Micrococcaceae
The Micrococcaceae are a family of Gram-positive bacteria belonging to the phylum Actinomycetota, class Actinomycetia, order Micrococcales, characterized by high guanine-cytosine (G+C) content in their DNA, typically ranging from 65% to 75%.[1] These bacteria are predominantly cocci-shaped, measuring 0.5–2.0 μm in diameter, non-spore-forming, and usually non-motile, arranging in pairs, tetrads, or irregular clusters due to division in multiple planes.[2] They are aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, catalase-positive, and oxidase-variable, with many species capable of growing on simple media and exhibiting halotolerance up to 5–10% NaCl.[3][4] Members of the Micrococcaceae are ubiquitous in diverse environments, including soil, freshwater and marine sediments, air, and the skin and mucous membranes of humans and animals, where they often play roles in nutrient cycling and biodegradation.[5] Some species demonstrate biotechnological potential, such as plant growth promotion through phytohormone production or the synthesis of antimicrobial compounds like bacteriocins for food preservation, while others are opportunistic pathogens associated with infections in immunocompromised individuals, particularly in clinical settings.[5][6] The family encompasses over 20 genera, with Micrococcus as the type genus, alongside notable ones including Kocuria, Rothia, Nesterenkonia, Dermacoccus, Kytococcus, and Citricoccus, following taxonomic revisions based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing and phylogenomic analyses that have refined boundaries and excluded genera like Staphylococcus (now in Staphylococcaceae).[7][5] These revisions, such as those by Stackebrandt et al. (1997) and Zhi et al. (2009), emphasize the family's diversity in ecological adaptations and metabolic capabilities.[1]Overview
Definition and General Characteristics
Micrococcaceae is a family of Gram-positive bacteria characterized by high guanine and cytosine (G+C) content in their DNA, typically ranging from 64 to 75 mol%, belonging to the phylum Actinomycetota, class Actinomycetia, and order Micrococcales.[7][2] Members of this family are generally aerobic or facultatively anaerobic, non-motile, non-spore-forming cocci or short rods that divide in two or three planes, often forming pairs, tetrads, or irregular clusters.[2] They are catalase-positive and chemoorganotrophic, utilizing organic compounds as carbon and energy sources through respiratory metabolism.[2] The type genus of Micrococcaceae is Micrococcus, named by Ferdinand Cohn in 1872 from observations of spherical bacteria in air and water samples, with the family etymology deriving from the New Latin masculine noun Micrococcus (type genus) combined with the Latin feminine plural suffix -aceae, denoting the Micrococcus family.[7] As of 2025, the family encompasses approximately 28 genera with validly published names, reflecting ongoing taxonomic refinements based on phylogenetic and genomic data.[7] These shared traits distinguish Micrococcaceae from related families within the order Micrococcales, emphasizing their adaptation to diverse environmental niches through robust metabolic versatility.[2]Significance
Members of the Micrococcaceae family, such as Micrococcus luteus, serve as opportunistic pathogens primarily affecting immunocompromised individuals, causing infections including bacteremia, peritonitis, pneumonia, septic arthritis, endocarditis, and meningitis.[4] These bacteria are also integral components of the human skin microbiota, contributing to microbial balance and potentially influencing skin health.[4] In environmental contexts, Micrococcaceae play key roles in soil bioremediation by degrading pollutants such as polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), with certain unclassified operational taxonomic units showing up to a 20-fold increase in abundance in PAH-contaminated soils, facilitating detoxification processes.[8] Their metabolic versatility supports the breakdown of hydrocarbons and other organic contaminants, enhancing ecosystem recovery in polluted environments.[9] Industrially, Micrococcaceae are employed as starter cultures in the production of fermented meat products like salami and sausages, where they improve texture, flavor, and pigment formation through nitrate reduction, often in combination with lactic acid bacteria.[10] They also contribute to cheese ripening via the production of extracellular enzymes such as proteases and lipases, accelerating flavor development and casein degradation at optimal temperatures of 30–37°C.[10] Additionally, species within this family are utilized as bioindicators in air quality monitoring due to their prevalence in dust and aerosols, aiding in the assessment of indoor and environmental microbial loads.[11] From a research perspective, Micrococcaceae serve as valuable models for investigating Gram-positive bacterial cell wall structures, particularly the peptidoglycan layer and associated glycopolymers, as demonstrated in studies on Micrococcus lysodeikticus cell walls that isolated key peptide components like Nα-[L-alanyl-γ-(α-D-glutamylglycine)]-L-lysyl-D-alanine.[12] They are also critical for studying antibiotic resistance mechanisms, with surveys revealing widespread resistance to antibiotics like sulfonamides, tetracyclines, and bacitracin among isolates from food sources, underscoring their role in understanding resistance dissemination via environmental and food chains.[13] Economically, Micrococcaceae have a mixed impact, occasionally contributing to food spoilage in dairy products and meats by producing off-flavors, off-odors, and textural defects through enzymatic activity, which leads to consumer dissatisfaction and financial losses for producers.[14] Despite this, their beneficial applications in fermentation processes help mitigate broader economic costs associated with food preservation and quality enhancement.[14]Taxonomy
Current Classification
The family Micrococcaceae belongs to the domain Bacteria, kingdom Bacillati, phylum Actinomycetota, class Actinomycetes, order Micrococcales.[1] It was originally described by Pribram in 1929 and included in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names in 1980, with subsequent emendations by Stackebrandt et al. in 1997 to incorporate phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic data, and by Zhi et al. in 2009 to refine the diagnostic criteria based on expanded genomic and phenotypic analyses. Synonyms for Micrococcaceae include Yaniaceae (Li et al. 2005) and Yaniellaceae (Li et al. 2008), both of which were proposed for closely related taxa but later subsumed into Micrococcaceae following phylogenetic re-evaluations that demonstrated their congruence with the family's core characteristics.[15][16] Membership in the family is delineated by a combination of molecular, chemotaxonomic, and phenotypic traits. Key criteria include 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities exceeding 92-95% to validated members, peptidoglycan structures of type A3α (typically Lys-Ala₃ or Lys-Gly₃ variants), predominant menaquinones MK-8(H₂) and MK-9(H₂), and cellular fatty acid profiles dominated by anteiso- and iso-methyl branched-chain acids such as i-C₁₅:₀ and ai-C₁₅:₀. These features distinguish Micrococcaceae from related families like Intrasporangiaceae within the order Micrococcales. Recent taxonomic updates post-2020 have primarily involved the addition of novel genera supported by whole-genome sequencing and multilocus phylogenies, such as Specibacter (Zhang et al. 2019).[17] As of 2025, the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) and NCBI Taxonomy reflect ongoing refinements, including reassignments under the emended order Micrococcales in alignment with higher-rank classifications proposed by Silva et al. (2025), without major alterations to the family's core definition.[7] The type genus of Micrococcaceae is Micrococcus, with the type species Micrococcus luteus (Schroeter 1872) Cohn 1872.[18]Historical Development
The family Micrococcaceae was established by Pribram in 1929 as part of a broader classification of microorganisms, primarily based on morphological characteristics such as the arrangement of small, spherical cells in tetrads or clusters. This initial description emphasized Gram-positive cocci with simple nutritional requirements, distinguishing them from other bacterial groups. The family's validity was formalized in the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names in 1980, which conserved the name Micrococcaceae with Micrococcus as the type genus. Significant revisions began in the mid-1990s with the advent of molecular phylogenetics, marking a shift from phenotypic traits to 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Stackebrandt et al. (1995) dissected the heterogeneous genus Micrococcus, proposing four new genera—Kocuria, Nesterenkonia, Kytococcus, and Dermacoccus—while emending Micrococcus, all assigned to Micrococcaceae based on shared phylogenetic signatures and chemotaxonomic features like cell-wall peptidoglycan type. In 1997, Stackebrandt et al. further emended the family within a new hierarchical system, placing it in the suborder Micrococcineae of the class Actinobacteria, incorporating additional genera such as Arthrobacter and Rothia through comparative 16S rRNA analysis that revealed cohesive nucleotide signatures. Zhi et al. (2009) provided a comprehensive update, emending the family description to include nine genera (Acaricomes, Arthrobacter, Citricoccus, Kocuria, Micrococcus, Nesterenkonia, Renibacterium, Rothia, and Zhihengliuella), adding two new ones (Acaricomes and Zhihengliuella) and removing three others (e.g., Kytococcus and Dermacoccus transferred to separate families) based on refined 16S rRNA signatures and phylogenetic clustering. The molecular era from the 1990s onward transformed Micrococcaceae taxonomy, replacing morphology-driven classifications with genotypic criteria, including DNA-DNA hybridization and later whole-genome sequencing. In the 2010s, genomic approaches led to reclassifications of Arthrobacter relatives; for instance, Busse (2016) reviewed the genus Arthrobacter and proposed splitting it into novel genera like Glutamicibacter (encompassing nine species) and Paeniglutamicibacter (six species), retaining their placement in Micrococcaceae due to shared genomic and phylogenetic traits despite morphological variations. This reflected broader impacts of whole-genome data, as seen in Parte et al. (2018), which used average nucleotide identity and digital DNA-DNA hybridization to validate and refine family boundaries, confirming the inclusion of diverse genera while excluding outliers. Notable controversies have centered on the inclusion of rod-shaped genera like Glutamicibacter, originally part of the coccus-dominated Arthrobacter, challenging the family's traditional emphasis on coccal morphology; debates persist on whether such pleomorphic members align with core 16S rRNA signatures or warrant separate families. From 2020 to 2025, metagenomics has increasingly informed revisions by uncovering uncultured diversity, contributing to minor emendations in journals like the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, such as the addition of genera like Enteractinococcus (initially described in 2012 but refined genomically in recent studies) through integrated multi-omics approaches. These developments underscore an ongoing transition toward polyphasic taxonomy, enhancing the family's resolution within Actinobacteria.Morphology and Physiology
Cellular Morphology
Members of the family Micrococcaceae are predominantly Gram-positive cocci, spherical in shape with diameters typically ranging from 0.5 to 2.0 μm, though some species reach up to 3 μm. These cells commonly occur in characteristic arrangements such as pairs, tetrads, or irregular clusters, reflecting their division in multiple planes.[2] They are non-motile and lack flagella, with no evidence of spore formation across the family.[19] Certain genera within Micrococcaceae, notably Arthrobacter, display morphological variation through a rod-coccus growth cycle; cells appear as irregular rods (0.2–1.0 μm wide by 1.0–10.0 μm long) during exponential growth phases and transition to spherical cocci (0.7–2.0 μm in diameter) in stationary or older cultures, a dimorphism linked to environmental nutrient availability.[20] This pleomorphism is less common in core genera like Micrococcus, where cells remain consistently coccoid. The cell walls are Gram-positive, featuring a thick peptidoglycan layer of type A3α, characterized by L-lysine as the diamino acid and interpeptide bridges such as L-Ala-L-Thr-Gly or L-Ala₂.[21] Mycolic acids are absent, resulting in non-acid-fast staining properties.[22] The genomic DNA of Micrococcaceae exhibits a high G+C content, typically 65–75 mol%, contributing to their thermal stability and classification within high-GC Gram-positive bacteria.[3] Cellular fatty acids are dominated by branched-chain types, with major components including anteiso-C_{15:0} (often >40%) and iso-C_{15:0}, alongside lesser amounts of straight-chain saturated acids; these lipids support membrane fluidity in diverse environments.[23] Under microscopic examination, many species, particularly in genera like Micrococcus and Kocuria, display yellow to orange pigmentation attributable to carotenoid production, which imparts a vivid coloration to colonies and aids in preliminary identification.[24]Biochemical and Metabolic Properties
Members of the Micrococcaceae family are primarily aerobic or facultatively anaerobic bacteria that function as chemoorganotrophs, deriving energy from the oxidation of organic compounds such as sugars and amino acids. Some species exhibit nitrate reduction capabilities, contributing to their metabolic versatility in nutrient-limited environments.[3][2] These bacteria are characteristically catalase-positive, enabling the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide, while oxidase activity varies across the family, often appearing weakly positive. Urease activity is present in certain members, facilitating urea hydrolysis, and coagulase production is generally absent, distinguishing them from related pathogens. They also produce enzymes such as proteinases and lipases, which aid in the degradation of proteins and lipids.[25][2] Growth occurs optimally under mesophilic conditions, with temperatures ranging from 20°C to 37°C, and at neutral pH levels between 6 and 8. Many tolerate moderate salinity, with some species demonstrating halotolerance up to 10% NaCl, allowing adaptation to varied environmental stresses.[3][2] Carbon source utilization is centered on simple sugars like glucose and fructose, with limited acid production from carbohydrate fermentation, reflecting their respiratory metabolism. This selective utilization supports efficient energy extraction without extensive fermentative byproducts.[2] Regarding antibiotic sensitivity, Micrococcaceae members are typically susceptible to penicillin and other beta-lactams, as well as vancomycin and gentamicin, though resistance patterns can vary, particularly to lysostaphin, to which they show inherent resistance.[6]Phylogeny and Genomics
Phylogenetic Relationships
The family Micrococcaceae occupies a position within the phylum Actinomycetota (formerly Actinobacteria), class Actinomycetia, and order Micrococcales, representing high G+C-content Gram-positive bacteria that form a distinct clade in bacterial phylogeny. This placement is supported by both 16S rRNA gene sequence analyses and phylogenomic trees derived from whole-genome data, positioning Micrococcaceae as a core component of Micrococcales alongside closely related families such as Dermacoccaceae and Intrasporangiaceae, which share similar ecological niches and morphological traits like coccoid cell shapes.[1][26] Phylogenetic analyses based on 16S rRNA gene sequences reveal core clades within Micrococcaceae, including a well-supported Micrococcus-Kocuria group characterized by sequence similarities exceeding 95% among type strains, and a separate Nesterenkonia-Yaniella branch with intra-clade similarities around 96-98%. Family delineation is typically based on 16S rRNA similarity thresholds greater than 92%, which delineate Micrococcaceae from adjacent families in Micrococcales while confirming its monophyly in maximum-likelihood trees. Multilocus sequence analyses using concatenated housekeeping genes further corroborate this monophyly.[27][5][28] Recent phylogenomic studies from 2020 to 2025, incorporating whole-genome alignments and average amino acid identity (AAI) metrics, have refined these relationships by integrating over 100 type-strain genomes, revealing robust support for Micrococcaceae monophyly. Recent analyses, such as those in 2024, have proposed potential mergers of genera like Kocuria and related taxa based on AAI values exceeding 65%, highlighting ongoing refinements to family boundaries.[5][29] These analyses highlight inferred evolutionary adaptations, such as the acquisition of high G+C genomes (typically 65-75 mol%) and carotenoid biosynthesis gene clusters, which likely enhanced UV resistance and membrane stability in soil and aquatic environments during early diversification.[5][29]Genomic Characteristics
Members of the Micrococcaceae family possess compact genomes typically ranging from 2.5 to 4.5 megabase pairs (Mbp) in size, organized as a single circular chromosome.[30][31] The guanine-cytosine (G+C) content of these genomes is characteristically high, varying between 65% and 75%.[2] For instance, the genome of Micrococcus luteus ATCC 4698 measures 2.5 Mbp with a G+C content of 73%, while Kocuria strains exhibit sizes averaging 3.7 Mbp and G+C contents around 71-72%.[30][32][31] These genomes encode approximately 2,300 to 3,000 protein-coding genes, reflecting their streamlined architecture suited to diverse environmental niches.[33][34][32] CRISPR-Cas systems, which provide adaptive immunity against phages and plasmids, are present in some strains but absent in others, indicating variability across the family.[34][35] Plasmid carriage is generally rare, though linear plasmids have been identified in certain Micrococcus isolates, potentially facilitating genetic exchange.[36][35] Key genetic features include genes involved in peptidoglycan synthesis, such as the mur operon (e.g., murA to murG), which underpin the family's characteristic cell wall structure.[37] Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters are also prominent, encoding pigments like carotenoids responsible for the yellow-orange coloration in many strains and occasional bacteriocins for microbial competition.[38][39] Comparative genomic analyses reveal evidence of horizontal gene transfer, particularly for antibiotic resistance determinants such as tetracycline efflux genes (tet), which are disseminated within the family and related actinobacteria.[40] Pan-genome studies demonstrate an open architecture with conserved core genes for central metabolism, including glycolysis and amino acid biosynthesis, while accessory genes contribute to niche adaptation.[41][31] The first complete genome from the family was that of Micrococcus luteus NCTC 2666, sequenced in 2009, marking a milestone in understanding actinobacterial genomics.[30] By 2025, over 50 high-quality genomes from Micrococcaceae representatives are publicly available in databases like NCBI, enabling broader comparative insights.[42][43]Ecology and Distribution
Natural Habitats
Members of the Micrococcaceae family exhibit a ubiquitous distribution across diverse environments, including soil, freshwater, marine sediments, and human-associated sites such as skin, mucous membranes, and indoor air.[44][9] Micrococcus species, for instance, are commonly isolated from terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems like soil, fresh and marine water, sand, vegetation, dust, and air.[44] These bacteria are also prevalent on mammalian skin and in environmental dust, contributing to their widespread presence.[9] Certain Micrococcaceae occupy specific niches in extreme environments, such as Antarctic soils and hypersaline lakes. Micrococcus antarcticus, a psychrophilic species, was isolated from blood agar plates exposed at the Chinese Great Wall Station in Antarctica, highlighting adaptation to cold Antarctic conditions.[45] Similarly, Nesterenkonia species thrive in hypersaline settings, with Nesterenkonia lacusekhoensis recovered from the hypersaline Ekho Lake in East Antarctica's Vestfold Hills.[46] Other Nesterenkonia strains have been documented in hypersaline lakes and soils worldwide, underscoring their halotolerant nature.[47] Micrococcaceae are abundant in oligotrophic soils and facilitate airborne dispersal through dust particles. In dust-generating regions like the Gobi Desert, Micrococcaceae are detected in saltating dust particles, aiding their global transport.[48] Isolation commonly involves air samplers, such as single-stage impactors for indoor and atmospheric collection, and skin swabs using sterile cotton applicators moistened with saline, followed by culturing on nutrient agar.[49][50] Globally, Micrococcaceae display a cosmopolitan distribution with higher diversity observed in temperate regions, often detected via metagenomic analyses of uncultured environmental samples.[51] Their presence in soil and air metagenomes from various biomes confirms broad ecological prevalence, though cultivation-independent methods reveal additional uncultured lineages.[52]Ecological Roles and Human Interactions
Members of the Micrococcaceae family play significant roles in environmental biodegradation processes, particularly in the degradation of organic pollutants such as aromatic compounds, antibiotics, and plasticizers. For instance, species like Kocuria flava have demonstrated the ability to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) including phenanthrene, anthracene, and fluorene, with degradation efficiencies reaching up to 63% under aerobic conditions. Similarly, Paenarthrobacter ureafaciens effectively breaks down dibutyl phthalate, a common plasticizer, highlighting their potential in remediating contaminated soils and wastewater. These bacteria contribute to nitrogen cycling through nitrate assimilation and reduction, where genera such as Micrococcus and Arthrobacter facilitate the conversion of nitrates in acidic upland soils, supporting nutrient turnover in terrestrial ecosystems.[53][54][55] In symbiotic associations, Micrococcaceae members enhance plant growth promotion, notably through phosphate solubilization and stabilization of soil microbial communities. Citricoccus lacusdiani, for example, solubilizes insoluble inorganic and organic phosphates, releasing up to 24.7 mg/L of bioavailable phosphorus, which aids nutrient acquisition in nutrient-poor soils. Rhizosphere isolates like Micrococcus and Kocuria from halophyte plants exhibit plant growth-promoting traits, including tolerance to salinity and production of growth-stimulating compounds, thereby stabilizing biofilms in soil microbial consortia. These interactions bolster ecosystem resilience by improving plant nutrient uptake and maintaining community structure in stressed environments.[56][57] Regarding climate relevance, Micrococcaceae contribute to carbon sequestration in soils via organic matter decomposition and carbon turnover. Their degradation capabilities enable resistance to adverse conditions, promoting the accumulation of soil organic carbon fractions and supporting long-term carbon storage in terrestrial systems. Additionally, these bacteria are sensitive to environmental disturbances like wildfires, which alter their community composition and potentially disrupt carbon cycling processes.[58][59][60] Human interactions with Micrococcaceae encompass both beneficial and pathogenic aspects, with many species acting as commensals on human skin to prevent pathogen colonization through competitive exclusion and immune modulation. As part of the core skin microbiome, genera like Micrococcus maintain microbial balance, reducing the risk of opportunistic infections by dominating niches and producing antimicrobial metabolites. However, they can cause rare infections, particularly in immunocompromised individuals, including bacteremia, endocarditis, and skin/soft tissue infections, as seen with Kocuria species. In industrial contexts, Micrococcaceae are applied in bioremediation for pollutant cleanup but also contribute to food spoilage, such as in cheese and fermented meats where uncontrolled growth leads to off-flavors, and occasional contamination in cosmetics. Some strains exhibit antibiotic degradation abilities, potentially influencing resistance dynamics in clinical settings.[61][62][63][10][64]Genera
List of Genera
The family Micrococcaceae encompasses approximately 28 validly published genera as of 2025, based on updates from the List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) and the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (IJSEM). As of November 2025, recent studies (e.g., Kästle-Silva et al. 2025) have reassigned the family to the order Actinomycetales, but the genera list remains stable.[7] These genera are primarily Gram-positive, high G+C content actinobacteria, with some reclassifications over time; notably, the genus Staphylococcus was historically included but excluded following its transfer to the family Staphylococcaceae in 2009. No provisional genera are currently recognized within the family, though ongoing phylogenetic studies may lead to future adjustments. The following table lists the genera alphabetically, including the year of valid publication, proposing authority, type species, and approximate number of recognized species.| Genus | Year | Authority | Type Species | Number of Species |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acaricomes | 2008 | Hamana et al. | Acaricomes phytoseiuli | 1 |
| Arthrobacter | 1947 | Conn and Dimmick | Arthrobacter globiformis | ~100 |
| Auritidibacter | 2009 | Yassin et al. | Auritidibacter ignavus | 1 |
| Citricoccus | 2002 | Altenburger et al. | Citricoccus muralis | 5 |
| Demetria | 1997 | Groth et al. | Demetria terragena | 1 |
| Dermacoccus | 1981 | Stackebrandt and Kandler | Dermacoccus nishinomiyaensis | 4 |
| Enteractinococcus | 2012 | Cao et al. | Enteractinococcus coprophilus | 3 |
| Glutamicibacter | 2016 | Park et al. | Glutamicibacter halophytocola | 5 |
| Kocuria | 1995 | Stackebrandt et al. | Kocuria rosea | ~26 |
| Kytococcus | 1981 | Stackebrandt and Kandler | Kytococcus sedentarius | 2 |
| Leucobacter | 1998 | Takeuchi et al. | Leucobacter komagatae | ~25 |
| Luteimicrobium | 2011 | Zhang et al. | Luteimicrobium subalbum | 1 |
| Micrococcus | 1872 | Cohn (Approved Lists 1980) | Micrococcus luteus | ~15 |
| Microterricola | 2011 | Lee et al. | Microterricola viridari | 3 |
| Nesterenkonia | 1995 | Stackebrandt et al. | Nesterenkonia halobia | ~15 |
| Ornithinicoccus | 2008 | Hamana et al. | Ornithinicoccus contaminans | 1 |
| Paeniglutamicibacter | 2016 | Park et al. | Paeniglutamicibacter antarcticus | 4 |
| Pseudarthrobacter | 2016 | Ding et al. | Pseudarthrobacter phenanthrenivorans | ~8 |
| Rothia | 1967 | Georg and Brown | Rothia dentocariosa | 7 |
| Sinomonas | 2012 | Kim et al. | Sinomonas fluvii | 5 |
| Terrabacter | 1981 | Prauser et al. | Terrabacter tumescens | ~8 |
| Terracoccus | 1997 | Prauser et al. | Terracoccus luteus | 2 |
| Tersicoccus | 2012 | Mignard and Flandrois | Tersicoccus phoenicis | 2 |
| Yaniella | 2007 | Yassin et al. | Yaniella halotolerans | ~5 |
| Yonghaparkia | 2011 | Yoon et al. | Yonghaparkia alkaliphila | 1 |
| Zhihengliuella | 2007 | Zhang et al. | Zhihengliuella halotolerans | 3 |
| Zimmermannella | 1996 | Lin and Yokota | Zimmermannella helvola | 1 |