Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Old Great Bulgaria

Old Great Bulgaria, also known as Kubrat's Bulgaria, was a 7th-century located in the Pontic-Caspian steppe, encompassing the region north of the , around the , and extending between the and rivers. It was founded by the khagan , who united various semi-nomadic Bulgar tribes, primarily the (Unogundurs), along with , , Sabirs, and other groups of mixed Turkic and Iranian origins, forming a multi-ethnic confederation centered at . The state emerged around 632 as Kubrat broke away from the collapsing , establishing independence through military prowess and diplomatic ties with the , where Kubrat himself had been raised, baptized as a Christian, and honored as a patrician. During its brief existence, Old Great Bulgaria functioned as a powerful entity, with maintaining neutrality in regional conflicts such as invasions of Byzantine territories while fostering alliances that ensured its stability against neighboring powers like the . The khaganate's society was organized around tribal aristocracy and nomadic warfare, with archaeological evidence from sites like the Pereshchepina treasure indicating a blend of steppe nomadic culture, including artificial deformation and interactions with Sarmatian and Alan influences. Following 's death in the mid-7th century, as described by Byzantine chronicler , the realm fragmented into five successor states under his sons—Batbay, Kotrag, , , and Asparuh—due to internal divisions and external pressures from the rising Khazar Khaganate, leading to the dispersal of Bulgar groups across . This dissolution marked the end of Old Great Bulgaria as a unified entity, but its legacy endured through the migrations of its peoples, notably Asparuh's establishment of the on the Lower in 681 after defeating Byzantine forces, which laid the foundations for the medieval Bulgarian state.

Historical Background

Bulgar Tribes and Origins

The Bulgars were a Turkic-speaking nomadic confederation that originated in Central Asia, specifically in the regions of Mongolia and southern Siberia during the 4th and 5th centuries CE, as part of the broader Oguric branch of Turkic peoples with proto-Turkic linguistic and cultural roots. Their ethnogenesis involved a mix of Mongoloid and Europoid elements, shaped by interactions with earlier steppe groups like the Huns and the Tiele (T'ieh-le) confederation, leading to a semi-nomadic warrior society focused on equestrian warfare and pastoralism. Key subgroups included the Onogurs, who settled in the Pontic steppe around 463 CE and were known for fur trade activities near the Volga and Crimea; the Kutrigurs, positioned west of the Don River; and the Utigurs, located east of the Sea of Azov, all of which were interconnected and often identified collectively with the Bulgars in historical records. In the 5th and 6th centuries , the undertook westward migrations across the Eurasian s, driven by external pressures from expanding groups such as the Sabirs and , who disrupted their territories in the Black Sea region around 463 and 557 , respectively. These movements culminated in their settlement in the Pontic-Caspian steppe north of the , where they established dominance over local nomadic populations and formed loose confederations. The ' arrival in particular forced the subjugation or displacement of Bulgar tribes, including the and , integrating some into broader alliances while prompting others to seek new territories further west. Archaeological evidence from burial sites in the Pontic steppe, such as pit graves with deformed skulls, pottery, and weapons, links Bulgar material culture to Central Asian Turkic traditions, including influences from the Pazyryk culture in the Altai region, which exemplifies early equestrian nomadism. Linguistically, proto-Turkic roots are evident in Oguro-Bulgaric features like rhotacism and lambdacism, preserved in runic inscriptions and fragments from sites like the Orkhon Valley, as well as adaptations of Sogdian script for Turkic use by the 6th century CE. Byzantine sources, notably Procopius of Caesarea in his Wars (mid-6th century), provide contemporary accounts of these tribes, describing the Kutrigurs and Utigurs as Hunnic offshoots raiding the Balkans and distinguishing their eastern and western positions relative to the Sea of Azov and Don River. Under Hunnic and Avar influences, the Bulgars divided into eastern (Utigurs) and western (Kutrigurs) branches by the mid-6th century, with the Don and Sea of Azov serving as natural dividers that reflected political and territorial separations amid ongoing steppe conflicts. This bifurcation was exacerbated by Hunnic remnants post-Attila (453 CE), which maintained cultural continuity with Bulgar groups, and Avar conquests that absorbed or scattered tribes, setting the stage for their role in regional power dynamics.

Pre-Kubrat Period

In the mid-6th century, the Bulgar tribes of the Pontic steppe experienced significant political fragmentation following the arrival and rapid expansion of the Khaganate around 558 , which imposed dominance over the region north of the . The subjugated key Bulgar groups, particularly the to the west of the and the to the east, integrating them into their military structure while extracting tribute and using them in campaigns against the . This subjugation, detailed in fragments from the historian Menander Protector, led to a period of disunity among the Bulgars, as the tribes were compelled to serve Avar interests, including joint raids on Byzantine territories such as in 568 . Byzantine diplomacy exploited this fragmentation to counter Avar pressure, forging temporary alliances with Bulgar leaders against the khaganate. Under Emperor Justinian I (r. 527–565 CE), envoys contacted Utigur ruler Sandilkh in 559 CE, inciting him to attack the Avar-aligned Kutrigurs, resulting in heavy losses for the latter and a brief respite for Byzantine frontiers. Internal conflicts among Bulgar chieftains further weakened cohesion; for instance, Kutigur leader Organa, an Onogur prince, sought Byzantine support in 619 CE by visiting Constantinople with a delegation, negotiating a treaty, and accepting Christianity before returning to the steppe amid ongoing Avar dominance. These alliances, however, were opportunistic and short-lived, as recorded in Byzantine sources like Theophylact Simocatta's History, which describes Bulgar ambassadors invoking Avar-Byzantine peace treaties in 598–599 CE to plead for protection during border skirmishes, only to face betrayal by Byzantine forces. The Avar expansion also intertwined with Slavic migrations, as the khaganate incorporated groups into its forces, facilitating their southward push into the and exacerbating pressures on Bulgar territories. In the region, emerged as an early Bulgar center by the first half of the , when Unogundur-Bulgar tribes conquered the site and nearby settlements like Kepoi, using them as bases amid the steppe's volatility. Archaeological evidence from necropolises, including graves with artificial skull deformation dated to the 4th–5th centuries , supports the presence of proto-Bulgar nomads in the area prior to intensified control. This era of subjugation and opportunistic set the stage for later Bulgar efforts to assert in the face of mounting external threats.

Establishment and Rule

Khan Kubrat's Rise

Kubrat, a scion of the prestigious clan among the , is recorded in medieval Bulgarian sources as succeeding Gostun of the Ermi clan, suggesting a possible familial or dynastic link to earlier Kutrigur leadership in the Pontic region. His early life intersected with Byzantine influence when, around 619, he accompanied his uncle Organa, the Onogur ruler, to during Emperor Heraclius's efforts to secure allies against the and . There, both were baptized into , and Kubrat, as a , remained at the to receive an education in Byzantine and , eventually earning the prestigious of patrician—a rank denoting high honor and alliance with the empire. This Byzantine sojourn positioned Kubrat as a bridge between steppe nomadism and imperial sophistication, fostering diplomatic ties that would aid his later ambitions. By approximately 630, Kubrat returned to the Pontic steppe amid the collapse of the , where Bulgar tribes such as the , , and were fragmented and nominally subject to Avar overlordship. Leveraging his Byzantine connections for support, including possible military aid from , Kubrat rapidly consolidated power by defeating Avar forces in the region and integrating disparate Bulgar groups under his authority. These efforts neutralized internal divisions and expanded his influence across the , marking a shift from tribal disunity to cohesive political entity. In 632, at a pivotal council held in the ancient Greek colony of on the , was formally proclaimed khan, thereby founding the confederation known as Old Great Bulgaria (Magna Bulgaria), as chronicled by the Byzantine historian . This proclamation symbolized the culmination of his rise, transforming a loose tribal into a recognized steppe power independent of Avar domination.

Territory and Political Structure

The territory of Old Great Bulgaria under Khan Kubrat encompassed the western Pontic-Caspian steppe region, stretching from the Dnieper River in the west to the Don River and approaches to the lower Volga in the east, with southern boundaries along the Black Sea, Sea of Azov, and Kuban River, and northern limits reaching the forest-steppe transition zone. According to the Byzantine chronicler Theophanes the Confessor, this realm included the area from the Maeotian Lake (Sea of Azov) to the Kuphis River (identified as the Kuban), comprising the core lands of Old Great Bulgaria and adjacent territories inhabited by related groups. The administrative and political center was Phanagoria on the Taman Peninsula, a strategic location that facilitated control over maritime and overland communications in the region. The political structure of Old Great Bulgaria functioned as a loose of Bulgar tribes, unified under as supreme following his expulsion of overlords in the region. The primary tribal components were the (also called Unogundurs), who formed the ruling core, alongside the (or Kotrags), described by Byzantine sources as sharing ethnic and linguistic ties within the same broader Bulgar grouping. This tribal alliance emphasized decentralized authority, with exercising overarching leadership through personal prestige and military prowess rather than rigid administrative hierarchies, allowing adaptation to the mobile environment. Diplomatic ties with the bolstered the confederation's stability, culminating in a 635 peace treaty between —who had been baptized and educated in —and Emperor Heraclius, which affirmed Kubrat's independence as he had already been honored with the title of patrician during his time at the imperial court. This agreement included Byzantine commitments to non-aggression and potential , while enabling Bulgar forces to conduct raids on Byzantine-held to extract additional levies and resources. The economic base relied on pastoral nomadism, centered on horse and cattle herding across seasonal pastures, complemented by oversight of trade routes that funneled slaves, furs, and eastern commodities like silks toward Byzantine markets.

Decline and Disintegration

Kubrat's Death and Succession Crisis

Khan died around 650–665 AD, likely from natural causes at an advanced age, in , the capital of Old Great Bulgaria. According to Byzantine chronicler , 's passing occurred during the reign of Emperor (r. 668–685), leaving the state vulnerable without his unifying leadership; places it earlier in 642/3, but this is considered erroneous as was active in 648. The date remains debated among historians. On his deathbed, Kubrat instructed his five sons to remain united to preserve the confederation's independence, a plea recorded in both and Theophanes. The sons, identified in the and Byzantine sources as (eldest, of the clan), Kotrag, , , and Asparukh, divided the realm among themselves. inherited the core western territories around the Pontic steppe, while the others led portions of the tribes in different directions: Kotrag toward the , to under influence, to the as a Byzantine , and Asparukh's group settling near the . This partition, as detailed by , directly contravened Kubrat's advice and exposed the fragility of the loose tribal alliance. Batbayan's rule, lasting until around 668 according to the Nominalia, initially maintained control over the but quickly unraveled due to the absence of Kubrat's central authority. Internal strife emerged as the brothers' departures weakened cohesion, fostering disputes among the remaining tribes. By 670, facing mounting pressure from the expanding Khazar Khaganate, Batbayan submitted to Khazar overlordship, paying tribute to avert immediate conflict and marking the onset of Old Great Bulgaria's subjugation. Theophanes notes this vassalage as a pragmatic but humiliating concession, highlighting the succession crisis's role in eroding the state's .

Khazar Invasion and Collapse

In the mid- to late 7th century, the Khazar Khaganate rose to prominence following the subjugation of the Western Turkic Khaganate by the Tang dynasty around 657 CE, enabling the Khazars to consolidate power in the Pontic-Caspian steppe and launch aggressive expansions into the Volga and Caspian regions starting in the late 650s CE. This expansion placed direct pressure on the neighboring Old Great Bulgaria, as the Khazars sought to dominate trade routes and nomadic territories in the North Caucasus and beyond. Key military confrontations unfolded around 670–680 CE, when Khazar forces defeated and subjugated the Bulgars under Batbayan, Kubrat's eldest son and successor in the eastern territories, compelling many Bulgar groups to either submit as vassals or flee westward. According to Byzantine chronicler Theophanes the Confessor, Batbayan's forces were overwhelmed by the Khazars, leading to his capitulation and the imposition of tribute, which marked the beginning of Bulgar dispersal from the core Pontic steppe. Similarly, Patriarch Nicephorus records that other Bulgar leaders, such as Asparukh, were pursued and driven from their mountain strongholds near the Don River, exacerbating the internal divisions following Kubrat's death. These defeats fragmented Old Great Bulgaria, with Khazar hegemony extending over the region by the early 8th century. Byzantine-Khazar relations played a complex role in this period, as Emperor had forged an alliance with in the 630s against and threats, but post-Kubrat, pragmatically accommodated Khazar expansion to counter common steppe foes like the . The geographer Ananias of Shirak notes the ' strategic position at the Caspian Gates by the 660s, which facilitated their control over eastern trade and indirectly supported Byzantine interests, though this ultimately enabled unchecked Khazar dominance over the . By 700 CE, these dynamics had led to the full dispersal of Bulgar tribes, with many seeking refuge in distant regions or integrating into Khazar structures. Archaeological evidence corroborates this collapse, particularly at sites like Phanagoria on the Taman Peninsula, where destruction layers and abrupt shifts in material culture—such as the appearance of Khazar-style fortifications and the decline of Bulgar-associated artifacts—date to the late 7th century. Excavations reveal layers of burning and abandonment around 670–700 CE, followed by Khazar revival of the settlement in the early 8th century, evidenced by brachycephalic skulls and "pine-tree" ornamentation techniques indicative of incoming nomadic influences. The nearby Malaya Pereshchepina burial, associated with Kubrat himself and containing over 25 kg of gold and 50 kg of silver artifacts, dates to the mid-7th century. These findings underscore the violent transition from Bulgar to Khazar control in the region.

Successor States and Legacy

Volga Bulgaria

Following the collapse of Old Great Bulgaria after Khan Kubrat's death around 642–648, his second son Kotrag led the eastern branch of the northward, migrating up the River in the late to escape Khazar dominance. This group incorporated remnants of allied tribes such as the Sabirs and Barsils, nomadic previously active in the Pontic-Caspian steppes, forming a multi-ethnic confederation as they settled in the Middle . The migration, occurring post-670, positioned these near the confluence of the and rivers, where they established initial settlements between approximately 670 and 700. By the early , under Kotrag's leadership, these migrants founded as a distinct polity, transitioning from to a more sedentary society through alliances with local Finno-Ugric groups and control over riverine trade routes. The state coalesced around the Kama-Volga confluence, with emerging as the primary capital by the 9th-10th centuries, serving as a fortified urban center that facilitated economic growth and administrative functions. developed into a prosperous by the , marked by the adoption of in 922 under Khan , who invited a delegation from the led by to formalize the conversion and secure diplomatic ties. This religious shift, influenced by trade contacts with the , elevated the state's status and integrated it into broader networks, predating the Christianization of Kievan Rus' by over six decades. Volga Bulgaria flourished as a key trade hub on the Silk Road's northern branch, exchanging furs, honey, and slaves for luxury goods like silk, spices, and metals from , , and , while maintaining complex interactions with neighboring powers. Relations with the involved initial subjugation followed by assertions of independence post-Islamization, whereas engagements with the Rus' principalities included both commerce and military conflicts, such as raids by I in the late that prompted defensive fortifications. The state's cultural landscape synthesized Turkic Bulgar traditions—evident in and equestrian artifacts—with Finno-Ugric elements from indigenous and Udmurt populations, fostering a unique ethnolinguistic identity preserved in modern and folklore. This legacy endured until the Mongol conquest in 1236, when Batu Khan's forces overran and other major cities like Bilyar, incorporating into the ulus of the Jochid dynasty and disrupting its autonomy while perpetuating Islamic-Turkic influences in the region. The integration under Mongol rule accelerated demographic shifts, blending Bulgar elites with Kipchak Turkic nomads and sustaining trade continuity, though at the cost of political independence until the rise of the in the 15th century.

Danube Bulgaria and First Bulgarian Empire

Following the collapse of Old Great Bulgaria, Asparuh, one of Khan Kubrat's sons, led a group of Onogundur Bulgars southward across the Danube River around 680 CE, seeking new territories amid pressures from the Khazar Khaganate. These nomadic Turkic-speaking warriors, numbering in the tens of thousands, settled in the marshy Ongal region north of the Danube Delta, where they integrated with local Slavic tribes displaced by earlier Byzantine campaigns. In the summer of 681, Asparuh's forces decisively defeated a Byzantine army led by Emperor Constantine IV at the Battle of Ongal, exploiting the terrain's swamps and the exhaustion of the imperial troops after a prolonged campaign. This victory shattered Byzantine dominance in the region, forcing Constantine to abandon his siege and retreat to Constantinople. The triumph at Ongal paved the way for the establishment of the Danube Bulgar Khanate in the province of , encompassing modern-day northeastern between the and the . Asparuh founded as the political and capital, a fortified encampment on the open plains that blended nomadic traditions with emerging sedentary structures, including earthen ramparts enclosing over 20 square kilometers. Byzantine recognition came swiftly through the Treaty of 681, under which Emperor acknowledged Bulgar sovereignty over the territory south of the , agreed to pay an annual tribute, and ceded lands in as a . This agreement, documented in Byzantine chronicles, marked the formal birth of the Bulgarian state and shifted the power balance in the , allowing the to consolidate control over populations through a mix of subjugation and alliances. Under Asparuh's successors, particularly Khan Tervel in the early 8th century (r. circa 700–721), the khanate evolved into a more structured entity that laid the foundations for the First Bulgarian Empire. Tervel aided Byzantine Emperor Justinian II in 705 by providing 15,000 warriors to restore him to the throne, earning the title of caesar and additional lands in Thrace as rewards. This alliance culminated in Tervel's pivotal intervention during the Arab siege of Constantinople in 717–718, where his forces of up to 50,000 Bulgars attacked the Umayyad army's rear, slaughtering tens of thousands and contributing to the siege's failure amid harsh winter conditions and Byzantine use of Greek fire. Tervel's reign also saw accelerated assimilation between the Bulgar elite and the Slavic majority, with intermarriages, shared military service, and the adoption of Slavic names fostering a unified identity, though the Bulgar nobility retained Turkic titles and pagan rituals centered at sites like the Madara Rider monument. A defining milestone in the khanate's rise to imperial status occurred in 811 during the , when (r. 803–814) ambushed and annihilated a massive led by Nicephorus I. After sacking , the imperial army of 80,000 was lured into the Vărbitsa Pass, where Bulgarian forces under encircled and massacred them, killing Nicephorus and capturing his son Stauracius, who was left paralyzed. This catastrophic defeat, one of 's worst, prompted to besiege and expand Bulgarian territory into and , solidifying the state's imperial character. The endured as a major Balkan power until its conquest by under in 1018, leaving a legacy of cultural fusion and resistance that shaped medieval Southeastern Europe.

Other Bulgar Migrations

Following the collapse of Old Great Bulgaria under Khazar pressure in the late 660s, several Bulgar groups undertook migrations that did not lead to the formation of major successor states, instead dispersing to peripheral regions and integrating with local populations. One such group was led by , identified in Byzantine sources as a son of Khan Kubrat, who initially sought refuge in after his father's death around 642–648. There, and his followers, comprising and associated numbering approximately 70,000, came under the overlordship of the Khaganate, establishing a territory in the Srem region (modern , ). By around 680, amid conflicts with the , Kuber led his people southward into the Byzantine-controlled regions of and , where they temporarily allied with Avar forces against local tribes before breaking away. In 686, and his followers—estimated at 30,000 including men, women, and children—arrived near , seeking imperial protection from . The Byzantine emperor granted them settlement in the Medikion district (near in modern ), allowing semi-autonomous status in exchange for ; this arrangement was formalized through a treaty, as recorded by the Byzantine chronicler . Kuber's community maintained Bulgar customs while intermingling with local , contributing to the ethnic mosaic of the hinterland. Another dispersal involved a Bulgar contingent possibly led by Alcek (also Alzeco or Altsek), reputed in some traditions as 's fifth son, though direct evidence linking him to Kubrat remains uncertain. Around 662–663, during the invasion of , Alcek offered military aid to King Grimoald I, leading approximately 700 Bulgar warriors who had migrated westward, likely via the Adriatic or overland routes from the . In return, Grimoald settled them in the , particularly in the Apulian and Molisan uplands, including areas around Ravenna's and sites such as Sepino, Boiano (Bovianum), , and Gallo Matese. These settlers, known as Altsikurs or "Bulgars of Alcek," integrated into society as , preserving elements of their Turkic language and customs for about two centuries, as evidenced by toponyms and archaeological traces of Bulgar burial practices. The primary account comes from Paul the Deacon's Historia Langobardorum (Book V, chapter 29), which describes their role in Lombard campaigns and eventual assimilation. In the , upland Bulgar groups evaded the main Khazar conquest by retreating into the mountainous Elbrus region, where they are considered by some scholars to form the ancestral core of the Balkar and Karachay peoples. These communities, numbering in the tens of thousands, maintained Turkic linguistic and cultural traditions, including pastoral nomadism and epic folklore, distinct from the lowland Khazar-influenced populations. Genetic and linguistic studies indicate continuity with ancient Bulgar elements, such as shared Oghuric Turkic substrates in their Kipchak-based dialects, alongside and Alan admixtures; this upland refuge allowed preservation of Bulgar identity amid the 7th-century upheavals. Balkar and Karachay oral histories, documented in 19th-century ethnographies, reference ancient "Bulgar" migrations fleeing eastern nomads, supporting their self-identification as descendants of these evaders. Smaller Bulgar remnants also lingered in the Pannonian basin, particularly (northern ), where Kuber's initial settlement left lasting influences. Archaeological evidence from 7th–8th century sites in Srem reveals Bulgar-style pottery and horse burials, while linguistic traces persist in toponyms like Kubriš (near ) and hydronyms such as the Kubr river, derived from Bulgar kub ("fortress" or "mound"). These elements, analyzed in comparative Turkic onomastics, indicate minor Bulgar-Slavic hybrid communities that assimilated into emerging Serbian and polities by the , without forming distinct polities.

References

  1. [1]
    (PDF) Great Bulgaria of Kubrat Khan and the river Kuphis
    The debates among scholars, concerning the question of where Old Great Bulgaria was founded, have continued for a long time. What is unquestionable is the ...
  2. [2]
    None
    Summary of each segment:
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Bulgarians and Jews throughout History
    known to the Byzantine chronists as 'Great Bulgaria', in the steppes between the Azov sea and the Kuban river in the 6th century. One of the Bulgar tribes ...
  4. [4]
    [PDF] An Introduction to the History of the Turkic People
    Page 1. Peter B. Golden. An Introduction to the History of the Turkic Peoples. Ethnogenesis and State-Formation in. Medieval and Early Modern Eurasia and the ...
  5. [5]
    Huns and Bulgars in - AKJournals
    Nov 7, 2022 · The primary aim of the article is to present a different approach in the critic of sources concerning the reconstruction of „late Hunnic” and „early Bulgaric” ...
  6. [6]
    40. Early Byzantine Sources on the Oghuric Tribes in the Northern ...
    ... tribes with a well-founded evidence for an Altaic or Turkic descent, the so-called Ogurs, Onogurs, Saragurs, Kutrigurs, Utigurs and the like. This is the ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Origins of the Bulgars
    The use of the Bulgar ethnonym in the names of Old Great Bulgaria, Danubian Bulgaria and Volga Bolgar possibly indicates the power of the Bulgars in the ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] The Bulgarians and the Avar Chaganate, 6th-9th c. A.D. Áúëãàðèòå ...
    8 The subjugation of the Bulgarian tribes was one of the Avars' arguments when they tried to obtain an annual tribute from the Byzantines. In 5689 as well as in ...Missing: disunity primary
  9. [9]
  10. [10]
    THE ALTAIC WORLD THROUGH BYZANTINE EYES - jstor
    When the power of the European Huns was crushed at Nedao in 455, the balance of power on the Pontic-Caspian steppes changed dramatically.
  11. [11]
    None
    Below is a merged summary of the requested information on **Organa**, **Bulgar Alliances with Byzantines in 619**, and **Pre-Kubrat Period Events Involving Avars** from "The Early Medieval Balkans" by John V. A. Fine, Jr. The response consolidates all details from the provided summaries into a dense, comprehensive format, using tables where appropriate to maximize information retention. Where information conflicts or is absent, it is noted accordingly.
  12. [12]
    None
    Below is a merged response summarizing the content from all provided segments regarding Bulgar diplomatic interactions with Byzantines against Avars in the 6th-7th century, based on *The History of Theophylact Simocatta*. The response retains all information mentioned across the summaries, organized for clarity and density. Where applicable, tables in CSV format are used to consolidate detailed information efficiently.
  13. [13]
    First Bulgarian Empire 681-1018 - EuroDocs - BYU
    Dec 2, 2021 · Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans. Genealogy of Bulgarian rulers. Also in facsimile with English translation. (681-767; transcription in ...
  14. [14]
    S. Runciman - A history of the First Bulgarian empire - 1.1
    Kubrat was also made a patrician. [1] Both Nicephorus and John of Nikiou when they mention Kubrat call him nephew of Organa. Clearly Nicephorus's two accounts ...
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    Proto-Bulgarians - 5 - Kroraina
    The sources are not only brief, but confusing as well. Especially the text of Theophanes, which is the most detailed one. Recently, I. Chichurov made an attempt ...Missing: primary | Show results with:primary
  17. [17]
    [PDF] PHANAGORIA - Фанагория
    During its lifetime, from the mid 6th century BC to the early 10th century AD,. Phanagoria witnessed a great many historic events, often of supra-regional.Missing: center | Show results with:center
  18. [18]
    From the Eurasian Steppes to Christian Europe: Bulgarians and ...
    Sep 1, 2023 · In the decades after 680/681, the Bulgars remained a powerful neighbor of the Byzantines. The Bulgarian Khan Tervel, probably Asparuh's ...
  19. [19]
    Pastoral nomadic migrations and conquests (Chapter 14)
    This chapter analyzes general causes for pastoral nomadic migrations. It examines three parts of Afro-Eurasia: the Eurasian steppes, semi-deserts and deserts.
  20. [20]
    (PDF) History of the Bulgars: from Armenia to Kazan - ResearchGate
    Aug 23, 2018 · In this work based on primary sources, the author investigates the chronology of the appearance of the Bulgars and their movement around Europe.
  21. [21]
    (PDF) Early Mediaeval identity of the Bulgarians - Academia.edu
    The khans Avtiochol and Irnik, listed in the Nominalia of the Bulgarian khans today are identified with Attila and Ernach. The issue about the origin and ...
  22. [22]
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
  25. [25]
    (PDF) Muslim Sources on the Magyars in the Second Half of the 9th ...
    Apr 3, 2022 · ... old Great Bulgaria and the so-called Kotragoi, who are of the same ... Volga Bulgaria was described in detail by Ibn Faḍlān; similarly ...
  26. [26]
    Father Paisii Hilendarski`s Message About the Volga Ancestral ...
    ... Bulgarians, led by one of the sons of Kubrat Khan-Kotrag, settled in the Volga region and founded the Volga Bulgaria. This information is based on the ...
  27. [27]
    [PDF] TheTurkic-Muslim Kara-Khanid Khanate, with a capital in ... - IROWS
    North of Cumania lay Volga Bulgaria, an Islamic state with a populous capital at. Bolghar, supported as a mainstay of trade with China, Baghdad, Constantinople ...
  28. [28]
    Asparuh and His People on the Lower Danube through the Eyes of ...
    Aug 9, 2025 · The Danube Bulgaria's rise and its territorial expansion changed the political situation in this area. The Bulgarians became Byzantium's chief ...
  29. [29]
    History of Bulgaria | Key Events, Important People, & Dates - Britannica
    This article is a survey of important events and people in the history of Bulgaria from ancient times to the present.
  30. [30]
    Emil Hersak - Vulgarum dux Alzeco - Kroraina
    However, in the first part of the 7th century, under the leadership of Kubrat of the Dulo clan ... khan Kubrat and his FIVE SONS! Furthermore, it has been ...
  31. [31]
    (PDF) Karachay-Balkar, Karachay and Balkar Complex: Ethnicity ...
    The aim of this article is to discuss suitability and functionality of the language names Karachay-Balkar, Karachay and Balkar as well as the historical ...<|separator|>
  32. [32]
    (PDF) THE BULGARIANS DURING V-VII AD Book Exposition
    The name “Old Great Bulgaria” was used by Theophanes, Nikephoros and Anastasius Bibliothecarius as borrowed from an older source. It is claimed that it was ...