Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast

The (NKAO) was an autonomous administrative region within the , established on July 7, 1923, by the Central Executive Committee of the Azerbaijan SSR and dissolved on November 26, 1991, by the of . The oblast encompassed a mountainous territory in the , covering approximately 4,400 square kilometers, with a population of about 192,000 in the , of which roughly 77 percent were ethnic and 21 percent . Despite its formal subordination to Azerbaijan, the region's ethnic composition—stemming from historical Armenian settlement patterns and Soviet demographic policies—fostered persistent tensions, as Armenians sought administrative transfer to the SSR, a demand repeatedly rejected by to preserve Soviet . The NKAO's , granted under Soviet nationalities policy, included limited through a regional soviet but lacked fiscal or independence, reflecting central control over ethnic divisions engineered during the Bolshevik consolidation of Transcaucasia. In the late 1980s, amid Mikhail Gorbachev's , local Armenian leaders petitioned for unification with , igniting interethnic clashes that escalated into the following the USSR's collapse, rendering the oblast's structures obsolete as Armenian forces seized control by 1994. This Soviet-era delineation, prioritizing geopolitical stability over ethnic , exemplified causal dynamics where arbitrary borders amplified irredentist pressures, culminating in the region's separation until Azerbaijan's 2023 reintegration dissolved remaining autonomous pretensions.

Background and Establishment

Pre-Soviet Historical Context

The region of , encompassing the mountainous highlands of eastern , traces its historical habitation to , with ethnic present since the 6th century BCE as part of the ancient province of Artsakh. Over centuries, it fell under successive dominions including (2nd century BCE to 8th century CE, later Armenianized), Arab caliphates, Seljuks, , and Persian Safavids from the early 16th century, with the name "" (Turkic-Persian for "black garden") emerging during this Turkic-Persian influenced era. In the mountainous districts, Armenian communities maintained a demographic predominance amid these shifts, governed semi-autonomously by local melik (prince) families under nominal Persian oversight. The Karabakh Khanate, established in 1747 with Shusha as its center, represented Muslim Turkic rule over the broader area but left the highland Armenian melikdoms with considerable de facto independence until Russian expansion. Russia annexed the khanate through the 1805 agreement with its ruler and formalized control via the Treaty of Gulistan in 1813 following the Russo-Persian War (1804–1813), incorporating Karabakh into the Elizavetpol Governorate. The subsequent Treaty of Turkmenchay (1828) after another Russo-Persian conflict ceded remaining Iranian Transcaucasian territories, prompting large-scale Armenian resettlements: approximately 40,000 from Iran and 84,600 from the Ottoman Empire by the early 1830s, bolstering the Armenian population in the highlands. These migrations, combined with Muslim outflows to Persia and the Ottoman Empire, altered demographics, with Armenians comprising the majority in the future Nagorno-Karabakh territory. Russian imperial censuses reflect this: in the mountainous Karabakh districts, Armenians numbered 30,850 in 1823 (versus 5,370 Tatars/Muslims), rising to 106,363 Armenians by 1897 (versus 20,409 Tatars), driven by returnees, resettlements, and natural growth amid relative stability under tsarist administration. The area, populated for centuries by Christian Armenians alongside Turkic Azeris in lower districts, experienced intercommunal tensions by the early 20th century, including mutual brutalities that disrupted prior coexistence, though the highlands retained an Armenian preponderance. Shusha uyezd, established in 1868, administered the region until the 1917 Russian Revolution, setting demographic precedents for later delimitations.

Soviet Creation and Border Delimitation (1923)

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast was established on July 7, 1923, via a decree of the Central Executive Committee of the Azerbaijan Soviet Socialist Republic titled "On the Establishment of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast," subordinating the region's administration to Baku while granting it nominal autonomy in cultural and local affairs. This decision came amid the Soviet Union's broader territorial reorganization of the Transcaucasus following the 1921-1922 formation of the Azerbaijan, Armenia, and Armenia SSRs within the Transcaucasian SFSR, where ethnic Armenians constituted approximately 95 percent of the oblast's population of around 109,000 at the time. The move reflected Joseph Stalin's role as People's Commissar for Nationalities, who prioritized administrative stability and Azerbaijan's claims—rooted in pre-Soviet control over Karabakh lowlands—over ethnic self-determination, despite the area's historical Armenian demographic dominance in the highlands. Earlier, on July 4, 1921, the Plenum of the Caucasian Bureau (Kavburo) of the Russian Communist Party () had unanimously resolved to incorporate the mountainous part of into the Armenian SSR, aligning with Bolshevik principles of delineating borders to reflect ethnic majorities and resolve lingering conflicts from the 1918-1920 Armenian-Azerbaijani clashes over the region. This initial ruling, documented in Protocol No. 11, aimed to integrate Armenian-populated areas like uezd's highlands into while leaving lowland with , but it faced reversal due to Azerbaijani protests, logistical delays, and Soviet imperatives to avoid further destabilizing the oil-rich Azerbaijani republic, which held leverage through its economic contributions and nascent Bolshevik consolidation. The non-implementation underscored the opportunistic character of early Soviet nationalities policy, where ethnic concessions were subordinated to geopolitical balancing and prevention of pan-Turkic or pan-Armenian . Border delimitation occurred concurrently through a July 1923 commission under Azerbaijani Soviet authorities, which carved out roughly 4,400 square kilometers of predominantly mountainous terrain from the former Elisabethpol Governorate, excluding Armenian-inhabited border strips transferred to Armenia (such as parts of Zangezur) and incorporating mixed or buffer zones to separate the Armenian highlands from Azerbaijani lowlands. The resulting territory initially encompassed key areas like the Shusha district core and adjacent highlands, with Khankendi designated as the administrative center over the historically significant but contested Shusha city, reflecting pragmatic choices to isolate the enclave and limit its contiguity with Armenia. This configuration, while providing internal self-governance, embedded a linguistically and culturally distinct Armenian entity within Azerbaijan, fostering administrative frictions from the outset as Soviet oversight emphasized loyalty to Moscow over local ethnic cohesion.

Administrative and Political Structure

Territorial Divisions

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) was administratively divided into five s, or districts, reflecting the Soviet system's standard territorial subdivision for autonomous oblasts. These were Askeran , Hadrut , Mardakert , Martuni , and Shusha . Each raion encompassed multiple rural settlements and was governed by a local soviet, with authority over local , , and within its boundaries, subordinate to the oblast-level bodies in . The administrative center of the NKAO was (also known as Khankendi), designated as a of oblast subordination and thus administratively separate from the raions, housing key institutions such as the oblast executive committee and party apparatus. This structure persisted from the 1930s through the late 1980s, following initial delimitations in 1923–1926 that incorporated villages from adjacent SSR uyezds (Jevanshir, , and Qubadli), prioritizing compact Armenian-populated highland areas while excluding some peripheral Azerbaijani-inhabited lowlands. Minor boundary adjustments occurred in the 1940s and 1960s, such as the incorporation of Raion elements, but the five-raion framework remained stable until the oblast's dissolution in 1991.
RaionApproximate Area (km², late Soviet era)Key Features
~1,000Central location, including parts of the Karabakh Range; administrative ties to vicinity.
~800Southern district with agricultural focus; bordered SSR.
Mardakert~1,500Northernmost, forested and mountainous; included Shahumyan subregion claims later.
Martuni~600Eastern, mineral resources like ; dense villages.
~500Western, urban core with city as center; cultural and historical significance.
These divisions facilitated centralized Soviet control while allowing limited local autonomy in cultural and linguistic matters for the predominantly , though economic decisions remained integrated with the .

Governance and Key Leadership Roles

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous (NKAO) operated under the Soviet administrative framework for autonomous oblasts, integrated within the while retaining limited self-governance in cultural and local affairs. Authority was structured hierarchically, with the organization exerting control over policy, appointments, and implementation, subordinate to the Central . The formal legislative body was the (Regional) Soviet of People's Deputies, which elected a for oversight and an Committee for administrative execution; the latter handled budgeting, , , and , funded partly through allocations. Key executive leadership centered on the Chairman of the Oblast Executive Committee, who served as the primary administrator reporting to both local soviets and republican authorities in . Upon the oblast's establishment via decree on July 7, 1923, initial control was vested in a provisional Committee of five members, chaired by Armenak Karagozov, tasked with border delineation, , and suppressing counter-revolutionary elements. This transitional body dissolved following the adoption of the 1924 Statute (Constitution), which formalized governance through the supreme , a standing Central Executive Committee, and a responsible for sectoral commissariats in finance, agriculture, and internal affairs; proceedings emphasized native-language use, reflecting the Armenian-majority population. The paramount role was the First (or Regional) Secretary of the Nagorno-Karabakh Committee of the Azerbaijan Communist Party, who directed cadre selection, ideological conformity, and resource distribution, often overriding soviet decisions during purges or economic campaigns. Early secretaries, such as those under Stalin-era consolidations, focused on collectivization and industrialization, though high turnover reflected Moscow's interventions. In the Brezhnev stagnation period through the 1980s, figures like Boris Kevorkov held the post until early 1988, navigating underinvestment complaints amid ethnic tensions; he was ousted following petitions for transfer to Armenia, succeeded by Genrikh Poghosyan (also spelled Henrikh Poghossian), who assumed duties amid escalating protests but failed to quell demands for unification. Notable chairmen of the Executive Committee in the late Soviet era included Leonard Petrosyan, elected in 1988 to manage crisis response, including refugee coordination and security amid intercommunal violence; his tenure highlighted the oblast's subordination, as republican oversight from Baku intensified, limiting autonomous decision-making on defense or foreign ties. These roles underscored causal tensions: party secretaries prioritized loyalty to Azerbaijan SSR integration, often at odds with local Armenian elites advocating cultural preservation, contributing to governance fragility exposed in 1988 nationalist mobilizations.

Demographics and Social Composition

The population of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast, as recorded in successive Soviet censuses, increased overall from 125,300 in 1926 to 189,085 by January 1989, reflecting modest long-term growth amid periods of decline and recovery. This trajectory was marked by a postwar dip, with the total falling to 130,406 in 1959 from 150,837 in 1939, attributable to World War II losses and limited postwar repatriation in the region. Subsequent censuses showed steady rebound, driven primarily by natural increase, though annual growth rates remained below 1 percent on average across the period. Key census figures for total population are summarized below:
YearTotal Population
1926125,300
1939150,837
1959130,406
1970150,313
1979162,181
1989189,085
Demographic trends indicated a predominantly rural , with urban residency concentrated in (Khankendi), which grew from approximately 10,000 residents in the to over 50,000 by 1989, comprising about one-quarter of the oblast's total. Age structure data from the 1959 census revealed signs of aging, with a higher proportion of elderly residents compared to broader SSR averages, linked to lower rates and out-migration of younger cohorts to centers elsewhere in the republic. Birth and death rates aligned with Soviet Caucasian norms, but net migration remained negative in the mid-century, contributing to the 1939–1959 stagnation before stabilizing in later decades. By the late , stood at roughly 43 persons per square kilometer across the oblast's 4,400 square kilometers, underscoring its mountainous and dispersed settlement patterns.

Ethnic Dynamics and Cultural Elements

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast maintained a predominantly ethnic composition throughout its Soviet-era existence, with forming the titular majority. Upon its creation in 1923, constituted approximately 94-95% of the population. By the 1979 , comprised 75% of residents, alongside 23% ethnic and smaller groups including and . The 1989 tallied 189,000 inhabitants, with at 76.9% (145,500 individuals) and at 21.5% (40,600 individuals). Ethnic dynamics exhibited gradual shifts, as the Armenian share declined relatively due to differential birth rates favoring Azerbaijanis and net migration flows, including Armenian inflows from Azerbaijan SSR lowlands seeking cultural affinity and economic prospects, offset by Azerbaijani outflows. Interethnic relations operated under Soviet frameworks promoting nominal , yet harbored frictions over perceived Azerbaijani administrative bias in funding and appointments, prompting Armenian petitions for to the Armenian SSR in 1945, 1965, and 1977—all denied by central authorities to preserve SSR boundaries. These undercurrents reflected causal tensions from mismatched ethnic majorities and titular statuses, though overt violence remained contained until the late 1980s. Cultural elements centered on Armenian heritage, with the designated for official use, schooling, and local governance, sustaining and identity amid pressures. Over 4,000 Armenian historical sites, including medieval monasteries like Gandzasar and cross-stones, persisted as focal points of continuity, even as Soviet anti-religious policies curtailed active worship from the onward. Azerbaijani minority , such as Shiʿi Islamic practices and nomadic traditions, coexisted in villages but held marginal institutional presence compared to Armenian theaters, ensembles, and promoting regional distinctiveness within the Azerbaijani SSR.

Economic and Developmental Aspects

Resource Base and Industries

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast's base was dominated by in its river valleys, conducive to , fruit orchards, grain cultivation, and via mulberry groves. The region achieved prominence in production, yielding about one ton in collective farms during the Soviet era, positioning it as a leader within the SSR. Mineral deposits encompassed , , polymetallic ores, , and other nonferrous metals, primarily in mountainous areas, though large-scale exploitation was constrained by terrain and infrastructure limitations. Extensive forests of , , and other hardwoods covered higher elevations, supplying timber for local use. Economic activities centered on and related processing industries, with supporting wine and production at facilities like the state wine factory in . Light industries included and from , alongside tobacco processing and . Secondary sectors involved , stone quarrying, and production for building materials, with minor operations extracting metals on a small scale. Overall, the oblast's industries emphasized consumer goods, holding 36% of the SSR's capacity in that category despite comprising only 25% of the republic's territory. Industrial development lagged relative to the broader , contributing just 2.3% of the republic's total output in 1972; from 1971 to 1986, NKAO industrial production grew 1.5-fold, compared to 2.5-fold republic-wide, reflecting priorities in centralized planning that favored raw material supply over balanced local growth. dominated employment and , with the oblast serving as a net exporter of produce under Soviet allocation systems, though geographic enclavity restricted diversification into .

Infrastructure and Living Standards

During the Soviet era, the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) featured limited due to its mountainous terrain, with primary road connections relying on the linking Stepanakert to SSR and limited internal road development funded by the SSR. Capital investments in the NKAO from 1971 to 1985 totaled 483 million rubles, representing a 2.8-fold increase over the prior 15 years and focusing on social and economic facilities, though figures varied in interpretation across sources. capital investment rose from 59 rubles annually in 1961–1965 to 226 rubles in 1981–1985, exceeding republic averages according to Azerbaijani analyses of Soviet data. Energy included the Soviet-constructed Sarsang Reservoir, operational by the 1970s, providing hydroelectric power that supported local industry and households. Living standards in the NKAO, as measured by official Soviet indicators, surpassed Azerbaijan SSR averages in key areas; per capita living space in urban apartments was approximately one-third greater, while rural residents had 1.5 times more space than the republic norm. The oblast led in per capita agricultural output despite comprising only 5.1% of Azerbaijan's territory, contributing to higher overall social development metrics like housing and utilities access. However, ethnic Armenian residents claimed lower living standards relative to Azerbaijan proper, citing perceived underinvestment and discrimination, a grievance noted in U.S. intelligence assessments that highlighted disparities in job opportunities and resource allocation fueling ethnic tensions. Industrial production in the NKAO accounted for 2.3% of the Azerbaijan SSR's total in 1972, with steady growth through the 1980s, though absolute funding levels stagnated in some periods according to Armenian interpretations of Soviet records. These conflicting perceptions of economic equity contributed to rising nationalist sentiments by the late 1980s.

Escalation of Tensions and Dissolution

Nationalist Movements in the Late Soviet Era

In the context of Gorbachev's reforms, which encouraged open expression of grievances, Armenian intellectuals and community leaders in began organizing petitions in late 1987 to address perceived and economic neglect under Azerbaijani Soviet oversight. By early 1988, approximately 75,000 signatures from residents of the oblast and the Armenian SSR urged the transfer of the territory to , framing it as a rectification of the 1923 Soviet administrative decision. On February 20, 1988, the regional soviet voted 110 to 17 to petition the of the USSR, , and for unification with the SSR, marking the formal launch of the . This resolution triggered widespread demonstrations, with tens of thousands rallying in and up to 200,000 gathering in by February 28, reflecting broad ethnic support amid fears of demographic shifts favoring . The Supreme Soviet endorsed the unification demand on March 15, but 's leadership rejected it, while initially tolerated the protests as part of before imposing restrictions. Parallel Azerbaijani nationalist sentiments emerged in response, with rallies in Baku and other cities decrying the petitions as separatism and demanding firmer central control over the oblast. Tensions erupted into violence during the Sumgait pogrom from February 27 to 29, 1988, where Azerbaijani mobs targeted Armenian residents in the industrial town near Baku, killing at least 26 to 32 Armenians according to official Soviet investigations, with unconfirmed reports citing higher figures and widespread looting and assaults. Soviet authorities attributed the unrest to rumors of Armenian attacks on Azerbaijanis in Karabakh, though eyewitness accounts described organized ethnic targeting, prompting an exodus of Armenians from Azerbaijani cities. To coordinate the growing protests, the Karabakh Committee formed in spring 1988, initially led by intellectuals like Igor Muradyan and including figures such as Vazgen Manukyan; by May, it expanded to encompass broader societal elements and directed nonviolent actions, including strikes and further petitions, until Soviet authorities arrested its leaders in late 1988 for destabilizing the union. Azerbaijan's formally denied the unification request in July 1988, heightening reciprocal ethnic mobilizations that undermined intercommunal relations. These events exposed fractures in Soviet nationality policy, as local grievances leveraged central reforms to challenge republican boundaries, foreshadowing broader disputes.

Formal Abolition and Secession Attempts (1988–1989)

On February 20, 1988, the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) Regional Soviet of People's Deputies convened an extraordinary session and adopted a resolution, by a vote of 110 to 17, petitioning the Supreme Soviets of the Azerbaijan SSR, Armenian SSR, and the USSR for the transfer of the NKAO from Azerbaijan to Armenia, citing the ethnic Armenian majority's expressed desire for reunification. This action formalized the secessionist push amid ongoing demonstrations and petitions that had gathered over 80,000 signatures from NKAO residents supporting unification with Armenia since late 1987. The resolution effectively sought to abolish the NKAO's autonomous status within by dissolving its administrative ties to and integrating it into the Armenian SSR, invoking Soviet constitutional provisions on for autonomous regions equivalent to those for union republics. 's rejected the petition in June 1988, while the Armenian SSR endorsed it on June 15, 1988, and appealed to the central Soviet authorities for approval. On July 12, 1988, the NKAO Regional Soviet reaffirmed its unification vote, escalating the formal efforts despite opposition from Azerbaijani authorities, who viewed the moves as a violation of . By December 1, 1989, the Supreme Soviets of both the SSR and NKAO jointly declared unification, further advancing the de facto abolition of the oblast's autonomy under Azerbaijani jurisdiction through legislative assertion of merged sovereignty, though this lacked endorsement from or . The USSR had previously rejected border changes on July 18, 1988, deeming them incompatible with the Soviet Constitution's prohibitions on ethnic divisions of republics, prompting to impose economic restrictions and administrative controls on the NKAO without formally dissolving its status until after independence. These attempts highlighted underlying ethnic tensions, with sources emphasizing demographic and Azerbaijani counterparts stressing indivisible republican borders, amid rising violence including pogroms that displaced thousands.

Controversies and Analytical Perspectives

Soviet Nationality Policies and Ethnic Engineering

The delimitation of national borders in the during the early 1920s, guided by Bolshevik principles of nationality policy, prioritized the creation of ethnically defined union republics while subordinating minorities through arrangements. In 1921, following the Soviet conquest, the Caucasian Bureau initially considered attaching the Armenian-majority region to the Armenian SSR, but , as Commissar for Nationalities, directed its inclusion within the Azerbaijan SSR to consolidate Turkic solidarity against potential Turkish influence and to employ divide-and-rule tactics amid fragile post-revolutionary alliances. The Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) was formally established on July 7, 1923, granting limited to its population, which comprised approximately 89% of the 125,159 residents per the , while embedding it administratively under Azerbaijani oversight. Initial korenizatsiya policies in the promoted indigenous languages and cadres, allowing as an in the NKAO alongside cultural institutions, but these gave way to centralizing pressures from onward, with Azerbaijani authorities exerting control over appointments, , and resource allocation. Under leaders like , who served as First Secretary of the Azerbaijan from 1969 to 1982, integration efforts intensified, including the placement of in key administrative and economic roles, which marginalized Armenian influence and incentivized Azeri in-migration for industrial and agricultural opportunities. This constituted a form of ethnic , as systematically altered toponyms from Armenian to Azerbaijani variants—replacing over 300 names by the 1980s—and curtailed Armenian-language schooling, closing dozens of schools starting in the 1960s while expanding Azeri-medium instruction. Demographic shifts reflected these policies, with Soviet censuses recording the Azerbaijani share rising from 10% (12,592 individuals) in 1926 to 23% (37,264 individuals) by 1979, reducing the Armenian proportion from 89% to 76% amid net Armenian out-migration driven by economic discrimination and cultural erosion. By the 1989 census, Armenians numbered 145,450 (76.9%) in a total population of 189,089, with Azerbaijanis at 40,688 (21.5%), a trend attributed not merely to natural growth but to directed and selective favoring Azeri communities in lowland districts. Such engineering sowed latent grievances, as autonomy proved illusory under titular republic dominance, fostering resentment without mechanisms for territorial adjustment despite repeated Armenian petitions to in the and . Azerbaijani interpretations frame these changes as organic integration, while Armenian accounts highlight coercive , underscoring interpretive biases in post-Soviet .

Azerbaijani and Armenian Interpretations of Autonomy

Azerbaijani interpretations frame the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) as a legitimate administrative concession within Azerbaijan's sovereign territory, established by Soviet decree on July 7, 1923, to accommodate the region's Armenian-majority population while preserving historical Azerbaijani control over Karabakh, which traces back to medieval principalities and khanates under Muslim rule. This autonomy, they argue, granted substantial cultural, linguistic, and local governance rights—such as Armenian as the official language and an Armenian-dominated regional council—without undermining Azerbaijan's territorial integrity, as evidenced by the NKAO's explicit subordination to the Azerbaijan SSR under Soviet law. Azerbaijani analysts contend that the Soviet decision reflected pragmatic ethnic management amid post-Russian Revolution chaos, rejecting Armenian unification petitions from 1920–1921 as irredentist, and that subsequent Armenian secessionist movements in 1988 violated both Soviet constitutional norms and international principles of territorial inviolability. In contrast, Armenian interpretations portray the NKAO's as a flawed and discriminatory Soviet imposition that ignored ethnic , with the 1923 delineation—despite a 94–95% population—serving Stalin's divide-and-rule strategy to weaken pan- unity by attaching the enclave to rather than , as initially petitioned by local councils in 1921. highlight systemic grievances under SSR administration, including cultural suppression (e.g., restrictions on -language and church restoration), economic underdevelopment relative to Azerbaijan proper, and demographic through Azerbaijani settlement policies that reduced the Armenian share from 94% in 1926 to 76% by 1979, alongside coerced out-migration. These views posit the autonomy as nominal, with real power centralized in —lacking veto rights over regional decisions and facing periodic or Azerification pressures—thus justifying late-Soviet demands for reunification as remediation of an arbitrary border frozen since the , rather than from a parent state. Both sides invoke the NKAO's 1921–1923 formation debates, where Bolshevik commissions weighed Armenian claims against Azerbaijani assertions of historical , ultimately opting for to stabilize the Transcaucasus amid remnants, though Azerbaijani sources emphasize voluntary Armenian assimilation historically, while ones stress pre-Soviet Armenian principalities in the highlands. This divergence underscores causal tensions: Azerbaijanis see as generous minority protection that exploited for , whereas view it as engineered subordination exacerbating identity-based inequities, with Soviet policies enabling latent conflicts through mismatched demographics and administrative hierarchies.

Causal Factors in Ethnic Conflicts

The establishment of the (NKAO) in within the Azerbaijani Soviet Socialist Republic (SSR), despite its ethnic majority of approximately 94% as recorded in the , created a fundamental mismatch between demographic realities and administrative boundaries, fostering long-term ethnic grievances. This decision, attributed to Joseph Stalin's nationalities policy aimed at balancing regional powers and preventing territorial unification with Soviet , subordinated a cohesive Armenian enclave to Azerbaijani oversight, limiting local in favor of centralized control from . Such artificial border-drawing, common in Soviet ethnic engineering, sowed seeds of resentment by denying the oblast's titular population—ethnically —full , while enabling Azerbaijani authorities to enforce policies perceived as discriminatory, including restrictions on cultural institutions and settlement incentives for . Competing historical narratives exacerbated these institutional tensions, with Armenians viewing Nagorno-Karabakh as an integral part of ancient Artsakh, a medieval kingdom with continuous cultural and religious ties evidenced by monasteries and khachkars dating to the 4th-13th centuries, versus Azerbaijani claims framing it as historically Azerbaijani land under Islamic rule since the . These primordial attachments to territory, reinforced by religious divides—Christian against Muslim —intensified zero-sum perceptions of , where concessions by one side implied existential loss for the other. Soviet suppression of open debate on these claims during the masked underlying animosities, but demographic pressures, such as the population's stagnation at around 76% by 1979 amid Azerbaijani influxes, heightened fears of and cultural erasure. Economic and developmental disparities within the NKAO further fueled dynamics, as the region—rich in forests, , and production—lagged under Azerbaijani administration, with communities receiving disproportionate underinvestment compared to Azerbaijani-populated areas, leading to perceptions of deliberate marginalization. This structural , compounded by Baku's policies limiting access to and in favor of Azeri cadres, eroded trust in the framework, transforming latent ethnic friction into active resistance by the 1960s through petitions for reunification with . Ultimately, these factors converged in a causal chain where mismatched governance, historical , and resource inequities primed the for violent escalation upon the Soviet Union's weakening grip in the late , revealing the fragility of engineered ethnic accommodations absent genuine .

Long-Term Legacy

Role in Post-Soviet Wars

The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) initiated the chain of events leading to the through its regional soviet's vote on February 20, 1988, to petition for transfer from the SSR to the Armenian SSR, amid Gorbachev's reforms that loosened central control. This action, supported by 110 of 120 delegates, sparked immediate inter-ethnic violence, including Armenian demonstrations in and retaliatory clashes in , marking the NKAO as the epicenter of post-Soviet in the . The oblast's ethnic Armenian majority, comprising about 76% of its population per the 1979 Soviet census, framed the demand as , while viewed it as unconstitutional , escalating into pogroms such as the anti-Armenian violence in in February 1988, where dozens of Armenians were killed. Following the Soviet Union's dissolution in December 1991, abolished the NKAO's autonomy on November 26, 1991, renaming it the province within its borders, but forces in the , bolstered by volunteers from , had already seized control of much of the territory by early 1992. The war, spanning 1988 to 1994, saw NKAO-based militias and regular troops advance beyond the oblast's boundaries, capturing seven adjacent Azerbaijani districts by mid-1993 through offensives like Operation Kelbajar in April 1993, which displaced over 300,000 Azerbaijanis from that area alone. Total casualties reached approximately 30,000 killed, including civilians on both sides, with events like the in February 1992—where Azerbaijani forces reported 613 deaths, including non-combatants—highlighting reciprocal atrocities amid the fighting for the NKAO's territory. The ceasefire on May 12, 1994, froze control over the NKAO and the occupied buffer zones, displacing around 700,000 Azerbaijanis and 300,000 overall, while establishing the de facto on the former oblast's soil. The NKAO's unresolved status perpetuated post-Soviet instability, serving as the core disputed area in subsequent clashes, including the 2016 Four-Day War and border skirmishes that killed dozens, and culminating in the from September 27 to November 10, 2020, where recaptured significant portions of the surrounding districts but left the former NKAO under Armenian-aligned control until 2023. This 44-day conflict resulted in over 6,000 military deaths and further civilian casualties, with Azerbaijani advances enabled by drone technology and precision strikes, underscoring the NKAO's role as a persistent trigger for regional militarization and alliance formations, such as Russia's peacekeeping mandate under the November 9, 2020, trilateral agreement. The oblast's legacy extended to the September 19–20, 2023, Azerbaijani offensive, which prompted the dissolution of Artsakh authorities and the exodus of nearly all remaining ethnic , effectively reintegrating the territory into without further large-scale post-Soviet warfare.

Integration into Modern Azerbaijan (Post-2023)

Following 's offensive on September 19, 2023, which resulted in the surrender of Armenian separatist forces, the self-declared was dissolved on January 1, 2024, effectively ending any separate administrative status for the region and integrating it fully under Azerbaijani as the . The Azerbaijani government abolished the Autonomous Oblast's remnants, reallocating its territories into administrative districts such as Khojavend and , with asserting direct control over governance, security, and resource allocation. This integration was framed by Azerbaijani authorities as the restoration of constitutional order, with President declaring the region "fully liberated" and initiating operations that cleared over 20,000 hectares by mid-2024 to enable safe access. Azerbaijan allocated approximately $10.3 billion from 2021 to 2025 for reconstruction, focusing on revival including roads, the airport (under construction as of 2025), and housing in formerly Armenian-held areas. Resettlement efforts, dubbed the "Great Return," prioritized ethnic displaced in prior conflicts, with over 10,000 IDPs returned to villages like Agaly and Talish by April 2025, though targets of 40,000 by 2026 faced delays due to logistical and economic hurdles. These initiatives included building modern settlements and agricultural facilities, aiming to reverse demographic shifts from the war, where comprised a minority before the Armenian occupation. The ethnic Armenian population, which numbered around 120,000 prior to the offensive, largely fled to in a mass exodus of over 100,000 between September 24 and October 3, 2023, leaving fewer than 15 residents by October 2024 amid reports of humanitarian pressures including aid blockades and security operations. Returns have been negligible, despite an provisional order on November 17, 2023, requiring to facilitate voluntary repatriation and prevent conditions that might compel departure; monitors cited ongoing intimidation, property seizures, and cultural site demolitions—such as over 1,000 structures damaged or erased by 2024—as deterrents. In 2025, prosecuted 16 former Artsakh officials, including ex-State Minister Ruben Vardanyan, on charges of and , signaling judicial while rejecting dual citizenship or extraterritorial rights for returning Armenians. Azerbaijani policy emphasizes loyalty oaths and under national laws, with no provisions for restored .

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] NAGORNO KARABAGH LEGAL ASPECTS - FARA eFile
    Sep 10, 2020 · On July 7, 1923, the Azerbaijan SSR's Central Executive Revolutionary. Committee established the Nagorno Karabagh Autonomous Oblast/Region. ( ...
  2. [2]
    The History Behind the Violence in Nagorno-Karabakh - Lawfare
    Oct 19, 2020 · ... Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO). The oblast's borders were ... By 1989, according to the census, the population was 76.9 percent ...<|separator|>
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Unraveling the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict
    formed, along with the designation of Nagorno Karabakh as an autonomous oblast, holding an ethnic majority of Armenians.12 However, when the Bolsheviks ...<|separator|>
  4. [4]
    NAGORNO-KARABAKH - Russia's Periphery
    Since its official incorporation into the Azerbaijan Soviet Republic in 1921, the Armenian residents have been continually struggling for liberation from ...
  5. [5]
    Tensions Between Armenia and Azerbaijan | Global Conflict Tracker
    Amid Soviet dissolution in 1991, just as Armenia and Azerbaijan achieved statehood, Nagorno-Karabakh officially declared independence and full-scale war erupted ...
  6. [6]
    Complete Defeat and the End of the Non-Recognized State of ...
    Sep 16, 2024 · By the end of the war in 1994, Armenian forces had gained control over Nagorno-Karabakh and several surrounding districts, establishing a self- ...Missing: Oblast | Show results with:Oblast
  7. [7]
    Full article: The De Facto State of Nagorno-Karabakh: Historical and ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · The article analyses the complex history of Nagorny Karabakh and the wider Caucasus and its implications for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict ...Missing: reliable | Show results with:reliable
  8. [8]
    How Karabakh khanate was joined to the Russian Empire
    The treaty between the Karabakh Khanate and the Russian Empire about the transition of the khanate under the power of Russia was signed on May 14, 1805, in the ...
  9. [9]
    Nagorno-Karabakh profile - BBC News
    Jan 30, 2024 · 1991 - With the break-up of the Soviet Union, Karabakh declares itself an independent republic, and as Soviet control loosens Armenian-Azeri ...
  10. [10]
    Azerbaijan SSR
    Nagorno-Garabagh Autonomous Region was established in 1923. On July 7, 1923 - The Central Executive Committee of the Azerbaijan SSR adopted a Decree on ...
  11. [11]
    Stalin's Legacy: The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict - ADST.org
    The present-day conflict has its roots in the decisions made by Joseph Stalin when he was the acting Commissar of Nationalities for the Soviet Union during the ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  12. [12]
    The Armenian-Artsakh Connection | AGBU
    17th-19th Centuries: Five Armenian Melik (prince) families ruled the five Melikdoms of Karabakh. Shown above are the remains of the Dizak castle (Artsakh) ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  13. [13]
    Why violence has re-emerged in Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict
    Nov 6, 2020 · ... Caucasian Bureau was forced to change its decision and to attach Nagorno-Karabakh to Soviet Azerbaijan. At that time, more than 90% of that ...<|separator|>
  14. [14]
    Moscow and the delimitation of Karabakh in the 1920s - Biweekly
    Every detail of what happened is made explicit in Protocol No. 11 of the session of the Caucasus Bureau of the Central Committee of the RKP(b) on July 4 and in ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Formation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Region as a vivid ...
    THE SPECIFICITY OF INTER-STATE BORDERS IN THE SOUTH CAUCASUS IS THAT THEY EMERGED AS A RESULT OF ADMINISTRATIVE-. TERRITORIAL REFORMS CARRIED OUT FIRST BY THE ...
  16. [16]
    Nagorno-Karabakh in Administrative - Territorial structure of ...
    The commission convened in July 1923 to develop the statute for the Autonomous Oblast of Nagorno-Karabakh and define borders between Lower and Upper Karabakh ...
  17. [17]
    Drawing the borders of Nagorno-Karabakh - Aze.Media
    Apr 8, 2021 · On July 4, 1923, when the Caucasian Bureau decided to cede Nagorno-Karabakh to Armenia, the issue was reviewed by the RCP on Narimanov's ...Missing: delimitation | Show results with:delimitation
  18. [18]
    [PDF] Shusha
    However, on July. 7, 1923, at the plenum, not Shusha, but Khankendi was elected the center of the Nagorno-Karabakh. Autonomous Region (NKAO). Armenian ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  19. [19]
    How the Soviet legacy shaped the current conflict in Nagorno ...
    Oct 30, 2020 · This decision by Soviet authorities was meant to create a sizeable Armenian ethnic minority within Azerbaijan that could be used as a pressure ...
  20. [20]
    Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast
    It was divided into five raions or administrative divisions: Mardakert District (NKAO); Martuni District (NKAO); Shusha District (NKAO); Askeran District (NKAO) ...
  21. [21]
    The 1924 Constitution of the Autonomous Nagorno-Karabakh
    Nov 26, 2024 · The new USSR Constitution adopted in 1936 renamed the region from "АОНК" (Autonomous Oblast of Nagorno-Karabakh) to "НКАО" (Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast).
  22. [22]
    Birth of Karabakh Movement: Askeran 1988 - CIVILNET
    Feb 14, 2018 · ... Nagorno Karabakh's Regional Committee's First Secretary Boris Kevorkov, both members of the Communist Party. During the session, it was ...
  23. [23]
    Chronology of Key Events February 1988-June 2003
    Leonard Petrossian is elected Chairman of the NKR Executive Committee. September 22. Russian and Kazakhstani Presidents Boris Yeltsin and Nursultan Nazarbayev ...
  24. [24]
    Demographics Statistics in Nagorno-Karabakh during the Soviet ...
    KarabakhFacts is a comprehensive database on Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict, its history and the current peace process, mediated by OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs.Missing: Pre- reliable
  25. [25]
    The 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh War and Russia's Geopolitical Power
    Feb 12, 2021 · For example, in 1926, out of 125,300 residents in Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast in Azerbaijan SSR, 111,694 (89.1%) were Armenian while ...
  26. [26]
    Population of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast According ...
    Dec 29, 2022 · The purpose of the article is to reveal the demographic characteristics of the population of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast ...Missing: 1926 1970 1979 1989
  27. [27]
    The NK Issue in the Soviet Period - Real Artsakh
    The creation of the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast within Azerbaijan SSR in 1923 did not resolve the Karabakh conflict. Since the early 1920s and during ...
  28. [28]
    What was the ethnic composition of Nagorno-Karabakh during the ...
    Oct 31, 2020 · [3] Although this army managed to take control of the region, many ethnic Azerbaijanis in Karabakh were either deported or killed by Armenians ...
  29. [29]
    The Nagorno Karabakh Republic ("NKR") is also referred to as the ...
    ... Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Oblast ("NKAO", the Russian word "oblast" means ... According to the official data of the 1989 USSR census, the population ...
  30. [30]
    UNHCR CDR Background Paper on Refugees and Asylum Seekers ...
    According to the 1989 census, Nagorno-Karabakh's population was approximately 75 percent ethnic Armenian (145,000) and 25 percent Azeri (40,688). Although ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    Why Armenian Cultural Heritage Threatens Azerbaijan's Claims to ...
    Feb 28, 2021 · Nagorno-Karabakh (historically called “Artsakh” in Armenian) is home to one of the world's oldest surviving indigenous Christian populations, ...
  32. [32]
    Ancient Faith: The Churches of Nagorno-Karabakh Online Exhibition
    In the twentieth century, during the Soviet period, Communist leaders heavily restricted religious worship. ... Armenian cultural heritage in Karabakh.[17] They ...
  33. [33]
    Great Power Competition in Contested States: The Case of Nagorno ...
    May 29, 2025 · The Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Oblast (NKAO) was created in 1923. ... To be sure, there are some valuable resources (e.g., gold, copper, marble, ...
  34. [34]
    Establishment of the MKAR (Mountainous Karabakh Autonomous ...
    The Mountainous Karabakh Autonomous Region (MKAR) was established, there were conducted considerable reforms in the economic, social and cultural spheres.
  35. [35]
    Nagorno-Karabakh's nascent wine industry begins to bear fruit
    Apr 29, 2019 · In the Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic there was a state wine factory in Askeran, near the capital Stepanakert, making ...Missing: Oblast viticulture
  36. [36]
    Economic situation in Nagorno-Karabakh: NKAO, “NKR”, current ...
    Jun 17, 2021 · In 1972, Nagorno-Karabakh accounted for 2.3% of the industrial production of the Azerbaijan SSR. Between 1971 and 1986, the increase of ...
  37. [37]
    - Karabakh in 1920-1980
    The town of Khankandi was defined as the administrative centre of the autonomy. In September 1923, the name of the town was changed to Stepanakert after Stepan ...
  38. [38]
    Karabakh Movement 88: A Chronology of Events on the Road to ...
    Jan 26, 2018 · The Karabakh Movement was one of the largest protest movements in Soviet history. Below is a brief timeline of the major events of 1987-1988.
  39. [39]
    Karabakh Armenians' Appeals to Politburo and the Crimean Tatar ...
    Jan 10, 2018 · The start of the Karabakh movement is typically dated to February 20, 1988, when Nagorno Karabakh's regional council adopted a formal appeal to Moscow, Baku ...
  40. [40]
    Chronology of Events - Institute of Armenian Studies - USC Dornsife
    Nagorno Karabakh declares itself a republic, citing Soviet law on secession and international principle of self-determination. August 30, 1991. Azerbaijan ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  41. [41]
    The massacre of Armenians in Sumgait, in Soviet Azerbaijan, began ...
    Feb 27, 1988 · ... pogrom that lasted from February 27 to February 29. The number of victims has never been fully ascertained, ranging from the 20s or 30s, up ...
  42. [42]
    Armenia's Revolution and the Legacy of 1988
    May 7, 2018 · Even before the Baltic States and Georgia rose up, the political novices of Armenia's “Karabakh Committee” galvanized a mass public movement.
  43. [43]
    Developments of 1988-1990, Liberation Movement
    It became known later that the Organization Committee carried out deportation operations aimed against the Armenian population of Nagorno Karabakh and ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  44. [44]
    Nagorno-Karabakh | Self-Determination and Secession in ...
    The study concentrates primarily on two legal aspects, namely the disputed right to secession of Armenians living in Nagorno-Karabakh and the present legal ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Nagorno Karabakh Legal Folder - NKR Office in Washington, DC
    On July 7, 1923, an Autonomous Oblast (Region) of Nagorno Karabakh (subsequently renamed into Nagorno Karabakh Autonomous Oblast) was created on the part of its ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Resolution of the Presidium of the USSR Supreme Soviet regarding ...
    The USSR Presidium deemed a change of borders and ethnic division of Azerbaijan and Armenia impossible, based on the USSR Constitution.Missing: February | Show results with:February
  47. [47]
    Nagorno-Karabakh votes to secede from Soviet Azerbaijan
    Sep 27, 2023 · The legislature of Nagorno-Karabakh had previously requested permission to join Armenia. Armenia's parliament endorsed the demand, but ...
  48. [48]
    Armenians protest USSR's refusal to honor Nagorno-Karabakh ...
    In early February of 1988, the regional government of Nagorno-Karabakh held a referendum asking its citizens if they wished to secede from Azerbaijan and unite ...
  49. [49]
    How It All Began: The Soviet Nationalities Policy and the Roots of ...
    Feb 8, 2018 · Though open manifestations of nationalism were strictly prohibited in the USSR, the Soviet system offered the ethnocratic elites in the Soviet ...
  50. [50]
    Tracing The Effects Of Soviet Union's Policies In Nagorno-Karabakh ...
    Dec 22, 2023 · Meanwhile, according to censuses, the Azerbaijani population in Nagorno-Karabakh increased from 12,592 to 37,264 in 1979, consisting 23% of ...Missing: Oblast census
  51. [51]
    Why Autonomy? The Making of Nagorno-Karabakh Autonomous ...
    Autonomy was given to Karabakh to resolve disputes between Armenia and Azerbaijan, leaving it under Azerbaijani control, a solution that satisfied neither side.<|control11|><|separator|>
  52. [52]
    On Autonomy For Nagorno-Karabakh: Lessons Of History
    In this way, Karabakh, an inalienable part of Azerbaijan, was deliberately divided to give autonomy to the Armenians who had moved there. Those who sealed the ...Missing: interpretation perspective
  53. [53]
    Understanding Armenian Narratives : An Azerbaijani Perspective on ...
    This essay aims to understand Armenian claims over Nagorno‑Karabakh in light of both history and international law. ... According to this narrative, the ...Missing: interpretation | Show results with:interpretation
  54. [54]
    Understanding the Conflict - Institute of Armenian Studies
    The Armenian-Azerbaijani dispute over Nagorno Karabakh is more than 100 years old, pre-dating the establishment of the independent national republics of Armenia ...Missing: 20th demographics reliable sources
  55. [55]
    Nagorno-Karabakh's Perpetual Conflict Shows Soviet Union Still ...
    Sep 25, 2023 · The region had been primarily governed by a separatist, ethnic Armenian self-declared republic and backed by the Armenian government. Karabakh ( ...Missing: governance structure era
  56. [56]
    [PDF] ETHNIC CONFLICT IN NAGORNO-KARABAKH
    The conflict began in the late 1980s over Nagorno-Karabakh, with Armenian occupation after a dispute over ownership, and 610,000 displaced. Political elites ...
  57. [57]
    Orchestrating Ethnic War in Karabakh: An Agent-Based Analysis
    Dec 10, 2024 · Adopting an agent-based approach, this paper demonstrates that the Karabakh conflict (1980-2023) was not primarily fuelled by deep-rooted ethnic ...
  58. [58]
    Ethnic Conflict in the Transcausasus: The Case of Nagorno-Karabakh
    1920s. The descendants of these semi-nomads generally seek work herding animals, and it is they who most frequently migrate to. Armenian, Georgian, ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  59. [59]
    Mapping the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict - Blogs at Kent
    Apr 15, 2018 · Underlying causes​​ In the analysis of Betts (Betts, 1999), the Nagorno-Karabakh case seems to be influenced by structural and cultural elements.
  60. [60]
    The Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: A Visual Explainer
    Sep 16, 2023 · Starts from: Crisis Group has used Armenian and Azerbaijani government websites, de facto Nagorno-Karabakh sources and online media outlets in ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  61. [61]
    A Renewed Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict: Reading Between the Front ...
    Sep 22, 2023 · During Soviet rule, Nagorno-Karabakh held the status of an autonomous region within the Republic of Azerbaijan. The weakening and ultimate ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Post-Conflict Resettlement in Karabakh: Rebuilding Livelihoods
    Feb 13, 2025 · In 2023 and 2024, the government earmarked USD 3.29 billion and USD 2.82 billion, respectively, for Karabakh's reconstruction. Budget ...
  63. [63]
    Nagorno-Karabakh conflict killed 5,000 soldiers - BBC
    Dec 3, 2020 · Now Azerbaijan says 2,783 of its forces died in the Nagorno-Karabakh war and another 100 are missing in action. It brings to over 5,000 the ...
  64. [64]
    Azerbaijan's Challenges in the Reconstruction of Karabakh - PISM
    In December 2022, Azerbaijan imposed a blockade on Karabakh, and then in September 2023 took full control of the rest of the NKR and ended its existence. As a ...Missing: Oblast | Show results with:Oblast
  65. [65]
    Karabakh after war: Mapping post-conflict reconstruction
    Jul 19, 2024 · In the summer of 2022, Azerbaijan began resettling its first village in Karabakh*, a region in its southwest that had been under Armenian ...
  66. [66]
    Azerbaijan: 'Great Return' numbers not looking so good - Eurasianet
    May 16, 2025 · Over the past four years, the government has allocated about $10.3 billion for reconstruction and repatriation. It's important to note that ...
  67. [67]
    Return of Azerbaijanis to Karabakh: numbers rise, questions remain
    Apr 18, 2025 · The Azerbaijani government says it plans to resettle 40,000 people by 2026. However, the exact methods and mechanisms for achieving this goal ...
  68. [68]
    2024 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Azerbaijan
    ” According to media reports, only 15 ethnic Armenian residents remained in Nagorno-Karabakh as of October 24. The government permitted the International ...Missing: 2025 | Show results with:2025<|separator|>
  69. [69]
    (PDF) Post-Conflict Resettlement in Karabakh: Rebuilding Livelihoods
    Feb 14, 2025 · 1 Following the recapture of the territory by Azerbaijani forces in September 2023,. more than 100,000 Karabakh Armenians fled to Armenia (UNHCR ...
  70. [70]
    Analysis: International efforts to help Karabakh Armenians return to ...
    May 20, 2025 · The International Court of Justice ordered in a ruling on 17 November 2023 that Azerbaijan must allow the Karabakh Armenians to return home ...<|separator|>
  71. [71]
    Destruction of Armenian heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh - ACLED
    Sep 20, 2024 · Report on destruction of Armenian heritage in Nagorno-Karabakh amid ongoing conflict and territorial disputes. 20 September 2024.
  72. [72]
    Why Are There No Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh?
    This special report documents how ethnic Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh were intentionally subjected to regular attacks, intimidation, deprivation of basic ...