Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Muhammad al-Nasir

Abu ʿAbd Allāh Muḥammad al-Nāṣir (d. 1213) was the fourth caliph of the Almohad Caliphate, reigning from 1199 until his death and overseeing a vast Berber Muslim empire spanning North Africa, the Iberian Peninsula, and parts of the western Mediterranean. He succeeded his father, Abū Yūsuf Yaʿqūb al-Manṣūr, amid internal stability but soon confronted mounting pressures from Christian kingdoms in Iberia and doctrinal challenges within the Almohad movement. Al-Nāṣir's rule was defined by efforts to reinforce Almohad unitarian orthodoxy through administrative and religious reforms, including reasserting central authority over provincial governors and moderating some of the doctrinal rigidities introduced under his predecessor to broaden support among Malikī scholars and non-Almohad Muslims. However, his proclamation of jihad against the Christian coalition led to the catastrophic Almohad defeat at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212, where his forces were routed, exposing vulnerabilities in Almohad military cohesion and precipitating the empire's fragmentation and accelerated loss of al-Andalus. This reversal, attributed by contemporaries to lapses in religious zeal, marked a pivotal decline in Almohad power and emboldened regional revolts, culminating in al-Nāṣir's death the following year and succession by his underage son, Yūsuf II.

Early Life and Ascension to Power

Birth and Family Background

Muhammad al-Nasir, full name Muhammad ibn Abi Yusuf Ya'qub al-Nasir li-Din Allah, was born circa 1182 to the Almohad caliph Abu Yusuf Ya'qub al-Mansur (r. 1184–1199), who had consolidated and expanded the empire across the and through military victories, including the decisive defeat of the forces at the in 1195. His birth likely occurred in , the Almohad capital established under his father's rule as a center of political and religious authority. As a scion of the Almohad dynasty, al-Nasir belonged to the Banu Abd al-Mu'min, the ruling clan descended from (r. 1130–1163), a of origin from the Kumiya tribe near modern-day Nedroma in present-day , who rose as the successor to the movement's theological founder, Muhammad ibn Tumart, and forged the caliphate by overthrowing the Almoravids. The dynasty emphasized unitarian doctrine (), rejecting in theology and enforcing strict adherence among tribes and Arab subjects alike, which shaped the familial and cultural milieu into which al-Nasir was born. His paternal grandfather was Abu Ya'qub Yusuf I (r. 1163–1184), who continued the consolidation of power initiated by Abd al-Mu'min. Historical records provide scant details on al-Nasir's mother or siblings prior to his accession, suggesting she may have been a concubine or lesser consort in line with Almohad practices where caliphal heirs often emerged from diverse backgrounds within the imperial household. Upon al-Mansur's death on 23 January 1199, the approximately 17-year-old was immediately proclaimed caliph, inheriting an empire at its territorial peak but facing nascent challenges from internal dissent and external pressures.

Education and Early Role in Almohad Court

Muhammad al-Nasir was the son of Almohad Caliph Abu Ya'qub Yusuf al-Mansur, who ruled from 1184 to 1199. Toward the end of al-Mansur's reign, the caliph actively sought support from key tribal and religious figures to designate Muhammad as his successor, ensuring a smooth dynastic transition within the Almohad system. This appointment positioned the young prince as heir apparent, involving him in court deliberations and preparations for governance amid the empire's expansive administration over North Africa and al-Andalus. As heir, al-Nasir underwent training aligned with Almohad elite formation, which combined rigorous religious instruction in the movement's doctrine of absolute (divine unity) with practical military preparation. The Almohad ḥuffāẓ—the scholarly and leadership cadre from which princes drew—received education emphasizing Ibn Tumart's theological reforms alongside combat readiness for and internal pacification. This upbringing equipped al-Nasir for the caliphal role, though primary chronicles note limited independent actions prior to his 1199 ascension, reflecting his subordinate status under al-Mansur's direct oversight.

Ascension Following Abu Yaqub al-Mansur's Death

Abu Yaqub al-Mansur, the third Almohad caliph, died in Marrakesh in 1199 after a reign marked by military successes, including the decisive victory at the Battle of Alarcos in 1195. His death occurred amid the empire's territorial zenith, spanning North Africa from Libya to southern Spain, though internal fissures from rigid doctrinal enforcement and peripheral revolts were emerging. Muhammad al-Nasir, his son and designated successor, was proclaimed caliph immediately upon his father's death in 1199, with no recorded challenges to his legitimacy from Almohad sheikhs, tribal allies, or provincial governors. This seamless transition reflected al-Nasir's prior involvement in , as he had served in administrative capacities during al-Mansur's campaigns and proceedings, positioning him as the natural heir within the dynastic structure established by Ibn Tumart's successors. The proclamation in , the political and religious center, reaffirmed continuity in Almohad orthodoxy and authority. At ascension, al-Nasir, approximately 17 years old, confronted an inheritance of administrative complexity, including oversight of vast tribal confederations and the maintenance of doctrinal purity through the talaba (religious scholars). While the core territories remained loyal, early signs of strain appeared in , where Christian kingdoms exploited post-Alarcos complacency, and in , where Banu Ghaniya rebels persisted. Al-Nasir's initial consolidation focused on stabilizing the court and military, appointing trusted viziers to manage fiscal and logistical demands of the expansive realm.

Domestic Policies and Administration

Viziers and Key Advisors

Abu Muhammad Abd al-Wahid ibn Abi served as to Muhammad al-Nasir from 1199 to 1205, managing administrative affairs during the early years of the caliph's reign following his ascension at age 10. A member of the influential Hintata tribe through his descent from Abu Hafs al-Hintati, Abd al-Wahid transitioned to the role of governor of in 1207, where he effectively suppressed the lingering revolt of the Banu Ghaniya Banu Ghaniya, a Arab dynasty that had challenged Almohad authority in the eastern and since the 1180s. His success in 1206 against the rebels, including the capture and execution of their leader Abdallah ibn Abi Hafs, restored central control over and surrounding regions, preventing fragmentation and enabling tribute flows to . Abu Sa'id Uthman ibn Jam'i also functioned as a under , contributing to palace bureaucracy and amid economic strains such as declining gold production and disrupted trade routes. His role extended into the succession, advising the young Yusuf II from 1214 onward, indicating continuity in Almohad administrative reliance on experienced tribal-linked officials to navigate internal dissent and fiscal shortfalls. Earlier, Abu Zayd bin Yujan held the vizierate briefly from 1198 to 1199, bridging the transition from al-Mansur's era but with limited documented impact on 's policies. Key advisors like exemplified the Almohad system's integration of tribal leaders into high office, balancing doctrinal enforcement with pragmatic governance, though 's youthful inexperience and post-1212 military setbacks exposed vulnerabilities in this structure, including unpaid troops and eroded loyalties.

Religious Enforcement and Almohad Doctrine

Muhammad al-Nasir rigorously upheld the of tawhid, the absolute unity of God, which rejected anthropomorphic interpretations of divine attributes and supplanted the prevalent of jurisprudence with a rationalist derived from Ibn Tumart's teachings. This framework, emphasizing logical deduction over (imitation of predecessors), was propagated through state-controlled institutions, including the talaba (religious students) who served as doctrinal enforcers across the empire. Al-Nasir promoted a centralized Islamic to consolidate loyalty among the tribes, mandating public sermons (khutba) delivered in Berber language to reinforce unity and doctrinal purity. Enforcement extended to suppressing deviations within Muslim society, continuing the Almohad tradition of purging anthropomorphist or literalist tendencies deemed incompatible with strict ; nonconformists faced social , exile, or execution, as the regime viewed doctrinal laxity as a causal threat to imperial cohesion. Al-Nasir's administration integrated tribal sheikhs into this system, requiring their adherence to Ibn Tumart's A'azz ma yutlab (the most demanded thing), the foundational Almohad creed that demanded public profession of monotheistic tenets without intermediaries. This internal rigor aimed to eradicate Almoravid-era influences, such as tolerance for Sufi excesses or Maliki rituals, fostering a uniform that underpinned military mobilization. Regarding non-Muslims, al-Nasir perpetuated the Almohad policy of abolishing status, compelling and —particularly Muwallad (converted) communities—to convert to or face exile, a departure from prior protections under payment. Jewish traders encountered intensified pressure to profess the Almohad creed, with non-compliance leading to economic marginalization or flight to Christian territories. During his rule, were mandated to wear cloaks or turbans as identifying markers, a measure persisting until 1224 and symbolizing enforced subordination. These actions reflected the regime's causal logic: religious heterogeneity undermined the , prompting purges that reduced non-Muslim populations but strained administrative resources amid rebellions.

Suppression of Internal Rebellions

During Muhammad al-Nasir's caliphate (1199–1213), internal stability in the Almohad core territories of Morocco faced challenges from regional uprisings, including the Dakala Revolution in the Doukkala plain, a revolt in , and an Arab tribal rebellion in the . These events stemmed from local discontent with centralized Almohad authority and tribal resistance amid the caliph's youth—he ascended at around age 16—and his emphasis on religious seclusion over direct governance. Suppression efforts relied heavily on delegated authority to capable viziers and provincial governors, such as Abu Sa'id Uthman al-Jarsi and Ibn Abi Hafs, who mobilized Almohad tribal levies to restore order. The caliph's administration quelled these revolts through military campaigns and reinforced loyalty among tribes, preventing widespread fragmentation in the immediate hinterlands of and other key centers. However, al-Nasir's perceived administrative detachment invited insurrections among larger confederates, foreshadowing later dynastic vulnerabilities, though immediate threats were contained without major territorial losses. These suppressions underscored the Almohad system's dependence on sheikhly alliances and coercive force to enforce unity, as prioritized doctrinal purity—evident in his commissioning of theological works—over expansive internal reforms. By 1203, core Moroccan control was secured sufficiently to allow redirection of resources toward peripheral campaigns, though underlying tribal frictions persisted.

Military Campaigns

North African Campaigns Against Rebels

Upon ascending to the caliphate on 25 1199, Muhammad al-Nasir inherited ongoing challenges to Almohad authority in from the Banu Ghaniya, Almoravid descendants who had invaded from the since 1184, allying with local Arab tribes and capturing key sites like Bijaya in eastern . These rebels exploited Almohad overextension, briefly controlling and Gabes before partial setbacks in 1187–1188 under al-Nasir's predecessor. To neutralize the Banu Ghaniya's maritime base and supply lines, al-Nasir personally led a naval-military expedition in 1203, conquering the Balearic Islands—including Mallorca and Menorca—and eliminating their core leadership, thereby severing external support for mainland insurgencies. This operation, involving coordinated Almohad fleets and ground forces, marked a decisive blow against the last Almoravid holdouts and restored nominal control over eastern Maghreb trade routes. By 1206, al-Nasir's viceroy Abdul Wahid ibn Abi Hafs completed the suppression in , defeating remaining Banu Ghaniya forces and their tribal allies in , reconquering , and reorganizing local governance to prevent resurgence. These campaigns stabilized Almohad rule in the region temporarily, though they strained resources and foreshadowed later fractures, as local governors like the Hafsids asserted by 1229. Al-Nasir's efforts relied on tribal levies and centralized command but highlighted vulnerabilities to nomadic alliances and logistical demands across the .

Restoration Efforts in al-Andalus

Following his ascension in 1199, Muhammad al-Nasir directed primary military resources toward quelling rebellions in North Africa, particularly against the Banu Ghaniya in the Balearic Islands and eastern Maghreb, which delayed comprehensive interventions in al-Andalus where Christian forces exploited the relative Almohad inaction. Local Almohad governors in Iberia maintained control over core territories like Seville and Cordoba, but faced increasing pressure from Castilian and Aragonese incursions, including the recapture of frontier castles during the 1200s. By 1211, escalating Christian offensives prompted a decisive restoration campaign; broke existing truces, seizing Malagón, Calatrava la Vieja, and the strategic fortress of Salvatierra, which threatened Almohad supply lines and morale in the region. Al-Nasir responded by proclaiming a , mobilizing forces from , , and —comprising Berber tribesmen, Andalusian levies, and black slaves—totaling an estimated 100,000 to 300,000 combatants, though logistical challenges reduced effective strength. In February 1211, he departed , crossing the by mid-May and establishing headquarters in before advancing toward Jaén to intercept the Christian coalition and reinforce beleaguered garrisons. These efforts temporarily halted further immediate Christian gains, with al-Nasir rallying disaffected Muslim emirs and redistributing resources to fortify key cities like Ubeda and Baeza, aiming to reassert central Almohad authority eroded by local autonomies. However, internal divisions, including resistance from some Andalusian elites wary of intensified Almohad doctrinal impositions, undermined cohesion, as evidenced by uneven troop commitments from peninsular provinces. The campaign's focus on defensive consolidation rather than offensive reconquest reflected al-Nasir's strategic caution, prioritizing the preservation of the Valley heartland over expansive recoveries lost since his father's 1195 victory at .

The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa and Its Aftermath

In 1212, Muhammad al-Nasir mobilized a large Almohad , estimated at 50,000 to 100,000 troops drawn from Moroccan, Andalusian, , , and vassal contingents, including , to confront a Christian coalition advancing into Almohad territory in . The caliph positioned his forces defensively at Puerto de Muradal near Las Navas de Tolosa, relying on fortified terrain and cavalry charges to repel the invaders led by , supported by , Pedro II of Aragon, military orders such as the Templars and Calatravans, and a diminished number of crusaders (ultramontanos), with Christian forces totaling approximately 10,000 to 20,000 after many foreign contingents departed due to logistical strains. The engagement unfolded on July 16, 1212, amid intense heat, with al-Nasir directing central advances and flank maneuvers against the Christian under Diego López de Haro. Christian forces executed a coordinated in three columns—Alfonso in the center, on the left, and on the right—employing feigned retreats and flanking to breach Almohad lines after prolonged fighting, leading to a as Almohad cohesion collapsed. al-Nasir initially held his position but ultimately fled the battlefield toward Jaén, abandoning his army to pursuit by Christian troops that extended for miles into the night, resulting in heavy Almohad casualties estimated between 20,000 and 100,000, while Christian losses remained comparatively low. In the immediate aftermath, Alfonso VIII capitalized on the victory by capturing Baeza and without resistance, pushing the frontier southward by over 100 miles and exposing southern Almohad strongholds to further incursions. al-Nasir's retreat to undermined his prestige and military authority within the , exacerbating internal divisions and disloyalty, as the defeat shattered Almohad dominance in and facilitated subsequent Christian gains, including the fall of key cities like by 1236. The battle's decisiveness stemmed from the Almohads' inability to integrate diverse levies effectively against a unified, tactically adaptive opponent, marking a causal turning point in the erosion of centralized caliphal power.

Foreign Relations

Interactions with Iberian Christian Kingdoms

Following the ascension of Muhammad al-Nasir in 1199, the pursued pragmatic diplomacy with select Iberian Christian kingdoms to mitigate multi-front threats and facilitate internal stabilization. Truces with the Kingdom of León under Alfonso IX enabled the Leonese monarch to redirect military efforts toward rival Christian realms like , rather than engaging the Almohads directly; these agreements formed part of León's broader expansion strategy amid inter-Christian conflicts. Similar arrangements existed with , where a spanning 1198 to 1201 with Sancho VII provided temporary respite, distinguishing it from prior pacts by limiting external Christian support against Almohad forces. These diplomatic overtures reflected Almohad efforts to exploit divisions among the Christian rulers of , , León, , and , often intervening indirectly in their disputes to preserve frontier stability. Inheriting a ten-year truce from his predecessor Abu Yaqub al-Mansur with (concluded circa 1197 following the ), al-Nasir initially upheld such pacts, though border raids and strategic shifts eroded them by the early 1210s. Alliances like that with León, however, drew papal condemnation, contributing to Alfonso IX's in 1209 for perceived collaboration with Muslim powers. Post-1212, after the Almohad defeat at Las Navas de Tolosa, interreligious hostilities with Iberian Christians subsided temporarily as al-Nasir redirected resources to quell North African revolts, effectively yielding peace without formal concessions or tribute demands from the . This lull underscored the caliph's prioritization of core territories over renewed Iberian engagements, amid the fragmentation of Almohad authority in .

Correspondence and Relations with King John of England

In 1212, amid of 's mounting conflicts with and his own barons, a reportedly traveled from to the Almohad court of Muhammad al-Nasir, seeking a against common adversaries. The primary account derives from the chronicler , writing in the mid-13th century, who described the envoys—including two knights and a cleric named Robert of —proposing that John would submit his kingdom as a to al-Nasir, potentially even converting to and aligning under Almohad in exchange for naval or support. portrayed al-Nasir as dismissive, questioning the envoys' overtures and ultimately rejecting the proposal, citing the caliph's preoccupation with Iberian fronts following the decisive Christian victory at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa earlier that year. Modern historiography regards Paris's narrative with caution, attributing elements like the alleged offer of to his evident against , whom he depicted as desperate and perfidious. While no surviving Almohad records corroborate the embassy, —such as John's documented diplomatic overtures to other Muslim rulers and the strategic context of —suggests a genuine attempt at alliance, albeit without the hyperbolic submission claims. Al-Nasir, focused on consolidating Almohad authority in and after heavy losses at Las Navas (July 16, 1212), had little incentive to divert resources to distant European entanglements, rendering any partnership improbable. No direct correspondence between al-Nasir and John survives, and the episode underscores the caliph's insular , prioritizing against Iberian Christians over broader Mediterranean coalitions. The failed outreach highlights John's isolation, contributing to his capitulation to papal in 1213 and the baronial revolt culminating in the following year, without Almohad involvement.

Death and Historical Assessment

Circumstances of Death

Following the decisive Almohad defeat at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa on July 16, 1212, Muhammad al-Nasir withdrew his forces southward and returned to , the Almohad capital. There, he secluded himself within the royal palace, avoiding public appearances amid the empire's mounting crises. Al-Nasir died in in 1213, approximately one year after the battle, with historical accounts attributing his demise to illness amid the psychological and political strain of the reversal. Some later analyses propose alternative explanations, including grief-induced decline or possible murder linked to internal factionalism, though contemporary records emphasize natural causes without definitive evidence for foul play. His death marked the end of direct leadership following the territorial setbacks in , exacerbating the caliphate's fragmentation.

Immediate Consequences for the Almohad Caliphate

Following the death of Muhammad al-Nasir in May 1213, his approximately ten-year-old son Yusuf II succeeded him as caliph, adopting the title al-Mustansir; the young ruler's accession was confirmed through election by the Almohad sheikhs, reflecting the movement's traditional consultative mechanisms amid the empire's existing vulnerabilities. This transition to a minor on the throne necessitated regency by senior family members and officials, which diluted central authority and hindered decisive responses to the caliphate's compounding crises, including revenue losses from halved tax bases in al-Andalus due to prior territorial erosion. In , the power vacuum facilitated early challenges from tribal groups, notably the Banu Marin, who launched attacks against Almohad forces as early as along the coastal regions, exploiting the regime's weakened military cohesion post-Las Navas de Tolosa. These incursions marked the onset of peripheral fragmentation, as provincial governors increasingly prioritized local defense over loyalty to , though no full-scale revolts immediately toppled the core structure. In , Christian kingdoms pressed advantages gained in 1212, capturing peripheral strongholds and prompting Almohad concessions, yet the caliphate retained nominal over major cities like into the 1220s, delaying total collapse but underscoring the inability to mount effective counteroffensives under immature leadership. Overall, al-Nasir's demise without a capable adult heir accelerated institutional decay, as the Almohad system's reliance on charismatic, ideologically driven caliphs faltered against fiscal strain and opportunistic rivals, setting the stage for later secessions like that of the Hafsids in Ifriqiya by the 1220s.

Achievements, Criticisms, and Long-Term Legacy

Muhammad al-Nasir's achievements included suppressing rebellions in by personally leading an army from between 1204 and 1205 to eliminate rebel leaders. He also secured the in 1203, expanding Almohad territorial control. During his reign from 1199 to 1213, he increased the weight of Almohad coinage to 4.66 grams, reflecting efforts to stabilize the economy amid prior declines. Criticisms of al-Nasir center on his military leadership, particularly the defeat at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212, where logistical failures, supply shortages, unpaid troops, and low morale among forces led to a by superior Christian numbers. At age 19 during the battle, his execution of tribal sheikhs alienated key supporters, exacerbating desertions and internal dissent. Economic mismanagement, including empty warehouses and a market fire in , compounded by loss of control over and tribes due to uncompensated losses, fueled rebellions and weakened the caliphate's cohesion. His centralized policies hindered regional defenses against Christian incursions, such as the loss of Salvatierra castle in 1211. Al-Nasir's long-term legacy is tied to accelerating the Almohad Caliphate's decline, with the 1212 defeat marking the onset of territorial losses in , culminating in the fall of in 1236 and in 1248. This overextension of ambitions amid economic strain and tribal divisions aligned with Ibn Khaldun's cyclical theory of dynastic collapse by the fourth generation. His reign facilitated Christian momentum and paved the way for the Marinid dynasty's rise, as internal weaknesses from faltering revenues and gold supplies eroded Almohad authority in and Iberia.

References

  1. [1]
    War In The Iberian Peninsula, 700-1600 [PDF] - VDOC.PUB
    This would mark the climax of the Almohad power (Bennison 2016). Abu Yusuf al-Mansur was succeeded by his son, Abu 'Abd Allah Muhammad al-Nasir (d. 1213) ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Almohad: the Rise and Fall of the Strangers - PDXScholar
    Aug 27, 2020 · In addition to the outpouring of scholarly articles on the Almohad since 2000, two books have been published in the last ten years: Allen ...
  4. [4]
  5. [5]
    Muḥammad ibn Abī Yūsuf Yaʿḳūb al-Nāṣir | Almohad caliph
    The Almohad caliph al-Nāṣir (Muḥammad ibn Abī Yūsuf Yaʿqūb) restored the empire's authority in the region with several large military campaigns from 1205 to ...
  6. [6]
    Muhammad al-Nasir Biography - Pantheon World
    Muhammad al-Nasir was the last Fatimid caliph of Egypt. He was overthrown by the Ayyubids in 1171 and died in 1174.
  7. [7]
    Morocco: The Almohads (1121 - 1269 CE) - Chronicle Fanack.com
    Aug 7, 2022 · Fired by the idea of reforming the religion and the morals of the Maghreb, he preached against corrupted morals, music and luxury, promising a ...
  8. [8]
    'Abd al-Mu'min | Almohad Dynasty, History, & Biography | Britannica
    Oct 11, 2025 · ʿAbd al-Muʾmin was a Berber caliph of the Almohad dynasty (reigned 1130–63), who conquered the North African Maghrib from the Almoravids and ...
  9. [9]
    Muḥammad al-Nāṣir | Almohad caliph - Britannica
    The Almohad caliph Muḥammad al-Nāṣir had moved to Jaén, then the mountainous area around Baeza, intending to cut off the Christians at the plain of Las Navas ...
  10. [10]
    The Mothers of the Caliph's Sons: Women as Spoils of War during ...
    1163–1184) had about 18 sons, and his grandson Yaqub al-Mansur (r. 1184 ... He sought their help to establish his son Muhammad as his heir, as we shall ...
  11. [11]
    Muhammad al-Nasir | Military Wiki - Fandom
    Biography. On January 25, 1199, al-Nasir's father al-Mansur died; al-Nasir was proclaimed the new caliph that very day. al-Nasir inherited from his father an ...
  12. [12]
    Yusuf II, Almohad caliph Facts for Kids
    Sep 6, 2025 · Yusuf II, Almohad caliph facts for kids ; Predecessor, Muhammad al-Nasir ; Successor, Abd al-Wahid I ; Born, c. 1203 ; Died, 1224 (aged c. 20–21).
  13. [13]
    Almohad Dynasty - New World Encyclopedia
    The Almohad's were Islamic revivalists who set themselves the task of eradicating laxness and enforcing a strict and pious observance of Islam's rituals and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Almohad Caliphate History, Culture & Caliphs - Study.com
    Almohad Dynasty Caliphs ; Muhammad al-Nasir, 1199 to 1213, He lost the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212, giving Christian kingdoms the momentum they needed ...
  15. [15]
    The Almohads | My Jewish Learning
    The subsequent ruler, Abu 'Abd-Allah, ordered that Jews wear yellow cloaks or turbans, which continued until 1224 (The conjecture that this had anything to do ...
  16. [16]
    Revolutions and Riots against the Almohad tate in Morocco and ...
    Apr 21, 2022 · In this research, the revolutions and riots that took place against the Almohads state, we discussed the revolutions that took place against ...<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    Las Navas de Tolosa, Battle of (1212) - The Crusades - Erenow
    Muhammad al-Nasir agreed to intervene after some hesitation. In February 1211 he and his forces left Marrakech; they reached Tarifa in mid-May and finally ...
  18. [18]
    Almohad wars in the Iberian Peninsula - Wikipedia
    In July 16, Alfonso VIII, Peter II of Aragon and Sancho VII of Navarre fought against Muhammad al-Nasir, the Almohad caliph, in Navas de Tolosa (near Santa ...
  19. [19]
    Al-Andalus revisited - Arab News
    In 1211, in a bid to rid the province of the Christian threat once and for all, he led a strong army across the Mediterranean. This time, however, the ...
  20. [20]
    [PDF] chapter 16 MUSLIM SPAIN AND PORTUGAL: AL-ANDALUS AND ...
    il was succeeded in his position of power by his son Muhammad, ... The original heir ... Al-Mansur's death marks the end of the greatness of the Almohad caliphate.
  21. [21]
    Almohads in Al-Andalus.12th Century. - Spain Then and Now
    The high point of Almohad dominance came in 1195 with the resounding defeat of Alfonso VIII of Castile at Alarcos (about mid-way between Madrid and Granada).
  22. [22]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa (1212) based on the provided segments. To retain all information in a dense and organized manner, I will use a combination of narrative text and a table in CSV format for key details. The narrative will provide an overview and context, while the table will consolidate specific data points (e.g., dates, roles, sizes, tactics, etc.) across all summaries.
  23. [23]
    The Treaties between the Kings of León and the Almohads within the Leonese Expansion Strategy, 1157–1230 (Chapter 7) - Journal of Medieval Military History
    ### Summary of Treaties Between Almohad Caliphs and Kingdom of León (Focus on Muhammad al-Nasir, 1199–1214)
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    ALARCOS, 19 July 1195 - War History
    Dec 14, 2024 · In the time of [the caliph al-Mansur] they drew their pay every four months without fail. But in the time of this [caliph, al-Nasir], and ...
  26. [26]
    The Papacy and Christian Mercenaries - Thirteenth-Century - jstor
    ... Almohad caliph Muhammad al-Nasir. As these states reorganized internally, interreligious conflict halted, at least for the time being. Castile and the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] King John's Delegation to the Almohad Court (1212)
    Ultimately, we do not yet have enough evidence to prove that an embassy from King John to the caliph al-Nāṣir took place in 1212. However, what is shown ...
  28. [28]
    King John's Delegation to the Almohad Court (1212) - Brepols
    In stockA study of medieval interreligious interactions as manifested in Matthew Paris's story of an English delegation to the Almohads.
  29. [29]
    The Almohads - ArcGIS StoryMaps
    Mar 25, 2020 · Returning to Marrakech in defeat, the caliph retreated into his palace until his death in 1213 . . The victory, transformed through he ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  30. [30]
    The relations of King Sancho VII of Navarre - with the Almohads
    ... scholarly and trustworthy John of Salisbury, Henry's ambassadors told the Pope that their master would sooner follow the errors of Nûr-al-Dïn and adopt his ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] The Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa
    Christian knights returned triumphantly to their camp after chasing the routed Almohad army for miles. Al-Nasir fled quickly to Morocco, never to return to ...
  32. [32]
    Marinids - New World Encyclopedia
    1215: Banu Marin (Marinids) attack the Almohads when the 16-year-old Almohad caliph Yusuf II Al-Mustansir took power in 1213. The battle took place on the coast ...<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] Ḥafṣid State Formation, Diplomacy, and Transformation, 1220-1450
    From 1204 to 1205, Almohad caliph al-Nasir (r. 1199-1213) himself led an army from ... Muslim state-ship than scholarly works often has recognized. The ...