Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Magnetic deviation

Magnetic deviation refers to the angular error in a magnetic compass reading arising from local magnetic influences produced by the , , or nearby equipment, which causes the compass needle to deviate from the true magnetic north direction. Unlike magnetic variation (or ), which is the fixed angular difference between true geographic north and magnetic north due to the Earth's uneven , deviation is a variable error dependent on the heading and magnetic properties of the surrounding structure. This phenomenon is particularly relevant in , where accurate compass readings are essential for determining over , and it affects both and contexts by introducing inaccuracies that can lead to navigational errors if uncorrected. The primary causes of magnetic deviation stem from ferromagnetic materials, such as hulls, engines, or instruments, that become magnetized either permanently or temporarily, as well as from electrical currents in wiring or devices that generate electromagnetic fields. In ships, for instance, components like anchors, propellers, or can induce deviation that varies as the changes heading, with permanent from the hull's creating consistent offsets and induced fluctuating with external fields or motion. Similarly, in , , parts, or even modifications like new installations can distort the , exacerbated by factors such as or turns that amplify effects. These local disturbances are typically small but can reach several degrees, necessitating regular monitoring to ensure safety. To mitigate magnetic deviation, navigators perform a process known as "swinging the compass," where the or is aligned to known headings—often using visual references like or GPS—and adjustments are made using compensating magnets or soft iron correctors to minimize errors across all directions. The resulting corrections are recorded in a deviation card or table, which lists offsets for specific headings (e.g., 4° west at 220°), allowing pilots or mariners to apply them manually during operation. In modern systems, or electronic fluxgate may reduce reliance on traditional magnetic ones, but deviation remains a critical consideration for backup and regulatory compliance in both and standards.

Fundamentals

Definition and Principles

Magnetic deviation refers to the angular error in a magnetic reading caused by local magnetic fields generated by the itself, such as a ship or , which interfere with the . This local interference distorts the compass needle's alignment, leading to a discrepancy between the indicated heading and the actual magnetic heading relative to the Earth's magnetic north. Unlike magnetic variation, which arises from the angular difference between and magnetic north due to the Earth's geomagnetic field, deviation is a vehicle-specific effect that must be accounted for in . The fundamental principle underlying magnetic deviation is that a magnetic compass needle aligns with the direction of the total horizontal magnetic field at its location, which is the vector sum of the Earth's geomagnetic field (B_Earth) and the disturbing field (B_local) produced by nearby ferromagnetic materials or electrical systems in the vehicle. When B_local is present, it alters the resultant field direction, causing the needle to point away from the true magnetic meridian by an angle known as the deviation angle (δ). This deviation varies with the vehicle's heading because the orientation changes the relative components of B_local—typically reaching maximum values on east-west headings where transverse disturbing fields are most pronounced relative to the Earth's field. To quantify this, the deviation angle δ is defined as the difference between the magnetic heading (H_m, the direction relative to magnetic north) and the heading (H_c, the reading on the ): \delta = H_m - H_c This relation derives from the vector addition of magnetic fields: the heading H_c corresponds to the azimuth of the resultant field B_total = B_Earth + B_local, while H_m aligns with B_Earth alone; for small deviations, δ ≈ (component of B_local perpendicular to B_Earth) / |B_Earth|. In , the true heading (H_t, relative to ) is then obtained by adding magnetic variation (V) to the magnetic heading: H_t = H_m + V, or equivalently, H_t = H_c + δ + V, emphasizing deviation's role as a local correction alongside the global variation.

Distinction from Magnetic Variation

Magnetic variation, also known as , refers to the angular difference between (geographic north) and magnetic north at a given location on Earth's surface, arising from irregularities in the planet's due to its molten core and crustal anomalies. This angle varies by geographic position and over time, with changes occurring gradually due to shifts in Earth's magnetic poles, typically on the order of a few degrees per decade. In contrast, magnetic deviation is the error introduced in a compass reading by the local magnetic influences of the vehicle or craft in which it is installed, such as ferrous materials or electrical equipment, and it depends on the specific heading and configuration of that vehicle. Unlike variation, which is a fixed value for a particular location (though it evolves slowly), deviation fluctuates with the vehicle's orientation—for instance, it might be zero degrees when heading north but reach up to 10 degrees when heading east due to onboard . The distinctions between these two phenomena are critical for accurate , as they affect reliability in different ways:
AspectMagnetic VariationMagnetic Deviation
CauseGeographic and temporal variations in .Local effects from the 's ferrous materials, electrical currents, or nearby magnets.
VariabilityFixed for a specific but changes slowly over years due to geomagnetic shifts.Changes with vehicle heading, load distribution, and modifications; can be zero or up to 20 degrees depending on circumstances.
Correction MethodDetermined from charts, models, or isogonic lines (lines of equal ); applied globally for the area.Measured onboard via compass swinging and compensated using deviation cards or adjustable magnets.
ExamplesIn , variation is about 1° east as of 2025.On a ship, deviation could be +5° on a northerly heading but -3° on a southerly one, corrected by swinging the through all headings.
In navigation practice, the total compass error is the sum of variation and deviation, expressed as total error = variation + deviation, necessitating separate corrections for each to obtain true headings.

Causes

Ferromagnetic Influences

Ferromagnetic materials in such as ships and aircraft generate local magnetic fields that distort the , leading to compass deviation. These influences arise primarily from permanent and induced in components, which alter the direction of the compass needle relative to the magnetic north. Permanent magnetism originates from hard iron elements that retain after exposure to external fields, while induced magnetism occurs in soft iron that becomes temporarily magnetized in proportion to the ambient . Permanent magnetism is caused by hard iron components, such as steel hulls in ships or blocks in , which acquire stable magnetic poles during construction or manufacturing when aligned with the Earth's field. This results in a fixed that produces consistent deviation patterns, often semicircular in nature. For instance, the fore-aft component (denoted as B) creates north-seeking or south-seeking effects along the vehicle's longitudinal , while the athwartship component (C) generates east-west deviations to it. Vertical permanent magnetism can also contribute to errors when the vehicle tilts. Induced magnetism, in contrast, affects soft iron items like cranes, pipes, or structural beams, which do not retain magnetism but align with the Earth's field, producing that varies with the vehicle's heading and location. This leads to dynamic deviation, including semicircular effects from vertical soft iron and quadrantal deviations from horizontal placements, where errors are maximum in northeast/southwest or southeast/northwest quadrants. The intensity depends on the Earth's horizontal (H) and vertical (Z) field components, with stronger effects at higher latitudes due to increased dip angle. The field components from ferromagnetic influences include north-seeking (fore-aft), east-west (athwartship), and vertical deviations. Vertical components become prominent during vehicle tilt, causing heeling error in ships, where rolling induces a horizontal force on the needle, maximum on north-south headings and varying with . In , similar vertical effects arise from or , exacerbating deviations from structural . Specific examples illustrate these effects: In aircraft, and fittings induce fields from both permanent and soft iron properties, leading to significant errors that can reach several degrees without adjustment. Stray from sources such as tools, magnetic cargo, or unshielded permanent magnets in devices like loudspeakers can also induce significant deviations. For example, permanent magnets in speaker systems can alter readings by several degrees if placed nearby without shielding, as their static fields interact directly with the compass needle. Such stray influences are common in operational environments where portable equipment or cargo is moved, leading to unpredictable errors.

Non-Ferromagnetic Sources

Non-ferromagnetic sources of magnetic deviation arise primarily from electromagnetic fields generated by electrical currents and , which produce localized distortions in the without involving materials. These effects are distinct from those caused by ferromagnetic influences, as they stem from dynamic rather than static material magnetization. In and contexts, such sources can lead to compass errors that vary with operational states, necessitating careful placement and shielding of . Electrical currents flowing through wiring, motors, batteries, and generators create oscillating magnetic fields that induce compass deviations. For instance, (AC) systems in generators or large power circuits can produce fields strong enough to deflect needles, with deviations often exceeding 10 degrees during operation in aircraft due to electrically powered systems like alternators or heaters. In ships, similar currents from engine order telegraphs, voltage regulators, or circuits contribute to transient errors when equipment is active. These fields are generated by the movement of charges, following principles of , and their intensity depends on current strength and proximity to the . Specific equipment such as radios, radar systems, and high-voltage lines further exacerbates these deviations by emitting localized electromagnetic fields. transmitters and receivers, for example, can cause variable compass deflections in both ships and if positioned too closely, often requiring separate deviation cards for operation with and without such systems active. In older avionics, components involving electromagnetic deflection, like those in navigation displays, have been noted to contribute to similar localized fields. High-voltage lines in vessels or wiring loops amplify these effects, potentially leading to errors that demand equipment relocation or shielding to maintain accuracy within acceptable limits, typically ±10 degrees. Unlike the relatively steady deviations from ferromagnetic materials, those from non-ferromagnetic sources are highly variable, fluctuating with power usage, equipment activation, or movement. This intermittency—such as deviations appearing only when a radio transmitter is on or a motor starts—complicates and underscores the need for dynamic monitoring in both ships and .

Measurement and Compensation

Compass Swinging Procedures

Compass swinging, also known as compass adjustment or swinging the ship/aircraft, is an empirical process to determine and record the magnetic deviation of a by placing the vessel or on specific headings and comparing readings against known magnetic directions. This procedure accounts for onboard magnetic influences that cause the compass needle to deviate from true magnetic north. In contexts, the process begins with preparation in an open-water area free from external magnetic , such as structures or cranes, ensuring the is on an even and all electrical equipment is secured to minimize transient effects. The ship is then maneuvered to align with the eight primary headings: cardinal points (north 000°, east 090°, south 180°, 270°) and intercardinal points (northeast 045°, southeast 135°, southwest 225°, northwest 315°), using accurate references like a , GPS, or sun calculations from nautical almanacs. While steady on each heading for at least two minutes to avoid dynamic errors, the reading is recorded simultaneously with the known magnetic heading, which is derived by correcting the true heading for local magnetic variation. Deviation is calculated as the algebraic difference between the magnetic heading and the reading (Deviation = Magnetic Heading - Heading), with results noted as east (E) or (W). Essential tools include the binnacle equipped with correctors such as fore-and-aft (B) and athwartship (C) magnets, Flinders bars, quadrantal spheres, and heeling magnets, all positioned per Resolution A.382(X) to counter known deviation sources. Observations are logged on standardized forms like NAVSEA 3120/4 for tabulation, and environmental controls—such as calm seas, systems off during initial swings, and no nearby —are maintained to ensure accuracy. A deviation card or is then produced for display near the compass, providing navigators with correction values for any heading. Swinging is mandatory under SOLAS Chapter V, Regulation 19.2.1 for all ships, specifically after initial installation, when the becomes unreliable, following structural repairs or electrical alterations, and at intervals not exceeding two years per ISO 25862:2019 to keep residual deviation within limits (typically ≤5° for ships under 500 and ≤3° for larger vessels). For certain vessels, such as those transiting the , annual swinging is required with deviations not exceeding 7°. Lightning strikes or major refits also necessitate immediate re-swinging due to potential magnetic changes. The following is a representative sample deviation table derived from a post-swinging record, showing residual deviations on the eight headings (values are illustrative based on typical adjustments):
Ship's Head (°)Deviation (°)
000 (N)+3° E
045 (NE)+1° W
090 (E)-7° W
135 (SE)-4° E
180 (S)+2° W
225 (SW)+5° E
270 (W)-2° E
315 (NW)-1° W
This table allows quick corrections, such as adding 3° east when steering north. In , compass swinging is performed on a certified or centerline marked with magnetic headings, typically after installation, maintenance, or if deviation exceeds limits. The is taxied or towed to the same eight and intercardinal headings, with readings compared to the known magnetic heading (true heading corrected for variation). Procedures follow FAA 43.215, using N-S and E-W compensators (magnets or adjustment screws) to minimize deviations, ideally to less than 3° on all headings. The process accounts for -specific factors like engine operation or effects, and results are recorded in a deviation card placed near the . Swings are required before flight in without remote indicating systems, with periodic checks per manufacturer or regulatory guidelines.

Deviation Correction Techniques

Deviation correction techniques aim to minimize the impact of local magnetic interferences on a compass by either physically neutralizing the disturbing fields or mathematically accounting for residual errors. Physical methods involve installing correctors within the compass binnacle to counteract the ship's or aircraft's magnetic influences, while mathematical approaches use data from compass swinging to generate correction tables or formulas. These techniques ensure navigational accuracy, with residual deviation typically limited to 5° or less for safe operations on ships and 3° or less for aircraft. Physical compensation primarily addresses permanent and induced through specialized devices. Fore-and-aft permanent magnets correct semicircular deviations caused by the permanent , positioned to adjust errors maximum on east-west headings (B ). Athwartship magnets similarly counteract deviations maximum on north-south headings (C ). For induced , soft iron spheres neutralize quadrantal deviations from soft iron structures; these spheres, often 7 inches in diameter and placed symmetrically, are adjusted by position or slewing to balance D and E . Vertical induced effects, which vary with magnetic , are mitigated by a Flinders bar—a soft iron rod installed near the to equalize the vertical component of the Earth's field across headings. The bar's length is calculated using deviation observations from different latitudes, such as via the formula c = \frac{H_1 \tan B_1 - H_2 \tan B_2}{\lambda (Z_1 - Z_2)}, where parameters relate to intensity (H), (B), and vertical component (Z). These correctors are applied sequentially, starting with soft iron for induced fields before permanent magnets, to avoid compounding errors. In , corrections often use simpler N-S and E-W magnets or adjustable correctors within the housing, without Flinders bars or spheres due to space constraints. Mathematical correction relies on analyzing deviation data obtained from compass swinging procedures to create deviation curves or tables. These tables list residual errors for specific headings, allowing navigators to apply offsets manually (e.g., +3° on 045°). For broader application, deviations are modeled using a approximation derived from the periodic nature of relative to the heading θ: \delta \approx A + B \sin \theta + C \cos \theta + D \sin 2\theta + E \cos 2\theta Here, A represents uniform error (often zero after adjustment), B and C capture semicircular components, and D and E address quadrantal effects; coefficients are solved from eight and intercardinal observations via least-squares fitting. This model enables for any heading and is implemented in tabular form for practical use. In modern , compasses such as fluxgate systems incorporate software for automated deviation correction. These devices use multi-axis sensors to detect fields and apply adjustments via algorithms like the , analyzing deviations without traditional swinging and achieving high accuracy (e.g., under 1° error). Such systems integrate with GPS and gyrocompasses for hybrid corrections, serving as backups to primary in both and applications. Verification of corrections involves post-adjustment compass swinging on known headings to measure residual deviations, confirming reductions below acceptable limits (e.g., 5° maximum for ships). If errors exceed thresholds, further fine-tuning of correctors is required, with results documented in a deviation card for ongoing reference.

Historical Context

Early Discoveries

Early observations of magnetic deviation, the local errors in compass readings caused by nearby ferromagnetic materials, emerged gradually as navigators encountered inconsistencies beyond the known geographic variation of . In ancient times, the employed —a naturally magnetized —for purposes as early as the 2nd century BCE during the , shaping it into a spoon-like device that aligned with the . This tool later evolved into a by the during the , but wooden vessels with minimal iron meant no significant deviation was observed or recognized. Similarly, Viking seafarers around the 9th–11th centuries relied on sunstones ( crystals for polarizing light) and rather than magnetic es, avoiding any deviation issues associated with iron-rich environments or ships. The first documented recognition of compass deviation due to onboard iron appeared in the 16th century. Portuguese navigator João de Castro, during his 1538 voyage to India, systematically measured at 43 locations and noted that proximity to artillery, anchors, and other iron objects aboard ship caused the needle to deviate from expected readings. His observations, recorded in his Roteiro da Viagem de Lisboa a , represented the earliest printed account attributing such errors to local magnetic influences rather than instrumental faults or geographic variation alone. Around the same time, English naval officer William Borough, in his 1581 Discourse of the Variation of the Cumpas, documented measurements near , primarily focused on changes. By the late , astronomer advanced understanding through his paper on magnetic variation, where he mapped global patterns but also reported localized deviations encountered during sea voyages, such as those influenced by landmasses or vessel fittings. These findings, based on observations from his 1698–1700 expeditions aboard HMS Paramour, underscored the need to distinguish ship-induced errors from broader terrestrial effects. In the , clockmaker and instrument maker conducted precise measurements in starting around 1722, identifying short-term fluctuations in the compass needle that he initially attributed to friction but later recognized as diurnal magnetic variation.

Evolution in Navigation Practices

In the , the advent of ironclad ships necessitated systematic approaches to managing magnetic deviation, culminating in key theoretical and regulatory advancements. Scottish mathematician Archibald Smith developed a comprehensive mathematical framework for calculating and compensating deviation caused by a ship's iron structure, detailed in his 1862 Admiralty Manual for Ascertaining and Applying the Deviations of the Caused by the Iron in a Ship, which provided equations to model both permanent and induced effects. This work built on earlier observations but offered practical tools for naval use, influencing deviation tables and adjustments. Concurrently, the British formalized procedures through the 1838 report of the Compass Committee, which mandated compass swinging—systematic on-water calibration to determine residual deviations—as a compulsory practice for all iron-hulled vessels to ensure accurate headings. A pivotal milestone was the 1876 patent by William Thomson (later ) for a compass corrector using adjustable deflectors and soft iron spheres to counteract heeling and quadrantal errors, enabling more stable maritime in iron ships. The extended these principles to , where magnetic deviation became critical amid rapid development. During in the , pilots relied on early magnetic compasses like the Type B liquid-filled model, which required deviation compensation to counter interference from engines and metal airframes, as documented in contemporary manuals emphasizing pre-flight swinging for operational accuracy. By , standards evolved significantly; the U.S. implemented standardized designs for shipboard compasses and remote flux valve systems in , such as the Mark VIII direct-reading compass used in dive bombers like the SBD Dauntless, which incorporated deviation tables to limit errors to under 5 degrees under combat conditions. These designs integrated Flinders bars and quadrantal magnets, reflecting wartime priorities for reliable heading information in both naval and aerial operations. In the , international regulations and technological integration have refined deviation management while preserving the magnetic as a vital . The 1974 SOLAS Convention, through its Chapter V Regulation 19 and supporting IMO Resolution A.382(X) of 1977, required all vessels over 150 gross tons to carry properly adjusted magnetic compasses with deviation curves limited to 5 degrees maximum, mandating periodic swinging and record-keeping to comply with global standards. The introduction of GPS revolutionized by providing precise references, reducing primary reliance on magnetic compasses for course plotting but retaining them for redundancy in GPS-denied scenarios, as evidenced by military and civilian adoption during the era. By the , fluxgate magnetometers enable real-time deviation correction in unmanned surface vessels and modern ships, using onboard algorithms to dynamically compensate for hull-induced fields, achieving sub-degree accuracy as demonstrated in recent calibration studies. Similarly, post-2000 electronic flight instrument systems (EFIS) in , such as those integrating attitude heading reference systems (AHRS) with magnetometers, minimize traditional deviation through digital processing and self-calibration, displaying corrected magnetic headings on primary flight displays while complying with FAA standards for .

References

  1. [1]
    Magnetic Compass - FIU
    Feb 23, 1999 · It is caused by a combination of inertia and magnetic dip. As the aircraft accelerates, the compass card, acting like a pendulum, tilts slightly ...
  2. [2]
    Difference between Deviation and Variation: Pilotinstitute
    Dec 6, 2022 · Magnetic deviation is the difference between the (inaccurate) magnetic heading indicated by the compass and the actual magnetic heading of the aircraft.
  3. [3]
    Marine navigation courses: compass ASA RYA - Sailing Issues
    Magnetic deviation – this time a compass error originating from within the ship – is caused by magnetic forces brought on by pieces of metal, such as an engine ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Chapter 16: Navigation - Federal Aviation Administration
    Determining the magnetic heading is an intermediate step necessary to obtain the correct compass heading for the flight. To determine compass heading, a ...
  5. [5]
    Appendix D - Naval History and Heritage Command - Navy.mil
    Mar 24, 2015 · Deviation: the error caused by the magnetic properties of any iron in the immediate vicinity of the compass.
  6. [6]
    [PDF] HANDBOOK OF MAGNETIC COMPASS ADJUSTMENT
    The horizontal B and C components of permanent magnetism cause varying deviations of the compass as the ship swings in heading on an even keel. Plotting these ...
  7. [7]
    The Principles of the Deviation of the Compass and its Correction
    12. Deviation Defined.—Under the influence of the earth's magnetism acting alone, the needle of the compass is drawn to point directly to the magnetic poles of ...
  8. [8]
    Magnetic Compass & Ship Magnetism - Simplified Explanation
    Magnetic forces from permanent magnets are called permanent magnetism to differentiate it from that caused due to Induced magnetism from soft irons. Terrestrial ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] AC 43-215 - Standardized Procedures for Performing Aircraft ...
    Aug 7, 2017 · This advisory circular (AC) describes procedures for calibrating an aircraft magnetic compass to minimize the effect of aircraft-induced.
  10. [10]
    MAGNETIC COMPASS ADJUSTMENT - MARINE COMPASS ...
    ISO 25862 : 2009 (E): States that all SOLAS vessels should have their compass swung/adjusted and a new deviation card issued at maximum two yearly intervals.Magnetic compass location... · What does "swinging the...
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Marine Magnetic Compass Requirements
    SOLAS V Annex 13 states that compasses should be adjusted when: a) first installed, b) they become unreliable, c) following structural repairs, d) electrical ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    Maintenance and Adjustment of Magnetic Compasses. - Irclass.org
    The performance of the magnetic compass should be monitored and deviations to be recorded in a compass deviation book at regular intervals (Ref: IMO Resolution ...Missing: modern | Show results with:modern
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Handbook of magnetic compass adjustment and compensation
    (4) Vertical soft iron Flinders bar in its external tube,. (5) Soft iron ... deviation curves for determining the length of Flinders bar, see chapter VIII.
  16. [16]
    Theory of Magnetic Compass Adjustment
    This corrects for heeling error, which is the result of the ship's vertical ... This is convenient: if B=2, that means 2 degrees of B error is in the deviation ...
  17. [17]
    Development of Ship's Digital Compass Using Flux-gate Sensors ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · Vertical magnets are inserted for the correction of heeling error before the correction of semicircular deviation to ensure steadiness of the ...
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    [PDF] SOME EARLY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HISTORY OF ...
    and friend Joao de Castro, who was in command of one of the 11 ships that sailed in 1538 to India, and enjoined him to test and investigate carefully the ...
  20. [20]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  21. [21]
    Chapter 2. Terrestrial magnetism I. Understanding the magnetic field
    Between 1580 and 1670, such work was carried out in London, England, by the mathematician Edmund Gunter (1581–1626), the navigator William Borough (or ...
  22. [22]
    Obituary Notices of Fellows Deceased - jstor
    unrestricted theory, as given by Archibald Smith in Part III. of the. 'Admiralty Manual,' is even simpler and more ready for ordinary use than the partial ...
  23. [23]
    Admiralty Compass Observatory, 1842-1971
    The Admiralty Compass Observatory (ACO) formed in March 1842 to improve the Mariners compass, following the recommendations of the Compass Committee.Missing: compulsory regulation
  24. [24]
    This is an early example of a compass and binnacle patented in ...
    This is an early example of a compass and binnacle patented in 1876 (patent no. 1339) by Sir William Thomson (later Lord Kelvin) to overcome one of the main ...Missing: 1839 | Show results with:1839
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Aviation in the U.S. Army, 1919-1939, - DTIC
    ... magnetic compass was the sole navigational instrument in an era where ... deviation to the batt( ry. This system was first successful on November 24 ...<|separator|>
  26. [26]
    [PDF] A.382(X) adopted on 14 November 1977 MAGNETIC COMPASSES ...
    Dec 15, 1977 · The minimum distances of the standard compass from any magnetic material which is part of the ship's structure should be to the satisfaction of ...
  27. [27]
    GPS navigation: from the Gulf War to civvy street | Science Museum
    Nov 2, 2018 · In the 1990s, soldiers in the Gulf War were equipped with GPS technology that transformed their ability to manoeuvre in a featureless, unmapped landscape.
  28. [28]
    Magnetic Data Correction for Fluxgate Magnetometers on a ...
    Jul 21, 2025 · While one common strategy to mitigate the inherent magnetic noise of a platform is to tow the magnetometer behind the USV to physically separate ...Missing: deviation 2020s
  29. [29]
    Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) | SKYbrary Aviation Safety
    An Electronic Flight Instrument System (EFIS) is a flight deck instrument display system in which the display technology used is electronic rather than ...Missing: magnetic post- 2000