Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Pillarbox

A pillarbox is a visual formatting technique in and film that displays content with a narrower , such as 4:3, on a wider screen format like 16:9 by adding vertical bars—or "pillars"—on the left and right sides to maintain the original image proportions without distortion. This method ensures the full height of the image is utilized while filling the unused horizontal space with solid , preventing stretching or cropping that could alter the intended composition. Pillarboxing became particularly relevant with the transition from (SDTV) to (HDTV) in the late 1990s and early 2000s, as broadcasters and viewers adapted legacy 4:3 content for modern 16:9 displays. Unlike the more prevalent letterboxing, which adds horizontal black bars at the top and bottom for wider content on narrower screens, pillarboxing addresses the inverse scenario and is less common due to the dominance of formats in contemporary media. Common examples include viewing older television programs, commercials, or portrait-oriented videos on TVs, where the black bars frame the centered image to avoid visual artifacts. In practice, pillarboxing is often automatic in compatible display devices, though users may encounter options to override it via or stretch modes, which can introduce if the is not preserved. This technique underscores broader challenges in conversion across media platforms, influencing everything from home entertainment systems to streaming services, where maintaining artistic integrity remains a key consideration for content creators and engineers.

Fundamentals

Definition

Pillarboxing refers to the addition of black vertical bars, also known as mattes or masking, on the left and right sides of a video image to accommodate the unused portions of a wider screen while preserving the original . These bars create a visual effect resembling pillars framing the content, ensuring the image remains undistorted and true to its intended proportions. In common usage, pillarboxing is also termed "sidebars" or "vertical letterboxing," particularly in broadcasting and video production contexts where aspect ratio mismatches occur. This technique is employed when narrower content is displayed on broader screens, such as presenting a 4:3 aspect ratio image on a 16:9 screen, resulting in black bars that fill the extra horizontal space to avoid stretching or cropping the video. The underlying cause stems from differences in aspect ratios between source material and display devices.

Causes and Aspect Ratios

The of an image or video frame is defined as the proportional relationship between its width and height, typically expressed in the format width:height, such as 4:3, which indicates 4 units of width for every 3 units of height. This ratio determines the shape of the content and is crucial for maintaining visual integrity across different display formats. Pillarboxing primarily arises from an aspect ratio mismatch where the source content has a narrower —meaning it is taller relative to its width—than the target . For instance, legacy content in 4:3 (equivalent to 1.33:1) displayed on a modern 16:9 (1.78:1) screen results in vertical black bars on either side to accommodate the difference without distortion. Similarly, flat films at 1.85:1, common in theatrical releases, can trigger pillarboxing when shown on ultra- displays like 2.39:1 (also known as or ), as the source is relatively narrower. These mismatches are standard in and , where 4:3 remains prevalent in older archives and 16:9 dominates per ATSC and ITU guidelines. The mathematical basis for pillarboxing involves the source content to match the display's height while preserving its original proportions, then adding bars to fill the remaining horizontal space. Assuming the display height h_d and source r_s = \frac{w_s}{h_s}, the scaled source width is w_s' = h_d \times r_s, and each pillarbox bar width is b = \frac{w_d - w_s'}{2}, where w_d is the display width. For a 4:3 source (r_s = \frac{4}{3} \approx 1.333) on a 16:9 display (r_d = \frac{16}{9} \approx 1.778, so w_d = h_d \times 1.778), substitute to get w_s' = h_d \times 1.333, w_d - w_s' = h_d \times (1.778 - 1.333) = h_d \times 0.445, and b = \frac{h_d \times 0.445}{2} \approx 0.2225 h_d. To arrive at the , normalize by display width: each bar occupies approximately \frac{0.2225 h_d}{1.778 h_d} \approx 12.5\% of the total width, derived from the ratio \frac{1 - r_s / r_d}{2} = \frac{1 - 1.333 / 1.778}{2} \approx 0.125. This ensures the original framing is undistorted. Unlike , which warps the image by forcing it to fill the and altering proportions, or cropping, which removes portions of the and potentially loses key visual elements, pillarboxing preserves the source's intended composition by embedding it intact within the wider . This method aligns with industry standards for non-destructive adaptation, prioritizing in professional video systems.

Technical Aspects

Implementation in Video Systems

In video signal processing, pillarboxing is achieved through the application of mattes or during format conversion in the encoding , where black bars are added to the left and right sides of the active picture area to fit narrower (such as 4:3) into a wider (such as 16:9) without , cropping, or loss of original data. This process preserves the integrity of the active video region by scaling the input proportionally and filling the excess horizontal space with solid black pixels, typically encoded as RGB (0,0,0) for maximum and neutrality. Standards such as ATSC A/53 and incorporate pillarboxing via Active Format Description () metadata, a 4-bit code embedded in the MPEG video stream or SDI signal to indicate the and position of the active picture, enabling downstream devices to apply precise matting. For instance, value 1001 (decimal 9) specifies a 4:3 active image pillarboxed and centered within a 16:9 coded frame, while complementary bar_data() provides exact pixel counts for left and right bars to define their boundaries. HDMI supports related signaling through Auxiliary Video Information () InfoFrames, which convey the picture and active format, allowing receivers to implement pillarboxing during decoding and display. In software encoding tools, pillarboxing is automated during aspect ratio conversion; for example, FFmpeg's pad filter computes bar positions dynamically—such as x=(output_width - input_width)/2 for centering—and appends black padding to the frame edges without re-encoding the core video if possible. similarly applies pillarboxing via sequence settings or export presets, where importing 4:3 footage into a 16:9 timeline requires manual scaling (e.g., to 75%) to add side padding and maintain the source proportions, with options to adjust bar color and opacity for custom workflows. Hardware implementations rely on GPUs and dedicated video decoders for pillarboxing, where the decoded is scaled to the target resolution and bars are rendered by filling side regions with uniform black pixels through shader-based calculations, ensuring low-latency output for broadcast or playback. These components, often integrated in systems compliant with ATSC or , position bars symmetrically (e.g., via offset formulas like (frame_width - active_width)/2) to align with signals, minimizing processing overhead. Quality considerations in pillarboxing emphasize uniform bar rendering to prevent artifacts, such as edge bleeding from compression mismatches or inconsistent black levels, which can degrade perceived sharpness; best practices involve using exact RGB (0,0,0) values and verifying bar uniformity in the encoded output to ensure non-intrusive integration with the active picture.

Display and Broadcasting Methods

In broadcast transmission, pillarboxing is facilitated through aspect ratio signaling embedded in the video signal to guide receivers on proper display formatting. For , Wide Screen Signalling (WSS) embeds digital metadata in the invisible lines of the signal, typically lines 20 and 283 in 625-line systems, to indicate the content's , such as 4:3 or 16:9, allowing 16:9 displays to add pillarbox bars for 4:3 material without distortion. In digital broadcasting standards like ATSC and , active format description () or similar metadata in the specifies the and positioning, instructing decoders to apply pillarboxing when embedding standard-definition () 4:3 content within high-definition () 16:9 frames, ensuring preservation of the original proportions during multi-format transmissions. Consumer displays, such as televisions and monitors, automatically detect and apply pillarboxing based on the signaled to maintain integrity. Modern LCD and TVs parse incoming from , ATSC tuners, or set-top boxes to center 4:3 content within a 16:9 frame, adding uniform black bars on the left and right sides; for instance, a 4:3 on a 1920x1080 display results in 240-pixel-wide bars per side. Users can select modes like "original" or "4:3" to enforce pillarboxing, contrasting with or "full" modes that or stretch the , potentially introducing . In streaming and modern media platforms, pillarboxing is triggered via embedded in video containers like MP4 or HLS streams. Services such as encode information in the video , directing compatible to add pillarbox bars for 4:3 , even when upscaled to resolutions; during upscaling, the bars scale proportionally with the image to fill the wider frame without altering the active picture area. Similarly, uses SEI (Supplemental Enhancement Information) messages in H.264/H.265 streams to signal s, enabling automatic pillarboxing on devices for older uploads. Challenges in pillarboxing arise from display technology differences and broadcast formats. Older CRT displays render pillarbox bars with true black levels due to their inherent light emission control, appearing deeper and less distracting compared to LCD panels, where backlight bleed can make bars appear grayish and reduce contrast in dark scenes. OLEDs mitigate this with per-pixel lighting for near-perfect blacks, but inconsistencies persist in multi-format broadcasts, such as embedding SD 4:3 signals in HD 16:9 slots without proper AFD, leading to unintended cropping or mismatched bars across devices. User adjustments for pillarboxing are available in set-top boxes and smart TVs through picture settings menus, often under "" or "screen fit" options, allowing selection of pillarbox-preserving modes like "pan scan" avoidance or "just scan." Disabling pillarboxing by choosing "stretch" or "wide" modes fills the screen but horizontally distorts the image, stretching circular objects into ovals and altering artistic compositions, which broadcasters and standards bodies discourage to preserve content intent.

History

Origins in Early Film and Television

The standard aspect ratio for silent era films, established around 1892, was 1.33:1 (commonly expressed as ), derived from the dimensions of where each utilized four perforations vertically. This ratio became the norm for early , including productions through the , as it provided a balanced for without the need for side matting techniques like pillarboxing. However, experimental formats began emerging in the late , such as Henri Chrétien's anamorphic lens system tested in short films, which introduced wider ratios like 1.66:1 or greater, foreshadowing future display mismatches but not yet requiring pillarboxing on standard screens. Television standards in the mid-20th century further entrenched the 4:3 ratio as the baseline. The system, adopted by the FCC in 1941 for U.S. broadcasts, specified a 4:3 to align with existing film practices, enabling seamless adaptation of cinematic content to home viewing. Similarly, Europe's PAL standard, developed in the early and first broadcast in 1967, locked in 4:3 for 625-line analog transmissions, creating a global foundation for television that would later highlight incompatibilities with evolving formats. The initial display mismatches appeared in the when theatrical films, such as those using with a 2.35:1 ratio, were adapted for 4:3 broadcasts, often resulting in letterboxing rather than pillarboxing. This inverse scenario—wider content on narrower displays—highlighted the growing divergence between cinema and TV aspect ratios, but the specific need for pillarboxing emerged only as shifted toward . A pivotal development occurred in the with Europe's introduction of enhanced 16:9 broadcasts; the HD-MAC system, proposed in under the 95 project, transmitted high-definition signals at 1250 lines and 16:9, necessitating pillarboxing for legacy 4:3 programming to preserve original compositions without distortion. Early demonstrations in this era often met with viewer resistance, as unfamiliar "black bars" on the sides of 4:3 content prompted complaints about wasted screen space and perceived quality loss, fueling debates over format in analog .

Evolution with Widescreen Adoption

The transition to formats in the marked a pivotal shift in television standards, driven by the push for (HDTV). In 1995, the Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) released Recommended Practice RP 187, which specified guidelines for signaling, including support for 16:9 , to accommodate emerging HDTV systems and ensure with legacy content. This standard facilitated the integration of 16:9 into broadcast equipment, leading to widespread pillarboxing of 4:3 programming on early displays as broadcasters and manufacturers prepared for HDTV rollout. Concurrently, the European Union's 16:9 Action Plan, initiated in the early , accelerated adoption across by subsidizing production and transmission equipment, making pillarboxing a common sight for standard-definition content on new televisions. The saw pillarboxing standardized further through global digital transitions, particularly as analog signals were phased out in favor of digital formats optimized for 16:9. In the , the analog-to-digital switch culminated on June 12, 2009, when full-power stations ceased analog broadcasts and transitioned exclusively to (DTV), embedding 16:9 as the default for HD content and necessitating pillarboxing for remaining 4:3 material to preserve image integrity. This shift not only modernized but also entrenched pillarboxing in broadcast workflows, as digital compression and transmission favored widescreen natives. Globally, these changes amplified pillarboxing's role, though adoption timelines varied: embraced 16:9 for both standard- and high-definition broadcasts by the late 1990s, with widespread widescreen SD programming, while the lagged, maintaining predominant 4:3 analog until HDTV penetration surged around 2007-2009, resulting in a sharper increase in pillarboxed legacy content on new sets. The rise of streaming services in the further solidified pillarboxing as a norm for handling archival and non- content. Platforms like , launched in 2007 and expanding offerings by the mid-, routinely applied pillarboxing to older 4:3 television shows and films to fit 16:9 displays without distortion, ensuring faithful reproduction of classic programming amid growing libraries of legacy media. Similarly, Netflix's expansion during this decade emphasized 16:9 delivery, using pillarboxing for pre- content to maintain artistic intent, which became a standard practice across video as user bases shifted to devices. This era's model, unburdened by analog constraints, made pillarboxing ubiquitous for preserving aspect ratios in vast catalogs of historical footage. By the 2020s, up to 2025, pillarboxing's evolution has stabilized with 16:9's unchallenged dominance in consumer displays and broadcasts, yielding minimal structural changes to its application. However, occasional pillarboxing persists for ultra-narrow formats, such as IMAX's 1.43:1 in select releases or streaming versions of theatrical films, where the taller image requires side bars on standard 16:9 screens to avoid cropping vertical details. This niche use underscores pillarboxing's ongoing utility in adapting specialized cinematic formats to home viewing environments.

Applications and Uses

Standard Aspect Ratio Preservation

Pillarboxing primarily functions to maintain the original of video content when displayed on screens with a wider format, such as converting 4:3 standard-definition material to 16:9 high-definition without altering the image's proportions. This technique involves adding vertical black bars, or "pillars," to the left and right edges of the frame, ensuring the active picture remains undistorted and complete. By avoiding horizontal stretching, which would elongate objects unnaturally and introduce geometric , or cropping, which eliminates portions of the intended , pillarboxing safeguards the integrity of the source material during format adaptation. The benefits of pillarboxing extend to preserving the director's original , as it retains the precise framing and visual balance established during , preventing the loss of contextual elements like background details or character positioning. This approach also minimizes visual artifacts, such as edge blurring or inconsistent scaling that can arise from forced fits, while maintaining accurate color reproduction and contrast levels solely within the active image area—the black bars themselves do not interfere with the picture's or . In archival contexts, pillarboxing is preferred over alternatives like pan-and-scan, which repurpose content by shifting the frame and potentially omitting key information, thereby upholding the ethical standard of to . Common scenarios for pillarboxing include the presentation of legacy programs, such as sitcoms originally produced in 4:3, on modern 16:9 streaming platforms, where the bars ensure the nostalgic, authentic viewing experience without modification. Similarly, European PAL-standard content, typically in 4:3, is often pillarboxed when adapted for U.S. NTSC-derived systems to accommodate mismatches without compromising the original broadcast framing. guidelines reinforce this practice; for instance, SMPTE 199 outlines methods for mapping images to high-definition signals while preserving aspect ratios through techniques like pillarboxing for narrower content, and the International Association of Sound and Audiovisual Archives (IASA), in alignment with EBU standards, recommends pillarboxing as the default for upconverting 4:3 video to 16:9 masters in preservation workflows. From a viewer , pillarboxing conveys an "authentic" by visually indicating the content's original , which helps sustain and reduces cognitive disruption compared to distorted alternatives that can break the flow or alter emotional impact. This signaling aligns with professional standards prioritizing unaltered reproduction, fostering trust in the medium's reliability for historical or artistic accuracy.

Stylized and Creative Applications

In television production, stylized pillarboxing has been employed to enhance aesthetic framing, particularly for integrating 4:3 content into broadcasts. For instance, early seasons of , originally produced in 4:3, are often presented with pillarboxing on modern 16:9 channels to preserve the original composition. Similarly, news broadcasts use pillarboxing for 4:3 archival inserts. In film and , directors intentionally adopt narrow aspect ratios such as 4:3 or even squarer formats like 1.19:1 to evoke claustrophobic effects, resulting in pillarboxing when displayed on formats. ' The Lighthouse (2019) exemplifies this, shot in a nearly square 1.19:1 to heighten isolation and tension in its confined seaside setting, creating a sense of entrapment amplified by the side bars on 16:9 screens. This approach contrasts with norms, drawing on the 4:3 's historical association with vintage or intimate storytelling to foster unease in horror genres. Broadcasters have evolved pillarboxing beyond black mattes by incorporating colored or patterned bars for channel identity, transforming potential "dead space" into branded elements. This practice stems from widescreen guidelines, where side bars serve as canvases for subtle animations or color schemes aligned with programming themes. Debates surrounding pillarboxing in the 2020s center on its perceived waste of screen real estate versus its role as a deliberate creative tool, particularly in vertical-to-horizontal adaptations like TikTok-to-TV content. Critics argue that side bars underutilize display area, potentially reducing immersion on large screens, as noted in discussions of aspect ratio mismatches in high-definition broadcasting. Proponents, however, highlight its necessity for artistic integrity, enabling formats like 4:3 revivals in films such as Zack Snyder's Justice League (2021), where the ratio conveys a mythic, enclosed scale without distortion. These tensions reflect broader trends in multi-platform media, balancing technical constraints with expressive choices.

Comparison with Letterboxing

Letterboxing refers to the addition of horizontal black bars at the top and bottom of a to accommodate content with a wider than the screen's native ratio, such as presenting 2.39:1 cinematic films on a 16:9 television without distortion. In contrast, pillarboxing adds vertical black bars on the left and right sides to fit narrower content onto a wider screen, preserving the original proportions of sources like 4:3 standard-definition video on 16:9 high-definition . Both techniques maintain the source material's by matting unused screen areas with black, but they differ fundamentally in orientation: letterboxing addresses horizontal expansion needs, while pillarboxing handles vertical contraction, resulting in varied impacts on available screen real estate—pillarboxing reduces horizontal space but retains full vertical height, whereas letterboxing does the opposite. Pillarboxing is commonly applied when upconverting standard-definition 4:3 content to high-definition 16:9 broadcasts, such as archival television material aired on modern networks, ensuring compatibility without cropping or stretching. Letterboxing, conversely, is prevalent in and television adaptations of films, like 1.85:1 or 2.39:1 movies formatted for 16:9 or older 4:3 screens, and both methods can combine in scenarios involving multiple conversions, such as embedding 4:3 pillarboxed content within a letterboxed frame. These approaches prioritize fidelity to the original composition over maximizing screen usage, though pillarboxing may enhance vertical visibility for portrait-oriented elements at the cost of side margins, while letterboxing can emphasize horizontal depth but limit vertical framing. Both pillarboxing and letterboxing emerged from the historical shift in aspect ratios during the transition from 4:3 standards, established in the , to 16:9 formats in the 1990s and 2000s, driven by cinematic innovations like anamorphic lenses in the that widened ratios to compete with . Letterboxing gained prominence earlier in due to the prevalence of widescreen films requiring adaptation to standard TV screens, whereas pillarboxing became more relevant with the widespread adoption of 16:9 high-definition around 2007, reflecting the need to integrate legacy 4:3 content into newer systems.

Windowboxing and Other Matting Techniques

Windowboxing is a video matting technique that combines elements of both pillarboxing and letterboxing, resulting in black bars added to all four sides of the display screen to preserve the original of content when there is an extreme mismatch between the source material and the viewing device. This approach creates a smaller, "windowed" within the frame, often occurring when square or near-square content, such as 1:1 videos, is displayed on much wider screens like 16:9 or 2.39:1 formats. For instance, displaying 4:3 archival footage on a modern ultrawide screen may require windowboxing to avoid while maintaining the full original . Other matting alternatives to pillarboxing include pan-and-scan, which involves cropping and dynamically panning across portions of the image to fill a narrower without adding bars, thereby maximizing screen usage but sacrificing peripheral —up to 52% of the frame in some cases. , another method, non-uniformly scales the image to fit the , eliminating bars entirely but distorting proportions, such as making characters appear unnaturally tall or wide, which undermines visual fidelity. Active resizing, often powered by content-aware algorithms, automates adjustments like intelligent cropping or to adapt videos in real-time, minimizing loss of key elements without fixed bars or distortion; this technique draws from early research in video retargeting to optimize for varying displays. Windowboxing is employed infrequently, primarily in archival restorations of classic films where preserving the exact original framing is paramount, or in early DVD players that mishandled anamorphic encoding, leading to unintended four-sided matting. Its advantages lie in complete fidelity to the source material, ensuring no content is cropped or altered, unlike pan-and-scan or ; however, it drastically reduces the visible image area—sometimes by over 40%—making it less viewer-friendly than pillarboxing, which only adds vertical bars and intrudes minimally on screen real estate. With the widespread standardization of 16:9 aspect ratios in and streaming since the , windowboxing and similar hybrid techniques are declining in relevance for mainstream use, though they persist in niche scenarios like adapting square videos (e.g., 1:1 content) for cinema projections or multi-format live events.

References

  1. [1]
    Definition of pillarbox | PCMag
    The display of a standard TV image on a wide screen. For example, to show a standard TV program with a 4:3 aspect ratio on a high definition TV set with a 16:9 ...
  2. [2]
    Pillarbox format - Oxford Reference
    Pillarboxing is less common than letterboxing but may be used when 4 x 3 pictures are shown on widescreens such as the 16:9 television format.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
  3. [3]
    Understanding Aspect Ratio
    ### Summary of Pillarboxing Section
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Automatic Letter/Pillarbox Detection for Optimized Display of Digital TV
    Abstract: In this paper we propose a method for the automatic detection of the true aspect ratio of digital video, by detecting the presence and width of ...
  5. [5]
    History - Widescreen.org
    Similarly, if the source material is narrower than the TV, such as showing an older 4:3 TV show or movie (like The Wizard of Oz) on a 16:9 screen, "pillarboxing ...
  6. [6]
    The importance of aspect ratio in modern filmmaking - Adobe
    Aspect ratio describes the relationship of an image's width to its height. This relationship matters because it determines how much space surrounds the subject ...
  7. [7]
    Picture Aspect Ratio - Win32 apps - Microsoft Learn
    May 9, 2023 · Crop the image. Stretching the image to fit the display area is almost always wrong, because it does not preserve the correct picture aspect ...
  8. [8]
    Using AFD to Resolve Aspect Ratio Discrepancy - TVTechnology
    Jul 11, 2006 · For the straight letterbox or pillarbox cases, if the display is aware of the active area it may take steps to mitigate the effects of uneven ...Missing: mismatch | Show results with:mismatch<|control11|><|separator|>
  9. [9]
    asr technical specifications - Awards Submissions - Oscars.org
    Accepted Aspect Ratios: · Flat (1998 × 1080 or 3996 × 2160), = 1.85:1 · Scope (2048 × 858 or 4096 × 1716), ≈ 2.39:1 · HDTV (1920 × 1080 or 3840 × 2160), = 16:9, ≈ ...
  10. [10]
    Pillarbox - Ross Video
    Black bars are added to the right and left of a 4:3 image to display correctly in a 16:9 video format. Figure 1. 4:3 to 16:9 Pillarbox Aspect Ratio Conversion.
  11. [11]
  12. [12]
    Filling black borders in Fullscreen mode - VideoHelp Forum
    Nov 27, 2020 · Black0 (RGB: 0, 0, 0) offers the best contrast ratio vs the frame and is the default option in current video players. However it should be noted ...
  13. [13]
    [PDF] ATSC Digital Television Standard: Part 4 – MPEG-2 Video System ...
    Aug 7, 2009 · The combination of source aspect ratio and active_format allows the decoder to identify whether the “area of interest” is the whole of the frame ...
  14. [14]
    Active Format Description - AFD Insertion - Telestream
    AFD is a standard set of codes that indicate both the aspect ratio of the stream and the active portion (letter box, pillar box) of the image.
  15. [15]
    [PDF] 3G/HD/SD SDI to HDMI Converter User Guide - Ensemble Designs
    Converting formats of unequal ratios is done by letterboxing (horizontal bars) or pillar boxing (vertical pillars) in order to keep the original format's aspect ...<|separator|>
  16. [16]
    [PDF] 625-Line television Wide Screen Signalling (WSS) - ETSI
    The wide screen signalling information contains information on the aspect ratio range of the transmitted signal and its position, on the position of the ...
  17. [17]
    Sisvel's Widescreen Signaling (WSS): Optimize TV Viewing
    Widescreen Signaling (WSS) describes the system and the signal that can be used by television receivers for identifying the image format of an analogue ...
  18. [18]
    [PDF] ATSC Standard A/72 Part 1
    [13] Digital TV Group: “Digital Receiver Implementation Guidelines and Recommended. Receiver Reaction to Aspect Ratio Signaling in Digital Video Broadcasting, ...
  19. [19]
    DTV Aspect Ratio Signaling | TV Tech - TVTechnology
    Oct 2, 2001 · AFD provides for a 4-bit field describing the active aspect ratio format. The formats supported by AFD include some that we would find useful in ...Missing: HDMI | Show results with:HDMI
  20. [20]
    Understanding Aspect Ratio - Crutchfield
    the image is "pillar-boxed." 4:3 image stretched to ...
  21. [21]
    What's TV aspect ratio? - Xfinity Support
    An example of Pillarbox aspect. It is an image with vertical black bars on both. The TV Box is showing a 4:3 square picture, but the TV is showing a 16 ...
  22. [22]
    Best Practices: Archival Aspect Ratio Workflow
    Netflix does not have any creative constraints on aspect ratio, but technical errors should be resolved. This article provides best practices for identifying ...Missing: YouTube | Show results with:YouTube
  23. [23]
    Suspicious-Display-Aspect-Ratio - Netflix | Partner Help Center
    The resulting encoded video will have excessive pillarboxing. Example of a suspicious display aspect ratio: 0.46; significant difference from closest standard ...Missing: YouTube metadata
  24. [24]
    (PDF) The comparison between the CRT monitor with 3 new types of ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · The mechanisms that create light within each suggest that OLED screens should be able to show the color black, while LCD screens may not.
  25. [25]
    [PDF] SD > HD Conversion - Telestream
    1080i/p and 720p HD formats can be easily translated into SD formats supported by FlipFactory, with excellent visual quality and clarity.
  26. [26]
    I'm a Certified Calibrator and These 5 Pro Tips Instantly Make Any ...
    If your TV has a distorted image, strange colors, or that annoying "soap opera effect," here are the quick fixes I recommend trying first.
  27. [27]
    A Brief History of Aspect Ratios, aka Screen Proportions
    Feb 20, 2018 · Original silent film format (1892).Aspect ratio: 4:3 (1.33) ... standard 35mm film, and then re-expanding it when projected. Example ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  28. [28]
    Widescreen Museum Introduction to the history of wide screen cinema
    Experiments with 56mm, 65mm, 70mm and other film widths were done throughout the late 1920s and early 1930s. A few films were produced in these larger formats ...
  29. [29]
    A History of Widescreen and Wide-Film Projection Processes
    Feb 9, 2010 · Grandeur was one of a number of widescreen processes developed by the major studios in the late 1920s and early 30s. The Great Depression and ...
  30. [30]
    NTSC Television Broadcasting System - Telecomponents
    Other standards in the final recommendation were an aspect ratio of 4:3, and frequency modulation (FM) for the sound signal (which was quite new at the time).
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Enhanced 4:3 aspect ratio television systems - ITU
    The term enhanced television designates a number of different improvements applicable to 525/60 and 625/50 television systems, providing an aspect ratio of 4:3 ...
  32. [32]
    [PDF] COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES - EUR-Lex
    Jul 9, 1991 · HD-MAC standard, operators shall redistribute these programmes also in the 16 : 9 aspect ratio format and the D2-MAC or HD-MAC standard.
  33. [33]
    'High Definition' Has Evolved a Lot in 100 Years - 8K Association
    Mar 26, 2025 · In 1986, the HD-MAC system was proposed, but the displays of the time limited the quality of the image and a decision was made to abandon the ...
  34. [34]
    Square and Non-Square Pixels - Lurker's Guide - lurkertech.com
    In 1995, SMPTE created RP 187, "Center, Aspect Ratio, and Blanking of Video Images," to address exactly that problem. Unfortunately, instead of recommending the ...
  35. [35]
    What is 16:9 Aspect Ratio? Definition & Examples - Boords
    Mar 3, 2024 · The 16:9 aspect ratio describes a width of 16 units and a height of 9 units. Depending on the device, you can measure a unit in pixels, inches, or millimeters.
  36. [36]
    Is It Time to Stop Leading With 16:9? - Just Video Walls
    During the 1990s, the European Union's 16:9 Action Plan played a pivotal role in propelling the widescreen ratio into the television mainstream. Following the ...
  37. [37]
    Digital Television - Federal Communications Commission
    Aug 9, 2016 · Since June 13, 2009, full-power television stations nationwide have been required to broadcast exclusively in a digital format. The switch from ...
  38. [38]
    The Switch from Analog to Digital TV - Nielsen
    On June 12, 2009, the FCC required all high-power analog US television stations to turn off their signals and move to a digital-only transmission.
  39. [39]
    Apple opens its Immersive Video format to third-party creators
    Jun 20, 2025 · Apple Vision Pro is the first and the only device that can present films in IMAX 1.43:1 aspect ratio outside the cinema. However, only ...
  40. [40]
    IMAX Enhanced Home Theater Certification: What We Know So Far
    Oct 30, 2018 · The first IMAX theaters used 70mm film with an aspect ratio of about 1.43:1, together with huge screens in specialized venues, to present a ...
  41. [41]
    [PDF] TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR PROGRAM DELIVERY
    Sep 21, 2016 · The pillarbox aspect ratio conversion shall be used. ▫ Conversion by horizontal stretching is prohibited. For 16:9 SD Material. ▫ The aspect ...
  42. [42]
    [PDF] Understanding DCP Aspect Ratios
    To preserve the original 4x3 aspect ratio, black bars would be added to the sides (pillarboxing) of the image and the Flat aspect ratio would be used. 16:9 ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  43. [43]
    Digital Statement Part III - International Federation of Film Archives
    Just as with frame rates, all films should be digitised, preserved, and presented in their original aspect ratio. In instances where the digital aspect ratio ...
  44. [44]
    [PDF] Guidelines for the Preservation of Video Recordings
    Jun 11, 2018 · ... aspect ratio) to HD (with a 16:9 aspect ratio), most archives will prefer to use pillarbox framing, as the alternative is what is called ...
  45. [45]
    [PDF] Canceling the Postage Stamp: AFD, Bar Data and Pan-Scan
    We are all familiar by now with one of the unfortunate side effects of the transition from the 4x3 aspect ratio of. NTSC to the 16x9 aspect ratio of high- ...
  46. [46]
    No, FXX's Cropping Is Not Ruining the Simpsons Marathon
    Aug 27, 2014 · It has taken away about 25 percent of every frame of the show's first 19 seasons. By airing episodes originally created for standard definition 4:3 screens.
  47. [47]
    [PDF] WIDESCREEN BOOK
    BBC Broadcast has issued Guidelines for Producers on the use of 4:3 inserts in widescreen programmes which, in summary, recommends that. • 4:3 pictures MUST ...
  48. [48]
    The Lighthouse's obscure aspect ratio is no accident | British GQ
    Feb 6, 2020 · Robert Pattinson's The Lighthouse is shot entirely in an old-fashioned, box-like aspect ratio, while Fleabag is shot in cinematic 2.35.
  49. [49]
    Guide to Aspect Ratios: 8 Film and TV Aspect Ratios - MasterClass
    Jun 21, 2021 · Today, the 4:3 aspect ratio primarily serves artistic purposes, such as mimicking a style of filmmaking before the widescreen aspect ratio ...
  50. [50]
    Circular videos and dynamic squares : experimental aspect ratios
    Feb 1, 2021 · A creative investigation into film frames, screen shapes and aspect ratios. In the digital era, videos can be created in any shape, from 1x1 ...
  51. [51]
    Broadcasters explore vertical video format to reach new audiences
    Dec 11, 2024 · According to research from Magna Global, vertical videos achieve a 90% brand recall rate compared to 69% for horizontal videos. This ...
  52. [52]
    How The TV-To-TikTok Pipeline Is Surging Viewership For ... - Forbes
    May 22, 2025 · A huge 69% of users have co-created content relating to a show or movie, showing how much potential there is to turn great TV into viral trends2 ...
  53. [53]
    ESPN | Princess Pictures Wiki | Fandom
    Archived non-HD programming is presented in 4:3 standard definition with stylized pillarboxing. ... On November 19, 2017, in Season 29, episode 7 of The Simpsons ...
  54. [54]
    Mapping Aspect Ratios in the Age of High-Definition Television
    Aug 6, 2014 · show or film's widescreen version in HD. One concern with presenting widescreen for HDTV is pillar boxing, whereby black bars. are displayed ...
  55. [55]
    Aspect Ratios and Visual Storytelling in Zack Snyder's Justice League
    Mar 22, 2021 · Zack Snyder's use of the 4:3 aspect ratio in Justice League gives it a unique, almost mythic feel—really sets it apart from standard widescreen ...
  56. [56]
  57. [57]
    Aspect Ratio: It Used to Be Easy | TV Tech - TVTechnology.com
    Nov 11, 2003 · Thus, most cinematic aspect ratios must be accommodated to the 4:3 aspect ratio of NTSC, PAL and SECAM rasters.
  58. [58]
    [PDF] TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION FOR THE DELIVERY OF ... - BBC
    Nov 25, 2020 · Alternatively, it may be presented in a pillar-box or letterbox format, which: • may be of an intermediate ratio between 4:3 and 16:9, but must ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] Best Practices Cataloging Guide Original Toolkit - SHARE |
    Best Practice Recommendation (Video): Code Technique (008/34) for streaming ... Windowboxing” incorporates both letterboxing and pillarboxing ...
  60. [60]
    Aspect Ratio Oddities | Sound & Vision
    Feb 9, 2009 · If the filmmakers presented each section of the movie in its precise original aspect ratio, the 1.44:1 IMAX scenes would wind up pillarboxed in ...
  61. [61]
    The Complete Guide to Understanding Video Aspect Ratios - Dacast
    Sep 11, 2025 · The video aspect ratio is the video width in proportion to the height of the TV screen. This ratio describes how wide your video is.
  62. [62]
    [PDF] Video Retargeting: Automating Pan and Scan
    Video retargeting adapts video for different displays by cropping and scaling, using an optimization to minimize information loss and can introduce virtual ...Missing: matting windowboxing stretching resizing