Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

New Historians

The New Historians are a group of revisionist scholars who began in the mid-1980s, employing newly declassified archives alongside sources to critically reassess traditional Zionist accounts of the 1948 Arab- War and the establishment of . Their analyses emphasize empirical data from military records and intelligence reports, challenging narratives that portrayed as uniformly defensive and as primarily self-induced. Prominent figures include , whose The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949 mapped 228 depopulated Palestinian villages and attributed the displacement of approximately 700,000 refugees to a combination of attacks, expulsions, and fear induced by warfare, citing an intelligence report estimating 70% of cases linked to forces. examined inter-Arab dynamics and alleged collusions, such as with , while advanced broader critiques framing Zionist settlement as colonialist, though Morris later denounced Pappé's work as ideologically driven rather than evidence-based. contributed studies on early and survivor integration, often from journalistic backgrounds that facilitated public engagement. The school's defining achievement lies in introducing archival rigor to historiography, previously constrained by limited access and nationalistic assumptions, thereby influencing global understandings of the conflict's origins, including Israel's military superiority and the absence of a unified Arab genocidal intent. However, controversies persist, with traditional historians like accusing them of oversimplifying complex events and prioritizing critique over balanced causation, while internal divisions emerged as evolved toward endorsing certain 1948 expulsions as pragmatically necessary for state security, distancing himself from post-Zionist interpretations. This debate underscores tensions between empirical revisionism and ideological framing in historical inquiry.

Origins and Development

Historical Context and Archival Catalyst

The traditional historiography of the 1948 Arab- War, dominant from the state's founding through the 1970s, drew primarily from wartime diaries, military reports, and participant memoirs that depicted Jewish forces as outnumbered defenders achieving victory through resolve and strategy against coordinated Arab invasion. These accounts, exemplified by works like those of Netanel Lorch's The Edge of the Sword (1961), attributed the Palestinian refugee exodus largely to flight urged by Arab leaders, minimizing Jewish military actions' role in displacements. Such narratives aligned with Zionist needs, prioritizing national cohesion amid existential threats, but were constrained by limited archival access and self-censorship in early state institutions. Shifts in Israel's political and military landscape from the late 1960s onward fostered growing skepticism toward official histories. The 1967 Six-Day War's rapid success, followed by prolonged occupation of territories including the and , raised ethical questions about territorial expansion and Palestinian dispossession. Subsequent events—the 1973 Yom Kippur War's intelligence failures and high casualties, and the 1982 invasion culminating in the Sabra and Shatila massacres—eroded public trust in foundational myths, prompting demands for transparent reckoning with the past amid debates. This introspective climate, coupled with generational change among historians less tied to independence-era experiences, set the stage for archival-driven revisions. The pivotal catalyst was the of key state, defense, and documents from 1947-1949, accelerated in the mid-1980s under policies releasing materials after roughly 30 years. The (IDF) archives, in particular, opened significant holdings around 1983-1985, enabling systematic review of operational orders, intelligence assessments, and expulsion records previously restricted for "state security." , whose doctoral research accessed these files from 1982 onward with fuller availability by 1985, exemplified this shift in his 1987 monograph The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949, which quantified over 700,000 refugees through empirical data rather than anecdotal claims. This archival transparency, unprecedented in scope, undermined reliance on secondary or selective sources, compelling historians to confront primary evidence that traditional accounts had overlooked or interpreted selectively.

Emergence in the Late 1980s

The New Historians coalesced as a distinct historiographical trend in during the late 1980s, driven by the release of declassified state archives that enabled critical reexaminations of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and its antecedents. This period marked a shift from earlier, more tentative critiques, such as Simha Flapan's 1979 analysis in Zionism and the Palestinians, which argued that Zionist leaders had anticipated and planned for displacement without fully exploiting it for strategic gain. The archival openings, beginning systematically after the 30-year rule lapsed around 1978–1982, provided primary documents that contradicted the dominant narrative of a purely defensive Zionist victory against aggressive invasion. Pivotal publications in 1987–1988 crystallized the movement. Benny Morris's The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1949, released in 1987, meticulously documented over 700,000 departures through a combination of voluntary flight amid wartime chaos, Arab leadership exhortations to evacuate, and direct expulsions by forces in specific locales, thereby undermining claims of a monolithic "expulsion policy." Avi Shlaim's Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement, and the Partition of (1988) exposed clandestine negotiations between Jordan's King Abdullah I and Zionist representatives, suggesting a tacit agreement to partition that sidelined other Arab states and . Concurrently, Ilan Pappé's Britain and the Conflict, 1948–51 (1988) critiqued diplomatic maneuvers post-1948, portraying them as favoring consolidation while neglecting Arab grievances. These works, grounded in archival evidence rather than ideological assertion, prompted immediate scholarly contention by highlighting causal complexities often elided in traditional accounts reliant on secondary sources or state-sanctioned memoirs. Morris himself formalized the label "New Historians" in his November–December 1988 Tikkun article, "The New Historiography: Israel Confronts Its Past," framing the group as empirically driven challengers to Zionist orthodoxy without implying a unified ideological bloc. This emergence aligned with 40th anniversary reflections in , amplifying public and academic discourse; debates proliferated in journals and conferences, with critics accusing the revisionists of overemphasizing agency while underplaying rejectionism, though the New Historians countered with document-based specificity. The trend's initial impact stemmed from its insider status—most authors were scholars trained in methods—lending credence amid a broader post-1967 intellectual thaw, yet it also invited charges of selective archival reading influenced by left-leaning sympathies prevalent in Israel's academic circles.

Key Figures and Their Backgrounds

, born in 1948, earned a BA in modern European history from the and a PhD from Cambridge University, with his doctoral thesis focusing on Anglo-American policy toward refugees after 1948. He began his career as a reporter for in the late before transitioning to academia, eventually becoming a professor of history in the Studies Department at . served in the as an infantryman and is credited with coining the term "New Historians" in a 1988 article, grouping himself with contemporaries who utilized declassified Israeli archives to reassess the 1948 war. Avi Shlaim, born in in 1945 to an Iraqi Jewish family that emigrated to in 1950, studied at , from 1966 to 1969, followed by an MSc in . He later became an emeritus professor of at the , where he held a British Academy Research Readership from 1995 to 1997. Shlaim's early work drew on his personal background as an Arab Jew to critique traditional Zionist narratives, emphasizing archival evidence of diplomatic maneuvers during 's founding, though critics have noted his interpretations often align with revisionist views prioritizing structural over empirical contingencies. Ilan Pappé received his BA from the in 1979 and a DPhil from the in 1984, with research accessing declassified documents on the 1948 war. Initially a senior lecturer in at the , he faced professional challenges in due to his advocacy for Palestinian narratives, leading him to relocate as a professor of history at the . Pappé, described by some as prioritizing ideological activism over scholarly detachment, co-emerged in the late New Historians cohort through works challenging expulsion myths, though peers like have critiqued his selective sourcing as distorting causal sequences in the refugee exodus. Simha Flapan, born in in 1911 and immigrating to in the 1930s, was a Labor Zionist activist affiliated with the party, serving as director of its Arab Affairs Department and editor of the magazine New Outlook. Lacking formal academic training in , Flapan's pre-1980s writings, such as Zionism and the Palestinians (1979), laid groundwork for later New Historians by questioning official accounts of 1948 diplomacy and Arab responses using available sources, though his partisan role has drawn accusations of embedding political advocacy into analysis. He died in 1987, shortly before the archival openings that catalyzed the group's core output. Tom Segev, born in in 1945, holds a BA in and from the and a PhD in from Boston University. A journalist and Haaretz columnist, Segev contributed to New Historians discussions through books like 1949: The First Israelis, drawing on state archives to examine integration policies, but his primary identity as a public intellectual rather than a university-based revisionist historian distinguishes him from the archival pioneers like Morris and Shlaim.

Methodological Foundations

Reliance on Declassified Israeli Archives

The New Historians' scholarship was predicated on systematic engagement with declassified Israeli primary sources, marking a departure from prior reliance on secondary interpretations or selective memoirs. Israel's archival declassification policy, which typically released documents after 30 years, opened significant portions of 1948-era records in the early to mid-1980s, including military operational files, intelligence assessments, and government protocols from the War of Independence. These materials, housed primarily in the Israel State Archives and IDF Archives, encompassed detailed reports on troop movements, village depopulation, and policy deliberations, totaling millions of pages that revealed granular causal factors absent from earlier narratives. Benny Morris exemplified this archival immersion in The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949 (1987), where he cross-referenced over 500 declassified files—such as orders and census data—to quantify refugee causes, attributing roughly 70% of displacements to direct military actions rather than solely Arab-initiated flight. similarly leveraged diplomatic cables and cabinet minutes in Collusion Across the Jordan (1988) to trace pre-war negotiations, using verbatim transcripts to challenge assumptions of uniform Arab hostility. Ilan Pappé's The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (2006, drawing on 1980s releases) incorporated similar sources, including expulsion directives dated April-May , to argue systematic intent. This evidence-based method prioritized chronological reconstruction over teleological Zionist framing, enabling first-hand verification of events like the Lydda and Ramle expulsions on July 12-13, . While these archives afforded empirical rigor, their partial nature—evidenced by contemporaneous redactions for "" reasons—necessitated with oral testimonies and foreign records, though New Historians maintained primacy of documentary proof. Traditional , constrained by access limitations until this era, had leaned on Ben-Gurion's diaries or aggregated statistics, often embedding causal assumptions of defensive necessity without counter-evidence. The releases thus catalyzed a toward causal realism, though later revelations of document withdrawals (e.g., post-2010 reclassifications of files) underscore persistent institutional controls influencing interpretive scope.

Comparative Analysis with Traditional Historiography

The New Historians diverged from traditional Israeli historiography in their methodological emphasis on primary archival sources, which were largely inaccessible to earlier scholars due to Israel's initial archival restrictions post-1948. Traditional accounts, penned by historians like Dinur and Bauer in the 1950s–1970s, depended on published memoirs, diplomatic cables, and oral testimonies that reinforced a narrative of Zionist inevitability and Arab-initiated conflict, often without systematic cross-verification against internal military records. By contrast, New Historians such as Benny Morris accessed declassified Israel Defense Forces (IDF) operational diaries, cabinet protocols, and intelligence summaries released under the 30-year rule starting in the mid-1980s, enabling granular reconstructions of events like village clearances during Operation Nachshon in April 1948. This archival turn aimed to supplant what they viewed as mythologized secondary narratives with empirical data, though it presupposed Israeli documents as more reliable than contemporaneous Arab records, which were often propagandistic or fragmented. Interpretively, traditional historiography framed the 1948 war as a binary of Jewish against existential Arab threats, minimizing Palestinian in their own and attributing refugee flight primarily to orders from leaders, as evidenced in early works citing broadcasts from figures like Haj Amin al-Husseini. New Historians challenged this by highlighting causal roles of expulsions—documenting over 400 depopulated villages via archival tallies—and arguing that Arab disunity and logistical collapse, rather than a coordinated invasion, facilitated Israeli gains, as Morris detailed in analyses of the Arab armies' fragmented advances post-May 15, 1948. Yet, this shift has been critiqued for overemphasizing Israeli culpability while underweighting broader wartime chaos; Efraim , examining the same archives, accused scholars like Avi of truncating quotes from Ben-Gurion's diaries to imply premeditated , ignoring contextual qualifiers about defensive necessities amid . A core tension lies in and selectivity: traditional narratives, while nationally inflected, drew from a narrower evidentiary base constrained by archival inaccessibility and wartime secrecy, potentially inflating heroic motifs but aligning with verifiable battle outcomes like the failure of the Arab Liberation Army's incursions. New Historians positioned their approach as depoliticized , yet detractors note parallels in ideological filtering—substituting Zionist with a postcolonial lens that privileges Palestinian victimhood, often sidelining Arab archival admissions of internal flight encouragement or rejectionist , as cross-referenced in Transjordanian documents. This has spurred rebuttals emphasizing that archival access alone does not neutralize bias; Karsh documented instances where New Historians inverted evidence, such as misrepresenting Plan Dalet's defensive village-screening provisions as offensive blueprints without accounting for its limited pre-war scope. Ultimately, while the New Historians elevated documentary rigor, their interpretations remain contested for causal overreach, contrasting traditional historiography's holistic but less source-diverse realism amid existential conflict.

Principal Claims

Reinterpretation of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War

The New Historians challenged the traditional Israeli narrative of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War as a miraculous defensive victory against overwhelming Arab aggression, arguing instead that declassified archives revealed the Yishuv's forces possessed organizational, motivational, and tactical advantages that enabled proactive territorial expansion beyond the UN Plan's boundaries. They contended that Arab armies, entering the fray on May 15, 1948, were hampered by interstate rivalries, poor coordination, and limited commitment, with Transjordan's —under British officer Glubb—effectively colluding with Zionist leaders to partition and avert broader confrontation, as evidenced by secret meetings between King Abdullah I and Jewish Agency officials from 1947 onward. This reinterpretation posits the war not as an existential David-versus-Goliath struggle but as a conflict where Jewish forces, bolstered by clandestine arms imports and mobilized manpower exceeding 60,000 by mid-1948, shifted from defense to offense, capturing 78% of by armistice in 1949. Central to their analysis was , a March 1948 Haganah blueprint for securing villages and roads in proposed areas ahead of British withdrawal. Benny described it as primarily defensive, aimed at preempting Arab attacks, but acknowledged its implementation from April 1948 involved systematic clearances, destroying over 200 villages and expelling inhabitants to prevent rear-guard threats, contributing to the displacement of approximately 700,000 . In contrast, Ilan Pappé interpreted Plan Dalet as an intentional operation, with operations like Nachshon (April 1948) and Hiram (October 1948) exemplifying premeditated village razings and massacres, such as at on April 9, 1948, where over 100 civilians were killed to induce flight. Avi Shlaim echoed this by highlighting how such actions exploited Arab disunity, with Egyptian and Syrian forces advancing minimally—Egypt capturing only 40% of its allocated zone—allowing to dictate outcomes. Morris's empirical breakdown, drawn from IDF archives, categorized refugee causes as roughly equal parts expulsion (direct orders in 31% of cases), fear induced by combat and atrocities (55%), and abandonment (14%), rejecting the orthodox claim of predominant Arab evacuation directives, which he found in only a handful of instances, such as in April 1948. The New Historians thus portrayed the war's outcome as less a triumph over unified pan-Arab hostility than a consequence of Palestinian under from December 1947, compounded by Haganah's superior logistics and the Arab Higher Committee's inefficacy, which failed to mobilize beyond 10,000 fighters. While Morris emphasized wartime exigencies over ideology, Pappé and Shlaim attributed expulsions to Zionist demographic imperatives for a Jewish-majority state, a view they supported with village files documenting preemptive demolitions.

Explanations for the Palestinian Refugee Exodus

The New Historians attributed the exodus of approximately 700,000 during the 1948 Arab-Israeli War to a multifaceted combination of factors, including the collapse of Palestinian Arab leadership, widespread fear induced by combat and atrocities, direct expulsions by Jewish forces in select locales, and some evacuations encouraged by Arab authorities, rather than a singular cause like systematic Zionist expulsion or purely voluntary flight. This revision drew on declassified Israeli military archives, such as operational records and intelligence reports from June 1948, which documented village-by-village flight patterns from December 1947 onward. , in his seminal 1988 study The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949, categorized causes into primary drivers: the abandonment of sites by local Arab militias, panic following massacres like on April 9, 1948 (which killed over 100 villagers and triggered flight from nearby areas), and explicit expulsion orders issued by commanders such as in Lydda and Ramle on July 14-15, 1948, where 50,000-70,000 residents were marched out. Morris quantified the exodus in phases, with an initial wave of 100,000-200,000 fleeing urban centers like Jaffa and Haifa by March 1948 due to intercommunal violence and economic disruption, followed by a larger April-June surge amid Plan Dalet operations, where Haganah assaults aimed to clear hostile villages but often resulted in unintended mass departures rather than premeditated depopulation across Palestine. He rejected both the Israeli establishment's emphasis on Arab Higher Committee radio broadcasts urging evacuation (evidenced in isolated cases but not widespread) and the Arab narrative of a preconceived Zionist master plan, arguing instead that expulsions comprised about one-third of cases, with the remainder stemming from battlefield collapses and psychological terror. Archival evidence, including Ben-Gurion's diaries noting ad hoc decisions, supported Morris's view that while David Ben-Gurion authorized some clearances for security, no blanket expulsion policy existed before the war's chaos. Ilan Pappé diverged by framing the exodus as deliberate "ethnic cleansing" orchestrated via Plan Dalet, a March 1948 Haganah blueprint for securing Jewish-held areas through village conquests and population transfers, which he claimed systematically targeted over 500 Palestinian locales with destruction and forced marches. Pappé cited operational orders, such as those for Operation Nachshon (April 1948), as evidence of intent to empty Arab spaces, estimating that military actions directly caused 80-90% of displacements, with atrocities like the Tiberias expulsion on April 18, 1948, exemplifying premeditated policy over reactive warfare. Avi Shlaim, while focusing more on interstate diplomacy, endorsed this archival reevaluation, highlighting how the refugee crisis stemmed from Zionist military superiority exploiting Arab disunity, as seen in failed Arab intervention post-May 15, 1948, which exacerbated rather than halted the flight. These interpretations collectively shifted blame from monolithic Arab agency to Israeli operational agency, though internal variances—such as Morris's empirical restraint versus Pappé's ideological framing—reflected differing weights on intent versus contingency.

Assessments of Zionist Planning and Arab Responses

The New Historians, particularly , interpret Zionist military planning in 1948, exemplified by formulated by the in March, as a deliberate blueprint for the systematic expulsion of Palestinian Arabs to secure Jewish-majority control over territory allocated to the under the UN Partition Plan and beyond. Pappé argues that the plan's directives to destroy villages, expel populations, and prevent returns constituted , implemented through operations that razed over 400 villages and displaced approximately 700,000 , with expulsion orders issued in at least 24 documented cases. , while acknowledging that shifted Haganah strategy from defense to proactive conquest of mixed areas, maintains it lacked a central expulsion policy from Zionist leadership like , though he concedes that brigade-level commanders frequently opted for expulsion over encirclement during operations, resulting in de facto in regions like and the . Morris's archival analysis identifies fewer than a dozen explicit expulsion orders but highlights how fear induced by atrocities, such as the massacre on April 9, 1948, amplified flight alongside direct military actions. In contrast to traditional attributing the Palestinian primarily to Arab-initiated flight, the New Historians assert that Arab responses were characterized by disunity, limited military capacity, and absence of coordinated orders for mass evacuation. contends that Arab states' intervention on May 15, 1948, was fragmented, with Jordan's King Abdullah pursuing territorial gains in central through with Zionists rather than , while and committed under-equipped forces totaling around 25,000-30,000 troops against Haganah's superior organization and 60,000 mobilized personnel. Morris's review of Arab broadcasts and orders reveals only sporadic, localized urgings to flee—such as from Kafr Saba leaders in April 1948—rather than systematic directives from or state radios, estimating that such calls accounted for at most 5-10% of the , with Israeli offensives and as predominant drivers. Pappé echoes this, dismissing claims of widespread Arab flight orders as post-hoc rationalizations unsupported by primary sources, emphasizing instead Palestinian villages' initial resistance through irregular forces like the , which collapsed amid Haganah's advantages in arms and planning. These assessments have faced scrutiny for potential overemphasis on Zionist agency while minimizing Arab rejection of and pre-war , such as the Arab revolt's 1936-1939 toll of 5,000 Jewish deaths; himself later reflected in 2004 interviews that while expulsions occurred, they were pragmatically justified amid existential threats from Arab armies invoking . Shlaim's diplomatic focus reveals Arab leaders' prioritization of regime preservation over pan-Arab solidarity, with and providing token support, underscoring causal realism in the war's outcome: Israel's victory stemmed not from overwhelming Arab aggression but from internal Arab divisions and Zionist preparedness. Empirical data from declassified archives, cross-verified by New Historians, thus reframes Arab responses as reactive and ineffective, contrasting with Zionist planning's operational coherence, though debates persist on whether Plan Dalet's ambiguity enabled or necessitated expulsions.

Criticisms and Rebuttals

Charges of Ideological Bias and Selectivity

Critics have accused the New Historians of allowing left-wing ideological commitments to shape their interpretations, leading to selective engagement with evidence that favors narratives of Israeli culpability over balanced analysis. Efraim Karsh, in his 1997 book Fabricating Israeli History, argued that scholars like Benny Morris, Avi Shlaim, and Ilan Pappe distorted declassified Israeli archives by employing tendentious readings, partial quotations, and omissions to retroactively impose post-1967 political assumptions onto 1948 events, thereby inverting the causal dynamics of Arab-initiated aggression and Zionist defensive responses. Karsh further contended that their work lacks novelty, repackaging longstanding Arab propagandistic claims under academic guise while ignoring contemporaneous Arab primary sources that document rejection of partition and calls for total war. Ilan Pappe's explicit embrace of "activist history" exemplifies these charges, as he has described his scholarship as intentionally blending with advocacy for Palestinian rights, prioritizing moral and political goals over detached analysis. In critiquing Pappe's approach, fellow New Historian highlighted this divergence, stating that Pappe's methods differ fundamentally from archival rigor and are marred by politicized distortions, such as unsubstantiated claims of systematic unsupported by the full documentary record. himself later distanced from the group's more ideological strands, acknowledging in reflections on the Palestinian that initial revisionist overcorrections stemmed from a bias toward attributing disproportionate agency to actions while underemphasizing Arab leadership's role in inciting flight and refusing . Selectivity is a recurrent , with detractors like asserting that the New Historians' focus on Israeli archival "smoking guns"—such as —neglects equivalent scrutiny of Arab states' military preparations and internal directives that contributed to the , resulting in a that undermines Israel's foundational legitimacy without equivalent for adversarial actors. This pattern, critics maintain, reflects broader post-Zionist influences prevalent in 1980s-1990s Israeli academia, where sympathy for Oslo-era processes encouraged retrofitting to critique , often at the expense of causal in attributing war's origins to mutual escalations rather than unilateral Zionist aggression. Such charges underscore ongoing debates about whether the New Historians advanced truth-seeking inquiry or advanced a selective aligned with institutional left-leaning predispositions in Western and Israeli intellectual circles.

Empirical Challenges from Opposing Scholars

Opposing scholars have contested the New Historians' empirical claims by highlighting selective use of declassified archives, misinterpretations of military documents, and omission of contemporaneous Arab sources that indicate greater Palestinian agency in the 1948 exodus. Efraim Karsh, in his 1997 analysis, argued that figures like Benny Morris and Avi Shlaim ignored or distorted evidence of Arab Higher Committee directives encouraging civilian evacuations from key areas like Haifa and Jaffa in April 1948, as documented in Arabic broadcasts and memoranda, to facilitate military operations and avoid complicating Arab advances. Karsh further contended that Morris's tally of over 300 expulsions in The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem (1987) conflated tactical retreats during combat with systematic ethnic cleansing, overlooking Israeli military records showing many villages depopulated prior to Haganah operations due to preemptive flight amid irregular warfare. Shabtai Teveth's extensive 1989 review of Morris's work identified factual inaccuracies in source handling, such as erroneous attributions of expulsion orders to absent from his diaries or cabinet minutes, and undercounting Arab-initiated attacks that precipitated defensive clearances. Teveth emphasized that Morris's framework minimized the role of Arab rejection of the November 1947 UN Partition Plan—evidenced by coordinated invasions from five Arab states in May 1948—treating the as primarily aggression rather than a response to existential threats outlined in declarations. Regarding , critics like Karsh rebutted Ilan Pappé's portrayal of it as a master plan for transfer by citing operational orders from March 1948 that prioritized securing supply lines and villages hostile to Jewish convoys, not blanket depopulation, with expulsions occurring in 24 documented cases amid fluid battles rather than as premeditated policy. Additional challenges targeted Avi Shlaim's assertions of Zionist-Transjordanian collusion, where Karsh documented fabricated quotations from King Abdullah's meetings with Jewish Agency leaders, such as altering a protocol to imply acquiescence unsupported by unaltered records or Abdullah's subsequent military actions against Jewish settlements. These critiques underscore a pattern of evidentiary asymmetry: while New Historians privileged self-incriminating documents, opponents integrated primary sources—like Radio transcripts from April 1948 urging "evacuate the women and children"—revealing causal factors in movements that traditional had long incorporated but revisionists sidelined. Such disputes persist, with even later conceding in 2004 interviews greater responsibility for the war's initiation and scale, estimated at 520,000-600,000 rather than the inflated 800,000 figure often cited without demographic verification.

Internal Fractures Among New Historians

Although the New Historians shared a commitment to archival from declassified Israeli documents in the late 1980s and early 1990s, significant fractures emerged over interpretive methods and political implications, most prominently between and . , who prioritized empirical verification and objectivity, criticized Pappé for adopting a postmodernist framework that treated history as competing narratives rather than verifiable facts, allowing ideological preferences to override . Pappé openly acknowledged his pro-Palestinian as shaping his "subjective approach," which contended led to selective sourcing and factual inaccuracies, such as incorrect dates for the formation of Zionist militias (claiming pre-1936 origins instead of 1940-1941) and inflated post-1948 Palestinian refugee estimates (1 million versus the documented ~300,000). In a 2004 review of Pappé's A History of Modern Palestine, Morris labeled the work "appalling" and Pappé himself "at best, one of the world’s sloppiest historians; at worst, one of the most dishonest," pointing to distortions like altering David Ben-Gurion's diary entry on a 1940s gas experiment—changing "dazzled" to "blinded" and omitting the 24-hour recovery duration to imply greater Israeli culpability. These methodological disputes underscored a broader rift: Morris viewed the New Historians as an informal cohort challenging Zionist narratives through rigorous scholarship, not a unified ideological bloc, while Pappé integrated advocacy for a one-state solution and academic boycotts of Israel, which Morris saw as propagandistic. The Second Intifada, erupting in September 2000, exacerbated these divisions by prompting to reassess Palestinian Arab agency and intentions, shifting his political alignment rightward and leading him to regret the incomplete expulsion of Arabs during as a missed opportunity for demographic security. In contrast, Pappé intensified his anti-Zionist critique, framing as deliberate under a master plan—a characterization rejected in favor of ad hoc military decisions amid wartime chaos, without evidence of premeditated policy from Israel's leadership. Such divergences, while less pronounced with figures like who retained more alignment with initial revisionist premises, highlighted how personal evolutions and evidentiary standards fragmented the group's cohesion beyond their archival origins.

Reception and Influence

Impact on Israeli Domestic Narratives

The publications of the New Historians, beginning prominently with Benny Morris's The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem in 1987, ignited a fierce public controversy in Israel by contesting the orthodox narrative of the 1948 war as a purely defensive triumph. Drawing on declassified Israeli archives, their emphasis on Zionist expulsions and military operations like prompted widespread media debates, with traditional historians such as accusing them of selectivity and ideological distortion that undermined national morale. Despite backlash—including claims of from right-wing figures—their arguments resonated with segments of the Israeli left and youth, fostering a climate where previously taboo topics, such as Palestinian displacement, entered mainstream discourse. This historiographical shift permeated Israeli education and politics, leading to revisions in school textbooks that incorporated evidence of mutual atrocities and Arab rejectionism alongside Zionist agency in the refugee crisis, moving away from unnuanced heroic portrayals. By the early , their work aligned with post-Zionist intellectual currents, influencing Labor Party figures to view the refugee issue as negotiable rather than an absolute taboo, which facilitated concessions in the ' framework on historical redress. Polls from the era, such as those by the in 1995, reflected growing public acceptance among secular s of shared culpability in events, though this remained contested and did not sway broader Zionist self-conception. However, the New Historians' domestic influence waned amid the Second Intifada (2000–2005), as suicide bombings and stalled peace efforts discredited narratives perceived as overly conciliatory; Morris himself publicly recanted softer interpretations in a 2004 Haaretz interview, arguing that ethnic transfer had been a pragmatic necessity given Arab hostility. Right-wing critiques, amplified by scholars like Efraim Karsh, portrayed their revisions as empirically flawed and politically motivated, reinforcing traditional narratives in Knesset debates and popular media. Ultimately, while they fractured monolithic Zionist storytelling—evident in sustained academic symposia and cultural outputs like Ari Folman's 2008 film Waltz with Bashir—their legacy entrenched polarization, with orthodox views regaining primacy in public education by the 2010s amid rising nationalism.

Adoption in Western Academia and Media

The works of the New Historians, beginning with English-language publications in the late such as Benny Morris's The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949 (, 1987) and Avi Shlaim's Collusion Across the (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988), rapidly gained traction in academic circles, particularly within Middle East studies departments in the United States and . These texts, drawing on declassified archives, were welcomed for challenging established Zionist narratives and were frequently incorporated into university curricula, influencing syllabi at institutions like Oxford University, where Shlaim held a professorship, and various U.S. campuses. Their adoption reflected a broader receptivity in to reinterpretations emphasizing Palestinian and responsibility, often without equivalent scrutiny of the historians' methodological selectivity. By the , the New Historians' framework had permeated academic discourse, with Ilan Pappé's analyses, such as those in Britain and the Arab- Conflict, 1948-51 (Macmillan, 1988), cited extensively in peer-reviewed journals and monographs on the Arab- conflict. This integration was facilitated by alignments with postmodern historiographical trends and a prevailing institutional toward state narratives, leading to their prominence in programs at universities including the , where Pappé relocated in 2008 amid domestic controversies in . Empirical data from citation analyses indicate their disproportionate influence relative to traditional historians, with Morris's works alone referenced in over 1,000 scholarly articles by 2000, predominantly in Western outlets. However, this uptake has been critiqued for overlooking archival imbalances, as the New Historians prioritized documents while underemphasizing Arab sources, a leniency not extended to opposing viewpoints in the same institutional settings. In Western media, the New Historians' perspectives were amplified during the Oslo peace process (1993-2000) and the Second Intifada (2000-2005), with outlets like The New York Times and The Guardian featuring their interpretations to frame the Palestinian refugee crisis as primarily a product of Zionist expulsion rather than multifaceted wartime dynamics. For instance, Morris's findings were invoked in The New York Times coverage of the 50th anniversary of Israel's founding in 1998 to highlight alleged Israeli "transfer" policies, shaping public narratives toward greater symmetry between Israeli and Palestinian accounts. Shlaim and Pappé appeared in European broadcasts and op-eds, such as BBC documentaries in the early 2000s, where their emphasis on Arab rejectionism's lesser role resonated with editorial preferences for critiquing Israeli actions. This media adoption, peaking around 2000 with sales of Pappé's The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine (Oneworld, 2006) exceeding 100,000 copies in English, often presented their work as definitive without noting internal debates or rebuttals from scholars like Efraim Karsh, reflecting a selective endorsement aligned with prevailing anti-Zionist sentiments in journalistic circles.

Evolution of Views Post-Oslo and Intifadas

Following the signed on September 13, 1993, between Israel and the , several New Historians initially viewed the agreement as partially vindicating their emphasis on mutual Arab and Zionist responsibilities in the 1948 war and its aftermath, seeing it as a pragmatic step toward territorial compromise and refugee resolution. , for instance, expressed guarded optimism about the process's potential to address historical grievances through negotiation, aligning with his archival findings on the contingency of past events rather than inevitable conflict. However, critiqued Oslo early on as structurally imbalanced, arguing it entrenched Israeli control over key territories and diluted Palestinian claims without genuine reciprocity. The eruption of the Second Intifada on September 28, 2000—triggered by Ariel Sharon's visit to the /Haram al-Sharif and escalating into widespread violence that claimed over 1,000 Israeli and 3,000 Palestinian lives by —prompted significant reevaluations among the group. Morris underwent a pronounced shift, abandoning earlier left-leaning positions to advocate for Israel's unilateral disengagement from in and a security barrier, while attributing the accords' failure primarily to Palestinian rejectionism at in July 2000 and subsequent terrorism, which he saw as evidence of irreconcilable cultural divides. He later defended aspects of 1948 expulsions as necessary for state survival, a stance he linked directly to the intifada's empirical lessons on Arab intentions. In contrast, Pappé's views hardened against itself, framing as a "suicidal track" that masked ongoing and settlement expansion, with over 100,000 new Israeli settlers added in the and between 1993 and 2000 despite interim agreements. He rejected two-state solutions post-intifada, advocating instead for a single democratic state and supporting movements, positions rooted in his interpretation of the violence as resistance to Oslo's capitulatory framework rather than its rejection. Avi Shlaim maintained a critical stance toward policy, attributing Oslo's collapse to settlement growth and Netanyahu's election reversal of commitments, but he acknowledged the 's role in fostering disillusionment with negotiated peace, leading to a broader societal retreat from revisionist narratives. Shlaim's post-2000 writings emphasized continuity in Zionist , viewing the not as a break but as confirmation of power imbalances unaddressed by the accords. This divergence highlighted fractures: Morris's empirical pivot toward security realism clashed with Pappé and Shlaim's ideological persistence, influencing the New Historians' waning cohesion as a unified school.

Contemporary Relevance and Legacy

Reassessments in Light of Recent Conflicts

Benny Morris, a prominent figure among the New Historians, underwent a significant ideological shift following the collapse of the and the outbreak of the Second in September 2000, which saw approximately 1,000 s killed, primarily by Palestinian suicide bombings targeting civilians. In response to these events, Morris publicly revised his earlier emphasis on Zionist culpability, arguing that Palestinian rejectionism—evident in the Arab states' refusal of the 1947 UN Partition Plan and subsequent wars—demonstrated a persistent unwillingness to accept Jewish statehood alongside Arab entities. He critiqued the New Historiography's tendency to downplay Arab agency in initiating conflicts, stating in a 2004 interview that "something categorical happened in 1948" requiring Israel's defensive transfers of populations, a view he linked to empirical patterns of Arab aggression rather than mere . This reassessment intensified after the October 7, 2023, attack, which killed about 1,200 s—mostly civilians—and resulted in the abduction of over 250 hostages, marking the deadliest assault on Jews since . described the attack not as an aberration but as a predictable outcome of Islamist rooted in historical Arab-Islamic antipathy toward Jewish sovereignty, drawing parallels to earlier pogroms and wars. He supported Israel's subsequent military campaign in aimed at dismantling Hamas's infrastructure, contending that half-measures had previously emboldened adversaries, as evidenced by Hamas's buildup of 30,000-40,000 fighters and 20,000-30,000 rockets despite Israeli withdrawals. 's evolution highlighted a broader empirical challenge to the New Historians' framework: repeated Palestinian leadership choices favoring violence over negotiation, from the Intifadas to Hamas's charter denying Israel's existence, undermined narratives portraying policies as the primary causal driver of conflict. In contrast, Ilan Pappe maintained his critical stance toward without substantial reassessment, framing the attack as a consequence of decades of Zionist "" while characterizing Israel's Gaza operations—resulting in over 40,000 Palestinian deaths by mid-2025, per figures—as genocidal elimination efforts detached from historical context. Pappe argued that dehistoricizing the assault by focusing on Hamas's actions obscured root causes like the 1948 Nakba, advocating instead for a irrespective of security threats posed by groups rejecting compromise. His position, echoed in outlets sympathetic to Palestinian narratives, persisted amid evidence of Hamas's use of civilian infrastructure for military purposes, as documented in and reports, but without conceding Palestinian in escalating cycles of violence. Avi Shlaim similarly showed limited evolution, continuing to emphasize intransigence in works post-Intifadas and post-October 7, such as his 2025 analysis portraying the conflict as Israel's "long war" on without reevaluating Arab rejection of two-state offers at (2000) or Annapolis (2007). Shlaim's advocacy for faltered against the empirical reality of Hamas's in since 2007, which prioritized over , leading to repeated escalations like the 2008-2009 and 2014 wars. These divergences among New Historians underscored how recent conflicts exposed fractures in their interpretive paradigms: Morris's data-driven pivot toward causal realism on Arab versus Pappe and Shlaim's adherence to ideological critiques, often amplified in academic circles despite biases favoring narratives of exceptional fault.

Contributions to Balanced Historiography

The New Historians advanced balanced historiography of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War through systematic analysis of declassified Israeli military and state archives, made accessible starting in 1978, which revealed operational details previously obscured by wartime secrecy and national mythology. This archival turn enabled empirical reassessments, such as Benny Morris's documentation of the Palestinian refugee exodus in phases tied to specific Israeli military actions, including expulsions in at least 24 documented cases during operations like Hiram and Yoav in October-November 1948, countering claims of purely voluntary flight without negating instances of Arab-initiated evacuations. Avi Shlaim's examination of diplomatic records exposed covert understandings, such as the 1948 non-aggression pact between King Abdullah of Transjordan and Zionist leaders, brokered with British involvement, undermining the traditional portrayal of a monolithic Arab coalition intent on Israel's annihilation and highlighting intra-Arab divisions. Similarly, revisions to the military balance narrative—demonstrating Israel's qualitative edges in organization, training, and arms procurement despite initial numerical disparities—dismantled the "few against many" myth, with evidence showing forces numbering around 35,000 by war's end against fragmented Arab armies totaling under 40,000 effective troops. Ilan Pappé's archival scrutiny of , implemented from April 1948, illustrated systematic village clearances and property destruction in over 500 depopulated sites, integrating Palestinian oral histories and documents to contextualize displacement as a strategic outcome rather than incidental chaos, though his emphasis on premeditated has faced scrutiny for interpretive overreach. Collectively, these efforts fostered causal realism by prioritizing verifiable documents over ideological priors, prompting even critics to acknowledge the necessity of incorporating multifaceted evidence—Israeli, British, and Arab—for a less prone to hagiographic distortion. This empirical rigor has endured, influencing subsequent scholarship to weigh wartime expulsions alongside Arab rejection of and irregular warfare tactics, yielding narratives that attribute causality to interactive belligerent decisions rather than unilateral victimhood.

Persistent Debates on and

Central to ongoing disputes is the of the , involving approximately 700,000 refugees, with New Historians attributing a substantial share to military expulsions and village clearances documented in declassified and archives, while traditional accounts emphasize Arab-initiated flight amid wartime collapse and directives from the . , in analyzing over 400 village files, identified expulsions in cases like Lydda and Ramle—where 50,000-70,000 were forcibly marched out on July 12-14, 1948—but estimated that fear of attack and Arab orders contributed to at least half the displacements, rejecting claims of a singular master plan. Interpretations of , the March 1948 Haganah blueprint for securing areas allocated to the plus corridors, underscore evidentiary divides: posits it as a deliberate directive, citing orders to destroy villages resisting occupation and correlating operations with 369 depopulated sites by war's end. and critics like counter that the plan was defensive, aimed at preempting Arab attacks post-UN Partition rejection, with expulsion clauses applied reactively rather than proactively, as evidenced by unaltered Arab-majority zones outside operational zones. Accusations of evidentiary selectivity persist, with opponents such as charging New Historians with overreliance on fragmented Israeli operational logs while sidelining Arab sources—like Husseini committee telegrams urging evacuations—and contextual factors including preemptive Arab assaults from December 1947 that triggered the phase. Internal New Historian fissures, exemplified by Morris's 2004 disavowal of Pappé as a "post-Zionist" propagandist prioritizing over empirical rigor, highlight how causal attributions often hinge on from ambiguous documents rather than explicit records. Recent archival restrictions, including Israel's 2019 policy limiting access to pre-1948 documents citing security, have intensified debates over evidence suppression, though scholars maintain that available materials—spanning 1948-1956 files—sufficiently reveal tactical expulsions without proving systematic premeditation, underscoring causality's multifaceted nature tied to war dynamics over unilateral design.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] Benny Morris Introduction - University of Michigan Press
    The early New Historians were essentially outsiders in terms of Israeli acade- mia: Tom Segev (author of 1949: The First Israelis; The Seventh Million; and. One ...
  2. [2]
    The New Historians of Israel and their Political Involvement
    The "New Historians" are young social scientists who question Israeli history, especially the 1948-49 war, and challenge accepted truths.Missing: historiography | Show results with:historiography
  3. [3]
    1948 - Yale University Press
    ... Israel. He is the leading figure among Israel's “New Historians,” who over the past two decades have reshaped our understanding of the Israeli-Arab conflict.
  4. [4]
    Falsifying the Record: A Fresh Look at Zionist Documentation of 1948
    The Israeli archives' declassification of most state and political party papers during the past decade or so en- ables the historian to look afresh at the ...
  5. [5]
    https://merip.org/1998/06/fifty-years-through-the-eyes-of-new-historians-in-israel/
  6. [6]
    https://journals.openedition.org/bcrfj/6868
  7. [7]
    Rewriting Israel's History - Middle East Forum
    The new historians claim to provide factual revelations about the origins of the Israeli-Arab conflict. According to Shlaim, “the new historiography is written ...
  8. [8]
    An Indicative Archive: Salvaging Nakba Documents
    Starting in the late 1980s, a group of Israeli scholars known as the New Historians published several monographs challenging the Israeli/Zionist narrative ...
  9. [9]
    Simha Flapan. Zionism and the Palestinians. London: Croom Helm ...
    Simha Flapan. Zionism and the Palestinians. London: Croom Helm, 1979. Index. 361 pp. $24.95 - Volume 15 Issue 1.
  10. [10]
    [PDF] A question of historiography: the “new historians” of Israel
    Archival documents written during the period of the creation of the Israeli state thus became accessible from the late 1970s, and by. 1987, the first and most ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  11. [11]
    Benny Morris. The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947 ...
    Benny Morris. The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947–1949. (Cambridge Middle East Library.) New York: Cambridge University Press. 1987. Pp. xx, 380.<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    Avi Shlaim, Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist ...
    Avi Shlaim, Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement, and the Partition of Palestine (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988).
  13. [13]
    Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-51 | SpringerLink
    Book Title Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-51; Authors Ilan Pappe; Series Title St Antony's/Macmillan Series; DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349 ...
  14. [14]
    Israel's New Historians and the use of historical context
    The debate on Israel's New Historians 1 calls for a new assessment in view of the ever changing condition of the Arab–Israeli conflict on the one hand, ...
  15. [15]
    The "New Historians" - jstor
    $$39.95 cloth. Writing about Zionist and Israeli history will never be the same, thanks to scholars such as Avi Shlaim, Benny Morris, and Ilan Pappe. In the ...Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  16. [16]
    Fifty Years Through the Eyes of "New Historians" in Israel - MERIP
    Jun 28, 1998 · The new historiography has become the focus of heated public debate that addresses contemporary Israeli problems by looking at the past. As ...
  17. [17]
    Benny Morris - Prospect Magazine
    After receiving his BA in modern European history from the Hebrew University, Morris did a doctorate at Cambridge, England, finishing his thesis, on Anglo- ...Missing: career | Show results with:career
  18. [18]
    For Benny Morris the Israeli left isn't where it used to be.
    Educated at Cambridge University, Morris started his career in the late 1970s as a reporter for the Jerusalem Post, at that time a left-leaning newspaper.
  19. [19]
    Dr. Benny Morris: A New Look at 1948 - Event
    Feb 20, 2020 · He was born in Israel in 1948 and was educated at the Hebrew University (BA) and Cambridge University (Ph.D.). He served in the IDF in infantry ...
  20. [20]
    Avi Shlaim | DPIR - Department of Politics and International Relations
    He was born in Baghdad in 1945 and grew up in Israel. He read History at Jesus College, Cambridge, 1966-1969 and did an M.Sc. (Econ.) in International ...
  21. [21]
    https://www.thebritishacademy.ac.uk/fellows/profiles/avi-shlaim-FBA
  22. [22]
    The Hyphen Unites: Avi Shlaim on Arab-Jewish Life
    Jan 3, 2025 · Avi Shlaim, is a celebrated "New Historian” whose earlier work established him as an influential historian of Middle Eastern politics and ...
  23. [23]
    Ilan Pappe Profile | University of Exeter
    Professor Pappé obtained his BA degree from the Hebrew University in Jerusalem in 1979 and the D. Phil from the University of Oxford in 1984.
  24. [24]
    Ilan Pappe | Official Publisher Page - Simon & Schuster
    Ilan Pappe is an Israeli historian and socialist activist. He is a professor of history at the College of Social Sciences and International Studies at the ...
  25. [25]
    https://www.camera.org/article/backgrounder-on-professor-ilan-pappe-when-ideology-trumps-scholarship-1035
  26. [26]
    The Life and Legacy of Simha Flapan
    Mar 26, 2024 · Among the 'New Historians' of Israel whose works were published in the 1980s, Simha Flapan is perhaps the least well-known today.
  27. [27]
    Simha Flapan, Israel - Bruno Kreisky Stiftung
    Simha Flapan was born in Poland in 1911 and emigrated to Palestine in the 1930s. Simha Flapan became general secretary of the left…Missing: biography | Show results with:biography
  28. [28]
    Tom Segev | DHA - The Deborah Harris Agency
    Segev holds a BA in History and Political Science from the Hebrew University and a Ph.D. in History from Boston University. In 2000 and in 2010, Segev's books ...
  29. [29]
    https://journalism.berkeley.edu/event/historian-and-israeli-journalist-tom-segev
  30. [30]
    Why Israel is blocking access to its archives | Conflict News
    Jun 10, 2016 · Israel is concealing vital records to prevent darkest periods in its history from coming to light, academics say.
  31. [31]
    Israel's Vanishing Files, Archival Deception and Paper Trails - MERIP
    The Israeli government is keeping many of the state's archival documents classified, censored and out of the reach of potentially critical historians.
  32. [32]
    The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited
    Benny Morris' The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem was published in 1988. Its startling revelations about how and why 700,000 Palestinians left ...
  33. [33]
    Classified: Politicizing the Nakba in Israel's state archives
    Feb 19, 2016 · Documents that have already been cited in history books are being re-classified in the State Archives. Israeli state archive documents that ...
  34. [34]
    The Erasure of the Nakba in Israel's Archives - jstor
    13 In the 1980s, document declassification within Israeli archives provided extensive evidence of expulsions, as well as incidents of rape and massacres ...
  35. [35]
    The Debate about 1948 - jstor
    The difference, in a nutshell, is that the new historiography is written with access to the official Is- raeli and Western documents, whereas the earlier ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Avi Shlaim on Israel's New Historians, Hamas, and the BDS Movement
    Oct 23, 2017 · So the main contribution of Israel's New History has been to challenge the nationalist biases of the traditional Zionist historiography of the ...
  37. [37]
    Efraim Karsh, the "New Historians" of Israel, Their Methodology and ...
    In order to prove his argument, Karsh progresses from a political- ideological argument to a meticulous methodological analysis.Missing: critique | Show results with:critique
  38. [38]
    fabricating-israeli-history-the-new-historians-by-efraim-karsh-210 ...
    Efraim Karsh not only questions whether there is much new in the accounts of the. "new historians," but he also claims that what is new is generally false. In.
  39. [39]
    The Historiography of the 1948 Wars | Sciences Po Mass Violence ...
    Nov 1, 2008 · Eugen Rogan and Avi Shlaim (Rogan, 2001) undertook the collective rewriting of the 1948 wars and debunked the myth of an Israeli David facing an ...Missing: reinterpretation | Show results with:reinterpretation
  40. [40]
    [PDF] Conflicting Narratives of the 1948 War - ShareOK
    This paper discusses the differences in new and old history in the context of the. 1948 War, specifically focusing on the issues of the Arab-Israeli military ...Missing: reinterpretation | Show results with:reinterpretation
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement ...
    Jan 30, 2021 · This book is the result of a decade of grappling with the complexities of the Arab-Israeli conflict. In 1980 I embarked on a study of ...
  42. [42]
    Avi SHLAIM, Collusion Across the Jordan - jstor
    was only as a result of collusion between Israel and Jordan that the Palestinians "became the principal losers in the 1948 war"; that somehow, and not ...
  43. [43]
    Myth: Israel was outnumbered and outgunned in 1948 war
    Collusion across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist movement, and the partition of Palestine. Clarendon Press, 1988. Shlaim, Avi. “The debate about 1948.” ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited [2nd Edition]
    Benny Morris' The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem,. 1947–1949, was first published in 1988. Its startling reve- lations about how and why 700,000 ...
  45. [45]
    1948 Refugees | Israel Law Review | Cambridge Core
    Professor Morris began by introducing the creation of the Palestinian refugee problem as a result of the 1947–49 war. The refugee problem, he considered, was ...
  46. [46]
    [PDF] Pappe-Ilan-The-Ethnic-Cleansing-of-Palestine.pdf - Yplus
    'Ilan Pappe has written an extraordinary book of profound relevance to the past, present, and future of Israel/Palestine relations.' —Richard Falk, Professor of ...
  47. [47]
    [PDF] The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine by Ilan Pappé
    ILAN PAPPÉ, an Israeli historian and professor of political science at Haifa University, is the author of a number of books, including The Making of the Arab- ...
  48. [48]
    [PDF] Origins of the Palestinian Refugee Problem - ISMI
    way, as docume archive. The Palestinian refugee problem was born of war, not by design, Jewish or Arab. It was largely a by-product of Arab and Jewish fears and ...
  49. [49]
    The Historiography of Israel's new historians; rewriting the history of ...
    ... Israel. He remains a controversial figure, both within the collegium of the new historians for his justification of the atrocities during the Nakba, as well ...
  50. [50]
    The 1948 Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine - Taylor & Francis Online
    Dec 21, 2020 · Ilan Pappé, an Israeli historian and professor of political science at Haifa University, is the author of a number of books, including The ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  51. [51]
    Israel's “new history” and the Palestinians | openDemocracy
    Nov 4, 2009 · ... 1948-1951 (Palgrave, 1988). * Avi Shlaim, Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, the Zionist Movement, and the Partition of Palestine ...
  52. [52]
    The Causes and Character of the Arab Exodus from Palestine - jstor
    Branch Analysis of June 1948. Benny Morris. Since 1948, two contradictory explanations have dominated the historical debate about the causes of the ...
  53. [53]
    the Israel defence forces intelligence branch analysis of June 1948
    The causes and character of the Arab exodus from Palestine: the Israel defence forces intelligence branch analysis of June 1948. Benny Morris.
  54. [54]
    [PDF] The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited | Yplus
    700,000 Palestinians became refugees during the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, with the first wave in Dec 1947-Mar 1948 and the second wave in April-June 1948.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] The Palestinian Exodus of 1948 - Palestine-studies.org
    Michael Bar-Zohar, Ben-Gurion: A Political. Biography, vol. 2 (Hebrew, Tel ... See Simha Flapan, Zionism and the Palestin- ians (London, 1979), 302. 49 ...<|separator|>
  56. [56]
    From Taboo to the Negotiable: The Israeli New Historiansand the ...
    I review the main findings and arguments of the New Historians and demonstrate that they significantly challenged the Israeli traditional narrative.
  57. [57]
    Avi Shlaim · It can be done - London Review of Books
    Jun 9, 1994 · Avi Shlaim, reviewing Benny Morris's book on Israel's Border Wars 1949-56, describes Arab refugees infiltrating into Israel 'looking for ...Missing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s<|separator|>
  58. [58]
    New Historians and the Defection of Benny Morris - The Blogs
    Jun 19, 2023 · This article argues that Morris's shift in views is an outgrowth of a fundamental flaw in the Israeli New Historiography.
  59. [59]
    Benny Morris: Ilan Pappe's New Book Is Appalling
    This truly is an appalling book. Anyone interested in the real history of Palestine/Israel and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict would do well to run vigorously ...
  60. [60]
    Hidden in Plain Sight | Zeithistorische Forschungen
    ... New Historians gave rise to and legitimized various new approaches to, and new perspectives on, the study of Israeli history. Despite Mana's scoffing at ...
  61. [61]
    [PDF] The Historiography of Israel's New Historians - CORE
    At the same time I know and respect the history of the Palestinian Nakba, the origin of the Palestinian refugee problem. If my thesis is found unsatisfactionary ...<|separator|>
  62. [62]
    Fabricating Israeli History: The 'New Historians' - 2nd Edition - Efra
    Free deliveryIsraeli historiography is under assault by "new historians" exposing "Zionist narrative". This text takes issue with these "revisionists", arguing that they ...Missing: key | Show results with:key
  63. [63]
    [PDF] Shabtai Teveth and the Whole Truth
    Avi Shlaim, one of Teveth's targets, later called him “the most strident and vitri- olic” critic of the self-declared iconoclasts who set about smashing the.
  64. [64]
    Charging Israel With Original Sin - Commentary Magazine
    Sep 1, 1989 · Another is Benny Morris, an Israeli journalist who has a doctorate from Cambridge but whose academic qualifications are less than complete ...Missing: criticism | Show results with:criticism
  65. [65]
    Exposing How Post-Zionists Manipulate History
    This essay, in focusing on the return of Benny Morris to the fold of mainstream Israeli historians, will review the impact of the New Historians on Middle East ...
  66. [66]
    The Unbearable Lightness of My Critics - Middle East Forum
    but I have reviewed a previous opus of Ephraim Karsh on the Israeli new historians which may give those interested an idea of what kind of person/scholar he is.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    https://www.jcpa.org/article/exposing-how-post-zionists-manipulate-history/
  68. [68]
    Benny Morris: "The 1948 War Was an Islamic Holy War"
    “Shabtai Tevet claimed that the things I wrote served the needs of the PLO; it questioned all the myths in the accepted Zionist narrative. The establishment ...Missing: Teveth | Show results with:Teveth
  69. [69]
    Ilan Pappe: "One of the World's Sloppiest Historians"
    Mar 16, 2011 · To the deliberate slanting of history Pappe adds a profound ignorance of basic facts. Together these sins and deficiencies render his “histories ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Benny Morris Has Thoughts on Israel, the War, and Our Future
    Jun 25, 2024 · Once a left-winger who ushered in the era of “New Historians”—those endorsing revisionist history of Zionism—he shifted rightward after peace ...
  71. [71]
    When historians matter - Prospect Magazine
    Pappé blames Israel for the expulsion and the dispossession of the Palestinians; Morris comes closer than ever before to blaming the Palestinians for their own ...Missing: internal disagreements
  72. [72]
    Post-Zionist Israel - The American Prospect
    Dec 19, 2001 · Benny Morris, a professor of history at Ben-Gurion University, and Avi Shlaim, a professor of history at Oxford, have come to be thought of as ...
  73. [73]
    Why academic scholarship on Israel and Palestine threatens ...
    Jun 18, 2024 · The emergence of Israel's New Historians, who began publishing books in English in the second half of the 1980s, was another major contribution ...
  74. [74]
    Field of Fire: Fifty Years in Middle East Studies - ASMEA
    Apr 11, 2024 · And pridefully, indeed, Shlaim, Pappé, and Morris declared themselves the New Historians, rewriting the story of Israel's creation. And I ...Missing: reinterpretation | Show results with:reinterpretation
  75. [75]
    The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict After Oslo - MERIP
    These questions have been raised by Israeli intellectuals during the last decade, especially the “new historians.” Many now acknowledge that Zionism was, at ...
  76. [76]
    The Oslo Accords at 25, the second intifada at 18 | Brookings
    Sep 12, 2018 · September 13 marks 25 years since negotiators signed the 1993 Oslo Accords; September 29 marks 18 years after the outbreak of the second intifada.
  77. [77]
    No More Tears - MERIP
    Morris now provides a moral justification for ethnic cleansing that he did not offer before the second intifada, arguing that “[e]ven the great American ...Missing: shift | Show results with:shift
  78. [78]
    9 - The Suicidal Track: The Death of Oslo and the Road to Perdition
    The Oslo accord was already declared dead and irrelevant by the time the first edition of this book was published in 2003. Instead of bringing healing to a ...
  79. [79]
    Ilan Pappé on Israel's 'post-Zionist moment' and the triumph of 'neo ...
    Oct 2, 2014 · In this latest book he tells the story of the rise and fall of the intellectual and cultural movement in Israel that came to be known as “post-Zionism”.
  80. [80]
    Israel and Palestine by Avi Shlaim | Book review - The Guardian
    Oct 23, 2009 · The facts, Shlaim gloomily acknowledges, bear out the critics: Israeli settlements in the occupied territories doubled in the decade after 1993, ...
  81. [81]
    Historian Benny Morris on Israel's wars, Palestinian 'mistakes'
    Nov 27, 2023 · When Hamas invaded Israel on Oct. 7, the scale and savagery shocked the world. But the attack, as well as Israel's ruthless response in Gaza ...
  82. [82]
    Podcast #227: The October 7 Terrorist Attacks: a Historical Perspective
    Nov 1, 2023 · JK: This is one of the most shocking aspects of the attacks. How Hamas could could organize such a huge attack involving hundreds of terrorists ...
  83. [83]
    Benny Morris: “The Iranian nuclear program is Netanyahu's ...
    Jun 26, 2025 · And it's hardly mentioned anymore that Hamas attacked Israel on October 7, 2023, killed 1,200 Israelis, most of them civilians, and abducted ...
  84. [84]
    The Origins and Ideology of Hamas
    Jan 23, 2024 · “As shocking and awful as the Hamas attack of October 7 on Israelis was, it was not a surprise for those of us who have examined the Jew ...
  85. [85]
    Why Israel wants to erase context and history in the war on Gaza
    Nov 5, 2023 · The dehistoricisation of what is happening helps Israel pursue genocidal policies in Gaza. ... Ilan Pappe is the Director of European Center of ...
  86. [86]
    Ilan Pappé, The Collapse of Zionism — Sidecar - New Left Review
    Jun 21, 2024 · Hamas's assault of October 7 can be likened to an earthquake that strikes an old building. ... Here, I will argue that these are clearer than ever ...
  87. [87]
    Israeli Historian Ilan Pappé on the Context Behind Current Violence
    Oct 31, 2023 · We speak with Israeli historian Ilan Pappé about Israel's escalating war on Gaza, as well as a leaked document from the country's Ministry ...
  88. [88]
    https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110351637-061/html
  89. [89]
    [PDF] Review of Ilan Pappe's, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine
    Ilan Pappe has added another work to the many that have already been written in English on the. 1948 Arab-Israeli War and the expulsion of more.
  90. [90]
    [PDF] The “Conversion” of Benny Morris: Morality in the History of 1948 ...
    The history surrounding the 1948 War and the creation of the Palestinian- refugee crisis continues to be contentious, political, and filled with questions.