Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Manila–Cavite Expressway

The Manila–Cavite Expressway, commonly abbreviated as CAVITEX, is a 14-kilometer controlled-access toll highway in the connecting in City, , to Kawit in province along the western shore of . Built primarily on reclaimed land, the expressway consists of multi-lane segments including the original R-1 section and extensions, with two toll plazas facilitating barrier toll collection for vehicles above certain engine capacities while restricting smaller motorcycles and tricycles. Developed initially in the as a 6.6-kilometer asphalt road known as the Coastal Road to alleviate congestion between , , and southern areas, CAVITEX underwent significant expansion starting December 27, 1994, through a agreement between the Public Estates Authority (now Philippine Reclamation Authority) and private partners for the R-1 Expressway project. The first phase extended the route by seven kilometers with four lanes into , enhancing connectivity for commuters and commerce between the densely populated and industrial zones in . Operated by the Tollway Corporation, a entity under the Philippine Reclamation Authority, CAVITEX serves as a critical for daily traffic, reducing travel times compared to alternative surface roads and supporting economic activity in southern despite periodic toll rate adjustments and infrastructure maintenance needs. Recent developments include cashless tolling implementations and extensions like the , though the core route has faced operational disputes, including a legal over a proposed offer amid efforts to fund expansions.

Route and Design

Route Description

The Manila–Cavite Expressway, commonly known as CAVITEX and designated as in the , is a 14-kilometer controlled-access extending from its northern terminus at the Seaside Drive interchange in , —connecting to (Radial Road 1)—southward along the western shore of Bacoor Bay to the Kawit Toll Plaza in , . The route traverses , , and , providing a direct coastal link that bypasses congested urban arterials for vehicles traveling between and southern province. Configured primarily as a four-lane (two lanes per direction) divided , the features grade-separated interchanges for efficient traffic flow. Major access points include the interchange at and Seaside Drive, the Sucat interchange linking to Dr. A. Santos Avenue in , the Zapote interchange connecting to Alabang–Zapote Road in , and the terminal Kawit plaza providing exits to Tirona Highway (N62) and local roads. These interchanges support entry and exit for regional commuters, with the route's alignment facilitating connections to nearby facilities such as via adjacent roads. The southern end at serves as a gateway for onward travel, including proposed extensions like Segment 5 toward and in , enhancing connectivity to industrial and residential areas in the province.

Engineering and Technical Features

The Manila–Cavite Expressway consists of approximately 14 kilometers of controlled-access roadway, primarily comprising Segment 1 (6.48 km from Seaside Drive to Zapote) and Segment 4 (7.4 km from Zapote Interchange to Toll Plaza). Segment 1 originated as an upgrade of the existing R-1 , with expansions including widening to eight lanes (2x4) over 5.2 km and at key bridges. Segment 4 employs a four-lane (2x2) configuration designed for efficient coastal traversal along Bacoor Bay. Structural elements include three mainline bridges—Paranaque, , and Wawa—widened to accommodate eight lanes, enhancing capacity and safety over water crossings. A notable feature is the 400-meter Left Turning Facility flyover, providing four southbound lanes to facilitate access to adjacent routes. Interchanges, such as those at R-1, Sucat, SLEX, and Zapote, utilize and trumpet designs to minimize at-grade conflicts and support high-volume traffic flow. Toll collection infrastructure features two plazas: Paranaque with 20 lanes (including 7 reversible) and with 20 lanes (including 4 reversible), enabling dynamic adjustment to peak-hour demands. The expressway integrates advanced traffic management systems, encompassing computerized tolling, , variable message signs, roadway lighting, and response capabilities, aligned with international standards for operational efficiency. These elements collectively address the engineering challenges of a high-density urban-coastal corridor, prioritizing durability against environmental exposure and seamless connectivity.

History

Origins and Early Development as Untolled Road

The originated as a key infrastructure initiative during the administration of President in the early 1970s, aimed at developing a direct coastal highway along to connect with province. On November 20, 1973, the signed a with the Construction and Development Corporation of the Philippines (CDCP) for the road's alongside reclamation efforts in the foreshore and offshore areas of . This project, designated as a national priority under Letter of Instruction No. 85, sought to reclaim land and build roadways to alleviate chronic traffic congestion on inland routes like Quirino Avenue in and . Construction commenced shortly after the 1973 contract, focusing on a four-lane undivided highway extending approximately 6.6 kilometers initially from the vicinity of Roxas Boulevard southward through Parañaque and Las Piñas toward Cavite. The road incorporated reclamation to create stable ground along the bay's edge, addressing both transportation needs and land development for future urban expansion. Segments were developed progressively to minimize disruption, with the initial phases prioritizing connectivity to reduce bottlenecks in southern Metro Manila. By 1983, the core Manila-Cavite Coastal Road had been completed and opened to the public as an untolled facility, providing free access that markedly improved travel times and traffic flow between and . It operated without tolls throughout its early years, functioning as a public integrated into the national highway network, and underwent minor expansions, such as widening to four lanes by the late , to accommodate growing vehicular demand prior to its upgrade to standards. The untolled status persisted until the mid-1990s, when deterioration and increased usage prompted proposals for rehabilitation and tolling to fund maintenance and further development.

Proposal for Expressway Conversion

In the early 1990s, the Manila-Cavite Coastal Road, originally constructed as an untolled four-lane highway in the late and opened to by , faced increasing deterioration from heavy use and required rehabilitation to handle growing vehicular between and Cavite Province. The Philippine government, through the Public Estates Authority (, now Philippine Reclamation Authority), identified the need for modernization, leading to proposals for involvement to upgrade the 14-kilometer route into a tolled with improved safety features, expanded capacity, and extensions. This culminated in the conceptualization of the Manila-Cavite Toll Expressway Project (MCTEP), structured as a to finance rehabilitation, operation, and maintenance via toll revenues under a build-operate-and-transfer scheme. On October 6, 1994, PEA signed a (MOU) with Mara Philippines Corporation and Renong Berhad, Malaysian firms, outlining the project's scope, including the conversion of the existing R-1 segment into a controlled-access tollway. This was formalized on December 27, 1994, through a establishing the Manila-Cavite Toll Expressway Joint Venture Company, with PEA providing rights-of-way free of charge and the partners committing to complete upgrades within specified timelines. The proposal emphasized engineering enhancements such as asphalt resurfacing, addition of barriers, lighting, and interchanges to transform the road into a high-standard , projected to reduce congestion and support economic growth in southern and . Initial plans under MCTEP divided the project into segments, with Segment 1 focusing on the core Manila-to-Bacoor rehabilitation, while anticipating extensions like the R-1 to connect further south. Toll rates were to be regulated by the Toll Regulatory Board, with revenues funding operations and debt recovery over a 30-year concession period.

Construction, Joint Venture, and Initial Operations

The Manila-Cavite Toll Expressway Project originated from a signed on February 3, 1994, between the governments of the and for cooperative development of the tollway. This led to a Agreement on December 27, 1994, between the Public Estates Authority (now Philippine Reclamation Authority) and a Malaysian consortium comprising United Engineers (Malaysia) Berhad, , and Renong Berhad, under a build-operate-transfer framework to finance, design, construct, operate, and maintain the initial 13.7-kilometer expressway from in to in . Cavitex Infrastructure Corporation was incorporated on October 9, 1995, as the project company to execute these responsibilities. Construction commenced immediately following the agreement, with the initial segment (R-1 Expressway, approximately 7 kilometers) involving elevated viaducts, interchanges, and coastal alignments to alleviate congestion on the existing untolled Manila-Cavite Coastal Road. The project cost was estimated at around ₱6.5 billion, funded primarily through loans and equity from the Malaysian partners, with the consortium responsible for toll collection to recover investments over a 30-year concession period. The R-1 segment opened to traffic on May 24, 1998, following issuance of a Notice to Start Toll Collection by the Toll Regulatory Board, marking the onset of commercial operations with initial toll rates set at ₱1 per kilometer for Class 1 vehicles. Initial operations focused on the to stretch, providing a controlled-access alternative that reduced travel times from to by up to 50% compared to surface , though early traffic volumes were modest due to limited extensions and competing routes. In December 1999, the Malaysian partners' shares were acquired by , a Filipino-owned entity, shifting full operational control to local management while retaining the original concession terms.

Major Expansions and Extensions

The R-1 Extension, comprising 4, added a 7.4-kilometer four-lane tollway from the Zapote Interchange in to the Kawit Toll Plaza, extending access deeper into and supporting increased traffic volumes from . This southward push followed the initial operational phases of the core expressway and integrated with local roads like , though full realization of the proposed 22-kilometer 5 from Binakayan-Aplaya in to further coastal areas, including , has remained in planning without construction commencement as of 2025. A pivotal recent expansion is the CAVITEX–C5 Link, a 7.7-kilometer elevated and at-grade connector linking the main expressway in Parañaque to C-5 Road in Taguig via Segments 2 and 3, designed to bypass congestion on South Luzon Expressway (SLEX) and local arterials. Key milestones include the opening of the C5 Link Flyover Extension on July 16, 2022, which spans over SLEX to Merville and Sucat areas, followed by the Sucat Interchange inauguration on June 21, 2024, handling about 23,000 vehicles daily and cutting Kawit-to-Sucat travel from one hour to under 30 minutes. Segment 3B, a 2-kilometer portion from Sucat to E. Rodriguez Avenue along C-5, advanced with groundbreaking on June 21, 2024, targeting completion by the third quarter of 2025 to further streamline north-south flows. Complementing these, the 1.2-kilometer CAVITEX-CALAX Link in broke ground on June 21, 2024, to directly interconnect with the , decongesting Tirona Highway and Centennial Road while facilitating faster links to economic zones. These initiatives, aligned with national infrastructure priorities, prioritize phased implementation to minimize disruptions amid rising regional development pressures.

Governance and Operations

Management Structure and Joint Venture Agreement

The Manila–Cavite Expressway, known as CAVITEX, is operated under a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) signed on December 27, 1994, between the Public Estates Authority (now Philippine Reclamation Authority, or PRA), Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA), and Renong Corporation of Malaysia, with subsequent involvement of United Engineers (Malaysia) Berhad (UEM). The agreement covers the development, financing, construction, operation, and maintenance of the expressway's initial segments, including the R-1 Expressway upgrade (Segment 1), C-5 Link Expressway (Segments 2 and 3), and R-1 Extension (Segments 4 and 5), spanning a 35-year concession period following loan repayment. Cavitex Infrastructure Corporation (CIC), incorporated on October 9, 1995, by MARA and UEM to represent private interests, became the primary private partner after Cavitex Holdings, Inc. acquired full ownership of the Malaysian stakes in 1999. CIC and PRA form the core partners, with PRA delegating operational responsibilities to its , Public Estates Authority Tollways Corporation (PEATC), which serves as the designated operator. Under an Operations and Maintenance Agreement, CIC nominates five of seven PEATC board members and assumes primary responsibility for day-to-day operations, including collection, upkeep, and expansions, while absorbing associated costs. Since January 2, 2013, , a of Corporation, has managed CIC's operations pursuant to a Management Letter-Agreement executed on December 27, 2012. A Operation Agreement, signed on July 26, 1996, between CIC, PRA, and the Toll Regulatory Board (TRB), formalizes collection and regulatory oversight, with the TRB as grantor enforcing a 30-year concession from October 1, 1998, to September 30, 2033. Revenue sharing under the JVA stipulates that during the loan repayment phase, PRA receives 10% of gross toll revenues, with the private partner () retaining 90%; post-repayment, the split shifts to 60% for PRA and 40% for . Excess cash balances, net of operations and maintenance expenses, are distributed monthly between the partners. This structure has faced disputes, including a asserting the overdue transition to the 60-40 split in PRA's favor and seeking enhanced oversight or of operations due to alleged non-compliance. has advocated for amicable resolution while emphasizing its role in expansions and maintenance. The TRB retains ultimate authority over toll rates and project compliance, approving adjustments based on petitions from both partners.

Toll Collection and Rate Adjustments

Toll collection on the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX) employs (RFID) technology via the Easytrip system, marking it as the first toll road in the to adopt this method for electronic tolling. Motorists affix RFID stickers to vehicles, enabling transactions processed in 3-4 seconds as vehicles slow at toll plazas without full stops. A mandatory full cashless policy was implemented across all CAVITEX toll plazas on September 14, 2024, eliminating cash payments to reduce congestion and enforce RFID compliance, with penalties for non-users. The system integrates with the national One RFID initiative, allowing a single sticker for multiple expressways including CAVITEX. Toll rates are segmented by route portions, such as the R-1 mainline from Seaside Drive to Zapote and extensions like Zapote to , with classifications for Class 1 vehicles (cars, motorcycles with sidecars), Class 2 (buses, light trucks), and Class 3 (heavy trucks). Adjustments are governed by the Toll Regulatory Board (TRB) under the toll operation agreement with Cavitex Infrastructure Corporation and the Philippine Reclamation Authority, permitting periodic increases every three years to fund maintenance, operations, debt service, and expansions. Prior to recent hikes, rates for the R-1 portion (Seaside Drive to Zapote) stood at ₱35 for Class 1, ₱70 for Class 2, and ₱104 for Class 3 as of 2024.
Date EffectiveSegment (Seaside/Zapote to Zapote)Class 1Class 2Class 3Source
May 12, 2022R-1 Portion₱33₱67₱100
August 21, 2023R-1 Portion₱35₱70₱104
October 28, 2025R-1 Portion₱39₱78₱117
For the R-1 Extension Segment 4 (Zapote to ), adjustments occur in tranches; the first tranche effective October 28, 2025, raises Class 1 from ₱73 to ₱88, Class 2 from ₱146 to ₱176, and Class 3 from ₱219 to ₱264, with a second tranche planned subsequently to support extension maintenance. These hikes, approved by TRB for petitions dating to 2020 and 2023, incorporate and aim to sustain amid and project costs, though extensions like C-5 Link maintain separate matrices starting at ₱35-36 for Class 1. vehicles and agricultural trucks receive temporary exemptions or rebates during initial implementation periods.

Controversies and Disputes

Ownership and Operational Control Conflicts

In April 2024, the Public Estates Authority Tollway (PEATC), a government-owned entity, filed a petition for a writ of in the of City to compel Infrastructure (CIC), the private operator under Metro Pacific Tollways (MPTC), to turn over operations and maintenance (O&M) of the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX). PEATC asserted that CIC's concession agreement expired in 2021, rendering the expressway government property subject to its control, and alleged non-compliance with a revenue-sharing shift to a 60-40 favoring the as stipulated in the agreement with the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA). CIC and MPTC contested PEATC's authority to initiate the lawsuit independently, arguing that the with PRA required collective action for disputes and that PEATC's officer-in-charge, Dioscoro Jr., lacked board approval to file without PRA involvement. In response, CIC filed a criminal complaint against Esteban in May 2024 for violating anti-graft laws under Section 3(e) of Republic Act No. 3019, accusing him of causing undue injury to the government through unauthorized actions that could expose it to claims if the concession period had not lapsed. MPTC emphasized that seizing control prematurely would trigger contractual liabilities, including compensation for investors, and urged resolution through or rather than litigation. Amid the standoff, proposed acquiring the government's 35% stake in the for 2.5 billion (approximately USD 44 million) to enable full private operation and prevent project delays, including extensions like the C-5 South Link. PRA rejected the offer as undervaluing the asset, which generated 2.4 billion in gross revenues in 2023 alone, and detrimental to interests by forgoing future income streams. PEATC further alleged "rampant " in CIC's toll collection and maintenance practices, claiming deliberate underperformance to justify the , though CIC denied these accusations and highlighted its investments exceeding 20 billion since 2006. The conflict underscores tensions in public-private partnerships over contract duration, revenue allocation, and control transitions, with PEATC viewing CAVITEX as reclaimable national infrastructure post-concession, while maintains the agreement's validity extends operations until at least 2033 absent mutual termination. As of late , no resolution had been reached, prompting Department of Finance exploration of buyout facilitation, though continued without reported turnover. In 2017, Cavitex Infrastructure Corporation (CIC) and the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA), joint venture partners in the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX), initiated arbitration proceedings against the Republic of the Philippines before the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA Case No. 2017-13), primarily contesting Toll Regulatory Board (TRB) decisions on toll rate adjustments and alleged breaches of the joint venture agreement. The claims centered on disputes over provisional toll increases and compensation for operational expansions, with CIC arguing that regulatory delays and denials violated the concession terms established in 1995. The proceedings concluded on September 7, 2021, following a joint manifestation by PRA and the Republic leading to the withdrawal of claims, terminating the case without a final award on merits; subsequent petitions for toll relief were then processed by the TRB. More recent legal challenges emerged in 2024, escalating tensions over operational control and ownership shares in the , where (a of Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation, holding 74% equity) faced petitions from government entities seeking takeover. On April 12, 2024, PEA Tollway Corporation (PEATC), a PRA affiliate, filed a petition before the in to assume CAVITEX operations, alleging CIC's breaches including unauthorized toll hikes, failure to remit revenues, and non-compliance with maintenance obligations under the 1997 supplemental agreement. countered that PEATC lacked legal standing to sue independently, asserting the dispute required PRA's inclusion as the proper party and that premature seizure before the 2033 concession expiry would trigger government liability for damages. CIC pursued countermeasures, including a May 2024 criminal complaint against PEATC officer-in-charge Diosdado Esteban Jr. for , slander by deed, usurpation of , and graft violations, stemming from Esteban's public accusations of CIC's mismanagement. The Court of Appeals in July 2024 rejected CIC's against PEATC, allowing ongoing public discourse amid the litigation. Parallel efforts for resolution included CIC's April 2024 proposal to buy out PRA's 26% stake for 2.5 billion, rejected by PRA as undervaluing government interests and failing to address alleged contractual defaults. These disputes highlight recurring frictions in public-private concessions, with arbitration clauses in the agreement providing a mechanism for toll-related impasses, though recent control battles have shifted to domestic courts.

Allegations of Corruption and Mismanagement

In April 2024, Dioscoro Esteban Jr., officer-in-charge of the Public Estates Authority Tollway (PEATC), publicly alleged "rampant " in the operations of Cavitex Infrastructure (CIC), the private partner managing the Manila-Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX). Esteban claimed to have witnessed these irregularities firsthand, citing them as a reason for demanding the turnover of CAVITEX control to PEATC, which he asserted was government property under a agreement. These claims emerged amid a heated dispute over operational authority, where PEATC argued that CIC had unlawfully retained control despite alleged lapses in the partnership. CIC vehemently denied the accusations, describing them as baseless and unsupported by evidence, and responded by filing criminal complaints against Esteban on May 9, 2024, before the Office of the Ombudsman. The charges included perjury, slander by deed, usurpation of public authority, and violation of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act (Republic Act No. 3019), asserting that Esteban's statements were fabricated to justify an unlawful takeover attempt. CIC emphasized that no concrete proof of corruption had been presented, framing the allegations as part of a broader conflict over the joint venture's governance, including a proposed PHP 2.5-billion buyout of the government's stake, which PEATC and the Philippine Reclamation Authority (PRA) rejected as undervaluing public assets. The controversy ties into prior scrutiny, such as a 2018 Commission on Audit report questioning CIC's control over CAVITEX revenues and operations, which fueled arguments for PEATC oversight. However, no formal charges or convictions against CIC executives for corruption have resulted from these claims as of October 2025, with the disputes largely revolving around contractual interpretations rather than substantiated financial misconduct. In a related development, the Ombudsman suspended PRA officials in July 2023 for grave misconduct in a Cavite reclamation dispute linked to CAVITEX extensions, highlighting governance tensions but not directly implicating CIC in graft. These exchanges underscore ongoing legal battles over management rights, with both sides leveraging corruption narratives to bolster their positions without independent verification of systemic mismanagement in toll collection or project execution.

Impact and Reception

Economic and Traffic Benefits

The Manila–Cavite Expressway has significantly enhanced traffic flow between and province by providing a dedicated tolled corridor that bypasses congested surface roads such as . Average daily traffic volumes have grown steadily, reaching approximately 259,815 vehicles in recent assessments, with projections exceeding 340,000 by the end of 2025 following capacity expansions, reflecting a more than 30% increase and indicating effective demand absorption for commuter and freight movement. Expansions, including linkage projects, are designed to further mitigate bottlenecks, promoting smoother north-south connectivity and reducing peak-hour delays for users accessing key interchanges. Economically, the expressway supports by facilitating efficient access to Cavite's industrial zones and export-oriented hubs, where over 20 economic zones drive in sectors like and automotive . This bolsters for and daily commutes, contributing to local economic uplift through improved , as noted in project scoping documents for adjacent developments. High utilization rates underscore its role in sustaining commercial activity southward from , aligning with broader infrastructure goals to enhance productivity without direct GDP attribution in available assessments.

Criticisms and Public Concerns

Public dissatisfaction with the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX) has primarily focused on toll rate adjustments perceived as burdensome amid persistent traffic challenges in the . Toll hikes implemented on August 21, 2023, raised Class 1 vehicle fees from P33 to P35 for certain segments, with further adjustments approved for October 28, 2025, following petitions by the operator to the Toll Regulatory Board. Motorists expressed mixed reactions to the 2023 increases, citing inadequate improvements in road quality and traffic flow relative to the added costs. Environmental and livelihood impacts have drawn criticism from coastal communities, particularly subsistence fisherfolk affected by the expressway's alignment along . A 2022 study found that the R-1 CAVITEX Coastal Road Project disrupted municipal activities through restricted to traditional grounds and altered coastal ecosystems, reducing catches and incomes for affected households. These concerns highlight broader ecological risks from coastal infrastructure, including potential long-term harm to marine , though operators maintain compliance with environmental standards. Construction of extensions, such as the CAVITEX-C5 Link, has prompted public complaints linking project activities to localized flooding. In May 2025, residents blamed temporary structures and earthworks for exacerbating inundation in during heavy rains, prompting calls for mitigation measures despite operator assurances of hydrological assessments. issues, including occasional reports of surface deterioration despite revenues, have fueled perceptions of mismanagement, though verifiable on widespread potholes or failures remains limited compared to adjacent roads.

Future Developments

The CAVITEX–C-5 Link Expressway is a 7.7-kilometer, 2×3-lane connecting the (CAVITEX R1) in to C-5 Road in City, designed to provide seamless access between southern and eastern corridors. The project forms part of the (MCTEP) under a public-private , aiming to alleviate on local roads like Dr. A. Santos Avenue and Sucat Road. Comprising Segments 2, 3A-1, 3A-2, and 3B, the link integrates with existing infrastructure such as the (SLEX). Segments 3A-1 and 3A-2, totaling 3.8 kilometers from Merville to , became operational prior to 2023, while Segment 2—a 1.9-kilometer stretch from the Toll Plaza to the Sucat Interchange via the R-1 interchange—followed with Phase 2 construction commencing in the first quarter of 2023 and the Sucat Interchange inaugurated on June 21, 2024, by President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. This interchange directly links CAVITEX to C-5 Extension, shortening trips to 's (BGC). Segment 3B, the final 2-kilometer portion from Sucat Interchange to E. Rodriguez Avenue along C-5, had its groundbreaking on June 21, 2024, and remains under construction as of October 2025, with completion targeted for late 2025 to establish a continuous route. Opened segments currently accommodate about 16,000 vehicles daily, contributing to reduced travel times of up to 10 minutes between CAVITEX and Sucat Road. Full operation is expected to handle 40,000 vehicles per day, cutting overall journey times from CAVITEX R1 to SLEX/C-5 from 40 minutes to 10 minutes and supporting integration with adjacent projects like the CAVITEX-CALAX Link. The CAVITEX–CALAX Link Expressway (CCLINK), also known as the CALAX Link, is a 1.3-kilometer elevated connector project that integrates the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX) with the Cavite–Laguna Expressway (CALAX) at the Kawit Toll Plaza in Kawit, Cavite. This linkage facilitates direct access from CAVITEX's western terminus to CALAX's Kawit Interchange, enhancing connectivity for traffic flowing between Manila, Cavite, and Laguna provinces while alleviating congestion on local roads such as the Aguinaldo Highway. Construction of the CCLINK forms part of broader CAVITEX expansion initiatives under the Philippine government's program, with the project aimed at reducing travel times and supporting economic corridors in southern . The Kawit Interchange on CALAX, integral to this connection, includes the Governor's Drive Interchange, which reached approximately 40% completion as of early 2025 and is targeted for operationalization later that year to enable full integration. President Ferdinand R. Marcos Jr. inspected the CALAX Cavite segment, including Governor's Drive elements, on March 21, 2025, underscoring ongoing progress toward linking the two expressways. Other extensions tied to this interconnection include CALAX's Subsection 3 segments, which extend westward from the Interchange to integrate with CAVITEX, comprising four lanes and designed to handle projected traffic volumes of up to 100,000 vehicles daily upon completion. These enhancements are expected to open by the third quarter of 2025, providing seamless tolling and interchange ramps for bidirectional flow. The overall setup positions CALAX as (E3) in the national network, with the CAVITEX link serving as a critical western spur to optimize regional freight and commuter mobility.

Sangley Point and Segment 5 Proposals

The Expressway's Segment 5 has been proposed as a 22-kilometer tollway extension primarily to enhance connectivity in province, linking the existing terminus to areas including , Sangley Point, and . First conceptualized in the as part of broader network expansions, the segment aims to alleviate congestion on local roads and support industrial and residential growth in southern by providing direct access to emerging developments like the Sangley Point . Metro Pacific Tollways Corporation (MPTC), the primary operator of the expressway through its subsidiary Cavitex Infrastructure Corporation, submitted detailed proposals for Segment 5 in the late 2010s, including a dedicated 5-kilometer spur road from the Kawit Interchange directly to Sangley Point to facilitate airport access. This initiative, pitched under unsolicited public-private partnership frameworks, would integrate with the under-construction Sangley Airport Access Road while running parallel in parts, particularly Segment 5.3 at 5.39 kilometers, to handle projected traffic volumes from the airport's dual-runway operations serving up to 6.5 million passengers annually. MPTC's plans emphasize seamless linkage to the broader Cavite-Laguna Expressway network, potentially reducing travel times to Metro Manila by integrating with existing interchanges. Development of the spur and Segment 5 gained renewed momentum with the October 2024 approval by the Philippine Competition Commission of a joint venture for the Sangley Point International Airport between the Cavite provincial government and a consortium including CAVITEX stakeholders such as House of Investments and ICTSI. This partnership explicitly incorporates infrastructure enhancements, including a connector road from CAVITEX to the airport site, as part of transforming the former naval airfield into a commercial hub with adjacent "Sangley Aerocity" developments featuring technohubs and logistics facilities. However, as of mid-2025, full approval from the National Economic and Development Authority and Toll Regulatory Board remains pending for the expressway components, with MPTC indicating dependency on finalized airport master plans to proceed. These proposals prioritize four-lane configurations with potential expansions, funded via toll revenues, though critics note risks of overlapping with separate government-funded access roads.

Exits and Interchanges

Mainline and Kawit Extension Exits

The mainline of the Manila–Cavite Expressway (CAVITEX), designated as R-1 and part of Expressway , originates at near Seaside Drive in City and extends southward through , , and to the Zapote area. This segment includes limited major interchanges due to its coastal alignment parallel to local roads, with entry ramps primarily from service roads and barriers at the Toll Plaza. Key interchanges provide connectivity to regional networks: the () in facilitates access to , while the () interchange in and connects to C-5 Road extensions toward eastern . Further south, the interchange at N62 (Aguinaldo Boulevard) and N411 (–Zapote Road) in serves local traffic to Cavite's urban centers and southern suburbs. The Kawit Extension, comprising Segment 4 of the R-1 Extension from Zapote to , , adds approximately 5 kilometers of four-lane roadway terminating at the Kawit Toll Plaza. This extension splits into dual termini along Kawit's northern coast: the primary ramp feeds into the intersection of Covelandia Road and Tirona Highway (N63) in Binakayan-Aplaya, providing access to town proper and nearby industrial areas, while a secondary exit-only ramp connects directly to Tirona Highway in Marulas for southward travel toward . Toll collection occurs at entry barriers, with no exit tolls except at designated plazas like Kawit, supporting barrier-free flow at ramps.
InterchangeLocationConnected Roads
Roxas BoulevardPasayRoxas Blvd / Seaside Blvd (northern terminus)
NAIA ExpresswayParañaqueE6 (NAIAx)
CAVITEX–C-5 LinkParañaque / Las PiñasE5 (C-5 Link), Dr. A. Santos Ave / Sucat Rd
Aguinaldo Blvd / Alabang–ZapoteBacoorN62, N411 (Zapote exit)
Tirona Highway / CovelandiaKawitN63 (Tirona Hwy), Covelandia Rd (southern terminus)