Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Magic Quadrant

The Magic Quadrant is a research methodology developed by , Inc., that provides a graphical competitive positioning of technology providers in specific markets, plotting vendors on a two-dimensional matrix based on their completeness of vision (the ability to understand and respond to market needs through innovative strategies) and ability to execute (the capacity to deliver products, services, and financial viability). This tool divides vendors into four distinct quadrants to illustrate their relative strengths and market positioning: Leaders, who demonstrate strong vision and execution, positioning them as dominant players; Challengers, with robust execution but more limited foresight; Visionaries, offering innovative ideas but potentially weaker delivery capabilities; and Niche Players, specializing in targeted segments with narrower scope or emerging presence. The evaluation process employs standardized criteria, including product functionality, sales execution, , and market responsiveness, derived from vendor submissions, reference checks, and analyst insights. Gartner's Magic Quadrants cover a wide array of fast-growing sectors, such as enterprise IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, data analytics, , and network services, enabling IT leaders and teams to assess maturity, identify potential partners, and make informed decisions. Each report includes not only the quadrant graphic but also detailed analyses, actionable recommendations, and interactive features for customization by industry, region, or organization size. As a foundational resource since its public introduction in the —building on internal methodologies from the 1980s—the Magic Quadrant has become a for vendor benchmarking and in the global ecosystem.

Introduction

Definition

The Magic Quadrant is a proprietary series of market research reports published by Gartner, Inc., that employs qualitative data analysis to evaluate and position vendors operating within specific technology markets. This tool manifests as a graphical two-dimensional matrix, which plots vendors to offer a concise visual summary of their competitive standings in the assessed market. The term "Magic Quadrant" was first used publicly by in 1994, with its conceptual roots tracing back to the as an internal mechanism for rapidly summarizing market dynamics. These reports primarily target fast-growing or emerging sectors where differentiation plays a pivotal role in market evolution. The resulting placements divide into four quadrants—Leaders, Challengers, Visionaries, and Niche Players—highlighting varied strengths in execution and innovation.

Purpose and Usage

The Magic Quadrant serves as a strategic tool developed by to deliver buyers, investors, and executives with a concise snapshot of the competitive landscape within specific markets, enabling informed decision-making during vendor selection processes. By offering graphical positioning alongside in-depth analyses, it highlights relative strengths and weaknesses of providers, providing actionable insights into market maturity, direction, and key participants to support strategic investments. In contexts, the Magic Quadrant assists organizations in evaluating maturity, capabilities, and overall presence, frequently informing the of requests for proposals (RFPs) and influencing negotiations by establishing benchmarks for supplier performance. This application helps leaders identify suitable technology solutions that align with objectives, such as optimizing sourcing and digitizing operations in areas like cloud infrastructure and cybersecurity. Gartner publishes Magic Quadrant reports annually or biennially for targeted markets, resulting in over 100 such reports each year as of 2025 to reflect evolving industry dynamics. From a perspective, vendors commonly reference their quadrant placement in promotional materials to enhance and credibility, though Gartner enforces strict policies prohibiting any implication that positioning can be purchased or influenced by payments.

History

Origins

Gartner was founded in 1979 by , a former International Business Machines Corp. executive and analyst, as an independent research and advisory firm specializing in markets. The company, initially known as Gartner Group, Inc., aimed to provide objective analysis and insights to help organizations navigate the emerging complexities of IT investments. In the early 1980s, Gartner analysts, under the leadership of during internal research meetings at the firm's headquarters, developed an early version of the Magic Quadrant as a simple visual matrix. This tool functioned as a graphical summary to position vendors within market segments, offering a concise overview during client briefings and thought experiments known as "Stalking Horses," where scenarios were explored to test strategic assumptions. It emerged as an internal aid to distill complex vendor evaluations amid the rapid expansion of IT sectors driven by the personal computer revolution. The initial motivation for this visual framework was to create a standardized method for comparing technology providers in dynamic and fragmented markets, particularly as the IT industry accelerated with the PC adoption surge in the 1980s and the groundwork for the boom in the early 1990s. The term "Magic Quadrant" was first used publicly by in a research report in 1994, marking its transition from an internal resource to a branded analytical tool.

Evolution

Following its public introduction in 1994, the Magic Quadrant expanded its scope during the late 1990s and 2000s through Gartner's acquisitions and growth, broadening coverage from primarily IT hardware markets to include software and services sectors. For instance, the first Magic Quadrant for digital commerce software was published in 2000, marking entry into key . This period also saw the introduction of companion reports, such as Critical Capabilities, which provide use-case-specific evaluations to complement the quadrant positioning and were piloted in evolutions around 2017. In the 2010s, the Magic Quadrant adapted to the era by increasing update frequency and extending coverage to emerging areas like cloud infrastructure, platforms, and cybersecurity solutions. This shift reflected rapid market changes, with reports such as the Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Services appearing annually from onward. Legal challenges, including a 2009 lawsuit by ZL Technologies alleging and lack of transparency in e-discovery quadrant placements, and a 2014 suit by claiming favoritism in network performance monitoring ratings, underscored concerns over methodological fairness and prompted to refine its processes for greater disclosure. A key milestone in involved updates to evaluation criteria in reports like the Magic Quadrant for Customer Engagement Center, emphasizing metrics such as multichannel support and to better align with buyer priorities. By the , as of 2025, the Magic Quadrant has integrated with Gartner's Peer Insights platform, incorporating verified end-user reviews to enhance vendor assessments and provide more holistic insights alongside traditional analyst evaluations. Cumulatively, approximately 150 technology markets have been covered by Magic Quadrants since their . Throughout these developments, the core axes of "Ability to Execute" and "Completeness of Vision" have remained consistent, providing a stable framework for positioning.

Methodology

Evaluation Criteria

Gartner's Magic Quadrant evaluates vendors along two principal dimensions: Ability to Execute and Completeness of Vision. These dimensions form the basis for positioning vendors on the , with scores derived from a structured assessment process tailored to each . The methodology emphasizes a balanced consideration of current performance and future potential, ensuring that placements reflect both operational effectiveness and . Weightings for the dimensions and subcriteria can be adjusted via interactive features for customized analysis. Ability to Execute measures a vendor's proficiency in delivering its stated through tangible products, s, and go-to-market strategies. Key components include the breadth and depth of product or offerings, overall financial viability and , execution and pricing effectiveness, market responsiveness and track record, marketing execution, support, and operational capabilities. Vendors are scored on these elements primarily through detailed questionnaires submitted by the vendors themselves, analysis of public financial filings, and insights gathered from hundreds of client inquiries conducted by analysts. Since 2021, independent user reviews from Peer Insights are also incorporated. This dimension underscores a vendor's capacity to meet current market demands and sustain operations amid competitive pressures. Completeness of Vision assesses how well a comprehends current and dynamics and positions itself to capitalize on them through and . It encompasses market understanding and anticipation of needs, the robustness of the 's and sales strategies, the alignment of product offerings with market evolution, the adaptability of its , focus on vertical or industry-specific strategies, commitment to and thought , and geographic for expansion. Evaluation draws from in-depth interviews and briefings with executives, combined with the proprietary expertise of research analysts who synthesize trends from ongoing market monitoring. This dimension highlights a vendor's potential to shape the market rather than merely respond to it. The underlying data for these criteria stems from a blend of sources, including more than 500 client inquiries per Magic Quadrant , formal briefings, and publicly available information such as regulatory filings and . Notably, the core Magic Quadrant does not incorporate direct surveys from end-users, though such may inform related like Critical Capabilities . inclusion in a Magic Quadrant is not automatic; candidates must satisfy predefined market-specific thresholds, such as minimum revenue from the relevant segment and a viable global presence across multiple regions, to ensure the analysis focuses on significant, sustainable players.

Axes and Positioning

The Magic Quadrant graphic employs two key axes to position vendors within a given . The horizontal axis, labeled Completeness of Vision, extends from low (left) to high (right) and measures a vendor's capacity to articulate an innovative, forward-looking strategy that aligns with evolution and customer needs. This axis evaluates elements such as understanding, , and the potential to shape industry direction. The vertical axis, Ability to Execute, runs from low (bottom) to high (top) and assesses a vendor's operational in translating into tangible results. It considers factors like product and service quality, sales and marketing prowess, customer support, and overall financial stability to determine execution strength. Vendors receive composite scores on these axes derived from Gartner's evaluation criteria, after which they are plotted as individual dots on the . Median lines are drawn across both axes to delineate the four quadrants, with vendors in the upper-right region—combining high and execution—positioned as leaders in competitive maturity. Visual aids enhance interpretability, with historical views showing year-over-year vendor movement through changes in dot positions over time (typically up to three years). Accompanying the graphic is a detailed narrative in the report, which profiles each vendor's strengths and weaknesses, offering contextual analysis tied to their axis scores and market dynamics.

Quadrants and Ratings

Leaders

The Leaders quadrant occupies the top-right position on the Magic Quadrant graph, where vendors score highly on both the Ability to Execute and Completeness of axes. Vendors placed in the Leaders quadrant are characterized as market frontrunners with a demonstrated history of effective execution against their strategic visions, coupled with strong positioning for trends. These providers typically exhibit robust , extensive product and service portfolios, significant , and the ability to influence industry standards through their offerings and practices. For organizations, Leaders represent preferred options for implementing stable, enterprise-scale solutions, as their balanced strengths in current delivery and future-oriented planning minimize risks in complex deployments. Prominent examples include and , which frequently appear in this quadrant within domains like cloud infrastructure and platform services. Progression into this space signals a provider's achievement of market maturity and sustained .

Challengers

The Challengers quadrant in 's Magic Quadrant is located in the bottom-right position, representing vendors that demonstrate high Ability to Execute but comparatively lower Completeness of Vision. This placement highlights providers with robust operational capabilities and market presence, yet limited foresight into emerging trends and market evolution. Challengers are typically large, established companies with proven products, mature implementations, and significant resources, enabling them to perform effectively in current market conditions or dominate specific segments. However, their strategies often remain conservative, focusing on maintaining existing strengths rather than pioneering disruptive innovations, which positions them as incumbents potentially resistant to rapid shifts in technology or customer demands. For buyers, Challengers offer reliability and stability, making them attractive options for risk-averse organizations prioritizing immediate execution and proven delivery over long-term visionary alignment. These vendors hold potential to shift leftward toward the Leaders quadrant by investing in innovation to better anticipate market directions. Examples include enterprise software giants like IBM, which has been positioned as a Challenger in certain legacy markets, such as data center backup solutions in 2022, due to strong execution amid evolving demands.

Visionaries

The Visionaries quadrant in Gartner's Magic Quadrant positions vendors in the top-left area of the graphical representation, where they score highly on Completeness of Vision but lower on Ability to Execute. This placement reflects a strong forward-looking perspective on market evolution, often envisioning transformative changes or new paradigms, yet with current limitations in delivering scalable solutions. Vendors in this quadrant are typically innovative disruptors that anticipate and market shifts, such as those involving or , but face constraints in resources, market presence, or operational maturity that hinder immediate execution. They demonstrate a deep understanding of where the market is headed or how rules might be redefined, positioning them as thought leaders rather than current market dominators. The axes of the Magic Quadrant—measuring Ability to Execute vertically and Completeness of Vision horizontally—highlight these vendors' visionary scores as a key differentiator. For buyers, offer cutting-edge solutions aligned with future trends, making them ideal for organizations seeking high-growth potential in innovative areas, though this comes with elevated risk due to unproven scalability. An example includes HYCU, positioned as a in the 2025 Magic Quadrant for and Platforms due to its focus on and multi-cloud protection.

Niche Players

Niche Players occupy the bottom-left quadrant of the Magic Quadrant, characterized by vendors scoring lower on both Ability to Execute and Completeness of compared to those in other quadrants. This positioning reflects a limited overall market presence, where vendors demonstrate constrained capabilities in delivering comprehensive solutions across the broader market. These vendors typically focus successfully on a small market segment or exhibit a lack of focus, failing to out-innovate or outperform competitors in key areas. They often specialize in niche offerings, such as region-specific solutions or targeted functionalities, due to limited resources, nascent development, or a deliberate strategy to serve particular use cases rather than the entire market. As a result, Niche Players may excel in one sub-area—such as cost-effectiveness for small-scale deployments—but generally show weaknesses in , breadth, or global reach. For buyers, Niche Players offer value in scenarios requiring specialized or budget-conscious options, where broad market leadership is not essential. They can provide tailored solutions that align closely with specific business needs, potentially offering higher suitability for niche applications than more generalized providers. However, their limited execution and vision imply higher risks in long-term viability or expansion, making them suitable primarily for organizations with focused requirements rather than enterprise-wide transformations. These traits position them as potential growth candidates, as successful niche strategies could enable movement to other quadrants with resource expansion or market adaptation.

Related Gartner Research

Critical Capabilities

Gartner's Critical Capabilities report employs a weighted to evaluate vendor products and services against a set of use cases, typically 4 to 7 depending on the , tailored to the specific under , such as functionality, capabilities, and . This approach identifies critical differentiators that determine how well offerings support common deployment scenarios, enabling a granular comparison beyond broad positioning. The primary purpose of Critical Capabilities is to deliver a quantitative that complements the qualitative insights of the Magic Quadrant, assigning scores from 1 (poor) to 5 (outstanding) for each capability across the defined use cases. By focusing on product and service performance rather than vendor strategy, it addresses the Magic Quadrant's high-level nature, helping stakeholders identify solutions optimized for particular needs like real-time processing or hybrid environments. The evaluation process leverages foundational data from the Magic Quadrant research, augmented by direct product testing, vendor demonstrations, and aggregated client feedback from surveys and inquiries. Analysts define use cases based on market demands, weight capabilities according to their relevance (e.g., higher emphasis on data integration for logical data warehousing), and update scores off-cycle if significant changes occur in offerings. In practice, Critical Capabilities aids by allowing buyers to prioritize vendors aligned with their priorities; for instance, in the 2019 report on Data Management Solutions for , the "Logical Data Warehouse" weighted access to multiple data sources at 30%, highlighting its importance for integrating diverse datasets in exploratory workflows. This use-case-driven scoring facilitates customized vendor shortlisting and RFP development, emphasizing practical fit over general leadership.

Other Frameworks

Gartner's Hype Cycle is a graphical representation that illustrates the maturity, adoption, and social application of specific technologies through five phases: Innovation Trigger, Peak of Inflated Expectations, Trough of Disillusionment, Slope of Enlightenment, and Plateau of Productivity. This framework helps contextualize markets evaluated in the Magic Quadrant by highlighting where technologies stand in their adoption lifecycle, enabling organizations to assess risks and opportunities beyond vendor positioning. The Market Guide serves as an alternative research format for nascent or rapidly evolving markets that lack the maturity required for a full Magic Quadrant . It provides strategic direction, identifies key market participants, and offers practical recommendations without the quadrant-based visualization, focusing instead on short-term expectations and early-stage dynamics. Gartner Peer Insights, launched in 2015 and integrated into Magic Quadrant reports starting around 2017, is a verified user review platform that aggregates end-user experiences to validate analyst evaluations. It adds real-world perspectives through ratings and reviews, helping buyers cross-reference vendor placements in the Magic Quadrant with peer feedback on implementation and satisfaction. The Strategic (SPM) framework integrates outputs from multiple research tools—such as Magic Quadrants and Hype Cycles—to support enterprise-wide strategy formulation. It enables organizations to align technology investments across portfolios, modeling interdependencies to achieve broader business outcomes. This approach complements the Magic Quadrant by providing a synthesized view for , similar to how Critical Capabilities refines vendor assessments in specific use cases.

Criticisms and Limitations

Key Criticisms

One major criticism of the Gartner Magic Quadrant is its inherent subjectivity and lack of transparency in the evaluation process. The proprietary criteria used to assess vendors' completeness of vision and ability to execute are not publicly disclosed in detail, leading to accusations that analyst biases and undisclosed methodologies influence vendor placements. This opacity has fueled legal challenges, such as the 2009 lawsuit filed by ZL Technologies against Gartner, which alleged that the Magic Quadrant misled customers by favoring large vendors with substantial marketing budgets over innovative smaller competitors. Similarly, in 2014, NetScout Systems sued Gartner, claiming that its placement as a "Challenger" rather than a "Leader" in the Network Performance Monitoring and Diagnostics Magic Quadrant resulted from the firm's refusal to purchase Gartner's consulting services, highlighting perceived conflicts of interest in the analyst-vendor relationship. Perceptions of a "" model further undermine the Quadrant's credibility, with critics arguing that vendors must invest heavily in briefings, inquiries, and advisory services—often costing tens of thousands of dollars—to secure favorable evaluations, potentially creating favoritism toward well-resourced companies. These accusations, prominently raised in the NetScout lawsuit, portray 's business model as one where non-participating vendors are disadvantaged, though Gartner has consistently denied any direct linkage between payments and positioning. Despite ongoing scrutiny, including discussions in 2025 analyst reports on methodological biases such as overlooking vendor lock-in complexity or the absence of Visionaries in certain markets like CCaaS, no lawsuits have successfully proven instances of explicit pay-for-placement, with courts dismissing claims due to insufficient evidence of malice or . The Magic Quadrant's annual update cycle also draws criticism for providing only a static of the , which fails to capture rapid technological shifts, disruptive innovations, or evolving customer needs in fast-paced sectors like and . This temporal limitation means that a vendor's position may quickly become outdated, overlooking breakthroughs that occur between reports and potentially marginalizing niche players focused on specialized or regional solutions. For instance, the methodology's emphasis on broad market execution often sidelines vendors excelling in targeted innovations or geographic outside and , reinforcing a toward global incumbents. Finally, the Quadrant is faulted for encouraging overreliance by teams and executives, who sometimes treat it as the definitive buying guide rather than one data point, which can stifle and . This misuse has real-world consequences, disadvantaging vendors not aligned with 's criteria and potentially harming competitive diversity.

Responses and Alternatives

addresses criticisms of the Magic Quadrant by emphasizing its rigorous peer-review process, where each report undergoes evaluation by multiple analysts and research management to ensure analytical independence and accuracy. The firm's and analyst ethics policies further reinforce objectivity, prohibiting undue influence from vendors and requiring analysts to base evaluations on factual assessments without external pressures. In response to vendor concerns about participation, explicitly prohibits threats of withdrawal, stating that vendors cannot of inclusion in a Magic Quadrant to maintain a comprehensive market view for clients. To enhance transparency following legal challenges that affirmed the opinion-based nature of its research, has incorporated greater disclosure of evaluation criteria weights in its Magic Quadrant , allowing users to adjust these weights interactively for customized analyses. Additionally, the firm has integrated Peer Insights—user-generated reviews from verified customers—directly into Magic Quadrant reports, providing a balanced perspective that combines analyst expertise with real-world user feedback to mitigate perceptions of subjectivity. Competing approaches to vendor evaluation include the Forrester Wave, which employs a similar graphical quadrant but places greater emphasis on quantitative scoring across strategy, current offerings, and market presence for more measurable comparisons. The MarketScape offers an alternative through its linear positioning model, mapping vendors on a two-dimensional of capabilities and strategies without distinct quadrants, focusing on holistic market dynamics. For user-driven alternatives, platforms like and TrustRadius aggregate crowd-sourced reviews from end-users, enabling peer-based rankings that prioritize practical experiences over analyst opinions. As of 2025, the research industry is shifting toward hybrid models that blend traditional analyst insights with crowd-sourced data, as seen in Gartner's Peer Insights and broader trends in combining qualitative expert analysis with quantitative user feedback for more robust evaluations.

References

  1. [1]
    Magic Quadrant Research Methodology - Gartner
    A Gartner Magic Quadrant is a culmination of research in a specific market, giving you a wide-angle view of the relative positions of the market's competitors.
  2. [2]
    Definition of Magic Quadrant - IT Glossary - Gartner
    Magic Quadrants compare vendors based on Gartner's standard criteria and methodology. Each report comes with a Magic Quadrant graphic that depicts a market ...
  3. [3]
    How Markets and Vendors Are Evaluated in Gartner Magic Quadrants
    Mar 19, 2024 · Magic Quadrants offer visual snapshots, in-depth analyses and actionable advice that provide insight into a market's direction, maturity and participants.<|control11|><|separator|>
  4. [4]
    Gartner Magic Quadrant & Critical Capabilities
    Gartner Magic Quadrant research methodology provides a graphical competitive positioning of four types of technology providers in fast-growing markets.Research · 4G and 5G Private Mobile... · Access Management · Become a ClientMissing: explanation | Show results with:explanation
  5. [5]
    Can we really trust the Gartner Magic Quadrant? - Tech Monitor
    Mar 3, 2017 · The term “Magic Quadrant” was first used in public by Gartner in 1994 but its history goes back to the 1980s when it was meant as a quick ...Missing: origin | Show results with:origin
  6. [6]
    Gartner Magic Quadrants - Create Your Own
    The Gartner Magic Quadrant is a market research report providing qualitative analysis into a market's direction, maturity, and participants.
  7. [7]
    The Guide to Digital Service and Technology Partners | Gartner
    The Gartner Magic Quadrant helps compare providers, understand their visions, and plots their competitive positions, including Leaders, Visionaries, Niche ...
  8. [8]
    Gartner Magic Quadrant for Source-to-Pay Suites
    Mar 24, 2025 · This Magic Quadrant will help procurement technology leaders evaluate and select the most suitable software vendor to optimize and digitize their sourcing.
  9. [9]
    Content Compliance Policy - Gartner
    You may promote your placement on the X & Y axes. Examples: ABC Company is highest in execution on the Gartner Magic Quadrant for XXX. ABC Company is furthest ...
  10. [10]
    https://www.wsj.com/business/entrepreneurship/gideon-gartner-founded-company-advising-computer-buyers-11608216711
  11. [11]
    Gideon Gartner, visionary of technology research, dies at 85
    Dec 17, 2020 · Gartner put an indelible stamp on the tech research industry in 1979 when he started the Gartner Group. Up to then, computer research firms ...
  12. [12]
    Gartner Magic Quadrant - CIO Wiki
    Feb 23, 2021 · The term “Magic Quadrant” was first used in public by Gartner in 1994 but its history goes back to the 1980s when it was meant as a quick ...Missing: origins | Show results with:origins
  13. [13]
    Profile of Gartner Inc. and Gartner Consulting - Umbrex
    Founding and Early Years (1979–1980s): Gartner was founded in 1979 by Gideon Gartner, a former IBM analyst, along with co-founder David Stein. The firm ...
  14. [14]
    https://www.managementconsulted.com/gartner/
  15. [15]
    What is the Gartner Magic Quadrant and Why Does it Matter?
    Feb 7, 2025 · The Gartner Magic Quadrant is a visual method of reporting. Magic Quadrants are used to depict which companies are leading the way within a specific market.What is Gartner's Magic... · How to Read the Gartner... · Why is the Gartner Magic...
  16. [16]
    A Data-driven Analysis of Gartner Magic Quadrants for Digital ...
    Sep 19, 2022 · There have been around 175 different MQs since Gartner started producing them in 1994. Many are retired and others not being updated every year.
  17. [17]
    Critical Capabilities Research Methodology - Gartner
    Magic Quadrants contain a broader analysis of the vendors in a market, while the companion Critical Capabilities directly focuses on the product/service ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Gartner Critical Capabilities Evolution Pilot 2017
    Are you making any changes to the complementary Magic Quadrant methodology? Updates will apply only to Critical Capabilities at this time. Gartner currently ...
  19. [19]
    The Chronicles of Cloud Computing | Samsung SDS | USA
    May 26, 2023 · Bespin Global has been registered in Gartner's Magic Quadrant for five years since 2017. Although the aspects have changed a little now ...
  20. [20]
    2011–2021 (and beyond) : A decade of public cloud - Medium
    Nov 27, 2021 · Gartner recently published its “Magic Quadrant for Cloud Infrastructure and Platform Services” for the year 2021, bringing the 2010–2020 period to a close.
  21. [21]
    Gartner Sued Over Magic Quadrant for Alleged Damages of $132M ...
    Oct 20, 2009 · Gartner Sued Over Magic Quadrant for Alleged Damages of $132M plus Punitives of $1.3B · Fair Disclosure on Conflicts of Interest. Gartner ...
  22. [22]
    Vendor Sues Gartner Over Magic Quadrant 'Pay to Play' Model
    Aug 8, 2014 · NetScout Systems, based in Westford, Mass., filed the lawsuit in Connecticut Superior Court Tuesday under the Connecticut Unfair Trade ...Missing: 2012 | Show results with:2012
  23. [23]
    Gartner's 2017 Magic Quadrant for CRM - Zendesk
    In this report, Magic Quadrant for the CRM Customer Engagement Center 2017, Gartner examines the global market for customer service and support applications.Missing: metrics | Show results with:metrics
  24. [24]
    SAS a Leader: Gartner's 2017 Magic Quadrant for Multichannel ...
    Apr 18, 2017 · “Customer experience” is more than marketing buzz – it is often the differentiator between a good brand and a great one.
  25. [25]
    Gartner Peer Insights | Find & Compare Enterprise Software and ...
    Trusted Reviews. Get valuable peer perspectives when and where you need them - seamlessly integrated into Gartner.com, Magic Quadrants, Peer Finder and more.Gartner, Inc. · Peer Community · Your Reviews · CategoriesMissing: 2020s | Show results with:2020s
  26. [26]
    Gartner Hype Cycle Identifies Top AI Innovations in 2025
    Aug 5, 2025 · AI agents and AI-ready data are the two fastest advancing technologies on the 2025 Gartner Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence, according to ...
  27. [27]
    The 2025 Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence Goes Beyond GenAI
    Jul 8, 2025 · The 2025 Hype Cycle for Artificial Intelligence helps leaders prioritize high-impact, emerging AI techniques, navigate regulatory complexity ...
  28. [28]
    Does Gartner Have a CDP Magic Quadrant? - Treasure Data
    Aug 10, 2021 · Gartner released its first Magic Quadrant on the CDP market in 2024. ... covering over 300+ technology markets and 3,000 vendors.” Peer ...
  29. [29]
    How Markets and Vendors Are Evaluated in Gartner Magic Quadrants
    Aug 15, 2019 · Magic Quadrants offer visual snapshots, in-depth analyses and actionable advice that provide insight into a market's direction, maturity and participants.
  30. [30]
    Understanding Gartner Magic Quadrant: what is it really? - Tyk.io
    Mar 11, 2024 · A Magic Quadrant is a strategic tool giving deep insights into market players, using a uniform set of criteria to evaluate them, then treating the results ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Gartner Magic Quadrant 2013 Enhancements Preview for Gartner ...
    The historical view of a Magic Quadrant is available where that MQ has been consistently published for the specific market over 2 or 3 years.
  32. [32]
    Gartner Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Storage Platforms
    Sep 2, 2025 · Leaders execute well against their current vision and are well positioned for tomorrow. · Visionaries understand where the market is going or ...Included In Full Research · The Magic Quadrant: Your... · The Magic Quadrant Is More...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  33. [33]
    Magic Quadrant for Configure, Price and Quote Application Suites
    Nov 8, 2022 · This Magic Quadrant evaluates 15 vendors to help application leaders find the best one for their needs. Included in Full Research. Market ...
  34. [34]
    Our Take: How We Became a Gartner Magic Quadrant Challenger
    Jun 2, 2022 · Other inclusion criteria categories include the vendor's offering platform, revenue and presence, scope, delivery model, deployments, new ...Missing: threshold | Show results with:threshold
  35. [35]
    IBM positioned as a Visionary in the 2023 Gartner ® Magic Quadrant ...
    Sep 26, 2023 · We believe that fact led to IBM being placed in the Challengers quadrant in last year's edition. Had we stayed the course with our previous ...Missing: historical examples
  36. [36]
    How Products and Services Are Evaluated in Gartner Critical ...
    Mar 19, 2024 · Gartner Critical Capabilities research complements Magic Quadrant analyses by offering deeper insight into products and services provided by multiple vendors ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  37. [37]
    [PDF] Critical Capabilities for Data Management Solutions for Analytics
    analytics across any deployment environment ... Gartner Critical Capabilities”. “Magic Quadrant for Data Management Solutions for Analytics”. Evidence.
  38. [38]
    Gartner Hype Cycle Research Methodology
    Gartner Hype Cycle methodology offers insights into technology and application evolution to help you manage deployment aligned with business goals.
  39. [39]
    Market Guide Research Methodology - Gartner
    When markets are growing and IT solutions are stable yet competitive, Magic Quadrants provide the best tool for understanding the positioning of the ...Missing: characteristics | Show results with:characteristics
  40. [40]
    Interactive Magic Quadrant With Peer Insights User Reviews - Gartner
    9. The Magic Quadrant is published annually. How often are the Peer Insights user reviews updated in the Interactive Magic Quadrant? The Peer Insights ratings ...Missing: per | Show results with:per
  41. [41]
    Best Strategic Portfolio Management Reviews 2025 - Gartner
    SPM offerings integrate multiple portfolios with interdependent structures, creating a dynamic model of the path to realize strategic outcomes. These products ...Product Listings · Planisware Enterprise · Decision Lens
  42. [42]
    Gartner Magic Quadrant lawsuit: Sour grapes or real gripes? - ZDNET
    Oct 21, 2009 · Gartner's use of their proprietary “Magic Quadrant” is misleading and favors large vendors with large sales and marketing budgets over smaller ...
  43. [43]
    Vendor sues Gartner over Magic Quadrant - iTnews
    Aug 10, 2014 · Networking tools vendor NetScout has sued IT analyst group Gartner for defamation in a US court, claiming it was given a poor rating in the ...
  44. [44]
    Debunking the Pay-for-Play Perception in Analyst Firms
    Oct 7, 2024 · This article addresses the common misconception that analyst firms, like Forrester and Gartner, operate on a "pay-for-play" basis.
  45. [45]
    Understanding Gartner, and its limitations - CSO Online
    Feb 1, 2018 · Gartner notes that their MQs offer visual snapshots, in-depth analyses and actionable advice that provide insight into a market's direction, ...
  46. [46]
    https://www.gartner.com/en/about/ombuds/ombuds-faqs
  47. [47]
    Ombuds Guide - Gartner
    Each piece of Gartner research is subject to a rigorous peer-review process by members of the worldwide analyst community, and review by Research management is ...Missing: ethics | Show results with:ethics
  48. [48]
    Independence and Objectivity | Gartner
    Analyst ethics. Our analysts develop their viewpoints without influence, stating the facts as they see them. To ensure analytical independence, accuracy and ...
  49. [49]
    Why Vendors Cannot Withdraw from Gartner Magic Quadrants
    Feb 27, 2025 · In this blog post, we address why vendors cannot withdraw from an MQ if they disagree with the results and how our rigorous research process ensures fairness ...
  50. [50]
    Compare G2 vs. TrustRadius
    Users report that G2.com provides a more comprehensive "Product Content" experience with a score of 9.2, while TrustRadius lags behind at 7.8. Reviewers mention ...Missing: driven analyst
  51. [51]
    4 Market Research Trends Redefining Insights in 2025 - Qualtrics
    Oct 22, 2024 · These artificial responses mimic real-world information, allowing researchers to gather insights without putting sensitive data from their ...
  52. [52]
    Interactive Magic Quadrant - Peer Insights User Reviews - Gartner
    The Interactive Gartner Magic Quadrant® is Gartner's proven and established market and vendor evaluation methodology for more than 300 markets.Missing: history | Show results with:history<|control11|><|separator|>