Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

EDES

The Ethnikos Dimokratikos Ellinikos Syndesmos (EDES), known in English as the National Republican Greek League, was a major anti-Axis resistance organization formed during the German-Italian-Bulgarian occupation of in . Founded in September 1941 by Colonel , a officer with Venizelist sympathies, EDES advocated democratic and operated primarily in northwestern , particularly , where it conducted guerrilla operations against occupation forces. As the principal non-communist alternative to the larger communist-led EAM-, EDES received support from British agents and focused on sabotaging supply lines, liberating local areas, and maintaining order in controlled territories amid widespread famine and reprisals. Its forces, peaking at around 20,000 fighters, clashed not only with occupiers but also with in internecine conflicts that foreshadowed the Greek Civil War, amid mutual accusations of collaboration and territorial ambitions. While EDES contributed to the eventual withdrawal in , its legacy remains debated due to Zervas's pragmatic wartime dealings, including limited truces with Italian forces before their surrender, and post-liberation rivalries that highlighted deep ideological divisions in Greek society.

Origins and Ideology

Foundation

The Ethnikos Dimokratikos Ellinikos Syndesmos (EDES), or National Republican Greek League, was founded in September 1941 by Colonel in the mountains of during the . Zervas, a veteran officer of Venizelist republican leanings, organized the group in response to the Italian invasion of October 1940 and the subsequent German conquest in April 1941, which left under tripartite occupation by German, Italian, and Bulgarian forces. Recruitment drew initially from demobilized Greek army officers, local civilians in northwestern , and sympathizers opposed to the monarchist , leveraging Zervas's familial and regional ties in to form small guerrilla bands. These early adherents shared Zervas's dissatisfaction with the exiled authorities' perceived inaction against the occupiers and internal divisions. Originally operating as a decentralized network of local resistance cells focused on and evasion, EDES gradually formalized its structure under Zervas's command, establishing regional commands to coordinate activities across and adjacent areas. This evolution reflected the need for unified leadership amid escalating occupation hardships, including and reprisals.

Core Principles and Objectives

The National Republican Greek League (EDES) was established on 9 September 1941 with the primary objective of liberating Greece from Axis occupation through armed resistance, while advocating for a republican constitution infused with a socialist spirit that rejected dictatorship. Its founding declaration emphasized punishing treason associated with King George II and the Metaxas regime, including confiscation of properties linked to collaboration, and purging state institutions such as the army, police, and judiciary to instill a national republican ethos. EDES committed to by eradicating economic inequalities and , aiming to prevent and foster equitable resource distribution as foundational to post-liberation . Central to its principles was opposition to monarchical restoration, viewing the abolition of the as essential for genuine and democratic renewal, independent of wartime outcomes. The organization prioritized national unity under republican , planning to transfer authority to elected representatives whose legitimacy would be affirmed by popular validation following . In parallel, EDES maintained an explicitly anti-communist orientation, positioning itself as a defender of cohesion against ideological threats that could fragment amid occupation-induced subversion. This stance underscored a focus on empirical efficacy in combating forces and collaborators, eschewing political in favor of pragmatic and causal prioritization of external liberation before internal ideological contests. , it advocated democratic elections over vengeful purges, targeting fascist enablers based on verifiable actions rather than blanket ideological .

Military Operations Against Axis Forces

Initial Resistance Efforts


Following its formation in 1941, EDES under initiated small-scale guerrilla operations in late 1941, focusing on and ambushes against supply lines in the mountainous terrain of , particularly . These exploited local knowledge of the rugged landscape to target garrisons and convoys along key roads such as the Yannina-Arta-Agrinion route and the Metsovon Highway, disrupting logistics without engaging in prolonged battles. For instance, on 23 October 1942, Zervas forces ambushed an Italian convoy near , demonstrating early effectiveness in harassment warfare.
Amid the severe of winter 1941-1942, which claimed an estimated 200,000 to 300,000 lives due to blockades and requisitions, EDES surged as locals sought protection and retaliation against occupier reprisals. The organization grew from approximately 41 fighters in late 1941 to 59 by mid-1942, expanding to several hundred active guerrillas through targeted drives in villages affected by hunger and punitive actions. This expansion enabled EDES to establish initial control over remote mountainous zones, where fighters provided basic civilian aid—such as and security—contrasting sharply with the exploitative requisitions imposed by forces that exacerbated the crisis. These liberated pockets served as bases for further operations, fostering local support while avoiding direct confrontation until efforts intensified coordination in mid-1942.

Gorgopotamos Viaduct Sabotage

The Gorgopotamos Viaduct sabotage, codenamed , took place on November 25, 1942, involving a joint effort by 12 British (SOE) saboteurs, approximately 86 guerrillas under , and 52 EDES fighters led by Colonel to demolish the key railway bridge spanning the Gorgopotamos River in . The viaduct formed a critical segment of the Athens-Thessaloniki rail line, essential for transporting supplies from harbor to forces via and onward to . EDES forces, drawing from Zervas's National Groups of , provided essential manpower for securing the approaches and perimeter against nearby Italian garrisons at both ends of the viaduct, as well as potential or patrols, allowing the SOE demolition team—headed by E. C. W. Myers and sapper Tom Barnes—to access and wire the structure's piers with over 600 pounds of explosives. Zervas personally coordinated with Velouchiotis in a meeting on to align efforts, overcoming ideological frictions to prioritize the anti-Axis objective, marking EDES's first major coordinated strike against occupation infrastructure. The explosion severed the bridge's main spans, halting all rail traffic on the line for roughly six weeks until makeshift repairs under German supervision using 2,500 forced laborers partially restored it. This disruption impeded logistics by an estimated 40 percent on the Greek segment, delaying reinforcements and materiel to Rommel's amid ongoing North African campaigns, as documented in SOE after-action analyses. The operation's tactical precision and inter-group collaboration elevated EDES's profile among Allied coordinators, fostering subsequent British support while demonstrating guerrilla efficacy in severing enemy supply chains.

Major Engagements and Territorial Control

Following the Italian armistice on September 8, 1943, EDES forces led by disarmed surrendering Italian garrisons in northwestern and initiated direct confrontations with advancing units in . These early independent campaigns involved ambushes on supply lines and raids on fortifications, employing guerrilla tactics to inflict attrition on reinforcements seeking to consolidate control after Italy's capitulation. By late 1943, EDES had secured operational dominance in segments of , including areas around Arta and , where fighters disrupted German convoys and destroyed key infrastructure, such as bridges and outposts, hindering enemy logistics. Engagements in the Mountains and peripheral locales, including defensive actions near passes, forced German withdrawals through sustained harassment, with EDES units numbering up to several thousand combatants by mid-1944 contributing to the progressive erosion of presence in the region. In liberated zones under EDES administration, local governance structures were established to sustain operations, including resource levies equivalent to taxes directed toward arming fighters and evidence-based executions of documented collaborators to maintain order and security. These efforts culminated in quantifiable disruptions, such as the elimination of multiple convoys and fortified positions, which aligned with broader Allied pressure leading to Axis evacuation from by October 1944.

Alliances and External Support

British Backing and Coordination

The British (SOE) initiated support for EDES in 1942, providing arms, training, and intelligence to bolster its operations against forces, with liaison officers embedded to coordinate activities under Napoleon Zervas's command. This assistance included financial aid to mobilize fighters and logistical drops that enhanced EDES's capacity for sabotage and , reflecting SOE's assessment of EDES as a more reliable partner than communist-led due to its alignment with non-Soviet-influenced national liberation goals. Zervas met with SOE representatives on 19 to formalize ahead of key sabotage efforts, establishing protocols for joint planning that prioritized EDES's territorial control in and . SOE's prioritization of EDES stemmed from its dependence on British supplies for survival against ELAS incursions, allowing near-complete influence over EDES strategy to prevent communist dominance in post-liberation . By mid-1943, this support extended to enforcing agreements like the National Bands Agreement, where SOE leveraged arms withholdings to compel EDES-ELAS ceasefires, though EDES retained preferential access to resources for sustained anti-Axis engagements. Declassified military analyses document how liaison officers' counsel shaped Zervas's decisions, enabling EDES to secure the Ionian coast in late with direct operational backing amid advancing Allied forces. This coordination yielded empirical gains in EDES's firepower and operational reach, as wartime dispatches record increased sabotage efficacy following SOE-supplied explosives and weaponry, contrasting with ELAS's more autonomous armament from captured stocks. British policy, driven by strategic imperatives to maintain a non-communist , thus positioned EDES as a key vector for Allied disruption of logistics without risking Soviet-aligned expansion in the .

Joint Actions with Other Groups

The Gorgopotamos viaduct sabotage on November 25, 1942, exemplified EDES's rare cross-ideological cooperation with the communist-led , as both groups contributed fighters—approximately 150 from EDES under alongside ELAS detachments—to support British SOE saboteurs in demolishing the key rail link between and , disrupting supply lines for over two months. This operation, planned as , marked one of the few instances of unified action against shared occupiers, though post-war leftist narratives often emphasized ELAS's role while minimizing EDES's logistical and combat contributions, reflecting ideological biases in communist-dominated accounts. In July 1943, EDES participated in the National Bands Agreement alongside and the smaller republican group, committing to coordinated anti-Axis operations under a joint headquarters to prevent inter-group skirmishes and focus efforts on German and Italian forces. This pact facilitated limited shared raids and exchanges in , such as disrupting rail communications, but yielded uneven results due to persistent mutual suspicions over command and resource allocation. EDES also formed alliances with minor monarchist and republican bands, like local units, for targeted ambushes on Italian garrisons in , pooling scouts and explosives to amplify disruptions without formal integration. These collaborations, while effective in short-term setbacks—such as delaying reinforcements by thousands of tons of —highlighted pragmatic unity driven by mediation rather than ideological alignment, ultimately exposing fault lines in burden-sharing that EDES leaders cited as precursors to later fractures.

Conflicts Within the Resistance

Rising Tensions with

Tensions between EDES and escalated from early , as , aligned with communist goals of postwar political dominance, aggressively expanded into territories controlled by nationalist groups like EDES, particularly in and , where EDES maintained defensive operations rooted in republican and anti-monarchist principles. This expansionism manifested in 's systematic disarmament of rival bands, including non-communist units, to consolidate arms and manpower; for instance, in spring , captured and disarmed elements associated with figures like Sarafis, who then defected to command. Such actions empirically triggered defections from mixed or pressured groups, with remnants of targeted organizations like EKKA fleeing control toward collaborationist rather than submission, highlighting the causal link between 's coercive tactics and fragmentation within the resistance. By October 1943, these frictions erupted into direct confrontations, with launching offensives against EDES strongholds to preempt rival influence and secure monopolistic control over liberated zones, nearly destroying EDES forces in the process and forcing a retreat to . EDES's refusal to yield stemmed from a principled stand against ceding ground to a force pursuing ideological hegemony, evidenced by 's parallel purges of non-communists, such as the April 1944 elimination of leader Dimitrios Psaros following his rejection of subordination demands. The September 1944 Caserta Agreement, which nominally placed all guerrilla forces under the Greek Government of National Unity and British command, failed to mitigate these dynamics; instead, exploited its superior numbers—around 50,000 fighters compared to EDES's 10,000—to intensify pressure for EDES's effective subordination, viewing the accord as a vehicle for resource monopolization amid impending withdrawal. British observers, through liaison reports, corroborated 's pattern of political eliminations and expansionist intent, noting the threat of communist overreach that justified bolstering EDES as a to preserve pluralistic structures.

Key Clashes and Dekemvriana Events

Amid the outbreak of the Dekemvriana in Athens on December 3, 1944, ELAS initiated parallel assaults on EDES positions in Epirus to neutralize the competing resistance organization and secure dominance in northern Greece. EDES, loyal to the British-backed Greek government of national unity, defended its strongholds while coordinating with Allied efforts against ELAS expansion. These clashes exemplified ELAS's strategy to eliminate non-communist guerrillas during the power vacuum of liberation. On December 23, 1944, ELAS forces launched a major invasion into the EDES-controlled region of Epirus, achieving an initial 16-mile penetration against Zervas's approximately 10,000 fighters. By December 25, ELAS had shattered EDES's defensive capabilities, exploiting desertions and numerical superiority to force remnants to retreat toward British-held Corfu. Despite this rapid collapse of EDES units in the north, the group's alignment with government and British forces prevented total annihilation and contributed to the containment of ELAS advances. The gains proved short-lived, as mounting British and Greek government pressure, including aerial and ground support, shifted the momentum. The Varkiza Agreement, signed on February 12, 1945, compelled to disarm, release prisoners, and vacate occupied areas, effectively reversing their territorial expansions and affirming the provisional government's authority. This outcome underscored 's overextension in challenging Allied-backed structures, paving the way for temporary postwar stability.

Controversies and Historical Debates

Allegations of Collaboration

Allegations of collaboration with Axis forces have been leveled against EDES primarily by its communist rivals in EAM-ELAS, who portrayed such dealings as evidence of betrayal to justify territorial expansions and attacks on EDES units. These claims often centered on purported tacit understandings or "gentlemen's agreements" between EDES leader Napoleon Zervas and Italian or German commanders, allegedly aimed at mutual non-aggression or support against the expanding ELAS presence in Epirus during 1943. For instance, ELAS reports from October 1943 accused Zervas of coordinating with Italian forces prior to their September capitulation, including exchanges of intelligence or arms to counter ELAS advances, though these assertions relied heavily on unverified partisan testimonies rather than captured documents or neutral observers. Such accusations gained traction amid the breakdown of the National Bands Agreement in mid-1943, when launched offensives against EDES in , framing them as preemptive strikes against "quislings." Left-leaning historical narratives, including those from post-war communist accounts, amplified these claims by citing sporadic local truces—common in fragmented guerrilla theaters where survival necessitated temporary halts in hostilities—as proof of systemic alignment. However, primary records, such as those referenced in assessments, frequently depicted EDES as a persistent , with operations against Zervas forces continuing despite any alleged pacts, underscoring the opportunistic nature of such contacts over outright alliance. British intelligence evaluations, drawing from on-the-ground officers embedded with EDES, dismissed many charges as ELAS-orchestrated designed to monopolize legitimacy and British supplies. These viewpoints highlighted the prioritization of anti-communist imperatives in , where ELAS posed a more immediate existential risk to EDES than retreating garrisons, leading to selective engagements that rivals misconstrued as . Despite this, certain academic analyses acknowledge informal anti-communist alignments involving Zervas and occupation-linked elements, though without substantiating direct pacts beyond .

Rebuttals and Contextual Analysis

EDES's record of verifiable anti-Axis operations, including the joint of the Gorgopotamos viaduct on November 25, 1942—which severed critical rail links supplying German forces in and involved EDES fighters alongside and commandos—directly contradicts claims of systematic collaboration, as such actions required coordinated opposition to occupation forces. In , EDES forces under conducted sustained guerrilla campaigns against Italian and German garrisons from 1942 onward, liberating sectors of the region and disrupting control, efforts documented in military mission reports that highlight EDES's effectiveness in pinning down enemy troops. These engagements, supported by (SOE) liaison officers embedded with EDES, underscore a causal commitment to weakening and territorial hold, rather than enabling it, with declassified assessments affirming Zervas's groups as reliable partners in and gathering despite operational frictions. Accusations of , often citing isolated tactical contacts or local truces in contested areas, emerged predominantly as rhetorical tools during escalating intra-resistance rivalries, such as the 1943-1944 clashes in and , where leaders like Sarafis invoked them to rationalize preemptive strikes against EDES without substantive evidence of ideological betrayal. Such claims ignored 's parallel reprisals against non-communist civilians and rival groups, framing EDES's pragmatic maneuvers—necessitated by geographic isolation and resource scarcity—as equivalent to the outright pacts seen in collaborationist , a distinction upheld by contemporaneous observations prioritizing EDES's net contribution to Allied objectives over internecine disputes. Post-2000 , drawing on archival releases and quantitative analyses of impacts, has increasingly validated EDES's role through empirical metrics like documented casualties and damage in its operational zones, countering earlier narratives shaped by Cold War-era partisan lenses that downplayed non-communist efforts. These reassessments emphasize causal factors such as EDES's alignment with British-supplied and , which enabled verifiable defeats of units in northwestern , distinguishing expedient survival tactics from the deliberate alleged by contemporaries amid the broader chaos of and civil strife.

Dissolution and Legacy

Post-Liberation Fate

Following the Axis occupation's end in October 1944, the provisional Greek government issued orders on November 8 for the dissolution of major guerrilla organizations, including EDES and , effective December 10, with mechanisms allowing eligible fighters to enlist in the national army as reservists. These directives aimed at centralizing military authority under the government amid fears of communist-led , prioritizing unified command over fragmented resistance structures. EDES, aligned with republican and anti-communist elements, complied in principle but was rapidly undermined by 's aggressive expansion during the clashes in and surrounding areas, where its forces incurred catastrophic losses—effectively ceasing organized operations as a distinct entity. Remnants of EDES personnel were subsequently absorbed into the reorganized , bolstering its anti-communist core as the Varkiza Agreement of February 12, 1945, enforced disarmament and further consolidated government control over non-communist guerrillas. This integration reflected pragmatic state-building rather than EDES's operational shortcomings, preserving experienced cadres from and northwestern for defensive roles against renewed Democratic Army threats. Napoleon , EDES's founder and commander, shifted to civilian leadership, assuming the role of Minister of Public Order under Prime Minister Dimitrios Maximos in 1945 and Minister of Public Works under Sophoklis Venizelos in 1946; he established the National Party of , which garnered 22 parliamentary seats in the March 31, 1946, elections. EDES veterans' marginalization as a cohesive political or military faction stemmed from the government's emphasis on national unity and suppression of factional identities to counter communist subversion, though their anti-communist orientation ensured selective incorporation into efforts from onward, where they supplemented - and U.S.-backed forces without reforming under the EDES banner. This process incurred no verifiable of EDES loyalists comparable to leftist reprisals, but the organization's precluded sustained recognition, subordinating its legacy to broader state narratives of resistance and .

Long-Term Impact and Recognition

The efforts of EDES during and immediately after the Axis occupation were instrumental in bolstering 's post-liberation alignment with Western powers, thereby contributing causally to the of Soviet expansion in the . As the principal non-communist resistance force backed by British liaison officers, EDES coordinated with Allied landings in to secure against ELAS seizure, enabling the formation of a provisional government under that prioritized democratic institutions over communist insurgency. This alignment facilitated U.S. intervention via the on March 12, 1947, which provided $300 million in aid to and , solidifying 's role as a founding member in 1949 and preventing a domino effect of communist regimes from southward. Official state recognition of EDES materialized promptly amid the Greek Civil War's anticommunist imperatives, with Emergency Law 971 enacted on September 16, 1949, validating 25 EDES units and designating leader as National Resistance General Leader, distinct from the delayed acknowledgment of EAM-ELAS until Law 1285 on August 19, 1982. By 2006, the recognition process encompassed 116,000 non-communist resistance veterans, including EDES members, versus 220,000 for communist-affiliated fighters, underscoring the organization's validated scale. Law 2320 of 1995 further restored pensions for eligible EDES survivors, addressing wartime service disparities. Despite early statutory honors, EDES's legacy encountered historiographical marginalization in academia and media, where systemic left-leaning biases privileged EAM-ELAS narratives, often portraying non-communist resistors as peripheral or collaboration-prone until post-1974 revisions prompted broader inclusivity. Nationalists hail EDES for embodying uncompromised patriotism against both occupiers and domestic , whereas monarchists decry its ideology, which rejected King George II's restoration and aligned with Venizelist liberals. Empirical resistance evaluations, including British SOE reports on EDES operations yielding over 10,000 casualties and infrastructure disruptions, substantiate its efficacy independent of ideological critiques.

References

  1. [1]
    The Greek Civil War, 1944-1949 | New Orleans
    May 22, 2020 · Another large resistance group, the National Greek Republican League, or EDES, was anti-communist but opposed to the monarchist government in ...
  2. [2]
    The Greek Holocaust - Warfare History Network
    Jan 20, 2024 · On the other side of the resistance movement was the EDES, a noncommunist organization under the command of General Napoleon Zervas. In this, ...
  3. [3]
    Greek Civil War: After Defeating the Nazis, the Next Enemy Was ...
    Jun 12, 2006 · On the other side of the coin, meanwhile, a 51-year-old republican colonel named Napoleon Zercas formed the Ethnikos Dimokratikos Ellinikos ...
  4. [4]
    The Plot Against Greece | Foreign Affairs
    Late in 1943 they began to shift their main effort at coöperation to a so-called Rightist resistance group, EDES (Ellinikos Dimokratikos Syndesmos), or ...
  5. [5]
    Napoleon Zervas: A Comprehensive Examination of His Life and ...
    Jan 12, 2025 · His role in the resistance, as well as his subsequent political career, has left a complex and often controversial legacy in Greek history. This ...
  6. [6]
  7. [7]
    [PDF] CASE STUDY IN GUERRILLA WAR. GREECE DURING ... - DTIC
    As Zervas dominated EDES in the mountains, he also began to assert his increasing independence of EDES in Athens. This occurrence fol- lowed a natural ...
  8. [8]
  9. [9]
    (PDF) National Republican Greek League (EDES), 1941-1944
    PDF | On May 1, 2020, Bisser Petrov published National Republican Greek League (EDES), 1941-1944: Discarded Principles and Ambiguous Activities | Find, ...
  10. [10]
    EDES - 1940-1945 [RESISTANCE]
    The National Republican Greek League, EDES, has been formed with the following objectives: To establish in Greece the Republican constitution, in a socialist ...
  11. [11]
    The Greek Famine During the Nazi Occupation - GreekReporter.com
    Oct 23, 2022 · The Greek famine during the three and a half years of Nazi occupation killed at least two hundred thousand and perhaps as many as three hundred thousand people.Missing: EDES growth reprisals
  12. [12]
    Greek Tragedy: Civil War During World War II - HistoryNet
    Jan 25, 2017 · On Nov. 25, 1942, 86 ELAS and 52 EDES partisans—supporting a dozen-man demolition party of Britain's Special Operations Executive (SOE)— ...
  13. [13]
    Operation Harling – Gorgopotamos and the Greek Resistance
    It was founded on 9 September 1941 by a former Greek army officer, Colonel Napoleon Zervas, who had been expelled after the failed pro-Venizelist coup d'état of ...Missing: principles | Show results with:principles
  14. [14]
    Operation Harling: Textbook Guerrilla Warfare - Aspects of History
    Operation Harling, the first major Anglo-Greek sabotage mission of the war, had been in the planning stage since the summer of 1942.
  15. [15]
    Operation Harling | SikhNet
    Jan 23, 2017 · Operation Harling was to destroy one of three railway viaducts on the line between Thessaloniki and Athens in order seriously to disrupt vital supplies.
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Gorgopotamos and After: Tom Barnes' Greek Archive, 1942–45
    Cecil Edward (Tom) Barnes took part in the famous sabotage operation of the. Gorgopotamos Bridge in November 1942 as leader of the demolition party.<|separator|>
  17. [17]
    November 25th 1942 - The blowing up of the Gorgopotamos railway ...
    Nov 25, 2022 · The Operation called for the blowing up of one of the three bridges over the Papadia, Asopos and Gorgopotamos rivers. They were all major ...Operation Harling – Gorgopotamos and the Greek Resistance15 days before OXI National Day The Greek Resistance ... - FacebookMore results from www.facebook.com
  18. [18]
    Mission Impossible: The Destruction of the Asopos Viaduct
    The reconstruction of the Gorgapotamos viaduct and resumption of freight services along the line in January 1943 meant a new effort was needed to once again ...
  19. [19]
    (PDF) The Special Operations Executive in Greece: Operation Harling
    Operation Harling catalyzed the Greek resistance movement's transition to organized guerrilla warfare, enhancing recruitment and support.
  20. [20]
    Gorgopotamos: The Greatest Moment of Greek Resistance Against ...
    Nov 25, 2024 · The blowing of the Gorgopotamos bridge was one of the greatest acts of sabotage during World War II. It won the admiration of all occupied ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] Art of War Papers - Instilling Aggressiveness US Advisors and Greek ...
    19 Napoleon Zervas, who had commanded EDES and became an example of the ultra-right-wing officials, was implementing such repressive measures by right-wing ...
  22. [22]
    Guerrilla Warfare in the Arta Region (Epirus-Greece) During World ...
    Dec 4, 2024 · Zervas was a retired venizelist officer, known for his involvement in various pre-war military coups. He was born in Arta and had strong family ...
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Level Analysis of the British SOE in Crete and Greece during World ...
    May 23, 2019 · The cumulative effects of the SOE's activities diverted, disrupted, delayed, and destroyed enemy forces relative to. Allied conventional forces' ...
  24. [24]
    [PDF] EARLY BRITISH CONTACTS WITH THE GREEK RESISTANCE IN ...
    Nov 25, 2015 · The hopes of SOE were particularly fastened on Zervas, who received considerable sums of money from SOE to induce him to take the field, but ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Allied Strategy in the Mediterranean, the Resistance and Political ...
    Mar 15, 2018 · The bridge was successfully destroyed on 25 November 1942 in an operation in which groups of ELAS and EDES guerillas participated. The ...
  27. [27]
    The Greek Civil War 1943-1949 - GlobalSecurity.org
    Founded on September 27, 1941, EAM was ostensibly a coalition of six ... (Ethnikos Dimokratikos Ellinikos Syndesmos), the National Republican Greek League.<|separator|>
  28. [28]
    [PDF] The Road To American Participation In The Greek Civil War, 1943 ...
    By this very token, the stand against communism had to start in Greece. ... Historical Journal 27, no. 3 (September 1984): 715-727. Gaddis, John Lewis ...
  29. [29]
    EDES | Greek Resistance, Civil War & Guerrilla Warfare - Britannica
    Led by Gen. Napoleon Zervas, EDES was originally liberal and antimonarchist, but it moved steadily to. ... Date: December 3, 1944 - October 16, 1949. (Show ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] British Military Mission (BMM) to Greece, 1942-44
    Nov 26, 2024 · The British successfully carried out their mission on the viaduct and their efforts marked the first joint operation between the British ...<|separator|>
  31. [31]
    LEFTISTS IN GREECE INVADE EDES REGION; 16-Mile Penetration ...
    23 -- The long- threatened attack by Greek Elas forces upon Gen. Napoleon Zervas and his right-wing Edes army, estimated at about 10,000, in Epirus, has ...
  32. [32]
    ELAS TROOPS BREAK EDES RIVALS' MIGHT; Greek Rightists ...
    ELAS TROOPS BREAK EDES RIVALS' MIGHT; Greek Rightists, Weakened by Desertions, Trying to Flee to British-Held Corfu. Share full article.Missing: destroys | Show results with:destroys
  33. [33]
    Napoleon Zervas and his collaboration with the Germans
    Jul 25, 2024 · Zervas had told the British that he would only cease the war when communist forces released all of Epirus to him. Zervas also guaranteed the ...Missing: liberated administration
  34. [34]
    Collaboration, resistance and liberation in the Balkans, 1941–1945
    Founded in the spring of 1942, it operated mostly in Epirus, the home region of its leader, General Napoleon Zervas. ... 1942 by combined Četnik-Italian forces.<|separator|>
  35. [35]
    The Battle of Gorgopotamos Brits and Greeks in World War II -
    Nov 25, 2021 · It was one of the first major sabotage acts in Axis–occupied Europe and the beginning of a permanent British involvement with the Greek ...Missing: tons | Show results with:tons
  36. [36]
    [PDF] British Military Mission (BMM) to Greece, 1942-44 - DTIC
    May 21, 2009 · 33 The overarching goals established by EDES centered on resisting the. Axis occupiers and attempting to impart a balance of republicanism ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] British Intelligence Services in Greece, 1940 - 1947 - Apollo
    ... Historical Journal, Vol. 38, no. 2 (1995) p. 504. 8 John O. Iatrides, Revolt in Athens: The Greek Communist 'Second Round', 1944-1945. (Princeton, Princeton ...
  38. [38]
    [PDF] The Greek Historiography of the 1940s. A Reassessment
    The aim of the present paper is to discuss and assess these contributions to the historiography of Greece during the 1940s, with particular focus on post-2000 ...
  39. [39]
    Old Interpretations and New Approaches in the Historiography of the ...
    Dec 24, 2017 · In a 2004 survey article, Nikos Marantzidis and Giorgos Antoniou outlined the main trends in studies. of Greece during the turbulent decade ...
  40. [40]
    GREECE DISSOLVING GUERRILLA GROUPS; Disarming of Elas ...
    orders ELAS and EDES dissolution effective Dec 10; provides for guerrilla reservists wishing to join army; Ankara repts EAM will disband.
  41. [41]
    [63] Agreement Between the Greek Government and EAM
    While the agreement was officially signed at Athens, the terms of the agreement were reached at Varkiza and it is known as the Varkiza Agreement.↩; Joint ...Missing: EDES dissolution
  42. [42]
    Napoleon Zervas | World War II Database
    He was the leader of the Greek resistance organization National Republican Greek League (EDES), which he joined in Sep 1941. He was credited with bringing Greek ...
  43. [43]
    Greek Civil War - The Dawn of the Cold War | History Blog
    Jan 23, 2021 · In March 1943 they initiated the signing of the National Bands Agreement to stop all hostilities. In September 1943, the conflict renewed.
  44. [44]
    Heroes or Outcasts? The Long Saga of the State's Recognition of ...
    Aug 3, 2023 · This article explores how the Greek state created and implemented the legislation relating to recognition of the National Resistance during three different ...
  45. [45]
    Heroes or Outcasts? The Long Saga of the State's Recognition of ...
    This article explores how the Greek state created and implemented the legislation relating to recognition of the National Resistance during three different ...Missing: impact | Show results with:impact
  46. [46]
    The Vanguard of Greek Resistance Against Nazi Occupation
    May 29, 2024 · Founded in 1941 by Colonel Napoleon Zervas, EDES emerged as a beacon of hope amidst the darkness of occupation. Zervas, a decorated veteran ...