Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Obelisk


An obelisk is a tall, monolithic pillar of stone, rectangular in cross-section with four tapering sides converging to a pyramidal apex known as a , originating in as a symbol of the sun god and pharaonic authority. Typically quarried from a single block of red granite at and erected in pairs flanking entrances, obelisks were inscribed with hieroglyphs recounting the 's deeds and invocations to deities. The construction process involved precise quarrying and transport via the , with the largest intact example—erected by at around 1450 BCE—reaching 29.6 meters in height and weighing over 300 tons. Ancient obelisks, numbering around 30 surviving intact specimens, were later transported as trophies to by imperial decree, influencing and modern monumental architecture worldwide, where obelisk forms commemorate events or figures independent of their original symbolism.

Definition and Etymology

Physical Description and Characteristics

An obelisk is a tall, slender, four-sided tapering monument, square in cross-section at the base, that narrows gradually toward a small pyramidal apex called the pyramidion. Ancient Egyptian obelisks were quarried as monolithic structures from single blocks of hard stone, predominantly red granite sourced from Aswan quarries, though earlier examples occasionally used graywacke sandstone. The shaft surfaces exhibit slight convexity, with polished faces often bearing hieroglyphic inscriptions across all four sides; the pyramidion was typically capped with gold or electrum to reflect sunlight. Erected on square bases, surviving giant ancient obelisks measure between 9 and 32 meters in height, with smaller variants under 7 meters. Subsequent obelisks in other cultures replicate this silhouette but frequently employ assembled masonry rather than monolithic stone.

Linguistic Origins and Terminology

The ancient Egyptians referred to obelisks as tekhenu, a term denoting a structure intended to "pierce" the sky, reflecting their vertical aspiration toward the heavens and solar symbolism. This nomenclature appears in hieroglyphic inscriptions from onward, with larger variants categorized as txn wr ("great obelisk") or txn aA ("major obelisk") based on scale. The modern English term "obelisk" derives from the Ancient Greek obeliskos (ὀβελίσκος), a diminutive form of obelos (ὀβελός), meaning "spit" or "skewer," applied by Greek observers like Herodotus to describe the monument's tapering, needle-like form resembling a roasting spit. This Greek word entered Latin as obeliscus, then Middle French as obelisque, before adoption into English by the mid-16th century. Related terminology includes the "" (†), a mark sharing the same Greek root obelos, originally used in ancient by scholars like (c. 220–143 BCE) to indicate doubtful or spurious passages, evoking the pointed shape but distinct from monumental usage. In later contexts, such as Roman engineering descriptions by (c. 77 CE), obelisks were likened to "sun-beams" in Phoenician linguistic associations, though this reflects interpretive translation rather than primary .

Origins in Ancient Egypt

Invention and Early Examples

Obelisks were invented in ancient Egypt during the Old Kingdom, emerging as architectural elements tied to solar worship and temple entrances. The form likely developed from primordial mound symbols like the benben stone at Heliopolis, evolving into tapered, four-sided pillars topped with a pyramidion, representing the sun's rays petrified in stone. Earliest attestations appear in the Fifth Dynasty (c. 2494–2345 BCE), when pharaohs such as Sahure and Niuserre erected them at solar temples, as recorded in temple reliefs and inscriptions depicting their construction and dedication to Ra. No complete obelisks from the Fifth or Sixth Dynasties survive intact, though fragmentary evidence and textual references confirm their production from red or pink , quarried and transported via the . These early monuments were relatively modest in scale compared to later examples, typically 6 to 10 meters high, and paired at pylons to mark sacred spaces. The transition to the saw refinements, with increased height and hieroglyphic coverage detailing royal achievements and divine favor. The oldest surviving obelisk, dating to the reign of (c. 1971–1926 BCE) of the Twelfth Dynasty, stands in Heliopolis (modern Al-Matariyyah, ), measuring about 21 meters in height and weighing approximately 120 tons. Inscribed on all four faces with offerings to Ra-Atum and praises of the pharaoh's piety, it exemplifies the form's maturation into a durable emblem of eternal light and kingship. This monument, hewn from a single block, underscores the advanced quarrying and erection techniques already mastered by this period.

Nubian Contributions

During the Napatan period of the Kingdom of Kush (c. 750–590 BC), following the 25th Dynasty's conquest and rule of Egypt, Nubian kings perpetuated the obelisk tradition in their religious centers, erecting them as symbols of solar divinity and royal piety within Egyptian-influenced temple architecture. Remains of such an obelisk, dedicated to the sun god, were excavated in the sanctuary of the Amun temple at Jebel Barkal, the Kushite holy mountain and former capital of Napata near modern Karima, Sudan, underscoring the form's integration into core Nubian cult sites. A preserved example is the obelisk fragment linked to King (r. c. 653–640 BC), standing approximately 2.8 meters tall and quarried from Nubian at in northern ; this monument, now in the in , , exemplifies Kushite craftsmanship in the post-pharaonic era, with hieroglyphic inscriptions affirming continuity in form and symbolism. By the Meroitic period (c. 300 BC–350 AD), with the capital shifted to , obelisks adapted to funerary roles, as seen in two specimens used to seal a entrance at Abri in , reflecting practical repurposing amid evolving burial practices distinct from erections. These instances demonstrate Nubian agency in sustaining obelisk production through local quarrying expertise and cultural synthesis, though reliant on prototypes, thereby extending the monument's regional endurance beyond dynastic .

Peak Production Periods

Obelisk production originated in , with inscriptions and reliefs indicating erection as early as the 5th Dynasty (c. 2465–2325 BCE), when small, squat examples up to 3 meters tall adorned sun temples at sites like . Surviving pre-New Kingdom obelisks remain scarce, limited primarily to examples such as the red pair dedicated by (c. 1971–1926 BCE) at Heliopolis, one of which still stands at approximately 20.4 meters. Production peaked during the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), especially under the 18th and 19th Dynasties, yielding the largest and most numerous obelisks as symbols of pharaonic power and divine favor. Pharaohs of this era, leveraging expanded resources from imperial conquests, commissioned monuments exceeding 30 meters in height, often in pairs at temple entrances like and . In the 18th Dynasty, (c. 1493–1482 BCE) erected an 24-meter obelisk at around 1490 BCE. (1479–1458 BCE) followed with a renowned pair at , the larger measuring 29.6 meters and quarried from granite in seven months circa 1458 BCE, inscribed with claims of divine craftsmanship. (1479–1425 BCE) raised multiple, including a 32-meter obelisk at circa 1430 BCE, later relocated to as the . The 19th Dynasty saw continued intensity, with (1279–1213 BCE) commissioning the highest volume, including pairs at and Heliopolis, such as the 25-meter obelisks now in and (, though erected later than Ptolemaic times). Of the roughly 30 surviving large obelisks bearing hieroglyphs, the vast majority date to this New Kingdom apex, reflecting heightened technical prowess and ideological emphasis on solar worship and eternal commemoration. Production waned post-New Kingdom, with sporadic Ptolemaic examples but no comparable scale or frequency.

Symbolism and Purpose

Religious and Solar Associations

In , obelisks served as sacred monuments primarily dedicated to solar deities, with the sun god being central to their symbolism. Erected in temple complexes such as those at Heliopolis and , they embodied divine presence and were often inscribed with offerings to or Amun-Ra, invoking eternal life and cosmic order. The obelisk's form represented the petrified rays of , linking the earthly realm to the heavens and facilitating the pharaoh's to the divine. Its tapering shaft culminated in a , frequently sheathed in or to capture and reflect , symbolizing the stone—the primordial mound of creation associated with and Ra's emergence from chaos. Pairs of obelisks flanked entrances, aligned to mark events like solstices, reinforcing their role in rituals that honored the sun's life-giving power and the pharaoh's role as intermediary between gods and humanity. During the under , obelisks were reinterpreted as rays of the , the singular disk, though this emphasis waned post-reform.

Commemorative and Funerary Functions

Obelisks were erected by primarily to commemorate their achievements, piety, and divine legitimacy, often in pairs at entrances to honor solar deities like or Amun-Ra. Inscriptions carved on their surfaces detailed the ruler's deeds, such as monumental constructions, military victories, and offerings to the gods, ensuring eternal remembrance of their reign. For instance, Queen Hatshepsut's obelisks at , completed around 1458 BCE, bear hieroglyphs proclaiming their erection as a gift to Amun-Ra, emphasizing her divine election and the seven-year quarrying effort under divine command. These texts also reference her participation in the sed-festival, a rite renewing kingship and symbolizing perpetual rule. Similarly, erected multiple obelisks, including a pair commemorated on scarabs as enduring in Amun's , highlighting his devotion and accomplishments. In their funerary roles, obelisks drew from earlier benben stones, representing the primordial mound of creation and the sun god's manifestation, thereby symbolizing and the pharaoh's eternal life. Proto-obelisks in Fifth Dynasty sun temples, such as those of and Niuserre, facilitated the king's and cultic worship, linking cycles to rebirth. By the Old Kingdom's Sixth Dynasty, small obelisks adorned private funerary monuments, evoking royal prestige and hopes for posthumous renewal. Although New Kingdom obelisks shifted toward temple commemoration, their pyramidal tips—often gilded to mimic sun rays—retained ties to the deceased ruler's ascent to the divine , akin to the benben's role in Heliopolitan cosmology. This enduring imagery underscored the pharaoh's identification with Ra's daily regeneration, blending commemorative permanence with funerary aspirations for immortality.

Inscriptions and Dedications

Ancient Egyptian obelisks featured hieroglyphic inscriptions carved on all four faces of the , typically consisting of vertical columns of text that included names, titles, and dedications to deities, particularly the sun god or Amun-Ra. These inscriptions served to eternalize the 's piety, divine favor, and monumental achievements, functioning as both religious offerings and propagandistic memorials. The texts often invoked the 's role as intermediary between gods and people, emphasizing the obelisk's erection as a fulfillment of divine command. The obelisks of at Temple provide prominent examples of such dedications. Erected around 1458 BCE, the surviving inscriptions on the standing obelisk detail her commissioning of the monuments for , highlighting her devotion to the god as her divine father and crediting III's involvement under her regency. The base texts, arranged in horizontal lines, proclaim: "Two great obelisks have been erected by her majesty... they are words by the Lord of the gods," underscoring the rapid construction—completed in seven months—as evidence of divine and human collaboration. The fallen obelisk's fragments preserve similar content, reinforcing Hatshepsut's legitimacy and the obelisks' role in rituals. Obelisks of , such as the one now in Istanbul's , bear inscriptions celebrating military victories, including his campaign against the circa 1450 BCE, with texts describing crossing the and divine aid in battle. Each face features a central column of hieroglyphs praising the pharaoh's prowess and dedicating the monument to . Similarly, the paired obelisks known as —originally from Heliopolis—were inscribed by with dedications to , later augmented by around 1250 BCE with additions commemorating his own Syrian conquests and restorations. These layered texts illustrate how obelisks accumulated historical dedications over generations, adapting original inscriptions to affirm continuity of pharaonic power. In Nubian contexts, obelisks like those at Gebel Barkal featured inscriptions linking local rulers to pharaonic traditions, dedicating them to of and invoking solar imagery. Overall, the inscriptions transformed obelisks into textual artifacts, where hieroglyphs not only consecrated the stone but also encoded theological and political narratives, preserved through scholarly translations despite from exposure.

Engineering and Construction

Quarrying and Material Selection

Ancient Egyptian obelisks were primarily constructed from red or pink granite quarried in the Aswan region of southern Egypt, valued for its durability and resistance to weathering due to its coarse- to very coarse-grained texture. This material was sourced from bedrock outcrops in the northern quarries near the Nile, where the stone's quality allowed for the creation of monolithic pillars capable of withstanding millennia of exposure. Selection criteria focused on uniform grain structure and absence of fissures, as imperfections could lead to structural failure during extraction, as evidenced by the Unfinished Obelisk, a 42-meter-long block abandoned due to cracks forming in the granite during quarrying around 1500 BCE. Quarrying began with identifying suitable bedrock sites, followed by marking the obelisk's outline on the surface using measurements derived from plans. Workers then excavated parallel trenches along the length and sides by pounding the with dolerite balls—denser stones harder than —to fracture and remove unwanted material, a labor-intensive process that could take months for large monoliths. For the base, undercutting was attempted by continuing to pound beneath the block, but the demonstrates the risks, where internal stresses caused longitudinal cracks before completion, halting work and leaving it as a testament to the precision required. To facilitate splitting along precise lines, ancient quarrymen inserted wooden wedges into pre-cut channels and soaked them with water, causing expansion that exploited natural fissures in the granite. This technique, combined with copper chisels for finer detailing, minimized waste while maximizing the yield from high-quality veins, though experimental replications indicate quarrying rates of approximately 216 cubic centimeters per hour per worker under optimal conditions. The Aswan quarries' proximity to the Nile also aided initial transport logistics, with evidence of ancient canals suggesting floated blocks to reduce overland hauling.

Shaping Techniques

Ancient Egyptian obelisks were shaped primarily at the from monolithic blocks of hard stone, such as red from , to form their characteristic tall, tapered pillars with pyramidal tops. Artisans began by selecting suitable and marking the obelisk's outline on the surface, then excavated trenches along the intended sides and base using dolerite pounders—dense, hard igneous stone balls swung repeatedly to chip away without iron tools. This pounding , evidenced by tool marks on quarry surfaces, allowed precise control over the stone's removal, with workers creating vertical channels up to several meters deep. The in , abandoned during the New Kingdom around 1450 BCE under Queen Hatshepsut, provides direct archaeological insight into the process; its partially carved form shows side trenches averaging 1.5–2 meters deep and a partially undercut base, indicating the monument's intended length of approximately 42 meters and weight exceeding 1,000 tons. To separate the block from the , narrow grooves were cut at the base, into which wooden wedges were inserted and expanded by soaking with water, leveraging the granite's response to hydraulic pressure along natural fissures. Once detached, the obelisk's surfaces were refined through further abrasion: pounders rough-shaped the tapering form, followed by grinding with quartz sand and dolerite or implements to smooth the faces and edges, achieving the precise pyramidalion cap. This labor-intensive finishing, requiring thousands of man-hours, minimized on-site adjustments after transport, as obelisks were typically shipped nearly complete. Softer stones like from other quarries employed similar pounding but supplemented with copper chisels for faster progress.

Transportation and Erection Methods

Obelisks were quarried from Aswan's deposits and moved overland to the on wooden sleds pulled by teams of workers using thick ropes, with an estimated 2,200 laborers required for a 220-ton organized into multiple pulling lines. Techniques likely included twisting ropes around fixed levers for enhanced traction and arranging sleds crosswise to improve maneuverability around turns. Archaeological includes a Middle Kingdom relief in the tomb of Djehutihotep illustrating the transport of a 60-ton colossal on a water-lubricated sledge hauled by 172 men, indicating analogous methods scaled up for obelisks. Riverine transport relied on specialized barges during the annual inundation to ease navigation and support heavy loads, with texts documenting shipments from near to temple sites like . For Queen Hatshepsut's pair of obelisks, erected around 1458 BCE, relief blocks from her Red Chapel at record their quarrying and conveyance over approximately 800 kilometers northward, completed as part of her jubilee celebrations. Similar voyages are attested for obelisks of and Ramses II, emphasizing the pharaohs' mobilization of state resources, including shipbuilders and rowers, to deliver these monuments intact. Erection methods lack direct ancient depictions but are inferred from engineering principles, inscriptions boasting rapid completion, and modern experiments replicating ancient constraints without pulleys or iron tools. One hypothesis involves hauling the horizontal obelisk up a long earthen ramp exceeding its center of gravity, then undercutting the earth to pivot it into a pedestal groove serving as a fulcrum; however, scale models reveal alignment difficulties and excessive material removal needs, rendering it improbable for precision placement. A viable alternative, validated through physical models, uses a counterbalanced : the obelisk base rests in a groove, with a sand-filled on the lever arm gradually lifting the as is removed, requiring diminishing as it approaches verticality—for a 75-foot equivalent weighing 4 pounds, 2.5 pounds of sufficed. Obelisks' frequent paired erection, as with Hatshepsut's 29.6-meter examples at (one standing, the other fallen), may have enabled coordinated leverage or temporary propping between them. Proposals incorporating dry sand's compaction under —placing the obelisk in a filled and extracting sand to induce self-righting—address horizontal positioning before vertical , potentially sequencing with or ramp techniques to minimize rope strain on massive shafts up to 42 meters and 500 tons. Inscriptions, such as those on Hatshepsut's obelisk claiming quarrying in seven months, underscore the feats' logistical demands but omit technical specifics, consistent with elite oversight by overseers like Aneni under . These methods reflect causal efficiencies in manpower and materials, prioritizing reversible earthworks over permanent scaffolds.

Adoption and Adaptation in Other Ancient Cultures

Mesopotamian and Assyrian Obelisks

The adoption of obelisk-like monoliths in occurred primarily during the period, distinct from the earlier tradition of tall, solar-symbolic pillars. examples, emerging in the and Neo-Assyrian eras (c. 14th–7th centuries BCE), were shorter or shafts used for commemorative purposes, featuring narrative reliefs and documenting royal campaigns, hunts, and tribute receptions rather than religious dedications to deities. These structures served as propagandistic tools to legitimize kingship through visual and textual records of power, contrasting with obelisks' emphasis on divine kingship and alignments. A prominent Middle Assyrian example is the White Obelisk, discovered at and dated to the reign of Ashurnasirpal I (c. 1050–1031 BCE), measuring approximately 2.85 meters in height, 0.70 meters in width, and 0.43 meters in depth, carved from white . Its four sides bear incised reliefs depicting the king receiving tribute from foreign delegates, scenes of lion hunts, and ritual offerings, accompanied by inscriptions praising the ruler's victories and piety toward gods like . Scholarly debate persists on its precise attribution, with some attributing it to (883–859 BCE) based on stylistic and contextual similarities to Neo-Assyrian palace art, though paleographic evidence favors the earlier king. In the Neo-Assyrian period, the Rassam Obelisk, excavated at (ancient Kalhu) and erected by around 865 BCE, exemplifies further development, standing roughly 2 meters tall in fragmented form with detailed annals of military conquests in and tribute from subjugated peoples. Carved in black limestone, it features hierarchical reliefs prioritizing the king and deities, underscoring imperial ideology through enumeration of spoils—such as 25,000 prisoners and vast quantities of metals from campaigns—without the tapering pyramidal apex typical of designs. The , another Middle artifact possibly from (c. 1243–1207 BCE), similarly records building projects and divine favor, highlighting a continuity in using these monoliths for state propaganda amid the region's unstable geopolitics. Unlike obelisks, which reached heights exceeding 30 meters and symbolized eternal solar rays, variants remained under 3 meters, prioritizing dense content over monumental scale or astronomical function, reflecting Mesopotamia's clay-based scribal tradition adapted to stone for durability in contexts. No evidence indicates widespread quarrying or transportation feats comparable to Nile-based ; instead, local Tigris-Euphrates sourcing and erection emphasized accessibility for elite audiences. These obelisks declined with the Empire's fall c. 612 BCE, leaving a legacy of stelae that influenced later Near Eastern monumental art.

Roman Appropriation and Relocation

The 's appropriation of obelisks commenced following the conquest of in 30 BCE, with Emperor initiating the practice by transporting two granite obelisks from Heliopolis to in 10 BCE. One, originally dedicated by pharaohs and Ramses II, stood 21.79 meters tall and weighed over 200 tons; it was erected at the spina of the as a marker and symbol of Roman dominion over , later rededicated to the sun god . The second served as the for a massive in the Horologium Augusti, commemorating 's victory and aligning with his birthday on the summer solstice. Subsequent emperors continued this tradition to assert imperial prestige and engineering superiority. In 37 CE, relocated an uninscribed 25.5-meter obelisk weighing 326 tons from to the spina of the Circus Vaticanus, demonstrating logistical feats involving specialized ships for Mediterranean transport and Nile-to-Tiber navigation. commissioned and imported another from Egyptian granite in the late 1st century CE, placing it at the to evoke exotic authority. The most monumental relocation occurred in 357 CE under Constantius II, who shipped the tallest surviving ancient obelisk—32.2 meters high and 455 tons—from Karnak (erected by Thutmose III around 1450 BCE) to the Circus Maximus, fulfilling plans initiated by his father Constantine I. By the early 5th century CE, Romans had imported at least eight Egyptian obelisks, alongside five Roman-crafted imitations, positioning them in circuses, temples, and mausolea to blend Egyptian solar symbolism with Roman imperial ideology. These acts of relocation underscored Rome's absorption of conquered cultures, transforming foreign monuments into emblems of eternal power amid the empire's expansion.

Byzantine and Later Adaptations

The inherited and perpetuated the Roman tradition of employing obelisks as emblems of imperial authority and , prominently featuring them in Constantinople's civic . The exemplifies this continuity: an ancient Egyptian granite monolith commissioned by Pharaoh in the 15th century BC to honor victories in , it was relocated from and erected in the in 390 AD under to celebrate defeats of usurpers and in 388 AD. Originally approximately 30 meters tall, breakage during transport or initial erection efforts reduced its height to about 20 meters, with the structure resting on a Proconnesian base—roughly 7 square meters—adorned with reliefs depicting the , his court, and spectators, alongside Latin and inscriptions attributing the 30-to-32-day erection to (388–392 AD). The base's modifications compensated for the shortened shaft, and an original bronze pinecone finial was lost to wind damage in 869 AD, underscoring practical engineering responses to material challenges in a post-pagan context where solar symbolism yielded to Christian imperial propaganda. A distinct Byzantine appears in the , or Masonry Obelisk, a 32-meter-high constructed in the same , likely originating as a 5th-century Theodosian counterpart to the Egyptian import but substantially rebuilt in the , possibly under Porphyrogenitus or to honor Basil I's victories (r. 867–886 AD). Unlike monolithic predecessors, this adaptation employed a stone core sheathed in gilded bronze plates embossed with battle scenes, enabling scalable commemoration without reliance on scarce quarried and enhancing durability against earthquakes prevalent in the region. Positioned to demarcate the track's turning point alongside the and Theodosius Obelisk, it facilitated public viewing of imperial achievements during chariot races, adapting the form for multifunctional urban symbolism that integrated engineering realism with historical prestige. These structures persisted into later periods, preserved after the conquest, where they informed Islamic rulers' appreciation of antique grandeur without significant reconfiguration, bridging Byzantine maintenance practices into early modern contexts. The approach influenced subsequent non-monolithic pyramidal monuments in and the , prioritizing causal stability over exact replication amid evolving material availability and seismic risks, though primary adaptations remained confined to the Eastern Mediterranean's inherited Roman-Byzantine framework.

Obelisks Beyond Antiquity

Presence in Pre-Columbian Americas and Similar Structures

The Tello Obelisk, discovered in 1919 by archaeologist Julio C. Tello at the site in north-central , represents the sole prominent example of an obelisk-like in Pre-Columbian . Dating to the Early Horizon period (circa 900–200 BCE) of the , this structure stands 2.52 meters tall with a four-sided prismatic form that tapers slightly from a base girth of approximately 1 meter to 0.87 meters toward the upper portion. All four faces feature intricate bas-relief carvings depicting a central (crocodilian) figure intertwined with symbolic motifs, including bands of serrated teeth, feline heads, avian elements, and vegetative patterns, interpreted as elements of Chavín cosmology and shamanistic rather than royal dedications or solar symbolism akin to prototypes. The , originally positioned within the temple complex's galleries, likely served a or totemic function, reflecting the Chavín horizon's emphasis on hybrid mythical beings and centers, though its precise erection method—potentially involving local quarrying and leverage techniques—remains inferred from site evidence without direct analogs to engineering. In , no monolithic tapered obelisks equivalent to the ian or Tello forms have been identified; instead, cultures such as the and their predecessors erected tall, upright stelae—flat, rectangular slabs often exceeding 3 meters in height and intricately carved with glyphs, rulers' portraits, and astronomical data. These monuments, prominent from the Preclassic period (circa 2000 BCE–250 CE) onward at sites like in or , functioned for commemorative, calendrical, and propagandistic purposes, sometimes placed in pairs flanking plazas or stairways, evoking superficial parallels to obelisk pairs at temple entrances but differing fundamentally in their slab-like profile, lack of tapering, and composite construction from quarried blocks rather than single stones. Olmec and later Zapotec examples, such as colossal heads or freestanding altars, further diverge, prioritizing rounded or blocky forms over vertical, pyramidal-topped pillars. The absence of true obelisks across the underscores independent architectural evolutions driven by local materials, cosmologies, and labor systems, with no archaeological evidence supporting transoceanic influence from or the . Similar columnar or phallic monuments appear sporadically in Andean contexts beyond Chavín, such as tenon-heads or ushnu platforms, but these lack the Tello's unified tapering design and inscribed permanence.

Relocation to Modern Cities

During the 19th century, Egyptian rulers under the Muhammad Ali dynasty gifted several ancient obelisks to Western powers as diplomatic gestures to foster alliances and showcase Egypt's heritage amid modernization efforts. These relocations involved significant engineering feats, including overland and maritime transport, reflecting the era's imperial interests in Egyptian antiquities. The Luxor Obelisk, carved from red granite circa 1250 BCE during the reign of and originally paired at , was offered by Muhammad Ali Pasha to France in 1831 following the July Monarchy's ascension. Shipped via the and Mediterranean in 1833 aboard a custom vessel, it reached and was erected at on October 25, 1836, by engineer Apollinaire Lebas using ramps, capstans, and ; the operation cost about 2.5 million francs, precluding relocation of its mate. In 1877, Ismail presented an obelisk from Heliopolis—erected by around 1450 BCE and later moved to —to , arriving in 1878 after a voyage on the Olga that claimed six lives amid storms. Erected on the in 1878 with electric lighting added, it commemorates Anglo-Egyptian ties. Its twin obelisk, similarly from 's era, was gifted to the in 1880 by the same . Transported by Lieutenant Commander Henry H. Gorringe on the steamship Dessoug with iron caissons for protection, it was installed in , , on January 22, 1881, weighing 220 tons and standing 69 feet tall. These three obelisks—Paris, , and —represent the last major relocations of ancient Egyptian monuments to modern cities, driven by 19th-century Egyptian diplomacy rather than conquest, with subsequent preservation emphasizing their historical integrity over further movement.

Preservation Efforts and Recent Findings

Preservation efforts for ancient Egyptian obelisks have focused on both in-situ protection at temple complexes and conservation of relocated examples in museums and urban settings. At in , ongoing assessments address and affecting monument blocks, including obelisk bases, through material analysis and stabilization techniques as documented in recent geological studies. The in Quarry remains anchored in bedrock as a protected , illustrating ancient quarrying failures while preserved against modern erosion via site management by Egyptian authorities. For relocated obelisks, the conducted the most extensive conservation of Cleopatra's Needle—a 3,500-year-old obelisk—between 2011 and 2014, involving laser cleaning of its 2,112-square-foot surface to remove centuries of grime and pollutants, alongside adhesive stabilization of fractures and the first complete survey. In , a broken Ramses II obelisk from was restored and re-erected in 2022 at the Grand Egyptian Museum's entrance on an elevated steel frame with seismic isolators, enabling visibility of its base while mitigating salt damage and microfractures through modern engineering. Recent findings include the 2021 detection of seven crypto-hieroglyphs on the Luxor Obelisk in ' , identified by Egyptologist Jean-Guillaume Olette-Pelletier during scaffolding; these encoded texts use puns and atypical reading directions to propagate Ramses II's divine kingship and offerings to , revealing sophisticated propagandistic elements in New Kingdom monumental inscriptions. Such discoveries, pending full publication in specialized journals, underscore the layered complexity of hieroglyphic encoding beyond overt carvings, informed by direct examination rather than prior transcriptions.

Modern Obelisks

Commemorative and National Monuments

The obelisk form, revived in the , became a popular choice for commemorating national figures and events due to its ancient associations with monumental permanence and power. Architects drew on precedents to symbolize enduring legacy, often scaling up the design for civic pride. This adaptation reflected Enlightenment-era fascination with while serving modern nationalist purposes, such as honoring military leaders or independence struggles. The in , exemplifies this trend, constructed from 1848 to 1884 as a hollow masonry obelisk reaching 555 feet (169 meters) in height, dedicated to for his roles in the and as first U.S. president. Designed by Robert Mills, it was the world's tallest masonry structure upon completion, funded by public subscriptions and federal appropriations despite interruptions from funding shortages and the . Its aluminum capstone, inscribed "Laus Deo" (Praise be to God), underscores the era's blend of civic reverence and religious sentiment. In , the Wellington Monument in Dublin's , an 62-meter granite obelisk designed by Robert Smirke, was initiated in 1817 to honor Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington, for his military victories including , with completion delayed until 1861 due to design changes and funding issues. Similarly, the in , a 567-foot (173-meter) column dedicated in 1939, commemorates the 1836 that secured Texan independence from , standing as the world's tallest column. Constructed of concrete-encased steel with a star-topped obelisk form, it was funded by and private donations to evoke resilience and victory. The , erected in 1936 from to a height of 67.5 meters, marks the fourth centenary of the city's first founding by in 1536, with its four faces inscribed to represent key historical phases including the second founding in 1580 and declarations. Built in just 31 days under architect Alberto Prebisch, it symbolizes urban endurance amid Argentina's growing . These structures demonstrate the obelisk's versatility in 19th- and 20th-century contexts, prioritizing verticality and inscription for memory over ancient religious functions.

Architectural and Symbolic Uses

In modern , obelisks function as decorative elements that punctuate vistas, mark focal points, and enhance spatial organization in gardens and public spaces. Often constructed from materials like , , or , they are positioned at the termini of circulation routes or elevated sites to draw the eye and provide vantage points, a practice rooted in 18th- and 19th-century pleasure gardens but persisting in contemporary designs such as romantic parks and cemeteries. For instance, smaller-scale obelisks serve as garden ornaments, supporting climbing plants or standing alone to create vertical emphasis amid horizontal plantings. Beyond landscapes, obelisks appear in scaled-down forms as architectural accents, including pinnacles on buildings or sculptural integrations that evoke historical grandeur without the monolithic scale of ancient prototypes. In 20th-century proposals, such as the 1922 Chicago Tribune Tower competition, obelisk-inspired towers were suggested for their tapered profiles, which combine structural efficiency with symbolic height. Modern iterations, often assembled from multiple stones rather than single quarried blocks, prioritize aesthetic durability over ancient engineering feats, appearing in urban plazas or as subtle motifs in postmodern facades to reference antiquity. Symbolically, contemporary obelisks retain associations with ancient solar worship, representing rays of , regeneration, and eternal stability due to their tapering form rising toward the . In architectural contexts, they evoke republican virtues, heroism, and , frequently linked to Freemasonic iconography that interprets the form as a emblem of and moral uprightness. This verticality symbolizes human aspiration and defiance of , channeling a sense of power and continuity across eras, though some 20th-century analyses attribute phallic connotations to the shape, as noted in psychoanalytic interpretations by figures like Freud. Such uses underscore obelisks' role in imbuing modern structures with layered historical and metaphysical resonance, distinct from purely commemorative intent.

Experimental Reconstructions and Modern Engineering Tests

Experimental archaeology has demonstrated the feasibility of quarrying obelisks using stone tools prevalent in . In experiments conducted near the in in August 2022, researchers used dolerite pounders to quarry , achieving a removal rate of 216 cubic centimeters per hour at 85 strikes per minute, indicating that such methods could produce the trenches observed in ancient quarries over extended periods with teams of workers. Earlier tests by Denys Stocks in utilized flint chisels and punches to incise hieroglyphs into blocks, replicating marks found on ancient monuments and confirming the efficacy of percussive techniques without metal tools. These reconstructions align with evidence from the , where parallel trenches and scoop-like marks suggest systematic pounding and splitting using wooden wedges swollen with water to exploit natural fissures. Transportation simulations have validated ancient methods for moving obelisks over land and . 1990s experiments loaded a scaled obelisk onto a , demonstrating stability and capacity for River voyages, as quarried in could be floated downstream to sites like or Heliopolis during flood seasons. Overland transport likely employed rollers, sledges lubricated with or , and teams of laborers, with archaeological depictions and ramps supporting pulls of up to 40 tons using human and possibly animal power, though full-scale obelisk hauls remain untested due to logistical constraints. Erection experiments underscore the use of levers, ramps, and counterweights in raising obelisks. In a 1999 reconstruction, a 25-ton obelisk was pivoted upright using wooden levers inserted into a trench and rocked incrementally with ropes and counterpoise weights, succeeding where initial ramp attempts failed due to . Stocks' related trials with tools and abrasives further showed precise shaping of bases for stability, while modern pull-out tests on anchors mimic ancient fixations with metal clamps and lead pouring to secure bases against seismic forces. These tests collectively affirm that engineering, leveraging , , and organized labor, sufficed for erecting monuments up to 42 meters tall without evidence requiring lost advanced technologies.

Controversies and Interpretations

Fringe Theories on Origins and Construction

Proponents of ancient astronaut theory contend that the monumental scale and engineering precision of Egyptian obelisks, such as the 455-metric-ton quarried around 1400 BCE, imply technological capabilities beyond those of societies, necessitating assistance in their creation and erection. Erich von Däniken's foundational work in this paradigm, popularized through his 1968 book Chariots of the Gods?, extends to Egyptian megaliths generally, suggesting that structures like obelisks were feats enabled by alien visitors who imparted advanced knowledge or directly intervened in construction processes. The series amplifies this by proposing obelisks as commemorative markers of contact, with their tapered, pointed forms symbolizing spacecraft or beacons left by "gods" from the stars. A specific variant within these theories posits obelisks as functional devices for rather than mere symbols. In the episode "The Power of the Obelisks" of , contributors hypothesize that the monuments served as antennas or transceivers, enabling ancient to interface with entities interpreted as their deities, leveraging the obelisks' height and conductive composition to transmit signals across vast distances. This view aligns with broader claims of obelisks encoding directives, drawing on perceived alignments with bodies, though such interpretations rely on selective iconographic without supporting physical artifacts. Alternative fringe hypotheses reframe obelisks as components of an advanced energy infrastructure, exploiting the piezoelectric properties of quartz-rich to generate under mechanical stress. Theorists like Christopher Dunn, in extensions of his analysis of Giza's , suggest obelisks acted as energy conductors or resonators in a , potentially linked to pyramidal generators for harnessing atmospheric or telluric currents. Some proponents further speculate they functioned as frequency antennas from a pre-Egyptian lost civilization, such as , transmitting etheric or ionic energy across continents, with their placement near temples indicating ritualistic activation sites. These ideas, circulated in alternative history forums and , invoke unverified mechanisms like sonic for transport but overlook inscriptions and marks evidencing human labor.

Empirical Debunkings and Human Ingenuity Evidence

Archaeological examination of the unfinished obelisk in Aswan's granite quarries reveals tool marks from dolerite pounders, confirming that ancient Egyptians extracted monolithic granite by repeatedly striking the stone to create fissures and channels. This 42-meter-long, approximately 1,200-ton structure, abandoned during the reign of Hatshepsut around 1500 BCE due to cracks, preserves ochre guidelines and worker inscriptions that align with known New Kingdom practices. Photogrammetric analysis of similar quarrying experiments demonstrates a removal rate of 216 cubic centimeters per hour per worker using these pounding techniques, underscoring the feasibility of human labor over extended periods with organized teams. Evidence from completed obelisks, such as those at , shows precise shaping with chisels hardened by heat and abrasives like , followed by polishing with finer stones—methods replicated in modern archaeological tests without requiring hypothetical advanced technologies. Transportation logs from records indicate obelisks were floated on barges during flood seasons, with capacities for loads exceeding 1,000 tons, as corroborated by depictions on walls and harbor remains. involved earthen ramps for positioning and systems or controlled removal for uprighting, as experimentally verified in reconstructions where teams raised scaled models using ropes, wooden beams, and counterweights akin to those found in Egyptian sites. These techniques reflect sophisticated human engineering, supported by the remains of worker villages like , where over 5,000 skilled laborers lived with evidence of tool production and administrative oversight during the 18th Dynasty. Inscriptions praising pharaohs for mobilizing resources highlight state-directed ingenuity, with no empirical gaps necessitating or lost-civilization hypotheses; instead, incremental innovations in quarrying and explain the 29 surviving ancient obelisks. Recent restorations, such as the 2023 re-erection of a Ramses II obelisk using period-appropriate methods, further affirm the efficacy of these approaches in achieving vertical stability on pedestals.

References

  1. [1]
    Egyptian Obelisk - World History Encyclopedia
    Nov 6, 2016 · An obelisk is a stone rectangular pillar with a tapered top forming a pyramidion, set on a base, erected to commemorate an individual or event and honor the ...<|separator|>
  2. [2]
    The obelisk is an ancient Egyptian architectural feat. So why are so ...
    Sep 5, 2024 · Originally erected in honor of the sun god Re, the obelisk quickly caught on in Egypt and beyond, treasured as a spoil of war, a gift between ...
  3. [3]
    The Obelisks of Ancient Egypt - Pharaoh.se
    Obelisks meaning "pointed pillar" are tall four-sided monuments with a pyramid-like shape or pyramidion at the apex, quarried in one piece from a single ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  4. [4]
    Obelisk Definition & Origin - Egypt Tours Portal
    Feb 4, 2024 · An obelisk is simply a stone rectangular pillar with a tapered top forming a pyramid to commemorate an individual, an event, or honor the ancient gods.The Definition & Symbolism of... · The Largest Ancient Egyptian...
  5. [5]
    Obelisks in ancient Egypt - University College London
    The surviving giant monolithic obelisks range in height from 9 to 32 metres. The tip of the obelisk might be covered in shining metal - gold or the gold-silver ...Missing: dimensions | Show results with:dimensions
  6. [6]
    7 Fascinating Facts About Obelisks - Mental Floss
    Jan 20, 2016 · True obelisks as conceived by the ancient Egyptians are “monolithic,” or made from a single piece of stone. (The literal translation of monolith ...
  7. [7]
    Obelisk - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Obelisk, from Greek obeliskos via Latin and French, means a tapering stone column with a pyramidal top; originally a small spit or pointed pillar, also a ...
  8. [8]
    obelisk - Wiktionary, the free dictionary
    From Middle French obelisque, from Latin obeliscus (“obelisk”), from Ancient Greek ὀβελίσκος (obelískos), diminutive of ὀβελός (obelós, “needle”). Compare ...English · Etymology · References · Polish
  9. [9]
    obelisk, obelus | Sesquiotica
    May 30, 2012 · It comes from Greek ὀβελίσκος obeliskos “small spit” (as in for roasting). That's a diminutive of ὀβελός obelos. It may seem interesting enough ...
  10. [10]
    Obelisk - History of Early American Landscape Design
    Aug 12, 2021 · The term obelisk was used in the American colonies and early Republic to refer to a slender shaft or pillar with four faces that diminished in ...
  11. [11]
    Obelisks and ancient Rome - Smarthistory
    Apr 12, 2022 · Egyptians had invented obelisks during the Old Kingdom period (c. 2649–2150 B.C.E.). Rulers typically dedicated these prestigious pillars to ...Missing: earliest | Show results with:earliest
  12. [12]
    The History of Egyptian Obelisks - Michael Fassbender
    Obelisks, linked to the solar cult of Ra, were first built in the Fifth Dynasty, with classical proportions in the Sixth. They were cut from granite and ...
  13. [13]
  14. [14]
    What is the Oldest Preserved Obelisk? - Historicaleve -
    Aug 19, 2023 · The oldest surviving obelisk, dating to the reign of Senusret I (1918-1875 BC), is located in Heliopolis, Cairo.<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Remarks on Kushite Temples Dated to the Napatan-Meroitic Period
    Representation of the Amon Temple at Jebel Barkal (Napata). jebel barkal ... 7 Remains of an obelisk, symbol of the sun god, have been found in the sanctuary.
  16. [16]
    Obelisks in the Nubian Museum
    Five (5) obelisks exists in the Nubian Museum, officially named as the International Museum of Nubia, where is in Aswan, Upper Egypt.
  17. [17]
    [PDF] EXCAVATIONS BETWEEN ABU SIMBEL AND THE SUDAN ...
    or describe the relations between Meroitic Lower Nubia and Meroe, Egypt, and the adjacent deserts. ... At Abri, one tomb contained two obelisks used as blocking.
  18. [18]
    Obelisk | Ancient Egyptian Monument & Symbolism | Britannica
    An obelisk is a tapered, monolithic pillar, usually red granite, wider at the base, with a pyramidal top, often with hieroglyphs.
  19. [19]
    The Unfinished Obelisk - Discover Egypt's Monuments
    ... pyramidion to reflect the sun's rays. Obelisks are associated with solar mythology, representing the benben, or first land to come into existence at the ...
  20. [20]
    Power of the Obelisk - Digging up Ancient Aliens!
    Nov 27, 2023 · The origin of the Obelisk is a bit murky, and the earliest record of them being used is way back in the fourth dynasty. The Obelisk had a square ...
  21. [21]
  22. [22]
    Obelisk of Hatshepsut at Karnak - Pharaoh.se
    The inscription reads: The king himself; erection of two great obelisks for her sic father, Amon-Ra, in front of the august colonnade, wrought with exceedingly ...Missing: commemorative | Show results with:commemorative
  23. [23]
    Hatshepsut's obelisks at Karnak: Commemorating a sed-festival
    This article discusses an additional text inscribed on the bases of Hatshepsut's obelisks and outlines why it is an important source for the study of Hatshepsut ...
  24. [24]
    Scarab Commemorating Two Obelisks of Thutmose III - New Kingdom
    The inscription on this scarab, "Menkheperre, whose two obelisks endure in the temple of Amun," seems likely to commemorate the placement of the first pair.
  25. [25]
    The Obelisks of Egypt: Skyscrapers of the Past. By Labib Habachi.
    at least one obelisk at Abusir of red granite from Aswan and obelisks appear to have decorated private funerary monu- ments during Dynasty VI. Habachi maintains ...Missing: functions | Show results with:functions
  26. [26]
    Mythical Benben Stone: The Landing Site of Egyptian God Atum
    Aug 24, 2016 · Apart from being the name of a cult object, the Benben stone is also used to describe a type of ancient Egyptian architectural element.
  27. [27]
    The Digital Library Of Inscriptions and Calligraphies - Hatshepsut ...
    Queen Hatshepsut erected four obelisks in the temple of Amun at Karnak, two of which have disappeared entirely. Of the remaining pair, the northern one still ...
  28. [28]
    Thutmose III Obelisk
    The inscriptions of this obelisk beautifully remain on all four sides, and the typeface is also neat. The horus name and coronation name of Thutmose III are ...Missing: London | Show results with:London
  29. [29]
    Obelisk of Theodosius - Madain Project (en)
    The Obelisk of Theodosius (Turkish: Dikilitaş) is the Ancient Egyptian obelisk of Pharaoh Thutmose III re-erected in the Hippodrome of Constantinople (known ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Granite quarry survey in the Aswan region, Egypt
    The most widely used type is the Aswan red or pink granite, which is essentially coarse grained to very coarse grained, In the QuarryScapes project, a detailed ...
  31. [31]
    Explore Unfinished Obelisk Facts, History, & Architecture
    Jun 11, 2025 · Obelisks were associated with the sun god Ra and symbolized a connection between the earthly realm and the divine. Often placed at the entrances ...
  32. [32]
    The Unfinished Obelisk in Aswan - Inside Egypt
    Ancient Egyptians employed several techniques to carve obelisks from granite. The process began with selecting a suitable granite bedrock, and then workers used ...
  33. [33]
    Aswan obelisk quarry more than meets the eye | Penn State University
    Oct 16, 2007 · – The unfinished Obelisk Quarry in Aswan, Egypt, has a canal that may have connected to the Nile and allowed the large stone monuments to float ...
  34. [34]
    Constructing an Obelisk: How the True Rocks of Eternity were Made
    Sep 3, 2017 · Obelisks were made from red granite, carved using copper tools and water-soaked wooden wedges. They were transported by barge and inserted into ...
  35. [35]
    Photogrammetric measurement of the speed of quarrying granite ...
    ... quarrying technique in the area near the Unfinished Obelisk in Aswan, Egypt. The experiment resulted in determining a quarrying speed of 216 cm3/h with 85 ...
  36. [36]
    Quarrying in Ancient Egypt | Middle East And North Africa
    Vertical trenches were first cut along the back and two lateral sides of an intended block, and then the block's open front face was undercut to complete the ...QUARRYING IN ANCIENT... · Quarrying Technology and...
  37. [37]
    The Unfinished Obelisk | Aswan Obelisk - Egypt Time Travel
    Sep 6, 2020 · The unfinished obelisk is a rare opportunity to consider this complex process and the difficulty of shaping the large stone blocks that were part of most of ...
  38. [38]
    Unfinished Obelisk | Aswan Attraction - Flying Carpet Tours
    Sep 11, 2023 · The quarrying process involved cutting channels into the rock surface and then using wooden wedges to split the stone along the desired lines.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    How Did They Do it? New Insights on the Ancient Obelisk ...
    Sep 24, 2023 · Their transportation generally involved a journey by land from the quarry to a dock, where they would be loaded onto a suitable ship that would ...
  40. [40]
    (PDF) The Obelisks of Hatshepsut: Legitimacy and Propaganda.
    There is also a record of the transport of two obelisks from Aswan to Karnak.15 Finally, Hatshepsut ordained the erection of four obelisks in the temple of ...
  41. [41]
    NOVA Online | Mysteries of the Nile | March 19, 1999: Gifts of the River
    Mar 19, 1999 · Aneni, an high official under Tuthmosis I who saw to the erection of his two obelisks at Karnak, claimed in his tomb that he "built the 'august' ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Ancient Egyptian Methods of Raising Weights
    The obelisk was pulled up a long, sloping embankment until it was at a height well above that of its balancing-point or center of gravity; earth was cut from ...
  43. [43]
    [PDF] Obelisks and the Power of Monument - DigitalCommons@Providence
    Jun 16, 2023 · Egyptian symbolism of the obelisk apart from Augustus' propagandic framing. Augustus' obelisk at the Circus Maximus was one of the only ...<|separator|>
  44. [44]
    The Transport and Erection of Large Egyptian Obelisks - jstor
    The first method would employ a particular type of sand as an active force to move these large horizontal obelisks to their final elevated destination. Then.
  45. [45]
    (PDF) On the Origin of the Middle Assyrian Obelisks - Academia.edu
    The paper investigates the origins and significance of Middle Assyrian obelisks, particularly focusing on the Broken Obelisk and the White Obelisk ...
  46. [46]
    The White Obelisk and the Problem of Historical Narrative in the Art ...
    The limestone slabs carved with reliefs that lined the walls of the Assyrian royal palaces are among the most admired works of ancient Near Eastern art.
  47. [47]
    The White Obelisk of Ashurnasirpal I - World History et cetera
    Feb 16, 2017 · The obelisk was made of white limestone. It has a height of 285 centimetres, a width of 70.48 centimetres, and a depth of 42.54 centimetres. It ...
  48. [48]
    The White Obelisk - Google Arts & Culture
    The name of a king, Ashurnasirpal, is mentioned, but there is debate among scholars whether this refers to Ashurnasirpal I (1050-1031 BC) or II (883-859 BC).Missing: obelisks | Show results with:obelisks<|separator|>
  49. [49]
    obelisk | British Museum
    This object was first ascribed to the reign of the Assyrian king Ashurnasirpal II ... Reade 1975a / Ashurnasirpal I and the White Obelisk · Sollberger 1974a ...
  50. [50]
    THE RASSAM OBELISK - Cambridge University Press & Assessment
    The fragmentary obelisk of Ashurnasirpal II published here, in an entirely new reconstruction, was excavated at Nimrud by a British Museum expedition in ...
  51. [51]
  52. [52]
    Ancient Egyptian Obelisks in Rome & Beyond - Archaeology Travel
    Ancient Obelisks in Other Cities Around the World · Arles Obelisk · Boboli Gardens · Cleopatra's Needle, London · Cleopatra's Needle, New York City · Luxor Obelisk, ...
  53. [53]
    Lateran Obelisk - Smarthistory
    Lateran Obelisk, c. 1400 B.C.E., originally erected at the temple of Amun, Karnak by Thutmose III and Thutmose IV at a height of 32 meters; now roughly 4 ...
  54. [54]
    NOVA Online | Mysteries of the Nile | A World of Obelisks: Rome - PBS
    Location: Piazza S. Giovanni, Laterano, Rome, Italy Pharaoh: Tuthmosis III (reigned 1504-1450 BC) Height: 105.6 feet Weight: 455 tons
  55. [55]
    Obelisk of Theodosius - The Byzantine Legacy
    It was originally commissioned by the Egyptian Pharaoh Tuthmosis III in the 15th century BC to commemorate his victories in Syria.Missing: London | Show results with:London
  56. [56]
    Constantinople, Hippodrome, Second Obelisk - Livius.org
    Aug 10, 2020 · It was decorated with plates of gilded bronze, embossed with representations of the victories of the emperor Basilius I the Macedonian (r.867- ...<|separator|>
  57. [57]
    Masonry Obelisk - The Byzantine Legacy
    An obelisk erected by Augustus in the Circus Maximus in 10 BC was among the first obelisks brought to Rome. Other obelisks, including the Vatican Obelisk, were ...
  58. [58]
    Obelisks and Columns of Sultanahmet Square - Deraliye Terrace
    Sultanahmet Square is home to three important buildings from the Roman and Byzantine periods: Theodosius Obelisk, the Serpent Column and the Walled Obelisk.
  59. [59]
    Roman Obelisks - The Byzantine Legacy
    An Egyptian obelisk, which is a tall, four-sided, narrow tapering monolithic stone shaft surmounted by a pyramidion, were usually made from the reddish Aswan ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  60. [60]
    The Tello Obelisk, a Chavín de Huantár Sculpture - James Q. Jacobs
    The full girth at the base is near 1 m, and the form uniformly tapers to about 0.87 m in girth at the notch. All four sides or faces are sculpted in bas-relief ...
  61. [61]
    Tello obelisk | archaeology - Britannica
    ... Tello obelisk, a rectangular pillar carved in low relief to represent a caiman and covered with Chavín symbolic carvings, such as bands of teeth and animal
  62. [62]
    Moving Ancient Egyptian Obelisks | Art & Object
    Oct 16, 2020 · Whether by accident or vandalism, most obelisks were thrown down in the centuries after the end of the Roman Empire, to be later excavated and ...
  63. [63]
    The Luxor Obelisks - World History Edu
    Dec 14, 2024 · In 1836, it was erected at Place de la Concorde, a politically symbolic location in Paris, by King Louis-Philippe. This relocation project cost ...<|separator|>
  64. [64]
    The Luxor Obelisk on the Place de la Concorde in Paris
    The cost of relocating the obelisk to Paris was 2.5 million Francs at the time, a sum not available for a second operation. Although largely a symbolic gesture ...Missing: 1836 | Show results with:1836
  65. [65]
    How Cleopatra's Needle came to London
    Cleopatra's Needle is an ancient Egyptian obelisk that was shipped to London in the 1800s. It sits on the Thames Embankment with two brass sphinxes.Missing: relocation | Show results with:relocation
  66. [66]
    Obelisk (Cleopatra's Needle) - Central Park Conservancy
    The Obelisk was created around 1425 BCE in Heliopolis, Egypt, an area north of modern-day Cairo. It sits on a rocky hill known as Greywacke Knoll, across from ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  67. [67]
    How "Cleopatra's Needle" Was Brought to America | Proceedings
    Records show that the New York and London obelisks were erected in front of the Caesareum or Temple of the Caesars. Both were known as “Cleopatra's Needle” in ...
  68. [68]
    Conservation Assessment of the Stone Blocks in the Northeast ...
    Aug 30, 2024 · The main construction material of Karnak monuments is sandstone with high porosity, especially for the stone blocks in the northeast corner.<|control11|><|separator|>
  69. [69]
    Obelisk Conservation - Central Park Conservancy
    The Conservancy completed the most comprehensive conservation of the Egyptian Obelisk in its 3,500-year history, cleaning its surface with lasers and ...
  70. [70]
    The restoration and erection of the world's first elevated obelisk
    Feb 4, 2023 · This research is concerned with the re-erection of an obelisk that belongs to the famous Pharoah Ramses II. It was found broken and was ...
  71. [71]
    Hidden messages praising Pharaoh Ramesses II discovered on ...
    May 3, 2025 · A French Egyptologist has uncovered hidden messages on Paris's Luxor Obelisk, revealing secret hieroglyphic propaganda praising Ramses II.
  72. [72]
    History & Culture - Washington Monument (U.S. National Park Service)
    Built in the shape of an Egyptian obelisk, evoking the timelessness of ancient civilizations, the Washington Monument embodies the awe, respect, and gratitude ...
  73. [73]
    Washington Monument completed | December 6, 1884 - History.com
    On December 6, 1884, in Washington, DC, workers place a nine-inch aluminum pyramid inscribed with "Laus Deo," meaning praise (be) to God, atop a tower of white ...
  74. [74]
    Wellington Monument, Phoenix Park, CHAPELIZOD, Dublin 8 ...
    Freestanding granite obelisk, 62 metres tall, designed by Sir Robert Smirke as testimonial to Arthur Wellesley, Duke of Wellington. Foundation stone laid 1817, ...
  75. [75]
    San Jacinto Battlefield Monument
    The world's tallest war memorial stands at San Jacinto, honoring all those who fought for Texas's independence.Bigger In Texas · Design And Construction · Grand Opening
  76. [76]
    The obelisk | Official English Website for the City of Buenos Aires
    The monument itself was erected in 1936 to commemorate the fourth centenary of the first foundation of Buenos Aires by Pedro de Mendoza in 1536, and it marks ...
  77. [77]
    Buenos Aires' Obelisk: Yesterday and Today - Wander Argentina
    Made from Cordoba white stone and thrust up in just 31 days, the four sides of the 220-foot shaft each represent defining moments in the history of Buenos Aires ...
  78. [78]
  79. [79]
    Obelisks in the Landscape, from Ancient Egypt to Modern Times
    In modern European art, obelisks were adopted as one of the forms of commemorative monuments, and in smaller proportions as a decorative element in architecture ...Missing: adaptations | Show results with:adaptations
  80. [80]
    The 20th-Century Obelisk, From Imperialist Icon to Phallic Symbol
    Dec 16, 2019 · The obelisks are usually advertised as effective at dispelling negative forces, such as “trapped energy, which could cause destruction like ...
  81. [81]
    Towering Obelisks Are Everywhere. Here's Why They're So Awe ...
    The Luxor Obelisks are ancient Egyptian obelisks that stood on either side of the Luxor Temple during the reign of Ramesses II. The left-hand obelisk remains ...
  82. [82]
    The Origin of the Obelisk - On Verticality
    Dec 14, 2022 · Ancient Egyptian obelisks can be seen as an evolution of the megalith, which is an upright stone placed on the surface of the earth. These ...
  83. [83]
    Experiments in Egyptian archaeology: Stoneworking technology in ...
    In this fresh and engaging volume, Denys A. Stocks examines the archaeological and pictorial evidence for masonry in ancient Egypt.
  84. [84]
    NOVA Online | Secrets of Lost Empires | Pharaoh's Obelisk | Slide 5
    As a young man, Denys Stocks was obsessed with the Egyptians. For the past 20 years, this ancient-tools specialist has been recreating tools the Egyptians ...
  85. [85]
    How Obelisks Were Constructed, Moved, Shaped, and Erected in ...
    Due to the religious or aesthetic reason obelisks were originally erected “in pairs” at the entrance of ancient Egyptian temple, except the single “Lateran” ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  86. [86]
    Watch Ancient Aliens Season 19 Episode 4 | HISTORY Channel
    Feb 3, 2023 · The towering obelisks of ancient Egypt weigh hundreds of tons and ... Ancient Aliens. New Episodes Thursdays 8/7c; Stream Next Day. about ...Missing: theory | Show results with:theory
  87. [87]
    s19e04 - The Power of the Obelisks - Ancient Aliens Transcript - TvT
    Feb 4, 2023 · Could it be that the obelisks were alien communication devices, allowing the ancient Egyptians to make contact with their extraterrestrial gods?
  88. [88]
    [PDF] The Giza Power Plant Technologies Of Ancient Egypt Christopher ...
    Dunn believes materials like granite, known for their piezoelectric properties, were chosen intentionally to facilitate energy generation or transmission within ...
  89. [89]
  90. [90]
    Obelisks and the Theory of Wireless Energy Reception
    Sep 18, 2023 · One theory is that obelisks were used as receivers for wireless energy in ways that were lost with the Atlanteans.
  91. [91]
    Raising an Obelisk: An Engineering Puzzle - PBS LearningMedia
    Jan 15, 2016 · In this NOVA video, two teams test out two theories put forth by archaeologists to explain how ancient Egyptians might have raised massive obelisks to stable, ...Missing: construction methods
  92. [92]
    How Obelisks Were Constructed, Moved, Shaped, and Erected in ...
    Aug 6, 2025 · (PDF) How Obelisks Were Constructed, Moved, Shaped, and Erected in the Ancient Egypt.<|separator|>