Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Harling

Operation Harling was a sabotage conducted by the Special Operations Executive (SOE) in collaboration with fighters during , culminating in the destruction of the Gorgopotamos railway viaduct in Axis-occupied Greece on 25 November 1942. Launched in September 1942 as the first major SOE operation on the Greek mainland, the aimed to sever vital rail supply lines from the to , thereby hindering German reinforcements and shipments to Erwin Rommel's in . A team of twelve commandos, led by E. C. W. , parachuted into the rugged terrain of , where they linked up with disparate guerrilla bands including the communist-dominated and the royalist under . The operation's execution involved over 200 fighters assaulting garrisons guarding the viaduct's approaches, enabling sappers to plant and detonate explosives that collapsed key spans of the structure, rendering the line inoperable for over six weeks. This marked one of the earliest large-scale acts against in occupied and temporarily united rival resistance factions, though underlying tensions foreshadowed postwar conflicts. The raid's strategic impact delayed thousands of tons of supplies to Rommel's forces at a critical juncture before the Second , contributing to Allied momentum in the Mediterranean theater, though the Germans eventually rebuilt the bridge using forced labor. As the largest SOE demolition operation to date, it demonstrated the potential of in disrupting enemy logistics and boosted morale among occupied populations.

Historical Context

Axis Occupation of Greece

The commenced following the German invasion on April 6, 1941, which supported Italy's stalled campaign after its on October 28, 1940. Greek forces capitulated on April 23, 1941, leading to the division of the country into three occupation zones: controlled strategic areas including , , eastern , and parts of around ; administered the majority of the western mainland, , and numerous Aegean and ; occupied eastern , , and some northeastern islands, treating these territories as annexed provinces. This tripartite arrangement prioritized Axis logistical needs, with German forces securing key ports and rail infrastructure vital for supplying troops in and the Eastern Front. A collaborationist puppet regime, the Hellenic State, was established on April 30, 1941, under General as prime minister, followed by in December 1942 and in April 1943. These governments cooperated with Axis authorities to maintain order, enforce requisitions, and later form to combat resistance, though real power resided with and commands. emphasized economic , seizing Greece's fleet and imposing heavy payments, while Bulgarian forces pursued policies in their zone, displacing ethnic Greeks. occupation was relatively lighter in repression but focused on resource extraction for Mussolini's . The triggered severe economic collapse, exacerbated by Allied naval s, wartime destruction, and systematic requisitions of foodstuffs and raw materials to feed their armies. soared, with the losing nearly all value by 1944, and agricultural output plummeted due to labor shortages and confiscations. The Great Famine of 1941–1942 resulted in 200,000 to 300,000 deaths, primarily from and related diseases among urban populations, as rural surpluses were diverted to forces and black marketeers. policies, including a complete ban on food exports to unoccupied territories and prioritization of military needs, intensified the crisis, though British restrictions limited relief imports until late 1942. Axis garrisons, totaling around 300,000 troops by mid-1943 (including 100,000 , 200,000 , and ), enforced control through brutal reprisals, executing civilians in response to and imposing collective fines on villages. Infrastructure like the Athens-Thessaloniki railway, critical for troop movements and supply convoys to fronts, became a prime target for emerging due to its role in sustaining . Total civilian deaths during the reached approximately 500,000, encompassing victims, killings, and forced labor fatalities, underscoring the 's devastating toll.

Emergence of Rival Resistance Factions

In the wake of the beginning in April 1941, disparate resistance groups coalesced amid widespread famine and reprisals, but ideological fractures soon surfaced. The communist-dominated (EAM), sponsored by the (KKE), formed in September 1941, leveraging the party's organizational discipline to recruit broadly from peasants, workers, and disillusioned military personnel. EAM's armed branch, the (ELAS), emerged as its military wing in 1942, prioritizing both anti-occupier sabotage and territorial control to position communists favorably for postwar governance. Concurrently, to offset EAM's rapid ascendancy and prevent a communist monopoly on resistance efforts, non-communist officers established the National Republican Greek League (EDES) in September 1941, led by Colonel Napoleon Zervas, a proponent of republicanism rooted in Venizelist traditions. Operating chiefly in northwestern Greece, particularly Epirus, EDES drew support from liberal, antimonarchist, and nationalist elements wary of KKE influence, initially framing its struggle as one for democratic renewal without ideological extremism. British Special Operations Executive (SOE) agents provided arms and funding to EDES as a counterweight, recognizing the risks of over-reliance on EAM-ELAS. Tensions between and escalated from ideological antagonism—communist expansionism versus republican nationalism—compounded by competition for scarce resources and Allied patronage. 's superior numbers and coercive recruitment tactics, including forced and reprisals against rivals, fueled mutual distrust, yet pragmatic alliances formed against common threats, exemplified by their joint participation in Operation Harling in November 1942. This rivalry foreshadowed broader civil strife, as each faction maneuvered for postwar dominance, with aiming to supplant the Greek and aligning with royalist and British interests.

Planning and Preparation

SOE Strategic Objectives

The (SOE), operating from , pursued Operation Harling as a direct response to requests from General (GHQ) to Axis logistics in occupied , following the Royal Air Force's failure to interdict German supply convoys from to . The primary military objective was to sever the critical Thessaloniki-Athens railway line, which served as the main conduit for shipped from via the to ports at and thence to Erwin Rommel's , thereby supporting General Bernard Montgomery's Eighth Army offensive at in October 1942. This disruption aimed to delay or halt reinforcements and fuel shipments essential to Axis forces in , with SOE tasked to target one of three key viaducts—Gorgopotamos, Asopos, or Papadia—selected for their strategic centrality and vulnerability to . Beyond immediate logistical interdiction, SOE's broader strategic aims included fostering capabilities in to undermine control and establish a for coordinated resistance operations across occupied . By embedding a small sabotage team to link with local partisans, the sought to harness emerging resistance networks, such as the communist-led and royalist , compelling their temporary cooperation despite ideological divides and thereby validating SOE's doctrine of subversion through indigenous forces. Success was intended to boost morale among Greek fighters, encourage further Allied investment in Balkan resistance, and transition SOE efforts from isolated raids to sustained missions, as evidenced by the subsequent establishment of the British Military Mission to . These objectives aligned with SOE's charter to "set ablaze" through and subversion, prioritizing high-impact targets that maximized disruption with minimal resources while mitigating risks to Allied personnel in a theater where intelligence on resistance reliability remained limited. Conceived in late summer amid mounting pressure on Rommel's supply lines, the mission underscored SOE's role in integrating with conventional theater commands, though its tactical impact was partially eclipsed by the rapid Allied victory at .

Selection of the Gorgopotamos Target

The British (SOE) prioritized disrupting the Athens-Thessaloniki railway, a vital conduit for supplies to Erwin Rommel's in , where shipments of , food, and other sustained German operations. In early October 1942, SOE officers, including Major Eddy Myers, conducted of three viaducts in the Brallos : Gorgopotamos, Asopos, and Papadia, assessing vulnerability, repair difficulty, and access amid defenses. The Gorgopotamos viaduct emerged as the preferred target due to its curved steel-and-masonry design spanning a deep gorge, which would demand extensive reconstruction time—estimated at months—compared to straighter alternatives, thereby maximizing logistical interruption. and his team, guided by local contacts, determined it offered the strongest prospects for successful demolition with limited resources, despite garrisons guarding both approaches, as the site's terrain favored guerrilla approach and evasion. Greek resistance leaders from the communist-led and royalist , initially rivals, endorsed Gorgopotamos upon joint scouting three days prior to the assault, recognizing its centrality to enemy rail throughput and the potential for collaborative action without ceding strategic ground. This consensus, forged despite ideological tensions, underscored the target's neutral appeal in advancing Allied aims over factional gains.

British Team Assembly

The British (SOE) assembled the team for Operation Harling in late summer 1942 at its headquarters, selecting personnel with specialized skills suited for behind enemy lines in occupied . The mission required parachute-trained operatives capable of demolitions, signals communication, and liaison with local resistance groups, prioritizing engineers (sappers) for bridge destruction, radio operators for coordination, and interpreters fluent in Greek to bridge cultural and linguistic gaps. Lt. Col. Edmund "Eddie" Myers, a officer experienced in demolitions and irregular operations, was appointed overall commander due to his technical expertise and leadership in prior covert activities. The team comprised 12 men, organized into three self-contained groups of four to enhance survivability and operational flexibility during insertion and dispersal. Each group included a leader for command, an interpreter for negotiations, a for explosives work, and a for signals; some groups incorporated additional wireless personnel or Greek-speaking auxiliaries drawn from Allied forces, including seconded to SOE for their evasion skills from earlier campaigns. Key figures included Maj. Christopher Woodhouse as a group leader and principal liaison, leveraging his classical education and Greek proficiency, and Maj. Cooke, who led another subunit with experience in mountain terrain navigation.
GroupLeaderInterpreterSapperRadio Operator(s)
1Lt. Col. Eddie MyersCapt. Denys HamsonCapt. Tom BarnesSgts. Len Willmott, Frank Hernen
2Maj. Chris Woodhouse2nd Lt. Themis Marinos (Greek auxiliary)Lt. Inder GillSgt. Doug Phillips
3Maj. John Cooke-Capt. Nat Barker, Capt. Arthur EdmondsSgt. Mike Chittis
Preparation emphasized lightweight equipment for parachute drops, including explosives, radios, and survival gear, with rehearsals for target reconnaissance and guerrilla coordination before the scheduled insertion on 30 September 1942 via U.S. B-24 Liberators from bases in . This structure allowed the team to operate independently if separated, as occurred post-drop near Mount Giona, while retained strategic oversight.

Execution of the Mission

Parachute Insertion and Initial Contacts

The British (SOE) team for Operation Harling, consisting of twelve personnel divided into three groups of four—including three officers in command, three engineers, three interpreters, and three wireless operators—attempted parachute insertion into German- and Italian-occupied on the night of 28 September 1942 using three modified B-24 Liberator bombers from bases in . The initial drop failed when the aircraft could not locate the prearranged landing zone near Mount Giona in due to the absence of signal fires from local contacts. A successful insertion occurred on the night of 30 September 1942, with two of the Liberators dropping eight team members onto the slopes of Mount Giona, while the third aircraft aborted its mission; the intended drop zone farther west near leader in the Mountains had been altered by a garbled radio message. Led by Colonel Eddie Myers with Major Chris Woodhouse as second-in-command, the parachutists experienced scattered landings amid rugged terrain, with one group touching down perilously close to the Italian-occupied town of Karpenisi and evading capture only through assistance from local villagers who hid them and their equipment. Supplies and additional personnel, including the remaining four team members, were delivered in a follow-up drop approximately six weeks later in the Karpenisi Valley. The scattered teams reunited over the following one to two weeks, aided initially by local shepherds and villagers such as "Barba Niko," who provided food and shelter while the SOE operators recovered from injuries and oriented themselves in the unfamiliar mountainous region. Initial contacts with fighters, known as andartes, began shortly after landing as Myers' group linked up with small local bands, including early connections facilitated by Greek team member Themis Marinos to commander in the vicinity. Establishing broader cooperation proved challenging due to the ideological rivalry between the communist-dominated (Greek People's Liberation Army) and the right-wing (National Republican Greek League); direct outreach to Velouchiotis was initially elusive, requiring persistent efforts amid mutual suspicions. Woodhouse undertook a grueling 19-day trek southward to meet Zervas, whose forces numbered around 100 fighters in the Valtos Mountains, securing his commitment through diplomatic assurances of British support. Woodhouse then negotiated with Velouchiotis to overcome factional divisions, persuading both leaders to unite several hundred andartes for the mission despite their underlying political tensions.

Coordination with ELAS and EDES

The British (SOE) team, commanded by Brigadier Eddie Myers and including Major Christopher Woodhouse, established contact with the leaders of and shortly after parachuting into in early October 1942. , the military arm of the communist-dominated (EAM), and , the National Democratic Greek League led by Colonel , were ideologically opposed, with ELAS pursuing revolutionary aims and EDES focusing on national liberation under republican principles. Myers met Zervas on 19 November 1942 near Mavrolithari in , followed by a meeting with , the ELAS captain in the region, on 20 November. Woodhouse conducted negotiations emphasizing the strategic value of the Gorgopotamos bridge demolition and leveraging promises of arms and supplies to secure agreement for action, despite mutual distrust between the factions. A reconnaissance of the site occurred on 22 November, confirming the plan's feasibility. The coordinated force assembled for the assault totaled approximately 150 Greek partisans—86 from and 52 from —supplemented by 12 SOE saboteurs equipped with explosives and demolition expertise. units handled diversionary attacks on Italian guards at the northern end of the , while forces secured the southern approach and provided covering fire, enabling the British team to place and detonate charges under the spans. This division of roles reflected the British-brokered compromise, marking the first major collaborative effort between the rival groups and demonstrating SOE's ability to temporarily bridge their divisions for a common military objective.

Sabotage Assault and Demolition

The sabotage assault on the Gorgopotamos viaduct began at 11:07 PM on 25 November 1942, when approximately 250 Greek partisans—150 from under and 100 from under —launched coordinated attacks on the Italian guard posts at both ends of the structure. The , numbering around 100 personnel equipped with pillboxes and machine-gun emplacements, mounted a defense but were outnumbered and surprised. At the southern end, forces swiftly neutralized pillboxes with grenades before storming the barracks, forcing the surviving Italians to withdraw with minimal resistance. The northern end proved more contested, where fighters engaged in prolonged firefights to suppress counterattacks and secure the perimeter, preventing reinforcements from reaching the bridge. Throughout the engagement, British SOE signals directed the action, with Lieutenant-Colonel Eddy Myers authorizing a 15-minute delay before the full assault to ensure positioning. While the partisans maintained security, the British demolition party—led by New Zealander Lieutenant Tom Barnes and including experts like Inder Gill—rappelled down the viaduct's 50-meter gorge to access the piers. They carried approximately 300 kilograms of Nobel's 808 , placing charges on the central pier and adjacent arches despite discrepancies between pre-mission reconnaissance and the actual masonry structure, which necessitated on-site adjustments to wiring and placement. Fuses were ignited shortly before 1:00 AM on 26 November, culminating in the first detonation at 1:30 AM, which shattered the main pier and caused two 20-meter spans to collapse into the river below. A secondary blast at 2:21 AM demolished additional sections, rendering the inoperable and halting rail traffic for over two months. The operation inflicted light casualties on the Allied side—primarily minor wounds among the partisans—with around 15 killed and others captured, their arms seized to bolster resistance forces.

Immediate Outcomes

Disruption of Axis Logistics

The demolition of the Gorgopotamos viaduct on November 25, 1942, severed the primary railway artery linking in to and the in the south, a route essential for transiting supplies originating from and destined for and other theaters. The operation destroyed the bridge's central span, completely halting rail traffic and compelling German and Italian forces to rely on overburdened road networks or circuitous alternatives, which lacked comparable capacity for heavy . This interruption persisted for approximately , as reported by SOE leader Christopher Myers, during which repair efforts by Italian engineers under German oversight faced repeated threats from local resistance. Quantitatively, the sabotage reduced supply throughput via by an estimated 40 percent, exacerbating logistical bottlenecks at a time when Erwin Rommel's was retreating following the . Although the timing post-El Alamein diminished its direct utility against Rommel—who had already shifted westward—the disruption nonetheless strained ongoing reinforcements to and impeded the flow of raw materials like Greek chrome ore to . Road diversions proved inefficient, with convoys vulnerable to ambushes, further compounding delays in munitions, fuel, and troop movements critical to maintaining control in the . The viaduct's strategic centrality amplified these effects; prior to the war, it handled the bulk of freight south of the Brallos Pass, and its loss forced a temporary pivot to ports like or extended overland hauls, each option reducing effective logistics by orders of magnitude compared to efficiency. records, though sparse, indicate heightened urgency in repair prioritization, underscoring the operation's tangible bite into operational despite the Allies' Mediterranean gains.

Casualties, Reprisals, and Evacuation

During the sabotage assault on the Gorgopotamos viaduct on the night of 25–26 November 1942, the combined British-Greek force of approximately 150 men suffered no fatalities, with only minor injuries reported among four participants from wounds sustained in skirmishes with guards. The garrison, numbering around 100 troops at the bridge ends, incurred significant losses, including at least 30 killed or wounded, as resistance fighters overpowered sentries and machine-gun posts before the demolition charges detonated. In reprisal for the destruction, Italian forces executed ten villagers from nearby Ypati on 1 December 1942, marching them bound to the site and shooting them before the rubble. German authorities in separately hanged nine captured patriots publicly a few days after the attack, attributing the act to against occupation infrastructure. These executions exemplified punitive policies in occupied , where civilian reprisals often targeted local populations regardless of direct involvement to deter further resistance. Following the demolition, the teams dispersed into the surrounding mountains under cover of darkness, evading immediate pursuit due to the remote terrain and coordinated withdrawal routes planned with local guides. The British contingent, led by Lieutenant-Colonel E. C. W. , was initially slated for submarine evacuation shortly after the operation but received orders from to remain in and expand networks, forgoing extraction for several months. Greek partisans from and reintegrated into their units without further incident, leveraging the success to bolster recruitment in .

Long-Term Impact

Military and Morale Effects

The destruction of the Gorgopotamos viaduct on November 25–26, 1942, halted rail traffic on the critical line for approximately six weeks, preventing the transit of over 2,000 trainloads of supplies that Axis planners had intended for reinforcement of forces in . However, as the operation concluded nearly a month after the Allied victory at (October 23–November 11, 1942), its direct contribution to disrupting Erwin Rommel's logistics was minimal, with German retreats already underway and alternative sea routes partially compensating for rail shortfalls. In the broader theater, the sabotage failed to achieve the pre-mission goal of significantly shaping Axis deployments ahead of , as the timing limited its influence on supply flows from Greek ports to . Longer-term, Operation Harling compelled the to allocate additional engineering and security resources to infrastructure, including the rapid deployment of specialist units and heightened garrisoning along rail lines, which strained occupation forces already facing and harassment. This elevated threat level contributed to the diversion of German divisions—estimated at up to six from the Eastern Front—to bolster defenses in the , indirectly easing pressure on Allied advances elsewhere by tying down approximately 300,000 troops in through sustained guerrilla actions inspired by the . Follow-on operations, such as the Asopos viaduct demolition, extended disruptions, sinking shipping and further eroding logistical efficiency until the occupation's end in October 1944. On morale, the mission delivered a profound psychological uplift to the Greek resistance, marking the first large-scale success in occupied and validating inter-factional cooperation between communist-led (86 fighters) and royalist (52 fighters) under British coordination. This unity, though fleeting, fostered a amid hardships, spurring and subsequent raids that amplified confidence. For personnel, the event underscored vulnerabilities in rear-area security, prompting reprisals like the execution of nine locals but also eroding occupier complacency as resistance demonstrated capacity for coordinated strikes.

Political Ramifications in Greece

Operation Harling facilitated a temporary alliance between the communist-dominated ELAS, led by Aris Velouchiotis, and the republican EDES under Napoleon Zervas, marking the last instance of joint military cooperation between Greece's primary resistance factions despite their ideological divides. British SOE officers, including Brigadier Edmund Myers and Colonel Christopher Woodhouse, mediated this collaboration to execute the Gorgopotamos viaduct demolition on November 25, 1942, demonstrating the feasibility of unified guerrilla actions against Axis forces. However, the underlying political antagonisms—ELAS's affiliation with the EAM front aiming for post-war dominance versus EDES's alignment with republican and eventual royalist elements—rendered the partnership fragile. In the immediate aftermath, the operation's elevated morale and recruitment, transitioning disparate groups into more structured guerrilla networks supported by supplies totaling over £2 million from 1941 to 1944. Yet, cooperation eroded swiftly; clashes between and erupted within a month, escalating into open conflict by and a localized lasting until February 1944. The decision in December 1942 to retain the Harling team as a permanent Military Mission intensified involvement but exposed policy tensions: SOE prioritized military utility by aiding both groups, while the Foreign Office advocated severing ties with anti-monarchist to bolster II's eventual return. Longer-term, Harling underscored the resistance's in anti-Axis warfare and domestic power struggles, foreshadowing broader strife. ELAS's expansion, bolstered by captured Italian following the September 8, 1943 armistice, enabled ambitions to control upon liberation, clashing with British-backed government forces and precipitating the events in December 1944 and the subsequent . British efforts to restrain ELAS aligned it temporarily with Allied objectives, but ideological cleavages and EAM's rejection of perpetuated divisions, influencing Greece's fractured political landscape into the late .

Assessments and Controversies

Operational Success and Limitations

Operation Harling achieved a clear tactical success on the night of 25–26 November 1942, when British (SOE) personnel, supported by approximately 150 fighters from the communist-led and royalist groups, demolished two central spans of the Gorgopotamos viaduct using timed explosives after neutralizing guard posts. The operation proceeded despite delays in clearing the outposts, with demolition charges successfully placed and detonated, rendering the 211-meter-long structure impassable for rail traffic without significant casualties among the saboteurs—all participants evaded capture, though some sustained injuries. This marked one of the earliest large-scale acts against infrastructure in occupied , demonstrating the viability of coordinated guerrilla under SOE guidance. Strategically, the destruction disrupted a key segment of the Athens–Thessaloniki railway, which formed part of the primary overland supply route from Axis-occupied territories to Rommel's Afrika Korps in North Africa, reducing German logistics capacity by an estimated 40 percent during the critical period following the Second Battle of El Alamein. SOE commander Eddy Myers later assessed that the six-week interruption in rail shipments had a substantial effect on Axis materiel flows, forcing reliance on less efficient road convoys and port diversions amid Allied advances. The action validated the potential for resistance forces, augmented by Allied expertise, to execute precision strikes that tied down enemy resources, prompting Axis reinforcements in Greece—including engineering units and additional troops—to secure transport nodes. However, the operation's limitations were evident in its short-term scope and Axis adaptability; the viaduct was fully repaired by Italian IV Ferrovieri engineers within seven weeks using prefabricated sections, restoring rail throughput before the disruption could decisively alter the North theater's balance. Alternative trucking routes and shipments mitigated the blockade's severity, limiting the strategic ripple to a temporary logistical strain rather than a sustained impediment, as Rommel's supply vulnerabilities stemmed more from broader Allied efforts. Tactically, the reliance on fragile inter-factional between ideologically opposed Greek groups introduced coordination risks that, while not fatal here, foreshadowed operational frictions in subsequent missions, underscoring the challenges of scaling such actions amid divided resistance loyalties.

Inter-Factional Disputes and Historical Debates

The joint participation of and in Operation Harling masked underlying inter-factional tensions rooted in ideological divides, with aligned to the communist EAM seeking to expand political influence amid occupation, while under prioritized republican nationalism and . During planning, commanders, led by , displayed reluctance, initially viewing British SOE agents with suspicion and demanding verbal assurances of future material support that could bolster EAM's governance claims in liberated areas, as recounted in SOE mission reports from the period. These demands reflected 's strategy to leverage military actions for post-war power, contrasting 's more straightforward alignment with Allied goals without explicit political preconditions. Tensions surfaced during the assault on November 25, 1942, where contributed 86 fighters compared to 's 52, yet British observers noted uneven commitment, with some units focusing on perimeter security rather than direct engagement against guards, potentially to minimize and preserve forces for internal rivalries. Post-operation, as cooperation frayed—culminating in attacks on bands by October 1943—the factions accused each other of opportunism, with claiming exaggerated its role to claim over resistance legitimacy. Historical debates over Operation Harling's legacy have been shaped by Greece's subsequent (1946–1949), where communist narratives, propagated through EAM/ channels, attributed primary success to ELAS's numerical superiority and initiative, often downplaying to delegitimize non-communist resistance. In contrast, British SOE analyses and Western emphasize the operation's success as a product of enforced unity under Allied coordination, critiquing ELAS's politicization as a factor limiting sustained collaboration. Scholarly assessments acknowledge persistent controversy regarding credit shares, attributing it to biased recollections influenced by factional loyalties rather than empirical operational records. These debates underscore how wartime yielded to causal factionalism, with reprisals and resource competition eroding the brief alliance by early 1943.

References

  1. [1]
    Operation Harling – Gorgopotamos and the Greek Resistance
    Operation Harling was the demolition of the Gorgopotamos Bridge by Greek resistance and British commandos to disrupt supplies to Rommel's Afrika Korps.
  2. [2]
    Operation Harling: Textbook Guerrilla Warfare - Aspects of History
    On 23 November, a large band of guerrillas – twelve British and several hundred Greeks – set off through the snow towards Gorgopotamos. On arriving at the gorge ...
  3. [3]
    Operation Harling - Cutting of Rommel's Supplies, Sabotage in the ...
    Dec 9, 2018 · These daring missions could affect events hundreds of miles away, as happened with Operation Harling, an Anglo-Greek mission of 1942. Cutting ...
  4. [4]
    Sabotage in occupied Greece | shrine.org.au
    Jun 10, 2021 · An Italian garrison held both ends of the Gorgopotamos viaduct, the bridge finally selected as the only feasible target for the operation. On ...<|separator|>
  5. [5]
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    The blowing up of the Gorgopotamos bridge – Army.gr
    Nov 25, 2024 · The blowing up of the Gorgopotamos bridge is a major event of the Greek National Resistance, against the German Occupation, during WWII.
  8. [8]
    Gorgopotamos: The Greatest Moment of Greek Resistance Against ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · The blowing up of the Gorgopotamos bridge on November 25, 1942 stands as the greatest moment of Greece's resistance during World War II.
  9. [9]
    Greece - Holocaust Encyclopedia
    At the time of the Axis occupation in 1941, nearly 72,000 Jews lived in Greece. The differing priorities of Germany, Italy, and Bulgaria with regard to the ...
  10. [10]
    Starvation Without Reparations: The Nazi Occupation of Greece
    During the course of the Second World War, the Axis Powers occupied Greece for just over 4 years, beginning with the Italian and German invasion of April ...
  11. [11]
    The Greek Civil War, 1944-1949 | New Orleans
    May 22, 2020 · During the Axis occupation of the country from 1941–1944, nearly 100,000 people died of starvation. Resistance had begun slowly against German, ...
  12. [12]
    The Greek Holocaust - Warfare History Network
    Jan 20, 2024 · After invading Greece in 1941, Hitler's forces embarked on a reign of terror every bit as brutal as their other conquests.
  13. [13]
    The Greek Famine During the Nazi Occupation - GreekReporter.com
    Oct 23, 2022 · The Greek famine during the three and a half years of Nazi occupation killed at least two hundred thousand and perhaps as many as three hundred thousand people.
  14. [14]
    EAM-ELAS | Resistance Movement, Civil War, Liberation - Britannica
    EAM-ELAS, communist-sponsored resistance organization (formed September 1941) and its military wing (formed December 1942), which operated in occupied Greece ...
  15. [15]
    EDES | Greek Resistance, Civil War & Guerrilla Warfare | Britannica
    ... ELAS control of the resistance movement in occupied Greece during World War II ... The National WWII Museum - The Greek Civil War, 1944-1949 · University of ...Missing: emergence | Show results with:emergence
  16. [16]
    Operation Harling | Defense Media Network
    Nov 25, 2012 · The Greek Andartes overcame division between the two main resistance groups in order to help the Special Operations Executive carry out Operation Harling.Missing: context | Show results with:context
  17. [17]
    OPERATION HARLING - War History
    Dec 13, 2024 · Code name for the first Special Operations Executive (SOE) mission to the mainland of Greece, in September 1942, led by Brigadier Edmund Myers ...
  18. [18]
    Harling | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    'Harling' was an Allied special operations raid to destroy the Gorgopotamos railway bridge near Thermopylai in Axis-occupied Greece (25/26 November 1942).
  19. [19]
    [PDF] GREEK CAMPAIGN Major John Cooke, Special Operations Executive
    Operation Harling was conceived in late summer 1942 as an effort to stem the flow of supplies through. Greece to the German forces under Field Marshal Erwin ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    Operation Harling: Destruction of the Gorgopotamos Rail Bridge, 1942
    Aug 28, 2002 · Furthermore, SOE's mandate was to facilitate sabotage and subversion missions in Axis-occupied territories and this was anathema to SIS who ...Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  21. [21]
    RESISTANCE AND SOE IN GREECE - War History
    Jun 8, 2016 · Three railroad viaducts were chosen as potential targets; at Gorgopotamos, Asopos and Papadice and an SOE assault team of twelve men were ...Missing: target | Show results with:target
  22. [22]
    Operation Harling | SikhNet
    Jan 23, 2017 · Operation Harling was to destroy one of three railway viaducts on the line between Thessaloniki and Athens in order seriously to disrupt vital supplies.<|control11|><|separator|>
  23. [23]
    [PDF] GREEK CAMPAIGN Brigadier 'Eddie' Myers
    Operation Harling was a World War II mission by the British Special Operations Executive (SOE), in cooperation with the Greek Resistance groups ELAS and EDES, ...Missing: context factions
  24. [24]
    OPERATION HARLING - War History
    ### Summary of Operation Harling's Parachute Drop and Initial Contacts
  25. [25]
    (PDF) The Special Operations Executive in Greece: Operation Harling
    The operation showcased effective cooperation between Greek resistance groups EDES and ELAS despite their political differences. SOE's actions validated the ...Missing: factions | Show results with:factions
  26. [26]
    How Bridgebuster Barnes blew holes in enemy plans
    May 29, 2015 · On May 29, 1943, a top- secret cable came through for Allied engineer Tom Barnes, serving deep behind enemy lines in Greece.Missing: details | Show results with:details
  27. [27]
  28. [28]
    The night of the Giants: A glorious WW2 bridge sabotage
    Mar 3, 2021 · "Operation Harling", planned by British allied forces in Greece, aimed to cut off Nazi Germany's supplies to Marshal Erwin Rommel's forces ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Greek Tragedy: Civil War During World War II - HistoryNet
    Jan 25, 2017 · In addition to striking at Axis patrols and outposts, they attacked German supply lines, seriously impeding the flow of materiel to Hitler's ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] CASE STUDY IN GUERRILLA WAR. GREECE DURING ... - DTIC
    This case study examines guerrilla warfare in Greece during WWII, chosen for its similarities to other conflicts, and the unique value of its specific aspects.
  32. [32]
    From Where They Came | Steven James Hantzis
    May 25, 2020 · Most andartes belonged to either EDES or EAM-ELAS, rival resistance organizations within Greece. EAM-ELAS was larger and incorporated Greek ...Missing: factions | Show results with:factions<|separator|>
  33. [33]
    [PDF] British Military Mission (BMM) to Greece, 1942-44 - DTIC
    May 21, 2009 · The operation occurred nearly a month after the British victory at El Alamein thus providing very little effect on German supplies.77 The ...
  34. [34]
    [PDF] Level Analysis of the British SOE in Crete and Greece during World ...
    May 23, 2019 · This monograph seeks to identify the modes of special operations activities applied by the British Special Operations Executive (SOE) in Crete ...Missing: assembly | Show results with:assembly<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    Allied Strategy in the Mediterranean, the Resistance and Political ...
    Mar 15, 2018 · ... Operation HARLING on 30 September 1942. Britain's interest in Greece as a strategically crucial point in the imperial line of communications ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] EARLY BRITISH CONTACTS WITH THE GREEK RESISTANCE IN ...
    Nov 25, 2015 · At the beginning of 1942, SOE claimed, according to its records, to be in touch with two resistance groups in Athens through clandestine ...