Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Luftwaffe Field Divisions

The Field Divisions (: Luftwaffen-Feld-Divisionen) were formations raised by the during , beginning in late , to address severe manpower shortages in the Heer following heavy casualties on the Eastern Front. Composed primarily of surplus , maintenance personnel, and administrative staff with limited training—often just weeks—these units totaled around 21 divisions by 1945, but were chronically understrength and equipped with outdated weaponry such as rifles and horse-drawn transport. Under Hermann Göring's insistence on retaining command, the divisions suffered from inexperienced leadership unsuited to , leading to their frequent use in static defensive roles where they endured high attrition rates, as seen in the near-annihilation of the 1st and 8th Divisions at Leningrad and Stalingrad respectively. This expedient measure, while providing temporary relief to the army, exacerbated the 's decline by diverting essential support personnel from air operations, contributing to diminished aerial effectiveness later in the war.

Background and Rationale

Strategic Context in 1942

In early 1942, the German Army confronted acute infantry shortages on the Eastern Front, stemming from the exhaustive attrition of Operation Barbarossa and subsequent Soviet counteroffensives during the winter of 1941–1942. The initial invasion, commencing on June 22, 1941, had already resulted in heavy casualties, with German forces suffering ongoing depletion from combat, frostbite, and logistical strains in subzero conditions that exceeded -30°C in many sectors. By spring 1942, many Heer divisions operated at reduced strength, often below 10,000 men per unit against an authorized 17,000, impairing their ability to hold vast frontlines stretching over 1,000 kilometers and prepare for renewed offensives. These deficiencies arose amid Germany's strategic pivot to Operation , launched on June 28, 1942, aimed at securing Caucasian oil resources and the River city of Stalingrad to alleviate fuel shortages and economically cripple the . Hitler demanded additional divisions to support South's advance, but full mobilization of the remained limited by ideological resistance to measures, such as widespread female or reallocating skilled industrial labor. The Heer, prioritized for veteran troops, could not rapidly generate sufficient replacements, creating pressure to repurpose existing military assets without disrupting aircraft production or air operations, where monthly losses averaged over 700 planes by late 1941. The represented a key untapped reserve, having amassed 200,000–250,000 surplus ground personnel—primarily mechanics, flak crews, and support staff—due to declining operational inventories and stalled aircrew training pipelines. With strength overextended across multiple theaters, including commitments of roughly 2,750 to the East, these non- elements offered a manpower pool adaptable to roles, though lacking ground experience. This surplus stemmed from causal mismatches: early war expansions had bloated support echelons in anticipation of sustained air superiority, but realities, including 20% monthly rates in some units, rendered many redundant for tasks. Inter-service dynamics further shaped the response, as resisted transferring personnel to the Heer, viewing it as a dilution of autonomy and prestige. Instead, he proposed divisions commanded by air force officers to directly contribute to ground efforts, enabling Hitler to field new units swiftly—initial regiments formed in January–February 1942—while preserving organizational silos. This reflected broader command frictions, where Göring's ambitions to rival influence outweighed concerns over training gaps, setting the stage for field divisions' deployment in defensive and relief operations by late 1942.

Göring's Initiative and Hitler's Approval

In mid-1942, the German Army faced acute manpower shortages on the Eastern Front due to staggering casualties exceeding 1 million since , prompting high command discussions to reallocate approximately 50,000 surplus ground personnel—primarily mechanics, clerks, and support staff—for retraining as under Heer control. , as and commander-in-chief, vehemently resisted this transfer, viewing it as a threat to his service's independence, prestige, and political influence within the Nazi hierarchy; he countered with a proposal to form autonomous divisions drawn from ranks, commanded by air force officers and integrated into existing ground units like the Hermann Göring Parachute Panzer Division precursor. Göring's plan built on earlier ad hoc Luftwaffe ground commitments, such as Gruppe Meindl's improvised paratroop formation during the 1941 campaign, which demonstrated some viability for air force personnel in roles despite their lack of specialized . To implement his , Göring issued appeals for volunteers on 17 and 19 September 1942, targeting able-bodied personnel for redeployment to combat duties in , emphasizing the need to bolster the front without ceding control to the . This initiative aimed to repurpose over 200,000 underutilized airmen into field formations, preserving Göring's empire amid Luftwaffe operational failures like the inability to supply Stalingrad by air. Adolf Hitler, prioritizing personal loyalty to Göring over Army objections regarding the Luftwaffe personnel's inadequate combat preparation and potential strain on air operations, approved the formation of dedicated Luftwaffen-Feld-Divisionen in October 1942, authorizing the initial wave of up to ten divisions equipped with light infantry armament. This decision reflected Hitler's pattern of favoring service chiefs' autonomy, even as it exacerbated inter-service rivalries and diverted resources from aviation priorities, ultimately yielding units that performed poorly in sustained ground combat due to their origins in non-combat roles.

Formation and Organization

Establishment of Initial Divisions

The establishment of the initial Field Divisions occurred in the autumn of 1942 amid escalating manpower demands on the Eastern Front, driven by Hermann Göring's directive to repurpose surplus ground personnel—primarily from airfield defense and support roles—into formations under exclusive command. Göring's motivation included preserving organizational autonomy, as transferring these troops to the Heer would diminish prestige and resources; he issued calls for volunteers among officers and enlisted men on 17 and 19 September 1942 to accelerate recruitment. This followed the observed effectiveness of improvised ground units, such as Division Meindl, in combat operations earlier that year, which demonstrated the feasibility of employing personnel in tasks despite their lack of specialized training. Authorization for the first ten divisions was granted in October , with formation drawing from seven existing Flieger-Regiments (1st through 5th, 14th, and 21st), each comprising four battalions organized earlier in for potential ground duties. The 1st through 4th Luftwaffe Field Divisions were among the earliest raised, with their core elements assembled starting in the summer of at training areas in , incorporating battalions for , panzerjäger (anti-tank), , flak, signals, and pioneers. These units totaled approximately 10,000-12,000 men each, structured with two regiments of three battalions apiece, supported by limited and ancillary elements, reflecting an emphasis on over heavy due to constraints. Assembly prioritized rapid deployment over thorough preparation, with divisions retaining Luftwaffe blue uniforms, ranks, and discipline but transitioning to Heer-style tactics under Luftwaffe officers inexperienced in ground warfare. By late 1942, the initial divisions were dispatched eastward, underscoring the improvised nature of the program as a stopgap measure for infantry shortages rather than a strategic overhaul.

Structure and Hierarchy

The Field Divisions followed an adapted from Heer models but with reduced scale and Luftwaffe-specific elements. A standard division comprised a staff (Divisionsstab), two Luftwaffen-Jäger-Regimenter as the primary components—each including a staff and three s (Jäger-Bataillone), with each organized into three rifle companies (Jäger-Kompanien) and one heavy weapons company (schwere Kompanie) equipped with machine guns and mortars. Supporting arms included a Luftwaffen-Artillerie-Regiment typically structured with two light battalions (leichte Abteilungen), each featuring three batteries of 105mm howitzers or lighter field guns, an anti-tank battalion (Panzerjäger-Abteilung) with companies armed primarily with 50mm PaK 38 guns, and a mixed anti-aircraft battalion (gemischte Flak-Abteilung) for both air defense and ground support. Additional units encompassed an engineer company (Pionier-Kompanie), signals detachment (Nachrichten-Staffel), reconnaissance company, and various divisional supply services such as transport columns, workshops, and medical units. Initial authorized strength hovered around 12,000–13,000 personnel, roughly two-thirds that of a full Heer infantry division, reflecting equipment shortages and hasty formation.
ComponentKey Subunits
Infantry2 × Luftwaffen-Jäger-Regimenter (each: 3 × Jäger-Bataillone with 3 cos. + 1 heavy co.)
Artillery1 × Artillerie-Regiment (2 × light abtlns., 3 batteries each)
Anti-Tank/Anti-Aircraft1 × Panzerjäger-Abtln., 1 × Flak-Abtln. (mixed)
Support1 × Pionier-Kp., 1 × Nachrichten-Staffel, supply/transport units
Command hierarchy retained ranks and insignia, with division commanders holding Generalleutnant rank, regimental commanders Oberst, and battalion leaders Major or Oberstleutnant. Operational subordination initially fell under higher commands like air fleets, but divisions were placed under corps for tactical control from deployment. On 1 November 1943, surviving divisions transferred to Heer administration via the Field Corps, though personnel remained and continued using aviation ranks without Heer redesignation. This dual structure caused coordination issues, as officers lacked ground warfare experience compared to counterparts.

Luftwaffe Field Corps Integration

The Field Corps were established in late 1942 and early 1943 to provide a unified command structure for the expanding array of Field Divisions, enabling the to retain operational control over its ground formations separate from corps. Four such corps—I through IV—were planned, each typically comprising 2 to 4 field divisions along with attached flak, signals, and logistics elements drawn from resources. Commanded by generals of the , often from flieger or branches, these corps aimed to coordinate actions with air support while addressing the divisions' shortages in and armor through improvised groupings. The I Luftwaffe Field Corps, intended as the first such entity, was never fully activated as a distinct ground command and instead functioned under the existing XIII Fliegerkorps designation from October 1942 to , limiting its role in field division integration. In contrast, the II Luftwaffe Field Corps, formed by February 1943 under , effectively integrated divisions such as the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 6th Field Divisions for defensive operations on the Eastern Front, including the Battle of Nevel where it held lines against Soviet offensives. This corps exemplified the integration model by subordinating divisions directly to leadership, facilitating rapid redeployments but exposing coordination challenges due to the corps' reliance on under-equipped units. The III and IV Field followed suit, with the IV operational by January 1943 in southern theaters, commanding elements like the 189th and 198th Divisions (initially Luftwaffe-derived) along coastal defenses. Integration into these allowed field divisions to operate as semi-autonomous groups within groups, such as Army Group Center for II units, but persistent inter-service rivalries hampered from the Heer. By , mounting losses prompted the of most surviving field divisions to , effectively dissolving the ' unique integration framework, though some persisted in name until 1944. This shift underscored the provisional nature of Luftwaffe ground command, as structures failed to overcome inherent deficiencies in and heavy weaponry.

Personnel and Training

Recruitment from Surplus Luftwaffe Elements

In mid-1942, the Luftwaffe faced a surplus of ground personnel due to its rapid expansion and the shifting emphasis toward defensive operations, which reduced the demand for extensive maintenance and support crews for offensive air campaigns. This excess included mechanics, administrative staff, flak unit members, and other non-flying elements, many of whom had minimal combat training. , seeking to retain control over these troops rather than cede them to the Heer amid acute manpower shortages following operations like Stalingrad, proposed forming dedicated field divisions from this pool. Hitler's Directive of September 12, 1942, mandated the transfer of 200,000 soldiers to the to address deficits, but Göring's initiative allowed the to organize these men into its own units, ultimately drawing 200,000–250,000 surplus personnel into 22 field divisions by late 1942. Recruitment prioritized personnel from ground organizations, such as airfield support battalions and excess flak crews, with divisions like the 5th Field Division assembled in October 1942 explicitly from surplus . These men, often aged 30–40 and lacking experience, were combed from units across and occupied territories, with initial selections focusing on those deemed expendable for air operations. To provide leadership, the divisions incorporated transferred Heer non-commissioned officers and officers, as ranks were short on ground combat expertise. The process emphasized quantity over quality, with minimal screening for physical fitness or aptitude, leading to formations that retained Luftwaffe ranks, insignia, and pay scales but operated under Heer command in the field. By December 1942, the first 10 divisions were operational, each nominally structured with 12,500 men, though actual strengths varied due to hasty assembly and ongoing transfers. This recruitment strategy preserved Luftwaffe autonomy but exacerbated inter-service rivalries, as the Heer viewed the transfers as diluted reinforcements unfit for sustained frontline duty.

Training Deficiencies and Preparation

The Luftwaffe Field Divisions were assembled from surplus personnel, including ground crews, anti-aircraft gunners, and administrative staff, who possessed minimal prior exposure to operations. Following Hitler's directive on 8 October 1942 to form these units amid acute manpower shortages on the Eastern Front, training commenced hastily, typically spanning only a few weeks to two months of basic instruction. This abbreviated period focused on rudimentary handling, squad maneuvers, and light weapons familiarization but omitted comprehensive field exercises, prolonged marches, or specialized skills such as anti-tank tactics, which regular Heer divisions underwent for six months or more. Instructors, drawn from Luftwaffe non-commissioned officers with aviation or static defense backgrounds, lacked the doctrinal expertise and combat experience of trainers, resulting in inconsistent standards and gaps in practical knowledge. Many recruits were older conscripts in their thirties or forties, unaccustomed to physical exertion beyond airfield duties, leading to deficiencies in endurance, discipline, and cohesion under fire. Equipment shortages compounded these issues, as divisions often trained with makeshift or captured weapons, hindering proficiency in standard German infantry arms like the rifle or machine gun. By late 1942, several divisions, such as the 14th Field Division formed from the 61st Air Regiment, were deployed prematurely without completing full training cycles or receiving adequate heavy support weapons. This preparation shortfall manifested in early combat as high rates, tactical rigidity, and vulnerability to Soviet offensives, with units like the 8th Field Division exhibiting poor leadership from inexperienced officers unversed in . Subsequent evaluations by commands highlighted these systemic weaknesses, prompting partial integration under Heer oversight by November 1943, though core training deficits persisted.

Equipment and Logistics

Armament and Heavy Weapons Shortages

The Luftwaffe Field Divisions, formed primarily from surplus ground personnel without dedicated ground combat logistics, experienced acute shortages in heavy weapons from their inception in late 1942. Intended to follow Luftwaffe tables of organization and equipment (K.St.N.) similar to reduced-strength divisions, these units typically lacked the full complement of , anti-tank guns, and heavy machine guns allocated to counterparts. A standard Heer division possessed around 48 field howitzers and guns in its regiment, supplemented by battalion-level infantry guns and anti-tank batteries; in contrast, Luftwaffe divisions often deployed with only one or two understrength battalions equipped with lighter pieces, such as 7.5 cm mountain guns (GebK 15), totaling fewer than 24 tubes per division in initial configurations. This disparity arose because the prioritized aircraft production and air defense, diverting limited ground equipment like 10.5 cm and 15 cm howitzers to frontline needs or captured stocks, leaving field divisions reliant on horse-drawn light ill-suited for mobile warfare on the Eastern Front. Anti-tank capabilities were similarly deficient, with panzerjäger battalions authorized for 12-31 guns (e.g., ) but frequently operating at 50% strength or less due to production bottlenecks and reallocation to army units. Heavy machine guns (/42) and mortars (8 cm GrW 34) per regiment fell short of the 36-48 MGs and 18-24 mortars in Heer norms, as Luftwaffe units improvised with lighter 2 cm Flak guns repurposed for ground fire, achieving densities as low as one per mile of front in depleted sectors by 1943. These gaps were exacerbated by hasty formation—divisions like the 1st and 2nd Field Divisions entered combat in with incomplete batteries—and ongoing attrition, where retreats (e.g., at Nevel in ) resulted in abandonment of remaining . No organic armored support existed, forcing dependence on ad hoc attachments from panzer units, which were unavailable amid Germany's overall strain. By mid-1943, as divisions transferred to control and redesignation as standard (e.g., 18th to 18th ), shortages persisted, with late-war units mirroring under-equipment: reliance on stamped-steel , foreign-caliber , and salvaged . Empirical assessments from operational records indicate these deficiencies halved effective firepower compared to full Heer divisions, contributing to high casualty rates in Soviet offensives. Credible analyses, drawing from archives rather than biased narratives, attribute this not to incompetence but to inter-service rivalries and resource misallocation under Göring's command, where independence precluded integration into the 's robust supply chains.

Supply Chain Challenges

The Field Divisions suffered from systemic vulnerabilities arising from the service's aviation-centric apparatus, which was unprepared to sustain large-scale operations. Established in September 1942 amid escalating personnel surpluses, these divisions drew on supply depots optimized for parts, , and airbase maintenance rather than the volume of , shells, and wheeled or horse-drawn required for mobile ground warfare. This mismatch led to initial equipping shortfalls, with many units receiving incomplete (TO&E), including limited anti-tank guns and insufficient motor vehicles, forcing reliance on measures such as captured enemy or transfers from underutilized flak units. Deployment to the Eastern Front intensified these issues, where vast distances, incompatible Soviet rail gauges, and partisan interdictions strained delivery timelines, often resulting in frontline shortages of ammunition and winter clothing during operations like the relief of Demjansk in early 1943. Fuel rationing, prioritized for panzer and air units, hampered any motorized elements within the divisions, reducing mobility and exposing infantry to Soviet encirclements without adequate evacuation or reinforcement capacity. By spring 1943, chronic under-supply contributed to operational paralysis, as evidenced by the 2nd Luftwaffe Field Division's near-collapse near Leningrad due to depleted stocks and inability to replace losses, prompting partial re-subordination to Heer logistics in mid-1943—though coordination failures persisted owing to inter-service rivalries and Göring's reluctance to fully cede control. These logistical deficiencies were compounded by the divisions' low priority in the broader allocation system, where Heer commands resisted diverting scarce resources like heavy artillery or draft animals, viewing Luftwaffe units as interlopers. Empirical data from unit after-action reports indicate that supply echelons arrived sporadically, with divisions operating at 50-70% equipment levels by late , exacerbating attrition rates that exceeded 100% in some formations through 1944. This causal chain—structural separation leading to prioritization conflicts and infrastructural overload—rendered the field divisions unsustainable in prolonged , underscoring the folly of expanding ground forces without commensurate logistical adaptation.

Combat Deployments

Eastern Front Operations (1942-1943)

The first field divisions were deployed to the Eastern Front in late 1942 to address acute manpower shortages in the following heavy casualties during Operation Blue and the subsequent Soviet counteroffensives. The 1st Field Division, formed in September 1942, arrived in the sector in November 1942, relieving the Spanish 250th Infantry Division () and taking up defensive positions north of under the 18th Army. These units, composed primarily of surplus ground personnel with minimal infantry training, were tasked with static defense against probing Soviet attacks amid the harsh winter conditions. In December 1942, the 2nd Field Division was committed to near , where it participated in the desperate defense against the Soviet encirclement operation from November 1942 to January 1943, often referred to as the "Little Stalingrad of the North." The division suffered severe losses, with its under-equipped infantry regiments unable to effectively counter coordinated Soviet assaults lacking sufficient artillery support and anti-tank capabilities. By early 1943, additional divisions such as the 3rd and 6th joined and , bolstering lines but exposing their deficiencies in mobile warfare and heavy weapons. During the Soviet winter offensive of 1942-1943, field divisions endured repeated encirclements and retreats, particularly around Demyansk and the , where the repelled attacks but incurred casualties exceeding 50% of its strength by spring 1943 due to inadequate preparation and logistical strains. The formation of the I Luftwaffe Field Corps in early 1943 under coordinated these units, yet their performance highlighted systemic issues: personnel untrained for prolonged ground combat collapsed under pressure, leading to high rates and reliance on reinforcements. Overall, these deployments from late 1942 to mid-1943 resulted in the near-destruction of several divisions, underscoring the 's inability to sustain effective forces without Heer integration.

Western and Italian Theaters (1943-1944)

![German paratroop commander Alfred Schlemm in Italy][float-right]
In the Western Theater, several Luftwaffe Field Divisions were stationed for coastal defense duties during 1943. The 18th Luftwaffe Field Division was deployed in France from February to September 1943 before being transferred eastward. The 16th Luftwaffe Field Division arrived in the Netherlands in February 1943, initially serving in garrison and coastal defense roles. Similarly, the 17th Luftwaffe Field Division was positioned in the west for static defense.
By mid-1944, the 16th and 17th Luftwaffe Field Divisions were committed to combat in following the Allied invasion on June 6, 1944. The 16th Division fought around and was virtually annihilated during the intense battles, with remnants dissolved by late August 1944. The 17th Division defended River crossings and suffered comparable destruction, also disbanding in August amid the retreat from . These units, hampered by inadequate training and limited heavy equipment, incurred high casualties against superior Allied firepower and mobility. In the Italian Theater, Field Divisions provided reinforcements amid the Allied advance after the landings. The 20th Luftwaffe Field Division was subordinated to the in October 1943, engaging in defensive operations to stabilize the front south of . It participated in holding actions during the Gustav Line battles but faced attrition from Allied offensives, leading to its redesignation as an army Felddivision in November 1943. The 19th Luftwaffe Field Division, redesignated as the 19th Luftwaffe Assault Division on June 1, 1944, transferred from the to for defensive duties around under the . It conducted rearguard actions against advancing Allied forces, retreating north of by July 19, 1944, before disbandment later that month due to unsustainable losses. Like their counterparts, these divisions struggled with equipment shortages and unfamiliar terrain, contributing marginally to the prolonged but ultimately futile defense of .

Late-War Roles and Attrition

In late 1944 and early 1945, surviving Field Divisions were predominantly employed in static defensive roles across multiple fronts amid Germany's escalating manpower crisis. On the Western Front, the 16th and 17th [Luftwaffe](/page/Lu ftwaffe) Field Divisions reinforced the Atlantic Wall and engaged in the Normandy campaign following the Allied landings on June 6, 1944, attempting to contain the breakout but sustaining catastrophic losses that rendered them combat-ineffective by August. The 18th Field Division, integrated into the 15th Army, similarly absorbed initial assaults and subsequent retreats, leading to its partial disbandment in July 1944 with remnants redirected to for reconstitution. In , elements of divisions such as the 19th were transferred for coastal defense and anti-partisan operations, though many were reorganized into parachute units like the Division by early 1944 due to ongoing attrition. On the Eastern Front, where the majority of Luftwaffe Field Divisions remained committed, units like the 3rd and 6th faced relentless Soviet offensives from in June 1944 onward, serving as makeshift infantry to plug gaps in Army Group Center's collapsing lines. These divisions participated in delaying actions during the Soviet advances into and the , with several, including the 4th, holding positions in the until Germany's surrender on May 8, 1945. Their roles shifted toward absorbing encirclements and rear-guard duties, as the Luftwaffe's air assets dwindled, leaving ground formations isolated without close support. Attrition rates were exceptionally high, driven by the divisions' persistent deficiencies in heavy weaponry, , and trained , compounded by exposure to superior Allied and Soviet firepower. Casualty figures often exceeded 50% within months of deployment; for instance, the 16th Luftwaffe Field Division was virtually annihilated in , contributing to the broader German toll of approximately 290,000 casualties in the theater by September . Eastern Front units fared no better, with formations like the 7th suffering near-total destruction during the 1944 Soviet summer offensives, necessitating repeated disbandments and cannibalization of personnel into Heer units. This pattern of rapid depletion—exacerbated by low morale from inadequate training and supply shortages—resulted in over 80% of the original 22 field divisions being dissolved or absorbed by war's end, underscoring their unsustainability as frontline .

Performance Analysis

Tactical Effectiveness in Key Engagements

The Luftwaffe Field Divisions exhibited consistently poor tactical effectiveness across major engagements, attributable to their composition of undertrained ground personnel repurposed as , resulting in deficiencies in , unit cohesion, and adaptive response to enemy offensives. In static defenses, they often held positions briefly through sheer numbers but collapsed under sustained pressure due to unfamiliarity with ground combat doctrines honed by Heer units. During the in November–December 1942, the 6th Field Division, freshly committed to with incomplete training, defended against Soviet encirclement operations but contributed minimally to relief attempts, suffering near-total destruction by early 1943 amid heavy fighting that exposed their inability to execute coordinated counterattacks or exploit terrain effectively. The division's regiments fragmented under and assaults, with survivors withdrawn as combat-ineffective remnants, highlighting a pattern of high without reciprocal enemy disruption. In the Chir River battles of , the 7th Field Division was hastily deployed to XLVIII positions following Soviet penetrations post-Stalingrad , providing auxiliary infantry support in General Hermann Balck's counteroffensives but proving tactically rigid and vulnerable to tank-led breakthroughs, leading to its disbandment by March 1943 after disproportionate losses relative to its marginal impact on stabilizing the front. Lacking experience in integration, the division relied on defenses that buckled against the Soviet 5th Tank Army, underscoring systemic flaws in transitioning personnel to fluid riverine engagements. On the Western Front, the 16th Luftwaffe Field Division's performance in during the Allied invasion of June 1944 epitomized these shortcomings; positioned as a screening force opposite sectors, it offered negligible resistance to and seaborne assaults, disintegrating rapidly under coordinated firepower and being virtually wiped out by late amid failed attempts at mobile reserves or fallback positions. Its tactical inertia—manifest in poor reconnaissance and inability to contest key objectives like approaches—allowed Allies to bypass and envelop with minimal disruption, reflecting chronic underpreparation for high-intensity mechanized warfare.

Casualty Rates and Morale Factors

Luftwaffe Field Divisions endured exceptionally high casualty rates, particularly during their primary deployments on the Eastern Front from late 1942 onward, where fourteen divisions bore the brunt of intense Soviet offensives. Overall Luftwaffe ground forces, including these divisions, recorded approximately 53,469 , 114,732 wounded, and 48,284 missing between June 1941 and December 1944 on the Eastern Front, reflecting the disproportionate losses among under-equipped formations. Individual divisions often suffered 50% or greater attrition within months; for instance, the 1st Luftwaffe Field Division incurred significant losses during operations near Novgorod in 1944, contributing to its remnants being absorbed into other units. These rates stemmed causally from structural deficiencies, such as limited and antitank capabilities, which left divisions vulnerable to massed Soviet armor and assaults without effective counterfire. Morale among Field Division troops was undermined by several interrelated factors, including the hasty conversion of air support personnel—often older or medically unfit for flying duties—into infantrymen with minimal ground combat training. This lack of preparation fostered a sense of inadequacy, exacerbated by chronic equipment shortages and isolation from Luftwaffe air superiority, which failed to materialize amid broader operational constraints. Accounts from contemporary observers, such as in Wilhelm Tieke's analysis of , highlight repeated criticisms of poor combat tenacity, with field division units prone to rapid disintegration under pressure compared to Heer formations. While outright rates remained low relative to overall standards—reflecting disciplinary measures—surrender rates spiked in encirclements, driven by the cumulative effects of attrition, inadequate leadership continuity, and the absence of ideological commitment typical in units. The interplay of high casualties and eroding created a feedback loop, wherein initial losses depleted experienced cadres, further impairing and willingness to hold positions. This dynamic was evident in late-war theaters like , where surviving field division elements, such as those under , faced mounting defeats with diminished fighting spirit. Empirical evidence from division after-action reports underscores that morale collapse often preceded total operational failure, prioritizing survival over offensive action in the face of overwhelming odds.

Criticisms and Debates

Operational Failures and Structural Flaws

The Luftwaffe Field Divisions suffered from inherent structural deficiencies stemming from their hasty formation in September 1942 using surplus ground personnel, primarily mechanics and airbase support staff lacking any prior infantry training or combat experience in maneuver warfare. These units were organized under Hermann Göring's direct control to preserve Luftwaffe autonomy amid inter-service rivalries with the Heer, which precluded effective integration of army doctrine, logistics, or specialized ground officers, resulting in command structures ill-suited for sustained frontline operations. Equipment shortages compounded these issues, with divisions often receiving fewer than half the required heavy artillery pieces and antitank guns, forcing reliance on improvised or captured materiel that proved inadequate against Soviet armored assaults. Operationally, these flaws manifested in rapid disintegration during engagements on the Eastern Front, where divisions were deployed with minimal preparation into high-intensity combat. For instance, the 2nd Field Division collapsed during the Soviet offensive at Nevel in October 1943, with troops panicking and abandoning most heavy weapons in a single day, enabling a swift Soviet breakthrough that surprised both sides. Similarly, the 1st Field Division, committed near Leningrad from late 1942, endured catastrophic attrition, contributing to overall Luftwaffe ground forces incurring approximately 90% casualty rates on the Eastern Front by war's end due to inexperience against coordinated Soviet and tactics. Poor and , exacerbated by the absence of rigorous small-unit tactics , led to frequent routs; by mid-1943, evaluations highlighted these units' inability to hold defensive lines without Heer reinforcements, prompting debates on their to mechanized formations, which were never fully implemented. These failures not only drained Luftwaffe manpower reserves but also strained overall defensive efforts, as divisions were repeatedly shattered and reformed at great cost without addressing core organizational weaknesses.

Alternative Viewpoints on Viability

Some military historians contend that the Field Divisions, despite their improvisational origins and logistical constraints, exhibited viability as temporary expedients in a dire manpower crisis, particularly in absorbing attritional combat on the Eastern Front and thereby preserving Heer units for counteroffensives or repositioning. Formed rapidly from over 300,000 surplus ground personnel between September 1942 and 1944, these 22 divisions—each averaging 10,000-12,000 men—were deployed within weeks to critical sectors, where they often stabilized lines against Soviet assaults in 1943, such as during the , by leveraging Luftwaffe organizational discipline to maintain cohesion under fire. Michael J. Stout's analysis, drawing from primary war diaries and archives, highlights instances where divisions like the 16th Luftwaffe Field Division conducted effective delaying actions in in June-July 1944, holding terrain long enough to contest Allied advances despite inferior heavy weaponry. Proponents of this view argue that causal factors like the divisions' technical aptitude—stemming from aviation maintenance roles—enabled better improvisation of field repairs and anti-tank defenses compared to later formations, contributing to localized successes in defensive battles, as evidenced by unit reports praising their tenacity in sectors like the Panther-Wotan Line in 1943. While acknowledging high casualties (exceeding 200,000 across fronts by 1945), these assessments emphasize empirical outcomes: the divisions tied down enemy forces equivalent to several Heer divisions' worth of combat power, delaying breakthroughs and extending the Wehrmacht's operational lifespan by months in overextended theaters. This perspective counters blanket dismissals by attributing shortcomings more to systemic German resource dilution than inherent unviability, positing that in a context, such hybrid units represented pragmatic adaptation over doctrinal purity.

Dissolution and Reorganization

Transfer to Heer Control

On 1 November 1943, responsibility for the surviving Field Divisions was formally transferred to the Heer, integrating these understrength units into the Army's command structure. This affected approximately a dozen divisions, including the 5th, 10th, 12th, 13th, and 17th, which were redesignated as provisional field divisions with the "(L)" suffix—such as 5. Feld-Division (L)—to indicate their Luftwaffe provenance while subordinating them operationally to commands. The handover excluded Flak and specialized Luftwaffe artillery elements, which remained under air force control, but shifted , pioneer, and support battalions to Heer logistics and replacement systems. The transfer addressed chronic deficiencies in the divisions' performance, including officer inexperience in , mismatched equipment for sustained ground combat, and fragmented supply chains that prioritized aviation over needs. personnel, often drawn from surplus and ground staff with minimal small-arms training, had yielded casualty rates exceeding 100% in some units by mid-1943, prompting intervention to install qualified Heer commanders and standardize tactics. Although had authorized the Heer to assume oversight as early as September 1943, resisted yielding manpower until mounting Eastern Front crises—such as the loss of Kharkov and retreats in —necessitated unified ground force control. Following the transfer, several divisions underwent partial refits in rear areas, with the 5th dispatched to for reorganization by November 1943, incorporating limited reinforcements to bolster . However, the divisions retained a distinct identity through their Luftwaffe-sourced ranks, leading to ongoing and cohesion issues under Heer oversight, as many airmen struggled with the rigors of static defense roles. This administrative shift dissolved the Luftwaffe's independent ground army ambitions, reallocating scarce resources to air operations while the Heer absorbed the divisions' 50,000–60,000 personnel into its depleted amid .

Final Disbandments and Absorption

In late 1944, as Allied and Soviet offensives intensified, several Field Divisions, already redesignated under Heer command as Feld-Divisionen (L), reached states of combat ineffectiveness due to irreplaceable losses, prompting systematic disbandments and redistributions of personnel. For instance, the 13th Field Division was dissolved in , with its remnants incorporated into the 12th Field Division to bolster the latter's strength amid the Leningrad front's collapse. Similarly, elements of the 22nd Field Division, including its Regiment 44, regiment, and anti-tank battalion, were disbanded in January 1944 and absorbed into other ground units before full Heer integration. By mid-1944, divisions engaged in the campaign and Eastern Front encirclements suffered near-total destruction, accelerating absorptions into surviving Heer formations. The 16th Field Division (L)'s infantry elements were officially disbanded in August 1944 following heavy attrition in , with survivors reassigned to ad hoc battle groups or regular infantry divisions. In , the 20th Field Division (L) received disbandment orders on November 8, 1944, after prolonged defensive actions, transferring its anti-tank and other specialized units to the 155th Field Training Division and other theater reserves. The 19th Field Division (L) followed suit, with its Sturm Battalion dissolved in August 1944 and personnel funneled into Division elements. Into 1945, the few remnants of Luftwaffe Field Divisions not yet absorbed—primarily cadre from or pockets—were either surrendered en masse in May or integrated into or shadow divisions for final stands, effectively ending the distinct identity of these units. This process reflected broader efforts to consolidate manpower amid shortages, prioritizing experienced airmen for infantry roles over specialized air support duties. No Luftwaffe Field Divisions existed as independent entities by war's end, with all viable personnel contributing to Heer sustainability until capitulation.

Legacy and Historical Impact

Lessons for Combined Arms Doctrine

The Field Divisions exemplified the challenges of implementing doctrine without adequate organic integration of , , armor, and air support. Formed primarily from surplus personnel lacking specialized training, these units typically fielded only battalions with repurposed Flak for anti-tank roles, but suffered from chronic shortages of field guns, heavy mortars, and mobile armored elements. This imbalance rendered them vulnerable in defensive positions against Soviet mechanized assaults, as seen in the high casualty rates during the 1943 Demyansk operations where divisions like the 2nd and 5th Field Divisions disintegrated under barrages and tank attacks without sufficient counter-battery or anti-armor capabilities. Their reliance on external air strikes, intended as a doctrinal cornerstone, proved unreliable due to fuel shortages, competing strategic priorities, and superiority by mid-1944, underscoring the of assuming perpetual air dominance in operations. Key lessons from these formations emphasize the primacy of balanced, self-contained within divisions. Effective requires integral and anti-tank assets to enable and mutual protection, rather than depending on detached Flak units ill-suited for mobile ground combat; the Luftwaffe divisions' Flak-heavy composition, while potent against low-flying aircraft, failed to provide the sustained needed for advances or retreats on the Eastern Front. regimens must prioritize cross-branch proficiency, as personnel's familiarity with technical roles did not translate to small-unit tactics or coordination under fire, leading to fragmented responses in engagements like the 1944 Anzio breakout where Luftwaffe units collapsed without Heer panzer reinforcement. Command structures must foster unified inter-service coordination to avoid doctrinal silos. The Luftwaffe's independent control perpetuated rivalries with the Heer, hindering joint planning and , which exacerbated equipment shortages—divisions often entered with obsolete and insufficient transport. Ultimately, these divisions illustrated that efficacy demands holistic doctrinal evolution, not improvised transfers of branch-specific personnel, as ad-hoc adaptations yielded disproportionate losses: over 90% of the 22 divisions were destroyed or absorbed by , with aggregate casualties exceeding 100,000 men.

Comparative Assessment with Heer Divisions

Luftwaffe Field Divisions were organizationally inferior to Heer divisions, typically comprising two regiments with four battalions each, limited (often a single with captured or outdated pieces), and support elements totaling around 12,000–14,000 men, in contrast to the Heer's standard structure of three s (nine battalions), a full regiment, and ancillary units fielding 16,000–18,000 personnel. This reduced scale equated to roughly half the manpower and firepower of Heer divisions, rendering LFDs more akin to reinforced brigades than full divisions capable of independent operations. Training disparities further underscored their weaknesses: LFD personnel, primarily surplus ground crew, mechanics, and administrative staff reassigned from air support roles starting in October 1942, received only abbreviated instruction—often weeks rather than months—lacking the rigorous, doctrine-based preparation that Heer recruits underwent through established schools and field exercises. Consequently, LFD officers and NCOs, many promoted hastily from non-combat roles, struggled with tactical leadership, while Heer units benefited from experienced cadre honed by pre-war maneuvers and early campaign successes. Equipment shortages compounded these issues, as LFDs entered with inadequate heavy machine guns, mortars, anti-tank weapons, and motorized transport, frequently relying on allocations or Heer attachments for artillery and logistics; by comparison, Heer divisions, despite wartime shortages from 1943 onward, retained priority access to standardized , Pak guns, and support within the Wehrmacht's allocation system. In performance metrics, LFDs incurred disproportionately high casualties—such as the near-annihilation of the 16th and 17th LFDs during the Normandy campaign in June–August 1944—due to brittle cohesion under fire, whereas Heer divisions, even late-war types, demonstrated greater resilience in defensive roles through better integration of . These factors rendered LFDs less viable for sustained ground warfare, prompting their mass transfer to Heer command under OKH control by , after which surviving elements were reorganized or disbanded amid recognition of their structural flaws relative to the army's more adaptable formations. Army assessments viewed the 22 LFDs as marginal reinforcements offering little net relief to frontline shortages, prioritizing quantity over quality in a manner that diluted overall effectiveness compared to the Heer's emphasis on doctrinal proficiency.

References

  1. [1]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions - Flames Of War
    May 27, 2020 · Division Meindl was formed as an overall command for the numerous air force security battalions and hastily formed defence battalions that ...
  2. [2]
    18.Feld Division (Lw): History and Mission - Angelfire
    The first Luftwaffe field divisions were organized in the autumn of 1942 as a result of the depletion of German ground forces on the Eastern Front. Because of ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  3. [3]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions - K.St.N. List - Research Blog
    Jul 26, 2016 · Luftwaffe Field Divisions were authorized in 1942, with 22 raised between 1942 and 1943. They were considered a failed experiment and most were ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Strategy for Defeat: The Luftwaffe, 1933-1945 - Air University
    Richthofen's disapproval in October 1942 ofGbring's intention to establish 20 Luftwaffe field divisions : ... Thus, German strategy in 1942 was entirely of ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
    Case Blue: the Eastern Front between Barbarossa and Stalingrad
    Jul 14, 2022 · Eighty years on, David Porter analyses Germany's plan to launch another great offensive in the summer of 1942.
  6. [6]
    Goering's Boys in Blue: The Luftwaffe Field Divisions, 1942-1945
    The Luftwaffe Field Divisions have remained on the periphery of World War II historiography for over seventy years, overshadowed by the myth of German military ...Missing: formation | Show results with:formation
  7. [7]
    The WW2 German Air Force raised over 20 Infantry Field Divisions ...
    Jun 27, 2019 · The WW2 German Air Force raised over 20 Infantry Field Divisions from nearly 250k excess airmen to help the Army fight the ground war.In WWII, why did the Luftwaffe posses field divisions? - Redditquestion about the luftwaffe ground forces reinforcing other german ...More results from www.reddit.comMissing: surplus | Show results with:surplus
  8. [8]
    Hitler's Luftwaffe Infantry: The German Air Force Field Divisions ...
    Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring, head of the Luftwaffe, vehemently opposed the plan, fearing it would diminish his political power after several Luftwaffe ...
  9. [9]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions 1941–45 - Osprey Publishing
    Free delivery over $35 30-day returnsDec 20, 2012 · On 17 September 1942, Göring called for volunteers from throughout the Luftwaffe for combat duty in the East. Even before that date, however ...
  10. [10]
    chapter iv on the brink: january-october 1942 - Ibiblio
    The Luftwaffe trained its fighter forces for offensive operations in enemy airspace. Consequently, the burden of defending the Reich fell on the flak units.
  11. [11]
    Hitler's Luftwaffe Infantry: The German Air Force Field Divisions ...
    30-day returnsHitler, prioritizing political loyalty over military logic, approved the creation of Luftwaffen Felddivisionen (Luftwaffe Field Divisions). Despite being ill- ...
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Field and Flak Divisions - ElectronicsAndBooks
    "Division Hermann Göring" in October 1942. The formation reorganized as a panzer division seven months later. In May 1944 it took the curious sounding name ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] Formed summer 1942: 1st-4th B
    The 1st Luftwaffe Field Division, formed summer 1942, included 1st-4th Battalions, Panzerjäger, Artillery, Flak, Radfahr, Pioneer, and Luftnachrichten ...
  14. [14]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions | WWII Forums
    Mar 2, 2009 · The Luftwaffe troops formed the front line of the 21. Panzerdivision's sector, with supporting panzertruppen directly behind them in the second ...
  15. [15]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions 1941-45 | PDF - Scribd
    Rating 5.0 (1) Luftwaffe Field Divisions 1941-45 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf) or read online for free.<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    Luftwaffen-Feld-Divisionen - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    In das Heer übernommen wurden die Luftwaffen-Felddivisionen 1 bis 6 und 9 bis 21, die eingesetzten Teile der 22. Luftwaffen-Felddivision und das Feld-Regiment ...
  17. [17]
    German Plans and Organization - HyperWar: Riviera to the Rhine
    In the south the Nineteenth Army guarded the Mediterranean coast with three corps: the IV Luftwaffe Field Corps, with three divisions; Corps Kniess (soon to ...
  18. [18]
    Planning the November Offensive - HyperWar: Riviera to the Rhine
    Die, Petersen's IV Luftwaffe Field Corps had two fairly strong divisions--the somewhat understrength but experienced 198th Division, most of which faced the ...
  19. [19]
    Luftwaffe Field Divisions - Hobby
    May 27, 2020 · The success of Meindl's division swung the balance, and Göring got his way. The first ten of these divisions were organized in September of 1942 ...
  20. [20]
    Goering's Boys in Blue - The Luftwaffe Field Divisions 1942-1945
    Jun 22, 2022 · ... divisions - why they were formed in the first place, their general role in the German war effort, and their significance to the war itself ...Missing: proposal | Show results with:proposal
  21. [21]
    Luftwaffe Ground Force's - The Military Mark
    Sep 26, 2025 · 5. Luftwaffe Feld-Division was formed in October 1942 under the command of Generalmajor Hans Joachim von Armin. Made up of surplus ground crew, ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Luftwaffe Flak and Field Divisions 1939-1945 (Images of War)
    Luftwaffe FlaK and Field Divisions is an illustrated record of Hermann Göring's. Luftwaffe ground force that comprised an array of radar operators, ...Missing: credible | Show results with:credible
  24. [24]
    Luftwaffe feld divisions - Feldgrau Forum
    Dec 11, 2002 · While the Stalingrad campaign raged in late 1942, manpower shortages became increasingly apparent. Hitler decided to take excess Luftwaffe ...<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    Going All Göring - Breakthrough Assault
    Sep 26, 2018 · Finding Our Formation ; Heer Division. Luftwaffe Field Division ; 3 Regiments or 3 Battalions. 1 Regiment of 4 Battalions ; Full Artillery Regiment.
  26. [26]
    Were the Luftwaffe field Divisions In WW2 low morale formations?
    Jul 8, 2021 · Seven Luftwaffe "field regiments" were formed as an emergency expedient in early 1942, but the men were poorly trained, having only a few weeks ...What was the point of the Luftwaffe Field Divisions during WWII.In WWII, why did the Luftwaffe posses field divisions? - RedditMore results from www.reddit.com
  27. [27]
    8th Luftwaffe Field Division December 1942 - Feldgrau Forum
    Mar 20, 2005 · Here is some info I put together regarding your question. The core of the division was formed from Flieger Regiment 42 on 29 October 1942 and ...
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Luftwaffe Field Division 1944-45 - Fire and Fury Games
    Luftwaffe Field Division 1944-45. Morale and training was average at best, in the East the Heer took over the senior command functions, whereas at the ...Missing: deficiencies | Show results with:deficiencies
  29. [29]
    14th Luftwaffe Field Division (Wehrmacht) | Military Wiki - Fandom
    The 14th Luftwaffe Field Division was formed in late 1942 from the 61st Air Regiment. Despite not having completed its training or having been fully equipped, ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
  31. [31]
  32. [32]
    Performance of Luftwaffen-Field-Divisions - Feldgrau Forum
    From June 1941 until 31 December 1944 Luftwaffe losses on Eastern front were reported as 53,469 KIA, 114,732 WIA, 48,284 MIA = 216,485 in total. Michate, ...
  33. [33]
    18.Feld Division (Lw): Uniforms and Equipment - Angelfire
    As a late war unit, the weapons issued to Luftwaffe field divisions were often the same as found among those of the Volksgrenadier divisions. Shortages in ...Missing: armament | Show results with:armament
  34. [34]
    In WWII, why did the Luftwaffe posses field divisions? - Reddit
    May 6, 2016 · The Luftwaffe's insistence that the field divisions be staffed by its own officers compounded the shortcomings in training and equipment.Were the Luftwaffe field Divisions In WW2 low morale formations?What was the point of the Luftwaffe Field Divisions during WWII.More results from www.reddit.com
  35. [35]
    2nd Luftwaffe Field Division - Wikipedia
    It was formed using surplus Luftwaffe ground crew and served on the Eastern Front from late 1942 to October 1943, when it was destroyed and disbanded.
  36. [36]
    [PDF] German Army Group North, 15 November 1942
    1st Luftwaffe Field Division: 1st-4th Battalions (16 cos). Panzerjäger (AT) ... (only part of division present, rest with LIV Corps). XXVII Corps: 11th ...
  37. [37]
    D-Day: British and Canadian Sectors - The Luftwaffe Field Division
    Oct 17, 2020 · Goering put a plan forward to Hitler to form all these ... The 16th and 17th Luftwaffe Field Divisions (16. FD(L) and 17. FD(L)) ...Missing: Göring proposal<|separator|>
  38. [38]
    The German Response to D-Day | Imperial War Museums
    ... manpower shortages. Most had good artillery provision, and were leavened by officers and NCOs with valuable combat experience in the East. The more numerous ...
  39. [39]
    16th Luftwaffe Field Division Normandy 1944 - Kampfgruppe Willow
    Aug 21, 2024 · The two Luftwaffe field divisions 16 and 17 were both roughly handled in Normandy during the fighting and were dissolved and broken up by the end of August ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  40. [40]
    The 19th and 20th Luftwaffe Field Divisions - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · The 19th and 20th Luftwaffe Field Divisions (LFD) were part of the 3rd wave of infantry divisions formed from air force personnel in France in March 1943.
  41. [41]
    German Forces in Italy - The Hand Grenade Division
    A number of regular infantry divisions, known as Luftwaffe Field Divisions, were also created beginning in 1942, serving in Russia and later Normandy. ...
  42. [42]
    Luftwaffe Ground Troops - Custermen
    The German paratroopers were organized from a cadre of troops of the Herman Goring Regiment who had been trained to use parachutes. The paratrooper units were ...
  43. [43]
    Luftwaffe field divisions - Matrix Games Forums
    Most of the divisions men remained on the Eastern Front and were captured when AGC was smashed by the Russian offensive in July/August 1944. ... Formed in 1942-43 ...
  44. [44]
    6th Luftwaffe Field Division (Germany) | Military Wiki - Fandom
    The division had barely completed training when it was assigned to Army Group Centre on the Eastern Front, where it participated in the Battle of Velikiye Luki.
  45. [45]
    A Study in Command: General Balck's Chir River Battles, 1942
    Jul 18, 2017 · A German general fought one of history's greatest divisional battles. In late November 1942, Soviet forces broke through the front- line positions held by ...Missing: performance | Show results with:performance
  46. [46]
  47. [47]
    How common were German deserters in WW2? - Quora
    Jan 22, 2021 · The consequences for deserters were severe, with about 20,000 deserters executed and 35,000 sentenced to death. Desertion rates varied ...
  48. [48]
    What was the main weakness of the German Luftwaffe in World War II?
    Sep 12, 2023 · The Luftwaffe was one massive weakness. They couldn't decide on an air strategy: they had very little fuel: they had almost no aluminum.
  49. [49]
    Goering's Ground Troops | U.S. Naval Institute
    60-day returnsThis revealing history explores Hermann Goering's desperate creation of twenty-two Luftwaffe Field Divisions—air force personnel hastily repurposed as infantry ...
  50. [50]
    Goering's Ground Troops: The Luftwaffe Field Divisions of World ...
    30-day returnsThis revealing history explores Hermann Goering's desperate creation of twenty-two Luftwaffe Field Divisions—air force personnel hastily repurposed as ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] historical study - military improvisations during the russian campaign
    inflict heavy casualties upon engineers and infantry by concentrat- ing ... Losses in men and materiel were re- placed by crews and aircraft from the ...
  52. [52]
    12. Luftwaffen-Feld-Division - Axis History
    Jul 16, 2011 · It was transferred to the Heer on 1 November 1943 and redesignated 12. Feld-Division (L). The division suffered heavy losses during the ...
  53. [53]
    17. Luftwaffen-Feld-Division - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    Am 1. November 1943 wurde die Division in das Heer übernommen (Zur Umbenennung der Division in Feld-Division 17 (L) siehe hier). Anfang 1944 wurde die Division ...Missing: Luftwaffe Übergabe
  54. [54]
    13. Luftwaffen-Feld-Division - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    April 1944 wurde die Division aufgelöst: 1.) Durch Heeresgruppe Nord ist die 13. Luftwaffen-Feld-Division aufzulösen und in die 12.
  55. [55]
    22. Luftwaffen-Feld-Division - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    Die 22. Luftwaffen-Felddivision sollte Anfang 1943 bei der Heeresgruppe Nord aus der Luftwaffen-Division Meindl aufgestellt werden. Die Aufstellung wurde aber ...
  56. [56]
    Divisionseinheiten der 16. Feld-Division (L) - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    Im Sommer 1944 wurde das Bataillon in der Normandie stark angeschlagen. Daraufhin wurde das Bataillon im August 1944 offiziell aufgelöst.
  57. [57]
    Divisionseinheiten der 19. Feld-Division (L) - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    Luftwaffen-Sturm-Division. Unter dieser wurde das Bataillon jetzt in Italien eingesetzt. Bei der Auflösung der Division wurde das Bataillon im August 1944 in ...
  58. [58]
    9. Feld-Division (L) - Lexikon der Wehrmacht
    Einsatz und Unterstellung: Die Luftwaffen-Feld-Division 9 wurde am 1 ... Auflösung der Division – etwa am 28. Januar 1944 auf Gut Ulvi bei Wesenberg ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] German Defensive Doctrine - Army University Press
    At the end of World War I, the Germans adopted the elastic defense IR depth and continued to use it as therr basic doctrine through the end of World War IIL ...
  60. [60]
    [PDF] strategy for defeat the luftwaffe 1933 -1945 - DTIC
    ... Losses, Production, and Strategy ... Eastern Front-. June 22-November 1, 1941 ...