Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Massive particle

In , a massive particle is defined as an elementary or composite entity possessing a non-zero , which provides it with in its and prevents it from achieving the , unlike massless particles such as that invariably propagate at the c. The of such a particle is given by Einstein's E = mc^2, where m is the , forming the baseline for its total relativistic E = \gamma mc^2 (with \gamma = 1/\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}) when in motion. This distinction is fundamental in and ; for example, massive spin-1 particles like the W and Z bosons exhibit three possible () states, compared to only two for massless spin-1 particles like the . Within the Standard Model of particle physics, the majority of known fundamental particles are massive, including the six quarks (up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom), the charged leptons (, , ), neutrinos (with tiny but non-zero masses confirmed by experiments), and the electroweak bosons ^\pm and Z^0 (with masses of approximately 80 GeV/c^2 for the ^\pm and 91 GeV/c^2 for the Z^0). In contrast, the (mediator of ) and eight gluons (mediators of the strong force) remain massless. The origin of these masses stems from the Higgs mechanism, where particles interact with the pervasive Higgs field, acquiring mass proportional to the strength of the coupling; the itself, discovered in 2012 at the LHC, has a mass of about 125 GeV/c^2 and completes this framework. Composite massive particles, such as protons (mass ≈ 938 MeV/c^2) and neutrons, derive most of their mass from the of quarks via rather than direct Higgs contributions. Massive particles underpin the structure of ordinary matter and influence cosmic phenomena; for instance, baryonic matter consists of massive protons and neutrons, while hypothetical , with masses typically in the GeV to TeV range, are leading candidates for due to their predicted weak interactions and gravitational effects observed in galactic dynamics. Ongoing experiments at accelerators like the LHC and direct-detection facilities such as XENONnT continue to probe extensions beyond the , searching for new massive particles that could resolve puzzles like the or neutrino mass generation.

Definition and Fundamentals

Rest Mass Concept

In special relativity, the rest mass of a particle, often denoted as m_0 or simply m, is defined as the invariant mass measured in the particle's rest frame, where its velocity is zero relative to the observer. This quantity represents the intrinsic inertial property of the particle and remains unchanged under Lorentz transformations, ensuring it is the same for all inertial observers irrespective of their relative motion. The concept of rest mass originated with Albert Einstein's 1905 paper "Does the Inertia of a Body Depend Upon Its Energy Content?", which linked mass directly to energy and marked a departure from the Newtonian view of mass as a static measure of matter and inertia, uninfluenced by energy content. In Newtonian mechanics, mass was treated as an absolute, velocity-independent quantity proportional to volume and density, but Einstein's framework integrated it into the relativistic structure, where rest mass serves as the fundamental scalar invariant characterizing massive particles. For subatomic particles, rest mass is conventionally expressed in units of energy per speed squared, such as electronvolts per c^2 (eV/c^2), where c is the ; this convention arises from the mass-energy equivalence. A representative example is the , with a rest mass of approximately 0.510 999 MeV/c^2. The associated rest energy is given by E_0 = m c^2, which quantifies the energy inherent to the particle's mass even at rest, underscoring the profound equivalence between and for massive particles.

Distinction from Massless Particles

Massless particles, such as photons and gluons, possess zero rest and consequently always propagate at the c in , following null geodesics in . In contrast, massive particles, which have a positive rest as defined in the of , are inherently incapable of reaching the , instead tracing timelike worldlines that allow for subluminal velocities. This fundamental difference manifests in observable effects like for massive particles, where their elapses more slowly relative to stationary observers as their speed increases. The provides a quantitative distinction, given by the formula m = \sqrt{\frac{E^2}{c^4} - \frac{p^2}{c^2}}, where E is the total , p is the , and c is the ; for massive particles, m > 0, while for massless particles, m = 0 since E = pc. This relation underscores that massless particles exhibit a linear E = pc, whereas massive particles follow a nonlinear one, E = \sqrt{(pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2}, reflecting their rest contribution. Conceptually, accelerating a massive particle to approach c demands progressively more energy, ultimately requiring an infinite amount to achieve exactly c, which is physically unattainable and highlights the of where massive objects remain within the . These distinctions are pivotal in theoretical frameworks, ensuring that massive particles experience and relativistic effects absent in their massless counterparts.

Physical Properties

Energy-Momentum Relation

In special relativity, the energy-momentum relation for a massive particle is encapsulated in the , defined as p^\mu = \left( \frac{E}{c}, \vec{p} \right), where E is the total energy, \vec{p} is the , and c is the . This formulation, introduced by in his 1908 work on , ensures that physical laws remain invariant under Lorentz transformations. The key invariant property is p_\mu p^\mu = m^2 c^2, where m is the and the is (+, -, -, -); this relation holds in all inertial frames and distinguishes massive particles from massless ones by yielding a non-zero value. The total energy E and momentum \vec{p} are expressed as E = \gamma m c^2 and \vec{p} = \gamma m \vec{v}, where \gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} is the and \vec{v} is the particle's velocity. These expressions arise from extending the Newtonian definitions to be consistent with relativistic , ensuring laws transform properly under Lorentz boosts. Substituting into the yields the E^2 = (p c)^2 + (m c^2)^2, where p = |\vec{p}|, confirming that energy and momentum are interdependent for massive particles. A standard derivation begins in the particle's rest frame, where \vec{p} = 0 and E = m c^2, the rest energy established by in 1905. Applying a to a frame moving at \vec{u} relative to the rest frame mixes the energy and components, leading to the general forms E = \gamma_u (E' + u p_x') and p_x = \gamma_u (p_x' + \frac{u}{c^2} E') (with similar for other components), where primed quantities are in the rest frame and \gamma_u = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{u^2}{c^2}}}. For a particle with \vec{v} in the lab frame, this yields the \gamma m prefactor after identifying the rest-frame conditions. In the low-velocity limit where v \ll c, \gamma \approx 1 + \frac{1}{2} \frac{v^2}{c^2}, so E \approx m c^2 + \frac{1}{2} m v^2, recovering the Newtonian added to the rest energy. This approximation highlights the compatibility of with at everyday speeds while underscoring the profound role of rest energy.

Velocity and Lorentz Factor

In , massive particles cannot reach the c due to their nonzero rest mass, which requires infinite to achieve v = c; instead, their v remains strictly less than c for any finite E, approaching c asymptotically as E \to \infty. This arises from the energy-momentum relation, where the particle's total E = \gamma m c^2 grows without bound while p = \gamma m v increases, ensuring v = p c^2 / E < c. For low velocities where v \ll c, the Lorentz factor \gamma = 1 / \sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2} expands approximately as \gamma \approx 1 + \frac{1}{2} (v/c)^2, recovering classical Newtonian behavior where relativistic effects are negligible. The Lorentz factor \gamma governs key relativistic effects on massive particle motion. Length contraction shortens the measured length of an object moving at velocity v relative to the observer, given by L = L_0 / \gamma, where L_0 is the proper length in the rest frame; this applies to particle trajectories in accelerators, where the lab frame perceives a contracted path length compared to the particle's rest frame view of the apparatus. Similarly, time dilation extends the observed lifetime of moving particles, with the lab time interval \Delta t = \gamma \Delta \tau, where \Delta \tau is the proper time in the particle's rest frame; this effect is crucial for understanding particle stability during high-speed travel. A prominent example occurs with cosmic-ray muons, which are produced high in Earth's atmosphere with lifetimes of about 2.2 microseconds in their rest frame—too short to reach sea level classically—but time dilation at relativistic speeds (γ ≈ 20) extends their observed decay time to roughly 44 microseconds, allowing many to penetrate to the surface. This phenomenon directly verifies time dilation and underscores how mass enforces relativistic kinematics in natural high-energy processes.

Role in Theories

In Special Relativity

In special relativity, massive particles are described using the framework of Minkowski spacetime, a four-dimensional continuum that unifies space and time into a single geometric structure. This formulation, introduced by Hermann Minkowski in his 1908 lecture "Space and Time," provided a mathematical foundation for Einstein's 1905 theory by representing the dynamics of massive particles as curves in this spacetime, where physical laws remain invariant under Lorentz transformations. Minkowski's approach emphasized that the "world" of events forms an absolute entity, with space and time as interdependent projections, enabling a precise geometric interpretation of particle motion. The trajectory of a massive particle in Minkowski spacetime is known as its worldline, which is always timelike, meaning the particle's velocity remains below the speed of light c in all inertial frames. These worldlines are parameterized by the proper time \tau, the time measured by a clock moving with the particle, providing an invariant way to describe its path from past to future. For inertial motion, the worldline is a straight line; for accelerated motion, it curves while remaining within the light cone defined by the metric. This parameterization ensures that the worldline's length corresponds to the particle's intrinsic lifetime, independent of the observer's frame. The proper time interval d\tau along the worldline is related to the coordinate time dt in a given frame by d\tau = dt / \gamma, where \gamma = (1 - v^2/c^2)^{-1/2} is the Lorentz factor and v is the particle's speed. Integrating d\tau along the trajectory yields the total proper time experienced by the particle. This relation arises from the spacetime interval for timelike paths, given by ds^2 = -c^2 d\tau^2 = c^2 dt^2 (1 - v^2/c^2), which defines the invariant "distance" along the worldline in the mostly-plus metric signature. A key feature of this framework is Lorentz invariance, under which the rest mass of a massive particle serves as a scalar invariant, unchanged across all inertial frames. This invariance stems from the four-momentum vector p^\mu, whose magnitude squared p^\mu p_\mu = -m^2 c^2 (with m the rest mass) remains constant under Lorentz transformations, distinguishing massive particles from massless ones that follow null geodesics. Minkowski's spacetime geometry thus ensures that the rest mass encapsulates the particle's intrinsic properties, preserved regardless of relative motion.

In Quantum Field Theory

In quantum field theory (QFT), massive particles are described by quantum fields that incorporate a mass parameter in their equations of motion, distinguishing them from massless fields and ensuring relativistic invariance. These fields obey wave equations derived from the principles of special relativity and quantum mechanics, where the mass term modifies the dispersion relation and introduces a length scale associated with the particle's Compton wavelength. The quantization of these fields leads to creation and annihilation operators for particles with definite mass, enabling the computation of scattering amplitudes and other observables through perturbative expansions. For scalar massive particles, the fundamental equation is the Klein-Gordon equation, given by (\Box + \frac{m^2 c^2}{\hbar^2}) \phi = 0, where \Box = \partial^\mu \partial_\mu is the d'Alembertian operator, \phi is the scalar field, m is the particle mass, c is the speed of light, and \hbar is the reduced Planck's constant. This equation, first formulated independently by and , relativistically generalizes the for spin-0 particles by including the mass term that prevents superluminal propagation. For spin-1/2 fermions, the incorporates the mass term as (i \gamma^\mu \partial_\mu - \frac{m c}{\hbar}) \psi = 0, where \gamma^\mu are the Dirac matrices and \psi is the spinor field; this equation, derived by , predicts the existence of antiparticles and ensures positive-definite probabilities for massive electrons. These equations form the basis for free-field Lagrangians in QFT, with interaction terms added perturbatively. The mass of particles in the Standard Model is not a fundamental bare parameter but arises dynamically through spontaneous symmetry breaking via the . In this framework, originally proposed by , , and , a scalar Higgs field acquires a vacuum expectation value, generating effective masses for gauge bosons and fermions through Yukawa couplings, while preserving gauge invariance. This mechanism resolves the issue of massless gauge fields in spontaneously broken theories, with the Higgs boson's discovery confirming the mass generation process experimentally. In perturbative QFT, the propagator for a massive particle, which encodes the amplitude for propagation between spacetime points, takes the form \sim 1/(p^2 - m^2 + i\epsilon) in momentum space, contrasting with the massless case \sim 1/p^2 and introducing a pole at p^2 = m^2. This form derives directly from the inverse of the quadratic operator in the field's equation of motion and is essential for Feynman diagram calculations. However, quantum corrections from interactions lead to divergences, requiring mass renormalization, where the observed mass is obtained by tuning the bare mass parameter to cancel infinities in loop diagrams, as formalized in the renormalization group framework by Freeman Dyson and others. This procedure ensures finite predictions for physical masses across energy scales.

Examples and Implications

Fundamental Particles

In the Standard Model of particle physics, massive fundamental particles are classified into fermions (quarks and leptons) and bosons (W and Z gauge bosons, and the Higgs boson). Fermions carry half-integer spin and obey the Pauli exclusion principle, while bosons have integer spin and mediate forces or provide mass generation. Quarks and charged leptons acquire their masses through interactions with the Higgs field via the , whereas neutrinos have extremely small masses whose origin remains an open question beyond the minimal . Quarks are the building blocks of hadrons such as protons and neutrons; they come in six flavors organized into three generations and are always confined within composite particles due to color confinement by the strong force. The up and down quarks form the first generation, charm and strange the second, and top and bottom the third, with masses increasing significantly across generations. Leptons include three charged particles (electron, muon, tau) and three nearly massless neutrinos, also grouped by generations. The charged leptons have masses that increase dramatically from electron to tau, while neutrino masses are constrained to be less than 0.8 eV/c² at 90% confidence level for the electron neutrino, with similar upper limits for the others. Among the gauge bosons, the W⁺, W⁻, and Z bosons mediate the weak interaction and carry significant mass, distinguishing them from the massless photon (electromagnetic force) and gluons (strong force). The Higgs boson, a scalar particle with spin zero, is responsible for electroweak symmetry breaking and endows other particles with mass. The following table summarizes the masses of these massive Standard Model particles, organized by type and generation where applicable (values from the 2024 Particle Data Group review, in the \overline{\text{MS}} scheme for quarks at the Z boson mass scale unless noted otherwise).
Particle TypeGeneration 1Generation 2Generation 3
Quarks (MeV/c²)up: $2.16 \pm 0.07
down: $4.70 \pm 0.07
charm: $1273 \pm 5
strange: $93.5 \pm 0.8
: $172570 \pm 290
: $4183 \pm 7
Charged Leptons (MeV/c²): $0.510999 \pm 0.00000000015: $105.6583755 \pm 0.0000023: $1776.93 \pm 0.09
Neutrinos (eV/c²)\nu_e: < 0.45 (90% CL)\nu_\mu: < 0.19 \times 10^6 (90% CL)\nu_\tau: < 18.2 \times 10^6 (95% CL)
Gauge Bosons (GeV/c²)--W^\pm: $80.369 \pm 0.013
: $91.188 \pm 0.002
Higgs Boson (GeV/c²)--$125.20 \pm 0.11

Effects in Particle Accelerators

In particle accelerators, the rest of particles imposes fundamental limits on the processes that can occur, particularly through energy thresholds required for production. For instance, the creation of a particle-antiparticle pair demands a center-of- energy exceeding twice the rest energy, E > 2 m c^2, where m is the particle's rest . This threshold was evident in the Large Electron-Positron (LEP) collider at , where operations above approximately 161 GeV enabled the first observations of W-boson , as the W boson's of about 80.4 GeV necessitated this minimum energy to overcome the kinematic barrier. Such requirements highlight how dictates the feasibility of high-energy reactions, constraining experimental designs to achieve sufficient collision energies. Beam dynamics in accelerators are profoundly influenced by the mass of circulating particles, especially through synchrotron radiation losses during bends in magnetic fields. The power radiated by synchrotron radiation scales with the Lorentz factor \gamma raised to the fourth power for ultra-relativistic particles, P \propto \gamma^4 / \rho, where \rho is the bending radius; since \gamma = E / (m c^2) for a given total energy E, lighter massive particles exhibit higher \gamma and thus radiate more intensely, often by factors scaling as $1/m^4. This effect is pronounced for electrons in storage rings, where radiation damping stabilizes beams but limits achievable energies, whereas heavier particles like protons experience negligible losses, allowing for higher energies in facilities like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). The mass-dependent radiation thus shapes accelerator choices, favoring protons for multi-TeV operations to minimize energy dissipation. Scattering cross-sections in collisions involving massive particles reveal characteristic resonances arising from the massive propagators in amplitudes. These resonances manifest as peaks in the cross-section when the center-of-mass energy matches the particle's mass, enhancing production rates dramatically. A prime example is the Z boson resonance observed at LEP, where the e⁺e⁻ annihilation cross-section peaked at around 91 GeV, the Z mass, reaching values of approximately 40 nb for hadronic final states due to the Breit-Wigner form of the propagator. This mass-induced structure allowed precise measurements of electroweak parameters, underscoring how massive mediators amplify signals in accelerator data. The discovery of massive particles often hinges on identifying their decay signatures, which reflect mass hierarchies and conservation laws. At the LHC, the 2012 observation of the , with a of about 125 GeV, relied on detecting decay products like pairs or four-lepton events from H → γγ and H → ZZ* → 4ℓ channels, where the Z bosons' constrained the and branching ratios. These signatures, requiring high collision energies above the Higgs , confirmed the particle's existence through reconstructions that isolated the from background. Relativistic effects from high \gamma in massive particle beams pose significant engineering challenges, particularly for focusing and stability. In the LHC, protons accelerated to 7 TeV per beam achieve \gamma \approx 7465, as \gamma = E / (m_p c^2) with proton rest energy m_p c^2 \approx 0.938 GeV, leading to extreme and that complicate . These effects necessitate precise tuning to counter emittance growth and maintain micron-scale beam sizes at interaction points, as relativistic rigidities alter focusing strengths and amplify sensitivities to misalignments. Such challenges were critical during LHC commissioning, where beam-beam interactions and relativistic dynamics limited initial luminosities until advanced feedback systems stabilized the orbits.

References

  1. [1]
    Relativistic Energy - HyperPhysics
    The relativistic energy expression is the tool used to calculate binding energies of nuclei and the energy yields of nuclear fission and fusion.<|control11|><|separator|>
  2. [2]
    Nobel Prize—Why Particles Have Mass
    ### Summary of Massive vs. Massless Particles and Higgs Mechanism
  3. [3]
    [PDF] 60. Quark Masses - Particle Data Group
    May 31, 2024 · This note discusses some of the theoretical issues relevant for the determination of quark masses, which are fundamental parameters of the ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] 14. Neutrino Masses, Mixing, and Oscillations - Particle Data Group
    Dec 1, 2023 · This has important implications for the neutrino and in particular for the question of the neutrino mass 1. 1The physics of massive neutrinos ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] 88. Supersymmetry, Part I (Theory) - Particle Data Group
    Dec 1, 2023 · Remarkably, a stable weakly-interacting massive particle (WIMP) whose mass and interaction rate are governed by ... Beyond tree level, the ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] 90. Axions and Other Similar Particles
    Dec 1, 2023 · massive particles have also the capability to search for solar axions and ALPs. For low masses, ma . 100eV, the XENONnT experiment [291] has ...
  7. [7]
    [PDF] DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND UPON ITS ENERGY ...
    This edition of Einstein's Does the Inertia of a Body Depend upon its. Energy-Content is based on the English translation of his original 1905 German-.
  8. [8]
    [PDF] 1. Physical Constants - Particle Data Group
    electron mass me. 0.510 998 950 00(15) MeV/c2 = 9.109 383 7015(28)×10−31 kg. 0.30 proton mass mp. 938.272 088 16(29) MeV/c2 = 1.672 621 923 69(51)×10−27 kg.Missing: rest | Show results with:rest
  9. [9]
    Mass and Speed | Physics Van | Illinois
    Jul 6, 2011 · 1) Does a massless particle always travel at the speed of light? Why does it have to do that way? 2) Why speed of light is slower in certain ...
  10. [10]
    arXiv:1302.1821v3 [physics.gen-ph] 1 Jul 2013
    called “mass” is not an intrinsic property of the particles. According to special relativity theory, only massless particles can move at the light speed c.
  11. [11]
    [PDF] arXiv:1907.04178v3 [gr-qc] 1 Oct 2019
    Oct 1, 2019 · In general relativity, as we have discussed, it is assumed that massive particles follow timelike paths, and massless particles follows null ...
  12. [12]
    e_mc2.html - UNLV Physics
    Since giving massive particles infinite mass is giving them infinite energy by E=mc**2, special relativity dictates that you CANNOT accelerate massive particles ...
  13. [13]
    28.6 Relativistic Energy – College Physics
    No object with mass can attain the speed of light because an infinite amount of work and an infinite amount of energy input is required to accelerate a mass to ...
  14. [14]
    How Does Light Have Momentum Without Mass? - Physics Van
    The other way "mass" is often used, especially in recent years, is to mean "rest mass" or "invariant mass", which is sqrt(E2-p2*c2)/c2.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
  15. [15]
    If a particle with rest-mass were to, in theory, travel at the speed of ...
    Jun 21, 2007 · This equation tells you that you need an infinite amount of energy to accelerate a particle to (exactly) the speed of light, however, you can ...
  16. [16]
    Energy and Momentum in Lorentz Transformations - Galileo
    →p=m→v=m0→v√1−v2/c2E=mc2=√m20c4+c2→p2. ... E2−c2→p2=m20c4. That is to say, E2−c2→p2 depends only on the rest mass of the particle and the speed of light. It does ...
  17. [17]
    [PDF] Space and Time - UCSD Math
    It was Hermann Minkowski (Einstein's mathematics professor) who announced the new four- dimensional (spacetime) view of the world in 1908, which he deduced from ...
  18. [18]
    16 Relativistic Energy and Momentum
    Now we shall try to demonstrate that the formula for mv must be m0/√1−v2/c2, by arguing from the principle of relativity that the laws of physics must be the ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] 7.1 Transforming energy and momentum between reference frames
    T = pz L . In other words, the relativistic formulations of energy and momentum form a set of quantities that transform under a Lorentz transformation. Recall ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] Physics 111 Homework Solutions Week #9 - Thursday
    Mar 1, 2010 · Using the fact that v << c, we can use the binomial expansion on the Lorentz factor for small arguments. This gives. Therefore the equation ...<|separator|>
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Special Relativity
    moving length, L. So,. Lp=vΔt and L=vΔt p. Using the time dilation formula relating Δt and Δtp, we obtain. L = Lp √1−v2/c2 = γ−1 Lp. Length Contraction. Thus ...
  22. [22]
    Time Dilation
    The measured lifetimes of these cosmic-ray muons is indeed about five times longer than the rest-frame lifetime of a muon, in accordance with the previous two ...
  23. [23]
    Muons from cosmic rays and time dilation
    If the muons are moving fast enough -- relative to the Earth and people on the ground -- then their clocks will run slowly; that means that their lifetimes will ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] 7. Special Relativity
    In the context of special relativity, space and time is called Minkowski space. ... Until now, we built our discussion of particle trajectories on proper time.
  25. [25]
    The quantum theory of the electron - Journals
    Akhmeteli A (2018) The Dirac Equation as One Fourth-Order Equation for One Function: A General, Manifestly Covariant Form Quantum Foundations, Probability ...
  26. [26]
    Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons
    Oct 11, 2013 · The 2013 Nobel Prize in Physics has been awarded to two of the theorists who formulated the Higgs mechanism, which gives mass to fundamental particles.
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    Energy Record gives LEP new Discovery Possibilities - CERN
    The beam energy reached the W-pair production energy for the first time and physics data was taken at beam energies between 80.5 and 86 Gev. 1996-1997. During ...
  29. [29]
    Electroweak measurements in electron–positron collisions at W ...
    Electroweak measurements in electron–positron collisions at W-boson-pair energies at LEP ... pair production threshold at 160 GeV , up to 209 GeV. Based on about ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Synchrotron Radiation - SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
    Dec 2, 2001 · This book covers the physical aspects of synchrotron radiation generation and is designed as a textbook and reference for graduate students, ...
  31. [31]
    10.3: Synchrotron Radiation - Physics LibreTexts
    Mar 5, 2022 · According to Eq. (9.153), at a fixed magnetic field (in particle accelerators, limited to a-few-tesla fields of the beam-bending magnets), ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    [PDF] 55. Z Boson - Particle Data Group
    Dec 1, 2023 · Precision measurements at the Z-boson resonance using electron–positron colliding beams began in 1989 at the SLC and at LEP. During 1989–95, the ...
  33. [33]
    The Higgs boson: Revealing nature's secrets - CERN
    Jul 4, 2020 · The ATLAS and CMS detectors can therefore see only the remnants of transformations, signatures that a Higgs boson might have been produced in ...
  34. [34]
    The discovery and measurements of a Higgs boson - Journals
    Jan 13, 2015 · In July 2012, the ATLAS and CMS collaborations at CERN's Large Hadron Collider announced the discovery of a Higgs-like boson, a new heavy particle.
  35. [35]
    Taking a closer look at LHC - Relativity
    In the LHC each proton reaches an energy of 7 TeV. Firstly, we introduce some basic calculations in Special Relativity and afterwards we present a more ...
  36. [36]
    The technical challenges of the Large Hadron Collider - Journals
    Jan 13, 2015 · This consists of adjusting the focusing of the beams around the interaction points to minimize the beam size and hence maximize the luminosity.
  37. [37]
    [PDF] LHC Beam Stability and Feedback Control - CERN Document Server
    Sep 1, 2007 · This report presents the stability and control of the Large Hadron Collider's (LHC) two beam orbits and their particle momenta using beam-based ...