Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mating type

Mating types represent a genetic mechanism in certain unicellular eukaryotes, analogous to biological sexes in multicellular organisms, that regulates sexual compatibility and prevents self-fertilization by ensuring mating occurs only between compatible individuals.^[1] This system divides populations into distinct groups—typically two or more—based on specific alleles at mating-type loci, which control the expression of pheromones, receptors, and transcription factors essential for mate recognition and fusion.^[2] Prevalent in fungi, algae, ciliates, and social amoebae, mating types evolved from asymmetric gamete signaling to enhance reproductive efficiency and genetic diversity through outbreeding.^[1] In fungi, the most extensively studied group, mating types are governed by specialized genomic regions known as MAT loci, which encode regulatory proteins such as homeodomain or HMG-box transcription factors that orchestrate the sexual developmental cascade.^[2] Fungal mating systems are classified as bipolar, featuring a single MAT locus with two alleles yielding two mating types (e.g., Saccharomyces cerevisiae), or tetrapolar, involving two unlinked loci that generate thousands of compatible combinations (e.g., Schizophyllum commune).^[2] Approximately 90% of higher fungi are heterothallic, requiring opposite mating types for reproduction, while homothallic species can self-mate without such distinctions.^[3] The evolution of mating types likely originated in isogamous organisms to resolve signaling conflicts during gamete fusion, favoring two types in most lineages due to strong pairwise incompatibilities that resist the invasion of novel types.^[1] In some lineages, such as basidiomycetes, multiple mating types (up to thousands) have arisen through multiallelic systems, maximizing outbreeding potential and minimizing inbreeding risks.^[3] Beyond reproduction, mating-type loci influence traits like virulence in pathogens (e.g., Candida albicans) and hyphal differentiation, highlighting their broader regulatory roles.^[2]

Fundamentals

Definition

Mating types represent molecular or genetic markers that govern sexual compatibility in isogamous microorganisms, functioning as the microbial equivalent of sexes found in multicellular organisms but lacking any associated morphological dimorphism.^[4] In these systems, individuals or cells are classified into distinct mating types based on their genetic constitution at specific loci, which dictate whether they can engage in sexual reproduction with potential partners.^[2] This mechanism ensures that reproduction occurs only between compatible types, promoting genetic diversity through outcrossing. For syngamy—the fusion of gametes or haploid cells—to take place, partners must possess different mating types, a requirement that inherently discourages self-fertilization and inbreeding within the same genetic lineage.^[5] The simplest systems feature two mating types, often denoted by the "+" and "−" symbols, reflecting their complementary roles in initiating sexual processes.^[6] In the model organism Saccharomyces cerevisiae, these are specifically termed a and α, where cells of opposite types exchange pheromones to synchronize mating.^[7] More complex configurations involve multi-allelic mating type systems, in which compatibility arises from a large array of allelic variants at one or more loci, sometimes numbering in the thousands and allowing for extensive mating possibilities within a population.^[2] Such diversity maximizes outbreeding opportunities in species where random encounters are common. The foundational observation of mating types dates to 1904, when Albert F. Blakeslee identified two incompatible strains in the fungus Mucor mucedo, establishing the basis for understanding heterothallism in microorganisms.^[8]

Distinction from Sexes

Mating types represent genetically determined compatibility systems primarily found in unicellular or isogamous organisms, where gametes are morphologically identical but can only fuse with those of a different type, contrasting with sexes that involve anisogamy and dimorphic gametes of differing sizes, often accompanied by specialized physical structures for reproduction.^[9] In mating type systems, such as those in the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, the plus and minus designations ensure fusion between compatible partners without implying male or female roles or morphological differences.^[9] By comparison, sexes in anisogamous species like the volvocine alga Volvox carteri feature small, motile sperm and large, immotile eggs, with corresponding male and female morphologies that facilitate gamete delivery and resource allocation.^[10] Evolutionarily, mating types are considered ancestral to sexes, arising in early eukaryotic lineages before the differentiation of gamete sizes under disruptive selection pressures.^[9] This precedence is evident in isogamous microbes, where mating type loci first evolved to regulate partner recognition, setting the stage for later transitions to anisogamy in multicellular descendants.^[10] In contrast, the emergence of sexes correlates with the advantages of gamete specialization—small gametes for quantity and mobility, large ones for nourishment—but introduces dependencies that can limit flexibility in reproductive strategies.^[10] Functionally, mating types promote outcrossing through alternative alleles or idiomorphs at mating loci, preventing self-fertilization and enhancing genetic diversity without assigning fixed reproductive roles.^[5] For instance, in fungi, unifactorial systems with idiomorphs or bifactorial ones with multiple alleles reduce the probability of incompatible matings, favoring encounters between diverse partners.^[5] Sexes, however, enable specialized division of labor in gamete production and delivery, potentially increasing efficiency in anisogamous systems, though they can heighten inbreeding risks if population structures limit mate availability.^[9] Mating types often enforce self-incompatibility via heterothallism, requiring distinct types for fusion and thereby curtailing inbreeding, as seen in many fungal species where only opposite mating types can conjugate.^[5] This contrasts with some anisogamous organisms that exhibit homothallism, allowing selfing through compatible gametes within the same individual, which can facilitate rapid colonization but at the cost of reduced heterozygosity.^[5] Such mechanisms underscore how mating types prioritize genetic exchange in simple life forms, differing from the role-based specialization in sexed systems.^[9]

Genetic and Molecular Basis

Mating-Type Loci

Mating-type loci (MAT) are specialized genomic regions that determine sexual compatibility in many fungi and other organisms, characterized by idiomorphs rather than traditional homologous alleles. Idiomorphs are non-homologous DNA sequences of similar physical size that occupy the same chromosomal position and function as alternative forms of the mating-type locus.^[11] In ascomycetes, the MAT locus typically consists of two idiomorphs, MAT1-1 and MAT1-2; the MAT1-1 idiomorph often encodes genes such as MAT1-1-1 (an α-box transcription factor, analogous to MATα1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae), while MAT1-2 encodes MAT1-2-1 (an HMG-box protein, similar to MATa1).^[12] These idiomorphs ensure that only opposite mating types can initiate sexual reproduction, preventing self-mating in heterothallic species.^[13] Mating-type systems vary in complexity, with bipolar and tetrapolar configurations representing key structural types. Bipolar systems feature a single MAT locus with two idiomorphs, resulting in just two mating types, as seen in the ascomycete Saccharomyces cerevisiae where MATa and MATα determine compatibility.^[14] In contrast, tetrapolar systems involve two unlinked loci, often labeled A and B in basidiomycetes, each with multiple alleles or subloci that generate thousands of mating-type combinations—over 23,000 in species like Schizophyllum commune—promoting high outcrossing potential.^[15]^[16] The A locus in basidiomycetes typically houses genes for homeodomain transcription factors (HD1 and HD2), which form heterodimers to activate developmental pathways upon compatible mating, while the B locus encodes pheromone precursor genes and G-protein-coupled receptors for cell recognition.^[17] In yeasts like Saccharomyces, pheromone and receptor genes such as those in the STE family (e.g., STE2 and STE3) are regulated by the MAT locus, though located nearby or elsewhere in the genome.^[14] Recombination is frequently suppressed around MAT loci, leading to the evolution of non-recombining regions that resemble proto-sex chromosomes. This suppression maintains linkage between mating-type genes and linked sexually antagonistic alleles, often extending over large chromosomal segments in heterothallic fungi.^[18] Such regions exhibit reduced crossing-over, stratified evolutionary layers, and accumulation of repetitive elements, mirroring patterns in differentiated sex chromosomes.^[19] The regulation of these loci during mating involves transcriptional control by their encoded factors, as explored further in subsequent sections.^[12]

Regulatory Mechanisms

Regulatory mechanisms of mating types primarily involve the control of gene expression and signaling pathways that ensure compatibility and trigger reproductive processes in compatible encounters. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, activation of mating pathways occurs through differential gene expression dictated by the mating-type locus. Haploid cells of mating type a express a-specific genes, while α cells express α-specific genes; upon mating to form a/α diploids, the Mata1/α2 repressor complex forms, silencing haploid-specific genes such as those involved in sporulation and promoting diploid-specific traits like invasive growth repression.^[20] This repression is mediated by transcriptional silencing at the promoters of target genes, ensuring that only compatible mating types proceed to fusion and preventing self-mating in diploids.^[21] Pheromone signaling further regulates these pathways by initiating cellular responses in compatible partners. In S. cerevisiae, a cells produce the lipopeptide a-factor, while α cells produce α-factor; these pheromones bind to G-protein-coupled receptors (Ste3 for a-factor and Ste2 for α-factor) on the opposite mating type, activating a heterotrimeric G-protein complex (Gpa1/Ste4/Ste18).^[22] This triggers a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade involving scaffold protein Ste5, kinases Ste11, Ste7, and Fus3, leading to cell cycle arrest in G1 phase via Far1 induction and preparation for cell fusion through cytoskeletal reorganization and gene expression changes like upregulation of fusion genes.^[23] The pathway enforces specificity, as receptors are mating-type specific and expressed only in haploids, linking locus identity directly to signaling competence.^[24] Self-incompatibility is enforced in some fungi through heterodimerization of mating-type proteins that activate developmental genes only in compatible combinations. In the basidiomycete Ustilago maydis, the b locus encodes homeodomain proteins bE and bW; these form functional heterodimers solely when derived from different b alleles due to nonself recognition via variable N-terminal domains, while same-allele pairs do not dimerize.^[25] The bE/bW heterodimer acts as a transcriptional regulator, binding DNA to activate genes for filamentous growth, conjugation tube formation, and pathogenesis, such as rbf1, which coordinates downstream effectors; this ensures mating and development occur only between genetically distinct partners. Mating-type switching provides a mechanism in homothallic organisms to generate compatible mating types within a lineage, enabling self-fertilization. In S. cerevisiae, the HO endonuclease, expressed in late G1 phase of the mother cell, initiates switching by creating a double-strand break at the MAT locus, which is repaired via gene conversion using silent cassettes at HMLα or HMRa loci, replacing the existing MAT sequence with the opposite type.^[26] Donor preference is regulated by the recombination enhancer (RE) sequence, favoring the distal HML for a-to-α switches, and cell asymmetry factors like Ash1 repress HO in daughter cells to limit switching to one event per generation.^[27] This process, conserved in related yeasts, maintains reproductive flexibility without requiring external partners.^[28]

Distribution Across Organisms

In Fungi

In fungi, mating types regulate sexual compatibility and are particularly diverse across major phyla, enabling outcrossing while adapting to ecological niches. Ascomycetes predominantly exhibit bipolar mating systems, where a single mating-type locus (MAT) determines compatibility between two idiomorphs, MAT1-1 and MAT1-2. In the model heterothallic species Neurospora crassa, strains are either MAT1-1 (A) or MAT1-2 (a), with no known additional alleles beyond these two, facilitating plasmogamy only between opposite types to initiate perithecia formation.^[29] Homothallism in some ascomycetes, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, arises through mating-type switching via the HO endonuclease, allowing a single haploid cell to generate both mating types and self-fertilize.^[2] Basidiomycetes often display more complex tetrapolar systems, involving two unlinked loci, A and B, each with multiple alleles that control nuclear migration and clamp cell fusion, respectively. In Schizophyllum commune, the A locus harbors up to 288 alleles encoding homeodomain (HD) transcription factors that regulate development, while the B locus has 81 alleles specifying pheromones and G-protein-coupled receptors for cell recognition, yielding approximately 23,328 unique mating types to promote extensive outcrossing.^[30] These multiallelic systems enhance genetic diversity, with pheromones triggering directional hyphal growth toward compatible mates.^[15] Zygomycetes, now classified within Mucoromycota, typically feature simpler bipolar systems with plus (+) and minus (−) mating types defined by SexP and SexM genes, respectively, which encode HMG-domain transcription factors at a variable locus. In Mucor species like M. mucedo, opposite types produce trisporic acid pheromones to induce zygospore formation, though homothallic strains carry both genes.^[6] Genomic analyses reveal diverse locus organizations, including inversions and expansions, across Mucorales, reflecting evolutionary flexibility in this basal fungal lineage. Mating types in fungi extend beyond reproduction to influence ecological interactions, such as pathogenicity and symbiosis. In the opportunistic pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans, an ascomycete-like basidiomycete with a bipolar MAT locus, the α mating type predominates in clinical isolates and correlates with higher virulence, including enhanced capsule production and dissemination in mammalian hosts.^[31] Similarly, in symbiotic ectomycorrhizal basidiomycetes, mating-type compatibility governs dikaryon formation essential for root colonization, where multiallelic A and B loci ensure selective partnering that optimizes nutrient exchange with plants.^[32]

In Algae and Protists

In algae and protists, mating types facilitate sexual reproduction in diverse unicellular and colonial forms, often through simpler genetic systems compared to multicellular eukaryotes. These systems typically involve two or more idiomorphs at mating-type loci that ensure outcrossing, with variations reflecting adaptations to aquatic environments. Green algae, particularly isogamous species like Chlamydomonas reinhardtii, exhibit a bipolar mating system with two mating types, designated mt⁺ and mt⁻, where gametes of opposite types fuse to form zygotes. The mt⁻ mating type is determined by the MID gene, located in the rearranged domain of the mating-type locus, which encodes a transcription factor containing a leucine zipper motif that suppresses the plus differentiation program and promotes minus-specific traits such as fusion organelle formation.^[33] This genetic control highlights a molecular switch for gametic compatibility in isogamy. In the volvocine lineage, which includes Chlamydomonas as a basal isogamous representative, the MID ortholog evolves to determine male fate in anisogamous and oogamous species like Pleodorina starrii and Volvox carteri, marking a transition where mt⁻-like genotypes produce small, flagellated sperm while mt⁺-like genotypes form larger eggs.^[34] This shift underscores how conserved mating-type regulators underpin the evolution from equal-sized gametes to differentiated sexes. Ciliates such as Paramecium species display more complex mating-type systems, often involving multiple types within reproductively isolated groups called syngens. In Paramecium bursaria syngen 1, four complementary mating types (I–IV) are controlled by alternative alleles at two unlinked loci, where specific genotype combinations dictate type assignment and ensure mating only between compatible pairs. Similarly, Paramecium caudatum has two primary mating types (I and II), but inter-syngenic crosses reveal three genetic loci regulating specificity, with syngen boundaries maintaining compatibility barriers to prevent unproductive unions across populations.^[35] These multi-locus systems can yield multiple mating types in some ciliates, such as four in Paramecium bursaria syngen 1 or up to eight in certain varieties of P. bursaria, while species in the P. aurelia complex like Paramecium primaurelia typically have two (odd O and even E variants), promote genetic diversity while restricting mating to ecologically similar syngens.^[36]^[37] Diatoms and oomycetes represent transitional mating strategies, blending heterothallism with diploid phases. In pennate diatoms like Pseudo-nitzschia species, a heterothallic system predominates, with + and − mating types required for gamete pairing and auxospore formation to restore cell size after vegetative divisions reduce it below a threshold (typically 23–70% of maximum).^[38] However, some strains exhibit pseudo-homothallic behavior, where auxosporulation occurs within clones via self-compatible gametes, as observed in Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima, facilitating occasional uniparental reproduction.^[39] Oomycetes, such as Plasmopara viticola, maintain a diploid-dominant life cycle with two mating types (A1 and A2, or P1 and P2), where opposite types fuse to produce oospores; the mating-type locus spans a large non-recombining region (~570 kb) with hormone receptor genes enforcing heterothallism at the diploid stage.^[40] Analogous to mating types, certain cyanobacteria employ conjugation systems for genetic exchange, though these lack true sexual dimorphism. In species like Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803, conjugative plasmids transfer DNA via type IV secretion systems, with donor (F⁺-like) and recipient roles mimicking compatibility restrictions, but without meiotic recombination or mating-type loci.^[41] This horizontal transfer promotes adaptation but differs fundamentally from eukaryotic mating types.

Evolutionary History

Origins and Ancestral States

Mating types are believed to have originated approximately 1-2 billion years ago in the last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA), during a period of unicellular eukaryotic evolution characterized by ancestral isogamy, where gametes of similar size fused to form zygotes.^[42] This system likely arose to resolve genomic conflicts during syngamy, such as preventing self-fusion or deleterious intracellular parasite transmission, by enforcing compatibility between complementary haploid cells. Phylogenetic reconstructions indicate that the LECA possessed a full sexual cycle, including meiosis and cell fusion regulated by mating-type-like mechanisms, as evidenced by conserved core genes for recombination and gamete recognition across all major eukaryotic supergroups. Debates persist on whether the LECA exhibited heterothallism (multiple mating types) or homothallism (self-compatibility), with genomic evidence suggesting an ancestral mating-type system promoting outcrossing.^[43] Prior to their role in sexual reproduction, mating-type systems evolved from ancient self-recognition mechanisms, possibly adapted from prokaryotic biofilm formation and quorum sensing, which facilitated partner discrimination in early protoeukaryotes.^[44] In the opisthokont clade, encompassing fungi and animals, conserved MAT-like genes provide strong evidence for this deep ancestry; for instance, RWP-RK transcription factors such as MID, involved in mating-type determination in volvocine algae, have orthologs in choanoflagellates, suggesting an opisthokont-specific innovation predating multicellularity. These genes likely transitioned from vegetative cell adhesion functions to regulating gamete fusion, highlighting a pre-sexual adaptive role in cellular interactions. Fossil evidence points to red algae (Rhodophyta) as bearing some of the oldest indicators of sexual reproduction, with their fossil record extending back 1.2 billion years (e.g., Bangiomorpha pubescens showing reproductive structures suggestive of sex).^[45] Molecular data from modern red algae reveal conserved sexual cycles involving isogamous fusion and meiotic gene homologs, supporting ancient origins.^[46] Similarly, choanoflagellates, the closest unicellular relatives of animals, exhibit anisogamous mating with ploidy shifts and recombination, as observed in Salpingoeca rosetta, where nutrient limitation triggers gamete differentiation and cell fusion—features that underscore mating types as a prerequisite for establishing stable sexual cycles in early eukaryotes.^[47] These findings imply that mating types were integral to the emergence of eukaryotic sex, enabling controlled syngamy in diverse environmental contexts. Several hypotheses explain the selective pressures driving the evolution of mating types. One prominent idea posits that they mitigated Muller's ratchet—the irreversible accumulation of deleterious mutations in asexual populations—by promoting recombination and purging harmful alleles through outcrossing. Additionally, in variable environments, mating types facilitated outbreeding, enhancing genetic diversity and adaptability by preventing inbreeding depression and promoting heterozygote advantage.^[48] These mechanisms likely provided a fitness edge in the oxygenating Proterozoic oceans, where oxidative stress may have intensified the need for robust DNA repair via sex.

Diversification and Transitions

In basidiomycete fungi, mating type systems have diversified through structural expansions and rearrangements of the mating-type (MAT) loci, often involving duplications that increase allelic multiplicity and complexity beyond the ancestral tetrapolar configuration. The ancestral tetrapolar system features two unlinked loci—pheromone/receptor (P/R) and homeodomain (HD)—each with multiple alleles, generating thousands of mating combinations; transitions to bipolar systems occur via linkage of these loci, reducing multiplicity but enhancing compatibility in certain lineages, as seen in smuts like Ustilago hordei where recombination suppression fuses a and b loci into a single MAT. Further diversification arises from gene duplications within loci, such as expansions of pheromone genes in the P/R locus, leading to larger, more variable structures in species like Cryptococcus neoformans (average 91.7 kb). Recent 2024 genomic analyses of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), such as Rhizophagus irregularis, reveal unexpected MAT locus diversity with 15 distinct types across isolates, correlating with genome-wide variability and suggesting evolutionary pressures toward complex, potentially non-sexual multiplicity despite apparent asexuality.^[49] Transitions to homothallism represent a key evolutionary shift in mating systems, enabling self-fertilization through mechanisms like mating-type switching or locus loss, often favored in stable environments for reproductive assurance and rapid propagation. In budding yeasts, homothallism has evolved independently at least 31 times from heterothallic ancestors, outnumbering reverse transitions, with the HO endonuclease gene playing a central role in the three-locus switching system of species like Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where it initiates double-strand breaks for allele conversion from silent cassettes (HML/HMR) to the expressed MAT locus. Loss of one mating type or silencing of switching genes can also drive homothallism, providing advantages like efficient DNA repair and spore formation in isolated habitats, as evidenced by phylogenetic analyses across 332 yeast species showing biased directional evolution toward selfing. In volvocine algae, MAT loci have transitioned into sex-determining regions, evolving from isogamous mating type specification to dimorphic sexes via genetic linkage and recombination suppression, mirroring early steps in sex chromosome evolution. The MID gene, a conserved RWP-RK transcription factor within the MT locus, directs male (sperm) differentiation in multicellular species like Volvox carteri and Pleodorina starrii, where its expression in plus mating types suppresses female development; in Pleodorina, this results in bisexual or male phenotypes depending on allelic context, with the locus expanding into large, rearranged regions (>1 Mb) that inhibit crossing over, forming strata akin to Y chromosomes. These dynamics highlight how MAT evolution fosters sexual dimorphism, with suppressed recombination preserving sexually antagonistic alleles. Recent research illuminates ongoing MAT diversification, including 2025 studies on basidiomycetes revealing dynamic rearrangements like translocations and inversions that drive transitions between tetrapolar, bipolar, and pseudobipolar systems in Cryptococcus and Kwoniella species, with three novel linkage events identified across 49 strains, linking expansions (e.g., inversions at STE12 breakpoints) to ecological adaptation and pathogenicity.^[50] Complementing this, 2024 synthetic biology efforts have reprogrammed yeast mating-type switching for tunable differentiation, engineering logic gates (YES/AND) to control HO expression in sterile S. cerevisiae strains, achieving 1.2–67.1% conversion to alternative types for applications like consortia formation in xylan degradation, demonstrating the plasticity of these systems for biotechnological innovation.^[51]

References

[1]
Gamete signalling underlies the evolution of mating types and their ...
Novel mating types have an advantage as they are compatible with all others and rarely meet their own type. But if existing mating types coevolve to have strong ...
[2]
https://www.cell.com/current-biology/fulltext/S0960-9822(03)00730-9
[3]
8.6 Biology of mating type factors - David Moore's World of Fungi
Mating type factors are transcription regulators that promote outbreeding by preventing breeding between closely related progeny. They are not universal, and ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
WHAT USES ARE MATING TYPES? THE “DEVELOPMENTAL ...
Dec 29, 2011 · “Mating types” refer to incompatibilities between otherwise phenotypically similar partners (isogamy), whereas “sexes” imply some anisogamy, ...Missing: microorganisms | Show results with:microorganisms
[5]
Evolution of uni- and bifactorial sexual compatibility systems in fungi
Jul 10, 2013 · Each mating type carries only receptor and pheromone genes specific for that mating type. In general, syngamy can occur only between individuals ...
[6]
Sex in the Mucoralean Fungi - PMC - NIH
Mucorales fungi were first studied as a model for fungal sexual reproduction more than a century ago. ... Both terms were then adapted to describe cross-fertility ...
[7]
An Evolutionary Perspective on Yeast Mating-Type Switching - PMC
May 3, 2017 · The two types of haploid are often called mating types because they describe mating behavior: mating occurs only between a cells and α cells.
[8]
THE MATING SYSTEMS OF FUNGI I - New Phytologist Foundation
There is much evidence for complementary interactions of this type in Mucor mucedo (Blakeslee, 1904; BurgefF, 1924; Verkaik, 1930; Kohler, 193^a; Burnett, i9^3 ...
[9]
Evolution of Sexes from an Ancestral Mating-Type Specification ...
Jul 8, 2014 · Unicellular species may have mating types where gametes are morphologically identical but can only mate with those expressing a different mating ...
[10]
Evolutionary trajectories explain the diversified evolution of isogamy ...
Aug 6, 2012 · Almost all extant plant and animal species that reproduce sexually form anisogametes of two different sizes and mating types (1). It is ...
[11]
Identification and structure of the mating-type locus and ...
Idiomorphs may contain genes in addition to MAT1-1-1 or MAT1-2-1; for example, some species of ascomycetes have MAT1-1 idiomorphs with MAT1-1-3, which is also ...
[12]
Functional Characterization of MAT1-1-Specific Mating-Type Genes ...
Their mating-type loci are similar in structure (Fig. 1). The MAT1-2 (mat a) locus of N. crassa comprises two genes, MAT1-2-1 (mat a-1) and MAT1-2-2 (mat a ...
[13]
Structure and evolution of the Fusarium mating type locus - PubMed
In this study, molecular evolution of MAT loci was considered using the genus Fusarium (Teleomorph: Gibberella) as a model. Both MAT1-1 and MAT1-2 "idiomorphs" ...
[14]
Evolution of Mating Systems in Basidiomycetes and the Genetic ...
In most fungi, sexual reproduction is bipolar; that is, two alternate sets of genes at a single mating-type (MAT) locus determine two mating types.
[15]
Tetrapolar fungal mating types: Sexes by the thousands
Basidiomycetous fungi have thousands of mating types determined by two loci: one with transcription factors and one with a pheromone receptor system.
[16]
Basidiomycete Mating Type Genes and Pheromone Signaling - PMC
In agaricomycetes, two mating type loci, A, coding for homeodomain type transcription factors, and B, encoding a pheromone/receptor system, regulate the four ...
[17]
Recombination suppression and evolutionary strata around mating ...
Oct 28, 2020 · In ascomycete fungi, the mating-type locus* encodes transcription factors that control the mating-type-specific pheromone and pheromone-receptor ...
[18]
Recombination suppression and evolutionary strata around mating ...
Here we review the evidence for recombination suppression around mating-type loci in fungi, sometimes encompassing vast regions of the mating-type chromosomes.Missing: proto- | Show results with:proto-
[19]
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113229/
[20]
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(88)90429-1
[21]
https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.111.134577
[22]
https://doi.org/10.1093/genetics/147.1.19
[23]
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(84)90432-7
[24]
https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.7.10.3713
[25]
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(95)90372-0
[26]
https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90418-4
[27]
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.genet.32.1.561
[28]
DNAs of the two mating-type alleles of Neurospora crassa ... - PubMed
Neurospora crassa and all heterothallic and pseudohomothallic Neurospora species contain a single copy of one mating-type sequence or the other within each ...
[29]
The genetic structure and diversity of the A and B mating-type genes ...
For example, the number of estimated A alleles in S. commune is 288 versus the 81 estimated B alleles (Raper et al., 1958; Stamberg and Koltin, 1973), and the ...<|separator|>
[30]
Impact of Mating Type, Serotype, and Ploidy on the Virulence of ...
Cryptococcus neoformans, the most common cause of fungal infection of the central nervous system, has a bipolar mating system with a and α mating types and ...
[31]
Gene organization of the mating type regions in the ectomycorrhizal ...
Sep 25, 2008 · It is shown that the genes of the two mating type loci, A and B, are conserved across the Agaricales, but they are contained in regions of the ...
[32]
Mating Type in Chlamydomonas Is Specified by Mid, the minus ...
The mid sequence carries a putative leucine zipper motif, suggesting that it functions as a transcription factor to switch on the minus program and switch off ...
[33]
Identification of the Minus-Dominance Gene Ortholog in the Mating ...
The volvocine or colonial volvocalean algae are a model lineage for studying the evolution of sexual reproduction for two reasons: first, they have both ...Missing: transition | Show results with:transition
[34]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2206078/
[35]
Paramecium Genetics, Genomics, and Evolution - PMC
These mating types were eventually named odd (O) and even (E) for each species. Early genetic studies revealed that three (unlinked) genes (mtA, mtB, and mtC) ...2. Genetics · 3. Evolutionary Genomics · Literature Cited
[36]
Sexual reproduction and genetic polymorphism within the ... - Nature
Jun 30, 2020 · Pseudo-nitzschia species are generally heterothallic, meaning they require another mating type (e.g. PNp+ or PNp−) for sexual reproduction. Many ...
[37]
HOMOTHALLIC AUXOSPORULATION IN PSEUDO-NITZSCHIA ...
In Pseudo-nitzschia, reproductive stages have been identified in some species, and it is generally accepted that the genus is mainly heterothallic. Here we ...
[38]
Identification of the First Oomycete Mating-type Locus Sequence in ...
Mating type systems enforcing outcrossing at the diploid stage, involving only two mating types, have been described in oomycetes on the basis of cross ...
[39]
Evolution of Conjugation and Type IV Secretion Systems - PMC - NIH
Our data suggest that ssDNA conjugation arose first in diderm bacteria, possibly Proteobacteria, and then spread to other bacterial phyla.
[40]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7116238/
[41]
Origins of Eukaryotic Sexual Reproduction - PMC - PubMed Central
THE ORIGINS OF MATING TYPE The original self-recognition molecules in protoeukaryotic gametes might have engaged in homotypic interactions, like present-day ...
[42]
Evidence of ancient genome reduction in red algae (Rhodophyta)
Red algae (Rhodophyta) comprise a monophyletic eukaryotic lineage of ~6500 species with a fossil record that extends back 1.2 billion years.
[43]
https://europepmc.org/article/pmc/pmc7033744