Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Kalpasar Project

The Kalpasar Project, formally the Gulf of Khambhat Development Project, is a proposed mega-infrastructure initiative by the , , to erect a spanning the for impounding monsoon-season freshwater inflows from multiple rivers, thereby creating a large coastal to alleviate chronic shortages in the state while incorporating generation and enhanced regional connectivity. Conceptualized in the early 1960s and further developed in the by engineer Dr. Anil Kane as a multifaceted solution to Gujarat's intertwined challenges of , needs, transportation deficits, and underdeveloped fisheries and agriculture, the project envisions storing billions of cubic meters of freshwater annually for , potable supply, and , alongside producing over 1,900 megawatts of electricity and reclaiming substantial land for development. Pre-feasibility studies conducted in the late recommended detailed investigations, leading to expenditures exceeding Rs 30 crore by 2018 on environmental, hydrological, and engineering assessments, yet the government has remained undecided on technical, economic, and ecological viability, with unresolved concerns over disruption, including diminished and in the gulf's rich zones. Critics, including state political figures, have labeled it a non-starter due to prohibitive costs estimated at Rs 55,000 crore or more and potential irreversible harm to coastal livelihoods, while proponents highlight its capacity to transform arid regions through reliable augmentation and power, though as of 2024, construction awaits comprehensive feasibility clearance and remains stalled amid ongoing surveys.

Background

Etymology and Conceptual Origins

The term Kalpasar originates from Sanskrit, combining kalpa (denoting a cosmic cycle or fulfillment of desires) and sar (meaning lake or reservoir), to signify "a lake that fulfills all wishes." This etymology evokes the Hindu mythological Kalpavriksha, a divine wish-granting tree described in ancient texts such as the Puranas, symbolizing the project's envisioned role in providing boundless freshwater to alleviate Gujarat's chronic scarcity. Conceptually, the project stems from early proposals in the to dam the , harnessing tidal inflows from seven rivers—Narmada, Tapi, Sabarmati, Mahi, Shetrunji, Bhadar, and —to form a vast coastal freshwater lake spanning approximately 2,000 square kilometers. These initial ideas addressed Gujarat's arid climate and uneven distribution, which historically limited and potable water availability despite the state's riverine potential. The modern formulation emerged in 1987, when technocrat Anil Kane, former vice-chancellor of , developed it as a viable mega-engineering initiative integrating construction, generation, and regional connectivity to combat persistent water deficits. Kane's reconnaissance emphasized tidal dynamics in the gulf, where high tidal ranges—up to 11 meters—enable natural flushing and control, grounding the concept in hydrological feasibility rather than speculative ambition.

Geographical and Hydrological Context

The Gulf of Khambhat, an inlet of the Arabian Sea on India's western coast in Gujarat, separates the Saurashtra (Kathiawar) peninsula from the southeastern mainland, extending roughly 80 km inland with a narrowing funnel shape from about 60 km wide at the mouth to under 20 km at the northern head. This geographical configuration, bounded by districts including Bharuch, Anand, Kheda, and Bhavnagar, positions the gulf as a strategic site for large-scale water impoundment due to its enclosed basin potential. The Kalpasar Project proposes a 30 km-long dyke across the gulf's narrower northern section, linking the coasts near Hansot in Bharuch district and near Ghogha in Bhavnagar district, to enclose an area of approximately 2,000 square kilometers for freshwater storage. Hydrologically, the gulf features one of the world's highest tidal ranges, with semi-diurnal amplifying to 10-13 meters during springs in inner areas like (up to 13.33 m) and (13.14 m), driven by with the Arabian Sea's tidal constituent. These extreme fluctuations produce peak currents of 1.5-2 meters per second and significant , rendering the shallow gulf (average depth under 20 m) dynamically active but vulnerable to and salinity ingress. The project's dyke design exploits this tidal regime for potential power generation via sluices, while sealing off marine influences to preserve impounded freshwater. Major rivers such as the Narmada, Tapi, Mahi, and Sabarmati, along with tributaries like Dhadhar, , , and Ambika, drain into the gulf, delivering surplus runoff exceeding 10,000 million cubic meters (MCM) annually that presently dissipates into the . This inflow, peaking during the southwest (June-September), originates from catchments in and neighboring states, providing a renewable freshwater bounty amenable to storage in the proposed 10,000+ MCM reservoir capacity post-dyke closure. By harnessing these unregulated discharges—historically unstored due to seasonal variability—the project addresses regional scarcity in arid Saurashtra and northern , though success hinges on coordinating upstream diversions like Narmada allocations.

Historical Development

Early Proposals (1970s–1990s)

The Kalpasar Project originated as a conceptual response to Gujarat's persistent water shortages, with formal proposals emerging in the late 1980s. In , Dr. Anil Kane, a technocrat and former vice-chancellor of The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, proposed damming the to impound monsoon runoff from major rivers such as the Narmada, Tapi, Sabarmati, and Mahi, creating an estimated 16,000 square kilometers of freshwater reservoir capable of storing up to 10,000 million cubic meters annually for , drinking, and industrial use. Kane coined the name "Kalpasar," invoking a mythological ocean of milk symbolizing abundance and fulfillment of needs. By the mid-1990s, the proposal advanced toward initial technical scrutiny amid regional debates over water management alternatives like the Narmada projects. In 1995, Kane approached Gujarat Chief Minister Keshubhai Patel, securing immediate approval for Rs 10 crore to fund a pre-feasibility study, marking the state's first official endorsement. Late that October, the government commissioned the Dutch firm Royal Haskoning to evaluate hydrological, engineering, and economic aspects, focusing on dam alignment from Hansot to Ghogha (approximately 64 km), tidal energy potential (up to 1,800 MW), and land reclamation opportunities exceeding 20,000 hectares. Haskoning's pre-feasibility report, finalized in February 1998, confirmed the site's extreme tidal range (up to 11 meters) as advantageous for freshwater retention and power generation but highlighted seismic risks, sedimentation challenges, and the need for extensive environmental impact assessments. The study preliminarily estimated costs at around Rs 6,000 crore (1998 base year) for core components, excluding ancillary infrastructure, while projecting benefits including supply for 20 million people and support for Saurashtra-Kutch agriculture. Despite positive viability indicators, implementation stalled due to funding constraints, inter-state river-sharing disputes, and competing priorities like Narmada canal networks.

Formal Studies and Planning (2000s–2010s)

In the early 2000s, the Gujarat government advanced planning by accepting a pre-feasibility report prepared by six sub-committees, which examined pollution control strategies to mitigate salinity ingress and maintain freshwater quality in the proposed reservoir. This built on earlier Dutch-assisted assessments, incorporating hydrological modeling for salt balance and drainage to support irrigation demands estimated at 5,400 million cubic meters annually. Under Chief Minister Narendra Modi from 2001 onward, the project gained renewed momentum, with directives to expedite engineering and environmental evaluations amid ambitions to address chronic water shortages in Saurashtra and Kutch regions. The saw an expansion of specialized feasibility investigations, including hydrological, ecological, and socioeconomic assessments to evaluate dynamics, , and potential. Transportation connectivity studies, essential for integrating the proposed dam with regional infrastructure, were undertaken by L&T in partnership with the Gujarat Engineering Research Institute, analyzing road and rail alignments across the 64 km gulf span. Economic viability analyses projected costs exceeding Rs 90,000 , factoring in power generation from barrages and multipurpose benefits like fisheries enhancement and . By mid-decade, over Rs 200 crore had been invested in these multidisciplinary studies, yet challenges such as upstream water allocation disputes and environmental impact uncertainties delayed comprehensive outcomes. The Detailed Project Report, intended to consolidate findings for environmental clearances and funding, was slated for finalization by late 2018 but encountered setbacks, leaving key viability determinations unresolved into the period's close.

Recent Government Push (2020s)

In the early 2020s, the Gujarat government advanced preparatory infrastructure for the Kalpasar Project by initiating construction on the Bhadbhut Barrage, a critical upstream component designed to divert Narmada River water toward the proposed main dam and mitigate saltwater intrusion. Groundbreaking occurred on August 7, 2020, with an awarded contract valued at Rs 4,167 crore to a joint venture led by Larsen & Toubro and HCC, targeting completion by July 2027. This barrage, spanning 1.7 km across the Narmada estuary near Bharuch, includes ship locks, spillways, and a connecting canal to Kalpasar, enabling freshwater storage of up to 620 million cubic meters annually for irrigation and industry. By March 2024, the state had allocated and expended Rs 1,489 crore on Bhadbhut over the preceding three years, as detailed in the Socio-Economic Review 2023-24 presented to the state assembly, reflecting sustained budgetary commitment amid broader goals. Progress reached 53% completion by March 2025, with Bhupendra Patel personally reviewing site developments and emphasizing uninterrupted Narmada flow management during the monsoon season. These efforts align with integrating Kalpasar into regional initiatives like the , where the barrage's road link is projected to reduce travel distances between Saurashtra and . Despite these advancements, core feasibility assessments for the main 30-km sea dam lagged, with the detailed project report (DPR) anticipated by December 2022 but remaining incomplete as of September 2023, following over two decades and 216.50 in prior expenditures on studies. utilization issues persisted, including unspent allocations of 62.88 for related sweet water components in 2022-23, as reported by the Narmada department. Government reviews under Patel's administration, including high-priority project evaluations in July 2025, underscore ongoing prioritization, though environmental impact analyses on marine ecosystems—unresolved since initial proposals—continue to delay full implementation.

Project Objectives and Design

Primary Goals for Water and Resource Security

The Kalpasar Project aims to secure in by damming the to create a coastal freshwater with a live capacity of 7,800 million cubic meters at full reservoir level. This structure would impound monsoon-season inflows from major rivers such as the Narmada (via diversion), Tapi, Sabarmati, Mahi, and Dhadhar, along with contributions from seven minor rivers, thereby capturing water that currently constitutes about 46% of the state's lost to the . A core objective is to allocate stored water for , with an annual supply of 4,500 million cubic meters designated to irrigate approximately 1.054 million hectares in water-stressed regions like Saurashtra and Kutch, where drought vulnerability has historically constrained . The would also furnish potable for domestic needs and industrial usage, targeting deficits in arid and semi-arid zones that affect over 60 million residents, while integrating with upstream diversions like the Narmada link canal to augment supplies. Beyond direct allocation, the project intends to mitigate salinity intrusion into coastal groundwater aquifers by regulating tidal influences, thereby preserving aquifer integrity and facilitating an estimated annual recharge of 1,400 to 1,600 million cubic meters to sustain long-term subsurface reserves. This approach addresses causal factors of , such as unchecked seawater encroachment exacerbated by variability and over-extraction, without reliance on or external imports as primary mechanisms.

Infrastructure Components: Dam, Power, and Transport

The primary infrastructure component of the Kalpasar Project is a proposed closure , or seaward , extending approximately 64 kilometers from Gogha in to Hansot in across the . This structure aims to impound freshwater from major rivers including the Narmada, Tapi, Mahi, Sabarmati, and Shedhi, creating a with a storage capacity exceeding 10,000 million cubic meters during the monsoon season. The dam's design incorporates navigational locks and spillways to manage tidal inflows and outflows while minimizing into the enclosed basin. Power generation facilities center on a system leveraging the Gulf of Khambhat's extreme , which reaches up to 11 meters and supports one of the world's highest potentials. Recent pre-feasibility assessments estimate an installed capacity of 5,000 MW, with additional potential from and installations along the bund. Earlier techno-economic studies by the Central Electricity Authority proposed a more conservative 900 MW capacity based on phased installations. The system would operate by capturing surges to drive reversible turbines, providing baseload electricity to Gujarat's . Transport infrastructure integrated into the dam includes a 100-meter-wide crest accommodating a 10-lane and parallel railway lines, establishing a direct over-water link between Saurashtra and regions. This connectivity is projected to shorten the current 400-kilometer land route via bridges and ferries, potentially reducing travel times by over 50% and enhancing freight movement for ports and industries. The multi-modal corridor would support both passenger and cargo traffic, with provisions for future expansions in .

Integration with Regional Development

The Kalpasar Project facilitates regional development in by establishing a 10-lane across the proposed 30 km , connecting in Saurashtra to in and reducing the travel distance from 240 km (via circumnavigation of the ) to 60 km. This will lower costs, enhance flows between clusters in —such as chemical and hubs near Dahej and ports—and the agrarian Saurashtra region, thereby promoting balanced economic growth across divided geographies. Irrigation provisions from the , supplying to approximately 1 million hectares across 42 talukas in nine Saurashtra , integrate with existing and dam-filling schemes, enabling expanded cultivation of cash crops like and while mitigating that has historically constrained rural productivity. These allocations, drawn from surplus flows of rivers including Narmada, Tapi, and Sabarmati, support agro-industrial processing units and reduce dependency on , fostering agro-based industries in underserved talukas. The project synergizes with Gujarat's special investment regions, notably (SIR) under the Delhi-Mumbai , by providing seamless road access that links manufacturing zones in central to southern ports and northern supply chains, potentially accelerating investments in , automobiles, and with projected GDP contributions from shortened supply routes. Additionally, peripheral 6-lane roads around the and opportunities for solar and wind energy installations on the dam structure align with goals, supplying power to industrial estates and reducing transmission losses in remote Saurashtra areas. Port development benefits emerge through improved hinterland connectivity, enabling efficient movement from inland Saurashtra production centers to ports, which could expand handling capacities for bulk commodities and integrate with Sagarmala initiatives for coastal economic zones. infrastructure, including reservoir-side amenities, is planned to leverage the freshwater lake for eco-tourism circuits linking Saurashtra's heritage sites with mainland urban centers, diversifying local economies beyond agriculture. Overall, these elements position Kalpasar as a nodal connector in 's growth strategy, with pre-feasibility studies emphasizing its role in harmonizing benefits across state projects for sustained regional equity.

Technical and Engineering Aspects

Dam Specifications and Hydrological Engineering

The Kalpasar Project's primary infrastructure is a composite dyke spanning the , designed as a seaside breakwater to enclose a vast . The total dyke length measures 60.13 km, comprising 26.7 km across the open gulf waters, 13.6 km on the eastern side, and 19.83 km on the western side. The structure features a crest elevation at +9.0 m MSL, with foundations accommodating seabed depths from +5.0 m to -25.0 m MSL and widths varying between 200–300 m. Cross-sections incorporate an armor layer of prefabricated blocks such as Accropode™ II or XblocPlus (0.5–14 m³ in size), a secondary layer, rubble mound core, and toe berms, with a seaward slope of 1:1.33 to resist wave forces. Hydrological engineering focuses on transforming the tidal gulf into a freshwater basin by impounding river runoff while mitigating saline intrusion and . The enclosed spans 1,600 sq km with a capacity of 7,800 million cubic meters, operating between a Full Level (FRL) of +3 m MSL, Maximum (MWL) of +5 m MSL, and Minimum Drawdown Level (MDDL) of -4 m MSL. Annual inflows, estimated at 7,807 Mm³ at 50% dependability, derive from rivers including the Narmada (via diversion from Bhadbhut barrage), Sabarmati, Mahi, Dhadhar, and seven minor Saurashtra streams. is projected at 14 Mm³/year, with 4,886 Mm³ allocated as dead storage to sustain usability over a 400-year design life. Tidal dynamics in the , characterized by ranges up to 12 m and post-dyke variations of +6.5 m to -6 m MSL, necessitate robust via a at Dahej with a of 110,000 cumecs—exceeding the Probable Maximum of 86,000 cumecs. The features 100 spans (18 m wide), 99 piers (4 m thick), and vertical lift gates (18 m × 10 m) with an crest at -3.5 m MSL, enabling flushing during low tides (seaside levels below +5 m MSL for ~15 hours daily) to expel residual and prevent intrusion. Wave design accounts for maximum significant heights of 8.10 m, with the dyke's parapet elevations up to +19.0 m MSL to avert overtopping from storm surges and tsunamis. The reservoir-side slope employs dredged fill (1:2 gradient) with rock toe protection, ensuring stability against internal hydrological loads.
ParameterSpecification
Dyke Total Length60.13 km
Gulf Span26.7 km
Reservoir Capacity7,800 Mm³
Annual Sedimentation14 Mm³
Flood Regulator Capacity110,000 cumecs
Design Wave Height (Max Significant)8.10 m

Power Generation Mechanisms

The Kalpasar Project's power generation primarily relies on tidal energy extraction via a barrage integrated into the proposed 34-kilometer dyke spanning the , exploiting the region's macro- regime with ranges of 8 to 11 meters during spring . The system operates on an ebb-generation principle, where sluice gates allow seawater to fill a dedicated upstream of the barrage during incoming high , creating a head differential as the external recedes; this stored water is then released through low-head Kaplan or bulb turbines embedded in the structure, spinning generators to produce electricity. This unidirectional flow maximizes output from the predictable twice-daily cycles, with potential for bidirectional operation to capture , though ebb mode is prioritized for the site's asymmetrical dynamics and high risks. Installed capacity estimates vary across feasibility assessments due to differences in modeled basin sizing, turbine efficiency assumptions (typically 80-90% for tidal systems), and operational modes. The Central Electricity Authority's 1988 techno-economic study recommended a 900 MW plant based on conservative hydrological data and single-basin configuration. Later pre-feasibility analyses, incorporating updated tidal modeling and larger impoundment areas, project up to 5,000 MW from the core tidal component, potentially scaling with multi-basin expansions or hybrid pumped-storage integration using the freshwater reservoir for peak shaving. Annual energy yield could reach 7-10 billion kWh, contingent on maintenance of turbine passages amid the gulf's sediment loads exceeding 100 million tons yearly. Supplementary mechanisms include and photovoltaic arrays on reclaimed lands and the dyke crest, capitalizing on Gujarat's coastal speeds averaging 6-8 m/s and insolation of 5-6 kWh/m²/day, though these contribute marginally (estimated 500-1,000 MW combined) compared to tidal baseload potential. No conventional hydroelectric generation from river inflows is emphasized, as the freshwater basin prioritizes storage over run-of-river power; adjuncts may incorporate -thermal hybrids, but grid-scale output remains tidal-dominant. These renewables align with India's National Electricity Plan targets but face scrutiny over without the tidal barrage's dispatchable profile.

Construction Challenges and Technological Requirements

The construction of the Kalpasar dam faces significant geological challenges due to its location across the , which intersects the 400-km-long Cambay fault line running north-south and the east-west Narmada-Sone geo-fracture zone, placing the site over the Cambay rift—a 3-4 km deep geological feature formed by the convergence of major mountain range terminations. The region has been classified in Seismic Zone 4 following the 2001 Bhuj earthquake, rendering it susceptible to events measuring 5.5-6.0 on the , with potential epicenters near and districts; this necessitates earthquake-resistant designs adhering to guidelines from institutions like the Roorkee school of . Additionally, the seabed consists of soft alluvial deposits with high silt content from the Saurashtra Basin, complicating foundation stability and requiring extensive geotechnical investigations to mitigate risks of or differential . Hydrological conditions exacerbate these issues, as the Gulf experiences one of the world's highest ranges—up to 11 meters—with peak currents reaching 3 m/s, driven by the basin's inverted and complex that amplifies asymmetry and scour potential. The alignment spans approximately 60 km, including 26.7 km in deep marine waters with levels at -25 m, demanding phased to manage ingress during buildup and prevent or structural failure from dynamic wave forces. Technological requirements include advanced marine geophysical and geological surveys for precise dam alignment, such as those conducted using multi-beam echosounders and sub-bottom profilers to map sediments and faults. The proposed earthen or rockfill design incorporates rubble mound protection layers (approximately 0.5 m sized) on both faces to enhance against wave action and , alongside appurtenant structures like spillways designed via physical hydraulic modeling to handle extreme flows. Closure techniques, potentially horizontal or vertical, require specialized marine equipment for precise placement in high-current zones, with ongoing seismic monitoring by institutions like the Institute of Seismological Research in to inform real-time adjustments. International expertise has been sought for sea-based , given the scarcity of precedents for such scale in seismically active, high-tide environments.

Economic Evaluation

Cost Projections and Funding Mechanisms

The Kalpasar Project's total estimated cost stands at approximately ₹90,000 as of projections in the mid-2020s, covering the of a 64-kilometer , freshwater impoundment , tidal power generation facilities with a capacity of up to 1,100 MW, canals, and ancillary developments such as and ports. This figure represents an escalation from earlier estimates, such as ₹55,000 referenced in 2018 critiques, reflecting adjustments for inflation, expanded scope including integration, and updated engineering requirements. Cost breakdowns typically allocate the largest portions to the core dyke structure (around 40-50% of the total) and hydrological works, with power and transport components contributing additional billions. Funding mechanisms are centered on a public-private partnership (PPP) model, where the Government of Gujarat leads project development but intends to secure private investment through competitive e-tendering for construction, operation, and maintenance phases following the completion of a bankable detailed project report (DPR). State budgetary allocations have supported preparatory phases, including ₹62.88 crore designated for sweet water reservoir studies in fiscal year 2022-23, though actual expenditure fell short due to implementation delays. Potential revenue streams for repayment include tariffs from tidal power sales, water supply fees for irrigation and urban use, and land reclamation leases, projected to yield internal rates of return above 12% in feasibility models, though these depend on central government grants or loans for initial equity, which remain under negotiation. As of 2024, the Expert Advisory Group continues refining the DPR to attract PPP bids, emphasizing viability without excessive public debt.

Benefit Assessments: Irrigation, Industry, and GDP Impact

The Kalpasar Project is projected to provide irrigation benefits to approximately 10 lakh hectares of land across 42 talukas in nine districts of the Saurashtra region, enabling the cultivation of additional crops through the storage of up to 5,400 million cubic meters of freshwater annually from seasonal river inflows into the Gulf of Khambhat. This would address chronic water scarcity in coastal Saurashtra, where current irrigation coverage is limited, by facilitating river rejuvenation and reducing reliance on groundwater, potentially increasing agricultural productivity in saline-affected areas. Project evaluations estimate that 5,461 million cubic meters of allocatable water could support expanded cropping intensities, including rabi season cultivation, though actual realization depends on distribution infrastructure like pumping stations requiring 700 MW of power. For industrial applications, the reservoir is anticipated to supply up to 500 million cubic meters of freshwater annually, supporting manufacturing and processing sectors in water-stressed coastal by mitigating salinity ingress and stabilizing supply chains currently vulnerable to seasonal shortages. This allocation aligns with broader regional development goals, including integration with special economic zones like , where reliable water could reduce operational costs for industries dependent on or imported sources, though specific industrial uptake volumes remain contingent on downstream conveyance networks. Economic impact assessments, primarily from project feasibility studies, project indirect GDP contributions through enhanced agricultural output from irrigated lands and industrial expansion, but quantify these modestly with a benefit-cost ratio of 0.98 at an 8% discount rate, indicating marginal returns driven more by power generation than irrigation or industry alone. These evaluations, conducted by Gujarat state agencies, emphasize synergies with existing infrastructure like the Sardar Sarovar Project, potentially boosting Saurashtra's contribution to Gujarat's GDP—currently around 6-7% of state agricultural value added—via higher crop yields and agro-processing, though independent verification of long-term multipliers is limited and risks overstate benefits if hydrological inflows underperform historical averages.

Feasibility Analysis: Risks and Return on Investment

The Kalpasar Project's economic feasibility has been assessed through historical and preliminary studies, revealing a marginal benefit-cost ratio (BCR) of 1.04 at an 8% in a 1999 evaluation, which drops to 0.77 at 10%, indicating sensitivity to assumptions on rates and timelines. Updated cost projections as of 2022 estimate the total investment at approximately Rs. 1,00,200 s, including Rs. 65,000 crores for the dyke and transportation , Rs. 20,000 crores for regulators and channels, and Rs. 15,000 crores for components, with benefits projected from for 10.54 lakh hectares, a 7,800 million cubic meter freshwater , and annual generation of 2,500 million units. These returns hinge on successful integration with regional developments like reduced travel distances (e.g., from 240 km to 60 km across the gulf) and employment generation (20,000 jobs during six-year construction), but lack updated comprehensive BCR analyses post-1999, leaving uncertain amid escalating costs from earlier Rs. 50,000 crore estimates. Key risks include substantial financial exposure from the project's scale, requiring state-led funding supplemented by central government support in an 80:20 ratio as advocated in 2024, alongside potential cost overruns common in mega-infrastructure due to material and labor inflation. Technical challenges, such as constructing the dyke amid 6 m/s tidal currents, silty soil with low , and seismic activity in Zone III, could delay completion beyond the projected six years and inflate expenses, eroding projected returns from power and water sales. Hydrological uncertainties, including variable inflows affecting fill rates and the need for a 1,10,000 cumecs flood regulator operational only 15 hours daily, further threaten benefit realization, as lower-than-expected water storage would diminish and industrial value. Implementation delays persist, with techno-economic studies incomplete as of September 2023 despite decades of planning since the 1980s, amplifying opportunity costs and investor skepticism regarding payback periods. Critics, including former Gujarat officials, have labeled the project a "non-starter" due to unresolved engineering and funding hurdles, potentially yielding negative if or costs exceed forecasts. While proponents highlight a potential 12% annual return from multifaceted uses, this claim lacks corroboration from peer-reviewed or official post-2022 analyses, underscoring the need for rigorous, independent validation to confirm viability amid Gujarat's competing priorities. Overall, the return on investment appears borderline at best under optimistic scenarios, with risks of fiscal strain outweighing benefits unless technical and financial contingencies are robustly addressed.

Environmental Impacts and Mitigation

Effects on Marine Ecosystems and Fisheries

The construction of the proposed dyke across the would enclose approximately 2,000 square kilometers of waters, converting them into a freshwater through the impoundment of inflows from the Narmada, Tapi, Sabarmati, and other rivers. This shift from brackish-marine to freshwater conditions is anticipated to disrupt existing estuarine and coastal habitats, which currently support diverse reliant on mixing and influxes for and foraging. In particular, fish grounds in the Narmada could be adversely affected, potentially reducing populations of anadromous and catadromous that migrate between freshwater and the gulf. Reduced amplitudes post-construction may also alter dynamics, leading to or accretion outside the and changes in intertidal zones critical for benthic organisms and nurseries. Fisheries in the region, which depend heavily on the gulf's high-turbidity, nutrient-rich waters supporting species like Hilsa ilisha (hilsa shad) and penaeid prawns, face a transition from saltwater to freshwater exploitation. The project envisions a compensatory expansion in freshwater , with estimated yields starting at 2,000 metric tons annually and scaling to 20,000 metric tons upon full reservoir development through species like and . However, this shift could displace traditional marine fishing communities, whose livelihoods—estimated to involve thousands of fishers along the gulf coasts—rely on seasonal marine catches exceeding current freshwater potentials in the absence of intensive management. The affected (CRZ) areas encompass 69 square kilometers of mangroves, 1,017 square kilometers of intertidal mudflats, and 1,496 square kilometers of sea, habitats integral to fishery productivity. As of March 2021, the Gujarat government had not completed any dedicated studies on the project's marine ecological impacts despite three decades of planning and expenditures exceeding hundreds of crores on preliminary feasibility work, leaving uncertainties regarding long-term effects on fish stocks and biodiversity unresolved. Ongoing assessments, including fisheries studies for CRZ clearance, aim to evaluate bio-diversity, eco-hydrology, fish population dynamics, and fisher livelihoods, particularly in the Narmada River context. Proposed mitigations include seed stocking in the reservoir, vocational training for transitioning fishers, and infrastructure for fish processing and marketing to offset marine losses. Alternative configurations, such as excluding the Narmada mouth from closure, are under consideration to preserve key estuarine functions. A comprehensive Environmental Impact Assessment by the National Environmental Engineering Research Institute (NEERI) and ecological surveys by the Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology (GUIDE) are in progress to quantify these effects and refine mitigation strategies.

Hydrological and Coastal Alterations

The proposed Kalpasar dam, spanning approximately 64 km across the , would eliminate exchange within the basin, transforming the current semi-diurnal —with ranges exceeding 10 m and currents reaching 3.2 m/s—into a non- freshwater regulated by inflows from rivers such as the Narmada, Tapi, and Sabarmati. This shift would stabilize water levels inside the gulf, reducing through freshwater dominance and minimizing dynamic fluctuations driven by the funnel-shaped morphology that currently amplifies . Pre-feasibility hydrodynamic modeling predicts increased upstream due to the cessation of flushing, with river-borne sediments (concentrations up to 920 mg/L in baseline conditions) accumulating rather than being redistributed, potentially diminishing storage capacity over decades. Downstream of the dam, the reduced tidal prism would weaken nearshore currents and alter longshore sediment transport patterns, leading to sediment deficits along adjacent coastlines. Baseline numerical models of the gulf indicate that tides currently drive substantial sediment export (estimated at 3.0 × 10^7 Mt/year regionally), and impoundment would trap this material inside the , exacerbating on downdrift beaches and potentially affecting port operations through or scour changes. Coastal morphology could see localized accretion near the structure from altered flow deflection, but broader shoreline retreat risks arise from disrupted dynamics, as evidenced by historical -accretion cycles in the gulf linked to forcing. These alterations hinge on validated sediment transport models, which forecast divergent patterns: deposition-dominated upstream environments versus erosion-prone downstream zones, with implications for coastal stability requiring long-term empirical validation post-construction. The project's scale underscores causal links between tidal barrier effects and hydrological stasis, drawing parallels to analogous impoundments where sediment trapping has accelerated external rates by 20-50% in similar macrotidal settings, though site-specific quantification remains preliminary.

Proposed Mitigation Strategies and Empirical Data

Proposed mitigation strategies for the Kalpasar Project focus on minimizing alterations to ecosystems, , and coastal dynamics through , operational protocols, and ecological preservation measures. To address potential disruptions to and breeding, exclusion of the mouth from the reservoir is planned, preserving key marine fish spawning habitats and reducing ecological repercussions from freshwater impoundment. Related precursor projects, such as the Bhadbhut Barrage on the Narmada, incorporate fish passes designed to remain open nearly year-round, facilitating anadromous like hilsa (Tenualosa ilisha) movement; similar passes integrated with ship locks are proposed for Kalpasar to potentially enhance upstream access. Hydrological mitigation emphasizes control via selective freshwater inflows and flushing operations. modeling indicates that annual inflows of approximately 5,400 Mm³ from rivers including Narmada, Mahi, and Sabarmati can sustain demands while maintaining below thresholds for freshwater usability, assuming operational flushing through gates during low-tide periods when seaside levels are below +5 m MSL. The flood regulator, sized for 110,000 cumecs discharge (exceeding the probable maximum flood of 86,000 cumecs estimated by ), operates about 15 hours daily to manage surplus and prevent saline intrusion, with bed protection scour countermeasures using 0.5-1.5 m thick layers over 200-1,300 m lengths. Coastal and sedimentation impacts are addressed through dyke and dead allocation. Annual sedimentation of 14 Mm³ is accommodated in dead at -4 m MSL, ensuring a 400-year lifespan, while post-dyke tidal ranges of +6.5 m to -6 m MSL are modeled to limit surge effects, with transportation corridors elevated to +9.0 m MSL based on simulations predicting 2.5 m increases during cyclones. ecosystems receive targeted study by CSIR-CSMCRI (2016) for relocation or buffering, complemented by 5 m tree zones along edges to reduce light penetration disturbances to remaining marine biota. Alternative III prioritizes non-tidal power options to avoid seismic risks and further saline ingress, promoting for reduction. Empirical validation relies on hydrodynamic models rather than post-implementation data, as the project remains pre-construction; analogous estuarine barrages show variable efficacy, with fish pass utilization often below 50% for migratory species in contexts.

Controversies and Criticisms

Environmental Opposition and Scientific Debates

Environmental opposition to the Kalpasar Project has focused on its potential to disrupt the Gulf of Khambhat's dynamic estuarine , characterized by extreme ranges of up to 12 meters that drive mixing and support high biological . Critics, including ecologists and local activists, contend that the proposed would sever inflows, leading to reduced flushing, oxygen depletion, and proliferation of conditions in the impounded , thereby threatening marine biodiversity. Fisheries-dependent communities have voiced concerns over diminished fish stocks, as the gulf's tidal currents facilitate spawning grounds for species like Hilsa and Pomfret, with annual catches exceeding 100,000 tons attributed to this hydrology. The dam's construction could block larval migration and alter food webs, potentially halving fishery yields according to preliminary models, exacerbating livelihoods for over 50,000 fishers in adjacent districts. Related protests against precursor infrastructure, such as the Bhadbhut barrage, highlight fears of upstream salinity intrusion and habitat loss for mangroves covering approximately 200 square kilometers along the gulf's fringes. Scientific debates center on and , with the Ecology Commission questioning the feasibility of maintaining freshwater amid high silt loads from the Narmada and Tapi rivers—estimated at 50 million tons annually—that could reduce capacity by 20-30% within 20 years. Clayey, saline sediments in the gulf bed, combined with slow subsurface due to low permeability, raise risks of persistent gradients, as noted by hydrologists at M.S. University, Baroda. The Ministry of Environment and Forests has flagged unresolved ecological gaps, insisting on comprehensive baseline studies before clearance, which remain pending as of 2022. Proponents counter that mitigation via sluice gates and desalination could preserve tidal exchanges, but skeptics, including independent analysts, argue these overlook causal chains of ecosystem collapse seen in analogous projects like China's , where fisheries declined by 80% post-impoundment. Activists have accused state promotions of understating these risks, labeling claims of minimal impact as misleading amid absent peer-reviewed longitudinal data.

Economic and Technical Skepticism

Critics have highlighted the Kalpasar Project's escalating cost projections as a primary economic concern, with initial estimates from 1996 at Rs 6,000 crore rising to Rs 13,000 crore shortly thereafter, and recent figures exceeding Rs 90,000 crore at 2015-16 prices or even Rs 1.1 lakh crore. This inflation in projected expenses, without corresponding finalized benefits analysis, raises doubts about financial viability, particularly given the state's reliance on uncertain funding mechanisms amid competing infrastructure priorities. Further economic skepticism stems from substantial expenditures on preparatory studies yielding no conclusive feasibility report after decades of effort; as of 2022, over 216 had been spent across 20 years, yet the detailed project report remained incomplete. The Gujarat government has allocated additional sums, including 30.71 in 2016-2018 alone, without resolving core viability questions, prompting questions on opportunity costs and the risk of sunk investments in a project that may never materialize. Former Gujarat BJP minister Kanubhai Kalsaria described the initiative as a "non-starter," citing unresolved financial hurdles intertwined with technical uncertainties. On the technical front, skeptics point to formidable engineering challenges in constructing a 60 km across the tidally dynamic , where extreme tidal ranges—up to 11 meters—complicate foundation stability, sediment management, and construction logistics. The Ministry of Environment and Forests (MoEF) has identified gaps in addressing these issues, including inadequate modeling of hydrological impacts and ecological disruptions, deferring resolution to consultants without empirical validation. Runoff estimations for filling the proposed 18,000 sq km remain contentious, with critics arguing that variable inflows and losses could undermine projected storage of 10 million acre-feet, rendering power generation and benefits unreliable. Persistent delays in feasibility assessments—spanning 29 years as of 2018 without governmental confirmation of technical soundness—amplify doubts, as preliminary reports from 1996 onward have failed to integrate comprehensive data on seismic risks, material durability in saline conditions, and long-term structural integrity against cyclonic forces. Such unresolved elements, echoed in scientific debates over mega-engineering precedents like the , suggest that the project's scale may exceed current technological and logistical capacities in the region, potentially leading to cost overruns or outright abandonment.

Political and Stakeholder Conflicts

The Kalpasar Project has encountered political friction primarily within Gujarat's state politics, where opposition parties have accused the ruling (BJP) government of making unfulfilled promises spanning decades. In 2014, leaders claimed the state administration had "fooled" residents for 19 years by promoting the project without substantive advancement, highlighting repeated announcements lacking implementation. Similar criticisms emerged in 2013, when activists alleged then-Chief Minister was misleading the public on the project's viability and progress. Even internal BJP voices have expressed skepticism; in 2018, senior party figure and former minister described the initiative as a "non-starter" due to insurmountable technical and hydrological challenges, estimating insufficient water inflow from Narmada and other rivers to justify the Rs 55,000 cost. Regional political dynamics add layers of contention, particularly over benefit distribution across Gujarat's districts. In September 2024, former BJP minister Bavaku Undhad petitioned Prime Minister Narendra Modi to expand the project's scope to include Amreli district in Saurashtra, arguing it would address chronic water scarcity but implying uneven prioritization favoring other areas like South Gujarat. Persistent delays— with feasibility undecided after 29 years as of 2018, despite expenditures exceeding Rs 30 crore on studies—have fueled accusations of inefficiency, though the state government attributes hurdles to environmental clearances and technical assessments rather than political will. Stakeholder conflicts center on livelihood threats to coastal communities, especially fishermen reliant on the Gulf of Khambhat's tidal fisheries, which the proposed 64-km seawall would disrupt by altering salinity, currents, and fish migration patterns. Opposition intensified around the linked Bhadbhut Barrage on the Narmada River—a precursor to channel water into Kalpasar—where over 12,000 fisherfolk families protested in 2017, warning of collapsed fish stocks and estuarine ecosystems vital for prawns, crabs, and hilsa. In 2016, fishermen groups in Bharuch district threatened agitations to halt Bhadbhut construction, citing uncompensated losses from reduced tidal inflows; similar demonstrations occurred in 2013 with over 1,000 participants demanding livelihood safeguards. Environmental NGOs, such as those critiquing mega-dams' coastal impacts, have amplified these concerns, arguing the project risks irreversible harm to wetlands and biodiversity without adequate mitigation data. Project proponents, including Kalpasar engineers, counter that long-term freshwater storage could stabilize fisheries by curbing erosion and salinity fluctuations, though empirical evidence remains limited amid ongoing studies. These disputes underscore tensions between developmental ambitions and affected groups' demands for rehabilitation, with no resolved compensation framework as of 2025.

Current Status and Prospects

Progress as of 2025: Surveys, Approvals, and Precursors

Preliminary feasibility studies for the Kalpasar Project were conducted between 1996 and 1998, recommending detailed hydrological, geological, and environmental assessments as precursors to full implementation. These early efforts identified the potential for a 60 km dyke to create a 7,800 million cubic meter freshwater but highlighted needs for further geotechnical and topographic surveys to evaluate foundation stability and flood risks. Related precursor initiatives, such as the Bhadbhut Barrage on the , advanced as a smaller-scale tidal energy and measure, with construction progress reviewed in March 2025 and embankments slated for completion by December 2025 to inform broader dynamics. As of 2023, core feasibility studies remained incomplete, with the government unable to confirm viability despite decades of planning and over ₹216 crore expended on investigations by 2022. Geotechnical surveys for alignment, including soil strata analysis and evaluations, were proposed as essential prerequisites but lacked reported completion by mid-2025. The Expert Advisory Group (EAG), reconstituted in prior years, continued oversight into late 2024, evidenced by a December 13, 2024, government order on member remuneration, signaling ongoing technical consultations without advancing to tenders. No major approvals for full-scale or environmental clearance have been secured as of 2025, with preliminary surveys cited as finished in some accounts but unverified against official records. Project timelines project 3-5 additional years for pre- phases if feasibility is affirmed, amid persistent delays from unresolved hydrological data and alignments. Recent integrations, such as feasibility explored in a March 2025 study, represent incremental progress but do not substitute for comprehensive approvals.

Barriers to Implementation and Potential Timelines

The Kalpasar Project faces multiple barriers to implementation, foremost among them the lack of environmental clearances and unresolved ecological impacts. Construction of the proposed 64-km sea wall across the Gulf of Khambhat risks altering tidal flows, sediment dynamics, and marine biodiversity, necessitating detailed assessments that have yet to secure approval from the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; as of 2025, the project remains in the environmental clearance stage without these endorsements. Technical uncertainties, including accurate estimation of river runoff into the impounded reservoir and engineering challenges in a high-tide, seismically prone estuary, have been flagged by experts as potential non-starters, complicating feasibility. Financial hurdles further impede progress, with the venture's scale—estimated at over ₹90,000 —demanding massive funding amid Gujarat's competing water and demands, including integration that amplifies costs due to energy-intensive processes and needs. Political and conflicts, such as intra-party within Gujarat's BJP and coordination between state and central governments, have historically delayed momentum, while and management in the add operational complexities without proven large-scale precedents. The absence of a finalized detailed bankable project report (DPR) as of December 2024 underscores planning delays, with the government actively hiring international experts to address hydrological, environmental, and economic issues for DPR preparation. Potential timelines hinge on DPR completion and clearances, projected to require 3-5 years of pre- studies, followed by 15-20 years of phased ; however, ongoing preparatory surveys and land acquisition suggest full operationalization may extend into the 2040s or beyond, barring accelerated approvals or scaled-down pilots. Critics argue that without resolving core feasibility doubts, indefinite postponement remains a realistic .

Alternative Scenarios and Contingencies

Alternative scenarios for the Kalpasar Project have included variations in dam alignment and scale, with official studies exploring options such as selective freshwater withdrawal points to mitigate salinity intrusion into the proposed reservoir. Phased development has been proposed due to the project's immense scale, involving specialized construction methods for incremental closure of the Gulf of Khambhat, potentially allowing initial phases focused on tidal power or partial water storage before full reservoir creation. However, scaled-down versions excluding major Narmada River diversions have been deemed unviable by project proponents, as they would reduce available freshwater inflows by approximately 80%, severely limiting irrigation and drinking water benefits for Saurashtra and Kutch regions. Integration of complementary technologies, such as plants powered by the project's tidal energy, represents another explored option to enhance without relying solely on natural river inflows, addressing potential fluctuations through hybrid freshwater production. Economic analyses have evaluated these alternatives against baseline plans, emphasizing outputs like freshwater storage volumes and power generation to assess viability under varying hydrological conditions. Contingencies for delays or non-implementation include reliance on precursor infrastructure like the Bhadbhut Barrage on the Narmada, which could store and divert up to five times more water than certain interlinking canal proposals, serving as an interim measure for coastal while full Kalpasar feasibility studies continue. Persistent environmental or approval barriers as of 2022 pre-feasibility reviews could necessitate further site alternatives or abandonment in favor of decentralized and river interlinking projects, though these lack the reservoir's projected 10,000 MCM storage capacity. Political shifts or funding shortfalls, as noted in ongoing consultancy tenders through 2025, might pivot to public-private partnerships for partial tidal energy components, preserving some benefits amid full uncertainties.

References

  1. [1]
    Official Website of The Gulf of Khambhat Development Project ...
    Content on this website is published and managed by The Gulf of Khambhat Development Project (Kalpasar), Government of GujaratBhadbhut_Project · Maps · Contact · Salient Features
  2. [2]
    [PDF] KALPASAR
    The intent in constructing the freshwater portion of the Kalpasar project is to capture the freshwater inputs from the rivers flowing into the Gulf of ...
  3. [3]
    Dr Anil Kane: Brain Behind Kalpasar Dead | Vadodara News
    Apr 27, 2024 · The Kalpasar project of Gujarat government in the Gulf of Khambhat was his brainchild. Kane suffered a brain stroke on Feb 24 after which he ...
  4. [4]
    What is the Kalpasar project? - Quora
    Sep 20, 2017 · This project, can resolve four vital problems of the State of Gujarat which are water, electrical power, road-rail transport and development of ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Kalpasar can't be implemented, is a non-starter: Gujarat BJP's ...
    May 4, 2018 · This leader has declared that the Kalpasar project, conceptualized in early 1960s by creating a huge sweet water lake by damming the Gulf of Khambhat, is not ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] (CdSl<?;l: .3
    The pre-feasibility studies for the Kalpasar Project were carried out during the years 1996 to 1998, and it was suggested to carry out six specific subject ...
  7. [7]
    Gujarat government unclear on Kalpasar Dam project after spending ...
    Feb 21, 2018 · Despite spending Rs 30.71 crore in last two years, future of the ambitious freshwater lake project in Gulf of Khambhat, Kalpasar Dam project, is uncertain.Missing: controversies achievements
  8. [8]
    Thirty years on, govt still not sure about Kalpasar's impact on marine ...
    Mar 14, 2021 · The state government has also not been able to decide whether the project is technically, economically, and environmentally feasible. 1x1 polls.
  9. [9]
    Kalpasar Project Dholera 2025 – ₹90,000 Cr Mega Infrastructure
    The Gujarat government has completed preliminary surveys, and land acquisition is underway. Full-scale construction is expected post final approvals.
  10. [10]
    Kalpasar Dam Project: Strategic Game Changer for Dholera City
    Current Status of the Kalpasar Project​​ As of 2024, the Kalpasar Dam project has made significant progress, though it remains a work in progress. The Gujarat ...
  11. [11]
    Kalpsar PDF | PDF | Spawn (Biology) | Reservoir - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) [D1] = The website of Kalpasar Project, www.kalpasar.gujarat.gov.in. [D2] = Oceanographic survey for Kalpasar by Manojit Saha and Binu Alex. [D3] = J.N Vyas, .
  12. [12]
    about Kalpasar Project
    May 25, 2015 · 'Kalpasar' means a lake that fulfills all the wishes. The word originating from Hindu mythological 'Kalpa Vriksha' - wishing tree. This grand ...
  13. [13]
    Kalpasar Project (Yojana) : World's Largest Lake - Newser
    'Kalpasar' means a lake that fulfills all the wishes. The word originates from the Hindu mythological 'Kalpa Vriksha' – a wishing tree. ... This grand scheme ...
  14. [14]
    Narendra Modi aims to complete Kalpasar project in record time
    Nov 8, 2004 · The project was conceived by technocrat and former MS University vice-chancellor Anil Kane in 1987 to resolve Gujarat's water woes. An impressed ...
  15. [15]
    Kalpasar: Potential Coastal Impacts for India of a Mega-Engineering ...
    ... project as 'Kalpasar' a reference to a mythological wish fulfilling tree (Kane 1995). Kalpasar is considered a harbinger of prosperity to Gujarat state by ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  16. [16]
    kalpasar Project - Vibrant Dahej
    Kalpasar is a water resources project involving creation of fresh water reservoir in the Gulf of Khambhat for meeting demand of irrigation, domestic and ...Missing: conceptual origins history
  17. [17]
    The Kalpasar Project which envisages building a 30 km dam across ...
    Feb 26, 2021 · It entails the construction of a 30-km dam across the Gulf of Khambhat between Bharuch and Bhavnagar districts. Kalpasar Project aims to store ...
  18. [18]
    Prediction of tidal energy resources at Gulf of Kutch and Gulf of ...
    In the gulf of Khambhat the maximum tidal range at Daman, Hazira, Bhavnagar, Pipavav and Diu are 8.96 m, 13.14 m, 13.33 m, 13.41 m and 11.56 m respectively.
  19. [19]
    Tidal characteristics in the Gulf of Khambhat, northern Arabian Sea
    In the northern Arabian Sea, the maximum tidal range is found in GoK with an average tidal range of 10 m near to Bhavnagar (Kumar et al., 2006). Semi-diurnal ...
  20. [20]
    Suspended Sediments Streak a Shallow Gulf
    Jan 28, 2022 · The currents in the gulf are dominated by these strong tides, which can flow at 1.5 to 2 meters per second (3.3 to 4.5 miles per hour).
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Government of Gujarat
    "Environmental Impact Assessment Studies -. Sardar Sarovar (Narmada) Project ... Kalpasar project. In addition to the reasons mentioned in the previous ...
  22. [22]
    Circulation in the Gulf of Khambhat—A Lagrangian Perspective - MDPI
    The main rivers that drain into the GoK are the Narmada, Tapi, Mahi and Sabarmati, and these rivers discharge a large amount of suspended sediment (more than ...
  23. [23]
    Kalpasar Dam Project Dholera
    Rating 4.9 (3,684) The Kalpasar Project aims to create a freshwater reservoir with a 30km dam, improve connectivity, and boost fisheries and agriculture. It will also enhance ...
  24. [24]
    Damned squabbles - Down To Earth
    Jan 15, 1996 · LATE October 1995, the Gujarat government asked the Dutch company Haskoning to prepare a pre-feasibility report of the Kalpsar project - ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] HASKONING - Consulting Engineers and Architects
    KHAMBHAT GULF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT. (KALPASAR). PRE-FEASIBILITY REPORT. Final version. February 1998. Volume 1: Main report. Volume 2: Annexes 1-4. Volume 3 ...
  26. [26]
    Dutch grant for Gujarat's sweet water project - Times of India
    Aug 7, 2000 · the government has accepted a pre-feasibility report prepared by six sub-committees to study and suggest ways to stop pollution in kalpasar.
  27. [27]
    Current Activities & Future Plan.
    Transportation Studies for Kalpasar Project, L & T Ramboll / Gujarat Engineering Research Institute, Vadodara, View / Download. 1/13, Consultancy Work for ...Missing: 2000s 2010s
  28. [28]
    Kalpasar to take at least 20 years, if found feasible | Ahmedabad News
    Jan 18, 2017 · According to a pre-feasibility report of the project, the cost was estimated at Rs 53,000 crore (base year 1998) in which the tidal power ...Missing: Haskoning 1995
  29. [29]
    Feasibility report for Kalpsar project likely by December this year
    Mar 31, 2022 · Minister of State for Water resources, Jitubhai Chaudhary said that Rs. 216 crore expenditure has been made for various studies related to this ...Missing: Kalpasar | Show results with:Kalpasar
  30. [30]
    Gujarat water woes: Kalpsar project DPR likely by year end
    Feb 11, 2018 · Kalpsar, a project that envisages to harness water of seven rivers flowing in the sea by building a dam in the Gulf of Khambhat, is being seen ...Missing: etymology | Show results with:etymology
  31. [31]
    [PDF] DBL-HCC JV wins Rs. 4,167 crore Bhadbhut Barrage project
    Jul 23, 2020 · The main aim of the barrage is to divert water to. Kalpasar dam and prevent saltwater intrusion in Narmada river. It will also improve.
  32. [32]
    Bhadbhut barrage - Wikipedia
    The construction started on 7 August 2020 and will be completed by July 2027. Bhadbhut barrage. Bhadbhut barrage is located in Gujarat. Bhadbhut barrage.
  33. [33]
    Bhadbhut Project - Drishti IAS
    Aug 18, 2020 · The project is part of the larger Kalpasar Project, which entails the construction of a 30-km dam across the Gulf of Khambhat between Bharuch and Bhavnagar ...
  34. [34]
    1489 crore used on Kalpasar project in three years: Govt
    Mar 14, 2024 · The government has spent Rs 1489 crore on the Bhadbhut barrage project in the past three years, according to recent information provided by the ...
  35. [35]
    CM reviews progress on Bhadbhut barrage | Rajkot News
    Mar 29, 2025 · ... Kalpasar department. Officials informed the chief minister that the project is 53% complete. To not interrupt the water flow in the Narmada ...
  36. [36]
    DPR of Kalpasar project to be ready by end of December
    Apr 1, 2022 · “We expect the DPR to be submitted by December 2022. The project will entail an estimated cost of Rs 1.1 lakh crore and will store 8000 million ...
  37. [37]
    Kalpasar Study Incomplete | Ahmedabad News - Times of India
    Sep 22, 2023 · Although the project was announced more than three decades ago, the state government is still not in a position to say whether it is feasible.
  38. [38]
    Feasibility Report For Kalpsar Project Is Still Pending After Twenty ...
    Mar 17, 2022 · Even after twenty years and Rs 216.50 crore later, the feasibility report of the state government's Kalpsar project is still not ready.Missing: 2000s 2010s
  39. [39]
    Gujarat failed to utilise funds marked for Kalpsar sweet water project
    Nov 28, 2023 · According to this report in the year 2021-22, it used Rs 1.76 crore less the budgeted amount of Rs 41.05 crore. It also states that planning of ...<|separator|>
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Pre-Feasibility Report | Environmental Clearance
    Jun 13, 2022 · The concept of the Gulf of Khambhat Development Project, popularly known as Kalpasar ... history with five major offshore sedimentary ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  41. [41]
    [PDF] State Policy Recommendations for Water Security in Gujarat - India
    The main objective of the Integrated Watershed Development Programme is to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and developing degraded ...
  42. [42]
    Benefits&Impact
    Benefits&Impact | Official Website of The Gulf of Khambhat Development Project (Kalpasar), Government of Gujarat, India.
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Activity No. 1/17 (A) Consultancy services for Kalpasar dam design ...
    The main work include designing of. Earthen/Rock fill Dam appurtenant structures but also include (i) finalization of type of closure technique i.e. horizontal, ...
  44. [44]
    Reassessment of tidal energy potential in India and a decision ...
    Jun 6, 2017 · It has also proposed Kalpasar project in the Gulf of Khambhat for exploiting about 5880 MW.
  45. [45]
    [PDF] No.8/2/88-Tidal/648 Government of India Central Electricity Authority ...
    On the basis of techno-economic feasibility study, a tidal power plant with an installed capacity of 900. MW has been proposed. A printed copy of the Techno-.
  46. [46]
    Benefits & Impact
    Irrigation benefit to approx. 10 lakh hectare 42 talukas of 9 districts of Saurashtra; Reduce travel distance from 240 km (when around the Gulf) to 60 km ...Missing: South | Show results with:South
  47. [47]
    Road Connectivity in Dholera SIR: Backbone of Industrial and ...
    This will greatly increase the industrial competitiveness of Dholera since it will be connected to South Gujarat seamlessly via the Kalpsar Dam road project.Missing: Kalpasar | Show results with:Kalpasar
  48. [48]
    The Gulf of Khambhat Development Project (Kalpasar), Gujarat
    The project will provide irrigation, drinking water, and industrial supply, and includes a 10-lane road link over the dam to reduce travel distance between ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] design of seaside dyke for the kalpasar project, gujarat - CWPRS
    The project involves building a 26.7 km long main dam with extensions on both sides into shallow tidal flats. The total length, including extensions, will be ...
  50. [50]
    Tidal energy generation in Kalpasar - TU Delft Repository
    Sep 11, 2018 · This thesis tackles one such potential project, the modeling of a tidal barrage power plant based in the Gulf of Khambhat off the Western coast ...
  51. [51]
    Full article: Status of tidal energy system in India
    Jun 27, 2019 · The potential capacity of electricity generation through tidal energy system in India is 10,000 MW ... In 2010 Kalpasar Tidal Power Project at The ...
  52. [52]
    (PDF) Desalination on Kalpsar Yojna - ResearchGate
    Mar 18, 2025 · This research explores the integration of desalination technologies within the Kalpsar Yojna, a large-scale water resource management initiative ...
  53. [53]
    Faultlines in Kalpasar project: Geologists | Ahmedabad News
    Mar 23, 2003 · The project envisages the construction of a dam between Ghogha, located on the western shores of the Gulf of Cambay in Bhavnagar district ...Missing: method challenges
  54. [54]
    [PDF] Dr. Sethuraman Ramesh - International Seabed Authority
    f) Marine geological and geophysical investigation for fixing the Dam alignment for Kalpasar project (Gulf of Cambay) during 2004. 1. Data acquisition and ...
  55. [55]
    Estimation of tidal current energy along the Gulf of Khambhat using ...
    Feb 9, 2017 · The maximum estimated tidal range is about 11 m in the Gulf of Khambhat and 8 m in the Gulf of Kachchh, and the associated tide-induced current ...
  56. [56]
    (PDF) The continental shelf in the southern Gulf of Khambhat—An ...
    Combined with inverted funnel shape of basin and complex seabed topography, tidal levels and induced currents are reported to reach up to 10 m and 3 ms À1 , ...
  57. [57]
    Final Vol 1 (BOA 1-95) | PDF | Earth Sciences - Scribd
    Longitude is fully exposed to incident waves from the Arabian Sea. Figure 1 Index and layout plan of proposed main dam to Kalpasar Project in Gujarat ... 1970s ...
  58. [58]
    Design of Dam Spillway Cum Downstream Wave Basin Physical ...
    Government of Gujarat has major proposal of development a multipurpose project, Kalpasar in the Gulf of Khambat. This project consists of constructing a 30 ...Missing: construction materials
  59. [59]
    [PDF] ...
    Jan 23, 2007 · Shri Rathod stated that impact of pollution and water quality of Kalpasar reservoir has been examined in six specific studies. However, the ...
  60. [60]
    World's longest Kalpasar project will built at Gulf of Khambhat
    Most of the studies have been completed in Kalpsar Dam Yojana, the largest dream project of the Gujarat government since the establishment of the state of ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board (GIDB)
    Kalpasar Project. This is an ambitious project to provide fresh water, reclaim land for development, and improve transportation across Gulf of Khambat. Page 23 ...
  62. [62]
    Benefits of Kalpasar Project
    May 25, 2015 · Kalpasar, therefore, would provide a renewable and environmentally sustainable power source in Gujarat that would spearhead the economic growth ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] KALPASAR
    Oct 26, 1999 · Although the framework for analysis is largely based upon the Pre-feasibility study, various changes have been introduced - among others ...Missing: 1995 | Show results with:1995
  64. [64]
    Kalpasar feasibility study to be completed by end of 2013
    Mar 6, 2013 · The techno-economic feasibility study undertaken for the Rs 50,000 crore Kalpasar project of Gujarat government is likely to be completed by ...
  65. [65]
    Ex-Gujarat minister urges PM Modi to 'save Saurashtra' with ...
    Sep 11, 2024 · Undhad called on the central government to declare the project as a national initiative, with an 80:20 funding ratio, where 80% of the project ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Activity No. 1/4 Hydrodynamic and sediment model studies and ...
    Use the calibrated sedimentation model to evaluate the changes in the sedimentation pattern in the upstream and downstream side of the gulf due to dam ...Missing: flow | Show results with:flow
  67. [67]
    [PDF] Numerical Modelling of Tidal Circulation and Sediment Transport in ...
    Mar 10, 2010 · AbSTRACT. A depth-averaged numerical model was developed to study tidal circulation and suspended sediment transport in the gulf of Khambhat ...
  68. [68]
    Barrage across Narmada: promise of sweet water, worries about hilsa
    Aug 18, 2020 · The project is part of the larger Kalpasar Project ... This fish pass will remain open almost throughout the year,” the official said.
  69. [69]
    Kalpasar - SANDRP
    Oct 3, 2014 · The project will destroy the coastal and deltaic fisheries and wetlands. As SANDRP has been highlighting for some time now, riverine fisherfolk ...
  70. [70]
    Why Modi's Rs 54,000 cr legacy project is doomed - Rediff.com News
    Oct 28, 2010 · Modi's hankering for illusory legacy in the Kalpsar mega water project could prove disastrous for the state's environment and economy, ...
  71. [71]
    Danger to mangrove cover along Gulf of Khambhat - Times of India
    Aug 22, 2012 · File notings say, mangroves plantation along the coastal Gulf may have the "potential of proving to be a hurdle for obtaining environmental ...Missing: fisheries | Show results with:fisheries
  72. [72]
    Fisherfolks oppose allotment of land to salt-making companies in ...
    Apr 4, 2024 · During a protest on 4 April 2024, the fishermen vehemently opposed the move and urged the government to halt the operations of the Bhadbhut ...
  73. [73]
    MoEF picks holes in Kalpsar project - The Indian Express
    May 24, 2011 · On September 22,2009,the state government took new decisions regarding delinking tidal power component from the Kalpsar project,shifting of dam ...
  74. [74]
    Narendra Modi misleading people regarding Kalpasar project
    May 21, 2013 · Activists here today alleged that Modi was misleading people on the Gulf of Khambhat Development Project (Kalpasar).
  75. [75]
    Rs 94 crore spent on study, Kalpasar feasibility still not settled
    Mar 3, 2017 · According to key officials associated with the project, if found feasible, the Kalpasar project will take at least 20 years. The latest project ...Missing: skepticism | Show results with:skepticism
  76. [76]
    29 years on, govt doesn't know if Kalpsar Project is feasible ...
    Mar 16, 2018 · Patel wrote, “In 1989, the first Kalpsar project plan was prepared. A pre-feasibility report was prepared in 1996, six special reports were ...Missing: skepticism | Show results with:skepticism
  77. [77]
    Feasibility report for Kalpsar project still not complete: Govt
    Sep 22, 2023 · The feasibility study for the Kalpasar Project has not yet been finalized, stated the Gujarat government during the recently concluded Monsoon session of the ...Missing: 43 | Show results with:43
  78. [78]
    People of Gujarat have been fooled in the name of Kalpsar project ...
    Jul 14, 2014 · Opposition Congress today alleged that the Gujarat government has "fooled" the people of state in the name of the Kalpsar project.
  79. [79]
    DRP News Bulletin 09 October 2017 (Gujarat Fishermen Protest ...
    Oct 9, 2017 · However, the project is facing opposition because it would adversely affect over 12000 fisherfolk families and their livelihoods. Neither they ...
  80. [80]
    Fishermen oppose Bhadbhut barrage project | Rajkot News
    Aug 25, 2016 · Few fishermen groups have threatened to launch an agitation to stall the construction of Bhadbhut barrage over Narmada river near Bharuch.
  81. [81]
    [PDF] t-1 AUG 2018
    Aug 1, 2018 · 1.0 The Pre-feasibility Studies for the Kalpasar Project were carried out during the year 1996-1998, and it was suggested to carry out Six.
  82. [82]
    Report Part 1 - environmental clearance
    The Kalpasar project involves a 60.13 km dyke construction, a 7800 million cubic meter reservoir, and a 150m wide road/rail corridor. It is a new project in ...
  83. [83]
    based members of the Expert Advisory Group (EAG) Kalpasar Project
    13-12-2024 · Kalpasar Project Remuneratton To the India -based members of the Expert Advisory Group (EAG) Kalpasar Project PDF icon (1.40MB) - ...
  84. [84]
    Hiring the Advisory services of International Experts for studying and ...
    The Kalpasar Project involves hiring international experts for a Detailed Bankable Project Report (DPR), and includes an Expert Advisory Group.
  85. [85]
    [PDF] NARMADA ;..NO WATER RESOURCES DEPARI'.MEN ...
    The main objective of the (pre)-feasibility study should be the selection of the development scenario and of the scale of the scheme.
  86. [86]
    [PDF] Executive Summary - National Water Development Agency
    Jheri Dam: The height of the Jheri dam has been designed as 73.00 m with top width as 10.00 m. The FRL of the Jheri dam has been kept as 246.0 m. The ...
  87. [87]
    [PDF] request for proposal for providing consultants for technical ... - NCCR
    demand for drinking and irrigation, the Government of Gujarat (GoG) proposes an ambitious project, called Kalpasar Dam Project, which involves constructing a ~ ...