Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mean squared displacement

The mean squared displacement (MSD) is a fundamental statistical quantity in physics and biophysics that measures the average of the squared distances traveled by particles, such as molecules, atoms, or colloids, from their starting positions over a specified time lag. Formally defined as \langle [\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)]^2 \rangle, where \mathbf{r}(t) is the position at time t, the angular brackets denote an ensemble average, MSD quantifies the extent of particle spreading due to random thermal fluctuations or external forces. In diffusive regimes like Brownian motion, MSD exhibits linear growth with time, \langle \Delta r^2 \rangle = 2d D t (where d is the dimensionality and D is the diffusion coefficient), a relationship first derived by Albert Einstein in 1905 to explain the irregular motion of suspended particles.^[1] This linearity distinguishes pure diffusion from other transport modes, such as subdiffusive (MSD \propto t^\alpha with \alpha < 1) or superdiffusive (\alpha > 1) behaviors observed in complex environments. In physics, MSD is central to analyzing random walks, polymer chain dynamics, and molecular simulations, enabling the extraction of transport coefficients from trajectory data.^[2] For instance, in molecular dynamics simulations, it helps characterize self-diffusion in liquids and solids by relating long-time plateaus to lattice vibrations.^[3] In biology and biophysics, MSD analysis is widely applied to single-particle tracking experiments, revealing anomalous diffusion in cellular environments, such as cytoskeletal constraints or crowding effects on intracellular proteins and organelles. Techniques like image-based MSD (iMSD) map spatiotemporal heterogeneity in living cells, aiding studies of molecular mobility in membranes or cytoplasm. Recent advancements emphasize robust interpretations of MSD curves to distinguish measurement artifacts from true anomalous transport in biophysical systems.^[4]^[5]^[6]

Definition and Properties

General Definition

The mean squared displacement (MSD), denoted as \langle [\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)]^2 \rangle, is defined as the ensemble average of the squared displacement of a particle from its initial position \mathbf{r}(0) after time t, where \mathbf{r}(t) represents the position at time t.^[4] This statistical measure quantifies the typical extent of particle spreading in stochastic processes, providing insight into the spatial exploration driven by random forces. Introduced by Albert Einstein in his 1905 paper on Brownian motion, the MSD served as a key tool to model the erratic movements of microscopic particles suspended in fluids, linking observable fluctuations to underlying molecular collisions.^[7] Einstein's formulation demonstrated how such displacements arise from the thermal agitation of surrounding molecules, laying foundational groundwork for understanding diffusion without relying on direct atomic visualization.^[8] Fundamental properties of the MSD include its non-negativity, as it averages squared distances that are inherently positive.^[4] In normal diffusion regimes, the MSD scales linearly with time, reflecting a constant rate of spreading characteristic of uncorrelated random walks.^[7] As a second-moment statistic, it specifically captures the variance of the displacement distribution, remaining insensitive to transient velocity correlations that might influence higher-order or velocity-based metrics in overdamped systems.^[9]

Relation to Diffusion Coefficient

In normal diffusion, the mean squared displacement (MSD) of a particle is linearly proportional to time, given by the relation \langle [\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)]^2 \rangle = 2 d D t, where d is the dimensionality of the space, D is the diffusion coefficient, and t is the elapsed time.^[7] This proportionality arises from the random walk nature of Brownian motion and provides a direct measure of diffusive transport.^[7] The diffusion coefficient D can be extracted from the MSD through the limiting expression D = \lim_{t \to \infty} \frac{\langle [\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)]^2 \rangle}{2 d t}, which captures the asymptotic linear regime of the MSD curve.^[10] In practice, this involves fitting a linear model to the long-time portion of the MSD versus time plot obtained from particle trajectories, enabling quantitative assessment of mobility in systems like colloids or biomolecules.^[10] The MSD-based approach primarily yields the self-diffusion coefficient, which describes the motion of an individual particle independent of others, as traced from its own displacement history.^[11] In contrast, the collective diffusion coefficient characterizes the cooperative transport of multiple particles, often derived from concentration fluctuation dynamics rather than single-particle MSD, and differs from self-diffusion when interparticle correlations are significant.^[12]

Derivations in Brownian Motion

One-Dimensional Derivation

The one-dimensional mean squared displacement (MSD) for a Brownian particle can be derived from the overdamped Langevin equation, which describes the motion in the inertialess limit where viscous drag dominates over mass inertia, assuming no external forces and Markovian noise characterized by Gaussian white noise. In this framework, the position r(t) satisfies the stochastic differential equation

\frac{dr}{dt} = \sqrt{2D} \, \xi(t),

where D is the diffusion coefficient related to temperature, viscosity, and particle size via the Einstein relation D = k_B T / \gamma (with \gamma the friction coefficient), and \xi(t) is zero-mean Gaussian white noise obeying \langle \xi(t) \rangle = 0 and \langle \xi(t) \xi(t') \rangle = \delta(t - t').^[13] Integrating from initial time 0 to t, with initial position r(0), yields

r(t) = r(0) + \sqrt{2D} \int_0^t \xi(s) \, ds.

The displacement is thus \Delta r(t) = r(t) - r(0) = \sqrt{2D} \int_0^t \xi(s) \, ds. The MSD is the ensemble average \langle [\Delta r(t)]^2 \rangle. Squaring the displacement gives

[\Delta r(t)]^2 = 2D \left( \int_0^t \xi(s) \, ds \right)^2 = 2D \int_0^t \int_0^t \xi(s) \xi(u) \, ds \, du.

Taking the ensemble average and using the noise correlation,

\langle [\Delta r(t)]^2 \rangle = 2D \int_0^t \int_0^t \langle \xi(s) \xi(u) \rangle \, ds \, du = 2D \int_0^t \int_0^t \delta(s - u) \, ds \, du = 2D \int_0^t 1 \, ds = 2Dt,

valid in the long-time diffusive regime where the overdamped approximation holds.

Multi-Dimensional Extension

In the multi-dimensional extension of Brownian motion, the displacement is described by a vector \mathbf{r}(t) in n-dimensional space, where the components are independent and identically distributed under isotropic conditions. Building on the one-dimensional result, the mean squared displacement (MSD) is given by \langle |\mathbf{r}(t) - \mathbf{r}(0)|^2 \rangle = 2nDt, where D is the diffusion coefficient and n is the dimensionality. This formula arises from the summation of variances along orthogonal coordinate axes. For each dimension i = 1 to n, the displacement \Delta x_i satisfies \langle \Delta x_i^2 \rangle = 2Dt, assuming Gaussian statistics and independence between components. The total MSD then follows as

\langle |\Delta \mathbf{r}|^2 \rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n \langle \Delta x_i^2 \rangle = 2nDt,

which reflects the additive nature of uncorrelated motions in Euclidean space. In cases of anisotropic diffusion, where the diffusion coefficients differ across dimensions (e.g., due to spatial heterogeneity or molecular asymmetry), the isotropic assumption breaks down. Here, the MSD generalizes to \langle |\Delta \mathbf{r}|^2 \rangle = 2 \sum_{i=1}^n D_i t, with each D_i specific to the i-th axis; the effective diffusion can then be characterized by the distribution of these D_i values. This vectorial formulation remains coordinate-independent, relying solely on the Euclidean norm |\Delta \mathbf{r}| of the displacement vector, ensuring applicability across rotated or transformed reference frames without altering the underlying statistics.

Time-Dependent Formulations

MSD for Time Lags

The mean squared displacement (MSD) for a time lag \tau quantifies the average squared distance traveled by a particle over an interval \tau, averaged over multiple starting times t. It is formally defined as

\text{MSD}(\tau) = \left\langle |\mathbf{r}(t + \tau) - \mathbf{r}(t)|^2 \right\rangle_t,

where \mathbf{r}(t) denotes the position vector of the particle at time t, and the angle brackets \langle \cdot \rangle_t represent the time average over all possible starting times t within the observation period.^[14] This formulation allows for the analysis of particle trajectories that may exhibit non-stationary behavior or require evaluation at arbitrary lags, extending beyond fixed-time measurements. In stationary processes, such as standard Brownian motion, the MSD for time lag \tau simplifies to a linear dependence on \tau, given by \text{MSD}(\tau) = 2d D \tau, where d is the dimensionality of the space and D is the diffusion coefficient.^[14] This equivalence to the standard MSD arises because the statistical properties of displacements depend solely on the lag \tau and not on the absolute time t, ensuring consistent averaging across the trajectory.^[7] For finite-length trajectories, which are common in experimental single-particle tracking, the MSD(\tau) is computed using overlapping time windows to maximize the number of displacement samples available for each lag. Specifically, for a discrete trajectory with positions recorded at times t_i = i \Delta t (where \Delta t is the sampling interval), the MSD at lag n \Delta t = \tau is estimated as

\text{MSD}(n \Delta t) = \frac{1}{N - n} \sum_{i=1}^{N - n} |\mathbf{r}(t_{i+n}) - \mathbf{r}(t_i)|^2,

where N is the total number of time points; this overlapping approach reduces bias from edge effects and improves statistical reliability, though it introduces correlations between successive estimates that must be accounted for in error analysis. In ergodic systems, such as those exhibiting normal diffusion, the time-averaged MSD(\tau) converges to the ensemble-averaged MSD over sufficiently long observation times, meaning that properties inferred from a single trajectory match those from averaging over many independent particles.^[15] This equivalence underpins the reliability of MSD analysis for characterizing ergodic dynamics in practical settings.^[14]

Asymptotic Behaviors

In the underdamped regime of Brownian motion, the mean squared displacement (MSD) exhibits distinct asymptotic behaviors at short and long time scales, reflecting transitions between ballistic and diffusive dynamics. At short times, where the lag time \tau \to 0, the MSD approximates ballistic motion dominated by the particle's initial thermal velocity, given by \langle \Delta r^2(\tau) \rangle \approx d v^2 \tau^2, with v^2 = k_B T / m (where v^2 is the mean squared velocity per dimension) arising from the equipartition theorem, where k_B is Boltzmann's constant, T is temperature, and m is the particle mass.^[16] This quadratic dependence underscores the inertial persistence of velocity before frictional damping takes effect.^[16] At long times, \tau \to \infty, friction and random forces equilibrate, leading to a diffusive regime where the MSD grows linearly as \langle \Delta r^2(\tau) \rangle \approx 2 d D \tau, with d denoting the spatial dimension and D = k_B T / \gamma the diffusion coefficient, \gamma being the friction coefficient.^[16] This linear scaling aligns with the overdamped limit and Fickian diffusion predictions from the Einstein relation.^[16] The transition between these regimes occurs around the crossover time scale \tau_c \approx m / \gamma, known as the inertial relaxation time, which marks the point where viscous drag overcomes inertia.^[16] Below \tau_c, ballistic effects prevail, while above it, diffusive behavior dominates. These canonical asymptotics serve as a reference for detecting anomalous diffusion, where deviations—such as sublinear (\tau^\alpha with \alpha < 1) or superlinear (\alpha > 1) growth—signal non-Fickian processes like those in crowded media or active systems.^[17]

Experimental Measurement

Measurement Techniques

The primary method for obtaining the positional data required to compute mean squared displacement (MSD) involves single-particle tracking (SPT) techniques using optical microscopy. In these approaches, the trajectory \mathbf{r}(t) of individual particles is recorded over time, often via video microscopy where particles are visualized and their centroids located frame by frame. Fluorescence microscopy, such as total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) or confocal setups, is frequently employed for labeling and tracking biomolecules or colloidal particles in biological or soft matter systems, enabling sub-diffraction resolution through algorithms like Gaussian fitting for centroid estimation.^[18]^[4] An alternative approach is image-based mean squared displacement (iMSD), which computes MSD maps directly from temporal image stacks without tracking individual particles. This method is particularly advantageous for dense samples or heterogeneous environments, such as living cells, where SPT may fail due to particle overlap or high density, providing spatiotemporal heterogeneity in diffusion properties.^[19] Once trajectories are acquired, the MSD as a function of time lag \tau is numerically computed from the discrete position data sampled at intervals \Delta t. For a trajectory of N points, the estimator is given by

\text{MSD}(\tau) = \frac{1}{N - \tau / \Delta t} \sum_{i=1}^{N - \tau / \Delta t} \left| \mathbf{r}(i \Delta t + \tau) - \mathbf{r}(i \Delta t) \right|^2,

where the sum averages the squared displacements over all possible starting positions separated by \tau, providing an ensemble average approximation from a single trajectory. This time-lag formulation, which relates to the general time-dependent MSD, is implemented in software tools like TrackPy or custom scripts for efficient processing of large datasets.^[4]^[20] To assess the reliability of the computed MSD, error estimation techniques are essential due to finite trajectory lengths and noise. Bootstrap resampling, where multiple MSD curves are generated by randomly sampling with replacement from the displacement pairs, yields confidence intervals by computing the standard deviation across resamples (typically 500–1000 iterations). Alternatively, when multiple independent trajectories are available, the variance of the MSD across these trajectories provides a direct measure of uncertainty, often visualized as error bars on MSD plots.^[21]^[22] Experimental artifacts can bias MSD calculations, necessitating corrections for localization precision and sample drift. Localization error, arising from photon noise or fitting inaccuracies in microscopy, introduces an additive offset to the MSD that scales with the square of the precision \sigma, typically subtracted as $4\sigma^2 in 2D for short lags using models derived for Brownian motion. Drift, caused by mechanical instabilities or thermal fluctuations in the imaging setup, manifests as a superimposed linear trend in long-time MSD; it is corrected by fiducial markers or polynomial fitting to align trajectories across frames, ensuring accurate short-time diffusion measurements.^[20]^[23] Recent developments as of 2025 include trajectory-free methods, such as the Countoscope approach, which estimates collective dynamics by counting particles in regions of interest without resolving individual tracks, and machine learning techniques for enhanced trajectory analysis, improving robustness in noisy or anomalous diffusion scenarios.^[24]^[25]

Data Interpretation Challenges

Interpreting mean squared displacement (MSD) data from experimental measurements often encounters challenges due to noise, which can significantly distort results, particularly at short timescales. High-frequency noise, arising from localization errors in imaging techniques, tends to inflate the short-time MSD, leading to overestimation of the apparent diffusion coefficient if not addressed.^[26] To mitigate this, researchers apply filtering methods that estimate the mean squared displacement attributable to noise itself, subtracting it from the total MSD to recover the true particle motion.^[26] This correction is essential in single-particle tracking experiments, where localization precision limits the reliability of early-time data, and failure to account for it can bias interpretations of diffusive behavior.^[4] Another key challenge stems from non-ergodicity in heterogeneous systems, where the ensemble-averaged MSD—computed over many trajectories—differs systematically from the time-averaged MSD obtained from individual trajectories. In such environments, like crowded cellular membranes, particles experience varying local conditions, resulting in weak ergodicity breaking and amplitude fluctuations in time-averaged MSDs that do not converge to ensemble averages even over long observation times.^[27] This discrepancy complicates the inference of population-level diffusion properties from single-trajectory data, as time averages may underestimate heterogeneity while ensemble averages mask individual variations.^[27] Addressing non-ergodicity requires analyzing both averaging approaches separately and quantifying scatter in time-averaged MSD amplitudes to detect underlying system heterogeneity.^[28] Fitting procedures for extracting the diffusion coefficient from MSD curves also pose interpretive difficulties, as standard linear regression applied to long-time data assumes normal diffusion but can mislead when curvature appears due to unaccounted anomalies or finite trajectory lengths. For Brownian motion, the long-time regime follows MSD ≈ 2dDτ (where d is dimensionality, D is the diffusion coefficient, and τ is lag time), allowing linear fits to yield D accurately, yet short trajectories or confounding factors like drift introduce biases that inflate uncertainty.^[4] Caution is advised when observing curvature, which may signal transitions to anomalous regimes rather than fitting artifacts, prompting the use of weighted least-squares or segmented fits to isolate reliable linear portions.^[29] Over-reliance on simple linear regression without assessing fit quality can thus propagate errors into downstream analyses of transport properties. Validation of MSD interpretations demands rigorous checks against control experiments or simulations to ensure consistency and rule out artifacts. Comparing experimental MSDs with those from simulated Brownian particles under matched conditions verifies the absence of systematic biases, such as uncompensated drift or inadequate sampling.^[30] Additionally, maintaining unit consistency—e.g., ensuring displacements are in nm² rather than μm² to avoid scaling errors—is critical for quantitative reliability, as mismatches can alter perceived diffusion scales by orders of magnitude.^[31] These validation steps, including replicate controls and simulation benchmarking, provide confidence in MSD-derived metrics and highlight potential misinterpretations from experimental imperfections.^[32]

Advanced Applications

Anomalous Diffusion

Anomalous diffusion refers to transport processes where the mean squared displacement (MSD) does not scale linearly with time lag τ, unlike in normal Brownian motion. Instead, it follows a power-law relation \langle r^2(\tau) \rangle \propto \tau^\alpha with anomalous exponent \alpha \neq 1.^[33] Subdiffusion, characterized by $0 < \alpha < 1, manifests in hindered environments like crowded media where particles experience prolonged trapping or obstacles that slow long-time spreading.^[28] In contrast, superdiffusion occurs for \alpha > 1, typically involving mechanisms that enable faster-than-diffusive exploration, such as Lévy walks with heavy-tailed step lengths or durations that promote extended ballistic segments.^[34] To quantify anomalous diffusion, the generalized diffusion coefficient D_\alpha is introduced, defined as

D_\alpha = \lim_{\tau \to \infty} \frac{\langle r^2(\tau) \rangle}{2 d \tau^\alpha},

where d is the spatial dimension; this reduces to the standard diffusion coefficient D when \alpha = 1.^[35] This coefficient captures the effective transport rate in the anomalous regime, allowing comparison across different systems while accounting for the nonlinear time scaling.^[36] Subdiffusion often arises from the continuous time random walk (CTRW) framework, where particles undergo uncorrelated steps but experience power-law distributed waiting times, leading to temporal heterogeneity and \alpha < 1.^[37] Another key mechanism involves correlated motion, modeled by fractional Brownian motion (fBM), a Gaussian process with long-range correlations in step displacements; anti-persistent correlations (Hurst exponent H < 1/2) yield subdiffusion, while persistent ones (H > 1/2) produce superdiffusion.^[38] These models highlight how memory effects or trapping disrupt the independence assumed in normal diffusion. A prominent example of subdiffusion is the motion of proteins or macromolecules in the cytoplasm of living cells, where high concentrations of obstacles like organelles and polymers create a crowded milieu that impedes free diffusion, resulting in \alpha \approx 0.5–$0.8$ over micron scales.^[39] Such behavior underscores the role of environmental complexity in biological transport, deviating from the linear asymptotic growth seen in dilute normal diffusion.^[40]

Uses in Soft Matter Physics

In soft matter physics, the mean squared displacement (MSD) serves as a key metric for characterizing the dynamics of complex fluids and structured materials, particularly in systems where traditional continuum descriptions fail. One prominent application is in polymer dynamics, where MSD quantifies the conformational relaxation of chain segments. In the Rouse model, which describes the dynamics of unentangled polymer chains in dilute solutions without hydrodynamic interactions, the MSD of a chain segment exhibits subdiffusive behavior proportional to t^{1/2} at short times, reflecting the Rouse relaxation modes, before transitioning to normal diffusive behavior (\propto t) at longer times dominated by center-of-mass motion. In colloidal suspensions, MSD provides insights into the glass transition, revealing microscopic mechanisms such as particle caging and activated hopping. Near the glass transition, particles become transiently trapped in cages formed by neighboring particles, leading to a characteristic plateau in the MSD at intermediate times, where the displacement saturates at the squared cage size before eventual escape via hopping enables long-time diffusion. This behavior has been directly observed in three-dimensional colloidal systems, confirming the role of caging in dynamical arrest. Microrheology leverages MSD to probe the viscoelastic properties of soft materials at microscopic scales, often surpassing the resolution of bulk rheology. By tracking the thermal motion of embedded probe particles, the MSD is transformed into frequency-dependent viscoelastic moduli using the generalized Stokes-Einstein relation (GSER), which relates the viscoelastic modulus to the MSD in Laplace space: \tilde{G}(s) = \frac{k_B T}{\pi a s \tilde{\langle r^2(s) \rangle}}, where G'(\omega) and G''(\omega) are extracted via Fourier transform to infer storage and loss moduli.^[41] This approach, pioneered in passive microrheology, enables non-invasive characterization of weakly elastic materials like gels and cytoskeletal networks. In biological soft matter, MSD analysis of liposomes and vesicles has been instrumental in assessing membrane fluidity since advancements in single-particle tracking in the 1990s. By monitoring the trajectories of fluorescently labeled lipids or proteins in giant unilamellar vesicles, the MSD yields diffusion coefficients that quantify lateral mobility, with anomalous subdiffusion indicating reduced fluidity due to cholesterol content or phase separation, as opposed to free diffusion in fluid phases.

References

[1]
[PDF] Brownian Motion
The fact that the mean displacement is zero, and the mean square displacement grows linearly in ... Einstein showed how to relate the diffusion constant ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
4.7.2.2. Mean Squared Displacement — MDAnalysis.analysis.msd
MSDs can be used to characterize the speed at which particles move and has its roots in the study of Brownian motion.
[3]
Mean Square Displacement Analysis of Single-Particle Trajectories ...
Incomplete trajectories. The mean square displacement definition used in this work (Eq. (7)) assumes that the location of the probe is known at all time ...
[4]
On the interpretation of mean-square displacement in ... - IOP Science
Sep 13, 2024 · In biological systems, an MSD analysis may be performed using a statistical analysis of particle trajectories recorded with single-particle ...Abstract · Introduction · Distinct interpretations of SDE... · Hänggi-Klimontovich-to...
[5]
Quantitative image mean squared displacement (iMSD) analysis of ...
May 1, 2018 · Image mean square displacement analysis (iMSD) is a method allowing the mapping of diffusion dynamics of molecules in living cells.
[6]
[PDF] the brownian movement - DAMTP
Albert Einstein. Manufactured ... observation that the so-called Brownian motion is caused by the irregular thermal movements the molecules of the liquid.Missing: citation | Show results with:citation
[7]
Einstein, A. (1905) On the Movement of Small Particles Suspended ...
Einstein, A. (1905) On the Movement of Small Particles Suspended in Stationary Liquids Required by the Molecular-Kinetic Theory of Heat.
[8]
[PDF] arXiv:1211.1458v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 7 Nov 2012
Nov 7, 2012 · The reason is that both MSD and VACF are insensitive to white noise of the detection system since they are averages over large data sets. On the ...
[9]
Accurate Estimation of Diffusion Coefficients and their Uncertainties ...
Self-diffusion coefficients, D*, are routinely estimated from molecular dynamics simulations by fitting a linear model to the observed mean squared ...
[10]
Collective diffusion coefficient in limited channel: two methods for ...
Aug 12, 2022 · Self-diffusion refers to the diffusion caused by the Brownian motion of a molecule, the self-diffusion coefficient is usually obtained by ...
[11]
Diffusion of lithium ions in Lithium-argyrodite solid-state electrolytes
Oct 27, 2020 · The self and collective diffusion coefficients will be the same if the diffusing atoms or molecules move independently of each other, but they ...
[12]
[PDF] Paul Langevin's 1908 paper ''On the Theory of Brownian Motion ...
We present a translation of Paul Langevin's landmark paper. In it ... 2Paul Langevin, ''Sur la théorie du mouvement brownien,'' C. R. Acad. Sci ...
[13]
https://www.physik.uni-augsburg.de/theo1/hanggi/History/Langevin1908.pdf
[14]
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25168660
[15]
[PDF] arXiv:1609.07250v1 [cond-mat.stat-mech] 23 Sep 2016
Sep 23, 2016 · The mean squared displacement (MSD) of a Brownian particle at sufficiently long times ... The underdamped Langevin equation (21) is thus ...
[16]
Novel anomalous diffusion phenomena of underdamped Langevin ...
We characterize particle's trajectory via an underdamped Langevin system driven by a Gaussian white noise with a time dependent diffusivity of velocity.
[17]
Review Single-particle Tracking as a Quantitative Microscopy-based ...
In this review, we give an introduction into single-particle tracking (SPT) and determination of the mean-squared displacement. We also give an overview of ...
[18]
Mean square displacement analysis of single-particle trajectories ...
Oct 20, 2010 · We examine the capability of mean square displacement (MSD) analysis to extract reliable values of the diffusion coefficient D of a single particle undergoing ...
[19]
A Jump-Distance-Based Parameter Inference Scheme for ... - NIH
... mean-squared displacement (MSD) analysis. Although simple, MSD analysis ... With regards to setting error estimates, a nonparametric bootstrap may be ...
[20]
A general expression for the statistical error in a diffusion coefficient ...
Feb 22, 2023 · ... mean squared displacement of diffusing particles . We focus on ... bootstrap resampling, there are two compelling advantages in ...
[21]
A mean shift algorithm for drift correction in localization microscopy
Sep 8, 2021 · This work presents a mathematically simple mean shift (MS) algorithm that allows for accurate drift correction with high time resolution from acquired ...Abstract · Introduction · Results
[22]
Static and Dynamic Errors in Particle Tracking Microrheology
We precisely quantified the effect of localization errors in the determination of the mean-squared displacement by separating the sources of these errors into ...
[23]
Ergodic and nonergodic processes coexist in the plasma membrane ...
The ensemble-averaged MSD follows a power law tα, but the time-averaged MSD is linear, resembling Fickian diffusion (7–9). However, the time-ensemble-averaged ...
[24]
Quantifying non-ergodicity of anomalous diffusion with higher order ...
Jun 20, 2017 · We presented an analysis of the amplitude scatter distribution of the time averaged MSD of various, widely used anomalous diffusion processes: ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Identifying short- and long-time modes of the mean-square ...
May 16, 2019 · Under-damped Brownian motion. In this subsection, we test three different models to fit the MSD function generated by solving the under-damped ...Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[26]
An experimentally representative in-silico protocol for dynamical ...
Apr 12, 2024 · The MD protocols were validated by comparing mean squared displacement parameters extracted from simulated (MSD(T)) and experimental (<u2(T)>) ...
[27]
Porous Media Microstructure Determines the Diffusion of Active Matter
The mean squared displacement (MSD) of 4 μm active Janus colloids in experiments (black symbols) agrees with that in our BD simulation of the equivalent ...
[28]
Trajectory Analysis in Single-Particle Tracking: From Mean Squared ...
Guidelines for the Fitting of Anomalous Diffusion Mean Square Displacement Graphs from Single Particle Tracking Experiments. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0117722. doi ...
[29]
Towards a robust criterion of anomalous diffusion - Nature
Nov 28, 2022 · The anomalous diffusion exponent α is commonly used to tell whether normal (Brownian, α = 1) or anomalous diffusion (α ≠ 1) is observed. Here, ...
[30]
Anomalous Diffusion and Lévy Walks Distinguish Active from Inertial ...
We show that such dense active suspensions manifest superdiffusion, via Lévy walks, which masquerades as a crossover from ballistic to diffusive scaling.Abstract · Article Text · ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
[31]
A fractional diffusion random laser | Scientific Reports - Nature
Jun 18, 2019 · is the expression of the generalized diffusion coefficient, which reduces to the standard value D when α = 1. However, when α < 1 Eq. (7) ...
[32]
Guidelines for the Fitting of Anomalous Diffusion Mean Square ...
Guidelines for the Fitting of Anomalous Diffusion Mean Square Displacement Graphs from Single Particle Tracking Experiments ... mean-squared displacement. Journal ...<|separator|>
[33]
The random walk's guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional ...
This report demonstrates that fractional equations have come of age as a complementary tool in the description of anomalous transport processes.Missing: subdiffusion | Show results with:subdiffusion
[34]
Anomalous Diffusion: Fractional Brownian Motion vs. Fractional Ito ...
Nov 8, 2021 · Abstract:Generalizing Brownian motion (BM), fractional Brownian motion (FBM) is a paradigmatic selfsimilar model for anomalous diffusion.
[35]
Anomalous Subdiffusion Is a Measure for Cytoplasmic Crowding in ...
Regardless of its microscopic origin, anomalous subdiffusion has been shown to strongly influence the formation of spatiotemporal patterns (Weiss, 2003) as well ...
[36]
Elucidating the Origin of Anomalous Diffusion in Crowded Fluids
Jul 15, 2009 · In all of these cases, a nonlinear growth of the mean square displacement (MSD) ⟨ r ( t ) 2 ⟩ ∼ t α with α < 1 has been observed. Despite the ...Missing: D_alpha tau^<|control11|><|separator|>