Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Operation Long Jump

Operation Long Jump, known in German as Unternehmen Weitsprung, was an alleged covert operation by Nazi Germany's intelligence services to assassinate the Allied "" leaders—U.S. President , British Prime Minister , and Soviet Premier —during their first joint summit at the from November 28 to December 1, 1943. The purported plan involved a small team of SS commandos, including parachutists and explosives experts, infiltrating via neutral to execute coordinated attacks, such as bombing the British and Soviet legations or using silenced weapons during unguarded moments, with reportedly approving the scheme after intercepts revealed the conference details. According to Soviet accounts, the plot was thwarted by agent , who captured six German operatives, including key planner Ludwig Geigner, after they arrived in under journalistic cover; these claims stem primarily from post-war interrogations and declassified materials, which describe the agents' confessions under duress. The operation's historicity remains highly contested among historians, lacking any corroboration from captured German archives, wartime or RSHA documents, or independent Allied intelligence beyond relayed Soviet warnings dismissed at the time as exaggerated. , the SS often linked to the plot in popular narratives, explicitly denied involvement in his memoirs and trial testimonies, attributing such stories to enemy fabrication, while skepticism—evident in wartime cables—viewed the alerts as potential Soviet maneuvers to inflate prowess or manipulate Allied security arrangements. Soviet-origin sources, prone to self-aggrandizing propaganda amid Stalin's cult of intelligence triumphs, form the evidentiary core, with no primary Nazi records surfacing despite extensive post-war scrutiny of regime files; this reliance raises doubts about coerced confessions from executed agents like Geigner and Bernhard Klitzsch, whose reliability is undermined by conditions documented in declassified files. If executed successfully, the plot could have disrupted Allied coordination on D-Day planning and Eastern Front strategy, but its defining controversy lies in its transformation into a staple of Cold War-era Soviet , amplified in KGB literature and films like Teheran-43 (1981), which portrayed Vartanian as a heroic counterspy despite scant non-Soviet verification. Western analysts, including those reviewing captured records, have noted the absence of operational orders or logistics traces typical of verified Nazi like the Mussolini rescue, suggesting the scheme may represent an inflated or invented episode to justify heightened Soviet security measures at , where insisted on villa accommodations partly to enable covert bugging of Roosevelt's quarters. This episode underscores broader challenges in evaluating WWII covert history, where adversarial claims demand cross-verification against empirical archives rather than unilateral narratives from state security apparatuses.

Historical Background

The Tehran Conference

The Tehran Conference was held from November 28 to December 1, 1943, in , , marking the first in-person meeting of the Allied "Big Three" leaders: U.S. President , British Prime Minister , and Soviet Premier . The summit focused on coordinating military strategy against , including firm commitments to launch —a cross-Channel of in May 1944—as the primary offensive to relieve pressure on Soviet forces in the east. Discussions also addressed postwar territorial arrangements, such as Soviet influence over and Poland's borders, alongside Stalin's agreement to enter the war against in exchange for territorial concessions in the Kurile Islands and southern . Tehran's selection as the venue stemmed from its strategic position as a neutral hub facilitating Allied supply lines through , while accommodating Stalin's insistence on a location no farther than a few days' train journey from , as he refused air travel due to security concerns and health limitations. The conference's high stakes for the lay in its potential to solidify Allied unity, enabling synchronized offensives that could decisively shorten the war and shape Europe's reconstruction, thereby threatening Germany's survival amid mounting defeats on multiple fronts. Logistical arrangements emphasized security amid wartime risks, with most sessions conducted within the heavily guarded Soviet embassy compound, where resided to benefit from its fortified perimeter and Soviet protection details, despite placing him in closer proximity to Stalin's staff. Churchill, by contrast, stayed at the British legation across town, necessitating armored convoys for transit between venues under joint Allied and local Iranian security oversight. These measures reflected the summit's vulnerability in a region bordering Axis-influenced territories, underscoring the Allies' prioritization of leader safety to ensure uninterrupted strategic deliberations.

Nazi Intelligence and Desperation in 1943

By mid-1943, faced severe strategic setbacks on multiple fronts, culminating in a shift from offensive operations to desperate defensive measures. The concluded on February 2, 1943, with the surrender of the German 6th Army, resulting in approximately 91,000 German troops captured and overall losses exceeding 800,000 dead, wounded, or missing, marking a turning point that shattered the myth of German invincibility on the Eastern Front. This defeat was followed by the from July 5 to August 23, 1943, the last major German offensive on the Eastern Front, where the committed over 3,000 tanks but suffered irreplaceable losses of around 700 tanks and 200,000 casualties, allowing Soviet forces to seize the initiative and advance westward. In the West, Allied landings in in July 1943 and the Italian armistice on September 8 further eroded control in the Mediterranean, compounding resource shortages, manpower deficits, and logistical strains that left Hitler increasingly reliant on unconventional tactics to avert collapse. These reversals fueled Hitler's preoccupation with high-stakes disruptions to Allied coordination, including potential decapitation strikes against enemy leadership, as conventional warfare yielded diminishing returns amid mounting Allied industrial and numerical superiority. German intelligence agencies, primarily the Abwehr (military intelligence under Admiral Wilhelm Canaris) and the SD (SS security service led by Reinhard Heydrich until his death in 1942 and later Walter Schellenberg), maintained networks for espionage, sabotage, and signals intelligence, with the Abwehr's Abteilung I focusing on foreign agent recruitment and Abteilung II on subversion. Despite internal rivalries—exacerbated by Canaris's growing disaffection with the regime—these organizations achieved sporadic successes, such as the B-Dienst naval codebreakers decrypting some Allied merchant shipping signals until Allied encryption upgrades in 1943 curtailed their edge. However, Allied countermeasures, including the compromise of German Enigma traffic and purges of infiltrated agents via operations like Double Cross, progressively undermined German human and signals intelligence efficacy, rendering the services overstretched and vulnerable to deception. Illustrating the feasibility of bold under duress, the successful rescue of on September 12, 1943, during Operation Eiche demonstrated Nazi capabilities for high-risk commando raids. SS Hauptsturmführer , leading a force of paratroopers and SS commandos, executed a glider-borne assault on the Gran Sasso hotel in the Italian Apennines, where Mussolini was held captive, extracting him without firing a shot and flying him to safety via Storch aircraft. This operation, personally ordered by Hitler on July 26, 1943, amid Italy's defection, highlighted the regime's willingness to invest in audacious ventures leveraging elite units like the , even as broader military prospects dimmed, and boosted propaganda narratives of resilience despite underlying desperation.

The Alleged Plot

Planning and Objectives

According to postwar interrogations and disclosures, primarily from Soviet sources, Operation Long Jump was allegedly authorized by in the late summer of 1943 upon learning of the forthcoming , with the aim of simultaneously assassinating U.S. President , British Prime Minister , and Soviet Premier . The operation's core objective was to eliminate the Allied "" leaders in one strike, thereby shattering the coalition's cohesion, sowing chaos among the Allies, and potentially enabling to secure a favorable or extend the war by forcing internal divisions. Alternative aims included the possibility of kidnapping one or more leaders for use as tools or bargaining leverage against the remaining Allies, though remained the prioritized outcome. Planning coordination fell under SS oversight, with chief reportedly receiving directives to organize the effort, drawing on and assets already positioned in the . intelligence on the conference's timing—November 28 to December 1, 1943—and venue in was said to stem from espionage networks in , including local agents and possibly intercepted Allied communications, allowing alignment of the plot with the leaders' confirmed itineraries. No contemporary documents, such as orders from the Führerhauptquartier or RSHA files, have been identified to substantiate these planning elements, with accounts relying on testimonies from captured operatives.

Key Personnel and Organization

The operation's claimed high-level coordination was attributed to , Chief of the (RSHA), who allegedly transferred operational control from the to SS elements and selected the tactical leader. Kaltenbrunner's role stemmed from directives by and Reinhard Heydrich's successors in Nazi intelligence hierarchies, emphasizing integration of SD and resources for covert actions abroad. Tactical command on the ground was reportedly assigned to , an SS-Obersturmbannführer renowned for prior commando raids such as the 1943 Gran Sasso rescue of , positioning him to oversee the insertion and execution phases in . Skorzeny's involvement highlighted the plot's reliance on Waffen-SS special forces expertise for high-risk infiltration, distinct from standard espionage. The organizational framework involved a compact team of 6–8 German agents, primarily -trained parachutists, slated for airdrop near , , on or around November 1943, with provisions for radio coordination and exfiltration. Support structures drew on pro-German Iranian networks, including tribal elements and consular contacts in neutral Persia, to provide safe houses, local guides, and logistical aid without direct military presence. This decentralized setup aimed to minimize exposure while leveraging pre-existing assets in the region established since 1941.

Proposed Assassination Methods

The alleged primary method, as described in postwar interrogations of officers and Soviet reports, involved parachuting a team of six to ten specially trained commandos into the Iranian desert near using long-range such as the Ju 290. Once on the ground, the commandos were to infiltrate the city via prearranged safe houses, arming themselves with submachine guns, pistols, and explosives to carry out bombings or direct shootings against , Churchill, and . Tactical details from these accounts specified targeting vulnerable transit points, particularly during Roosevelt's movements between his residence and conference sites, which were anticipated to offer brief windows of exposure due to his reliance on a and less fortified motorcades compared to Stalin's heavily guarded routines. The operation's design hinged on synchronized intelligence from local agents to pinpoint these moments, with commandos positioning for ambushes at venues like the British Embassy where joint meetings occurred. Supplementary approaches outlined in the same sources included the use of disguised infiltrators—such as purported Soviet defectors in Red Army uniforms—to breach security perimeters and facilitate access to the leaders' entourages. While primary emphasis was on airborne drops for rapid deployment, variants like glider insertions were reportedly contemplated for quieter landings in rugged terrain, though unconfirmed in captured planning documents.

Discovery and Counterintelligence

Soviet Intelligence Breakthroughs

The NKVD's primary breakthrough came through deep penetration of German intelligence networks via human sources. Soviet agent Nikolai Kuznetsov, operating undercover as Wehrmacht Oberleutnant Paul Siebert—a Ukrainian-born German officer—extracted details of the assassination plot during a drinking session with SS-Sturmbannführer Hans Ulrich von Ortel in Rivne, western Ukraine, in late October 1943. Kuznetsov, fluent in German and embedded in Nazi-occupied territories since 1942, elicited confessions about Operation Long Jump's targeting of Stalin, Roosevelt, and Churchill at the Tehran Conference, including planned sabotage elements. This intelligence, relayed promptly to Moscow, marked the initial alert to Soviet leadership of an imminent threat. Complementing Kuznetsov's , operatives in , led by 19-year-old agent (codenamed "Amir"), maintained a pre-existing network monitoring activities in and surrounding areas. Vartanian's group detected the parachute insertion of the first German sabotage team—six agents, including two radio operators—near Qum, approximately 70 kilometers south of Tehran, roughly two weeks before the conference convened on November 28, 1943. Soviet forces shadowed the infiltrators to their safehouse in the capital, where an support network provided logistics. Signals intelligence further corroborated the human reports, as units intercepted, recorded, and decoded the German agents' radio transmissions from their villa. These decrypts revealed operational details, such as coordination for a follow-up insertion, confirming the plot's scope despite German efforts at secrecy. The combined intelligence prompted to notify Allied counterparts, leading to enhanced embassy security measures and limited coordination with British on contingency venue adjustments, including Roosevelt's relocation to the secure Soviet compound for the duration of the talks.

Allied Security Responses

Upon receiving intelligence of a potential German assassination plot involving parachutists, the Allies coordinated enhanced security protocols for the Tehran Conference held from November 28 to December 1, 1943. The Soviet Union deployed an additional 3,000 troops under General Andrei Krulev to bolster defenses in the city, focusing on perimeter control and rapid response capabilities. United States Secret Service agents, numbering around a half-dozen, collaborated directly with Soviet NKVD personnel to safeguard President Franklin D. Roosevelt, while British security emphasized embassy fortifications but expressed reservations about overall vulnerability. To mitigate risks from reported Nazi infiltrators, relocated from the more exposed American legation to the Soviet embassy compound, which offered superior protection under oversight. His transport involved a —consisting of two s flanking a limousine carrying an agent—while traveled separately in a low-profile escorted by a single , minimizing exposure to potential snipers or saboteurs. 's reliance on a due to polio-related mobility limitations further shaped these adaptations, enabling discreet movement within secured areas without public visibility that could invite targeting. Anglo-American intelligence exchanged limited details on the , but operational primacy rested with Soviet forces, who controlled the venue and executed on-ground sweeps against suspected agents, including ambushes on parachutists. A joint Allied initiative offered a $20,000 reward for information leading to the capture of remaining German commandos, underscoring coordinated deterrence efforts despite venue-specific dependencies. These measures ensured no incursions disrupted proceedings, with Soviet troops handling the bulk of physical enforcement.

Postwar Accounts and Evidence

Soviet Revelations and German Confessions

Soviet intelligence agencies reported the arrest of several German agents in during November 1943, shortly before the . Under interrogation by the , these operatives confessed to involvement in a coordinated assassination plot targeting , , and Churchill, describing plans for infiltration via parachute drops near and subsequent attacks using explosives or close-quarters elimination. These wartime testimonies, extracted from captured Abwehr and SS personnel between 1943 and 1945, outlined the plot's scope, including reconnaissance by local German networks and coordination with high-level commands in . Interrogators documented admissions of training sabotage teams in techniques tailored to the conference venue, with one reportedly revealing details of a backup plan involving neutral territory contacts. In the postwar period, Soviet disclosures expanded on these confessions through official publications in the 1950s and 1960s. Accounts drawn from archives detailed the German codename "Weitsprung," attributing operational oversight to figures and citing extracted statements from detained officers that confirmed preliminary phases such as signal intelligence on conference logistics and agent insertion rehearsals in occupied territories. These revelations, disseminated in state-approved histories, emphasized the role of Soviet in preempting the scheme via preemptive arrests and venue fortifications.

Lack of German Archival Corroboration

No references to Unternehmen Weitsprung (Operation Long Jump) appear in surviving German archives from 1943, including records of the (OKW) or (SD) branches of the SS, despite the operation's alleged scale as a high-priority assassination plot targeting Allied leaders at the (November 28–December 1, 1943). In contrast, contemporaneous , such as the September 12, 1943, rescue of (Unternehmen Eiche), left detailed documentation in captured and files, while the July 20, 1944, coup attempt (Unternehmen ) generated extensive OKW and records preserved through internal investigations. Otto Skorzeny, the SS-Obersturmbannführer frequently implicated as operational commander, categorically denied the plot's existence in his postwar memoirs Skorzeny's Secret Missions (published 1957), stating he attended a briefing with and SS-Brigadeführer on potential Tehran disruptions but dismissed assassination as unfeasible due to logistical barriers, with no subsequent orders issued. Skorzeny attributed circulating accounts to Allied or Soviet fabrications amplified after the war. Nazi authorities ordered widespread destruction of sensitive documents in 1945 to evade Allied scrutiny, potentially accounting for gaps in SS and Foreign Office files related to intelligence abroad. However, this does not fully explain the evidentiary void for Weitsprung, as partial records from equivalent 1943 endeavors—like SD penetration operations in the or on —persist in declassified Bundesarchiv holdings and U.S. captures, without allusion to coordinated leader assassinations.

Skepticism and Historiographical Debate

Arguments for the Plot's Existence

Proponents argue that Hitler's documented enthusiasm for targeted assassinations of enemy leaders provides a strategic rationale consistent with Operation Long Jump. Throughout , Hitler personally authorized numerous plots against figures like and British commanders, viewing such strikes as potential turning points amid Germany's deteriorating position in late 1943. This pattern of endorsing bold, high-risk operations aligns with intelligence reports of his direct involvement in planning a simultaneous elimination of the Allied "" during the from November 28 to December 1, 1943. The assignment of , Hitler's favored commando leader, further bolsters claims of the plot's viability. Skorzeny had recently orchestrated the daring airborne rescue of on September 12, 1943, in Operation Eiche, demonstrating proven expertise in glider insertions, sabotage, and extraction under hostile conditions—skills directly applicable to infiltrating Tehran's secure venues. Proponents emphasize that selecting such a specialist, rather than conventional forces, reflects genuine intent rather than mere posturing. Soviet security measures at , including the abrupt relocation of Stalin's quarters within the embassy compound and the rapid arrest of several suspected operatives, empirically indicate a response to actionable intelligence rather than baseless paranoia alone. These actions disrupted reported networks in , where agents had established footholds for sabotage since 1941. Allied coordination, informed by shared on Axis communications, amplified these precautions, suggesting a corroborated multi-source . Analyses like and Josh Mensch's The Nazi Conspiracy (2022) contend that the operation's scope—encompassing paratrooper drops, local recruits, and explosive devices—mirrors Nazi escalatory tactics during their 1943 counteroffensives, when conventional victories waned. The authors draw on cross-referenced accounts from captured personnel and venue layouts to argue feasibility, positing that the plot's audacity fits Hitler's documented risk appetite for game-changing disruptions.

Arguments Against and Alternative Explanations

The primary evidence for Operation Long Jump derives from postwar Soviet accounts, including confessions extracted by the from captured German agents such as Hans Ulrich von Ortel, whose interrogations occurred under conditions notorious for coercion and fabrication to serve Stalinist objectives, such as inflating intelligence successes or justifying internal purges. , the officer purportedly tasked with leading the operation, explicitly denied its existence in his 1957 memoirs, Skorzeny’s Special Missions, asserting that von Ortel was a fictitious identity invented by Soviet authorities and that no such plot was ever planned or executed by . Logistical challenges render the alleged plot implausible given the security environment at the 1943 Tehran Conference. Tehran was saturated with Soviet NKVD troops, British forces, and Allied protective details, following Iran's declaration of war on Germany on September 23, 1943, which heightened surveillance and restricted Axis movements; inserting commandos via parachute drops from Focke-Wulf Condor aircraft would have required evading Allied air superiority in the region, a feat unsupported by any corroborated German aviation records or reconnaissance data. Historian Adrian O'Sullivan, in his analysis of Axis operations in Persia, describes the scheme as an "elaborate literary hoax" by Soviet counterintelligence, citing the absence of feasible infiltration routes amid multilayered defenses and the operational infeasibility of coordinating simultaneous assassinations across guarded compounds. U.S. and British intelligence reports from the period, including debriefings with Soviet Foreign Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, acknowledged only vague German agent activity in Tehran without endorsing specifics of a high-level plot, reflecting Western dismissal of NKVD claims as exaggerated. Alternative explanations posit the narrative as Soviet disinformation engineered to bolster NKVD prestige and manipulate Allied dynamics. CIA historical reviews suggest Stalin fabricated the threat to compel U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt's relocation to the heavily bugged Soviet embassy compound, enabling electronic surveillance of negotiations rather than genuine protection; this aligns with declassified evidence of Soviet eavesdropping devices planted in Allied quarters. The story may also have served propagandistic ends, amplifying Stalin's image as a vigilant leader amid delays in the promised Western second front—Operation Overlord was postponed until June 1944—while deflecting scrutiny from Soviet security vulnerabilities, as no contemporaneous U.S. or British corroborated the plot despite extensive monitoring of activities. Such fabrications fit patterns of NKVD myth-making, as noted by intelligence historians, where invented triumphs masked operational shortcomings and reinforced domestic loyalty to the regime.

Implications of Fabrication Theories

Theories that Operation Long Jump was a Soviet fabrication carry significant implications for evaluating the credibility of intelligence claims throughout . A fabricated plot would fit within established patterns of Stalinist , where the amplified or invented operational successes to project an image of unassailable competence and to consolidate domestic control amid purges and wartime pressures. This aligns with broader Soviet practices of strategic , including the manipulation of captured agent testimonies and postwar revelations timed for effect, thereby eroding confidence in uncorroborated assertions on other fronts, such as penetrations or thwartings. Should the operation prove invented, the Allies' elaborate security protocols at the —encompassing thousands of Soviet military police and joint Allied forces securing the perimeter and delegations—could be recast as prudent, generalized precautions against the inherent risks of convening in a volatile, Axis-proximate theater, unprompted by any singular scheme. Absent a real threat, the conference's uninterrupted proceedings from November 28 to December 1, 1943, which yielded key agreements on and Eastern Front coordination without evidence of thwarted infiltrations, underscore that no operational disruption occurred, attributing Soviet-arrest narratives to possible misdirection of unrelated activities rather than a foiled strike. Historiographical assessments, including a 2020 Skeptoid analysis, reinforce the fabrication hypothesis by pointing to inconsistencies like Otto Skorzeny's memoir denials, the evaporation of alleged operatives in Soviet custody, and CIA evaluations deeming it a concoction possibly aimed at facilitating surveillance of . These perspectives caution against overreliance on Soviet-sourced in reconstructing WWII events, advocating prioritization of declassified Allied and archival materials— which yield no supporting documentation— to mitigate distortions in narratives of Axis-Allied covert struggles and to temper inherited skepticism toward Moscow's unilateral postwar disclosures amid emerging tensions.

References

  1. [1]
    [PDF] How "Uncle Joe" Bugged FDR: The Lessons of History - CIA
    Nazi plot. In order to impress ... 91-107. 29. The KGB literature: Aleksandr Lukin, “Operatsiya 'Dal'nyi prizhok'”. [“Operation 'Long Jump'”], Ogonek, No.
  2. [2]
    Hitler's Operation Long Jump - Skeptoid Podcast
    Sep 29, 2020 · What's the mystery? Some say that Operation Long Jump was attempted by the Nazis and thwarted, and some say it never even existed. Today we're ...
  3. [3]
    The Most Dangerous Man in Europe: Who was Otto Skorzeny?
    Apr 30, 2023 · Operation Long Jump was a supposed plan to assassinate the Big Three ... Churchill claimed this was Soviet propaganda, and Otto Skorzeny later ...
  4. [4]
    'Operation LONG JUMP'
    Jan 17, 2018 · the Soviet propaganda campaign; however, its content too is decid- edly pro- Russian.32 It was directed by William Freshman and Giacomo.
  5. [5]
    Special forces: facts & fiction - Commandos
    ... Unternehmen Weitsprung but was ultimately never put into action, probably never existed, even though a number of books sometimes claim otherwise. However ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence<|separator|>
  6. [6]
    Meltzer & Mensch: The Long Shelf Life of Russian Disinformation
    Mar 31, 2023 · There is no German archival evidence for Operation Long Jump, the authors say, because “the Nazis who planned it” feared the death penalty from ...Missing: "peer | Show results with:"peer
  7. [7]
    The Tehran Conference, 1943 - Office of the Historian
    In exchange for a Soviet declaration of war against Japan, Roosevelt conceded to Stalin's demands for the Kurile Islands and the southern half of Sakhalin, and ...Missing: participants embassy
  8. [8]
    FDR attends Tehran Conference | November 28, 1943 - History.com
    Tehran, Iran, was chosen as the site for the talks largely due to its strategic importance to the Allies.
  9. [9]
    Big Three in Tehran - Warfare History Network
    It was outside Russia, but close enough for Stalin to get back quickly to Moscow if needed. Churchill was ready to go anywhere, but Roosevelt balked.
  10. [10]
    The Big Three And The Tehran Conference | Imperial War Museums
    Soviet Embassy, Tehran; Scene of the Churchill, Stalin Roosevelt Conference. 30 November 1943. By the time the first full session of the Tehran Conference ...Missing: participants decisions
  11. [11]
    List of papers - Historical Documents - Office of the Historian
    Agreement by Stalin to meet in Tehran on dates proposed by Roosevelt; intention to send Molotov and a Russian military representative to Cairo on November 22.
  12. [12]
    World War II in Eastern Europe, 1942–1945 | Holocaust Encyclopedia
    After Stalingrad, Soviet forces remained on the offensive for the remainder of the war, despite some temporary setbacks. A last German offensive at Kursk failed ...
  13. [13]
    Defeat of Hitler: The Kursk Gamble - The History Place
    After the catastrophe at Stalingrad, the German Army in southern Russia had been forced to fall back in order to regroup, dig in and stabilize the whole ...
  14. [14]
    German Espionage and Sabotage
    The Abwehr was divided into three basic groups (Abteilung). Abt I was charged with offensive intelligence, including espionage; Abt II with sabotage and ...
  15. [15]
    German code breaking in World War II - Wikipedia
    The Navy's B-Dienst was an exception to the rule, although its successes largely ended when the Allies began using more sophisticated encryption methods by 1943 ...
  16. [16]
    [PDF] Cryptologic Aspects of German Intelligence Activities in South ...
    Admiral Wilhelm Franz Canaris commanded the Abwehr from 1935 to 1944, when his espionage functions were transferred to the Reich Security. Administration. Page ...
  17. [17]
    Operation Eiche: The Rescue of Benito Mussolini - ARSOF History
    Interview and story of SS Major Otto Skorzeny who located and rescued Benito Mussolini, from his captivity on the Gran Sasso, Italy.
  18. [18]
    Operation Eiche: The Rescue of Benito Mussolini - Sky HISTORY
    On the morning of the 12th of September 1943, Skorzeny and a crack team of SS commandoes and 'Fallschirmjäger' paratroopers boarded ten DFS 230 gliders and set ...
  19. [19]
    Operation Long Jump: The Nazi Assassination Attempt on the "Big ...
    The failure of Operation Long Jump did not diminish Skorzeny's reputation in the eyes of the Nazi warlords, nor put an end to covert commando operations. In ...Missing: credibility | Show results with:credibility
  20. [20]
    Hitler's Plan to Kill Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill—at the Same Time
    Dec 1, 2015 · During World War II, heads of state were on high alert for assassination attempts. Churchill believed (correctly) that Hitler wanted him dead.Missing: objectives | Show results with:objectives
  21. [21]
    Operation Long Jump: Hitler's Plan to Kill off his Enemies all at Once
    Oct 17, 2017 · The Nazis planned to assassinate the major world players in 1943, while they were at the Tehran Conference. Tehran, in Iran, had been chosen as ...<|separator|>
  22. [22]
    Nazi Agents in Iran – Hitler's Middle East Spy Ring and the Plot to ...
    Jun 2, 2020 · ... Nazi plot to assassinate FDR, Churchill, and Stalin at the Tehran Conference at the tail end of November, 1943. Dubbed Operation Long Jump.Missing: approval | Show results with:approval
  23. [23]
    Operation Long Jump - Stew Ross Discovers
    May 23, 2020 · Operation Long Jump. Nazi intelligence uncovered the Tehran meeting, dates, and location by decoding U.S. Naval codes. This information was ...
  24. [24]
    Did You Know (5) - Keghart
    Dec 10, 2021 · ... Operation Long Jump, concocted by Hitler, headed by Ernst Kaltenbrunner and led by Otto Skorzeny, which was an attempt to assassinate Stalin ...
  25. [25]
    Night of the Assassins: The Nazi Plot to Eliminate the 'Big Three'
    Sep 21, 2020 · Their mission, which the Nazi High Command codenamed Operation Long Jump: to kill Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin at the Tehran Conference.
  26. [26]
    Operation Long Jump - Everything Everywhere Daily
    Jan 25, 2022 · The Germans began to organize the mission with an SS team in Copenhagen and they also began to coordinate their large number of spy assets ...
  27. [27]
    The (probable) Nazi plot to kill Churchill, FDR and Stalin all at once ...
    Feb 4, 2023 · Asked about British doubts, Mensch cited another historian from the UK, Adrian O'Sullivan. “[O'Sullivan] was very skeptical of the plot,” Mensch ...
  28. [28]
    Hitler’s Plan to Kill Roosevelt, Stalin, and Churchill—at the Same Time
    ### Summary of Operation Long Jump Assassination Methods
  29. [29]
    How Soviet intelligence saved the lives of Stalin, Roosevelt, and ...
    Nov 28, 2019 · The idea was conceived after German intelligence deciphered a U.S. naval code in September 1943, and learned of Stalin, Roosevelt, and ...
  30. [30]
    A Soviet Spy Saved Stalin, Churchill and FDR from a Nazi ...
    May 17, 2023 · Gevork Vartanian was a Soviet intelligence officer from Armenia who, at age 19, discovered the Nazis' plan to kill the Allied leadership in Tehran.
  31. [31]
    Weitsprung | Operations & Codenames of WWII
    Operation Weitsprung. long jump. 'Weitsprung' was a German plan to assassinate ... All the German transmissions were then intercepted by Soviet and British ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  32. [32]
    Operation Long Jump: The Alleged German Plan to Assassinate the ...
    Mar 20, 2023 · Chief of the Security Main Office Ernst Kaltenbrunner, a high-ranking member of the Waffen-SS, was tasked with appointing an individual to lead ...Missing: coordination | Show results with:coordination
  33. [33]
    Spy Fiction? The Soviet Spook Who Foiled A Nazi Plot
    Nov 27, 2019 · A petite 17-year-old was among a team of Soviet agents credited by Moscow with thwarting a Nazi plot and saving the lives of the "Big Three" Allied leaders.
  34. [34]
    A Drunk Conversation Stopped the German Attempt to Assassinate ...
    Nov 9, 2018 · Many historians also argue that the operation was an imaginary one created by Stalin. The intended outcome was for Roosevelt to stay in bugged ...
  35. [35]
    The Truth Behind the Secret Nazi Plot to Kill the Big Three - Medium
    Oct 22, 2023 · The truth behind the secret Nazi plot to kill the Big Three: Operation Long Jump was a Nazi plan to assassinate Stalin, Churchill, and Franklin D. Roosevelt.
  36. [36]
  37. [37]
    How Otto Skorzeny Went From Hitler's Favorite Commando To An ...
    Mar 27, 2018 · Called Operation Long Jump, Skorzeny and his commandos were required to infiltrate the Tehran Conference and assassinate the 'Big Three': ...
  38. [38]
    German Covert Initiatives and British Intelligence in Persia (Iran ...
    The narrative of German covert initiatives and Allied security-intelligence measures in Persia (Iran) during the Second World War has been neglected by postwar ...
  39. [39]
    The Nazi Conspiracy - Operation Long Jump - BookBrowse.com
    Rating 4.7 (37) Jan 10, 2023 · The Nazi Conspiracy by Brad Meltzer and Josh Mensch centers on an alleged plot by the Germans during World War II to kill or kidnap the three major world ...
  40. [40]
    Nazi Secret Warfare in Occupied Persia (Iran)
    Apr 13, 2012 · elaborate literary hoax (Operation WEITSPRUNG [Long Jump]) in an apparent attempt to endow Russian counterintelligence at the Tehran.Missing: skeptical | Show results with:skeptical
  41. [41]
    What were the logistics of the the Tehran Conference of 1943?
    Oct 10, 2014 · Given the attitude of the US & USSR in the Cold War towards one another, this seems almost like a fantasy. But Stalin deeply needed the military ...