Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Comprehension

Comprehension is the act or capacity of understanding the meaning, significance, or nature of information, particularly through interpreting communications or stimuli.^[1] In cognitive psychology, it represents a complex process of extracting and constructing meaning from input, integrating sensory data with existing knowledge to form coherent mental representations.^[2] This process underpins higher-level cognition, enabling learning, reasoning, communication, and decision-making by facilitating the formation of durable memories and adaptive responses.^[2] Key sub-processes include perception (initial sensory encoding), attention (selective focus on relevant details), encoding and integration (linking new information to long-term memory stores), and inference (filling conceptual gaps through prediction or analogy).^[3] Influential models, such as Walter Kintsch's Construction-Integration framework, describe comprehension as a two-phase mechanism: first constructing a network of propositions from the input (e.g., text or discourse), then integrating them via spreading activation to resolve ambiguities and build a situation model.^[4] Comprehension manifests across domains, with prominent applications in reading (deriving meaning from written language through lexical, syntactic, and semantic analysis) and listening (processing spoken discourse in real-time).^[5] Factors influencing its efficacy include prior knowledge, working memory capacity, motivation, and text complexity; deficits in these can impair performance, as seen in conditions like dyslexia or attention disorders.^[2] In educational contexts, effective comprehension instruction emphasizes active strategies like questioning, summarizing, and visualizing to enhance mental model construction.^[6] Beyond human cognition, the concept informs artificial intelligence, where natural language processing systems aim to mimic these integrative processes for tasks like machine translation or dialogue.^[4]

Definition and Fundamentals

Core Definition

Comprehension is the cognitive process through which individuals actively construct meaning from sensory input or presented information, involving the extraction of relevant details, their interpretation, and integration with existing knowledge to form a coherent mental representation.^[7] This active engagement distinguishes comprehension from passive perception, as it requires deliberate cognitive effort to build understanding across linguistic, visual, or auditory modalities.^[3] A key distinction within comprehension lies between literal and inferential levels. Literal comprehension focuses on surface-level decoding of explicitly stated information, such as identifying facts, vocabulary, or sequential events directly conveyed in the input.^[7] Inferential comprehension, by contrast, demands deeper processing to derive unstated meanings, connections, or implications by linking the input to prior knowledge and context.^[7] For example, literal comprehension of a simple sentence like "The bird flew to the tree" entails recognizing the action and location as described. In a narrative context, inferential comprehension might involve grasping the implied theme of freedom or escape based on surrounding details and the reader's background experiences. As a multifaceted cognitive skill, comprehension transcends mere recognition by encompassing these layered processes of decoding, interpretation, and integration, often facilitated briefly by the activation of mental schemas.^[3]^[7]

Historical Evolution

The roots of comprehension theories trace back to ancient philosophy in the 4th century BCE, where Aristotle explored interpretation through his works on logic and rhetoric. In On Interpretation, Aristotle examined how language signifies mental experiences, emphasizing that assertions must affirm or deny a single predicate of a single subject to convey logical truth, thus establishing early principles for linguistic understanding and the evaluation of meaning.^[8] Complementing this, Aristotle's Rhetoric highlighted the role of clarity in prose style and metaphors in facilitating audience comprehension of persuasive arguments, balancing accessibility with engagement to ensure effective interpretation.^[9] In the early 20th century, comprehension shifted toward behaviorist frameworks, prominently through Edward L. Thorndike's 1917 connectionism theory, which framed reading as a reasoning process involving associative bonds between textual stimuli and responses to derive meaning. Thorndike argued that comprehension emerges from strengthened connections formed via repetition and reinforcement, aligning with behaviorist emphasis on observable habits over internal mental states.^[10] This view dominated educational psychology, prioritizing measurable outcomes like word recognition and factual recall in reading instruction.^[11] A pivotal transition occurred in the mid-20th century, moving from behaviorism to constructivist models post-1960s, driven by the cognitive revolution that recast comprehension as an active, reader-centered process. Noam Chomsky's generative grammar, introduced in the 1950s, challenged structuralist linguistics by proposing innate universal structures for language generation, influencing comprehension theories to model sentence processing as dynamic mental computation rather than mere association.^[12] This linguistic evolution paralleled broader shifts in psycholinguistics, underscoring how readers construct meaning through internal generative mechanisms.^[11] Key milestones in the 1970s further solidified constructivist approaches, including Dolores Durkin's 1978 critique, which, based on extensive classroom observations, exposed the scarcity of explicit comprehension instruction—averaging less than 1% of reading time—with educators prioritizing assessment over strategy teaching.^[13] Concurrently, Richard C. Anderson's schema theory emerged, conceptualizing comprehension as the activation of prior knowledge structures (schemata) to organize and interpret new textual information, as evidenced in studies showing perspective shifts enhance recall.^[14] These developments marked a foundational turn toward integrating cognitive and knowledge-based elements in modern theories.^[11]

Types of Comprehension

Reading Comprehension

Reading comprehension refers to the process by which individuals construct meaning from written text through the integration of decoding skills, linguistic knowledge, and higher-level cognitive processes. According to the Simple View of Reading model, reading comprehension is the product of decoding (the ability to recognize words accurately and fluently) and linguistic comprehension (the ability to understand spoken language, including vocabulary and syntax).^[15] Decoding primarily involves grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, where readers map written letters or letter combinations to their corresponding sounds, enabling word recognition; this foundational skill is emphasized in phonics instruction as a predictable relationship between phonemes and graphemes.^[16] Vocabulary decoding builds on this by requiring knowledge of word meanings to interpret lexical items within context, while text structure analysis allows readers to identify organizational patterns such as cause-effect, compare-contrast, or sequence, which facilitate deeper understanding of narrative or expository content. One widely adopted strategy for enhancing reading comprehension is the SQ3R method, developed by Francis P. Robinson in 1946. This approach involves five steps: Survey (skimming headings, summaries, and visuals to preview the text), Question (formulating queries based on the preview to guide reading), Read (actively engaging with the material to answer questions), Recite (summarizing key points from memory to reinforce retention), and Review (revisiting the text to consolidate understanding).^[17] The SQ3R method promotes active reading and has been shown to improve retention and comprehension by structuring the interaction between reader and text. Challenges in reading comprehension often arise from factors such as text density and cultural mismatches, which can lead to miscues—deviations from accurate text reproduction that disrupt meaning-making. High text density, characterized by a prevalence of unfamiliar vocabulary or complex syntax, increases cognitive load and reduces comprehension, particularly for non-native or less proficient readers.^[18] Cultural mismatches occur when readers lack background knowledge or schemas aligned with the text's cultural references, resulting in lower comprehension scores; for instance, nativizing stories to incorporate familiar cultural elements has been found to mitigate these effects.^[19] Miscues, such as substitutions or omissions, signal underlying issues like poor grapho-phonic skills or failure to use context for prediction, and they are associated with broader reading impairments that hinder overall comprehension.^[20] Global trends in reading comprehension are tracked through assessments like the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), administered by the OECD since 2000, which evaluates 15-year-olds' ability to apply reading skills to real-world tasks. PISA results indicate varied performance across countries, with 13 participating countries and economies showing significant improvements in reading scores from 2000 to 2018, though persistent inequities remain linked to socioeconomic factors.^[21] However, the 2022 PISA results indicated a significant decline in reading performance across most countries, with the OECD average dropping by about 10 score points from 2018, linked to pandemic disruptions.^[22] These assessments highlight the importance of targeted interventions to address comprehension gaps in diverse educational contexts.

Listening Comprehension

Listening comprehension refers to the process by which individuals understand spoken language through the interpretation of auditory input in real time, relying on contextual cues to construct meaning from fleeting speech signals.^[23] This dynamic process demands immediate cognitive engagement, distinguishing it from other forms of language processing by its ephemeral nature and dependence on acoustic features.^[24] At its core, listening comprehension involves phonological processing, where listeners decode individual sounds and phonemes to recognize words within continuous speech streams. Prosody interpretation plays a crucial role, as variations in pitch, rhythm, and stress convey emphasis, emotion, and syntactic structure, aiding in the segmentation of the speech signal. Handling transient speech signals is essential, as spoken language disappears once uttered, requiring rapid integration of auditory information without the ability to revisit content.^[25]^[26]^[27] Unlike reading comprehension, which allows for deliberate pacing and visual scanning, listening is influenced by external variables such as speech rate, which can exceed 150 words per minute in natural conversation, potentially overwhelming processing capacity if too rapid. Accents introduce variability in pronunciation and intonation, reducing accuracy for unfamiliar varieties, while non-verbal cues like tone signal speaker intent or sarcasm, adding layers of inference not present in written text. These factors demand heightened attentional resources to maintain understanding amid auditory flux.^[23]^[28]^[29] Key theoretical frameworks underscore listening as an interactive inference process, as outlined in Rost's 2011 model, which posits that comprehension emerges from the interplay of bottom-up acoustic decoding and top-down expectations, enabling listeners to predict and fill gaps in the signal. Empirical studies further highlight challenges like background noise, which can significantly degrade comprehension accuracy in noisy environments, particularly affecting children and non-native speakers through masking of phonetic cues and increased cognitive load. These insights emphasize the need for robust perceptual strategies in adverse conditions.^[30] In applications to second-language acquisition, listening comprehension often develops prior to reading proficiency, providing foundational input for phonological awareness and vocabulary building, as learners first attune to spoken forms before tackling orthographic representations. This sequence supports immersive pedagogies, where exposure to authentic speech enhances overall linguistic competence. Inference processes in listening share mechanisms with broader cognitive integration, though adapted to auditory constraints.^[31]

Cognitive Mechanisms

Schema Activation

Schema activation refers to the cognitive process by which individuals retrieve and apply pre-existing mental frameworks, known as schemas, to interpret and organize incoming information during comprehension. Schemas are abstract knowledge structures that represent generic concepts and their associated attributes, relationships, and procedures, enabling efficient processing of familiar situations. This concept originated from Frederic Bartlett's seminal 1932 experiments on memory, where participants' recollections of stories were influenced by their cultural schemas, leading to reconstructive rather than verbatim recall. The activation of schemas occurs through top-down processing, in which prior expectations derived from these frameworks guide attention and fill in ambiguities or gaps in the sensory input, thereby facilitating rapid and coherent understanding. For instance, when reading a description of entering a restaurant, an individual's activated restaurant schema might supply unstated details such as expecting a menu, waiter service, and payment at the end, allowing the reader to comprehend the narrative without explicit mention of these elements. This process enhances efficiency by reducing cognitive load, as the brain leverages stored knowledge to predict and interpret novel stimuli. David Rumelhart's 1980 schema theory further elaborated on this mechanism in the context of reading comprehension, positing schemas as dynamic templates that instantiate specific instances to match text content. Empirical studies within this framework demonstrated that materials congruent with readers' schemas lead to superior recall and comprehension compared to incongruent ones, as activated schemas provide a scaffold for encoding and retrieving information.

Inference and Integration

Inference and integration represent key cognitive processes in comprehension, where readers draw implicit conclusions from explicit textual cues and synthesize disparate elements into a unified mental representation. Inference entails generating unstated ideas to bridge gaps in the input, while integration merges these inferences with encoded information to achieve coherence. These operations enable deeper understanding beyond literal decoding, allowing individuals to form situation models that capture the text's intended meaning. Inferences vary by scope and purpose. Local inferences operate at the sentence or clause level, linking adjacent ideas for immediate coherence, such as deducing a character's emotion from described actions. In contrast, global inferences encompass the broader text, synthesizing details to discern main themes or outcomes. Coherence inferences focus on maintaining logical continuity, often through causal reasoning, whereas elaborative inferences enrich the representation by incorporating external knowledge, like predicting future events based on patterns. A prominent framework for integration is Kintsch's construction-integration theory, which describes comprehension as a two-phase process. In the construction phase, readers generate a propositional network from textual elements and activated knowledge, producing both relevant and extraneous connections. The integration phase then applies weighting mechanisms—via spreading activation—to suppress inconsistent propositions and strengthen coherent ones, yielding a streamlined situation model. This model emphasizes how partial matches between text and long-term memory facilitate adaptive comprehension. The process unfolds through targeted steps, including forging causal links to explain relationships between events—for instance, inferring that a storm caused a delay from contextual clues—and resolving ambiguities by evaluating multiple interpretations against the emerging model. These steps ensure that fragmented inputs cohere into a narrative or argumentative whole. Empirical support comes from eye-tracking research, which reveals processing pauses during inference generation, such as increased fixation times and regressions when readers encounter ambiguous or inferentially demanding passages. For example, longer gazes on critical words signal the effort to connect causal antecedents, confirming that inferences disrupt fluent reading until resolved. Schemas may briefly prime these inferences by activating relevant knowledge structures.

Influencing Factors

Linguistic Elements

Linguistic elements play a pivotal role in comprehension by shaping how readers or listeners decode and integrate meaning from text or speech. Vocabulary depth, in particular, determines the extent to which individuals can access and process semantic content efficiently. According to Nation's four strands model, effective vocabulary learning involves balanced exposure through meaning-focused input, meaning-focused output, deliberate language-focused learning, and fluency development, all of which contribute to achieving comprehension thresholds. This model underscores that insufficient word knowledge hinders overall understanding, as learners must recognize a high proportion of words to engage meaningfully with language. Research indicates that for unassisted comprehension of fiction texts, approximately 98% vocabulary coverage is required, meaning only 2% unknown words allow for adequate grasp without external aids.^[32] At lower coverage levels, such as 80% familiar words, comprehension drops significantly, often resulting in fragmented or no understanding.^[32] Syntax and cohesion further influence comprehension by providing structural cues that link ideas across sentences. In Halliday and Hasan's cohesion theory, textual unity arises from grammatical and lexical ties, including conjunctions that signal logical relations between clauses.^[33] Connectives like "however" or "therefore" explicitly mark contrast or cause-effect relationships, facilitating the reader's navigation of discourse flow and reducing cognitive effort in inferring connections.^[34] Without such cohesive devices, texts become disjointed, impairing the integration of information and leading to lower comprehension scores, as demonstrated in studies where cohesive manipulations affected recall and inference accuracy.^[34] This theory highlights how syntactic elements, beyond mere grammar, create a cohesive network that supports coherent interpretation. Semantics introduces challenges through ambiguities that require contextual resolution for successful comprehension. Garden-path sentences exemplify this, where initial syntactic parsing leads to a misinterpretation that must be revised upon encountering disambiguating information.^[35] For instance, in "The horse raced past the barn fell," readers initially interpret "raced" as the main verb, only to reanalyze it as a reduced relative clause when reaching "fell," relying on context to resolve the ambiguity.^[35] Such structures probe psycholinguistic processes, revealing that comprehension involves rapid error detection and repair, often guided by world knowledge or prior discourse.^[36] Failure to resolve these ambiguities can persist, affecting overall text understanding even after correction.^[36] Cross-linguistic variations in linguistic structure also modulate comprehension, particularly in how morphological complexity influences processing speed. Agglutinative languages, such as Basque or Turkish, attach multiple affixes to roots to convey grammatical information, resulting in longer words that initially slow reading rates compared to analytic languages like English.^[37] In Basque, beginning readers exhibit decoding strategies for inflected forms, leading to longer fixation times and reduced speed, though skilled readers shift to direct lexical access, mitigating these effects.^[38] This progression suggests that comprehension in agglutinative systems demands heightened morphological awareness, impacting efficiency across proficiency levels and highlighting typology's role in cognitive processing demands.^[37]

Environmental and Individual Variables

Environmental factors significantly influence comprehension processes, particularly in listening and reading contexts. Background noise, for instance, impairs speech perception and listening comprehension, with studies showing that children experience greater deficits than adults in noisy environments, leading to reduced accuracy in understanding spoken narratives. In classroom settings, excessive noise levels exceeding recommended thresholds, such as 35 dBA outlined in acoustic guidelines, can disrupt focus and lower comprehension rates by hindering signal-to-noise ratios essential for clear auditory processing.^[39] Similarly, digital distractions like on-screen advertisements and social media notifications during reading sessions fragment attention, resulting in disrupted reading flow and diminished text comprehension compared to distraction-free conditions. Individual differences play a crucial role in modulating comprehension effectiveness, with age-related changes being a prominent factor. As individuals age, particularly beyond 60, declines in working memory capacity contribute to reduced sentence comprehension and overall cognitive processing speed, making it harder to integrate information from complex texts or discourses. Motivation, influenced by self-efficacy beliefs as theorized by Bandura, further affects engagement; higher reading self-efficacy correlates with improved word recognition and sustained effort in comprehension tasks, enabling learners to persist through challenging materials. Cultural backgrounds shape how individuals interpret narratives, with collectivist orientations emphasizing relational harmony and group dynamics in story comprehension, unlike individualist cultures that prioritize personal agency and autonomy in interpretations. For example, mothers from individualist societies often use high-elaborative narrative styles during book-sharing, building detailed stories that highlight independent actions, whereas those from collectivist societies use more directive and expansive styles, fostering comprehension attuned to social contexts.^[40] Health-related variables, such as fatigue and dyslexia, also impact processing efficiency. Cognitive fatigue from prolonged mental effort compromises attention and working memory, leading to lower performance on comprehension tasks, with studies indicating that even short breaks can mitigate these effects by restoring focus. Dyslexia, characterized by difficulties in word recognition and phonological processing, slows reading fluency and elevates the cognitive load, resulting in poorer overall reading comprehension compared to typical readers, though targeted interventions can enhance outcomes.

Assessment and Applications

Measurement Techniques

Standardized tests are widely used to evaluate comprehension levels, particularly in reading and listening contexts. The cloze procedure, introduced by Taylor in 1953, involves presenting a text with blanks at regular intervals (typically every fifth to tenth word) and requiring participants to fill in the missing words based on contextual understanding, thereby assessing both vocabulary and syntactic comprehension.^[41] This method provides a quantitative measure of text readability and reader proficiency, with exact replacements (using the original word) or acceptable alternatives scored for accuracy.^[41] Multiple-choice formats are prevalent in high-stakes assessments like the TOEFL and IELTS, which target academic and general comprehension skills. In the TOEFL iBT Reading section, participants read passages of approximately 700 words and answer multiple-choice questions that test factual recall, inference, vocabulary in context, and rhetorical purpose, with 10 questions per passage contributing to an overall comprehension score.^[42] Similarly, the IELTS Academic Reading test includes multiple-choice questions (selecting one or more correct options from a list) to evaluate understanding of main ideas, details, and logical arguments in informational texts.^[43] Think-aloud protocols capture the dynamic processes of comprehension by prompting participants to verbalize their thoughts in real time during tasks such as reading or listening. Developed through protocol analysis methodologies, this technique minimizes retrospective bias by focusing on concurrent verbal reports, which reveal strategies like prediction, monitoring, and inference-making. Ericsson and Simon's 1993 framework emphasizes that such verbalizations serve as valid data for inferring cognitive operations when instructions avoid leading probes, allowing researchers to segment and code protocols for patterns in comprehension processing. Neuroimaging techniques, particularly functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), provide objective insights into the neural substrates of comprehension by measuring brain activation during tasks. Studies using fMRI have demonstrated increased activity in Broca's area (left inferior frontal gyrus) during inference tasks in sentence comprehension, where participants integrate contextual cues to resolve ambiguities or predict outcomes.^[44] For instance, activation in this region correlates with working memory demands during complex syntactic processing, highlighting its role beyond mere production in integrating meaning.^[44] Quantitative metrics in comprehension assessment typically include accuracy rates, which calculate the proportion of correct responses in tasks like multiple-choice or cloze, and recall scores, derived from free or cued retellings of material to gauge retention of key ideas and details. These indices establish benchmarks for proficiency, with accuracy often exceeding 60% indicating functional comprehension in standardized contexts, though thresholds vary by task complexity. Such measures prioritize reliability and validity in evaluating overall understanding without delving into process details.

Educational and Clinical Uses

In educational settings, reciprocal teaching serves as a prominent strategy for enhancing comprehension, particularly in reading. Developed by Palincsar and Brown in 1984, this approach involves collaborative dialogues where teachers and students engage in four core activities: predicting content based on text cues, generating questions to probe understanding, clarifying unclear elements, and summarizing key ideas. These activities promote metacognitive monitoring and foster deeper text engagement, leading to improved comprehension outcomes for struggling readers.^[45] Recent national assessments, such as the 2024 NAEP Reading results, indicate declining comprehension scores (a 2-point drop for grades 4 and 8 compared to 2022), underscoring the need for effective interventions like reciprocal teaching.^[46] Longitudinal evaluations reveal substantial gains, with reciprocal teaching producing improvements of approximately 40-50 percentage points after 15-20 sessions; for instance, students advanced from about 30% to 70-80% accuracy on comprehension assessments, with effects persisting post-intervention.^[47] Clinical interventions target comprehension deficits in conditions like aphasia and ADHD through specialized therapies. For aphasia, melodic intonation therapy (MIT) utilizes melodic phrasing and rhythm to facilitate language processing, with evidence indicating improvements in overall aphasia severity that extend to receptive comprehension elements.^[48] In ADHD, comprehension therapies emphasize executive function support, such as the RAP strategy—where individuals read a passage, ask and answer questions about it, paraphrase the content, and review for retention—to build sustained attention and inferential skills during listening or reading tasks.^[49] Technology aids further support comprehension development via interactive tools. Duolingo employs adaptive algorithms in its listening exercises, presenting audio prompts at progressively challenging levels with immediate feedback to reinforce auditory processing and vocabulary integration. Research demonstrates that learners completing initial Duolingo modules achieve intermediate listening proficiency, equivalent to a full university semester of study.^[50] Virtual reality (VR) applications create immersive scenarios for schema activation, enabling users to virtually explore environments that contextualize narratives or concepts, thereby enhancing inferential comprehension. Experimental studies show VR-based reading activities yield higher engagement and better retention compared to video-based methods.^[51] Comparable benefits appear in clinical applications, where aphasia therapies correlate with measurable receptive gains, and technology tools sustain progress through repeated, personalized practice.^[52]

References

[1]
comprehension - APA Dictionary of Psychology
Apr 19, 2018 · the act or capability of understanding something, especially the meaning of a communication. Compare apprehension. See also verbal comprehension ...
[2]
Chapter 9 Toward a Comprehensive Model of Comprehension
Comprehension, arguably the backbone of cognition, is the processing of information to extract meaning. It is a complex cognitive process that is necessary for ...Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy<|control11|><|separator|>
[3]
(PDF) The cognitive process of comprehension - ResearchGate
Aug 6, 2025 · Comprehension is an individual's ability to understand a concept or action and relies on a higher cognitive process that also relies on existing ...
[4]
Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. - APA PsycNET
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge University Press. Abstract. Presents a theory of human text comprehension that the author ...
[5]
Comprehension. - APA PsycNET
We discuss some of the processes involved in text comprehension along with some of the major issues that have arisen in trying to understand how people ...
[6]
Reading comprehension I: Discourse. - APA PsycNet
Reading comprehension is a complex skill involving interacting processes, and this chapter focuses on discourse comprehension in skilled readers.
[7]
[PDF] Reading Comprehension - ERIC
Reading comprehension is the process of extracting and constructing meaning through interaction with written language, requiring a mental representation of the ...Missing: philosophy | Show results with:philosophy
[8]
Aristotle's Logic - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Mar 18, 2000 · In On Interpretation, Aristotle argues that a single assertion must always either affirm or deny a single predicate of a single subject. Thus, ...
[9]
Aristotle's Rhetoric - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Mar 15, 2022 · Aristotle's rhetorical analysis of persuasion draws on many concepts and ideas that are also treated in his logical, ethical, political and psychological ...
[10]
Thorndike's "Reading as Reasoning": Influence and Impact - jstor
Edward L. Thorndike announced and elaborated his theory of learning around the turn of the century (Thorndike, 1898; 1911). Often referred to as "bond" ...
[11]
[PDF] The roots of reading comprehension instruction
Jul 26, 2017 · The first period tracks the evolution of reading comprehension instruction before the beginning of the revolution in cognitive psychology ...
[12]
Generative grammar | Syntax, Semantics, Phonology - Britannica
Oct 22, 2025 · Noam Chomsky's linguistic research in the 1950s aimed to understand the tools and means through which children acquire language. He proposed a ...Missing: comprehension | Show results with:comprehension
[13]
[PDF] What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension ...
However, because the pilot study (Durkin, 1977) revealed such a dearth of comprehension instruction, a decision was made to observe during social studies, too.
[14]
[PDF] Pearson, P.,David A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in ...
Anderson, Richard C.; Pearson, P.,David. TITLE. A Schema-Theoretic View of Basic Processes in Reading. Comprehension, Technical Report No. 306. INSTITUTION.
[15]
Decoding, Reading, and Reading Disability - Sage Journals
A simple model of reading is proposed, which holds that reading equals the product of decoding and comprehension.
[16]
[PDF] National Reading Panel - Teaching Children to Read
... measures of near transfer such as recall, question answering and generation, and summarization of texts. These comprehension strategies, when used in.
[17]
[PDF] Henk, William A. TITLE Tracing the Roots of Textbook Study System
*SQ3R Study Formula. ABSTRACT. Francis P. Robinson's 1946 text, "Effective Study," first presented his Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review (SQ3R).
[18]
Unknown Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension ...
Nov 27, 2023 · The present study replicated Hu and Nation's research in a context different from a typical Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic context.Missing: mismatches miscues
[19]
[PDF] The effects of cultural familiarity on reading comprehension - ERIC
Abstract. This study investigated whether cultural familiarity influences comprehension of short stories and whether nativizing the story or using reading ...
[20]
Readers Recruit Executive Functions to Self-Correct Miscues During ...
Miscues are associated with reading impairments. Difficulties with ORF-P and online comprehension may elicit a cascading production of miscues partially due to ...
[21]
PISA 2018 Results (Volume I) - OECD
Dec 3, 2019 · Long-term trends are reported for the longest available period since PISA 2000 for reading, PISA 2003 for mathematics and PISA 2006 for science.
[22]
What is unique to listening
This suggests that speech rate is more critical to comprehension when listening to speakers with less standard accents. There is less research on the effects of ...
[23]
[PDF] Teaching and Researching Listening (2nd ed.) - TESL-EJ
In Section I, Rost defines listening in terms of neurological, linguistic, semantic, and pragmatic processing, and then considers the latter three types of ...
[24]
Concurrent processing of the prosodic hierarchy is supported by ...
Dec 20, 2024 · Phonological theories capture these modulations, positing that the speech signal is linguistically organized into units of increasing sizes.
[25]
The effects of prosody instruction on listening comprehension in an ...
Feb 24, 2021 · It is argued that short periods of instruction targeting prosodic features can improve the effectiveness of traditional product-oriented EAP listening ...
[26]
[PDF] Auditory Brainstem Correlates of Perceptual Timing Deficits
processing hypothesis, which states that deficits in processing transient rapid acoustic signals weaken the ability to distinguish phonemes (Temple et al ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[27]
[PDF] The Investigation of Different English Accents on Listening ...
This paper investigates the potential effects of different English accents on non-native English speakers' listening comprehension and tries to shed light ...
[28]
The Effects of Nonnative Accents on Listening Comprehension - jstor
Mackey and Finn (1997) also emphasize that untrained native English listeners rate nonstandard native English accents as less natural sounding than standard ...
[29]
Effects of noise and reverberation on speech perception and ...
Children were more impaired than adults by background sounds in both speech perception and listening comprehension. Classroom noise evoked a reliable disruption ...
[30]
Why Read Charlotte is adding a focus on listening comprehension ...
Jan 26, 2024 · Current reading science finds that listening comprehension generally precedes reading comprehension. The major difference between listening ...
[31]
[PDF] Unknown Vocabulary Density and Reading Comprehension
To read novels and have coverage of 95-98% of the running words, a learner would need a vocabulary size of around. 5,000 word families (Hirsh and Nation 1992), ...
[32]
Cohesion in English | M.A.K. Halliday, Ruqaiya Hasan
Jan 14, 2014 · This book studies the cohesion that arises from semantic relations between sentences. Reference from one to the other, repetition of word ...
[33]
[PDF] COHESIVE TIES AND MEANING COMPREHENSION
Oct 15, 2014 · Halliday and Hasan (1976) observe that conjunction is a different type of semantic relation, one which is no longer any kind of search.<|separator|>
[34]
Garden Path - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
Garden path refers to a phenomenon in sentence processing where initial interpretations lead to confusion or misinterpretation, requiring the listener to ...
[35]
[PDF] Sidestepping Garden Paths - Haskins Laboratories
One account of ambiguity resolution is known as the "garden path model” (Clifton & ... ambiguous sentences are interpreted outside of context. The parser attempts ...
[36]
[PDF] Reading development in agglutinative languages
Dec 8, 2009 · In sum, our results provide empirical evidence that language typology affects the organization of the lexicon during word recognition and that ...Missing: speed | Show results with:speed
[37]
Reading development in agglutinative languages: Evidence from ...
The authors claimed that in agglutinative languages, morphological discrimination could be a better detector of reading impairments than simple vocabulary ...
[38]
“Cloze Procedure”: A New Tool for Measuring Readability
Here is the first comprehensive statement of a research method and its theory which were introduced briefly during a workshop at the 1953 AEJ convention.Missing: original citation
[39]
TOEFL iBT Reading Section - ETS
It includes two reading passages, each approximately 700 words long, with 10 questions per passage. It should take about 35 minutes to complete the Reading ...Missing: multiple- | Show results with:multiple-
[40]
Academic test - sample test questions - IELTS
Academic Reading (60 minutes) · Academic Reading Sample task Multiple Choice (one answer) · Academic Reading Sample task Multiple Choice (more than one answer).
[41]
Broca's area, sentence comprehension, and working memory
According to one view, Broca's area is involved in processing a subcomponent of syntactic processing. Another view holds that it contributes to sentence ...
[42]
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and ...
Dec 14, 2009 · Reciprocal teaching, with an adult model guiding the student to interact with the text in more sophisticated ways, led to a significant ...
[43]
Melodic Intonation Therapy for aphasia: A multi‐level meta‐analysis ...
Aug 2, 2022 · Melodic Intonation Therapy (MIT) is a prominent rehabilitation program originally developed for individuals with non-fluent aphasia.
[44]
ADHD Reading: Effective Support Strategies - Forbrain
Two strategies readers with ADHD can use to improve their comprehension are the TWA and RAP strategies. The TWA strategy encourages readers to think while ...
[45]
Duolingo's English learners show strong reading and listening skills
Sep 19, 2022 · New research shows that Duolingo learners who complete the beginning sections scored intermediate on reading and listening!
[46]
An experimental study on reading in high‐immersion virtual reality
Oct 3, 2023 · This process makes the reading experience more engaging and may lead to better comprehension. Second, VR technology is more interactive compared ...
[47]
[PDF] Reciprocal Teaching - ASCD
improved their oral language proficiency with an effect size of +1.09 and their general reading progress with an effect size of .66. Reciprocal teaching also.
[48]
Auditory Comprehension Interventions for People With Aphasia
This scoping review examined studies reporting restorative treatments designed to improve auditory comprehension in people with aphasia.