Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Inequality

Economic inequality refers to the disparity in the distribution of income—earnings from work, investments, and other sources—and wealth—accumulated assets net of liabilities—among individuals and households within a society or globally.^[1]^[2] It manifests in uneven access to opportunities, education, and resources, often measured by the Gini coefficient, which quantifies deviation from perfect equality on a scale from 0 (complete equality) to 1 (one person holds all income).^[3]^[4] Globally, economic inequality rose sharply over two centuries, driven by industrialization in Europe and North America outpacing other regions, reaching a Gini peak near 0.72 around 2000 before declining to approximately 0.67 by 2020 as rapid growth in Asia—particularly China and India—lifted billions from poverty and narrowed between-country gaps.^[5]^[6] Within individual countries, trends vary: inequality has increased in the United States and some other advanced economies since the late 1970s, with top earners capturing a larger income share due to factors like skill-biased technological change and financialization, while it has stabilized or fallen in parts of Europe and emerging markets through progressive taxation and social transfers.^[7]^[8] Empirical evidence attributes much of observed inequality to market dynamics, including returns to education and innovation that reward high productivity, alongside policy choices like marginal tax rates and labor regulations; for instance, rising skill premiums—where college-educated workers earn disproportionately more—have widened gaps in high-income nations, though globalization has simultaneously compressed them by integrating low-wage labor markets.^[8]^[5] Debates center on its consequences, with data showing no clear universal harm to growth—some analyses link high inequality to reduced investment in advanced economies, yet historical patterns reveal that inequality often accompanies early-stage development before markets and mobility equalize outcomes over generations.^[8]^[5] Despite persistent narratives in academic and media sources emphasizing rising inequality as a crisis, global absolute living standards have surged, underscoring that disparities must be weighed against overall prosperity gains.^[5]^[9]

Definitions and Types

Economic Inequality

Economic inequality refers to the uneven distribution of economic resources, such as income and wealth, across individuals or households within a society. It is primarily assessed through disparities in pre-tax income flows—earnings from wages, salaries, investments, and transfers—and accumulated wealth stocks, including assets like real estate, financial holdings, and savings minus debts.^[2]^[10] This focus distinguishes economic inequality from social or political forms, emphasizing quantifiable material outcomes central to empirical economic analysis.^[11] Income inequality captures periodic resource flows, often measured via Gini coefficients or top income shares, while wealth inequality reflects intergenerational accumulation and tends to be more pronounced due to compounding returns on capital and limited downward mobility. In most countries, wealth disparities exceed income gaps, with the top 10% typically holding 50-70% of total wealth compared to 30-50% of income. For instance, data from the World Inequality Database indicate that the top 1% wealth share reached 32% in the United States by 2022 and averaged 25-40% across high-income nations, far outpacing top income shares of 15-20%.^[12]^[13]^[14] In capitalist market systems, economic inequality arises naturally from heterogeneous productivity, where compensation aligns with marginal contributions to output, varying by skills, innovation, and risk-bearing. Empirical studies confirm that such dispersion correlates with differences in human capital and entrepreneurial activity, rather than uniform outcomes. Notably, despite rising top-end inequality metrics since 1980—driven by globalization and technological shifts—global absolute poverty has declined sharply, with the extreme poverty rate (under $2.15 daily, 2017 PPP) falling from about 42% in 1981 to 8.5% by 2019, lifting over 1.2 billion people above subsistence levels per World Bank estimates.^[15]^[16]^[17] This underscores that aggregate growth in market economies can reduce material deprivation even amid widening relative disparities. Social inequality encompasses disparities in social status, access to opportunities, and life outcomes arising from ascribed characteristics such as gender, race or ethnicity, disability, and age, distinct from purely economic metrics like income distribution. These inequalities often manifest in differential treatment, cultural norms, and behavioral patterns that influence social mobility and integration, intersecting with economic factors but driven by non-financial mechanisms like preferences, family structures, and institutional barriers. Empirical evidence indicates that while discrimination contributes, individual choices and cultural practices explain substantial portions of persistent gaps.^[18] In gender-based disparities, women in OECD countries face an unadjusted pay gap averaging 11.9%, with portions attributable to unexplained factors such as firm-specific wage premiums ranging from 10-20% after controlling for observables in European nations. Globally, gender gaps in educational attainment have narrowed significantly, closing 95.1% according to World Economic Forum benchmarks, yet labor force participation remains divergent at 47% for women versus 72% for men, reflecting preferences for family roles and work-life balance over equal occupational entry. These patterns persist despite policy interventions, suggesting causal roles for innate differences in interests and time allocation choices rather than solely external barriers.^[19]^[20]^[21] Racial and ethnic inequalities, exemplified by the U.S. Black-White wealth gap, show median Black household wealth at approximately one-tenth of White levels in recent Federal Reserve data, with average holdings for Black families at 15-20% of White counterparts, remaining stable since the 1980s despite income convergence efforts. Cultural factors, including family structure, contribute independently of racial discrimination: children from intact two-parent families exhibit lower poverty rates, reduced criminal involvement, and higher college attendance across Black and White groups, with single-parent households correlating to adverse outcomes like elevated crime risk even after controlling for socioeconomic status.^[22]^[23]^[18]^[24] Disability introduces further social exclusions, affecting 1.3 billion people or 16% of the global population, with disabled individuals facing median earnings roughly two-thirds lower than non-disabled peers and poverty rates up to 40% among certain racial subgroups. Access to services and social participation is hindered by physical and attitudinal barriers, leading to mediated health disparities where disability onset causally predicts poorer well-being independent of prior socioeconomic status. Age-based inequalities compound these, with elderly individuals experiencing social exclusion through reduced opportunities and stereotypes, while youth face barriers in policy prioritization and economic entry, fostering intergenerational divides in status and integration.^[25]^[26]^[27]^[28]^[29]

Political Inequality

Political inequality refers to asymmetries in the ability of individuals or groups to influence political decisions, governance structures, and policy outcomes, often manifesting as disproportionate access to power rather than mere differences in electoral participation. This form of inequality arises from structural barriers and resource disparities that amplify the voices of certain actors, such as economic elites, while marginalizing others. Empirical analyses indicate that in advanced democracies, political influence correlates strongly with socioeconomic status, leading to policies that more closely align with affluent preferences than those of the median citizen.^[30]^[31] Key measures of political inequality include elite overrepresentation in decision-making bodies and disparities in lobbying influence. In the United States, the median net worth of members of Congress exceeded $1 million as of 2018, far surpassing the median American household net worth of approximately $121,700 reported by the Federal Reserve for the same period, highlighting how lawmakers' personal wealth—often derived from business, law, or inheritance—creates representational gaps with constituents. Lobbying expenditures further exacerbate this, with total U.S. federal lobbying spending reaching $3.5 billion in 2022, predominantly from corporations and high-income interest groups that secure favorable regulatory outcomes through sustained advocacy. Voter turnout differentials also quantify inequality, as higher-income individuals participate at rates 20-30 percentage points above low-income groups in presidential elections; for instance, in 2020, turnout among those earning over $100,000 annually approached 80%, compared to under 50% for those below $30,000.^[32]^[33] While economic inequality contributes causally by enabling resource-intensive political activities like campaign financing, political inequality operates through independent channels such as media consolidation and institutional barriers. Consolidation in media ownership has reduced local news coverage by up to 20% in affected markets post-acquisition by conglomerates, shifting focus to national narratives and diminishing scrutiny of local governance, which indirectly bolsters elite influence by limiting diverse information flows. Lower turnout among less affluent voters, driven by factors like work demands and registration hurdles rather than mere apathy, entrenches this dynamic, as elected officials prioritize responsive constituencies. Studies show mutual responsiveness between elites and voters is skewed, with policymakers aligning more with high-income preferences on issues like taxation and regulation.^[34]^[35] Concentrated political power yields mixed empirical outcomes: it often entrenches incumbent-favoring policies, such as subsidies or deregulation benefiting established interests, by insulating decisions from broad electoral pressures, yet it can facilitate decisive responses in crises through streamlined elite coordination. For example, analyses of policy responsiveness reveal that affluent citizens' views predict legislative outcomes with high fidelity, while lower-income opinions exert negligible independent effect, perpetuating cycles of influence asymmetry. However, in acute scenarios like financial meltdowns, elite networks have enabled rapid interventions, as seen in coordinated bailouts, though such actions risk long-term entrenchment of status quo power structures.^[36]^[37]^[31]

Measurement

Key Metrics and Indices

The Gini coefficient is the most widely used single measure of statistical dispersion for income or wealth distributions, ranging from 0 for perfect equality to 1 for perfect inequality; it is calculated as twice the area between the Lorenz curve and the 45-degree line of equality.^[38]^[39] National Gini coefficients for disposable income typically fall between 0.2 and 0.6 across countries, with a global unweighted average of approximately 0.35 as of 2021, though the true interpersonal global Gini—accounting for cross-border disparities—reaches 0.67.^[40]^[41]^[6] In the United States, the household income Gini coefficient increased from 0.403 in 1980 to 0.418 in 2023, reflecting rising dispersion driven by differential gains at the upper end.^[42]^[43] Critics note its relative insensitivity to extreme values in the distribution tails, as it weights deviations proportionally rather than emphasizing outliers.^[44] Alternative indices address such limitations by prioritizing tail disparities or enabling decomposition. The Theil index, an entropy-based measure from the general class of inequality metrics, quantifies dispersion as the logarithmic deviation of individual incomes from the mean, scaled by population; its key advantage is additivity, allowing breakdown into within-group and between-group components for analyzing subgroup contributions to overall inequality.^[45] The Palma ratio, defined as the share of national income held by the top 10% divided by that of the bottom 40%, better captures extremes since middle-income shares (deciles 5-9) tend to hover around 50% across contexts; values above 1 indicate top-heavy distributions, with global estimates often exceeding 2.^[46]^[47] These metrics apply to economic inequality primarily but extend to social dimensions via proxies like educational attainment or health outcomes when data permit ordinal ranking. Metrics derive from household surveys (e.g., U.S. Current Population Survey), which provide broad coverage but underreport top incomes due to non-response and self-reporting biases; tax records capture high earners more accurately via administrative data; and national accounts aggregate totals for calibration, as in Distributional National Accounts methods that impute top shares to align microdata with macro aggregates.^[48]^[49]^[50] Recent U.S. data through 2023 show Gini stability around 0.42, with no confirmed decline in preliminary 2024 figures despite bottom-quintile wage gains outpacing inflation in select sectors.^[42]^[51]

Limitations and Alternative Approaches

The Gini coefficient, as a static snapshot of income distribution, fails to account for absolute changes in living standards or intergenerational mobility, potentially overstating persistent disparities in dynamic economies where individuals frequently shift income quintiles over time.^[52] For instance, it does not differentiate between scenarios where overall incomes rise uniformly versus those with widening gaps, nor does it capture upward mobility rates observed in longitudinal data, such as U.S. Social Security earnings records showing moderate increases in lifetime inequality compared to annual snapshots.^[53]^[54] Standard income-based metrics like the Gini also overlook post-tax and transfer adjustments, which substantially mitigate measured inequality; in advanced economies, fiscal policies including taxes and public social spending reduce income inequality by approximately one-third.^[2] This omission can exaggerate pre-fiscal disparities, as disposable income distributions reflect more equalization than gross figures suggest.^[55] Similarly, reliance on reported incomes underestimates the equalizing effects of unreported or informal sector activities, which often provide supplementary earnings to lower-income households in both developed and emerging markets, thereby compressing effective inequality when incorporated.^[56] Alternative approaches emphasize consumption patterns over income, revealing less divergence; U.S. data from the 1980s onward indicate consumption inequality rose by only 5% post-2005, far below the 28% increase in income inequality, as households smooth expenditures via savings, credit, or transfers.^[57] Lifetime earnings metrics further moderate apparent disparities, with lifetime Gini coefficients roughly half those of annual measures due to income volatility over careers.^[58] Recent analyses (2024–2025) advocate integrating intergenerational transfers—such as bequests and public pensions—into inequality assessments, as static snapshots ignore how these flows sustain wealth across generations, misleading evaluations of opportunity in high-mobility contexts.^[59]^[60] These refinements, drawing on panel data and fiscal incidence models, better align measurements with causal dynamics like human capital accumulation and policy-induced redistribution.^[61]

Historical Trends

Pre-Industrial and Early Modern Periods

In hunter-gatherer societies, wealth inequality was typically low, with median Gini coefficients estimated at 0.17 based on ethnographic studies of intergenerational wealth transmission across multiple populations, reflecting egalitarian norms enforced by mobility, sharing, and limited accumulation opportunities.^[62] The Neolithic transition to agriculture around 10,000 BCE introduced persistent disparities, as land became a storable asset; archaeological proxies like house sizes yield Gini estimates of 0.35 to 0.46 for ancient farming communities, driven by differential access to fertile plots and surplus production.^[63] Feudal structures in medieval Europe (circa 9th–15th centuries) entrenched high inequality, with wealth Gini coefficients ranging from 0.4 to 0.6, as land—comprising up to 90% of productive assets—was concentrated among nobility through hereditary grants and primogeniture, which directed estates to eldest sons while fragmenting peasant holdings via partible inheritance or fines.^[64] ^[65] In England, peasant land inequality rose sharply from the 11th to 13th centuries, as manorial lords consolidated demesnes amid population growth, exacerbating rents and serfdom obligations that bound laborers to hereditary plots.^[65] The Black Death pandemic of 1347–1351 temporarily reversed this trend across Europe by killing 30–60% of the population, creating acute labor shortages that boosted survivor wages by 50–100% in real terms and prompted wealth redistribution through abandoned holdings and weakened feudal dues; analyses of probate records from Italy and England show the top decile's wealth share falling by 15–20%, yielding Gini declines sustained for about a century before rebounding with population recovery.^[66] ^[67] Intergenerational social mobility remained constrained by estate-based hierarchies—nobility, clergy, and commons—with guild monopolies and legal primogeniture limiting ascent; studies of tax and probate data from France, Germany, and Sweden indicate mobility rates below 20% for crossing major class lines, far lower than in later industrial periods, as inheritance rules and endogamous marriages preserved elite advantages.^[68]

Industrial Era to Mid-20th Century

The Industrial Revolution, beginning in Britain around 1760 and spreading to other Western economies by the mid-19th century, initially drove a marked increase in income inequality as rural populations migrated to urban factories, widening the gap between capital owners and wage laborers. Simon Kuznets hypothesized in 1955 that this pattern—inequality rising during early industrialization due to structural shifts favoring skilled urban workers and entrepreneurs, followed by later declines as education and mass production diffused opportunities—characterized developing economies.^[69] In Britain, the Gini coefficient for income inequality climbed from approximately 0.54 in the late 17th century to 0.60 by 1798 amid rapid mechanization and enclosure movements that displaced agricultural workers, remaining elevated at around 0.58 into the mid-19th century before stabilizing near 0.48 by 1870.^[70] Similarly, in the United States during the Gilded Age (roughly 1870–1900) and extending into the 1920s, the top 1% income share surged to 23.9% of total pretax income by 1928, fueled by rapid industrialization, monopolistic trusts, and speculative booms that concentrated gains among industrial magnates.^[71] This upward trajectory reversed sharply from World War I onward, with the Great Depression (1929–1939) and World War II (1939–1945) acting as major equalizing forces through mechanisms like capital destruction, labor shortages that boosted low-end wages, strengthened unions, and progressive taxation. In the U.S., the top income decile's share plummeted from 45–50% in the 1910s–1920s to under 35% by the 1950s, a phenomenon termed the "Great Compression," driven by wartime wage controls, full employment policies, and New Deal reforms that expanded union bargaining power and social safety nets.^[72]^[73] European nations experienced analogous declines; for instance, Gini coefficients fell 7–10 points during WWII due to total mobilization eroding inherited wealth and inflating worker incomes relative to fixed capital returns.^[74] These compressions were not merely cyclical but reflected causal pressures from geopolitical shocks and institutional responses, including expanded suffrage and labor organizing, which redistributed bargaining power without relying on sustained growth alone. Globally, the era's industrialization spread unevenly, often via colonial extraction that amplified domestic inequalities in imperial cores and peripheries alike. European powers' colonial empires, peaking in the late 19th century, funneled resource surpluses to metropolitan elites, sustaining high inequality ratios—such as Britain's top 10% capturing over 50% of national income—while entrenching elite capture in colonies through land grants and monopolies that favored settler or comprador classes over indigenous majorities.^[75] This dynamic reinforced Kuznets-like patterns in colonizing nations but delayed or distorted them in dependencies, where extractive institutions hindered broad-based skill diffusion and instead perpetuated dual economies of elite enclaves amid subsistence poverty.^[76] By mid-century, wartime disruptions to colonial systems began eroding these imbalances, setting the stage for postwar decolonization, though legacies of concentrated control persisted.

Late 20th Century to Present

In the United States, income inequality reversed course after 1980, with the top 1% pre-tax income share rising from approximately 10% in 1980 to around 20% by 2020, according to estimates by economists Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez based on tax data.^[77] Alternative reconstructions incorporating underreported income, such as those by Auten and Splinter, indicate a smaller increase, with the top 1% share reaching about 15% by the late 2010s, highlighting debates over measurement assumptions in tax-based series that may overstate top shares due to unadjusted deductions and offshore income.^[78] This within-country uptrend occurred amid policy shifts like tax cuts and financial deregulation, though causal attribution remains contested given concurrent globalization and skill-biased technological change. Globally, interpersonal income inequality declined between 1980 and the 2010s, driven by rapid growth in Asia—particularly China and India—reducing between-country disparities, per data from the World Inequality Database; however, within-country inequality rose in most advanced economies and even in some emerging ones.^[79] The 2008 financial crisis amplified wealth and income gaps in the US, with median family wealth falling 39% from 2007 to 2010 while disparities widened, as upper-income households recovered faster through asset rebounds and bailouts disproportionately benefiting financial sectors.^[80] Earnings inequality also increased, with the recession exacerbating polarization between routine and high-skill jobs amid high unemployment concentrated in lower-wage sectors.^[81] The COVID-19 pandemic initially widened global income inequality, raising the worldwide Gini coefficient by about 0.7 points and extreme poverty by 90 million people through 2021, due to disproportionate job losses in low-skill service sectors and uneven fiscal relief.^[82] In the US, pandemic effects showed mixed results, with income inequality stable or slightly elevated early on but no broad surge, as stimulus transfers temporarily buffered lower incomes before inflation eroded gains.^[83] By 2023-2024, US income inequality exhibited stagnation or minor compression, with the Gini ratio for family incomes dipping from 0.458 in 2022 to 0.452 in 2023, reflecting broad wage acceleration across percentiles amid tight labor markets.^[84] Nominal wage growth averaged 3.9% year-over-year for private workers in 2023-2024, with particularly strong gains at the low end—up 15% for the bottom 10th percentile since 2019—outpacing historical patterns and contributing to slight Gini moderation, though real earnings lagged inflation cumulatively.^[85] ^[86] Projections from economists suggest artificial intelligence could further widen inequality by amplifying skill premiums, displacing mid-tier cognitive tasks while boosting returns to high-skill capital owners, potentially polarizing incomes within brackets as AI adoption favors advanced economies and educated workers.^[87] ^[88] This aligns with historical technological shifts but risks deeper divides absent complementary diffusion to lower-skill applications.^[89]

Causes

Individual and Behavioral Factors

Individual choices regarding education significantly influence economic outcomes, with empirical evidence indicating a substantial earnings premium associated with higher levels of schooling. For instance, men with graduate degrees earn a median lifetime total of $3.6 million, compared to $2.1 million for high school graduates, while women with graduate degrees earn $2.8 million versus $1.7 million for those with only a high school diploma, based on Social Security Administration data incorporating earnings histories through 2018.^[90] This premium persists even after accounting for factors like field of study and institution, though it varies by demographics, with recent analyses showing college attendance yielding higher earnings for marginal students after eight years and increased lifetime tax contributions.^[91] Effort and work patterns also contribute to disparities, as variation in lifetime hours worked explains approximately 30% of the variation in lifetime earnings among U.S. workers, according to panel data analysis.^[92] Top earners often work longer hours, with the highest decile averaging 4.4 more weekly hours than the bottom decile in recent Census surveys, reflecting behavioral differences in labor supply that amplify income gaps independent of hourly wages.^[93] Family structure decisions, such as delaying marriage or childbearing until economic stability is achieved, correlate with reduced poverty risk; conversely, single-parent households face elevated poverty rates, with U.S. Census data showing rates around 25-30% for female-headed families in recent years, roughly five times higher than married-couple families at about 5%.^[94] Longitudinal studies link early family formation choices to persistent disadvantage, as children in single-parent homes experience 2-3 times the poverty exposure compared to two-parent households, per analyses of Current Population Survey data.^[95] Heritability plays a role in earnings variation, with twin studies estimating that genetic factors account for 40-60% of differences in lifetime earnings, as evidenced by Finnish registry data on monozygotic and dizygotic twins over two decades, where men's earnings showed over 50% heritability and women's around 40%. These estimates hold after controlling for shared environment, suggesting innate abilities and traits influence labor market success, though environmental interactions modulate outcomes.^[96] Assortative mating, where individuals pair with similar socioeconomic partners, exacerbates inequality by concentrating advantages; empirical models indicate it accounts for a notable share of household income variance, with U.S. data from 1960-2005 showing increased spousal correlation in education and earnings contributing to rising Gini coefficients.^[97] This pattern amplifies intergenerational transmission, as high-earning couples pool resources more effectively than mixed pairs.^[98] Behavioral traits like self-control, including delayed gratification, predict long-term economic gains in some longitudinal cohorts; preschoolers demonstrating greater delay in experiments amassed higher net worth and permanent income by mid-life, per follow-up data linking early impulse control to capital formation and avoidance of high-interest debt.^[99] However, replications question the robustness of these links, attributing partial effects to socioeconomic confounds rather than isolated self-control.^[100]

Institutional and Policy Factors

Labor market regulations, including minimum wages and unionization, shape income inequality by compressing wage distributions at the lower end while potentially influencing employment dynamics. Empirical studies indicate that substantial minimum wage increases can elevate low-wage incomes and narrow income gaps in the short term, as observed in analyses of policy hikes across various contexts.^[101] However, meta-analyses and econometric evidence reveal mixed employment effects, with hikes often leading to disemployment among low-skilled and young workers, thereby limiting opportunities for the least advantaged and potentially offsetting inequality reductions through higher unemployment rates.^[102]^[103] Union density correlates inversely with wage inequality, with research estimating that declining U.S. unionization from the late 1970s to the 1980s explained 10-20% of rising male wage dispersion, primarily by bolstering bargaining power for less-skilled workers.^[104] In Nordic economies, centralized collective bargaining has sustained compressed wage structures and low inequality since the mid-20th century, though high social trust and cultural homogeneity—rather than policy alone—appear critical for maintaining labor market participation and fiscal viability amid generous welfare provisions.^[105]^[106] Tax policies targeting wealth transfers, such as inheritance and estate taxes, directly address intergenerational persistence of inequality. Cross-national survey data from Europe and the U.S. demonstrate that inheritances significantly boost recipients' wealth positions, exacerbating top-end disparities, with effects persisting over generations absent intervention.^[107] Empirical models calibrated to Swedish register data show that inheritance taxation reduces wealth inequality in the short run by redistributing bequests, though recipients' behavioral adjustments—like increased savings—can reverse much of this impact within a decade.^[108]^[109] Analyses of Austria's 2008 inheritance tax abolition further indicate worsening wealth Gini coefficients post-reform, underscoring taxation's role in curbing dynastic accumulation when evasion is minimized.^[110] Progressive structures focusing on large estates yield efficiency gains by minimally distorting labor incentives, per lifecycle simulations, though political resistance often limits their scope. Broader institutional frameworks, including secure property rights and impartial rule of law, foster economic mobility over static equality by enabling investment and innovation. Cross-country regressions link stronger legal protections and property rights enforcement to higher intergenerational income elasticity, with improvements explaining substantial variance in mobility outcomes beyond initial wealth endowments.^[111]^[112] Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson's framework posits inclusive institutions—characterized by constrained executive power and broad property enforcement—as drivers of long-run prosperity and reduced absolute poverty, contrasting extractive systems that entrench elite capture and stagnation, evidenced by historical reversals in colonial legacies.^[113] Cronyist policies, favoring politically connected entities through subsidies or regulatory capture, empirically amplify inequality by distorting resource allocation away from productive merit-based competition. Studies of connected firms in emerging and advanced economies reveal crony networks inflating markups and barriers to entry, correlating with elevated Gini coefficients and slower per-capita growth compared to competitive regimes.^[114] In contrast, meritocratic institutional designs, emphasizing transparent contracting and anti-corruption enforcement, enhance social capital and long-term output, as simulated in policy experiments where higher meritocracy degrees yield sustained mobility gains without compressing overall incentives.^[115]

Technological and Global Influences

Technological advancements, particularly since the 1980s, have disproportionately rewarded workers with advanced cognitive skills and capital owners through skill-biased technical change, where automation and information technology have increased productivity in non-routine tasks while displacing routine manual and cognitive occupations.^[116] This shift, exemplified by the IT boom, has widened wage gaps in developed economies like the United States, with high-skill premiums rising as demand for abstract problem-solving outpaced supply, contributing to labor market polarization and elevated income inequality.^[117] Empirical analysis shows that occupations requiring non-routine cognitive abilities saw real wage growth of approximately 20-30% for top earners between 1980 and 2010, while routine middle-skill jobs stagnated or declined. Globalization, through offshoring and trade liberalization, has amplified these effects by exposing low-skill workers in high-wage countries to competition from lower-cost labor abroad, particularly via the "China shock" of surging imports post-2000.^[118] Regions in the U.S. most affected by Chinese import competition experienced manufacturing employment declines of 1-2 percentage points per year from 1999 to 2011, alongside wage reductions for non-college-educated workers, boosting within-country inequality as gains accrued to export-oriented firms and high-skill professionals.^[119] However, this process has reduced global income inequality, with rapid growth in developing nations like China and India lifting billions into the middle class and lowering the worldwide Gini coefficient from about 0.70 in the 1990s to around 0.63 by 2020, driven primarily by between-country convergence rather than within-country equalization.^[120] In the 2020s, the acceleration of artificial intelligence is projected to further disperse productivity and incomes by automating a broader range of cognitive tasks, potentially increasing variance in earnings without corresponding gains in social mobility.^[121] Studies forecast that AI adoption could widen U.S. income inequality by enhancing returns to high-skill workers and capital-intensive firms, with top decile earners capturing disproportionate benefits akin to prior technological waves, while displacing middle-skill roles in sectors like clerical and analytical work.^[122] Projections indicate global inequality may rise if AI concentrates in advanced economies, exacerbating both within-nation gaps and between-country divides unless offset by diffusion to emerging markets.^[123]

Consequences

Potential Benefits

Economic inequality can incentivize productive behaviors by rewarding risk-taking, effort, and innovation with disproportionate returns, thereby motivating individuals and firms to allocate resources toward high-value activities rather than leisure or low-productivity pursuits. Empirical analyses indicate that, in contexts of moderate inequality, such disparities correlate positively with economic growth; for example, cross-country panel data reveal that inequality boosts growth in low-income economies by enhancing savings and investment incentives, with the relationship turning negative only at high inequality levels above a net Gini of 27 percent. In dynamic settings like U.S. counties, particularly metropolitan areas, higher income Gini coefficients have been associated with faster per capita income growth, suggesting localized incentives drive expansion.^[124]^[125]^[126] This mechanism facilitates efficient resource allocation, as wealth concentration enables capital to flow to high-productivity uses, such as entrepreneurship and technological advancement, where returns justify risks. Literature reviews highlight that income inequality exerts a positive effect on growth via elevated savings rates among higher earners, who reinvest in capital-intensive projects rather than consumption. Venture capital ecosystems, which thrive on the prospect of outsized gains, exemplify this: environments permitting greater inequality, like the United States (Gini ≈0.41 in 2022), support substantially higher VC investments and innovation outputs—evidenced by U.S. dominance in patents (over 600,000 granted in 2022) and startups—compared to more egalitarian European peers (average Gini ≈0.30), where compressed rewards dampen such allocations.^[127]^[128] Historically, rising inequality played a causal role in structural transformation; in Britain from 1270 to 1940, increasing income disparities contributed significantly to the manufacturing sector's expansion, channeling labor and capital into industrial innovations that propelled the Industrial Revolution and sustained long-term growth. Such patterns underscore inequality's functional role in spurring breakthroughs by aligning private incentives with societal productivity gains, as uneven rewards encouraged inventors and investors to pioneer technologies like steam power and mechanized production.^[129]

Potential Drawbacks

High levels of income inequality have been linked to potential political instability, including risks of unrest or democratic erosion, but rigorous empirical analyses reveal weak causal connections after controlling for factors like institutional quality, growth rates, and historical context. Przeworski's examinations of regime dynamics across countries show that while inequality can hinder consolidation in nascent democracies, it does not systematically cause revolutions or breakdowns in mature systems, as evidenced by democracies sustaining high Gini coefficients for extended periods without collapse.^[130]^[131] Elevated inequality is associated with diminished social trust, with studies indicating that residual inequality—particularly at the lower distribution tail—reduces interpersonal and institutional confidence, potentially exacerbating coordination failures among the poor. However, absolute poverty metrics often explain greater variance in trust levels than relative disparities alone, suggesting that deprivation's direct effects dominate in shaping cohesion outcomes across global datasets.^[132]^[133] Claims that inequality impairs health primarily through relative position effects, as advanced by Wilkinson and Pickett, have been critiqued for methodological flaws including data cherry-picking and inadequate isolation of psychosocial mechanisms from absolute income influences. Empirical investigations affirm the absolute income hypothesis, wherein higher individual or household earnings directly improve self-reported health and longevity, with relative effects proving smaller or context-dependent, especially in low-income settings where baseline deprivation overrides status comparisons.^[134]^[135] Recent global patterns underscore the conditional nature of these drawbacks: billionaire wealth rose by $2 trillion in 2024, yet extreme poverty fell to 692 million people (10.3% of the world population), returning to pre-pandemic trajectories without precipitating instability spikes or health crises, highlighting that absolute gains can mitigate relative disparity risks.^[136]^[137]

Concepts and Measurement

Social mobility refers to the capacity of individuals or households to change their socioeconomic status over time, most commonly assessed through intergenerational comparisons of income, earnings, or wealth between parents and children, in contrast to static inequality, which captures the distribution of resources within a single generation at a given point.^[138] This distinction emphasizes dynamic shifts rather than fixed disparities, with mobility often reflecting opportunities for advancement independent of prevailing inequality levels.^[139] Absolute mobility measures the fraction of children who surpass their parents' economic outcomes in real terms, such as earnings adjusted for inflation, providing insight into whether successive generations achieve higher living standards. In the United States, rates of absolute upward income mobility stood at approximately 90% for children born in 1940 but declined to 50% for those born in the 1980s, based on comparisons of family income at age 30 for children and age 34 for parents.^[140] ^[139] This metric highlights aggregate progress amid economic growth but can mask persistent relative positioning if overall income rises uniformly. Relative mobility, conversely, evaluates position within the income distribution across generations, focusing on whether children from lower ranks can reach higher percentiles regardless of absolute gains. A primary metric is the intergenerational elasticity (IGE) of income or earnings, which quantifies the percentage change in a child's income associated with a one percentage point change in parental income; values closer to zero indicate higher mobility. In the United States, IGE estimates typically range from 0.4 to 0.5, implying moderate persistence of advantage or disadvantage.^[141] ^[142] Cross-national comparisons reveal lower IGE in Nordic countries—around 0.15 in Denmark and 0.27 in Sweden—suggesting greater relative mobility than in the US, where IGE exceeds 0.4, according to analyses by Miles Corak correlating inequality with mobility persistence.^[143] ^[144] Measuring mobility entails challenges, particularly in distinguishing short-term fluctuations from lifetime trajectories, as single-year income snapshots introduce attenuation bias that underestimates true persistence by averaging over transitory variance.^[145] ^[53] Longitudinal data spanning multiple years or decades, such as administrative tax records, mitigate this by capturing permanent income, though availability limits comparability across cohorts and nations.^[146] Age-specific benchmarks, like income at age 30, standardize comparisons but may overlook variations in life-cycle earning patterns influenced by factors such as education timing or family formation.^[139]

Determinants and Empirical Patterns

Empirical analyses consistently identify family structure as a primary determinant of intergenerational social mobility, with children raised in stable two-parent households exhibiting higher rates of upward mobility compared to those from single-parent or unstable families. A study using longitudinal data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics found that family structure moderates the transmission of parental education to children's outcomes, with intact families showing stronger positive associations across measures of schooling and earnings.^[147] Similarly, research analyzing U.S. tax records and census data indicates that the advantages of two-parent households peak during adolescence, contributing to long-term economic outcomes independent of parental income levels.^[148] These patterns hold after controlling for socioeconomic factors, suggesting causal influences through resource stability, parental involvement, and behavioral modeling rather than selection effects alone. Neighborhood characteristics explain a substantial portion of variation in mobility outcomes, with zip-code-level studies revealing that local environments account for up to 20% of differences in children's adult earnings through mechanisms like peer influences and community values. Raj Chetty and colleagues' analysis of over five million families using de-identified tax data from 1996–2012 demonstrated that children moving to higher-opportunity neighborhoods before age 13 experience earnings gains of approximately 1% per year of exposure, linked to factors such as lower residential segregation and greater social capital rather than schools alone.^[149] High-mobility areas correlate with reduced income inequality at the local level and stronger community ties, underscoring how spatial sorting amplifies family-level effects.^[150] Cross-national data reveal that social mobility persists or even thrives in systems with high inequality but low institutional barriers, contrasting with rigid caste or class structures where mobility remains stagnant regardless of growth. International comparisons, such as those from the World Bank's Human Opportunity Index across 41 countries, show that ex-ante inequality of opportunity—driven by birthplace and family background—negatively correlates with overall mobility, yet nations like the U.S. exhibit higher absolute upward rates for low-income cohorts than egalitarian but closed systems like parts of Scandinavia when adjusted for absolute income gains.^[151] In developing contexts with caste-like rigidities, mobility indices remain below 0.3 on a 0–1 scale, while open economies permit quintile jumps despite Gini coefficients exceeding 0.4.^[152] In the United States during the 2020s, intergenerational mobility has shown relative stability amid rising inequality, with rank-rank correlations hovering around 0.4–0.5 for cohorts born in the 1980s–1990s, per updated analyses of tax and administrative data.^[153] Immigration has facilitated upward paths for select groups, as second-generation immigrants from high-skill or entrepreneurial backgrounds achieve mobility rates comparable to or exceeding natives, with empirical studies of U.S. census data indicating convergence to native distributions within one generation for earnings and education.^[154] However, low-skilled immigration inflows have been associated with slight downward pressure on native low-end mobility in localized labor markets, though aggregate effects remain modest.^[155]

Policy Responses

Redistributive Approaches

Redistributive approaches to inequality primarily involve fiscal policies that transfer resources from higher-income to lower-income individuals through progressive taxation, refundable tax credits, and direct cash transfers. Progressive income taxes impose higher marginal rates on larger incomes, aiming to capture a greater share of economic output from top earners. For instance, in OECD countries, taxes and transfers collectively reduce the Gini coefficient of market income inequality by approximately 25%, equivalent to about 11 Gini points on average. Similarly, the International Monetary Fund notes that fiscal policies in advanced economies offset roughly one-third of pre-tax income disparities. These mechanisms achieve short-term reductions in measured inequality of 20-30% in various national contexts by equalizing disposable incomes.^[156]^[157] Programs like the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) in the United States exemplify targeted redistribution, providing refundable credits to low-wage workers to supplement earnings and encourage labor participation. The EITC has lifted millions out of poverty annually, with expansions since the 1990s correlating to reduced child poverty rates by up to 5 percentage points in affected households. However, its impact on overall inequality metrics remains modest; analyses indicate it lowers the Gini coefficient by less than 1% due to its focus on working poor rather than broad wealth transfers.^[158]^[159] High marginal tax rates inherent in progressive systems can distort economic incentives, as evidenced by Laffer curve dynamics where rates exceeding revenue-maximizing levels reduce labor supply, investment, and taxable income. IMF research on historical tax reforms shows that cuts from prohibitive marginal rates—often above 70%—have increased revenues by boosting activity, particularly when initial rates suppress work effort among high earners. Empirical studies across U.S. states further link greater income tax progressivity to slower real GDP growth, with a one-standard-deviation increase in progressivity associated with 3-4% lower growth three years later.^[160]^[161] Universal basic income (UBI) represents a more uniform redistributive tool, providing unconditional cash payments to all citizens regardless of employment. Finland's 2017-2018 trial, which gave €560 monthly to 2,000 randomly selected unemployed individuals aged 25-58, found no significant employment effects—recipients worked slightly less but reported higher life satisfaction and reduced stress—yet scaling it nationally would impose substantial fiscal burdens, estimated at 2-3% of GDP without offsetting benefit cuts. While such trials reveal minimal short-term work disincentives compared to means-tested welfare, the high costs and lack of productivity gains limit their viability for broad inequality reduction.^[162]^[163] Overall, redistributive policies offset about one-third of market-driven inequality across OECD nations but exhibit diminishing returns at high intensities, where incentive distortions may contribute to subdued long-term growth. Cross-country evidence indicates that while moderate transfers enhance equity without clear growth penalties, reliance on heavy redistribution correlates with reduced dynamism in high-tax environments, as resources shift from productive investment to consumption.^[156]^[161]

Growth-Oriented and Opportunity-Focused Strategies

Growth-oriented strategies prioritize expanding economic output and individual capabilities to enhance long-term social mobility, contrasting with redistributive measures by targeting productivity and innovation drivers. These approaches include educational reforms that empower parental choice and regulatory reductions that foster entrepreneurship, aiming to create broader ladders of opportunity through sustained economic expansion rather than immediate resource reallocation. Empirical analyses indicate that such policies correlate with higher absolute mobility rates by amplifying the pie of available positions, as opposed to slicing existing shares.^[164] School choice programs, such as vouchers, enable families to select educational environments better suited to their children's needs, yielding measurable improvements in student outcomes. In Milwaukee's Parental Choice Program, a state-mandated evaluation of participants compared to public school peers revealed higher high school graduation rates—7 percentage points above the control group—and increased four-year college enrollment by 6-8 percentage points, persisting into postsecondary attainment.^[165] Random assignment studies of the program further documented modest gains in standardized test scores, equivalent to 0.1-0.2 standard deviations in reading and math after several years, particularly benefiting low-income and minority students.^[166] These effects stem from competitive pressures on public schools and access to specialized curricula, fostering skills that translate to future earnings potential without relying on fiscal transfers.^[167] Deregulation and trade liberalization post-1980s in the United States facilitated entrepreneurship by reducing barriers to entry, contributing to sectoral innovations and job creation. The deregulation of airlines, trucking, and telecommunications in the late 1970s and 1980s lowered consumer prices by 20-50% in affected industries and spurred new business formations, with entrepreneurship rates peaking in the early 1980s amid tax reforms that incentivized risk-taking.^[168] This environment enabled upward mobility through self-employment and small firm growth, as evidenced by increased intergenerational income elasticity improvements for cohorts entering the workforce during this period, where entrepreneurial ventures accounted for disproportionate income gains among lower quintiles.^[169] Unlike static redistribution, these supply-side enhancements generate compounding returns via human capital accumulation and market dynamism. Cross-national evidence underscores that opportunity-focused policies sustain GDP growth by 1-2% annually in adopting economies, per analyses of structural reforms, outpacing redistributive interventions which exhibit diminishing marginal benefits due to work disincentives and fiscal drag.^[170] For instance, excessive redistribution correlates with reduced conflict initially but triggers backlash and efficiency losses beyond moderate thresholds, whereas growth-oriented measures like skill investments yield persistent mobility without such trade-offs.^[171] This causal chain—policy to productivity to opportunity—relies on verifiable incentives aligning individual effort with societal expansion, avoiding the zero-sum pitfalls of leveling mechanisms.^[127]

Evidence on Effectiveness

Empirical evaluations of redistributive policies reveal short-term reductions in poverty and inequality metrics, but long-term associations with economic stagnation and diminished absolute gains for lower-income groups. Meta-analyses of European welfare states, which feature higher redistribution rates, indicate that such systems correlate with slower GDP growth and lower absolute income mobility for the poor compared to the United States, where pre-tax market incomes and overall growth have driven greater real income increases for the bottom quintile over decades. For instance, from 1980 to the 2010s, U.S. policies emphasizing market incentives yielded higher absolute standards of living for low earners despite wider relative disparities, as evidenced by cross-national income distribution data covering the full spectrum from poorest households to the top.^[172]^[173] In contrast, opportunity-focused interventions demonstrate stronger causal links to sustained mobility. Chile's 1981 nationwide school voucher reform, which subsidized private education choices, increased educational attainment and labor market outcomes for disadvantaged students, with affected cohorts showing higher wages and employment rates in adulthood, as per longitudinal studies tracking individuals through 2006. This reform enhanced intergenerational mobility by enabling low-income families to access higher-performing schools, though it also prompted sorting effects; overall, targeted expansions like the 2019 preferential subsidy for the poorest 40% further amplified academic gains without broad disincentives.^[174] Recent U.S. evaluations underscore the efficacy of conditional, behaviorally neutral transfers. The 2021 Child Tax Credit expansion, providing up to $3,600 per child, reduced child poverty by approximately 46% in its inaugural year, lifting 3.7 million children above the poverty line through direct cash infusions that boosted family resources without phase-out cliffs that deter work. Post-expiration analyses in 2024 confirm this impact, estimating that reinstating similar credits could avert 2.4 million children from poverty annually, with minimal employment disincentives observed in low-income households.^[175]^[176] Policies neglecting behavioral incentives have historically underperformed, highlighting causal mechanisms like work traps. Prior to the 1996 Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act, U.S. Aid to Families with Dependent Children created effective marginal tax rates exceeding 100% due to benefit phase-outs, trapping recipients in dependency and correlating with stagnant employment. The reform's time limits and work requirements halved welfare caseloads within five years, raised single-mother employment by 10-15 percentage points, and yielded net poverty reductions through earnings gains, as synthesized in meta-analyses of program evaluations.^[177]^[178]

Debates and Perspectives

Dominant Viewpoints on Fairness and Justice

Progressive viewpoints on fairness often frame inequality as a form of systemic injustice that demands corrective measures to achieve equity in outcomes. John Rawls, in his 1971 work A Theory of Justice, argued that principles of justice should be selected from behind a "veil of ignorance," where individuals lack knowledge of their own position in society, leading to the difference principle: social and economic inequalities are permissible only if they are to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged members of society.^[179] This approach prioritizes the welfare of the worst-off, viewing unequal outcomes as unjust unless they improve conditions for those at the bottom through mechanisms like progressive taxation or targeted redistribution.^[180] Conservative perspectives, by contrast, emphasize equality of opportunity and procedural fairness over outcome equalization, regarding significant inequalities as natural results of differing individual abilities, efforts, and choices. Robert Nozick's entitlement theory posits that justice in holdings arises from just initial acquisition and voluntary transfer, rendering redistributive policies illegitimate as they violate property rights without regard to historical processes.^[181] Friedrich Hayek contended that true equality lies in uniform application of general rules of law, not engineered outcomes, warning that pursuits of "social justice" distort spontaneous market orders and undermine liberty by necessitating arbitrary interventions.^[182] Such views highlight moral hazards in enforced equality, including reduced incentives for productivity and innovation due to anticipated redistribution.^[183] Utilitarian approaches assess fairness by maximizing overall welfare, potentially accommodating inequality if it enhances total utility through economic growth or efficiency gains that outweigh cohesion costs. This tradition, rooted in thinkers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, evaluates distributions based on aggregate happiness rather than strict equality, accepting disparities that incentivize effort or investment provided marginal utilities diminish appropriately across income levels.^[184] Empirical considerations, such as whether inequality fosters innovation versus social instability, inform the balance, though utilitarians reject absolute egalitarianism absent net welfare improvements.^[185]

Empirical Challenges to Common Narratives

Since 1990, the global share of people living in extreme poverty has fallen from approximately 38% to 9% by 2024, lifting over 1.5 billion individuals out of destitution, even as global income inequality, measured by the Gini coefficient, remained high or fluctuated without a corresponding reversal in poverty trends.^[186]^[187] This pattern challenges narratives portraying economic inequality as inherently zero-sum, where gains for the wealthy necessarily impoverish the masses; instead, absolute improvements in living standards for the bottom quintiles have coincided with overall growth, particularly in emerging economies like China and India, driven by market liberalization and technological diffusion.^[188]^[40] Empirical studies indicate no robust causal relationship between income inequality and political instability once controlling for institutional quality, economic development, and historical context, contradicting claims of inevitable social upheaval from disparate wealth distribution. For instance, historical analyses reveal counterexamples where high inequality persisted without triggering unrest, such as in periods of sustained growth under stable governance, while instability more reliably correlates with weak rule of law and extractive institutions rather than Gini levels alone.^[189] Economists like Daron Acemoglu argue that inclusive institutions fostering innovation and property rights are primary drivers of long-term stability and prosperity, overshadowing inequality's direct effects, as evidenced in cross-country regressions where institutional variables explain variance in outcomes better than distribution metrics.^[190] Critiques of extreme wealth concentration, such as Oxfam's 2025 reports claiming billionaire fortunes surged by $2 trillion in 2024 amid stagnant poverty reduction, overlook the role of entrepreneurial value creation in expanding total economic output and absolute opportunities, as these gains often stem from innovations benefiting broader populations through cheaper goods and services.^[191] Oxfam, an advocacy organization focused on redistribution, emphasizes relative disparities but understates concurrent global progress, such as the World Bank's documented decline in extreme poverty from 2.3 billion to under 1 billion people between 1990 and 2025.^[16] In the United States, the Gini coefficient has stabilized around 41.8 in 2023 after rising through the late 20th century, suggesting market dynamics like wage compression in tech sectors and productivity spillovers may induce self-correction without heavy intervention, as competition erodes concentrated rents over time.^[42]^[51]

References

[1]
What Is Economic Inequality? | CFR Education
Jun 9, 2025 · Economic inequality refers to the disparity in wealth (one's total assets) and income (the money one receives from activities like work or investment) between ...
[2]
Introduction to Inequality - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Most common metric is Income Inequality, which refers to the extent to which income is evenly distributed within a population.
[3]
Income inequality: Gini coefficient - Our World in Data
The Gini coefficient measures inequality on a scale from 0 to 1. Higher values indicate higher inequality. Depending on the country and year, the data ...All Charts · FAQs
[4]
Income inequality - OECD
Income inequality is the difference in how income is distributed among the population. Income is defined as household disposable income in a particular year. It ...
[5]
Economic Inequality - Our World in Data
This data explorer provides a range of inequality indicators measured according to two different definitions of income obtained from different sources.Gini coefficient · The history of global economic... · How has income inequality...
[6]
Global inequality from 1820 to now
In effect, the global Gini increased from 0.60 in 1820 to 0.72 in 1910, again 0.72 in 2000 and 0.67 in 2020 (see Figure 2.3). Note that the global inequality ...Global Inequality From 1820... · The Regional Composition Of... · ``contemporary Global...
[7]
How has income inequality within countries evolved over the past ...
Jul 6, 2023 · Inequality over the past century: dramatic declines, followed by substantial rises in some countries – but not in others. Over the early and ...
[8]
[PDF] Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality: A Global ...
Jun 1, 2015 · Interestingly, we find that rising skill premium is associated with widening income disparities in advanced countries, while financial deepening ...
[9]
The history of global economic inequality - Our World in Data
Apr 17, 2017 · Global income inequality increased for two centuries and is now falling. This visualization shows the distribution of incomes between 1988 and ...
[10]
'What's the difference between income and wealth?' and other ...
Jul 23, 2021 · Income is earnings from jobs, etc., while wealth is assets minus debt, accumulated over time.
[11]
What is economic inequality? - IZA World of Labor
Economic inequality is the unequal distribution of income and opportunity between different groups in society. It is a concern in almost all countries ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[12]
Wealth inequality is much larger than income inequality
Wealth inequality is twice as high as income inequality, with the richest 10% owning about half of total wealth, and the amount of wealth held in relation to ...
[13]
[PDF] do people distinguish income from wealth inequality?
May 23, 2024 · In most countries, wealth inequality is much higher than income inequality, spurring debates about wealth taxation.
[14]
Wealth share of the richest 1%, 2023 - Our World in Data
The share of wealth owned by the richest 1%. Source: World Inequality Database (WID.world) (2025) – with major processing by Our World in Data.
[15]
Capitalist systems and income inequality - CEPR
Dec 3, 2020 · This column introduces a new measure of compositional inequality, allowing the authors to distinguish between different capitalist societies.
[16]
Poverty Overview: Development news, research, data | World Bank
From 1990 to 2025, the total number of people worldwide living in extreme poverty declined from around 2.3 billion to around 831 million. The sharp decline ...Measuring Poverty · Poverty & Equity Assessments · Poverty and Equity Briefs
[17]
Poverty - Our World in Data
Measuring global poverty in an unequal world · Global extreme poverty declined substantially over the last generation · Hundreds of millions will remain in ...
[18]
Less Poverty, Less Prison, More College: What Two Parents Mean ...
Jun 17, 2021 · It is simply the truth that white and black children usually do better when raised by their own mother and father, compared to single-parent and ...
[19]
[PDF] Reporting Gender Pay Gaps in OECD Countries (EN)
Across OECD countries, on average, the unadjusted gender pay gap stands at 11.9% – meaning that the median full-time working woman earns about 88 cents to ...
[20]
[PDF] The Unequal Impact of Firms on the Gender Wage Gap
Feb 13, 2025 · In most European countries, including Sweden, Norway, France, Finland, Netherlands, Portugal, Italy, gaps in wage premiums account for 10–20 ...
[21]
The gender gap in employment: What's holding women back?
The current global labour force participation rate for women is just under 47%. For men, it's 72%. That's a difference of 25 percentage points, with some ...
[22]
The Fed - Wealth Inequality and the Racial Wealth Gap
Oct 22, 2021 · The average Black and Hispanic or Latino households earn about half as much as the average White household and own only about 15 to 20 percent as much net ...
[23]
The Racial Wealth Gap 1992 to 2022 - NCRC
Oct 28, 2024 · The racial wealth gap between median Black and White households has remained virtually unchanged from 1992 to 2022.
[24]
Growing up in single-parent families and the criminal involvement of ...
The results suggest that growing up in single-parent families is associated with an elevated risk of involvement in crime by adolescents.
[25]
Disability - World Health Organization (WHO)
Mar 7, 2023 · An estimated 1.3 billion people experience significant disability. This represents 16% of the world's population, or 1 in 6 of us.
[26]
Disability & Socioeconomic Status
Median earnings for people with no disability were over $30,469, compared to the $20,250 median income reported for individuals with a disability (U.S. Census ...
[27]
[PDF] Financial Inequality: Disability, Race and Poverty in America
Almost 40 percent of African Americans with disabilities live in poverty, compared with 24 percent of Non-Hispanic Whites, 29 percent of Latinos and 19 percent ...
[28]
Disability-related inequalities in health and well-being are mediated ...
Research from longitudinal studies has provided evidence of a causal relationship between disability acquisition and poor health and well-being outcomes.
[29]
An Inconvenienced Youth? Ageism and its Potential ...
In the modern world, older people face reduced social and economic opportunities, damage to self-esteem, and exacerbated physical health problems, to name only ...
[30]
https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052521-094617
[31]
Political Parties, Interest Groups, and Unequal Class Influence in ...
Do policy makers in both parties represent the opinions of the richest Americans, ignoring those of median income? We find that the two political parties ...
[32]
Majority of lawmakers in 116th Congress are millionaires
Apr 23, 2020 · The median net worth of members of Congress who filed disclosures last year is just over $1 million. Much of the wealth in Congress is ...
[33]
Voting and Income | Econofact
Feb 7, 2019 · in voter turnout. Roughly about 60 percent of eligible people voted in the United States during recent presidential elections. Participation ...
[34]
How Media Consolidation Affects the News You See - Chicago Booth
Mar 4, 2025 · This is important because traditional media is still the main source of news about local politicians and policy issues, despite the rise of ...
[35]
Media Consolidation Means Less Local News, More Right Wing Slant
Jul 30, 2019 · A new study shows that the trend toward conglomerate ownership is causing local stations to focus more on national politics at the expense of local politics.
[36]
Who influences whom? Inequality in the mutual responsiveness ...
This study addresses the responsiveness of political elites to voter preferences, and vice versa, around elections. Such mutual responsiveness is vital to ...
[37]
Political Entrenchment and Public Law - The Yale Law Journal
Nov 2, 2015 · This Article demonstrates that political actors also entrench themselves and their policies through an array of functional alternatives.
[38]
Gini index - Glossary | DataBank
Statistical concept(s): The Gini index is the average of all pairwise absolute differences between individual consumption or income, normalized by twice the ...
[39]
What Is the Gini Coefficient? - SHADAC
Mar 13, 2025 · The Gini Coefficient is a measure of inequality, often income inequality, with values ranging from zero to one.
[40]
Gini index - World Bank Open Data
Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments.India · United States · Brazil · World
[41]
Gini inequality index by country, around the world
The Gini index measures income inequality. In 2021, the average was 35.28, with Colombia at 55.1 and Slovakia at 24.1.
[42]
GINI Index for the United States (SIPOVGINIUSA) - FRED
Graph and download economic data for GINI Index for the United States (SIPOVGINIUSA) from 1963 to 2023 about gini, indexes, and USA.
[43]
Historical Income Tables: Income Inequality - U.S. Census Bureau
Aug 25, 2025 · Access demographic, economic and population data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Explore census data with visualizations and view tutorials.
[44]
[PDF] Beware the Gini Index! A New Inequality Measure - arXiv
0.5), because the Gini index is relatively insensitive to a distribution's tail, namely to extreme realizations of a variable (Section 2). While a ...
[45]
Theil index - Wikipedia
The Theil index is a statistic primarily used to measure economic inequality and other economic phenomena, though it has also been used to measure racial ...Formula · Derivation from entropy · Decomposability
[46]
Metadata Glossary - World Bank DataBank
The Theil index is part of a larger family of measures referred to as the General Entropy class. Compared to the Gini index, it has the advantage of being ...
[47]
https://www.investopedia.com/news/measuring-inequality-forget-gini-go-palma/
[48]
Measuring Inequality: Forget Gini, the Palma Ratio Might Surprise You
A high Palma ratio indicates higher inequality in a society. It compares the share of income held by the top 10% versus the bottom 40% of earners. A higher ...
[49]
Income Inequality Data Tables - U.S. Census Bureau
Nov 22, 2021 · Detailed historical tables showing selected measures of household income dispersion are included in the appendix of this report. Additional ...
[50]
World Inequality Database: Home - WID
Home The source for global inequality data. Open access, high quality wealth and income inequality data developed by an international academic consortium.
[51]
Income inequality: Gini coefficient (before tax) - Our World in Data
The data is estimated from a combination of household surveys, tax records and national accounts data. This combination can provide a more accurate picture ...
[52]
Gini index - United States - World Bank Open Data
Data are based on primary household survey data obtained from government statistical agencies and World Bank country departments. ... 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020 ...
[53]
Income inequality measures - PMC - PubMed Central - NIH
The Gini coefficient's main weakness as a measure of income distribution is that it is incapable of differentiating different kinds of inequalities. Lorenz ...
[54]
[PDF] Earnings Inequality and Mobility in the United States
This paper uses Social Security Administration longitudinal earnings micro data since 1937 to analyze the evolution of inequality and mobility in the United.
[55]
[PDF] Inequality in Lifetime Earnings, 1986-2012 ECINEQ 2021 579
Other measures—the Gini coefficient, the mean to median ratio, two Theil coefficients—exhibit similarly moderate increases in lifetime inequality.
[56]
Fiscal Policy and Income Inequality in - IMF eLibrary
Jul 3, 2014 · Fiscal policy has played a significant role in reducing income inequality in advanced economies, with most of this reduction being achieved on ...
[57]
Unveiling the Shadow Economy | BCG
Nov 6, 2023 · This so-called “shadow economy”—also known as the black market or the informal or underground economy—is the body of economic activities ...
[58]
Consumption and Income Inequality since the 1960s | NBER
In the 1980s, inequality for both measures rose, but the increase was much greater for income (28 percent) than for consumption (5 percent). After 2005, these ...Why Consumption? · Addressing Concerns About... · Trends In Income And...
[59]
[PDF] Redistribution from a Lifetime Perspective | Nuffield Foundation
Income inequality is much lower from a lifetime perspective than a cross- sectional perspective: the Gini coefficient – a common measure of inequality – for ...
[60]
Class origin, intergenerational transfers, and the gender wealth gap
Sep 5, 2024 · Intergenerational transfers thus emerge as driver of gender wealth inequality at the very top of the class origin hierarchy. Issue Section:.
[61]
[PDF] TTPI - Working Paper 7/2025 May 2025
Therefore, the primary goal of this paper is to measure the size of intergenerational transfers made through the tax and transfer system, how this has ...
[62]
[PDF] Lifetime inequality and redistribution - IFS
In this paper we look at lifetime inequality to address two main questions: How well does a modern tax system, based on annual information, target lifetime ...
[63]
Wealth Transmission and Inequality Among Hunter-Gatherers - PMC
We report quantitative estimates of intergenerational transmission and population-wide inequality for wealth measures in a set of hunter-gatherer populations.Missing: feudal | Show results with:feudal
[64]
The Archaeology of Inequality | The MIT Press Reader
Apr 13, 2022 · In the ancient farming societies under study the Gini coefficients are estimated to have been between 35 and 46; interestingly, the real ...Missing: industrial feudal proxies
[65]
Wealth inequality in pre‐industrial Europe: What role did ...
Jan 6, 2022 · ... Gini coefficients of around 0.4 to 0.6, or even much lower still for small-scale societies of hunter-gatherers, foragers, and horticulturalists.
[66]
[PDF] Land Markets and Inequality: Evidence from Medieval England
Jun 18, 2012 · Rural communities in England experienced a dramatic increase in the inequality of peasant land- holdings between the 11th and 13th centuries.
[67]
Economic Inequality in Preindustrial Times: Europe and Beyond
It now seems clear that in the period circa 1300–1800, inequality of both income and wealth grew almost monotonically almost everywhere in Europe.
[68]
Pandemics and inequality: A historical overview - CEPR
Oct 15, 2020 · In the aftermath of the Black Death, the richest 10% of the population lost their grip on between 15% and 20% of overall wealth. This decline in ...
[69]
[PDF] Guido Alfani* Social and economic mobility in preindustrial Europe
Clark measured the long-run pace of preindustrial social mobility for England and partly for Sweden (he achieved a much broader geographic coverage for the ...Missing: castes | Show results with:castes
[70]
[PDF] Economic Growth and Income Inequality
The central theme of this paper is the character and causes of long- term changes in the personal distribution of income. Does inequality.Missing: era | Show results with:era
[71]
Class structure and inequality during the industrial revolution - jstor
Jul 9, 2016 · The Gini coefficient was 0.54 in 1688, and 0.53 in 1759. By. 1798, the Gini coefficient had jumped to 0.60 and it remained elevated at 0.58.
[72]
U.S. income inequality, on rise for decades, is now highest since 1928
Dec 5, 2013 · In 1928, the top 1% of families received 23.9% of all pretax income, while the bottom 90% received 50.7%. But the Depression and World War II ...
[73]
[PDF] Figure I.1. Income inequality in the United States, 1910-2010 - ENS
The top decile share in U.S. national income dropped from 45-50% in the 1910s-1920s to less than 35% in the 1950s (this is the fall documented by.
[74]
[PDF] the great compression: the wage structure in the united states at mid ...
The compression in the wage structure from 1940 to 1950 may have been caused by factors unique to the World War II period or, alternatively, may have been a ...
[75]
Inequality: Total war as a great leveller - CEPR
Sep 2, 2019 · In the US, different types of income Ginis fell by 7 to 10 points during the war years and stabilised thereafter. The UK was not far behind, and ...
[76]
Income inequality and colonialism - ScienceDirect.com
This paper proposes that colonialism is a major explanation behind today's differences in income inequality across countries.Income Inequality And... · Introduction · Colonization And European...
[77]
[PDF] Colonialism, Inequality, and Long-Run Paths of Development
Hence, economic inequality can sometimes, in the sorts of conditions that are not uncommon in colonies or less-developed countries (with an abundance of ...
[78]
[PDF] Striking it Richer: The Evolution of Top Incomes in the United States ...
The top 10% income share fell from 50.6% to 48.6%, the top 1% income share fell from. 22.8% to 20.0% (Figures 1 and 2). Indeed, top 1% real incomes fell by 14.9 ...
[79]
It's Time to Discard Piketty's Inequality Statistics | The Daily Economy
Nov 28, 2023 · In the main article by Piketty and Saez, the top 1 percent earned 9 percent of all pre-tax incomes in 1980 versus 20 percent in 2020. In Auten ...
[80]
10 facts on global inequality in 2024 - WID
Nov 19, 2024 · The United States is the most unequal country in the OECD, with 21% of national income going to the richest 1% – the same as in Mexico (21%), ...<|separator|>
[81]
How U.S. wealth inequality has changed since Great Recession
Nov 1, 2017 · The Great Recession of 2007-2009 triggered a sharp, prolonged decline in the wealth of American families, and an already large wealth gap ...
[82]
How the Great Recession changed class inequality: Evidence from ...
The Great Recession widened the earnings gap between the working and upper-middle class, with a 5 percentage point increase in unemployment associated with a 0 ...2. Background · 2.3. Socioeconomic... · 4. Results
[83]
Publication: The Impact of COVID-19 on Global Inequality and Poverty
This paper estimates that COVID-19 increased the global Gini index by 0.7 point and global extreme poverty (using a poverty line of $2.15 per day) by 90 million ...
[84]
Income inequality hardly changed during the COVID-19 pandemic
Feb 8, 2024 · Contrary to expectations, there was no widespread increase in either within-country or global income inequality during the pandemic.
[85]
Income Gini Ratio of Families by Race of Householder, All Races
Income Gini Ratio of Families by Race of Householder, All Races (GINIALLRF) ; 2024: 0.456 ; 2023: 0.452 ; 2022: 0.458 ; 2021: 0.462 ; 2020: 0.458.
[86]
Nominal Wage Tracker | Economic Policy Institute
Key numbers on nominal wages. Actual year-over-year growth for private employees: 3.9%. Chart: Nominal wage growth has been far below ...Missing: broad | Show results with:broad
[87]
Strong wage growth for low-wage workers bucks the historic trend
The hourly wage for the lowest-paid workers at the bottom 10% grew a tremendous 15.3% over this period. The wage growth at the lower end of the wage ...
[88]
AI's impact on income inequality in the US - Brookings Institution
Jul 3, 2024 · According to one survey, about half of Americans think that the increased use of AI will lead to greater income inequality and a more polarized society.
[89]
AI Will Transform the Global Economy. Let's Make Sure It Benefits ...
Jan 14, 2024 · AI could also affect income and wealth inequality within countries. We may see polarization within income brackets, with workers who can harness ...
[90]
What America's top economists are saying about AI and inequality
Jan 7, 2025 · Will Generative AI Reduce Or Widen Income Inequality ... It's a big reason why economists believe income inequality has widened in recent decades.
[91]
Research Summary: Education and Lifetime Earnings - Social Security
Men with graduate degrees earn $1.5 million more in median lifetime earnings than high school graduates. Women with graduate degrees earn $1.1 million more.
[92]
New Evidence on the Returns to Attending College | NBER
Jul 1, 2024 · Attending college leads to higher earnings, even for marginal students, with a premium after 8 years, and increased tax revenue after 25 years.
[93]
The Relationship between Lifetime Hours Worked and Lifetime ...
Mar 12, 2024 · In our sample, variation in lifetime hours worked explains about 30% of the variation in lifetime earnings.
[94]
Do top earners work more hours? It depends which country they live in
Sep 27, 2022 · America's top 10% of earners work an average of 4.4 hours more each week than those in the bottom 10%, according to a US Census Bureau survey.
[95]
Poverty in the United States: 2022 - U.S. Census Bureau
Sep 12, 2023 · The SPM rate in 2022 was 12.4 percent, an increase of 4.6 percentage points from 2021. · The SPM child poverty rate more than doubled, from 5.2 ...Missing: risk | Show results with:risk
[96]
Living Conditions in Single Parent Households - U.S. Census Bureau
Poverty was high among households that relied on welfare all of last year, did not contain an adult who worked or did contain a single parent around 60 percent, ...
[97]
[PDF] On the Origins of Socio-Economic Inequalities: Evidence from Twin ...
We find the heritability of earnings to be almost double that of education. Conversely, shared environmental factors explain slightly more than a third of ...
[98]
Marry Your Like: Assortative Mating and Income Inequality
Thus, assortative mating is important for income inequality. The high level of married female labor-force participation in 2005 is important for this result.
[99]
Assortative Mating and Wealth Inequalities Between and Within ...
May 16, 2023 · Abstract. Positive assortative mating may be a driver of wealth inequalities, but this relationship has not yet been examined.
[100]
Predicting mid-life capital formation with pre-school delay of ...
They reported 11 mid-life capital formation outcomes, including net worth, permanent income, absence of high-interest debt, forward-looking behaviors, and ...
[101]
Delay of gratification and adult outcomes: The Marshmallow Test ...
Jul 29, 2024 · The study found that Marshmallow Test performance does not reliably predict adult achievement, health, or behavior.
[102]
Effects of the Minimum Wage (MW) on Income Inequality - MDPI
Thus, this paper provides new scientific evidence demonstrating that a significant increase in the minimum wage can significantly improve the income of low-wage ...
[103]
The Economics of the Minimum Wage: Myths, Facts, and ... - AIER
Apr 1, 2025 · Empirical studies on this issue have produced mixed results, but many show that increasing the minimum wage leads to job losses, particularly ...<|separator|>
[104]
[PDF] Employment effects of minimum wages | IZA World of Labor
Employers will substitute away from less-skilled workers toward more-skilled workers after a minimum wage increase. This “labor−labor” substitution has ...
[105]
[PDF] Unions, Norms, and the Rise in U.S. Wage Inequality
Scholars estimate that declining unionization explains 10 to 20 per- cent of the growth in men's wage inequality from the late 1970s through the late 1980s ( ...
[106]
Collective bargaining is associated with lower income inequality
Mar 14, 2023 · We have identified a negative correlation between union density and collective wage bargaining and inequality across countries and over time.
[107]
The Nordic Exceptionalism - The World Happiness Report
The Nordic countries are also famous for low levels of income inequality, but the evidence is not clear that a lack of income inequality is a potential ...
[108]
The influence of inheritances on wealth inequality in rich countries
This paper uses survey data from Germany, Spain, France, Italy, Great Britain and the United States to analyze how inheritances impact wealth inequality in ...1. Introduction · 2. Wealth Transfers In... · 4. Results
[109]
How Do Inheritances Shape Wealth Inequality? Theory and ...
We find that inheritances reduce relative measures of wealth inequality in the short-run, but this effect is completely reversed within a decade.Setting, Data, and Empirical... · Inheritance Effect on Wealth... · Discussions
[110]
[PDF] Inheritance and wealth inequality - Uppsala University
This paper uses population register data on inheritances and wealth in Sweden to estimate the causal impact of inheritances on wealth inequality.
[111]
https://www.archbridgeinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/Social-mobility-and-rule-of-law_Callais.pdf
[112]
[PDF] ECONOMIC MOBILITY, THE RULE OF LAW, AND PROPERTY ...
I find that legal systems and the protection of property rights are important for explaining intergenerational income mobility in a cross-country analysis. To a ...
[113]
Economic Mobility, the Rule of Law, and Property Rights Protection
May 30, 2022 · The institutional environment, specifically the quality of legal systems and protection of property rights, are often ignored in the economic ...
[114]
[PDF] INSTITUTIONS AS A FUNDAMENTAL CAUSE OF LONG-RUN ...
Abstract. This paper develops the empirical and theoretical case that differences in economic in- stitutions are the fundamental cause of differences in ...
[115]
[PDF] IMPACT OF CRONY CAPITALISM ON INCOME INEQUALITY
Aug 10, 2024 · For example, studies have shown that crony capitalism leads to increased market power for politically connected firms, resulting in higher ...
[116]
Does Meritocracy Promote Economic Growth? Evidence From Turkey
Mar 25, 2025 · In general, the findings of our policy experiments show that a higher meritocracy degree can promote social capital and therefore long-run ...
[117]
[PDF] Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and ...
Card, David, DiNardo, John, 2002. Skill biased technological change and rising wage inequality: some problems and puzzles. Journal of Labor Economics 20 ...
[118]
[PDF] The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US ...
Alongside unbalanced technological progress, we evaluate numerous alternative explanations for the pronounced differences in wage and employment polarization.
[119]
[PDF] The China Shock: Learning from Labor-Market Adjustment to Large ...
Aug 8, 2016 · As wage inequality rose, low-skill wages and employment fell, and manufacturing employment contracted in the United States, globalization was ...
[120]
Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States
The China Syndrome: Local Labor Market Effects of Import Competition in the United States by David H. Autor, David Dorn and Gordon H. Hanson.Missing: globalization offshoring
[121]
Inequality: Global trends - Development Initiatives
May 2, 2023 · Chart showing that between 1990 and 2020, the global Gini coefficient has decreased, largely driven by decreasing inequality between countries.
[122]
AI Adoption and Inequality - International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Apr 4, 2025 · Some argue AI will exacerbate economic disparities, while others suggest it could reduce inequality by primarily disrupting high-income jobs.
[123]
AI's Impact on Income Inequality in the US - GovAI
AI may increase inequality by boosting high-income workers and shifting income to capital, though some studies suggest AI could boost middle class wages.
[124]
Three Reasons Why AI May Widen Global Inequality
Oct 17, 2024 · The rise of AI could exacerbate both within-country and between-country inequality, thus placing upward pressure on global inequality.
[125]
Inequality and Economic Growth: The Role of Initial Income
The relationship between inequality and GDP growth decreases with initial income. In low-income countries, inequality boosts growth; in high-income countries, ...
[126]
Income Inequality and Economic Growth in United States Counties
Feb 18, 2025 · A positive relationship between an income Gini coefficient and per capita income growth is observed only in central metro counties with ...
[127]
A New Twist in the Link Between Inequality and Economic ...
May 11, 2017 · The impact of income inequality on economic development is positive for values of a net Gini below 27 percent (where net refers to its measurement after taxes ...
[128]
Literature review on income inequality and economic growth - PMC
Existing studies report that income inequality exerts a positive impact on economic growth through savings rates (see [3,13,17]). According to these studies ...
[129]
Comparing Economic Growth between EU and US States - ECIPE
Jul 3, 2023 · If EU countries were US states, many would be among the poorest. In 2021, the GDP per capita gap was 82%, and the difference in prosperity has ...
[130]
Inequality and the Industrial Revolution - ScienceDirect.com
Using data for Britain over the period 1270–1940, we show that increasing inequality was a major contributor to the expansion of the manufacturing sector.
[131]
Why Inequality Harms Consolidation but Does Not Affect ... - jstor
Przeworski and his coauthors revolution- ized the field of comparative politics by showing that wealth has no effect on democratization but instead promotes ...
[132]
[PDF] Democracy and Economic Development* Adam Przeworski ...
I examine the mutual relation between political regimes and economic development. An analysis of regime dynamics shows that while the paths to democracy are ...
[133]
[PDF] Growing Apart, Losing Trust? The Impact of Inequality on Social ...
The paper finds that overall inequality lowers an individual's sense of trust, mainly from residual inequality and inequality at the bottom of the distribution.
[134]
[PDF] 1 INEQUALITY AND THE EROSION OF TRUST AMONG THE POOR
The erosion of trust among the poor due to increases in income inequality may be an important mechanism hindering mobilization in favor of redistribution.
[135]
Fact-checking The Spirit Level - TaxPayers' Alliance
Jul 16, 2010 · Amongst that large body of scientific literature, there have been several suggestions of selection bias on Wilkinson's part (that's 'cherry- ...
[136]
Income, income inequality, and health: Evidence from China
We find evidence supporting the absolute income hypothesis that income has a positive effect on self-reported health status. Consistent with findings by Daly ...
[137]
Billionaire wealth surges by $2 trillion in 2024, three times faster ...
Jan 20, 2025 · Billionaire wealth grew by $2 trillion in 2024 alone, equivalent to roughly $5.7 billion a day, at a rate three times faster than the year before.
[138]
September 2024 global poverty update from the World Bank: revised ...
Sep 20, 2024 · By now, global extreme poverty has returned to pre-pandemic levels. However, low- and lower-middle-income countries have been less resilient, ...
[139]
[PDF] Intergenerational income persistence | IZA World of Labor
Intergenerational income elasticity, a measure of inequality transmitted between generations, is related to a well-developed conceptual framework.<|separator|>
[140]
The Fading American Dream: Trends in Absolute Income Mobility ...
Dec 8, 2016 · We find that rates of absolute mobility have fallen from approximately 90%for children born in 1940 to 50% for children born in the 1980s.
[141]
The fading American dream: Trends in absolute income mobility ...
We found that rates of absolute mobility have fallen from approximately 90% for children born in 1940 to 50% for children born in the 1980s.
[142]
Local Intergenerational Mobility - ScienceDirect.com
The broad consensus in the literature is that the average value of the IGE of income for the US ranges between 0.4 and 0.5 (e.g., Lee and Solon, 2009). In this ...
[143]
The IGE: Anatomy of a Mobility Score | Science | AAAS
May 22, 2014 · To be precise, IGE measures how much a 1% rise in a parent's income affects their child's income. The scale runs from 0 to 1. A score of 0.4, ...
[144]
[PDF] The United States in Comparison - IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
Corak (2006) suggests that the best estimate for the United States is somewhere between 0.4 and 0.6. Figure 1shows a 22 country comparison of intergenerational ...Missing: IGE | Show results with:IGE
[145]
[PDF] A comparison of upward and downward intergenerational mobility in ...
Canada and Sweden appear to have the same level of relatively high income mobility, while mobility in the United States by this measure is signifi- cantly lower ...
[146]
[PDF] new estimates of intergenerational mobility in the united states using ...
Abstract—Previous studies, relying on short-term averages of fathers' earnings, have estimated the intergenerational elasticity (IGE) in earnings.
[147]
[PDF] Economic Mobility Is the American Dream Alive and Well
One can talk about mobility over a lifetime, between generations, or over a short period such as a year or two. Unlike analyses that investigate shorter-term.
[148]
Family Structure and the Intergenerational Transmission of ...
The evidence suggests that family structure moderates the association between parents' education and children's schooling across most measures of children's ...
[149]
[PDF] The Effects of Parental Income and Family Structure on ...
The results advance the understanding of intergenerational income mobility and highlight the long-term importance of familial conditions for adult economic ...
[150]
[PDF] The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility
We characterize the effects of neighborhoods on children's earnings and other outcomes in adult- hood by studying more than five million families who move ...
[151]
[PDF] Where is the Land of Opportunity? The Geography of ...
High mobility areas have (1) less residential segregation, (2) less income inequality, (3) better primary schools, (4) greater social capital, and (5) greater ...
[152]
Inequality of Opportunity, Income - Open Knowledge Repository
This paper presents a comparison of ex-ante measures of inequality of economic opportunity (IEO) across 41 countries, and of the Human Opportunity Index (HOI) ...
[153]
Intergenerational mobility around the world: A new database
The subnational regions with comparatively high rates of mobility are found to be less residentially segregated, have lower inequality, higher quality public ...
[154]
[PDF] NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES THE OPPORTUNITY ATLAS
Prior studies of the geography of intergenerational mobility that focus on variation across counties or CZs (e.g., Chetty et al. 2014) thus miss a substantial ...<|separator|>
[155]
[PDF] Intergenerational Social Mobility Among the Chil- dren of Immigrants ...
Jun 3, 2024 · The study finds that second-generation mobility is similar to natives, determined by parental class, with some regional advantages and ...
[156]
[PDF] Immigration and Social Mobility - IZA - Institute of Labor Economics
This paper provides an empirical analysis of the causal relationship between immigration patterns and social mobility among natives. Such a causal ...
[157]
[PDF] Income redistribution across OECD countries (EN)
Taxes and transfers reduce the Gini index of market income inequality by slightly more than 25 per cent (or 11 Gini points) on average across the OECD (Figure 1) ...
[158]
Inequality: Fiscal Policy Can Make the Difference
Oct 11, 2017 · In advanced economies, fiscal policy offsets about a third of income inequality before taxes and transfers—commonly known as market income ...
[159]
New Research Findings on the Effects of the Earned Income Tax ...
The EITC has a strong impact in reducing poverty both because it is a refundable tax credit and because of its targeting on working families with low incomes.
[160]
[PDF] The Earned Income Tax Credit and the Child Tax Credit
Sep 25, 2013 · The EITC reduces the Gini coefficient by 0.34 percent, and the CTC reduces it by 0.61 percent (Hungerford. 2010), indicating that the credits ...
[161]
[PDF] Evidence on the Laffer Curve - IMF eLibrary
Since reductions in marginal tax rates lead to reve- nue increases only if tax rates are very high, the preferred reform involves reductions in the highest ...
[162]
[PDF] Macroeconomic Effects of Progressive Taxation
The study found that current year's income tax progressivity has a strong negative effect on the annual growth rate of real gross state product 3 years later.
[163]
Finland basic income trial left people 'happier but jobless' - BBC
Feb 8, 2019 · The experiment saw 2,000 people paid €560 (£490) a month, instead of their unemployment benefit. Giving jobless people in Finland a basic income ...Missing: disincentives | Show results with:disincentives
[164]
[PDF] First results from the Finnish basic income experiment
The results show that whereas it had no significant impact on employment, it led to less bureaucracy as well as higher life satisfaction and well- being. LEGAL ...Missing: disincentives | Show results with:disincentives
[165]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263301142_School_Vouchers_and_Student_Attainment_Evidence_from_a_State-Mandated_Study_of_Milwaukee%27s_Parental_Choice_Program
[166]
School Vouchers and Student Attainment: Evidence from a State ...
Aug 7, 2025 · In this article we examine educational attainment levels for students in Milwaukee's citywide voucher program and a comparable group of ...
[167]
[PDF] 2024 EDITION - EdChoice
Both were random assignment studies (see Appendix) that found students in the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program tended to improve on standardized test scores.
[168]
Milwaukee Parental Choice Program Evaluation
Our main findings included that the program had a positive effect on a student's likelihood of graduating from high school and enrolling and persisting in a 4- ...Missing: RCT results
[169]
A Brief History of Regulation and Deregulation
The deregulation of transportation and telecommunications that occurred in the 1970s and 1980s succeeded in increasing competition, which lowered consumer ...
[170]
[PDF] Entrepreneurship and the Decline of American Growth
Entrepreneurs are alert to new opportunities, providing the new products, services, and methods that are foundational to economic growth.
[171]
Publication: Competition Policy for Development: Powering Markets ...
Jul 24, 2025 · This report examines two pivotal dimensions of the competitive process: the dynamics of market competition in developing economies and the ...Missing: GDP | Show results with:GDP
[172]
Redistribution, income inequality, and conflict in developing countries
Absolute income redistribution lowers conflict but shows diminishing returns, with excessive redistribution potentially triggering a backlash from higher-income ...
[173]
[PDF] Why Is Europe More Equal Than the United States?
Rather than focusing on a handful of indicators, we cover the entire distribution from the poorest income groups (well covered by household surveys) to the top.
[174]
[PDF] Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-Style Welfare State?
In this section we review the basic facts about the level of redistribu- tion to the poor in the United States and Europe. Government Spending. Table 1 ...
[175]
Effects of school reformon education and labor market performance
This paper studies the effects of a school voucher reform in Chile that was adopted nationwide in 1981. At that time, Chilean economic and social policy was ...
[176]
Child Tax Credit - Center on Poverty and Social Policy
This research estimates the potential anti-poverty impacts of proposed and enacted changes to the Child Tax Credit, with a particular focus on child poverty ...
[177]
Expanded Child Tax Credit as a Key Anti-Poverty & Child Welfare ...
The expanded CTC reduced child poverty, protected against maltreatment, and could reduce child poverty by 40% and child welfare involvement.
[178]
Welfare Reform, Success or Failure? It Worked - Brookings Institution
Experience with welfare reform since 1996 shows conclusively that most low-income families are capable of finding and holding jobs.
[179]
[PDF] Meta-Analysis of Welfare-to-Work Programs
It has been recognized that welfare reform and welfare-to-work programs might affect different population subgroups differentially (Walters, 2001). Thus, a ...
[180]
John Rawls' 'A Theory of Justice' - 1000-Word Philosophy
Jul 27, 2018 · ' To identify fairness, Rawls develops two important concepts: the original position and the veil of ignorance. ... difference principle.
[181]
Social Justice and Rawls' Difference Principle - Essex Student Journal
Jan 1, 2017 · The Difference Principle is the second principle which states that any inequality that is permitted in society should only be permitted on the basis that it ...
[182]
Robert Nozick's Political Philosophy.
Nozick attempted to demonstrate the intuition that only free market exchanges respect persons as equals. To do this Nozick developed his “entitlement theory of ...
[183]
Equality, Value, and Merit by Friedrich A Hayek - Wold Wide Web
The great aim of the struggle for liberty has been equality before the law. This equality under the rules which the state enforces may be supplemented by a ...
[184]
Full article: Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution
Mar 3, 2023 · Conservative or right-wing ideology puts much emphasis on individual rights and thus inequality is seen as a necessary outcome when some ...
[185]
Utilitarianism and Equality - Benjamin Studebaker
Sep 17, 2012 · Utilitarianism recognises some practical limits on inequality, but that does not make it an inherently anti-inequality moral system. Like many ...
[186]
The views on distributive justice and economic inequality revisited
Following the logic of the greatest happiness for the greatest number, utilitarianism focuses on maximizing utility rather than equality. Happiness or utility ...
[187]
Extreme poverty: How far have we come, and how far do we still ...
Nov 22, 2021 · The world has made immense progress against extreme poverty, but it is still the reality for almost one in ten people worldwide.Missing: 1990 | Show results with:1990
[188]
Extreme poverty has not declined in these four Southern African ...
Jul 9, 2025 · Globally, the share of the population living in extreme poverty has declined fast, from 38% in 1990 to 9% in 2024.
[189]
Was the global decline of extreme poverty only due to China?
by 2022, this share was down to 11%. The large economic growth that lifted ...
[190]
[PDF] Does increasing inequality threaten social stability? Evidence from ...
Mar 4, 2024 · While the link between inequality and instability seems unequivocal, there exist many historical counter-examples in which significant ...
[191]
https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/takers-not-makers-unjust-poverty-and-unearned-wealth-colonialism
[192]
Takers not Makers: The unjust poverty and unearned wealth of ...
Jan 20, 2025 · Billionaire wealth has risen three times faster in 2024 than 2023. Five trillionaires are now expected within a decade. Meanwhile, crises of ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique