Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

ELAS

The Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS; Ελληνικός Λαϊκός Απελευθερωτικός Στρατός) was the primary military organization of the communist-dominated (EAM), functioning as Greece's main guerrilla force against the occupation during . Emerging in the mountains under figures like , ELAS conducted ambushes, sabotage operations, and territorial control in rural areas, tying down German, Italian, and Bulgarian forces while building a parallel administration in liberated zones. By late 1944, its strength reached approximately 22,000 fighters, enabling it to dominate much of the countryside and contribute to the eventual withdrawal from mainland in of that year. Despite its anti-Axis efforts, ELAS's communist leadership pursued ideological hegemony, systematically eliminating rival non-communist resistance groups like through armed confrontations and forced absorptions, which eroded broader national unity. Post-liberation, ELAS forces stormed police stations in on December 3, 1944, igniting the battles against British expeditionary troops and the returning government, in a bid to install a Soviet-style . These events, marked by atrocities including public torture-murders of policemen and internment of civilians, underscored ELAS's shift from wartime resistance to civil strife, culminating in the 1945 Varkiza Agreement for nominal disbandment—though many fighters later reformed into the for the ensuing .

Historical Context and Formation

Axis Occupation of Greece

The Axis occupation of Greece began after Italy's invasion on 28 October 1940, which Greek forces initially repelled, prompting German intervention on 6 April 1941 alongside Italian and Bulgarian troops. German armored divisions rapidly advanced through the Metaxas Line and outflanked Allied positions in the Battle of Greece, capturing Thessaloniki on 9 April and Athens on 27 April 1941. The Greek army capitulated on 23 April, with remaining Allied forces evacuating by late May, marking the end of organized resistance and the establishment of Axis control over the mainland and most islands. Greece was partitioned into three zones of occupation: Germany assumed direct control of key strategic areas, including the Athens-Piraeus region, eastern with , parts of western , and ; Italy occupied the majority of the mainland, , and numerous ; Bulgaria annexed eastern , , and the Florina-Kastoria region. This division facilitated resource extraction, with occupiers imposing heavy requisitions of food, livestock, and raw materials to support war efforts, exacerbating economic collapse from prior invasion damage. Following Italy's with the Allies on 8 , German forces seized former Italian territories, intensifying control until in October 1944. Economic exploitation and blockades triggered the Great Famine, peaking in the winter of 1941-1942, as forces commandeered agricultural output— alone extracted over 20% of Greece's grain production—while disrupting shipping and imposing export bans that prevented food imports. In , daily death rates from and reached 300 by December 1941, contributing to an estimated 200,000 to 300,000 total famine-related deaths nationwide during the . German policies also included forced deportations of labor, with 60,000 sent to by 1944, alongside systematic plunder of infrastructure and cultural artifacts. Occupation brutality, manifested in reprisal killings—such as the execution of 50 Greek civilians for every German soldier killed—and village razings, like the in December 1943 where over 500 men and boys were shot, generated profound popular discontent. These conditions, compounded by collaborationist puppet regimes, spurred the growth of armed resistance groups; the , leveraging underground networks, formed the (EAM) in September 1941, which by December organized ELAS as its guerrilla army to target Axis supply lines and garrisons.

Establishment of EAM and ELAS

The National Liberation Front (EAM), or Ethnikó Apeleftherotikó Métopo, was founded on September 27, 1941, in a clandestine meeting in Athens' Kallithea district, spearheaded by the Communist Party of Greece (KKE) alongside smaller leftist groups such as the Agricultural Party of Greece and the National Union of Greece. This initiative followed the KKE's Central Committee convocation in late June 1941, which assessed the Axis occupation—initiated by the German invasion in April 1941—as a strategic opening to mobilize the populace against the occupiers and the puppet Greek government, amid widespread famine and economic collapse that claimed an estimated 300,000 lives during the winter of 1941–1942. Although presented as a broad patriotic coalition, EAM's structure and directives were dominated by KKE cadres, who supplied the organizational discipline lacking in other nascent resistance efforts. EAM rapidly expanded its civilian networks for , , and aid distribution, establishing local committees (organossis) across urban and rural areas to enforce compliance and recruit amid the power vacuum left by the forces' focus on exploitation rather than governance. By mid-1942, these efforts transitioned to armed resistance, with partisan bands forming under EAM auspices in mountainous regions like Roumeli and the , precursors to a unified military structure. The KKE's emphasis on , drawing from Marxist-Leninist tactics of , enabled EAM to outpace rivals like the republican-aligned National Republican Greek League (), which emerged later in but lacked comparable grassroots penetration. The Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS), or Ellinikós Laïkós Apeleftherotikós Strátos, was officially constituted as EAM's military wing in December 1942, though initial guerrilla detachments had coalesced earlier in 1942 under captains such as Athanasios Klaras (known as ) in . ELAS adopted a decentralized command suited to , with divisions (mereïdes) organized by geography rather than rigid hierarchy, prioritizing ideological loyalty over professional military experience; recruits included peasants, workers, and deserters armed initially with captured weapons and improvised explosives. This formation reflected the KKE's strategic calculus to build a parallel power base, ostensibly for national defense but oriented toward securing territorial control for postwar political leverage, as evidenced by internal directives prioritizing expansion over coordination with non-communist groups. By late 1943, ELAS claimed over 50,000 fighters, though effectiveness varied due to limited Allied supplies and internal purges of suspected "deviationists."

Military Organization

Command and Leadership Structure

The leadership of ELAS was subordinate to the of EAM, which was dominated by members of the (KKE) and provided overarching political direction, ensuring alignment with communist objectives amid the occupation. ELAS maintained a distinct under this umbrella, comprising a High Command focused on and execution, and an ELAS Central Committee handling organizational, logistical, and cadre-related issues. This dual structure reflected the fusion of and political authority, with political commissars embedded at all levels to enforce ideological discipline and prevent deviations from party lines, a practice rooted in Soviet-influenced guerrilla doctrines. From its inception in December 1941, ELAS adopted a tripartite leadership model extending from the General Headquarters down to level, typically consisting of a military commander for tactical decisions, a for ideological oversight and morale, and a staff or security officer for administrative and enforcement functions. This setup prioritized political loyalty over pure military efficiency, as evidenced by the frequent subordination of field commanders to EAM directives, which sometimes hampered unified operations against forces. In September 1943, Stefanos Sarafis, a former republican army officer with experience from the , was appointed Chief of ELAS General Headquarters to professionalize command, though he operated under KKE political supervision. Key field commanders included Athanasios Klaras, known as , a KKE member appointed kapetanios (chief captain) in early 1942, who led partisan bands in (Roumeli) and pioneered ELAS's initial guerrilla tactics starting February 1942. Political oversight was exerted by figures like Andreas Tzimas, chief commissar responsible for integrating communist cadre into units, and Georgios Siantos, who coordinated from EAM's headquarters. Regional commands, such as the Macedonian division under Evripidis Bakirtzis and later Markos Vafiadis, operated semi-autonomously but reported to the central apparatus, with Ptolemaios Sarigiannis serving as for ELAS's by 1944. This structure enabled rapid expansion to over 50,000 fighters by mid-1944 but also sowed tensions, as communist dominance alienated non-communist elements and fueled rivalries with other resistance groups.

Recruitment, Composition, and Armament


recruitment combined voluntary enlistment motivated by to occupation and EAM propaganda emphasizing national liberation with coercive measures, including forced in areas under its control and threats labeling non-joiners as traitors. In liberated villages, local elders often drafted men, who swore oaths pledging death for , while economic hardship and reprisals against non-supporters bolstered numbers. The appealed to marginalized groups such as youth through EPON and women, expanding its base beyond initial Communist cadres.
ELAS composition drew primarily from rural Greek peasants, workers, and mountain villagers, encompassing a mix of ideological Communists, nationalists, and opportunists united against occupation, with leadership featuring former officers like Colonel Stephanos Sarafis as from 1943. It included diverse elements such as men, women, and , though exact demographics remain sparsely documented; women served in and support roles, reflecting EAM's inclusive rhetoric toward repressed segments of society. By late 1943, ELAS integrated around 800 monarchist and 1,500 republican officers alongside 1,270 reservists, broadening its expertise. Strength grew from small bands in 1942 to approximately 5,000 men by spring 1943, reaching 16,000 active guerrillas plus 16,000 reserves by June 1943, 44,000 by late 1943, and peaking at 95,000 in summer 1944 before contracting to about 50,000 by October 1944. Armament consisted of a disparate array of light infantry weapons, predominantly captured from Italian and German forces, including rifles, machine guns, and submachine guns familiar to Greek troops from pre-occupation stocks. British airdrops via SOE supplied additional small arms, explosives, and over 2,500 tons of materiel by 1944, though ammunition shortages persisted; significant hauls included artillery from the surrendered Italian Pinerolo Division in September 1943. Per commander Sarafis, typical holdings encompassed 3,000 , 300 automatic rifles, 100 submachine guns, 30 machine guns, and 10 mortars, with improvised devices like rock mines supplementing formal equipment for guerrilla tactics. Heavy weapons remained scarce, limiting ELAS to infantry-focused operations without tanks or aircraft.

Anti-Axis Operations

Initial Sabotage and Guerrilla Actions

ELAS commenced its guerrilla operations in mid-1942, initially concentrating on hit-and-run attacks against Italian garrisons and supply lines in remote areas such as the mountains and , where terrain favored mobility over conventional engagement. These early actions involved small units of dozens of fighters ambushing isolated patrols and disrupting local communications, aiming to harass occupiers while minimizing casualties and building operational experience. A landmark event in ELAS's initial phase was its participation in the Gorgopotamos viaduct sabotage on November 25, 1942, during . Coordinated with British agents and rival forces, ELAS provided around 100 combatants who secured the perimeter and repelled Italian guards, facilitating the placement of explosives that collapsed a central arch of the 300-meter-long structure. This demolition severed the primary rail artery linking to and ports, compelling Axis forces to detour via longer routes and delaying materiel shipments to Rommel's by an estimated 10,000 tons over subsequent weeks. Subsequent to Gorgopotamos, ELAS expanded efforts, targeting rail infrastructure with increasing frequency; by late , resistance groups including ELAS had derailed multiple and damaged tracks, contributing to broader disruptions in across occupied . These operations, often executed at night with limited armament like captured rifles and homemade explosives, underscored ELAS's reliance on surprise and local knowledge, though they provoked reprisals against civilians in affected regions.

Key Battles and Territorial Expansion

ELAS conducted its initial significant engagements against Italian occupation forces in 1942, focusing on ambushes and small-scale attacks to disrupt supply lines and assert presence in rural areas. On December 18, 1942, ELAS forces ambushed an Italian regiment near Mikro Chorio in Evrytania, inflicting heavy casualties—reportedly around 70 Italians killed—and destroying equipment, marking one of the early successful guerrilla actions that boosted recruitment and morale. Similar operations included the Battle of Ryka in 1942, where ELAS killed approximately 40 Italian soldiers, demonstrating the effectiveness of hit-and-run tactics in mountainous terrain. The Italian armistice with the Allies on September 8, 1943, provided a pivotal opportunity for territorial gains, as ELAS units moved to disarm isolated Italian garrisons across before German forces could intervene. These operations yielded thousands of rifles, machine guns, and artillery pieces, enabling ELAS to arm larger formations and extend control over previously contested rural districts. By mid-1943, ELAS had driven Italian troops from significant portions of the , , and other mainland regions, establishing "Free " zones in the mountains where presence was minimal. Throughout 1943–1944, ELAS maintained pressure on German forces through sabotage of railways and ambushes on convoys, though pitched battles remained rare due to the guerrilla of operations. As German withdrawals accelerated in late 1944 ahead of Allied advances, ELAS secured additional territory, controlling much of the countryside—estimated at over half the mainland—while troops retained urban centers and coastal areas. This expansion relied on captured and local support, but was complicated by parallel conflicts with non-communist resistance groups, diverting resources from purely anti- efforts.

Political Dimensions

The Political Committee of National Liberation

The (PEEA), established on 10 March 1944 in the village of Viniani in , functioned as the provisional governing body for areas under EAM-ELAS control during the occupation. Formed by the EAM , it declared itself the supreme political authority in "Free Greece," aiming to administer liberated territories, coordinate efforts, and challenge the legitimacy of both the -backed collaborationist in and the London-based . The committee's founding manifesto emphasized national unity against occupation but prioritized reorganizing society along lines favoring workers' committees, land redistribution, and suppression of perceived class enemies, reflecting the dominant role of the (KKE) within EAM structures. Leadership included constitutional law professor Alexandros Svolos as president, alongside figures like Georgios Siantos (EAM general secretary and KKE member) and other nominal representatives from smaller parties, though KKE cadres held key positions and veto power, ensuring alignment with communist directives. PEEA operated through a six-member executive committee and specialized commissions, issuing over 40 decrees by late 1944 on matters such as judicial reforms (abolishing pre-war courts in favor of people's tribunals), (introducing compulsory schooling with ideological content), economic measures (confiscating large estates for peasant committees), and conscription to bolster ELAS ranks. These policies centralized power in EAM-ELAS hands, with local devolved to partisan committees that enforced compliance, often through , while providing like healthcare and to build popular support in mountainous regions controlling approximately 70% of Greece's territory by mid-1944. PEEA's relationship with ELAS was symbiotic, with the army serving as its enforcer for territorial security and policy implementation; ELAS units guarded PEEA sessions, suppressed dissent, and expanded "liberated zones" to legitimize the committee's claims. Internationally, PEEA sought Allied recognition by dispatching delegates to and appealing for legitimacy as a representative of the , but and officials viewed it warily due to its KKE dominance and unilateral actions, such as the Levadeia conference that sidelined non-EAM groups. Domestically, it clashed with rival organizations like , labeling them "quisling" auxiliaries, which foreshadowed intra-Greek conflicts; while PEEA claimed broad representativeness through purported elections in liberated areas (reporting 1.5 million participants in rigged plebiscites), critics, including diplomats, highlighted its exclusionary tactics and failure to integrate moderate elements, underscoring a shift from anti-Axis focus toward postwar power consolidation.

Relations with Allied Powers and Government-in-Exile

The British (SOE) established initial contacts with EAM and ELAS in September 1942, when officers parachuted into near Mount Giona to coordinate against forces, leading to joint operations such as the Gorgopotamos viaduct demolition on November 25, 1942, which disrupted German supply lines. Despite this pragmatic collaboration, British authorities grew wary of ELAS's communist dominance under the Communist Party of Greece (KKE), viewing it as ideologically incompatible and prioritizing support for non-communist rivals like ; supplies to ELAS remained limited, with SOE missions reporting ELAS's primary focus on consolidating power rather than solely anti-Axis efforts. Relations with the Greek , relocated to by 1943, were strained by EAM's parallel political structures, including the establishment of the (PEEA) in March 1944 as a rival claiming legitimacy over liberated territories. At the from May 17–20, 1944, EAM representatives participated alongside exile government figures and other resistance groups, signing a for a under , which incorporated six EAM ministers; however, EAM withdrew its ministers in October 1944 amid disputes over ELAS disarmament and control of interior ministry security forces. Tensions escalated with the Caserta Agreement on September 26, 1944, where ELAS leadership, under pressure from Allied advances, pledged subordination to British General as supreme Allied commander in , placing all resistance forces under unified command for post-liberation operations; this was intended to prevent unilateral ELAS actions but was undermined by ELAS's refusal to disarm fully, culminating in the clashes in starting December 3, 1944. British policy, reinforced by the October 9, 1944, between and allocating 90% British influence in , aimed to bolster the against communist takeover, with Soviet non-intervention tacitly honoring spheres of influence despite ideological alignment with KKE. involvement remained secondary, deferring to British lead while providing to Papandreou's government, reflecting concerns over ELAS's potential to establish a Soviet-style regime post-liberation.

Inter-Resistance Conflicts

Clashes with EDES and Other Groups

The primary antagonist to ELAS among non-communist resistance organizations was the , led by Colonel , which emphasized liberal-republican principles and cooperation with the British and . Initial joint operations against Axis forces, such as the Gorgopotamos viaduct sabotage in , gave way to rivalry over territory, recruits, and Allied materiel as Axis withdrawal accelerated after the Italian armistice on September 8, 1943. ELAS, aiming for post-liberation dominance, viewed EDES as a barrier to establishing EAM's as the government, while EDES accused ELAS of totalitarian ambitions and selective anti-Axis engagement to preserve strength for internal power struggles. The National Bands Agreement, signed July 23, 1943, at in , mandated unified command under British oversight and mutual recognition of territories, but collapsed amid accusations of violations: ELAS refused to integrate or disband rival bands fully, using the truce to consolidate gains and form PEEA on October 10, 1943, while claimed ELAS orchestrated provocations to justify aggression. Open hostilities erupted in late October 1943 when ELAS divisions, numbering around 20,000 in the region, assaulted -held areas in and , capturing key positions like and by early November; these actions displaced over 10,000 fighters and civilians, with ELAS employing superior manpower and local conscription to encircle opponents. Fighting subsided temporarily under British-mediated truces in and the Cassino Agreement in May 1944, which nominally placed both under Allied command, but sporadic engagements continued as ELAS expanded into EDES enclaves, leveraging its estimated 50,000-100,000 effectives against EDES's 12,000-20,000. ELAS also targeted smaller groups, including the National and Social Liberation (), whose 5,000-10,000 members faced disarmament and executions after refusing EAM subordination; EKKA leader Dimitrios Psarros was killed in during an ELAS ambush near Levadia, precipitating EKKA's dissolution. These internecine conflicts diverted resources from anti-Axis efforts, costing hundreds of lives monthly and alienating Allied support, with liaison officers documenting ELAS's systematic elimination of rivals to monopolize resistance authority. By late 1944, amid the broader clashes with British and government forces in starting December 3, ELAS exploited the chaos to overrun residual units in , effectively neutralizing Zervas's organization through coordinated assaults that fragmented its command and supply lines. Zervas, operating from British-protected zones, protested these moves as betrayals of national unity, while EAM countered that harbored monarchist sympathizers and collaborated sporadically with occupiers for survival—a charge substantiated in isolated cases but overstated to justify ELAS offensives. The intra-resistance violence, totaling thousands of casualties, underscored ELAS's prioritization of ideological over coordinated liberation, eroding the resistance's cohesion as forces retreated.

Escalation to Intra-Greek Civil Strife in 1943-1944

In October 1943, following the Italian armistice with the Allies on September 8, ELAS initiated widespread attacks on and other non-communist resistance groups, marking the onset of organized intra-Greek civil strife. These operations violated the National Bands Agreement of July 5, 1943, which had been brokered by British liaison officers to unify guerrilla efforts under a joint command structure and subordinate all groups to Allied direction. ELAS, seeking to eliminate rivals and secure a monopoly on armed power in anticipation of post-occupation politics, targeted units across regions including , , and Roumeli, often transferring divisions from adjacent areas to overwhelm opponents. On October 12, 1943, ELAS launched coordinated assaults on headquarters and detachments, as well as smaller groups like those led by Tsaous Anton in , sparking battles that disrupted anti- operations and drew German reprisals against civilians. In , where held dominance, ELAS reinforcements from escalated the fighting into a regional war, with leader accusing ELAS of collaborationist tendencies to justify temporary truces with forces for survival. Combat persisted intensely through late 1943 and into early 1944, particularly in contested zones like Tzumerka and Grammos, resulting in hundreds of guerrilla casualties on both sides and the temporary alignment of some elements with occupation authorities to counter ELAS advances. British missions, including attempts to enforce the agreement through arbitration, proved ineffective as ELAS leadership, influenced by the , prioritized revolutionary consolidation over cooperation, viewing EDES as a bourgeois obstacle to proletarian dominance. A fragile emerged in February 1944, but sporadic clashes continued, enabling ELAS to consolidate control over liberated zones and intern or execute captured rivals. By mid-1944, ELAS had subdued in much of northern and , confining the latter to coastal enclaves and interning thousands of its fighters, which fragmented the resistance and heightened tensions with the Allied-backed . This phase of conflict, often termed the "first round" of the Greek Civil War, diverted resources from targets—ELAS strength peaked at around 50,000-70,000 fighters while numbered 10,000-20,000—and foreshadowed broader strife, as communist control of rural areas positioned ELAS to challenge central authority upon liberation in October 1944. The escalation stemmed causally from ideological incompatibility, with ELAS's centralized, party-directed structure enabling aggressive expansionism, contrasted against 's decentralized, republican orientation, rendering unity illusory amid power vacuums left by retreating forces.

Atrocities, Repressions, and Controversies

Executions of Suspected Collaborators and Rivals

ELAS and its security apparatus, the Organization for the Protection of the People's Struggle (OPLA), carried out executions of suspected Axis collaborators, including members of the German- and Italian-backed , as well as perceived political rivals such as monarchists, liberals, and members of rival resistance groups like . These actions, often conducted through summary trials by "people's courts" or direct assassinations, escalated during the winter of 1943–1944 as part of a broader campaign dubbed the "" to consolidate EAM/ELAS control in rural areas amid growing intra-resistance tensions and Axis-backed efforts. Targets included not only documented informants or armed collaborators but also local notables (e.g., mayors, priests, and landowners) labeled as "reactionaries," with killings frequently blending political motives and personal vendettas. In the Argolid region of the , empirical analysis of local records, interviews, and archives reveals approximately 368 civilian deaths attributed to EAM/ELAS between and , representing about 55% of total noncombatant killings in the area during that period. Early instances included 29 assassinations in winter 1943–1944 targeting suspected collaborators and opponents in villages, with execution sites such as monasteries near Borsa and Heli. By spring 1944, reprisals against Security Battalion sympathizers resulted in 56 deaths at St. George Monastery in Korinthia, many by slitting throats. In June–July 1944, preemptory executions of 50 villagers in western Argolid and 17 in Malandreni on Feneos Mountain aimed to deter defections, while August saw 119 killed in eastern Argolid villages deemed "traitorous," including mass slaughters of hostages in Heli (60–80 victims). Quotas for executions—sometimes 5–15% of a village's population—were imposed in certain areas to enforce compliance. A prominent example occurred during the in mid-September 1944, where ELAS forces defeated a garrison of and local collaborators in ; following the victory, they executed between 500 and 1,000 captured fighters and civilians, many thrown into a well or killed summarily. EAM/ELAS justified such acts as revolutionary justice against and betrayal, yet historical accounts indicate procedural irregularities, lack of evidence in many cases, and disproportionate targeting of non-combatants or intra-Greek rivals, contributing to cycles of reprisals that weakened unified resistance efforts. These executions, while framed as anti-collaboration measures, often served to eliminate competition from other factions and secure territorial dominance ahead of withdrawal.

Forced Conscription and Civilian Abuses

During 1943 and 1944, ELAS increasingly relied on forced to augment its ranks amid territorial expansion and internecine conflicts with rival groups, compelling able-bodied men from villages in controlled areas to join under threat of violence or reprisals against their families. assessments from the period estimated that thousands of non-communist were coerced into ELAS service, with one citing over 3,000 such reluctant recruits in specific regions who lacked ideological commitment but were integrated to bolster manpower. Allied observers, including operatives, documented cases where local populations were rendered "innocuous" or directly forced into EAM-ELAS structures, contributing to the organization's rapid growth from a few thousand fighters in late 1942 to tens of thousands by mid-1944. These drives often involved raids on rural communities, where resisters press-ganged into , leading to widespread disruption and ; non-compliance frequently resulted in punitive measures such as , hostage-taking, or summary , exacerbating hardships in famine-stricken occupied . German records and postwar testimonies, including those from the , corroborated that EAM-ELAS encompassed both ideological adherents and those compelled by coercion, with the latter often deserting when opportunities arose due to lack of loyalty. This coercive approach, while enabling ELAS to sustain operations against forces, alienated segments of the rural populace and fueled accusations of from non-communist sources, as villagers faced not only hardships but also internal enforcement of quotas for fighters, supplies, and labor. Civilian abuses extended beyond recruitment to include arbitrary impositions in "liberated" zones, where EAM-ELAS authorities extracted food, , and manpower under duress, often leaving communities vulnerable to reprisals from retreating troops or rival factions. Deserters or refusers were subjected to harsh penalties, including or execution in some instances, as ELAS sought to maintain and prevent leaks to adversaries. These practices, documented in Allied reports and local accounts, reflected ELAS's prioritization of consolidation over voluntary mobilization, straining relations with the government-in-exile and contributing to the escalation of intra-Greek tensions by late 1944.

Dissolution and Immediate Aftermath

The Dekemvriana and Varkiza Agreement

The Dekemvriana, or December Events, consisted of intense urban combat in and from 3 December 1944 to 11 January 1945, involving ELAS units against Expeditionary Forces and Greek government-aligned . The clashes erupted after troops fired on a pro-EAM demonstration on 3 December, killing at least 28 civilians and wounding over 100, in response to ELAS encircling government police stations and refusing to vacate positions as per the prior Caserta Agreement of September 1944. ELAS, seeking to consolidate control over liberated areas and prevent the restoration of pre-occupation royalist authorities, launched offensives to seize key infrastructure, including the and government ministries, but faced superior firepower, including tanks and air support. Casualties were heavy on both sides, with ELAS suffering an estimated 3,000 killed or wounded, though exact figures remain disputed due to incomplete records and partisan reporting. British intervention, authorized under the Percentages Agreement between Churchill and Stalin, prioritized stabilizing a non-communist government-in-exile under Georgios Papandreou, viewing ELAS advances as a bid for communist dominance rather than mere security measures. ELAS initially held advantages in numbers—approximately 12,000 fighters in Attica—but lacked heavy weaponry and coordinated logistics, leading to tactical retreats by mid-January after British reinforcements arrived. The fighting exacerbated intra-Greek divisions, with ELAS executing suspected collaborators and rival resistance members during the chaos, while government forces and British troops conducted reprisals against leftists. By 15 January 1945, ELAS leadership, under pressure from military setbacks and Allied diplomacy, agreed to a ceasefire, paving the way for negotiations. The Varkiza Agreement, signed on 12 February 1945 at the Varkiza villa near between the Greek government of and EAM representatives, formalized ELAS's capitulation and dissolution. Key provisions mandated the immediate disarmament and disbandment of ELAS units, with over 50,000 rifles, 6,000 machine guns, and 100 artillery pieces surrendered to British oversight within weeks; ELAS fighters were to be demobilized, with options for integration into a national army under government control. The accord granted broad amnesty for political offenses committed during the occupation and resistance, pledged restoration of , and committed to purging collaborators through judicial processes, while scheduling plebiscites on the and elections by 1946. Despite these terms, implementation faltered: EAM/ELAS cadres faced widespread reprisals, including arrests and executions by right-wing groups, undermining the amnesty's intent and fueling resentment that contributed to the subsequent phase in 1946. The agreement reflected ELAS's strategic defeat, as British and government forces held , but it preserved EAM's political organization, allowing underground reorganization amid perceptions of unequal enforcement—government security forces retained arms while ELAS fully disarmed. Historians note Varkiza as a temporary truce rather than genuine , with ELAS's dissolution marking the end of its formal military role but not the ideological conflict.

Transition to the Greek Civil War

The Varkiza Agreement, signed on February 12, 1945, mandated the dissolution of ELAS, requiring its fighters to hand over approximately 70,000 weapons and either join the reorganized under oversight or demobilize into civilian roles, while promising political participation for EAM members and a on the . In practice, compliance was uneven; ELAS leadership surrendered only a fraction of arms, concealing others in anticipation of future conflict, as the KKE viewed the accord not as a genuine truce but as a tactical pause to regroup amid perceived by monarchist and forces. Post-agreement, the Greek government, dominated by right-wing elements from the exile administration, unleashed a campaign of "White Terror" through auxiliary police and paramilitary bands like X (Chi), targeting over 50,000 EAM affiliates with arrests, beatings, and killings, which eroded any basis for reconciliation and drove thousands of ex-ELAS personnel into hiding in rural strongholds or neighboring communist states. The KKE, excluded from influence despite Varkiza's assurances, boycotted the March 31, 1946, parliamentary elections—widely criticized for fraud and suppression of leftist voters—and responded by authorizing guerrilla operations from October 1946 onward, framing them as defense against state persecution while pursuing Soviet-aligned revolutionary objectives. This groundwork enabled the reconstitution of ELAS remnants as the (DSE) in late 1946, with its first congress convening clandestinely that December under commanders like Markos Vafiadis, inheriting ELAS's organizational model, tactics, and personnel estimated at 10,000-15,000 initial fighters supplied via Yugoslav sanctuaries. The DSE's emergence transformed sporadic banditry into structured insurgency, escalating into the Greek Civil War's decisive phase by early 1947, as KKE doctrine prioritized armed overthrow over electoral legitimacy, exploiting rural discontent but ultimately clashing with U.S.-backed government forces under the .

Long-Term Impact and Evaluation

Contributions to Liberation Versus Revolutionary Ambitions

ELAS forces conducted numerous guerrilla operations against occupiers from its formal inception on 16 September 1941, escalating to coordinated and ambushes by mid-1942. Notable actions included the 25 November 1942 destruction of the Gorgopotamos viaduct, a critical rail link for supplies in , which temporarily disrupted German logistics across the and was executed jointly with British SOE support. By July 1943, ELAS comprised the majority of 's estimated 20,000–30,000 , engaging in that targeted garrisons, convoys, and infrastructure, thereby compelling —primarily , , and —to allocate substantial troops for internal security rather than frontline deployment. These efforts contributed to the diversion of German divisions, with of resource transports (e.g., and mines) hindering war production, though quantitative assessments of overall impact remain debated due to the limited scale of forces relative to occupation troops exceeding 300,000 by 1943. By summer 1943, ELAS had liberated extensive rural territories, establishing "free zones" covering up to two-thirds of Greece's landmass by October 1944, coinciding with the Axis withdrawal amid advancing Allied forces in the Balkans. In these areas, ELAS provided security against retreating occupiers and local collaborators, facilitating civilian survival amid famine and reprisals, with peak strength reaching approximately 50,000–70,000 fighters by late 1944. However, operational priorities often shifted toward internecine conflicts; from October 1943, ELAS prioritized assaults on non-communist rivals like EDES, resulting in intra-resistance clashes that killed thousands and fragmented anti-Axis coordination, as documented in British intelligence reports highlighting ELAS's diversion of resources from joint operations. The revolutionary ambitions of ELAS's parent organization, EAM—dominated by the (KKE)—subordinated liberation efforts to long-term ideological goals of establishing a proletarian state. KKE leaders, including Secretary-General (from exile in Dachau until 1945), framed resistance as a pathway to socialist revolution, with EAM's parallel administrative structures in liberated zones—people's committees enforcing , taxation, and purges—functioning as a proto-counter-state rather than provisional awaiting national restoration. Scholarly analyses, on declassified Allied records, argue this dual purpose manifested in ELAS's refusal to integrate under British-Greek government authority post-1944, culminating in the December 1944 uprising in , where 20,000–25,000 ELAS troops sought to oust the Papandreou government and monopolize power, prioritizing communist hegemony over unified liberation. Historians emphasizing causal realism note that while ELAS's tactical contributions harassed forces—potentially tying down 5–10 German divisions through perpetual low-intensity threats—their strategic calculus favored building exclusive military-political dominance, evidenced by the elimination of rival groups (e.g., over 1,000 fighters killed in 1943–1944 clashes) to preclude pluralism. This approach, rooted in Marxist-Leninist doctrine prioritizing class struggle, undermined broader Allied objectives and precipitated Greece's descent into , rendering ELAS's anti-occupation role instrumental to, rather than independent of, revolutionary aims. Primary KKE directives from 1942–1944, as analyzed in tribunals, explicitly linked warfare to "people's democracy" consolidation, confirming ambitions extended beyond expulsion of foreign troops to internal power seizure.

Historiographical Perspectives and Debates

Historiographical interpretations of ELAS have been profoundly shaped by the ideological fault lines of the Greek Civil War and the era, with narratives oscillating between glorification as a national liberator and condemnation as a proto-revolutionary force. Communist-aligned accounts, prevalent in KKE publications and early leftist scholarship, emphasized ELAS's guerrilla efficacy against Axis targets—such as the Gorgopotamos viaduct sabotage in , co-executed with —and its role in administering "liberated zones" as embodiments of , often eliding or justifying violence against non-communist rivals as necessary purges of collaborationists. In opposition, state-sponsored under the post-1949 governments framed ELAS as a Soviet-influenced that prioritized warfare over anti-occupation struggle, portraying its expansion to over 50,000 fighters by 1944 as a bid to supplant the legitimate rather than resist invaders. Western analyses, informed by declassified British and Allied records, generally credit ELAS with disproportionate contributions to tying down forces—estimated at 20-30 divisions diverted to —but underscore its intra-resistance aggressions, such as the attack on in , as indicative of hegemonic ambitions that precipitated the first phase of civil strife. These perspectives attribute ELAS's dominance, with control over two-thirds of rural by early 1944, to organizational discipline under KKE direction rather than broad popular support, contrasting it with EDES's smaller, more fragmented operations aligned with republican nationalists. Contemporary scholarship has shifted toward empirical micro-studies, challenging both hagiographic and demonizing traditions by quantifying ELAS's dual role in resistance and repression. Stathis N. Kalyvas's analysis of the Argolid region documents ELAS-orchestrated "" accounting for 55% of approximately 670 civilian deaths between 1943 and 1944 (around 368 victims), involving systematic assassinations, executions via OPLA death squads, village burnings, and massacres like the eastern Argolid killings of 119, often targeting "reactionaries" in a mix of political and personal vendettas to secure EAM . Such findings counter leftist tendencies to reframe these as "revolutionary justice" aberrations, while critiquing right-wing exaggerations; they draw on triangulated local archives, interviews, and Allied reports to reveal violence as bureaucratic and preemptive, escalating after Security Battalion formations in 1943. Central debates revolve around ELAS's foundational aims: national liberation versus counter-state construction. Proponents of the former cite its Axis engagements, including the 1944 rout of Italian forces in the ; critics, using evidence of parallel institutions like People's Justice Courts that executed thousands (e.g., 800–1,000 at Meligalas in September 1944), argue these facilitated revolutionary power-building, as in the "Mountains Government" of May 1944. Source credibility remains contested—KKE archives underemphasize internal terror, British liaison reports exhibit anti-communist skew, and post-1974 academia, influenced by left-leaning institutions, has variably integrated ELAS into a unified canon via laws like the 1982 recognition statute, yet resists full accountability for repressive excesses. This evolution underscores a move from myth-making to prioritizing verifiable local dynamics over ideological priors.

References

  1. [1]
    The Greek Civil War, 1944-1949 | New Orleans
    May 22, 2020 · Instead, the EAM leadership agreed to disband its military arm, the ELAS. Many communist guerrilla leaders refused to accept the agreement, ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
  2. [2]
    [PDF] Greek Civil War 1944–49
    Oct 30, 2024 · military arm, the Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS), against the British-supported Greek government and anti-Communist groups. The war ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] The Communist Army of Greece, 1947-1949: A Study of Its Failure
    Tzimas sent Aris Velouchiotis to the mountains to create the military arm of SAM.-" It was called the Greek Popular. Liberation Army, or ELAS. SLA3 took ...
  4. [4]
    The Greek Holocaust - Warfare History Network
    Jan 20, 2024 · Terrible atrocities by the Germans against the Greek populace followed. The Greek Holocaust. After invading Greece in 1941, Hitler's forces ...
  5. [5]
    Starvation Without Reparations: The Nazi Occupation of Greece
    During the course of the Second World War, the Axis Powers occupied Greece for just over 4 years, beginning with the Italian and German invasion of April ...
  6. [6]
    Greece - Holocaust Encyclopedia
    After the Greeks surrendered, Germany, Italy, and Bulgaria divided the country into zones of occupation. Germany occupied western Macedonia (including ...
  7. [7]
    SECTION VIII GERMAN-OCCUPIED GREECE - Project MUSE
    Germany, Italy, and Bulgaria then partitioned Greece into three occupation zones. The Italians became responsible for the bulk of mainland Greece until the ...
  8. [8]
    The Greek Famine During the Nazi Occupation - GreekReporter.com
    Oct 23, 2022 · The Greek famine during the three and a half years of Nazi occupation killed at least 200000 and perhaps as many as 300000 people.
  9. [9]
    EAM: Notes on Greece's National Liberation Front
    Dec 8, 2021 · EAM was founded, under utmost secrecy, in a tiny house in the center of Athens on the evening of September 27, 1941. The participants in the ...
  10. [10]
    The creation of EAM - Hellenic Foreign Policy (1936-1944)
    In September 1941 the National Liberation Front (EAM) was founded; an organisation which was projected as a point of reference for all Greeks in their common ...
  11. [11]
    EAM-ELAS | Resistance Movement, Civil War, Liberation - Britannica
    EAM-ELAS, communist-sponsored resistance organization (formed September 1941) and its military wing (formed December 1942), which operated in occupied Greece ...
  12. [12]
    The Greek National Liberation Front (EAM) - jstor
    planted the swastika on the Acropolis. The occupation of Greece had begun. During the following three and a half years, until October I944, Greece re-.
  13. [13]
    [PDF] CASE STUDY IN GUERRILLA WAR. GREECE DURING ... - DTIC
    20 July, making the representation of non-ELAS to ELAS on JGHQ three to ... hierarchial command structure. While these echelons were in no way.
  14. [14]
    Greek Resistance Army. By Stefanos Sarafis. Translated by Sylvia ...
    Elas: Greek Resistance Army. By Stefanos Sarafis. Translated by Sylvia Moody. Biographical Introduction and Footnotes by Marion Sarafis.
  15. [15]
    ELAS: Greek Resistance Army, by Maj.-Gen. Stefanos Sarafis. Trans ...
    Out of conviction he sided with the republican forces and became the Commander-in-Chief of ELAS (National. Popular Liberation Army), the military arm of EAM ( ...
  16. [16]
    Aris Velouchiotis - World War II Database
    He publicly sided with the national communist leadership in a ceasefire between ELAS and its rivals, but soon changed his mind and continued the fighting, thus ...
  17. [17]
    Aris Velouchiotis: The soul of Greek Resistance
    Jun 16, 2020 · Alongside Major General Stefanos Sarafis, he contributed significantly to the creation of the first ELAS resistance groups. Furthermore, his ...
  18. [18]
    Leader of the Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS) - ztab1
    Oct 28, 2019 · Aris Velouchiotis was appointed military leader of ELAS at the beginning of the Resistance Movement, by the EAM leadership, being at the ...
  19. [19]
    Important terms • Memories of the Occupation in Greece
    EAM (Hellinikon Apeleftherotikon metopon, National Liberation Front): It was founded on September 27th, 1941 by the Communist Party. It was the largest ...<|separator|>
  20. [20]
    (PDF) IRREGULAR WARFARE IN OCCUPIED GREECE 1941-1944
    ELAS bands were eventually created all over Greece; the first organized bands appeared in Olympus in southern Macedonia and in central Greece during mid-1942.
  21. [21]
    Greece in the Second World War
    In the summer of 1942 the first ELAS guerrilla band takes to the mountains. ... In November of 1942 Greek fighters and British soldiers who have been ...
  22. [22]
    Operation Harling – Gorgopotamos and the Greek Resistance
    The demolition of the Gorgopotamos Bridge was carried out on 25 November 1942, by the combined forces of the Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS) ... sabotage ...
  23. [23]
    Operation Harling: Textbook Guerrilla Warfare - Aspects of History
    Operation Harling, the first major Anglo-Greek sabotage mission of the war, had been in the planning stage since the summer of 1942.
  24. [24]
    Allied Strategy in the Mediterranean, the Resistance and Political ...
    Mar 15, 2018 · This was the explosion of the Gorgopotamos viaduct in southern Greece that would render inoperative the railway connection which served the Axis ...
  25. [25]
    The Most Enchanting Mountain Village in Evrytania—And the ...
    Apr 10, 2025 · On December 18, 1942, a key battle between ELAS fighters and Italian troops took place here, known as the Battle of Mikro Chorio. While the ...
  26. [26]
    Mikro Chorio of Evritania: the generosity of nature - Exploring Greece
    On December 18, 1942, ELAS men ambushed and attacked an Italian regiment operating in the area. The surprise attack inflicted heavy casualties and damage on the ...
  27. [27]
    Ethnikos Laikos Apeleftherotikos Stratos (ELAS) - Hellenica World
    ELAS initiated action against the German and Italian forces of occupation in Greece in 7 June 1942. Aris Velouchiotis with a small group of 10-15 guerillas ...Missing: Key | Show results with:Key
  28. [28]
    (PDF) From Resistance to Counterstate: The Making of ...
    Aug 10, 2025 · By the summer of 1943, the armed resistance forces had liberated a vast area in mainland Greece from the Axis occupation. The liberated zones, ...
  29. [29]
    National Council, (PEEA), Koryschades, 1944 - Hellenic Net
    On March 10, 1944, the Political Committee of National Liberation was sworn in as the highest political authority in Free Greece, headed by the military man ...
  30. [30]
    How British Imperialism Crushed the Greek Revolution – Part 1 - Lalkar
    On Sunday, March 10, 1944, the Political Committee for National Liberation (PEEA) was founded in the village of Viniani in Evrytania. In the village square the ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    [PDF] White Book: May 1944 – March 1945
    NATIONAL LIBERATION FRONT (E.A.M.). WHITE BOOK. MAY 1944 - MARCH 1945. "5- For ... * (Editor's Note: the judicial system and courts established by the EAM in Free ...
  32. [32]
    The Mountain Government (PEEA)
    Suddenly in March 1944, EAM announced the formation of the Political Committee of National Liberation (PEEA) for the administration of those areas under the ...Missing: relations | Show results with:relations
  33. [33]
    The Communist Party of Greece led the Anti-Fascist Resistance ...
    EAM was dominated by KKE (Greek Communist Party). By stressing ... EAM/ELAS honored the Caserta provisions in the main during the German withdrawal.<|control11|><|separator|>
  34. [34]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    Greece: · Policy of the United States regarding the question of the political organization of Greece following liberation from German occupation (Documents 80– ...
  35. [35]
    [PDF] OSS - REPORTS ON SITUATION IN GREECE, 1944 - CIA
    The EAM with its fighting forces the ELAS (Greek People's Liberation Army) represents the outstanding resistance group in Greece. Anthony Eden is reported to ...
  36. [36]
    [PDF] Level Analysis of the British SOE in Crete and Greece during World ...
    May 23, 2019 · 80. The communist EAM-ELAS group was unreconcilable with the British SOE political leanings and were more concerned with competing with SOE ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The British Foreign Policy in Greece during the period 1943-1949
    Jun 19, 2019 · belongs to the category of the historical sources that lately made quite ... Question number one: Why the British reinforced EAM-ELAS, a pro- ...Missing: relations | Show results with:relations
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Road To American Participation In The Greek Civil War, 1943 ...
    ... GREECE. FROM OCCUPATION TO EAM/ELAS DEFEAT (1942-1945). This chapter surveys the events from 1942-1944 which led to the withdraw of German troops from Greece.<|separator|>
  39. [39]
    Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    In his speech to the Greek people broadcast from Cairo last night, Mr. Papandreou made the following main points: 1. EAM has not yet joined the Government, ...
  40. [40]
    Makes 'percentages' agreement on spheres of influence
    Churchill proposed splitting by percentages Romania, Greece, Yugoslavia, Bulgaria and Hungary with the Russians.Missing: ELAS | Show results with:ELAS
  41. [41]
    [PDF] Cold War Conflict: American Intervention in Greece - DTIC
    armistice known as the Plaka Agreement. 22 EAM/ELAS used this cease fire to establish an alternative government, the Political. Committee of National ...
  42. [42]
    The Dekemvriana: Red Terror in Athens - Warfare History Network
    The first signs that a troubling winter of 1944 was brewing in Athens emerged in October 1943, open warfare broke out between E.D.E.S. and E.L.A.S., each ...<|separator|>
  43. [43]
    The Greek Civil War 1943-1949 - GlobalSecurity.org
    This upsurge in guerrilla activity bode well for the two main resistance armies ELAS and EDES. ... CHAPTER FIVE THE THIRD ROUND Guerrilla War Returns to Greece On ...
  44. [44]
    Greek Resistance - Connexipedia article - Connexions.org
    ... ELAS, newly under the command of General Stefanos Sarafis. EAM/ELAS was by that time the only truly nationwide Resistance group, as EDES was limited in ...<|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Guerrilla Warfare in the Arta Region (Epirus-Greece) During World ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · The battles conducted from October 1943 to February 1944 in Tzumérka region, which was the bone of contention for both ELAS and EDES, are ...
  46. [46]
    The Greek Civil War, 1946–1949 | Origins
    Mar 2, 2016 · In December 1946, they renamed themselves the Greek Democratic Army (DSE) and were completely controlled by the Greek Communist Party (KKE). The ...Missing: date | Show results with:date<|separator|>
  47. [47]
    [PDF] Red Terror – Leftist Violence During the Occupation - Stathis Kalyvas
    Mar 30, 2017 · The EAM terror campaign of winter 1943–1944 was hardly peculiar to the Argolid. A similar wave of killings swept the entire Peloponnese during ...Missing: purges | Show results with:purges
  48. [48]
    Greek Tragedy: Civil War During World War II - HistoryNet
    Jan 25, 2017 · In 1944, though their country lay shattered after years of Axis occupation, Greek partisan forces engaged in a bitter civil war with far-reaching consequences.
  49. [49]
    [PDF] ISOLATING THE GUERRILLA. VOLUME 2. CLASSIC AND ... - DTIC
    Forced recruitment played an increasingly im- portant part as the war ... in central Greece, and in December 1942 ELAS, the EAM's military arm, was ...<|separator|>
  50. [50]
    , of 30 >-34251
    They are well armed but have little ammunition. There are a further 3,000 men or more, who are not communists'but have been forced to join the ELAS. They ...
  51. [51]
    [PDF] OSS - GREEK MISSION, GENERAL CORREPONDENCE, 1944 - CIA
    In Athens the leadership is vested in a small group, the Kentron. (Central Committee), many of whom are largely, not wholly, Hellenis in blood (many come from ...
  52. [52]
    A HISTORY OF THE GREEK RESISTANCE IN THE SECOND ...
    them had been press-ganged into service was one of the foremost reasons ... was estimated that in mainland Greece ELAS guerrillas consumed over. 18 tons ...
  53. [53]
    Transcript for NMT 7: Hostage Case - Nuremberg - Transcript Viewer
    "That even nationalistic Greeks joined the ranks of the EAM in addition to those who were forced to join up can be explained by the fact that at the ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] greece and oman: successful anglo/american - DTIC
    Dec 6, 2009 · In Varkiza, near Athens, ELAS and the Greek Minister of Foreign Affairs came to an ... there is speculation of forced recruitment taking ...
  55. [55]
    Athens 1944: Britain's dirty secret | Second world war | The Guardian
    Nov 30, 2014 · We also said that the Greek anti-Nazi resistance, ELAS/EAM, agreed not to oppose the landing of British troops in May 1944. The historians point ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    December Events: The Prelude to the Greek Civil War, 80 Years On
    Dec 3, 2024 · The December Events marked a grim turning point for Greece, plunging the country into a civil war that claimed 47,000 lives and scarred its ...
  58. [58]
    [63] Agreement Between the Greek Government and EAM
    Immediately on the publication of the present agreement the armed forces of resistance shall be demobilised and in particular the ELAS, both Regular and Reserve ...
  59. [59]
    The Varkiza Agreement | The ending act of "Dekemvriana"
    Feb 12, 2022 · The Varkiza Agreement was signed on February 12, 1945, in Vari, Attica, between members of the government of Nikolaos Plastiras and EAM / ELAS.Missing: dissolution | Show results with:dissolution
  60. [60]
    1940-1945 [LIBERATION]
    The Varkiza agreement aimed to end fighting, reinstate civil liberties, grant amnesty, and form a national army, but was broken by both sides.Missing: dissolution historical
  61. [61]
    National Reconciliation After Civil War: The Case of Greece
    This article discusses post-conflict reconciliation in Greece following the divisive civil war of the 1940s. Focusing on the elite political discourse and ...
  62. [62]
    From Varkiza to the Seventh Congress | SpringerLink
    Of the nine Articles of the Agreement, only two contained obligations for EAM and the KKE: Article IV stipulated that ELAS was to 'set at liberty all civilians ...<|separator|>
  63. [63]
    Heroes or Outcasts? The Long Saga of the State's Recognition of ...
    Aug 3, 2023 · After the first postwar elections on 31 March 1946, the Greek parliament began officially defining the National Resistance. From the start, the ...
  64. [64]
    80 Years Since the Varkiza Agreement: The Truce That Failed to ...
    Feb 12, 2025 · Despite its intentions, the agreement failed to achieve lasting peace and instead set the stage for the Greek Civil War. Key Provisions of the ...
  65. [65]
    Greek Civil War - The Dawn of the Cold War | History Blog
    Jan 23, 2021 · In February 1942 the EAM formed its military wing, the Greek People's Liberation Army (ELAS). ELAS was the most dominant resistance force in ...
  66. [66]
    German Antiguerrilla Operations in the Balkans (1941-1944) - Ibiblio
    The purpose of this study is to describe briefly the German campaign against the guerrillas in the Balkans during the period of the European Axis occupation.<|separator|>
  67. [67]
    German Occupation | Contested Greek-German Pasts
    Not only did the resistance movement sabotage the transport of Balkan raw materials that were much needed by the Axis war effort (copper, chromium, bauxite), ...
  68. [68]
    Liberated Zones of Occupied Greece, 1943-1944 - Academia.edu
    Since the summer of 1943, the armed Resistance and mainly ELAS (Greek People's Liberation Army), had liberated from the Axis occupation a vast territory in ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] The Greek Historiography of the 1940s. A Reassessment
    The post-revisionists argued that there was a 'long civil war' between 1943 and 1949, which stemmed from the revolutionary goals of the Greek Communist Party.Missing: ambitions primary
  70. [70]
    [PDF] A Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece - CORE
    ELAS never made an official enquiry for Psarros' murder and Zoulas was not ... September 1942 ELAS was still small and vulnerable and Velouchiotis had already.
  71. [71]
    Conclusion | A History of the Greek Resistance in the Second World ...
    The Varkiza accord put an end to the clashes between government forces, the British and ELAS that took place in Athens during the winter of 1944–45. 2.