Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Horizontal

Horizontal is a privately held, minority-owned firm founded in 2003, specializing in , consulting, and solutions across , , creative, and business sectors. The company operates through two primary divisions—Horizontal , which focuses on end-to-end design via , creativity, and platforms like and commerce systems, and Horizontal Talent, a agency connecting employers with professionals in specialized fields. Headquartered in the United States with global offices including in , Horizontal emphasizes long-term talent investment, diversity, and scalable solutions for complex business challenges, positioning itself among the top 1% of U.S. firms by scale and reach. While praised for its employee development and innovative service models, it has received mixed feedback on workplace culture in independent reviews.

Etymology and Historical Development

Origins of the Term

The term "horizontal" derives from the Latin adjective horizontalis, formed from horizon (accusative horizontem), which traces to the horizōn kyklos ("bounding circle" or "circle that separates"), denoting the apparent boundary between earth and sky. This etymological root reflects the horizon's perceived flat, level line when viewed from a distance, linking the word to concepts of parallelism and extension across a plane. The word entered English in the mid-16th century, around 1555, via French horizontal or directly from Medieval Latin horizontalis, initially describing something situated near or parallel to the horizon, as in astronomical or navigational contexts. Its earliest recorded use appears in Eden's 1555 English translation of Martire d'Anghiera's Decades of the New Worlde, referring to lines or planes aligned with the horizon. By the 1630s, the term had evolved to encompass the modern geometric sense of "flat" or "parallel to the horizon," independent of elevation, facilitating its application in , , and physics where it denotes a direction to the local vertical (plumb line). This shift paralleled advancements in and drawing, where horizontal lines represented level planes mimicking the horizon's apparent straightness.

Evolution in Scientific Usage

In , the concept of horizontal motion was framed within , where bodies on a horizontal plane were thought to require a continuous external or impetus to sustain movement, naturally coming to rest due to an inherent tendency toward repose. Aristotle's Physics (circa 350 BCE) posited that horizontal lacked a "natural" direction, unlike vertical fall toward the Earth's center, leading to deceleration without perpetual propulsion. This view dominated until the late , influencing medieval scholars like Jean Buridan, who introduced impetus theory but still aligned horizontal persistence with temporary internal forces rather than intrinsic uniformity. The scientific conceptualization of horizontal underwent a with Galileo Galilei's experiments in the early . In Dialogues Concerning (1638), Galileo demonstrated through inclined plane trials that a ball rolling down increasingly shallow inclines approaches uniform speed on a perfectly horizontal surface, attributing this to the absence of net vertical acceleration components when is minimized. This established horizontal motion as and constant-velocity under ideal conditions, a foundational into independent of vertical gravitational effects, enabling the resolution of complex trajectories—like projectiles—into independent horizontal (uniform) and vertical (accelerated) components yielding parabolic paths. Galileo's approach privileged empirical over teleological explanations, marking horizontal's evolution from qualitative descriptor to quantitative vector in . Isaac Newton's (1687) further formalized this in his , positing that bodies maintain uniform horizontal rectilinear motion unless acted upon by external forces, synthesizing Galileo's findings with broader dynamics. In and , horizontal planes—defined as locally to the plumb line—gained precision through 18th-19th century like spirit levels and theodolites, facilitating accurate leveling for and , as in the French metric system's baseline measurements (1790s). By the , refined horizontal as observer-dependent in non-inertial frames, yet retained its classical role in approximations for terrestrial physics.

Core Definitions and Principles

Geometric and Physical Foundations

In , a horizontal line is defined as one that extends to the horizon, exhibiting a constant and zero slope in a , where it aligns with the x-axis and shows no variation in the y-coordinate. This orientation contrasts with vertical lines, which are perpendicular to horizontals and align with the y-axis. Such lines form the basis for level planes in , enabling the construction of rectangles, grids, and other figures where parallelism and perpendicularity ensure consistent measurements independent of gravitational influence in purely abstract terms. Physically, the horizontal direction emerges from the interaction between local gravity and the Earth's surface, where the vertical is established by the plumb line—the direction of the gravitational acceleration vector, approximately 9.8 m/s² toward the planet's center. A horizontal plane is thus perpendicular to this vertical at any given point, forming a level surface tangent to the geoid, which approximates the mean sea level as an equipotential surface. This definition ensures that, on a truly horizontal plane, the component of gravitational force parallel to the surface is zero, preventing net acceleration in horizontal directions absent other forces like friction or wind. However, due to Earth's oblate spheroid shape, horizontal planes at distinct locations are not parallel; they intersect along great circles converging toward the poles, with deviations measurable in geodesy as small as arcseconds over kilometers. In , these foundations underpin analyses of motion, such as projectiles, where horizontal remains constant because imparts no horizontal , conserving in that direction per Newton's . This separation of horizontal and vertical components simplifies decomposition, with empirical validation from experiments like Galileo's tests in the early , confirming uniform horizontal motion under ideal conditions.

Distinctions from Vertical Orientation

In physics, the vertical orientation is defined as the direction aligned with the local , specifically along the plumb line, which points in the direction of (approximately 9.8 m/s² downward at Earth's surface). This direction approximates the radial vector toward Earth's center, though slight deviations occur due to the planet's oblateness and rotation./3:_Two-Dimensional_Kinematics/3.3:_Projectile_Motion) In contrast, horizontal orientation refers to any direction to this vertical, lying within a plane to the Earth's at the given location. This perpendicularity ensures that horizontal planes or lines experience no component of gravitational force in their plane under ideal conditions, distinguishing them from vertical paths where directly opposes or aids motion. For instance, in kinematic analyses such as , the horizontal velocity component remains constant (barring air resistance or other horizontal forces), while the vertical component undergoes uniform acceleration of -9.8 m/s², leading to parabolic trajectories. Geometrically, vertical lines converge toward a and , reflecting the of plumb lines over large distances, whereas horizontal lines remain parallel within a local frame but form small circles around the Earth's globally./03:_Two-Dimensional_Kinematics/3.04:_Projectile_Motion) These distinctions underpin applications in and , where instruments like levels detect deviations from true horizontal by referencing the plumb line, ensuring structures align to for stability. In non-uniform gravitational fields, such as near mountains, the horizontal may exhibit minor tilts, but locally, the holds as a first .

Measurement and Coordinate Systems

Astronomical Applications

The , alternatively termed the alt-azimuth or alt-az system, serves as a fundamental framework in astronomy for locating celestial objects relative to an observer's immediate horizon and . This system defines positions using two angular measurements: altitude, which quantifies the vertical angle from the horizon upward to the object (ranging from 0° at the horizon to 90° at the ), and , the horizontal angle measured clockwise from along the horizon (from 0° to 360°). It is inherently local and time-dependent, as causes coordinates to shift continuously, necessitating real-time calculations for tracking objects. In practical astronomical observations, the system underpins alt-azimuth telescope mounts, which permit independent adjustments in elevation (altitude) and rotation () to follow sky objects without complex clock drives. These mounts, common since the in designs like those by John Dollond in 1769, enable straightforward pointing for visual and photographic astronomy, particularly for amateurs and short-duration sessions where equatorial alignment proves cumbersome. Professional applications extend to and , where horizontal coordinates facilitate site-specific beam pointing and data reduction for instruments like single-dish telescopes, as the observer's horizon defines the instantaneous . Software tools and planetarium applications, such as Stellarium or SkySafari, routinely convert equatorial coordinates to horizontal ones using the observer's , , and , aiding in locating transient phenomena like meteors, satellites, or solar system bodies; for instance, on October 28, 2025, at 40°N , the Moon's position might register an altitude of approximately 45° and of 180° at local midnight, varying by exact time and site elevation. This conversion relies on , incorporating the local to account for . The system's simplicity suits naked-eye navigation and educational settings, though it requires frequent recalibration for long exposures due to field rotation—a non-issue in equatorial systems but mitigated in modern Dobsonian telescopes via manual tracking. Despite its ubiquity for terrestrial-based viewing, the horizontal system's observer-centric nature limits its utility in space astronomy or global catalogs, where fixed equatorial or systems prevail for positioning across epochs. Nonetheless, it remains essential for horizon-grazing events, such as crepuscular observations of planets or corrections in precise , ensuring alignment with local topography and weather conditions.

Engineering and Surveying Techniques

In and , horizontal orientation refers to directions and positions parallel to the local horizontal plane, defined as to the direction of at a given point, approximating an surface of the Earth's field. This plane is established using instruments that detect gravitational level, such as spirit levels or automatic levels, which align the tangent to the horizontal surface by means of a bubble vial or mechanism. Horizontal control surveys create networks of reference points with known coordinates to facilitate accurate positioning for construction, mapping, and infrastructure projects, often tied to geodetic datums like the in the United States. Traditional techniques for horizontal measurements include surveys, where distances along are reduced to horizontal equivalents by measuring the vertical and applying trigonometric corrections, such as horizontal = slope × cos(vertical ). are measured using theodolites or transits to determine bearings and azimuths in the horizontal plane, enabling methods like (angle-based networks) or traversing (sequential distance-and- measurements between stations). These approaches form closed loops or ties to fixed benchmarks to minimize errors through , with historical accuracy limited by instrument precision to about 1:5,000 for traverses. Modern engineering surveying employs electronic total stations, which integrate horizontal angle encoders, electronic distance measurement (EDM) via phase-shift or time-of-flight lasers, and automated vertical compensators to compute horizontal positions directly, achieving accuracies of 1:20,000 or better. Real-time kinematic (RTK) GPS and global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) provide horizontal control by differential carrier-phase positioning, referencing base stations for centimeter-level precision without line-of-sight requirements, as used in large-scale projects like highway alignment. Trilateration using GPS baselines or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) scanners further enhances horizontal mapping by generating dense point clouds projected onto horizontal planes. These techniques prioritize redundancy, such as multiple observations and statistical error propagation, to ensure causal reliability in positional data for applications like site layout and deformation monitoring.

Applications in Various Fields

Biology and Medicine

In anatomy and medicine, the horizontal plane, also termed the transverse or axial plane, divides the body into superior (upper) and inferior (lower) portions when the subject is in . This plane runs parallel to the ground and perpendicular to the body's longitudinal axis, facilitating descriptions of structures in cross-sectional imaging such as scans and . For instance, a horizontal section at the level of the umbilicus separates the above from the below, aiding in precise localization of organs and pathologies./1:_Introduction_to_Anatomy_and_Physiology/1.4:_Mapping_the_Body/1.4D:_Body_Planes_and_Sections) Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) in denotes the non-sexual movement of genetic material between organisms unrelated by descent, bypassing vertical inheritance from parent to offspring. Prevalent in prokaryotes, HGT occurs via three primary mechanisms: , involving uptake of free DNA from the environment; conjugation, direct cell-to-cell transfer through a ; and , mediated by bacteriophages. Genomic analyses reveal HGT has profoundly influenced microbial evolution, with up to 20-30% of bacterial genes showing evidence of recent transfer, enabling rapid adaptation such as acquisition of metabolic pathways or virulence factors. In eukaryotes, HGT is rarer but documented, as in the endosymbiotic origins of mitochondria and chloroplasts, where bacterial genes integrated into host genomes. Medically, HGT exacerbates challenges like antibiotic resistance, where genes encoding beta-lactamases or efflux pumps disseminate across bacterial species, contributing to over 1.27 million annual deaths from resistant infections as of 2019 data. Empirical studies confirm HGT's role in outbreaks, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) acquiring resistance via plasmids. In , horizontal transmission describes pathogen spread between individuals within the same generation, distinct from across generations. This mode dominates most infectious diseases, including via respiratory droplets, through sexual contact or blood, and by vectors, with basic reproduction numbers (R0) often exceeding 1 to sustain epidemics. Unlike , which is congenital or perinatal, horizontal routes necessitate interventions like and isolation to interrupt chains, as evidenced by SARS-CoV-2 containment strategies reducing incidence by 50-90% in compliant populations during 2020-2022.

Economics and Business Structures

Horizontal integration in involves the merger or acquisition of competitors operating at the same stage of production within an , enabling firms to expand and consolidate operations. This strategy leverages synergies such as shared resources in marketing, research and development, and distribution to achieve , thereby lowering per-unit costs and enhancing competitiveness. However, it can raise , potentially reducing and inviting antitrust scrutiny from regulators concerned about diminished . Notable examples include Procter & Gamble's $57 billion acquisition of in 2005, which combined overlapping consumer goods portfolios to dominate personal care and grooming markets. Microsoft's $68.7 billion purchase of , completed in October 2023 after regulatory hurdles, integrated gaming assets to bolster its entertainment division amid streaming competition. Similarly, Disney's $71.3 billion acquisition of in 2019 expanded its content library for , illustrating horizontal integration's role in capturing synergies in media production and distribution. Horizontal markets, by contrast, refer to goods or services applicable across multiple industries rather than niche sectors, facilitating broad but intensifying . Unlike vertical markets tailored to specific demographics or functions, horizontal ones—such as general office software or basic tools like pens—target diverse users, reducing sector-specific risks while relying on efficient scaling for profitability. Economically, this structure promotes diversification and lower entry barriers for standardized products, though success hinges on superior internal efficiencies amid widespread competition. In structures, horizontal approaches emphasize flat hierarchies with minimal layers, fostering decentralized that can accelerate and cut administrative costs compared to vertical models. Empirical studies indicate such structures correlate with faster responsiveness, though they risk coordination challenges in larger firms without strong . Overall, horizontal configurations in prioritize lateral expansion and breadth, contrasting with depth-oriented vertical strategies, with outcomes varying by industry scale and regulatory environment.

Organizational and Structural Implications

Horizontal Structures in Management

Horizontal structures in management, also known as flat or horizontal organizational designs, feature minimal layers of authority between top executives and frontline employees, emphasizing decentralized decision-making and wide spans of control where managers oversee numerous subordinates. This contrasts with traditional vertical hierarchies by prioritizing collaboration, cross-functional teams, and employee autonomy over rigid chains of command, enabling quicker information flow and adaptability in dynamic environments. Such structures often emerge in startups and knowledge-intensive industries, where innovation relies on broad skill utilization rather than specialized oversight. Key characteristics include reduced , which lowers administrative costs, and an emphasis on self-directed teams that integrate functions like product development and horizontally across the . Empirical analyses indicate that horizontal designs can enhance in uncertain settings by shortening communication paths, as evidenced in comparisons of U.S. and firms where horizontal information structures facilitated adaptive responses. However, their success depends on contextual factors like firm size and task complexity; studies reviewing structural find horizontal forms optimal for environments requiring rapid coordination but less so for standardized operations needing clear vertical differentiation. Benefits include accelerated and heightened , as employees gain over outcomes without awaiting hierarchical approvals, potentially boosting in flat setups by 20-30% in small-to-medium enterprises through leaner operations. Enhanced arises from , with flatter structures correlating to higher in surveys of sectors, though these gains diminish in larger scales without supporting mechanisms like robust communication tools. Drawbacks encompass ambiguity, where broad responsibilities lead to decision or conflicts, and constrained progression due to fewer supervisory roles, limiting talent retention in ambitious workforces. Coordination challenges intensify as organizations grow, with empirical cases showing overload on senior leaders and inefficiencies in scaling, as horizontal spans of strain oversight without vertical buffers. Real-world implementations, such as Corporation's model, demonstrate horizontal principles through employee-led projects without formal bosses, fostering creativity in game development but requiring cultural alignment to mitigate free-rider issues. Similarly, transitions to self-managing horizontal forms in medium-sized firms have yielded mixed outcomes, with one longitudinal case revealing initial gains but subsequent needs for elements to address gaps. Overall, while horizontal structures align with causal demands for in volatile markets, their empirical viability hinges on deliberate safeguards against inherent coordination costs, as unsupported flatness often reverts to informal hierarchies.

Criticisms and Empirical Outcomes

Critics of horizontal organizational structures argue that the absence of clear hierarchies can lead to decision-making paralysis, as consensus-building among peers often slows processes compared to directive authority in hierarchical models. This diffusion of accountability may foster free-riding behaviors and inefficiencies, particularly in coordinating complex tasks where specialized oversight is required. Additionally, flat designs risk role proliferation and unintended bureaucratic layers, as seen in self-management systems where employees accumulate multiple overlapping responsibilities without streamlined resolution mechanisms. Empirical evidence highlights scalability limitations, with flat structures performing adequately in small, creative teams but faltering in larger organizations due to escalating communication overhead and coordination failures. A study of startups found that while flatter hierarchies enhance ideation, they correlate with haphazard execution and higher commercial failure rates, as managers become overwhelmed without sufficient directional authority. Organizations exceeding approximately 800 employees often require multiple hierarchical layers for effective performance, prompting many to reintroduce structure after initial flat experiments. Case studies underscore these challenges: ' 2013 adoption of , a radical horizontal governance model, resulted in employee roles expanding from an average of 1 to 7.4 per person within two years, contributing to operational rigidity rather than . The initiative led to a 30% turnover rate in 2015—10 percentage points above the company's historical norm—with over 250 employees departing via a offer, reflecting widespread adaptation difficulties. Similarly, firms like Wistia and Treehouse abandoned flat structures after encountering scaling bottlenecks, reverting to hierarchies to restore efficiency. In gaming company , the flat model enabled but revealed informal power imbalances and execution gaps, with critics noting that success often hinges on self-selecting high-performers while underperformers persist without managerial intervention. Overall, while horizontal approaches may boost short-term engagement in niche contexts, longitudinal data indicates they rarely sustain superior performance against hierarchical alternatives in mature or expanding firms, as coordination demands favor structured for causal efficacy in and goal alignment.

Comparisons with Hierarchical Models

Horizontal organizational structures, characterized by minimal layers of and decentralized , differ fundamentally from hierarchical models, which feature multiple tiers of command, clear chains of , and top-down . In hierarchical systems, decisions flow from senior leaders through intermediate managers to frontline employees, enabling precise coordination in complex, large-scale operations but often resulting in slower response times due to approval bottlenecks. Flat structures, by contrast, empower employees at all levels to contribute directly, reducing and fostering agility, though this can lead to coordination challenges as organizations grow. Empirical analyses indicate that hierarchies excel in environments requiring standardized processes, such as or operations, where role clarity minimizes errors, whereas horizontal models suit dynamic settings like startups or by accelerating innovation cycles. Research on decision-making speed highlights a key advantage of flat structures: with fewer intermediaries, information travels faster, enabling quicker adaptations to market changes. A 1995 study on delayering found that reducing management layers shortens communication paths and stimulates local initiative, correlating with improved responsiveness in firms that implemented such changes during the 1990s UK restructuring wave. Conversely, tall hierarchies, with their emphasis on oversight, can delay actions; for instance, in healthcare, hierarchical leadership has been linked to poorer patient safety outcomes due to suppressed frontline input, as evidenced by analyses of morale and error rates in stratified teams. However, flat models risk decision paralysis in ambiguous situations, where consensus-seeking replaces authoritative directives, a drawback observed in scaling attempts by self-directed firms. Scalability represents a pronounced limitation for horizontal structures compared to hierarchies. As organizations expand beyond 150-200 employees—a often cited in management literature for the "" limit—flat models struggle with informal overload, leading to and inefficiencies without added structure. Case studies of tech startups, such as those adopting self-, show that while initial growth benefits from flatness, many revert to hierarchies to handle ; for example, a 2021 examination of scaling flat orgs revealed that pure horizontality falters without selective layering, contrasting with hierarchical giants like , which maintained dominance through tiered accountability until internal rigidities emerged in the 2000s. Hierarchies, meanwhile, facilitate growth via across levels but can entrench , as seen in firms where excessive layers correlate with 10-20% productivity drags from misaligned incentives. Empirical outcomes on performance metrics reveal mixed results, underscoring context-dependency over ideological preferences. A 2023 perception-based quantitative in disaster response contexts found stakeholders viewing flat structures as superior for joint operations in the region, citing enhanced collaboration over hierarchical , though actual implementation data remains perceptual rather than outcome-measured. On job satisfaction, older from the 1970s-1980s indicated flat structures boost managerial autonomy but tall ones provide clearer progression paths, with recent evidence suggesting flatter firms attract fewer female applicants due to perceived informality risks. Innovation proxies, like patent rates, favor hierarchies in R&D-heavy sectors for their resource allocation precision, while flat models shine in software via rapid iteration, as in Corporation's experiments—yet even there, informal leaders emerge, mimicking hidden hierarchies. Overall, no structure universally outperforms; causal factors like firm size, industry volatility, and cultural alignment determine efficacy, with hybrids increasingly adopted to mitigate pure forms' extremes.

References

  1. [1]
    Horizontal
    We've changed our name to Horizontal. We solve complex challenges across two distinct businesses: Horizontal Digital · Horizontal Talent.
  2. [2]
    Horizontal | LinkedIn
    Jul 1, 2004 · Founded in 2003, we are a certified Minority Business Enterprise that proudly invests in diversity and growth of our in-house talent as well as ...
  3. [3]
    Horizontal Home Page
    We architect meaningful, end-to-end experiences through strategy, creativity and technology. CX Strategy & Design Sales, Service & CRM Commerce Customer Data ...Bengaluru · Careers · Vadodara, India · Minneapolis, MN
  4. [4]
    Horizontal Talent: Staffing & consulting agency for employers & job ...
    Horizontal is a minority-owned professional services company specializing in technology, marketing, creative and business strategy.Bengaluru's IT hub · Contact us · Work at Horizontal · Hyderabad's HITEC City
  5. [5]
    Contact | Horizontal Talent
    Looking to hire? We are proud to be in the top 1% of U.S. staffing firms with a strong presence around the globe. Browse our talented list of candidates today.
  6. [6]
    Horizontal Talent | LinkedIn
    As a privately held, minority-owned business, we take the long view – investing in our team, fostering diversity and expanding our offerings like Talent Board.
  7. [7]
    Pros & Cons of Working At Horizontal (184 Reviews) - Glassdoor
    Rating 3.9 (262) Horizontal has an employee rating of 3.9 out of 5 stars, based on 184 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working ...
  8. [8]
    Horizontal - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    From Latin horizontem via French, "horizontal" (1550s) means relating to or near the horizon; by 1630s, it also means "flat" or parallel to the horizon.
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    horizontal, adj. & n. meanings, etymology and more
    There are 16 meanings listed in OED's entry for the word horizontal, one of which is labelled obsolete. See 'Meaning & use' for definitions, usage, and ...Missing: organization | Show results with:organization
  11. [11]
    Horizontal - math word definition - Math Open Reference
    A horizontal line is one which runs left-to-right across the page. In geometry, a horizontal line is one which runs from left to right across the page.
  12. [12]
    GALILEO'S STUDIES OF PROJECTILE MOTION
    By varying the ball's horizontal velocity and vertical drop, Galileo was able to determine that the path of a projectile is parabolic. A page from Galileo's ...
  13. [13]
    Galileo on Projectile Motion - andrew.cmu.ed
    Galileo accounted for projectile motion by composing uniform rectilinear motion with free fall to produce a parabolic trajectory. His argument for the uniform ...
  14. [14]
    1. Discovering Gravity - Galileo - The University of Virginia
    He considered the motion of an object when not subject to interference as its “natural” motion. Using his terminology, then, natural horizontal motion is motion ...
  15. [15]
    Horizontal gene transfer and the earliest stages of the evolution of life
    Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) has been suggested to be the dominant hereditary process at the earliest stages of evolution.
  16. [16]
    Horizontal Definition (Illustrated Mathematics Dictionary) - Math is Fun
    Horizontal ... Going side-to-side, like the horizon. Parallel to the horizon. In a flat or level manner. (Up-down is called vertical).
  17. [17]
    Horizontal line - Math.net
    A horizontal line is a line whose y-value does not change; it travels from left-to-right or right-to-left and does not move up or down along the y-axis.<|separator|>
  18. [18]
    Horizontal and Vertical Velocity of a Projectile
    The horizontal velocity of a projectile is constant (a never changing in value),; There is a vertical acceleration caused by gravity; its value is 9.8 m/s/s, ...
  19. [19]
    3.3: Projectile Motion - Physics LibreTexts
    Nov 5, 2020 · The range of the projectile is the displacement in the horizontal direction. There is no acceleration in this direction since gravity only acts ...
  20. [20]
    4.3 Projectile Motion - University Physics Volume 1 | OpenStax
    Sep 19, 2016 · (c) The velocity in the vertical direction begins to decrease as the object rises. At its highest point, the vertical velocity is zero. As ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] 5. Leveling
    A horizontal plane is perpendicular to the gravity direction. In surveying, it is defined as a plane that is perpendicular to the local vertical line.
  22. [22]
    [PDF] Chapter 3 Motion in Two and Three Dimensions
    s2 and is directed downward. If its coordinates are given by a horizontal x axis and a vertical y axis which is directed upward, then the acceleration of.
  23. [23]
    Altitude & Azimuth: The Horizontal Coordinate System
    The horizontal coordinate system, also known as the Alt/Az system, is a method for describing the exact position of objects in the sky, such as planets, ...
  24. [24]
    Horizontal Coordinate System | COSMOS
    The horizonal coordinate system depends on the location of the observer and the time of the observation. It measures the altitude and azimuth of an object in ...
  25. [25]
    horizontal_coordinates.html - UNLV Physics
    In the horizontal coordinate system, you locate an astronomical object using altitude (the angle from the horizon along a great circle through the zenith) and ...
  26. [26]
    Alt-Az - Astronomy 505
    The alt-az (horizontal) coordinate system is the simplest coordinate system, as it is based on the observer's horizon.
  27. [27]
    3.3 Horizontal Coordinates (ALT,AZ)
    The horizontal coordinates azimuth A and altitude E (elevation) is used to enable an observer on earth to locate celestial objects in the observer's local sky.
  28. [28]
    [PDF] Positional Astronomy Chapter 3
    is used to enable an observer on earth to locate celestial objects in the observer's local sky. ○ The observer's horizontal plane is the fundamental plane of ...
  29. [29]
    What is a Control Survey? Types, Importance + Process - Formplus
    Feb 24, 2023 · Horizontal control surveys are used to establish coordinate systems, such as State Plane Coordinates, and are essential for accurate map-making.
  30. [30]
    8. Horizontal Positions | The Nature of Geographic Information
    Surveyors have developed distinct methods, based on separate control networks, for measuring horizontal and vertical positions.
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Basic Surveying - Student Workbook
    Mar 15, 2007 · Two methods are commonly used to measure the horizontal distance between two points using a tape. See figure 3-3. The first method is to ...
  32. [32]
    Establishing horizontal control
    Measure the vertical angle between control points, so that the surface length can be reduced to a horizontal distance. Station the tripod over a control point.
  33. [33]
    Horizontal control surveys - Surveying course
    Horizontal control surveys establish control points for coordinates in construction projects, using methods like traversing, triangulation, trilateration, GPS, ...Missing: engineering | Show results with:engineering
  34. [34]
    [PDF] An Introduction to Survey Methods and Techniques - CED Engineering
    Survey methods include total stations, RTK GPS, LIDAR, older methods like transit-tape, and transit-stadia, and plane table surveying.
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    5.5 Land Surveying and Conventional Techniques for Measuring ...
    Land surveyors measure horizontal positions in geographic or plane coordinate systems relative to previously surveyed positions called control points.
  37. [37]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer - PMC - NIH
    Horizontal gene transfer (HGT) is the movement of genetic information between organisms, a process that includes the spread of antibiotic resistance genes ...
  38. [38]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer and the History of Life - PMC - NIH
    Horizontal gene transfer is a major evolutionary force that constantly reshapes microbial genomes. Emerging phylogenetic methods use information about ...
  39. [39]
    Horizontal Gene Transfer among Bacteria and Its Role in Biological ...
    May 16, 2014 · This medical problem stimulated research in bacterial genetics which revealed that horizontal gene transfer is involved in some of the genetic ...
  40. [40]
    Horizontal Disease Transmission - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    Horizontal disease transmission is defined as the spread of disease from one individual to another through direct contact or indirect contact with contaminated ...
  41. [41]
    Epidemiology and Evolution - Medical Microbiology - NCBI Bookshelf
    Transmission may be horizontal (between different individuals), or vertical (between mother and offspring either before, during, or immediately after birth).
  42. [42]
    Virus Transmission and Epidemiology - PMC - PubMed Central
    In contrast, most viral infections exhibit horizontal transmission, meaning that direct host-to-host transmission occurs. Viruses with horizontal transmission ...
  43. [43]
    Horizontal Integration Explained: Definition, Examples, and Benefits
    Horizontal integration involves acquiring or merging with businesses at the same level within an industry, strengthening a firm's market presence.
  44. [44]
    Understanding Horizontal Integration in Mergers and Acquisitions
    Jul 15, 2025 · 1. Disney's Acquisition of 21st Century Fox (2019) · 2. Marriott International's Acquisition of Starwood Hotels (2016) · 3. Facebook's Acquisition ...
  45. [45]
    Horizontal Market: What it is, How it Works - Investopedia
    Horizontal Markets vs. Vertical Markets. Vertical markets are the opposite of horizontal markets in that they focus on a very niche sector or demographic. For ...
  46. [46]
    Impact of organizational structure and in-organization resource ...
    In horizontal-structured organizations, members' decision-making processes are simultaneous and more equal, with less influence from others, while in vertical ...
  47. [47]
    Horizontal Organizational Structure: Key Features & Benefits - PMaps
    Feb 3, 2025 · A horizontal organizational structure is a business model that minimizes hierarchical levels, fostering a flat hierarchy where decision-making is decentralized.Table Of Content · Types Of Organizational... · Advantages
  48. [48]
    Horizontal Organizational Structure: Advantages & Disadvantages
    A horizontal organizational structure is one that has only a few layers of management. Managers have a wider span of control with more subordinates in a flat ...<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    What is Horizontal Organizational Structure? Benefits, Examples
    Jul 17, 2024 · Horizontal structures emphasize empowering employees to take ownership of their work and contribute to organizational goals autonomously. This ...
  50. [50]
    Organizational Structure for Companies With Examples and Benefits
    Flatarchy, also known as a horizontal structure, is used among many startups. It flattens the hierarchy and chain of command as the name implies. It gives its ...
  51. [51]
    (DOC) Flat Organisations - Academia.edu
    In addition to increased productivity, organisations using a flat structure can experience leaner budgets by eliminating costly middle- management salaries.
  52. [52]
    [PDF] Horizontal vs. Vertical Information Structure of the Firm
    This study is motivated by a. U S. - Japan comparison of industrial organization. The objective of this paper is to compare the efficiency of two informational ...
  53. [53]
    (PDF) Discovering the efficient organization structure: Horizontal ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · In this article, we review organizational structures and find that there are two efficient structures, a vertical structure and a horizontal structure.
  54. [54]
    Size and Structure in Complex Organizations - jstor
    Horizontal differentiation was measured a$ the number of divisions or departments in the organization. Vertical differentiation was measured as the number of ...
  55. [55]
    14.2 Organizational Structure – Organizational Behavior
    Moreover, in a flat structure, advancement opportunities will be more limited, because there are fewer management layers.Missing: horizontal | Show results with:horizontal
  56. [56]
    10.4 Creating an Organizational Structure – Strategic Management
    Using a functional structure creates advantages and disadvantages. An important benefit of adopting a functional structure is that each person tends to ...
  57. [57]
    [PDF] Chapter 11: Organizational Design: - Structure, Culture, and Control
    – In flat structures: the span of control is wide. • Meaning one manager supervises many employees. Page 21. Copyright © 2017 by ...<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    Changes in formal structure towards self-managing organization ...
    May 9, 2023 · We analyze the case of a medium-sized firm that experiences organizational change from rigid bureaucratic structures to a more self-managing organization model.
  59. [59]
    How to get better at flatter designs: considerations for shaping and ...
    Jan 27, 2022 · First, hierarchical structures may not be that bad after all, and they may come in handy when scaling teams-based work becomes difficult. Second ...
  60. [60]
    Self-managing organizations: Exploring the limits of less ...
    This paper reviews the literature on less-hierarchical organizing and identifies three categories of research: post-bureaucratic organizations, humanistic ...
  61. [61]
    The myth of the flat start‐up: Reconsidering the organizational ... - SMS
    Aug 20, 2021 · This study suggests that while a flatter hierarchy can improve ideation and creative success, it can result in haphazard execution and commercial failure.
  62. [62]
    What's Really Going on Zappos? The Impact of Holacracy on ...
    Mar 16, 2016 · 18% of employees (more than 250 people) left Zappos – that's on top of the company's normal attrition rate of 12%. In total, Zappos lost 30% of its workforce ...
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Who's the boss? The persistence of entrepreneurial hierarchy in flat ...
    Nov 11, 2022 · Valve is a useful case study for several reasons, espe- cially because it shows how, when formal hierarchy is aban- doned, it is often replaced ...
  64. [64]
    Hierarchical vs Flat Organizational Structure [with Pros & Cons]
    Jun 6, 2024 · Hierarchical structures have multiple management layers, top-down decisions, and slower communication. Flat structures have few or no middle ...
  65. [65]
    Comparison between Hierarchical and Flat Organization Structures
    Hierarchical structures have multiple management layers, while flat structures have few or no layers, with a short chain of command and wide span of control.
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Is Flatter Better? Delayering the management hierarchy
    An early study by Porter and Lawler (1964) found that the size of the organisation is a relevant factor in the degree of satisfaction in tall and flat ...
  67. [67]
    To what extent does hierarchical leadership affect health care ... - NIH
    Flatter structures differ from a traditional hierarchy in that they remove middle managers and increase accessibility of decision-makers to frontline staff.
  68. [68]
    How to Successfully Scale a Flat Organization
    Jun 7, 2021 · Many startups today have adopted a “self-directed” model, which includes flat organizational structures, minimal hierarchy, self-management.
  69. [69]
    Scaling Flat: When To Bend The Rules Of Flat Hierarchies - Forbes
    Mar 5, 2025 · A flat hierarchy can work well for smaller teams, larger organizations often need selective structure to maintain efficiency.
  70. [70]
    Flat vs. Hierarchical Organizations: Which Structure Works Best?
    May 15, 2025 · Hierarchical structures have defined roles, but slower decisions. Flat structures offer faster decisions, but may have role ambiguity. Hybrid ...
  71. [71]
    A perception study of Hierarchical vs Flat Organizational Structures ...
    Mar 7, 2023 · This quantitative study aims to evaluate the perceptions of stakeholders towards the benefits of flat organizational structures over hierarchical structures ...
  72. [72]
    The Effects of “Tall” Versus “Flat” Organization Structure on ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · The literature implies that employees attached to organizations with few reporting levels seem to be more satisfied with their work environment than otherwise.
  73. [73]
    Research Shows Flatter Hierarchies' Hidden Cost
    Aug 20, 2024 · “Firms that tout flatter hierarchies attract a lower share of applicants that are women,” says Assistant Professor of Management and Organization Reuben Hurst.