Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Kinetic diameter

The kinetic diameter of a is the effective size derived from molecular sieving experiments or gas measurements, representing the of an equivalent hard that models the molecule's collision and diffusion behavior in gases and porous structures. It quantifies the likelihood of molecular collisions and is crucial for predicting transport properties, such as the in rarefied gases, where λ = k_B T / (√2 π d² p) with d as the kinetic , T the , p the , and k_B Boltzmann's . Unlike static measures like van der Waals , kinetic accounts for molecular orientation and dynamics during interactions, often overestimating or underestimating based on shape—for instance, linear molecules like CO₂ (d = 3.3 Å) can align to traverse narrower pores than spherical ones of similar size. In kinetic theory, the kinetic diameter corresponds to the collision diameter σ in the hard-sphere model, calibrated to match experimental viscosity η ≈ (5/16) √(π m k T) / (π σ²), where m is molecular mass and other symbols are standard. This parameter is essential for applications in gas separation and adsorption, such as in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) or zeolites, where pore limiting diameters are compared to molecular kinetic diameters to predict selectivity—for example, xenon (d = 3.96 Å) is sieved from krypton (d = 3.80 Å) in narrow channels due to size differences. Values vary slightly across studies due to measurement methods but are standardized for common gases, as shown below: These diameters enable precise modeling of phenomena like in transitional flow regimes ( ≈ 1), where molecular size directly impacts permeance through . Recent quantum mechanical calculations further refine kinetic diameters by incorporating wavefunction overlaps, improving predictions for small gaseous molecules in adsorption and studies.

Definition and Theory

Definition

The kinetic diameter of a is defined as the effective in a hard-sphere model, representing the size that governs the probability of intermolecular collisions in a gas. In this model, molecules are approximated as rigid spheres, where the kinetic diameter d quantifies the scale for collisions, influencing properties such as and . Within the kinetic theory of gases, the kinetic diameter expresses the likelihood of collisions by determining the collision cross-section, given by \sigma = \pi d^2, where \sigma is the effective area presented by one to another during encounters. This cross-section arises from considerations of the \lambda, the average distance a molecule travels between collisions, which is inversely proportional to n \sigma (with n as the ), allowing the kinetic diameter to be calibrated to match experimental data. The parameter thus captures the dynamic interaction geometry under thermal motion, rather than static structures. Unlike the physical diameter, which might refer to a geometric or crystallographic measure, the kinetic diameter accounts for molecular shape, orientation, and transient interactions during high-speed collisions in dilute gases, providing an effective size optimized for predictive accuracy in kinetic processes. It is typically expressed in angstroms (\AA), on the order of 2–6 \AA for common gas molecules, emphasizing its role in modeling collision-dominated transport.

Theoretical Foundation

The kinetic diameter concept emerges from the foundational hard-sphere model in the , pioneered by James Clerk Maxwell and in the mid-to-late . In this model, gas molecules are idealized as rigid, impenetrable spheres of diameter d that interact solely through elastic binary collisions, neglecting intermolecular attractions at larger distances. This simplification allows for the derivation of macroscopic from microscopic dynamics, where the collision cross-section \pi d^2 determines the probability of encounters between molecules. Maxwell's 1860 analysis introduced finite molecular size to resolve discrepancies in pressure and viscosity calculations for ideal gases, marking a shift from point-particle assumptions. The formalizes this model by governing the time evolution of the one-particle velocity distribution function f(\mathbf{r}, \mathbf{v}, t), incorporating a collision that explicitly depends on the molecular d. For , the collision term captures the loss and gain of particles due to , with the differential cross-section derived from the of spheres of d. This underpins the calculation of coefficients via the Chapman-Enskog perturbation expansion, linking d to properties such as shear viscosity \eta \approx \frac{5}{16 d^2} \sqrt{\pi m k_B T} and self-diffusion coefficient D \approx \frac{3}{8 n d^2} \sqrt{\frac{\pi k_B T}{m}}, where m is , n is , k_B is Boltzmann's constant, and T is temperature. These expressions highlight how the kinetic governs and in dilute gases. A key illustration of the kinetic diameter's role is its appearance in the mean free path \lambda = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2} \pi d^2 n}, the average distance a travels between collisions, which scales inversely with d^2 and directly influences gas-phase behavior such as rates and reaction kinetics. Larger d values lead to shorter \lambda, increasing and altering transport efficiency. While the original hard-sphere framework assumed spherical symmetry, early 20th-century refinements by Boltzmann and subsequent workers extended it to account for non-spherical effects in denser or adsorbed phases. Notably, in adsorption studies, Donald W. Breck adapted these principles for pore , defining effective kinetic diameters to predict molecular sieving based on in confined geometries.

Determination Methods

Experimental Determination

Experimental determination of kinetic diameter relies on measuring gas transport properties in controlled conditions, such as in bulk gases or and adsorption in porous materials, to infer the effective molecular size under collision-dominated dynamics. These methods apply kinetic theory to relate observable transport coefficients to the collision , providing empirical values that reflect the molecule's effective size during rapid interactions. measurements offer a direct bulk-gas approach, while and adsorption experiments in microporous media like zeolites probe size-selective behavior at near-molecular scales. Viscosity measurements derive the kinetic diameter from the gas's resistance to shear flow, using the Chapman-Enskog theory, which models dilute gases as undergoing binary collisions. The dynamic \eta is given by \eta = \frac{5}{16} \frac{\sqrt{\pi m k T}}{\pi d^2}, where m is the , k is Boltzmann's constant, T is , and d is the kinetic diameter. Rearranging this equation allows d to be calculated from experimentally measured \eta at known T and m. For , viscosity data yield a kinetic diameter of 3.64 , consistent with values obtained under standard conditions. Diffusion experiments in porous media, such as s, determine kinetic diameter by observing how molecular affects through narrow channels, often in the Knudsen regime where molecule-wall collisions dominate over molecule-molecule interactions. In this regime, the Knudsen D_K is expressed as D_K = \frac{d_p}{3} \sqrt{\frac{8 k T}{\pi m}}, with d_p as the pore diameter; however, when the molecular approaches d_p, decreases due to steric hindrance or exclusion, allowing d to be inferred from the onset of restricted or zero uptake. For instance, in 5A with pores around 4.3 , molecules smaller than this threshold diffuse freely, while larger ones show reduced rates, verifying sizes like nitrogen's 3.64 through comparisons with (2.6 ), which exhibits unimpeded in the same structure.80236-6)80236-6) Adsorption isotherms in molecular sieves provide another empirical route by matching the extent of uptake to molecular size, as sieving effects cause sharp drops in adsorption capacity when the kinetic diameter exceeds the effective pore aperture. Isotherms are measured gravimetrically or volumetrically at varying and , with the critical diameter inferred from the or where uptake transitions from full to partial or none, reflecting the energy barrier for entry. This method has been used to refine kinetic diameters for gases like oxygen and by correlating isotherm shapes in tailored sieves, such as carbon molecular sieves with tunable ultramicropores. These experimental approaches are often validated computationally by simulating transport coefficients and comparing them to measured values, ensuring consistency across methods.

Computational Methods

Quantum mechanical methods provide a rigorous, approach to computing kinetic diameters by examining the distribution of molecules. The effective collision diameter is determined from the cross-sectional area of iso-surfaces of the total at a low, fixed density threshold (e.g., 0.001 a.u.), which delineates the molecular "surface" relevant for intermolecular collisions. This technique captures quantum effects in the electron cloud, yielding values that align closely with empirical kinetic diameters for small gaseous molecules; for instance, the computed for H₂ is 2.89 . Molecular dynamics simulations enable the estimation of kinetic diameters through direct modeling of gas-phase molecular interactions. Trajectories of colliding molecules are generated using accurate ab initio-derived surfaces, allowing extraction of hard-sphere equivalent collision cross-sections from angles and impact parameters. These cross-sections, averaged over numerous collision events, provide effective diameters particularly suited for diatomic species like N₂ and O₂, accounting for rotational and vibrational influences in nonequilibrium conditions. Empirical correlations offer practical approximations for kinetic diameters of spherical molecules based on thermodynamic or potential parameters. One common method uses the critical molar volume V_c (in cm³/mol) to estimate d \approx 0.841 V_c^{1/3}, derived from kinetic theory relations linking molecular size to experimental critical properties. Alternatively, Lennard-Jones parameters provide estimates where the collision diameter closely approximates the finite-distance parameter \sigma_{LJ} for nonpolar gases, facilitating quick assessments without full simulations. For non-spherical molecules, effective kinetic diameters are obtained by averaging collision dimensions over molecular orientations to yield a mean value applicable in diffusion models. This involves constructing a geometrical representation from internuclear distances and van der Waals atomic radii, then computing orientationally averaged diameters for configurations like linear, pyramidal, or tetrahedral structures, ensuring the effective size reflects isotropic gas-phase behavior. Such computational approaches are often validated against experimental gas data to confirm their predictive accuracy for collision dynamics.

Tabulated Kinetic Diameters

Values for Common Molecules

The kinetic diameters for a selection of gases and vapors, as compiled in Breck's foundational reference on molecular sieves, serve as a for adsorption and separation studies. These values, in angstroms (Å), reflect the effective molecular cross-sections relevant to processes and are typically referenced under standard conditions of 298 K and 1 atm. The following table summarizes kinetic diameters for representative molecules, including light gases, noble gases, and hydrocarbons:
MoleculeFormulaKinetic Diameter (Å)
HeliumHe2.60
HydrogenH₂2.89
OxygenO₂3.46
ArgonAr3.40
NitrogenN₂3.64
Carbon dioxideCO₂3.30
MethaneCH₄3.80
KryptonKr3.60
EthyleneC₂H₄3.90
EthaneC₂H₆4.00
XenonXe3.96
PropaneC₃H₈4.30

Sources and Variations

The tabulated kinetic diameters for molecules originate from several primary sources, each rooted in different experimental or theoretical contexts. Donald W. Breck's 1974 on zeolites provides one of the most influential compilations, derived from adsorption and diffusion measurements in molecular sieves, emphasizing effective sizes for sieving applications. Earlier foundational work by Hirschfelder, Curtiss, and Bird in 1954 established kinetic diameters through collision integrals in the framework, based on transport properties like and in gases. More recent quantum mechanical studies, such as the 2014 analysis by Mehio et al., refine these values using iso-electronic density surfaces for small gaseous molecules, offering a computational validation aligned with empirical trends. Kinetic diameters exhibit slight variations with temperature and pressure due to molecular vibrational and rotational effects, which expand the effective molecular cross-section. For instance, the kinetic diameter of shows a marginal increase at elevated temperatures, reflecting enhanced vibrational amplitudes. Pressure effects are generally minor at typical conditions but can influence effective sizes in dense phases through intermolecular interactions. Discrepancies in reported kinetic diameters arise from the underlying measurement methods, with values differing systematically between approaches. Viscosity-based determinations, often derived from Lennard-Jones parameters, yield smaller diameters for non-polar molecules, while adsorption-based methods in porous media produce larger values, particularly for polar species like CO₂ due to adsorbate-adsorbent interactions. For CO₂, this results in a reported range of 3.3–3.9 across sources. For applications in porous media such as gas separation, adsorption-derived kinetic diameters from sources like Breck are recommended, as they better capture sieving behavior relevant to and processes, including separations like Kr/Xe.

Applications

In Gas Separation and Adsorption

Kinetic diameter plays a pivotal role in gas separation and adsorption processes by determining the rate of into porous adsorbents, enabling kinetic selectivity where molecules with smaller diameters access pore structures more rapidly than larger ones. In adsorption-based technologies, this leads to preferential uptake of smaller gases during short cycle times, distinguishing kinetic control from equilibrium-driven separation, where affinity governs final loadings. Such mechanisms are essential in industrial applications like (), where rapid diffusion enhances throughput and purity. Molecular sieving in s exemplifies this, as their uniform micropores act as gates based on kinetic , excluding larger molecules while allowing smaller ones to enter and adsorb. For instance, zeolite 5A, with an effective of approximately 5 , selectively adsorbs linear n-paraffins (kinetic ~4.3 for n-hexane) from branched isomers (kinetic ~5.0 for ), a process widely used in refining to purify feedstocks. This sieving effect relies on the diffusion rates dictated by kinetic , preventing branched molecules from entering the channels and thus achieving high selectivity without relying on chemical differences. In (PSA) systems, kinetic diameter differences drive the separation of gases with similar adsorption affinities, such as oxygen (3.46 Å) and (3.64 Å) in using carbon molecular sieves (). Oxygen diffuses faster into the ultramicropores of CMS, adsorbing preferentially during the pressurization step, while remains in the gas phase, yielding high-purity (up to 99.9%) upon depressurization. This kinetic selectivity, with diffusion rate ratios often exceeding 10:1, allows PSA to operate efficiently at ambient conditions, contrasting with cryogenic . A notable case is the separation of (3.66 Å) from (4.05 Å) in off-gases from nuclear fuel reprocessing, where with tailored pore sizes around 3.6–4.0 Å enable molecular sieving to capture these radioactive at low concentrations. Krypton's smaller kinetic diameter allows faster diffusion and adsorption, while xenon's larger size restricts access, achieving selectivities up to 5:1 under ambient conditions and facilitating safer . This application highlights kinetic diameter's role in addressing trace-level separations in hazardous environments. Under , separation depends on strengths at long times, but kinetic control—governed by kinetic —dominates in cycling processes, where smaller molecules achieve higher loadings due to faster . This enhances overall throughput in by minimizing cycle times, as seen in systems where coefficients vary exponentially with differences, prioritizing speed over maximum capacity.

In Membrane Permeation

In membrane , the kinetic diameter plays a crucial role in determining gas transport rates through selective barriers, particularly in the solution-diffusion model prevalent in dense polymeric membranes. According to this model, overall permeability P is given by the product of D and S, where D is inversely related to the kinetic diameter d due to activated transport mechanisms involving jumps through transient free volume elements in the matrix. For instance, with a small kinetic diameter of 2.89 exhibits significantly higher and thus faster compared to larger gases like (3.8 ) in materials such as polyimides. This size-dependent enables selective separation based on molecular dimensions, with smaller penetrants achieving higher fluxes while maintaining contributions from polymer-penetrant interactions. In microporous membranes, where pore sizes are comparable to molecular dimensions, Knudsen diffusion dominates when the mean free path exceeds the pore diameter, leading to separation factors \alpha approximated by the inverse square root of the molecular weight ratio \alpha = \sqrt{M_2 / M_1} for ideal cases. However, non-ideal behavior arises when kinetic diameters approach or exceed effective pore sizes, modulating the separation by restricting access and altering collision dynamics at pore walls. For example, in carbon molecular sieve membranes, penetrants with larger kinetic diameters experience hindered Knudsen flow, reducing their effective diffusivity and enhancing selectivity over smaller molecules beyond what molecular weight alone predicts. A key application of kinetic diameter in permeation is the separation of CO₂ from CH₄ in , leveraging the size difference of 3.3 for CO₂ versus 3.8 for CH₄ to achieve high selectivity in glassy polymers. These materials, such as 6FDA-based polyimides, exploit the solution-diffusion mechanism where the smaller CO₂ diffuses more readily through the rigid matrix, yielding CO₂/CH₄ selectivities exceeding 50 under mixed-gas conditions at elevated pressures. This size-sieving effect is particularly pronounced in ultramicroporous glassy polymers, where free volume distributions tuned to these diameters minimize CH₄ crossover while maintaining high CO₂ permeability. Size sieving in metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) further exemplifies the utility of kinetic diameter for challenging separations like olefins from paraffins, with tailored pore apertures matching the 4.0 diameter of against 4.3 for . In MOF membranes such as those derived from ultramicroporous frameworks like SIFSIX-3-Ni, the narrow channels enable molecular sieving, allowing to permeate rapidly while effectively excluding , achieving separation factors over 100 at industrially relevant conditions. This approach outperforms traditional by capitalizing on the subtle kinetic diameter disparity, with diffusion pathways designed to favor the unsaturated olefin through entropic and steric control.

Limitations and Comparisons

For Dissimilar Molecules

In mixtures, the kinetic diameter for collisions between dissimilar molecules A and B is determined using the Lorentz-Berthelot combining rules, which average the individual diameters to yield an effective collision diameter d_{AB} = \frac{d_A + d_B}{2}. This arithmetic mean is applied in the framework to model transport properties such as and coefficients in gases. The rule assumes a hard-sphere-like where the effective size represents the point of closest approach during collisions, facilitating predictions of behavior in kinetic theory. Electrostatic interactions in mixtures of polar and non-polar molecules can significantly alter the effective kinetic diameter beyond the simple hard-sphere average, as attractive forces like dipole-quadrupole coupling or hydrogen bonding increase the collision cross-section. In more strongly associating systems, such as vapor dimers, hydrogen bonding increases the collision cross-section by a factor of up to 2.2 at 300 K, demonstrating how modifies the effective molecular size in processes. In practical applications involving mixtures, differences in kinetic diameters between dissimilar molecules influence separation processes like , where retention times of s vary with the carrier gas choice due to varying collision frequencies and rates. For example, using (smaller diameter) versus (larger diameter) as carrier gases alters the gas-phase interactions and plate heights, affecting retention and in adsorption-based columns. These effects highlight how kinetic diameter disparities in mixtures guide the selection of carrier gases to optimize separation efficiency. However, the hard-sphere assumption underlying the averaged kinetic diameter fails for mixtures with highly dissimilar molecular sizes, such as with large hydrocarbons, where the small molecule's deviate from central collisions, leading to inaccurate cross-sections without corrections. In such cases, detailed calculations or modified collision integrals are required to account for impacts and reduced effective volumes, as the simple average overestimates scattering rates for the lighter, smaller species. These limitations necessitate advanced models like the Chapman-Enskog theory with full potential integration for precise predictions in extreme size disparities.

Comparison with Other Molecular Size Measures

Kinetic diameter provides a measure of molecular size particularly suited to in porous media, differing from other size metrics that emphasize static or equilibrium properties. The van der Waals diameter, derived from critical volume as approximately (V_c / N_A)^{1/3} × 1.25, accounts for both repulsive and attractive intermolecular forces, resulting in a larger effective size compared to kinetic diameter; for (N₂), the van der Waals is about 3.98 Å, while the kinetic is 3.64 Å. This discrepancy arises because van der Waals diameters incorporate longer-range attractions, making them more appropriate for describing molecular packing in liquids or solids, whereas kinetic diameters focus on the effective cross-section during collisions or . The critical diameter, which stems from corresponding states theory and represents the size parameter in equations of state like the , can under- or overestimate kinetic diameters depending on molecular shape; for example, CO₂ (critical 2.8 Å vs. kinetic 3.3 Å) and NH₃ (critical 3.8 Å vs. kinetic 2.6 Å). This metric is valuable for thermodynamic predictions and phase behavior but less reliable for dynamic processes like adsorption in narrow pores, where kinetic diameter better captures shape-dependent accessibility. Bond length or conformational diameters, which quantify extended molecular dimensions based on covalent bonding or flexible chain configurations, are primarily relevant for polymers or large biomolecules rather than small gases. For simple gases like O₂ or N₂, these measures (e.g., N≡N bond length of 1.1 Å) fail to represent overall size for transport, as they ignore non-bonded interactions; kinetic diameter is thus preferred for diffusion and permeation studies in such cases. In practice, kinetic diameter excels in modeling gas separation and membrane permeation due to its empirical basis in collision dynamics, while van der Waals diameters suit liquid-phase simulations and critical property estimations, and critical diameters aid in generalized thermodynamic correlations. Selection depends on the context: dynamic processes favor kinetic measures, equilibrium packing favors van der Waals, and theoretical scaling favors critical.

References

  1. [1]
    Molecular diameters of rarefied gases | Scientific Reports - Nature
    Feb 8, 2022 · In contrast, the kinetic diameter of carbon dioxide is close to the small transversal van der Waals diameter and overpredicts experimental data.
  2. [2]
    Computational Predictions for Xenon/Krypton Separation in MOFs
    Jul 7, 2022 · Xenon is the larger and more polarizable of the two, with a kinetic diameter of 3.96 Å, (20) compared to the kinetic diameter of krypton, 3.80 Å ...
  3. [3]
    Characterization technique of gases permeation properties in ...
    Feb 28, 2022 · The kinetic diameters of He, H2, Ar and N2 molecules are 0.26 nm, 0.29 nm, 0.34 nm and 0.364 nm, respectively. Kinetic diameter is the size of ...
  4. [4]
    Application of a tailorable carbon molecular sieve to evaluate ...
    For spherical adsorptives such as noble gases or methane, the critical diameter is simply defined as the diameter of the sphere surrounding the molecule [34].
  5. [5]
    Statistical analysis of CO2/N2 gas separation permeance and ...
    Apr 15, 2024 · Previous studies indicate that CO2 molecules with a kinetic diameter of 3.30 A can readily pass through the membrane, whereas N2 molecules with ...
  6. [6]
    None
    Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    [PDF] Chapter 1 Elementary kinetic theory of gases
    In the kinetic theory, the size of atoms and molecules is usually characterized by so-called gaskinetic or kinetic diameters , which are chosen to match values ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] History of the Kinetic Theory of Gases* by Stephen G. Brush** Table ...
    Abandoning his earlier postulate that the gas molecules have infinitesimal size, he now assumed that they have a large enough diameter or "sphere of action ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] A quick introduction to kinetic theory. - Applied Mathematics
    In one-dimensional collisions, the particles exchange velocity upon collision, and the overall effect of the collision is simply an exchange in particle labels.
  10. [10]
    Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use
    Bibliographic information ; Author, Donald W. Breck ; Edition, 99, illustrated ; Publisher, Wiley, 1973 ; ISBN, 0471099856, 9780471099857 ; Length, 771 pages.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Collision cross sections and nonequilibrium viscosity coefficients of ...
    Mar 5, 2020 · This study examines the collision dynamics of atom–atom, atom–molecule, and molecule–molecule interactions for O–O, N–N, O 2 –O, N 2 –N, O 2 –N, N 2 –O,
  14. [14]
    [PDF] chemical engineering transactions - Aidic
    However, Lennard-Jones parameters for evaluation are limited for bulky molecules, like in TDOs. Additionally, kinetic diameter can be observed from commonly ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry, and Use
    ... Kinetic Diameter lite metakaolin mixture mole Molecular Sieve Molecular ... Table temperature tetrahedra Typical Unit Cell unit cell Unit Cell Contents ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Mechanism of Selectivity Control for Zeolites Modified with Organic ...
    Equilibrium separation is based on the equilibrium loading of one adsorbate being greater than the others, and kinetic separation is by the difference in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Separation and Purification of Hydrocarbons with Porous Materials
    Mar 30, 2021 · Two typical cases of steric separation can be found in 3A zeolite for solvent drying and 5A zeolite for the separation of linear paraffins from ...
  19. [19]
    Direct Synthesis of 5A Zeolite From Palygorskite: The Influence of ...
    Jan 1, 2024 · The kinetic diameter of 2MP and 3MP molecules are both 0.50 nm, while nHEX's kinetic diameter is 0.43 nm. The static kinetic measurements ...
  20. [20]
    (PDF) Air Separation by Carbon Molecular Sieves - ResearchGate
    Aug 5, 2025 · The separation of nitrogen from air on a carbon molecular sieve is achieved by a difference in the adsorption kinetics of oxygen and nitrogen.
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Separation of High Purity Nitrogen from Air by Pressure Swing ...
    Oxygen has a kinetic diameter of 0.346 nm, whereas that of nitrogen is 0.364 nm. So oxygen diffuses much faster than nitrogen.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Alternative Materials Literature Review
    Separation of Xe and Kr can be achieved through their differences in kinetic diameters (Xe: 4.047 Å,. Kr: 3.655 Å) and polarizabilities (Xe: 40.44×10-25 and Kr: ...Missing: Breck | Show results with:Breck
  23. [23]
    Adsorption Equilibrium, Thermodynamic, and Kinetic Study of O2/N2 ...
    May 19, 2022 · The size of a molecule as a target is related to its kinetic diameter in a gas. O2 and N2 have kinetic diameters of 3.46 and 3.64 Å, ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  24. [24]
    Gas Permeability, Fractional Free Volume and Molecular Kinetic ...
    Feb 9, 2022 · From the analysis of the permeability as a function of the gas kinetic diameters, permeability decreases for gases with higher kinetic diameters ...Missing: empirical critical
  25. [25]
    Strategies for Lowering Hydrogen Permeation in Membranes for ...
    Aug 21, 2025 · Given that the hydrogen kinetic diameter (2.89 Å) falls between ... hydrogen permeation properties of membranes by altering the polymer ...
  26. [26]
    Knudsen diffusion in microporous carbon membranes with ...
    The correct pore diameter to use for Knudsen diffusion in such microporous membranes ... membrane pore diameter and the penetrant's kinetic diameter (as defined ...
  27. [27]
    Solving the inverse Knudsen problem: Gas diffusion in random ...
    Feb 15, 2021 · In this paper, we have identified the specific geometric and thermodynamic parameters that determine the gas diffusion kinetics in arrays of randomly oriented ...
  28. [28]
    Carbon Molecular Sieve Membranes for Selective CO 2 /CH 4 and ...
    Jul 2, 2023 · Due to the slight difference in the kinetic diameters of CH4 (380 pm) and CO2 (330 pm), CMS membranes with enhanced adsorption sites and narrow ...
  29. [29]
    Enhanced CO2/CH4 Separation Performance of a Mixed Matrix ...
    Lowering the temperature dramatically increases the CO2 sorption in the glassy polymer ... kinetic size (3.3 vs 3.8 Å). Detailed analysis reveals that the ...
  30. [30]
    An Ultramicroporous Metal–Organic Framework for High Sieving ...
    Sep 29, 2020 · Two-Dimensional Anion-Pillared Metal–Organic Framework for Sieving Separation of Propylene from Propane with Ultrahigh Kinetic Performance.
  31. [31]
    Metal-organic framework membranes with scale-like structure for ...
    Nov 30, 2024 · Molecular sieve membrane technology enables an attractive energy-saving and cost-effective avenue for propylene/propane separation, providing ...
  32. [32]
    Rate enhancement in collisions of sulfuric acid molecules due ... - ACP
    Oct 30, 2019 · The collision cross section of sulfuric acid molecules is larger than expected, enhancing the collision coefficient by a factor of 2.2 at 300K.
  33. [33]
    Effect of Different Carrier Gases on Retention Times in Gas ...
    Effect of Different Carrier Gases on Retention Times in Gas-Adsorption Chromatography - Analytical Chemistry (ACS Publications)Missing: diameter dissimilar