Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Open Polar Sea

The Open Polar Sea refers to a hypothesized ice-free ocean basin surrounding the North Pole, proposed primarily during the 19th century as a navigable waterway beyond the peripheral ice pack.^[1] This theory posited that warm currents, such as extensions of the Gulf Stream, maintained a temperate, open expanse at high latitudes, facilitating easier access to polar regions than the observed surrounding ice suggested.^[2] Proponents, including British Admiralty official John Barrow and German cartographer August Petermann, drew indirect support from phenomena like mirages of distant land, migrations of warm-water species, and early hydrographic data indicating northward heat transport.^[3] However, the hypothesis lacked direct empirical verification and persisted amid limited Arctic penetration, influencing expedition planning despite mounting contradictory observations from whalers and explorers encountering unrelenting ice barriers.^[4] The theory's allure stemmed from practical imperatives, including Britain's quest for a Northwest Passage to Asia, which encouraged optimistic interpretations of sparse data over rigorous causal analysis of ice formation dynamics.^[5] Key advocates argued that seawater's salinity prevented freezing or that centrifugal forces from Earth's rotation cleared central polar waters, but these claims overlooked thermodynamic realities of radiative cooling and latent heat release in ice growth.^[1] Expeditions like Elisha Kent Kane's 1853–1855 voyage and the 1879–1881 Jeannette mission, explicitly aimed at reaching this supposed sea, ended in disaster, with vessels crushed by ice and crews suffering high fatalities, underscoring the perils of hypothesis-driven exploration without adequate evidential grounding.^[6]^[7] Disproof accumulated through persistent failures to breach the ice edge and direct soundings revealing thick, multi-year pack ice extending to the pole, culminating in Fridtjof Nansen's 1893–1896 Fram expedition, which drifted embedded in ice for over two years without sighting open water, providing irrefutable data against the open sea model.^[8] Subsequent ventures, including Roald Amundsen's and Robert Peary's polar reaches, confirmed perennial ice dominance via sledge traverses and aerial reconnaissance, aligning with first-principles understanding of polar climatology where extreme isolation from solar input sustains frozen equilibrium.^[5] Though discredited by the early 20th century, the Open Polar Sea exemplifies how institutional pressures for discovery routes and interpretive biases in pre-instrumented oceanography delayed acceptance of empirical limits, a cautionary case in scientific history.^[3]^[2]

Historical Origins

Early Conceptions in Exploration Lore

The notion of an open polar sea originated in ancient Greek mythology with Hyperborea, a fabled land north of Thrace portrayed as a temperate paradise of eternal spring, free from harsh winds and blessed by perpetual sunlight, as described in accounts attributing divine favor and abundant life to its inhabitants.^[9] This lore contrasted the known frigid north with an idealized habitable realm, influencing later conceptions of navigable polar regions. Empirical observations began with Pytheas of Massalia's voyage around 325 BCE, where he reached Thule—likely in the far northern British Isles or Iceland—and reported a frozen ocean (Cronian Sea) one day's sail beyond, yet noted the midnight sun illuminating a cohesive, gelatinous sea teeming with marine life, seeding interpretations of intermittent openness amid ice.^[10]^[11] Medieval European traditions perpetuated these ideas through cartographic and textual survivals, blending mythic temperateness with vague reports of northern accessibility, though direct empirical Arctic ventures remained sparse until the early modern era. In the 1590s, Dutch cartographer Petrus Plancius formalized an exploratory rationale, arguing astronomically that temperatures declined southward to 66° latitude but reversed poleward due to uninterrupted summer solar radiation—up to 24 hours daily—which would melt any ice formation, ensuring an ice-free central sea conducive to navigation.^[12] Plancius's views, disseminated via maps promoting northeastern passages, drew on celestial mechanics to counter prevailing ice fears without relying on direct sightings. Early 17th-century Arctic whaling expeditions by Dutch and English fleets, commencing around Spitsbergen in 1611, provided anecdotal reinforcements through observations of migratory bird flocks—such as fulmars and guillemots—venturing north beyond visible pack ice, implying proximate land or polynyas; floating vegetation suggestive of distant shores; and inflows of warmer saline currents enabling prolonged seasonal access to higher latitudes despite surrounding ice.^[13]^[14] These reports, logged in captains' journals from voyages targeting bowhead whales, portrayed the pack as a peripheral barrier to potentially open interior waters, though limited by seasonal constraints and navigational perils.

19th-Century Scientific Formulation

John Barrow, Second Secretary to the Admiralty, played a pivotal role in reviving the open polar sea hypothesis during the early 19th century, integrating it into British naval strategy for Arctic exploration. In 1818, Barrow orchestrated dual expeditions—one westward via Baffin Bay for the Northwest Passage and another eastward toward Spitsbergen—explicitly motivated by the prospect of an ice-free polar ocean facilitating direct trade routes to Asia and scientific discovery of northern geography.^[15]^[16] These efforts reflected Barrow's advocacy for navigable high-latitude seas, drawing on historical accounts while aligning with post-Napoleonic imperial ambitions to repurpose naval resources for commercial gain.^[17] American naval physician Elisha Kent Kane further formalized the concept in mid-century narratives, emphasizing observational evidence from overland traverses. During the Second Grinnell Expedition of 1853–1855, Kane's sledge parties documented extensive leads and polynyas in the ice northwest of Greenland, which he portrayed as gateways to a warmer, open polar basin beyond the peripheral pack ice.^[18]^[19] In his 1851 pamphlet Access to an Open Polar Sea, Kane argued for the hypothesis's feasibility, linking it to geomagnetic and faunal indications of reduced polar ice, thereby influencing American public and congressional support for Arctic ventures amid the Franklin search.^[19] German geographer August Petermann contributed to its mainstream acceptance through influential cartography in the 1850s and 1860s, producing polar projections that visualized a expansive, ice-free central Arctic ocean encircled by a peripheral ice belt.^[20] Petermann's 1852 polar chart and subsequent maps, disseminated via publications like Petermanns Mitteilungen, portrayed hypothetical channels leading to this basin, blending empirical whaling reports with theoretical geography to advocate for transpolar navigation.^[21] These depictions secured funding from U.S. and European sponsors by framing the open sea as a verifiable geographic feature amenable to expeditionary proof, intertwining scientific cartography with geopolitical incentives for polar access.^[4]

Arguments Supporting the Hypothesis

Oceanographic and Climatic Rationales

The hypothesis of an open polar sea was supported by 19th-century oceanographers who posited that the Gulf Stream extended northward into the Arctic Basin, delivering sufficient heat to inhibit perennial ice formation. Matthew Fontaine Maury, in his 1855 work The Physical Geography of the Sea, described the Gulf Stream as originating in the Gulf of Mexico and terminating in the Arctic Seas, with its warm waters purportedly radiating heat equatorward from the pole while maintaining an ice-free central ocean.^[22] This view drew on early hydrographic observations, including temperature and current measurements from transatlantic voyages, which indicated a continuous northward flux of subtropical waters capable of countering polar cooling.^[23] August Petermann, a prominent cartographer and Arctic theorist, refined this current-based rationale by emphasizing a variant where warm inflows from the Atlantic and Pacific converged at the pole, preventing ice accumulation through advective heat transfer estimated at levels sufficient to sustain liquid water year-round.^[20] Complementing these arguments, proponents invoked seawater's elevated salinity—typically 3.5% in oceanic basins—which depresses the freezing point to approximately -1.8°C, lower than freshwater ice formation thresholds, thereby rendering surface waters resistant to solidification even under subzero air temperatures.^[1] This physical property, combined with turbulent mixing from currents, was held to dissolve nascent ice layers before they could consolidate. Climatic factors further bolstered the case, particularly the polar region's extended summer insolation, where continuous daylight for up to six months delivers cumulative solar radiation capable of melting any winter-formed ice, as calculated from basic radiative balance principles assuming minimal albedo feedback from open water.^[24] Petermann integrated this solar influence with current dynamics, arguing that the absence of land barriers allowed unobstructed heat convergence, fostering a stable polynya-like basin at the pole.^[20] Such reasoning, rooted in contemporaneous bathymetric ignorance and simplified thermodynamic models, portrayed the open sea as a causal equilibrium of inflowing warmth, saline depression of freezing, and prolonged illumination.

Observational and Biological Evidence

Explorers during the 1850s, including Elisha Kent Kane on his second Grinnell expedition (1853–1855), reported sightings of southern migratory land birds such as robins and woodcocks at latitudes exceeding 78°N in Smith Sound. These observations, logged in mid-1854 amid heavy pack ice, were interpreted by proponents as signs of nearby open water habitats capable of supporting avian life atypical for such extreme northern environments, implying ice-free zones beyond the visible ice edge.^[4]^[25] Driftwood and attached relic vegetation, including roots and organic matter, encountered on Arctic ice floes by expeditions in the early to mid-19th century, were cited as biological markers of proximate landmasses with terrestrial ecosystems. The relative freshness of some specimens, lacking extensive marine degradation, suggested origins from shores not distant enough to traverse vast ice barriers, thereby reinforcing conjectures of encircling ice-free coastal regions around a polar basin.^[26] Whaling records from British and American voyages spanning the 1770s to 1850s documented recurrent large-scale leads and polynyas within the pack ice, notably the North Water—a persistent open-water area in northern Baffin Bay and Smith Sound spanning approximately 80,000 km². Whalers exploited these features for access and hunting as early as the early 19th century, with navigators noting their reliability; such patterns were extended by hypothesis advocates to posit a vaster, perennial central sea sustained by similar dynamics, free from perpetual ice cover.^[27]^[28]

Empirical Challenges and Disproof

Pre-20th-Century Expeditions

The 1860–1861 expedition under Isaac Israel Hayes, aboard the schooner United States, targeted the Open Polar Sea by probing northward through Smith Sound with a crew of 15. Hayes advanced to about 81°35' N latitude via sledge parties, where he documented sightings of what appeared to be vast open water extending northward, accompanied by elevated temperatures—air up to 43°F (6°C) and seawater at 34°F (1°C)—attributed to proximity to a warmer, ice-free polar basin.^[29] Harsh winds, equipment failures, and encroaching ice forced retreat after nine months, yielding data that Hayes presented as supportive yet inconclusive due to incomplete penetration.^[30] British Franklin search efforts in the 1840s–1850s, including the 1850–1851 squadron led by Horatio Austin and the 1852–1854 command of Edward Belcher, traversed the Canadian Arctic archipelago amid thick pack ice but identified navigable leads, such as in Wellington Channel, alongside warmer inflows and marine life indicators suggestive of broader open water beyond.^[4] These observations, gathered while prioritizing survivor traces, were cautiously interpreted by some participants as aligning with the hypothesis, positing that Franklin's vessels might have accessed such polynyas en route to an unfrozen polar expanse; persistent barriers, however, precluded resolution, amplifying logistical perils like frostbite and scurvy losses.^[25] Charles Francis Hall's 1871–1873 Polaris voyage, the first U.S. government-sponsored polar thrust, pursued the Open Polar Sea northward via Kennedy Channel, attaining 82°11' N before multi-year ice immobilized the vessel in October 1872. Hall's sudden death from apparent poisoning preceded the ship's crushing in 1873, stranding 19 survivors on floes for six months; amid this, reports emerged of mirage-distorted vistas resembling distant open seas, intermittent leads permitting brief advances, and thermal anomalies hinting at underlying currents, which expedition logs framed as tentative validations despite the catastrophe.^[31] ^[32] Internal discord and supply shortages underscored the hypothesis-testing ambiguities, with no conclusive breach achieved.

Decisive 19th- and 20th-Century Voyages

Fridtjof Nansen's Fram expedition from 1893 to 1896 sought to penetrate the Arctic by allowing the purpose-built ship Fram to freeze into the ice pack off Siberia and drift toward the North Pole, testing the hypothesis of a navigable polar sea through direct observation.^[33] The vessel became entrapped in ice in September 1893 and drifted northward, reaching a maximum latitude of approximately 84°N before Nansen and companion Fredrik Hjalmar Johansen abandoned ship in March 1895 for a sledge journey to 86°13.6′N, the farthest north at the time.^[8] Their measurements revealed thick, multi-year ice floes up to 2–3 meters deep, with no evidence of an open central basin; instead, the ice pack exhibited irregular deformation from pressure ridges and leads, confirming a continuous, dynamic but impermeable cover over the deep Polar Basin (depths exceeding 3,000 meters).^[8] Nansen's oceanographic data, including salinity and temperature profiles, indicated persistent ice formation driven by cold surface waters and the Transpolar Drift, undermining expectations of ice-free conditions from warmer currents.^[8] The Fram eventually emerged from the ice in August 1896 off Greenland, having traversed without encountering open polar waters.^[33] Robert Peary's expeditions in 1905–1906 and 1908–1909 involved sledge traverses from Ellesmere Island toward the North Pole, documenting unrelenting ice conditions that refuted the open sea concept.^[34] In the later effort, Peary claimed to reach 90°N on April 6, 1909, after traveling approximately 413 nautical miles over hummocked, pressure-ridged sea ice averaging 1.5–2 meters thick, with no breaks into liquid water beyond seasonal leads.^[35] His party's observations of uniform ice extension from the Canadian archipelago to the pole—supported by navigational fixes and ethnographic consultations with Inuit hunters familiar with regional ice—demonstrated a cohesive pack without a central polynya or navigable sea, attributing ice persistence to thermodynamic freezing and wind-driven compression.^[35] These findings, though debated for exact polar attainment, were corroborated by subsequent under-ice profiling. The USS Nautilus (SSN-571) achieved the first submerged transit beneath the Arctic ice cap to the North Pole on August 3, 1958, providing sonar and periscope data on a continuous ice canopy averaging 6–10 meters thick, with keel depths preventing surface breaches and confirming no open polar basin.^[36] Covering 1,830 nautical miles under ice from the Pacific to the Atlantic, the submarine encountered variable but unbroken coverage, including multi-year floes resistant to seasonal melt, which causal analysis linked to radiative cooling and haline convection maintaining year-round solidity.^[36] ^[37] Soviet drifting ice stations, initiated in the 1930s and expanded through the 1950s (e.g., North Pole-1 in 1937), deployed teams on floes for multi-year occupations, yielding bathymetric, ice-core, and meteorological records that mapped a permanent central ice cap spanning the Arctic Ocean.^[38] Observations from stations like NP-2 (1950–1951) recorded ice thicknesses of 3–5 meters in the polar region, with snow accumulation insulating against melt and pressure ridges indicating long-term accumulation rather than transient seasonal ice, directly falsifying a navigable open sea.^[38] These efforts, combined with early 1920s–1930s aerial reconnaissance flights that photographed extensive pack ice without central openings, established the causal dominance of perennial congelation over hypothetical warm-water upwelling.^[39]

Legacy and Scientific Impact

Influence on Arctic Exploration Strategies

The belief in an Open Polar Sea provided a rationale for increased governmental funding of Arctic expeditions, particularly in the United States, where proponents linked it to prospects of commercial navigation routes, whaling grounds, and national prestige. In 1852, the U.S. Congress appropriated $150,000 for the second Grinnell Expedition led by Elisha Kent Kane, motivated in part by hopes of accessing an ice-free polar basin that could facilitate trans-Arctic trade and rescue efforts for lost explorers.^[5] Similarly, President-elect Abraham Lincoln endorsed Isaac Israel Hayes' 1860 expedition, intervening with congressional allies to secure logistical support amid "Arctic Fever" enthusiasm for verifying the open sea's existence and its potential for American expansion.^[40] These investments reflected a strategic emphasis on direct polar penetration over peripheral surveys, as advocates argued the theory promised quicker access to central Arctic resources compared to incremental coastal mapping. The hypothesis prompted a tactical shift in exploration routes, moving away from earlier conjectures of a vast northern landmass—such as the hypothetical "Croker Mountains" or continental extensions—and toward targeted assaults on the pole via open-water corridors. British Admiralty Second Secretary John Barrow, a key proponent, redirected Royal Navy resources from Siberian and Alaskan coastal probes to high-latitude voyages, exemplified by the 1845 Franklin Expedition's push through the presumed navigable channels toward an anticipated polynya.^[2] American explorers like Kane and Hayes adopted similar approaches, provisioning for extended sledge hauls and steam-assisted breakthroughs into the theorized sea, which diverted manpower and vessels from alternative theories favoring land-based overland treks or peripheral whaling routes. This reorientation concentrated efforts on Smith Sound and Kennedy Channel as gateways, influencing subsequent ventures like Charles Francis Hall's 1871 Polaris Expedition.^[1] While the theory galvanized ventures by promising reduced ice impediments, it contributed to elevated risks and resource drains through overoptimism about navigability, leading to preventable casualties. The Franklin Expedition's 1845 departure with 129 men aboard HMS Erebus and Terror, outfitted for a summer passage into open waters, ended in total loss when ships became entrapped in continuous pack ice, exacerbated by assumptions of a warming polar basin that underestimated multiyear floe persistence.^[2] Kane's 1853–1855 expedition similarly suffered frostbite deaths and shipwreck after probing for the sea, draining further congressional funds without empirical validation and highlighting the perils of prioritizing unverified hydrographic models over conservative provisioning for prolonged ice confinement. These outcomes underscored the empirical costs of hypothesis-driven routing, where motivational allure deferred rigorous ice reconnaissance in favor of speculative gains.^[5]

Lessons in Scientific Methodology

The Open Polar Sea hypothesis exemplifies the pitfalls of confirmation bias in scientific inquiry, where selective emphasis on anomalous observations, such as polynyas and leads in sea ice, overshadowed contradictory evidence of extensive ice barriers. Proponents, including explorers and theorists like Elisha Kent Kane, interpreted transient openings—caused by wind-driven divergence or upwelling rather than underlying warm waters—as harbingers of a perennial ice-free basin, while marginalizing accounts of unrelenting pack ice encountered in high latitudes.^[1]^[41] This pattern delayed recognition of causal ice-ocean dynamics, including thermodynamic freezing processes and circulatory currents that sustain variable but persistent ice cover, in favor of uniformitarian assumptions extrapolating temperate climate gradients poleward without accounting for radiative cooling and brine rejection.^[2] The theory's longevity underscores the primacy of falsifiability and rigorous empirical testing over inductive accumulation of circumstantial support. Indirect rationales, such as biological indicators (e.g., southern-range marine species in northern waters) or geomagnetic anomalies attributed to open-water convection, accumulated without decisive confrontation until sustained ventures pierced presumed ice rims, revealing homogeneous pack ice extending to the pole.^[41]^[42] Persistent expeditionary efforts, despite high risks and failures, enforced direct verification, illustrating how hypotheses resilient to disproof through ad hoc adjustments—such as positing peripheral ice belts shielding a central sea—erode under methodical null hypothesis scrutiny.^[43] Entanglement of scientific pursuit with geopolitical imperatives further compromised objectivity, fostering interpretive selectivity. Advocates like Matthew Fontaine Maury framed the hypothesis as enabling transpolar commerce and naval dominance, aligning evidence with national ambitions for Arctic passages amid Anglo-American rivalries, which prioritized navigational optimism over impartial data aggregation.^[2] This fusion incentivized overlooking thickening ice reports from whalers and prioritizing mirage-induced "water skies," revealing how extraneous motives can perpetuate errors until unadulterated observation prevails.^[41] Ultimately, the episode reinforces privileging causal mechanisms grounded in physics—e.g., latent heat release in ice formation—over speculative constructs, demanding meta-skepticism toward consensus shaped by non-epistemic pressures.^[1]

Modern Arctic Conditions

Observed Ice Dynamics

Satellite records from the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) document a multi-decadal decline in Arctic summer minimum sea ice extent, from an average of approximately 7.5 million km² during the 1980s to around 4.5 million km² in the 2020s, with record lows such as 3.74 million km² in September 2020.^[44]^[45] This reduction accompanies a sharp decrease in multi-year ice coverage, which comprised about 2.7 million km² (roughly 26% of the March ice pack) in 1985 but only 4.4% by March 2020.^[46] Winter sea ice maximum extent persists at higher levels, averaging 14-16 million km² in March over the satellite era, reflecting seasonal refreezing and expansion across the Arctic marginal seas.^[47] Ice thickness, derived from submarine upward-looking sonar profiles, shows average drafts of 2-4 meters in the central Arctic basin, with thicker multi-year ridges exceeding 5 meters in some transects, though overall thinning trends are evident since the 1990s.^[48] Interannual and decadal variability in extent and thickness is modulated by natural climate modes, including the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation (AMO), which influences ice loss rates through alterations in ocean heat transport and atmospheric circulation patterns, accounting for up to 50% of variability in marginal ice zones.^[49]^[50] Polynyas—open water features within the pack ice—form recurrently due to wind-driven divergence, ocean upwelling, and ice dynamics, as mapped in satellite-derived datasets from 2013-2022 showing persistent occurrences in regions like the Laptev and East Siberian Seas.^[51] These features exhibit spatial and temporal variability tied to local wind regimes and coastal topography, with recent examples including a large polynya spanning 100 km by 30 km during extreme wind events.^[52]

Comparisons to Historical Predictions

The Open Polar Sea hypothesis, as articulated by 19th-century explorers and theorists such as Constantine Phipps and Ferdinand von Wrangel, envisioned a vast, perennial ice-free basin encircling the North Pole, sustained by warm currents or inherent oceanic temperateness independent of broader climatic forcings.^[1] In contrast, modern satellite and submarine observations from 1958 onward, including data from the USS Nautilus's transpolar voyage and continuous monitoring by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC), have consistently documented persistent multiyear sea ice over the central Arctic, with no evidence of a stable, year-round open gyre or basin as hypothesized.^[53] September minimum extents have declined from approximately 7.5 million square kilometers in the late 1970s to 4.28 million square kilometers in 2024, reflecting seasonal melt but retaining coverage over the pole and precluding the predicted ice-free core.^[45] While peripheral regions exhibit expanding open water areas—attributable to diminished ice export through Fram Strait and amplified summer insolation absorption— these developments stem from observed thermodynamic disequilibria, including atmospheric heat transport and surface albedo reductions, rather than the static, circulation-driven equilibrium posited in historical models.^[54] Submarine upward-looking sonar profiles through the 2020s confirm ice drafts exceeding 1-2 meters in the central basin even during minima, diverging from expectations of uniformly navigable, temperate waters.^[55] Contemporary scientific understanding frames Arctic sea ice variability as a transient response to radiative imbalances, wherein longwave trapping and shortwave absorption dominate over speculative 19th-century notions of an intrinsically warm polar ocean.^[56] This dynamic interplay, evidenced by correlations between declining ice concentration and enhanced surface turbulent fluxes since 2002, underscores the hypothesis's empirical shortfall without implying reversibility to a perennial open state under current forcings.^[57]

References

[1]
An open polar sea? - Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
May 2, 2024 · The northward flow of warm waters was just one explanation for the open polar sea theory. Some people thought seawater was too salty to freeze; ...
[2]
'Ancient lore with modern appliances': networks, expertise, and the ...
Jul 22, 2021 · At its core, the debate surrounding theories purporting the existence of the Open Polar Sea centred on the limits of knowledge: how do you ...
[3]
Hypothesis Versus Fact: August Petermann and Polar Research
Jan 1, 1999 · Stone. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14430/arctic929. Keywords: August Petermann, history, exploration, Arctic Ocean, open polar sea, Gulf Stream ...<|separator|>
[4]
[PDF] open-polar-sea-in-extremes.pdf - Time to Eat the Dogs
Maury had become interested in the open polar sea theory in the 1840s. He laid out his arguments in The Physical Geography of the Sea, and its Meteorology.
[5]
To the North Pole! | Proceedings - U.S. Naval Institute
Despite its tragic ending, however, the exedition helped disprove facile theories of an open polar sea and of the presumed Arctic landmass near Russia, and ...
[6]
The Ill-fated Jeannette Expedition to The Arctic | Amusing Planet
Jan 13, 2024 · Leading cartographer August Petermann from Germany was a firm believer in the Open Polar Sea theory. ... They also disproved the theory ...<|separator|>
[7]
Science As Faith: Arctic Martyrs And The Open Polar Sea - Patheos
Apr 6, 2021 · In his 1869 book on The Open Polar Sea, Isaac Israel Hayes described the iceberg-ridden waters off Greenland as “a land of enchantment… the ' ...
[8]
History | Nansen and the Drift of the Fram (1893-1896)
Although Nansen did not achieve the North Pole, the Fram expedition finally put an end to the "Open Polar Sea" theory, and made numerous scientific observations ...
[9]
HYPERBOREA - Fabulous Northern Land of Greek Legend
Hyperborea was a theocracy ruled by three priests of the god Apollon. These gigantic kings, known as the Boreades, were sons of Boreas (the North Wind). Their ...Missing: lore | Show results with:lore
[10]
On the Ocean: The Famous Voyage of Pytheas
Jul 14, 2017 · Written in Greek sometime around 325 BCE, it is perhaps the earliest documented description of the British Isles and its inhabitants.Missing: open | Show results with:open
[11]
[PDF] PYTHEAS OF MASSALIA; Texts, Translation, and Commentary
Pytheas of Massalia (Marseille), mariner, explorer, geographer and astronomer, made a pioneering voyage into the then unknown Atlantic around 325 BC, ...
[12]
The Three Voyages of William Barents to the Arctic Regions (1594 ...
A warm defender of his doctrines was found in the Dutch cosmographer Plancius. Maintainer of the existence of an open Polar Sea, Plancius argued that the ...
[13]
17th century whaling - Spitsbergen Svalbard
English and Dutch whalers, targeting Bowhead whales, established shore stations to process whale oil. They used small boats and harpoons, and the oil was used ...<|separator|>
[14]
[PDF] Climate Change, Whaling, and Conflict in the Seventeenth-Century ...
Where there was no sea ice, whalers could travel freely. Once again, open water allowed Dutch whalers to linger off. Spitsbergen even after English sailors ...Missing: birds | Show results with:birds
[15]
https://brill.com/display/book/9789004521841/BP000022.pdf
[16]
[PDF] William Scoresby, Jr. (1789-1857) and the Open Polar Sea
However,. Scoresby and Sir John Barrow, Second Secretary of the Admiralty, the main organizer of arctic exploration, had opposing perceptions of the nature of ...
[17]
The Arctic in the Quarterly Review - Taylor & Francis Online
My essay analyzes a series of eighteen articles on Arctic exploration published in the Quarterly between 1816 and 1840 by John Barrow, the bureaucrat behind the ...
[18]
Elisha Kent Kane | Arctic Expedition, Arctic Explorer, Polar Scientist
Elisha Kent Kane was an American physician and Arctic explorer who in 1850 led an unsuccessful expedition to northwestern Greenland to search for the ...
[19]
KANE, ELISHA KENT – Dictionary of Canadian Biography
On his return from the 1850–51 Arctic expedition he put forth his theory of an open polar sea in a 24-page pamphlet, Access to an open polar sea in connection ...
[20]
(PDF) Hypothesis Versus Fact: August Petermann and Polar Research
Aug 6, 2025 · Although the actual course of polar research disproved Petermann's hypotheses, his conception not only exerted considerable influence on the ...
[21]
August Petermann, 'Polar chart', 1852, Justus Perthes Collection,...
His map was frequently used at scientific meetings and public events to underwrite the scientific basis for the existence of an Open Polar Sea. Claims to ...
[22]
The Gulf Stream and Its Problems - jstor
The Gulf of Mexico is its fountain, and its mouth is in the. Arctic Seas. It is the Gulf Stream. There is in the world no other such majestic flow of waters.<|control11|><|separator|>
[23]
[PDF] Progress in Oceanography - Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Feb 1, 2008 · Generally these charts indicate a northward flow of warm surface water from the Gulf Stream region into the northern North Atlantic and a ...
[24]
The opening of the Transpolar Sea Route: Logistical, geopolitical ...
This hypothesis allowed for an “open polar sea” further offshore, warmed by six months of daylight and temperate ocean currents [3].Missing: formulation | Show results with:formulation
[25]
On the Open Polar Sea - Believer Magazine
Feb 1, 2014 · If Kane's hypothesis seems crazy, he was far from the only one who believed it. Theories about the existence of an open polar sea had circulated ...
[26]
The Polar Question | Proceedings - 1885 Vol. 11/4/35
The botanists of the Swedish Expedition found that Spitzbergen abounds in vegetation of great richness and variety, making the best field for naturalists yet ...
[27]
[PDF] THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE NORTH WATER TO WHALES AND ...
This recurring polynia was known by the bowhead whalers as the North Water and it was frequently visited by whalers and expeditions during the 19th century. The ...
[28]
An Oasis of Open Water | Hakai Magazine
Nov 27, 2018 · European whalers called it the North Water. But the Inuit who live here have long called it the Pikialasorsuaq [peek-yayla-sor-swakh], or the ...
[29]
Arctic obsession drove explorers to seek the North Pole
Jan 24, 2020 · Hayes claimed to have traveled far north enough to have seen the open polar sea, but later analysis revealed that his calculations were off. His ...
[30]
[PDF] The Isaac Hayes 1860-1861 Polar Expedition
Mar 6, 2022 · The purpose of the expedition was to confirm the existence of such an open sea by reaching the North Pole and to explore the northern coasts ...
[31]
Polaris: the chief scientist's recollections of the American North Pole ...
Apr 26, 2017 · Prior to Hall's death and the dissolution of the crew, the expedition had successfully blitzed northwards through Melville Bay, Smith Sound, ...
[32]
[PDF] Polaris - Northern Review
In June 1871, Charles Francis Hall embarked as the commander of an ill-fated expedition to the North Pole on the Polaris, the first of its kind launched by ...
[33]
The First Fram Expedition (1893-1896) - Fram Museum
He started plant collecting as the Fram sailed along the Siberian coast and continued by collecting algae in the ice. In addition he doctored the expedition ...
[34]
Mystery of the Arctic Ice: Who was First to the North Pole
Apr 6, 2022 · One of the most famous explorers of the area was Robert Peary, who manned multiple expeditions throughout Greenland and toward the North Pole.
[35]
Who Discovered the North Pole? - Smithsonian Magazine
Reading an account of a Swedish explorer's failed attempt to become the first person to cross the Greenland ice cap, Peary borrowed $500 from his mother, ...
[36]
Navigating Under the North Pole Icecap - U.S. Naval Institute
On 3 August 1958, the USS Nautilus (SSN-571) became the first submarine to cross the North Pole underneath the Arctic ice cap.
[37]
Significance of the Nautilus Polar Cruise - May 1958 Vol. 84/5/663
Potential of Under-Ice Operations At any time of the year, a submarine maneuvering under the polar ice pack could expect to find either open water or ice thin ...
[38]
North Pole Drifting Stations (1930s-1980s)
The drifting ice stations collected fundamental observational data. These operations continued until 1991 when the station "North Pole-31" terminated. During ...Missing: permanent | Show results with:permanent
[39]
Historic Variations in Arctic sea ice. Part II: 1920-1950 - Climate Etc.
Apr 10, 2013 · This paper explores the controversy surrounding the period 1920-1950, which was a period of substantial warming in the Arctic.
[40]
The Open Polar Sea: Lincoln and the Arctic Explorer
Feb 9, 2021 · Kane had trekked to the Arctic in search of survivors from Sir John Franklin's 1845 expedition and an “Open Polar Sea” route to the North Pole.
[41]
on the origin and persistence of error in geography 1
J. K. Wright, “ The Open Polar Sea,”Geographical Review, Vol. 43 (1953), pp. 338–65, also printed in Wright, cited in footnote 14. 40 W. M. Davis, “ The ...
[42]
On the Origin and Persistence of Error in Geography - jstor
The open polar sea was not finally dropped as a subject for debate until after the voyage of the Fram, commanded by. Fridtjof Nansen. Nansen permitted the ...Missing: disproof | Show results with:disproof
[43]
ON THE ORIGIN AND PERSISTENCE OF ERROR IN GEOGRAPHY
Mar 15, 2010 · The inculcation of scientific method by example, with an illustration drawn from the Quaternary geology of Utah ... The Open Polar Sea. Source: ...
[44]
Sea Ice Index Daily and Monthly Image Viewer
Monthly images show sea ice extent with an outline of the 30-year (1981-2010) median extent for that month (magenta line). Other monthly images show sea ice ...Data Archive · Compare & Animate · FAQMissing: summer minimum 1980s 2020s
[45]
Arctic Sea Ice Minimum Extent - Earth Indicator - NASA Science
The measurements have shown that September Arctic sea ice is shrinking at a rate of 12.2% per decade, compared to its average extent during the period from 1981 ...
[46]
Sea Ice Age | National Snow and Ice Data Center
In March 2020, similarly old ice comprised just 4.4 percent of the Arctic Ocean sea ice cover. In March 1985, old ice covered 2.70 million square kilometers.
[47]
Sea Ice Today | National Snow and Ice Data Center
In the Arctic, the annual minimum sea ice extent occurs in September and the annual sea ice maximum extent occurs in March. In the Antarctic, the minimum ...Charctic Interactive Sea Ice... · Studying sea ice · Sea Ice Analysis Tool · Data ToolsMissing: 1980s | Show results with:1980s
[48]
Decline in Arctic sea ice thickness from submarine and ICESat ...
Aug 6, 2009 · This combined analysis shows a long-term trend of sea ice thinning over submarine and ICESat records that span five decades.
[49]
Sources of multi-decadal variability in Arctic sea ice extent
Jul 26, 2012 · Oceanic sources of variability are also thought to have had a significant impact on SIE. These include the Atlantic multi-decadal oscillation ...Abstract · Introduction · Multi-model Analysis · Estimating the AMO driven...
[50]
Influence of the Atlantic and Pacific Multidecadal Variability on Arctic ...
The internal components of AMV and PMV can enhance or weaken the decadal sea ice loss rates over the marginal Arctic Ocean by more than 50%. The AMV- or PMV- ...
[51]
Map of Arctic and Antarctic Polynyas 2013–2022 Using Sea Ice ...
We present a dataset of daily polynya distribution in the Arctic and Antarctic from 2013 to 2022, analyzing their spatial patterns, interannual variability, and ...
[52]
Scientists discover large Arctic polynya | Polar Journal
At its peak, the polynya was 100 kilometers long and 30 kilometers wide. As the new report points out, the polynya formed during an episode of extreme winds.
[53]
Arctic sea ice extent levels off; 2024 minimum set
Sep 24, 2024 · On September 11, Arctic sea ice likely reached its annual minimum extent of 4.28 million square kilometers (1.65 million square miles).Missing: 1958- free
[54]
https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-02796-y
[55]
The Late Mesozoic‐Cenozoic Arctic Ocean Climate and Sea Ice ...
Nov 6, 2019 · When extrapolating this alarming trend, the central Arctic Ocean might become ice-free during summers within about the next 2–5 decades.
[56]
The future of ice sheets and sea ice: Between reversible retreat and ...
We review the recent findings that such a tipping point probably does not exist for the loss of Arctic summer sea ice.The Future Of Ice Sheets And... · The Ice--Albedo Feedback · Arctic Sea Ice
[57]
Satellite observations reveal the impact of changing sea ice on ...
May 2, 2025 · This study estimates wintertime surface turbulent fluxes across the Arctic Ocean during 2002−2020, integrating various satellite-based sea ice observations ...