Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Jurchen language

The Jurchen language was an extinct member of the Tungusic language family, specifically within the Southern Tungusic Jurchenic (or Manchuric) branch, spoken by the Jurchen people—an ethnic group in southern Manchuria who established the Jin dynasty (1115–1234 CE). As the official language of this dynasty, which succeeded the Liao (907–1125 CE) and controlled northern China until its fall to Mongol invasions in 1234 CE, Jurchen played a pivotal role in medieval East Asian history and is recognized as the direct linguistic ancestor of Manchu, with the Jurchen ethnonym evolving into "jušen" in Manchu usage until the community's redesignation as Manchu in 1635 CE. Jurchen existed in multiple varieties, including documented forms labeled Jurchen A and B, and undocumented southern dialects that contributed to later Jurchenic languages such as Sibe (with over 20,000 speakers today), Alchuka, and Bala, all of which show traces of Mongolic influence from historical contacts, particularly in and (e.g., emphatic prefixes like mV- and possessive clitics in Sibe). The retained archaic Proto-Tungusic features, such as the absence of the p > f shift seen in northern branches and limited compared to Manchu, while exhibiting typological similarities to its successor, including genitive markers (-i*) and second-person pronouns (ši). Its homeland is inferred to lie in the Amur River basin near in the , aligning with archaeolinguistic evidence from sites (ca. 600 BCE–200 CE) and the Jin Empire's territorial extent west of the lake. Documentation of Jurchen is sparse but significant, comprising primarily Jin dynasty inscriptions on stone steles and metal artifacts, (1368–1644 ) vocabularies compiled by the Bureau of Interpreters (ca. 1500 ), and petroglyphic texts from sites like the Arkhara River in the . The language employed three indigenous writing systems: a large script created in 1119 for official use, a small script introduced in 1138 with syllabic and semantographic elements, and later adaptations influenced by (from 1599 onward in Manchu). These materials, partially deciphered since the , reveal lexical borrowings from (e.g., murgi 'barley' from Middle Chinese mək) and Proto-Tungusic roots (e.g., sele 'iron'), underscoring Jurchen's role in cultural and linguistic exchanges across . With no known living speakers since the , Jurchen survives mainly through these historical records and its evolution into Manchu, which itself declined under the (1644–1911 ).

Classification and history

Linguistic affiliation

The Jurchen language is classified as a member of the Southern Tungusic branch of the , which itself has been proposed as part of the broader Altaic macrofamily encompassing Turkic, Mongolic, and Tungusic languages, though the genetic validity of the Altaic hypothesis remains debated among linguists, with many attributing shared features to prolonged areal contact rather than common descent. Within the Tungusic family, Jurchen belongs to the Jurchenic (or Manchuric) subgroup of the Southern branch, alongside its direct successors Manchu and Xibe (also known as Sibe), as well as other languages like Alchuka and Bala derived from undocumented southern Jurchen dialects, with Jurchen serving as the ancestral form from which Manchu evolved during the transition from the to the . Jurchen existed in multiple varieties, including documented forms labeled Jurchen A and B. This close relationship is evident in the high degree of similarity and continuity between Jurchen and Manchu, particularly in and core vocabulary, as reconstructed through comparative analysis of surviving texts. In contrast to Northern Tungusic languages such as Evenki, which form a separate branch characterized by extensive dialectal variation across , Jurchen and its relatives exhibit distinct Southern innovations, including regularized derivations and shifts in possessive marking, while retaining family-wide agglutinative and . further supports these affiliations through shared phonological patterns, such as groupings and alternations, and lexical cognates in basic terms like those for and environment, underscoring Jurchen's position as a foundational Southern Tungusic .

Historical usage

The Jurchen language originated among the Jurchen tribes inhabiting southeastern during the 10th and 11th centuries, prior to the establishment of the Jin dynasty, where it served as the primary means of communication within these semi-nomadic communities amid interactions with neighboring Khitan and groups. These early speakers, part of the broader Tungusic linguistic family, incorporated elements from like Khitan due to bilingualism among the elite, reflecting the region's cultural and political dynamics under the Liao empire. With the founding of the Jin dynasty in 1115, Jurchen became an alongside , employed extensively in administration, military affairs, and emerging literary traditions to consolidate Jurchen identity and governance over conquered territories. The dynasty instituted a dedicated examination system for Jurchen-language proficiency to train officials, fostering a literary culture that included poetry, historical records, and legal documents, though much of this output was influenced by models. This period marked the language's peak, with its formalized for official inscriptions and edicts until the dynasty's fall. Following the Mongol in , which dismantled the empire, Jurchen experienced rapid decline as Mongol administrative practices supplanted it, leading to and among surviving populations. Remnants persisted into the (1368–1644), where Jurchen-speaking tribes in border regions like Jianzhou engaged in trade, tribute, and military interactions with Ming authorities, necessitating interpreters and limited documentary use of the language in diplomatic contexts during the 14th to 16th centuries. In 1635, , ruler of the Later Jin state, renamed the and their language "Manchu" to evoke ancient tribal legacies and distinguish from the historical , signaling a transitional phase toward a unified ethnic and linguistic identity. By the late , distinct Jurchen had effectively extincted as a , evolving into Manchu while native speakers dwindled due to and imperial policies, leaving no fluent users today.

Writing system

Development of the script

The Jurchen script was created in 1119 by Wanyan Xiyin, a high-ranking official, at the behest of Wanyan Aguda, the founder and first emperor of the Jin dynasty (1115–1234). This initial version, known as the large script (nüzhen dazì 女真大字), was modeled primarily on the Khitan large script, incorporating elements from the earlier Khitan writing system used by the Liao dynasty (907–1125), while also drawing structural influences from Chinese characters. The script's design addressed the needs of the Jurchen language, a Tungusic tongue, by blending logographic representations of whole words with phonographic components for syllables and sounds, allowing for more flexible expression than purely ideographic systems. Written vertically from top to bottom and right to left, it mirrored the orientation of Chinese script but featured distinct, often simplified or modified glyphs to suit Jurchen phonology. The large script initially comprised around 1,400 characters, as evidenced by historical compilations and inventories of known forms, enabling basic documentation of Jurchen texts. By the 1140s, during the reign of Xizong (r. 1135–1150), the system underwent expansion and reform to enhance phonetic accuracy, particularly for administrative and purposes; this included the development of a small (nüzhen xiaozì 女真小字) in 1138, which introduced more streamlined syllabic elements and reduced the reliance on complex logograms. The total repertoire grew to over 1,700 identifiable characters across both variants, better accommodating the language's agglutinative structure and diverse vocabulary. Official adoption occurred in 1120 for the large script in Jin bureaucracy, with the small script promulgated in 1145 to facilitate wider use in official decrees, legal documents, and translations. Following the Mongol conquest and the fall of the Jin dynasty in 1234, the entered a period of decline, as the Jurchen elite integrated into broader Mongol and later Ming administrative frameworks that favored . No new characters were created after the 13th century, and by the mid-15th century, knowledge of the script had largely vanished among Jurchen descendants, contributing to its status as a historical system preserved only in limited artifacts.

Surviving materials

The surviving materials of the are primarily epigraphic, consisting of inscriptions on stone stelae, tablets, and minor artifacts, with the total corpus comprising approximately 1,500 characters, mostly from the . These texts provide limited glimpses into the language but are insufficient for comprehensive . Among the key inscriptions is the Jin Victory Memorial Stele (Da Jin Desheng Tuo Song Bei), erected in 1185 to commemorate a triumph led by Xiang; it contains approximately 140 Jurchen characters in a bilingual format alongside text, discovered in Fuyu, Province. Another notable example is the Penglai poem tablet, an undated artifact from Shandong Province featuring a poetic composition by the Jurchen scholar-official Aotun Liangbi, inscribed with approximately 170 characters across several columns. A further important find is the petroglyphic inscription on the Arkhara River in the , discovered in 2018 and dated to the Jin era, providing additional evidence of use in remote areas. These monuments, often commemorative or literary in nature, represent the most substantial extant examples of continuous Jurchen text. During the Jin era, a body of original literature and translations of Chinese classics was produced, including renderings of the Xiaojing (Classic of Filial Piety) and Xiaoxue (Elementary Learning) into Jurchen, commissioned by Emperor Shizong in 1164 as part of efforts to promote the language among elites; however, these works are entirely lost, with only historical accounts attesting to their existence. No complete manuscripts or printed books in Jurchen have survived from this period, likely due to the dynasty's fall and subsequent cultural disruptions. Other fragments include seal impressions bearing short Jurchen phrases, typically on the sides of official stamps with on the faces, as well as inscriptions on border markers from the Ming period (1368–1644), such as the 1413 erected by the Ming Yishiha near the Nurgan regional commission, which features Jurchen alongside , Mongolian, and to assert authority over Jurchen territories. Although coin inscriptions in Jurchen have been referenced in some contexts, no verified examples from the Ming era are documented, with surviving numismatic artifacts remaining in . The challenges in deciphering these materials stem from their brevity—often limited to phrases or short passages—and the general lack of extensive bilingual texts beyond a few stelae, which complicates phonetic and grammatical analysis despite scholarly efforts using comparative Tungusic linguistics. Poor preservation, variant forms, and the script's by the mid-15th century further hinder full interpretation.

Phonology and grammar

Phonological features

The phonological features of the Jurchen language, particularly its Late or Ming-period variety (), have been reconstructed primarily from phonetic transcriptions in the Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters and analyses of the , with comparisons to Written Manchu providing additional context. While Late Jurchen phonology is better attested, Jin-period (12th-13th century) features remain partially reconstructed, notably retaining initial *p- (vs. *f- in Late Jurchen and Manchu) and lacking . These sources reveal a system typical of , featuring a robust inventory and a vowel system influenced by , though exact details remain tentative due to limited surviving materials and transcription biases from . The consonant inventory of Late Jurchen comprises approximately 20-25 , including voiceless and voiced stops, fricatives, affricates, and sonorants, with limited evidence of palatalization. Late Jurchen lacked phonemic in stops, maintaining a voicing , unlike later Manchu where aspiration developed under influence. Reconstructions identify bilabial, alveolar, palatal, and velar places of articulation, as seen in forms like paxʊn ('liver', corresponding to Manchu faxʊn) and Katu (a ). The /ŋ/ is treated as a distinct , often word-finally or medially, while rare sounds like /p/, /ʦ/, /ʣ/, /ʒ/, and /w/ appear infrequently and their status is debated. Uvular allophones occur in contexts of retracted tongue root (RTR) . The following table summarizes the reconstructed Late Jurchen based on Sino-Jurchen transcriptions and :
Place/MannerBilabialAlveolarPalatal/AffricateVelar
Stops (voiceless)ptʧk
Stops (voiced)bdʤg
Fricatives-sʃx
-ʦ--
Nasalsmn-ŋ
Liquids/Glides-l, rj-
Palatalization occurs sporadically, such as /i/ becoming [ï] after alveopalatals like /ʧ/ or /ʃ/. The vowel system consists of 6-8 monophthongs, including /i, u, ʊ, ə, a, ɔ/, with no clear evidence for long-short distinctions or tones, though diphthongs may arise from vowel sequences in open syllables. Vowel harmony operates on tongue root retraction ([RTR]) and rounding features, similar to Manchu; for instance, non-high vowels like /a/ round to [ɔ] or near labial consonants, as in fulian(g) ('phoenix'). Reductions are common, with /ʊ/ merging into /u/ and /ə/ varying to in certain contexts, reflecting processes inferred from Ming Chinese glosses. Syllables in Jurchen follow a primarily (C) structure, with a maximum of CVVC in some reconstructions, aligning with Tungusic patterns where open syllables undergo reduction more readily than closed ones (e.g., sara ''). Reconstructions from -period (12th-13th century) materials, such as the script analyzed by Kiyose, suggest earlier forms preserved initial *p- (vs. later *f- in Ming Jurchen), but full remains incompletely reconstructed. Uncertainties persist regarding precise contrasts, the phonemic status of rare consonants like /ʒ/, and the extent of or diphthongs, owing to the scarcity of native texts and reliance on imperfect transcriptions. These limitations highlight the challenges in distinguishing Jurchen innovations from influences in its evolution toward Manchu.

Grammatical structure

The Jurchen language displays agglutinative typical of the Tungusic , with suffixes attached to stems to express grammatical categories such as case and derivation. Nouns are inflected for case using suffixes, including the genitive -i, dative -də, accusative -bə, and locative -ʧi, as evidenced in reconstructed Middle Jurchen forms from inscriptions and vocabularies. Plurality is marked by suffixes like -so, as seen in forms such as boiso 'many' derived from earlier singular bases. There is no in nouns, and does not trigger in adjectives or verbs. The basic word order is subject-object-verb (SOV), with postpositions following nouns to indicate spatial or relational functions, a pattern shared with its descendant Manchu. Syntactic flexibility appears in some constructions, potentially influenced by contact with neighboring languages, allowing verb stems to function in attributive or predicative roles without additional marking. Verbs conjugate for , number, tense (e.g., present and ), and through suffixation, with person agreement aligning with the subject. features include the suffix -r (e.g., ǯalur 'filling'), which serves as a finite or attribute and differs from the innovated -ra/-re/-ro in Manchu. Evidential distinctions may be implied in verbal forms, though is sparse. Due to the scarcity of surviving texts—primarily inscriptions, steles, and fragmented vocabularies in Sino-Jurchen glosses—grammatical analysis relies on and parallels with Manchu, revealing clear noun-verb distinctions but no complete conjugation paradigms or complex sentence structures. , a phonological trait, occasionally conditions alternations, such as in case endings.

Vocabulary sources

Dictionaries and glossaries

The primary surviving dictionaries and glossaries of the Jurchen language date from the Ming dynasty and were compiled by the Bureau of Interpreters (Sìyí Guǎn), an institution established in 1407 to facilitate communication with northern border groups, including the Jurchen tribes. These works, produced between approximately 1403 and the late 16th century, reflect Ming administrative efforts to regulate trade, diplomacy, and tribute relations with Jurchen communities in regions like Nurgan (modern-day parts of Heilongjiang and Jilin provinces). Jurchen interpreters, often bilingual individuals from tributary groups, contributed to the compilations by providing oral terms that were then recorded in Jurchen script where possible and systematically transcribed using Chinese characters for phonetic approximation. A related vocabulary was also compiled by the Bureau of Translators (Sīyì Guǎn). The most comprehensive of these is the Sino-Jurchen vocabulary section within the Huá-Yí yìyǔ (Sino-Barbarian Interpreters' Manual), a multilingual glossary originally compiled during the Yongle era (1403–1424) and expanded in subsequent editions up to around 1601. This bilingual Chinese-Jurchen resource comprises 759 primary entries across three volumes, plus 158 supplementary items, focusing on practical lexicon for intercultural exchange. Categories encompass basic domains such as numerals (e.g., "one" as ə mu and "two" as juwe), body parts (e.g., "head" as fulahun), animals (e.g., "tiger" as tasha), (e.g., "mountain" as ali-in), and diplomatic terms related to time, seasons, , and tools. Chinese phonetic transcriptions, rendered via hanzi, often preserve initial consonants and qualities, though inconsistencies arise from interpreters' dialects and scribes' limitations. These materials hold substantial scholarly value as the chief repositories of late medieval Jurchen and , bridging the gap between inscriptions and early Manchu texts. Despite transcription errors—such as inconsistent notation or conflation of similar sounds—they enable reconstruction of Jurchen syllable structure, including features like initial n- and jh- clusters, and reveal vocabulary overlaps with Manchu (e.g., numerals and kinship terms). Modern analyses, drawing on manuscript variants held in collections like the and Tiānyīgé Library, underscore their role in tracing Tungusic linguistic evolution, though orthographic confirmation occasionally requires cross-reference to surviving inscriptions.

Words in Chinese texts

The History of Jin (Jīn shǐ), compiled in 1345 under the Yuan dynasty, preserves the most systematic collection of Jurchen words in a Chinese historical text through its appendix titled "Jin Guoyu Jie" (Explanation of the National Language of the Jin), which lists 125 Jurchen terms transcribed into Chinese characters with accompanying glosses in Chinese. These entries primarily cover administrative, military, and kinship terminology, reflecting the language's use in the Jin court's official contexts from the 12th century. For instance, the ruling clan's name "Wanyan" (完顏) is glossed as equivalent to the Han Chinese surname Wang (王), highlighting early Sinicization efforts among Jurchen elites. Other examples include military ranks such as "Meng'an" (猛安), denoting a commander of 1,000 soldiers, and "Mouke" (謀克), referring to a commander of 100 soldiers, which illustrate the hierarchical structure of Jurchen society. Etymologies in the Jin Guoyu Jie occasionally trace terms to Liao dynasty influences, such as "Xiangwen" (詳穩) and "Yilijin" (移力斤), suggesting borrowings from Khitan via intermediary languages. This vocabulary offers crucial insights into Jurchen sociopolitical organization but is constrained to proper nouns, titles, and functional loanwords, with limited representation of everyday lexicon. Daniel Kane's analysis underscores its value for reconstructing early Tungusic and semantics, though the list's brevity limits broader grammatical inferences. Beyond the History of Jin, Jurchen terms appear sporadically in Ming dynasty sources, particularly the Ming Veritable Records (Míng shílù) and border administration reports from the 15th and 16th centuries, where they document interactions with Jurchen tribes along the northeastern frontier. These include tribal designations like "Haixi Jurchen" (海西女真) and titles such as "Beile" (貝勒), often used in diplomatic dispatches to denote chieftains or regional leaders. Such references provide evidence of linguistic continuity into the late Jurchen period, with some terms overlapping those in Ming-era glossaries for verification. However, their utility remains contextual, aiding understanding of Jurchen-Ming relations rather than offering comprehensive lexical data. A key challenge in interpreting these words stems from transcription via , which inadequately capture Jurchen —lacking distinctions in vowels, consonants, and tones—leading to potential distortions in efforts. Scholars like note that this Sino-Jurchen prioritizes semantic approximation over phonetic fidelity, complicating etymological links to later Manchu. Despite these limitations, the terms in texts remain essential for tracing Jurchen's administrative and cultural imprint during the and post-Jin eras.

Relation to Manchu and modern scholarship

Evolution into Manchu

The Late Jurchen language of the 15th and 16th centuries exhibited strong linguistic continuity with early Manchu, featuring a inventory and core phonological features that were nearly identical, such as shared velar-uvular alternations and reflexes like *mK for intervocalic nasals. Minor phonological shifts distinguished the two, including the of intervocalic stops to fricatives (e.g., *k > x in Manchu) and the absence of dental palatalization before *i in Late Jurchen (e.g., -ti 'from' versus Manchu -ci), alongside a merger of u and ū in some Ming-era Jurchen varieties that did not persist in standard Manchu. This continuity positioned Late Jurchen and early Manchu within a single Tungusic , with Manchu dialects descending directly from Jurchen varieties. In 1635, issued a decree renaming the and their language "Manchu" (Manju), prohibiting prior ethnonyms like Jurchen (Jušen) to foster unity among northeastern tribes and distance from historical connotations. This political rebranding marked a formal transition, aligning the language's identity with the emerging Manchu state, though the spoken form remained a direct continuation of Late Jurchen. The Manchu script, developed in 1599 under Nurhaci's commission, evolved from the Jurchen-Manchu writing tradition by adapting the Mongolian alphabet, with scholars like Erdeni, G'agai, and Dahai introducing simplifications such as dots and circles in to better represent Tungusic . This replaced earlier Jurchen orthographies, facilitating the documentation of the transitioning language. Vocabulary retention between Jurchen and Manchu was substantial, with core terms showing near-identity (e.g., Jurchen šeun 'sun' versus Manchu šun), though Manchu incorporated increasing loanwords, particularly for , , and administration) and Mongolian borrowings (e.g., titles and measurements). These influences, stemming from prolonged contact during the transition period, enriched Manchu while preserving its Tungusic foundation.

Contemporary studies and romanization

Contemporary studies of the Jurchen emerged in the late , with sinologist Wilhelm Grube conducting the first systematic analysis based on surviving inscriptions and vocabularies, as detailed in his 1896 monograph Die Sprache und Schrift der Jučen. Grube's work laid the foundation for understanding Jurchen as a Tungusic by examining the of Interpreters' Sino-Jurchen , though his interpretations were later refined by subsequent scholars. In the 20th and 21st centuries, research advanced through contributions from linguists such as Jerry Norman, whose studies on Manchu linguistics provided comparative insights into Jurchen as its predecessor, and Aisin-Gioro Ulhicun, a Manchu scholar whose analyses of Jurchen scripts and inscriptions have illuminated morphological and lexical features. Scholars primarily employ comparative reconstruction methods, leveraging the well-documented and Chinese historical records to infer Jurchen , , and . This approach has been particularly effective in tracing dialectal variations and etymological links, despite the language's extinction by the . Romanization of Jurchen follows adapted systems from Tungusic linguistics, often modifying conventions like those in Roy Andrew Miller's framework for Altaic languages or standard Manchu romanizations, with Cyrillic used for proper names in Russian scholarship; for instance, the prominent Wanyan clan is rendered as "Wanyan" in Latin script. These systems prioritize phonetic accuracy based on reconstructed sounds, facilitating cross-linguistic comparisons. The primary challenge in Jurchen studies stems from the incomplete corpus, comprising mostly short inscriptions, glossaries, and loanwords in Chinese texts, which fuels debates over phonological details such as vowel harmony and consonant clusters. Recent advances include the digitization of artifacts and creation of online corpora, enabling broader access and computational analysis of texts since the early 2000s. As of 2025, ongoing efforts encompass proposals for Unicode encoding of the Jurchen Small Script and digital preservation projects for inscribed monuments in Mongolia. Jurchen is recognized as ancestral to Manchu and closely related to the modern Xibe language spoken in Xinjiang.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    Jurchen - Macquarie University
    Jurchen is the Tungusic language once spoken by the historical Jurchen, a mediaeval ethnic group in southern Manchuria who in 1115 established a regional ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  4. [4]
    The Unity and Diversity of Altaic - Annual Reviews
    The five language families that have been classified under Altaic include, in a rough west-to- east succession, Turkic, Mongolic, Tungusic, Koreanic, and ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Tungusic languages - OAPEN Library
    Language Research 23(2). 233–271. Kiyose, Gisaburo N. 1977. A study of the Jurchen language and script: Reconstruc- tion and decipherment. Kyōto: Shōwado ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] THE HISTORICAL PHONOLOGY OF MANCHU DIALECTS
    ... Jurchen is thus the earliest Tungusic language attested in a native script. (The Khitan language continued to be used as a written language by some. Jurchens ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] observations on the para-mongolic elements in jurchenic
    Very probably, a part of the Jurchen elite of the 10th to 11th centuries were bilingual in. Khitan. The power relationship changed after the collapse of the ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Kitan-Liao and Jurchen-Jin - History
    For this reason, after 1127, the Song dynasty came to be known as the Southern Song (1127-1276). The Jurchens embraced Chinese language and customs so ...Missing: 10th- | Show results with:10th-
  9. [9]
    [PDF] Revisiting the Jurchen Language Examination System
    This essay contextualizes the unique institution of the Jurchen language examination system in the creation of a new literary culture in the Jin dynasty (1115– ...Missing: 10th- | Show results with:10th-
  10. [10]
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Manchu Studies in Korea
    Even during the Jin dynasty, the Jurchens greatly favored narrative literature. The first two rulers of the Manchu state, Nurhachi and. Hongtaiji, were both ...Missing: 10th- pre-
  12. [12]
    [PDF] ChinaX Course Notes - edX
    In 1635, Hong renamed his people from the Jurchens to the Manchus and in 1636 renamed his state from the Later. Jin to the Great Qing (da Qing). These two ...
  13. [13]
    The homeland of Proto-Tungusic inferred from contemporary words ...
    The Tungusic languages form a language family spoken in Xinjiang, Siberia, Manchuria and the Russian Far East. There is a general consensus that these languages ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  14. [14]
    The Jurchen Script (www.chinaknowledge.de)
    The script was created by Yan Xiyin 顏希尹on command of emperor Jin Taizu 金太祖(r. 1115-1122) and was promulgated as the official script in 1119. The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Jurchen Script - ecph-china - Berkshire Publishing
    According to the History of Jin, its first version was created in 1119 by Wanyan Xiyin at the order of Wanyan Aguda, the Jurchen chieftain who later founded the ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Towards an Encoding of the Jurchen Script - Unicode
    Mar 15, 2023 · When the Jin dynasty was established in 1115, no script designed for writing the Jurchen language existed, and Khitan scripts were used for ...Missing: literature | Show results with:literature
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Uralic and Altaic Series
    Putting proposed derivations to one side, one can list a fair number of Jurchen characters which are unlike. Chinese, but which can be found in the Khitan large ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Contact in the prehistory of the Sakha (Yakuts): Linguistic and ...
    typological similarity of Sakha and the Tungusic languages (e.g. SOV word order, suffixing agglutinative morphology, similar means of subordination by the use ...
  19. [19]
    On Plural Formation in Manchu - jstor
    8 In Jurchen, the plural form of baila was boiso, but it became boihso in ... The plural suffix -so occurs with a noun ending in o, but there are few ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] On Some Archaic Features of the Jurchen Language - HUSCAP
    Mar 31, 2012 · Jin Guangping and Jin Qizong (and also G. Kiyose) read the. Jurchen character 亟 as ru, H. Yamaji reads it as lu (Jin Qizong 1984: 20-21).
  21. [21]
    (PDF) The Tungusic Languages: A History of Contacts - Academia.edu
    Tungusic languages exhibit extensive areal contacts with various Northeast Asian language families, influencing their structure and lexicon. The text serves as ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Proposal to Encode the Jurchen Script - Unicode
    Jun 12, 2024 · This is a proposal to encode the Jurchen script, by Andrew West, Sun Bojun, and Zhōnghuá Zìkù, for consideration by JTC1/SC2/WG2 and UTC.
  23. [23]
    from the Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bureau of Interpreters - jstor
    in 1989 by Daniel Kane (The Sino-Jurchen Vocabulary of the Bu- reau of ... Jurchen language and also an useful introduction to this field of. 1 Kane's ...
  24. [24]
    Jurchen Language - Brill Reference Works
    These materials clearly reveal that Jurchen is a Tungusic language that is typologically identical to its later Manchu stage. The modern study of Jurchen began ...
  25. [25]
    WRITING AN EMPIRE: AN ANALYSIS OF THE MANCHU ORIGIN ...
    Nov 21, 2016 · 12) of 1635, Hong Taiji announced and confirmed that the name of his people would be “Manchu” (Man. manju), and other terms, such as Jurchen ...Chongde Version, 1635 · Inspiration Behind The... · Shunzhi Version, 1655Missing: decree | Show results with:decree
  26. [26]
    The Creation of the Manchu Script - Central Asiatic Journal
    This article is focused on the historical conditions which led to the creation of the Manchu script out of the Mongol alphabet in 1599, as well as the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 1 MANJU TACIRE: LEARNING MANCHU, AN INTRODUCTION TO ...
    Aug 15, 2019 · It has a simple five case system, using the ablative, dative, locative, genitive and accusative cases – with there being four total suffixes for ...
  28. [28]
    Die sprache und schrift der Juc̆en : Grube, Wilhelm, 1855-1908
    Sep 25, 2014 · Die sprache und schrift der Juc̆en ; Publication date: 1896 ; Usage: Public Domain Mark 1.0 Creative Commons License publicdomain ; Topics ...
  29. [29]
    The Manchus and Their Language (Presidential Address) - jstor
    When the Jurchens gave their dynasty the designation jin, which is the Chinese word for 'gold', they were undoubtedly thinking of the river region where they ...Missing: percentage | Show results with:percentage
  30. [30]
    Genealogical Relationship of Jurchen Dialects and Literary Manchu
    Jurchen is the language of the Jurchen tribes which founded the. Chin dynasty (1115-1234) in northern China and is the first. Tunguz language ever recorded ...
  31. [31]
    Die Sprache und Schrift der Jučen - Wilhelm Grube - Google Books
    Title, Die Sprache und Schrift der Jučen. Author, Wilhelm Grube. Publisher, Harrassowitz, 1896. Original from, the Bavarian State Library.
  32. [32]
    Morphological Aspects of the Language of the Jurchen Script
    May 9, 2014 · so-called Smaller Jurchen script (SJS) as compared with the morphology of Classical Manchu. The discussion has two principal objectives. On ...
  33. [33]
    Recent developments in the research and digitalization of Jurchen ...
    This paper provides a comprehensive review of the research and advancements in Jurchen language and literature since the 20th century. Recent discoveries of ...