Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Popular sire effect

The popular sire effect, also known as popular sire syndrome, is a phenomenon in selective animal breeding where a limited number of male animals exhibiting desirable traits—such as superior conformation, performance, or productivity—are disproportionately used to sire offspring, resulting in the overrepresentation of their genetic material within the population and a marked reduction in overall genetic diversity.^[1] This effect is particularly prevalent in closed breeding populations like purebred dogs and livestock species, including dairy cattle, where breeders prioritize sires based on show success, progeny performance, or economic value.^[2] The imbalance arises because each litter from a popular sire displaces reproductive opportunities for other males, accelerating the concentration of specific alleles while diminishing the effective population size.^[3] The consequences of the popular sire effect are profound, primarily manifesting as increased inbreeding and the rapid dissemination of deleterious genetic variants, which heighten the prevalence of inherited disorders and compromise long-term breed health. In dogs, pedigree analyses across multiple breeds reveal that popular sires are the leading contributor to genetic erosion, with simulations showing that uneven mating practices can significantly elevate the frequency of recessive disease alleles within a few generations.^[1] For instance, in the Leonberger breed, 25% of sires responsible for 66% of offspring have driven average inbreeding coefficients to 0.29, correlating with reduced heterozygosity and higher homozygosity for potentially harmful mutations.^[4] Similarly, in the US Holstein dairy cattle population, historically popular sires like Shottle (siring over 14,000 progeny) have limited Y-chromosome diversity while amplifying autosomal segments linked to traits like milk production, though at the cost of broader genomic variation.^[5] These dynamics exacerbate inbreeding depression, evidenced by outcomes such as smaller litter sizes, elevated puppy mortality, diminished fertility, and shortened lifespans in affected breeds.^[6] Efforts to mitigate the popular sire effect focus on promoting balanced breeding strategies to preserve genetic health without sacrificing desired traits.^[2] Regulatory measures, such as limiting the maximum number of offspring per sire—already implemented in breeds like the German Shepherd—have demonstrated success in curbing inbreeding rates and stabilizing allele frequencies.^[1] Genomic tools, including single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays and estimated breeding values, enable breeders to select diverse sires while avoiding carriers of known disorders, as seen in reductions of conditions like patellar luxation in certain dog breeds through targeted screening.^[2] Crossbreeding initiatives and international pedigree databases further aid in reintroducing genetic variation, underscoring the need for collaborative, data-driven approaches to sustain viable populations.^[4]

Overview

Definition

The popular sire effect refers to the overuse of a single male animal, termed the sire, in breeding programs, resulting in the disproportionate contribution of its genetic material to the population due to selection for desirable phenotypic traits such as conformation, performance in competitions, or productivity.^[7] This phenomenon is prevalent in artificially managed breeding systems across species like dogs, horses, and livestock, where human preferences drive the repeated mating of popular sires with multiple females.^[8] A key characteristic of the popular sire effect is the sire's outsized influence on the gene pool through artificial selection, where one male may sire hundreds of offspring over its reproductive lifetime, often extending its genetic impact across several generations via those progeny.^[8] This leads to a rapid concentration of the sire's alleles, amplifying both beneficial and deleterious traits within the population.^[7] In animal breeding, the sire denotes the male parent, while the dam denotes the female parent; the biological disparity in reproductive capacity—one sire can inseminate numerous dams—enables this effect, as dams typically produce fewer offspring per cycle compared to a sire's potential output.^[9]

Historical Background

The popular sire effect was first noted in livestock breeding during the early 20th century, where the adage "the bull is half the herd" underscored the outsized genetic influence of a single male on herd composition through repeated use. This saying, common in early 20th-century agricultural literature, highlighted how artificial selection amplified the role of sires in shaping future generations, often leading to concentrated genetic contributions from favored individuals. In 1915, Williams Haynes conducted a statistical analysis of three terrier breeds, revealing that approximately 20% of stud dogs sired over 40% of puppies, providing early empirical evidence of the phenomenon in canine breeding and linking it to broader patterns in selective breeding practices.^[10] The establishment of organized kennel clubs further contextualized the effect by standardizing breeds and elevating show performance as a breeding criterion. The American Kennel Club (AKC), founded in 1884, played a pivotal role by regulating pedigrees and hosting conformation shows that rewarded physical traits, inadvertently encouraging breeders to favor winners as sires to replicate desirable conformations.^[11] Similar organizations, such as the Kennel Club in the UK (established 1873), promoted breed standards that prioritized show success, fostering environments where a limited number of champion males gained widespread use. Recognition of the popular sire effect intensified in dog breeding after World War II, as pedigree registrations surged and show culture expanded, amplifying the use of top-winning sires.^[3] By the 1980s, veterinary geneticists began formalizing the term through studies quantifying its impacts, with researcher Malcolm B. Willis highlighting how overuse of popular sires reduced genetic diversity and increased inbreeding risks in pedigree dogs.^[3] These analyses, building on earlier observations, emphasized the need for balanced breeding to mitigate long-term consequences.^[3]

Mechanisms

Breeding Practices

In dog breeding, breeders frequently prioritize sires that excel in conformation shows or meet stringent breed standards, driving the overuse of these animals due to perceived superior qualities and high market demand for their offspring.^[12] This selection process is amplified by commercial breeding operations and backyard breeders, who seek to capitalize on the prestige and sales potential associated with champion lineages.^[12] Kennel clubs and breed registries play a central role in these practices by awarding titles and certifications that elevate certain sires' status, encouraging widespread breeding use within closed populations.^[3] For instance, a single popular sire in purebred dogs can be mated to dozens of females each year, often producing hundreds to thousands of offspring over its lifetime.^[12] Such ratios reflect an imbalance where only 33% to 70% of available sires across breeds are effectively utilized, concentrating reproduction among the most favored individuals.^[13] Similar patterns occur in livestock breeding, particularly in dairy cattle, where artificial insemination (AI) technologies enable elite sires selected for production traits to be used extensively across large-scale operations.^[14] Industry structures, including AI cooperatives and genetic evaluation programs, promote these sires through rankings and semen distribution networks, often resulting in one bull siring 10,000 or more progeny in registered herds alone.^[14] In sheep and pig breeding, commercial demands for rapid growth and uniformity likewise favor overuse of high-performing sires, with one individual potentially contributing to numerous offspring per generation in intensive systems.^[15]

Genetic Transmission

In Mendelian inheritance, a sire transmits approximately 50% of its autosomal genetic material to each offspring via gametes, with the other half contributed by the dam.^[16] When a popular sire is overused in breeding programs, this transmission is multiplied across many progeny, resulting in the sire's genome becoming overrepresented in the population. For example, alleles carried by a popular sire can reach frequencies exceeding 50% in a breed's gene pool within a few generations, as seen in the case of a recessive mutation for ichthyosis in Golden Retrievers that spread rapidly due to a single carrier sire in the 1990s.^[17] This amplification occurs because the sire's descendants often continue to be bred extensively, concentrating its genetic contribution and skewing the overall gene pool toward its variants. Deleterious recessive alleles, which cause disorders only when homozygous, pose a particular risk in this scenario. Such alleles remain phenotypically masked in heterozygous carriers, allowing a popular sire to unknowingly propagate them to approximately half of its offspring without immediate detection.^[2] As these carrier offspring are interbred—often with close relatives sharing the same sire—the likelihood of producing homozygous individuals rises sharply, unmasking the recessive traits in subsequent generations. This mechanism has been implicated in the dissemination of monogenic disorders, where the inflated allele frequency from a single sire's overuse elevates the prevalence of affected individuals across the breed.^[17] From a population genetics standpoint, the popular sire effect drives a rapid increase in allele frequencies through artificial selection imposed by breeding choices, akin to directional selection favoring the sire's genome.^[16] This selective pressure alters the distribution of genetic variation, with the sire's alleles rising in proportion while others diminish, potentially leading to fixation of both advantageous and harmful variants. The process accelerates genetic drift and reduces heterozygosity, making populations more susceptible to the expression of recessive conditions when mating occurs among related progeny.^[2]

Consequences

Health Impacts

The popular sire effect exacerbates the prevalence of recessive genetic disorders in animal populations by concentrating deleterious alleles, leading to higher rates of homozygous pairings that manifest these conditions. Recessive disorders such as hip dysplasia, progressive retinal atrophy (PRA), and lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) become more common as the overuse of a single sire spreads carrier status widely, resulting in affected offspring when carriers are mated. For instance, founder effects combined with popular sire usage have been linked to the dissemination of monogenic disorders, with prevalence exceeding 50% for some heritable conditions like hip dysplasia in certain lines.^[18]^[2]^[18] Inbreeding depression, a direct consequence of the reduced genetic variation from popular sire breeding, manifests in various health detriments including reduced fertility, weakened immune responses, and diminished lifespan. Affected lines exhibit smaller litter sizes and lower puppy survival rates due to the expression of harmful recessive traits, with studies showing fertility declines in breeds like Golden Retrievers where inbreeding coefficients exceed 0.2. Immune system compromise is evident in higher susceptibility to autoimmune diseases, contributing to overall increased morbidity, such as a 29% higher relative risk of veterinary care events in breeds with inbreeding levels above 0.25.^[19]^[20]^[19] Shorter lifespans are another hallmark of inbreeding depression in popular sire-impacted populations, with quantitative evidence indicating that outbred individuals within breeds live significantly longer than their inbred counterparts. For example, in Golden Retrievers, dogs with low inbreeding (coefficient of inbreeding <0.02) demonstrate extended longevity compared to those with higher values, highlighting the cumulative toll of deleterious gene expression.^[21]^[21]

Genetic Diversity Effects

The popular sire effect significantly contributes to the loss of heterozygosity within breeds by disproportionately amplifying the genetic contribution of a few males, thereby reducing overall genetic variation over generations. This reduction is commonly quantified using the effective population size (Ne), a key metric in population genetics that reflects the number of individuals effectively contributing to the gene pool, accounting for factors like unequal breeding contributions. The formula for Ne in scenarios with imbalanced sex ratios, such as those exacerbated by the popular sire effect, is given by Ne = 4NmNf / (Nm + Nf), where Nm represents the number of breeding males and Nf the number of breeding females; this equation highlights how a small Nm—due to overuse of popular sires—drastically lowers Ne, accelerating the rate of heterozygosity loss estimated as 1 - (1 - 1/(2Ne))^t, with t denoting the number of generations.^[7]^[22] By concentrating reproduction among limited sires, the popular sire effect creates genetic bottlenecks, where the population passes through a narrow genetic corridor that further diminishes allelic diversity and heightens vulnerability to stochastic events. These bottlenecks mimic founder effects but are artificially induced through breeding practices, leading to elevated inbreeding coefficients and a homogenized gene pool that struggles to maintain resilience against environmental shifts or emerging pathogens.^[23]^[24] Evolutionarily, the popular sire effect hastens the fixation of alleles through intensified genetic drift in low-Ne populations, curtailing the raw material for natural or artificial selection and thereby diminishing a breed's long-term adaptability to changing conditions or new selective pressures. This accelerated fixation reduces the potential for evolutionary responses, such as adaptation to novel diseases or climatic variations, as rare alleles that might confer beneficial traits are more likely to be lost.^[7]

Examples

In Dogs

The popular sire effect has been particularly evident in Golden Retrievers, where the overuse of top show-winning sires from the 1980s and 1990s contributed to widespread cancer predispositions in the breed.^[25] These sires, selected for conformational excellence in American Kennel Club (AKC) competitions, were bred extensively, rapidly propagating latent genetic mutations associated with cancers such as hemangiosarcoma and lymphoma.^[26] By the late 1990s, cancer had become the leading cause of death, accounting for approximately 61% of fatalities in North American Golden Retrievers, a rate more than double that observed in other breeds.^[25]^[27] In Labrador Retrievers, the effect is illustrated through the overuse of popular field trial sires, which has linked to increased incidences of hip and elbow dysplasia.^[3] Elite performers in AKC-sanctioned field trials, prized for retrieving ability and stamina, were repeatedly bred in the late 20th century, concentrating polygenic risk factors for these orthopedic conditions within the breed's gene pool.^[3] Dysplasia rates in Labradors remain elevated, with studies indicating heritability influenced heavily by sire contributions, exacerbating joint instability and arthritis in descendants.^[3] Genetic analyses from the 2010s demonstrate the scale of this phenomenon, revealing that descendants of a single popular sire can comprise up to 90% of a breed's gene pool within three to four generations.^[3] For instance, one Golden Retriever sire produced over 100,000 descendants across 15 generations, dominating the registry and reducing overall genetic diversity.^[3] Similar patterns in Labradors show prolific field trial winners siring thousands of offspring, leading to homogenized pedigrees and heightened vulnerability to inherited disorders.^[3] Breed clubs, including the AKC and national parent organizations like the Golden Retriever Club of America, have inadvertently amplified the popular sire effect by emphasizing champion pedigrees in registration and promotion.^[3] Titles from conformation shows and performance events elevate certain dogs' status, encouraging breeders to prioritize their lines for perceived quality, which narrows the effective population size and perpetuates genetic bottlenecks.^[3] This focus on show and trial success, while advancing breed standards, has historically overlooked long-term diversity, resulting in overrepresentation of select sires in modern registries.^[3]

In Livestock

The popular sire effect has been particularly pronounced in dairy cattle breeding, where artificial insemination (AI) and bull studs have enabled the extensive use of a limited number of elite sires, leading to increased inbreeding. In the 1970s, overuse of popular Holstein bulls in the United States resulted in average inbreeding coefficients of approximately 4.7% across registered animals, contributing to a narrowing of the genetic base and heightened risks of inbreeding depression.^[28] This trend was exacerbated by the concentration of semen distribution through centralized bull studs, which amplified the genetic influence of top performers selected for milk yield and type traits. Similar patterns emerged in sheep and pig production, where AI technologies have allowed one boar's or ram's genes to proliferate rapidly; for instance, in commercial pig lines, the widespread adoption of high-growth sires has led to inbreeding levels that reduce litter size by approximately 0.6 piglets weaned per 10% increase in the coefficient.^[29] In sheep breeds, extensive sire use across flocks has elevated average relatedness, with some purebred populations showing annual inbreeding rates of 0.5-1%, diminishing overall genetic diversity.^[30] In the livestock industry, semen banks and genomic selection tools have further intensified the popular sire effect by prioritizing sires with superior estimated breeding values, often resulting in a handful of bulls contributing 10-20% of the genes in large dairy herds through thousands of inseminations.^[31] This concentration, driven by economic incentives for rapid genetic progress in traits like milk production and growth efficiency, has economic implications, as reduced genetic diversity can lower herd fertility and resilience, with inbreeding depression causing approximately a 0.3% decline in conception rates per 1% increase in the coefficient.^[32] Historical studies in cattle have documented early signs of these issues, revealing fertility drops in lines descended from heavily used bulls and underscoring the long-standing challenges of sire overuse even before modern AI.^[33] Recent genomic analyses as of 2022 confirm ongoing inbreeding depression in US Holstein cattle, with effective population sizes continuing to decline despite selection efforts.^[31]

Mitigation Strategies

Preventive Measures

To mitigate the popular sire effect, breeders utilize genetic testing through comprehensive DNA panels that screen for over 200 hereditary canine diseases, enabling the identification of deleterious mutations in potential sires before they are widely used and thereby preventing the spread of genetic disorders across populations.^[34] These panels, offered by veterinary genetic companies, assess risks for conditions such as progressive retinal atrophy and von Willebrand's disease, allowing informed decisions on sire selection. Complementing this, pedigree analysis software tools facilitate the evaluation of ancestral lines to detect hidden relatedness, supporting breeders in choosing diverse pairings that reduce the risk of amplifying unfavorable traits from overused sires.^[35] Breeding guidelines from major kennel clubs and organizations recommend imposing strict limits on the number of litters or offspring per sire to curb overuse, such as in certain breed clubs or capping sires such that no dog has offspring equivalent to more than 5% of the puppies registered in the breed population during a five-year period, as recommended by the Fédération Cynologique Internationale (FCI).^[36]^[37] These protocols promote diverse mating by encouraging the rotation of multiple sires within breeding programs, ensuring a broader genetic base and avoiding concentration on any single individual. Similar guidelines exist in livestock, such as limiting the progeny of popular sires like bulls in cattle through artificial insemination programs that distribute semen from various donors.^[38] Key monitoring tools include the coefficient of inbreeding (COI), a quantitative measure of the probability that an individual inherits two identical alleles by descent from a common ancestor, which helps breeders track and minimize relatedness in planned litters. The COI is calculated using the formula:

F_X = \sum \left( \frac{1}{2} \right)^{n+1} (1 + F_A)

where F_X is the inbreeding coefficient of the individual, the summation is taken over all paths through common ancestors connecting the parents, n is the number of individuals in the loop (generations separating the parents from the common ancestor via each path), and F_A is the inbreeding coefficient of the common ancestor (often assumed to be 0 if unknown). By computing COI for prospective offspring via software integrated with pedigree data, breeders can prioritize matings with values below 5-10% to preserve genetic health and diversity.^[39]

Implementation Challenges

Breeders often face significant economic pressures that hinder the adoption of mitigation strategies against the popular sire effect, as the short-term profitability of using high-demand sires outweighs the perceived long-term benefits of genetic diversity. Popular sires, typically those with show-winning traits, command premium stud fees and produce litters that sell quickly due to market appeal, incentivizing breeders to prioritize them despite the risks of spreading deleterious genes.^[40] This focus on immediate revenue from fashionable breeds neglects the downstream costs associated with increased prevalence of inherited disorders, such as hip dysplasia in Labrador Retrievers, which can elevate veterinary expenses for treatments and care throughout the dogs' lives.^[41] Consequently, commercial operations, including puppy mills, continue overbreeding popular lines to meet consumer demand, perpetuating the cycle even as evidence mounts for higher lifetime healthcare costs in affected populations.^[42] Cultural resistance within breeding communities further complicates implementation, rooted in longstanding traditions that valorize champion sires as embodiments of breed ideals. Kennel clubs, such as the Canadian Kennel Club, uphold rigid breed standards emphasizing conformational excellence, which historically encourage the overuse of award-winning males to replicate "desirable" traits, often at the expense of broader genetic health.^[43] These traditions foster a reluctance to diversify breeding stock, as breeders and clubs view restrictions on popular sires as threats to preserving the breed's aesthetic legacy. Additionally, enforcement mechanisms in registries remain lax; while guidelines may recommend health and temperament assessments, compliance is voluntary and inconsistently monitored, allowing popular sire practices to persist unchecked across many breeds.^[44] This cultural inertia is compounded by a lack of widespread education on genetic risks, leading to resistance against reforms that challenge established show-circuit norms.^[43] Technical limitations in genetic screening tools pose additional barriers, as current tests cover only a fraction of the potential heritable traits, limiting breeders' ability to make informed decisions on sire selection. While DNA tests exist for approximately 200-300 known Mendelian disorders in dogs, far more genetic conditions—estimated in the hundreds—remain untestable due to their polygenic nature or unidentified mutations, meaning only about 20-30% of relevant traits can be reliably screened in practice.^[45] For instance, progressive retinal atrophy exhibits mutational heterogeneity across breeds, where testing for one variant may miss others, providing incomplete risk assessments. In rare breeds with small population sizes, such as the Dutch Kooikerhondje (founded by just 9 dams and 6 sires), these limitations are exacerbated, as the popular sire effect rapidly amplifies untested deleterious alleles within an already narrow gene pool, accelerating inbreeding depression.^[2] Overall, the absence of comprehensive, breed-specific testing panels undermines efforts to enforce diversity measures effectively.^[46]

References

[1]
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2011.06.016
[2]
The challenges of pedigree dog health: approaches to combating ...
Feb 11, 2015 · ... popular sire effect and promoting increased genetic variability on a population-wide scale. Such restrictions on sires are already in place ...
[3]
The Pox of Popular Sires - The Institute of Canine Biology
Dec 5, 2013 · Every litter produced by this popular sire is one less reproductive opportunity for any of the other potential sires in the breed, so the ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[4]
Genomic diversity and population structure of the Leonberger dog ...
Oct 14, 2020 · Pedigree analyses identified 22 founder animals and revealed an apparent popular sire effect. The average pedigree-based inbreeding ...
[5]
https://doi.org/10.3168/jdsc.2022-0299
[6]
[PDF] Popular sires - The Biggest Contributor to Inbreeding
What are the effects of a popular sire? The over use of a sire can shrink the size of a breeds gene pool. The gene pool is the.Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[7]
Key Genetic Parameters for Population Management - Frontiers
... genetic diversity. This phenomenon is known as the popular sire effect. This has happened with many companion breeds whose main breeding goal, which is to ...
[8]
Trends in genetic diversity for all Kennel Club registered pedigree ...
Sep 21, 2015 · Evidence of popular sires was common in all breeds. Popular sires make large genetic contributions to subsequent generations and are the biggest ...
[9]
Horse Breeding Lingo: Pedigree Terminology - AQHA
Jan 28, 2022 · Sire and dam: A sire is a horse's father, a dam its mother. To produce and to sire: A mare produces foals; stallions sire foals; stallions do ...
[10]
https://academic.oup.com/jhered/article-abstract/6/11/494/802194
[11]
EFFECT OF THE POPULAR SIRE | Journal of Heredity
WILLIAMS HAYNES; EFFECT OF THE POPULAR SIRE: A Statistical Study of Three Varieties of Terriers—Over Forty Per Cent. of the Puppies Sired by Approximately.
[12]
History of the American Kennel Club
Founded in 1884, the not-for-profit AKC is the recognized and trusted expert in breed, health, and training information for all dogs. AKC actively advocates for ...Missing: influence | Show results with:influence
[13]
[PDF] Current Dog Breeding Practices Impacts on Health and Preservation ...
May 21, 2020 · Popular sires can become overrepresented in the breed and impact the breed population's genetic composition, leading to a surge in the sire's.
[14]
Mating practices and the dissemination of genetic disorders in ...
Simulation results confirmed that the popular sire practice leads to a dissemination of genetic disorders. Under a realistic scenario, regarding the imbalance ...Missing: purebred | Show results with:purebred
[15]
The importance of historically popular sires on the accuracy of ... - NIH
Apr 20, 2023 · Historically popular sires capture the genetic composition of recent populations, but younger sires capture more. •. Sires with the greatest ...
[16]
Opportunities of Genomics for the Use of Semen Cryo-Conserved in ...
Jul 14, 2022 · In these programs, an intense selection for performance often causes the popular sire effect (Wellmann and Bennewitz, 2019). This effect may ...
[17]
Key Genetic Parameters for Population Management - PMC - NIH
This phenomenon is known as the popular sire effect. This has happened with ... genetic diversity is equal to the native genetic diversity of the breed.
[18]
Genetics of inherited skin disorders in dogs - ScienceDirect.com
In purebred dogs, the problem is further exacerbated by the excessive use of elite breeding animals ('popular sire effect'). Every dog carries a small number of ...
[19]
Assessing the impact of breeding strategies on inherited disorders ...
In recent years, concerns have been raised on the diversity, health and welfare of our (pedigree) dog population. Somewhat justified, the popular sire effect ...
[20]
The effect of inbreeding, body size and morphology on health in dog ...
Dec 2, 2021 · There is evidence that high levels of inbreeding have consequences on health. Close inbreeding has a negative effect on litter size and neonatal ...
[21]
Inbreeding depression causes reduced fecundity in Golden Retrievers
May 21, 2019 · Inbreeding depression has been demonstrated to impact vital rates, productivity, and performance in human populations, wild and endangered ...Missing: disorders | Show results with:disorders<|control11|><|separator|>
[22]
Body size, inbreeding, and lifespan in domestic dogs - PMC
Dec 5, 2019 · We hypothesized that inbreeding depression may be responsible for some of the variation in lifespan observed in dogs. In the following ...
[23]
https://cgejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40575-015-0014-9
[24]
The challenges of pedigree dog health: approaches to combating inherited disease - Companion Animal Health and Genetics
Summary of each segment:
[25]
Demographic assessment of the Dalmatian dog – effective ... - PMC
Mar 26, 2020 · This phenomenon is common in dog breeding and called the “popular sire effect”. In this study, we aimed to gain an insight into the ...<|separator|>
[26]
Cancer in Dogs: A Large-Scale Study Offers Hope - Kinship
The “popular-sire” effect occurs when an animal with desirable attributes is bred repeatedly. Descendants share specific genetic mutations, both good and bad, ...
[27]
Why are golden retrievers so susceptible to cancer?
Jan 18, 2012 · Basically the founding dogs of the golden retriever breed happened to have genes that increased their risk for cancer. Since all golden ...
[28]
The Golden Retriever Lifetime Study: establishing an observational ...
The Golden Retriever breed is also suspected of being at high risk for cancer development, as described below. Golden Retrievers are owned by a diverse ...<|separator|>
[29]
Inbreeding of and relationship among registered Holsteins - PubMed
These were used to estimate inbreeding and inter se relationship for the Holstein breed. Estimates of inbreeding were 4.7, 3.8, and 4.3% for 1970, 1976, and ...
[30]
Inbreeding in Swine - Pork Information Gateway
Inbreeding of both the pigs and the dam have a substantial negative effect on litter size, pig weight and growth to 154 days. The inbreeding of the boar had ...
[31]
Inbreeding trends and genetic diversity in purebred sheep populations
S1). Greater across-flock use of sires may lead to greater relatedness among flocks, which in turn could contribute to less genetic diversity and higher rates ...
[32]
Genomic selection in United States dairy cattle - PMC - NIH
The genomic selection program for dairy cattle in the United States has doubled the rate of genetic gain. Since 2010, the average annual increase in net merit ...
[33]
Inbreeding depression due to recent and ancient inbreeding in ...
Sep 27, 2019 · Inbreeding depression is the decrease in mean performance due to mating between relatives. Many important traits in dairy cattle, such as yield ...Missing: 1920s | Show results with:1920s
[34]
4 million pets DNA tested (and counting)! - Wisdom Panel
Jun 27, 2023 · Our genetic panels include: 45+ health tests, 25+ trait tests for cats; 200+ genetic health disorders and 30+ traits for dogs. To find the ...<|separator|>
[35]
Inbreeding calculators | Dog health - The Kennel Club
Use our Inbreeding Coefficient calculators as part of your decision. These use all the pedigree records stored on our database to calculate a result.
[36]
(PDF) Animal welfare in modern dog breeding - ResearchGate
Aug 7, 2025 · ... maximum limits for the number of offspring per sire in each breed. The limits are defined as 25 % of the average yearly number of ...
[37]
Review Genetic diversity, inbreeding and breeding practices in dogs
Purebred dog health is thought to be compromised by an increasing occurence of inherited diseases but inadequate prevalence data on common disorders have ...
[38]
COI FAQS: Understanding the Coefficient of Inbreeding
Jun 4, 2015 · The coefficient of inbreeding is the probability of inheriting two copies of the same allele from an ancestor that occurs on both sides of the pedigree.
[39]
Ethical Concerns about Fashionable Dog Breeding - PMC - NIH
In fact, Ghirlanda et al. have found that popular dog breeds tend to be less trainable and more prone to separation anxiety, fear of other dogs, and aggression ...
[40]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10930939/
[41]
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40575-018-0057-9
[42]
A new direction for kennel club regulations and breed standards - NIH
Yes, as this investigation has established, kennel clubs are strongly implicated in having created and sustained an unhealthy purebred situation. Kennel clubs ...
[43]
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1950109/
[44]
[PDF] “My dog took the DNA test and was cleared of every genetic disorder ...
Far more than 175 (or 200, or 300) genetic diseases exist in dogs. Being clear of 175 of them doesn't mean your dog is. “cleared of every genetic disorder.” ...Missing: screening | Show results with:screening
[45]
https://www.akcchf.org/educational-resources/library/articles/39-Me-CC-Oct2020-C-Coile.pdf