Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Interpellation

Interpellation is a concept in structuralist Marxist theory, developed by Louis Althusser, describing the process by which ideology "hails" or summons individuals, who in turn recognize and internalize themselves as subjects aligned with prevailing social structures, thereby ensuring their voluntary participation in reproducing class relations.^[1] Althusser introduced the term in his 1970 essay "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses," using the example of a police officer calling "Hey, you there!" to illustrate how the hailed individual turns, assumes the position of the addressed subject, and accepts ideological interpellation as a natural act of self-identification.^[1] This hailing operates not through overt coercion but via subtle recognition within ideological frameworks, distinguishing it from the repressive functions of the state. Central to Althusser's framework, interpellation occurs primarily through Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs)—institutions like schools, churches, families, and media—that propagate the ruling ideology and form subjects who perceive their interests as freely chosen, thus perpetuating capitalist relations of production without direct force.^[1] Unlike the Repressive State Apparatus (e.g., police, military), which relies on violence, ISAs achieve reproduction through ritualized practices and symbolic recognition, making ideology appear as lived experience rather than imposed doctrine.^[1] The theory posits that all ideology interpellates concrete individuals as subjects, with the ultimate Subject (often figured as God or the state) guaranteeing this process's universality.^[1] Althusser's interpellation has profoundly shaped subsequent thought in cultural theory, media studies, and postcolonial analysis, influencing applications to how texts or discourses position audiences as ideological participants.^[2] However, it has faced criticism for its deterministic emphasis on structural hailing at the expense of subjective agency, resistance, or psychic contingency, with thinkers like Judith Butler arguing it inadequately accounts for subversion within the interpellation process itself.^[3] The model's reliance on illustrative anecdotes over testable mechanisms has also drawn scrutiny for prioritizing theoretical elegance over causal empirical grounding.^[4] Despite these limitations, interpellation remains a foundational lens for examining subject formation in ideological contexts.

Philosophical Concept

Origins and Althusser's Formulation

The philosophical concept of interpellation originated with French Marxist philosopher Louis Althusser in his essay "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes Towards an Investigation)," first published in the journal La Pensée in 1970.^[5] Althusser developed the term to explain how ideology functions not merely as false consciousness but as a material practice that actively constitutes individuals as subjects, ensuring the reproduction of social relations under capitalism.^[5] Drawing on influences such as Lacanian psychoanalysis and Hegelian dialectics, he positioned interpellation within his broader theory of Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs), such as education, religion, and family, which operate alongside Repressive State Apparatuses to maintain class domination.^[5] Althusser formulated interpellation as the process by which ideology "hails" or interpellates concrete individuals, transforming them into subjects who freely recognize and submit to ideological norms.^[5] This hailing is omnipresent and automatic, occurring through everyday rituals and discourses that presuppose the subject's existence within the ideological structure. For instance, Althusser illustrated the mechanism with the example of a police officer hailing a passerby: "Hey, you there!" The individual's instinctive turn in response—assuming the call is directed at them—marks their recognition as a subject of the law, embodying the ideological command to obey authority without coercion.^[5] This act of recognition, Althusser argued, is not illusory but produces real effects, binding subjects to the prevailing mode of production by aligning their imagined relation to real conditions of existence.^[5] In Althusser's view, interpellation is universal under ideology, affecting all individuals from birth through ISAs, which instill obedience and misrecognition of class antagonism.^[5] He emphasized that subjects are "always-already" interpellated, emerging not as pre-ideological beings but as effects of ideology itself, with no escape except through revolutionary practice that disrupts these apparatuses.^[5] This formulation marked a shift from earlier Marxist views of ideology as epiphenomenal, insisting instead on its structural necessity for capitalist reproduction.^[5]

Mechanism of Ideological Hailing

In Louis Althusser's formulation, the mechanism of ideological hailing, or interpellation, operates through ideology's address to concrete individuals, transforming them into subjects via a process of recognition. Ideology functions by invoking the category of the subject, which preexists and constitutes individuals as bearers of specific roles within social structures; this hailing is not merely verbal but embedded in practices that elicit automatic assent. As Althusser states, "all ideology hails or interpellates concrete individuals as concrete subjects," rendering the individual accountable to ideological norms through the interpellation's success in producing self-recognition.^[5] The paradigmatic illustration of this mechanism is the everyday encounter with authority, such as a police officer calling out "Hey, you there!" to a passerby on the street. Upon turning in response, the individual implicitly acknowledges themselves as the addressee—the subject of the Law—thereby internalizing ideological subjection; this act of turning constitutes the individual as a free, responsible subject who voluntarily submits to the ideological order. Althusser emphasizes that such recognition is not coerced but spontaneous, mirroring broader ideological processes where subjects misrecognize their subjection as freedom, ensuring the reproduction of relations of production. This hailing extends beyond isolated incidents to systematic practices within ideological state apparatuses (ISAs), such as education or family, which interpellate individuals from infancy—e.g., through rituals like naming or schooling that assign predefined subject positions.^[5]^[4] Fundamentally, interpellation presupposes an "absolute Subject"—such as God or the Law—as the guarantor of the hailing's efficacy, with individuals recognizing themselves in the mirror of this higher authority. Althusser argues this mechanism is "always-already" operative, retroactively constituting subjectivity itself; failure to respond would negate the subject, but ideology's omnipresence ensures near-universal efficacy, binding individuals to class-specific ideologies under the guise of universality. Empirical instantiation occurs continuously via ISAs, which outnumber repressive apparatuses and interpellate through non-violent means, such as curricula reinforcing capitalist work ethics or familial norms inculcating obedience.^[5]^[6]

Applications in Ideology and Culture

Interpellation operates within cultural domains by embedding ideological calls in everyday representations, prompting individuals to internalize subjectivities that sustain prevailing power structures, such as capitalism or nationalism. In Althusser's framework, cultural practices like literature and media function as extensions of ideological state apparatuses, where narratives "hail" audiences into roles that appear natural and self-evident. For example, religious ideology interpellates believers through rituals and doctrines that position them as subjects before a divine authority, fostering obedience without overt coercion.^[7] In popular media and advertising, interpellation manifests through targeted appeals that construct consumer identities. Advertisements employing phrases like "people like you" directly address potential buyers, eliciting recognition as market participants and reinforcing commodity fetishism as a voluntary choice.^[8] Similarly, films and television hail viewers into ideological alignments by portraying protagonists whose struggles and triumphs mirror societal norms, such as rugged individualism in Hollywood narratives, thereby interpellating audiences as aspirational subjects within liberal capitalist orders.^[9] This process extends to digital media, where algorithmic content curates personalized "hails" that weave users into echo chambers of ideological reinforcement, as seen in social platforms prioritizing engagement over dissent.^[10] Literature and educational texts apply interpellation by framing readers as inheritors of cultural ideologies, often through canonical works that normalize class or gender hierarchies. For instance, bourgeois novels interpellate readers as moral subjects aligned with property relations, subtly reproducing the ideological conditions for capital accumulation.^[11] In cultural studies, this extends to postcolonial contexts, where interpellation critiques how colonial discourses hail colonized subjects into inferior positions, as explored in Fanon's analysis of racial hailing like "Look, a nigger!", which parallels Althusser's police summons but highlights resistive fractures in ideological recognition.^[7] Empirical observations in media effects research indicate that such cultural hailing succeeds variably, with audience agency allowing competing interpellations, yet dominant ideologies prevail through repetitive exposure across apparatuses.^[12]

Criticisms and Alternative Perspectives

Philosophical and Theoretical Critiques

Critiques of Althusser's theory of interpellation often center on its perceived determinism, positing that ideological hailing universally succeeds in constituting subjects without sufficient room for resistance or failure. Philosophers argue that Althusser's model implies a totalizing efficacy of ideology, where individuals invariably recognize themselves in the ideological call, thereby reinforcing state power without accounting for misrecognition or subversion.^[13] This functionalist assumption, critics contend, overlooks the contingency of subject formation, treating ideology as an omnipotent mechanism rather than one subject to disruption.^[14] Judith Butler reformulates interpellation to address these limitations, emphasizing "passionate attachment" over Althusser's reliance on guilt or reprimand as the mechanism of subjection. In Butler's view, subjects emerge not through a singular, coercive hailing but via iterative performative acts that allow for psychic ambivalence and potential resistance, challenging Althusser's foreclosure of agency.^[3] She critiques Althusser for underemphasizing the discursive and pre-subjective realm, where power operates through seduction and desire rather than mere recognition, thus opening space for subversion within ideology itself.^[15] This shift, Butler argues, avoids the theory's reduction of subjectivity to a passive mirror of ideological structures.^[16] Post-structuralist thinkers like Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari further contest interpellation by rejecting its Oedipal and statist framing of subjectivity, viewing it as perpetuating a molar, repressive subject at the expense of molecular, desiring flows. They criticize the theory for conflating the subject of enunciation (ideological voice) with the subject of the statement (individual response), thereby neglecting non-representational becomings and the potential for escape from ideological capture.^[17] Such critiques highlight interpellation's philosophical reliance on a linguistic model of hailing that, while materialist in intent, risks idealizing ideology's grip on the psyche.^[13] Theoretical objections also target the circularity inherent in Althusser's account: the process presupposes a pre-existing capacity for recognition in the individual before interpellation completes subjectivation, raising questions about causal origins of ideological efficacy. Critics from anti-humanist traditions, while sympathetic to Althusser's structuralism, argue this loop undermines the theory's explanatory power, as it fails to delineate how raw individuals—lacking prior subjectivity—first respond to the hail without an independent motivational structure.^[18] These philosophical tensions underscore broader debates on whether interpellation adequately bridges material practices and subjective interiority, often favoring empirical or psychoanalytic alternatives for greater causal precision.^[19]

Empirical Challenges and Real-World Counterexamples

Twin studies in behavioral genetics reveal substantial heritability in political ideologies, undermining the Althusserian claim that subjects are constituted ex nihilo through ideological interpellation. Analyses of over 12,000 twin pairs from Australia, Denmark, Sweden, Hungary, and the United States estimate that genetic factors explain 40-60% of the variance in self-identified ideological positions, with monozygotic twins showing greater concordance than dizygotic twins even when reared apart.^[20]^[21] This evidence points to endogenous psychological dispositions—rooted in biology rather than external hailing—as foundational to ideological alignment, suggesting individuals selectively recognize or reject ideological calls based on pre-existing traits rather than universally submitting to them.^[20] Such findings imply a causal realism where ideology interacts with, but does not unilaterally determine, subject formation; for example, polygenic scores associated with cognitive performance predict variations in social liberalism and authoritarianism, independent of environmental ideological exposure.^[22] Counterexamples abound in cases of ideological non-recognition, as seen in identical twins separated at birth who nonetheless adopt congruent political stances despite divergent socialization, defying the expectation of interpellation's omnipotence in shaping subjects through state apparatuses like education or media.^[23] Real-world breakdowns further illustrate interpellation's empirical limits, such as the European Union's post-2008 financial crisis, where imposed austerity ideologies failed to secure broad subjectivation, instead provoking widespread populist resistance and electoral upheavals that exposed the fragility of hailing mechanisms amid economic realities.^[24] Similarly, the swift collapse of Soviet interpellation in Eastern Europe during 1989-1991—marked by mass defections from communist subject positions without corresponding repression—demonstrates how sustained material contradictions can override ideological reproduction, rendering subjects unamenable to prior hails and necessitating alternative frameworks.^[24] These instances highlight interpellation's dependence on conducive conditions, not its purported universality.

Political Procedure

Historical Origins and Development

The interpellation procedure in parliamentary systems originated in France during the early 19th century, evolving from customary practices of legislative questioning into a formalized tool for holding the executive accountable. Although roots trace to revolutionary assemblies in the late 18th century, where deputies sought explanations from ministers, the modern sense solidified under the July Monarchy (1830–1848). An early documented assertion of the right occurred in 1831, when Deputy Mauguin used interpellation to affirm deputies' authority to demand ministerial responses on policy issues, marking a shift toward structured debates that could influence government stability.^[25] This development aligned with the emerging doctrine of ministerial responsibility, allowing opposition members to challenge cabinet actions without immediate recourse to censure motions.^[26] Suppressed under the authoritarian Second Empire (1852–1870), the practice was revived and entrenched during the Third Republic (1870–1940), where it became a cornerstone of parliamentary oversight. Interpellations frequently escalated into votes of confidence, contributing to the short tenure of ministries—averaging about 1.5 years between 1871 and 1914—as governments faced repeated scrutiny on foreign policy, budgets, and domestic reforms. A notable early example was a May 1871 interpellation signed by 320 deputies questioning the Thiers government's policies, highlighting its role in testing executive legitimacy amid post-Commune tensions.^[27] Regulations evolved to prioritize urgent matters, with the Chamber of Deputies handling over 100 interpellations annually by the late 19th century, often prioritizing them over routine business.^[28] By the late 19th century, interpellation diffused across continental Europe as parliamentary regimes proliferated, adapting to constitutions in Belgium (from 1831 onward), the German Reichstag (post-1871), and other states like Italy and Austria-Hungary. In these systems, it served as a mechanism for opposition scrutiny, distinct from British question time by enabling extended debates and potential no-confidence triggers. This spread reflected broader constitutional convergence toward responsible government, though variations emerged—such as oral versus written forms or binding versus advisory outcomes—shaped by local power balances between legislatures and executives.^[29]^[30] In the 20th century, reforms in France's Fourth (1946–1958) and Fifth Republics (1958–present) curtailed its potency to curb instability, limiting automatic confidence votes and integrating it with question periods, while retention persisted in systems like Germany's Bundestag for focused inquiries.^[31]

Procedures and Examples in Parliamentary Systems

In parliamentary systems, interpellation serves as a formal mechanism for legislators to summon executive officials, typically ministers, to the legislative chamber for questioning on specific policies, actions, or decisions, thereby enabling oversight and accountability.^[32] The procedure generally requires advance notice—often ranging from 24 hours to several days—submitted in writing by a requisite number of members, such as a parliamentary group or a minimum percentage of the house (e.g., 5%).^[33] Upon acceptance, the government provides a response in plenary session, followed by debate where members may probe further, though the executive is not obligated to alter policy unless a subsequent motion, such as censure, passes.^[31] This tool contrasts with routine questioning by emphasizing structured confrontation, potentially escalating to resolutions or no-confidence votes if dissatisfaction persists.^[34] In the German Bundestag, interpellations are categorized as major or minor. Major interpellations, requiring initiation by at least 5% of members or a parliamentary group, are debated in plenary after the government's written reply, allowing for oral scrutiny on topics like policy implementation.^[33] Minor interpellations receive written responses only, without plenary debate, streamlining less contentious inquiries.^[33] Governed by Sections 100–104 of the Bundestag's rules of procedure, these instruments ensure government transparency, as seen in repeated uses by opposition groups to challenge federal actions, such as military support operations in 2015.^[35]^[36] The French National Assembly employs interpellation to question ministers on government decisions, akin to initiating a debate that mirrors aspects of a censure motion under Article 156 of its regulations.^[37] Requests must be concise and policy-focused, with the assembly president scheduling them for plenary response, often leading to extended discussions if unresolved.^[26] Historical applications include opposition challenges to executive policies, reinforcing legislative control without immediate dismissal unless escalated.^[38] In India's Lok Sabha, interpellation manifests as the right of members to pose questions on public interest matters to ministers, typically during Question Hour or via short-notice queries for urgent issues.^[39] Admissibility requires speaker approval, with responses delivered orally or in writing, potentially triggering motions if answers prove inadequate, as in cases scrutinizing administrative lapses.^[40] This procedure, rooted in oversight traditions, has been invoked hundreds of times annually to demand explanations on governance, though disruptions can limit efficacy.^[41]

Broader Implications and Influence

Althusser's formulation of interpellation, introduced in his 1970 essay "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses," provided social theorists with a framework for analyzing how ideologies materially constitute subjects through recognition and hailing, shifting focus from ideology as mere illusion to a process embedded in practices.^[4] This mechanism influenced post-Marxist thought by emphasizing the retroactive construction of identity via ideological structures, impacting fields like sociology where it explains subject formation amid power relations.^[42] In cultural studies, interpellation has been deployed to dissect media and advertising's role in hailing consumers into ideological positions, such as post-feminist identities.^[43] Within academia, the concept permeated humanities and social sciences curricula, particularly in education theory, where schools are viewed as dominant ideological state apparatuses that interpellate students into class-sorted roles via invisible cultural norms.^[4] It informed analyses of identity in literature and recitation pedagogy, highlighting how texts and rituals reinforce hegemony through subject recognition.^[44] Thinkers like Judith Butler adapted and critiqued interpellation to incorporate discursive and psychic dimensions, arguing it enables resistance by exposing the violence in subjectivation, thus extending its reach into gender and performativity studies while challenging Althusser's structural determinism.^[3] Despite its influence, interpellation's uptake in left-leaning academic institutions has drawn scrutiny for prioritizing ideological critique over empirical falsifiability, with applications often assuming causal efficacy without rigorous testing against behavioral data.^[45] Recent scholarship, such as in international relations, continues to refine it for examining belonging and emotion in political subjecthood, underscoring its enduring but contested role in theorizing power's subtle operations.^[46] This persistence reflects academia's preference for interpretive frameworks in ideology analysis, though rival approaches emphasize agency and material constraints more empirically.^[47]

Contemporary Relevance and Debates

In contemporary social theory, Althusser's concept of interpellation informs analyses of digital media and social platforms, where users are hailed into ideological subject positions through algorithmic feeds, recognition mechanisms like likes and shares, and personalized content that elicits identification with consumerist or activist roles.^[48]^[49] This application extends to selfies and visual self-presentation, which reinforce ideological constructions of the self amid capitalist imperatives.^[50] Such frameworks highlight causal mechanisms in how platforms sustain ideological reproduction without overt coercion, privileging empirical observations of user engagement over unsubstantiated claims of free choice. Debates persist over interpellation's determinism, with Judith Butler critiquing Althusser's model for implying unilateral subjection via misrecognition and guilt, instead emphasizing "passionate attachment" to regulatory norms that enables resistance through performative repetition and psychic ambivalence.^[14] Butler's revision opens space for agency within ideology's grip, arguing that subjects emerge not merely from hailing but from prior desires for reprimand, thus challenging Althusser's structural rigidity while retaining his insight into subjection's inescapability.^[15] Recent extensions, including genealogies linking interpellation to anti-humanism and non-philosophy, question its universality amid competing hails in pluralistic societies, though academic overreliance on Althusser reflects institutional preferences for materialist explanations despite empirical gaps in falsifying ideological effects.^[51] In parliamentary systems, interpellation endures as a scrutiny tool, exemplified by the 2023 summoning of a Minister of Internal Affairs in Albania's legislature to address policy lapses, underscoring its role in public accountability.^[52] Effectiveness debates center on its capacity to expose executive deviations versus limitations in enforcement; while it facilitates debate and potential censure, empirical reviews indicate variable impact, with some systems shifting to written questions due to perceived inefficacy in compelling substantive responses amid executive dominance.^[53]^[54] Proponents view it as vital for oversight in hybrid regimes, yet critics note politicization reduces causal leverage on policy, favoring data-driven metrics over ritualistic confrontations.^[32]

References

[1]
[PDF] Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses by Louis Althusser 1969 ...
Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses by Louis Althusser 1969-70. Notes. 1. This text is made up of two extracts from an ongoing study. The sub-title.
[2]
Louis Althusser on Interpellation, and the Ideological State Apparatus
May 18, 2015 · Althusser introduces the concept of interpellation, otherwise known as “hailing.” Ideologies “call out” or “hail” people and offer a particular identity.
[3]
Resisting Ideology: On Butler's Critique of Althusser - Project MUSE
For Butler, interpellation explains how the subject emerges in and through language, and her critique of Althusser is meant to open up psychic and discursive ...<|separator|>
[4]
Notes on Althusser: Ideology and Interpellation - UCF
Jan 27, 2017 · Interpellation is the experience of being “hailed,” like a taxi driver is hailed by a person on the sidewalk sticking her arm out to get a lift.Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy
[5]
Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses by Louis Althusser 1969 ...
First published: in La Pensée, 1970; Translated: from the French by Ben Brewster; Source: Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, Monthly Review Press 1971;
[6]
Notes on Interpellation
For Althusser, interpellation works in a manner much like giving a person a name, or calling out to them in the street. That is, ideologies “address” people and ...
[7]
Figures of interpellation in Althusser and Fanon - Radical Philosophy
Althusser and Fanon target their respective analyses on two formulas of interpellation – 'Look, a nigger!' (Fanon), 'Hey, you there!' (Althusser) – and it is ...<|separator|>
[8]
Althusser - a Critique: Competing Interpellations - HealthyPlace
Althusser is contrasting the manifest text with a latent text which is the result of the lapses, distortions, silences and absences in the manifest text. The ...
[9]
Interpellation - (Film and Media Theory) - Fiveable
Interpellation emphasizes how individuals are 'hailed' or called into positions of identity by cultural texts, making them aware of their social roles. This ...
[10]
Media Effects: Althusser and Interpellation - ShortCutstv
Interpellation involves the idea that we are woven into the various ideological fabrics of society, such that the two are effectively inseparable.
[11]
Culture, Ideology and Education/Interpellation through Literature
Mar 1, 2025 · The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. Routledge, 1991. 2. Althusser, Louis. Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses.
[12]
Doing Cultural Theory - Ideology: Marxism and Louis Althusser
Althusser described interpellation as a kind of summons and his classic formula is to compare the way ideology works with the way the police hail suspects.
[13]
Althusser's Dramaturgy and the Critique of Ideology | differences
Nov 1, 2015 · The first element that I find striking in Althusser's examples of interpellation concerns his insistence on the staging of the voice that ...
[14]
RESISTING IDEOLOGY: ON BUTLER'S CRITIQUE OF ALTHUSSER
The entire thrust of Althusser's presen tation of ISAs is to undo the idealist schema of ideology-as-belief and words-as-actions.
[15]
Resisting Ideology: On Butler's Critique of Althusser - PhilPapers
For Butler, interpellation explains how the subject emerges in and through language, and her critique of Althusser is meant to open up psychic and discursive ...<|separator|>
[16]
Subjected Subjects? On Judith Butler's Paradox of Interpellation - jstor
In Butler's analysis, subjects "work" because they are coerced by a sovereign voice with which they have a prior complicity, a prior desire for reprimand.<|separator|>
[17]
Althusserian Interpellations: Intellectual Trajectory and New Avenues
Feb 6, 2023 · Deleuze and Guattari's criticism of interpellation is part of a broader discussion about the subject of the enunciation and the subject of the ...
[18]
Louis Althusser - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Oct 16, 2009 · Louis Pierre Althusser (1918–1990) was one of the most influential Marxist philosophers of the 20 th Century.
[19]
[PDF] Fidelity that is not Interpellation: Reading Althuss- er's Misreadings ...
Nov 23, 2015 · Differently put, Althusser's critique is grounded first on Christian universality, or more precisely, based on his mastery of attempting to ...
[20]
Genetic Influences on Political Ideologies: Twin Analyses of 19 ...
The combined evidence suggests that political ideology constitutes a fundamental aspect of one's genetically informed psychological disposition, but as Fisher ...
[21]
On the genetic basis of political orientation - ScienceDirect.com
Twin studies show that political ideology is about 40% heritable. More sophisticated designs also find a substantial genetic influence on ideology.
[22]
Predicting political beliefs with polygenic scores for cognitive ... - NIH
We found both IQ and polygenic scores significantly predicted all six of our political scales. Polygenic scores predicted social liberalism and lower ...<|separator|>
[23]
Study on twins suggests our political beliefs may be hard-wired
Dec 9, 2013 · They found that somewhat more than half of the difference in self-identified political ideology (56%) is explained by genetic factors. The ...
[24]
Full article: From Financial Crisis to a Crisis of Interpellation
From Financial Crisis to a Crisis of Interpellation: Unpacking Ideology Production in the European Union and Clarifying How Its Failures Affect Foreign Affairs.
[25]
https://journals.openedition.org/corela/1719
[26]
[PDF] QUESTIONS, INTERPELLATION AND MOTION OF CENSORSHIP ...
Officials called for interpellation who without just cause refuse to attend, will be, for the same fact, deposed from their positions.
[27]
L'Assemblée nationale entre 1871 et 1873 – Le « Gouvernement ...
Le 20 mai, une demande d'interpellation sur la politique du cabinet, signée par 320 députés, est lue à l'Assemblée. Lorsque le 24 mai, le monarchiste Edmond ...<|separator|>
[28]
Sur une décision fondatrice du Conseil constitutionnel
Comme les autres moyens d'action du contrôle parlementaire, l'interpellation est d'origine coutumière, mais il importe de rappeler qu'il s'agissait au ...
[29]
Parliamentary Debate - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
' A common feature of many European legislatures (for example, in Germany and Sweden) is the 'interpellation' or short debate by means of which an opposition ...
[30]
INTERPELLATION AS A TOOL OF PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL ...
Aug 6, 2025 · INTERPELLATION AS A TOOL OF PARLIAMENTARY CONTROL OF THE GOVERNMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF POWER LEGITIMIZATION: THE EUROPEAN EXPERIENCE. January ...
[31]
[PDF] Tools for parliamentary oversight
The rules of procedure usually take account of the balance between the government side and the opposition side in parliament, and often favour one or more of ...
[32]
Dimension: 1.7.4 Summoning the executive in plenary
This process is often known as “interpellation” and can involve deliberation on their possible dismissal from the government. Interpellation is a powerful tool ...
[33]
German Bundestag - Instruments of scrutiny
At least five percent of the Members or a parliamentary group are required in order to put questions to the government on a particular topic in written form.
[34]
[PDF] Parliamentary Oversight of the Executive in the OSCE Region
May 29, 2025 · The parliaments in continental Europe have permanent legislative and non-legislative committees, non-permanent committees, joint committees and ...
[35]
Major Interpellations | Bedeutung & Erklärung | Legal Lexikon
Rating 4.7 (1,013) Aug 25, 2025 · Major interpellations are parliamentary instruments designed to ensure the oversight function of parliaments vis-à-vis governments. They enable ...
[36]
Parliamentary right to be informed on support operations of the ...
Jun 2, 2015 · The Organstreit proceedings concern several replies by the Federal Government to minor interpellations of the parliamentary group DIE LINKE in ...
[37]
IPU PARLINE database: FRANCE (Assemblée nationale), Oversight
The interpellation procedure, if predicted by the regulations (Article 156), is the same as that of a motion of censure, as all requests for interpellation ...
[38]
Parliamentary Function of Oversight - Agora
Questions are intended to clarify or discuss government policies and may lead to interpellation, where the rules permit, if the answer is not satisfactory. In ...
[39]
[Solved] The 'Speaker' can ask a member of the 'House' - Testbook
Apr 6, 2020 · Interpellation, The right of the members of the house to ask questions on matters of public interest to the government is called interpellation.
[40]
[Solved] Which of the following statement is/are correct? The parli
The parliamentary process for seeking the details of work from a government official is called "Interpellation". In both the houses, the time immediately after ...
[41]
[PDF] DISRUPTIONS IN THE INDIAN PARLIAMENT
On receipt of the reply, the major interpellation shall be placed on the agenda. ... members from the Anglo-Indian community to the Lok Sabha if it is not “ ...
[42]
Understanding the Concept of Interpellation in Sociology
Jan 15, 2024 · Interpellation is a critical concept in sociology and cultural theory that explores how individuals are shaped by the structures of ideology ...
[43]
Exploring Althusser's theory of interpellation in advertising
This essay would examine the ideology in contemporary advertisements drawing upon Althusser's concept of 'interpellation' in a post-feminist context.
[44]
[PDF] The Politics of Recitation: Ideology, Interpellation, and Hegemony
In this article, David I. Backer introduces the politics of recitation as a third realm for research on recitation pedagogy, in addition to process and ...<|separator|>
[45]
Interpellation, power, violence, structural constraint, emotion ...
Jul 2, 2019 · The physical structure of a shack demands a different level of protest. Shack dwellers are visible whether they like it or not, so visible forms ...
[46]
Interpellation and the Politics of Belonging: A Psychoanalytical ...
Jul 25, 2023 · This part critically reads Louis Althusser's theorization of interpellation from his Ideology and Ideological State Apparatus (Althusser 1971).
[47]
Interpellative Styles: Choreographies of Identity Disruptions and ...
Aug 20, 2022 · In the course of everyday life, individuals are constantly interpellated into subject positions and their corresponding practices. Even when ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[48]
On the Social Media Ideology - Journal #75 - e-flux
One function of ideology as defined by Louis Althusser is recognition, the (in)famous interpellation of the subject that is being called upon.8 We can apply ...
[49]
Social Media and the Concept of Interpellation - ResearchGate
The French philosopher Louis Althusser uses the term “interpellation” to describe a process in which individuals become subjects.
[50]
[PDF] Selfie and Interpellation - A preliminary study of the role of ideology ...
Abstract: In this essay, I present a preliminary analysis of selfying that combines the social construction of the self with the critical approach to ...
[51]
'Ideology and Interpellation: Anti-Humanism to Non-Philosophy' by ...
Apr 19, 2024 · Jonathan Fardy's Ideology and Interpellation provides a genealogy of Althusser's concept of ideology and the related conceptual constellation of theory, ...
[52]
DRI assesses the interpellation process of the Minister of Internal ...
Sep 28, 2023 · The Minister of Internal Affairs had not been summoned to the Parliament through the interpellation procedure from 2019 to 2022.<|separator|>
[53]
[PDF] The Effectiveness of the Question as a Means of Parliamentary ...
Oct 31, 2019 · The importance of this research is that it demonstrates the importance of the parliamentary question in exposing the mistakes and deviations of ...
[54]
[PDF] ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF WRITTEN QUESTIONS ...
Sep 2, 2021 · The reason for this departure was that interpellations were not considered to be effective as a form of interaction with Ministers.<|control11|><|separator|>