Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Neil Fleming

Neil Fleming (1939–2022) was a New Zealand educationalist and theorist best known for developing the VARK model, a widely used framework that categorizes learning preferences into four sensory modalities: visual, aural (auditory), read/write, and kinesthetic. Born in New Zealand, Fleming pursued a career in education, serving as a teacher, school inspector, and instructor across secondary schools, teacher training institutions, and universities, including Lincoln University. Fleming's primary research focus was on how individuals learn and communicate using preferred sensory modalities, drawing from extensive observations conducted during his time as an in the late . He initially conceived the questionnaire in 1987 as a tool to help students, teachers, and professionals identify and leverage their , expanding on earlier models like VAK by incorporating a read/write category. This model was formally introduced in a 1992 collaborative with Mills titled "Not Another Inventory, Rather a for Reflection," which emphasized its role in promoting and adaptive teaching strategies rather than rigid categorization. The approach posits that while most learners have a dominant , many are , and tailoring instruction to these preferences can enhance engagement and outcomes without implying differences in . Throughout his career, Fleming facilitated workshops on principles for over two decades across , , and , applying them to diverse fields such as , , and for elite athletes. He authored several resources, including books and online materials available through the official website, which continue to support educators and learners worldwide. Fleming passed away on 16 June 2022 in , , leaving a lasting in educational theory and practice.

Biography

Early Life and Education

Neil Fleming was born on 19 October 1939 in . He received his .

Professional Career

Fleming began his professional career as a high school teacher in , focusing on in various institutions. His early roles involved direct , where he developed foundational expertise in and student engagement. Over the subsequent decades, he transitioned into lecturing positions at universities and centers, emphasizing instructional methods and educational theory. At these institutions, Fleming delivered courses on teaching practices, contributing to the preparation of future educators through practical workshops and academic guidance. In the , Fleming was appointed as a senior education inspector for the New Zealand Ministry of Education, serving in this capacity for nine years across the , overseeing more than 100 high schools. In this role, he conducted extensive observations in over 8,000 classrooms, evaluating teaching effectiveness and diverse learning environments to inform systemic improvements. These inspections provided him with broad insights into pedagogical challenges and student variations, which later influenced his work on learning preferences. After his tenure as inspector, Fleming served as Director of the Education Centre at Lincoln University for over a , where he focused on faculty development and improving teaching quality.

Personal Life and Death

Neil Fleming was married to Faye for 59 years at the time of his death. The couple resided in , New Zealand, and Fleming was known for his close , including frequent duties with his grandchildren as part of a large extended . He was described by family and friends as having a particular way with children and people of all ages, reflecting his warm and engaging personal demeanor. In his personal time, Fleming pursued hands-on hobbies that showcased his practical and nurturing side, such as maintaining two beehives on his urban property, tending a collection of 80 heritage roses, and crafting solid wood furniture. These activities highlighted his appreciation for nature and craftsmanship, providing a counterbalance to his lifelong engagement with learning and community. As a dedicated community member and self-described humanist in , he emphasized the importance of family and relatives in daily life. Fleming died suddenly at his home in on June 16, 2022, at the age of 82. A public celebration of his life was held on June 22, 2022, at The in Christchurch's . Tributes from and associates portrayed him as caring, generous, empathetic, and humorous, with reflections underscoring his profound personal impact and the essential role of in his worldview.

VARK Model

Origins and Development

Neil Fleming developed the model based on observations from his tenure as a school inspector in during the 1970s and 1980s, where he observed significant discrepancies between approaches and student outcomes. He noted that some students excelled even under subpar instruction, while others struggled despite highly effective teachers, suggesting that individual learning preferences played a key role in these mismatches. These observations, drawn from classroom inspections across the country, highlighted the limitations of uniform methods and inspired Fleming to develop a tool for identifying sensory-based preferences to better align with diverse learner needs. The model emerged from earlier learning style theories, particularly the VAK framework rooted in neuro-linguistic programming (), which emphasized visual, aural, and kinesthetic modalities. Fleming adapted and expanded this foundation to address practical challenges in New Zealand's educational system, where there was a need for accessible strategies to support both teachers and students in tertiary and secondary settings. Initially formulated in the late 1980s, the VARK questionnaire was first introduced in 1987 through Fleming's work at Lincoln University, marking a shift toward learner-centered approaches that prioritized "learning to learn" over content delivery alone. A key innovation in VARK was the addition of the "Read/Write" (R) modality, which Fleming included to differentiate preferences for textual information from those for symbolic visuals. Prior VAK models often conflated visual learning with reading printed words, but Fleming recognized that learners favoring lists, notes, and essays required distinct strategies, such as transforming diagrams into prose or vice versa. This distinction made the model more precise for educational applications, enabling better customization of study techniques without overhauling teaching practices.

Core Components

The VARK model, developed by Neil Fleming, identifies four primary sensory modalities through which individuals prefer to learn and process information: Visual (V), Aural/Auditory (A), Read/Write (R), and Kinesthetic (K). These components stem from observations of how people naturally engage with educational content, emphasizing preferences rather than abilities. Visual (V) learners prefer information presented through visual aids such as maps, , charts, graphs, flow charts, and symbolic representations like arrows or circles. They focus on the layout and design elements, including white space, patterns, and shapes, to organize and recall information effectively. For instance, a visual learner might best understand a concept by sketching a on a rather than reading a textual description. Notably, this modality excludes preferences for photographs, videos, or lecture slides like PowerPoint, which align more with other categories. Aural/Auditory (A) learners favor information that is heard or spoken, such as through lectures, group discussions, oral instructions, or even radio broadcasts. They benefit from verbal interactions, including talking things out aloud, using in a chat-like format, or engaging in debates to solidify understanding. An example is a learner who sorts and refines ideas by first discussing them verbally with peers before committing to written notes. Read/Write (R) learners thrive with text-based materials, including lists, headings, textbooks, manuals, essays, and assignments that involve reading or writing. This emphasizes structured written information, such as glossaries, quotations, or articles, and often involves or summarizing in words. For example, individuals with this preference might rely heavily on dictionaries or detailed written instructions to grasp complex topics. Kinesthetic (K) learners prefer hands-on, experiential approaches to learning, incorporating real or simulated practice, demonstrations, and physical engagement with materials. They value concrete examples, such as , building models, or using case studies that allow for . A typical involves learning by manipulating objects, like assembling a device to understand its mechanics, rather than observing passively. In addition to single-modality preferences, the VARK model recognizes multimodal learners, who exhibit strengths across multiple categories and adapt their strategies accordingly. There are two subtypes: contextual or "selective" multimodals, who choose specific modes based on the situation—for instance, using read/write for legal documents but kinesthetic for practical demonstrations—and integrative multimodals, who combine all preferred modes simultaneously for comprehensive learning, though this may require more time. This flexibility highlights the model's emphasis on personalized, context-aware approaches to information processing.

Questionnaire and Assessment

The VARK Questionnaire, developed by Neil Fleming in 1987 as a practical instrument to assess learning preferences aligned with the model's four modalities—visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic—consists of 16 multiple-choice questions designed for self-administration. Each question presents a common scenario related to learning or information processing, such as "When I operate new equipment for the first time, I am most comfortable if...," followed by four response options, one for each modality (e.g., watching a demonstration for visual, listening to instructions for aural, reading the manual for read/write, or hands-on trial for kinesthetic). Respondents select the option that best matches their preference, with the flexibility to choose multiple answers if no single option fully applies, accommodating tendencies. Scoring involves tallying the selected responses for each to generate a profile of scores, typically ranging from 0 to 16 per category, which reveals dominant preferences (unimodal) or balanced patterns if scores are similar across categories. This simple manual or automated process allows users to identify their primary learning style and access tailored strategies, such as helpsheets for study techniques. Since the early 2000s, the has been available as a free online tool on the official website, enabling instant scoring and personalized reports. The tool offers distinct versions optimized for adults and students, including full profile reports that provide detailed feedback and learning strategies suited to professional or academic contexts, ensuring broad accessibility without cost barriers.

Applications and Criticisms

Educational and Professional Uses

The VARK model has been widely adopted in classrooms to develop tailored lesson plans that accommodate diverse learning preferences, such as incorporating diagrams and infographics for visual learners to enhance comprehension and retention. Teachers often use the model's four modalities—visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic—as the foundation for these adaptations, enabling students to engage with material through preferred channels like discussions for aural learners or hands-on activities for kinesthetic ones. This approach has supported curriculum design in various educational settings, including remote learning environments where multimodal resources like podcasts and simulations maintain student engagement. Since the 1990s, the model has been integrated into teacher training programs worldwide, serving as a tool to equip educators with strategies for addressing learner diversity and fostering inclusive teaching practices. For instance, texts used in preparation programs frequently discuss VARK to help future teachers reflect on and adapt instructional methods, promoting staff development and conversation about effective . This adoption has extended to workshops, where trainers apply VARK to refine lesson delivery and assessment techniques. In corporate training and , the model facilitates diverse learner engagement by customizing programs to include elements like videos and charts for visual participants, interactive for kinesthetic ones, written manuals for read/write preferences, and group discussions for aural styles. Organizations use VARK questionnaires during and workshops to boost retention and , with approaches addressing the majority of learners who prefer multiple styles, thereby aligning training with individual needs in fields such as and . This has proven effective in creating inclusive environments that reduce disengagement and support ongoing skill development. In , where Neil Fleming developed the model at Lincoln University in the late 1980s, has been implemented in through consultations and direct applications in classrooms. For example, Fleming's work involved using the to identify preferences, leading to tailored strategies such as audio recordings for aural learners like one named Nick, who improved exam performance after adopting verbal practice methods, or written annotations under graphs for read/write learners like Mary in economics courses. These implementations at Lincoln University exemplify how Fleming consulted with educators to diversify teaching modes, enhancing academic success across modalities.

Scientific Reception and Limitations

The VARK model has enjoyed widespread popularity among educators and practitioners since its introduction in the 1990s, valued for its straightforward accessibility and utility in promoting of learning preferences. Surveys indicate high rates, with approximately 93% of teachers endorsing the idea that students learn better through their preferred styles, as represented by models like . Similarly, global educator beliefs in such approaches hover around 89%, reflecting its enduring appeal in and strategies despite academic scrutiny. However, scientific reception has been markedly critical, particularly regarding the lack of robust supporting the model's efficacy in improving learning outcomes. A seminal review by Pashler et al. (2009) examined hypotheses, including those akin to , and concluded there is no valid evidence that tailoring instruction to preferred modalities enhances achievement, based on the absence of well-controlled studies demonstrating aptitude-treatment interactions. Subsequent from the through the has reinforced this, with meta-analyses and experimental studies showing no consistent correlation between preferences and academic performance across diverse student populations. For instance, a 2025 study of 326 undergraduate dental students found no significant correlation between styles and academic performance, though 58% preferred . Analyses of 's relationship to outcomes reveal mixed or negligible effects, often confounded by factors like rather than style matching, as seen in some positive applications like a 2024 study in where multimodal approaches improved lab skills in training. The itself demonstrates moderate reliability in self-reported preferences, though its predictive power for success remains limited. Key limitations of the VARK model include its potential to foster stereotyping of learners, which may restrict their engagement with diverse methods and reinforce fixed mindsets about abilities. It also exhibits significant overlap with other frameworks, such as model, where preferences for concrete experience or abstract conceptualization can align with VARK's kinesthetic or read/write modes, complicating distinct application. Additionally, cultural biases influence reported preferences, as demographic factors like and socioeconomic background shape responses, potentially undermining the model's universality in global contexts. In response to these critiques, Neil Fleming and supporters have emphasized the model's heuristic value as a practical tool for initiating discussions on learning strategies, rather than a scientifically rigorous diagnostic. They argue that the absence of definitive proof of ineffectiveness does not preclude its benefits for millions of users, positioning as a non-harmful aid for over prescriptive .

Legacy and Publications

Key Works and Contributions

Neil Fleming's primary publication on the model is the 1995 paper "I'm Different; Not Dumb: Modes of (V.A.R.K.) in the Tertiary ," presented at the 18th Research and Development Society of conference, where he elaborated on adapting teaching methods to s' sensory preferences in settings. In this work, Fleming introduced practical strategies for incorporating visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic elements into instruction to enhance and . Building on this foundation, Fleming authored "Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies" in 2001, a comprehensive guide that detailed strategies for educators to align teaching practices with learners' modality preferences, including diagnostic tools and implementation examples for diverse educational contexts. The emphasized self-awareness among students and teachers, providing actionable advice to foster environments without rigid categorization. Throughout the to , Fleming produced numerous articles and papers exploring modality preferences in , starting with the seminal 1992 co-authored piece "Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection," published in To Improve the Academy, which first formalized the questionnaire as a reflective tool rather than a definitive . Subsequent works, such as "The Nature of Preference" (2009) and "Learning Styles Again: VARKing Up the Right Tree!" (co-authored with David Baume, 2006), addressed misconceptions about and defended the framework's utility in promoting flexible teaching approaches. These publications, often disseminated through educational journals and conference proceedings, focused on empirical observations from classroom practices to support evidence-based adaptations in instruction. In the 2000s, Fleming developed extensive resources, including the official VARK website (vark-learn.com), which provided free access to the questionnaire, scoring guides, and strategies, alongside paid training materials like helpsheets and workshop kits to assist educators in applying the model. These digital and printed resources were designed for self-guided use by students and for teachers, expanding the model's accessibility beyond academic publications. Fleming's other contributions included conducting workshops and consultations on learning styles, primarily based in New Zealand but extending internationally to , , and over more than two decades, where he trained educators, business professionals, and sports coaches in VARK principles to improve communication and training efficacy. His efforts in these areas were informed by his earlier role as a school inspector, which sparked his interest in diverse learning needs.

Influence and Recognition

Fleming's VARK model has achieved widespread global dissemination, with the questionnaire completed by over one million individuals annually as of 2023, reflecting its into educational practices across diverse regions including , , and . The model's emphasis on preferences has significantly influenced modern , inspiring adaptive platforms that tailor content delivery to visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic styles for enhanced personalization. For instance, virtual learning environments have incorporated VARK-based algorithms to recommend resources aligned with user preferences, improving engagement and outcomes in online settings. Fleming received recognition for his contributions to teaching and research within New Zealand's sector, including facilitation of workshops on learning modalities for over two decades. The framework is frequently cited in pedagogical literature, appearing in studies on performance and across disciplines such as and . Following Fleming's death on June 16, 2022, the resources and questionnaire have maintained ongoing utility, supported by his team's continued maintenance of the official platform, including new guides for researchers as of 2023, and its application in contemporary educational tools and studies through 2025.

References

  1. [1]
    Biographies of the Founders of VARK®
    Neil Fleming was a learner and a teacher. His main research interest was in how people learn and how they use their modality preferences in their communication.
  2. [2]
    VARK model | Research Starters - EBSCO
    The VARK model is a framework for understanding individual learning preferences, developed by New Zealand educator Neil Fleming.<|control11|><|separator|>
  3. [3]
    Neil D. Fleming (born 1939) is a teacher and inspector from...
    Neil D. Fleming (born 1939) is a teacher and inspector from New Zealand who worked in universities, teacher education centers, and high schools.
  4. [4]
    Introduction to VARK®:for better learning
    ... Neil Fleming, Christchurch, New Zealand, was the first to systematically present a series of questions with helpsheets for students, teachers, employees ...Neil Fleming · The VARK Modalities · Understanding your results
  5. [5]
    The myth of "learning styles" - Kedyou
    May 11, 2023 · The VARK model of learning styles was first introduced by Neil Fleming in 1987 when observing classrooms as a school inspector in New Zealand (1) ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] How-Do-I-Learn-Best-Sample.pdf
    Jul 16, 2019 · Although we have known for centuries about different communication modes, the VARK package, initially developed in 1987 by Neil Fleming, was the ...
  7. [7]
    What are VARK Learning Styles? - Defined Learning | Blog
    The VARK model was designed by Neil Fleming in 1987. In this model, Fleming developed a way to help students learn more about their preferences. VARK learning ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    Neil Fleming - Prabook
    Before working for eleven years in faculty development at Lincoln University, he was for nine years a senior inspector for the over 100 high schools in the ...
  10. [10]
    [PDF] Not Another Inventory, Rather a Catalyst for Reflection
    In this article the authors focus on the use of a modal preferences questionnaire as a catalyst to empower students to reflect on their own.
  11. [11]
    Are You Fed Up With Learning Styles Already? - eLearning Industry
    Sep 11, 2023 · In his words, "For nine years I was one of Her Majesty's school inspectors in the New Zealand education system. During this time, I watched ...
  12. [12]
    Neil FLEMING Obituary (2022) - The Press Death Notices
    FLEMING, Neil Donald: Died on June 16, 2022, suddenly at home in Christchurch, aged 82 years. Much loved husband of Faye for 59 years.
  13. [13]
    Neil FLEMING Obituary (2022) - Christchurch, Canterbury - The Press
    Jun 21, 2022 · It was one of the great privileges to have meet and worked with Neil 2002 - 2012 in introducing learning preferences and VARK into the world of ...
  14. [14]
    What does effective teaching look like? - VARK Learn
    Mar 28, 2024 · The development of VARK​​ Neil's time observing classes as a New Zealand school inspector in the 1970s & 80s left him puzzled when observing that ...Modern Teaching Is... · Effective Teaching With... · 1. Using Vark Modalities To...Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Learning Styles Again: VARKing up the right tree!
    Neil Fleming is an educational developer and the designer of the VARK questionnaire, and David Baume. PhD FSEDA is an international higher educational.Missing: Papakura | Show results with:Papakura
  16. [16]
    The VARK Modalities: Visual, Aural, Read/write & Kinesthetic
    The acronym VARK stands for the four VARK modalities – Visual, Aural, Read/write, and Kinesthetic – sensory modalities that are used for learning information.Missing: obituary | Show results with:obituary
  17. [17]
    VARK Questionnaire: How do you learn best?
    - **Structure**: The VARK Questionnaire contains multiple-choice questions (exact number not specified in the provided content). Each question presents scenarios with four options corresponding to V (Visual), A (Aural), R (Read/Write), and K (Kinesthetic) learning preferences.
  18. [18]
  19. [19]
    VARK in Action: Practical Applications for Everyone
    Dec 3, 2024 · VARK helps trainers create a more inclusive environment by offering materials in multiple formats, ensuring trainees with different learning ...
  20. [20]
    Prevalence of Learning Styles in Educational Psychology and ...
    Sep 9, 2019 · This content analysis focused on the presence and quantity of learning styles discussion in 20 texts commonly used in educator preparation programs.
  21. [21]
    How to use VARK® to improve learning:A guide for teachers
    VARK is a questionnaire identifying learning preferences (Visual, Aural, Read/write, Kinesthetic) and suggests study strategies to improve learning.How Does Vark Work? · Best Practices When... · Should I Design My Learning...Missing: programs | Show results with:programs<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Training with VARK®: A Strong Foundation For Ongoing Learning ...
    Nov 2, 2024 · VARK helps you understand how your team learns so that you can create meaningful, engaging training - a strong foundation for ongoing ...Trainer Guidelines With Vark · Training With Vark · Conclusion
  23. [23]
    [PDF] not dumb Modes of presentation (V.A.R.K.) in the tertiary classroom
    Those skilled in using neuro-linguistic programming (N.L.P.) and left-brain, right brain theorists have been claiming that the visual, aural, kinesthetic ...Missing: evolution | Show results with:evolution
  24. [24]
    Evidence-based approaches to learning - PMC
    Aug 16, 2018 · Belief in the VARK model is commonplace; 93% of British teachers believed that students learnt better when they received information in their ...
  25. [25]
    New review says ineffective 'learning styles' theory persists in ...
    Jan 6, 2021 · A new review by Swansea University reveals there is widespread belief around the world in a teaching method that is not only ineffective but may actually be ...
  26. [26]
    Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence - Sage Journals
    The term “learning styles” refers to the concept that individuals differ in regard to what mode of instruction or study is most effective for them.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Learning Styles: A Review of Validity and Usefulness - ERIC
    Aug 18, 2016 · Current study gives a synthetic introduction of the existing strands of learning style categorizations, and critically discusses the limitations ...
  28. [28]
    (PDF) Exploring the VARK model: a review of the validity and ...
    Jun 16, 2023 · The review found that the VARK questionnaire is generally considered a valid and reliable tool for assessing an individual's learning style preference.
  29. [29]
    The Impact of Cultural and Socioeconomic Factors on Learning Styles
    Oct 24, 2024 · Learning styles-such as visual, auditory, or kinesthetic-are often influenced by the cultural context in which a person is raised. For example, ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] The Case Against Learning Styles: “There is no evidence...”
    VARK is a questionnaire used to indicate people's preferences for taking-in and presenting information - Communication. The most damning criticism, about ...
  31. [31]
    Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies - Neil Fleming
    Title, Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies ; Author, Neil Fleming ; Publisher, Neil D. Fleming, 2001 ; ISBN, 0473089750, 9780473089757.
  32. [32]
    Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies - ScienceOpen
    Teaching and learning styles: VARK strategies. Author(s): ND Fleming, Neil D. Fleming, N. FLEMING, N Fleming. Publication date: 2001.
  33. [33]
  34. [34]
  35. [35]
  36. [36]
    VARK Learning Styles - Helping you learn better
    VARK is a learning styles questionnaire that helps you learn better by suggesting the study strategies that are best for you.Questionnaire · The VARK Questionnaire · The VARK Modalities · Neil FlemingMissing: core components
  37. [37]
    VARK® Research:What do we know about VARK? -
    In 2022, 11,212 people filled in both the VARK Learning Styles Questionnaire and the VARK Strategies Questionnaire, enabling us to compare their preferences ...Missing: global adoption countries millions users
  38. [38]
    Personalized Learning in Virtual Learning Environments Using ...
    Apr 28, 2023 · In this paper, we propose an approach to personalizing learning resources based on students' learning styles in a virtual learning environment ...1. Introduction · 2. Materials And Methods · 4. DiscussionMissing: influence | Show results with:influence
  39. [39]
    [PDF] A VARK learning style-based Recommendation system for Adaptive ...
    By developing a new adaptive e-learning system that leverages the VARK model, we aim to create a more personalized and effective educational environment.
  40. [40]
    Influence of applying VARK learning styles on enhancing teaching ...
    Sep 26, 2024 · Each test was composed of thirteen questions (3 case studies, 4 MCQ questions, and 6 microscopic identifications), and each question scored one ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] The role of student and instructor VARK learning styles in principles ...
    This paper contributes to the literature by investigating the link between student performance in principles of economics courses and instructors' attributes, ...<|separator|>