Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Paramardi

Paramardi (c. 1165–1203 ), also known as Paramardideva or Parmal, was a king of the Chandela dynasty that governed the Jejakabhukti region—encompassing much of present-day in . As the last effective ruler of his line before its decline amid invasions by Muslim forces from the northwest, Paramardi focused on territorial recovery following defeats inflicted by neighboring Hindu kingdoms, such as the Gahadavalas, thereby stabilizing Chandela holdings for a time. Chandela inscriptions from his era, including the Tehri copper-plate grant, portray him as a patron of , with compositions praising reflecting his religious devotion amid administrative duties. His reign marked the waning of Chandela architectural , which had peaked earlier with temples, though he sustained regional cultural continuity against mounting external threats.

Biography

Early Life and Family

Paramardi was born in the mid-12th century as the son of II and grandson of Madanavarman, the Chandela ruler of Jejakabhukti who reigned from c. 1128 to 1165 . The Chandela dynasty, centered in the region, maintained continuity from earlier kings such as Kirtivarman (r. c. 1090–1100 ), preserving territorial control over Jejakabhukti amid regional power shifts. Yashovarman II's reign was brief, lasting only from c. 1164 to 1165 CE, after which Madanavarman arranged for his grandson's . Paramardi ascended the throne in 1165 CE at approximately five years of age, as recorded in the Bagheri stone inscription and corroborated by the Ajaygarh inscription alongside accounts in the Parmal Raso. This early coronation, overseen by his grandfather, marked a smooth dynastic transition without recorded challenges, reflecting the stability of Chandela familial authority at , the dynastic capital. No inscriptions or contemporary records detail Paramardi's siblings or early education, though his youth implies regency under familial or ministerial oversight, as evidenced by the appointment of officials like Pumsottama in the Bagheri inscription. Later traditions mention a named Malandevi, but her role pertains to his mature reign rather than formative years. The Bateshvar inscription affirms his direct succession from , underscoring paternal lineage ties central to Chandela legitimacy.

Ascension and Early Reign

Paramardi ascended the Chandela throne in Jejakabhukti in 1165 , succeeding his grandfather Madanavarman, whose had extended the dynasty's territorial influence through conquests in the region. His father, Yashovarman II, is noted in contemporary records as having either predeceased Madanavarman or held no substantive , facilitating Paramardi's direct inheritance and claims to legitimacy rooted in familial and dynastic continuity. An Ajaygarh inscription from his reign describes Paramardi as a "bāl-opi netā" (leader even in childhood), corroborating accounts of his youth at accession—potentially as young as five years, per bardic traditions like the Parmal Raso—though epigraphic evidence prioritizes his early assertion of authority over legendary details. Inscriptions dated to 1165–1166 CE at Semra and 1166–1167 CE at record land grants to Brahmins and temple functionaries, signaling administrative stability and royal patronage to reinforce control over core strongholds such as the Mahoba fort, which served as a administrative and defensive hub. These early measures emphasized internal consolidation amid the kingdom's post-expansion phase, with grants evidencing fiscal policies that sustained economies and local elites, thereby legitimizing Paramardi's rule without immediate recourse to campaigns. Diplomatic continuity from Madanavarman's , including non-aggression pacts with northern powers like the Gahadavalas, allowed for this period of relative until external pressures mounted in the late 1170s. By 1171 CE, further inscriptions at Ichhawar attest to expanded oversight of peripheral areas, underscoring a phased reassertion of central authority over Jejakabhukti's fragmented feudatories.

Military History

Conflicts with Neighboring Powers

Paramardi's reign witnessed persistent border skirmishes and territorial rivalries with the , as the Chandelas sought to defend and expand influence in central India's contested regions. Contemporary records indicate that Kalachuri incursions allowed them to reclaim the Trans-Kaimur area during periods of Chandela vulnerability, reflecting a pattern of opportunistic raids amid fluctuating power dynamics. A inscription from 1183 poetically describes the Tripuri ruler fainting at tales of Paramardi's valor, suggesting Chandela successes in repelling or defeating Kalachuri forces, likely under Jayasimha, though direct campaign details remain sparse. Tensions extended to the Gahadavalas in the north, marked by hostilities inherited from predecessors like Madanavarman, including clashes with rulers such as Govindachandra and Jayachandra. These disputes involved northern border defenses, with no evidence of formal alliances but rather competitive assertions of dominance over shared frontiers. Paramardi also contended with the Paramaras of Malwa through military engagements, as Chandela expansions under earlier kings provoked retaliatory actions, contributing to a cycle of minor victories and setbacks that strained resources without decisive territorial gains. To counter these threats, Paramardi leveraged Jejakabhukti's hilly terrain and fortifications, particularly the Kalinjar hill fort, for strategic defense against raids, enabling retreats and prolonged resistance. Inscriptions such as the Batesvar stone record (V.S. 1252) extol the dynasty's capacity to "crush the host of enemies," implying organized troop levies and a military structure with roles like (army commanders) to maintain readiness. The 1201 Kalinjar inscription further titles him dasarnadhipati (lord of ten regions), evidencing efforts to consolidate defenses and project power amid these regional pressures.

Chahamana Invasion of 1182–1183

In 1182–1183 CE, Prithviraj III of the Chahamanas invaded the Chandela kingdom of Jejakabhukti, targeting the territories ruled by Paramardi. The Madanpur inscriptions, dated to Vikrama Samvat 1239 (corresponding to 1182–1183 CE) and issued under Prithviraj's authority, record that his forces devastated the region, sacked the Chandela capital at , and compelled Paramardi to submit after a decisive defeat. These epigraphic claims indicate tactical Chahamana superiority in the campaign, likely enabled by coordinated raids that exploited Chandela vulnerabilities, though specific triggers such as border disputes or Paramardi's regional expansions remain unattested in contemporary records. The invasion involved sieges and raids culminating in the temporary occupation of key Chandela strongholds, including , where Chahamana troops reportedly plundered resources and asserted control over peripheral territories. Poetic accounts in the dramatize the conflict as an epic confrontation featuring Chandela warriors and Udal, who allegedly resisted fiercely before falling, but such narratives exaggerate heroic feats and lack corroboration from inscriptions, prioritizing legendary embellishment over verifiable tactics. Paramardi's forces offered resistance, yet the epigraphic evidence underscores the invaders' initial success in disrupting Chandela administration and extracting concessions. Immediate aftermath saw limited Chahamana consolidation, with Prithviraj withdrawing after achieving punitive objectives, allowing Paramardi to regroup and restore by issuing subsequent grants, such as the 1183 Mahoba inscription that boasts of his unyielding valor against adversaries. This recovery, evidenced by Paramardi's continued rule over Jejakabhukti into the 1190s, highlights the invasion's short-term impact rather than permanent subjugation, as no enduring Chahamana administrative changes are recorded in the region. The event strained Chandela resources but did not precipitate dynastic collapse, preserving Paramardi's authority until later Ghurid pressures.

Ghurid Campaigns and Defeat

Following the decisive Ghurid victory over the Chahamana forces at the Second in 1192 , which eliminated a major northern Indian power and facilitated the consolidation of Ghurid authority in the region under , the invaders turned their attention southward to weaker kingdoms amid regional fragmentation. By 1202–1203 , Aibak, acting as Muhammad of Ghor's viceroy, initiated campaigns into (Jejakabhukti), targeting the Chandela domain ruled by Paramardi to exploit its isolation after prior internal conflicts. These incursions represented a shift from localized Hindu rivalries to systematic Muslim expansion, with Ghurid forces leveraging rapid maneuvers—numbering in the tens of thousands, including Turkic horse archers—to overwhelm slower infantry-based defenses typical of kingdoms. Paramardi mounted a solo defense without documented alliances, initially confronting the Ghurids in open battle near , the Chandela capital, where his forces resisted but suffered defeat, compelling the king to withdraw to the fortified hilltop stronghold of Kalinjar. Aibak then laid to Kalinjar in 1203 CE, employing siege engines and attrition tactics against its formidable defenses, which had historically repelled earlier invaders through natural barriers and stockpiled supplies. Persian chronicler Minhaj-i-Siraj Juzjani, in his (completed ca. 1260 CE), records the Ghurid success in subduing the "Rai of " (identifiable as Paramardi's realm), though as a pro-Sultanate source written decades later by an author embedded in the conquering court, it emphasizes Islamic triumphs while downplaying the scale of Chandela resistance. Empirical accounts highlight Ghurid advantages in mobility and , contrasting with Chandela reliance on static forts, leading to Paramardi's capture and death in combat during the siege. The fall of Kalinjar resulted in the plunder of Chandela treasuries and temples, with thousands enslaved, signaling the effective subjugation of Jejakabhukti and the termination of independent Chandela sovereignty. Paramardi's defeat integrated the region into the nascent Sultanate's tributary sphere, paving the way for further Ghurid administrative outposts, though nominal local rulers persisted under oversight until later consolidations. This campaign underscored the causal impact of Ghurid logistical superiority and the exhaustion of Hindu polities from internecine wars, as evidenced by the rapid sequence of conquests post-1192.

Governance and Administration

Political Structure

Paramardideva's political structure centered on a centralized monarchy, where the king held absolute authority as the embodiment of divine kingship, evidenced by his regal title Paramardideva, denoting supremacy akin to a supreme deity, and adherence to the traditional sevenfold elements of statecraft including sovereignty, ministers, territory, forts, treasury, army, and allies. This framework, rooted in inscriptional records like the Mau Stone inscription, emphasized the monarch's role in upholding dharma through righteous governance, with royal prerogatives extending to judicial, fiscal, and military decisions. Decision-making was supported by a (mantrimandala), comprising officials such as the (mantrimukhya), secretaries (saciva), and specialized roles like the minister for war and peace (sandhivigrahika), often filled by learned or experienced nobles selected for expertise rather than strictly hereditary lines. Paramardideva notably delegated substantial administrative duties to his Sallakshana, a of the Vashistha , whose counsel elevated the king's dominion, as detailed in the Baghari inscription of circa 1196 CE; other ministers included figures like Lahada and Pumsottama, who advised on policy and . Territorial administration relied on a feudal , with Jejakabhukti divided into provinces (visayas or mandalas) overseen by feudatories (samantas), typically loyal chiefs or royal kin responsible for local tax collection, , and military obligations to the sovereign. These subunits further fragmented into sub-districts (pattalas) and villages (gramas), managed by assemblies of elders and influencers, ensuring through land grants and temple endowments that reinforced the king's dharma-centric legitimacy. This system, while decentralized at the periphery, maintained royal oversight via itinerant officials and periodic assemblies, as inferred from Chandela inscriptional patterns.

Economic and Military Organization

The of Paramardi's in Jejakabhukti was predominantly agrarian, with derived from dues known as bhaga, alongside bhoga (produce taxes), kara (fines and taxes), hiranya (from treasures and mines), and sulka (customs tolls). Agricultural taxation targeted key crops and resources such as timber, , , , mangoes, and madhuka flowers, reflecting state control over forests, mines, and produce essential for sustaining both civilian and military needs. grants, often agrahara villages endowed with rights to temples, trees, mines, and grazing animals, were allocated to Brahmins for religious merit and to military officials like rautas for service, providing a mechanism for resource mobilization while reducing direct state through tax exemptions; these grants were ceremonially issued on auspicious occasions and upheld by successor rulers to ensure continuity. Military funding relied on these agrarian taxes and feudal obligations from samantas (vassals), supplemented by mineral wealth from regional mines, which supported fortifications like Kalanjara and Ajaygadh. Paramardi's forces comprised approximately 100,000 troops, including 20,000 , with standard components of , mounted units, and war elephants inferred from prior Chandela campaigns and the dynasty's defensive requirements against invasions. Leadership fell to senapatis (commanders) and rautas managing levies, but over-dependence on such feudal contingents—evident in alliances like those with Gahadavala forces under and Udal totaling 50,000—exposed vulnerabilities, as seen in the 1182 defeat by and the 1202 Ghurid conquest of Kalanjara amid , internal discord, and logistical strains like unreliable water supplies.
Revenue SourceDescriptionApplication
BhagaLand dues from agricultureCore funding for state and military
BhogaTaxes on produce (e.g., crops, timber)Supported levies and grants
Kara/Hiranya/SulkaFines, mine/toll revenuesBolstered defenses via resource extraction
This structure, while enabling mobilization for conflicts like the Chahamana invasion, proved unsustainable against more centralized adversaries, contributing to the kingdom's contraction post-1202.

Cultural and Architectural Legacy

Patronage of Temples and Inscriptions

Paramardi's religious patronage is primarily attested through copper-plate grants that endowed land and associated resources to Brahmins and temples, reflecting the Chandela dynasty's longstanding devotion to and . The Semra plates, issued during his reign circa 1165–1177 , record donations to 309 Brahmins specifying their gotras, , and shakhas, including tracts of land accompanied by temples, residential mansions, and rights over trees, mines, and other produce, thereby sustaining priestly communities and temple maintenance. Similarly, the Mahoba plates of circa 1173 (Vikrama Samvat 1230) document a incorporating a , mansion, and rights to sal trees, sugarcane, cotton fields, and mines, underscoring targeted support for religious institutions amid administrative continuity. These epigraphs, often inscribed in , not only enumerate the material donations but also invoke Paramardi's and royal lineage—tracing descent from lunar Kshatriyas via figures like and Chandratreya, with implicit ties to as a dynastic —as seen in the Batesvar inscription of circa 1195 . Such at sites like functioned dually as historical archives of benefactions and instruments of legitimation, extolling the king's generosity to counterbalance narratives of territorial losses. No surviving evidence points to direct sponsorship of Sanskrit literary works or court poets under Paramardi, though the grants align with 12th-century North Indian traditions of royal endowment to sustain Vedic scholarship and ritual practices. While these acts preserved Hindu institutional frameworks during a period of external incursions, including Chahamana and Ghurid pressures, the scale appears modest compared to earlier Chandela rulers, with inscriptions emphasizing administrative delegation—such as to Sallakshana in the Bagheri stone record—rather than expansive personal . ' focus on Brahminical recipients and temple-integrated lands highlights causal in devotional economies, prioritizing empirical sustenance over ideological innovation.

Fortifications and Regional Impact

Paramardi relied on the Chandela dynasty's established network of hill forts in Jejakabhukti, including those at , Kalinjar, and Ajaigarh, which were strategically positioned in rugged, elevated terrain to exploit natural defenses such as steep slopes and limited access points for prolonged resistance against invaders. , as the contemporary capital, featured fortified structures that withstood initial assaults but were ultimately sacked during the Chahamana invasion of 1182–1183 CE, prompting Paramardi's withdrawal to more defensible sites. These forts, constructed with massive stone walls and gateways adapted to the Vindhya region's , enabled Chandela forces under his command to mount effective counteroffensives, as seen in the prolonged defense at Kalinjar. At Kalinjar, Paramardi personally contributed to fortifications by overseeing the of the upper leading into the outer works, a structure designed to bolster during sieges, reflecting adaptations for and in his era (reigned c. 1165–1203 CE). This fort, elevated on a plateau with walls up to 30–35 meters high on 25–30 meter foundations, served as a refuge in 1182–1183 CE and withstood a Ghurid until its surrender in 1203 CE, when Qutb al-Din Aibak's forces overwhelmed the defenders after capturing adjacent territories. Ajaigarh, another key with similar hilltop design including gates, temples, and reservoirs, functioned as a secondary stronghold, its Van Durg (forest-type) layout emphasizing concealment and natural barriers for troop movements and supply lines. These defenses had mixed regional effects in Jejakabhukti, offering localized security that supported agricultural stability and internal trade routes amid recurring threats, yet the demands of maintenance and repeated mobilizations strained agrarian resources and labor during prolonged conflicts. Archaeological remnants, such as Kalinjar's intact walls and gateways, persist today, evidencing robust pre-invasion that facilitated resistance rather than signaling defensive neglect. The forts' utility in delaying Ghurid advances until 1203 CE underscores their role in preserving Chandela autonomy temporarily, though ultimate territorial losses disrupted regional cohesion.

Historiography and Legacy

Primary Sources and Inscriptions

The evidentiary foundation for Paramardi's reign derives primarily from epigraphic issued under Chandela , which enumerate land grants, genealogical assertions, and royal eulogies. The copper-plate inscription, dated to Vikrama Samvat 1230 (corresponding to 1173 ), attributes to Paramardi victories over regional adversaries and administrative benefactions, while the Pachar copper-plate of Vikrama Samvat 1233 (1176 ) similarly endowments and self-proclaimed martial feats. Additional plates from Semra (1165–1166 ), Ichhawar (1171 ), and further issues (1166–1167 and 1173 ) corroborate these patterns, offering dated evidence of territorial control in Jejakabhukti without reliance on later interpretations. Cross-verification appears in chronicles of Ghurid expansions, which detail campaigns culminating in the subjugation of Chandela holdings around 1202–1203 CE, including the sack of and Kalinjar; these accounts, such as those in Minhaj-i-Siraj's , emphasize logistical conquests over ideological motives, aligning temporally with Chandela records of defensive retreats but diverging in ascriptions of agency to Ghurid commanders like Qutb al-Din Aibak. Such external texts, rooted in contemporary administrative , provide causal anchors for the dynasty's terminal phase, though their focus on victors introduces selective omissions of Chandela resilience. Literary sources like the reference Paramardi's encounters with Chahamana forces circa 1182–1183 CE, portraying sacking of amid heroic hyperbole; however, as a bardic epic composed post-events, it embeds poetic embellishments—such as supernatural archery and unverified alliances—that demand scrutiny for factual distortion, prioritizing narrative glorification over empirical sequence. Archaeological traces at sites like Ajaygarh and Mahoba yield inscribed slabs affirming Paramardi's oversight of fortifications and grants, sustaining dynastic continuity from prior Chandela phases without direct temple dedications under his rule; Khajuraho's structural corpus, while predating him (peaking 950–1050 CE), hosts ancillary epigraphs linking to Jejakabhukti's administrative sphere, underscoring material persistence amid political flux. These artifacts, verifiable through inscriptional paleography, resist interpretive overreach by anchoring claims to datable stone and metal media.

Debates on Decline and Resistance

Scholars attribute the Chandela dynasty's accelerated decline under Paramardi (r. ca. 1165–1203 ) partly to internal disunity among Hindu kingdoms, which precluded coordinated resistance to Ghurid advances. Prior conflicts, including Paramardi's 1182 defeat by Chahamana ruler Prithviraj III, drained resources and exemplified feuds that fragmented defenses across northern , enabling invaders to exploit divisions rather than confront unified opposition. Dr. Ray posits that alliances with dynasties like the Gahadavalas—hindered by evidenced hostilities with Jayacandra—might have altered outcomes, though no records substantiate such cooperation, underscoring chronic rivalries as a causal factor paralleling failures in regions like and . Military historians highlight technological and organizational gaps between Indian forces and Turkic invaders as amplifying vulnerabilities, debunking overreliance on narratives of innate valor without tactical adaptation. Turkic armies leveraged swift , composite bows for ranged , and structured reserves to outmaneuver elephant-dependent hosts, which panicked under arrow barrages and lacked mobility for pursuit. V.A. Smith describes Turkish advance guards testing enemy lines before reserves exploited breaches, a method contrasting feudal loyalties to chiefs over centralized command, resulting in disorganized retreats. Dr. Habibullah and link Paramardi's 1202 CE surrender to Qutb al-Din Aibak to these disparities compounded by waning martial spirit, evidenced in contemporary accounts like Hasan Nizami's Taj al-Ma'athir. Criticisms of administrative inertia under Paramardi include internal court divisions—such as oppositions from minister Ajay Deva and warriors Alha-Udal—and resource diversion from fortifications to , fostering perceptions of overextension despite decades of relative post-1182 . Dr. N.S. , drawing on inscriptions, critiques weak for eroding fighting capacity, while H.C. balances this against Ghurid numerical superiority, arguing structural limited scalability but did not preclude effective localized resistance. Perspectives emphasizing cultural frame Paramardi's prolonged hold on Jejakabhukti amid expansionist pressures as valorous defiance, prioritizing empirical defensive longevity over deterministic narratives that normalize foreign dominance as "."

References

  1. [1]
    Paramardi: 1 definition
    Oct 24, 2024 · Paramardi or Paramardideva (r. 1165-1203 AD) is the name of an ancient king from the Chandela dynasty, as mentioned in the “Tehri plate of Chandella ...
  2. [2]
    Parmal - Rulers of Chandela Dynasty - Ancient India History Notes
    Paramardi (reigned 1165-1203 CE) or Parmal was a king of central India's Chandela dynasty. He ruled the Jejakabhukti region (Bundelkhand in present-day ...
  3. [3]
    [PDF] History Of The Candellas Of Jejakabhukti
    ... Paramardi states,. “From the eye-lotus of Atri was born the god. 1. (who is) ... king. He will possess the philosopher's stone, and will turn iron into.
  4. [4]
    Paramardideva, Paramardi-deva: 1 definition
    Oct 24, 2024 · Paramardideva or Paramardi (r. 1165-1203 AD) is the name of an ancient king from the Chandela dynasty, as mentioned in the “Tehri plate of Chandella ...
  5. [5]
    Chandela Dynasty (10th to 13th Century) - Ancient India History Notes
    King Paramardi or Parmal of the Chandela dynasty of central India ruled from approximately 1165 until 1203 CE. · He controlled the Jejakabhukti territory ( ...
  6. [6]
    Madanavarman, Madana-varman: 1 definition
    Oct 24, 2024 · Madanavarman (r. 1128–1165 A.D.) is the name of an ancient king from the Chandela dynasty, as mentioned in the “Tehri plate of Chandella<|control11|><|separator|>
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Prithviraj Chauhan - ClearIAS
    Sep 7, 2022 · Madanpur inscriptions of 1182 CE: Inscription 1: Mentions that Prithviraj invaded the territory of the Chandela ruler Paramardi; Inscription ...
  9. [9]
    The Great Prithviraj Chauhan - Eduindex News
    Jun 29, 2021 · Prithviraj's victory against the Chandelas increased the number of his enemies and also forced the Chandelas to join forces with the Gahadavalas ...
  10. [10]
    The North Indian Kingdoms – The Rajputs - BYJU'S
    Paramardi the last independent Chandella ruler was defeated by Qutb-ud-din Aibak ... The reign of the Paramaras came to an end with the invasion of Ala-ud-din ...
  11. [11]
    muhammad ghori relations with the solankis of gujarat and ...
    ... Paramardi Deva, the Chandellas ruler of Bundelkhand. They offered resistance on the battle field but on being defeated were compelled to take refuge in the fort ...
  12. [12]
  13. [13]
    Invasion of Qutub-ud-din Aibak - IndiaNetzone
    Scholars are of the view that after the battle Muslims plundered the treasury of the fort. About 50,000 Hindus were made slaves. Many temples ware broken and ...
  14. [14]
    Full text of "Political Institutions And Administration Of Northern India ...
    The Baghari stone inscription graphically states how through the advice of the minister Sallakshana, the king Paramadideva became as it were the lord of the ...
  15. [15]
    [PDF] Chandella kingdom: The builder and patrons
    Several inscriptions tell his tales of military conquests. He engaged ... In this battle thirty Chandella soldiers were killed and seventeen injured.
  16. [16]
    Chandela | Rajput Dynasty, Jejakabhukti, Bundelkhand, & Khajuraho
    The Kandariya Mahadeva Temple stands as the pinnacle of Chandela architectural achievement. Spanning more than 102 feet (31 meters) in length and crowned with ...
  17. [17]
    Chandela Dynasty - Madhya Pradesh Tourism
    The outstanding contribution of the Chandelas was to build the famous temples of Khajuraho between the mid-10th and mid-11th centuries.
  18. [18]
    Political And Cultural Antecedents Of The Medieval Fort Of Kalinjar
    According to a Chandela ... Abul Fazl while mentioning the expedition was probably hinting towards the informal 'accession' (i.e. 1530 and not 1531).
  19. [19]
    Short History of Kalinjar Fort
    The upper gate, leading into the outwork, is attributed to Raja Parmal, or Paramardi Deva, who reigned from A.D. 1167 to 1203. There are several inscriptions, ...
  20. [20]
    Fort of Kalinjar And Its Medieval Structures - Kalinjar Fort Research
    Built on strong 25-30 metre wide foundations, this Chandela fort has a height of around 30-25 metre with a summit which is 8 metres wide. It has a length of 7.5 ...Missing: Paramardi | Show results with:Paramardi
  21. [21]
    Siege of Kalinjar | Military Wiki - Fandom
    Qutb-uddin Aibak led his expedition towards Kalinjar in 1202–1203. He defeated Chandela forces and occupied Kalinjar. Paramardi surrendered and promised to pay ...
  22. [22]
    Ajaygarh Fort - Kalinjar Fort Research
    Ajaygarh Fort, built by the Chandela dynasty, is on a hilltop with two temples, two tanks, and requires climbing 500 steps. It has two remaining gates.
  23. [23]
    [PDF] defensive ideal van durg, hindu ajaigarh fort of chandela dynasty on ...
    The fort is located on a forested steep hill KedarParvat raised about 240 metres high from the surrounding plains. It was occupied by. Chandela kings in 9th ...Missing: Paramardi | Show results with:Paramardi<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    THE MEDIEVAL FORT OF KALINJAR AND ITS HISTORY - jstor
    According to a Chandela inscription this place was known as "the dwelling ... Grant-inscription of Viravarman, the successor of Trailokyavarman, dated.<|separator|>
  25. [25]
    [PDF] 84833
    Mar 21, 2001 · Mahoba Copper Plate Inscription of. Paramardideva: (Vikrama) Year 1230. Pachhar Copper Plate Inscription of. Paramardideva: (Vikrama) Year 1233.Missing: Paramardi Chandela primary
  26. [26]
    Literary trajectories of the historic king (Chapter 2) - The Last Hindu ...
    Dec 5, 2015 · Prithviraj misses his target, in other words, and is manifestly not the phenomenal archer that the Rāso represents him to be. The bard Chand ...
  27. [27]
    Ghurid Campaigns on the Indian Subcontinent - Study Buddhism
    The Ghurid campaign on the Indian subcontinent, then, was not, in fact, a holy war to convert infidels, but basically a drive to conquer territory, both Muslim ...
  28. [28]
    Causes of the Success of the Turks Against the Rajput
    (3) Lack of political insight: Even a series of Muslim invasions did not produce a single Rajput ruler with political insight to visualize as to what would ...