Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Lytic cycle

The lytic cycle is a form of viral replication primarily observed in bacteriophages, where the virus infects a bacterial host, hijacks its cellular machinery to produce multiple copies of itself, and ultimately lyses the host cell to release the progeny virions, leading to the destruction of the bacterium.^[1] This process contrasts with the lysogenic cycle, in which the phage genome integrates into the host's DNA as a prophage and replicates passively without immediate cell lysis.^[2] In the lytic cycle, the process begins with attachment, where the bacteriophage binds to specific receptors on the bacterial cell surface, such as lipopolysaccharides, using its tail fibers for recognition and specificity.^[2] Following attachment, penetration occurs as the phage injects its genetic material—typically double-stranded DNA—into the host cytoplasm through the contracted tail sheath, leaving the empty capsid outside.^[2] Once inside, during the biosynthesis phase, the viral genome directs the host's ribosomes to transcribe and translate viral proteins while replicating the phage DNA, often degrading the host's own DNA to redirect resources toward viral production.^[2] The cycle progresses to maturation, where newly synthesized viral genomes and structural proteins (such as capsomeres and tail components) self-assemble into complete virions within the host cell, transforming it into a viral factory.^[2] Finally, in the release stage, phage-encoded enzymes disrupt the bacterial cell wall and membrane, causing lysis and the liberation of approximately 100–200 progeny phages, which can then infect neighboring cells; the entire cycle typically lasts about 40 minutes under optimal conditions.^[3] This lytic replication strategy is characteristic of virulent phages like T4, enabling rapid propagation and playing a crucial role in bacterial population control in ecosystems, as well as in applications such as phage therapy for combating antibiotic-resistant infections due to the phages' high host specificity.^[2]

Overview

Definition and characteristics

The lytic cycle is a form of viral reproduction in which a virus infects a host cell, commandeers its metabolic machinery to synthesize viral components, assembles numerous progeny virions, and ultimately destroys the host cell through lysis to release the new viruses.^[2] This process exemplifies obligate intracellular parasitism, as viruses lack the independent replicative capabilities required for propagation outside a living host, relying entirely on bacterial or eukaryotic cellular resources for genome replication and protein synthesis.^[4] Key characteristics of the lytic cycle include its rapid progression and high yield of progeny, typically completing in 20-60 minutes for bacteriophages under optimal conditions, such as 25-30 minutes at 37°C for Escherichia coli infections.^[5] Each infected cell generally produces 100-200 new virions, though yields can range up to 500 depending on the virus and host.^[6] Unlike non-destructive viral cycles, the lytic pathway does not integrate the viral genome into the host's DNA, instead directing all resources toward immediate, destructive replication that amplifies viral populations at the expense of host viability.^[7] In a high-level overview, the lytic cycle begins with viral attachment and genome delivery into the host, followed by takeover of host transcription and translation to produce viral proteins and replicate the genome as concatemers, culminating in virion assembly and host membrane rupture via phage-encoded enzymes like lysozyme.^[7] A classic model is the infection of E. coli by bacteriophage T4, a virulent myovirus that exemplifies these traits through its efficient, strictly lytic replication without lysogenic potential.^[8]

Comparison to lysogenic cycle

The lytic cycle in temperate bacteriophages, such as lambda phage, involves immediate viral genome replication within the host cell, leading to the production of progeny virions and eventual host cell lysis, whereas the lysogenic cycle entails the integration of the viral genome into the host chromosome as a prophage, allowing dormant replication alongside the host without immediate cell death.^[2]^[9] In the lytic pathway, the host bacterium is destroyed to release new phages, facilitating rapid propagation, while in lysogeny, the prophage remains stable and is passed to daughter cells during host division, potentially conferring benefits like toxin production or immunity to superinfection.^[2]^[10] Lysogeny can switch to the lytic cycle through induction triggered by environmental stresses, such as UV light, DNA-damaging agents like mitomycin C, or nutrient starvation, which activate the bacterial SOS response; this leads to the proteolytic cleavage of the lysogenic repressor protein by RecA, derepressing lytic genes and initiating viral replication.^[9]^[2] Evolutionarily, the lytic cycle provides an advantage for quick dissemination in environments with high host densities and favorable conditions, maximizing short-term reproduction rates, whereas the lysogenic cycle promotes long-term viral survival in hostile or low-host-density settings by avoiding detection and leveraging host propagation until conditions improve for induction.^[10]^[9] Upon initial infection, the choice between lytic and lysogenic cycles serves as a critical decision point influenced by factors like the multiplicity of infection (MOI), where higher MOI—indicating multiple phages per host—favors lysogeny to prevent wasteful lysis in crowded infections; this is mediated by viral genes, such as the cI repressor in lambda phage, which establishes and maintains the prophage state when dominant over lytic promoters.^[11]^[9]^[12]

Stages of infection

Attachment and adsorption

The attachment and adsorption phase initiates the lytic cycle in bacteriophages, particularly tailed phages of the order Caudovirales, where specialized viral proteins mediate specific binding to the host cell surface. In bacteriophage T4, a well-studied myovirus, long tail fibers (LTFs) serve as the primary attachment proteins, extending from the baseplate at the distal end of the tail to recognize and bind host receptors. These LTFs interact with lipopolysaccharides (LPS) on the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli, through specific residues in the LPS core region, including the lipid A and inner core oligosaccharides. Additionally, the outer membrane porin OmpC functions as a co-receptor, enhancing binding affinity by providing a proteinaceous anchor alongside the carbohydrate-based LPS. This dual-receptor strategy ensures stable initial contact, with structural studies revealing that the LTF tip domains, particularly the receptor-binding module, undergo conformational adjustments to accommodate both LPS and OmpC.^[13]^[14]^[15] The specificity of attachment determines the phage's host range, as compatibility between LTFs and host receptors dictates infectivity. For bacteriophage T4, the host range is restricted to E. coli strains expressing OmpC, with mutants lacking this porin showing negligible adsorption and plaque formation. LPS variations further modulate specificity; for instance, T4 efficiently binds E. coli B strains via exposed glucose residues in the LPS core when OmpC is absent, but requires OmpC in K-12 strains where the LPS outer core is modified. This receptor compatibility underscores how evolutionary pressures shape phage tropism, with mismatches preventing infection and thus limiting the phage to susceptible bacterial populations. Seminal genetic and biochemical analyses have confirmed OmpC's essential role, as its overexpression increases T4 adsorption rates while deletion abolishes them.^[16]^[15]^[17] Adsorption proceeds in two kinetically distinct steps: an initial reversible phase followed by irreversible commitment. During reversible attachment, LTFs make transient, low-affinity contacts with the host surface, often via electrostatic interactions, allowing the phage to scan for optimal receptors; this phase is characterized by a forward rate constant on the order of 10^6 to 10^8 M^{-1} s^{-1}. Upon specific recognition, particularly of OmpC or compatible LPS, the LTFs trigger baseplate remodeling and tail sheath contraction, locking the phage in an irreversible state with no dissociation observed. For T4, the overall adsorption rate constant is approximately 3 \times 10^{-9} \ \mathrm{ml \ min^{-1}}, reflecting efficient collision and binding under physiological conditions. This process is ATP-independent, driven by passive diffusion and molecular recognition rather than host metabolic energy, though it demands precise tail orientation toward the peptidoglycan layer for the ensuing penetration.^[18]^[19]^[20]^[21]

Penetration and uncoating

Following attachment to the host cell surface, penetration in the lytic cycle involves the delivery of the viral genome across the bacterial cell envelope into the cytoplasm. For tailed bacteriophages, this occurs through a syringe-like mechanism where the contracted tail tube pierces the outer membrane and traverses the periplasm before fusing with the inner cytoplasmic membrane.^[18] In bacteriophage T4, binding triggers a conformational switch in the baseplate, leading to sheath contraction that drives the rigid tail tube through the outer membrane; the N-terminal domain of gp5 then exhibits lysozyme-like activity to locally degrade the peptidoglycan layer, facilitating advancement into the periplasm.^[18] This process depolarizes the host membrane by creating a transient pore, allowing the linear double-stranded DNA genome to translocate at rates up to 10 kb/s through the channel formed by tail proteins gp27 and gp29.^[18] Uncoating follows immediately, releasing the genome from the capsid while the empty head remains extracellularly attached to the cell surface. In T4, DNA ejection occurs via the portal vertex at the capsid-tail junction, with no further disassembly of the icosahedral capsid required inside the host.^[18] Bacteriophage lambda employs a comparable tail-mediated injection, where the tail tube breaches the periplasmic space, though it lacks a dedicated tail-associated lysozyme and relies on mechanical piercing augmented by host membrane dynamics for genome transfer.^[22] To overcome structural barriers like the peptidoglycan cell wall, many bacteriophages encode depolymerases or hydrolases as tail appendages that specifically degrade polysaccharide components, such as capsular polysaccharides or lipopolysaccharides, enabling efficient envelope traversal.^[23] These enzymes, often fused to tail fibers or spikes, hydrolyze glycosidic bonds to create localized breaches without widespread cell wall damage.^[23] In analogous lytic replication of enveloped animal viruses, penetration proceeds via direct fusion of the viral envelope with the host plasma membrane—mediated by fusion proteins like hemagglutinin in influenza—or receptor-mediated endocytosis followed by endosomal fusion, both triggered by conformational changes often pH-dependent.^[24] Uncoating then liberates the genome into the cytoplasm through capsid disassembly, driven by environmental cues such as low pH or host factors.^[24] Under optimal conditions, genome delivery efficiency approaches 100% for compatible phage-host pairs, with virtually all injected particles successfully transferring their full genome while leaving empty capsids outside the cell.^[18]

Intracellular replication

Transcription and early gene expression

Upon injection of the bacteriophage genome into the host bacterium, transcription of early viral genes commences immediately using the host's RNA polymerase holoenzyme, which includes the σ70 subunit for promoter recognition.^[25] These early promoters (Pe) are strong and resemble Escherichia coli σ70-dependent promoters, featuring conserved -35 (TTGACA-like, often GTTTAC) and -10 (TATAAT-like, often TAT/CT/AAT) boxes separated by 17 ± 1 bp, along with A/T-rich UP elements upstream that enhance binding affinity to the α subunit of RNA polymerase.^[25] T4 identifies approximately 39 such Pe promoters, primarily on the minus strand of its genome, enabling efficient redirection of the host machinery toward viral transcription without initial phage-encoded polymerases.^[25] To further bias host RNA polymerase toward viral promoters over host ones, the injected T4 Alt protein (gpAlt) ADP-ribosylates the α subunit at arginine 265, increasing the enzyme's preference for T4 early promoters while reducing activity at host promoters.^[26] This modification occurs rapidly post-injection, ensuring high-level expression of immediate-early genes within the first minute of infection.^[26] Early genes encode proteins that shut down host functions and prepare the cell for viral replication, including nucleases such as those from genes 46 and 47, which degrade host DNA to prevent competing replication and provide nucleotides for phage use.^[25] They also produce replication enzymes like the gene 41 helicase, which unwinds DNA for upcoming genome copying, and gene 43 DNA polymerase, essential for later replication initiation.^[25] This phase of transcription persists for about 5-10 minutes in T4 infections at optimal temperatures (e.g., 37°C), transitioning to middle-mode expression as phage-encoded factors accumulate.^[26]

Biosynthesis and genome replication

Following the production of viral mRNAs through early gene expression, these transcripts are translated into proteins using the host cell's ribosomal machinery. In bacteriophages such as T4, viral mRNAs are often polycistronic, organized into operons that allow coordinated expression of multiple genes from a single transcript, enabling efficient synthesis of replication and structural proteins by host ribosomes.^[27]^[28] Viral genome replication occurs through specialized mechanisms that utilize phage-encoded enzymes to amplify the genetic material exponentially within the host cell. In bacteriophage T4, replication begins with an origin-dependent theta mode early in infection, transitioning to recombination-dependent rolling circle replication later to produce long concatemers of the genome.^[29] The process relies on viral polymerases, including the T4 DNA polymerase (gene 43 product), which ensures high-fidelity synthesis. Similarly, in bacteriophage T7, replication involves the T7 DNA polymerase for elongation and the T7 RNA polymerase, which not only transcribes late genes but also generates RNA primers to initiate DNA synthesis.^[30]^[31] This replication yields a substantial increase in viral genomes, with T4 achieving approximately 100- to 200-fold amplification per infected cell over the infection cycle, typically completing in 20-30 minutes under optimal conditions.^[32] To support this biosynthesis, phages divert host resources by inhibiting host translation through mechanisms that block initiation on host mRNAs, including ADP-ribosylation of RNA polymerase and RNAylation of host ribosomal proteins (as of 2023), thereby favoring viral protein production.^[33]^[34] Additionally, degradation of host DNA by T4 nucleases provides nucleotide precursors that are efficiently reincorporated into progeny viral genomes.^[35]

Virion assembly and release

Maturation and packaging

Following genome replication, the maturation and packaging stage assembles the viral structural proteins and packages the newly synthesized DNA concatemers into proheads to form mature virions. Proheads are empty precursor capsids formed by the self-assembly of major capsid proteins (MCPs) around a central portal vertex complex, with internal scaffolding proteins temporarily stabilizing the structure and guiding proper morphology before their removal during maturation. In bacteriophage T4, prohead assembly initiates at the dodecameric portal protein gp20, which serves as a nucleation site for the scaffolding core (including gp22 and internal proteins IpI, IpII, IpIII) and co-polymerization of precursor MCP gp23, resulting in a spherical prohead approximately 50 nm in diameter.^[36] During maturation, the prohead undergoes a conformational expansion to its elongated icosahedral shape, driven by DNA packaging pressure; scaffolding proteins are released through a portal channel, and the viral protease gp21 cleaves the precursor gp23 to its mature form gp23* and processes scaffolding proteins for removal, stabilizing the capsid; the 12 special vertices incorporate gp24 instead of gp23.^[37] Genome packaging involves the specific recognition, cleavage, and forceful insertion of DNA concatemers into the prohead via the portal vertex, powered by a terminase motor complex. In lambda phage, the heteromeric terminase (small subunit gpNu1 and large subunit gpA) binds to the cosB subsite adjacent to the nicking site cosN on the concatemer, making staggered cuts to generate cohesive ends and initiating packaging of the monomeric 48.5 kb genome; the DNA is then translocated processively into the prohead through the portal dodecamer, with gpA's ATPase activity providing the energy for insertion until termination at the next cosQ site.^[38] T4 employs a headful packaging strategy without fixed pac sites, where the terminase complex (gp16 small subunit and gp17 large subunit ATPase) docks at the portal vertex, captures free DNA ends from replication intermediates or concatemers, and packages DNA sequentially in ~2% excess of the head volume (approximately 170 kb per head), cleaving via endonuclease activity after each headful to produce terminally redundant genomes.^[37] This motor generates forces up to 57 pN, sufficient to overcome DNA bending and compaction, filling the head to near-crystalline density.^[39] After DNA packaging completes head maturation, tails assemble independently from baseplate proteins and tube/sheath components before attaching to the portal vertex of the filled head, forming the complete virion. In T4, tail assembly starts with the baseplate hub, followed by fiber and tube addition, and the completed tail docks via interactions with the portal to yield infectious particles. Quality control during assembly degrades defective proheads or incompletely packaged virions through proteolysis or exclusion from tail attachment. These processes ensure efficient production of viable progeny, drawing on the biosynthetic pool of capsid, tail, and terminase proteins accumulated earlier in infection.^[40]

Lysis mechanisms

In the lytic cycle of bacteriophages infecting bacterial hosts, the final stage of host cell destruction is mediated primarily by the holin-endolysin system, a coordinated mechanism that ensures timely release of progeny virions. Holins are small transmembrane proteins that accumulate in the host's cytoplasmic membrane during late stages of infection; upon reaching a critical concentration, they oligomerize to form large, nonspecific pores (up to 2-3 nm in diameter) that depolarize the membrane and allow endolysins to access the periplasm.^[41] Endolysins, also known as phage lysins, are muralytic enzymes that degrade the peptidoglycan layer of the bacterial cell wall, leading to osmotic lysis; for example, in bacteriophage T4, the endolysin (gp e) specifically hydrolyzes the β-1,4 glycosidic bonds between N-acetylmuramic acid and N-acetylglucosamine in peptidoglycan.^[42] This dual action—membrane permeabilization by holins followed by wall degradation by endolysins—prevents premature lysis and synchronizes release after virion assembly is complete.^[43] The timing of lysis is precisely regulated to maximize progeny yield, typically occurring after a latent period of 20-30 minutes post-infection in model systems like T4 on exponentially growing Escherichia coli at 37°C, during which intracellular replication and assembly produce 100-200 mature virions per cell.^[44] Lysis is delayed until late gene products, including holins and endolysins, accumulate sufficiently, but under conditions of high multiplicity of infection (MOI > 10), a phenomenon known as lysis inhibition can extend this delay by 10-20 minutes or more, allowing additional rounds of virion production within the same cell to enhance overall fitness in dense populations.^[45] Upon holin triggering, endolysins rapidly degrade the cell wall (within seconds), causing the cytoplasmic membrane to burst through the weakened envelope, propelling 100-200 virions into the extracellular environment while leaving behind cellular debris such as fragmented peptidoglycan and membrane vesicles.^[42]

Molecular regulation

Temporal gene control

In the lytic cycle of bacteriophages, temporal gene control orchestrates the sequential expression of viral genes to ensure efficient progression from host takeover to virion production and release. This regulation primarily occurs at the transcriptional level, dividing gene expression into distinct phases: early, middle, and late. Early genes, expressed immediately after infection (typically within 0-5 minutes in model systems like Escherichia coli at 37°C), focus on host machinery modification and initiation of phage replication. Middle genes follow, supporting DNA replication and metabolic reprogramming, while late genes (often peaking around 10-20 minutes post-infection) encode structural components and lysis factors.^[46]^[47] Key mechanisms for this temporal sequencing include antitermination and sigma factor modification. In bacteriophage λ, the early N protein enables antitermination by binding to nut sites (containing boxA, boxB, and boxC RNA elements) in nascent transcripts, recruiting host Nus factors (NusA, NusB, NusE/S10, NusG) to form a processive, termination-resistant RNA polymerase complex. This allows read-through of terminators, extending transcription from immediate early promoters (pL and pR) to delayed early genes essential for replication.^[48]^[49]^[46] In contrast, bacteriophage T4 employs sigma factor replacement for middle gene activation. Early-expressed proteins AsiA and MotA redirect the host σ⁷⁰ RNA polymerase: AsiA inhibits σ⁷⁰ interaction with the -10 promoter element, while MotA binds the -30 region of middle promoters and recruits the polymerase via protein-protein contacts, enabling expression of replication and recombination genes around 3-5 minutes post-infection. Late T4 transcription then shifts to phage-encoded σ factors like gp55, which replaces σ⁷⁰ and couples expression to ongoing DNA replication via the sliding clamp gp45.^[50]^[51]^[46] Gene expression cascades amplify this temporal order, where products of one phase activate the next. In T4, early genes like motA and asia directly stimulate middle promoters, creating a feed-forward loop that coordinates replication with subsequent structural gene synthesis. Similarly, in λ, early antitermination by N paves the way for Q protein expression, which antiterminates late promoters (pR') for head, tail, and lysis genes. These cascades ensure minimal overlap and resource efficiency during the brief lytic cycle of model phages such as T4 (~25-30 minutes).^[46]^[52]^[47] A critical aspect of lytic commitment in λ involves the Cro repressor, which binds operator sites (OR) to repress the lysogenic promoter pRM while allowing lytic transcription from pR, thereby locking the cycle into the lytic pathway by inhibiting cI repressor accumulation. This bistable Cro-cI switch, established early post-infection, reinforces lytic progression by downregulating competing lysogenic signals.^[53]^[54]

Key regulatory elements

In bacteriophage lambda, the lytic cycle is tightly regulated by specific promoters and operator sites that control early gene expression. The rightward promoter (pR) and leftward promoter (pL) are strong constitutive promoters active immediately upon infection, driving transcription of early genes essential for replication and recombination.^[9] These promoters are overlapped by operator regions, OR and OL, each consisting of three tandem binding sites (OR1-OR3 and OL1-OL3), which serve as docking platforms for repressor proteins to modulate transcription initiation.^[55] The operator sites enable competitive binding that favors lytic progression by repressing lysogenic maintenance genes. Key regulatory proteins further enforce lytic commitment. The Cro repressor, transcribed from pR, binds preferentially to OR3 at increasing concentrations during the lytic cycle, thereby blocking the maintenance promoter pRM and preventing synthesis of the CI repressor that would otherwise establish lysogeny.^[56] This antagonistic action of Cro against CI tips the genetic switch toward lytic replication. Later in the cycle, the Q protein acts as a transcription antiterminator, modifying RNA polymerase at the late gene promoter pR' to bypass a terminator (tR') and allow expression of structural and lysis genes.^[57] Q binds to a specific RNA hairpin structure formed during pausing, stabilizing the elongating complex for efficient late gene transcription.^[58] Regulatory pathways involving enzymatic modifications also coordinate lytic timing. In bacteriophage T4, the DNA adenine methyltransferase (Dam) methylates GATC sites on the phage genome shortly after infection, influencing the temporal progression of replication by protecting DNA from host restriction enzymes and modulating access to replication origins.^[59] This methylation occurs processively on hemimethylated DNA post-replication, ensuring synchronized virion production without interference from host defenses.^[60] Although less common, some phages employ two-component-like signaling cascades, where sensor proteins detect host conditions to activate response regulators that fine-tune lytic gene expression, as seen in systems where phage-encoded histidine kinases interact with host pathways to override stress responses.^[61] Recent studies have uncovered phage-encoded anti-CRISPR systems that counter bacterial adaptive immunity systems such as CRISPR-Cas, enhancing lytic efficiency. Post-2020 research identified anti-CRISPR (Acr) proteins in phage genomes that inhibit host CRISPR-Cas nucleases, allowing unrestrained genome injection and replication during lytic infection.^[62] For instance, AcrIF1 and related proteins bind and allosterically disrupt Cas proteins, preventing spacer acquisition and cleavage of phage DNA.^[63] These mechanisms enable phages to overcome bacterial CRISPR-Cas defenses, and recent engineering of Acrs into therapeutic phages has shown promise in treating infections by multidrug-resistant bacteria.^[63] As of 2025, research continues to uncover new anti-CRISPR proteins, highlighting the ongoing evolutionary arms race between phages and bacterial immune systems.^[64]

References

[1]
Bacteriophages - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
During a lytic replication cycle, a phage attaches to a susceptible host bacterium, introduces its genome into the host cell cytoplasm, and utilizes the host's ...
[2]
Viral Replication – Microbial Genetics (Dr.B)
Figure x.x: A virulent phage shows only the lytic cycle pictured here. In the lytic cycle, the phage 1) attaches to host cell, 2)enters host cells, 3) ...Learning Objectives · Introduction To Viral... · The Life Cycle Of...Missing: scientific | Show results with:scientific<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
The future of bacteriophage biology - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
The whole cycle can last ∼40 minutes and produce ∼100 new phages (Fig. 1). This type of lytic cycle is the only mode of reproduction for many phages. Other ...
[4]
Introduction to Viruses – General Microbiology
Viruses are typically described as obligate intracellular parasites, acellular infectious agents that require the presence of a host cell in order to multiply.
[5]
Duration of infection cycle - Bacteriophage T4 - BNID 111744
Duration of infection cycle. Range, 25 - 30 min. Organism ... time available to complete packaging in the 25- to 30-min infection cycle of phage T4.
[6]
Bacteriophages presence in nature and their role ... - PubMed Central
However, after each generation cycle phage produces ~100-200 new phage particles while one bacterial cell divided into two daughter cells only.
[7]
Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4 - ASM Journals
Typically, lysis is seen to occur at about 25 min, when the infective-center titer sharply rises, as each infected cell releases 100 to 500 progeny phage. One ...Missing: lytic | Show results with:lytic
[8]
Structure and function of bacteriophage T4 - PMC - PubMed Central
Bacteriophage T4 is classified as a member in the Myoviridae family of the Caudovirales order because it has a contractile tail.
[9]
The Developmental Switch in Bacteriophage λ: A Critical Role ... - NIH
Bacteriophage λ of Escherichia coli has two alternative life cycles after infection–host survival with lysogen formation, or host lysis and phage production. In ...
[10]
Lysogeny in nature: mechanisms, impact and ecology of temperate ...
Mar 14, 2017 · Lytic cycles both kill and solubilize host bacteria, whereas lysogenic cycles impact host cells more subtly, both physiologically and ...
[11]
Decision Making at a Subcellular Level Determines the Outcome of ...
The lysogeny probability increases with MOI, and is higher for shorter cells compared to longer ones. Also shown (dotted lines) are control experiments yielding ...
[12]
Lambda's Switch: Lessons from a Module Swap - Cell Press
Consider, to begin with, the lambda phage repressor, the. DNA-binding protein that, in a lysogen, turns off transcription of lytic phage genes. The repressor.
[13]
Molecular anatomy of the receptor binding module of a ...
Dec 19, 2019 · Phage T4 LTF needle binds to both LPS and OmpC receptors · Amino acids lining the LTF needle tip interact with LPS and OmpC receptors · Modulation ...
[14]
Interactions of bacteriophage T4 adhesin with selected ... - Nature
Jul 19, 2018 · T4 bacteriophage recognizes either E. coli B type lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or OmpC protein with identical efficiency. LPS is the main surface ...
[15]
Roles of lipopolysaccharide and outer membrane protein OmpC of ...
OmpC protein is needed for the core-lipid A region of lipopolysaccharide for T4 receptor activity. OmpC is not needed if glucose residue is exposed. Lack of ...
[16]
Understanding Bacteriophage Tail Fiber Interaction with Host ... - MDPI
Oct 12, 2022 · OmpC is the primary receptor for the T4 phage to infect the E. coli K12 strain because T4 cannot adsorb to a K12 mutant lacking OmpC [68]. It is ...
[17]
Characterization of the interactions between Escherichia coli ...
T4 phage uses LPS and OmpC to adsorb to the E. coli K-12 strain (Henning and Jann 1979). LPS is composed of three regions, lipid A, inner core, and outer core ...
[18]
Structural remodeling of bacteriophage T4 and host membranes ...
We show for the first time that most long tail fibers are folded back against the tail sheath until irreversible adsorption, a feature compatible with the ...
[19]
On Kinetics of Phage Adsorption - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
A kinetic model for phage adsorption is proposed, consisting of reversible adsorption and desorption, and irreversible binding. These processes are ...
[20]
Bacteriophage Adsorption Rate and Optimal Lysis Time - PMC - NIH
The estimated adsorption rates for the stf+ and stf− phages are 9.90 ± 3.00 × 10−9 and 1.33 ± 0.383 × 10−9 phage−1 cell−1 ml−1 min−1, with mean ± 95% ...
[21]
Phage adsorption and lytic propagation in Lactobacillus plantarum
Dec 2, 2015 · In concordance with these results, several authors verified that adsorption is an energy-independent process. ... Bacteriophage T4 development ...
[22]
Penetration of Membrane-Containing Double-Stranded-DNA ... - NIH
Changes in the CM permeability and the depolarization of the membrane indicate that the genomes of phages T4, T5, and lambda are injected through a transient ...
[23]
Diversity and Function of Phage Encoded Depolymerases - Frontiers
Jan 9, 2020 · Phage-encoded depolymerases, as tail spike proteins, cleave polysaccharides (CPS, EPS, LPS) of bacteria, aiding in phage infection.
[24]
Virus entry: molecular mechanisms and biomedical applications
Virus entry into animal cells is initiated by attachment to receptors and is followed by important conformational changes of viral proteins, penetration ...
[25]
https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.67.1.86-156.2003
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-422X-7-289
[27]
Monocistronic and polycistronic bacteriophage T4 gene 23 messages
We studied transcription of T4 late genes by in vitro translation of size-fractionated late RNA and by hybridization of T4 late RNA to plasmids containing ...Missing: replication mechanism
[28]
Viral subversion of the host protein synthesis machinery - Nature
Oct 17, 2011 · Phage T4 proteins involved in DNA replication autogenously repress translation of their own encoding mRNA by sequence-specific or, in the ...
[29]
Bacteriophage T4 gene 41 helicase and gene 59 helicase-loading ...
Gene 41 helicase is needed for both early origin-dependent T4 phage replication and replication of plasmids with the cloned T4 origins ori(uvsY) and ori(34).
[30]
Conformational dynamics of bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase and ...
Gene 5 of bacteriophage T7 encodes a DNA polymerase (gp5) responsible for the replication of the phage DNA. Gp5 polymerizes nucleotides with low ...
[31]
Bacteriophage T7 DNA polymerase – sequenase - Frontiers
Apr 15, 2014 · This article reviews the history of studies on T7 DNA polymerase with emphasis on the serial key steps leading to its use in DNA sequencing.
[32]
Design of bacteriophage T4-based artificial viral vectors for human ...
May 30, 2023 · We assemble a series of AVVs designed to deliver full-length dystrophin gene or perform various molecular operations to remodel human genome.
[33]
Bacteriophage T4-induced shut-off of host-specific translation - PMC
To study the mechanism by which bacteriophage T4 inhibits the synthesis of inducible host enzymes we measured the formation of beta-galactosidase from ...
[34]
Bacteriophage T4 Infection of Stationary Phase E. coli: Life after Log ...
Sep 7, 2016 · Once fresh glucose and amino acids become available, the standard lytic infection process rapidly resumes and concentrations of up to 1011 ...
[35]
Structure and assembly of bacteriophage T4 head - Virology Journal
Dec 3, 2010 · The terminase-DNA complex docks on the prohead through gp17 interactions with the special portal vertex formed by the dodecameric gp20, thus ...
[36]
Bacteriophage T4 Head: Structure, Assembly, and Genome Packaging
Feb 14, 2023 · Recent discoveries on the T4 head (capsid) structure, portal vertex, and genome packaging add a significant body of new literature to phage biology.
[37]
Bacteriophage Lambda Terminase and the Mechanism of Viral DNA ...
The cos site represents the junction between two genomes in a concatemer and serves as the packaging initiation site. Unlike the pac sequences of viruses that ...
[38]
A Promiscuous DNA Packaging Machine from Bacteriophage T4
The T4 packaging machine is highly promiscuous, translocating DNA into both proheads and filled phage heads, and can re-fill the capsid with any DNA.Missing: lytic cycle
[39]
Subcellular organization of viral particles during maturation of ...
May 4, 2022 · We show that after capsids complete DNA packaging at the surface of the phage nucleus, tails assemble and attach to capsids, and these particles ...
[40]
Bacteriophage Assembly - MDPI
Assembly of bacteriophage T7 into polycapsids occurs in the presence of scaffolding protein, but only when the ratio of scaffolding protein to the capsid ...
[41]
Bacteriophage lysis: mechanism and regulation - PMC - NIH
The available evidence suggests that holins oligomerize to form nonspecific holes and that this hole-forming step is the regulated step in phage lysis. The ...
[42]
The Bacteriophage T4 Rapid-Lysis Genes and Their Mutational ...
Like most phages with double-stranded DNA, phage T4 exits the infected host cell by a lytic process requiring, at a minimum, an endolysin and a holin.
[43]
Holins: form and function in bacteriophage lysis - Oxford Academic
During the lytic cycle of most bacteriophages, a phage-encoded peptidoglycan-degrading activity is elaborated. At least four entirely distinct types of enzymes ...
[44]
Characterization of a T4-like Bacteriophage vB_EcoM-Sa45lw as a ...
Feb 2, 2022 · The phage has a latent period of 27 min with an estimated burst size of 80 PFU/CFU and is stable at a wide range of pH (pH 3 to pH 10.5) and ...
[45]
Look Who's Talking: T-Even Phage Lysis Inhibition, the Granddaddy ...
Oct 16, 2019 · With lysis inhibition, the outcome is a temporary avoidance of lysis, i.e., a lysis delay, resulting in increased numbers of virions (greater ...
[46]
Regulation of Apoptosis by Enteroviruses - Frontiers
On the other hand, the induction of apoptosis can also benefit viruses because apoptosis of virus-infected cells allows the virus to evade host immune ...
[47]
Biology 2e, Biological Diversity, Viruses, Virus Infections and Hosts
The bacteriophage lytic cycle begins when the phage attaches via a slender stalk to the host A temperate bacteriophage has both lytic and lysogenic cycles.
[48]
Transcription regulation mechanisms of bacteriophages
In the lytic cycle (e.g., phage T4), phage encoded DNA captures the host transcriptional machinery to synthesize phage proteins, subsequently followed by phage ...
[49]
Integrated Omics Reveal Time-Resolved Insights into T4 Phage ...
Nov 12, 2022 · In this study, we apply transcriptomics and proteomics to characterize the temporal patterns of transcription and protein synthesis during the T4 phage ...
[50]
The antitermination activity of bacteriophage λ N protein is controlled ...
N protein activates the transcription of developmental genes of phage λ by contacting the RNA polymerase (RNAP) of transcriptional complexes of the E. coli host ...
[51]
Bacteriophage lambda N protein alone can induce transcription ...
The addition of NusA makes antitermination by the N-nut+ complex yet more effective. This NusA-dependent increase in antitermination is lost when delta nut ...
[52]
phage T4 MotA transcription factor contains a novel DNA binding ...
Apr 30, 2018 · During infection, bacteriophage T4 produces the MotA transcription factor that redirects the host RNA polymerase to the expression of T4 middle genes.
[53]
Structural basis of phage transcriptional regulation - ScienceDirect
Aug 8, 2024 · The transcription of phage T4 genes is temporal., The promoters of T4 early genes are similar to host bacterial promoters, featuring the ...
[54]
The activation domain of the MotA transcription factor ... - EMBO Press
Bacteriophage T4 encodes a transcription factor, MotA, that binds to the −30 region of middle‐mode promoters and activates transcription by host RNA polymerase ...
[55]
Cro's role in the CI–Cro bistable switch is critical for λ's transition ...
Cro is essential for λ lytic development, but a large body of indirect evidence indicates that it is Cro's action in turning down lytic transcription, rather ...
[56]
Structural basis for transcription antitermination at bacterial intrinsic ...
Jul 11, 2019 · Our study reveals the structural basis for transcription antitermination by phage proteins and provides insights into bacterial transcription regulation.
[57]
Promoter Interference in a Bacteriophage Lambda Control Region
The pR and pRM promoters of bacteriophage lambda direct transcription in divergent directions from start sites separated by 83 phosphodiester bonds.
[58]
Role of the lytic repressor in prophage induction of phage λ ... - PNAS
Cro is expressed from the PR promoter and, as its levels increase during the lytic cycle, it begins to bind to its operators. At relatively low concentrations, ...
[59]
The phage λ Q gene product: Activity of a transcription antiterminator ...
Phage λ gene Q encodes a positive regulator of phage late gene expression. We show that purified Q gene protein functions as a transcription antiterminator ...
[60]
Phage lambda gene Q antiterminator recognizes RNA polymerase ...
The positive regulator encoded by phage lambda gene Q is a transcription antiterminator that affects RNA polymerase initiating at the phage late gene ...
[61]
Structure of the bacteriophage T4 DNA adenine methyltransferase
The hemimethylated GATC sites, present immediately following DNA replication, regulate the timing and targeting of a number of cellular functions. In addition, ...
[62]
Molecular Biology of Bacteriophage T4 - Part V - ASM Journals
Part V covers host-phage interactions, including the transition from host to phage metabolism, recognition, attachment, injection, and effects on host genome ...
[63]
The phage-encoded PIT4 protein affects multiple two-component ...
Nov 14, 2023 · In this study, a phage-derived protein was studied that impacts key virulence factors of the pathogen via interaction with multiple histidine kinases of TCSs.
[64]
Structure-guided discovery of anti-CRISPR and anti-phage defense ...
Jan 20, 2024 · Acrs are the best studied anti-defense systems and were originally discovered in 2013 from phage genomes infecting strains of Pseudomonas ...
[65]
Engineered Bacteriophages Containing Anti-CRISPR Suppress ...
Aug 16, 2022 · Research has shown that Acr-containing phages suppress CRISPR immunity through a cooperation mechanism; initial infection by Acr phages triggers ...<|control11|><|separator|>