Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Projection

Psychological projection is an unconscious psychological defense mechanism whereby individuals attribute their own undesirable or unacceptable thoughts, feelings, impulses, or traits to another person or external object, thereby displacing internal conflict onto others.^[1]^[2]^[3] First conceptualized by Sigmund Freud in the late 19th century as part of psychoanalytic theory, the idea was further elaborated by his daughter Anna Freud in her 1936 work The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence, where it was described as a primitive ego defense used to manage anxiety by externalizing repudiated aspects of the self.^[3]^[4] In clinical contexts, projection manifests in phenomena such as paranoia, where individuals perceive threats in others that originate from their own suppressed aggression, or in narcissistic disorders, where personal flaws are denied by ascribing them to rivals.^[1]^[2] While rooted in observational clinical evidence rather than large-scale experimental validation, empirical studies have identified correlates, such as elevated projection in individuals with poor emotional self-regulation, linking it to interpersonal biases and relational strain.^[5]^[6] Critics note that distinguishing defensive projection from cognitive biases like false consensus requires careful measurement, as the mechanism's unconscious nature complicates direct falsification, yet its patterns remain observable in therapeutic settings and self-report scales.^[7]

Mathematics

Projections in linear algebra and geometry

In linear algebra, a projection is defined as a linear transformation P: V \to V on a vector space V that satisfies the idempotence condition P^2 = P, meaning applying the projection twice yields the same result as applying it once.^[8] In inner product spaces equipped with an Euclidean norm, such as \mathbb{R}^n, orthogonal projections are a special case where P is also self-adjoint (P^T = P in matrix representation), ensuring that the projection onto a subspace W maps any vector \mathbf{x} to the unique point P\mathbf{x} \in W that minimizes the Euclidean distance \|\mathbf{x} - P\mathbf{x}\|, with the error vector \mathbf{x} - P\mathbf{x} orthogonal to W.^[8]^[9] The explicit formula for the orthogonal projection of a vector \mathbf{v} onto a one-dimensional subspace spanned by a unit vector \hat{\mathbf{u}} (with \|\hat{\mathbf{u}}\| = 1) is \proj_{\hat{\mathbf{u}}} \mathbf{v} = (\mathbf{v} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}) \hat{\mathbf{u}}, derived from the requirement that \mathbf{v} - \proj_{\hat{\mathbf{u}}} \mathbf{v} is perpendicular to \hat{\mathbf{u}}, so their dot product vanishes: (\mathbf{v} - (\mathbf{v} \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}}) \hat{\mathbf{u}}) \cdot \hat{\mathbf{u}} = 0.^[9] For a subspace W with orthonormal basis \{\mathbf{u}_1, \dots, \mathbf{u}_k\}, the projection generalizes to P\mathbf{v} = \sum_{i=1}^k (\mathbf{v} \cdot \mathbf{u}_i) \mathbf{u}_i, as orthogonality allows decomposition without cross terms.^[8] In matrix form, if U has orthonormal columns spanning W, then P = U U^T.^[8] These properties hold in low dimensions; for example, in \mathbb{R}^2, projecting \mathbf{v} = (3, 4) onto the x-axis subspace spanned by \hat{\mathbf{u}} = (1, 0) yields (3, 0), with distance \|(3,4) - (3,0)\| = 4, the minimal possible to the line.^[9] In \mathbb{R}^3, projecting onto the xy-plane (spanned by \mathbf{e}_1, \mathbf{e}_2) discards the z-component, preserving coordinates in x and y while minimizing distance via perpendicular drop.^[8] Idempotence follows directly: P^2 \mathbf{v} = P (P \mathbf{v}) = P \mathbf{v} since P \mathbf{v} \in W and P acts as identity on W.^[8] Self-adjointness ensures \langle P\mathbf{x}, \mathbf{y} \rangle = \langle \mathbf{x}, P\mathbf{y} \rangle, confirming orthogonality of error to subspace.^[8] Orthogonal projections underpin least-squares approximation: for an overdetermined system A\mathbf{x} = \mathbf{b} with m > n and full column rank n, the solution \hat{\mathbf{x}} = (A^T A)^{-1} A^T \mathbf{b} satisfies A \hat{\mathbf{x}} = P \mathbf{b}, where P = A (A^T A)^{-1} A^T projects \mathbf{b} onto the column space of A, minimizing \|A\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{b}\|^2.^[10] Geometrically, this interprets inconsistent equations as finding the closest point in the column space to \mathbf{b}, with residual orthogonal to columns of A.^[10] In geometry, orthogonal projections map points by lines perpendicular to a fixed hyperplane, preserving parallelism and ratios along non-perpendicular directions, as seen in shadows under illumination by parallel rays orthogonal to the projection plane, where the shadow of a point \mathbf{p} on plane z=0 from \mathbf{p} = (x,y,z) is (x,y,0).^[11] This collapses the perpendicular coordinate while retaining others, aligning with the linear algebra definition where the plane is the image subspace and the normal direction is the kernel.^[11]

Projective geometry and transformations

Projective geometry is a branch of mathematics that investigates geometric properties invariant under projection, prioritizing the preservation of incidence relations—such as points lying on lines—over distances, angles, or parallelism. Unlike Euclidean geometry, which relies on metric structures, projective geometry treats projections as fundamental transformations that map points from one plane to another via a center of projection, unifying diverse configurations through collinearity and intersection. This framework emerged from efforts to generalize perspective in art and resolve synthetic problems in conic sections, with key axioms ensuring that any two distinct points determine a unique line and any two distinct lines intersect in a unique point.^[12] The foundational ideas trace to Girard Desargues, who in 1639 published Brouillon project d'une atteinte aux événements des rencontres du cônne avec un plan, introducing theorems on perspective triangles that anticipated projective invariance, though largely overlooked until the 19th century amid dominance of analytic methods. Jean-Victor Poncelet revived and systematized these concepts in his 1822 treatise Traité des propriétés projectives des figures, establishing projective geometry as a synthetic discipline independent of coordinates, emphasizing properties like harmonic divisions preserved across projections. Subsequent developments by August Ferdinand Möbius and Julius Plücker further refined duality and coordinate systems, solidifying its distinction from affine geometry by incorporating points at infinity to eliminate parallelism as a primitive notion.^[13]^[12] In the real projective plane \mathbb{RP}^2, points are represented using homogeneous coordinates [x : y : z], where (x, y, z) \neq (0,0,0) and equivalence holds under nonzero scalar multiplication, allowing a single framework for finite points (where z \neq 0, dehomogenized to affine (x/z, y/z)) and ideal points at infinity (where z = 0). Lines are similarly defined as [a : b : c] satisfying a x + b y + c z = 0, with incidence given by the vanishing of this bilinear form. Projective transformations, or collineations, are induced by invertible $3 \times 3 matrices up to scalar, mapping lines to lines bijectively and preserving collinearity; they form the group \mathrm{PGL}(3, \mathbb{R}), contrasting affine transformations that fix the line at infinity and preserve parallelism.^[14]^[15] A central invariant under these transformations is the cross-ratio of four collinear points A, B, C, D, defined as (A,B;C,D) = \frac{(C-A)/(D-A)}{(C-B)/(D-B)} in affine coordinates, which remains unchanged and characterizes projective equivalence on the line. This invariance enables classification of pencils of conics, where all nondegenerate conics are projectively equivalent as projections of a circle onto a plane, explaining phenomena like ellipses, parabolas, and hyperbolas as perspective views without metric distortion. Central projections, from a viewpoint to a picture plane, model such perspective drawings, while parallel projections approximate orthographic views by placing the center at infinity, both subsumed in the projective framework.^[16] Duality in projective geometry interchanges points and lines symmetrically: a theorem stating "two points determine a line" dualizes to "two lines determine a point," with proofs interchangeable via coordinate reciprocity, as in Desargues' theorem on perspective triangles. Collineations include perspectivities (central projections between planes) and their compositions, generating the full automorphism group; this structure underpins applications like unifying conic sections through projection from a vertex.^[17]^[18]

Projections in statistics and data analysis

In linear regression, orthogonal projections map the response vector onto the column space of the design matrix X, producing fitted values that minimize the residual sum of squares. The projection operator, termed the hat matrix, is defined as H = X(X^T X)^{-1} X^T, which satisfies H^2 = H (idempotence) and H^T = H (symmetry), ensuring the projection is orthogonal and uniquely determines the least-squares estimator \hat{\beta} = (X^T X)^{-1} X^T y.^[19]^[20] This framework underpins hypothesis testing, such as F-tests comparing projected (explained) variance against residual variance to assess predictor significance, with the trace of H equaling the model's degrees of freedom.^[21] Principal component analysis (PCA) employs projections to reduce dimensionality by transforming data into uncorrelated components that successively maximize variance. These directions are the eigenvectors of the sample covariance matrix \Sigma = \frac{1}{n-1} X^T X (centered data), ordered by descending eigenvalues \lambda_1 \geq \lambda_2 \geq \cdots \geq \lambda_p, where the projection onto the top k eigenvectors yields scores Z = X V_k capturing the leading variance structure.^[22]^[23] PCA thus facilitates visualization and noise reduction in empirical datasets, though its linear nature limits recovery of non-linear dependencies, and retained variance (e.g., via scree plots) guides component selection without guaranteeing causal interpretability.^[24] In high-dimensional data analysis, projections extend to machine learning embeddings, where random linear projections approximate distance preservation for curse-of-dimensionality mitigation, as formalized by the Johnson-Lindenstrauss lemma bounding distortion with O(\epsilon^{-2} \log n) dimensions. Post-2020 advancements include hybrid random projections combining Gaussian and sparse variants to enhance embedding quality in representation learning, achieving lower reconstruction errors in tasks like classification on datasets exceeding 10,000 features.^[25]^[26] Such methods support scalable hypothesis testing in sparse regimes but require validation against overfitting, as projections preserve correlations without establishing causal mechanisms absent domain-specific assumptions like instrument validity.^[27]

Physics

Projections in classical mechanics

In classical mechanics, projections involve decomposing vectors—such as velocity, force, or acceleration—into orthogonal components along coordinate axes or other directions, enabling the independent application of Newton's second law (\vec{F} = m \vec{a}) to each component for causal analysis of motion. This vector resolution simplifies problems by exploiting the linearity of Newtonian dynamics, where interactions like gravity act uniformly without coupling between perpendicular directions in inertial frames. The scalar projection of a vector \vec{A} onto a unit vector \hat{u} is A_u = \vec{A} \cdot \hat{u} = |\vec{A}| \cos \phi, where \phi is the angle between them, providing the effective magnitude along that direction.^[28]^[29] A foundational application appears in projectile motion, where an initial velocity \vec{v} launched at angle \theta to the horizontal resolves into constant horizontal component v_x = v \cos \theta (unaffected by gravity in vacuum) and vertical component v_y = v \sin \theta (decelerating at g \approx 9.8 \, \mathrm{m/s^2}). This decomposition yields parabolic trajectories, with range R = \frac{v^2 \sin 2\theta}{g} maximized at \theta = 45^\circ, as derived from integrating components over flight time. Galileo anticipated this framework through inclined plane experiments around 1604–1608, resolving gravitational acceleration into parallel (g \sin \alpha) and perpendicular components, measuring uniform acceleration proportional to \sin \alpha via bronze balls rolling down grooves, with results published in Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences (1638). These findings empirically validated constant acceleration under resolved forces, countering Aristotelian views of natural motion.^[30]^[31]^[32] Projections also underpin the work-energy theorem, where work W by a constant force \vec{F} over displacement \vec{d} is the dot product W = \vec{F} \cdot \vec{d} = F d \cos \theta, representing the parallel component F_\parallel = F \cos \theta times d. The theorem states net work equals kinetic energy change: W_\mathrm{net} = \Delta K = \frac{1}{2} m (v_f^2 - v_i^2), derived by integrating \vec{F} \cdot d\vec{r} along paths, as in conservative fields like gravity. Empirical confirmation spans Galileo's timings to 20th-century ballistics, where resolved drag and gravity components match observed trajectories in artillery data, such as U.S. Army tables from World War I yielding muzzle velocities around 700–900 m/s for 75 mm guns with predictable ranges under component analysis.^[33]

Projections in optics and electromagnetism

In ray optics, projections describe the geometric tracing of light rays from an object point through an optical system to form an image on a plane. A pinhole camera exemplifies this by allowing rays to pass undeflected through a small aperture, resulting in a real, inverted image where rays from the object's top project to the bottom of the image plane and vice versa, due to the central projection geometry.^[34] This inversion arises causally from the straight-line propagation of rays crossing at the aperture, with image sharpness improving as the pinhole diameter decreases to about 0.5 mm for visible light, balancing diffraction limits empirically observed in experiments.^[34] Thin lenses refine this projection via refraction, approximating paraxial ray paths with the lensmaker's formula and the thin lens equation

\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{[o](/page/

)} + \frac{1}{i}

, where f is the focal length (typically 10-50 mm for common glass lenses), [o](/page/O) the object distance, and i the image distance.^[35] Derived from similar triangles in ray diagrams for converging lenses, this equation predicts real inverted images for [o](/page/O) > f , with magnification

m = -\frac{i}{[o](/page/

)}

, verified through bench setups measuring image positions accurate to within 1-2% for object distances up to 1 m.^[35]^[36] In electromagnetism, projections manifest in the polarization of transverse waves, where the electric field vector \vec{E} (oscillating at frequencies around $5 \times 10^{14} Hz for visible light) projects onto a plane perpendicular to propagation. Linear polarizers transmit only the component parallel to their axis, with transmitted intensity following Malus's law I = I_0 \cos^2 \theta, where \theta is the angle between \vec{E} and the axis, empirically confirmed by rotating polarizers yielding intensity variations matching cosine-squared profiles to within experimental error of 0.5% using monochromatic sources.^[37] Diffraction patterns project spatial structure via wave interference, with the far-field (Fraunhofer) intensity distribution equaling the squared modulus of the Fourier transform of the aperture transmittance function, as derived from the Huygens-Fresnel principle.^[38] Thomas Young's 1801 double-slit experiment illuminated slits separated by 0.1-1 mm with sunlight filtered to ~550 nm wavelength, producing fringes spaced by \Delta y = \frac{\lambda L}{d} (L screen distance ~1 m, d slit separation), where central maximum intensity reached 4 times single-slit levels, providing direct evidence of wave superposition without reliance on particle models.^[39] Modern laser replications (e.g., He-Ne at 632.8 nm) reproduce these patterns with fringe contrasts >95%, underscoring causal wave propagation over interpretive duality frameworks.^[38]

Visualization and Mapping

Optical and graphical projections

In optics, cameras employ perspective projection to form images, where light rays from three-dimensional points converge at a focal point on the image plane, simulating the human visual system's convergence of parallel lines toward vanishing points.^[40] This pinhole model assumes rays pass through a single aperture, producing foreshortening and distortion for objects off the optical axis, which limits fidelity in wide-angle scenarios.^[41] Empirical optical systems, such as those in photographic lenses, achieve this projection through physical refraction and aperture control, yielding high-fidelity representations bounded by lens aberrations and diffraction limits. Graphical projections in computer rendering approximate these optical effects computationally to generate two-dimensional images from three-dimensional models. Perspective projection is implemented using homogeneous coordinates, which extend Cartesian points to four dimensions (x, y, z, w), enabling linear matrix transformations that incorporate perspective division (dividing by w) to simulate depth-based scaling and vanishing points.^[42] This contrasts with real optics by relying on discrete polygon rasterization, which approximates light transport via interpolated shading rather than tracing individual rays, introducing artifacts like aliasing unless mitigated by anti-aliasing techniques. In technical drawing, orthographic projections maintain parallel lines as parallel without foreshortening, preserving true dimensions for measurement across multiple views (e.g., front, top, side), ideal for engineering blueprints where spatial accuracy trumps visual depth cues.^[43] Oblique projections, a parallel variant, project the front face at true scale while receding axes at an angle (typically 45 degrees), offering a pictorial sense of depth with less distortion than perspective but compressing rear dimensions (e.g., half-scale in cabinet projection), which suits illustrative sketches over precise metrology.^[44] Orthographic excels in distortion-free representation for manufacturing tolerances, whereas oblique provides intuitive three-dimensional perception at the cost of proportional inaccuracies in depth. Post-2020 advancements in graphics hardware have enhanced real-time ray tracing, enabling computational projections closer to optical fidelity by simulating light paths with global illumination, reflections, and refractions on consumer GPUs. NVIDIA's RTX 40-series GPUs, released in 2022, incorporated third-generation RT cores and AI-accelerated denoising (e.g., DLSS 3), achieving photorealistic rendering at 60+ frames per second in engines like Unreal Engine 5, surpassing prior rasterization approximations in handling complex light interactions.^[45] These developments leverage tensor cores for neural rendering, reducing noise in ray-traced scenes and bridging the gap between empirical optics and graphical simulations, though computational demands still exceed optical hardware efficiency for unbounded scenes.^[46]

Cartographic map projections

Cartographic map projections transform the three-dimensional surface of the Earth, approximated as a sphere or oblate spheroid, onto a two-dimensional plane, inevitably introducing distortions due to the incompatibility of spherical and Euclidean geometries, as no isometric mapping exists between a sphere and a plane. These distortions affect properties such as area, shape (conformality), distance, and direction, with the choice of projection determined by the need to preserve specific attributes for particular applications, such as navigation or thematic mapping. Empirical geodesy confirms that Earth's slight oblateness exacerbates minor scale variations, but the primary causal distortions arise from the projection mathematics itself, independent of measurement errors in latitude and longitude grids derived from satellite and ground surveys.^[47] The Mercator projection, formulated by Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator in 1569, exemplifies a conformal cylindrical projection that preserves angles and local shapes, rendering rhumb lines (paths of constant compass bearing) as straight lines, which proved invaluable for marine navigation during the Age of Exploration. Its mathematical basis involves projecting the sphere onto a cylinder tangent at the equator, with map coordinates given by x = R \lambda and y = R \ln\left(\tan\left(\frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{\phi}{2}\right)\right), where \lambda is longitude, \phi is latitude, and R is the Earth's radius; this logarithmic scaling causes exponential areal inflation toward the poles, making Greenland appear comparable in size to Africa despite Africa's actual area being about 14 times larger. While effective for directional accuracy, this geometric distortion has drawn criticism for misrepresenting relative landmass sizes in non-navigational contexts, such as educational or political maps, though such issues stem from misuse rather than inherent bias in the projection.^[48]^[49] Equal-area projections prioritize the conservation of surface integrals, ensuring that regions retain their true relative areas, which is critical for thematic maps displaying quantities like population density or resource distribution. The Mollweide projection, a pseudocylindrical equal-area design, maps the sphere into an ellipse with a 2:1 width-to-height ratio, where the central meridian is straight, other meridians are sinusoidal curves, and parallels are equally spaced horizontal lines except at the poles; its forward equations involve solving \theta = 2 \arcsin\left( \sqrt{ \frac{1 - \sin \phi}{2} } \right) iteratively for the auxiliary angle, followed by x = \sqrt{2} R \lambda \cos \theta / \pi and y = \sqrt{2} R \sin \theta, preserving areas but introducing angular distortions that elongate shapes near the edges. This projection suits global data visualization where areal fidelity outweighs shape preservation, though it sacrifices equidistance and conformality.^[50]^[51] Compromise projections balance multiple properties without strictly adhering to any one, aiming to minimize perceptual distortions for general-purpose world maps. The Robinson projection, developed in 1963 by cartographer Arthur H. Robinson under contract with Rand McNally, is a pseudocylindrical design with curved meridians and parallels, optimized via empirical table look-up for low overall error in area, angle, and distance, though it preserves none exactly; it was adopted by National Geographic Society for world maps from 1988 to 1998. Similarly, the Winkel Tripel projection, introduced in 1921 by German cartographer Oswald Winkel as a hybrid averaging the equirectangular and Aitoff projections, reduces both areal and angular distortions across the globe, with equations x = \frac{1}{2} (x_e + x_a) and y = \frac{1}{2} (y_e + y_a), where subscripts denote the component projections; National Geographic selected it in 1998 as its standard for general world maps due to superior visual balance over alternatives like Robinson. Distortions in these and other projections are rigorously quantified using Tissot's indicatrix, devised in 1859 by French mathematician Nicolas Auguste Tissot, which represents infinitesimal circles on the sphere as ellipses on the map—their major and minor axes indicate meridional and parallel scale factors, while eccentricity measures shear and angular deformation, enabling comparative evaluation of projection trade-offs based on empirical distortion metrics rather than subjective aesthetics.^[52]^[53]^[54]^[55]^[56]

Chemistry

Structural projections in organic chemistry

Structural projections in organic chemistry represent three-dimensional molecular arrangements in two dimensions, facilitating the depiction of stereochemistry and conformations essential for understanding reactivity and properties. These methods emerged to address the limitations of flat drawings in conveying tetrahedral geometry and bond rotations, grounded in empirical determinations of molecular structures. Fischer projections, developed by Emil Fischer in 1891 for elucidating carbohydrate configurations, project tetrahedral carbons onto a plane where the intersection forms a cross, with the carbon atom implied at the center.^[57] In this convention, vertical bonds extend away from the observer (into the plane), while horizontal bonds project forward (out of the plane), aligning with the eclipsed conformation along the chain for acyclic polyols like aldoses.^[58] This standardized orientation enables straightforward assignment of D/L configurations based on the chiral center farthest from the carbonyl group.^[59] Equivalence rules preserve stereochemical identity in Fischer projections: a 180° rotation in the plane yields the identical enantiomer, as vertical and horizontal orientations remain consistent relative to the viewer, whereas 90° rotations or swaps of two substituents invert configuration and require mental adjustment.^[60] Primarily applied to carbohydrates, these projections facilitated Fischer's systematic elucidation of sugar isomers, such as distinguishing glucose from mannose via oxidation and reduction experiments correlating to known tartaric acid enantiomers. For complex molecules, multiple chiral centers are stacked vertically, with the most oxidized carbon at the top, aiding in the representation of diastereomers like epimers differing at one center.^[61] Newman projections, viewing molecules along a C-C bond axis with the front carbon's substituents as a circle and the rear as a smaller circle behind, reveal staggered and eclipsed conformations critical for torsional analysis. In staggered forms, substituents are offset by 60° dihedral angles, minimizing torsional strain from electron repulsion in aligned sigma bonds, whereas eclipsed conformations exhibit higher energy due to this strain, quantified at approximately 12 kJ/mol per H-H interaction in ethane.^[62] Sawhorse projections complement this by providing an oblique, three-dimensional perspective akin to a sawhorse frame, displaying bond angles and relative positions without axial overlap, thus highlighting steric interactions in chains like butane's gauche (60°) versus anti (180°) forms, where gauche incurs ~3.8 kJ/mol steric penalty atop baseline torsion.^[63] These tools causally link conformation to energy via partial eclipsing of bonds, predicting barriers observed in rotational spectroscopy.^[64] Empirical validation of these projections relies on X-ray crystallography, which since the 1910s has resolved absolute configurations in crystalline small molecules like tartaric acid, confirming Fischer's assignments through bond lengths and torsion angles matching projected models.^[65] Post-1950s advancements in NMR spectroscopy, particularly 1H and 13C variants routine by the 1960s, corroborate chiral centers via chemical shift differences and NOE effects indicating spatial proximities, as in validating glucose's beta-anomer configuration against projected rings.^[66] Discrepancies, such as initial mismatches in early sugar models, were resolved by integrating these data, ensuring projections align with causal molecular realities rather than arbitrary conventions.^[67]

Biology

Anatomical and neural projections

In neuroanatomy, projections refer to the bundled axonal extensions from neuronal somata in one region to postsynaptic targets in another, forming tracts that mediate signal transmission and circuit function. These structures are characterized through dissection, electron microscopy, and modern tracing methods like viral vectors or lipophilic dyes, which delineate origin, path, and arborization patterns. For instance, corticospinal projections from layer V pyramidal neurons in the motor cortex descend via the pyramidal tract to innervate spinal interneurons and motoneurons, with branching diversity quantified in rodent models using single-neuron reconstruction techniques.^[68]^[69] Topographic organization is a defining property of many projections, preserving spatial relationships between source and target neurons to enable orderly information processing. In the visual pathway, retinal ganglion cell axons project via the optic tract to the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus, maintaining retinotopic maps where adjacent retinal loci connect to adjacent thalamic neurons, which in turn relay to the primary visual cortex (V1) through optic radiations. This mapping, verified by electrophysiological recordings and optical imaging in primates and rodents, ensures that visual field coordinates are represented contiguously across subcortical and cortical stations.^[70]^[71] Embryonic development of projections involves initial axon outgrowth guided by gradients of cell-surface and extracellular molecules, followed by refinement via synaptic competition and neural activity. Anterograde tracer injections in chick and rodent embryos reveal early topographic specificity, as in motor pools where subclasses of spinal motoneurons extend axons along stereotyped peripheral nerve paths to limb targets, determined by combinatorial transcription factor codes like LIM-homeodomain proteins. Similarly, olivocerebellar projections exhibit restricted fiber targeting by embryonic day 15 in rats, supporting causal roles for molecular cues in pathfinding over purely activity-dependent mechanisms.^[72]^[73] Disruption of projections by injury or disease triggers Wallerian degeneration, a stereotypic anterograde process where the axon distal to the lesion site undergoes fragmentation, myelin breakdown, and clearance by Schwann cells or macrophages, typically within days to weeks. In peripheral nerve crush models, this degeneration correlates with proximal axotomy and is delayed in mutants lacking NMNAT2 enzyme activity, highlighting molecular regulators like SARM1 that execute the degenerative program. Central projections, such as in traumatic brain injury, show analogous pathology with beading and disconnection, detectable via diffusion tensor imaging in human cases and linked to functional deficits in motor and sensory domains.^[74]^[75]^[76]

Psychology

Psychological projection as a defense mechanism

Psychological projection refers to an unconscious defense mechanism in which an individual attributes their own undesirable or anxiety-provoking thoughts, feelings, or impulses to another person or external object, thereby preserving the ego from internal conflict.^[4] Sigmund Freud first elaborated this concept in his 1911 analysis of the Schreber case, where he described projection as central to paranoia, positing that repressed homosexual impulses in the patient were externalized as delusions of persecution, transforming internal hostility into perceived threats from others.^[77] In this mechanism, the ego displaces unacceptable id-driven content onto the superego or external reality to mitigate psychic tension arising from intrapsychic conflict.^[78] Carl Jung extended the idea through his concept of the shadow, the repository of repressed personal traits and instincts, which individuals project onto others to avoid confronting their own disowned aspects.^[79] Jung observed this in clinical encounters during the 1910s and 1920s, noting that such projections often manifest as moral judgments or attributions of inferiority to external figures, rooted in the failure to integrate the shadow into conscious awareness.^[80] Unlike empathy, which involves accurate inference of another's internal state based on observable cues and perspective-taking, projection distorts perception by overlaying one's own unresolved conflicts, serving self-protection rather than relational understanding.^[81] This mechanism becomes empirically observable in projective testing, such as the Rorschach inkblot test, developed by Hermann Rorschach in 1921, where ambiguous stimuli elicit responses revealing unconscious projections.^[82] Meta-analyses of Rorschach validity, including systematic reviews up to the 2010s, have shown moderate construct validity for certain variables (correlations ranging from 0.40 to 0.50), supporting its utility in detecting projected perceptual distortions tied to underlying psychopathology.^[83] Case studies, like Freud's examination of paranoid patients, illustrate how projection causally links repressed aggression to external accusations, with empirical social psychology research confirming that individuals with high self-reported defensiveness exhibit increased attribution of their own traits to others under stress.^[7]

Empirical validation, criticisms, and controversies

Empirical research on psychological projection as a defense mechanism yields mixed results, with correlational evidence linking it to traits like narcissism but limited causal validation. A 2011 study found that narcissistic individuals exhibit heightened meta-perceptions of transparency, attributing their own traits to others to bolster self-views, consistent with projection dynamics.^[84] Meta-analyses of defense mechanisms in the 2010s, including projection, correlate immature or neurotic defenses with poorer psychosocial adjustment and self-deception in clinical samples, particularly among those scoring high on narcissistic vulnerability.^[85]^[86] However, broader reviews highlight inconsistent replication, with early empirical tests of Freudian projection failing to demonstrate robust predictive power beyond basic attribution errors.^[7] Critics, including Hans Eysenck, have long argued that projection and related psychoanalytic constructs lack falsifiability, rendering them scientifically untenable as they can retroactively explain any discrepant behavior without testable predictions.^[87] Eysenck's broader dismissal of Freudian theory emphasized the absence of controlled experimental evidence, positioning projection as an ad hoc interpretation rather than a verifiable process, a view echoed in critiques of projective testing instruments like the Rorschach for poor reliability and validity.^[88] Defenders counter that modern operationalizations, such as in emotion regulation studies, show projection varying with self-regulatory deficits, yet these often conflate it with conscious biases, undermining claims of unconscious defense.^[5] In political discourse, projection accusations have proliferated, often ideologically charged, with claims of "projecting" racism or authoritarianism leveled bidirectionally; 2020s analyses reveal symmetric partisan false consensus effects, where individuals overestimate in-group prevalence of norm violations like election denial, mimicking projection but driven by social projection rather than defense.^[89]^[90] Right-leaning commentators, citing studies on media bias, argue that left-leaning narratives normalize victim-projection dismissals (e.g., attributing societal ills to out-group prejudice while ignoring in-group parallels), yet empirical data on cognitive distortions indicate equivalent hypocrisy appeals across ideologies, privileging simpler explanations like motivated reasoning over unfalsifiable mechanisms.^[91]^[92] Alternative accounts, such as confirmation bias or moral hypocrisy, better explain many projection-like attributions without invoking unconscious dynamics; for instance, partisan hypocrisy arises from selective enforcement of standards, where individuals rationalize inconsistencies via motivated cognition rather than displacing unwanted traits.^[93]^[94] These causal alternatives align with observable data on bias symmetry, challenging overreliance on projection in therapeutic or diagnostic contexts where evidence favors explicit self-interest or perceptual errors.^[95]

Linguistics

Voice and phonetic projection

Voice projection in phonetics encompasses the physiological and acoustic mechanisms that enable efficient transmission of speech sounds, characterized by elevated sound pressure levels (SPL) and resonance optimization for audibility over distance. Diaphragmatic engagement modulates subglottal pressure by coordinating abdominal and thoracic musculature, facilitating sustained airflow that supports phonation at intensities exceeding conversational norms. Empirical measurements indicate that vocal efforts doubling perceived loudness yield SPL increases of 9-10 dB, attributable to enhanced respiratory kinematics rather than laryngeal strain alone.^[96] Resonance in voice projection arises from vocal tract configurations amplifying specific frequencies, particularly during vowel articulation, where lower first formant (F1) values in open vowels enhance acoustic carry. Spectrographic analysis, enabled by the sound spectrograph invented in 1946, visualizes these traits through time-frequency-amplitude plots, revealing prosodic projections via intensity peaks and fundamental frequency (F0) modulations that distinguish stressed syllables. Post-1950s adoption of this technology in phonetic laboratories quantified how prosodic amplitude variations—up to 6-12 dB in emphatic speech—bolster perceptual salience without spectral distortion.^[97]^[98] Cross-linguistic data highlight variations in phonetic projection demands, especially in tonal systems where pitch accuracy delineates lexical meaning. Fieldwork on 129 Chinese tonal varieties documents citation tones with F0 excursions spanning 100-200 Hz, necessitating precise diaphragmatic stabilization to maintain contour integrity amid respiratory cycles. In non-tonal languages like English, projection relies more on amplitude-driven stress, but tonal speakers exhibit heightened F0 control, correlating with finer pitch discrimination thresholds verified in perceptual experiments. These differences underscore causal links between respiratory physiology and linguistic typology, with empirical acoustics confirming that tonal projection errors exceed 20% in untrained bilinguals due to mismatched subglottal support.^[99]^[100]

Arts and Entertainment

Projections in film, theater, and media

The magic lantern, an early image projection device utilizing oil lamps and glass slides to cast enlarged pictures onto screens, emerged in the mid-17th century as a precursor to narrative visual entertainment. Credited to Dutch scientist Christiaan Huygens around 1659, it was employed in public spectacles like phantasmagoria shows, which projected ghostly images and simple stories to captivate audiences in darkened rooms.^[101]^[102] These demonstrations relied on basic optics and hand-painted slides to evoke motion through sequential projection, laying groundwork for projected storytelling despite limitations in image stability and brightness. This technology advanced into motion picture projection with the Lumière brothers' Cinématographe, debuted commercially on December 28, 1895, at Paris's Grand Café, where short films drew paying crowds of about 35 viewers per session.^[103] The device's perforated celluloid film strips, coated with silver halide emulsions sensitive to light exposure, enabled capture of sequential images whose rapid projection exploited human persistence of vision—a retinal retention of about 1/16th second—to simulate fluid movement.^[104] Early cinema screenings expanded globally, with U.S. nickelodeons by 1905 hosting up to 10,000 daily patrons per city, underscoring projection's role in mass narrative media.^[105] In theater, projections supplemented scenery from the 19th century via lantern slides for atmospheric effects, evolving to the Linnebach lantern in the 1910s, which directed strong lights through painted glass onto rear stages for diffused backdrops without visible frames.^[106] By the mid-20th century, 35mm film projectors integrated into live performances for dynamic visuals, later supplanted by digital LED arrays offering programmable imagery with resolutions exceeding 4K. Early film projections suffered flicker from low frame rates (typically 16-18 fps in silents), mitigated by the 24 fps standard adopted in the late 1920s for sound synchronization, as in Warner Bros.' 1927 The Jazz Singer, reducing perceived judder while balancing film stock costs.^[107] Analog projection preserved film's granular texture from emulsion variability, yielding superior dynamic range in high-end 70mm formats, but demanded physical distribution and maintenance.^[108] Digital alternatives, dominant since the 2010s, eliminate chemical processing but incur higher data demands for streaming equivalents—up to 7 GB per hour in 4K—straining bandwidth without film's inherent archival durability against bit rot.^[109] Theater projections now favor hybrid digital systems for flexibility, though purists note analog's causal fidelity to light physics over digital's algorithmic approximations.^[110]

Modern projection mapping and technological advances

Software tools like MadMapper enable precise calibration for projection mapping on irregular surfaces by allowing users to warp, mask, and blend content in real-time, supporting applications in live events and installations for dynamic visual effects.^[111] These advancements, building on post-2020 updates, integrate with DMX lighting and LED systems to facilitate seamless synchronization without hardware modifications.^[112] Hardware innovations include 4K laser projectors, such as Digital Projection's TITAN series delivering up to 37,000 lumens, which improve brightness and longevity over lamp-based systems, enabling outdoor and large-scale mappings with reduced maintenance.^[113] Trends from 2020 to 2025 emphasize portability through compact, high-resolution units supporting HDR and ultra-short-throw lenses, enhancing interactivity via motion sensors for audience-responsive content.^[114] AI-driven content adaptation has emerged as a key development, automating visual generation and real-time adjustments based on environmental data or viewer gestures, as demonstrated in tools for generative projection mapping that reduce production timelines.^[115] ^[116] Enhanced AR integration overlays projected imagery with mobile or wearable AR, creating hybrid environments where physical surfaces host interactive digital layers, though causal limitations persist due to projector dependency on line-of-sight.^[117] ^[118] Despite hype, empirical metrics indicate efficacy in engagement; corporate events using projection mapping report 44% higher attendee interaction duration and brand recall compared to standard visuals, per ROI analyses.^[119] Visitor studies on cultural installations further validate improved narrative immersion, with projection enhancing perceived depth over static displays.^[120] Market reports project growth to USD 6.66 billion in 2025, fueled by entertainment and emerging home applications, though edtech adoption lags due to scalability issues.^[121] Criticisms highlight high energy demands from laser systems and calibration costs, averaging USD 10,000 per minute of custom 3D content, alongside distortion artifacts from perspective misalignment on non-planar surfaces.^[122] ^[123] Ambient light interference further reduces efficacy outdoors, necessitating controlled environments for optimal causal fidelity over promotional claims.^[124]

References

[1]
Projection | Psychology Today
Projection is the process of displacing one's feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive ...
[2]
Psychological Projection (+ Examples)
Oct 10, 2024 · Projection is a psychological defense mechanism that involves attributing one's undesirable traits, feelings, or impulses to other people.
[3]
Projection as a Defense Mechanism - Verywell Mind
May 10, 2024 · Freud initially proposed projection as one of several defense mechanisms, which his daughter, Anna Freud, expanded on in her book, "The Ego and ...Origins · Development · Examples of Projection · Defense Mechanism or...
[4]
Defense Mechanisms - StatPearls - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
May 22, 2023 · Anna Freud defined defense mechanisms as unconscious resources used by the ego to decrease internal stress ultimately.
[5]
Blaming others: Individual differences in self-projection - ScienceDirect
The present research shows that individual differences in the ability to self-regulate emotions (ie, action versus state orientation) predict projection.
[6]
Defensive Projection, Superimposed on Simplistic Object Relations ...
The principal hypothesis in this study was that an elevated use of defensive projection would predict impaired patient-practitioner relationships under ...
[7]
Empirical Studies of Projection: A Critical Review - Sage Journals
This paper assesses empirical work on projection, a Freudian concept, focusing on its defensive qualities and targeting, and two forms: Classical and ...Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
[8]
Orthogonal Projection — Applied Linear Algebra
A matrix P is an orthogonal projector (or orthogonal projection matrix) if P 2 = P and P T = P . Theorem. Let P be the orthogonal projection onto ...
[9]
6.3: Orthogonal Projection - Mathematics LibreTexts
Mar 16, 2025 · Learn the basic properties of orthogonal projections as linear transformations and as matrix transformations.Orthogonal Decomposition · Definition \(\PageIndex{2... · Example \(\PageIndex{7...
[10]
[PDF] Lecture 16: Projection matrices and least squares
Last lecture, we learned that P = A(AT A)-1 AT is the matrix that projects a vector b onto the space spanned by the columns of A. If b is perpendicular to.
[11]
Orthogonal Projection -- from Wolfram MathWorld
Orthogonal projection is a projection by parallel rays, preserving tangencies, parallel lines, and ratios of lengths and areas. Ellipses project to ellipses, ...
[12]
[PDF] Projective Geometry
The study of the rules of perspective in painting (da Vinci & Dürer ∼1500) lead to the development of projective geometry (Poncelet, 1822), dealing with the ...
[13]
Projective Geometry | SpringerLink
Jun 23, 2010 · One of them was discovered by the Greek geometer Pappus around 300 ce, and another by the French mathematician Desargues around 1640. Even ...
[14]
[PDF] Homogeneous Coordinates∗
Homogeneous coordinates are used to represent points and lines in projective geometry, which is used in computer graphics and other applications.
[15]
[PDF] Affine and Projective Geometry - IMJ-PRG
Affine geometry is a collection of points and lines. Projective geometry adds 'points at infinity' to an affine plane.
[16]
[PDF] CLASSICAL GEOMETRIES 13. The cross ratio We have studied the ...
We can now observe by Theorem 13.3.1 that not only is the cross ratio r invariant under. Moebius functions and projectivities of projective lines and ...
[17]
[PDF] Basics of Projective Geometry - UPenn CIS
There is a useful model (interpretation) of plane projective geometry in terms of the central projection in R3 from the origin onto the plane z = 1. Another ...
[18]
[PDF] PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY Michel Lavrauw Nesin Mathematics ...
Collineations. A collineation between two projective spaces π and π0 of dimension ≥ 2 is a bijection between the set of subspaces of P and the set of subspaces ...
[19]
[PDF] 3.0 Linear Regression with Matrices - Stat@Duke
The orthogonal projection of the hat matrix minimizes the sum of the squared vertical distances onto the subspace. Recall that in multiple linear regression ...
[20]
[PDF] Chapter 2. Linear Models - HKUST Math Department
It means that Hb is in this linear space formed by the columns of X. And b − Hb is orthogonal to this space. In general, a projection matrix H is symmetric and ...
[21]
[PDF] Stat 5102 Notes: Regression
Apr 27, 2007 · Abstractly, regression is orthogonal projection in n-dimensional space. ... The model matrix and the hat matrix have the same rank. Proof ...<|separator|>
[22]
Principal Component Analysis - Sebastian Raschka
Jan 27, 2015 · The eigenvectors and eigenvalues of a covariance (or correlation) matrix represent the “core” of a PCA: The eigenvectors (principal components) ...Sections · Introduction · Preparing the Iris Dataset · - Eigendecomposition...
[23]
[PDF] Topic 5: Principal component analysis 5.1 Covariance matrices
An orthogonal projection given by top-k eigenvectors of cov(X) is called a (rank-k) principal component analysis (PCA) projection. Corollary 5.2 reveals an ...
[24]
Principal components analysis (PCA). - Jeremy Jordan
Jul 7, 2017 · 1. Compute the covariance matrix. · 2. Find eigenvectors ( U ) and eigenvalues ( S ) of the covariance matrix using singular value decomposition.<|separator|>
[25]
[PDF] Re-Examining Linear Embeddings for High-Dimensional Bayesian ...
In this paper we study the use of linear embeddings for HDBO, and in particular we re-examine prior efforts to use random linear projections. Random ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[26]
Hybrid random projection technique for enhanced representation in ...
Mar 1, 2025 · This paper introduces a novel hybrid random projection method (HRP) that effectively combines the strengths of normal random projection (NRP) and plus-minus ...
[27]
Lifting the curse from high-dimensional data: automated projection ...
May 29, 2025 · Abstract. Unsupervised clustering is a powerful machine-learning technique widely used to analyze high-dimensional biological data.
[28]
Vector Resolution: Finding the Components of a Vector
Vector resolution is the process of graphically or trigonometrically determining the magnitude and direction of a vector's components.Missing: classical | Show results with:classical
[29]
[PDF] Newtonian Dynamics - Richard Fitzpatrick
An important corollary of Newton's second law is that force is a vector ... the angle subtended between the projection of the radius vector onto the x-y plane and.
[30]
3.4 Projectile Motion – College Physics - OpenEd@JWU
The magnitudes of the components of the velocity v are v x = v cos θ and v y = v sin θ , where v is the magnitude of the velocity and θ is its direction, as ...
[31]
Galileo's Acceleration Experiment
Galileo set out his ideas about falling bodies, and about projectiles in general, in a book called “Two New Sciences”.
[32]
Galileo's Inclined Plane Experiment - Maple Help - Maplesoft
One of his greatest contributions involved accurately measuring the effect of gravity on free falling bodies. Galileo hypothesized that a falling object would ...
[33]
3.1: The Work - Energy Theorem - Physics LibreTexts
Nov 8, 2022 · In words, this reads: "The change of an object's kinetic energy when it changes its position from A to B equals the work done on it by all ...
[34]
[PDF] First Order Optics
Light from an object placed outside of the box will propagate through the pinhole and form an inverted image on the wall.
[35]
Thin-Lens Equation:Cartesian Convention - HyperPhysics Concepts
The derivation of the Gaussian form proceeds from triangle geometry. For a thin lens, the lens power P is the sum of the surface powers. For thicker lenses ...
[36]
[PDF] Thin Lenses - Mississippi State University
The purpose of this experiment is to investigate the thin lens formula for both a single lens and combinations of lenses. Materials. 1. Component carrier (small).
[37]
Polarization
An ideal polarizer is a material that passes only EM waves for which the electric field vector is parallel to its transmission axis. The electric field is a ...<|separator|>
[38]
[PDF] 20. Diffraction and the Fourier Transform
Fraunhofer Diffraction from a slit is simply the Fourier Transform of a rect function, which is a sinc function. The irradiance is then sinc2 .
[39]
[PDF] Optics Lab 9 Interference and Diffraction - De Anza College
Thomas Young in 1801 did the first experiment that conclusively showed the interference of light from 2 sources. He filtered sunlight to make as source of red ...
[40]
Perspective Camera Models - Columbia CS
The perspective camera model, also called a pinhole camera, projects 3D points onto an image plane from a center of projection (COP). The focal length is the ...
[41]
[PDF] Perspective Projection: the Wrong Imaging Model - Margaret Fleck
Perspective projection distorts shapes and intensity outside the optical axis, and is not suitable for wide-angle images, where objects change shape.
[42]
Explaining Homogeneous Coordinates & Projective Geometry
Feb 24, 2014 · Homogeneous coordinates are 4D coordinates in projective geometry, with an extra dimension (W) that scales the X, Y, and Z dimensions.
[43]
Parallel (Othographic & Oblique) Projection in Computer Graphics
Feb 15, 2022 · Parallel projection has lines emerging parallel from a surface. It includes orthographic (perpendicular) and oblique (at an angle) projections.
[44]
Orthographic and Oblique Projection
The oblique projection, on the other hand, shows the front surface and the top surface, which includes three dimensions: length, width, and height.
[45]
AI-Powered Neural Rendering Technologies | NVIDIA RTX ...
NVIDIA RTX PRO™ Blackwell GPUs are the most advanced RTX GPUs offering high-performance, real-time ray tracing, AI-accelerated compute, and professional ...Missing: post- | Show results with:post-
[46]
Types of Ray Tracing, Performance On GeForce GPUs, and More
The real-time ray tracing capabilities of GeForce RTX GPUs also enable us to more-accurately model the effect of light bouncing off of surfaces in a scene, ...
[47]
Quantifying and minimizing distortion in map projections
May 10, 2023 · It's well known that you cannot map a sphere onto the plane without distortion. You can't map the entire sphere to the plane at all because ...
[48]
Gerardus Mercator - National Geographic Education
Oct 19, 2023 · In 1569, Mercator published his epic world map. This map, with its Mercator projection, was designed to help sailors navigate around the globe.Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
[49]
Mercator Projection: How it Changed Mapmaking - CivilGEO
Mercator's Projection Introduces a Distortion or Two During the 16th century, Mercator's projection represented a truly revolutionary development in nautical ...Missing: date | Show results with:date
[50]
Mollweide—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
The Mollweide projection is an equal-area pseudocylindrical map projection displaying the world in a form of an ellipse with axes in a 2:1 ratio.Missing: formula | Show results with:formula
[51]
Mollweide Projection -- from Wolfram MathWorld
The Mollweide projection is a map projection also called the elliptical projection or homolographic equal-area projection. The forward transformation is x ...Missing: properties | Show results with:properties
[52]
Robinson—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
The Robinson projection is perhaps the most commonly used compromise pseudocylindrical map projection for world maps.
[53]
Arthur Howard Robinson - AAG
... Robinson Projection in 1965 under contract with Rand McNally. Beginning in the early 1960s, Robinson set out to devise a compromise map projection (one that ...
[54]
Winkel Tripel—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation
It has been used by the National Geographic Society since 1998 for general world maps. The Winkel Tripel projection was introduced by Oswald Winkel in 1921.Missing: UN | Show results with:UN
[55]
Tissot Indicatrix - Compare Map Projections
Tissot's Indicatrix is a method to visualize the distortions of a map projection. It was introduced in 1859 by the French mathematician Nicolas Auguste Tissot.
[56]
Tissot's indicatrix helps illustrate map projection distortion - Esri
Mar 24, 2011 · Tissot's indicatrix is a valuable tool in understanding and teaching about map projections, both to illustrate linear, angular, and areal distortion.
[57]
25.2 Representing Carbohydrate Stereochemistry: Fischer Projections
Sep 20, 2023 · In 1891, the German chemist Emil Fischer suggested a method based on the projection of a tetrahedral carbon atom onto a flat surface.Missing: invention | Show results with:invention
[58]
[PDF] Carbohydrates
• Fischer projection: a two dimensional representation for showing the configuration of carbohydrates. – horizontal lines represent bonds projecting forward. – ...
[59]
Stereoisomers - MSU chemistry
In a Fischer projection drawing, the four bonds to a chiral carbon make a cross with the carbon atom at the intersection of the horizontal and vertical lines.
[60]
[PDF] Stereochemistry
Fischer projections that differ by a 180° rotation are the same enantiomer, since the vertical lines are still back, and the horizontal lines are still forward.
[61]
Emil Fischer and the Structure of Grape Sugar and Its Isomers
Rosanoff further streamlined Fischer's projection in 1906. Before we set out on this adventure, some background on the status of carbohydrate chemistry in 1884 ...Missing: invention date
[62]
8.2: Conformational Analysis - Chemistry LibreTexts
May 12, 2020 · NEWMAN PROJECTIONS AND DIHEDRAL (TORSIONAL) ANGLE. The type of drawing used at the bottom of the figure in the last page is called a Newman ...
[63]
Sawhorse Projections - Chemistry Steps
A sawhorse projection of a molecule is simply a look at it from an angle. This angle is in between the sideview and the front view.
[64]
3.7 Conformations of Other Alkanes - Organic Chemistry | OpenStax
Sep 20, 2023 · Figure 3.9 Newman projections of propane showing staggered and eclipsed conformations. The staggered conformer is lower in energy by 14 kJ/mol.Missing: analysis | Show results with:analysis
[65]
Combining X-ray and NMR Crystallography to Explore the ...
Jul 20, 2022 · One aim of the present study is to investigate whether the combination of solid-state NMR with X-ray crystallography can help to bridge the gap ...
[66]
Stereochemistry and Validation of Macromolecular Structures - NIH
Analysis of the geometry and stereochemical validation of the models is equally applicable to structures determined by either crystallography or NMR, whereas ...
[67]
Knowledge-based validation of protein structure coordinates derived ...
This has prompted the development of methods for validating protein structures, in both the X-ray and NMR fields.Missing: projections | Show results with:projections
[68]
Axonal Barcode Analysis of Pyramidal Tract Projections from Mouse ...
Oct 12, 2022 · Axonal projections from the primary motor cortex (M1) to the brainstem and spinal cord travel via the pyramidal tract (PT), running along the ...
[69]
Reconstruction of 1000 Projection Neurons Reveals New Cell Types ...
Neuronal morphology, especially the shape of the axonal arbor, provides an essential descriptor of cell type and reveals how individual neurons route their ...
[70]
The Retinotopic Representation of the Visual Field - NCBI - NIH
The spatial relationships among the ganglion cells in the retina are maintained in their central targets as orderly representations or “maps” of visual ...
[71]
Chapter 15: Visual Processing: Cortical Pathways
The topographic (spatial) relationships of retinal neurons are maintained throughout the visual system, which preserves the retinotopic map of the visual world.
[72]
Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by ...
The topographic organization of motor projections depends on the generation of subclasses of motor neurons that select specific paths to their targets. We have ...Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[73]
Evidence of early topographic organization in the embryonic ...
The study found that the olivocerebellar projection shows topographic organization as early as E15, with fiber restriction to specific regions.Missing: studies | Show results with:studies
[74]
Wallerian Degeneration: A Major Component of Early Axonal ...
Our results show that Wallerian degeneration is a major component of axonal pathology in the periplaque white matter in early MS.
[75]
The Drama of Wallerian Degeneration: The Cast, Crew, and Script
Nov 23, 2021 · In this review, we describe our current understanding of Wallerian degeneration, focusing on the molecular players and mechanisms that mediate ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[76]
Wallerian degeneration | Radiology Reference Article
Mar 10, 2025 · Wallerian degeneration is the process of antegrade degeneration of the axons and their accompanying myelin sheaths due to a proximal axonal or neuronal cell ...On This Page · Pathology · Radiographic Features
[77]
Schreber and the Paranoid Process - PEP-Web
Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Paranoia. The Schreber case (Freud, 1911) has a unique position in psychoanalytic history. Perhaps of all of Freud's ... projection ...Missing: Sigmund | Show results with:Sigmund
[78]
[PDF] Freudian Defense Mechanisms and Empirical Findings in Modern ...
Projection is evident, but the projection itself may be a by-product of defense rather than part of the defensive response itself.
[79]
The Jungian Shadow - The Society of Analytical Psychology
In Jung's model of the psyche, there are various personified structures that interact with one another in our inner world.
[80]
Projection: You Are My Mirror and I Am Yours - Jung Society of Utah
Apr 29, 2016 · According to Jung, “The best political, social, and spiritual work we can do is to withdraw the projection of our own shadow onto others.
[81]
The Dance of Empathy and Projection - Psychology Today
Apr 5, 2025 · Projection externalizes the self's unresolved truths, while empathy aspires toward connection despite the limits of understanding. . It is ...Beyond Projection: Empathy... · Projection: The Unconscious... · Emotional Resonance And...
[82]
Rorschach inkblot test and psychopathology among patients ... - NIH
Jun 4, 2021 · Rorschach test was developed by Hermann Rorschach in 1921[1]. ... Early meta-analyses indicated that validity ranged from 0.40 to 0.50.
[83]
The validity of individual Rorschach variables: Systematic reviews ...
We systematically evaluated the peer-reviewed Rorschach validity literature for the 65 main variables in the popular Comprehensive System (CS).
[84]
You Probably Think this Paper's About You: Narcissists' Perceptions ...
In fact, one popular theory of narcissism argues that narcissists use others, through their meta-perceptions, to maintain their overly positive self-perceptions ...
[85]
The “Why” and “How” of Narcissism: A Process Model of Narcissistic ...
The model demonstrates how narcissism manifests itself as a stable and consistent cluster of behaviors in pursuit of social status and how it develops and ...
[86]
The Hierarchy of Defense Mechanisms: Assessing ... - Frontiers
More than half century of empirical research has demonstrated the impact of defensive functioning in psychological well-being, personality organization and ...
[87]
Looking back: the controversial Hans Eysenck | BPS
Apr 28, 2011 · Eysenck was probably the most divisive figure British psychology has ever produced. No other psychologist aroused such contrary reactions from ...
[88]
[PDF] The Scientific Status of Projective Techniques
Critics argued that the Rorschach lacked standardized administration procedures and adequate norms, and that evi- dence for its reliability and validity was ...<|separator|>
[89]
Democratic Norms, Social Projection, and False Consensus in the ...
Jul 1, 2021 · We examine individuals' views about democratic norm violations related to the peaceful transfer of power and acceptance of election results.
[90]
Cognitive distortions are associated with increasing political ... - NIH
Jul 15, 2025 · Here, we compare the prevalence of language patterns that have shown to be indicative of cognitive distortions among a cohort of Twitter users ...
[91]
Partisanship sways news consumers more than the truth, new study ...
Oct 10, 2024 · In addition, the effect of partisan bias was stronger for real news than fake news. That is, people were more likely to disbelieve true ...Missing: projection discourse
[92]
[PDF] Confirmation Bias Across the Partisan Divide
These partisan biases help explain the magnitude and stability of partisan differences across a host of political issues and beliefs: when partisan political ...Missing: projection | Show results with:projection
[93]
The motivated appeal to hypocrisy: the relation of ... - PubMed Central
Specifically, some defined hypocrisy narrowly by claiming that a hypocrite is one who does not truly believe their own message; Craig, they argued, believed his ...
[94]
Making Sense of Moral Hypocrisy
Sep 26, 2024 · Making Sense of Moral Hypocrisy. Everyone wants to believe they have an unshakeable moral compass, but our perception of morality is often ...
[95]
From critical to hypocritical: Counterfactual thinking increases ...
Partisans on both sides of the political aisle complain that the mainstream media is hypocritical, but they disagree about whom that hypocrisy benefits.
[96]
Age-Related Changes to Speech Breathing with Increased Vocal ...
Previous studies that used a “twice as loud” cue reported approximately a 9-10 dB SPL increase (Dromey & Ramig, 1998; Kleinow, Smith, & Ramig, 2001).Missing: diaphragmatic | Show results with:diaphragmatic
[97]
[PDF] Phonetics - Stanford University
Dec 30, 2020 · Thus, the spectrogram is a useful way of visualizing the three dimensions (time x frequency x amplitude). Figure 25.19 shows spectrograms of ...
[98]
[PDF] HL1144.pdf - Haskins Laboratories
The impressive accomplishments of the post-World War II years were due mainly to three developments: The invention of the sound spectrograph, the replacement ...
[99]
A cross-linguistic review of citation tone production studies
Oct 15, 2024 · This paper presents a systematic review of research methods and practices in 136 citation tone studies on 129 tonal language varieties in China
[100]
Cross-language Perception of Non-native Tonal Contrasts - NIH
This study examined the perception of the four Mandarin lexical tones by Mandarin-naïve Hong Kong Cantonese, Japanese, and Canadian English listener groups.Missing: projection fieldwork
[101]
About Magic Lanterns
The magic lantern was invented in the 1600's, probably by Christiaan Huygens, a Dutch scientist. It was the earliest form of slide projector and has a long and ...
[102]
Magic Lanterns – The Beginnings of Projection
Their invention dates back to 1650, when a Duch physicist, Christiaan Huygens, took a break from inventing telescopes to create a device intented to bemuse and ...
[103]
First commercial movie screened | December 28, 1895 - History.com
On December 28, 1895, the world's first commercial movie screening takes place at the Grand Cafe in Paris. The film was made by Louis and Auguste Lumière.
[104]
Persistence of Vision: The Optical Phenomenon Behind Motion ...
The persistence of vision theory suggests that the human eye and brain work together to create a seamless experience of motion from a sequence of still images.Missing: emulsion | Show results with:emulsion
[105]
Processing Chemistry - Ophthalmic Photographers' Society
Film is composed of an acetate base coated with a light sensitive emulsion. The emulsion side of the film is the side that faces the lens of the camera when ...Missing: persistence | Show results with:persistence
[106]
From Spark to Hologram: A Timeline of Theatre Technology
Nov 27, 2012 · 1910s: Linnebach Lantern becomes the first use of projections on the stage by utilizing a strong light source filtered through a painted glass ...
[107]
Film History: Frames Per Second - Films Fatale
May 14, 2020 · Twenty four FPS was the absolute lowest a film could be before the audio track would begin to warp and wobble. Otherwise, with various FPS ...Missing: flicker mitigation
[108]
Film vs. digital: the most contentious debate in the film world ... - Vox
Jan 5, 2016 · Film is transportive; it inspires nostalgia, especially among film buffs. Compared with that, digital video can look antiseptic and polished. ( ...
[109]
What is the truth about digital projection? | Little White Lies
Dec 5, 2024 · Dismissed as inferior by dedicated print enthusiasts yet a mainstay of cinemas around the world – we talk to cinema workers about the pros and cons of digital ...
[110]
The Fi Hall of Fame: Hacking Film - Why 24 Frames Per Second?
Jul 31, 2023 · The short answer: Not much, the film speed standard was a hack. The longer answer: the entire history of filmmaking technology is a series of hacks.Missing: mitigation 1920s
[111]
MadMapper
MadMapper is the reference software for visual mapping projection, an accessible and powerful tool for video, dmx lighting, LED and lasers live shows.MadMapper Software · Educational Offer · MiniMad · Mad AI
[112]
MadMapper Software
MadMapper is the reference software for visual mapping projection, an accessible and powerful tool for video, dmx lighting, LED and lasers live shows.
[113]
Projection Mapping
Featured powerful DLP projectors for projection mapping. TITAN Laser WUXGA / 4K-UHD. Flagship 3-Chip DLP laser projectors up to 37,000 Lumens. Up to 37,000 ...
[114]
Projection Equipments 2025-2033 Analysis: Trends, Competitor ...
Rating 4.8 (1,980) May 29, 2025 · Projection Equipments Trends · Rise of Laser Technology: · Increased Resolution and HDR Support: · Ultra-short-throw and Interactive Projectors: ...
[115]
AI-Powered Visual Generation for Video Mapping
Aug 10, 2025 · This hands-on session introduces a practical and accessible method for AI-powered visual generation in projection mapping.Missing: driven | Show results with:driven
[116]
Projection Mapping Market Global Forecast Report 2025-2032
Oct 10, 2025 · Integration of AI-driven content adaptation and real-time data visualization in large-scale projection mapping installations. Advancements in ...
[117]
Projection mapping technologies: A review of current trends and ...
This study summarizes current trends and future directions in projection mapping technologies. Projection mapping seamlessly merges the virtual and real worlds.
[118]
How Can Projection Mapping Be Used in Advertising? - BrandXR
Jun 8, 2024 · Augmented Reality Integration: Combining projection mapping with augmented reality (AR) allows for highly interactive experiences. Users can ...
[119]
https://www.coffeeoncue.com.au/blogs/event-planner/projection-mapping-roi-boost-corporate-event-engagement
[120]
Visitor's experience evaluation of applied projection mapping ...
Mar 14, 2023 · Metrics details. Abstract. Research on digital cultural heritage is concerned with the implementation of projection mapping (PJM) technologies ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
[121]
Projection Mapping Market Size & Share Analysis
Aug 12, 2025 · The Projection Mapping Market is expected to reach USD 6.66 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 21.72% to reach USD 17.82 billion by 2030.Missing: edtech | Show results with:edtech
[122]
The Cost of Projection Mapping, ON Services - OnServices
The average projection mapping service costs about $10,000 per one-minute of 3D video content. ... Ensure that your projection surface is located in an area with ...
[123]
A Perspective Distortion Correction Method for Planar Imaging ...
Mar 18, 2025 · This paper proposed a perspective distortion correction method for planar imaging based on homography mapping.
[124]
Pros & Cons of Projection Mapping - Ascend Studios
Jul 10, 2018 · Unfortunately, projection mapping does have some cons. First and foremost is that it's hard, if not impossible, to see in high-light situations.