Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Many-body localization

Many-body localization (MBL) is a phenomenon occurring in isolated, strongly disordered, interacting quantum many-body systems, where disorder prevents the system from reaching thermal equilibrium, leading to a non-ergodic phase that acts as a perfect insulator at finite temperatures and retains memory of its initial conditions in local observables for arbitrarily long times.^[1] Unlike single-particle Anderson localization, which affects non-interacting particles, MBL emerges from the interplay of disorder and interactions, stabilizing localized eigenstates that violate the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) and exhibit an extensive set of quasi-local conserved quantities.^[2] This results in slow or logarithmic growth of entanglement entropy after quantum quenches, area-law scaling of entanglement even in highly excited states, and the possibility of dynamically stable quantum orders inaccessible to equilibrium thermodynamics.^[1] The concept of MBL was theoretically proposed in 2006 by Basko, Aleiner, and Altshuler, who demonstrated through perturbative renormalization group analysis that an MBL phase exists in one-dimensional interacting electron systems for sufficiently strong disorder, marking a transition from a metallic to an insulating state at finite interaction strength.^[3] Subsequent theoretical work has extended MBL to higher dimensions, spin systems, and lattice models, revealing its robustness against weak perturbations and connections to quantum information concepts like error correction.^[4] Experimentally, MBL has been observed in synthetic quantum platforms, including ultracold atoms in disordered optical lattices, where signatures like suppressed transport and persistent initial-state correlations were reported in 2015, as well as in trapped-ion and superconducting qubit arrays demonstrating the localization transition.^[5]^[6] MBL challenges the foundations of statistical mechanics by providing a mechanism for ergodicity breaking in closed quantum systems, with implications for understanding non-equilibrium dynamics, quantum simulation, and potential applications in quantum memory devices that resist decoherence.^[2] Ongoing research debates the stability of the MBL phase against rare resonances and heating effects, particularly in higher dimensions, while numerical studies using tensor networks and exact diagonalization continue to probe the critical disorder strength and universality class of the MBL transition.^[7]

Fundamentals of Thermalization and Localization

Thermalization in Isolated Quantum Many-Body Systems

In isolated quantum many-body systems, thermalization refers to the process by which an initial non-equilibrium state evolves under unitary time evolution to appear equilibrated, as if described by a thermal ensemble. This phenomenon arises due to the intrinsic ergodicity of quantum dynamics, where the system's evolution explores the available phase space densely, leading to statistical behavior consistent with thermodynamics. Unlike classical ergodicity, which relies on mixing in phase space to justify time averages equaling ensemble averages, quantum ergodicity is constrained by unitarity, preserving the total von Neumann entropy of the closed system at zero while allowing subsystem entropies to increase irreversibly, mimicking the second law of thermodynamics. The eigenstate thermalization hypothesis (ETH) provides a microscopic foundation for this thermalization in non-integrable systems. ETH posits that individual energy eigenstates |E_α⟩ behave as thermal states for local observables, such that the matrix elements ⟨E_α|O|E_β⟩ of a generic operator O take the form ⟨E_α|O|E_β⟩ ≈ f_O(E) δ(E_α - E_β) + e^{-S(E)/2} g_O(E, ω) R_{αβ}, where E = (E_α + E_β)/2, ω = E_α - E_β, S(E) is the thermodynamic entropy at energy E, f_O and g_O are smooth functions, and R_{αβ} is a random variable with zero mean and unit variance. This ansatz ensures that diagonal elements match microcanonical expectations, while off-diagonal elements are suppressed exponentially with system size, enabling the system to equilibrate without violating unitarity. Thermalization dynamics manifest through the growth of entanglement and entropy measures in subsystems. For an initial pure state |ψ(0)⟩ evolving as |ψ(t)⟩ = e^{-iHt/ℏ} |ψ(0)⟩, the von Neumann entropy S_vN of a subsystem increases from near zero to the Page value S_vN ≈ ln D_A - 1/2, where D_A is the Hilbert space dimension of the subsystem, reflecting maximal entanglement at infinite temperature. Alternatively, the diagonal entropy S_diag(t) = -∑_α |⟨E_α|ψ(t)⟩|^2 ln |⟨E_α|ψ(t)⟩|^2, computed in the energy eigenbasis, rises to the infinite-temperature value ln D, where D is the total Hilbert space dimension, indicating relaxation to a diagonal ensemble. However, clean integrable systems, such as non-interacting free fermions, fail to thermalize due to an abundance of conserved quantities, like single-particle occupation numbers, which constrain the dynamics to a generalized Gibbs ensemble (GGE) rather than a thermal state. In these cases, expectation values of observables do not approach those of a grand canonical ensemble but instead remain tied to the initial state's constraints, preventing full ergodicity.

Single-Particle Anderson Localization

In 1958, Philip W. Anderson published a groundbreaking paper demonstrating that disorder in a lattice can prevent the diffusion of electrons, leading to their localization.^[8] This work addressed transport processes in impure semiconductors, where random potentials disrupt coherent wave propagation, marking the origin of what is now known as Anderson localization.^[8] Anderson's analysis showed that sufficiently strong disorder confines wavefunctions to finite regions, inhibiting extended states and metallic conduction.^[8] The foundational model for this localization is the tight-binding Hamiltonian on a lattice:

H = \sum_i \epsilon_i |i\rangle \langle i| + t \sum_{\langle i,j \rangle} \left( |i\rangle \langle j| + \mathrm{h.c.} \right),

where \epsilon_i are random on-site energies drawn from a disorder distribution, t is the hopping amplitude between nearest neighbors \langle i,j \rangle, and h.c. denotes the Hermitian conjugate.^[8] For strong disorder, where the typical |\epsilon_i| exceeds t, the eigenstates become exponentially localized, with wavefunctions decaying as \psi(r) \sim e^{-|r|/\xi}, where \xi is the localization length that remains finite and independent of system size.^[8] This localization arises from destructive interference in the disordered potential, preventing wavepacket spreading.^[8] A key theoretical advancement came in 1979 with the scaling theory of localization by Abrahams, Anderson, Licciardello, and Ramakrishnan, which provided a framework for understanding the transition between localized and delocalized phases.^[9] Building on Thouless's argument that conductance serves as a measure of level spacing relative to the Thouless energy, the theory analyzes how conductance g(L) scales with system size L in d dimensions, revealing a lower critical dimension d_c = 2 below which all states are localized for any disorder strength.^[9] In one and two dimensions, the scaling flow drives systems toward insulating behavior, while in three dimensions, a metal-insulator transition occurs at a critical disorder strength.^[9] A hallmark of the localized phase is the absence of diffusion: starting from an initial state, the mean-squared displacement \langle r^2(t) \rangle saturates to a constant value at long times rather than growing linearly as \sim t in a diffusive metal.^[8] This saturation reflects the confinement of probability density within the localization volume \sim \xi^d, underscoring the failure of ergodicity in disordered non-interacting systems.^[8]

Definition and Mechanisms of Many-Body Localization

Core Phenomenon and Transition Criteria

Many-body localization (MBL) represents a dynamical phase in isolated, disordered, interacting quantum many-body systems where strong disorder suppresses thermalization, preventing the system from reaching equilibrium despite unitary evolution. In this phase, the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis fails, and the system preserves information about its initial conditions indefinitely, exhibiting non-ergodic behavior that contrasts with the rapid equilibration seen in clean or weakly disordered thermalizing systems.^[10] This phenomenon generalizes single-particle Anderson localization to the interacting regime, where disorder localizes not just single-particle wavefunctions but the entire many-body state. A hallmark of MBL is the slow growth of entanglement entropy following a quantum quench, scaling as S(t) \sim \log t due to dephasing between quasi-local conserved quantities, rather than the linear-in-time growth to a volume-law saturation characteristic of ergodic phases.^[11] This logarithmic entanglement spreading reflects area-law scaling in the steady state, preserving short-range correlations and avoiding the extensive entanglement typical of thermal states.^[11] The transition to the MBL phase occurs at a critical disorder strength W_c \sim J, where J denotes the typical interaction or hopping amplitude, marking the onset of localization. This criterion arises from a many-body generalization of the Imry-Ma argument, which assesses the stability of ordered domains against disorder-induced fluctuations, predicting that interactions destabilize localization only when disorder is insufficient to suppress resonant couplings across scales.^[12] Diagnostic signatures include a crossover in energy level spacing statistics from Gaussian Orthogonal Ensemble (GOE) distributions in the ergodic phase—indicating chaotic level repulsion—to Poisson statistics in the MBL phase, signaling uncorrelated, localized eigenstates.^[13] An experimentally viable probe of the transition is the site-resolved imbalance parameter, defined as

I(t) = \frac{1}{N(N-1)} \sum_{i < j} \langle (n_i - n_j)^2 \rangle,

where n_i is the occupation at site i and N is the system size; in the MBL phase, I(t) saturates to a nonzero value reflecting persistent inhomogeneities, whereas it relaxes to zero in the thermal phase.^[5] The phenomenological renormalization group (PRG) framework captures the transition as an unstable flow between fixed points: weak disorder drives the system toward an ergodic, thermalizing attractor, while strong disorder flows to an MBL fixed point where localization cascades across length scales.^[14]

Role of Disorder and Interactions

In many-body localization (MBL), disorder plays a central role in suppressing thermalization by localizing single-particle excitations, while interactions introduce coupling between these excitations that can either stabilize or destabilize the localized phase depending on their relative strengths. Random disorder, typically modeled as uncorrelated on-site random fields drawn from a uniform distribution, induces MBL in one-dimensional interacting systems above a critical disorder strength, where the system fails to explore its full Hilbert space due to exponentially suppressed hopping amplitudes. Quasiperiodic disorder, such as in the Aubry-André model with a potential V(x) = 2\lambda \cos(2\pi b x + \phi), also supports MBL but exhibits distinct stability thresholds; single-particle localization occurs at a finite \lambda_c = 2, and the many-body phase persists for \lambda > \lambda_c albeit with reduced robustness to interactions compared to random disorder, as quasiperiodic potentials lack the rare deep traps that enhance localization in random cases. Interactions are essential for MBL, as non-interacting disordered systems always localize in one dimension via Anderson localization, but interactions can delocalize the system by generating resonances that facilitate energy exchange across sites. In a perturbative framework, starting from strongly disordered single-particle localized states, interactions of strength J perturbatively couple distant sites, creating resonances with probability P \sim (J/W)^q where W is the disorder strength and q > 1 represents the number of sites involved (often q \sim r for distance r); for W \gg J, these resonances are exponentially rare, allowing the system to remain localized with quasi-local integrals of motion (l-bits).^[15] This suppression of resonances under strong disorder distinguishes MBL from ergodic thermalization, where dense resonances lead to rapid equilibration. However, the stability of the MBL phase remains debated, with mechanisms like avalanches of resonances potentially destabilizing it on long timescales, and numerical evidence suggesting sensitivity to system size.^[7] Certain factors can destabilize MBL by enhancing resonance proliferation or introducing effective heating. Long-range interactions decaying as $1/r^\alpha with \alpha \leq 2 promote delocalization even at strong disorder, as they enable efficient energy transport and lead to an "MBL meltdown" where the localized phase collapses into thermalization on finite timescales. Similarly, environmental dephasing, modeled as stochastic phase noise on spins, destroys MBL by facilitating incoherent scattering that averages over quantum superpositions, driving the system toward classical thermalization regardless of disorder strength. A canonical model illustrating these effects is the one-dimensional disordered Heisenberg spin-1/2 chain,

H = \sum_i J_i \vec{S}_i \cdot \vec{S}_{i+1} + \sum_i h_i S_i^z,

where J_i are uniform exchange couplings (often set to J=1) and h_i are random fields uniformly distributed in [-W, W]. Earlier numerical studies suggested an MBL phase for W > W_c \approx 3.8 J, with the transition marked by the onset of l-bit fragmentation and logarithmic entanglement growth, while weaker disorder yields ergodic behavior.^[15] However, more recent investigations using larger system sizes indicate a higher critical disorder or question the existence of a stable MBL phase in the thermodynamic limit, with estimates drifting upward (e.g., W_c \gtrsim 5) due to finite-size effects.^[7]

Theoretical Developments

Historical Evolution

The concept of many-body localization (MBL) originated from efforts to understand how interactions in disordered quantum systems could extend or suppress single-particle Anderson localization. In 2006, Basko, Aleiner, and Altshuler investigated the crossover from non-interacting localized states to the many-body regime, proposing a perturbative mechanism where strong disorder could prevent thermalization and lead to ergodicity breaking even at finite temperatures.^[3] This work highlighted the failure of thermalization in isolated quantum many-body systems as a key puzzle driving the field.^[16] A formal proposal for MBL came in 2007 with numerical studies by Oganesyan and Huse, who used exact diagonalization on small random spin-1/2 chains to provide evidence of localization at high temperatures, showing that entanglement entropy saturates to a finite value independent of system size in the localized phase.^[17] This demonstrated a many-body localization transition as a function of disorder strength. In 2010, Pal and Huse built on this by examining the full spectrum of the Hamiltonian, confirming that all eigenstates in the MBL phase are localized, with level statistics resembling a Poisson distribution rather than the Wigner-Dyson form expected for ergodic systems.^[13] During the 2010s, theoretical developments solidified the MBL framework. In 2013, Serbyn, Papić, and Abanin proposed that MBL states are characterized by emergent local conservation laws, providing a quasiparticle description of the phase.^[18] A major milestone occurred in 2016 when Imbrie delivered a rigorous proof of MBL for a specific class of one-dimensional disordered spin chains with random fields and interactions, relying on assumptions about eigenvalue repulsion to establish localization of all eigenstates.^[19] Pre-2020, the field saw intense debates on the sharpness of the MBL transition and the stability of the phase against finite-size effects or higher-order processes, including discussions on whether dynamics in the MBL regime exhibit strict localization or slower, logarithmic light cones for entanglement and operator spreading.^[16] These controversies have continued post-2020, with recent numerical studies using tensor networks and exact diagonalization suggesting potential instability of the MBL phase due to rare region effects and avalanche mechanisms leading to slow delocalization, as reviewed in 2024.^[7]

Emergent Integrability and L-Bits

In the many-body localized (MBL) phase, the system exhibits emergent integrability, characterized by an extensive set of approximately conserved local quantities that diagonalize the Hamiltonian to leading order. This structure arises from strong disorder, which suppresses the thermalization processes typical of ergodic systems, leading to a quasi-integrable description despite the presence of interactions. Central to this picture are localized bits, or l-bits, which serve as effective quasiparticles representing local integrals of motion. These l-bits are constructed perturbatively from the bare spin operators S_i^z of the underlying lattice model, taking the form \tau_i^z \approx S_i^z + \sum_{j>i} \phi_{ij} S_j^z, where the couplings \phi_{ij} decay exponentially with distance, \phi_{ij} \sim e^{-|i-j|/\xi}, with \xi being the localization length. This exponential localization ensures that each l-bit is predominantly supported on a single site, with weak tails extending to distant sites, thereby preserving locality and approximate conservation. The l-bit operators \{\tau_i^z\} commute nearly with the Hamiltonian, [H, \tau_i^z] \approx 0, up to exponentially small terms. In the basis of these l-bits, the MBL Hamiltonian adopts an approximately diagonal form, H \approx \sum_i \varepsilon_i \tau_i^z + \sum_{i<j} V_{ij} \tau_i^z \tau_j^z + \cdots , where the single-l-bit terms \varepsilon_i are site-dependent energies set by the disorder, and the interaction terms V_{ij} decay exponentially with separation, V_{ij} \sim e^{-|i-j|/\xi}. Higher-order interactions, such as three-body terms, are similarly suppressed. This representation reveals the emergent integrability: the l-bits act as a complete set of weakly interacting conserved quantities, akin to an integrable model, preventing the system from exploring the full Hilbert space and inhibiting thermalization. The weakness of inter-l-bit couplings ensures that dynamics occur on exponentially long timescales, stabilizing the localized phase.^[20] A key consequence of this structure is the slow, logarithmic growth of entanglement entropy following a quantum quench, S(t) \approx (c/3) \log t, where c is a constant related to the central charge of the underlying conformal field theory. This growth arises from rare resonances between l-bits, where occasional strong couplings allow limited hybridization, propagating information diffusively via an avalanche mechanism. In this process, a resonant pair of l-bits can trigger further resonances in neighboring sites, but the exponential rarity of such events—governed by the disorder distribution—limits the spread to a logarithmic light cone, preventing ballistic entanglement propagation. This distinguishes MBL from ergodic phases, where entanglement grows linearly with time. The l-bit framework connects directly to the full many-body localization criterion, where all eigenstates are localized in Fock space, meaning their support is confined to a vanishing fraction of the exponentially large Hilbert space dimension. In this regime, the approximate conservation of l-bits ensures that eigenstates are simultaneous eigenstates of the \tau_i^z operators to leading order, with matrix elements between distant configurations suppressed exponentially. This localization of the entire spectrum underpins the breakdown of thermalization and the persistence of initial state information indefinitely. The l-bit picture was first proposed in the early 2010s as a phenomenological description of MBL.

Exotic Phenomena and Phases

Non-Ergodic Orders and Symmetry Breaking

In many-body localized (MBL) systems, non-ergodic orders emerge as robust phases that evade thermalization, featuring area-law entangled eigenstates with underlying hidden symmetries. These states maintain low entanglement entropy scaling with the boundary area of subsystems, S \propto |\partial A|, in contrast to the volume-law scaling S \propto |A| in ergodic systems. A key framework for understanding this is the spectrum bifurcation renormalization group (SBRG), which maps MBL Hamiltonians to fixed points resembling entanglement renormalization, where emergent conserved quantities act as stabilizers that enforce the area-law structure and reveal hidden symmetries in the spectrum.^[21] This renormalization reveals a fragmented Hilbert space, with the fixed-point Hamiltonians taking the form H_{\text{eff}} = \sum_i \epsilon_i \tau_i^z + \sum_{i<j} J_{ij} \tau_i^z \tau_j^z + \cdots, where the \tau_i^z operators represent quasi-local integrals of motion stabilizing the non-ergodic order.^[21] Such orders protect against decoherence, allowing persistent patterns incompatible with thermal equilibrium. Spontaneous symmetry breaking in MBL phases extends beyond ground-state phenomena, occurring in highly excited eigenstates and defying the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis. In disordered quantum Ising chains, for instance, the \mathbb{Z}_2 symmetry can break spontaneously, sustaining ferromagnetic order in the MBL regime even at energy densities where thermal phases would be paramagnetic. This preservation arises because localization inhibits the propagation of information needed to restore symmetry, enabling broken-symmetry configurations in finite-energy sectors. The disordered transverse-field Ising model H = -\sum_i J_i \sigma_i^z \sigma_{i+1}^z + \sum_i h_i \sigma_i^x exemplifies this, where strong random fields h_i drive localization while interactions J_i support the ordered phase past the thermal critical point.^[22] These broken symmetries contribute to exotic orders, stabilized by the absence of thermalization. Recent theoretical work has extended this to non-abelian symmetries in certain disordered systems.^[23] Fractal phases in MBL represent a many-body analog of multifractality observed in single-particle Anderson localization, characterized by non-trivial scaling of wavefunction statistics in Fock space. Eigenstates in the MBL phase display multifractal distributions, quantified by the inverse participation ratio (IPR) scaling as \text{IPR} \sim L^{-\tau(2)}, where \tau(2) \neq d and d is the system dimension, indicating sparse, fractal support unlike the ergodic \tau(2) = d or fully localized \tau(2) = 0 cases. This multifractality, with generalized dimensions D_q satisfying $0 < D_q < 1, emerges from interactions and disorder, leading to inhomogeneous participation across basis states. At the MBL transition, these properties sharpen, with the one-particle density matrix basis revealing enhanced localization compared to the computational basis.^[24] An illustrative example is the disordered higher-dimensional Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev (SYK) model on bipartite lattices, which undergoes an MBL transition while exhibiting emergent conformal symmetry in its delocalized phase. In this model, coupling N interacting Majorana fermions on one sublattice to M free ones on the other via random hoppings, the ratio r = M/N tunes the transition at r_c = 1; for r < 1, a diffusive metallic phase displays maximal chaos and conformal invariance at low energies, while r > 1 yields MBL with Poissonian level statistics. These features highlight how disorder can stabilize non-ergodic orders with conformal elements near the transition. The stability of such phases relies on the underlying emergent integrability through localized bits (L-bits).^[25]

Implications for Quantum Memory

Many-body localization (MBL) provides a robust mechanism for quantum memory by preventing thermalization, thereby preserving initial quantum states against decoherence in isolated systems. In the MBL phase, local observables retain memory of their initial conditions indefinitely, as interactions and disorder localize the system's degrees of freedom into quasi-conserved quantities known as l-bits. This leads to an exponentially long coherence time, where the fidelity of the initial state evolves as F(t) \approx e^{-\Gamma t}, with the decay rate \Gamma \sim e^{-L/\xi} depending exponentially on the system size L and localization length \xi. Such protection arises from the absence of diffusive transport and entanglement growth beyond logarithmic scales, enabling stable storage of quantum information even at finite temperatures. A key signature of this memory preservation is the suppression of quantum scrambling, quantified by out-of-time-order correlators (OTOCs) of the form \langle W(t) V(0) W(t) V(0) \rangle, where W and V are local operators separated in space. In thermalizing systems, these OTOCs decay to zero, indicating rapid information delocalization; in contrast, MBL systems exhibit OTOCs that saturate to a nonzero value, reflecting the persistence of local operator identities and limited information spreading. This behavior underscores MBL's role in maintaining quantum coherence against chaotic mixing. These properties position MBL as a foundation for fault-tolerant quantum computing, where MBL-protected l-bits can serve as stable qubits resilient to errors from interactions or weak coupling to environments. Recent theoretical proposals leverage MBL in disordered qubit arrays for enhanced error correction, demonstrating that disorder-induced localization can suppress error propagation and extend logical qubit lifetimes without active feedback. For instance, analyses of the many-qubit protection-operation trade-off highlight how MBL dynamics enable simultaneous information storage and manipulation in scalable architectures. Exotic non-ergodic orders in MBL phases can further underpin protected states, offering additional avenues for memory design. Despite these advantages, MBL quantum memories face limitations from finite-time delocalization triggered by rare resonances, where infrequent alignments of energy levels across distant sites induce slow thermalization avalanches. These resonances, occurring with probability exponentially suppressed in system size, can eventually erode localization on timescales t \sim e^{cL}, challenging long-term stability in practical implementations.

Experimental Realizations

Initial Demonstrations in Synthetic Systems

The initial experimental demonstrations of many-body localization (MBL) emerged in the mid-2010s using highly controllable synthetic quantum platforms, marking the first proof-of-principle observations of this non-ergodic phenomenon in interacting disordered systems. In 2015, ultracold fermionic atoms were loaded into a one-dimensional optical lattice to realize the disordered Fermi-Hubbard model, where disorder was implemented through a quasi-random optical superlattice potential superimposed on the primary lattice. By preparing initial states with inhomogeneous densities and monitoring time evolution, researchers observed suppressed thermalization: the density profiles retained memory of their initial configurations for times up to several seconds, in stark contrast to the rapid diffusive spreading seen in the clean, disorder-free case. This provided early evidence of MBL-induced localization in a strongly interacting fermionic system.^[26] Building on this, trapped-ion experiments in 2016 offered another seminal realization using chains of up to 10 ^{171}Yb^{+} ions to simulate spin-1/2 particles under a disordered transverse-field Ising Hamiltonian with programmable random disorder in the fields. Initial states were prepared far from equilibrium, such as domain-wall configurations, and evolved under the Hamiltonian via laser-driven spin interactions. Measurements revealed logarithmic growth of bipartite entanglement entropy with time, scaling as S \sim \log t, which is a hallmark of MBL dynamics driven by dephasing among localized degrees of freedom, rather than the linear growth expected in ergodic systems.^[27] Central to these demonstrations were observables probing non-ergodicity, including spectral functions that displayed localized spectral weight without diffusive broadening, signaling the absence of thermalization. Additionally, the return probability |\langle \psi(0) | \psi(t) \rangle|^2 was measured via Loschmidt echoes, showing a slow, power-law decay in the MBL regime—retaining significant overlap with the initial state over long times—compared to the exponential decay in thermalizing systems. These findings aligned with theoretical predictions of emergent local conserved quantities, or l-bits, that underpin the slow, quasi-integrable dynamics in MBL phases.^[27] Despite these successes, early experiments grappled with challenges inherent to finite-size systems and imperfect isolation. Limited chain lengths (around 5–10 sites) introduced finite-size effects, blurring the distinction between true MBL and transient prethermal behaviors, while unintended heating from sources like laser intensity fluctuations or residual magnetic field noise could mimic ergodicity by gradually populating higher-energy states. These issues necessitated careful disorder engineering and short-time dynamics to isolate MBL signatures before decoherence dominated.

Recent Advances and Observables

Since 2022, experiments with Rydberg atom arrays have provided new insights into many-body localization (MBL) by realizing strongly interacting spin models under controlled disorder, demonstrating localization in both one- and two-dimensional geometries.^[28] In these platforms, Rydberg blockade enforces infinite-range interactions, allowing the simulation of MBL in the limit of strong projections, where eigenstates exhibit area-law entanglement and logarithmic entanglement growth consistent with l-bit descriptions.^[29] These setups have revealed criticality at the MBL transition through multifractal scaling of wavefunctions, extending observations beyond random disorder to include antiblockade regimes.^[29] Superconducting qubit arrays have been used to probe MBL in two dimensions, with a 2025 demonstration using up to 70 qubits exploring delocalization under engineered disorder.^[30] The experiment observed faster decay of imbalance with increasing system size, providing evidence for the instability of the MBL phase in higher dimensions, consistent with theoretical predictions.^[30] Photonic lattices have enabled studies of quasiperiodic MBL since the early 2020s, particularly through kicked rotor models where incommensurate potentials induce localization without randomness, showing multifractal eigenstates and suppressed transport in integrated waveguide arrays.^[31] Advanced observables such as the Loschmidt echo and measures of dynamical quantum typicality have been employed to diagnose the MBL transition in these systems, capturing non-ergodic dynamics through decay rates and entanglement fluctuations.^[32] The Loschmidt echo, quantifying return probability after quenches, exhibits revivals and zeros signaling dynamical phase transitions at the MBL boundary, while dynamical typicality assesses how initial states sample the Hilbert space, revealing deviations from thermal expectations in localized phases.^[33] In 2025, investigations into multi-occupancy effects in the disordered Bose-Hubbard model demonstrated enhanced MBL stability for bosons compared to fermions, with multi-occupancy suppressing resonant delocalization and preserving localization even at stronger interactions.^[34] In 2025, numerical studies using Fock-space analysis have uncovered Poisson level statistics in the many-body spectrum, a hallmark of MBL indicating uncorrelated eigenstates across the Fock basis, confirming non-ergodicity through sparse connectivity in the energy landscape.^[35] Concurrently, evidence for MBL has been reported in systems with slowly varying potentials, where gradient-induced disorder stabilizes localized phases against thermalization, as observed in exact diagonalization-validated lattice simulations. Persistent open challenges include distinguishing genuine MBL from prethermal regimes, where apparent localization arises from slow heating rather than true eigenstate disorder.^[36] Long-time heating rates remain difficult to quantify experimentally, complicating claims of stability, as subtle resonances can induce eventual delocalization beyond accessible timescales.^[37]

References

[1]
https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.021001
[2]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031214-014726
[3]
[cond-mat/0602510] On the problem of many-body localization - arXiv
[Submitted on 22 Feb 2006]. Title:On the problem of many-body localization. Authors:D. M. Basko, I. L. Aleiner, B. L. Altshuler. View a PDF of the paper ...
[4]
Many-body localization: An introduction and selected topics
We present a basic introduction to the topic of many-body localization, using the simple example of a quantum spin chain that allows us to illustrate several ...
[5]
Observation of many-body localization of interacting fermions in a ...
Interactions tend to make localization less likely, but disorder, interactions, and localization may coexist in the so-called many-body localized state.
[6]
Experimental characterization of the quantum many-body ...
Jul 9, 2021 · We experimentally implement a scalable protocol for detecting the many-body localization transition point, using the dynamics of an superconducting qubit array.
[7]
Many-Body Localization in the Age of Classical Computing - arXiv
Mar 11, 2024 · This review focuses on recent numerical investigations aiming to clarify the status of the MBL phase, and it establishes the critical open questions about the ...
[8]
Absence of Diffusion in Certain Random Lattices | Phys. Rev.
This paper presents a simple model for such processes as spin diffusion or conduction in the "impurity band." These processes involve transport in a lattice ...
[9]
Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions | Phys. Rev. Lett.
Mar 5, 1979 · Scaling Theory of Localization: Absence of Quantum Diffusion in Two Dimensions. E. Abrahams · P. W. Anderson*, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. ...
[10]
Possible experimental manifestations of the many-body localization
Aug 23, 2007 · Possible experimental manifestations of the many-body localization. D. M. Basko1,*, I. L. Aleiner1, and B. L. Altshuler1,2. 1Physics ...
[11]
Universal Slow Growth of Entanglement in Interacting Strongly ...
Jun 28, 2013 · Maksym Serbyn1, Z. ... In this Letter, we identify a mechanism that underlies the logarithmic growth of entanglement in interacting MBL states.
[12]
Many-body localization: stability and instability - Journals
Oct 30, 2017 · The dimensional argument drives the whole analysis; it may be compared with the Imry–Ma argument comparing Ld/2 fluctuations of the bulk free ...
[13]
Many-body localization phase transition | Phys. Rev. B
Nov 9, 2010 · Since the many-body level spacing behaves as log δ ∼ − L d , this corresponds to an infinite dynamic-critical exponent z → ∞ . Note also that ...
[14]
Renormalization-group study of the many-body localization ...
Jun 21, 2019 · We study the many-body localized (MBL) phase and phase transition in one-dimensional quantum systems with short-range interactions and quenched disorder.<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|separator|>
[16]
Colloquium: Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement
May 22, 2019 · This Colloquium reviews recent theoretical and experimental advances in studies of MBL systems, focusing on the new perspective provided by entanglement.Abstract · Article Text · Introduction · The Many-body Localized Phase
[17]
Localization of interacting fermions at high temperature | Phys. Rev. B
We show that in this high- T regime, the localization transition may be studied numerically through exact diagonalization of small systems.Article Text · ENSEMBLE OF HAMILTONIANS · METHOD OF ANALYSIS · RESULTS
[18]
Local Conservation Laws and the Structure of the Many-Body ...
Sep 17, 2013 · We argue that the many-body localization can be used to protect coherence in the system by suppressing relaxation between eigenstates with different local ...
[19]
Diagonalization and Many-Body Localization for a Disordered ...
We prove that many-body localization follows from a physically reasonable assumption that limits the extent of level attraction in the statistics of eigenvalues ...Abstract · Article Text
[20]
Review: Local Integrals of Motion in Many-Body Localized systems
Sep 26, 2016 · We review the current (as of Fall 2016) status of the studies on the emergent integrability in many-body localized models.
[21]
Entanglement Holographic Mapping of Many-Body Localized ... - arXiv
Aug 14, 2015 · We introduce the spectrum bifurcation renormalization group (SBRG) as a generalization of the real-space renormalization group for the many-body localized (MBL ...
[22]
Many-body localization, thermalization, and entanglement - arXiv
Apr 30, 2018 · In this Colloquium we review recent theoretical and experimental advances in studies of MBL systems, focusing on the new perspective provided by entanglement.
[23]
None
Nothing is retrieved...<|control11|><|separator|>
[24]
Many-body localization in a quantum simulator with programmable ...
Jun 6, 2016 · We experimentally generate MBL states by applying an Ising Hamiltonian with long-range interactions and programmable random disorder to ten spins initialized ...
[25]
Many-body localization in the infinite-interaction limit and ... - Nature
Dec 3, 2022 · We study many-body localization (MBL) in a spin-chain model mimicking the Rydberg-blockade quantum simulator with infinite-strength projection and moderate ...
[26]
Localization and Criticality in Antiblockaded Two-Dimensional ...
Jan 6, 2022 · Recent experiments on 1D Rydberg atom arrays have shed light on various phenomena, including nonequilibrium quantum many-body dynamics [5]
[27]
[2507.16882] Many-body delocalization with a two-dimensional 70 ...
Jul 22, 2025 · Here, using a 70-qubit two-dimensional (2D) superconducting quantum simulator, we experimentally explore the robustness of the MBL regime in ...
[28]
Localization, multifractality, and many-body localization in ...
Here we study the localization phenomena in a one-dimensional periodically kicked quasiperiodic optical Raman lattice by using fractal dimensions. We show a ...<|separator|>
[29]
Probing quantum many-body dynamics using subsystem Loschmidt ...
Feb 4, 2025 · In the short-time regime, we use the subsystem Loschmidt echo to observe a dynamical quantum phase transition and show that it arises due to ...Missing: typicality MBL<|separator|>
[30]
[2504.00483] Loschmidt echo zeros and dynamical quantum phase ...
Apr 1, 2025 · In this work, we propose a theoretical scheme to probe Loschmidt echo zeros and observe dynamical quantum phase transitions in finite size systems.Missing: typicality MBL
[31]
[2503.03712] Many-body localization and particle multioccupancy in ...
Mar 5, 2025 · We study the potential influence of the particle multi-occupations on the stability of many-body localization in the disordered Bose-Hubbard ...
[32]
Many-body localization in the age of classical computing - IOPscience
This review focuses on recent numerical investigations aiming to clarify the status of the MBL phase, and it establishes the critical open questions about the ...
[33]
Prethermalization without Temperature | Phys. Rev. X
May 29, 2020 · Section IV provides concrete signatures for distinguishing between the different MBL and prethermal regimes in experiment, while Sec. V
[34]
[PDF] Observation of a prethermal discrete time crystal - UC Berkeley
Jun 11, 2021 · In addition to τpre, the prethermal regime is also characterized by the timescale associated with the frequency-dependent Floquet heating, τ∗.