Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mount Soledad Cross

The Mount Soledad Cross is a 43-foot-tall reinforced concrete Latin cross situated atop Mount Soledad in La Jolla, California, serving as the central element of the Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial, which commemorates American military veterans who died in service.^[1]^[2] Erected in 1954 by the American Legion Post 275 as a tribute to casualties of World War II and the Korean War, following earlier wooden crosses on the site dating back to 1913, the monument weighs 24 tons and spans 12 feet across its arms.^[1]^[3]^[4] Over decades, the memorial expanded to include granite walls inscribed with thousands of plaques honoring veterans from the Revolutionary War through modern conflicts, distinguishing it as one of the most comprehensive such sites in the United States.^[5]^[6] The cross became emblematic of First Amendment debates after 1989 lawsuits by plaintiff Philip K. Paulson alleged it constituted an unconstitutional endorsement of religion on public land, leading to oscillating federal court rulings, attempted municipal sales invalidated under state law, and a 2006 congressional transfer to federal ownership via Public Law 109-272.^[7]^[8]^[9] Resolution came in 2015 when the nonprofit Mt. Soledad Memorial Association purchased the half-acre site from the Department of Defense for $1.4 million, shifting it to private control and ending over 25 years of litigation through a 2016 settlement.^[10]^[11]^[12]

Physical Description and Location

Site and Structure

The Mount Soledad Cross is located on the summit of Mount Soledad, a prominent 822-foot (251 m) elevation hill in the La Jolla area of San Diego, California, situated north of downtown San Diego and east of the coastal La Jolla community.^[13] This hilltop position offers expansive panoramic vistas extending westward to the Pacific Ocean and eastward toward inland mountains, making the site a visible landmark from surrounding regions.^[14] The cross itself is a concrete structure designed by architect Donald Campbell, featuring hollow segments for reinforcement and standing 29 feet (8.8 m) tall atop a 14-foot base, resulting in a total height of 43 feet (13 m).^[13] ^[15] Its form emphasizes visibility and durability, integrated into the memorial's central axis amid terraced rings that radiate outward from a primary staircase, facilitating visitor access and spatial organization.^[4]

Surrounding Memorial Features

The Mount Soledad National Veterans Memorial features 11 curved walls of polished stone encircling the central cross, designed to honor individual U.S. military veterans from the Revolutionary War through modern conflicts.^[1] ^[16] These walls, initially comprising six low structures radiating from a pedestal with an American flag, were expanded by five additional walls in 2015 to accommodate growing commemorations.^[1] Black granite plaques mounted on the walls number over 5,600, with recent expansions reaching approximately 6,600, each etched with a veteran's photograph—often in uniform—alongside details of their service record, military branch insignias, American flags, and personal memorabilia.^[1] ^[17] Plaques vary in size, typically 8x8 inches, 12x8 inches, or 16x8 inches, and may include a brief family appreciation statement limited to six words.^[18] The plaques are installed sequentially on new wall sections without reserved positions, ensuring a collective tribute rather than individualized placement.^[18] Brick pathways separate the walls, facilitating visitor access and reflection, while breaks between sections provide panoramic views of the ocean and mountains.^[1] A central grass area, added during the 2015 expansion, serves as a venue for ceremonies such as Veterans Honor events and weddings, enhancing the site's role as a contemplative space.^[1] A dedicated name wall identifies the memorial, underscoring its purpose as a national tribute to military service.^[1]

Historical Origins and Development

Early Erected Crosses

The first cross on Mount Soledad was erected in 1913 by private citizens from La Jolla and Pacific Beach as a simple wooden structure made of California redwood, intended primarily as a site for Easter sunrise services and Christian observances.^[1]^[19] This cross served as a community landmark for religious gatherings but was destroyed by vandals who stole it in 1923.^[1]^[19] A second cross followed, constructed by local Protestant Christians from the surrounding areas using a stucco-over-wood frame design to replace the original and continue the tradition of Easter observances.^[19] This structure endured for nearly two decades before being toppled in a windstorm in 1952, prompting calls for a more durable replacement.^[19]^[14] At this stage, the crosses functioned explicitly as religious symbols rather than veterans memorials, reflecting the Christian heritage of the local community without formal ties to military commemoration.^[1]^[9]

1954 Construction and Dedication

The third cross on Mount Soledad, constructed in 1954, replaced earlier wooden versions damaged by weather and time, marking a shift to a permanent concrete structure designed by architect Donald Campbell.^[13]^[1] This iteration featured a 29-foot-tall vertical beam with a 12-foot horizontal arm span, mounted on a 14-foot base for a total height of 43 feet above ground, enhancing its visibility across the La Jolla coastline.^[13]^[20] Erected by the Mount Soledad Memorial Association on city-owned land, the cross was briefly damaged when dropped by a crane during installation but was repaired and secured as the site's enduring centerpiece.^[1]^[21] Originally designated the "Mount Soledad Easter Cross," it was built to facilitate annual Easter sunrise services while serving as a war memorial.^[1]^[22] The structure's primary purpose was to honor servicemembers who died in World War I, World War II, and the Korean Conflict, functioning as a "lasting monument" to their sacrifices amid the postwar era's emphasis on commemorating military valor.^[1]^[9] Dedication occurred on Easter Sunday, April 18, 1954, with the cross explicitly consecrated to "Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ" by the grandmother of William J. Kellogg, president of the Mount Soledad Memorial Association.^[13]^[9] This event underscored the cross's dual role as a religious symbol and veterans' tribute, reflecting the association's intent to blend Christian observance with national remembrance in a public setting.^[13]^[1] No initial plaques adorned the structure at dedication, though surrounding features would later expand to include veteran-specific commemorations.^[1]

Postwar Memorial Additions

Following the 1954 dedication of the concrete cross, the Mt. Soledad Memorial Association undertook expansions to transform the site into a dedicated veterans memorial. In 2000, the association constructed six curved walls radiating from a central pedestal, inscribed with black granite plaques of the same material used in the Vietnam Veterans Memorial in Washington, D.C.^[23] These plaques, numbering initially around 3,200 spaces, allow for personalized engravings including veterans' photographs, names, service records, military insignias, and narratives of their contributions, initially focusing on those who served in wartime from all branches, including World War II Merchant Marines.^[3]^[1] Demand for commemorative spaces prompted further growth. In 2012, five additional walls were added, extending the memorial's mission to encompass all U.S. veterans irrespective of service era or branch.^[3] Construction on this phase began in late 2012, with completion in 2015, incorporating over 2,400 new plaque positions and a central grass area for ceremonies, alongside a perimeter wall bearing the memorial's name.^[1] This expansion was facilitated by private donations and construction efforts led by figures such as George Dewhurst, whose family had ties to the original 1954 cross erection.^[24] These postwar additions elevated the site from a singular monument to a expansive tribute, with walls now holding more than 6,600 plaques as of 2024, honoring service from the Revolutionary War through contemporary conflicts.^[17] The plaques' design emphasizes individual stories over collective symbolism, purchased by families or supporters to perpetuate personal legacies of military service.^[1]

Significance as a Veterans Memorial

Honoring Military Service

The Mount Soledad National Veterans Memorial, centered on the 29-foot cross erected in 1954, primarily functions to commemorate the service and sacrifices of American military personnel who have defended the nation's freedoms. Originally dedicated on Easter Sunday, April 18, 1954, by the Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, the cross was installed as a lasting monument to servicemembers who lost their lives in World War I, World War II, and the Korean Conflict, encompassing veterans from all five branches of the U.S. military as well as the Merchant Marine.^[1] This dedication emphasized recognition of honorable service rather than solely wartime deaths, reflecting a broader tribute to individual contributions in preserving American liberties.^[1] Over time, the memorial expanded to honor veterans—living or deceased with honorable discharges—from the Revolutionary War through the ongoing War on Terror, making it unique among U.S. veterans memorials for including photographic images of the honorees alongside their service records, military insignias, and personal stories etched on black granite plaques.^[5] As of the latest expansions, more than 5,600 such plaques line the surrounding walls, initially designed in the 1990s with 3,200 plaques across six walls and augmented in 2015 by five additional walls adding over 2,400 more.^[1] These inscriptions feature notable figures including 23 Medal of Honor recipients, six U.S. Presidents who served, and prominent leaders such as Generals John J. Pershing and George S. Patton, underscoring the memorial's role in preserving detailed accounts of military dedication across eras.^[1] Annual Veterans Honor Ceremonies and events like Veterans Day observances reinforce the site's ongoing commitment to military commemoration, providing public spaces for reflection on service without distinguishing solely between combat fatalities and survivors.^[1] The plaques' focus on individual narratives—detailing branches, ranks, deployments, and achievements—distinguishes the memorial as a personalized archive of valor, extending beyond abstract symbolism to tangible recognition of diverse military experiences.^[5]

Plaque System and Commemorations

The plaque system at the Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial features individualized black granite plaques mounted on eleven curved wall panels encircling the cross, honoring U.S. veterans from all military branches and conflicts spanning the Revolutionary War to the Global War on Terrorism.^[5]^[3] Each plaque includes the veteran's name, branch of service, rank, era of service, a photograph (typically in uniform), military insignias, and a concise statement detailing accomplishments and contributions during their term.^[25]^[18] This system uniquely recognizes both living and deceased veterans, distinguishing it from memorials focused solely on the fallen.^[3] As of October 2025, over 6,600 plaques form this collection.^[26] Custom plaques are ordered by family, friends, or units through an online, mail, email, or in-person process, requiring the veteran's DD-214 form or honorable discharge documentation and at least one photograph for verification and design.^[18] Available in three sizes—8x8 inches ($1,500), 12x8 inches ($2,000), and 16x8 inches ($2,500)—with tax-deductible portions of $900, $1,350, and $1,710 respectively, plaques allow customization such as a brief service summary (word limits by size), up to six words of family appreciation, and optional picture-in-picture layouts or additional service-related images.^[18] After digital proof approval (with two free revisions), plaques are installed on the next available wall section, typically within 7-9 months, with placement assigned by the memorial's veterans committee; related plaques may be grouped if ordered concurrently and space permits.^[18] Post-installation, plaques are added to an online searchable database, filterable by name, branch, rank, and era, enabling virtual viewing.^[25] Commemorations center on dedication ceremonies for new plaques, often highlighting specific individuals or units, such as the January 26, 2025, event for Medal of Honor recipient Cmdr. Clyde Lassen or the 2016 ceremony for Vietnam War veterans of the 3rd Battalion, 26th Marine Regiment.^[27]^[28] These events integrate into broader annual observances, including Memorial Day and Veterans Day programs; for instance, the May 26, 2025, Memorial Day ceremony featured a plaque dedication for Seaman Lakiba Nicole Palmer and the 17 sailors lost with her.^[29] The memorial hosts over 80 ceremonies and events yearly, emphasizing service stories via plaques and fostering public gratitude for military contributions.^[5]

Cultural and Symbolic Role

The Mount Soledad Cross symbolizes the profound self-sacrifice of American military personnel, evoking the ultimate devotion required in wartime service akin to historical commemorations of fallen soldiers. In the context of the veterans memorial, the 29-foot Latin cross conveys an enduring message of patriotism and heroism, honoring those who defended the nation from the Revolutionary War to contemporary conflicts, including 23 Medal of Honor recipients and notable figures such as Presidents Truman, Eisenhower, Ford, and Reagan.^[30]^[1] This interpretation aligns with its dedication in 1954 as a tribute to casualties of World War I, World War II, and the Korean War, transforming an earlier religious marker into a broader emblem of national resilience and noble sacrifice.^[31] Culturally, the memorial site fosters community reflection and education on military heritage, serving as a public venue for annual Veterans Honor Ceremonies, Easter Sunday dedications since 1954, and other gatherings like weddings on its central grass area established in 2015. Over 5,600 black granite plaques, inscribed with photographs, service details, and insignias, preserve individual legacies of honorably discharged veterans, promoting stewardship and intergenerational awareness through guided tours and partnerships with educational organizations targeting school-aged youth.^[1]^[32] Its prominent position atop Mount Soledad, offering panoramic views of the Pacific Ocean, integrates it into San Diego's physical and cultural landscape as a beacon of local identity tied to the region's military tradition and Spanish missionary roots.^[31]

Legal Challenges

Initial Constitutional Claims

In 1989, Philip K. Paulson, a Vietnam War veteran and self-identified atheist, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California against the City of San Diego, challenging the constitutionality of the Mount Soledad Cross on public property.^[7] Paulson argued that the 43-foot-tall Latin cross, maintained by the city in Mount Soledad Park, constituted an impermissible endorsement of Christianity in violation of the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as it symbolized a sectarian religious message rather than a secular purpose.^[33] He further contended that the display breached the No Preference Clause of Article I, Section 4 of the California Constitution, which prohibits government preference for any religion, asserting that the cross's prominent placement and illumination conveyed official favoritism toward Christian beliefs.^[34] The complaint emphasized that the cross's design and history as a standalone religious monument, without contemporaneous secular elements at the time of its 1954 erection, failed the Lemon test established by the U.S. Supreme Court for evaluating Establishment Clause challenges, particularly the prongs requiring a secular legislative purpose and primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion.^[35] Paulson sought a permanent injunction to remove the cross from city-owned land, claiming personal injury from the perceived government-sponsored religious coercion, including discomfort as a non-Christian resident and taxpayer.^[36] On December 13, 1991, U.S. District Judge Napoleon A. Jones Jr. granted summary judgment for Paulson on the state constitutional claim, ruling that the cross's maintenance violated California's No Preference Clause by advancing Christianity over other faiths or non-belief, as its sectarian form predominated over any incidental secular context.^[34] The court deferred federal claims pending resolution of the state issue but noted the cross's isolation as a Christian symbol on public land supported findings of endorsement under precedents like County of Allegheny v. American Civil Liberties Union.^[34] This initial ruling ordered the cross's removal within 90 days, though stays and appeals followed, marking the start of protracted litigation.^[37]

Failed Transfer Attempts

In response to legal challenges alleging that the Mount Soledad Cross constituted an unconstitutional endorsement of religion on public property, the City of San Diego pursued several attempts to transfer ownership of the land beneath the cross to private entities, primarily the Mount Soledad Memorial Association (MSMA). These efforts aimed to privatize the site and thereby moot the Establishment Clause claims, but multiple initiatives failed due to judicial invalidation or electoral rejection.^[9] The first attempt occurred in 1992, when the City Council unanimously approved the sale of a 15-by-15-foot parcel directly under the cross to the MSMA for $14,500, following voter approval via Proposition F. A state court subsequently blocked the transfer, ruling it violated the California Constitution's prohibition on preferring one religion by structuring the sale to preserve a sectarian Christian symbol.^[9]^[38] A follow-up effort in 1993 involved a no-bid sale of an expanded parcel to the MSMA for $24,000, but a federal district court invalidated it, determining that the transaction demonstrated an impermissible intent to aid a religious purpose in violation of the state's "no preference" clause.^[9] In 1998, the city conducted a public bidding process, in which the MSMA secured the purchase for $104,000. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, sitting en banc, struck down the sale in 2002, holding that it was designed to maintain the cross as a predominantly religious monument on what remained effectively public land, thereby advancing a sectarian agenda in contravention of the Establishment Clause.^[9]^[39] A subsequent proposal in 2004, advanced through Proposition K, sought voter authorization for another sale but failed to garner the required two-thirds majority, with 59.18% voting against and 40.82% in favor.^[9] These rulings and rejections underscored judicial scrutiny of transfers perceived as pretextual mechanisms to evade constitutional restrictions rather than genuine privatizations.^[40]

Eminent Domain Proceedings

In May 2006, following a federal district court ruling that the city's ownership of the Mount Soledad Cross violated the Establishment Clause, U.S. Representative Duncan Hunter introduced legislation to authorize federal acquisition of the site.^[41] The House of Representatives passed the bill on May 11, 2006, by a vote of 382–21, designating the cross and surrounding property as the "Mount Soledad National Veterans Memorial" and invoking Congress's eminent domain authority to preserve it as a historic war memorial of national significance.^[42] The Senate approved the measure on August 1, 2006, without amendments, and President George W. Bush signed it into law on August 14, 2006, immediately transferring title from the City of San Diego to the federal government for just compensation of approximately $4.6 million, reflecting the appraised value of the 0.29-acre parcel.^[43]^[44] This legislative eminent domain action occurred amid pending appeals of the removal order, aiming to federalize the memorial and insulate it from local judicial mandates while asserting its secular historical context tied to Korean War veterans.^[33] The acquisition bypassed traditional judicial eminent domain proceedings under state law, relying instead on Congress's enumerated powers under Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution to acquire property for national memorials, though critics, including the ACLU, argued it did not resolve underlying constitutional issues and merely relocated the endorsement of Christianity to federal land.^[45] Subsequent lawsuits challenged the federal display but did not directly contest the validity of the taking itself, which the government defended as a valid exercise of sovereign authority to protect cultural landmarks.^[42]

Appellate and Supreme Court Rulings

In Trunk v. City of San Diego, a three-judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled on January 4, 2011, that the Mount Soledad Cross, as maintained on city property, constituted an impermissible endorsement of religion under the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, reversing a 2008 district court decision that had upheld the memorial.^[46]^[47] The panel applied the Lemon test from Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), finding that the cross's sectarian shape primarily conveyed a Christian message despite surrounding secular elements like plaques honoring veterans, and rejected arguments that its historical context as a war memorial neutralized its religious symbolism.^[46] Following federal acquisition of the site via eminent domain in 2006 and subsequent litigation in Mount Soledad Memorial Ass'n v. Trunk, the Ninth Circuit affirmed on November 13, 2013, a district court order requiring removal of the cross from federal land, holding that its standalone presence violated the Establishment Clause irrespective of the site's designation as a veterans memorial.^[42] The court emphasized that the cross's dominant visual feature overshadowed secular additions, creating a perception of government favoritism toward Christianity, and denied stays pending further appeals.^[30] The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari on June 25, 2012, in the initial appeal from the 2011 Ninth Circuit ruling, allowing the determination of unconstitutionality to stand without granting full review.^[45] In a subsequent petition related to the eminent domain proceedings, the Court again declined intervention on June 30, 2014, refusing to vacate the lower courts' orders for removal and effectively deferring to the Ninth Circuit's interpretation of precedent under the Establishment Clause.^[48] These denials preserved the appellate holdings amid ongoing efforts to transfer the property privately, without the Court issuing substantive opinions on the cross's constitutionality.^[48]

Perspectives on the Controversy

Claims of Religious Endorsement

The Jewish War Veterans of the United States, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), initiated a federal lawsuit in 2006 against the City of San Diego and later the U.S. Department of Justice after the site's transfer to federal ownership, asserting that the 43-foot Latin cross at the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial constituted an endorsement of Christianity in violation of the First Amendment's Establishment Clause.^[49] Plaintiffs, including Jewish military veterans, argued that the cross—a distinctly Christian symbol—dominated the memorial's landscape, overshadowing secular elements like donor plaques honoring veterans of various faiths and backgrounds, thereby conveying a governmental message of preference for Christianity over other religions or non-belief.^[50] This claim was rooted in the perception that the cross's prominence alienated non-Christian service members, such as Jewish veterans who viewed it as excluding or subordinating their sacrifices to a sectarian emblem.^[46] Earlier challenges echoed similar endorsements concerns; in 1989, Philip Paulson, a self-identified atheist and Vietnam War veteran, filed suit against the City of San Diego, contending that maintaining the cross on public parkland impermissibly advanced religion by subsidizing and promoting a Christian symbol through government ownership and upkeep.^[9] Challengers emphasized the cross's historical replacements—erected in 1913, 1926, and the current 1954 version by the Mount Soledad Memorial Association—as evidence of its sectarian origins, arguing that added secular plaques post-litigation failed to secularize the structure sufficiently under tests like Lemon v. Kurtzman, which prohibits government actions with a primary effect of advancing religion.^[33] The ACLU further maintained that the site's visibility and government maintenance amplified the endorsement, equating it to state-sponsored proselytization rather than neutral commemoration.^[45] These claims were advanced amid broader critiques from secular advocacy groups, such as the American Humanist Association, which described the cross as a "clear preference for Christians" that breached the Establishment Clause by prioritizing one faith's iconography in a public memorial intended to honor all veterans indiscriminately.^[51] Critics of the memorial, including Paulson, highlighted the cross's isolation atop the hill as reinforcing a perception of religious dominance, unsupported by empirical integration of diverse religious symbols that might dilute its Christian connotation.^[52] While such arguments drew from strict interpretations of church-state separation, proponents of the challenges, including the ACLU, positioned them as safeguarding pluralism against perceived institutional favoritism toward majority religious traditions.^[53]

Defenses Based on Historical Context

The Mount Soledad Cross was erected in 1954 as the third iteration on the site, following earlier wooden crosses placed in 1913 and the 1930s primarily for Easter observances, but with the concrete structure dedicated by the La Jolla American Legion Post 275 to commemorate veterans of the Korean War and those lost in World War II.^[3]^[1] This timing aligned with post-war remembrance efforts, positioning the 29-foot Latin cross as a symbol of sacrifice amid ongoing Cold War tensions and recent conflicts, rather than solely a religious marker.^[13] Defenders have emphasized that the cross's integration into a broader veterans memorial—expanded in the 1990s with granite walls, over 100 plaques honoring individual service members from World War I through modern eras, and non-sectarian elements like a reflecting pool—transforms its historical role into one of secular commemoration, where the cross serves as a longstanding emblem of military valor akin to those in Arlington National Cemetery or overseas American battlefields.^[1]^[30] The site's evolution reflects community-driven preservation of a landmark that predates litigation by decades, with records showing annual veteran-led ceremonies focused on patriotic themes since the 1950s, underscoring a primary purpose of honoring national service over religious promotion.^[14] In constitutional defenses, advocates have invoked the historical precedent of crosses in U.S. military contexts, arguing that such symbols carry an "undeniable historical meaning" as markers of fallen soldiers' universal sacrifice, not endorsement of Christianity, as recognized in Supreme Court reasoning from Van Orden v. Perry (2005), where longstanding passive displays were upheld for their cultural and historical accommodation rather than perceived coercion.^[54]^[30] This perspective counters claims of inherent sectarianism by noting empirical patterns: crosses have marked American graves in foreign wars since World War I, with the Department of Defense historically providing them as optional markers for Christian service members alongside Stars of David or other faiths, evidencing a tradition of inclusive martial symbolism rather than establishment.^[55] Critics of removal efforts, including legal representatives for the memorial association, have further contended that disregarding this 70-year historical continuum risks erasing context-specific secular adaptations, potentially subjecting all veteran symbols with Judeo-Christian roots to dismantling, despite broad public support evidenced by voter-approved preservation measures in San Diego's 2005 and 2006 ballot initiatives, where over 70% favored retaining the site as a war memorial.^[30]^[56] Such arguments prioritize the cross's documented role in fostering civic unity and remembrance, grounded in verifiable veteran tributes rather than abstract doctrinal tests.^[1]

Criticisms of Litigation Outcomes

Critics, including veterans' groups and conservative legal analysts, have faulted the litigation outcomes for their protracted duration and fiscal toll on the City of San Diego, with the initial ACLU lawsuit filed in 1989 extending over 25 years until a private transfer in 2016, during which taxpayers funded defenses and complied with court-mandated attorney fees for plaintiffs.^[11] ^[57] In one settlement, the city approved $750,000 in fees to plaintiffs' counsel in 2008, while earlier rulings threatened $5,000 daily fines for non-removal of the cross, underscoring the economic burdens imposed by repeated judicial interventions.^[30] These outcomes are seen as emblematic of how ideological challenges weaponized the courts, diverting resources from public services without resolving underlying constitutional tensions.^[33] The Ninth Circuit's rulings faced accusations of judicial overreach, particularly in invalidating city efforts to transfer the site, such as the 2002 auction won by the Mt. Soledad Memorial Association, which the court deemed a unconstitutional aid to religion despite an open bidding process and compliance with state law.^[58] In 2011, a panel reversed a district court's 2008 determination that the cross served a primarily secular commemorative purpose, holding it violated the Establishment Clause; the en banc denial of rehearing drew dissents from Judge Bea and others, who emphasized the monument's historical context as a 1954 veterans' memorial with added plaques honoring war dead, arguing the majority misapplied precedents like Van Orden v. Perry (2005) by disregarding longstanding passive displays.^[59] ^[33] Legal scholars have critiqued this as an overzealous enforcement of separationism, burdening free exercise rights and ignoring the cross's evolution from a standalone symbol to a comprehensive memorial site used for ecumenical remembrances.^[58] Defenders of the cross, such as the American Freedom Law Center and First Liberty Institute, have lambasted the outcomes for disrespecting veterans by equating a war memorial with governmental religious endorsement, attributing the persistence of challenges to ACLU-driven secularist agendas rather than neutral constitutional application.^[30] ^[31] This forced procedural workarounds, including the city's 2014 eminent domain acquisition and subsequent federal authorization for private sale under the 2015 National Defense Authorization Act, which critics view as evidence of courts' hostility toward Christian symbols in public spaces, compelling evasion of direct rulings.^[33] ^[60] Such maneuvers, while preserving the cross, are argued to reflect systemic bias in federal circuits like the Ninth, known for higher reversal rates on Establishment Clause issues, prioritizing abstract separation over empirical historical use.^[58]

Resolution and Aftermath

Final Private Ownership Transfer

In December 2014, the U.S. Congress included provisions in the National Defense Authorization Act authorizing the sale of the approximately half-acre parcel underlying the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial from the U.S. Department of Defense to a private entity.^[60] This legislative action followed the federal government's acquisition of the land through eminent domain proceedings initiated in 2006, after prior city-led transfer efforts had been invalidated by courts.^[61] On July 17, 2015, the Mount Soledad Memorial Association, a private nonprofit organization responsible for maintaining the memorial site, completed the purchase of the property from the Department of Defense for $1.4 million.^[62]^[63] The transaction transferred full ownership to the association, removing the monument from public land and thereby addressing the core constitutional concerns raised in ongoing litigation regarding the Establishment Clause.^[64] Association president Bruce Bailey stated that the acquisition allowed the group to "manage the memorial’s affairs from a place of ownership and accountability," emphasizing continued recognition of veterans through events and plaques honoring over 3,700 individuals.^[62] The private transfer rendered the federal lawsuit moot, leading to its dismissal by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on August 25, 2016, with the court noting there was "nothing to fight about anymore" due to the change in ownership status.^[60] This resolution concluded over 25 years of legal challenges without requiring removal or alteration of the cross, preserving the memorial's physical structure while shifting maintenance and liability to private hands.^[11]

Impact on Similar Memorials

The protracted litigation surrounding the Mount Soledad Cross, culminating in its 2015 transfer to private ownership, highlighted vulnerabilities in longstanding veteran memorials featuring religious symbols on public land, prompting defenders to adopt enhanced secular contextualization in other disputes. In response to Ninth Circuit rulings applying the Lemon test to deem the cross an endorsement of religion, supporters added granite walls inscribed with over 5,000 veterans' names and military emblems starting in 1998, transforming it from a standalone symbol to an integrated memorial—a strategy mirrored in cases like the Pensacola Veterans Memorial Cross, where similar plaques and walls were incorporated to emphasize historical commemoration over religious primacy.^[30] These lower court outcomes in Mount Soledad contributed to perceived inconsistencies across circuits, influencing the Supreme Court's decision to grant certiorari in American Legion v. American Humanist Ass'n (2019), where the Bladensburg Peace Cross was upheld under a framework favoring the "presumption of constitutionality" for longstanding monuments with integrated secular elements. Briefs in Bladensburg referenced Mount Soledad as exemplifying rigid endorsement analysis that overlooked historical evolution, aiding the 7-2 ruling that rejected strict separationism in favor of contextual pluralism for war memorials erected decades earlier.^[65]^[66] The case's resolution via a $1.4 million sale of the underlying federal land to the Mount Soledad Memorial Association on July 20, 2015, after failed municipal transfers and eminent domain proceedings, offered a pragmatic precedent for privatization to sidestep Establishment Clause challenges, as seen in prior successes like the Mojave Desert Veterans Memorial transfer upheld by the Supreme Court in 2010. This approach, validated by averting demolition deadlines imposed in 2011 and 2013, encouraged similar efforts in locales facing atheist group lawsuits, reducing reliance on uncertain judicial outcomes amid circuit splits.^[10]^[45]

Recent Maintenance and Events

Restoration Projects

In 2024, the Mount Soledad National Veterans Memorial Association initiated a comprehensive restoration project for the 29-foot concrete cross as part of the site's 70th anniversary celebrations, focusing on preserving its structural integrity amid coastal weathering.^[67] The effort, conducted approximately every decade, encompassed professional cleaning to remove accumulated grime, repainting of the cross's surface, sealing to protect against environmental degradation, and upgrades to its lighting system for enhanced visibility.^[68]^[69] The project began in early 2024 and involved collaboration with national construction firm Bernards for management, alongside specialized contributions such as concrete refurbishment and resealing by Stonhard to address deterioration in the cross's base and surrounding elements.^[70]^[71] American Scaffold provided custom-engineered scaffolding to facilitate safe access for these tasks, ensuring minimal disruption to the memorial's operations.^[72] The refurbishment was completed later that year, with the association publicly acknowledging the involved contractors for their role in maintaining the landmark's prominence.^[73] Historically, the site has seen replacement rather than mere restoration following vandalism to the original 1913 redwood cross, which was destroyed in 1923 and rebuilt by local residents, and again with the current steel-reinforced concrete version erected in 1954 after a construction mishap.^[1] These earlier interventions underscore a pattern of community-driven upkeep, though modern projects emphasize preventive maintenance under private nonprofit stewardship since the 1998 land transfer.^[19]

Contemporary Commemorative Activities

The Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial hosts annual public ceremonies on Memorial Day and Veterans Day to honor U.S. military service members from the Revolutionary War to the present, often featuring speeches, wreath-layings, and musical performances by local groups.^[5] These events underscore the site's evolution into a private nonprofit tribute, drawing community sponsors and volunteers for organization and upkeep.^[74] The Memorial Day ceremony on May 26, 2025, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m., specifically commemorated Seaman Lakiba Nicole Palmer, a San Diego native killed in service, with a plaque dedication and reflections on community unity amid fallen heroes' sacrifices.^[29]^[75]^[76] Veterans Day 2025, scheduled for November 8 at 11:00 a.m., marked the 250th anniversaries of the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps through a dedicated program honoring all veterans' contributions across conflicts.^[77]^[78] Beyond major holidays, the memorial organizes over 40 individual honor ceremonies annually, typically involving plaque unveilings on the site's granite walls for specific veterans' stories and achievements.^[22] Specialized events include the 2025 Women’s History Tribute Brunch, which recognized LtCol Evelyn ‘Jean’ Wright (Ret.) for her pioneering service.^[79] These activities sustain the memorial's function as an active site of remembrance, reliant on private funding and public attendance.^[80]

References

[1]
Learn About the Memorial History
Such concerns were the cause of a landmark court case that embroiled the monument for decades. From 1989 to 2015, Mt. Soledad's cross faced several legal ...
[2]
https://www.metnews.com/articles/2006/paul120106.htm
[3]
Mt Soledad National Veterans Memorial, La Jolla, California
The Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial was conceived in 1952 by American Legion Post 275 of La Jolla, California to honor war veterans of the Korean War.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[4]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial | TCLF
Oct 26, 2019 · Beginning in 1913, a series of crosses was erected on the hill summit, with architect Donald Campbell designing the present version in 1954.Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[5]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial | San Diego, CA
The only memorial that honors veterans, living or deceased, from the revolutionary war to the current war on terror, with an image of the veteran.The Latest News And Events · Honor A Veteran · About · Visit The Memorial
[6]
Mt Soledad National Veterans Memorial - San Diego Tourism Authority
The only memorial that honors veterans, living or deceased, from the revolutionary war to the current war on terror, with an image of the veteran. Mt. Soledad ...
[7]
Philip K. Paulson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of San Diego - Justia Law
Soledad cross to remain on public land. In 1991, the district court ruled that the presence of the cross in a publicly owned park violates the No Preference ...
[8]
[PDF] Public Law 109–272 109th Congress An Act
To preserve the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, California, by pro- viding for the immediate acquisition of the memorial by the United States.
[9]
[PDF] Soledad Cross History - ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties
The land underneath the cross is a city-owned public park. When the current cross was dedicated, on. Easter Sunday 1954 to “Our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ,” ...<|separator|>
[10]
Mount Soledad Land Sold - NBC 7 San Diego
Jul 21, 2015 · Documents confirm the title for the half-acre plot of land beneath the Mount Soledad cross was transferred from the federal Department of ...
[11]
Embattled Soledad cross will remain standing after 25-year legal battle
Sep 8, 2016 · More than 25 years of lawsuits, court rulings, aborted sales and property transfers over the landmark Mt. Soledad cross in La Jolla have finally come to an end.
[12]
Non-profit buys Mt. Soledad land from Department of Defense - CBS 8
Jul 21, 2015 · But supporters say the land is now owned by a private organization and lawsuits wanting to remove the cross should stop. "I'm very confident ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
[13]
The Mount Soledad Cross - The American Surveyor
Nov 19, 2016 · North of downtown San Diego, and just east of La Jolla, sits a prominent hill, 822 feet in height, known as Mount Soledad, a prominent feature ...
[14]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial above La Jolla
Nov 1, 2022 · Offering spectacular panoramic views stretching from the horizon in the west to the mountains in the east, Mt. Soledad, the highest point on ...
[15]
Mt. Soledad - The SD Experience
In 1998 the City of San Diego sold the cross and the land it stands on to the nonprofit Mount Soledad Memorial Association, and the cross was transformed into ...Missing: ownership | Show results with:ownership
[16]
Visit Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial
Visitors are invited to walk along the 11 walls and view the individual veterans plaques and climb the brick steps up to the cross for one of the city's most ...
[17]
Celebrating 70 Years - Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial
Apr 12, 2024 · Over 6,600 granite plaques line the walls, honoring everyone from ... memorial walls to its gentle walkways and the landmark cross. The ...
[18]
Order A Plaque - Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial
No, plaques are placed on the next section of the walls scheduled for installation. All walls must be filled before any new plaques can be placed on new walls.
[19]
Mount Soledad in La Jolla: 100 Years of History and Controversy
100 Years of History (& Controversy). Three different crosses have actually been constructed on the hill since the early 1900s. The original cross was made ...
[20]
Mount Soledad Photos - Oceanlight.com
The Mount Soledad Cross is a 29-foot-tall cross erected in 1954. Aerial ... Panorama dimensions: 5354 x 9669.
[21]
A Beacon of Freedom: Honoring our Nation's Veterans at Mt. Soledad
Sep 15, 2024 · Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial is considered one of the most unique veterans memorials in America. Located atop of one of the highest peaks in San ...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
[22]
Mount Soledad in La Jolla: Visitors Guide, History, Veterans Memorial
Nov 4, 2024 · The current 29′ concrete version was dedicated in 1954 as a memorial to Korean War dead ...
[23]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial Historical Marker
The first Memorial walls were built in 2000. The black granite plaques are the same type of granite that comprise the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, DC.
[24]
'Many heroes': La Jolla's Mount Soledad veterans memorial begins ...
Aug 18, 2022 · Phase III will add extensions to five existing walls, allowing for 2,000 additional plaques. The memorial currently has spaces for 5,400 ...Missing: postwar | Show results with:postwar<|control11|><|separator|>
[25]
Honoring Our Veterans | Virtual Plaques | Mt. Soledad Memorial
Search & view the unique online collection of plaques honoring our veterans at Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial. Visit the memorial today.Missing: system | Show results with:system
[26]
https://www.facebook.com/1MSMA/posts/were-honored-to-share-that-mt-soledad-national-veterans-memorial-has-received-th/1287686486735357/
[27]
Cmdr. Lassen Medal of Honor Plaque Dedication at Mt. Soledad ...
Feb 19, 2025 · ... plaque dedication ceremony for Cmdr. Clyde Lassen at Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego Jan. 26, 2025. In 1969, President Lyndon B ...
[28]
Mt. Soledad Memorial 3/26 Plaque Dedication - Dover Air Force Base
Aug 25, 2016 · Veterans of 3rd Battalion, 26th Marine Regiment who served during the Vietnam War attended a plaque dedication ceremony at Mount Soledad ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[29]
Memorial Day Ceremony (at Mt. Soledad National Veterans ...
May 26, 2025 · Close to 6,000 individual veteran tributes, embedded on black granite plaques, are mounted onto the curved walls honoring our United States ...Missing: features | Show results with:features
[30]
Defense of Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial
The lawsuit alleged that the City was violating both the California and United States Constitutions by allowing the cross to stand on City property. On December ...Missing: resolution | Show results with:resolution
[31]
Mt. Soledad Is Saved. So Why Am I Worrie - News - First Liberty
Jul 24, 2015 · He loved it because it reminded him of sacrifice, patriotism, and nobility. He loved it because it was part of the cultural and physical ...Missing: Christianity | Show results with:Christianity
[32]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial Honoring Sacrifice and ...
The Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial stands as a beacon of remembrance and education, inspiring visitors to honor the legacy of America's veterans.<|control11|><|separator|>
[33]
The Battle of Mount Soledad - City Journal
Jan 23, 2015 · Erected in 1954 to commemorate Korean War veterans, the cross is part of a 170-acre, city-owned park offering breathtaking views of the Pacific ...
[34]
Philip K. Paulson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. City of San Diego - Justia Law
In December 1991, the district court ruled that the presence of the cross on publicly owned land in Mount Soledad Park violated the No Preference Clause of the ...Missing: initial lawsuit
[35]
990 F.2d 1518
Philip K. Paulson and Howard T. Kreisner challenge the constitutionality of the Mt. Soledad Cross. Both Paulson and Kreisner are atheists, Vietnam combat ...
[36]
PAULSON v. CITY OF SAN DIEGO (2001) - FindLaw Caselaw
In December 1991, the district court ruled that the presence of the cross on publicly owned land in Mount Soledad Park violated the No Preference Clause of the ...Missing: initial lawsuit
[37]
[PDF] THE CITY ATTORNEY - docs - City of San Diego
In 1989, Plaintiff Philip Paulson (“Paulson”) brought suit in the United States District ... Soledad cross. The parties are due to appear in District. Court ...
[38]
Council OKs Sale of Mt. Soledad Cross Site - Los Angeles Times
Feb 25, 1992 · The San Diego City Council voted unanimously Monday to authorize the sale of city-owned land on which the controversial Mt. Soledad cross is ...Missing: blocked | Show results with:blocked
[39]
[PDF] THE CITY ATTORNEY - docs
2. Yes, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal has held that the Mount Soledad cross is a sectarian symbol that conveys a religious message and has ...
[40]
[PDF] The Mt. Soledad Latin Cross - ACLU
Aug 24, 2006 · The. Ninth Circuit, sitting en banc, invalidated this sale as well, finding that it “was structured to provide a direct, immediate, and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[41]
Judge orders removal of Mt. Soledad Cross | Catholic News Agency
May 8, 2006 · After a 17-year legal battle, Federal District Judge Gordon Thompson ordered San Diego officials to remove the historic Mount Soledad Cross ...Missing: proceedings | Show results with:proceedings
[42]
[PDF] No. 13-1061: Mount Soledad Mem. Ass. v. Trunk
at 3, the court ordered that the cross be removed within 90 days of its order. Id. at 6. The court also stayed that order pending the resolution of any ap-.
[43]
Bush saves cross by eminent domain - Washington Times
Aug 14, 2006 · President Bush signed a bill yesterday transferring ownership by eminent domain of a 29-foot cross overlooking San Diego from the city to ...Missing: VFW | Show results with:VFW
[44]
Cross Transferred to Feds; Legal Battle Continues
Aug 15, 2006 · A similar transfer was attempted last year, but rejected by the courts. ... Mount Soledad Cross were transferred to the federal government.).Missing: failed | Show results with:failed<|separator|>
[45]
Supreme Court Takes a Pass on Mt. Soledad Cross Case | ACLU
Jun 25, 2012 · The Supreme Court declined to review our challenge to the federal government's display of a 43-foot-tall Latin cross atop Mt. Soledad in San Diego, California.
[46]
Government Display Of Mt. Soledad Cross War Memorial Declared ...
Jan 4, 2011 · In 2006, the federal government, through an act of Congress, obtained the title to the cross and its surrounding property by eminent domain, and ...
[47]
Judge Calls the Mt. Soledad Cross Unconstitutional
Jan 4, 2011 · A judge has ruled the 43-foot high cross atop Mount Soledad is unconstitutional. In a long awaited opinion, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ...Missing: initial | Show results with:initial
[48]
Mt. Soledad cross stays - for a while, at least - SCOTUSblog
Jun 30, 2014 · The Supreme Court refused on Monday to step in to save the Mt. Soledad Christian cross that stands on a hilltop north of San Diego.
[49]
Jewish War Veterans of the USA v. Hagel/Trunk v. City of San Diego
May 1, 2012 · Soledad cross war memorial is unconstitutional. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear the case in 2012 and remanded it back to district court.Missing: details | Show results with:details
[50]
Jewish War Veterans of the United States of America, Inc.; Richard A ...
In Paulson, the case invalidating the City's 1998 land sale to the Association, we held that only the Cross on Mount Soledad bears historical significance.
[51]
Humanists Applaud Court's Decision to Not Rehear Mt. Soledad ...
Oct 17, 2011 · ... arguing that the cross is an unconstitutional breach of the Establishment Clause and represents a clear preference for Christians. In ...
[52]
Cross Challenged by ACLU | Voice of San Diego
Aug 25, 2006 · “It's just as unconstitutional for the federal government as it is for the city government to sponsor, subsidize and endorse a 43-foot tall ...
[53]
The Mt. Soledad Latin Cross: Q&A | American Civil Liberties Union
Aug 24, 2006 · In 2013, a federal judge ruled from the bench upholding the Ninth Circuit's ruling and ordering that the cross must come down. Status: Closed ( ...
[54]
[PDF] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Oct 14, 2011 · The site has been used solely for the purpose of memorializing fallen soldiers, consistent with the Cross's “undeniable historical meaning,” Van ...
[55]
Growing from a simple redwood cross erected in 1913, Mt. Soledad ...
Oct 27, 2022 · That's because in July 2015 the Mount Soledad Memorial Association agreed to purchase the cross and the land beneath it for $1.4 million from ...
[56]
[PDF] Military Symbolism or Religious Preference? The Mount Soledad ...
Feb 2, 2009 · The Mount Soledad cross has a long history. In 1913, private citizens ... The MSMA erected the third cross in 1954.11 This cross is the ...
[57]
San Diego OKs $750K Attorney Payment to Settle Cross Case
Jan 17, 2008 · A federal judge ruled in May that the city had to pay the attorney $900,000 in legal fees for his work on the Mount Soledad cross case, ...
[58]
[PDF] The Mt. Soledad Cross and the Ninth Circuit's Crusade to Burden ...
Part I lays out the intricate facts and history of the long, contentious legal battle and discusses the history of the cross, its litigation, and similar ...
[59]
Mt. Soledad - Cases - First Liberty Institute
ACLU Alleges Memorial Cross is Unconstitutional Erected in 1954, the Mt. Soledad Veterans Memorial symbolizes the selfless sacrifice and service of America's ...<|separator|>
[60]
Mt. Soledad Cross Dispute Ends Quietly In Settlement - KPBS
Sep 9, 2016 · After more than 25 years of legal battles over the cross on top of Mt. Soledad, the dispute has quietly ended in a settlement.
[61]
Soledad Cross land transfer approved - San Diego Union-Tribune
Dec 12, 2014 · A law allowing the transfer of the plot of land beneath the Mount Soledad cross from government to private ownership sailed through Congress ...
[62]
Mount Soledad Cross Land Transferred to La Jolla Nonprofit
Jul 20, 2015 · The land was owned by the city of San Diego before the federal government took it over nine years ago. Supporters say the cross is part of a war ...
[63]
Nonprofit Buys Mount Soledad Cross Property | KPBS Public Media
Jul 20, 2015 · The Mount Soledad Memorial Association took control of the half-acre property on Friday. The memorial has been caught in a decades-long legal ...
[64]
Group buys land under Mt. Soledad cross, possibly ending two ...
Jul 21, 2015 · The land beneath the cross on Mt. Soledad in San Diego has been purchased by a private, nonprofit group for $1.4 million, a key step toward ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[65]
[PDF] Nos. 17-1717 and 18-18 Petitioners, v ... - Supreme Court
Dec 26, 2018 · Current and former Justices of this Court have sharply disagreed on a number of difficult questions regarding the meaning and application of the ...
[66]
Supreme Court to rule on use of religious symbols in war memorials
Mar 28, 2019 · The Mount Soledad cross is a 43-foot cross which was once on publicly owned land. In 1989, a Vietnam War veteran filed suit against the city of ...
[67]
Mt. Soledad's 70th Anniversary Restoration Project
Jul 12, 2024 · As part of our ongoing mission of honoring veterans and our 70th anniversary, Mt. Soledad has recently undergone a restoration project.Missing: maintenance | Show results with:maintenance
[68]
Mount Soledad Memorial Association renovates landmark cross
The cross was erected in 1954; the memorial currently displays more than 6,000 plaques commemorating veteran's service. On April 18, San Diego City Council ...Missing: additions | Show results with:additions
[69]
Restoring an Icon: Scaffolding Solutions for Mt. Soledad National ...
The project scope involved a comprehensive restoration, including repainting and upgrading the lighting of the cross. The primary goal for Mt. Soledad was to ...
[70]
Stonhard Proudly Supports Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial ...
Stonhard is proud to have contributed to the 2024 restoration of the Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial in San Diego, refurbishing and resealing the concrete ...
[71]
Stonhard Proudly Contributes to Mount Soledad Veterans Memorial ...
The project, initiated in early 2024, saw national construction management company Bernards collaborate with memorial staff to restore the iconic cross and its ...
[72]
Major Maintenance Project at Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial
Apr 21, 2024 · The project will involve a professional cleaning of the iconic cross, as well as painting and other maintenance tasks. This initiative is ...Missing: restoration | Show results with:restoration
[73]
Mt. | Mt Soledad National Veterans Memorial - LinkedIn
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial is pleased to announce that the refurbishment project has been completed. A huge thank you to the following companies ...
[74]
Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial - Facebook
May 24, 2025 · THANK YOU to the incredible sponsors of our 2025 Memorial Day Ceremony at Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial!
[75]
https://soledadmemorial.org/remembering-seaman-lakiba-nicole-palmer-a-san-diego-hero/
[76]
Ceremonies and events honor Memorial Day 2025 around San Diego
May 26, 2025 · The Mount Soledad National Veterans Memorial hosted its annual Memorial Day ceremony. A plaque dedication and tribute was paid to San Diego ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[77]
Veterans Day 2025 - Mt Soledad Memorial
Oct 10, 2025 · Join us on Saturday, November 8th at 11:00 AM as Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial honors all Veterans and commemorates the 250th ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[78]
2025 Veterans Day Ceremony Celebrating All Veterans Who Have ...
Nov 8, 2025 · At this year's Veterans Day ceremony on Saturday, November 8 at 11 a.m., the Mt. Soledad National Veterans Memorial will honor all Veterans ...Missing: 2020-2025 | Show results with:2020-2025
[79]
https://soledadmemorial.org/honoring-a-pioneer-ltcol-evelyn-jean-wright-ret-celebrated-at-womens-history-tribute-brunch/
[80]
The Latest News And Events | Mt. Soledad Memorial
Remembering Seaman Lakiba Nicole Palmer: A San Diego Hero. In honor of Memorial Day 2025, we remember a fallen hero with deep San Diego roots.