Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Nubian pyramids

The Nubian pyramids are over 200 (approximately 220–255) ancient monumental tombs constructed by the rulers of the Kingdom of Kush in present-day , primarily between the BCE and the CE, distinguishing them as the largest collection of pyramids in the world outside . These structures, concentrated at key sites such as , , , and along the River, served as burial places for Kushite kings, queens, and later elite individuals, reflecting the kingdom's adoption and adaptation of Egyptian architectural traditions during its periods of rule over and subsequent independence. Smaller and steeper-sided than their counterparts, the Nubian pyramids typically measured 10 to 30 meters in height, with bases of 4 to 8 meters per side, and were often built atop underground chambers accessed via chapels or offering rooms on their eastern faces. Constructed mainly from blocks and , they featured distinctive -inspired elements like hieroglyphic inscriptions and reliefs, but incorporated local Kushite motifs, such as representations of the god Apedemak, emphasizing the kingdom's cultural synthesis. The pyramids emerged during the Napatan period (c. 750–300 BCE), coinciding with the 25th Dynasty's conquest of , and persisted into the Meroitic era, symbolizing royal power and continuity even as the kingdom shifted its capital southward to evade external threats. These monuments highlight the Kingdom of Kush's prosperity through trade in , , and , as well as its military and religious influence across , though many have suffered damage from ancient , natural , and modern conflicts. Recognized as World Heritage sites, including the Archaeological Sites of the Island of (inscribed 2011) and Jebel Barkal and the Site of the Napatan Region (inscribed 2003), the pyramids underscore Nubia's role as a cradle of one of Africa's earliest and most enduring civilizations, yet they remain less studied due to political instability in .

Historical Background

Origins and Chronology

The Nubian pyramids served as royal tombs constructed by the rulers of the , spanning from the 8th century BCE to the 4th century CE. These structures represent a distinctive adaptation of monumental architecture in ancient , evolving over more than a millennium to accommodate the burials of kings, queens, and elite members of the royal family. In total, over 200 such pyramids were built, far exceeding the number constructed in , though they were generally smaller in scale. The chronology of Nubian pyramid construction is divided into three main phases aligned with the political centers of the Kingdom of Kush. The early Napatan period (c. 750–590 BCE) marked the initial adoption of forms, beginning with transitional structures at the cemetery of . This was followed by the classic Napatan period (c. 590–270 BCE), during which building became more standardized and widespread, particularly under the 25th Dynasty pharaohs who ruled from 747 to 656 BCE, representing the peak of construction activity. The Meroitic period (c. 270 BCE–350 CE) saw the relocation of the capital to and a continuation of erection, with innovations in design but a gradual decline in scale and frequency toward the end. The origins of the pyramids trace back to a transition from earlier Nubian burial traditions of tumuli—earthen mounds over pit graves—to more elaborate superstructures influenced by architectural styles during the 25th Dynasty. The first true pyramid was erected under King (r. c. 747–716 BCE) at , signifying the formal establishment of this tomb type in ite royal practice around the mid-8th century BCE. Construction persisted through the Napatan and Meroitic eras until the kingdom's decline, accelerated by interventions in the region from the 1st century BCE and culminating in the Aksumite invasion around 350 CE, after which pyramid building ceased.

Kingdom of Kush and Political Context

The emerged as a powerful state in the Valley south of , flourishing from approximately the BCE to the CE, with its early capital at near the Fourth Cataract and a later shift to further south, which became a major center of political and economic power. This relocation to around 590 BCE, following the sack of by Egyptian forces under Pharaoh Psamtek II in 593 BCE, allowed Kush to distance itself from northern threats and maintain independence, enabling the kingdom to develop a distinct identity while sustaining trade and agriculture along the . Pyramids played a crucial role in legitimizing Kushite royal authority, serving as monumental tombs for kings—who ruled as pharaohs during 's 25th Dynasty (c. 744–656 BCE)—and queens known as kandakes, thereby linking rulers to divine and ancestral legitimacy through Egyptian-inspired architecture. Key figures included King Piye, whose conquest of around 727 BCE established Kushite dominance and prompted the adoption of construction to assert pharaonic continuity; (r. 690–664 BCE), who oversaw extensive building projects during the height of Kushite control over ; and later Meroitic ruler Arakamani (c. 270 BCE), whose at symbolized the kingdom's enduring royal tradition amid shifting power dynamics. Kush's political context was shaped by complex interactions with , beginning with occupation of during the New Kingdom (c. 1500–1070 BCE), which introduced cultural elements like pyramid-building concepts through colonial administration and resource extraction. The Kushites later reconquered under , fostering a synthesis of Nubian and traditions that reinforced their claims, while post-25th Dynasty relations evolved into trade partnerships with Ptolemaic and , exchanging goods like , , and slaves for luxury items and technology, which bolstered Kush's economic stability without direct conquest.

Architectural Features

Design and Structure

The Nubian pyramids exhibit a distinctive geometric form, characterized by their relatively modest scale and pronounced steepness, setting them apart from larger structures while reflecting adaptations to local resources and symbolic needs. Typically, these pyramids reach heights of 10 to 30 meters, with square bases typically measuring 6 to 10 meters per side (up to 52 meters for the largest, such as Taharqa's at ), allowing for more numerous constructions within royal necropolises. Their sloping sides form angles of 60 to 70 degrees, steeper than the 50 to 55 degrees common in , which contributes to a more vertical profile emphasizing ascent and divine elevation. This design, influenced by pyramid , prioritizes symbolic potency over monumental mass. Structurally, the pyramids feature a solid core composed of and , providing internal stability and fill, which is then encased by precisely cut blocks forming the outer facing. This stepped , with horizontal layers of stone, ensures durability against environmental stresses while maintaining a smooth, inclined surface. Attached to the eastern face—oriented toward the rising sun—is a small or , often a single-room serving as a focal point for rituals and offerings, integrated seamlessly into the pyramid's base. These components create a cohesive layout where the pyramid dominates the horizon, underscoring the ruler's eternal presence. Design variations evolved across periods, reflecting cultural and technical refinements. In the Napatan phase (ca. 750–300 BCE), pyramids closely mirrored Egyptian influences, incorporating entrances to subterranean burial chambers, often accessed via staircases from the eastern chapel, enhancing security and ritual complexity. By the Meroitic period (ca. 300 BCE–350 CE), structures featured similar entrances for simpler access, often flanked by decorative pylons that added monumental flair and symbolic gateways. These changes signify a transition toward more localized architectural expressions while retaining core pyramidal symbolism. Engineering adaptations emphasized practicality and integration with the , leveraging the terrains of Nubian highlands for foundational and . Unlike designs, Nubian pyramids lack internal chambers, instead relying on pits excavated directly beneath the base, which simplified and aligned with subsurface traditions. This approach minimized material demands and maximized the pyramid's role as a visible marker atop stable outcrops.

Materials and Construction Techniques

The Nubian pyramids were primarily built using locally sourced blocks, quarried from nearby formations such as the sandstone butte at Gebel Barkal in the Napatan region. These blocks formed the outer casing, providing durability in the arid environment while allowing for the steep angles characteristic of Kushite . In some cases, was employed for inner structural elements, including chambers and supporting features, likely transported from quarries in the Nile Valley or further south. Mudbrick was utilized for temporary construction aids, such as ramps and , which were essential for elevating materials during building phases. Construction techniques relied on ramp systems to transport and position the sandstone blocks, with evidence suggesting both straight and zigzag ramps built from mudbrick and rubble to facilitate ascent along the pyramid's sloping faces. Stone blocks were cut and shaped using copper chisels and stone hammers, tools that enabled precise dressing of surfaces despite the hardness of the sandstone. The workforce consisted of local Nubian laborers and skilled artisans, organized possibly through a corvée system that mobilized community resources during agricultural off-seasons, reflecting the centralized authority of the Kingdom of Kush. A key adaptation in Nubian pyramid building was the use of rubble fill—comprising earth, broken stone, and debris—packed within the core to minimize the quantity of quarried blocks needed, making construction more efficient with limited resources. This internal filling was encased by one or two layers of precisely cut blocks, creating a hollow or semi-hollow structure that contrasted with the solid of earlier . During the Meroitic period, advancements in block dressing techniques led to finer joints and more refined surface finishes, enhancing aesthetic appeal and structural integrity. The harsh environment posed significant challenges, including wind-driven that weathered the exteriors over time, as evidenced by the irregular surfaces observed on many pyramids. Later periods show signs of repairs, such as repatching with smaller stones or , undertaken to maintain the monuments' stability against ongoing environmental degradation.

Comparisons with Egyptian Pyramids

Shared Influences and Similarities

The Nubian pyramids and shared a fundamental purpose as royal tombs, designed to facilitate the deceased king's eternal life in the while manifesting the ruler's divine authority and connection to the gods. This common function underscored a belief in the pharaoh's transformation and ascent, mirroring concepts of and kingship that the Kushites embraced. Architecturally, both traditions employed the distinctive pyramidal form, adopted by the Kushites from models to evoke the mound—the primordial hill emerging from chaos, symbolizing creation and linked to deities like Re-Horakhty. Nubian pyramids, like ones, were typically oriented to the cardinal directions, aligning with and symbolism to aid the soul's journey. This formal parallelism highlighted the integration of religious motifs, including associations with cults that emphasized and divine kingship. The primary channel for these shared elements was the cultural transmission during the 25th Dynasty (ca. 744–656 BCE), when Kushite rulers conquered and governed , fostering deep exchanges in art, religion, and architecture. Kushite kings deliberately emulated Egyptian pharaonic styles, incorporating shared iconography such as falcon representations of —symbolizing protection and royal legitimacy—and uraei cobras denoting sovereignty on tomb chapels and related structures. Functionally, both pyramid complexes featured ancillary structures for funerary rites, including small offering chapels where rituals honored the deceased and stelae inscribed with dedications and prayers to ensure ongoing provisions in the . These elements paralleled mortuary practices, reinforcing the tombs' role as sites of perpetual worship and cultural continuity.

Distinctive Differences

Nubian pyramids are notably smaller in scale than their counterparts, with bases typically measuring 20 to 40 feet on a side and heights rarely exceeding 100 feet, in contrast to monumental structures like the , which has a base of 756 feet and a height of 481 feet. This reduced size, combined with steeper angles of inclination—often between 68° and 71° compared to the approximately 52° of —enabled the construction of larger numbers within limited spaces, resulting in cemeteries containing over 200 pyramids, such as at , rather than the fewer, more isolated grand Egyptian tombs. In terms of location and density, Nubian pyramids are densely clustered in necropolises along the River in modern-day , erected directly on natural bedrock without the extensive substructures or leveling required for sites, which are often more dispersed and set on prepared platforms. This arrangement reflects a practical to the local and resource availability, allowing for efficient use of space in royal burial grounds like those at and . Decorative elements on Nubian pyramids further distinguish them, featuring Meroitic-style pylons and small chapels positioned in front of the structures, adorned with reliefs that blend Egyptianizing —such as processions of deities—with distinctly Nubian motifs, including ram-headed representations of the god , symbolizing royal divine descent. Unlike the elaborate causeways, valley temples, and mortuary complexes of , Nubian examples lack these extensive ancillary features, emphasizing simpler, more integrated tomb-chapel units often inscribed with alongside hieroglyphs. The internal layout of Nubian pyramids prioritizes subterranean burials accessed via vertical shafts descending beneath the pyramid base, rather than incorporating the burial chambers within the pyramid mass as in designs, which often feature complex corbelled roofs and passageways. These shafts lead to modest chambers with minimal architectural elaboration, constructed using smaller blocks and focusing on functionality over grandeur, highlighting a divergence in funerary architecture that persisted despite influences from the 25th Dynasty.

Major Sites and Cemeteries

Napata Region Sites

The region, located along the River in northern near the Fourth , served as the heartland of the Kushite kingdom during the Napatan period, hosting several key pyramid complexes that reflect the early development of royal burial practices. These sites, including and , were strategically positioned in linear cemeteries extending westward from the river, with pyramids often grouped by royal family members and adjacent tombs for queens emphasizing familial proximity in the afterlife. The choice of locations was influenced by the sacred prominence of , a prominent mesa regarded as a religious center and manifestation of the god , which anchored the spiritual landscape of ancient . El-Kurru, situated about 20 km south of Jebel Barkal, represents the earliest royal cemetery of the Kushite rulers, dating to approximately 785–656 BCE during the formative phases of the 25th Dynasty. This site features three pyramids built atop earlier rock-cut tombs and tumuli, marking the transitional evolution from simple shaft graves to more monumental structures influenced by models. Burials here include those of such as , , and , underscoring El-Kurru's role as an ancestral necropolis before the shift to larger complexes. Further north, approximately 10 km from , the stands as one of the largest fields in , with around 72 structures primarily dedicated to kings and associated royalty from circa 664–315 BCE. Initiated by King , who constructed the site's inaugural and most imposing with a base measuring 51 meters square and an original height estimated at 40–50 meters, became the preferred burial ground for subsequent Napatan rulers until the capital's relocation southward. The , aligned in rows parallel to the , feature steep angles and chapels, with queens' tombs clustered nearby to maintain dynastic cohesion. Many pyramids in the region have suffered significant damage from natural erosion, wind-sand abrasion, and historical looting, which exposed subterranean chambers and scattered artifacts. Despite these challenges, the sites of , , and form part of a World Heritage property designated in 2003, benefiting from international efforts to mitigate environmental threats and promote conservation.

Meroë Region Sites

The Meroë region, serving as the southern capital of the during the Meroitic period (c. 300 BCE–350 CE), hosts the most extensive and numerous pyramid fields in , with over 200 structures concentrated around the ancient royal city of . These sites, collectively known as Begarawiya after the nearby modern village, reflect the political and economic zenith of the Meroitic kingdom, where pyramids were erected as royal tombs amid a landscape of temples and urban settlements. The pyramid fields are organized into three main necropolises—West, South, and North—each characterized by dense clusters of pyramids varying in size and steepness, built for , (kandakes), and nobles to signify status and lineage continuity. The West Cemetery primarily features larger pyramids for members, while the South and North necropolises include burials for , , and elites, with the West containing about 80 structures, the North around 38, and the South about 24. This spatial arrangement and proliferation of tombs highlight the era's prosperity, driven by , , and craftsmanship. A standout example is the pyramid of Queen (BEG N 6) in the North Cemetery, constructed around 10 BCE, which exemplifies Meroitic royal burial architecture and was associated with gold artifacts symbolizing wealth and divine favor. The pyramids often integrate with adjacent sacred complexes, such as the nearby Lion Temple at , forming a cohesive that linked funerary practices with religious devotion. Smaller satellite sites in the region, like Musawwarat es-Sufra, extend this network with their temple remains, though they feature fewer monumental tombs compared to the core Begarawiya fields. Situated in the transitional zone between Nile Valley savanna and arid desert, the pyramid sites leveraged local environmental resources, including quarries, for construction. Advancements in ironworking, evidenced by ancient mines and sites in the vicinity, supplied iron tools essential for efficient quarrying and masonry, enabling the rapid production of these structures during the Meroitic phase. As of 2025, the ongoing civil war in has restricted access to the sites and heightened risks of looting and damage, complicating conservation efforts.

Burial Practices

Tombs and Associated Structures

The burial chambers of Nubian pyramids are located entirely underground, separate from the pyramid superstructure above, and consist of shafts or rooms cut into the natural or ground. These chambers are accessed via staircases or sloping passages, often with barrel-vaulted roofs, and are typically lined with blocks to form simple rectangular or multi-room layouts, including side chambers for additional storage or burials. Niches carved into the walls served as spaces for offerings, reflecting the integration of practical and symbolic elements in Kushite funerary design. In royal examples, kings' chambers could comprise up to three interconnected rooms, while queens' s often had two, emphasizing hierarchical distinctions in tomb complexity. Associated structures primarily include small chapels built adjacent to the pyramid base on the east side, serving as focal points for funerary rites and offerings. These chapels feature false doors—symbolic portals carved in to allow the deceased's access to the living world—and accompanying stelae inscribed with dedications or epitaphs. Offering tables, often made of stone and positioned before the false doors, facilitated the presentation of food, drink, and . Some Meroitic-period chapels exhibit more elaborate designs, incorporating halls with columns supporting flat roofs, adapting Egyptian architectural influences to local traditions. Layout variations distinguish Napatan and Meroitic , reflecting evolving security concerns. Napatan entrances typically followed bent or circuitous paths from the area to the chamber, positioned at a distance from the to mislead potential robbers and complicate direct access. Meroitic designs shifted to straighter descents via central staircases leading directly to the chamber entrance, enhancing efficiency in construction while relying on the 's mass and remote locations for protection. Preservation challenges have been significant, as many chambers suffered collapses from unstable or were looted in , with modern excavations often uncovering fragmented sarcophagi amid debris and scattered artifacts.

Funerary Customs and Artifacts

Funerary customs among the , particularly during the Napatan and Meroitic periods, were heavily influenced by practices but incorporated distinct local variations, reflecting a syncretic blend of beliefs in the . Elite burials often involved the preparation of the body with shrouds and coffins, sometimes adorned with bead nets and jewelry to protect and honor the deceased, with the body typically placed on a wooden or stone platform within the chamber, without the artificial mummification typical in , relying instead on natural in the arid environments. Offerings typically included food, beverages such as wine, vessels, and weapons, intended to sustain the deceased in the eternal realm and underscore their status. Artifacts interred with the elite highlighted the wealth and cultural sophistication of Nubian society, featuring elaborate gold and silver jewelry crafted with semiprecious stones, ivory elements, and intricate designs. A notable example is the hoard discovered in the pyramid tomb of Queen Amanishakheto (ca. 10 BCE), which included hundreds of gold items such as bracelets, rings, and pectorals depicting deities, showcasing advanced techniques and royal prestige. Pottery vessels inscribed with served both practical and ritual purposes, while amulets portraying the indigenous lion-headed god Apedemak provided apotropaic protection against evil in the . Ivory tusks, often carved or used in composite artifacts, symbolized power and connections to trade networks. The symbolism embedded in these customs and artifacts emphasized the pyramid as an eternal abode facilitating communion with ancestors and divine forces, merging Egyptian solar motifs—representing rebirth and the sun god —with local ram iconography linked to and fertility. Ram-headed figures and solar disks on jewelry and tomb adornments illustrated this fusion, portraying the deceased as intermediaries between the living world and ancestral spirits. Socially, these elaborate pyramid burials were reserved exclusively for and high-ranking elites, affirming their divine and authority, whereas commoners received simpler mound or graves without such monumental markers.

Archaeological Exploration

Early European Discoveries

The first significant European encounter with the Nubian pyramids occurred in 1821 when French explorer Frédéric Cailliaud reached the site of during an expedition funded by Mehmet Ali, the viceroy of . Cailliaud produced detailed drawings, maps, and descriptions of the pyramids, marking the initial modern documentation of these structures and bringing their existence to European attention through his publication Voyage à Méroé, au fleuve Blanc (1826-1827). His work established basic chronologies and layouts for the necropolis, though limited by the exploratory nature of the visit. In the 1830s, Italian adventurer , serving as a in the , turned to at amid financial desperation. Employing gunpowder to demolish the tops of over 40 pyramids, Ferlini caused irreversible damage to the site in his search for valuables; his most notable find was a hoard of gold and silver jewelry, bracelets, and statuettes from the pyramid of Queen (c. 10 BCE), which he sold to collectors. These artifacts, including intricately crafted items depicting the queen, ended up in museums such as the Ägyptisches Museum in and the in , highlighting the era's colonial plunder while preserving key examples of Meroitic artistry. Ferlini's destructive methods exemplified the treasure-hunting mindset prevalent in 19th-century explorations, often prioritizing profit over preservation and exacerbating site degradation under colonial influences. By the late 19th and early 20th centuries, more systematic efforts emerged, though still within a colonial framework. , keeper of Egyptian and Assyrian antiquities at the , traveled to in the 1890s and 1900s, visiting the region including the pyramid field, where he documented the structures associated with kings like and collected inscriptions that informed early understandings of Kushite royalty. His publications, such as The Egyptian Sudan: Its History and Monuments (1907), synthesized observations from these trips, contributing maps and descriptions that built on Cailliaud's foundational work. Meanwhile, British archaeologist John Garstang led excavations at from 1909 to 1914 under the , uncovering associated chapels, temples, and royal tombs adjacent to the pyramids, which revealed insights into Meroitic funerary architecture and chronology. These endeavors, while advancing knowledge, often involved artifact removal to European institutions, perpetuating the challenges of looting and incomplete contextual recording in a period dominated by imperial interests.

Modern Excavations and Conservation Efforts

Modern archaeological efforts at Nubian pyramid sites have emphasized systematic excavation, multidisciplinary analysis, and collaboration, building on earlier explorations to uncover new insights into Kushite society. A landmark initiative was the Campaign to Save the Monuments of , launched in 1960 following appeals from and to protect threatened by the rising waters of from the Aswan High Dam construction. This two-decade effort (1960–1980) involved over 50 countries and focused on documenting, salvaging, and relocating more than 20 monuments in (southern and far northern ), such as temples at and border forts, through photographic surveys, structural reinforcements, and partial relocations to prevent submersion. While the major pyramid fields were located further south and not directly threatened, the campaign's Sudanese participation enhanced broader Nubian heritage documentation and fostered collaboration that benefited future research on sites like those in the region. In the Napata region, excavations at have been a cornerstone of 20th- and 21st-century work, with notable contributions from American and teams. From the 1980s to the early 2000s, archaeologist Timothy Kendall, directing the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston's Sudan Mission, conducted extensive surveys and digs at and surrounding Napatan sites, revealing temple complexes, royal tombs, and foundations that illuminated the site's role as a religious and political center of the Kingdom of Kush. Kendall's work included mapping over 100 structures and analyzing superstructures, providing foundational data on Napatan and . Complementing these efforts, the Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology, , has conducted ongoing fieldwork in northern since the late 20th century, including surveys and excavations near , such as the discovery of Napatan-period temples at sites like Sanam Abu Dom and conservation of medieval inscriptions at the museum. In 2025, archaeologists reported the identification of over 1,200 ancient sites in the Bayuda Desert from ongoing fieldwork, including cemeteries linked to Napatan and Meroitic periods, enhancing understanding of settlement patterns around necropolises. Recent discoveries have leveraged advanced technologies to explore unexcavated areas. At Jebel Barkal in 2023, a ground-penetrating radar (GPR) survey by international teams detected subsurface anomalies suggestive of buried structures, including potential extensions to known pyramid chapels and temple foundations, prompting targeted future digs. In the Meroë region, ongoing geophysical prospecting, including satellite-based remote sensing since the early 2020s, has mapped sand dune movements threatening pyramid stability and revealed outlines of unexcavated tombs beneath shifting sediments, informing non-invasive preservation strategies. These findings, combined with excavations at Nuri—where the Nuri Archaeological Expedition has documented royal tombs and prepared sites like Queen Yeturow's for public access—have uncovered Meroitic-period artifacts, including jewelry and inscriptions, shedding light on elite burial practices. Conservation initiatives have intensified to combat environmental and human threats to Nubian pyramids. Efforts target looting, exacerbated by Sudan's civil war since April 2023, which has led to widespread site desecration and the theft of thousands of artifacts from museums and necropolises, including those near Meroë and Napata; as of 2025, conservation labs have been stripped, and funerary artifacts from Nubian tombs are circulating in illicit markets. Climate-driven challenges, such as accelerating sand dune migration and erosion, pose risks to structural integrity; for instance, at Meroë, rising flood potential from altered Nile patterns could inundate low-lying pyramids, while desertification buries others under tons of sand. In response, projects such as the Google Arts & Culture's interactive 3D mapping of Meroë's 200+ pyramids, launched in 2022, enable virtual preservation and global access amid access restrictions from unrest. International bodies like UNESCO and the Sudanese National Corporation for Antiquities and Museums continue monitoring and community training to mitigate war-related damage, though ongoing conflict severely hampers fieldwork.

References

  1. [1]
    The Nubian Empire | Nowheres - Williams Sites
    The Nubian pyramids, with over 200 structures located in the region of ancient Nubia, represent a significant and often overlooked aspect of the cultural and ...Missing: builders | Show results with:builders
  2. [2]
    These mighty pyramids were built by one of Africa's earliest ...
    Dec 28, 2022 · They are now displayed at London's British Museum. There are 41 tombs in Meroë's north cemetery, 38 of which belong to monarchs who. There ...
  3. [3]
    Archaeological Sites of the Island of Meroe
    It was the seat of the rulers who occupied Egypt for close to a century and features, among other vestiges, pyramids, temples and domestic buildings as well ...Missing: Nubian | Show results with:Nubian
  4. [4]
    The Kingdom of Kush in ancient Nubia, an introduction - Smarthistory
    The Kingdom of Kush in ancient Nubia, an introduction. by The British Museum ... pyramids of Egyptian private tombs of the New Kingdom (about 1550–1070 ...
  5. [5]
    Meroitic period of the Kingdom of Kush - Smarthistory
    The sculpture and architecture of the period ... This wall comes from one of the small steep-sided pyramids with chapels in which the rulers were buried.
  6. [6]
    Nubia: Jewels of Ancient Sudan - Getty Museum
    Nubian rulers were buried near Napata in tombs that often took the form of pyramids, although smaller and with different proportions than their Egyptian ...Nubia · Jewels Of Ancient Sudan · The Kerma Period (about...Missing: facts | Show results with:facts
  7. [7]
    The pyramids of ancient Nubia and Meroe - African History Extra
    Feb 19, 2023 · More than 200 pyramids spread over half a dozen cities were built by the rulers and officials of Kush over a period of 1,000 years. These grand ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] From Tumulus to Pyramid: The Development of the Kushite Royal ...
    Reisner had posited eight phases of development from the earliest tumuli at El-Kurru (Ku. Tum. 1) to the appearance of the first pyramid in the reign of Piye ( ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Royal Pyramids of Meroe - SUDAN & NUBIA
    The Ancient Sudanese Pyramids. Pyramids first appear as part of Nubian royal burial prac- tices in the 7th century BC. The best known of the Napatan kings ...
  10. [10]
    The Kingdom of Kush - World History Encyclopedia
    Feb 26, 2018 · 330 CE the Axumites invaded and sacked Meroe. Although the city would continue on another 20 years, it was effectively destroyed by the Axumites ...Missing: construction | Show results with:construction
  11. [11]
    9.3 The Kingdom of Kush - World History Volume 1, to 1500
    Apr 19, 2023 · The Origin and Rise of the Kingdom of Kush. The history of the Nubian Kingdom of Kush is bound up in the history of Egypt, its northern neighbor ...
  12. [12]
    Kushite Pyramids - Egypt Museum
    The Kushite rulers adopted pyramid building as a deliberate connection to Egyptian royal traditions. This was especially prominent after their conquest of Egypt ...
  13. [13]
    King Piye and the Kushite control of Egypt - Smarthistory
    Piye, also called Piankhy (747–716 BCE) and Kushite ruler of the Napatan period, laid the foundations for the Twenty-fifth Dynasty of Egypt (747–656 BCE).
  14. [14]
    Nubian kings ruled Egypt for less than 100 years. Their influence ...
    Feb 7, 2025 · Nubian pharaohs from a Kushite kingdom, now in northern Sudan, ruled Egypt. For more than a hundred years, they revived and adapted ancient Egyptian customs.Taharqa, The Conqueror · Taharqa, The Builder · In Honor Of Amun<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Imperial expansions, quotidian interactions and the ebb and flow of ...
    The Kingdom of Kush: Handbook of the Napatan-Meroitic Civilization. Leiden: Brill. (Open in a new window)Google Scholar. Török, L. 2008. “From chiefdom to ...
  16. [16]
    Ancient Nubia and the Kingdom of Kush, an introduction (article)
    The early Kushite kings were buried on beds placed on stone platforms in the tombs under their pyramids. These structures were based on the pyramids of Egyptian ...
  17. [17]
    The Role of Greek Culture in Ancient and Medieval Nubia - jstor
    unprecedented prosperity in Kush. Trade with Roman Egypt expanded in tandem with growing Roman demand for the traditional products of Africa—gold, ivory ...
  18. [18]
    (PDF) Pyramids, Nubian - Academia.edu
    This paper explores the royal pyramid fields in Nubia, focusing on the influences and adaptations of Egyptian traditions by the Kushite kingdoms.Missing: builders | Show results with:builders
  19. [19]
    The Kingdom of Kush: The Napatan and Meroitic Empires
    Aug 6, 2025 · Kush and Egypt had a close relationship through much of Kush's long history in the areas of trade, metal and stone words, farming, ...
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Comparative Analysis Between Egyptian and Nubian Pyramids
    The pyramids of Giza date to approximately 2700-2675 BCE and signify Egypt's architectural evolution. · Nubian pyramids, built between 751-283 BCE, reflect a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Features - Miniature Pyramids of Sudan - July/August 2013
    In less than half an acre, they discovered the bases of 35 pyramids. The largest was 22 feet wide and once stood just over 30 feet high. Much smaller monuments, ...
  23. [23]
    The Land of Nubia - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Nov 2, 2018 · The region of Nubia begins at the point just south of Khartoum in the Sudan where the Blue and White Nile join, and is linked to Egypt by the Nile River.
  24. [24]
    Nubia: Treasures of Ancient Africa - Saint Louis Art Museum
    Apr 18, 2021 · These burial structures were steep-sided with decorated chapels attached on the eastern side, where the royal descendants could come to leave ...
  25. [25]
    Ancient Nubia: Art of the 25th Dynasty - High Museum of Art
    Almost nothing remains of the chapels that once stood in front of the pyramids at Nuri. This block from the tomb of King Aramatelka is a rare survivor. The ...Missing: falcons | Show results with:falcons
  26. [26]
    The Forgotten Pyramids of Sudan - JSTOR Daily
    Jun 15, 2015 · Sudanese pyramids, built by Nubians, are smaller, have steeper slopes, and are headstones with burial chambers underneath, unlike Egyptian ...
  27. [27]
    The Nubian kingdom of Kush, rival to Egypt | National Geographic
    After the Nubian pharaohs lost power, they retreated south from Egypt to form the Kingdom of Kush, which thrived in splendid isolation as the rest of Egypt ...
  28. [28]
    Gebel Barkal and the Sites of the Napatan Region
    The building materials and shapes of the pyramids, palaces, temples, burial chambers and funerary chapels have not been altered or modified. The relief ...
  29. [29]
    [PDF] Jebel Barkal and Ancient Napata: An Historical Overview
    Nubian type. These rapidly evolved into small Egyptian-style pyramids, set on high square bases (middle row, moving from left to right chronologically). The ...<|separator|>
  30. [30]
    [PDF] SUDAN & NUBIA
    Whereas the earlier tombs at el-Kurru followed Nubian tradition, comprising tumuli over a pit-grave, that of Piye had a small (7.5 m²) built superstructure, ...
  31. [31]
    El-Kurru, Sudan | U-M LSA Kelsey Museum of Archaeology
    The site had been known since excavations of George Reisner in 1918–1919 recovered the royal pyramid burials of kings and queens of ancient Kush.
  32. [32]
    [PDF] Sudanese Pyramids - Philip Effiong
    The oldest and largest pyramid at Nuri is that of the Napatan king and. 25th dynasty pharaoh Taharqa. However, the most extensive Nubian pyramid site is at ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  33. [33]
    Nuri Necropolis - Archaeology
    Who is Buried At Nuri? 690–664 BCE Taharqa, Founder of Nuri necropolis; built the largest pyramid. 664–653 BCE Tantamani, Successor of Taharqa; buried at Nuri.Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  34. [34]
    Sand dune movement and flooding risk analysis for the pyramids of ...
    Jun 27, 2023 · The pyramids of Meroe at the Al Bagrawiya archaeological site were built approximately 200 km north of Khartoum, between the Nile River and the ...
  35. [35]
    Full article: The ancient iron mines of Meroe - Taylor & Francis Online
    This paper presents the results of archaeological and geological research that has, for the first time, identified ancient iron mining activity in the area.
  36. [36]
    A New Radiocarbon Chronology for Ancient Iron Production in the ...
    Oct 19, 2017 · Increased building activities are evident at Meroe and Musawwarat. Such activities would have presumably required iron tools for quarrying stone ...
  37. [37]
    Culture of the Ancient Nubians: Art, Tombs and Pyramids
    In fact, not all the tombs in the cemetery have pyramids: Some are buried beneath simple rectangular structures called "mastaba," whereas others are topped with ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] Death and Burial in the Kingdom of Meroe - HAL-SHS
    Nov 28, 2023 · Mission archéologique de Nubie, 1929–1934. J.J. Augustin. Török, L. 1997 The Kingdom of Kush: Handbook of the Napatan-Meroitic Civilization.Missing: variations | Show results with:variations<|control11|><|separator|>
  39. [39]
    The Nubian Pyramids - Tour Egypt
    The Nubian pyramids are characterized by smaller scale, with steeper slopes, but they are far more numerous, considerably more standardized and owned by more ...Missing: phases | Show results with:phases
  40. [40]
    Dive beneath the pyramids of Sudan's black pharaohs
    Jul 2, 2019 · The largest and oldest pyramid at Nuri belongs to its most famous resident: the pharaoh Taharqa, a Kushite king who in the seventh century B.C. ...Missing: scholarly | Show results with:scholarly
  41. [41]
    Death and Burial in the Kingdom of Meroe - ResearchGate
    This article presents an overview of funerary customs and their antecedents in the king dom of Meroe (300 BCE–350 CE), with a focus on elite burials.
  42. [42]
    Post-Meroitic period | Discover Sudan! Archaeological and Cultural ...
    The lesser elites and the commoners were also buried in mound graves, which could still reach diameters of up to 20 metres. Hundreds of cemeteries attributed to ...
  43. [43]
    Meroe - UCL
    1772 James Bruce visited the site and identified it as Meroe; 1821 Frédéric Cailliaud, drawings and descriptions; between 1842-1945 the Prussian expedition ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Island of Meroe (Sudan) No 1336 - UNESCO World Heritage Centre
    Mar 10, 2011 · The temple includes an outer courtyard, a hypostyle hall, several ancillary rooms and ... The current approach by the State Party is to leave some ...
  45. [45]
    Meroe - Digital Heritage Lab - University of Liverpool
    Garstang, who had worked previously on funerary sites in Sudan, gained the approval of the Anglo-Egyptian Sudanese Government to excavate Meroë from 1909-1914.Missing: Nubian | Show results with:Nubian
  46. [46]
    Monuments of Nubia-International Campaign to Save the ...
    In 1959 the Egyptian and the Sudanese Governments requested UNESCO to assist their countries in the protection and rescue of the endangered monuments and sites.
  47. [47]
    The Rescue of Nubian Monuments and Sites
    The most famous of the monuments affected by the Aswan High Dam Project was the temple complex on the island of Philae.
  48. [48]
    Egypt's exquisite temples that had to be moved - BBC
    Apr 10, 2018 · Unesco's 'Nubia Campaign' came about in 1960, when the United Arab Republic (a political union of Egypt and Syria that existed between 1958 ...
  49. [49]
    [PDF] Napatan Temples: A Case Study from Gebel Barkal
    The theory is proposed that the temple was destroyed near the end of Dynasty 20 and that this, more than anything else, may have been what caused the high ...
  50. [50]
    Medieval inscriptions from the renovated Museum at Jebel Barkal ...
    A new project of the Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology, University of Warsaw, and the National Corporation of Antiquities and Museums of Sudan ...
  51. [51]
    Polish archaeologists identify over 1,200 ancient sites in Sudan's ...
    May 28, 2025 · Excavations were conducted at 88 sites, of which 36 were cemeteries and 55 settlements. The discoveries span a broad range of history ...
  52. [52]
    J. Barkal Geophysics Report 2023 - Academia.edu
    This preliminary report presents the findings from a Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) survey conducted at Jebel Barkal, Sudan, from January 9 to 21, 2023.
  53. [53]
    Nuri Archaeological Expedition (@nuripyramids) - Instagram
    With support from the Site Preservation program, the team prepared the beautifully painted tomb of Queen Yeturow for public access, marked site boundaries, and ...Missing: Swiss- mission 2023
  54. [54]
    In the Crosshairs: Rescuing Sudan's Cultural Heritage Amid Crisis
    Aug 21, 2025 · Sudan's cultural heritage is at risk due to conflict, with museums looted, archives torched, and sites desecrated. The National Museum was ...
  55. [55]
    Sudan's 'forgotten' pyramids risk being buried by shifting sand dunes
    Jun 14, 2021 · Sandstorms and shifting sand dunes pose the biggest threat to Sudan's ancient heritage sites. This phenomenon is nothing new, and was even chronicled thousands ...Missing: erosion | Show results with:erosion
  56. [56]
    Climate Change Is Burying Archaeological Sites Under Tons of Sand
    Sep 29, 2022 · Some archaeologists suggest that sand inundation could protect sites from looters and exposure to harsh weather. Many sites that are already ...
  57. [57]
    Step into the Meroë pyramids with Google - The Keyword
    May 17, 2022 · Over 200 pyramids were constructed in Meroë, the third and final capital of the Kushite Kingdom, an ancient African civilization that ruled ...
  58. [58]
    Archaeology and cultural heritage in wartime: Sudan 2023–2025
    Oct 7, 2025 · This article aims to record the efforts of the Sudanese antiquities department—the National Corporation for Antiquities and Museums (NCAM)— ...