Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mass attenuation coefficient

The mass attenuation coefficient, denoted as \mu / \rho, is a key parameter in radiation physics that quantifies the probability of photon interactions—such as the photoelectric effect, Compton scattering, and pair production—per unit mass of a material, independent of its density.^[1]^[2] It is derived from the linear attenuation coefficient \mu (with units of cm⁻¹) divided by the material's density \rho (in g/cm³), yielding units of cm²/g, and follows the exponential attenuation law I = I_0 e^{-(\mu / \rho) \rho x}, where I is the transmitted intensity, I_0 the initial intensity, and x the path length through the material.^[3]^[2] This normalization allows for standardized comparisons of photon penetration and absorption across diverse materials, from elements to compounds.^[1] The value of the mass attenuation coefficient varies significantly with photon energy and the atomic number Z of the material, typically decreasing with increasing energy due to shifts in dominant interaction mechanisms: photoelectric absorption prevails at low energies (below ~100 keV), Compton scattering dominates in the intermediate range (~100 keV to ~10 MeV), and pair production becomes prominent at high energies (above ~1.02 MeV).^[4]^[2] For example, at 1 MeV, the mass attenuation coefficient for water is approximately 0.0707 cm²/g, while for lead it is about 0.057 cm²/g, reflecting lead's superior shielding efficiency despite its higher density.^[2] Tabulated values, such as those compiled by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), are based on theoretical cross-section calculations and experimental data for all 92 elements, covering photon energies from 1 keV to 20 MeV.^[1] In practical applications, the mass attenuation coefficient is essential for radiation shielding design, dosimetry, and medical imaging, enabling predictions of beam attenuation in biological tissues, protective barriers, and detectors.^[1]^[4] For mixtures or compounds, it is calculated using the weighted average of elemental coefficients based on mass fractions, assuming incoherent scattering and no molecular binding effects.^[1] It is closely related to the mass energy-absorption coefficient \mu_{en} / \rho, which accounts for energy transferred to charged particles (excluding secondary radiative losses like bremsstrahlung), making it particularly useful for dose calculations in low-Z materials.^[1]

Fundamentals

Definition and Physical Interpretation

The mass attenuation coefficient, denoted as \mu / \rho, is defined as the ratio of the linear attenuation coefficient \mu to the density \rho of a material, providing a measure of the probability of photon interaction per unit mass of the attenuating medium.^[1] This normalization by mass distinguishes it from the linear attenuation coefficient, which depends on both the material's composition and its physical density, allowing for direct comparisons of attenuation properties across different densities, forms, or states of matter.^[1] Physically, the mass attenuation coefficient quantifies the effectiveness of a material in attenuating a beam of ionizing radiation, primarily photons such as X-rays or gamma rays, through processes like absorption and scattering that remove photons from the beam or redirect their energy.^[1] By expressing attenuation on a per-unit-mass basis, it enables the prediction of beam intensity reduction in scenarios where the material's thickness or density varies, such as in gaseous, liquid, or solid phases, without needing to adjust for specific volumetric arrangements.^[1] Attenuation itself follows an exponential law, where the transmitted intensity I of a monoenergetic photon beam through a material of thickness x is given by I = I_0 e^{-\mu x}, with I_0 as the initial intensity; substituting \mu = (\mu / \rho) \rho yields I = I_0 e^{-(\mu / \rho) (\rho x)}, highlighting how \mu / \rho renders the attenuation independent of density when considering mass per unit area (\rho x).^[1] For instance, for liquid water at 100 keV photon energy, \mu / \rho \approx 0.17 cm²/g, meaning that 0.17 cm² of water mass per unit beam area attenuates the beam equivalently, regardless of whether the water is in a thin layer or compressed form.^[5]

Units and Historical Development

The mass attenuation coefficient is expressed in units of area per unit mass, commonly cm²/g in practical applications, with the SI unit being m²/kg to ensure compliance with international standards. The conversion between these units is straightforward: 1 cm²/g = 0.1 m²/kg, reflecting the scaling from centimeters to meters and grams to kilograms. This unit choice normalizes the attenuation behavior across materials of varying densities, facilitating comparisons in radiation physics.^[1] Notation for the mass attenuation coefficient varies by field and context, with the most standard form being μ/ρ, where μ denotes the linear attenuation coefficient and ρ the material density. Alternative symbols include μ_m to explicitly indicate the mass-based quantity, particularly in medical and dosimetry literature. In astrophysics and atmospheric science, κ is sometimes employed for the mass extinction coefficient, which encompasses both absorption and scattering for photons, though it aligns closely with μ/ρ in photon interaction studies. Consistency in notation is emphasized for photons, as distinct from stopping power parameters used for charged particles or neutrons, to avoid confusion in cross-disciplinary applications.^[1] The concept emerged in the early 20th century amid foundational X-ray physics research, with Charles Glover Barkla and A. Sadler conducting the first empirical measurements of mass attenuation coefficients between 1907 and 1909, based on attenuation experiments with various absorbers. These studies laid the groundwork by quantifying how X-rays diminish in intensity through materials, independent of initial beam characteristics. By the 1920s and 1930s, quantum mechanics provided a theoretical foundation, linking observed attenuation to atomic cross-sections for processes like photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering, as advanced by researchers including Hans Bethe and Walter Heitler. A pivotal post-World War II development was the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) formal adoption and tabulation of mass attenuation coefficients, beginning with systematic compilations in 1952 under Ugo Fano's direction, covering energies from 10 keV to 100 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92. This effort integrated experimental data with emerging theoretical models, enhancing reliability for applications in shielding and dosimetry. In the 1950s, the field shifted further toward theoretical underpinnings, with compilations like those by Davisson and Evans incorporating quantum mechanical calculations for photon interactions, building on pre-war advancements to achieve greater predictive accuracy without sole reliance on measurements.

Mathematical Formulation

General Expression and Derivation

The linear attenuation coefficient \mu, which quantifies the fractional decrease in photon intensity per unit path length through a material, is fundamentally derived from the probability of photon interactions with atoms. For a beam of monoenergetic photons traversing a homogeneous material, the intensity I after distance x follows the exponential law I = I_0 e^{-\mu x}, where I_0 is the initial intensity. This coefficient is expressed as \mu = n \sigma, with n denoting the number density of atoms (atoms per unit volume) and \sigma the total atomic cross-section for all relevant photon interactions per atom.^[6]^[3] To obtain the mass attenuation coefficient \mu/\rho, which normalizes for material density \rho (in g/cm³) and enables comparison across substances independent of physical state, divide by \rho: \mu/\rho = \sigma / m_\text{atom}, where m_\text{atom} is the mass per atom. Since m_\text{atom} = A / N_A with A the atomic mass in g/mol and N_A Avogadro's number ($6.02214076 \times 10^{23} mol⁻¹), the number density n = \rho N_A / A, yielding \mu/\rho = (N_A / A) \sigma. The total cross-section \sigma is the sum of partial cross-sections \sigma_i for dominant processes: \sigma = \sum \sigma_i = \sigma_\text{pe} + \sigma_\text{incoh} + \sigma_\text{pair}, corresponding to photoelectric absorption (\sigma_\text{pe}), incoherent (Compton) scattering (\sigma_\text{incoh}), and pair production (\sigma_\text{pair}). Thus, the general expression is:

\frac{\mu}{\rho} = \frac{N_A}{A} \sum_i \sigma_i.

This formulation assumes incoherent scattering dominates over coherent effects in the total attenuation for many practical cases.^[6]^[3] The derivation relies on key assumptions: narrow-beam geometry to minimize scattered photons reaching the detector, monoenergetic incident photons for the exponential law to hold directly, and a dilute target where interactions are independent (no multiple scattering). For polychromatic beams, such as those from X-ray sources with broad spectra, the effective \mu/\rho requires integration over the energy distribution, as the simple exponential form no longer applies directly.^[6]^[3] The mass attenuation coefficient exhibits strong energy dependence, reflecting the varying dominance of interaction mechanisms. At low photon energies (below ~100 keV), \mu/\rho is high due to the $1/E^{3.5} scaling of photoelectric cross-sections; it decreases through intermediate energies (~0.1–10 MeV) where Compton scattering prevails; and at high energies (>10 MeV), pair production contributes increasingly, but overall \mu/\rho diminishes logarithmically. Specifically, the Compton component decreases at relativistic energies because the incoherent cross-section follows the Klein-Nishina formula, which reduces the scattering probability relative to the classical Thomson limit as photon energy exceeds the electron rest mass (~511 keV).^[6]^[7]

Decomposition into Components

The total mass attenuation coefficient, denoted as \mu / \rho, can be decomposed into the sum of the mass absorption coefficient \mu_{\text{abs}} / \rho and the mass scattering coefficient \mu_{\text{sca}} / \rho:

\frac{\mu}{\rho} = \frac{\mu_{\text{abs}}}{\rho} + \frac{\mu_{\text{sca}}}{\rho}.

The mass absorption coefficient \mu_{\text{abs}} / \rho accounts for interactions resulting in complete energy loss of the incident photon, primarily photoelectric absorption and pair production.^[6] In these processes, the photon is absorbed or annihilated, depositing its energy into the material. Conversely, the mass scattering coefficient \mu_{\text{sca}} / \rho describes interactions that primarily change the photon's direction with partial or no energy loss to the material, namely Compton (incoherent) scattering and Rayleigh (coherent) scattering.^[6] Each partial mass attenuation coefficient for a specific interaction type i is expressed as

\frac{\mu_i}{\rho} = \frac{N_A}{A} \sigma_i,

where N_A is Avogadro's constant, A is the molar mass of the material, and \sigma_i is the atomic cross-section per atom for that interaction.^[8] The photoelectric absorption cross-section \sigma_{\text{pe}} dominates at low photon energies, typically below 0.1 MeV, and scales approximately as Z^{4-5} / E^{3.5}, where Z is the atomic number and E is the photon energy.^[8] Compton scattering, governed by the Klein-Nishina formula, prevails in the intermediate range of 0.1 to 10 MeV.^[8] Pair production, requiring a minimum photon energy of 1.02 MeV to create an electron-positron pair, becomes dominant above 10 MeV and scales roughly as Z^2.^[8] Rayleigh scattering, which is elastic and scales as Z^2, contributes mainly at low energies but remains a minor component overall.^[8] The mass absorption coefficient \mu_{\text{abs}} / \rho is essential for quantifying energy deposition in materials, as in radiation shielding calculations.^[6] The mass scattering coefficient \mu_{\text{sca}} / \rho, by contrast, influences beam broadening and contrast in radiographic imaging, where scattered photons reduce resolution.^[9] In thick absorbers, multiple scattering can cause a build-up of secondary photons, effectively increasing the transmitted intensity beyond the simple exponential attenuation prediction; this effect is corrected using build-up factors that depend on material, energy, and geometry.^[10]

Application to Mixtures and Solutions

For incoherent mixtures and homogeneous compounds, the effective mass attenuation coefficient (\mu / \rho) is determined by the mixture rule, which provides a weighted average based on the mass fractions of the constituent elements or components:

\frac{\mu}{\rho} = \sum_i w_i \left( \frac{\mu}{\rho} \right)_i

where w_i is the mass fraction of the i-th component and (\mu / \rho)_i is its mass attenuation coefficient. This additivity holds under the assumption of independent photon interactions with each component, without significant interference effects, and is widely applicable to gases, liquids, and solids treated as random mixtures.^[6] In the context of liquid solutions, the mixture rule extends naturally, with the mass fractions derived from the solution's composition, including solvent density and solute molar mass. For dilute solutions, where solute mass fractions are small (typically w_i < 0.05), the effective (\mu / \rho) varies approximately linearly with solute concentration c (e.g., in mol/L), expressed as

\frac{\mu}{\rho} \approx \left( \frac{\mu}{\rho} \right)_{\text{solvent}} + c \left( \frac{\mu}{\rho} \right)_{\text{solute}}

here, (\mu / \rho)_{\text{solute}} represents the incremental contribution per unit concentration, scaled by the solute's elemental coefficients and solution volume. This linear approximation aligns with experimental observations for low concentrations, where solute-solvent interactions minimally perturb the additive behavior. In concentrated solutions, however, molecular associations or hydration effects may require empirical corrections to the additivity, such as adjustments for altered partial coefficients due to binding.^[11] As an illustrative example, consider a 1 M NaCl aqueous solution at a photon energy of 123 keV, where the mass fraction of NaCl is approximately 0.056 (based on its molar mass of 58.44 g/mol and solution density near 1.037 g/cm³). The effective (\mu / \rho) is approximated by weighting the values for water ((\mu / \rho)_{\text{H}_2\text{O}} \approx 0.161 cm²/g) and NaCl (derived from Na and Cl elemental coefficients, yielding (\mu / \rho)_{\text{NaCl}} \approx 0.166 cm²/g), resulting in (\mu / \rho) \approx 0.161 cm²/g—slightly higher than pure water due to the additive solute term.^[5]^[12]^[13] This calculation demonstrates the practical utility of the linear form for dilute cases, with the solute increment c \cdot (\mu / \rho)_{\text{solute}} \approx 0.0003 cm²/g.^[11] The mixture rule's additivity assumption is generally robust for incoherent scattering-dominated regimes but can deviate in bound systems like metallic alloys, where coherent scattering contributions lead to phase-dependent interference not captured by elemental averaging, potentially requiring structure-specific models.^[14]

Applications

Photon Interactions in X-rays and Gamma Rays

The mass attenuation coefficient (μ/ρ) for X-ray and gamma-ray photons exhibits strong dependence on photon energy and material atomic number (Z), reflecting the dominant interaction mechanisms in different energy regimes. In the low-energy X-ray range (below approximately 100 keV), the photoelectric effect predominates, where μ/ρ scales approximately as Z^4 / E^{3.5}, with E denoting photon energy; this leads to rapid attenuation in high-Z materials and enables sharp contrasts in diagnostic imaging.^[15] As energy increases to the mid-range (~100 keV to ~10 MeV), Compton scattering becomes dominant, rendering μ/ρ nearly independent of Z and varying slowly with energy due to the Klein-Nishina cross-section, resulting in comparable attenuation across diverse materials on a mass basis (with the exact upper limit depending on Z).^[15] At very high gamma-ray energies (above ~10 MeV for low-Z materials, lower for high-Z), pair production becomes prominent for E > 1.022 MeV, with μ/ρ proportional to Z^2 ln(E), causing attenuation to rise logarithmically and favoring high-Z absorbers for effective shielding.^[15] Material composition significantly influences these behaviors, as illustrated qualitatively in plots of μ/ρ versus E, which show steep declines at low energies for all elements but steeper slopes for higher Z due to enhanced photoelectric and pair production contributions. High-Z materials like lead (Z=82) exhibit elevated μ/ρ across broad spectra, making them ideal for gamma-ray shielding in nuclear facilities and radiation protection, where lead's density and interaction efficiency reduce required thicknesses. In contrast, low-Z materials such as soft tissue (effective Z ≈ 7.4) display lower μ/ρ dominated by Compton processes in the diagnostic X-ray window (20-150 keV), facilitating penetration for medical imaging while providing differential attenuation between tissues for contrast in radiography and computed tomography. These energy-dependent variations underpin practical applications, including attenuation contrasts in X-ray radiography, where differences in μ/ρ between bone (higher effective Z) and soft tissue enhance image visibility. Abrupt jumps in μ/ρ occur at K-shell absorption edges (e.g., around 88 keV for lead), corresponding to the binding energy of inner-shell electrons, which can be exploited for selective imaging or spectroscopy but may introduce artifacts if not accounted for in beam hardening corrections.^[16] In nuclear applications, such as shielding around reactors or handling radioactive sources, gamma rays from decays (e.g., 0.5-3 MeV from fission products) necessitate tailored materials to manage pair production and Compton contributions, ensuring safety in high-flux environments.^[15]

Composition Analysis of Materials

The mass attenuation coefficient enables the determination of material composition by leveraging the additive property for mixtures, where the effective mass attenuation coefficient is expressed as \mu / \rho = \sum w_i (\mu / \rho)_i, with w_i denoting the mass fraction of each component i. To analyze unknown solutions or mixtures, the transmitted intensity is measured through the sample at multiple photon energies using X-ray transmission. According to Beer's law, the intensity follows I = I_0 \exp\left( -(\mu / \rho) \rho t \right), where \rho is the density and t is the path length, allowing the effective \mu / \rho to be derived from \ln(I_0 / I) / (\rho t). Multiple measurements yield a system of equations solved for the mass fractions w_i, typically via least-squares optimization, assuming known pure-component \mu / \rho values from databases.^[17]^[18] In analytical chemistry, this approach is applied using transmission at two energies to quantify solute concentrations in aqueous solutions, such as detecting heavy metal ions where the high atomic number enhances attenuation contrast even at moderate levels. X-ray fluorescence complements transmission by providing element-specific signals, but attenuation methods excel for bulk composition without requiring excitation.^[19]^[20] A multi-energy strategy exploits discontinuities in mass attenuation coefficients at absorption edges, such as K-edges, for element-specific identification in mixtures. At energies straddling the K-edge of a target element, the differential attenuation isolates its contribution. For a simplified two-component system (e.g., solvent and solute), the mass fraction w_1 of the primary component at energy E is given by

w_1 = \frac{ \frac{\ln(I_0 / I)}{\rho t} - (\mu / \rho)_{2,E} }{ (\mu / \rho)_{1,E} - (\mu / \rho)_{2,E} },

where subscripts 1 and 2 denote components, enabling direct computation from measured transmissions. This K-edge method has been used to quantify metallic contrasts in biomedical mixtures, adaptable to multi-element solutions by scanning multiple edges.^[18]^[21] Such techniques find applications in environmental monitoring, where dual-energy transmission identifies heavy metal contaminants in wastewater, and in pharmaceutical quality control to verify active ingredient fractions in formulations. Limitations include beam hardening from polychromatic X-ray sources, which preferentially attenuates low energies and distorts effective \mu / \rho, necessitating corrections like spectral filtering or dual-energy decomposition.^[22]^[23]^[24]

Practical Implementation

Measurement Techniques

The primary experimental method for determining the mass attenuation coefficient is the transmission technique, which relies on measuring the attenuation of a collimated beam of photons through a sample of known thickness and density. In this setup, a monochromatic photon source, such as an X-ray tube or radioactive isotope, emits a beam that passes through the sample, with the transmitted intensity I recorded by a detector positioned downstream. The mass attenuation coefficient (\mu/\rho) is then derived from the exponential attenuation law, expressed as

I = I_0 e^{-(\mu/\rho) \rho x},

where I_0 is the incident intensity, \rho is the sample density, and x is the sample thickness.^[6] To minimize errors, the beam is collimated to reduce divergence, and the sample is typically a thin foil or pellet to ensure good statistics and avoid multiple scattering. Common error sources include photon scatter (Compton or coherent), which can artificially increase the measured transmission, and fluorescence effects in high-Z materials; these are corrected using lead collimators, Monte Carlo modeling of scatter profiles, or subtraction techniques based on empty-holder measurements.^[25]^[26] Measurements can be conducted in absolute or relative modes, depending on the precision requirements and available standards. Absolute measurements require direct determination of I_0, sample density \rho, and thickness x, often using high-purity foils weighed with microbalances and calibrated thickness gauges, achieving uncertainties below 2% but demanding rigorous control of beam uniformity.^[27] Relative measurements, more common in routine applications, calibrate against a reference material with known (\mu/\rho) values, such as aluminum or copper, by taking transmission ratios to normalize for source fluctuations and detector efficiency; this approach reduces systematic errors from I_0 variability while simplifying setup.^[28] Advanced techniques enhance precision and extend the applicable energy range, from keV scales for X-rays to MeV for gamma rays. Synchrotron radiation sources provide tunable, high-intensity monochromatic beams, enabling measurements with sub-0.1% accuracy over broad energy intervals by using ionization chambers or silicon drift detectors for simultaneous I_0 and I monitoring; for instance, copper's (\mu/\rho) has been determined at 108 energies between 5 and 20 keV with uncertainties better than 0.12% for most measurements.^[29] Monte Carlo simulations, such as those implemented in MCNPX or GEANT4, validate experimental results by modeling photon interactions and scatter, confirming measured (\mu/\rho) values for materials like cement at selected gamma-ray energies around 0.3-1.3 MeV, showing good agreement with experimental data.^[30] Modern implementations incorporate detector arrays, including hybrid pixel detectors, to map spatial variations in attenuation and perform energy-dispersive analysis, improving error analysis for inhomogeneous samples by resolving sub-millimeter beam profiles and reducing counting statistics uncertainties to under 0.5%.^[31]

Tabulated Data and Computational Tools

Curated databases provide essential pre-computed values of mass attenuation coefficients for elements, compounds, and mixtures, enabling rapid access for applications in radiation shielding and dosimetry. The NIST XCOM database, accessible online, calculates photon cross sections—including total attenuation—for elements (Z=1 to 92), compounds, and mixtures across photon energies from 1 keV to 20 MeV, using theoretical models based on evaluated data. As of 2025, NIST XCOM remains the primary tool, with recent studies (post-2020) validating its accuracy for low-Z elements in soft X-rays.^[32]^[33] It supports user-defined mixtures by specifying elemental weight fractions, producing output in tabular form with energy steps typically spaced logarithmically for interpolation. Similarly, the IAEA's XMuDat program computes mass attenuation, energy-transfer, and energy-absorption coefficients for up to 100 elements and common compounds, covering energies from 1 keV to 50 MeV and incorporating six interaction processes such as photoelectric absorption and Compton scattering.^[34] These databases collectively cover over 100 elemental and compound entries, with recent validations extending accuracy for low-Z materials in post-2020 studies.^[33] Interpolation methods are crucial for estimating mass attenuation coefficients at energies between tabulated points, often employing log-log fits due to the smooth, power-law-like energy dependence of interaction processes. In log-log space, linear interpolation between discrete energy points yields accurate approximations away from absorption edges.^[35] For complex scenarios, Monte Carlo simulation tools like FLUKA and GEANT4 compute effective μ/ρ values in heterogeneous geometries by tracking photon interactions, integrating over material compositions and densities to simulate attenuation in real-world setups such as medical phantoms or shielding designs. These tools draw from underlying databases like NIST XCOM for cross-section inputs, allowing predictions that generally agree well with databases for homogeneous media.^[36] Computational tools facilitate practical use, particularly for mixtures where direct tabulation is impractical. The NIST XCOM web interface serves as an online calculator, enabling users to input mixture compositions and generate μ/ρ tables or graphs for specified energy ranges, with tabulated values achieving accuracies better than 1% relative to experimental benchmarks for elements and simple compounds.^[37] Open-source implementations in GEANT4 and FLUKA support scripting for automated μ/ρ extraction in multi-layer materials, though prediction errors can exceed 5% in highly heterogeneous cases without validation.^[38] Additional resources, such as the GSI X-ray absorption calculator, provide quick estimates for elemental attenuation based on NIST data, emphasizing user-friendly access for educational and preliminary design purposes.^[39]

References

[1]
NIST: X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients - Introduction
The mass attenuation coefficient, μ/ρ, and the mass energy-absorption coefficient, μ en /ρ, are basic quantities used in calculations of the penetration and ...
[2]
[PDF] 32 - Shielding Radiation. - Nuclear Regulatory Commission
The mass attenuation coefficient (u/D) is the probability of an interaction (PE, CS, PP) per unit density thickness. Its units are cm2/g. In other words, u/D is ...
[3]
None
### Summary of Linear and Mass Attenuation Coefficients
[4]
The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents. X-ray attenuation
An attenuation coefficient is a measure of the quantity of radiation attenuation by a given thickness of absorber. Linear and mass attenuation coefficients are ...
[5]
X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients - Water, Liquid - NIST
1.00000E-03, 4.078E+03 ; 1.50000E-03, 1.376E+03 ; 2.00000E-03, 6.173E+02 ; 3.00000E-03, 1.929E+02 ...Missing: 100 | Show results with:100
[6]
NIST: X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients - Section 2
The attenuation coefficient, photon interaction cross sections and related quantities are functions of the photon energy.
[7]
Klein-Nishina cross-sections and radiation interaction coefficients of ...
Apr 28, 2025 · The Klein-Nishina scattering formula is utilized for calculating electronic cross-sections, atomic cross-sections, Compton mass attenuation ...
[8]
[PDF] Photon cross sections, attenuation coefficients, and energy ...
... Definition and significance of narrow-beam attenuation coefficient. 5. 1.4. Tabulation of attenuation coefficients. 9. 1.5. Definition and significance of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[9]
[PDF] X-ray absorption and analysis - School of Physics
[µ/ρ]tot = [µ/ρ]pe + [µ/ρ]scatt , where [µ/ρ]tot – total mass attenuation coefficient, [µ/ρ]pe – mass absorption coefficient due to photoelectric ...
[10]
[PDF] Engineering Compendium on Radiation Shielding
The other factor, often called the. "buildup factor", takes into account secondary photons produced in the absorber (mainly as the result of one or more Compton ...
[11]
Attenuation coefficients of 123 keV γ-radiation by dilute solutions of ...
The linear attenuation and mass attenuation (or absorption) coefficients of the 123 keV γ radiation from 57Co by dilute solutions of NaCl were studied for ...
[12]
Study of mass attenuation coefficients, effective atomic numbers and ...
Feb 21, 2013 · The attenuation coefficient is defined as the probability of radiation ... electron density, as it is defined as the electrons per unit mass of ...
[13]
https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/ElemTab/z17.html
[14]
[PDF] X-ray absorption - School of Physics
This near- discontinuity in the mass absorption coefficient is called an 'absorption edge'. Above the absorption edge, the difference between the photon energy ...
[15]
NIST: X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients - Table 4
Values of the mass attenuation coefficient, μ/ρ, and the mass energy-absorption coefficient, μen/ρ, as a function of photon energy, for compounds and mixtures.Water, Liquid · Air, Dry · Bone, Cortical · Tissue, Soft (ICRU-44)Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[16]
<em>Medical Physics</em> | AAPM Journal | Wiley Online Library
### Summary of Dual-Energy CT for Element Composition and Mass Fractions
[17]
Measurement of x-ray attenuation coefficients of aqueous solutions ...
Our experimental data proved that, even at low concentrations, the x-ray attenuation through these aqueous solutions could be differentiated.Missing: heavy metals
[18]
On the attenuation of X-rays and γ-rays for aqueous solutions of salts
Disparities in the linear attenuation coefficients of X-rays and gamma rays for aqueous solutions of soluble salts arising from the nonequality of volume of ...
[19]
K-edge ratio method for identification of multiple nanoparticulate ...
Abstract. Objective: Recently introduced energy-sensitive X-ray CT makes it feasible to discriminate different nanoparticulate contrast materials.
[20]
Determination of small quantities of heavy metals in water-soluble ...
Techniques for X-ray fluorescence (XRF) determination of heavy metals in natural waters and pure salts combined with preconcentration, are proposed.
[21]
Quantitative Determination of Trace Heavy Metals and Selected ...
Sep 15, 2021 · A new X-ray fluorescence (XRF) method is proposed for sample preparation and impurity quantification for elements heavier than sodium in carbon materials.
[22]
Beam hardening | Radiology Reference Article | Radiopaedia.org
Jun 3, 2025 · Beam hardening is the phenomenon that occurs when an x-ray beam comprised of polychromatic energies passes through an object, resulting in selective ...Question 1194 · Question 742 · Question 840
[23]
Full article: Correction of X-ray scattering in energy-resolved ...
Each segmented detector measures X-rays with different energy spectra, due to the absorption ... t j are the mass attenuation coefficient, density, and ...
[24]
[PDF] Absolute determination of the effect of scattering and fluorescence ...
Jul 20, 2004 · Abstract. We investigate the effect of x-ray scattering and fluorescence upon measurements of the x-ray mass attenuation coefficient.
[25]
[PDF] Advances in the measurements of the mass attenuation coefficients
The knowledge of atomic fundamental parameters such as mass attenuation coefficients or fluo- rescence yields with low uncertainties, is of decisive importance ...
[26]
Measurements of the x-ray mass-attenuation coefficient and ...
Nov 13, 2008 · Experimental technique. The XERT is a technique for high-accuracy measurement of mass-attenuation coefficients, form factors and x-ray ...
[27]
(IUCr) High-accuracy measurement of mass attenuation coefficients ...
The accuracy of measured mass attenuation coefficients is about 0.023% to 0.036% and some 50% better than previous claims. These measurements are the most ...
[28]
Validation of MCNPX with Experimental Results of Mass Attenuation ...
Sep 29, 2017 · In this study, MCNPX (version 2.4.0) Monte Carlo code has been used for investigations on mass attenuation coefficients of cement, gypsum and ...
[29]
[PDF] Characteristic measurements of a hybrid pixel detector - JYX
Nov 22, 2021 · These mass attenuation coefficient measurements were done using two Gold foils, Niobium and Rhodium. From mass attenuation coefficient ...
[30]
NIST XCOM: Element/Compound/Mixture
In this database, it is possible to obtain photon cross section data for a single element, compound, or mixture (a combination of elements and compounds).
[31]
Report IAEA-NDS-195, XMuDat
Aug 1, 1998 · XMuDat is a program for calculating photon interaction coefficients, including mass attenuation, energy transfer, and absorption, for six ...
[32]
A Closer Look at Mass Attenuation Coefficient Accuracy of Soft X-rays
Aug 6, 2025 · The novel datasets are expected to enhance the reliability of mass attenuation coefficients. View. Show abstract. Assessing the Accuracy of ...
[33]
[PDF] The degradation of gamma-ray mass attenuation of UO2 and MOX ...
For the energy dependent mass attenuation values, log-log interpolation was performed between the listed energies in NIST XCOM. 3.4 Uncertainty ...
[34]
Geant4, FLUKA and WinXCom studies - ScienceDirect
... Geant4 and FLUKA simulations. Based on the simulated mass attenuation coefficient, other significant parameters such as linear attenuation coefficient ...
[35]
Geant4 simulations for attenuation coefficients - GitHub
In this Geant4 simulations, mass attenuation coefficients for different materials, mostly part of human body, have been evaluated at different photon energies.
[36]
X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients | NIST
Sep 17, 2009 · Material constants and composition for compounds and mixtures. Values of the mass attenuation coefficient and the mass energy-absorption ...Section 2 · Air, Dry · Water, Liquid · Citation/Version HistoryMissing: definition | Show results with:definition
[37]
X-Ray attenuation & absorption calculator
X-Ray attenuation & absorption calculator ... Caculations are based on the NIST data for X-ray interaction cross sections and material densities. Code: G. Weber