Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Orthogonality principle

The orthogonality principle is a cornerstone of estimation theory in statistics and signal processing, asserting that an estimator achieves the minimum mean squared error (MSE) if and only if the estimation error is orthogonal—meaning uncorrelated—to the subspace spanned by the observations.^[1] This condition, often applied to linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) estimators, provides a necessary and sufficient criterion for optimality in Bayesian estimation problems.^[2] Mathematically, for a random variable X estimated from observations \mathbf{Y} = [Y_1, \dots, Y_n]^T, the principle requires that the error \tilde{X} = X - \hat{X} satisfies E[\tilde{X} Y_i] = 0 for all i, where \hat{X} is the estimator, typically linear as \hat{X} = \mathbf{a}^T \mathbf{Y} + b.^[1] This orthogonality extends to vector spaces of random variables, where the inner product is defined by the expectation E[UV], ensuring the error lies perpendicular to the observation subspace in a Hilbert space framework.^[2] The principle derives from the projection theorem in Hilbert spaces and is proven by showing that any deviation from orthogonality increases the MSE.^[3] Key applications include deriving LMMSE filters in signal processing, such as noise reduction in communications or sensor fusion in multi-antenna systems, where it yields explicit solutions like \hat{X}_{LMMSE} = \frac{\text{cov}(X,Y)}{\sigma_Y^2} Y for scalar cases.^[3] In sequential estimation, it facilitates recursive algorithms like the Kalman filter by maintaining orthogonality at each step.^[2] The principle also underpins broader techniques in adaptive filtering and random vector estimation, ensuring unbiased and efficient predictors under Gaussian assumptions or more general second-order statistics.^[1]

Mathematical Foundations

Inner Product Spaces

An inner product space is a vector space over the field of real or complex numbers equipped with an inner product, which is a scalar-valued function that generalizes the notion of the dot product and induces a norm and metric on the space.^[4] Formally, given a vector space V, an inner product \langle \cdot, \cdot \rangle: V \times V \to \mathbb{F} (where \mathbb{F} is \mathbb{R} or \mathbb{C}) satisfies the following properties for all vectors u, v, w \in V and scalars \alpha, \beta \in \mathbb{F}: linearity in the first argument, \langle \alpha u + \beta v, w \rangle = \alpha \langle u, w \rangle + \beta \langle v, w \rangle; conjugate symmetry, \langle u, v \rangle = \overline{\langle v, u \rangle}, where the bar denotes complex conjugation (reducing to symmetry \langle u, v \rangle = \langle v, u \rangle over \mathbb{R}); and positive-definiteness, \langle u, u \rangle \geq 0 with equality if and only if u = 0.^[5] These axioms ensure the inner product defines a semi-inner product that captures geometric concepts like length and angle in abstract settings.^[6] The inner product induces a norm \|u\| = \sqrt{\langle u, u \rangle}, which in turn generates a metric d(u, v) = \|u - v\| on V, enabling the study of distances and convergence within the space.^[7] This structure allows for the extension of Euclidean geometry to more general vector spaces, where orthogonality can be defined via \langle u, v \rangle = 0.^[8] A canonical example of a finite-dimensional inner product space is the Euclidean space \mathbb{R}^n equipped with the standard dot product \langle x, y \rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i y_i, which satisfies all the required properties and corresponds to the familiar geometry of \mathbb{R}^n.^[5] Similarly, the complex space \mathbb{C}^n uses \langle x, y \rangle = \sum_{i=1}^n x_i \overline{y_i} to account for conjugate symmetry.^[9] Inner products extend this framework to abstract vector spaces beyond coordinate-based representations, such as function spaces with integrals as inner products, without requiring completeness.^[10] Inner product spaces serve as the foundation for Hilbert spaces, which are their complete counterparts under the induced norm.^[11]

Orthogonality in Hilbert Spaces

In a Hilbert space, two vectors x and y are defined to be orthogonal if their inner product satisfies \langle x, y \rangle = 0.^[12] A Hilbert space is a complete inner product space, meaning it is a vector space equipped with an inner product that induces a norm, and every Cauchy sequence converges within the space.^[13] Central to the orthogonality principle is the Hilbert space L^2(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) consisting of square-integrable random variables on a probability space (\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P), where the inner product between two such random variables X and Y (assumed to be centered, i.e., with zero mean) is given by \langle X, Y \rangle = E[XY].^[14] This inner product ensures that L^2(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P) forms a Hilbert space, as the expectation operator preserves the necessary properties of completeness and the induced norm \|X\| = \sqrt{E[X^2]} corresponds to the standard deviation for centered variables.^[15] Two random variables X and Y in this space are orthogonal if E[XY] = 0, which implies statistical uncorrelation under the centering assumption.^[14] A fundamental consequence of orthogonality in Hilbert spaces is the Pythagorean theorem: if x and y are orthogonal, then \|x + y\|^2 = \|x\|^2 + \|y\|^2.^[16] In the context of L^2(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P), this translates to E[(X + Y)^2] = E[X^2] + E[Y^2] when E[XY] = 0.^[15] The geometric structure of Hilbert spaces facilitates orthogonal projections onto closed subspaces, where the projection of a vector x onto a subspace M is the unique element P_M x \in M such that x - P_M x is orthogonal to every element in M.^[17] This projection minimizes the distance \|x - m\| over all m \in M and is central to decomposing elements into orthogonal components.^[13]

Core Formulation in Estimation

Principle for Linear Estimators

The orthogonality principle applied to linear estimators specifies that the optimal linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) estimator \hat{\theta} = a + B Y of a random variable \theta given an observation vector Y satisfies the condition that the estimation error \theta - \hat{\theta} is orthogonal to every linear function of Y. This orthogonality is expressed as E[(\theta - \hat{\theta})(c + D Y)] = 0 for all constant vectors c and matrices D, where the expectation is taken with respect to the joint distribution of \theta and Y.^[18]^[19] To derive this condition, minimize the mean squared error E[(\theta - a - B Y)^2] by taking partial derivatives with respect to the scalar a and the matrix B (assuming \theta is scalar for notational simplicity, though the vector case follows analogously). Setting the derivative with respect to a to zero yields the unbiasedness condition E[\theta - \hat{\theta}] = 0. Setting the derivative with respect to B to zero produces E[(\theta - \hat{\theta}) Y^T] = 0. These two equations constitute the orthogonality conditions equivalent to the general statement above.^[18]^[20] Solving these equations gives the explicit form of the estimator coefficients. From E[\theta - \hat{\theta}] = 0, it follows that a = E[\theta] - B E[Y]. Substituting into the second condition yields B = \operatorname{Cov}(\theta, Y) \operatorname{Cov}(Y)^{-1}, where \operatorname{Cov}(\theta, Y) = E[(\theta - E[\theta])(Y - E[Y])^T] and \operatorname{Cov}(Y) = E[(Y - E[Y])(Y - E[Y])^T]. Thus, the LMMSE estimator is \hat{\theta} = E[\theta] + \operatorname{Cov}(\theta, Y) \operatorname{Cov}(Y)^{-1} (Y - E[Y]).^[19]^[20] These results hold under the assumptions that \theta and Y have finite second moments (ensuring the covariances exist) and that \operatorname{Cov}(Y) is invertible (guaranteeing a unique solution). If the processes are not zero-mean, the variables can be centered by subtracting their means prior to estimation. This algebraic formulation stems from the projection theorem in the Hilbert space of random variables equipped with the inner product defined by E[UV].^[18]^[19]

Geometric Interpretation

In the context of linear estimation, the orthogonality principle finds a natural geometric interpretation within the Hilbert space of square-integrable random variables, equipped with the inner product defined by expected values. Here, the problem of estimating a random variable θ based on observations Y is viewed as finding the closest point in the subspace spanned by all linear (or affine, if constants are included) functions of Y to the true θ. This subspace represents the set of all possible linear estimators, and the optimal estimator \hat{θ} is the orthogonal projection of θ onto this closed convex subspace.^[21]^[19] The key geometric insight is that the error vector θ - \hat{θ} is perpendicular to every direction in the observation subspace, meaning it lies in the orthogonal complement of that subspace. By the projection theorem in Hilbert spaces, this perpendicularity ensures that \hat{θ} minimizes the distance to θ, which corresponds to minimizing the mean squared error (MSE) as the squared norm in this space. This setup generalizes the classical Euclidean geometry where the shortest path from a point to a line or plane is along the perpendicular, thereby providing an intuitive justification for why the orthogonality condition yields the best linear unbiased estimator.^[22]^[23] To illustrate, consider a simplified two-dimensional analogy: imagine θ as a point in the plane, and the observation subspace as a line through the origin (or an affine line if including constants). The projection \hat{θ} is the foot of the perpendicular from θ to this line, making the error vector orthogonal to the line and thus the shortest possible connection. In the full Hilbert space setting, this extends to infinite-dimensional spaces of random processes, where the projection remains unique due to the completeness and separability properties of the space.^[22]^[23] This geometric framework underscores the uniqueness of the projection: in a Hilbert space, for any closed convex subspace, there exists exactly one closest point characterized by the orthogonality of the error to the subspace. It directly connects to classical least squares methods, where the geometry of projections onto column spaces minimizes residuals in deterministic settings, but here it elegantly adapts to the stochastic domain of random variables, unifying estimation under MSE criteria.^[19]^[21]

Examples

Univariate Estimation Example

To illustrate the orthogonality principle in a simple univariate setting, consider the estimation of a zero-mean random variable X with variance \sigma_X^2, representing a signal, from the noisy observation Y = X + N. Here, N is zero-mean noise independent of X with variance \sigma_N^2, ensuring X and N are uncorrelated.^[18] The optimal linear estimator takes the form \hat{X} = a Y, where the coefficient a is chosen to satisfy the orthogonality conditions: E[X - \hat{X}] = 0 (unbiasedness, which holds since both X and Y are zero-mean) and E[(X - \hat{X}) Y] = 0 (orthogonality of the error to the observation). Substituting the estimator yields E[(X - a Y) Y] = E[X Y] - a E[Y^2] = 0. Since E[X Y] = E[X(X + N)] = E[X^2] = \sigma_X^2 and E[Y^2] = \sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2, solving for a gives

a = \frac{\sigma_X^2}{\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2}.

^[18] To verify orthogonality explicitly, substitute the value of a:

E[(X - \hat{X}) Y] = \sigma_X^2 - \left( \frac{\sigma_X^2}{\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2} \right) (\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2) = \sigma_X^2 - \sigma_X^2 = 0. $$ This confirms that the error $X - \hat{X}$ is uncorrelated with $Y$, satisfying the principle. The mean squared error (MSE) is then

E[(X - \hat{X})^2] = E[X^2] - 2a E[X Y] + a^2 E[Y^2] = \sigma_X^2 - 2a \sigma_X^2 + a^2 (\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2). $$ Plugging in a simplifies this to

\text{MSE} = \frac{\sigma_X^2 \sigma_N^2}{\sigma_X^2 + \sigma_N^2}, $$ which is the minimum achievable MSE for linear estimators under these conditions, as the orthogonality principle ensures the projection of $X$ onto the space spanned by $Y$ minimizes the error variance.[](https://ee.stanford.edu/~gray/sp.pdf) Intuitively, the estimator $\hat{X}$ is a scaled version of the observation $Y$, where the scaling factor $a = \frac{\text{SNR}}{1 + \text{SNR}}$ and $\text{SNR} = \sigma_X^2 / \sigma_N^2$ weights the reliability of the noisy [measurement](/page/Measurement): when the signal variance dominates ($\text{SNR} \gg 1$), $a \approx 1$ and $\hat{X} \approx Y$; when noise dominates ($\text{SNR} \ll 1$), $a \approx 0$ and $\hat{X} \approx 0$. This example demonstrates how the principle derives the [Wiener filter](/page/Wiener_filter) coefficient in the scalar case.[](https://ee.stanford.edu/~gray/sp.pdf) ### Multivariate Estimation Example In the multivariate setting, the orthogonality principle guides the estimation of a vector parameter $\theta \in \mathbb{R}^p$ from the linear Gaussian observation model $Y = H\theta + V \in \mathbb{R}^n$, where $H \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times p}$ is a known full-column-rank matrix, and $V$ is zero-mean noise with positive definite covariance $R \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times n}$. The best linear unbiased estimator (BLUE) takes the form

\hat{\theta} = (H^T R^{-1} H)^{-1} H^T R^{-1} Y,

which minimizes the trace of the error covariance among all linear unbiased estimators and satisfies the orthogonality condition $\mathbb{E}[(\theta - \hat{\theta}) Y^T] = 0$.[](http://web.mit.edu/fmkashif/spring_06_stat/lecture6-7.pdf)[](https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~jiantao/225a2020spring/scribe/EECS225A_Lecture_2.pdf) This estimator arises as the linear minimum mean square error (LMMSE) solution under a non-informative prior on $\theta$ (i.e., infinite prior covariance).[](http://courses.washington.edu/b533/lect10.pdf) To verify the orthogonality condition, consider $\theta$ as a zero-mean random vector with covariance $Q$, independent of $V$, so $\mathbb{E}[YY^T] = HQH^T + R$ and $\mathbb{E}[\theta Y^T] = QH^T$. The BLUE corresponds to the limit of the LMMSE estimator as $Q \to \infty$, where the general LMMSE is $\hat{\theta} = QH^T (HQH^T + R)^{-1} Y$. The error covariance is $\mathbb{E}[(\theta - \hat{\theta})(\theta - \hat{\theta})^T] = Q - QH^T (HQH^T + R)^{-1} HQ$. For orthogonality, compute $\mathrm{Cov}(\theta - \hat{\theta}, Y) = QH^T - QH^T (HQH^T + R)^{-1} (HQH^T + R) = QH^T - QH^T = 0$, which holds exactly for finite $Q$ and extends to the BLUE in the non-informative limit.[](http://web.mit.edu/fmkashif/spring_06_stat/lecture6-7.pdf) In the deterministic $\theta$ case (equivalent to $Q \to \infty$), the condition manifests geometrically as the residual $Y - H\hat{\theta}$ being orthogonal to the column space of $H$ under the inner product $\langle a, b \rangle = a^T R^{-1} b$, yielding the normal equations $H^T R^{-1} (Y - H\hat{\theta}) = 0$.[](https://spinlab.wpi.edu/courses/ece531_2013/6-2principleoforthogonality.pdf) A simple numerical example illustrates this in a 2D setting with $p=2$, $n=2$, $H = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$, and $R = I_2$ (identity matrix, implying uncorrelated unit-variance noise). The model is $y_1 = \theta_1 + v_1$ and $y_2 = \theta_1 + \theta_2 + v_2$. Then,

H^T R^{-1} H = H^T H = \begin{pmatrix} 2 & 1 \ 1 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \quad (H^T R^{-1} H)^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & 2 \end{pmatrix},

H^T R^{-1} Y = H^T Y = \begin{pmatrix} y_1 + y_2 \ y_2 \end{pmatrix}.

Thus,

\hat{\theta} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \ -1 & 2 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} y_1 + y_2 \ y_2 \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} y_1 \ y_2 - y_1 \end{pmatrix}.

The error covariance is $(H^T R^{-1} H)^{-1} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & -1 \\ -1 & 2 \end{pmatrix}$, confirming unbiasedness ($\mathbb{E}[\hat{\theta}] = \theta$) and minimum variance among linear unbiased estimators. For a specific realization $Y = \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ 5 \end{pmatrix}$, we obtain $\hat{\theta} = \begin{pmatrix} 3 \\ 2 \end{pmatrix}$.[](http://courses.washington.edu/b533/lect10.pdf) The invertibility of $H^T R^{-1} H$ requires $H$ to have full column [rank](/page/Rank) (so the parameters are identifiable) and $R$ positive definite (ensuring the noise model is well-defined). If the means are non-zero, say $\mathbb{E}[\theta] = \mu_\theta$ and $\mathbb{E}[Y] = H\mu_\theta$, the data can be centered by subtracting these known values before applying the [estimator](/page/Estimator), preserving the orthogonality condition. This multivariate setup generalizes the univariate scalar case, where $H$ reduces to a scalar and $R$ to a variance.[](https://www.math.nagoya-u.ac.jp/~richard/teaching/s2022/Ethan.pdf) ## Generalizations and Extensions ### General Formulation The orthogonality principle in its general form applies to the minimum [mean squared error](/page/Mean_squared_error) (MMSE) [estimator](/page/Estimator) within the framework of $L^2$ spaces, providing a [characterization](/page/Characterization) of the optimal [estimator](/page/Estimator) without restricting it to linear structures. Specifically, for random variables $\theta$ and $Y$ defined on a [probability space](/page/Probability_space) $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$, the MMSE [estimator](/page/Estimator) $\hat{\theta} = E[\theta \mid Y]$ satisfies the orthogonality [condition](/page/Condition)

E\left[(\theta - \hat{\theta}) g(Y)\right] = 0

References

[1]
9.1.7 Estimation for Random Vectors - Probability Course
The above equations are called the orthogonality principle. The orthogonality principle is often stated as follows: The error (˜X) must be orthogonal to the ...
[2]
[PDF] ECE531 Screencast 6.2: The Principle of Orthogonality - spinlab
▷ the vectors u and v are orthogonal if their inner product u⊤v = 0. ▷ the subspace spanned by u and v is all possible coordinates formed by linear combinations ...
[3]
[PDF] Chapter 6 : Estimation 1 Estimation Based On Single Observation
(Y − µY ) + µX. Remark 1. (Orthogonality Principle) The ˆ X that minimizes the MSE is given by ˆ X ⊥ , i.e., ˆ X ⊥ (X − ˆ X). Proof.
[4]
[PDF] Inner Product Spaces - Purdue Math
Feb 16, 2007 · An inner product space is a real vector space where a mapping associates a real number with each pair of vectors, satisfying specific ...
[5]
[PDF] MATH 304 Linear Algebra Lecture 20: Inner product spaces ...
An inner product space is a vector space endowed with an inner product. Page 6. Examples. V = Rn. • (x,y) = x · y = x1y1 + x2y2 + ··· + xnyn. • (x,y) ...
[6]
[PDF] Inner Product Spaces - UC Davis Mathematics
Mar 2, 2007 · Inner product spaces are vector spaces with an inner product, which allows for the concept of length (or norm) of vectors. An inner product is ...
[7]
[PDF] 9 Inner product
An inner product is a generalization of the dot product, a way to combine two vectors to get a number, assigning a real number to each pair of vectors.
[8]
Inner Product Spaces - UMD Physics
Oct 27, 2005 · The generalization of the dot product to an arbitrary linear space is called an inner product and a linear space in which an inner product can ...
[9]
[PDF] Complex Inner Product Spaces 1 The definition
A complex inner product ⟨x|y⟩ is linear in y and conjugate linear in x. Definition 1 A complex inner product space is a vector space V over the field C of.
[10]
[PDF] Contents 3 Inner Product Spaces - Evan Dummit
An inner product space is a vector space with an inner product, which generalizes the dot product, allowing for notions of length and angle.
[11]
[PDF] 1 Inner Products and Hilbert Spaces
An inner product allows considering angles in a vector space. A Hilbert space is a pre-Hilbert space that is complete in the norm induced by the inner product.
[12]
[PDF] CHAPTER VIII HILBERT SPACES DEFINITION Let X and Y be two ...
DEFINITION. Let X be an inner product space. Two vectors x and y in X are called orthogonal or perpendicular if (x, y) = 0 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[13]
[PDF] Chapter 6: Hilbert Spaces - UC Davis Mathematics
The inner product structure of a Hilbert space allows us to introduce the concept of orthogonality, which makes it possible to visualize vectors and linear ...
[14]
[PDF] Hilbert Spaces - Wharton Statistics and Data Science
With the inner product hf, gi = R fgdP , L2 is a Hilbert space. Translated to the language of random variables, we form an i.p. space from random variables X ...
[15]
[PDF] Overview 1 Probability spaces - UChicago Math
Mar 21, 2016 · A natural framework for discussing random variables with zero mean and finite variance is the Hilbert space L2 with the inner product hX, Y i = ...
[16]
[PDF] hilbert spaces and the riesz representation theorem
Theorem 1.6 (The Pythagorean theorem for inner product spaces). If u, v are orthogonal, then ku + vk2 = kuk2 + kvk2. Proof of the Pythagorean theorem.
[17]
[PDF] Hilbert spaces and the projection theorem - Functional analysis
The second formula follows trivially by induction from the Pythagorean theorem. Proposition 5.9. Every Hilbert space has an orthonormal basis. Proof. Consider ...<|separator|>
[18]
[PDF] An Introduction to Statistical Signal Processing
Jan 4, 2011 · c 2004 by Cambridge University Press. Copies of the pdf file may be downloaded for individual use, but multiple copies cannot be made or printed.Missing: excerpt | Show results with:excerpt
[19]
[PDF] Appendix D - MMSE Estimation - John M. Cioffi
D.2 The Orthogonality Principle and Linear MMSE estimation. This section shows that a linear MMSE estimator with any jointly stationary distributions leads to ...Missing: seminal | Show results with:seminal
[20]
[PDF] Estimation techniques - MIT
Mar 2, 2006 · 2.1 Minimum Mean Squared Error (MMSE) estimation. 2.1.1 General formulation. The MMSE estimator minimizes the expected estimation error. C ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[21]
[PDF] Lecture 2: Linear Estimation - People @EECS
This particular loss has deep connec- tions with Hilbert space, which enables a general theory with beautiful formulas. ... (Orthogonality principle) The ...
[22]
[PDF] Hilbert spaces and the projection theorem - Paul Klein
The orthogonal complement G⊥ of a subset G of a Hilbert space. H is a Hilbert subspace. Proof. It is easy to see that G⊥ is a vector space. By the fact that any ...Missing: principle | Show results with:principle
[23]
[PDF] Contents - HAL @ USC
Nov 19, 1995 · best estimator by using one theorem, the Hilbert Space Projection Theorem (HSPT). ... orthogonality principle (check it!). 3.2 Affine ...
[24]
[PDF] The Best Linear Unbiased Estimate (BLUE) of a parameter θ
Best Linear Unbiased Estimates. Definition: The Best Linear Unbiased Estimate (BLUE) of a parameter θ based on data Y is. 1. a linear function of Y. That is ...
[25]
[PDF] Best Linear Unbiased Estimator
By definition, the BLUE is the unbiased linear estimator with the least variance. Unlike the MVUE, finding the BLUE only requires knowledge of the first two ...
[26]
[PDF] CONDITIONAL EXPECTATION Definition 1. Let (Ω,F,P) be a ...
For any real random variable X ∈ L2(Ω,F,P), define E(X |G) to be the orthogonal projection of X onto the closed subspace L2(Ω,G,P). This definition may seem a ...
[27]
[PDF] Lecture 10 : Conditional Expectation
Requirement (1) says that E(Y |G) ∈ L2(G) so E(Y |G) is just the orthogonal projection of Y onto the closed subspace L2(G). The lemma above shows that such a ...
[28]
[PDF] An Introduction to Estimation Theory * - NASA GMAO
May 28, 1997 · The present article attempts to bridge this gap by exposing some of the central concepts of estimation theory and connecting them with current ...
[29]
[PDF] A Step by Step Mathematical Derivation and Tutorial on Kalman Filters
Oct 8, 2019 · We present a step by step mathematical derivation of the Kalman filter using two different approaches. First, we consider the orthogonal.
[30]
Gauss Markov theorem - StatLect
The Gauss Markov theorem says that, under certain conditions, the ordinary least squares (OLS) estimator of the coefficients of a linear regression model is ...Missing: formalization date
[31]
[PDF] Generalized Least Squares Theory
This estimator is, by construction, the BLUE for βo under [A1] and [A2](i). The GLS and OLS estimators are not equivalent in general, except in some exceptional ...Missing: principle | Show results with:principle
[32]
[PDF] Chapter 11 - Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Spaces - UNM Math
We provide an in- troduction to the mathematical ideas behind this work emphasizing its connections to linear model theory and two applications to problems that ...
[33]
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9780387972339
[34]
[PDF] Legendre On Least Squares - University of York
nineteenth century were due in no small part to the development of the method of least squares. The same method is the foundation for the calculus of errors ...
[35]
[PDF] Signals, Systems and Inference, Chapter 11: Wiener Filtering
Under our assumption of zero-mean x[n], orthogonality is equivalent to uncorrelatedness. As we will show shortly, the orthogonality principle also applies in ...
[36]
[PDF] A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems1
Using a photo copy of R. E. Kalman's 1960 paper from an original of the ASME “Journal of Basic Engineering”, March. 1960 issue, I did my best to make an ...
[37]
[PDF] New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory1 - Duke People
principle: orthogonal projection. Consider an abstract space 9C such that an inner product (X, F) is defined between any two elements X, Y of 9C. The norm ...<|separator|>
[38]
[PDF] Forecasting with ARMA Models
it may be described as an orthogonality condition. This condition indicates that the prediction error y − ˆy is uncorrelated with x. The result is intuitively.
[39]
[PDF] Adaptive Noise Cancelling: Principles and Applications
In noise cancelling systems the practical objective is to produce a system output z = s + no - y that is a best fit in the least squares sense to the signal s.
[40]
[PDF] Equalization - John M. Cioffi
The Minimum Mean-Square Error Linear Equalizer (MMSE-LE) balances ISI reduction and noise ... Using the Orthogonality Principle of Appendix D.2, the MSE in ...Missing: audio | Show results with:audio