Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Mutation rate

The mutation rate is the frequency with which a specific gene or genomic site undergoes a change from its wild-type sequence to a mutant form, typically quantified as the number of mutations per biological unit, such as per nucleotide site per generation, per cell division, or per replication cycle.^[1] Mutation rates exhibit substantial variation across organisms and contexts, reflecting differences in genome size, replication mechanisms, and environmental pressures. In humans, the germline mutation rate is approximately 1.2 × 10^{-8} mutations per nucleotide site per generation, leading to roughly 60–100 novel point mutations in the diploid genome of each individual.^[2] In contrast, bacteria like Escherichia coli display lower rates of about 2 × 10^{-10} per site per cell division, while RNA viruses exhibit dramatically higher rates ranging from 10^{-6} to 10^{-3} errors per nucleotide per replication cycle, enabling rapid evolution but increasing susceptibility to error catastrophe.^[2]^[3] These rates are not fixed; they can be modulated by intrinsic factors like DNA polymerase fidelity and repair pathways, as well as extrinsic influences such as UV radiation or chemical mutagens.^[2] As the primary source of heritable genetic variation, the mutation rate plays a pivotal role in evolution, fueling adaptation through natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow while also contributing to genetic diseases and aging.^[4] Mutation rates themselves evolve under selective pressures, often decreasing in lineages with large effective population sizes to minimize deleterious effects, as evidenced by an inverse correlation between mutation rate and effective population size (u ∝ N_e^{-0.6}) across microbes and multicellular species.^[5] This dynamic interplay underscores the mutation rate's centrality in population genetics, where it balances the introduction of beneficial variants against the burden of harmful ones.^[5]

Fundamentals

Definition and Scope

The mutation rate, denoted as μ, is defined as the probability that a new mutation arises at a specific nucleotide site or across the entire genome during DNA replication or per generation.^[6] This measure captures the inherent error rate of genetic replication processes, typically expressed as mutations per nucleotide per replication cycle or per generation, and serves as a fundamental parameter in population genetics for modeling genetic variation and evolutionary change.^[3] The scope of mutation rate encompasses both germline mutations, which occur in reproductive cells and can be inherited by offspring, and somatic mutations, which arise in non-reproductive body cells and are not passed to descendants.^[7] It applies broadly to diverse genetic materials and organisms, including DNA-based systems in prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as well as RNA genomes in viruses, where rates vary due to differences in replication fidelity and genome size.^[8] In prokaryotes like bacteria, mutation rates reflect rapid cell divisions, while in eukaryotes, they account for complex multicellular life cycles, and in viruses, they highlight high variability between DNA and RNA types.^[9] The concept of mutation rate was formalized in population genetics during the 1920s, with J.B.S. Haldane developing early theoretical frameworks for mutation-selection balance and providing some of the first estimates based on Drosophila studies.^[10] Pioneering work by researchers like H.J. Muller in the late 1920s further refined initial estimates through experiments on fruit flies, establishing mutation rate as a quantifiable evolutionary force.^[11] A key distinction exists between mutation rate and mutation frequency: the former represents the probability of a mutation event per replication opportunity, such as per cell division or generation, whereas the latter denotes the observed proportion of mutants within a population, which can accumulate over multiple generations and be influenced by selection.^[3]

Units and Basic Parameters

Mutation rates are typically quantified using standardized units to facilitate comparisons across organisms and studies. The most common unit is mutations per nucleotide site per generation, often expressed in scientific notation such as 10^{-8} for humans, where the human germline mutation rate is estimated at approximately 1.2 \times 10^{-8} per nucleotide per generation.^[12] Other prevalent units include mutations per genome per generation, which for the human diploid genome averages around 60-100 new single-nucleotide variants per generation, and mutations per cell division, particularly relevant for unicellular organisms or somatic cells, where bacterial rates can reach 10^{-10} to 10^{-9} per base pair per division.^[13]^[14] The fundamental parameter for calculating mutation rate, denoted as \mu, follows the basic formula:

\mu = \frac{m}{N \times t}

where m represents the observed number of mutations, N is the number of nucleotides (or sites) under consideration, and t is the number of generations or cell divisions.^[15] This formulation assumes mutations occur as rare, independent events modeled by a Poisson process, where the probability of mutation at any site is low and events do not influence one another.^[16] In fluctuation analysis, such as the classic Luria-Delbrück experiment, the distribution of mutants across parallel cultures follows the Luria-Delbrück distribution, which arises from random mutation timing during exponential growth and enables estimation of \mu under the Poisson assumption; this distribution exhibits high variance due to jackpot events where early mutations amplify clonally.^[17] Adjustments to these parameters account for biological complexities. Ploidy influences effective rates, as diploid organisms like humans replicate two genome copies per cell division, potentially doubling mutation opportunities compared to haploids, though repair mechanisms may mitigate this.^[18] Replication fidelity, determined by DNA polymerase accuracy (error rates around 10^{-5} to 10^{-7} before proofreading) and post-replication repair (reducing net rates by 100- to 1000-fold), further modulates \mu.^[19] Genome size effects scale the per-genome mutation load linearly with N, leading to higher absolute mutations in larger genomes (e.g., eukaryotic vs. prokaryotic) even if per-nucleotide rates are comparable, as more sites serve as potential targets.^[20]

Measurement Techniques

Direct Estimation Methods

Direct estimation methods for mutation rates involve empirical observation of new mutations arising in controlled laboratory environments, typically through techniques that minimize the influence of natural selection and allow for the direct counting or detection of mutational events in replicating populations. These approaches provide precise measurements of spontaneous mutation rates by tracking changes over generations in model organisms such as bacteria and yeast, or in human lineages via pedigree analysis. Mutation accumulation (MA) lines represent a foundational technique for directly estimating mutation rates, involving the serial propagation of numerous independent lineages under relaxed selection to allow mutations to accumulate randomly over many generations. In this method, populations are bottlenecked periodically to small sizes, reducing the opportunity for selection to act, and mutations are subsequently enumerated through sequencing or phenotypic assays. This approach was pioneered in bacteria, particularly in studies of Escherichia coli, where John W. Drake's 1991 analysis of spontaneous mutation rates across DNA-based microbes established a near-constant genomic mutation rate of approximately 0.003 per genome per replication, despite wide variation in genome sizes. Subsequent MA experiments in E. coli using whole-genome sequencing have refined these estimates, revealing base-specific rates around 2 × 10^{-10} per nucleotide per generation and highlighting biases toward A/T mutations.^[21] Reporter gene assays offer another direct method for quantifying mutation rates by exploiting loss-of-function or reversion events in engineered reporter genes, such as lacZ from E. coli, which encodes β-galactosidase and enables colorimetric detection of mutants on selective media. In bacterial systems, forward mutation assays using lacZ reporters detect base substitutions and frameshifts by measuring the frequency of non-functional alleles in growing populations, while reversion assays track the restoration of function in predefined mutants. These assays, developed by researchers like Cynthia G. Cupples and John H. Miller, allow sensitive detection of specific mutation types in E. coli, with rates calibrated against known mutagens or repair-deficient strains.^[22] In yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), similar lacZ-based systems quantify mutation spectra in chromosomal contexts, providing insights into replication fidelity and repair efficiency, often yielding rates on the order of 10^{-7} to 10^{-8} per locus per generation. The fluctuation test, originally developed by Salvador E. Luria and Max Delbrück in 1943, estimates mutation rates by analyzing the variance in the number of mutants across parallel cultures grown from small inocula, leveraging the jackpot effect where early mutations lead to clonal expansions.^[23] In their seminal experiment with E. coli phage resistance, Luria and Delbrück demonstrated that mutations occur randomly during non-selective growth, calculating rates via the ratio of total mutants to cell divisions, typically around 10^{-8} per cell per generation for the studied locus. Modern adaptations of the fluctuation test, often combined with antibiotic resistance markers, continue to validate these principles in bacteria, providing robust estimates insensitive to plating biases when analyzed with maximum likelihood methods. Recent advances in whole-genome sequencing have enhanced direct estimation by enabling the detection of de novo mutations in MA lines and human pedigrees, offering genome-wide resolution without reliance on phenotypic reporters. In microbial MA experiments, deep sequencing of accumulated lineages has uncovered the full spectrum of spontaneous mutations, including indels and structural variants, with E. coli studies post-2010 confirming Drake's genomic rate while revealing repair pathway dependencies.^[21] For humans, trio sequencing of parent-offspring pedigrees since the early 2010s has directly measured germline de novo rates at approximately 1.2 × 10^{-8} per nucleotide per generation, with a strong paternal bias and elevated rates in older fathers, as evidenced in large Icelandic cohorts. These pedigree-based approaches, exemplified by whole-genome analyses of multi-generation families, have identified approximately 100–150 de novo mutations (including single-nucleotide variants, indels, and structural variants) per diploid genome per generation, emphasizing the role of sequencing depth in distinguishing germline from somatic events.^[24]

Indirect Estimation Methods

Indirect estimation methods infer mutation rates from patterns in existing genetic data, such as sequence alignments, pedigrees, and phylogenetic trees, without requiring direct observation of mutation events in controlled settings. These approaches leverage comparative genomics and evolutionary models to reconstruct historical rates, often assuming neutrality for certain sites to approximate the underlying mutation process. One common strategy involves analyzing substitution rates from aligned sequences, particularly synonymous substitutions (Ks), which serve as proxies for neutral mutation rates since they experience minimal selective pressure. The rate of synonymous substitutions is calculated by correcting observed differences for multiple hits and transition/transversion biases, providing an estimate of the neutral evolutionary rate. In molecular clock models, the neutral mutation rate λ is derived from the sequence divergence K between two lineages separated by time T using the formula

\lambda = \frac{K}{2T},

where the factor of 2 accounts for mutations accumulating independently in each lineage. This method has been widely applied to estimate long-term neutral rates across species, though it assumes a constant rate over time, which may not hold due to rate heterogeneity. Complementary use of the dN/dS ratio (ω), where dS approximates Ks, helps distinguish neutral evolution (ω ≈ 1) from selection but focuses primarily on non-neutral processes rather than raw mutation rates. Phylogenetic methods employ maximum likelihood frameworks to estimate branch-specific mutation rates from sequence alignments, incorporating models of nucleotide substitution and tree topologies. Tools like PAML (Phylogenetic Analysis by Maximum Likelihood) fit codon-based models to data, allowing inference of site-specific or branch-specific rates while accounting for evolutionary constraints. For instance, in rapidly evolving viruses, these methods have estimated HIV-1 substitution rates at approximately 2.7 × 10^{-3} substitutions per site per year in the p17 gag gene and up to 6.7 × 10^{-3} in the V3 region of env, highlighting the utility for short-term, high-rate systems where direct observation is challenging.^[25] Fossil-calibrated molecular clocks integrate paleontological divergence dates to scale genetic distances into absolute mutation rates over deep evolutionary time. By anchoring phylogenetic trees with fossil records of speciation events, these methods calibrate substitution rates to estimate long-term averages, often revealing rate variations linked to life-history traits. In mammals, such calibrations have shown mitochondrial DNA mutation rates varying from about 10^{-8} to 10^{-7} substitutions per site per year across taxa, with slower rates in larger-bodied species due to extended generation times and lower metabolic rates.

Sources of Variation

Intrinsic Biological Factors

Intrinsic biological factors influencing mutation rates encompass heritable genetic and cellular mechanisms that operate within organisms, independent of external influences. These include variations in DNA repair pathways, the fidelity of replication enzymes, and inherent genomic structural features that predispose certain regions to higher error accumulation. Such factors contribute to baseline differences in mutation rates observed across species and within genomes, shaping evolutionary trajectories through consistent internal biases. DNA repair efficiency plays a critical role in modulating mutation rates, with defects in systems like mismatch repair (MMR) leading to substantial increases. In Escherichia coli, inactivation of MMR components, such as the mutS gene, results in mutator phenotypes where mutation rates rise by 100- to 200-fold compared to wild-type strains, primarily due to unchecked replication errors. This elevation occurs because MMR normally excises and replaces mismatched bases post-replication, and its absence allows errors to persist, amplifying the overall mutation frequency. Similar defects in eukaryotic MMR pathways, such as those involving MSH2 or MLH1, have been linked to elevated somatic mutation rates in humans, underscoring the system's conserved role in maintaining genomic stability. The replication machinery itself introduces variability through polymerase fidelity and associated processes. In E. coli, DNA polymerase III exhibits an intrinsic error rate of approximately 10^{-5} errors per nucleotide during base selection, which is reduced to about 10^{-7} after 3'→5' exonuclease proofreading activity. This proofreading step enhances accuracy by removing misincorporated nucleotides, preventing their fixation in the daughter strand. In eukaryotes, replication timing further influences rates, with late-replicating regions—often associated with heterochromatin—showing elevated mutation frequencies; for instance, human genomic sequences replicating later in S phase accumulate mutations at rates up to 22% higher than early-replicating euchromatic regions, likely due to prolonged exposure to endogenous damage or reduced repair efficiency during condensed chromatin states. Genomic features impose site-specific biases on mutation rates, independent of repair or replication dynamics. CpG dinucleotides experience particularly high mutation rates, approximately 10- to 50-fold elevated compared to other sites, owing to the spontaneous deamination of methylated cytosines (5-methylcytosine) into thymine, which generates C→T transitions if unrepaired. This methylation-induced deamination is prevalent in vertebrate genomes, where over 70% of CpG sites are methylated, contributing to the underrepresentation of CpGs over evolutionary time. Additionally, chromatin organization affects regional rates: heterochromatic regions generally exhibit higher mutation accumulation than euchromatic ones, as the compact structure in heterochromatin limits access to repair proteins, leading to disparities in error correction across the genome. Organismal differences in mutation rates reflect adaptations in these intrinsic mechanisms, with multicellular eukaryotes typically displaying higher per-site-per-generation rates than prokaryotes due to variations in proofreading and repair sophistication. In humans, the germline mutation rate is approximately 1 × 10^{-8} per base pair per generation, contrasting with bacterial rates around 3.5 × 10^{-10} per site per generation in wild-type E. coli, attributable to enhanced proofreading in eukaryotic polymerases like DNA polymerase δ and ε, which achieve fidelities comparable to or exceeding bacterial systems through more robust exonuclease activity and accessory factors. These baseline differences highlight how evolutionary pressures have fine-tuned internal safeguards to balance genomic integrity with the demands of organismal complexity.

Extrinsic Environmental Factors

Extrinsic environmental factors significantly influence mutation rates by inducing DNA damage or altering replication fidelity, often independently of intrinsic cellular mechanisms. Mutagens, such as ultraviolet (UV) radiation, primarily affect bacteria and other microorganisms by forming cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers in DNA, which block replication and lead to error-prone bypass, thereby elevating mutation rates by 10- to 100-fold depending on exposure dose.^[26] Similarly, chemical mutagens like alkylating agents, including ethyl methanesulfonate, alkylate DNA bases such as guanine at the O6 position, causing miscoding during replication and resulting in transition mutations, with observed increases in forward mutation frequencies of greater than 10-fold in Escherichia coli at low concentrations.^[27] Temperature and pH variations also modulate spontaneous mutation rates through their effects on chemical stability of DNA. Elevated temperatures accelerate depurination—the hydrolysis of the glycosidic bond between purine bases and the deoxyribose sugar—following Arrhenius kinetics, where the rate approximately doubles for every 10°C rise, as seen in model DNA oligonucleotides under physiological conditions.^[28] Low pH exacerbates this process by protonating the glycosidic bond, increasing depurination rates up to 100-fold at pH 3 compared to neutral conditions in double-stranded DNA, which in turn promotes base substitutions if unrepaired.^[29] In microbial systems, point mutation rates can differ by up to 3.6-fold across different environmental growth conditions.^[30] In pathogenic lifestyles, host immune pressure and antibiotic exposure drive adaptive increases in bacterial mutation rates to facilitate rapid evolution. Sublethal antibiotic concentrations, such as those of ciprofloxacin, induce oxidative stress and activate error-prone DNA polymerases, enhancing genome-wide mutation rates by 10- to 100-fold in E. coli populations, thereby accelerating resistance acquisition.^[31] For viruses, replication within host cells often elevates mutation rates due to reliance on error-prone host polymerases; DNA viruses like polyomaviruses exhibit mutation rates of 10^{-6} to 10^{-8} substitutions per nucleotide per cycle when using low-fidelity host enzymes, exceeding their intrinsic fidelity.^[8] Human-induced factors, including smoking and air pollution, substantially raise somatic mutation rates in tissues prone to cancer. Tobacco smoke introduces polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons that form DNA adducts, doubling the burden of APOBEC-signature mutations—characterized by C-to-T transitions at TC dinucleotides—in lung tumors compared to non-smokers, contributing to higher overall tumor mutational burdens.^[32] Similarly, exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) from air pollution correlates with increased somatic mutations in lung cancers among never-smokers, with whole-genome sequencing revealing up to 20% higher mutation loads and distinct signatures linked to oxidative damage, independent of smoking history.^[33]

Mutation Spectrum

Types and Frequencies

Mutations are broadly classified into point mutations, which involve single nucleotide changes, and insertions/deletions (indels), which alter the length of the DNA sequence. Point mutations are subdivided into transitions and transversions. Transitions involve the substitution of a purine for another purine (A↔G) or a pyrimidine for another pyrimidine (C↔T), while transversions exchange a purine for a pyrimidine or vice versa (e.g., A↔C). Transitions occur 2-3 times more frequently than transversions across diverse genomes, primarily due to tautomeric shifts in nucleotide bases that facilitate purine-purine or pyrimidine-pyrimidine mismatches during replication.^[34]^[35] Insertions and deletions represent another major category, often occurring at homopolymeric regions where repetitive sequences like poly-A or poly-T tracts are prone to polymerase slippage. In humans, the rate of short indels (1-20 bp) is approximately 10^{-9} per site per generation, with many clustering in these repetitive contexts. Larger structural variants, such as copy number variations or inversions exceeding 20 bp, are rarer, occurring at rates of approximately 0.1–0.2 per diploid genome per generation (equivalent to ~10^{-11} per site), contributing less frequently to the overall mutation spectrum but with potentially greater functional impact.^[36]^[37] The frequencies of specific point mutations exhibit base-specific biases. In mammals, C→T substitutions are among the most common, accounting for up to 40% of single nucleotide variants, particularly at CpG dinucleotides where deamination of methylated cytosine drives this transition. Other transitions like A→G follow, while transversions such as C→A or G→T are less prevalent. In model organisms like yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), the mutation spectrum shows an AT bias, with a universal tendency for GC→AT substitutions that contributes to the AT-rich composition of their genomes over evolutionary time.^[38]^[39] Mutation frequencies also display context-dependency, including strand asymmetry arising from replication dynamics. The lagging strand, synthesized discontinuously by Okazaki fragments, experiences higher error rates than the leading strand due to differences in polymerase usage and exposure to replication-associated damage, leading to elevated mutation frequencies on the lagging template in bacterial and eukaryotic genomes.^[40]

Biases and Patterns

Mutation rates exhibit significant biases across the genome, leading to non-uniform distributions of mutations that are influenced by local sequence features and structural elements. One prominent example is the elevated mutation rate at CpG dinucleotides, where cytosines are frequently methylated to 5-methylcytosine (5mC). The deamination of 5mC to thymine creates a G:T mismatch that, if unrepaired, results in a C-to-T transition mutation upon replication. This process causes CpG sites to mutate at rates 10- to 50-fold higher than non-CpG sites in the human genome.^[41]^[42] Sequence-specific motifs further contribute to these biases by modulating polymerase error rates and repair efficiency. Mutations are particularly influenced by the trinucleotide context surrounding the altered base, as polymerase fidelity varies with immediate neighboring nucleotides. For instance, in cancer genomes, APOBEC enzymes generate characteristic mutational signatures, such as C-to-T or C-to-G changes preferentially at TC dinucleotides (e.g., in the TpC context), reflecting hypermutation driven by these cytidine deaminases during immune responses or pathological states. These context-dependent patterns are cataloged in comprehensive analyses of over 60 somatic signatures across human cancers, highlighting how local sequence environments dictate mutation propensity.^[43]^[44] Chromosomal location introduces additional spatial biases in mutation accumulation. Telomeres experience higher mutation rates due to replication stress and fork stalling, which increases error-prone repair and double-strand breaks in these repetitive, late-replicating regions. Similarly, germline mutation rates are elevated at constitutive DNA replication origins, where initiation of replication forks exposes single-stranded DNA vulnerable to damage and mutagenesis. Sex-specific biases amplify these patterns; in humans, the male germline transmits approximately three times more de novo mutations to offspring than the female germline, attributed to more cell divisions in spermatogenesis and higher exposure to replication errors over a lifetime.^[45]^[46]^[47] Temporal dynamics reveal age-related biases in somatic mutation accumulation, often following a clock-like progression independent of external stressors. In various human tissues, somatic mutations increase linearly with chronological age, with burdens far exceeding germline rates due to cumulative replication and endogenous damage. This clock-like signature, such as SBS5 in cancer genomes, accumulates at a constant rate across cell types, serving as a molecular biomarker of biological aging and linking mutation load to degenerative processes.^[48]^[49]

Evolutionary Implications

Role in Adaptation and Diversity

Mutations serve as the ultimate source of genetic variation, providing the raw material upon which natural selection acts to drive adaptation and evolutionary change.^[50] In stable environments, low mutation rates predominate to maintain genomic stability and minimize the accumulation of deleterious variants, preserving adapted phenotypes across generations.^[51] Conversely, elevated mutation rates can facilitate rapid adaptation in dynamic or stressful conditions by increasing the supply of beneficial variants; for instance, in bacteria exposed to antibiotics, mutator strains with mutation rates up to 100-fold higher than wild-type emerge and accelerate the evolution of resistance through enhanced production of adaptive mutations.^[52] Mutation rates significantly influence the generation of genetic diversity, with implications varying between reproductive modes. In asexual populations, higher mutation rates directly accelerate lineage divergence by introducing novel variants that accumulate without recombination, thereby promoting evolvability in response to selective pressures.^[50] In sexual organisms, mutation rates interact with recombination to shape diversity; moderate rates balance the introduction of variation with the purging of harmful mutations via outcrossing, optimizing long-term adaptability while avoiding excessive genetic load.^[50] However, excessively high rates can cross an error threshold, beyond which mutational errors overwhelm replication fidelity, leading to the erosion of genetic information in quasispecies distributions—as conceptualized in Eigen's model, where the critical rate μ_c ≈ 1/L (with L as genome length) marks the transition to informational collapse in self-replicating systems.^[53] Illustrative examples highlight these roles in real systems. The influenza A virus, with a high RNA-dependent RNA polymerase error rate of approximately 10^{-5} substitutions per nucleotide site per replication cycle, generates substantial antigenic diversity that enables immune evasion and seasonal adaptation, underscoring how elevated mutation facilitates short-term evolutionary success in rapidly changing host environments.^[54] In humans, the germline mutation rate of about 1.2 × 10^{-8} per site per generation underpins observed nucleotide diversity (π ≈ 10^{-3}), as quantified by the relationship π ≈ 4N_e μ (where N_e is effective population size), linking mutation supply directly to standing genetic variation available for adaptation.^[55]

Evolution of Mutation Rates Themselves

Mutation rates themselves are subject to natural selection, as they represent heritable traits influenced by the efficacy of DNA repair mechanisms and other fidelity factors. Selection generally acts to minimize deleterious mutations while balancing the potential benefits of increased genetic variation in certain contexts, leading to evolved optima that vary across taxa. Theoretical and empirical studies indicate that mutation rates evolve as a compromise between the costs of maintaining high-fidelity replication and the advantages of evolvability under specific demographic and environmental pressures.^[56]^[57] The drift-barrier hypothesis posits that natural selection drives mutation rates toward a minimum by favoring enhanced DNA repair, but this process is constrained by genetic drift, particularly in populations with small effective sizes. In species with large effective population sizes, such as many prokaryotes, selection is more efficient at purging mildly deleterious mutator alleles, resulting in lower per-site mutation rates compared to species with smaller effective sizes, like vertebrates. For instance, bacterial mutation rates are often orders of magnitude lower than those in multicellular eukaryotes, reflecting stronger selective refinement against weakly deleterious fidelity mutations in larger populations. This barrier explains why mutation rates do not universally approach zero, as drift limits further reductions beyond a certain threshold determined by population size and the power of selection.^[58]^[56]^[59] In contrast, mutator alleles that elevate mutation rates can confer selective advantages in rapidly changing or novel environments by accelerating the production of beneficial variants, allowing them to hitchhike to fixation alongside adaptive mutations. Experimental evolution in bacterial populations has demonstrated this dynamic, such as in Escherichia coli lineages where defects in the mutS gene, part of the mismatch repair system, increase mutation rates and spread through linkage with beneficial adaptations during adaptation to new stressors. Such mutators are transient in stable environments but persist or evolve in fluctuating conditions, highlighting how environmental heterogeneity can favor higher rates despite the long-term accumulation of deleterious mutations.^[60]^[61] Theoretical models further elucidate potential optima for mutation rates. Extensions of Fisher's geometric model, which conceptualizes adaptation in multidimensional phenotypic space, predict an intermediate optimal mutation rate that maximizes the supply of small-effect beneficial mutations without overwhelming the genome with deleterious ones. This optimum arises because mutations too small may fail to escape drift, while excessively large or frequent changes disrupt fitness. Complementing this, cost-benefit analyses of DNA repair investment reveal a trade-off: allocating resources to fidelity mechanisms reduces mutation rates but imposes energetic and opportunity costs, leading selection to favor rates where the marginal benefit of additional repair equals its cost. These models underscore that no universal optimum exists; instead, evolved rates reflect species-specific life histories and ecological niches.^[62]^[63]^[64] Empirical evidence from comparative genomics supports the evolved nature of mutation rates, revealing approximately 10-fold variation across species even within closely related clades, such as primates, consistent with selective optimization rather than neutral drift alone. In experimental evolution with microbes, mutation rates have been observed to evolve rapidly: for example, in adapting Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations, rates decreased under stabilizing selection but increased under directional pressures, demonstrating direct responsiveness to selective regimes. More recently, in 2025 experimental evolution with Pseudomonas fluorescens demonstrated the de novo evolution of localized hypermutation mechanisms that enhance evolvability by increasing adaptive mutation supply in specific genomic regions under fluctuating selection pressures.^[65] These findings affirm that mutation rates evolve as adaptive traits, shaped by the interplay of drift, selection, and environmental demands.^[66]^[20]^[60]^[67]

References

[1]
mutation rate | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
Frequency with which a gene changes from the wild-type to a specific mutant; generally expressed as the number of mutations per biological unit.
[2]
A new era of mutation rate analyses: Concepts and methods - PMC
The mutation rate is a pivotal biological characteristic, intricately governed by natural selection and historically garnering considerable attention.
[3]
Mutation Rates, Mutation Frequencies, and Proofreading-Repair ...
Sep 21, 2021 · RNA virus mutation rates are 10^-3 to 10^-6 errors per nucleotide. Mutation rate is the proportion of errors, while frequency is the average of ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[4]
Studying Mutation and Its Role in the Evolution of Bacteria - PMC - NIH
Mutation is the engine of evolution in that it generates the genetic variation on which the evolutionary process depends.
[5]
Evolution of the mutation rate - PMC - PubMed Central
refers to the equilibrium frequencies of deleterious alleles that are reached when the input of new variants by mutation is balanced by the removal by natural ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[6]
Mutation Rate - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Mutation rate (μ) is the frequency of a mutation event during genome replication, measured as mutations per base per replication round.<|separator|>
[7]
Somatic Mutation - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Somatic mutation is an alternation in DNA that occurs after conception. In contrast to germline mutations, somatic mutations are not transmitted to progeny.Rna-Seq: Methods And... · 3 Somatic Mutation Detection · Molecular And Genetic Bases...<|control11|><|separator|>
[8]
Viral Mutation Rates - PMC - NIH
The resulting rates range from 10−8 to10−6 s/n/c for DNA viruses and from 10−6 to 10−4 s/n/c for RNA viruses. Similar to what has been shown previously for DNA ...
[9]
The Distribution of Rates of Spontaneous Mutation over Viruses ...
Feb 6, 2006 · The rate among viral and cellular microbes with DNA chromosomes is close to 0.0034. Mutation rates among higher eukaryotes, estimated from ...
[10]
[PDF] Haldane and the first estimates of the human mutation rate
Haldane (1927) was the first to develop the formal theory for equilibrium frequencies of alleles in mutation– selection balance, and these calculations later ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
[11]
Trends in genetics – before the molecular era - Wiley Online Library
Oct 20, 2010 · In 1922 a first estimate was made for Drosophila by Morgan and Muller, based on recurrence mutation frequencies. The estimated total number was ...
[12]
Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation
For the genes involved in this study, the average rates of base-substitutional mutation are 11.63 (1.80) and 11.22 (3.23) × 10−9 per site per generation for ...
[13]
Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans - PMC - NIH
The average mutation rate was estimated to be approximately 2.5 x 10(-8) mutations per nucleotide site or 175 mutations per diploid genome per generation.Missing: units example
[14]
Rate, molecular spectrum, and consequences of human mutation
Although the human per-generation mutation rate is exceptionally high, on a per-cell division basis, the human germline mutation rate is lower than that ...
[15]
Determining Mutation Rates in Bacterial Populations - PMC - NIH
The purpose of this article is to provide experimental and mathematical methods for determining spontaneous mutation rates in bacterial cultures.
[16]
A Practical Guide to Measuring Mutation Rates in Antibiotic Resistance
The mutation rate can be determined by using the equation μ = [(r2/N2) − (r1/N1)] × ln (N2/N1) = (f1 − f2) × ln (N2/N1), where r1 is the observed number of ...
[17]
Sorting out mutation rates - PMC - NIH
Luria and Delbrück deduced that if a mutant happened to arise early during the growth of a culture, it would produce a large clone of identical descendants.
[18]
The genome-wide rate and spectrum of spontaneous mutations ...
May 14, 2018 · By altering the dynamics of DNA replication and repair, alternative ploidy states may experience different rates and types of new mutations, ...
[19]
Mutation Rates, Spectra, and Genome-Wide Distribution of ...
DNA mismatch repair is a highly conserved process that maintains the fidelity of genomes by decreasing the mutation rate 100- to 1000-fold (Kunkel and Erie 2005) ...
[20]
The divergence of mutation rates and spectra across the Tree of Life
Aug 24, 2023 · As a consequence, the average number of mutations per genome per cell division ranges from ∼ 0.01 for the smallest to ∼ 0.001 for the ...
[21]
Rate and molecular spectrum of spontaneous mutations in ... - PNAS
Sep 18, 2012 · In this report, we analyze spontaneous mutations accumulated over thousands of generations by wild-type Escherichia coli and a derivative defective in mismatch ...
[22]
Reporter gene regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by ... - PubMed
This assay can also be used to evaluate mutation rates associated with various conditions for in vitro PCR amplification of DNA.Missing: bacteria | Show results with:bacteria
[23]
Sorting out mutation rates - PNAS
Luria and Delbrück deduced that if a mutant happened to arise early during the growth of a culture, it would produce a large clone of identical descendants.
[24]
Mutation accumulation under UV radiation in Escherichia coli - Nature
Nov 6, 2017 · Irradiation with UV radiation induces thymine dimer lesions in DNA sequences. The unrepaired lesions increase the rate of replication errors, ...
[25]
ON THE MUTAGENIC EFFECT OF ALKYLATING AGENTS ... - PNAS
alkylating agents, but at low concentrations, the negative slope decreases. Both forward and reverse mutation rates are much larger with EES than with the.
[26]
Self-catalyzed site-specific depurination of guanine residues ... - PNAS
Mar 21, 2006 · The rate of spontaneous acid-catalyzed depurination should follow the usual temperature dependence, doubling with every 10°C rise; the ...
[27]
Mutational specificity of depurination. - PNAS
ABSTRACT. The mutagenic consequences of damage to. DNA produced by low pH and high temperature have been determined in a forward mutational system capable ...
[28]
Antibiotic treatment enhances the genome-wide mutation rate of ...
Our results suggest that antibiotics may generally enhance the mutation rates of target cells, thereby accelerating the rate of adaptation.
[29]
Tobacco smoke carcinogens exacerbate APOBEC mutagenesis and ...
Jan 22, 2025 · First, we found that the average burden of APOBEC signature mutations is nearly double in lung cancers from smokers compared to non-smokers ( ...Missing: pollution | Show results with:pollution
[30]
NIH study links particulate air pollution to increased mutations in ...
Whole-genome sequencing study found air pollution to cause more cancer-related changes than secondhand smoke.
[31]
Transition to transversion ratio estimation by accounting codon ...
Jun 30, 2023 · The ratio of ti to tv is theoretically expected to be 0.5. However, the ratio is generally observed around 2.0 in genomes (7,8). Factors such as ...
[32]
Are Nonsynonymous Transversions Generally More Deleterious ...
Aug 17, 2020 · Transitions require a much smaller distortion of the DNA double-helix structure than transversions so tend to occur more frequently in DNA ...
[33]
Hotspots of Human Mutation - PMC - NIH
An analysis of 33 families found a de novo indel rate of ~9 × 10–10 mutations per nucleotide per generation [7]. Approximately 45% of indels are concentrated in ...
[34]
Characteristics of de novo structural changes in the human genome
Our data indicate a mutation rate of 0.68 × 10−9 indel (1–20 bp) per base per generation and 0.08 SVs (>20 bp) per haploid genome (or 0.16 SVs per generation).
[35]
Somatic mutation rates scale with lifespan across mammals - Nature
Apr 13, 2022 · The mutational spectra across species appeared broadly consistent with that observed in humans, with a dominance of C>T and A>G substitutions ...
[36]
A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in ...
... mutation rates are unique to animals. Remarkably, each of the base substitutional mutations that we observed initiated at an A/T site (67% to G/C), which ...
[37]
The Inherent Asymmetry of DNA Replication - PMC - PubMed Central
Oct 6, 2018 · The lagging strand may have a higher rate of mutagenesis than the leading strand due to both incorporation of low fidelity DNA Polymerase α ...
[38]
CpG mutation rates in the human genome are highly dependent on ...
CpG dinucleotides mutate at a high rate because cytosine is vulnerable to deamination, cytosines in CpG dinucleotides are often methylated, and deamination ...
[39]
Somatic CpG hypermutation is associated with mismatch repair ...
Jul 18, 2024 · The majority of CpG sites in the genome are methylated, and deamination of 5mC to thymine causes G:T mismatches, which lead to C > T mutation ...Missing: 50x | Show results with:50x
[40]
The repertoire of mutational signatures in human cancer | Nature
Feb 5, 2020 · Somatic mutations in cancer genomes are caused by multiple mutational processes, each of which generates a characteristic mutational ...
[41]
SBS13 - Mutational Signatures - COSMIC
APOBEC3A is probably responsible for most mutations in human cancer, although APOBEC3B may also contribute (these differ in the sequence context two bases 5' to ...<|separator|>
[42]
Esc2 promotes telomere stability in response to DNA replication stress
Mar 6, 2019 · It appears, therefore, that stalled replication forks at TEL06R result in a higher mutation rate than at a non-telomeric location, suggesting ...Analysis Of Mutation Rates... · Results · Replication Fork Stalling At...
[43]
DNA replication initiation shapes the mutational landscape and ...
Nov 9, 2022 · Germline mutation rate is increased at constitutive origins. To determine the impact of replication initiation on mutation rates, we first ...
[44]
A paternal bias in germline mutation is widespread in amniotes and ...
Aug 2, 2022 · In humans and other mammals, germline mutations are more likely to arise in fathers than in mothers. Although this sex bias has long been ...
[45]
Somatic mutations in aging and disease - PMC - NIH
Numerous studies have documented the accumulation of somatic mutations with age in normal cells and tissues of mice, humans, and other animals.
[46]
The clock-like accumulation of germline and somatic mutations can ...
Mutations assigned to the clock-like signature SBS5 are found across cell types and increase significantly with age in every one (Fig 3E–3L). Moreover, SBS5 is ...
[47]
Impacts of mutation effects and population size on mutation rate in ...
Sep 30, 2010 · In any natural population, mutation is the primary source of genetic variation required for evolutionary novelty and adaptation.
[48]
Mutation rate dynamics in a bacterial population reflect tension ...
According to theory, mutation rates should be minimized for well-adapted populations living in stable environments, whereas hypermutators may evolve if ...
[49]
Mutation Frequencies and Antibiotic Resistance - PMC - NIH
In the case of antibiotic resistance, the mutation rate is frequently defined as the in vitro frequency at which detectable mutants arise in a bacterial ...
[50]
Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological ...
Eigen, M. Selforganization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58, 465–523 (1971).
[51]
The Mutational Robustness of Influenza A Virus | PLOS Pathogens
Aug 29, 2016 · While high mutation rates may increase the rate at which influenza virus will adapt to a new host, acquire a new route of transmission, or ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[52]
Population size influences the type of nucleotide variations in humans
Dec 5, 2019 · Nucleotide diversity (π = 4Neμ) is a measure of genetic variation, which is determined by mutation rate (μ) and effective population size (Ne).
[53]
Evolution of the mutation rate - ScienceDirect.com
Therefore, a key to understanding mutation rate evolution is determining the degree to which evolved mutation rates approach the barriers imposed by drift.
[54]
Genetic drift, selection and the evolution of the mutation rate - PubMed
Oct 14, 2016 · A potentially revealing hypothesis for mutation-rate evolution is that natural selection primarily operates to improve replication fidelity.
[55]
Drift-barrier hypothesis and mutation-rate evolution - PubMed - NIH
Nov 6, 2012 · Mutation dictates the tempo and mode of evolution, and like all traits, the mutation rate is subject to evolutionary modification.
[56]
Lower Bound to the Evolution of Mutation Rates - Oxford Academic
In contrast, if the population is initiated at a very low mutation rate, the mean mutation rate increases toward the quasi-equilibrium but does so slowly ...
[57]
Rapid evolution of mutation rate and spectrum in response ... - Nature
Aug 13, 2022 · The mean single-nucleotide mutation (SNM) rates in ancestral WT and MMR- progenitors are respectively 3.5 × 10−10 and 2.4 × 10−8 per site per ...
[58]
What is driving the acquisition of mutS and rpoS polymorphisms in ...
Recent experiments using evolving continuous-culture populations demonstrated that mutators such as mutS and mutY are enriched by hitchhiking with ...
[59]
Monotonicity of fitness landscapes and mutation rate control - PMC
First, we consider the geometric case of fitness being isomorphic to distance from an optimum, and show how problems of optimal mutation rate control can be ...
[60]
Darwinism for the Genomic Age: Connecting Mutation to ... - Frontiers
Feb 6, 2017 · Can selection produce long-term differences in mutation rate between species through balancing the costs and benefits of mutation and repair?
[61]
Life history and deleterious mutation rate coevolution - ScienceDirect
Sep 21, 2023 · The cost of germline maintenance gives rise to a trade-off between lowering the deleterious mutation rate and investing in life history ...
[62]
Evolution of the mutation rate across primates - ScienceDirect.com
almost 10-fold across species — with ...
[63]
Experimental evolution and the dynamics of genomic mutation rate ...
Here, we review advances in our understanding of mutation rate evolution that have been contributed by experimental studies.