Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Retrospective

A retrospective is a comprehensive review or exhibition looking back at past events, works, or performances, most commonly denoting an art show surveying an artist's or performer's oeuvre across their career to highlight evolution, influences, and achievements. In this context, such exhibitions often occur later in a creator's life or posthumously, providing chronological insight into stylistic developments and thematic consistencies without the constraints of contemporary trends. Beyond art, the term applies to structured reflections in fields like project management, where agile retrospectives involve teams analyzing recent processes to identify improvements in efficiency and outcomes, emphasizing empirical feedback over speculative planning. In scientific and medical research, retrospective studies examine existing data from prior events to infer causal patterns, offering cost-effective analysis but prone to biases from incomplete historical records. Legally, retrospective laws impose rules on pre-enactment actions, raising debates over fairness and predictability in governance. These applications underscore the concept's utility in fostering learning from history while highlighting risks of hindsight distortion in causal inference.

Definition and Etymology

Core Meaning and Origins

A retrospective constitutes a deliberate or of events, actions, or outcomes, aimed at evaluating their occurrence and implications through backward-directed . This core concept emphasizes examining what has transpired rather than anticipating possibilities, facilitating an grounded in actual historical sequences. The term derives from the Latin retrospectare, an intensive form of retrospicere meaning "to look back," compounded from retro- ("backward" or "behind") and specere ("to look at" or "observe"). This etymological underscores a visual or mental turning toward prior states, distinct from forward-oriented scrutiny. Entering English as an in the 1660s, "retrospective" formed from the earlier "retrospect" (attested around 1600) plus the "-ive," initially describing views or considerations oriented toward bygone periods. Early applications appeared in reflective discourses, such as surveys of historical precedents or philosophical meditations on antecedent causes, prioritizing empirical recounting over speculative foresight. This usage highlighted causal retrospection—dissecting sequences of events as they unfolded—to inform understanding, in contrast to prospective methods that project potential trajectories based on incomplete data.

Evolution of Usage

The term "retrospective" shifted in the early toward formalized analytical reviews, as evidenced by the launch of the Retrospective Review and Historical and Antiquarian Magazine in 1820, edited by Henry Southern and Nicholas Harris Nicolas, which systematically critiqued overlooked works from prior eras to inform contemporary understanding of and . This periodical's 16 volumes over eight years exemplified a move from informal personal reflection to disciplined, evidence-based evaluation of past events and texts, prioritizing empirical scrutiny of sources over narrative embellishment. In the , usage extended into and legal professions amid industrialization's push for operational , with retrospective methods embedded in audits and policy reviews to assess causal outcomes rather than isolated events. practices incorporated structured retrospectives in efficiency-driven frameworks post-World War II, as organizations like those in adopted iterative loops to refine processes based on performance data. In , the term underscored evaluations of legislative impacts, particularly in administrative contexts where agencies from onward faced scrutiny for retroactive effects, fostering a reliance on historical data to predict and mitigate . Post-2000, retrospectives formalized within iterative frameworks like agile methodologies, originating from the 2001 Agile principle of regular team reflection to adjust behaviors empirically. Data from agile implementations show these practices yield measurable gains, such as a 20-30% uplift in delivery predictability and defect reduction in software projects through action-oriented insights derived from sprint reviews. This integration highlighted a broader emphasis on data-informed cycles over anecdotal hindsight, aligning with evidence from longitudinal studies of .

Legal Applications

Retrospective Legislation Defined

Retrospective legislation, also termed retroactive law, consists of statutes that impose legal effects on events, transactions, or actions completed prior to the law's enactment, thereby modifying the , liabilities, or associated with those prior occurrences. Such laws may, for instance, retroactively adjust obligations incurred in previous fiscal years or validate or invalidate past administrative actions lacking contemporaneous statutory authority. While permissible in civil contexts under certain presumptions against retroactivity—such as the rule in presuming prospective operation absent clear intent—these laws face stringent scrutiny in penal matters to preserve predictability and fairness in legal obligations. In the United States, the explicitly curbs retrospective legislation through the Ex Post Facto Clause in Article I, Section 9, Clause 3, which bars from enacting laws that criminalize innocent acts committed before their passage, aggravate penalties for pre-existing offenses, alter evidentiary rules to the detriment of the in past cases, or impair defenses available at the time of the act. A parallel restriction applies to states under Article I, Section 10, Clause 1, ensuring uniformity in prohibiting retroactive criminal sanctions across federal and state levels. Internationally, Article 15 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), adopted in 1966 and entering into force in 1976, codifies a comparable safeguard by stipulating that no individual may be convicted of a criminal offense for conduct not deemed criminal under at the time of commission, nor subjected to a heavier penalty than applicable then, except where the act violated general principles of law recognized worldwide. This provision reflects a broader consensus against retroactive penalization, rooted in historical abuses like England's 17th-century bills of attainder—parliamentary enactments imposing or forfeiture without judicial trial on named individuals—which prompted constitutional bans influencing modern frameworks, including the U.S. provisions.

Historical Examples and Principles Against Retroactivity

In Calder v. Bull (1798), the U.S. addressed a retrospective probate law that reopened a will contest after its initial validation, articulating foundational principles against retroactivity in civil matters. Justice emphasized that laws punishing actions not previously deemed criminal are "unjust, oppressive, and inconsistent with the principles of a free government," extending the rationale of constitutional prohibitions on ex post facto laws to underscore the need for legal foreseeability to guide conduct. Although the Court upheld the law as remedial rather than punitive, it affirmed that retroactive measures eroding vested rights undermine the essence of law as a prospective rule, a view rooted in traditions viewing such enactments as contrary to fairness and stability. These principles align with broader rule-of-law doctrines requiring predictability and certainty, where retroactivity disrupts reliance on established legal expectations and treats past acts under unforeseen standards, thereby challenging . In early state practices post-Revolution, retrospective laws targeting Loyalist properties exemplified such concerns, prompting constitutional bans on ex post facto laws and bills of to prevent arbitrary impairment of acquired under prior regimes. Similarly, 20th-century tax amnesties in nations like Italy's 2001 Scudo Fiscale program applied retrospective waivers to past undeclared assets, forgiving penalties but highlighting tensions with prospectivity by altering consequences of prior non-compliance, often justified as administrative relief yet critiqued for eroding incentives for timely adherence. Empirical evidence underscores the risks: India's 2012 amendment imposed retrospective taxation on indirect offshore transfers predating the law, targeting deals like Vodafone's 2007 acquisition and sparking disputes that eroded confidence. This led to measurable investor hesitation, with reports noting damaged reputation and reduced inflows as firms perceived heightened unpredictability in tax regimes, prompting the law's partial in 2021 to restore stability. Such cases illustrate how frequent retroactive changes correlate with diminished economic predictability, reinforcing doctrinal preferences for prospectivity to safeguard vested interests and maintain rule-of-law integrity.

Criticisms and Impacts on Rule of Law

Retrospective legislation undermines the predictability essential to the by altering the legal effects of past events and actions that complied with existing norms at the time. This retroactivity impairs individuals' ability to foresee consequences, thereby violating principles of equality and , as citizens cannot reliably plan conduct or investments under stable expectations. Such measures extinguish or impair acquired , fostering an environment where state power overrides prior entitlements without prior notice. Empirically, retrospective laws have demonstrable economic harms, including diminished investor confidence and reduced flows. India's 2012 Finance Act amendments, which imposed taxes on offshore transactions dating back to , exemplified this by generating widespread uncertainty; critics noted they deterred foreign capital and damaged the country's international reputation for stability. The repealed these provisions in 2021 via the Taxation Laws () , refunding disputed amounts to signal commitment to non-retroactivity and revive FDI inflows, underscoring the prior policy's role in eroding trust. Similar dynamics appear in other contexts, where retroactive changes prompt capital outflows as investors seek jurisdictions with reliable legal frameworks. From a principled standpoint, these laws contravene foundational tenets by punishing or burdening unforeseeable conduct, prioritizing short-term state gains over protections for and contractual . They enable arbitrary exercises of power, inconsistent with social compacts that presume govern prospectively to secure and economic vitality. Proponents occasionally defend retrospection for remedial equity, such as rectifying overlooked injustices, but evidence reveals frequent abuse amplifies institutional distrust and suppresses broader activity rather than achieving balanced correction. Overreliance on such tools erodes the , as legislatures encroach on judicial roles in interpreting past facts.

Project Management and Software Development

Origins in Agile Methodologies

The concept of retrospectives as structured team reflections originated within the framework, an agile methodology pioneered by in 1993 during efforts at Easel Corporation. , alongside , formalized and presented at the 1995 conference, drawing inspiration from earlier holistic approaches like the 1986 article "The New New Product Development Game" by and , which emphasized iterative team inspections. Within , the sprint retrospective specifically emerged as a dedicated event held after each iteration—typically a time-boxed period of 2 to 4 weeks—to inspect team dynamics, processes, and potential adaptations, separate from the sprint review's emphasis on deliverable outcomes. This retrospective practice builds on foundational quality improvement principles, notably W. Edwards Deming's Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, which Deming adapted and promoted in Japan during the 1950s to enable iterative learning from empirical results. Sutherland explicitly linked the retrospective to PDCA's "check" phase, positioning it as a mechanism for teams to evaluate what occurred, identify causal factors in successes or failures, and plan targeted adjustments for subsequent cycles. Early Scrum implementations in the 1990s incorporated such reflections informally, but they gained explicit structure in documentation like Schwaber and Mike Beedle's 2001 book Agile Software Development with Scrum, which outlined core events including post-iteration inspections. The retrospective's integration into was codified in the inaugural Scrum Guide published in 2010 by Schwaber and , defining it as a team-led opportunity to enhance effectiveness through self-inspection. By the , as agile adoption expanded in technology sectors, retrospectives achieved broad prevalence, with 81% of surveyed teams reporting regular post-sprint sessions according to Scrum Alliance data. This uptake reflected 's influence on iterative beyond software, prioritizing evidence-based process refinements over static .

Structure and Methods

Agile retrospectives typically follow a structured process comprising phases such as setting the stage, gathering data on events and feelings, generating insights through analysis, deciding on actionable improvements, and closing with reflections. This sequence ensures teams systematically review the sprint without devolving into unstructured venting, as outlined in established agile practices. Common formats include the Start-Stop-Continue method, where participants identify practices to begin, halt, or maintain; Mad-Sad-Glad, which categorizes feedback by frustrations, disappointments, and positives to surface emotional dynamics; and exercises that map key events chronologically to highlight patterns. These techniques facilitate verifiable steps: allocating 10-15 minutes per category in Start-Stop-Continue for balanced input, or using sticky notes on timelines to plot highs and lows objectively. Sessions generally last 1-3 hours, scaled to sprint length—e.g., 60-90 minutes for a two-week —to maintain focus while allowing depth. Digital tools like for collaborative whiteboards or Jira-integrated boards enable remote participation, anonymous voting, and action tracking via templates that support these formats. Best practices emphasize fostering by establishing ground rules for non-judgmental sharing and rotating facilitators to build trust, enabling candid data gathering. Action items must include assigned owners and measurable timelines to ensure follow-through, transforming insights into testable changes. Empirical analyses of retrospective discussions in agile teams reveal that prioritizing actionable, non-recurring improvements correlates with enhanced process effectiveness, though outcomes depend on consistent implementation.

Empirical Benefits and Evidence

Empirical studies demonstrate that regular agile retrospectives contribute to measurable enhancements in team performance and software outcomes. Analysis of over 30,000 retrospective sessions reported an average Return on Time Invested () score of 8.33 out of 10, indicating strong team perception of value in fostering continuous and refinement. In organizational surveys, teams employing effective retrospectives alongside other agile practices report improved alignment with business needs and higher , with defects serving as a key indicator of success. These practices enable early identification of bottlenecks, directly supporting iterative adaptations that enhance overall adaptability. Longitudinal and further links consistent retrospective to quantifiable gains in development metrics. For instance, teams integrating data-driven reflections in retrospectives experience positive effects on team velocity through targeted process improvements, as evidenced by barriers to data use being overcome via enhancements. Systematic reviews of agile empirical studies highlight retrospectives' role in reducing gaps, with organizations achieving higher quality outcomes via frequent feedback loops and obstacle discussions during these sessions. While direct causation requires controlling for agile elements like daily stand-ups, meta-level from scrum-adopting teams shows correlations with lower defect rates and sustained increases. Beyond metrics, retrospectives promote a culture of by shifting focus from blame to systemic learning, countering entrenched hierarchies in environments. This aligns with causal mechanisms of iterative reflection, where repeated cycles yield compounding adaptations, as observed in large-scale agile projects analyzing retrospective reports for actionable insights. Peer-reviewed accounts emphasize that such practices build and communication, essential for long-term against project volatility.

Common Pitfalls and Critiques

A prevalent pitfall in agile retrospectives is the failure to implement and track action items derived from discussions, which perpetuates recurring problems and erodes trust in the process. Practitioner analyses report that teams often generate promising improvements during sessions but neglect follow-through due to competing priorities or inadequate mechanisms, leading to diminished perceived value over time. Retrospectives frequently become performative exercises lacking authentic candor, as participants withhold critical feedback to avoid interpersonal risks. This stems from insufficient , where team members fear reprisal or judgment, resulting in superficial exchanges rather than substantive critique. Empirical research underscores that low psychological safety correlates with reduced willingness to raise issues or admit errors, thereby limiting the sessions' diagnostic utility. Critiques highlight how retrospectives can devolve into unstructured venting without grounding in or metrics, prioritizing emotional over evidence-based problem-solving. Poor facilitation exacerbates this by allowing unfocused complaints to dominate, yielding few verifiable outcomes and fostering cynicism about the practice's . In mature agile teams, retrospectives risk marginal additional value, as entrenched routines yield fewer novel insights and may reinforce , where conformity suppresses dissenting analysis. Studies indicate that while these sessions correlate with higher team maturity, their impact plateaus without mechanisms to challenge assumptions or introduce external , potentially entrenching suboptimal habits under the guise of .

Arts and Cultural Contexts

Retrospective Exhibitions and Collections

Retrospective exhibitions in the consist of comprehensive surveys of an artist's oeuvre, spanning the entirety of their career from early works to mature and late productions, typically organized chronologically to trace stylistic evolution and thematic development. These shows, often mounted by major museums, aim to honor established artists while facilitating scholarly reassessment, drawing loans from private and public collections to assemble representative selections that may number in the hundreds of pieces. The practice gained prominence in the 20th century as institutions sought to canonize modern masters amid shifting artistic paradigms, building on earlier precedents like the 1861 Paris exhibition of J.-A.-D. Ingres's drawings, which marked one of the first dedicated retrospectives of an artist's preparatory works. A landmark example occurred in 1939–1940 at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, where director Alfred H. Barr Jr. curated Pablo Picasso's first major U.S. retrospective, featuring over 360 works from 1895 to 1939 that highlighted his transitions through Blue, Rose, Cubist, and Surrealist periods. This event not only affirmed Picasso's influence but also adapted to wartime contexts by emphasizing his role in avant-garde innovation. More recent instances, such as the 2021–2022 Jasper Johns: Mind/Mirror exhibition, split between the Whitney Museum of American Art and the Philadelphia Museum of Art, displayed approximately 500 items from the 1950s onward, including flags, targets, and crosshatch motifs, underscoring Johns's foundational impact on post-abstract expressionism. Structurally, these exhibitions frequently incorporate supplementary elements like —sketches, photographs, and archival documents—alongside timelines and interpretive wall texts to contextualize the artist's process and influences. Curatorial selections play a pivotal role in shaping historical narratives, as choices of , , and emphasis can elevate certain phases over others, thereby influencing the artist's place in art historical canon formation. Accompanying publications, often exhaustive catalogs with essays from specialists, provide detailed and analysis, ensuring the retrospective's legacy extends beyond the gallery walls.

Applications in Film, Music, and Literature

In , retrospective applications center on curated programs screening a director's oeuvre to highlight career progression, stylistic consistency, and historical context, often featuring restored prints and rare works. Institutions like the have hosted such events, exemplified by the 2012 "The Genius of Hitchcock" season, which presented over 40 films from 1925 to 1976, including lesser-known silents and thrillers to trace his evolution from British to suspense mastery. These retrospectives prioritize comprehensive canons over selective hits, facilitating critical reevaluation through sequential viewings. In music, retrospectives commonly take the form of compilation box sets or live tours that aggregate an artist's recordings across decades, incorporating outtakes, alternate mixes, and archival audio to reconstruct career trajectories. The Beatles' Anthology project, launched in 1995, exemplifies this with three double albums—Anthology 1 (November 1995), Anthology 2 (March 1996), and Anthology 3 (July 1996)—compiling 85 tracks spanning 1960 to 1970, including 21 previously unreleased songs and demos that illuminated the band's creative process from early covers to psychedelic experimentation. Accompanied by a multi-part and , it sold over 12 million copies worldwide by 1997, emphasizing empirical cataloging over interpretive remixing. In literature, retrospective formats involve authoritative collected editions that assemble an author's complete or selected works with inline annotations, , and appendices to recover original contexts, variants, and influences without imposing modern reinterpretations. Scholarly series like W.W. Norton's Annotated editions provide such structures; for instance, The New Annotated Frankenstein (2012) reprints Mary Shelley's 1818 text alongside 1831 revisions, with annotations detailing 19th-century scientific allusions, manuscript discrepancies, and biographical notes on Percy Shelley and Lord Byron's circle. These volumes, akin to compilations for figures like , focus on archival fidelity—cross-referencing first editions and —to enable readers to assess textual evolution empirically rather than through contemporary lenses.

Reception and Cultural Significance

Retrospective exhibitions have democratized access to artists' complete oeuvres by presenting comprehensive surveys in public institutions, enabling broader audiences to engage with historical works that might otherwise remain in private collections or archives. Major retrospectives often correlate with empirical boosts to artists' legacies, including spikes in ; for instance, studies indicate that shows can yield higher returns on repeat sales two years post-exhibition, reflecting increased visibility and demand. Similarly, posthumous retrospectives contribute to retrospective appreciation, elevating artwork values through heightened cultural recognition and sales activity, as seen in cases like Andy Warhol's exhibitions aligning with auction house surges. Criticisms of retrospectives center on curatorial biases that impose contemporary ideological lenses, potentially sanitizing or reframing controversial elements in an artist's body of work to align with modern sensibilities, thus risking over faithful representation. Curators, often drawn from elite academic circles, may prioritize thematic overextensions or narratives, obscuring nuanced artistic intent and fine distinctions in favor of homogenized interpretations. While attendance figures for such shows frequently draw large crowds—evidenced by general arts event data showing sustained —metrics on depth of reveal disparities, with superficial visits outpacing substantive intellectual or emotional absorption, particularly among demographics less attuned to rigorous historical . Overall, retrospectives reinforce cultural narratives by emphasizing empirical appreciation of works within their original historical contexts, countering anachronistic judgments that prioritize present-day . This preservation function sustains legacies against erosion by transient trends, though unchecked curatorial can undermine causal to the artist's era-specific motivations and achievements.

Standards and Broader Applications

In Technical and Professional Standards

In technical and professional standards, retrospectives primarily take the form of post-implementation reviews and periodic audits that systematically assess the adherence, , and ongoing of implemented protocols in fields such as and . These evaluations compare actual outcomes against predefined criteria, identifying gaps, nonconformities, and opportunities for refinement based on operational data from deployments. Such processes ensure standards remain effective by incorporating evidence from real-world usage, rather than relying solely on initial design assumptions. Standards organizations like the IEEE incorporate retrospective elements through defined procedures. The IEEE Standard for Software Reviews and (IEEE 1028-2008) specifies five types of reviews, including reviews and that retrospectively verify compliance with processes after implementation, with detailed steps for , participant roles, and corrective actions. Additionally, IEEE requires every to undergo review at least every ten years, analyzing practical application data to decide on revisions, reaffirmations, or withdrawals, thereby grounding updates in empirical feedback from users and implementers. In international standards such as those from ISO, surveillance audits function retrospectively by conducting on-site or remote examinations of certified organizations' practices, typically annually for the first two years post-certification and periodically thereafter, to confirm sustained compliance with requirements like those in ISO 9001 for systems. These audits review records, processes, and outcomes from prior periods, enabling identification of trends in deviations and evidence-based adjustments to standards, which helps prevent in dynamic technical environments. This retrospective framework in standards compliance emphasizes of implementation failures or successes—such as protocol inefficiencies revealed through usage metrics—to drive iterative improvements, distinguishing it from prospective planning by prioritizing verifiable post-deployment evidence over ideological or untested preferences.

Retrospective Analysis in Science and Research

Retrospective analysis in science and refers to observational studies that examine historical to identify associations between past exposures and outcomes, often in fields like and where prospective designs are infeasible. These studies, such as retrospective designs, reconstruct events by reviewing existing records, comparing groups with and without specific exposures to assess incidence or other endpoints. Unlike prospective studies that follow participants forward from exposure, retrospective approaches start from outcomes and trace backward, enabling efficient use of archived from clinical trials, registries, or population cohorts. In , retrospective cohort analyses have been applied to long-term datasets like the , initiated in 1948, to evaluate trends in cardiovascular outcomes. For instance, a 50-year review of Framingham data from 1948 to 1998 revealed declining incidence of alongside improved survival rates, attributing shifts to better management rather than diagnostic changes alone. Similarly, derived risk models from Framingham records, such as the 2008 general profile, use historical variables like age, , and to predict 10-year event risks, validated across cohorts for broad applicability. These examples highlight retrospective methods' role in testing for conditions where real-time follow-up spans decades. Such analyses offer empirical advantages in cost-efficiency and speed, as they leverage pre-collected without new participant , making them suitable for or ethical constraints on experimentation. They facilitate causal exploration when randomized trials are impossible, such as linking occupational exposures to occupational diseases via historical worker records, supporting through temporal sequencing and exposure-outcome gradients after statistical adjustments. Evidence from methodological reviews confirms their utility in generating hypotheses and estimating effect sizes, particularly in resource-limited settings, with relative risks calculable via on past cohorts. However, retrospective designs are susceptible to biases that undermine causal claims, including from incomplete historical records and by unmeasured variables like socioeconomic factors. error in self-reported data and missing entries—common in older datasets—can distort associations, as seen in critiques of chart reviews where up to 20-30% affects validity. Rigorous application demands techniques like or instrumental variables to mitigate confounders, yet they rank below prospective cohorts or trials in evidence hierarchies due to inherent temporality issues and potential reverse causation. Academic sources, often emphasizing these limitations, underscore the need for sensitivity analyses to assess robustness against unobserved biases.

Awards and Recognition for Retrospective Works

The , established in 1917, annually recognizes distinguished books providing retrospective analyses of American historical events through and primary sources, incentivizing comprehensive reviews that clarify causal dynamics. Notable recipients include James M. McPherson's Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era (awarded 1989), a data-intensive of political, economic, and factors spanning 1848–1865 based on archival records and quantitative assessments of battles and . Similarly, Doris Kearns Goodwin's No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The in (awarded 1995) earned acclaim for its detailed retrospective of domestic policy and leadership decisions from 1940–1945, drawing on letters, diaries, and government data to evaluate effectiveness. These honors underscore the value of methodical historical accounting in preserving verifiable narratives against . In scientific contexts, awards like the History of Science Society's Award for Outstanding Book in the History of Science, presented since 1959, honor retrospective scholarly works that rigorously reassess foundational discoveries and methodologies. For instance, the award has recognized compiling longitudinal data on experimental practices and theoretical shifts, promoting standards for evidence-based reinterpretation in fields like physics and biology. Such recognitions, though selective—one per year amid thousands of publications—foster incentives for data-driven retrospectives that refine professional canons and inform future research protocols, with winners frequently cited in peer-reviewed literature for their causal insights. The , initiated in 1962 by , similarly acknowledges cumulative professional outputs, often tied to retrospective compilations cataloging an artist's empirical discography and innovations over decades. Recipients, such as in 1967, receive it for "creative contributions of outstanding artistic significance," which encourages archival reviews of recordings and techniques, aiding preservation of technical standards in audio engineering. This award's impact lies in elevating comprehensive career assessments, though its infrequency (typically 10–15 annually from eligible nominees) highlights its role in selective canon-building. Critics note that these awards occasionally prioritize narrative accessibility and public resonance over exhaustive rigor; for example, Pulitzer History selections, judged by a panel including non-historians, have been observed to align more closely with subsequent commercial success and media profiles than with specialized academic metrics like peer citations. Such patterns, per analyses of winner trajectories, suggest potential trade-offs where popular synthesis may overshadow granular data scrutiny, potentially diluting incentives for purely archival retrospectives. Nonetheless, recipients' works endure as benchmarks for truthful reconstruction, countering biases in less-vetted accounts.

References

  1. [1]
    RETROSPECTIVE Definition & Meaning - Merriam-Webster
    Oct 17, 2025 · a generally comprehensive exhibition, compilation, or performance of the work of an artist over a span of years
  2. [2]
    RETROSPECTIVE Definition & Meaning - Dictionary.com
    any exhibition or series of showings or performances, as of musical works or motion pictures, representing the work of an artist or performer over all or a ...
  3. [3]
    RETROSPECTIVE definition | Cambridge English Dictionary
    RETROSPECTIVE meaning: 1. a show of the work an artist has done in their life so far: 2. relating to or thinking about…. Learn more.
  4. [4]
    Your Life's Work: The Artist's Retrospective - Art Biz Success
    Jun 11, 2014 · A retrospective is an exhibition that shows off the entire oeuvre of an artist's career. Typically arranged chronologically and later in an artist's life.
  5. [5]
    What is a Retrospective? | Definition and Overview - ProductPlan
    A retrospective is a meeting held after a product ships to discuss what happened during the product development and release process.
  6. [6]
    What are agile retrospectives? - Atlassian
    A retrospective helps teams perform better over time. See what the agile community is saying and learn how to run your own retrospective meetings.
  7. [7]
    Retrospective observational studies: Lights and shadows for ...
    A retrospective study (by definition non-interventional) is a purely observational review and/or reassessment of database records with the aim of analyzing ...
  8. [8]
    Retroactive Legislation: A Primer for Congress
    Aug 15, 2019 · A retroactive law as a law that looks backward or contemplates the past, affecting acts or facts that existed before the act came into effect.Missing: medicine | Show results with:medicine
  9. [9]
    6 Justifications for retrospective law - Oxford Academic
    The most convincing justification is to view retrospectivity as a 'necessary evil' especially under unusual conditions.
  10. [10]
    Retrospect - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating c.1600 from Latin retrospectum, meaning "to look back," retrospect means a survey or reference to past events.
  11. [11]
    Retrospective - Etymology, Origin & Meaning
    Originating in the 1660s from retrospect + -ive, retrospective means directed to past times; as a noun, it denotes an exhibition showing work development ...
  12. [12]
    Word of the Day: Retrospective | Merriam-Webster
    Oct 12, 2007 · A glance at the history of "retrospective" reveals that it traces back to the Latin "retro-" (meaning "back," "behind," or "backward") and ...<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/retrospect
  14. [14]
    The Retrospective Review, and Historical and Antiquarian Magazine
    Oct 19, 2017 · Title, The Retrospective Review, and Historical and Antiquarian Magazine ; Editors, Henry Southern, Sir Nicholas Harris Nicolas ; Publisher, C.
  15. [15]
    a historical perspective on twentieth-century management
    Dec 16, 2014 · It is characterised by an extraordinary dissemination and diversification of management. However, the era consists of different phases.Missing: expansion retrospective
  16. [16]
    Milestones in the Evolution of the Administrative State | Daedalus
    Jul 1, 2021 · Debate over the proper role for these agencies and the regulations they issue emerged early in the twentieth century and led to different ...
  17. [17]
    A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software ...
    This article examines publications and citations to illustrate how the research on agile has progressed in the 10 years following the articulation of the ...
  18. [18]
    Retrospective legislation - Oxford Reference
    Legislation that operates on matters taking place before its enactment, eg by penalizing conduct that was lawful when it occurred.
  19. [19]
    retroactive | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute
    Retroactive means a law or decision imposing liability for prior actions, generally disfavored, but allowed under certain circumstances.
  20. [20]
    Retrospectively changing rights and liabilities - 4 Pump Court
    Jul 20, 2021 · Under English law, for example, unless a contrary intention appears, an enactment is presumed not to be intended to have retrospective effect.
  21. [21]
    ArtI.S9.C3.3.1 Overview of Ex Post Facto Laws
    Article I, Section 9, Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. Separate provisions of the Constitution ban enactment of ex post ...
  22. [22]
    Overview of Ex Post Facto Laws | U.S. Constitution Annotated
    Article I, Section 9, Clause 3: No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed. Separate provisions of the Constitution ban enactment of ex post ...
  23. [23]
    Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto Laws Under the Constitution
    Article I, Section 9, Clause 3: Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 states that "no Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." Article I, Section ...
  24. [24]
    International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights | OHCHR
    No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under national or ...Missing: retroactive | Show results with:retroactive
  25. [25]
    Prohibition on retrospective criminal laws | Australian Human Rights ...
    ICCPR Article15 states: No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence, under ...
  26. [26]
    ArtI.S9.C3.1 Historical Background on Bills of Attainder
    The bill of attainder, a parliamentary act sentencing to death one or more specific persons, was a device often resorted to in sixteenth, seventeenth and ...
  27. [27]
    Historical Background on Bills of Attainder | U.S. Constitution ...
    A bill of attainder is legislation imposing punishment without a trial, often used in 16th-18th century England to sentence specific people to death.
  28. [28]
    Calder v. Bull | 3 U.S. 386 (1798) - Justia U.S. Supreme Court Center
    "Laws made to punish for actions done before the existence of such laws, and which have not been declared crimes by preceding laws, are unjust, oppressive, and ...
  29. [29]
    Non-Retroactivity as a General Principle of Law | Utrecht Law Review
    May 26, 2021 · Retroactive laws pose a challenge to the fundamental principles of equality, certainty and predictability underlying the rule of law. The ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Retroactive Legislation - American Enterprise Institute
    Retroactive laws are all those that explicitly refer to, and change the past legal consequences of, past behavior. Such laws can, in turn, be classified into ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Tax Amnesties: theory, trends, and some alternatives -- Chapter 1
    One such recent example is Italy's Scudo Fiscale (2001), which targeted undeclared offshore capital and enabled the repatriation of some €60 billion. Because of.Missing: 20th retrospective elements
  32. [32]
    India to scrap retrospective tax law in olive branch to global firms
    Aug 6, 2021 · At the heart of the long-running taxation disputes was a 2012 Indian law that enabled its tax authorities to make retroactive claims on overseas ...
  33. [33]
    Retrospective tax: Global investors cheer as India scraps policy - BBC
    Aug 6, 2021 · The law has been a major sore point with foreign investors. India has introduced a bill in its lower house to scrap a controversial 2012 law ...
  34. [34]
    India Nullifies Retrospective Application Of Indirect Transfer ...
    Aug 18, 2021 · The retrospective application had come as a shock and caused much damage to India's reputation shaking investor confidence in the Indian tax ...Missing: FDI | Show results with:FDI
  35. [35]
    The Folly of Retrospective Taxation: Why India Must Move Forward
    Sep 5, 2024 · Fundamentally, it undermines investor confidence by creating a legal environment where tax liabilities can be altered after the fact ...<|separator|>
  36. [36]
    Retrospective legislation and the rule of law - Oxford Academic
    Sep 1, 2025 · Retrospective legislation changes the legal effect of past events, undermining the rule of law by altering legal consequences of actions before ...
  37. [37]
    [PDF] The Vodafone Case and Retrospective Taxation - Atlantis Press
    Such rules could erode investor trust and deter foreign investment, which would be very harmful to India's economic growth and international reputation (Chand ...
  38. [38]
    Carried Interest Under Fire: What Proposed Tax Changes Mean for ...
    Feb 27, 2025 · Proponents also warn that retroactive tax changes would undermine tax predictability, discourage investment, and lead to capital flight as firms ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Constitutional Constraints on Retroactive Civil Legislation
    City of Chicago, 166 U.S. 226 (1897), which is generally considered the first case in which the Supreme Court incorporated a Bill of Rights provision against ...
  40. [40]
    Retrospective Legislation, Bills of Attainder, the Separation of ...
    Feb 5, 2016 · A bill of attainder is the “paradigm case of a statute which infringes both the separation of powers and the due process clause”
  41. [41]
    The History of Scrum - agile42
    Jun 9, 2023 · Scrum, as it is known today, was initially introduced to teams in 1993 by Jeff Sutherland, John Scumniotales, and Jeff McKenna of the Easel Corporation.
  42. [42]
    How the Sprint Retrospective became a pivotal event in Scrum
    Sep 15, 2019 · Jeff Sutherland and Ken Schwaber presented it to the world at OOPSLA in 1995. They based it on “The New New Product Development Game“ (1986) by ...
  43. [43]
    What is a Sprint Retrospective? - Scrum.org
    Assumptions that led them astray are identified and their origins explored. The Scrum Team discusses what went well during the Sprint, what problems it ...
  44. [44]
    The Deming Cycle, lean and agile - BCS, The Chartered Institute for IT
    Nov 10, 2022 · The Deming Cycle has also influenced agile. Jeff Sutherland wrote that 'the retrospective is the 'check' of Demings' plan-do-check-act cycle. ...
  45. [45]
    A Historical Look at The Scrum Guide From 1986 to 2020 - Kaizenko
    The origins of Scrum and the Scrum Guide trace back to a 1986 Harvard Business Review article by Takeuchi and Nonaka entitled “The New New Product Development ...
  46. [46]
    Scrum Guides: Home
    Scrum is a framework for developing and sustaining complex products. The Scrum Guide contains the official definition of Scrum as authored by Ken Schwaber ...Read Online · Select language & Download · Jeff Sutherland · Revision HistoryMissing: 2001 retrospective
  47. [47]
    300+ Agile and Scrum Statistics for 2024 - Parabol
    81% of Scrum teams report holding a retrospective after every sprint. (Source: Scrum Alliance). Teams that have regular sprint retrospectives have 24% more ...
  48. [48]
    17th State of Agile Report | Analyst Reports - Digital.ai
    Leading the charge to an Agile transformation, are business leaders and executives (32%), followed by individual technical teams (31%) and CIO/CTOs (20%). · 42% ...Missing: conducting retrospectives
  49. [49]
    The Five Phases of a Successful Retrospective - Retrium
    The five agile tools and techniques to prepare and lead meaningful data-driven discussions at your next agile team retro.How to not run a retrospective · Activity: Timeline · Activity: Force Field Analysis
  50. [50]
    Sprint Retrospective: How to Hold an Effective Meeting - Atlassian
    You can encourage better input by providing a simple structure for your sprint retrospective, such as the sad, mad, glad (SMG) method and the 4 Ls method.
  51. [51]
    How to Run Effective Retrospective Meetings - Lucid Software
    The Start, Stop, Continue approach is a standard structure that's accessible for most teams. Ask team members what they would like to start doing, what they ...Missing: methods | Show results with:methods
  52. [52]
    Mad Sad Glad Retrospective | Engage Your Team - TeamRetro
    The mad sad glad retrospective is a great way to boost morale, uncover barriers to productivity and get your team working better together.Missing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  53. [53]
    Mad Sad Glad Retrospectives Technique Explained - Cabiri
    Feb 27, 2024 · Timeline Retrospective: In a Timeline retrospective, teams visually map out the project timeline and identify key events and emotions associated ...
  54. [54]
    9 retrospective techniques that won't bore your team to tears
    Apr 7, 2025 · If you use this format for the entire retrospective, spend 10 minutes each on start, stop, and continue. For longer retro sessions, you can ...
  55. [55]
    Retrospective Tool | Inclusive and Engaging - Miro
    Use Miro's Agile retrospective tool to reflect on your work and identify useful takeaways. Run engaging retro meetings and focus on what matters.
  56. [56]
    Free Jira Retrospective Tool and Retro Board | Review by Easy Agile
    Rating 3.5/4 (160) 4 days ago · Free, Jira-native retrospective tool and online retro board with templates, anonymous input, voting, and action tracking.
  57. [57]
    Chapter 7: Psychological Safety - Retrium
    Sep 24, 2020 · In agile retrospectives, team members should be able to openly discuss problems and potential weaknesses on the team to identify opportunities ...
  58. [58]
    Master the Art of Retrospectives Action Plans - Neatro
    Jul 24, 2024 · This includes ensuring psychological safety during a retrospective, documenting tasks during the retrospective, assigning ownership, setting ...
  59. [59]
    Recurring opinions or productive improvements—what agile teams ...
    Nov 3, 2016 · Based on this empirical analysis we aim to state implications and research hypotheses regarding the team-level retrospective practices and the ...
  60. [60]
    https://echometerapp.com/en/analysis-retrospectives-tips/
  61. [61]
    How Scrum adds value to achieving software quality? - PMC - NIH
    Organizations that achieved higher software quality sought frequent customer feedback and had more efficient and impactful retrospectives (Abbas et al. 2010a).
  62. [62]
    Exploring Retrospective Meeting Practices and the Use of Data in ...
    Feb 5, 2025 · This study provides insights into retrospective practices by exploring barriers to project data utilization, including psychological safety concerns.
  63. [63]
    Game-based Sprint retrospectives: multiple action research - PMC
    In this paper, we report on an Action Research project in which we implemented six retrospective games in six Scrum teams that had experienced common ...
  64. [64]
    An Exploratory Study of Retrospectives in Large-Scale Agile ...
    May 17, 2018 · In this article, we study how a large-scale agile development project uses retrospectives through an analysis of retrospective reports identifying a total of ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Behavioral Aspects of Agile Software Development: A Case Study ...
    Jul 10, 2024 · Agile methods provide benefits such as better communication, increased trust between members of a development team, and improved alignment ...
  66. [66]
    Mistakes in the Sprint Retrospective - Fractal Systems Consulting
    Feb 6, 2023 · Not following up on action items: Teams sometimes come up with great action items to prevent problems from repeating. However sometimes ...
  67. [67]
    Why Retrospectives Fail: Fixing Action Item Follow-Through in Agile ...
    Jun 5, 2025 · The key to unlocking the true potential of your teams lies in embracing a people-centered approach to retrospectives. By focusing on the human ...
  68. [68]
    Antecedents of psychological safety in agile software development ...
    Objective: Studies show that psychological safety enhance agile values and practices, and some practitioners went as far as to claim “agile doesn't work ...
  69. [69]
    Retrospectives - Psych Safety
    Dec 1, 2023 · Psychological safety is a necessary foundation for an effective retrospective: we're not going to surface the messy details of work if people ...
  70. [70]
    Sprint Retrospectives: Solutions to 4 Common Problems
    Jul 11, 2024 · One of the most common complaints about retrospectives is that people fail to bring up real issues or admit to their problems. If people ...
  71. [71]
    (PDF) Agile ways of working: A team maturity perspective
    May 27, 2025 · The result indicates a strong correlation between levels of group maturity and the two agile practices iterative development and retrospectives.
  72. [72]
    Groupthink: the bane of high performing Agile Teams
    Groupthink is an instinctive conformity amongst teams to reinforce what the group values as defined (often covertly and unconsciously rather than overtly)<|separator|>
  73. [73]
    What are the Different Types of Art Exhibitions? — CAI
    Jan 12, 2023 · A retrospective exhibition is a one-person show representative of the entire oeuvre, life, and career of the artist in question, most often ...
  74. [74]
    The First Retrospective Exhibition of the Drawings of J.-A.-D. Ingres ...
    This article reconstructs the first major exhibition devoted to the drawings of J.-A.-D. Ingres, which was staged in Paris in 1861.
  75. [75]
    Pablo Picasso - Wikipedia
    In 1939 and 1940, the Museum of Modern Art in New York City, under its director Alfred Barr, a Picasso enthusiast, held a major retrospective of Picasso's ...Claude Picasso · Paloma Picasso · Guernica (Picasso) · Le Rêve (Picasso)
  76. [76]
    Review: 'Jasper Johns: Mind/Mirror' Divides and Conquers
    Sep 23, 2021 · A monumental retrospective at the Whitney Museum and the Philadelphia Museum of Art, reveals an artist's protean talent, changing perspectives and resiliency ...
  77. [77]
    The Art of Retrospection: Meret Oppenheim's “Imaginary Exhibition ...
    Oct 26, 2022 · Among these different self-narrating projects, the Imaginary Exhibition drawings are visually and conceptually unique: they frame the project of ...
  78. [78]
    Jasper Johns and Some Thoughts on Artist Retrospectives
    Mar 14, 2018 · Retrospectives follow a long tradition in the history of art that sought to distinguish and elevate particular individuals into the canon of art ...
  79. [79]
    The Genius of Alfred Hitchcock at the BFI: 10 of his lesser-known gems
    Jul 4, 2012 · The summer-long retrospective also includes wonderful films you may not have heard much about; here's 10 often-overlooked Hitchcocks you won't want to miss.
  80. [80]
    Special Feature: BFI present 'The Genius of Hitchcock' - CineVue
    May 10, 2012 · BFI retrospective The Genius of Hitchcock (June to October 2012) celebrates the lesser-known work of Britain's master of suspense.
  81. [81]
    https://www.amazon.com/Anthology-Collection-2025-CD-Boxset/dp/B0FC2YCV42
  82. [82]
    Anthology Collection (2025 Edition): 8CD Boxset - Amazon.com
    30-day returnsThe Anthology Collection 8CD set includes the 3 groundbreaking Anthology albums from the mid-90s, remastered in 2025 by Giles Martin, plus a new compilation, ...
  83. [83]
    Norton Annotated Series | W. W. Norton & Company Ltd.
    Collected for the first time, these African American folktales reclaim a lost cultural legacy to redefine American literature. The New Annotated Frankenstein.Missing: retrospectives examples
  84. [84]
    The Serious Reader: Scholarship and Annotated Editions
    Nov 10, 2023 · An annotated edition is a signal to the reading public of a work having reached the status of a literary “classic”, but one which may require clarification.
  85. [85]
    The Impact of Museum Shows on an Artist's Market is Mixed | Artsy
    Jun 8, 2018 · One might expect a solo show to boost the price of an artist two years after the exhibition, and thus see a higher return on a repeat sale.
  86. [86]
    How does an artwork increase in value? - Artsper Magazine
    Jan 27, 2023 · When a famed artist passes away, their creative legacy lives on in the art that they leave behind. Therefore, through retrospective appreciation ...
  87. [87]
    The Bias of the World: Curating After Szeemann & Hopps
    Criticism involves making finer and finer distinctions among like things, while the inflationary writing of curatorial rhetoric is used to obscure fine ...
  88. [88]
    How an Art Museum Betrays Its Social Class Bias - Hyperallergic
    Jun 15, 2021 · At the same time, curators are often socially disconnected from the communities which the museum nominally serves. At the TMA, all the curators ...
  89. [89]
    Comment | Despite what some critics claim, art today isn't really too ...
    Jan 7, 2025 · Bad art abounds, some curators overstretch themes, wall texts are often clunky—it was ever thus. And Tate undoubtedly has problems to solve. But ...
  90. [90]
    Who engages in the arts in the United States? A comparison of ... - NIH
    Jul 8, 2021 · Attendance at arts events was lower in participants with lower income and social class, poorer health, and those living in less urban areas.
  91. [91]
    [PDF] Intrinsic Impact: How Audiences and Visitors are Transformed by ...
    This report discusses the range of findings with respect to audiences' 'readiness to receive' the art and the six constructs of intrinsic impact: captivation, ...
  92. [92]
    How Exhibition History Affects Art Worth - FasterCapital
    Apr 4, 2025 · For artists, having their work exhibited widely can lead to greater visibility and potentially higher sales prices. Art advisors and gallerists ...
  93. [93]
    Curatorial Practice and the Power of Perception
    Jun 14, 2022 · Museums will inevitably present objects in ways that show biases, be it intentionally or unintentionally. In her 2000 book, art historian ...<|separator|>
  94. [94]
    What Is Post Implementation Review? - Atlassian
    A post-implementation review is a structured evaluation that examines your completed project from every angle. It compares actual results against initial goals, ...
  95. [95]
    What Is a Post-Implementation Review in Project Management?
    Aug 23, 2024 · A post-implementation review is a process to evaluate whether the objectives of the project were met. You can also use it to see how effectively the project ...
  96. [96]
    IEEE 1028-2008 - IEEE SA
    Five types of software reviews and audits, together with procedures required for the execution of each type, are defined in this standard.
  97. [97]
    IEEE Standard for Software Quality Assurance Processes
    Jun 13, 2014 · Every IEEE standard is subjected to review at least every ten years. When a document is more than ten years old and has not undergone a revision ...<|separator|>
  98. [98]
    ISO Surveillance Audits: Ensuring Ongoing Compliance and ...
    Mar 17, 2025 · ISO surveillance audits are periodic reviews conducted within the organization's certification cycle to verify ongoing adherence to ISO standards.
  99. [99]
    ISO Internal Audit Explained [with Procedures & Checklists]
    An ISO internal audit is a disciplined approach to assessing compliance against the requirements of ISO 9001:2015.Missing: retrospective | Show results with:retrospective
  100. [100]
    What is a post implementation review | PM-Partners
    Oct 1, 2021 · A post implementation review (PIR) or post completion review is a process of documenting the success (or failure) of the project according to its outcomes.
  101. [101]
    What Is a Retrospective Cohort Study? | Definition & Examples
    Feb 10, 2023 · A retrospective cohort study is a type of observational study that focuses on individuals who have an exposure to a disease or risk factor in common.When to use a retrospective... · Examples of retrospective... · Advantages and...
  102. [102]
    Retrospective Cohort Study - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A retrospective cohort study reviews past records to identify exposures and reconstruct disease or mortality outcomes over time, comparing exposed and non- ...
  103. [103]
    Prospective, Retrospective, Case-control, Cohort Studies - StatsDirect
    A retrospective study looks backwards and examines exposures to suspected risk ... in relation to an outcome that is established at the start of the study.
  104. [104]
    Long-Term Trends in the Incidence of and Survival with Heart Failure
    We examined temporal trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure among subjects in the Framingham Heart Study during a 50-year interval from the ...
  105. [105]
    General Cardiovascular Risk Profile for Use in Primary Care
    Jan 22, 2008 · Methods and Results— We used Cox proportional-hazards regression to evaluate the risk of developing a first CVD event in 8491 Framingham study ...Measurement Of Cvd Risk... · Results · General Cvd Risk Prediction...
  106. [106]
    Retrospective cohort studies: advantages and disadvantages
    Jan 24, 2014 · Many of the advantages and disadvantages of retrospective cohort studies are similar to those for prospective cohort study designs.
  107. [107]
    Cohort Studies: Design, Analysis, and Reporting - Chest Journal
    Cohort studies follow a group of individuals over time to measure outcomes, studying incidence, causes, and prognosis, and can be prospective or retrospective.
  108. [108]
    Overview: Cohort Study Designs - PMC - NIH
    This paper describes the prospective and retrospective cohort designs, examines the strengths and weaknesses, and discusses methods to report the results.
  109. [109]
    (PDF) Retrospective cohort studies: advantages and disadvantages
    Aug 6, 2025 · One of the main disadvantages is the possible introduction of selection bias. 19 However, as the full population was used here, there is no risk ...
  110. [110]
    Retrospective studies - PMC - NIH
    A major weakness of retrospective studies is that they generate a great deal of missed data. For example, all would agree that the forced expiratory volume in 1 ...
  111. [111]
    (PDF) Causal Inference in Retrospective Studies - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · A model for causal inference in prospective studies is reviewed and then applied to retrospective studies.
  112. [112]
    Retrospective studies - utility and caveats - PubMed
    Retrospective studies are an important tool to study rare diseases, manifestations and outcomes. Findings of these studies can form the basis on which ...
  113. [113]
    History - The Pulitzer Prizes
    No Ordinary Time: Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt: The Home Front in World War II, by Doris Kearns Goodwin (Simon & Schuster) · Case Closed: Lee Harvey Oswald and ...
  114. [114]
    Honors and Awards - History of Science Society
    The Society gives several awards and honors. Lectures offer distinguished historians of science the opportunity to present their views to a broad audience.
  115. [115]
    Lifetime Achievement Award - GRAMMY.com
    The Lifetime Achievement Award is presented to performers and artists who have made outstanding contributions to the recording industry.Missing: retrospective | Show results with:retrospective
  116. [116]
    Is the Pulitzer Prize recognised as "worthy" by professional historians?
    Jul 30, 2014 · In which case the Pulitzer prize winner you're mentioning was awarded by journalists, not historians, and likely for the craft of narrative ...Missing: rigor | Show results with:rigor
  117. [117]
    What Makes Journalism “Excellent”? Criteria Identified by Judges in ...
    What does “excellence” mean in journalism? The literature reveals no universally agreed set of standards, and awards guidelines are often unclear.