Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Karamchedu

Karamchedu is a village serving as the headquarters of Karamchedu mandal in Bapatla district, Andhra Pradesh, India. The village, characterized by prosperous cotton cultivation and economic dominance by the landowning Kamma community, gained national notoriety for the massacre on 17 July 1985, when Kamma villagers assaulted the subordinate Madiga Dalit agricultural laborers following a dispute over access to an irrigation tank for washing clothes and drinking water. This violence resulted in the deaths of six Dalit men, the rape of three Dalit women in broad daylight, the looting and burning of around 100 Dalit homes, and the displacement of hundreds of Madigas who fled to nearby areas. The Karamchedu incident exposed deep-seated caste hierarchies in rural , where socio-economic mobility and organizational efforts clashed with entrenched upper-caste control, particularly under the political influence of the government led by . It sparked widespread protests and the formation of the Andhra Pradesh Mahasabha, marking a pivotal moment in the resurgence of and contributing to the enactment of the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in 1989. Legal accountability was delayed for over two decades; initial acquittals were overturned by the in 2008, convicting 31 individuals, including life sentences for principal accused.

Background

Location and Demographics

Karamchedu is a village in , , , functioning as the administrative headquarters of Karamchedu mandal within the Chirala revenue division. The village is situated approximately 7 kilometers from the nearby town of and about 68 kilometers from the district headquarters at , in the coastal plains region of the state. As of the 2011 Census of India, Karamchedu had a total population of 11,667, comprising 5,808 males and 5,859 females, with a literacy rate of 67.6%. Scheduled Castes (SC) accounted for 9.93% of the population (approximately 1,159 individuals), primarily consisting of Dalit sub-groups such as Madigas and Malas, while Scheduled Tribes (ST) made up 7.58% (around 884 persons). The village's social structure is dominated by the Kamma caste, who historically comprised a significant majority—estimated at about 8,000 out of a total population of roughly 11,000 in the 1980s—as landowners and influential community members, alongside the Dalit populations that faced economic and social subordination.

Historical Caste and Economic Context

Karamchedu, a village in of Pradesh, historically featured a stratified system dominated by the Kamma community, which held sway over land ownership, , and local institutions. Kammas, as a forward with roots in peasant cultivation, controlled the bulk of economic resources, including trade, moneylending, and liquor distribution, while enforcing social hierarchies that relegated scheduled castes—primarily Madigas and Malas—to menial roles as agricultural laborers and servants. Other backward castes, such as Yadavas, Upparas, and Rajakas, occupied intermediate positions but faced similar subjugation, with practices restricting access to public spaces, water sources, and fair wages. The local economy centered on , sustained by the Krishna system, which divided lands into wet paddy fields, dry upland for cash crops like and , and tank-irrigated areas for miscellaneous produce until the mid-20th century. Approximately 11,000 acres of cultivable land were owned predominantly by Kamma households, enabling about 50 such families to monopolize production and commerce, fostering village prosperity amid stark inequalities. workers, often landless or holding marginal plots, labored under exploitative conditions, earning below minimum wages and trapped in intergenerational to landlords, a pattern reinforced by norms rather than market dynamics alone. This economic disparity intertwined with dominance, as Kamma control extended to political leverage through ties to regional parties and irrigation networks, limiting Dalit upward mobility despite post-independence land reforms that redistributed some holdings but failed to dismantle feudal residues. By the early 1980s, persistent —evident in segregated colonies like Madigapalle for s—contrasted with emerging Dalit literacy and organizational efforts, heightening latent conflicts without altering the underlying agrarian structure.

Prelude to Violence

Rising Tensions and Assertions

In the years leading up to 1985, Karamchedu's was marked by stark economic disparities, with Kamma landowners controlling vast agricultural holdings and employing Dalits primarily as agricultural laborers confined to menial tasks such as tending cattle or working in farmhouses. This feudal arrangement fostered resentment as Dalits began asserting greater autonomy, refusing traditional subservience and demanding fair treatment, which challenged the Kamma dominance rooted in land ownership and village governance. Dalit assertions intensified through cultural and social resistance, including the Madigas' emphasis on self-respect and martial skills like karrasamu, enabling them to protect community members from routine humiliations and assaults by upper castes. Incidents of Kamma aggression against lower castes, such as prior attacks on other communities like the Upperas, heightened mutual distrust, while s increasingly contested caste-based exclusions in public spaces and labor relations. These acts of defiance, though defensive in nature, were perceived by Kammas as threats to their established authority, exacerbating village-wide animosities. Political rivalries further fueled tensions, particularly around the 1983 Telugu Desam Party (TDP) victory led by Kamma figure , which consolidated Kamma influence, contrasted with Dalit support for the party. Clashes over voting rights during local political activities in early 1985 underscored these divisions, as Dalits resisted attempts to coerce their allegiance, aligning with broader movements contesting hierarchies amid rising awareness post-1970s . This confluence of economic dependence, social pushback, and partisan friction created a volatile atmosphere primed for escalation.

Immediate Triggers

The immediate triggers for the violence in Karamchedu stemmed from a dispute over access to the community's drinking water tank on July 16, 1985. In the evening, Kamma youth Srinivasa Rao washed a buffalo near the poorly maintained tank used by Harijans (primarily Madigas), causing contaminated water to flow into it. Harijan residents Kathi Chandruiah and Munnangi Suvarthamma objected to the of their water source. The confrontation escalated when another Kamma youth, Rayineedu Prasad, joined Srinivasa , verbally abusing Chandruiah and Suvarthamma while manhandling them with a used for whipping the . Suvarthamma seized the and struck Srinivasa in response. Local Harijan Pandiri Nageswara intervened, temporarily de-escalating the situation through . That night, Srinivasa mobilized around 20 Kamma individuals who approached Suvarthamma's house, attempting to drag her out for further assault, but retreated following pleas from villagers. The following morning on July 17, Suvarthamma's father-in-law, Munnangi Ankaiah, was summoned by Kamma landlords for an explanation of the prior evening's events. At approximately 7 a.m., Ankaiah reported the matter to his employer, Mandava Radhakrishna Murthy, but the landlords then assaulted Nageswara , convened at Murthy's residence, and forcibly detained Ankaiah, subjecting him to beatings and an axe attack by Yarlagadda Nayudamma. This sequence of retaliatory actions rapidly mobilized a of several hundred Kamma villagers, armed with axes, sticks, and spears, who proceeded to the Madigapalli ( quarter) for the assault. The dispute, while trivial in isolation, ignited amid underlying tensions, with the report attributing the escalation to premeditated aggression by dominant Kamma elements rather than mutual conflict.

The Incident

Chronology of Events on July 17, 1985

On July 17, 1985, a of approximately 100 Kamma individuals from Karamchedu and nearby villages initiated a coordinated on the Madigapalle settlement around 7 a.m., with numbers swelling to around 400 assailants armed with axes, sticks, spears, and other weapons. The attackers raided Dalit homes, beating occupants and forcing families to flee into adjacent fields and canals while looting and damaging property. Dalits scattered in panic, but pursuers chased them across fields and over distances up to 7 kilometers, hacking and stabbing fleeing individuals in a that lasted several hours. Six men were killed during the pursuit, including Tella Moshei, Tella Muttaiah, Duddu Ramesh, and others from the and Duddu families; an additional 20 Dalits sustained severe injuries from beatings and weapon strikes. Three Dalit women were raped amid the chaos. By midday, assailants had set fire to several Dalit homes and continued destroying property, displacing hundreds of residents who sought refuge in neighboring areas or town; no immediate intervention occurred to halt the . The assault concluded by evening, leaving the Madigapalle area devastated and marking one of the most organized caste-based attacks in post-independence .

Role of Key Individuals

Daggubati Chenchu Ramaiah, a prominent Kamma in Karamchedu, was identified as a primary instigator of the violence, leveraging his influence as a local leader to mobilize upper-caste residents against the community amid escalating disputes over resources and social assertions. His familial ties to then-Chief Minister —through his son Daggubati Venkateswara Rao's marriage to Rama Rao's daughter—allegedly shielded initial investigations, contributing to perceptions of impunity that prolonged community tensions. Chenchu Ramaiah was later killed in 1987 by members of the People's War Group, who cited his role in the massacre as motivation. On the Dalit response side, Katti Padma Rao, a scholar and activist residing in nearby , played a pivotal role in organizing relief for displaced families and spearheading agitations for accountability, which pressured authorities to expedite legal action. He co-founded the Mahasabha in the massacre's aftermath, using it to amplify demands for justice and foster political consciousness, efforts that sustained public scrutiny until convictions in 2008. Similarly, Bojja Tharakam resigned his position as pleader in protest against the state's handling of the incident, relocating to to represent victims and galvanize broader mobilization through legal and ideological advocacy. His involvement helped frame the massacre as emblematic of systemic oppression, influencing subsequent Dalit rights campaigns in .

Casualties and Immediate Aftermath

Victims and Injuries

The violence on July 17, 1985, resulted in the deaths of six Madigas, who were hacked, beaten, or drowned by mobs wielding weapons such as axes, sticks, and spears. Three women were raped amid the assaults, contributing to the pattern of reported in eyewitness accounts of the rampage through the Madiga colony. Several other suffered injuries, including beatings and cuts, though exact numbers remain undocumented in primary records; many fled or hid to evade further harm. No upper-caste casualties were reported from the incident.

Displacement and Community Response

Following the violence on July 17, 1985, hundreds of (primarily ) residents of Karamchedu were displaced, with their homes looted, damaged, and set ablaze by attackers, prompting many to flee for safety to relatives in other areas or resettle in nearby towns such as . The community responded with widespread mobilization, including the formation of the Mahasabha by activists Kathi Padma Rao and Bojja Tarakam, which organized protests, raised awareness of caste atrocities, and demanded accountability from authorities. This grassroots activism emphasized self-respect, economic independence from upper-caste landlords, and collective resistance against systemic oppression, marking a pivotal shift toward organized assertion in . Fact-finding efforts, such as the report by the Organization for the Protection of Democratic Rights (OPDR), urged displaced Dalits to return to Karamchedu, forge alliances with other rural poor groups, and arm themselves for to reclaim their presence in the village. The broader response contributed to national-level reforms, including advocacy that influenced the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act of 1989, aimed at curbing caste-based violence.

Government and Police Response

Initial Interventions

Following the violence on July 17, 1985, authorities imposed Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in Karamchedu, prohibiting gatherings of four or more persons to prevent escalation of unrest. personnel were deployed to the village to enforce the order and maintain public tranquility, with the restriction remaining in effect until July 29, 1985. Criminal cases were registered against individuals accused of participating in the attack, marking the commencement of formal . Chief Minister N. T. Rama Rao visited the site shortly thereafter to evaluate the situation and address community tensions. In the immediate aftermath, police arrested a number of identified participants from the violence, though primary organizers faced detention only after several days amid public pressure. These steps aimed to restore order in the locality, where approximately 3,000 upper-caste individuals had mobilized against the Dalit settlement.

Criticisms of Inaction

Criticisms of the response centered on their failure to prevent or halt the despite prior tensions and reports of mobilization by upper-caste groups. Dalit activists and the Andhra Pradesh Committee (APCLC) argued that demonstrated through inaction, as no significant occurred while a mob of approximately 3,000 Kamma individuals attacked the colony on July 17, 1985. The APCLC report highlighted that arrived only after the assault had concluded, allowing perpetrators to disperse without resistance, which enabled the flight of many identified assailants. Further scrutiny focused on the dismissive attitude of senior officials, exemplified by the Superintendent of Police's refusal to pursue charges aggressively, stating that rounding up thousands of Kammas for questioning was impractical and that fleeing suspects, being affluent, might have escaped to places like . Only 11 arrests were made in the immediate aftermath, despite eyewitness accounts implicating hundreds, leading civil liberties groups to accuse the force of partisanship favoring dominant castes. The Organization for Protection of Democratic Rights (OPDR) demanded swift prosecution of both culprits and negligent officials, decrying judicial inquiries as diversions from . The state government under Chief Minister N. T. Rama Rao, affiliated with the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) and sharing the Kamma caste background of the perpetrators, faced accusations of prioritizing pacification over protection. NTR's visit to affected areas was portrayed by critics as symbolic rather than substantive, with no immediate aid extended to displaced Dalit refugees sheltering in a Chirala church and no robust measures to secure the village. Organizations like APCLC and OPDR contended that this reflected systemic bias, as the government shielded influential landlord families, such as the Daggubati kin of a TDP legislator, implicated in instigating the violence, thereby exacerbating distrust in state institutions.

Investigations

The police investigation into the Karamchedu violence began immediately after the July 17, 1985, incident, with officers arriving at the scene between 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. during the ongoing attack but taking no action to halt it, as reported by eyewitness accounts from affected residents. A police camp was subsequently established in the village with a substantial force deployed to maintain order. The government identified approximately 150 individuals as involved in the assault, leading to formal charges under relevant sections of the for murder, rioting, and related offenses. By July 22, 1985, only 11 arrests had been made despite estimates of 2,000–3,000 participants in the mob, including figures such as Mandava Radhakrishna Murthy and Chaganti Satyanarayana, while prominent suspects like Yarlagadda Tirupatayya and Daggupati Kishore remained at large. The Superintendent of admitted that no systematic search for the ' bodies had been conducted in the days following the event. Investigations did not initially explore evidence of premeditation or conspiracy, with the Superintendent declining to address such aspects publicly. The Andhra Pradesh Civil Liberties Committee, in its July 22, 1985, report, criticized the probe for inadequate arrests and failure to protect survivors, citing an instance where a Madiga woman, Tella Rebbamma, was assaulted in the village on that date with minimal initial police response. These shortcomings were attributed by the committee to delays in apprehending influential perpetrators from the Kamma community, though the state police maintained the investigation proceeded under standard procedures without transfer to a special agency like the CBI. The case file, comprising witness statements and forensic elements where available, advanced to trial in Ongole only after years of preliminary proceedings.

Trials, Convictions, and Appeals

The trial of the accused in the Karamchedu violence commenced in the Additional at . In 1994, the court convicted 159 individuals, imposing on five accused and three-year terms on the remaining convicts for offenses including and rioting. The , in a decision on July 24, 1998, set aside the trial court's verdicts and acquitted all 159 accused, citing insufficient evidence to sustain the convictions. Dalit victims and survivors filed a Special Leave Petition in the on October 24, 1998, challenging the High Court's acquittals. On December 19, 2008—23 years after the incident—a bench consisting of Justices B.N. Agarwal and G.S. Singhvi partially upheld the trial court's findings, convicting 31 of the accused: for the primary perpetrator and three-year sentences for the other 30 on charges of rioting armed with , while acquitting the rest due to evidentiary shortcomings. The prolonged appeals process highlighted systemic delays in caste atrocity cases, with the final ruling coming amid ongoing advocacy for stricter enforcement of protective laws.

Broader Impacts

Emergence of Dalit Activism

The Karamchedu massacre of July 17, 1985, in which six Dalits from the Madiga subcaste were killed by members of the dominant Kamma caste, served as a pivotal catalyst for organized Dalit resistance in Andhra Pradesh, shifting from fragmented responses to caste violence toward a structured assertion of Dalit identity and rights. Prior to the incident, Dalit mobilization in the region had been influenced by earlier movements like the Dalit Panthers in the 1970s, but Karamchedu exposed systemic untouchability and economic domination, prompting widespread protests and the radicalization of Dalit consciousness. In direct response, the Dalita Mahasabha was established on , 1985, in , , by Dalit intellectuals including Katti Padma Rao and Bojja Tarakam, aiming to unite communities against atrocities and foster self-respect. The organization emerged from immediate post-massacre mobilizations, including funerals that drew thousands and highlighted complicity, leading to coordinated campaigns for and . It marked the birth of an Dalit movement in the state, distinct from Naxalite influences, by emphasizing caste annihilation over class struggle alone. The Mahasabha's formation galvanized and intellectual output, with writers producing works that documented atrocities and critiqued upper-caste hegemony, thereby amplifying the movement's reach beyond local villages. Subsequent events, such as protests against similar violence in Padirikuppam and Neerukonda, built on this momentum, establishing Dalit activism as a force for through demands for rather than mere formal reservations. By the late , the movement had influenced political discourse, though internal debates persisted over alliances with leftist groups.

Political Ramifications

The Karamchedu massacre unfolded under the Telugu Desam Party (TDP) administration of N. T. Rama Rao, whose Kamma caste background aligned with the dominant community involved in the violence, exacerbating perceptions of governmental complicity or leniency toward upper-caste interests. The event triggered statewide protests, including bandhs and marches organized by Dalit groups and opposition parties like Congress, which criticized the TDP for delayed intervention and failure to curb caste-based reprisals despite prior tensions in the village. This political backlash sustained public outrage into 1986 and beyond, positioning Karamchedu as a persistent critique of TDP's caste dynamics and contributing to the erosion of its Dalit voter base in coastal Andhra regions. The incident precipitated the establishment of the Andhra Pradesh Dalit Mahasabha (APDM) on August 11, 1985, by intellectuals and activists including Katti Padma , as a platform for autonomous mobilization independent of Naxalite or class-focused leftist frameworks. The APDM channeled grief into organized resistance, conducting fact-finding tours, campaigns, and anti-atrocity agitations that reframed struggles around annihilation rather than subsuming them under broader proletarian narratives, thereby influencing the trajectory of politics in the state. Over subsequent decades, the Mahasabha's advocacy pressured political parties to address Scheduled Caste reservations and protections more explicitly, culminating in its launch of a dedicated political front in to contest elections on -specific agendas. Karamchedu accelerated sociopolitical assertion, fostering cross-regional solidarity that disrupted entrenched hierarchies in Andhra Pradesh's , where dominant groups like Kammas had leveraged TDP's rise for territorial control since 1983. This shift democratized local power structures by compelling communities to prioritize self-respect and in alliances, reducing blind loyalty to patronage-based parties and amplifying demands for substantive reforms like the eventual strengthening of the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The massacre's legacy thus embedded violence as a electoral , altering vote fragmentation among s and underscoring the limits of regionalist in addressing structural inequities.

Controversies and Debates

Interpretations of Causes

The immediate trigger for the Karamchedu violence on July 17, 1985, stemmed from a confrontation at a village the previous day, where Kamma youths washing a soiled the source used by , prompting objection from a woman, Munnangi Suvaartha, who raised a vessel in ; this act was interpreted by the Kammas as a direct challenge to their dominance. The dispute escalated when Kamma individuals issued threats of retaliation, culminating in an organized attack by approximately 300 Kammas from Karamchedu and neighboring villages on the Dalit settlement of Madigapalle. Underlying the incident were entrenched practices of and social segregation in Karamchedu, where s—primarily Madigas serving as agricultural laborers—were confined to specific wards and barred from accessing common resources, temples, or upper-caste areas on equal terms, reinforcing Kamma control as the dominant landowning caste. Economic factors exacerbated tensions, as incomplete land reforms left Kammas with vast holdings and influence over Dalit labor, while emerging and awareness fostered resistance to exploitative wages and feudal obligations. Interpretations of the causes diverge along ideological lines. Dalit activists and scholars attribute the violence to a backlash against Dalit assertion of dignity and rights, marking a shift from subservience and galvanizing independent Dalit mobilization beyond earlier Naxalite class-focused frameworks. In contrast, analyses linked to the political context under the (TDP)—heavily supported by Kammas—view it as emblematic of dominant castes' emboldened enforcement of hierarchy amid populist governance that failed to dismantle caste privileges. These perspectives emphasize systemic caste-class intersections over isolated provocation, with empirical evidence from the one-sided scale of the assault underscoring premeditated dominance rather than mutual conflict.

Justice and Accountability Issues

The legal proceedings in the Karamchedu incident were marked by significant delays, spanning over two decades from the 1985 violence to the Supreme Court's 2008 verdict. The trial court in Ongole initially convicted 159 accused individuals to life imprisonment, but the Andhra Pradesh High Court acquitted all of them on July 24, 1998, prompting a special leave petition to the Supreme Court filed on October 24, 1998. The Supreme Court, in its December 19, 2008, judgment delivered by Justice G.S. Singhvi, overturned the High Court's acquittals and convicted 31 persons: the main accused, Anjaiah, received life imprisonment, while the remaining 30 were sentenced to three years' imprisonment each. Critics have highlighted the protracted timeline—23 years for a —as emblematic of systemic inefficiencies in handling atrocity cases, including the controversial transfer of the trial from Prakasam to districts, which was perceived to favor influential accused. The death of a key witness during proceedings further compromised the case, underscoring failures in and potential amid the involvement of politically connected figures, such as Daggubati Chenchu Ramaiah, brother-in-law of then-Chief Minister . These elements contributed to a substantial reduction in convictions from the trial court's 159 to the Court's 31, raising questions about the dilution of accountability for the perpetrators, predominantly from the dominant Kamma community. Accountability issues extended beyond judicial delays to perceived political interference, as the government under —aligned with Kamma interests—was in power during the incident and initial investigations, potentially influencing early responses. Despite the Court's intervention, activists argue that the light sentences for most convicts and the of over 100 others reflect inadequate deterrence, with justice remaining elusive for survivors even 40 years later due to entrenched caste hierarchies impeding thorough prosecution. The case exemplifies broader challenges in enforcing the (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, where delays and reversals undermine victim redress.

Legacy

Long-Term Social Changes

The Karamchedu massacre of July 17, 1985, catalyzed the formation of an autonomous movement in , distinct from earlier leftist or Naxalite influences, by galvanizing communities to assert rights against upper-caste dominance. This event prompted Dalit leaders to organize independently, leading to the establishment of groups focused on caste-specific struggles, which challenged traditional hierarchies in rural areas where economic power among Kamma landlords had previously suppressed Dalit agency. Over subsequent decades, this shift fostered greater Dalit political consciousness, with movements emphasizing self-respect and resistance to , altering interpersonal dynamics in villages through increased demands for shared resources like water access. Socially, the incident contributed to a reevaluation of interdependencies, as survivors and activists documented atrocities to build solidarity networks that extended beyond local confines, influencing broader and cultural expressions of resilience. However, empirical assessments indicate limited erosion of entrenched violence; subsequent massacres, such as Tsunduru in 1991, suggest that upper- retaliatory patterns persisted amid , which intensified land and labor disputes without proportionally advancing socioeconomic mobility. Activists note that while awareness of atrocities grew—even prompting leftist groups to acknowledge their prior denial of over factors—systemic barriers like unequal access to and employment have sustained disparities, with households in remaining disproportionately agrarian laborers. In the long term, Karamchedu's legacy includes heightened scrutiny of rural enforcement mechanisms, spurring responses like drives and legal that have incrementally pressured state interventions, though data from post-1985 periods reveal ongoing underreporting of atrocities due to fear and institutional inertia. This has not translated into uniform social integration; instead, it has segmented strategies, with sub-caste identities (e.g., vs. ) complicating unified progress, as evidenced by intra-Dalit competitions for reservations in the and beyond. Overall, the event marked a pivot toward assertive subjecthood but underscored the resilience of as a in social relations.

Commemorations and Recent Reflections

The Karamchedu massacre is commemorated annually on July 17, primarily through activist gatherings, protests, and public discussions organized by groups like the Mahasabha, which emerged directly from the 1985 events to honor victims and reinforce demands for justice. These observances often feature speeches emphasizing self-respect and resistance against upper- dominance, with participants recounting the violence that killed six s and injured many others. On the 35th anniversary in 2020, leaders reflected that the incident "ignited the spirit of self-respect and fighting" among marginalized communities, crediting it with spurring organized despite persistent socioeconomic barriers. By the 40th anniversary in 2025, reflections highlighted limited progress, noting that s continue facing violence and economic exclusion, with justice delayed as seen in ongoing appeals like the High Court's April 2025 ruling in related cases. Activists argued that while the massacre galvanized demands for protective laws, systemic prejudices endure, evidenced by recurring incidents of atrocities in .

References

  1. [1]
    Mandals | Bapatla District, Government of Andhra Pradesh | India
    Karamchedu. 16, Bapatla, Chirala, Parchur, Martur. 17, Bapatla, Chirala, Parchur, Parchur. 18, Bapatla, Chirala, Parchur, Yeddanapudi. 19, Bapatla, Chirala ...
  2. [2]
    [PDF] The Karamchedu Killings The Essence of the NTR Phenomenon
    Karamchedu is a big and prosperous village of Prakasam district in coastal. Andhra. The coastal villages of this district are major cultivators of cotton and ...Missing: Pradesh | Show results with:Pradesh
  3. [3]
    History of Karamchedu and what actually happened
    Jul 21, 2011 · Karamchedu village is located 7 km off from Chirala in Prakasam District of Andhra Pradesh State. The village was a big Panchayat with 16 wards.
  4. [4]
    The Karamchedu Killings and the Struggle to Uncover Untouchability
    The first case occurred in the village of Kanchikacherla (Krishna district) on 24 February 1968; a boy was tied to a post in the middle of the village, beaten ...
  5. [5]
    Karamchedu and the Dalit subject in Andhra Pradesh - Sage Journals
    At the centre of this history is the massacre of six Dalits in Karamchedu village, coastal Andhra, in 1985. The article focuses on the Karamchedu massacre ...
  6. [6]
    Gandhi, Untouchability and the Postcolonial Predicament, Social ...
    The Karamchedu massacre of 1985 catalyzed a national debate leading to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Prevention of Atrocities Act of 1989. The rape ...
  7. [7]
    SC convicts 31 in Karamchedu Dalit massacre | Hyderabad News
    Dec 20, 2008 · ... Karamchedu massacre case by awarding life sentence to the ma. ... However, a division bench of the AP High Court set aside the conviction on July ...
  8. [8]
    Karamchedu - Andhra Pradesh
    Karamchedu is a village located in Karamchedu mandal of Prakasam district in Andhra Pradesh, India. It is situated 68km away from district headquarter ...Missing: current | Show results with:current
  9. [9]
    Prakasam, Andhra Pradesh - Karamchedu - Population Census 2011
    Caste Factor. Schedule Caste (SC) constitutes 9.93 % while Schedule Tribe (ST) were 7.58 % of total population in Karamchedu village. Work Profile. In ...Missing: demographics composition
  10. [10]
    Chapter 14 The Martyrs of Karamchedu and Tsunduru, by K.L. ...
    The kamma community is about 8,000 out of the total village population of 11,000. Madiga children were made child labor. So, illiteracy rate is high. The ' ...Missing: demographics | Show results with:demographics
  11. [11]
    [PDF] Karamchedu and the Dalit subject in Andhra Pradesh
    At the centre of this history is the massacre of six Dalits in Karamchedu village, coastal Andhra, in 1985. The article focuses on the Karamchedu massacre and ...
  12. [12]
    Kararamchedu carnage: Remembering 40 years later…Whither ...
    Jul 17, 2024 · Karamchedu was a mass massacre, followed by Neerukonda village massacre (July 1987) wherein five rural poor (SCs) people were killed. Later, the ...
  13. [13]
    Karamchedu: A Dialectic without Development - jstor
    Thus about 11,000 acres of cultivated land are owned by the villagers, and most of the land owners are Kammas. ... (But the scheduled castes' lands were gradu-.Missing: history | Show results with:history
  14. [14]
    Forty years after Karamchedu, caste cauldron still simmers
    Jul 16, 2025 · The Karamchedu massacre sparked outrage, galvanised Dalits demanding stronger laws to protect them, and showed that India as still not shed ...
  15. [15]
    35 years after Karamchedu massacre in Andhra, Dalit activists ...
    Jul 18, 2020 · 35 years after Karamchedu massacre in Andhra, Dalit activists speak on what has changed · It was July 17, 1985. · The reason for the violence was ...
  16. [16]
    672 K. Satyanarayana, Social inequality and human dignity
    The massacre of Dalits (1985) in a village called Karamchedu in Andhra Pradesh was a turning point not only in the history of Dalit assertion in Andhra Pradesh ...Missing: composition | Show results with:composition<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    [PDF] 19850722-THE-KARAMCHEDU-MASSACRE-A-REPORT.pdf
    Committee visited Karamchedu, ,'the village where the .. massacre took place, ChiL la, he're the harijans who fled from\the vil'lioige after, the incident ...
  18. [18]
    Remembering Karamchedu Dalits' Massacre – Many Lessons
    Aug 17, 2017 · The Karamchedu massacre of Dalits (1985) on 17th July, 32 years ago in Karamchedu, a village in Andhra Pradesh was a turning point not only ...
  19. [19]
    Will caste disappear if we don't discuss it? 'Narappa' seems to think so
    Jul 22, 2021 · Following this, in 1987, Daggubati Chenchu Ramaiah, a Kamma landlord, was killed by the People's War Group (PWG) for his alleged role in the ...
  20. [20]
    a deep dive into the Karamchedu and Tsunduru Massacres - iPleaders
    Nov 2, 2023 · The Karamchedu Massacre took place in 1985 in the village of Karamchedru, located in Andhra Pradesh. This tragic event shook the nation. Shed ...
  21. [21]
    Bojja Tharakam: The Dalit Leader - Round Table India
    Sep 22, 2016 · He took up the Karamchedu case. The Dalita Maha Sabha (1985-1991) made a creative intervention in Telugu society and consequently changed the ...
  22. [22]
    Karamchedu: Second Anniversary - jstor
    Close relatives of the chief minister's son-in-law, Venkateswara Rao, a doctor, led a brutal assault on the. Madigas of the village, killing six men and raping ...
  23. [23]
    Memorial to be built for Karamchedu victims: Ravela - The Hindu
    Jul 18, 2015 · Dalit leaders and activists cutting across party-lines paid tributes to the six Dalits who had died in a massacre allegedly perpetrated by ...Missing: names | Show results with:names
  24. [24]
    Post-Chundur and Other Chundurs - jstor
    and therefore one does not see other. Chundurs. In Andhra Pradesh, assaults by forward castes (and in a few cases, by backward caste landowners) on dalits ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Human Rights in India - POLICE KILLINGS AND RURAL VIOLENCE ...
    Under Rama Rao, the state's campaign against suspected Naxalites escalated amid mounting human rights abuses, including encounter killings of peasant and tribal ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    Dalit and Naxalite Movements in AP: Solidarity or Hegemony? - jstor
    In the course of its struggle against caste atrocities, the dalit movement in. Andhra Pradesh has perceived the Naxalites as allies and, at timnes, ...Missing: tensions disputes
  27. [27]
    [PDF] The Dalit Movement and Democratization in Andhra Pradesh
    How and why is the annihilation of caste more important than anything else in actualizing a. Page 6. K.Y. Ratnam substantive democracy? How has caste violence ...
  28. [28]
    Dalit Mahasabha launches political outfit - The Hindu
    Oct 14, 2017 · The Andhra Pradesh Dalit Mahasabha, which led many struggles, including the one against Karamchedu and Tsunduru massacres, to assert the rights of the Dalits.
  29. [29]
    Caste Dominance and Territory in South India: Understanding ...
    Jul 6, 2018 · The demonstration is based on an analysis of the socio-spatial trajectories of the Kammas—a dominant caste from Coastal Andhra, where they ...
  30. [30]
    Forty years after Karamchedu, the plight of Dalits remains unchanged
    Jul 17, 2025 · Whereas it was initially thought that the civil liberties only dealt with the repression by the state, the Karamchedu massacre mobilised civil ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] A Historical Study of Dalit Movement in Andhra Pradesh - IJHSSI
    And more than 80 percent of them are in. Andhra Pradesh from Madiga and mala communities though there are other castes from Gauda, Yadava,. Kapukamma, Reddy and ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Karamchedu and the Dalit subject in Andhra Pradesh - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · At the centre of this history is the massacre of six Dalits in Karamchedu village, coastal Andhra, in 1985. The article focuses on the ...Missing: temple entry<|control11|><|separator|>