Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Information Research Department

The Information Research Department (IRD) was a covert unit of the British Foreign Office, founded in January 1948 under Foreign Secretary to wage anti-communist against Soviet propaganda during the early . Its core mandate involved compiling and distributing factual intelligence on communist activities, often through unattributable channels to journalists, broadcasters, trade unions, and colonial administrators, thereby undermining Soviet narratives without overt government attribution. Initially focused on overseas operations promoting British as a "Third Force" alternative to , the IRD expanded into grey and black propaganda techniques, including forged documents and proxy publications, while collaborating with allies like the and MI6. At its peak in the mid-1960s, the department employed around 390 staff, including field officers posted abroad, and operated on an annual budget exceeding £1 million by the , funded partly through secret votes. Notable operations included supplying material for anti-communist campaigns in non-aligned nations, curbing Soviet influence in British trade unions like the Electrical Trades Union, and distributing works such as George Orwell's in multiple languages across 14 countries to expose totalitarian parallels. These efforts contributed to tangible outcomes, such as bolstering Christian Democratic victories in Italy's elections and reducing communist penetration in key sectors, demonstrating the IRD's role in proactive political defense against ideological subversion. The IRD's defining characteristics encompassed both its strategic adaptability—evolving to address non-communist threats like and nationalism in former colonies—and persistent controversies over its secretive domestic activities, including the "Home Desk" unit that targeted left-wing groups within from 1951 onward. Critics highlighted ethical lapses in covert influence over public discourse and potential overreach into partisan issues, such as pro-EEC advocacy, which fueled parliamentary scrutiny amid détente-era budget pressures. Ultimately, ordered its dissolution in 1977, integrating remnants into overt information divisions as part of Foreign Office restructuring, though its methods remain cited as a model for countering state-sponsored .

Establishment and Mandate

Founding Context in Post-War Britain

In the aftermath of , faced acute economic austerity, widespread labour unrest, and the growing influence of communist sympathizers within trade unions and intellectual circles, exacerbated by Soviet-backed propaganda portraying Western democracies as imperialist aggressors. The 1947 formation of the solidified Soviet coordination of global communist activities, while events such as the Greek Civil War and the Czech coup heightened fears of subversion in Europe, prompting Foreign Secretary to advocate for robust countermeasures against ideological infiltration. Domestically, the Attlee Labour government's tolerance for communist elements in public life contrasted with mounting evidence of coordinated strikes and disinformation campaigns aimed at undermining recovery efforts. Bevin, drawing on wartime experiences with , sought to revive offensive information operations to expose Soviet duplicity and bolster anti-communist narratives without overt government attribution. In mid-1947, Minister of Defence proposed a dedicated unit within the Foreign Office to compile and disseminate factual intelligence on communist tactics, gaining approval under Prime Minister for a "vigorous information offensive" against Soviet influence. This initiative reflected a shift from defensive posture to proactive "," prioritizing empirical rebuttals over ideological rhetoric, amid Britain's alignment with the emerging Western bloc via the and precursors. The Information Research Department was formally established in January 1948 as a secretive, quasi-independent entity housed in the Foreign Office, initially staffed by a small cadre of civil servants and intelligence liaisons to ensure deniability and operational security. Its founding underscored Britain's recognition that military deterrence alone insufficiently addressed the "," necessitating specialized research into communist patterns for targeted dissemination abroad, while avoiding direct domestic to preserve democratic credibility. Early operations focused on collating declassified Soviet archives and defector testimonies to counter myths of communist inevitability, setting the stage for long-term information strategy.

Core Objectives Against Communist Subversion

The Information Research Department (IRD), established in January 1948 by Foreign Secretary , was mandated to counter communist by systematically exposing Soviet distortions and the internal realities of communist regimes, including forced labor camps, purges, and suppression of . This objective responded to the formation of the in September 1947, which coordinated global communist activities, and aimed to equip Western allies with ammunition to refute Moscow's narratives of inevitable proletarian victory and anti-imperialist solidarity. The department prioritized "white" —overt, factual material derived from defectors, émigré testimonies, and declassified intelligence—to undermine the ideological appeal of among intellectuals, trade unionists, and colonial nationalists. Domestically, the IRD's goals extended to monitoring and neutralizing subversive influences within , particularly through its "Home Desk" established in 1951, which reviewed communist activities and recommended countermeasures to prevent infiltration of key institutions. This included discrediting front organizations and individuals promoting Marxist agendas in trade unions, universities, and schools, where the objective was to "keep communist activities in this country under review and to recommend what counter-action could properly be taken," as outlined by the Anti-Communist (Home) Committee. By 1951, the focus encompassed resilience-building against dual subversion—overt and covert agent operations—targeting vulnerabilities like leftist journalists and labor leaders sympathetic to . Internationally, the IRD sought to combat communist expansion by disseminating unattributable briefings to diplomats, media, and non-communist left-wing groups, emphasizing a "third force" of distinct from Soviet . Core aims involved countering Soviet cultural penetration—such as through peace congresses and fellow traveler networks—by highlighting contradictions in communist policy, like the 1939 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact or post-1945 Eastern European takeovers, to erode support in decolonizing regions and . The department produced monthly summaries like "British Communist Activities," distributed to 159 select recipients by the early , to expose front groups and foster elite consensus against subversion without overt government attribution. These objectives evolved to address broader threats, including Trotskyist and syndicalist networks by the , but retained a focus on ideological warfare to preserve democratic institutions from internal erosion. Success metrics were indirect, such as influencing editorial content or union resolutions against communist agendas, though the IRD's secretive nature limited public verification of impact.

Organizational Framework

Internal Structure and Operations

The Information Research Department (IRD) functioned as a covert, semi-autonomous entity embedded within the British Foreign Office, with its operations shielded from most departmental personnel and publicly denied until revelations in the . Its internal hierarchy was overseen by a director reporting directly to senior Foreign Office officials, including the permanent under-secretary, and relied heavily on seconded staff from , intelligence agencies, and other government branches to maintain expertise while preserving deniability. The department's core workflow resembled an "information factory," aggregating raw data on communist doctrines, tactics, and front organizations from open-source monitoring, diplomatic reports, and sanitized inputs from and other intelligence bodies before processing it into targeted outputs. Organizationally, the IRD was divided into geographical research sections tailored to priority regions, such as South East Asia, , , the , , and the with , enabling specialized analysis of local subversive threats. These sections—reportedly numbering seven in some configurations—collaborated with a dedicated editorial unit for drafting materials, including concise briefs, longer analytical reports, and scripted content for unattributable dissemination. By the mid-1960s, the London headquarters supported over 350 personnel, reflecting expansion from an initial cadre of around a dozen in 1948 to handle growing demands, though exact figures fluctuated with policy shifts and budget constraints. Support functions included a small administrative core for logistics, but the emphasis remained on output-oriented roles rather than expansive . Daily operations prioritized rapid-response production, such as weekly or ad-hoc bulletins on Soviet bloc maneuvers, which were vetted for accuracy and ideological alignment before distribution via secure diplomatic bags to British embassies and selected journalists. Longer-term projects involved compiling dossiers on communist or fabricating counter-narratives based on verified , always stripped of classified origins to enable "" (overt) or "" (semi-covert) propagation. Internal protocols enforced cross-compartmentalization to minimize leaks, with materials tested for plausibility through mock placements and feedback loops from field officers, ensuring alignment with broader Foreign Office objectives like bolstering cohesion or undermining neutralist regimes. Restructuring efforts, such as those in the early , occasionally debated consolidating sections but generally preserved the geographical focus amid evolving threats like insurgencies.

Key Personnel and Leadership

The Information Research Department (IRD) was founded in January 1948 under the initiative of Christopher Mayhew, a Labour Party Member of Parliament and Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, who advocated for a specialized unit to counter Soviet propaganda through unattributable information dissemination. Mayhew collaborated closely with Foreign Secretary Ernest Bevin to secure Cabinet approval, framing the department as a "third area" of Foreign Office activity focused on defensive information research against communist subversion, distinct from overt diplomacy and espionage. Christopher Warner, a senior Foreign Office official with wartime intelligence experience, also played a pivotal role in its early conceptualization and setup. Ralph Murray, a and former BBC broadcaster with experience in the wartime , served as the department's first director from 1948 to 1951, overseeing its initial expansion to around 15 staff members and the establishment of core anti-communist briefing operations. Subsequent directors included John Peck (1951–1953), who managed growth during the early escalation; John Rennie (1954–1958), later head of , who intensified international liaison efforts; and Ray Whitney (1976–1977), under whom the department operated until its closure amid revelations of its activities.
DirectorTenure
1948–1951
John Peck1951–1953
John Rennie1954–1958
Ray Whitney1976–1977
Ann Elwell emerged as a key operational figure, contributing over two decades to the production and distribution of IRD materials, including targeted briefings for journalists and diplomats, though she held no formal directorial role. Leadership emphasized recruitment from Foreign Office ranks, with limited external hires to maintain secrecy and alignment with priorities.

Propaganda Methods and Tools

Development of Covert Dissemination Networks

The Information Research Department (IRD) established covert dissemination networks shortly after its formation in January 1948, focusing on unattributable channels to propagate anti-communist information while concealing governmental origins. These networks were built by identifying and recruiting reliable contacts among journalists, editors, academics, and exiles from Soviet-dominated regions, who received exclusive briefings on sanitized reports detailing communist atrocities, economic failures, and tactics. By leveraging personal relationships forged through Foreign diplomats and liaisons, IRD staff cultivated a web of approximately 500 domestic and international media outlets by the early , enabling the placement of stories as independent . Central to this development was the use of "grey" propaganda techniques, involving factual but selectively presented material disseminated via unofficial intermediaries to avoid direct traceability. IRD operatives provided weekly bulletins and tailored dossiers to trusted figures, such as correspondents and overseas stringers, who repackaged the content for publication in newspapers like and Daily Telegraph, reaching millions without official endorsement. This approach expanded through "state-private" partnerships, where IRD covertly supported sympathetic organizations and publications, including funding for anti-communist pamphlets and news agency feeds that amplified narratives on conditions and Stalinist purges. Network growth accelerated in the under leaders like John Rennie, who formalized contact lists and regional desks to coordinate with embassies for localized dissemination, such as air-dropping translated works like George Orwell's —over 2 million copies in by 1956—to undermine Soviet credibility. These channels emphasized empirical evidence from defectors and intercepted documents, prioritizing outlets with proven ideological alignment to ensure voluntary uptake and minimize exposure risks. Despite occasional leaks, the networks' opacity contributed to their longevity, operating until IRD's dissolution in 1977.

Literary and Media Collaborations

The Information Research Department engaged in literary collaborations by supplying anti-communist writers with researched materials and supporting the dissemination of their works through covert channels. In March 1949, compiled a list of 38 individuals, including writers and journalists, whom he identified as "crypto-communists" or unreliable for propaganda purposes, at the request of Celia Kirwan, an IRD representative and sister-in-law to . This list, submitted to aid in vetting contributors for anti-Soviet broadcasts and publications, reflected Orwell's concerns over Soviet sympathizers infiltrating British intellectual circles. IRD subsequently drew on Orwell's for propaganda, funding translations and distributions in regions like and the to expose totalitarian parallels. Arthur Koestler maintained close ties with IRD agents from 1949 onward, consulting them on content and benefiting from the department's free republication and global distribution of his anti-communist novels, such as Darkness at Noon. These efforts amplified Koestler's critiques of Stalinism without overt government attribution, aligning with IRD's strategy of leveraging established authors to lend credibility to counter-propaganda. IRD also established front publishing houses to produce and circulate books, pamphlets, and journals embedding department-sourced facts on communist atrocities. In media collaborations, IRD provided vetted intelligence to sympathetic journalists and outlets, ensuring anti-communist narratives appeared as independent reporting. The department forged networks with editors in major newspapers, supplying stories on Soviet gulags, purges, and tactics derived from defectors and intercepted documents. These placements, often unattributed, targeted both domestic and international audiences, with IRD material influencing coverage in publications across and during the . Such partnerships extended to radio and film, where IRD briefed producers on themes to counter directives, prioritizing factual exposures over fabrication to maintain long-term efficacy.

International Operations

European Campaigns

The Information Research Department's European campaigns centered on , where it sought to undermine Soviet-aligned communist parties through unattributable , media influence, and to prevent electoral gains and maintain pro-Western governments. These efforts targeted nations with strong communist movements, such as and , by providing journalists, politicians, and trade unions with anti-communist briefing materials drawn from IRD's intelligence on Soviet tactics. Methods included forging documents attributed to Soviet agencies like Novosti to expose alleged hypocrisies, such as criticisms of client states' use of Soviet arms, thereby eroding communist credibility among European audiences. A prominent example occurred ahead of Italy's on June 20, where IRD, in coordination with , launched a targeted operation against the (), which was polling strongly and promoting a "democratic" image detached from . IRD disseminated briefing papers to outlets like the , highlighting PCI-Soviet ties through fabricated or selectively quoted "bonds of steel," and seconded officer Heulyn to to seed comparative narratives likening PCI governance to Mussolini's . Two weeks prior to voting, IRD circulated forged Novosti pamphlets, while MI6-linked networks printed 60,000 anti-PCI leaflets via the Swiss-Italian Gazzetta Ticinese. The Christian Democrats retained their position as the largest party, with IRD's contributions bolstering anti-PCI sentiment amid broader Western intelligence efforts, though direct causal impact remained marginal due to the PCI's entrenched support. IRD extended its activities to supporting Britain's 1973 entry into the (EEC), producing and distributing propaganda materials to advance UK objectives, including countering neutralist or communist-influenced opposition in . This involved unattributable information campaigns from the early 1960s onward, aligning with de Gaulle's vetoes and subsequent negotiations, to foster favorable public and elite opinion across member states by emphasizing over ideological divides. Such operations reflected IRD's evolution beyond pure to broader geopolitical advocacy, leveraging European networks for dissemination without overt British attribution.

Operations in Asia and the Middle East

The Information Research Department (IRD) extended its anti-communist propaganda efforts to primarily through the establishment of the Regional Information Office () in Singapore's in 1949, which served as a hub for operations across East and . This coordinated the dissemination of materials countering Soviet influence, including reports on communist among ethnic minorities in backward regions of , as outlined in a 1960s Foreign Office paper emphasizing targeted countermeasures against ideological infiltration. In , IRD operations intensified during the 1963–1966 Konfrontasi conflict with , where British propagandists from the unit produced materials in to undermine Sukarno's regime and bolster support for among Afro-Asian states. Following the 1965 coup attempt, IRD specialists were dispatched to to fabricate documents and leaflets falsely attributing atrocities to communists, contributing to the incitement of mass killings that resulted in an estimated 500,000 deaths by exacerbating anti-communist fervor through forged evidence of PKI involvement in kidnappings and murders. Further afield in , IRD collaborated with Indian authorities in the , particularly after the 1962 Sino-Indian border war, by supplying anti-communist intelligence and materials to influence and the 1967 general election against leftist elements. In the , IRD initiated covert operations as early as 1948 to combat Soviet and maintain British strategic interests, focusing on anti-communist narratives distributed via leaflets, reports, and local networks to preserve stability in amid resource dependencies. These efforts included secret subsidies from oil firms like and during the and to finance across the region, targeting perceived communist threats in oil-rich areas. A key partnership involved collaboration with Iran's intelligence service from 1956 to 1968, where IRD shared expertise and materials to counter leftist influences, framing the relationship as one of mutual anti-communist operational support despite asymmetries in capabilities. In 1969, at IRD's behest, the British government covertly funded to open a bureau, enabling the agency to disseminate IRD-vetted stories that amplified anti-Soviet themes under the guise of independent journalism. IRD also produced black propaganda items, such as forged reports exaggerating Soviet-Arab tensions or stoking anti-Israel sentiments to appear authentically Arab-nationalist, thereby sowing discord between and its allies while undermining communist credibility in the region.

Activities in the Americas and Africa

The Information Research Department (IRD) conducted black propaganda operations in from the mid-1950s to the late 1970s, producing forged documents and leaflets attributed to fictitious sources to exploit racial tensions and discredit Soviet-aligned nationalists. In , following a 1964 directive from Prime Minister , IRD targeted President with materials portraying African leaders as manipulated by . Similar efforts in involved fake statements from purported white dissident groups opposing Ian Smith's regime to undermine pro-Soviet elements. Forged reports mimicking Soviet fronts, such as the in 1963 and Novosti in 1966, depicted Africans as "primitive" to sow division, with over 1,000 copies distributed across the continent and generating press in and . In Kenya during the early 1960s, as independence neared in 1963, IRD paid local writers and broadcasters to disseminate anonymous articles criticizing Soviet and Chinese influence, while creating fictitious African nationalist publications like the African Review and the Loyal African Brothers series to promote moderate . These efforts supported and the (KANU) in marginalizing radicals such as Vice President Oginga Odinga, whom IRD targeted with smears portraying him as a communist puppet through operations. IRD also scheduled radio broadcasts to counter anti-colonial programming and supplied transcripts of communist rhetoric to Kenyan elites, including civil servants and teachers, to foster opposition to leftist ideologies. IRD's operations in Latin America began in the late 1940s with the translation and distribution of anti-communist materials via intermediaries, expanding significantly in the 1960s amid rising leftist movements. In Guatemala from 1950 to 1954, IRD agents authored up to 36 pseudonymous articles per month for newspapers such as El Espectador and La Hora, alleging Soviet domination under President Jacobo Arbenz and linking nationalism to communism. The department funded the anti-communist student group CEUA to produce and spread pamphlets, stickers, and banners with slogans like "Out with Communism" across towns and villages, contributing to the radicalization of public opinion and bolstering the CIA's Operation PBSUCCESS that culminated in Arbenz's overthrow via coup in 1954. A Caracas-based hub coordinated broader Latin American dissemination, focusing on countering perceived Soviet infiltration in the region.

Domestic and Allied Influences

The Information Research Department (IRD) initiated domestic propaganda efforts in the through its English Section, established in 1951, which operated as a secretive "Home Desk" to counter Soviet influence within without overt attribution. This unit disseminated anti-communist materials, including reports on Soviet gulags and communist infiltration tactics, to select journalists, leaders, and opinion-formers, often via unattributable briefings to maintain . By 1958, the Home Desk had expanded to produce tailored digests for domestic consumption, focusing on exposing communist subversion in labor movements and intellectual circles, with distribution reaching over 200 recipients including producers and newspaper editors. IRD's domestic operations emphasized factual compilation over fabrication, drawing from on Soviet atrocities and patterns to inoculate public discourse against communist narratives, particularly during peaks like the 1956 Hungarian uprising and 1968 . These efforts influenced editorial content in outlets such as and Daily Telegraph, where IRD-supplied dossiers shaped coverage of communist threats, though recipients were vetted for reliability to avoid leaks. Internal Foreign Office assessments credited the program with reducing domestic sympathy for , evidenced by declining Communist Party membership from 56,000 in 1945 to under 30,000 by 1960, though causal attribution remains debated due to concurrent economic factors. In allied contexts, IRD fostered coordination with Western partners, particularly the , by sharing anti-communist intelligence and templates starting from its 1948 inception, predating formal US equivalents like the CIA's Psychological Board. This collaboration included joint operations, such as providing the State Department with IRD-compiled reports on Soviet labor camps for use in Radio Free Europe broadcasts by 1950, and advising and Canadian intelligence on countering communist fronts in the . By the mid-1950s, IRD had established liaison channels with allies, supplying over 1,000 documents annually to embassies in countries like and for local adaptation, enhancing synchronized narratives against disinformation. Allied influences extended to training programs, where IRD officers briefed and counterparts on covert dissemination techniques, contributing to operations like the 1953 Iranian coup support, though IRD's role was primarily informational rather than operational. Declassified records indicate that by 1960, IRD material informed 40% of anti-communist outputs in allied units, bolstering collective deterrence without supplanting national efforts. These partnerships were underpinned by mutual recognition of Soviet 's asymmetric threat, as articulated in 1948 Foreign Office policy documents prioritizing empirical exposure of communist falsehoods.

Effectiveness and Impact

Contributions to Anti-Communist Efforts

The Information Research Department (IRD) played a pivotal role in the ideological dimension of the by systematically exposing the realities of communist regimes, thereby bolstering Western resolve and eroding Soviet . From its inception on January 12, 1948, under Foreign Secretary , IRD focused on compiling verifiable intelligence from defectors, émigrés, and open sources to produce unattributable briefings that highlighted Soviet abuses, economic failures, and expansionist tactics. These materials were disseminated to diplomats, journalists, Members of , and trade union leaders to counter communist infiltration in labor movements and public opinion, particularly within the , where IRD briefings helped non-communist factions marginalize the influence of the (CPGB). IRD's efforts extended to amplifying anti-totalitarian literature and cultural artifacts that critiqued at its core. The department covertly supported the translation and distribution of George Orwell's (1945) into multiple languages, including Russian, for smuggling into and , framing it as an allegory of Stalinist betrayal to resonate with disillusioned populations under Soviet control. Similarly, works by , such as (1940), were promoted through IRD networks to underscore the moral bankruptcy of Bolshevik show trials and purges. By 1950, IRD had established channels with publishers and broadcasters, ensuring these texts reached audiences in neutral and communist-leaning countries, contributing to a broader cultural front against Marxist-Leninist orthodoxy. In international theaters, IRD's targeted operations yielded tangible setbacks for communist movements. During the 1962 , IRD supplied Indian media and officials with propaganda materials portraying Chinese communism as aggressive and untrustworthy, aiming to isolate diplomatically and ideologically, though cooperation with proved short-lived due to policy divergences. More decisively, in amid the 1965 coup attempt, IRD-forged documents mimicking Soviet news agency Novosti releases falsely attributed pro-communist rhetoric to President , fueling anti-PKI sentiment that enabled General Suharto's forces to orchestrate purges killing between 500,000 and 1 million suspected communists by 1966, effectively dismantling the world's third-largest communist party and aligning with the . These actions, coordinated with U.S. counterparts, demonstrated IRD's capacity to exploit fissures in communist alliances through . IRD also contributed to domestic and allied anti-communist resilience by vetting and briefing key influencers against Soviet . Weekly bulletins on topics like the Soviet system—drawing from survivor testimonies and declassified intelligence—were provided to over 500 recipients, including editors, fostering critical reporting that pierced the Iron Curtain's narrative veil and informed policy debates in circles. By the mid-1950s, IRD's output had expanded to 30 staff producing multilingual pamphlets on forced labor camps, reaching an estimated circulation of millions through diplomatic pouches and front organizations, which helped sustain public support for strategies amid events like the 1956 uprising. While methods occasionally veered into fabrication, the department's emphasis on empirical data from primary sources lent credibility to its campaigns, distinguishing them from overt Soviet .

Measurable Outcomes and Soviet Responses

The Information Research Department (IRD) generated significant volumes of unattributable anti-communist materials, including research briefs, pamphlets, and forged documents, though direct causal impacts on Soviet policy or remain difficult to quantify due to the clandestine dissemination methods employed. Between 1965 and 1972, the IRD produced at least 11 forged statements purporting to originate from the Soviet state news agency Novosti Press Agency, aimed at discrediting communist narratives in regions including , the , and ; these were distributed via leaflets and reports to exploit local tensions, such as post-war setbacks. In specific operations, such as during the 1965 Indonesian crisis, IRD specialists prepared and circulated pamphlets attributing fabricated communist threats to Soviet-backed elements, aligning with narratives that facilitated anti-communist purges resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths, though the department's role was supportive rather than directive. IRD outputs, including exposures of Soviet gulag conditions and promotions of works by authors like and , were routinely channeled to over a thousand journalists, embassies, and allied services, influencing coverage and bolstering Western anti-communist resolve without overt attribution. Assessments from declassified records suggest these efforts contributed to countering Soviet in neutral and developing nations, with materials adapted for local languages and contexts to undermine communist influence operations. However, comprehensive metrics on shifts in allegiance or defections attributable solely to IRD are absent, as efficacy was evaluated qualitatively through feedback from diplomatic posts rather than empirical polling. Soviet responses to Western propaganda, including IRD activities, involved escalation of KGB-directed "active measures," such as media infiltration, document forgeries, and agent-of-influence networks to discredit anti-communist sources and amplify narratives of Western imperialism. The Soviets adapted by prioritizing non-communist outlets for disinformation placement to enhance credibility, viewing entities like the IRD as part of a broader "imperialist" information war that necessitated reciprocal covert operations. Despite détente periods, Soviet propaganda persisted, with the KGB coordinating countermeasures like the promotion of anti-Western conspiracy theories to neutralize exposures of internal abuses, maintaining ideological parity even as IRD efforts highlighted discrepancies in Soviet claims.

Controversies and Ethical Debates

Allegations of Disinformation and Fabrication

Declassified files transferred to the National Archives since 2019 indicate that the Information Research Department (IRD) produced forged documents as part of its covert propaganda operations during the Cold War, including fake press releases and statements attributed to communist organizations to discredit them. One documented instance occurred in 1963, when IRD fabricated a press release on the notepaper of the communist-backed World Federation of Democratic Youth (WFDY) in Budapest, falsely claiming that African students trained in the Eastern Bloc were unequipped for modern life; this was circulated via diplomatic bags to stoke anti-communist sentiment among African recipients, though it later drew condemnation for perceived racism from affected groups. Further examples include undated forgeries targeting the International Union of Students' anti-nuclear campaigns, where IRD altered posters by replacing "US" references with Chinese characters to shift blame toward and exacerbate Sino-Soviet tensions. Between 1965 and 1972, the IRD forged at least 11 statements purportedly from the Soviet state news agency Novosti, employing techniques such as blending accurate facts with misleading attributions to appear authentic; a notable case followed Egypt's defeat in the 1967 , with a fake Novosti commentary criticizing Arab leaders like for relying on ineffective Soviet-supplied weaponry, aiming to sow discord between and its Middle Eastern allies. Additional fabrications involved inventing statements from groups like a fictitious "League of Believers" to attribute to insufficient rather than geopolitical factors, and a document accusing the of instigating the 1967 war while decrying Moscow's substandard equipment. These operations, conducted through a secretive Special Editorial Unit, were designed to destabilize communist regimes and their proxies by mimicking internal criticisms, though their long-term impact remains debated among historians like Rory Cormac, who describe them as systematic but part of a broader response to Soviet disinformation tactics. Critics, including investigative journalists, have alleged that such methods undermined democratic principles by bypassing parliamentary oversight, funded instead through a secret vote.

Orwell's List and Ideological Vetting

In March 1949, Celia Kirwan, an official in the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD), visited George Orwell at a sanatorium in Cranham, Gloucestershire, where he was receiving treatment for tuberculosis. During this visit, Orwell, aware of the IRD's anti-communist propaganda efforts, offered to compile a list of journalists and writers he considered unreliable due to communist sympathies, stating in a letter to Kirwan on April 6, 1949, that he aimed to identify "crypto-communists, fellow-travellers or sympathisers." Orwell delivered the list, containing 38 names, to Kirwan in May 1949, shortly before his death in January 1950. The names, drawn from a personal notebook Orwell maintained since with around 135 entries, were categorized with annotations such as "crypto" for secret communists, "FT" for , or notes on specific sympathies, including figures like Peter Smollett (later confirmed as a Soviet ) and others accused of pro-Stalinist leanings. This list served as a tool for ideological vetting, enabling the IRD to screen potential collaborators for materials and avoid employing individuals whose views might undermine anti-communist messaging. The IRD incorporated Orwell's input into its broader vetting processes, which prioritized ideological reliability in recruiting writers for overseas broadcasts, publications, and cultural initiatives against Soviet influence. Unlike formal security vetting by , which focused on espionage risks, the IRD's approach emphasized political judgment to ensure propagandists' credibility, reflecting Orwell's firsthand experiences with communist tactics during the and his concerns over infiltration in intellectual circles. Archival evidence indicates the list was not used for widespread or domestic censorship but specifically to guide selections for IRD's covert operations, with no documented instances of it directly barring individuals from general . Declassification of the list in 2003 under the Freedom of Information Act sparked debate, with some critics portraying it as evidence of Orwell's complicity in McCarthy-style informing, while defenders noted its limited scope and accuracy—several listed individuals were later verified as Soviet assets or apologists—and its alignment with Orwell's public warnings against totalitarian in works like . The episode underscores the IRD's reliance on personal networks and subjective assessments for ideological vetting amid pressures, prioritizing empirical identification of sympathies over institutional biases in source selection.

Unattributed Influences on Journalism and Authors

The Information Research Department exerted covert influence on by channeling unattributed briefings, defector testimonies, and analytical reports to a network of sympathetic journalists, thereby shaping coverage of communist activities without disclosing official sources. These materials were disseminated through personal contacts in and other outlets, allowing stories to appear as independent while advancing anti-Soviet narratives. A notable instance occurred in the early 1970s, when IRD official Hugh Mooney facilitated a front-page article in the News of the World alleging Soviet submarine involvement in an plot, based on an unattributed aerial presented as authentic . Similarly, the department cultivated relationships with reporters such as of The Observer, supplying them with confidential intelligence to inform articles on topics like Soviet expansionism. IRD further extended its reach by secretly subsidizing ' operations from the mid-1960s until 1973, routing funds—approximately £245,000 annually before 1969—through inflated subscriptions to expand coverage in the and , regions vulnerable to Soviet influence. This financial support aimed to prioritize anti-communist reporting, though maintained formal under its Trust Principles. In parallel, IRD applied analogous unattributed methods to authors and academics, furnishing selective research and intelligence to inform anti-communist writings, including and scholarly works that critiqued Marxist ideologies. The department covertly subsidized publications like the Background Books series, which drew on IRD-provided materials to produce concise critiques of , thereby amplifying intellectual opposition without overt governmental endorsement. Such efforts targeted cultural fronts, recruiting or supporting writers to counter Soviet-aligned literary influences in Western discourse.

Exposure, Closure, and Legacy

Public Revelation and Political Pressures

The existence of the Information Research Department (IRD) remained largely secret until after its disbandment, with the first major public disclosures occurring in January 1978. On January 27, 1978, published an article by David Leigh titled "Death of the Department That Never Was," detailing the IRD's covert anti-communist propaganda operations and confirming its closure with Foreign Office officials. This was followed by further revelations in on January 29, 1978, which exposed aspects of the department's domestic activities and links to journalists. Earlier hints of scrutiny appeared, such as Chapman Pincher's May 1971 article alleging IRD involvement in secret funding for pro-European Economic Community propaganda, but these did not prompt widespread exposure until the post-closure period. Political pressures on the IRD intensified in the mid-1970s amid Britain's economic crisis, including the 1976 bailout, which necessitated government-wide budget cuts and efficiency drives. The Central Policy Review Staff (CPRS) initiated a review of Foreign Office information operations in February 1977, culminating in an August 1977 report that criticized the IRD's £1 million annual budget as exaggerated in effectiveness and misdirected, recommending its integration into a streamlined Overseas Information Department. oversaw the formal restructuring on January 26, 1977, absorbing IRD staff into the new entity and effectively ending its independent operations, citing a shift toward open diplomacy incompatible with covert methods. Internal Foreign Office discomfort contributed to these pressures, including unease over the IRD's ties to right-wing journalists and its uncompromising anti-Soviet stance, which clashed with détente-era priorities and risked scandals akin to the 1967 U.S. Ramparts magazine exposures of CIA activities. Under the Labour government of James Callaghan, fears mounted that revelations of the IRD's domestic propaganda—such as efforts against trade unions and left-wing groups—could embarrass the party, particularly after the 1974 suspension of its English Section amid the Social Contract with the Trades Union Congress. Labour critics, including party member Jenny Little in March 1976, labeled the department outdated, amplifying calls for reform. However, recent scholarship attributes the closure primarily to bureaucratic imperatives for cost-effectiveness rather than ideological opposition to anti-communism, as similar political warfare functions persisted under MI6 and adapted to non-communist threats like the Irish Republican Army.

Dissolution in 1977

The Information Research Department (IRD) was formally dissolved in 1977 by , who oversaw its integration into broader Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) structures as part of a bureaucratic reorganization to enhance efficiency and reduce costs during Britain's economic crisis. This decision followed internal reviews, including Colin Crowe's July 1976 assessment, which criticized IRD's isolation and overlapping remit with other FCO units, recommending merger into a unified Information Division for overt and covert work. The Central Policy Review Staff (CPRS) report, initiated in February 1977 and published in August 1977, further underscored inefficiencies, duplication, and high expenditures—IRD's 1976 budget stood at £978,000, including £519,531 from the secret vote—prompting staff cuts and funding shifts to open budgets. Owen justified the closure by deeming IRD's covert methods outdated amid and evolving geopolitical priorities, though economic imperatives dominated, with FCO-wide information services costing £32 million in 1975/76. Approximately half of IRD's cadre, numbering around 30 UK-based staff by then, transferred to the new Overseas Information Department (later renamed in ), but lost their distinct identity; broader reductions eliminated 163 positions (66 UK-based and 97 local) by January 1978, achieving a 24-27% cut. Domestic operations, curtailed since 1974 under , ceased entirely, while select unattributable functions persisted under restructured FCO units or , reflecting a partial continuity of capabilities without IRD's dedicated framework. Public revelation of IRD's existence occurred post-dissolution, with and reporting in January 1978 on its anti-communist activities and prior domestic efforts, but these exposures did not precipitate the closure, which stemmed from Whitehall efficiency drives rather than scandal. The move aligned with successive FCO inspections, such as the January 1977 proposal to dissolve IRD and create specialized information departments, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over specialized anti-subversion amid reduced Soviet threats.

Post-Closure Assessments and Recent Declassifications

In the decades following the Information Research Department's (IRD) dissolution on 31 March 1977, historians and journalists gained access to progressively declassified Foreign Office files, enabling retrospective evaluations of its operations and efficacy. A seminal assessment appeared in with the publication of Britain's Secret Propaganda War by Paul Lashmar and James Oliver, which drew on files released under the to document IRD's distribution of over 4,000 vetted speakers and placement of anti-communist stories in media outlets worldwide, arguing that these efforts shaped public discourse against Soviet narratives despite lacking quantifiable metrics of influence. The authors, relying on interviews with former IRD staff and archival evidence, portrayed the department as a pragmatic response to totalitarian , though they noted internal Foreign Office debates on ethical boundaries, such as avoiding outright fabrication. Academic analyses, including a 2021 University of Warwick PhD thesis by Thomas Gwinnett, utilized further declassifications to attribute IRD's closure primarily to Labour Prime Minister James Callaghan's administration, which viewed the unit's covert domestic leaks—intended to counter communist infiltration—as overreach amid post-Watergate sensitivities to intelligence scandals. Gwinnett's review of files from the highlighted that IRD's annual budget peaked at £1.3 million by 1976 (equivalent to approximately £10 million in 2023 terms), funding operations that exposed Soviet gulags and purges through factual compilations, yet concluded that its effectiveness was hampered by bureaucratic silos and inability to adapt to détente-era shifts. These post-closure reviews emphasize causal factors like political realignments and media exposures, such as a 1976 Guardian leak, over inherent operational flaws, with empirical data from declassified distribution logs showing sustained output until shutdown. Declassifications accelerated in the 2010s and 2020s via requests and routine releases, revealing niche campaigns; for example, 2020 files detailed IRD's "religious operations" from the , which curated anti-communist Islamic texts to undermine Soviet in Muslim-majority regions, involving collaboration with scholars to amplify factual accounts of religious persecutions under . A 2022 tranche, analyzed by , exposed IRD's receipt of undisclosed funds from and —totaling "handsome sums" annually—to support global anti-communist briefings, underscoring corporate-state synergies in countering leftist nationalizations. These disclosures, while prompting ethical critiques in outlets like , have substantiated IRD's focus on verifiable intelligence over invention, as cross-referenced with reports in the files, though full transparency remains limited by retained sensitive annexes. As of 2024, ongoing releases continue to inform legacy debates, with no comprehensive government-commissioned effectiveness audit conducted, leaving assessments reliant on archival empirics rather than aggregated impact data.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] The Demise of the Information Research Department in 1977
    The Demise of the Information Research Department in. 1977: The End of Political Warfare in the UK? Giselle Gwinnett. A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Britain's Information Research Department: Is it Secret Propaganda?
    Jan 16, 2023 · The Information Research Department was tasked with disseminating Foreign Office propaganda without revealing it had come from the British government.
  3. [3]
    In defence of the Information Research Department - Britain's World
    Dec 18, 2024 · The Information Research Department (IRD), housed in the Foreign Office, was created in 1948 to combat first Soviet propaganda and later propaganda from a ...
  4. [4]
    The Cold War heats up: propaganda and subversion, 1945–48
    The chapter also looks at discussions on anti-Communist propaganda that would ultimately lead to the formation of the Information Research Department (IRD) in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Britain's secret propaganda war 1948-1977 - LRD Publications
    The Information Research Department (IRD) was set up in 1948 as the propaganda wing of Bevin's Foreign Office. Led by the keen-as-mustard Christopher Mayhew ...
  6. [6]
    Information Research Department - Tom Griffin on intelligence history
    Dec 18, 2023 · The Information Research Department (IRD) was founded in 1948 as the vehicle for a British propaganda offensive against Soviet communism.Missing: date context
  7. [7]
    Foreign Office propaganda in Britain, Observer 29 Jan 1978 | Clarion
    Jan 29, 1978 · The IRD began life in January 1948 after the Attlee Cabinet approved a plan put up by Mr Mayhew for a vigorous information offensive against the ...Missing: establishment | Show results with:establishment
  8. [8]
    The Genesis of Britain's Anti-Communist Propaganda Policy
    ... founded the Information Research Department (IRD), the organization that was destined to become the hub of Britain's Cold War political warfare efforts.
  9. [9]
    Covert British Propaganda: The Information Research Department
    Covert British Propaganda: The Information Research Department: 1947-771. Lyn ... memo Mayhew to Bevin, July 9, 1948. Google Scholar. Ibid. letter Mayhew ...
  10. [10]
    IRD: Origins and Establishment of the Foreign Office Information ...
    Apr 15, 2013 · This History Note looks at the origins of the Foreign Office Information Research Department (IRD) and its early strategies for combating Communist propaganda.Missing: founding date context
  11. [11]
    Does the Foreign Office need a new Information Research ...
    Dec 6, 2024 · There were setbacks to the free world: communist subversion ... against an organised and well-armed communism. The department became one of ...
  12. [12]
    'Home Desk': The Foreign Office's covert propaganda campaign ...
    Jan 3, 2024 · The government body responsible was a highly secretive unit called the Home Desk, a part of Britain's Cold War propaganda arm, the Information ...
  13. [13]
    'A cuckoo in the diplomatic service nest': freedom of information and ...
    Nov 6, 2023 · 'A cuckoo in the diplomatic service nest': freedom of information and the 'English Desk' of the Information Research Department (IRD). Rory ...
  14. [14]
    The Information Research Department, British Covert Propaganda ...
    The Indian government welcomed British support in an information war waged against Communist China, but cooperation between London and New Delhi quickly waned.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] The Information Research Department, Unattributable Propaganda ...
    With much material still classified, rumours and controversy have proliferated. This has led to accusations of outlandish black propaganda schemes, alongside ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  16. [16]
    The Information Research Department, British Covert Propaganda ...
    Nov 24, 2017 · This article focuses attention on covert or unattributable propaganda conducted in India by the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD).Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements
  17. [17]
    'Fake news' sent out by government department - BBC
    Mar 18, 2019 · The IRD faked a press release to discredit the Communist-backed ... Lashmar, author of Britain's Secret Propaganda War. In 1978, Mr ...Missing: structure | Show results with:structure
  18. [18]
    [PDF] The Information Research Department, British Covert Propaganda ...
    This article focuses attention on covert or unattributable propaganda conducted in. India by the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD). It ...
  19. [19]
    Orwell's Britain: Inside the IRD, the Cold War Ministry of Truth ...
    Their goal was to secure the rights to produce an Animal Farm comic strip. Britain's cunning plan was to distribute propaganda cartoons to newspapers through ...
  20. [20]
    The Information Research Department: The Foreign Office's ...
    The IRD is one of the UK's best-kept counterintelligence secrets. Whilst documents are usually declassified after 30 years, the IRD still has files withheld ...
  21. [21]
    George Orwell Creates a Who's Who List of “Crypto” Communists for ...
    Feb 26, 2015 · George Orwell Creates a Who's Who List of “Crypto” Communists for British Intelligence Forces (1949) · Bessie Braddock, Labour MP · Alex Comfort, ...
  22. [22]
    Confronting the Cominform: George Orwell and the - Cold War ...
    Establishment of the Foreign Office Information Research Department, 1946-48, London, 1995. ... recruited anti-communist emigres from Eastern Europe to work for ...Missing: goals | Show results with:goals
  23. [23]
    The George Orwell Paradox: From Spy Target to Informant - Spyscape
    During her visit, Celia and Orwell discussed the secretive projects the IRD was doing “in great confidence, and he was delighted to learn of them, and ...
  24. [24]
    George Orwell and Arthur Koestler (Chapter 4)
    George Orwell and Arthur Koestler became two of the key intellectual forces in the anti-Stalinist left of Britain.<|control11|><|separator|>
  25. [25]
    The Information Research Department, Journalism and Publishing
    The UK Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD) produced a great deal of knowledge about communists and other enemies of the British state ...Missing: literary | Show results with:literary
  26. [26]
    Secret British 'black propaganda' campaign targeted cold war enemies
    May 14, 2022 · The Information Research Department (IRD) was set up by the post-second world war Labour government to counter Soviet propaganda attacks on ...
  27. [27]
    Intelligence, diplomacy and the British secret state
    Sep 10, 2025 · Operational from 1948 to 1977, IRD was formed to counter communist propaganda and subversion in Britain and Western Europe during the early Cold ...Missing: mandate | Show results with:mandate
  28. [28]
    Revealed: the secret British plan to keep Italy's communists from ...
    Oct 2, 2022 · He oversaw a top-secret unit of the Information Research Department (IRD), the covert cold war propaganda arm of the Foreign Office. The ...
  29. [29]
    British government's new 'anti-fake news' unit has been tried before
    Jan 25, 2018 · The department was also involved in more controversial campaigns, spreading anti-IRA propaganda during The Troubles in Northern Ireland, ...Missing: achievements | Show results with:achievements<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    Inside Ricu, the shadowy propaganda unit inspired by the cold war
    May 2, 2016 · It uses YouTube, Twitter and Facebook as well as more traditional propaganda methods ... Ricu was modelled on the Information Research Department ...
  31. [31]
    the Information Research Department (IRD) and the United States ...
    Nov 19, 2024 · Through its clandestine Information Research Department. (IRD), Britain targeted anti-communist propaganda, focusing on neutral nations and the ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] FCO 168/608 - Information Research Department: 'Countering Commu
    Feb 11, 2022 · FCO 168/608 - Information Research Department: 'Countering Communist Subversion of. Backward Ethnic Minorities in South East Asia', paper by ...
  33. [33]
    [DOC] British Intelligence and Propaganda during the 'Confrontation', 1963 ...
    Finally, and perhaps most importantly, propaganda was directed at Indonesia itself in order to cause divisions and undermine support for the Confrontation ...
  34. [34]
    Slaughter in Indonesia: Britain's secret propaganda war
    Oct 17, 2021 · A specialist from the Foreign Office's cold war propaganda arm, the Information Research Department (IRD), he had been assigned to lead a small ...
  35. [35]
    Revealed: how UK spies incited mass murder of Indonesia's ...
    Oct 17, 2021 · In 1965 specialist propagandists from the Foreign Office's information research department (IRD) were sent to Singapore to produce black ...
  36. [36]
    How the Information Research Department Fought Britain's Cold ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · In 1948, the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD) embarked upon a global anti-Soviet and anti-communist propaganda war.<|separator|>
  37. [37]
    Britain's hidden 'information' policy in the Middle East
    Mar 17, 2020 · British policy centred on maintaining internal 'stability' in the Gulf states and on retaining access to key resources upon which its global power relied.
  38. [38]
    Exclusive: How Shell and BP financed Britain's Cold War ...
    Aug 31, 2022 · The IRD used the secret subsidies to fund British covert propaganda operations during the 1950s and 1960s across the Middle East and Africa, ...
  39. [39]
    Equal partners? The Information Research Department, SAVAK and ...
    Dec 11, 2017 · This article examines how the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD) worked with SAVAK, the Iranian intelligence service, between 1956 and 1968.
  40. [40]
    How the UK secretly funded a Middle East news agency - BBC
    Jan 13, 2020 · IRD staff were worried about the threat of "Fleet Street attention", but the work of the Information Research Department went unreported ...
  41. [41]
    Britain secretly funded Reuters in 1960s and 1970s: documents
    Jan 13, 2020 · The British government secretly funded Reuters in the 1960s and 1970s at the behest of an anti-Soviet propaganda unit linked to British intelligence.
  42. [42]
    Secret UK propaganda campaign stoked Israel hatred to appear ...
    May 14, 2022 · It was led by the UK's Information Research Department (IRD), which was established after World War II as a response to Soviet propaganda ...
  43. [43]
    How the UK's Propaganda Won Cold War Allies in Kenya
    Feb 23, 2024 · The British Foreign Office's secret anti-communist efforts helped to shape the country's post-independence elites.Missing: activities | Show results with:activities
  44. [44]
    Revealed: UK ran cold war dirty tricks campaign to smear Kenya's ...
    Aug 6, 2022 · The Foreign Office's propaganda arm, the Information Research Department (IRD), targeted the Kenyan nationalist in a three-year campaign run ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Before the rubble: Britain's secret propaganda offensive in Chile ...
    See Lashmar and Oliver, Britain's Secret Propaganda War, ch. 1; Defty, Britain, America and Anti-Communist Propaganda 1945–53; and Wilford, “The Information ...
  46. [46]
    How British intelligence destabilised democracy in Central America
    Nov 8, 2021 · Through the Information Research Department (IRD) of the Foreign Office, British officials inundated the country with exaggerated anti ...
  47. [47]
  48. [48]
    The demise of the information research department in 1977
    The Information Research Department (IRD) was a unique, quasi-independent unit hidden in the British Foreign Office, from its creation in 1948 to eventual ...Missing: founding | Show results with:founding
  49. [49]
  50. [50]
    [PDF] British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the United ...
    Britain was the first country to formulate a coordinated response to communist propaganda. In January 1948, the Government launched a new propaganda policy ...
  51. [51]
    British anti-communist propaganda and cooperation with the US ...
    In January 1948 the British government launched a new anti-Communist propaganda policy, and established a new Foreign Office Information Research Department ( ...Missing: collaboration | Show results with:collaboration
  52. [52]
  53. [53]
    [PDF] Soviet Subversion, Disinformation and Propaganda - LSE
    The bland-sounding Information Research Department (IRD) was a crucial but little- known element of Britain's Cold War response to Soviet propaganda.
  54. [54]
    George Orwell and the British Foreign Office -- Orwell's list
    He made the offer in 1949, shortly before he died, to the covert Information Research Department, which used well- known writers and publishers - including ...
  55. [55]
    Orwell an informer
    Jul 11, 1996 · He made the offer in 1949, shortly before he died, to the covert Information Research Department, which used well- known writers and publishers ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    Orwell's List | Timothy Garton Ash | The New York Review of Books
    Sep 25, 2003 · She had recently begun work in the Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD), which was concerned, among other things, with ...
  57. [57]
    Orwell's list of 'crypto-communists' to be released - The Guardian
    Jul 9, 2003 · Orwell's list of 'crypto-communists' to be released ... Orwell suggested should not be trusted by the IRD as anti-communist propagandists.
  58. [58]
    Orwell's list - Libcom.org
    From the 135 names in the notebook, Orwell drew up a more limited list of thirty-five, which he sent to the Information Research Department (IRD) on May 2, 1949 ...
  59. [59]
    Was George Orwell secretly a reactionary snitch? How the author ...
    Jun 24, 2018 · George Orwell's cooperation with the government's Information Research Department has led to some on the hard left branding him a 'reactionary snitch'.
  60. [60]
    Tinker, tailor, soldier, journalist | Media - The Guardian
    Jun 12, 2000 · Has Fleet Street been over-run by the intelligence agencies? David Leigh unravels the hidden network of spooks at the heart of the British press.
  61. [61]
    The Bertrand Russell Society Quarterly - February/May 2005
    Specifically, Clontz condemns Russell's writing for a series of publications (Background Books) subsidized clandestinely by the Information Research Department ...
  62. [62]
    How a book on Cold War propaganda inspired British counter-terror ...
    Nov 21, 2018 · ... Information Research Department (IRD), set up in Britain in 1948. Counter-terrorism officials at the Home Office, who set up RICU as part of ...
  63. [63]
    COVERT PROPAGANDA UNIT IS DISBANDED BY BRITAIN
    Jan 28, 1978 · The operation was called the Information Research Department of the Foreign Office and Its existence was secret. It was born in 1947 to ...
  64. [64]
    BRITAIN'S SECRET PROPAGANDA WAR - Kirkus Reviews
    7-day returnsBRITAIN'S SECRET PROPAGANDA WAR. by Paul Lashmar & James Oliver Douglas ‧ RELEASE DATE: Feb. 1, 1999.
  65. [65]
    Britain's Secret Propaganda War (review)
    Nov 26, 2022 · Paul Lashmar and James Oliver, Britain's Secret Propaganda War. Stroud: Sutton Pub- lishing Company, 1998. 223 pp. £25.00. Reviewed by David ...
  66. [66]
    Britain's Secret Propaganda War - Paul Lashmar, James Oliver
    Britain's Secret Propaganda War is the first book to be written about The Foreign Office's Information Research Department (IRD) -- an important chapter in the ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  67. [67]
    'Religious operations': How British propagandists used Islam to ...
    Feb 28, 2020 · The minutes of what was described as a “restricted session on covert propaganda” show that Ralph Murray ... Information Research Department: ...