Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Olivet Discourse

The Olivet Discourse is a prophetic address by to his disciples on the , recorded in the as comprising :1–25:46, :1–37, and Luke 21:5–36. Prompted by the disciples' questions regarding the destruction of the , the sign of ' coming, and the consummation of the age, the discourse outlines a sequence of events including deceptive false christs, international conflicts, natural disasters as "birth pains," persecution of followers, the proclamation of worldwide, the desecration known as the in the holy place, a surpassing prior or future calamities, and cosmic signs preceding the visible return of on clouds with power and glory to gather the elect. Jesus emphasizes vigilance amid these signs, likening the era to the budding fig tree indicating summer's nearness and urging recognition that "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place," while cautioning against precise date-setting since the day and hour remain unknown even to the . The discourse concludes with parables illustrating preparedness—the faithful versus wicked servants, the ten virgins, the talents—and a of final separating sheep from goats based on deeds toward the least brethren. A defining feature is ' prediction of the 's total ruin, stating "not one stone here will be left on another," uttered when the stood as an architectural marvel deemed indestructible by contemporaries; this foresaw its fulfillment in the Roman destruction of in under , corroborated by eyewitness accounts of horrors including famine, intra-city slaughter, and conflagration matching the prophesied tribulation's scale. Interpretive controversies persist over whether the discourse primarily anticipates this first-century (as in preterist readings tying "this generation" to ' audience) or encompasses dual near-term and ultimate eschatological fulfillments (as futurists contend, distinguishing destruction from parousia via shifts in context like fleeing to mountains), with empirical alignment to events underscoring the prophecy's precision amid skeptical dismissals in secular scholarship.

Biblical Context

Historical Setting

The Olivet Discourse took place on the , a ridge east of Jerusalem's , during the Tuesday of Passion Week in ' final days before his crucifixion, circa AD 30. This location provided a direct view of the city and complex, prompting the disciples' inquiry about the temple's grandeur and future after predicted its destruction. The event occurred amid ' public ministry in , following his and confrontations with religious authorities in the temple courts. Judea formed a under prefect Pontius Pilate's administration from AD 26 to 36, characterized by direct oversight after the client kingdom of fragmented following his death in 4 BC. Pilate, stationed primarily in but residing in during festivals like to maintain order, enforced taxation and , which exacerbated Jewish resentment due to perceived idolatrous practices and economic burdens. Incidents such as Pilate's introduction of imperial standards into around AD 26 and funding like an aqueduct from treasury funds without consent fueled periodic unrest and appeals to higher authorities. The Second Temple, originally rebuilt after the Babylonian but massively expanded by starting around 19 BC, stood as Judaism's religious and national centerpiece by AD 30, with construction ongoing for decades as noted in contemporary accounts. Jewish society anticipated a messianic deliverer amid domination, drawing from prophetic traditions of restoration, while sects like , , and vied for influence, heightening tensions during pilgrimage festivals. ' discourse addressed disciples Peter, James, , and Andrew privately, against this backdrop of eschatological expectation and political volatility.

Synoptic Accounts and Textual Analysis

The Olivet Discourse is preserved in the as follows: :1–25:46, which includes the core prophecy followed by parables of judgment; :1–37, the most concise version; and Luke 21:5–38, emphasizing historical events surrounding . These parallel accounts stem from a shared oral or written , with approximately 90% overlap in content such as the temple destruction prediction, birth pains of wars and famines, the , and calls to vigilance. Verbal similarities, especially between and the parallels in and Luke, indicate Markan priority in this , where and Luke independently adapt Mark's framework while adding distinct material. Key parallels include Jesus' response to the disciples' questions about the temple's end, his signs (false christs, earthquakes, persecutions), and the abrupt "this generation will not pass away" statement (:34; :30; Luke 21:32), tying the prophecy to near-term fulfillment. The "" reference (:15; :14), drawn from 9:27, appears in Mark and but is rephrased in Luke 21:20 as armies surrounding , reflecting contextual adaptation without altering the core warning of desecration. Such agreements underscore a unified originating from ' teaching, transmitted through early Christian communities before the Gospels' composition circa 60–80 CE. Differences arise from each evangelist's theological emphases and audience. Matthew expands with eschatological parables (e.g., talents, sheep and goats in chapter 25), absent in and Luke, to stress accountability for Jewish hearers. Luke uniquely details a with "Jerusalem surrounded by armies" (Luke 21:20) and distress among nations, aligning with Roman tactics in 66–70 CE, while omitting 's cosmic signs until after the temple's fall (compare Luke 21:25–28 with :29–31). 's account, likely the earliest, focuses on immediacy and endurance amid tribulation (:9–13), with terse warnings against date-setting (:32). These variations do not indicate contradiction but selective emphasis: Matthew heightens apocalyptic urgency, Luke historicizes for Gentiles, and prioritizes core exhortation. Textual criticism reveals high stability across manuscripts, with no significant variants altering the discourse's prophetic structure or key phrases; minor differences, such as word order in the "fig tree" (Matthew 24:32; Mark 13:28; Luke 21:29), align with scribal harmonization typical of Synoptic transmission. Critical scholars, including those employing , affirm the sayings' authenticity to due to Aramaic underpinnings and Palestinian , though some post-70 CE redaction is posited for Luke's details. Evangelical analyses, conversely, resist extensive , viewing differences as complementary eyewitness perspectives harmonized in the traditions. Overall, the accounts' supports their reliability as a unified prophetic , despite evangelistic adaptations.

Core Teachings

Prediction of the Temple's Destruction

In the Olivet Discourse, initiates the prophecy by foretelling the destruction of the Second . As recorded in the , while departing the temple complex, the disciples draw attention to its magnificent structures, prompting to declare that not one stone would be left upon another. This statement appears in :1-2: " left the temple and was walking away when his disciples came up to him to call his attention to its buildings. 'Do you see all these things?' he asked. 'Truly I tell you, not one stone here will be left on another; every one will be thrown down.'" Parallel accounts in Mark 13:1-2 and Luke 21:5-6 convey the same prediction, emphasizing the complete demolition of the temple's edifices. The temple, rebuilt by starting around 20-19 BC and still under expansion in ' time, represented the religious and national heart of . ' pronouncement, dated to circa AD 30-33 based on chronologies, stunned the disciples, who associated the temple's permanence with divine favor. This prediction sets the stage for the broader on ensuing tribulations and eschatological signs, linking immediate historical judgment to apocalyptic themes. Historical records confirm the fulfillment of this prophecy during the First Jewish-Roman War. In AD 70, Roman forces under besieged , culminating in the 's destruction on August 10 (). Eyewitness Flavius , a Jewish historian who defected to the Romans, details in how Roman soldiers set the temple ablaze despite ' orders to preserve it, with molten gold from the structure causing stones to be uprooted and overturned during salvage efforts. estimates over 1.1 million deaths and 97,000 captives from , with the temple's sanctuary and outer courts razed, leaving only parts of the retaining walls intact. The in depicts the looting of temple treasures, corroborating the event's scale. Archaeological evidence, including burn layers and stones at sites like the tunnels, aligns with ' account of systematic demolition. While the prophecy's specificity—preceding the event by roughly 40 years—has prompted debate on predictive authenticity versus post-event composition in some scholarly circles, the textual placement within pre-70 AD traditions supports its originating as an unfulfilled forecast at the time of utterance. Primary sources like , unmotivated by , provide independent verification of the temple's total ruin, fulfilling the condition of no stones left in their original superstructure positions.

Signs of the End Times

In the Olivet Discourse, delineates a sequence of signs preceding the end of the age, framed as "the beginning of birth pains" in the . These include widespread deception by false messiahs, escalating wars and rumors of wars among nations, famines, earthquakes, and other calamities, alongside persecution of believers, the global preaching of , the of the , a period of unparalleled tribulation, and cosmic disturbances. The accounts in :4-29, :5-25, and Luke 21:8-26 parallel closely, though Luke emphasizes Jerusalem's encirclement by armies as a signal for flight. These signs are presented not as immediate precursors to the final consummation but as preliminary indicators, with instructing disciples to endure without alarm, as "the end is not yet." Deception emerges as the initial sign, with Jesus warning, "Watch out that no one deceives you. For many will come in my name, claiming, 'I am the Messiah,' and will deceive many." Parallel warnings appear in and Luke, specifying false claims of messianic arrival or that "the time is near." Historical instances, such as self-proclaimed messiahs like (Acts 5:36) and false prophet (Acts 21:38) in the first century, align with this pattern, though Jesus frames it as ongoing until the end. Geopolitical and natural upheavals follow, including "wars and rumors of wars," with nation rising against nation and kingdom against kingdom, accompanied by famines and earthquakes in various places. Jesus qualifies these as inevitable but not conclusive of the end, likening them to labor pains intensifying over time. Biblical parallels in Luke add pestilences and great earthquakes, portending widespread distress. These descriptions echo prophetic motifs, such as 19:2 for national conflicts and 2:30-31 for terrestrial signs, but are uniquely sequenced in the discourse as eschatological harbingers. Persecution intensifies the signs, as believers face betrayal, hatred by all nations, and martyrdom for Jesus' name, leading some to fall away and others to false prophecy. Yet, the gospel must first be proclaimed to all nations as a testimony, after which "the end will come." This universal mission underscores endurance amid apostasy, with Matthew noting intra-community betrayals and Luke highlighting delivery to synagogues and prisons. The pivotal sign is the "abomination of desolation" referenced from Daniel 9:27, 11:31, and 12:11, standing in the holy place, prompting immediate flight from Judea to mountains, avoiding rooftops or fields. Luke interprets this as Jerusalem surrounded by armies, signaling its desolation. This triggers the "great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now," with false signs deceiving nearly all, culminating in cosmic signs: the sun darkened, moon failing to shine, stars falling, heavenly bodies shaken. These immediately precede the Son of Man's appearance, drawing from Daniel 7:13 and Isaiah 13:10, 34:4.

The Parousia and Final Judgment

In the Olivet Discourse, describes the parousia—the visible, glorious return of —as a cosmic event following tribulation, marked by signs in the heavens and the gathering of the . 24:29-31, immediately after the distress of those days, "the sun will be darkened, and the moon will not give its light; the stars will fall from the sky, and the heavenly bodies will be shaken," at which point "they will see coming on of , with and great ," sending angels with a loud to gather the from the four winds. This imagery draws from Daniel 7:13-14, portraying a divine figure approaching to receive everlasting , emphasizing and finality rather than a hidden or spiritualized advent. Mark 13:24-27 parallels this, specifying the Son of Man's coming "on clouds with great and " to dispatch angels for the 's collection, underscoring a public, observable event distinguishable from the temple's destruction. Luke 21:25-28 adds cosmic disturbances and the Son of Man's appearance "in a cloud with and great ," instructing believers to "stand up and lift up your heads, because your is drawing near." The discourse transitions to the final judgment in Matthew 25:31-46, depicting the Son of Man arriving in glory with all angels to sit on his throne, where "all the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats." The sheep, representing the righteous, inherit the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world for acts of mercy toward "the least of these my brothers," such as feeding the hungry and visiting the imprisoned, earning eternal life. Conversely, the goats, symbolizing the unrighteous, face eternal punishment in the fire prepared for the devil and his angels for neglecting such deeds, with the criterion rooted in response to Christ's brethren rather than mere belief. This judgment motif aligns with Old Testament precedents like the shepherd-king imagery in Ezekiel 34, where God judges between sheep and goats for faithfulness, but uniquely ties works of compassion to eternal outcomes in a eschatological framework. No direct parallel exists in Mark or Luke's accounts, though Luke 21:34-36 warns of sudden judgment on the unprepared, urging watchfulness. Scholars note the parousia's emphasis on unpredictability and visibility contrasts with secretive apocalypses in contemporary Jewish texts like 1 Enoch, positioning it as a climactic vindication for the faithful amid and tribulation. The final judgment's ethical focus—deeds as evidence of allegiance—avoids or works-righteousness by framing actions as outgrowths of relationship to Christ, consistent with broader teachings in James 2:14-26 on without works being dead. Interpretations attributing this solely to AD 70 events overlook the cosmic scale and implications absent from historical records of that siege, as documents no such celestial signs or global gathering despite detailing the temple's fall in 70 AD. Thus, the discourse presents parousia and judgment as culminating divine interventions, distinct from interim judgments, with eternal stakes hinging on moral response to .

Parables of Vigilance

In the concluding parables of the Olivet Discourse recorded in , illustrates the imperatives of vigilance, , and righteous conduct in anticipation of his parousia, emphasizing that the precise timing remains unknown and demands constant readiness. These three parables—the Ten Virgins, the Talents, and —transition from warnings of tribulation to personal accountability, portraying rewards for faithfulness and consequences for neglect. The (Matthew 25:1–13) likens the kingdom of heaven to ten virgins awaiting a with lamps. Five wise virgins carry extra oil, enabling them to join the procession when the arrives unexpectedly at midnight, while five foolish ones, whose lamps extinguish during the delay, are excluded after futilely seeking oil elsewhere. exhorts, "Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour wherein the cometh," highlighting the suddenness of the eschatological arrival and the insufficiency of last-minute preparations. The oil symbolizes sustaining spiritual resources, such as genuine or the Spirit's indwelling, which cannot be borrowed or hastily acquired. The (:14–30) depicts a man traveling abroad who entrusts varying sums—five s to one servant, two to another, and one to a third—according to their abilities. Upon return, the first two servants invest productively, doubling their amounts and receiving commendation: "Well done, thou good and faithful servant: thou hast been faithful over a few things, I will make thee ruler over many things." The third, fearing loss, buries his and is rebuked as "wicked and slothful," with his portion reassigned and himself cast into . This narrative stresses of God-given abilities, time, and resources, with faithfulness yielding eternal increase and unfaithfulness inviting , irrespective of initial endowment. The Parable of the Sheep and the Goats (Matthew 25:31–46) envisions the Son of Man enthroned in glory, separating gathered nations as a shepherd divides sheep from goats, placing the sheep at his right for inheritance of the kingdom prepared from the foundation of the world. The righteous sheep are commended for feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the imprisoned, and aiding the stranger—deeds equated with service to Christ himself—while the goats at the left are condemned to everlasting fire for omitting these acts of mercy. Though framed as works, the distinction evidences underlying heart allegiance, as true disciples unconsciously reflect Christ's compassion, whereas neglect reveals absence of relational union with him; this culminates the discourse's eschatological judgment theme.

Interpretive Frameworks

Preterist Interpretation

Preterism interprets the Olivet Discourse, recorded in , , and Luke 21, as a prophecy primarily fulfilled in the destruction of and the Second Temple by Roman forces in . Proponents, including partial preterists like L. and , contend that ' predictions of the temple's desolation—not one stone left upon another (:2)—directly correspond to the historical event where Titus's legions razed the structure on August 10, , during the First Jewish-Roman War. This view emphasizes the discourse's immediate context, triggered by the disciples' question about the temple's fate and the "end of the age" (:3), interpreting "this generation will not pass away" (:34) as referring to the contemporaries of who witnessed the fulfillment within their lifetime, spanning roughly 40 years from AD 30 to . Central to the preterist case are the "signs of the times" outlined by , such as false christs, wars, rumors of wars, famines, earthquakes, and the (:4–15; :5–14; Luke 21:8–20). These align with documented events preceding and during the siege: Jewish historian records multiple false prophets and messianic claimants, including and an Egyptian pseudo-prophet, who deceived multitudes in the 40s and 50s AD; widespread famines under (Acts 11:28); and seismic activity reported in the region. Luke's parallel explicitly identifies the abomination as compassed by armies (Luke 21:20), matching the Roman encirclement in AD 66–70, which describes as involving over 1.1 million deaths from , , and combat, with survivors sold into . Preterists argue these tribulations culminated in the temple's profanation, where Roman soldiers sacrificed to their standards within its courts, fulfilling the desecration prophecy akin to 9:27. The cosmic imagery of the sun darkened, moon not giving light, and stars falling (Matthew 24:29) is viewed not as literal astronomical events but as apocalyptic language symbolizing the fall of a world power, drawn from precedents like 13:10 for Babylon's overthrow or 32:7 for Egypt's judgment. Gentry maintains this "coming on the clouds" (Matthew 24:30) depicts Christ's vindication through divine judgment on apostate , evidenced by the Roman victory as instrument of God's wrath, rather than a physical parousia. While full preterists extend fulfillment to include the second advent and as spiritual events in , partial preterists like DeMar affirm a future bodily return but see the discourse's core—judgment on the old covenant system—historically realized, preserving against charges of denying eschatological hope. This interpretation underscores the discourse's role in urging first-century flight from (Matthew 24:16), a warning Eusebius credits with enabling Christians to escape to before the siege.

Futurist Interpretation

The futurist interpretation maintains that the Olivet Discourse, as recorded in Matthew 24–25, Mark 13, and Luke 21, primarily describes eschatological events culminating in the Second Coming of Christ, with many prophecies remaining unfulfilled beyond the partial foreshadowing of the temple's destruction in AD 70. Proponents, particularly within dispensational premillennialism, argue that Jesus' responses to the disciples' questions distinguish between the near-term sign of Jerusalem's fall (Matthew 24:1–2) and the broader "end of the age" (Matthew 24:3), with the latter focusing on a future seven-year tribulation period marked by unprecedented global distress. This view emphasizes a literal reading of prophetic elements, such as the "abomination of desolation" (Matthew 24:15; cf. Daniel 9:27, 11:31, 12:11), interpreted as a future desecration of a rebuilt Jewish temple by the Antichrist, distinct from historical Roman actions in AD 70 due to the prophecy's ties to end-times resurrection and judgment motifs in Daniel. Key signs outlined in the discourse—false christs, wars, famines, earthquakes, and persecutions (:4–14)—are seen as "birth pains" intensifying toward the tribulation's midpoint, rather than exhaustive fulfillments in the first century, given their escalating cosmic scope (e.g., darkened, moon not giving light, stars falling; :29). The phrase "this will not pass away until all these things take place" (:34) is understood to refer to the future witnessing the tribulation's signs, not ' contemporaries, preserving the prophecy's imminence for that era while aligning with unfulfilled cosmic disturbances observable only at the parousia. The visible "coming of on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" (:30) denotes the literal, bodily return of Christ to gather the elect (:31), followed by judgment parables (:1–46) that underscore readiness amid tribulation, with the sheep-and-goats separation (:31–46) depicting a millennial inauguration. Theologians like John F. Walvoord, former president of , articulate this framework by linking the discourse to 's seventy weeks (Daniel 9:24–27), positing a prophetic gap after the sixty-ninth week, with the seventieth week as the future tribulation unleashing , trumpets, and akin to Revelation's judgments. Similarly, dispensational scholars such as Thomas Ice contend that Luke's account (Luke 21:20–24) addresses AD 70's "times of the Gentiles," transitioning to post-tribulation cosmic signs (Luke 21:25–28), ensuring hermeneutical consistency across synoptic parallels without conflating local judgments with global . Critics of preterist views within highlight empirical mismatches, such as the absence of recorded cosmic signs or universal visibility of Christ's "coming" in , arguing that first-century historiography (e.g., ) documents siege horrors but not the discourse's full prophetic trajectory. This interpretation undergirds expectations of a pretribulational for the church, followed by Israel's tribulation refinement, culminating in Christ's earthly reign, though variants exist on precise timings like mid- or post-tribulational rapture positions.

Partial Preterist and Historicist Views

Partial preterists maintain that the Olivet Discourse primarily prophesies the destruction of the in AD 70 by Roman forces under , fulfilling predictions in :1–35, :1–30, and Luke 21:5–24. They identify signs such as false messiahs, wars, famines, earthquakes, and persecution as corresponding to first-century events, including the Jewish-Roman War from AD 66–70, with the "" linked to Roman desecration or the flight of Christians from as instructed in the text. The phrase "this generation will not pass away until all these things take place" (:34) is interpreted as referring to ' contemporaries, who witnessed the fulfillment within approximately 40 years of the prophecy. This view distinguishes the events from the future parousia, arguing that cosmic language in :29–31 (e.g., darkened sun and , stars falling) employs apocalyptic imagery symbolizing national judgment rather than literal astronomical phenomena, akin to prophecies against or . Proponents like Kenneth L. Gentry and contend that while the discourse addresses the disciples' questions about the temple's end and the end of the age, the former was consummated in , transitioning to future eschatological elements post-verse 35. They cite historical records, such as ' accounts of over 1.1 million deaths in and the temple's burning on August 10, , as empirical validation. Historicists interpret the Olivet Discourse as outlining a continuous progression of prophetic signs through the age, from the apostolic era to the final consummation, rather than a singular event. Wars, rumors of wars, false prophets, and (Matthew 24:6–21) are seen as recurring patterns in history, such as the fall of , barbarian invasions, medieval plagues, and modern conflicts, serving as "birth pains" leading to Christ's return. The is applied to various historical figures or events embodying opposition, like papal claims during the or revolutionary upheavals. Reformation-era commentators, including and John Calvin's successors, adopted historicist lenses for apocalyptic texts, viewing the discourse's signs as unfolding providentially across centuries, with the gospel preached to all nations (Matthew 24:14) progressively fulfilled through missionary expansion since the first century. Unlike partial preterism's emphasis on closure for initial signs, historicism posits no strict temporal boundary, allowing for layered fulfillments where earlier events prefigure greater end-time realities, culminating in visible cosmic signs and the Son of Man's coming. This approach critiques overly localized interpretations by emphasizing the discourse's integration with broader biblical , such as and 12, applied historically.

Theological Implications

Connections to Old Testament Prophecies

The Olivet Discourse draws extensively on prophetic motifs, particularly apocalyptic imagery depicting on nations and cities, as seen in the prophets' descriptions of historical cataclysms like the fall of or . This rhetorical style, characterized by hyperbolic cosmic signs and tribulation language, frames ' predictions within a where such elements symbolize political upheaval and desecration rather than literal astronomical events. A central connection is Jesus' explicit reference to the "abomination of desolation" in Matthew 24:15 (paralleled in Mark 13:14), which directly invokes Daniel 9:27, 11:31, and 12:11, where it signifies a profane intrusion into the temple sanctuary preceding severe judgment. Scholars note this as Jesus repurposing Daniel's typology—originally linked to Antiochus IV's desecration in 167 BCE—to foreshadow events tied to Jerusalem's fate. The ensuing "" described in :21 mirrors 12:1's unparalleled distress for , amplifying themes of national purification through suffering. Cosmic upheavals in :29—the sun darkened, moon refusing light, and stars falling—echo 13:10 (against ), :4, 2:10 and 2:31 (), and 32:7 (against ), where similar phenomena herald God's intervention in human affairs. These parallels underscore a in prophetic of using astral collapse to denote the collapse of imperial powers. Finally, the "Son of Man coming on the clouds of heaven with power and great glory" in :30 alludes to :13, portraying a heavenly figure receiving dominion amid judgment on earthly kingdoms, thus linking ' self-identification to messianic vindication over Israel's oppressors. Such interconnections position the discourse as a synthesis of Danielic and Isaianic , applying covenantal curses from Deuteronomy 28 and Leviticus 26 to first-century .

Role in Christian Eschatology

The Olivet Discourse represents Jesus' primary extended prophetic teaching on eschatological matters, comprising his responses to the disciples' inquiries about the Temple's destruction, signs of the end of the age, and his coming. Found in –25, , and Luke 21, it describes sequential events including wars, famines, earthquakes, persecution of believers, the , , and cosmic signs heralding the Son of Man's visible return on clouds with power and glory. This framework has established it as a for Christian doctrines of the Parousia, final judgment, and consummation, emphasizing themes of over history's end. Within evangelical scholarship, the discourse encapsulates core eschatology, integrating motifs from and other prophets to outline tribulation, , and accountability before Christ. Its parables of the fig tree, watchful servants, ten virgins, talents, and sheep and goats reinforce ethical imperatives tied to end-time readiness, influencing soteriological and ecclesiological emphases on and . These elements underscore a realized yet anticipatory hope, where partial historical fulfillments, such as the AD 70 destruction, point toward ultimate cosmic resolution without negating future expectations. The discourse's role extends to testing and refining eschatological systems, serving as a scriptural benchmark for premillennial, amillennial, and other views on timing and sequence of end-time events. By prioritizing observable signs and Christ's personal intervention, it counters speculative timelines, grounding in first-century apostolic witness and fostering a of vigilant endurance amid tribulation. This integrative function links it inextricably to Revelation's imagery, affirming a unified biblical narrative of judgment, renewal, and eternal reign.

Debates and Criticisms

Imminence and Timing Issues

The Olivet Discourse includes explicit temporal indicators that have fueled debates over the prophecy's timeframe, particularly :34, where states, "Truly I say to you, this generation will not pass away until all these things take place." The Greek term genea, translated as "generation," typically denotes contemporaries sharing a lifespan, roughly 30 to 40 years, as evidenced by its usage elsewhere in the Gospels to refer to ' immediate audience, such as in 11:16 and 23:36. This phrasing implies events unfolding within the disciples' lifetime, aligning with first-century expectations but challenging interpretations that extend fulfillment millennia into the future. Preterist interpreters, emphasizing the discourse's audience relevance, argue that "this generation" points to Jesus' contemporaries, with the prophecy's core—tribulation, , and Jerusalem's fall—culminating in the Roman siege of , approximately 40 years later. They contend this resolves imminence by fulfilling signs like wars, famines, and false messiahs within that span, viewing cosmic language (e.g., Matthew 24:29) as apocalyptic for political upheaval rather than literal astronomy. However, full preterists extend this to include the Parousia, positing a "coming" in judgment on , though this lacks empirical cosmic disruption observable in AD 70 records. Futurist views counter that genea can flexibly mean "" or "kind," referring to the enduring Jewish or the future cohort witnessing the signs' onset, thus decoupling timing from the first century. Proponents like John MacArthur argue the discourse shifts post-Matthew 24:36 ("that day and hour no one knows"), distinguishing near-term destruction from distant end-time events, avoiding failed charges by positing dual layers. Partial preterists blend these, seeing AD 70 as a typological precursor to ultimate fulfillment, but this introduces ambiguity in verses like Mark 13:30 paralleling Matthew without clear demarcation. Skeptical critiques highlight unresolved tensions: the discourse's seamless narrative from Temple warnings to universal cosmic signs (Matthew 24:3-31) suggests unified imminence, unfulfilled literally after two millennia, undermining prophetic reliability absent symbolic reinterpretations. Secular analyses, often from historically critical scholarship, treat such delays as evidence of early Christian apocalyptic disappointment, reflected in New Testament adjustments (e.g., 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3), though these sources may reflect institutional biases favoring naturalistic explanations over supernatural claims. Empirical data confirms localized fulfillments like Jerusalem's siege but no global celestial events, pressing interpreters toward contextual or telescopic readings without consensus.

Historical Evidence for AD 70 Fulfillment

The siege of by Roman forces under began in the spring of , with legions encircling the city as described in Luke 21:20 of the Olivet Discourse, where warned of armies surrounding as a sign to flee. Flavius , a Jewish and eyewitness who initially fought for the rebels before defecting to the Romans, records in that four Roman legions positioned themselves around the walls starting on the 14th of Artemisius (April/May ), trapping approximately 1.1 million people inside during season. This encirclement initiated a prolonged blockade that matches the Discourse's prediction of tribulation prompting flight from . Intense famine gripped the city, fulfilling descriptions of great distress and people fleeing to the mountains (Matthew 24:15-21; Mark 13:14). Josephus details how inhabitants endured so severe that they consumed , dung, and old shoes boiled for sustenance, with over 600,000 perishing from hunger alone by his estimate. A particularly harrowing account involves a noblewoman named , daughter of , who, driven mad by desperation, killed, cooked, and ate her own nursing infant before offering the remains to fellow sufferers, an event emblematic of the unprecedented tribulation prophesied. Roman historian corroborates the famine's extremity in Histories, noting the city's population swelled by pilgrims and then succumbed to want amid internal strife. The temple's destruction on the 10th of Lous (August AD 70) aligns with ' prophecy that no stone would be left upon another (:2). recounts how soldiers, against ' orders, set fire to the temple during the assault, with flames consuming the structure despite attempts to extinguish them; the intense heat caused massive gold fittings to melt and flow into cracks, leading to systematic dismantling of stones to retrieve the metal, effectively razing the sanctuary. While notes that parts of the and three towers remained standing for strategic reasons, the temple complex itself was utterly demolished, with its gates and inner courts left in ruins, fulfilling the specific prediction of total desolation. Archaeological evidence, including the exposure of and burn layers in excavations, supports this account of comprehensive destruction. Pre-siege portents reported by parallel signs in the heavens and false prophets foretold in the Discourse (:4-7, 29). He describes visions of chariots wheeling through clouds, celestial armies, and prophetic figures deceiving the people with promises of deliverance, contributing to the chaos that prevented timely escape. These events, occurring amid earthquakes and internal factional wars among Jewish leaders, underscore the multifaceted fulfillment in , as chronicled by a source with direct access to both Jewish and perspectives.

Challenges from Skeptical and Secular Perspectives

Skeptical scholars contend that the Olivet Discourse reflects ' expectation of an imminent apocalyptic consummation that empirically failed to occur, positioning him as a failed akin to other first-century Jewish eschatological figures. In particular, the declaration in :34—"Truly I tell you, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened"—is interpreted by critics like Bart Ehrman as binding the predicted events, including the "coming of " (:30), to Jesus' own contemporaries, yet no such visible cosmic intervention transpired within that timeframe, spanning roughly 30-100 . This view draws on the discourse's emphasis on urgency, such as warnings against delay (:28-29), which aligns with broader first-century apocalyptic rhetoric but lacks verifiable fulfillment beyond sociopolitical upheavals. From a historical-critical standpoint, the text's composition postdates the destruction of the Temple, suggesting elements like the temple's desolation (:15) were retroactively attributed to to lend prophetic authority amid known events documented by , rather than originating as precise foresight. Secular analysts note parallels to intertestamental Jewish literature, such as the War Scroll from , indicating the discourse draws from generic eschatological motifs—wars, famines, earthquakes (:6-7)—common to the era's turbulent conditions under Roman rule, without unique predictive power. These features, critics argue, reflect adaptive editing in the , composed circa 70-100 , to address the interpretive crisis of unfulfilled expectations, as evidenced by later adjustments like 2 Thessalonians 2:1-3 tempering imminence. Empirical scrutiny of the prophesied cosmic signs further undermines supernatural claims: descriptions of the sun darkening, moon failing to give light, and stars falling (:29; :24-25) find no corroboration in Roman, Jewish, or astronomical records around AD 70, contrasting with verifiable events like the temple's siege on August 10, 70 CE. Skeptics such as , in his 1906 analysis, highlighted this literal apocalyptic framework as evidence of Jesus' erroneous timeline, influenced by Danielic imagery but detached from causal historical outcomes. While academic consensus on dating supports post-event redaction, secular perspectives attribute the discourse's endurance to theological retrofitting rather than evidential , noting institutional biases in religious that prioritize over falsification.

References

  1. [1]
    What is the Olivet Discourse? | GotQuestions.org
    May 5, 2025 · The Olivet Discourse is the name given to the orderly and extended teaching given by Jesus Christ on the Mount of Olives. His subject is the end times.Missing: scholarship | Show results with:scholarship
  2. [2]
    Jesus and the Future: An Introduction to the Olivet Discourse
    May 8, 2018 · This series of blogs will first walk through the Olivet Discourse step by step and then explore four key topics that Jesus covers in his teaching about the ...
  3. [3]
    Jesus and the Future: A Closer Look at the Olivet Discourse
    May 10, 2018 · Jesus opens his discourse on the Mount of Olives with an alarming prophecy: the temple will soon be destroyed (Matt 24:1–2 and parallels).
  4. [4]
    What Does the Olivet Discourse Predict? | Mark Strauss on Mark 13
    Mar 12, 2025 · The preterist view holds that Jesus's predictions in the Olivet Discourse were fulfilled in the first century, specifically in AD 70 with the ...
  5. [5]
    Pontius Pilate: Biography & Role in Jesus' Crucifixion - Bart Ehrman
    Oct 4, 2024 · Pontius Pilate was the governor of the Roman province of Judea from 26-36/37 CE. This happened to coincide with the arrest of Jesus, and Pilate ...
  6. [6]
    Discipleship in the Olivet Discourse in Mark's Gospel
    The Olivet Discourse is the name of this exchange between Jesus and His disciples because it occurred on the Mount of Olives just east of the temple.
  7. [7]
    [PDF] The Olivet Discourse --Sam A. Smith
    Gospel Parallels: A Synopsis of the First Three Gospels, ed. by Burton ... synoptic gospels, as well as John's gospel, individually. This volume takes ...
  8. [8]
    [PDF] Scholars Crossing - Liberty University
    Aug 15, 2025 · CHAPTER 3: BEGINNING THE DISCOURSE. The famous Olivet Discourse, found in Matthew 24–25, with Mark 13 and Luke 21 covering parts of it, is ...
  9. [9]
    Synoptic Gospel Parallels - Synoptic Gospels Comparison
    Oct 13, 2024 · Parallel comparison of the synoptic gospels Matthew, Mark and Luke and the gospel parallels also compare the fourth canonical book of John.Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis<|separator|>
  10. [10]
    The Olivet discourse; Comparison of the three chapters
    Sep 30, 2017 · Comparison of Matthew 24, Mark 13 and Luke 21, Christ's most comprehensive explanation of His return and of the End of the Age.
  11. [11]
    Resolving the Olivet Discourse | Koinonia House
    May 1, 2005 · Luke's account focuses on a siege of Jerusalem that is substantially divergent from the Matthew account. It is the presumption that they are ...<|separator|>
  12. [12]
    [PDF] Evangelical Interpretations of the Olivet Discourse in Luke
    T he Olivet Discourse stands as one of the most important and exegetically perplexing por- tions of Jesus' teachings. All of the Synoptic Gos-.
  13. [13]
    Olivet Discourse: Comparing the Synoptic Gospels
    Aug 2, 2022 · The Olivet Discourse is a conversation Jesus had with his disciples shortly before his crucifixion. As they sat on the Mount of Olives ...
  14. [14]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024:1-2&version=NIV
  15. [15]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark%2013:1-2&version=NIV
  16. [16]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2021:5-6&version=NIV
  17. [17]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew%2024&version=NIV
  18. [18]
    Of the War, Book VI - Josephus
    This attack was made upon the first day of the month Panemus [Tamuz] [A.D. 70]. So when the Jews were retreated, the Romans brought their engines, although ...
  19. [19]
    Josephus Describes The Romans' Sack Of Jerusalem | From ... - PBS
    When they went in numbers into the lanes of the city, with their swords drawn, they slew those whom they overtook, without mercy, and set fire to the houses.
  20. [20]
    The Destruction of the Second Temple - Jewish Virtual Library
    It was destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE. The site of the ancient Jewish Temple is now occupied, in part, by the “Dome of the Rock” Mosque. In recent times, “ ...
  21. [21]
    Evidence for the Destruction of Jerusalem in 70AD
    Jul 6, 2013 · Josephus Flavius, also known as Yosef Ben Matityahu, was an eye-witness to the siege of Jerusalem. He somehow survived the siege of Yotvat in ...
  22. [22]
    Causes of the Temple's Destruction - Josephus.org
    The Lord destroyed the Holy City because the people had violated the basic principles of His Law and made the Temple unfit for worship.The Lamentation of Josephus · The Temple is Set on Fire · Omens of Destruction
  23. [23]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A4-29%3B+Mark+13%3A5-25%3B+Luke+21%3A8-26&version=ESV
  24. [24]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A6&version=ESV
  25. [25]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A4-5%3B+Mark+13%3A5-6%3B+Luke+21%3A8&version=ESV
  26. [26]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Acts+5%3A36%3B+Acts+21%3A38&version=ESV
  27. [27]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A6-8%3B+Mark+13%3A7-8%3B+Luke+21%3A9-11&version=ESV
  28. [28]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Isaiah+19%3A2%3B+Joel+2%3A30-31&version=ESV
  29. [29]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A9-14%3B+Mark+13%3A9-13%3B+Luke+21%3A12-19&version=ESV
  30. [30]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A15-29%3B+Mark+13%3A14-25%3B+Luke+21%3A20-28%3B+Daniel+9%3A27%2C11%3A31%2C12%3A11%3B+Isaiah+13%3A10%2C34%3A4&version=ESV
  31. [31]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+24%3A29-31&version=ESV
  32. [32]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Daniel+7%3A13-14&version=ESV
  33. [33]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Mark+13%3A24-27&version=ESV
  34. [34]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+21%3A25-28&version=ESV
  35. [35]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+25%3A31-46&version=ESV
  36. [36]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ezekiel+34&version=ESV
  37. [37]
    https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+2%3A14-26&version=ESV
  38. [38]
    The Olivet Discourse - part 2 - Don Carson - Matthew 24-25
    1. Natural disasters will be plentiful. We read in verse 7, “There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. All these are the beginning of birth pains ...
  39. [39]
    Christ's Olivet Discourse on the End of the Age—Part VI:The Parable ...
    The parable of the talents in Matthew 25:14-30 is the sixth and concluding illustration that our Lord uses relative to preparedness for the second advent. As in ...
  40. [40]
    What is the meaning of the Parable of the Ten Virgins? - Got Questions
    May 27, 2025 · ... Olivet Discourse, Jesus illustrates events of the end times with a series of parables. One is the parable of the ten virgins (Matthew 25:1–13).
  41. [41]
    Explain the parable of the 10 virgins and those without oil
    Mat 25:1-13 NKJV "Then the kingdom of heaven shall be likened to ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom. (2) Now five of them were ...
  42. [42]
    The Parable of the Talents - The SLJ Institute
    Lewis Johnson expounds the Parable of the Talents, providing insight into the responsibility of followers of Christ to be faithful with what God provides them.
  43. [43]
    Parables of Jesus: The Parable of the Talents
    Those who obtain other talents receive more talents in abundance. But those who do not obtain other talents shall lose even the talents they had initially.
  44. [44]
    What is the meaning of the Parable of the Sheep and Goats?
    Jan 4, 2022 · The core message of the Parable of the Sheep and Goats is that God's people will love others. Good works will result from our relationship to the Shepherd.Missing: eschatology | Show results with:eschatology<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    UNDERSTANDING THE OLIVET DISCOURSE
    Aug 5, 2022 · This five-lecture set presents all the essential elements necessary for properly understanding the Olivet Discourse.
  46. [46]
    The Olivet Discourse Made Easy by Kenneth L. Gentry Jr. | Goodreads
    Rating 4.5 (47) Gentry masterfully presents a partial preterist case for the reading of Matthew 24. He presents some interesting arguments in regard to the break that occurs ...<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Matthew 24 and "This Generation" - Scholars Crossing
    PRETERIST VIEW. Preterist Gary DeMar says, “the generation that was in existence when Jesus addressed His disciples would not pass away until all the events ...
  48. [48]
    The Witness Of Jewish Historian Josephus Validates The Fulfillment ...
    This Olivet Discourse Deception study gives the historical account of the events of the first century, which validate the fulfillment of the Olivet Discourse.
  49. [49]
    Flavius Josephus and Preterism - The American Vision
    May 2, 2013 · A preterist argues that certain prophecies have already been fulfilled and that includes events outlined in the Olivet Discourse.
  50. [50]
    https://www.tektonics.org/esch/olivet01.php
  51. [51]
    1 THESS. 4 AND THE OLIVET DISCOURSE
    Feb 28, 2023 · A classic, thorough explanation and defense of postmillennialism (600+ pages). Complete with several chapters answering specific objections. See ...
  52. [52]
    Full Preterism, Partial Preterism, Gary DeMar, and Various Heresies
    Mar 19, 2023 · A “full preterist” believes, in relationship to the second coming of Christ that in fact it has already happened.
  53. [53]
    How Revelation Proves Postmillennialism - The Shepherd's Church
    Aug 1, 2024 · Josephus records how the Christians, obedient to Christ's prophecy on the Mount of Olives, left the city and were spared from its destruction.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  54. [54]
    Christ's Olivet Discourse on the End of the Age—Part I | Walvoord.com
    Matthew 24 and 25 present Christ's discourse on the end of the age, His predictions of the events which lead up to and climax in His second coming to the earth.
  55. [55]
    [PDF] Mapping the Second Half of the Olivet Discourse1 Matt 24:32-25:46
    In categorizing the futurist dispensational views of Matt 24:31-25:46 we see two broad views: those who believe the Rapture of the Church is introduced in Matt ...
  56. [56]
    1. Introduction | Bible.org
    Jan 1, 2008 · The context of the Olivet Discourse has an amazing similarity to contemporary problems. As Christ dealt with spiritual, theological, and moral ...Missing: futurist | Show results with:futurist
  57. [57]
    The Olivet Discourse - part 3 - Don Carson - Matthew 24-25
    Dispensationalists have taken this line historically in order to solve the dilemma. They no longer hold to only one coming of Christ. He comes in a secret pre- ...
  58. [58]
    Christ's Olivet Discourse on the End of the Age—Part IV:How Near Is ...
    In the opening portion of Matthew 24, our Lord answered the questions which had been raised by His disciples concerning the end of the age and His own coming ...Missing: futurist | Show results with:futurist
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Evidence from the Seal Judgments' Reliance on the Olivet Discourse
    ... Olivet Discourse and the seal judgments do not prove a futurist interpretation of Revelation. Other interpretations of the Olivet Discourse remain possible.
  60. [60]
    Partial Preterism - truthsaves.org
    Partial preterists believe that most of the prophecies of the Olivet Discourse and Revelation had their fulfillment in 70 A.D., but that there is still a future ...<|separator|>
  61. [61]
    Why I'm A Partial Preterist - Cerebral Faith
    May 2, 2017 · In the Olivet Discourse, Jesus says “then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let no one on the housetop go down to take anything ...
  62. [62]
    Partial Preterist view of the End of the Age in Matthew
    Feb 14, 2024 · Many partial preterists link the "end of the age" reference in the Olivet Discourse to the events of 70 AD.
  63. [63]
    Who Are the Preterists? - TheoFaith
    Feb 3, 2025 · A well-known proponent of partial preterism, DeMar's books, such as Last Days Madness, aim to challenge futurist eschatology and offer a ...
  64. [64]
    The Olivet Discourse – Worth Another Look - Neo-Historicism
    Apr 16, 2018 · The Olivet Discourse, also called the “Little Apocalypse,” describes a period great persecution and tribulation beginning with the early ...
  65. [65]
    Historicists on Matthew 24 - Against Magog - WordPress.com
    Jan 28, 2022 · The key to remember is that the abomination of desolation causes the Great Tribulation. The language doesn't allow any separation in the ...
  66. [66]
    Thomas Ice Part 16 - Matthew 24:21 Historicism, Preterism & Daniel
    Historicism teaches that the events of the tribulation, as noted in the book of Revelation, have been occurring throughout the entire 2,000 years of the current ...
  67. [67]
    "A Futurist Exegesis of Matthew 24:1-42" by Kenneth Garcia
    May 23, 2025 · It critiques Preterist and Historicist views, arguing that key elements—including the abomination of desolation, the great tribulation, and the ...
  68. [68]
    Prophetic language of Mt 24 found throughout the Old Testament
    The language of Mt 24, like "sun darkened, moon turned to blood," is found in the Old Testament, used for past destructions, not just the second coming.
  69. [69]
    Christ's Olivet Discourse on the End of the Age—Part III:Signs of the ...
    Signs include the "abomination of desolation," great tribulation, sun darkening, stars falling, and the blaze of glory in the heavens when Christ returns.<|separator|>
  70. [70]
    Part 5/5: Comparing the Prophets to the Olivet Discourse Framework
    Jun 20, 2019 · Seven passages from the prophets will be compared with Jesus's Olivet Discourse framework: Isaiah 13, Ezekiel 38, Zechariah 12, Zechariah 14, Jeremiah 4, Joel ...
  71. [71]
    Jesus and the Olivet Discourse: The Son of Man Coming on the ...
    Feb 16, 2018 · When Jesus talks about “the Son of Man coming in the clouds,” he is alluding to Daniel 7:13-14. The details of Daniel 7 are much too complicated ...
  72. [72]
    The Olivet Discourse: The Tribulation and the Second Coming
    The Olivet Discourse1 is Jesus' longest, most important and detailed discussion of eschatology. In it he deals with the destruction of Jerusalem and the ...
  73. [73]
    The Olivet Discourse: Second Coming Prophesy or Prophetic ...
    May 23, 2024 · The Olivet Discourse is found in Matthew 24–25, Mark 13, and Luke 21. This famously difficult speech by Jesus is, at minimum, a prophecy against the Jerusalem ...
  74. [74]
    A Survey of the Eschatology of the Olivet Discourse Part I
    The Olivet Discourse as recorded in Matthew 24 and 25 is one of the most important and significant eschatological passages in the entire New Testament. Three ...Missing: scholarly sources
  75. [75]
    Six Points for Pastors “Unpacking” the Olivet Discourse
    Jun 9, 2025 · But the Lord's teaching on the Rapture in the Olivet Discourse draws and builds on Old Testament prophesies, connects directly with both Mark ...
  76. [76]
    [PDF] INTERPRETIVE FLAWS IN THE OLIVET DISCOURSE - TMS
    The Olivet Discourse is a majestic passage of Scripture in which the Lord explains the future of Israel from the perspective of believing Israel.Missing: scholarship | Show results with:scholarship<|separator|>
  77. [77]
    The Olivet Discourse: Resolution of Time. Ron Bigalke Jr
    Matthew gives the fullest account of the Olivet Discourse (cf. Mark 13; Luke 17:20–37; Luke 21:20–37). Even a cursory reading of Matthew's Gospel shows that he ...<|separator|>
  78. [78]
    Eschatology Archives - Detroit Baptist Theological Seminary
    The Olivet Discourse in Matthew 24–25 is the longest prophetic section in the NT outside of the book of Revelation. If the next prophesied event that ...
  79. [79]
    Does John MacArthur Make His Case on the Olivet Discourse?
    Oct 1, 2024 · [1] Since the meaning of “this generation” is crucial for establishing the proper time setting for the Olivet Discourse, MacArthur should have ...<|separator|>
  80. [80]
    (PDF) PRETERISM AND "THIS GENERATION" - Academia.edu
    This article argues that the exegetical data of the Gospels do not support preterism's contention that "this generation" establishes a time frame within ...
  81. [81]
    The Siege of Jerusalem, AD 70, by Flavius Josephus
    The Siege of Jerusalem, AD 70 by Josephus ... Jerusalem fell, after a siege, to a Roman army under Titus. Josephus was a Jew who had gone over to the Romans.
  82. [82]
    The Romans Destroy the Temple at Jerusalem, 70 AD
    An Eyewitness account of the Roman assault on Jerusalem ... The assault culminated in the burning and destruction of the Temple that served as the center of ...
  83. [83]
    Josephus -- Wars VI, the Destruction of Jerusalem - Arnold vander Nat
    Jerusalem and the Temple were beseiged, plundered, and utterly destroyed by the Romans in 70 CE, and how the people endured famine, pestilence, slaughter, ...
  84. [84]
    The Heart of Jesus' Message - The Bart Ehrman Blog
    Feb 12, 2022 · ... Olivet Discourse, and was only referring to events leading up to the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in A.D. 70? They also claim that ...
  85. [85]
    The Failed Apocalypse of Jesus - Dr. Bart D. Ehrman - YouTube
    Jun 26, 2021 · Bart Denton Ehrman is an American New Testament scholar focusing ... Olivet discourse had come to pass by AD 70. Check out Dr. Ehrman's ...<|separator|>
  86. [86]
    My Response to A Book That Responded To My Book: How Jesus ...
    Feb 13, 2022 · Dr Ehrman,. On the Olivet Discourse…Jesus implies that he would not be present with the disciples in the future. He concludes with the “Son of ...
  87. [87]
    Did Matthew Embellish The Olivet Discourse To Cover Up Jesus ...
    Jul 5, 2023 · Was Jesus a failed prophet? Did Jesus fail to return to earth when he had promised to return? Skeptics believe he did.<|separator|>
  88. [88]
    Mark's Olivet Discourse - Probably not about the Temple
    GMark was dated in relation to the war and the Olivet discourse was interpreted in the light of these historical events. The main point of the discussions was ...Missing: skeptical | Show results with:skeptical
  89. [89]
    The Olivet Discourse: Was Jesus Wrong? - Resurrection Review
    Feb 4, 2013 · The extreme literalism of Schweitzer's position has been set up in such a way that it makes preterism look like the only sensible alternative: ...