include nuts, tea, spinach, rhubarb, and chocolate, where intakes exceeding 250 mg/day—far above the typical dietary range of 50-200 mg/day—promote hyperoxaluria, particularly in individuals with idiopathic high oxalate absorption efficiency. For instance, regular consumption of black tea or almond-based products has been linked to urinary oxalate elevations of 50-100 mg/day in susceptible absorbers. Intestinal oxalate absorption, normally limited to 10-15% of dietary load due to bacterial degradation and calcium binding, can increase under high dietary exposure.[27]Other causes of secondary hyperoxaluria include acute intoxications and nutritional excesses that elevate oxalate precursors. Ethylene glycol poisoning, common in cases of antifreeze ingestion, is metabolized to glycolate and oxalate via hepatic alcohol dehydrogenase and glyoxylate pathways, causing severe hyperoxaluria and acute kidney injury with oxalate crystalluria.[28] High-dose vitamin C supplementation (>1 g/day) leads to oxalate overproduction through ascorbate catabolism, with urinary levels rising proportionally to intake and reversible upon cessation.[29] Rare contributors encompass Aspergillus niger infections, which produce oxalic acid as a virulence factor leading to systemic oxalosis, and pyridoxine (vitamin B6) deficiency, which impairs glyoxylate transamination and indirectly boosts oxalate synthesis.[30][31]Secondary hyperoxaluria accounts for the majority of hyperoxaluria cases, far outnumbering the rare primary forms.[24] Unlike genetic variants, it is often reversible through targeted interventions addressing the underlying cause, such as dietary modification or treatment of malabsorption.[32]
Signs and Symptoms
Clinical Presentation
Hyperoxaluria often presents with renal manifestations due to the formation of calcium oxalate stones, which are the primary culprits in causing symptoms. Patients commonly experience renal colic, characterized by severe, intermittent flank pain radiating to the abdomen or groin, often accompanied by nausea and vomiting, resulting from the passage of these stones through the urinary tract. This pain is frequently recurrent and can begin in childhood, particularly in primary hyperoxaluria (PH), where the median age of onset is around 4-5 years.[1][2]Hematuria, either gross (visible blood making urine pink, red, or brown) or microscopic, is another frequent initial sign, typically triggered by stone passage, irritation of the urinary tract, or associated urinary tract infections. In secondary hyperoxaluria, which arises from dietary excesses or enteric disorders, presentations may be milder and sometimes asymptomatic, with stones discovered incidentally during imaging for unrelated issues.[1][2][16]In advanced disease, particularly PH, systemic symptoms emerge as renal function declines, including fatigue and edema secondary to chronic kidney disease. Bone pain from oxalate deposition in the skeletal system can also occur, reflecting extrarenal involvement. Pediatric patients with infantile PH type 1 often exhibit failure to thrive, characterized by poor weight gain and linear growth, along with polyuria due to early nephrocalcinosis and tubular dysfunction.[16][1][33]
Complications
Untreated primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) frequently progresses to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), with approximately 50% of patients reaching this stage by their mid-20s, often by age 24 as the median onset.[34] Systemic oxalosis, resulting from calcium oxalate crystal deposition in extrarenal tissues once glomerular filtration rate falls below 30-40 mL/min/1.73 m², affects multiple organs and exacerbates disease severity.[14]In systemic oxalosis, oxalate deposits in the heart can infiltrate the myocardium and conduction system, leading to cardiomyopathy and life-threatening arrhythmias.[16]Retinopathy arises from retinal crystal accumulation, causing fibrosis and progressive visual impairment, particularly in severe infantile cases.[16] Vascular calcifications occur due to oxalate precipitation in vessel walls, contributing to widespread vasculopathy and increased cardiovascular risk.[14]Bone disease manifests as oxalate osteodystrophy, where crystals infiltrate the bone marrow and cortical bone, resulting in pain, reduced bone density, and pathological fractures; this is especially pronounced in patients on dialysis.[1] Crystal deposition in the bone marrow can also cause anemia and pancytopenia through fibrosis and hematopoietic suppression.[1]Post-kidney transplantation, isolated kidney grafts in PH1 patients experience rapid oxalate recurrence, leading to high rates of graft loss due to recurrent oxalosis, with reported 5-year kidney graft survival rates of 14–45% without concurrent liver transplantation to correct the metabolic defect.[35]In infantile PH1, presenting with ESRD before age 1 year, mortality is approximately 30%, primarily in the first few years due to multiorgan failure from advanced systemic oxalosis, though outcomes have improved with early intensive dialysis and transplantation.[36]
Diagnosis
Laboratory Evaluation
The laboratory evaluation of hyperoxaluria primarily involves biochemical assessments to quantify oxalate excretion and evaluate renal function, serving as the cornerstone for diagnosis and differentiation from other causes of nephrolithiasis. The gold standard test is the 24-hour urine collection, which measures total oxalate excretion, with levels exceeding 40 mg (0.45 mmol) per day indicating hyperoxaluria; values greater than 75 mg (0.83 mmol) per day, particularly when corrected for body surface area (>1 mmol/1.73 m² per day), are strongly suggestive of primary hyperoxaluria (PH).[1][14] This collection also assesses urinary citrate and calcium levels, as low citrate (<320 mg/day) and high calcium (>250 mg/day in women or >300 mg/day in men) can exacerbate stone formation risk in the context of elevated oxalate.[28] To ensure accuracy, patients should follow a normal diet during collection but avoid high-oxalate foods (e.g., spinach, rhubarb) for 24 hours prior if initial results are equivocal, as dietary oxalate can contribute up to 50% of urinary levels in non-PH cases.[14]Plasma oxalate measurement complements urine testing, particularly in patients with advanced renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m²), where levels above 30 µmol/L signal systemic oxalosis and extrarenal deposition.[37] Normal plasma oxalate is typically 1-3 µmol/L, but in PH with renal failure, it often exceeds 100 µmol/L due to reduced clearance.[1] Supporting laboratory tests include serum creatinine to calculate eGFR, which helps gauge the severity of renal involvement, as declining function (e.g., eGFR <50 mL/min/1.73 m²) promotes oxalate retention.[1] Urine volume and pH are also evaluated, with low volume (<2 L/day) increasing saturation risk and acidic pH (<7.2) favoring calcium oxalate precipitation.[14] For suspected PH type 2 (PH2), urinary or plasma L-glyceric acid levels should be measured, with elevations (>28 mmol/mol creatinine) confirming the diagnosis due to deficient glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase activity.[20]Interpretation requires caution, as spot urine samples normalized to creatinine are less reliable than 24-hour collections owing to diurnal variations in excretion (coefficient of variation ~14%) and potential incomplete collections.[14] Repeat testing is recommended for confirmation, and results must be interpreted in the context of clinical history to distinguish idiopathic or dietary hyperoxaluria from PH. Genetic testing may provide definitive confirmation but is typically pursued after initial biochemical abnormalities.[1]
Imaging and Biopsy
Ultrasound serves as the first-line imaging modality for evaluating nephrocalcinosis and urolithiasis in children with suspected hyperoxaluria, offering a non-invasive and radiation-free approach to detect medullary echogenicity indicative of early calcium oxalate deposition.[38] High-resolution ultrasonography is particularly effective for monitoring disease progression, classifying nephrocalcinosis severity based on echogenic patterns in the renal medulla, and is preferred in pediatric populations due to its safety and accessibility.[39] In primary hyperoxaluria, ultrasound findings often reveal hyperechoic regions corresponding to crystal accumulation, aiding in timely diagnosis before advanced renal impairment occurs.[40]Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) is utilized to assess stone burden and composition in hyperoxaluria, providing detailed visualization of urinary tract calculi with high sensitivity for even small stones.[41]Calcium oxalate stones, characteristic of hyperoxaluria, typically exhibit densities exceeding 600 Hounsfield units (HU) on CT, distinguishing them from less dense uric acid stones and guiding therapeutic decisions such as shock wavelithotripsy candidacy.[42] This modality is especially valuable in adults or when ultrasound is inconclusive, quantifying total stone volume and identifying complications like hydronephrosis without the need for contrast agents.[43]Renal biopsy is rarely performed in hyperoxaluria but may be indicated in atypical cases to confirm oxalosis, revealing intratubular and interstitial deposition of calcium oxalate crystals that appear as translucent sheaves under light microscopy.[20] Under polarized light, these crystals demonstrate characteristic birefringence, often in a fan- or rosette-shaped pattern, providing histopathological evidence of oxalate-induced tubular injury and fibrosis.[24] Biopsy findings can differentiate primary hyperoxaluria from other crystal nephropathies, though risks such as bleeding limit its routine use in favor of non-invasive diagnostics.[44]In patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to systemic oxalosis, bone or skin biopsies offer a means to confirm extrarenal oxalate deposition when renal function precludes urine-based testing.[45] Bone marrow biopsy frequently uncovers birefringent calcium oxalate crystals within granulomatous lesions or osteoid tissue, correlating with skeletal pain and fractures in advanced disease.[46] Similarly, skin biopsy in cutaneous oxalosis reveals crystal aggregates in the dermis or subcutaneous tissue, appearing as yellow papules or plaques, thus supporting the diagnosis of widespread systemic involvement.[47]
Genetic Testing
Genetic testing plays a central role in confirming the diagnosis of primary hyperoxaluria (PH) by identifying biallelic pathogenic variants in the genes responsible for the enzyme defects underlying the subtypes, such as AGXT for PH1, GRHPR for PH2, and HOGA1 for PH3.[16][14] This molecular approach allows precise subtyping, which is essential for prognosis and management decisions.Next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels targeting AGXT, GRHPR, and HOGA1 are the primary method for genetic testing in suspected PH cases, with sequence analysis detecting over 97% of pathogenic variants and deletion/duplication analysis identifying the remaining few percent.[16] These panels have identified more than 200 distinct variants in AGXT alone for PH1, including common mutations like p.Gly170Arg that may predict pyridoxine responsiveness.[48] NGS is preferred due to its high sensitivity (>99% for single nucleotide variants) and ability to analyze multiple genes simultaneously, making it accessible through commercial laboratories.[49]For at-risk families, prenatal genetic testing is available via amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling to detect PH-associated variants in fetal DNA, enabling early intervention planning.[50]Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), performed during in vitro fertilization, allows selection of embryos without pathogenic variants, preventing transmission of PH.[16]Historically, functional assays measuring enzyme activity—such as alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase in liver biopsies—were used to confirm PH1 diagnosis and assess variant pathogenicity, but these invasive procedures are now rarely performed due to the reliability of genetic testing.[16] They may still be considered in cases of variants of uncertain significance to evaluate residual enzyme function.[51]According to the 2023 expert consensus from ERKNet and OxalEurope (developed in 2022), genetic testing is recommended as the gold standard for all patients with suspected PH, ideally initiated within 30 days of presentation to facilitate rapid subtyping and family counseling.[14]
General measures for hyperoxaluria emphasize non-pharmacologic interventions to minimize urinary oxalate concentration, promote its excretion, and preserve kidney function. These strategies are foundational across both primary and secondary forms, aiming to reduce the risk of nephrolithiasis and oxalate nephropathy by addressing hydration status, dietary oxalate load, and urine chemistry without relying on targeted disease-modifying agents.Adequate hydration is a cornerstone of management, with adults encouraged to consume at least 3.5–4 liters of fluid daily to achieve a urine output exceeding 3 liters per 24 hours, thereby diluting oxalate and decreasing supersaturation for crystal formation.[14] In children, fluid intake should target 1.5 liters per square meter of body surface area daily, often necessitating enteral support like nasogastric or gastrostomy tubes in infants to maintain this volume and achieve urine output exceeding 2 liters per square meter.[14] This high intake helps counteract the low solubility of calcium oxalate, with optimal urine dilution reflected by a specific gravity below 1.010, reducing intratubular deposition and stone recurrence.[1]Dietary adjustments focus on restricting oxalate absorption while supporting gastrointestinal binding mechanisms. Patients should limit dietary oxalate to under 100 mg per day by avoiding high-oxalate foods such as spinach, rhubarb, chocolate, nuts, and tea, which can significantly contribute to endogenous oxalate load in susceptible individuals.[1] Concurrently, maintaining normal calcium intake of approximately 1000 mg per day is advised, as it facilitates oxalate chelation in the gut lumen, preventing its uptake into the bloodstream and subsequent renal filtration.[52] These modifications should be balanced to avoid nutritional deficiencies, with guidance from a dietitian to ensure overall caloric and nutrient adequacy.Potassium citrate supplementation serves as a supportive measure to alkalinize urine and enhance citrate levels, which inhibit calcium oxalate aggregation. Typical dosing is 10–20 mEq administered three times daily, adjusted to achieve a urine pH above 6.5 and citrate excretion of 500–600 mg per day, thereby promoting a less favorable environment for stone formation.[1] In pediatric cases, dosing may be weight-based at 0.1–0.15 g/kg daily, with monitoring for gastrointestinal tolerance.[14]Ongoing monitoring ensures the efficacy of these measures through regular evaluation of urine parameters. Patients should track daily urinevolume to confirm outputs above 3 liters, supplemented by specific gravity assessments using dipstick or refractometer to verify dilution (target <1.010).[53] Periodic 24-hour urine collections, ideally every 3 months initially and annually thereafter, allow quantification of oxalate excretion (goal ≤40 mg/day) and guide adjustments to hydration or diet.[1] This proactive surveillance helps prevent complications by detecting suboptimal compliance or progression early.
Pharmacologic Therapies
Pharmacologic therapies for hyperoxaluria aim to reduce oxalate production, absorption, or excretion, with options varying by type—primary (genetic) or secondary (enteric). In primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), pyridoxine (vitamin B6) is a key treatment for responsive cases, administered at 5-10 mg/kg/day orally, which can lower urinary oxalate excretion by 30-60% in approximately 30% of patients, particularly those with specific AGXT gene mutations like p.Gly170Arg.[54][55][56] This responsiveness is determined by monitoring urinary oxalate levels after 2-3 months of therapy, with higher doses requiring neurotoxicity surveillance.[14]For both primary and secondary forms, probiotics containing Oxalobacter formigenes represent an experimental approach to degrade dietary oxalate in the gut, potentially reducing urinary oxalate absorption. A phase 3 randomized controlled trial (ePHex; completed 2021, published 2022) evaluated oral Oxabact (O. formigenes) over 52 weeks in patients with PH, showing no overall significant reduction in plasma oxalate (least squares mean change: -3.80 µmol/L vs. placebo, p=0.064), though a subgroup with estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m² experienced a modest decrease (-3.3 µmol/L vs. +2.7 µmol/L for placebo).[57][58] A 2025 systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, including ePHex, reported a modest overall reduction in urinary oxalate with O. formigenes probiotics (standardized mean difference -0.45, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.08, p=0.02), particularly in non-dialysis patients, reinforcing its safety and potential adjunctive role.[59] The therapy was safe, with fewer adverse events than placebo and no serious drug-related issues, supporting its investigation for oxalate degradation in ongoing trials.In secondary hyperoxaluria, particularly enteric forms due to fat malabsorption (e.g., from ileal resection or bariatric surgery), recent reviews indicate limited or no significant efficacy of cholestyramine in reducing urinary oxalate, despite its use as a bile acid sequestrant (typical dose 4 g/day); addressing underlying malabsorption remains key.[25][60][61]Allopurinol, a xanthine oxidase inhibitor used in hyperuricosuric calcium oxalate stone disease, is generally avoided in primary hyperoxaluria due to its lack of direct effect on oxalate metabolism and potential for indirect complications like increased xanthine excretion competing with oxalate handling.[62]
Surgical and Transplant Options
Surgical interventions for managing kidney stones in hyperoxaluria primarily involve extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), which is considered for stones larger than 5 mm in the renal pelvis or ureter.[63] ESWL uses high-energy shock waves to fragment stones noninvasively, allowing passage through the urinary tract, but its efficacy is limited in cases of nephrocalcinosis due to the diffuse nature of oxalate deposits in the kidney parenchyma.[14] In primary hyperoxaluria (PH), ESWL is generally not recommended as a first-line approach because it may exacerbate kidney injury and accelerate progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), particularly when stones are associated with underlying metabolic overproduction of oxalate.[64]For patients with PH progressing to ESRD, isolated kidney transplantation can restore renal function but carries a high risk of recurrence due to persistent hepatic oxalate overproduction, with graft failure rates often exceeding 80% within five years without addressing the underlying liver defect.[65] Combined liver-kidney transplantation (CLKT) is the preferred definitive treatment for PH type 1 (PH1), as it corrects the hepatic enzyme deficiency (alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase) responsible for oxalate overproduction while replacing the failed kidney.[66] Preemptive CLKT, performed before dialysis or in advanced CKD stages, is recommended for pediatric and young adult PH1 patients to minimize systemic oxalosis and improve long-term outcomes, with studies showing kidney graft survival rates exceeding 80% at five years post-2010.[67] Patient and graft survival with CLKT has improved significantly in the modern era, reaching approximately 87% at 10 years, attributed to better perioperative management and donor selection.[67]Isolated liver transplantation is a rare option reserved for PH patients without ESRD, aiming to halt oxalate overproduction early in the disease course, though it is less commonly pursued due to the risks of surgery without immediate renal benefit and the availability of pharmacologic alternatives.[65] In select cases of PH type 2 or non-PH1 variants, isolated liver transplant may be considered if liver dysfunction contributes significantly, but outcomes are variable and depend on timely intervention.[68]
Emerging Treatments
Emerging treatments for hyperoxaluria, particularly primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), increasingly leverage genetic and molecular approaches to target the underlying defects in oxalate metabolism. These therapies aim to reduce hepatic oxalate production more durably than traditional interventions, with several RNA interference (RNAi) agents and gene-editing strategies advancing through clinical development or approval as of 2025. Such innovations hold promise for altering disease progression, especially in pediatric patients, by addressing enzyme deficiencies at the genetic level.Lumasiran (Oxlumo), a GalNAc-conjugated small interfering RNA (siRNA) that targets hydroxyacid oxidase 1 (HAO1) to inhibit glycolate oxidase in the liver, was approved by the FDA in 2020 for reducing urinary and plasma oxalate levels in pediatric and adult patients with PH1. Clinical trials demonstrated an average 65% reduction in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion compared to placebo. Long-term data from phase 3 extensions, reported in 2025, confirm sustained efficacy over two years, with mean reductions in plasma oxalate maintained and no new safety signals observed, supporting its role in preserving kidney function. Lumasiran received orphan drug designation from the FDA in 2016, reflecting its status for rare diseases.Nedosiran (Rivfloza), another investigational siRNA targeting lactate dehydrogenase A (LDHA) to block the conversion of glyoxylate to oxalate, received FDA approval in 2023 for lowering urinary oxalate in children aged 9 years and older and adults with PH1, with subsequent expansion to children aged 2 years and older by 2025. Phase 3 trial data showed a sustained mean reduction of at least 60% in 24-hour urinary oxalate excretion from baseline through 30 months, alongside stable renal function and reduced kidney stone events. Like lumasiran, nedosiran benefits from orphan drug status, granted by the FDA prior to approval.Gene-editing therapies represent a next-generation approach for potential one-time cures. ABO-101, a CRISPR-based therapy developed by Arbor Biotechnologies, targets HAO1 to permanently disable glycolate oxidase production in hepatocytes; the FDA accepted its investigational new drug (IND) application in December 2024, with phase 1/2 trials (redePHine) initiating in early 2025 and first patient dosing achieved by July 2025, reporting no serious adverse events in initial safety assessments. Similarly, YOLT-203 from YolTech Therapeutics employs in vivo CRISPR gene editing delivered via lipid nanoparticles to inactivate HAO1; phase 1 trials began in 2024, with positive interim data in February 2025 demonstrating safe oxalate reduction in early PH1 patients, and it received FDA orphan drug and rare pediatric disease designations in late 2024. Both therapies aim for durable, liver-specific editing to mitigate systemic oxalate burden.Preclinical advancements include mRNA-based replacement therapy for alanine-glyoxylate aminotransferase (AGT), the deficient enzyme in PH1. A 2025 study evaluated lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated AGT mRNA, which restored glyoxylate metabolism and reduced 24-hour urinary oxalate in PH1 mouse models and nonhuman primates, with no significant toxicity observed, paving the way for potential clinical translation.Access to these RNAi and gene therapies is facilitated by orphan drug designations, which provide incentives like market exclusivity, but high costs pose barriers; annual treatment expenses for RNAi agents like lumasiran and nedosiran often exceed $500,000 per patient, depending on body weight and dosing regimen. Ongoing efforts focus on expanding indications and improving affordability through assistance programs.
Prognosis
Outcomes by Type
Primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1) is associated with the most severe renal outcomes among the primary forms, with approximately 50% of untreated patients progressing to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) by age 15 and 80% by age 30.[28] Without intervention, the median age at ESRD onset varies by genetic mutation, ranging from 21 years in non-Gly170Arg variants to 47 years in homozygous Gly170Arg cases.[28] With the introduction of RNA interference therapy such as lumasiran, long-term data from 2025 indicate significantly improved renal preservation, with only 10% of treated patients progressing to ESRD compared to 92% in historical untreated cohorts, alongside stable estimated glomerular filtration rates across kidney function stages.[69]In contrast, primary hyperoxaluria types 2 and 3 (PH2 and PH3) exhibit better prognoses, with renal survival rates of 92% and 95% at 30 years post-diagnosis, respectively, translating to a lifetime ESRD risk of approximately 20-30% for PH2 and much lower for PH3.[70] For PH2, the median renal survival is around 43 years, with about 35% reaching ESRD by age 40, while PH3 rarely progresses beyond recurrent stones without advancing to kidney failure in most cases.[71][22]Secondary hyperoxaluria, often resulting from conditions like bariatric surgery or enteric malabsorption, demonstrates high reversibility upon correction of the underlying cause. Correction often leads to normalization of urinary oxalate levels, though renal function preservation depends on the extent of prior damage, with a significant risk of progression to ESRD in advanced cases.[1][72] For instance, in post-bariatric hyperoxaluria, reversal of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass leads to resolution within 1-12 months, with durable improvements in oxalate excretion and kidney function observed in treated patients.[73]Overall mortality in hyperoxaluria has improved markedly with modern care, including targeted therapies and transplantation, dropping to less than 5% in well-managed cases compared to approximately 30% in the pre-2000 era when supportive measures predominated and systemic oxalosis was common.[6]
Factors Influencing Prognosis
The prognosis of hyperoxaluria is shaped by a combination of non-modifiable and modifiable factors, with genetic profile playing a central role in primary forms. In primary hyperoxaluria type 1 (PH1), patients homozygous for pyridoxine-responsive mutations, such as p.Gly170Arg, exhibit significantly better renal survival compared to those with null mutations; for instance, median onset of kidney failure is delayed to 31.8 years in responsive genotypes versus 7.8 years in null homozygotes, representing a hazard ratio of 2.59 for progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD).[74] This responsiveness to vitamin B6 therapy further enhances outcomes by partially restoring enzyme activity, leading to reduced urinary oxalate levels and slower disease progression in approximately 30-60% of affected individuals with these variants.[75]Early diagnosis emerges as a critical modifiable factor, particularly in preventing ESRD before systemic oxalosis develops. Diagnostic delays, with a median of 1 year and up to 13.5% of cases undiagnosed for over a decade, substantially increase the risk of rapid renal decline; pre-ESRD interventions, such as intensive hydration and pyridoxine where applicable, can mitigate progression by addressing oxalate overload early, though exact risk reductions vary by type.[74] Patient compliance with conservative measures, including high fluid intake (>2 L/day) and low-oxalate diets, profoundly influences stone recurrence and overall renal preservation; in compliant cohorts, procedural interventions for urolithiasis drop to 10% from 56% in non-compliant groups, underscoring adherence's role in reducing stone burden by over 80%.[76]Comorbidities, especially in secondary hyperoxaluria, exacerbate prognosis when treatment is delayed. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), unchecked enteric oxalate absorption due to malabsorption worsens hyperoxaluria, leading to oxalate nephropathy; delayed management of underlying IBD activity heightens ESRD risk, potentially leading to rapid progression to dialysis in severe cases.[77] Socioeconomic factors also modulate access to advanced care, such as combined liver-kidney transplantation, which is more feasible in high-income settings; global disparities result in higher graft and patient survival rates (e.g., 75.8% at 10 years post-transplant) in resource-rich regions compared to lower-income areas with limited transplant availability.[35]