Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Protostega

Protostega is a genus of extinct marine turtles belonging to the family Protostegidae, known primarily from the species P. gigas, which inhabited the Western Interior Seaway during the Late Cretaceous period, approximately 86 to 83 million years ago.^[1] These turtles were among the largest marine reptiles of their time, reaching lengths of up to 3.4 meters and weights exceeding 2,000 pounds, making P. gigas the second-largest sea turtle ever known, surpassed only by its close relative Archelon.^[2]^[1] The genus was first described in 1871 based on specimens discovered in the Smoky Hill Chalk deposits of Kansas, with the type specimen collected by paleontologist Edward Drinker Cope and additional finds attributed to Othniel Charles Marsh.^[3] Fossils indicate that Protostega possessed a broad, flattened carapace up to 1.2 meters wide, elongated flippers for powerful swimming, and a large head adapted for an aquatic lifestyle, though lacking the hooked snout seen in Archelon.^[3]^[1] Recent histological studies reveal that Protostega exhibited rapid growth rates similar to modern leatherback turtles (Dermochelys coriacea), achieving 85% of adult humeral length by age 8 and potentially reaching sexual maturity within a decade, suggesting elevated metabolic rates suited to the warm, epicontinental seas of the Cretaceous.^[4] This adaptation likely contributed to its success in the diverse marine ecosystem of the Western Interior Seaway, where it coexisted with mosasaurs, plesiosaurs, and early bony fishes before going extinct during the end-Cretaceous mass extinction.^[1]^[3]

Discovery and Naming

Initial Discovery

The first known specimen of Protostega, a fragmentary fossil cataloged as YPM 1408, was collected on July 4, 1871, during a Yale College Scientific Expedition to western Kansas, led by paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh. This discovery occurred on the south side of the Smoky Hill River, approximately eight miles east of Fort Wallace, in exposures of the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Chalk Formation. The Smoky Hill Chalk represents marine deposits from the Western Interior Seaway, a vast shallow sea that divided North America during the Late Cretaceous, facilitating rich preservation of marine vertebrates in fine-grained chalk sediments. These deposits played a pivotal role in early paleontological surveys of the American West, as expeditions like Marsh's targeted the Cretaceous outcrops for novel fossils amid the competitive "Bone Wars" era of discovery. The specific horizon yielding the Protostega specimen dates to the early Campanian stage, approximately 83.5 million years ago, within the Hesperornis biostratigraphic zone.^[5] Due to its fragmentary condition—consisting of isolated bones that were not immediately diagnostic—the specimen was not formally recognized or described at the time of collection, highlighting possibilities for initial misidentification amid the era's focus on more complete marine reptile remains like mosasaurs. This oversight reflected the challenges of field paleontology in remote chalk badlands and the intense rivalry between Marsh and his contemporary Edward Drinker Cope, who later examined similar material. Cope formally named the genus Protostega in 1872 based on a more complete specimen he collected later that year from the same formation.

Type Specimen and Subsequent Finds

The genus Protostega was formally named by Edward Drinker Cope in 1872, based on a partial skeleton (AMNH FR 1503) collected from the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Formation in western Kansas, serving as the type specimen for P. gigas. This material, consisting primarily of plastron elements and limb bones, was described in Cope's publication in the Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. Subsequent discoveries expanded knowledge of Protostega gigas beyond the initial 1871 collection. In Kansas, paleontologist Charles H. Sternberg recovered multiple partial skeletons from the Smoky Hill Chalk during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including well-preserved carapaces and limbs now housed in institutions such as the Carnegie Museum of Natural History (e.g., CMNH 1420 and 1421).^[6] These specimens contributed detailed insights into the turtle's skeletal variation and abundance in the Western Interior Seaway. Additional finds from Alabama include isolated bones and partial remains from the late Santonian to early Campanian Mooreville Chalk Formation (Selma Group) in the Black Belt region, indicating a southeastern extension of the species' range.^[7] Further broadening the geographic distribution, isolated bones attributable to Protostega gigas were reported from the Campanian Rybushka Formation at the Beloe Ozero locality in Saratov Province, Russia, along the Upper Volga River, marking the first confirmed records outside North America and suggesting transatlantic dispersal capabilities.^[8] Among these post-type discoveries, the largest known specimen of P. gigas, with an estimated total length of 4.2 meters, was collected from the Upper Cretaceous Taylor Group near Dallas, Texas, in the late 19th century and is now in the Perot Museum of Nature and Science.^[9] This incomplete but substantial skeleton, lacking the head and some cervical vertebrae, has been pivotal in establishing upper limits for body size estimates in the genus, highlighting its position as one of the largest marine turtles.^[9]

Taxonomy and Classification

Etymology and Species

The genus name Protostega was coined by Edward Drinker Cope in 1871, combining the Greek roots "prōtos" (first) and "stegos" (roof or covering), in reference to the primitive, foundational structure of its carapace relative to later marine turtles. The species epithet "gigas" derives from the Latin word for "giant," highlighting the exceptional size of the type specimen, which measured over 3 meters in length. Protostega is currently regarded as monospecific, with P. gigas Cope, 1871 as the sole valid species; this consensus stems from comprehensive revisions that have synonymized all other proposed taxa under it. Historically, Oliver P. Hay proposed two additional species in 1908—P. potens and P. advena—based on partial skeletons from the Niobrara Formation in Kansas, distinguishing them primarily by plastron morphology and humerus proportions.^[10] Rainer Zangerl further expanded the genus in 1953, recognizing P. potens and introducing P. dixie and P. latus as distinct species from the Selma Formation in Alabama and related deposits, citing variations in skull shape, fontanelle size, and carapace proportions. Post-2000 studies have invalidated these taxa, treating P. potens, P. advena, P. dixie, and P. latus as junior synonyms or ontogenetic/individual variants of P. gigas, often due to overlapping diagnostic features and insufficient differentiation in fragmentary material. This monospecific status was formalized by Hooks (1998) in a systematic review of Late Cretaceous turtles and reaffirmed in subsequent analyses, such as those incorporating European material.^[11]^[12]

Phylogenetic Relationships

Protostega is classified within the family Protostegidae, part of the superfamily Dermochelyoidea, and occupies an intermediate evolutionary position between the modern leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea) and the hard-shelled sea turtles of the family Cheloniidae.^[4] This placement reflects its role as a stem-group representative of Chelonioidea, basal to the crown groups Dermochelyidae and Cheloniidae, highlighting the diversification of marine turtles during the Late Cretaceous.^[13] Phylogenetic analyses consistently recover Protostegidae as monophyletic, with Protostega gigas as the sole valid species within its genus, positioned outside the crown-group Chelonioidea.^[14] Key synapomorphies supporting the phylogenetic position of Protostega include reduced dermal ossification in the carapace and plastron, an elongated temporal region in the skull, and highly modified paddle-like limbs adapted for marine propulsion.^[14] These features align Protostegidae closely with Dermochelyidae in their loss of rigid shell plating but distinguish them from the more ossified Cheloniidae, suggesting convergent adaptations for open-ocean lifestyles.^[4] Such traits underscore Protostega's transitional morphology in the evolution of chelonioid sea turtles. Cladistic analyses, such as those by Sterli et al. (2018), positioned Protostega as sister to Archelon within Protostegidae, based on expanded character matrices including cranial and postcranial features. More recent studies, including those incorporating osteohistological data, support this topology, with Protostega and Archelon forming a derived clade in Protostegidae and emphasizing stem Chelonioidea affinities.^[4] These updates reinforce Protostegidae's exclusion from crown Chelonioidea, aligning fossil evidence with the K–T boundary radiation of modern sea turtle lineages.^[13]

Anatomy and Description

Size and General Morphology

Protostega gigas attained a substantial size for a marine turtle, with typical total body lengths of 2.7 to 3.4 meters based on complete and partial skeletons from the Late Cretaceous Smoky Hill Chalk Member. The largest known specimen (DMNH 1999) reached 3.4 meters, derived from scaling of limb bones such as the humerus and femur in the largest known individuals. Weight estimates, calculated through skeletal scaling and allometric regressions comparable to those used for modern sea turtles, fall between 400 and 900 kilograms, reflecting its robust yet buoyant build suited to oceanic environments.^[1] The overall body plan of Protostega was highly streamlined, featuring a hydrodynamically efficient form with a dorsoventrally flattened profile that minimized drag during swimming. Its carapace and plastron exhibited reduced ossification compared to more rigid-shelled turtles, allowing greater flexibility and aiding in buoyancy control through adjustable body volume in water. This leathery, less mineralized shell structure parallels adaptations seen in the modern leatherback turtle (Dermochelys coriacea), though Protostega's was proportionally larger.^[16]^[17] Limb proportions further emphasized its marine specialization, with elongated foreflippers that, when spread, spanned up to 4.7 meters in the largest specimens, providing powerful propulsion via paddling motions. These flippers, supported by elongated humeri and radii, were broader and more paddle-like than those of terrestrial turtles, enhancing maneuverability and speed in open water; individual foreflippers were approximately 1.5-1.6 times the length of the hind flippers. In comparison to extant sea turtles, Protostega was significantly larger than most species—such as the green turtle (Chelonia mydas), which reaches only about 1.5 meters—but smaller than its contemporary relative Archelon ischyros, which could reach up to 4.6 meters in total length.^[18]^[19]^[20]

Skeletal Features

The carapace of Protostega was characterized by a leathery texture, lacking the rigid ossification seen in many other turtles, and consisted of thin, elongated neural plates numbering 10 to 12 along the midline, which were often crested and covered the ribs only partially. These neural plates were paper-thin and prone to crushing in fossils, with the ribs remaining free for much of their distal length, contributing to a flexible dorsal shield. Peripheral plates were reduced in number and size, typically around 22 but variably developed, forming an incomplete bony margin that emphasized the overall lightweight construction of the shell.^[21]^[22] The plastron consisted of 9 plates, comprising paired epiplastrons, hyoplastrons, hypoplastrons, and xiphiplastrons flanking a single entoplastron, with intricate digitations along the borders of the hyo- and hypoplastrons that enhanced flexibility compared to the more fused plastrons of hard-shelled taxa. This arrangement allowed for greater ventral mobility, as the plates were not fully co-ossified, and radial striations on elements like the hypoplastron indicate a structure suited to an active aquatic lifestyle.^[23]^[8] The skull exhibited an elongated rostrum formed by distinct premaxillaries, maxillaries, and prefrontals, measuring approximately 58 cm in length when complete, with a narial opening about 7.5 cm long and 5.5 cm wide. Large temporal openings were defined by a prominent parieto-squamosal arch, providing space for robust jaw adductor musculature, while the overall cranial profile was narrow and elevated.^[21]^[24] The vertebral column included 8 cervical vertebrae, 10 dorsal vertebrae with centra lengths increasing from 5.5 cm anteriorly to 9 cm mid-series, and an extended caudal series with chevron facets on the posterior centra facilitating articulation with hemal elements for tail-based propulsion in water. These facets, along with the short, wide cervical bodies, supported a streamlined axial skeleton.^[21] The appendicular skeleton was adapted into broad paddles, with forelimbs spanning up to 250 cm when extended and hind limbs 190 cm, featuring hyperphalangy in the manus and pes where digits contained extra phalanges beyond the typical reptilian formula (e.g., front: 2-3-3-3-3, totaling 14 elements). The longest phalanges in the third manual digit reached 43 cm, enhancing paddle surface area akin to that in extant leatherback turtles.^[21]^[25]

Paleobiology

Growth and Physiology

Histological analysis of Protostega long bones, including humeri and femora, reveals a fibrolamellar bone microstructure characterized by high vascularization and spongiose tissue, indicative of rapid skeletal growth rates similar to those observed in modern leatherback sea turtles (Dermochelys coriacea).^[4] Lines of arrested growth (LAGs), interpreted as cyclical growth marks, are present in specimens, with counts up to eight LAGs suggesting individuals reached ages of approximately 8–9 years at death, during which humeral length doubled from about 18 cm to 35 cm.^[4] This pattern of sustained, variable but fast deposition implies that Protostega potentially attained sexual and skeletal maturity within 10 years, enabling early reproduction in a high-energy marine lifestyle.^[4] The absence of an external fundamental system (EFS) in the analyzed bones further supports that these individuals had not yet ceased growth, consistent with ongoing rapid ontogeny into adulthood.^[4] Bone microstructure also points to an elevated metabolism in Protostega, with the highly vascularized tissue suggesting endothermic-like traits and gigantothermy, where large body size helped retain heat.^[4] Such physiological strategies mirror those of leatherback turtles, which exhibit regional endothermy.^[4]

Diet and Behavior

Protostega gigas possessed a toothless but robust beak adapted for crushing, suggesting a primarily durophagous diet focused on hard-shelled mollusks such as inoceramid bivalves, with possible inclusion of softer prey like jellyfish, crustaceans, and seaweed based on anatomical comparisons to related protostegids.^[26]^[27] Gut contents from a closely related Early Cretaceous protostegid (cf. Notochelone) containing fragments of inoceramid shells encased in phosphatic material confirm that such bivalves formed a regular part of the diet in the family, likely ingested after being bitten into segments along with associated soft tissues.^[27] This feeding strategy aligns with the turtle's powerful jaws, enabling it to exploit benthic and pelagic resources in the Western Interior Seaway. Locomotion in Protostega was dominated by its enlarged foreflippers, which provided strong propulsive force for sustained open-ocean swimming, while the lightweight, flexible carapace—lacking extensive ossification—enhanced hydrodynamic efficiency and reduced drag.^[28] The species likely undertook long-distance migrations across marine environments, similar to modern sea turtles, with the ability to haul itself onto coastal margins for nesting behaviors inferred from body plan and fossil trackway analogs in related taxa.^[29] No direct evidence exists for coordinated group movements, supporting an inferred solitary lifestyle punctuated by periodic nesting events.^[30] Fossil evidence reveals significant predation risks for Protostega, with multiple specimens exhibiting bite marks and embedded teeth from the large shark Cretoxyrhina mantelli, indicating lethal or scavenging interactions that often targeted the limbs and shell.^[31] These injuries show no signs of healing in some cases, suggesting fatal attacks on live individuals, while possible encounters with mosasaurs are hypothesized from co-occurrence in the fossil record but lack specific bite trace confirmation for this genus.^[29] The absence of gregarious fossils or trace evidence further implies that Protostega did not rely on social grouping for defense, relying instead on its size and speed for evasion.^[32]

Distribution and Paleoecology

Geographic Distribution

Protostega gigas fossils are primarily known from the Western Interior Seaway of North America, with abundant remains recovered from the Smoky Hill Chalk Member of the Niobrara Formation in western Kansas, USA.^[1] The type specimen, described by Edward Drinker Cope in 1871, originates from Gove County, Kansas, within this formation. Additional material referred to Protostega sp. has been found in the Pierre Shale Formation, including the Pembina Member in southern Manitoba, Canada, and equivalents in South Dakota and New Mexico, USA, with protostegid remains reported from the latter. Secondary occurrences are documented in eastern North America, notably the Mooreville Chalk Formation (part of the Selma Group) in Greene County, Alabama, USA, where isolated bones and shark-bitten elements, including specimens with embedded teeth from the shark Cretoxyrhina mantelli, have been collected.^[31] In Eurasia, the species is recorded from the Campanian Rybushka Formation at the Beloe Ozero locality in Saratov Province, Russia, marking the first confirmed finds outside North America based on isolated cranial and postcranial elements.^[11] The temporal range of Protostega gigas is late Santonian to early Campanian stages of the Late Cretaceous, spanning approximately 86 to 80 million years ago, with the majority of specimens, including those from the Smoky Hill Chalk, dating to around 83.5 million years ago.^[1] This distribution pattern, extending from the Western Interior Seaway across the Atlantic to the Tethyan margins in Europe, indicates trans-Atlantic dispersal facilitated by open marine connections via the Tethys Sea, supporting a cosmopolitan paleobiogeography for the species during the Santonian–Campanian.

Habitat and Associated Fauna

Protostega inhabited the shallow to mid-depth waters of the Western Interior Seaway, an epicontinental sea that spanned central North America during the Late Cretaceous (late Santonian–early Campanian stages, approximately 86–80 million years ago). This environment featured depths up to ~200–500 meters overall, with the Niobrara Formation deposits indicating water depths of around 50–150 meters in the central basin.^[33]^[34] Surface water temperatures averaged 30 ± 2.7 °C, reflecting a warm, tropical climate influenced by high global sea levels and greenhouse conditions, while bottom waters could be cooler and occasionally dysoxic due to oxygen fluctuations driven by upwelling and stratification.^[35]^[36] The seaway's high productivity supported diverse marine life, with nutrient influx from surrounding landmasses promoting blooms of plankton and algae that formed the base of a complex food web.^[37] Similar paleoenvironmental conditions extended to Tethyan marine settings, where comparable protostegid turtles thrived in warm, shallow epicontinental seas; for instance, Protostega gigas specimens from the Campanian Rybushka Formation in Saratov Province, Russia, suggest analogous habitats with tropical waters and high faunal diversity.^[11] In the Western Interior Seaway, Protostega coexisted with a rich assemblage of marine vertebrates, including large predatory mosasaurs such as Tylosaurus proriger, short-necked plesiosaurs like Polycotylus, and giant teleost fish including Xiphactinus audax and various sharks.^[1] Smaller cheloniids, such as Toxochelys species, also shared this habitat, occupying similar neritic zones.^[38] As a mid-level consumer in this high-productivity ecosystem, Protostega likely foraged on abundant soft-bodied invertebrates and schooling fish, while serving as potential prey for apex predators like mosasaurs, evidenced by shark-bitten remains from Alabama and its rapid growth strategy to reach sizes up to 3.4 meters and reduce vulnerability.^[1]^[31] Oxygen fluctuations, particularly during periods of anoxia in deeper basin areas, influenced preservation and distribution, with many Protostega fossils occurring in oxygen-poor chalk deposits of the Smoky Hill Chalk Member (Kansas) that reflect episodic dysoxia.^[39] This dynamic paleoecology highlights the seaway as a vibrant, fluctuating marine realm supporting a balanced trophic structure amid global oceanic changes.^[40]

References

[1]
Rapid growth in Late Cretaceous sea turtles reveals life history ... - NIH
Feb 10, 2023 · Protostega gigas is the second largest known sea turtle taxon (behind its sister taxon Archelon ischyros), reaching a length of 3.4 m with a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[2]
One Large Turtle: Protostega gigas - Smithsonian Ocean
This Protostega gigas is a species of extinct sea turtle from 85 million years ago. They swam in North America's Cretaceous inland sea.Missing: scientific | Show results with:scientific
[3]
Protostega_dig-2011 - Oceans of Kansas Paleontology
Oct 24, 2011 · Protostega gigas Cope was the largest marine turtle in the Western Interior Sea during the deposition of the Smoky Hill Chalk.
[4]
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.14864
[5]
Smoky Hill Chalk Member, Niobrara Chalk (Upper Cretaceous) of ...
Feb 20, 2015 · The Smoky Hill Chalk Member, a portion of the Niobrara Chalk, was deposited in the Western Interior Sea about 80 million years ago in north central Kansas.
[6]
Protostega gigas and Other Cretaceous Reptiles and Fishes ... - jstor
PROTOSTEGA GIGAS AND OTHER CRETACEOUS REPTILES. AND FISHES FROM THE KANSAS CHALK. By CHARLES H. STERNBERG, Lawrence, Kan. Read before the Academy, at Manhattan, ...
[7]
[PDF] Protostega gigas and other sea turtles from the Campanian of ...
Mar 12, 2022 · 1. Distribution of Protostega: 1 e Kansas, USA, Niobrara Formation, Coniacian e Campanian (see Zangerl, 1953a); 2 e Arkansas, Brownstown Marl ...
[8]
Sternberg 1900-1 - Oceans of Kansas Paleontology
Nov 9, 2004 · The world's largest turtles - The Vienna Archelon (4.6 m) and the Dallas Protostega (4.2 m), upper Cretaceous of South Dakota and Texas.
[9]
NORTH AMERICA
PREFACE. In this treatise on the Fossil Turtles of North America there are described. 266 species, of which 76 are regarded as ...
[10]
https://iucn-tftsg.org/wp-content/uploads/file/Articles/Hay_1908.pdf
[11]
A gigantic bizarre marine turtle (Testudines: Chelonioidea) from the ...
Nov 17, 2022 · Phylogenetic relationships. The parsimony analyses resulted in 20 most parsimonious trees of 1647 steps in length, with a Consistency Index ...
[12]
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02724634.1998.10011036
[13]
(PDF) Shell Constraints on Evolutionary Body Size–Limb Size ...
Nov 13, 2024 · ... shell size (carapace length) to assess evidence of constraint. ... Protostega gigas (Protoste-gidae) and Pan-Chelonioidea indet., which ...
[14]
[PDF] Dinos-Educator-Guide.pdf - Museum of Idaho
Protostega gigas. Discovery locality: Texas. Flipper-span: 472 cm (15' 6”). First discovered in Kansas in the Niobrara Chalk and named by E.D. Cope,. Protostega ...<|control11|><|separator|>
[15]
(PDF) Rhinochelys (Chelonioidea: Protostegidae) from the Late ...
Nov 8, 2014 · ... Protostega gigas, dermochelyids and most cheloniids, the pos- ... valid species of Rhinochelys, R. pulchriceps, was recognized. The skull ...<|separator|>
[16]
Anatomy of Rhinochelys pulchriceps (Protostegidae) and marine ...
... Protostega gigas to be nested within a paraphyletic grade of protostegids ... length–width ratio with decreases in skull size. PC3 explains 24.7% of ...
[17]
Shell Constraints on Evolutionary Body Size–Limb Size Allometry ...
Nov 12, 2024 · Body length or body mass maxima in marine turtles may be constrained by their physiological needs related to oviparity. This mode of ...
[18]
[PDF] The osteology of Protostega
By G. R. Wieland. The first mention of ancient gigantic marine turtles from America was made by. Cope in 1871 in a letter to Professor J. P. ...
[19]
[PDF] vertebratefaunao33zang.pdf
Hay also described two additional species of Protostega, P.advena and P. ... Protostega advena Hay, 1908, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ., 75, p. 200, figs ...
[20]
[PDF] GR Wieland--Protostegan Plastron. - American Journal of Science
It is based on two specimens of the turtle closely related to Protostega, which I have described as Archelon ischyros,* both of which I collected near the ...
[21]
Comparative cranial morphology of the Late Cretaceous protostegid ...
The scope of this study is to help resolve its phylogenetic relationships by providing a detailed description of the external and internal cranial morphology of ...
[22]
Excavation of Cretaceous Reptiles in Alabama - jstor
hyperphalangy. Naturally, the fingers were webbed; and, with the ectocondyle or muscle-attachment on the humerus, far down the shaft, it gave'the Proto ...
[23]
Protostegidae - Cretaceous Atlas of Ancient Life
Their skulls may have been adapted to eat hard-shelled molluscs such as inoceramid clams from the bottom of the sea floor.Missing: habits | Show results with:habits
[24]
First gut contents in a Cretaceous sea turtle - PMC - NIH
Diets of extinct Cretaceous protostegids remain speculative. Hirayama (1994) suggested that they might have been molluscivores, adapted to feeding on hard- ...Missing: Protostega | Show results with:Protostega
[25]
Palaeos Vertebrates Chelonii: Protostegidae
Formerly Protostega advena Hay (1908); the over-all appearance and the major proportions of the skull of this species are very similar to those of Protostega.
[26]
Mesozoic Monthly: Protostega - Carnegie Museum of Natural History
Jun 20, 2020 · Protostega gigas, one of the largest sea turtles of all time, hauling itself onto the beach to lay its eggs!
[27]
(PDF) Nesting of Sea Turtles - ResearchGate
Jan 9, 2020 · Sea turtles are generally solitary, and in most species, individual female turtles nest on their own.
[28]
Shark-bitten protostegid turtles from the Upper Cretaceous ...
May 20, 2016 · In this paper, we describe two specimens of Protostega gigas Cope housed in the Field Museum of Natural History (FMNH), Chicago, Illinois.
[29]
Modern and Ancient Sea Turtle Nest Depredation - Academia.edu
The study documents 26 years of sea turtle nesting behaviors and predation patterns at St. Catherines Island. Loggerhead sea turtle nests average 3.72 m² ...
[30]
[PDF] Paleogeography and the Late Cretaceous of the Western Interior of ...
Extent of Western Interior seaway during peak late Turonian transgression (Watinoceras time) ... dynamic in the Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway of North.
[31]
Paleoceanography of the Late Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) Western ...
Well-preserved fossils of the Late Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway (WIS) of ... seaway with a maximum depth of ∼200 m; 'nearshore Interior',. Sr ...
[32]
Insight into climate and hydrology of the late cretaceous western ...
Feb 1, 2025 · Given its shallow depth, freshwater inputs to the WIS could have had a greater influence on conditions in the seaway compared to a deeper ocean ...
[33]
Temperature and salinity of the Late Cretaceous Western Interior ...
Nov 1, 2016 · Reconstructed Late Cretaceous temperatures range from ∼5 to 23 °C, with the majority of WIS samples between 5 and 15 °C (Fig. 2A). Temperatures ...
[34]
Microfossil and geochemical records reveal high-productivity ...
Here we investigate the paleoenvironment near the southwestern edge of the seaway during OAE2 by integrating microfossil and geochemical records.
[35]
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X24006125
[36]
[PDF] Late Cretaceous faunal dynamics in the Western Interior Seaway
Jun 7, 2011 · The decrease in diversity with depth can best be explained by the long-term presence of dysoxic/anoxic conditions that would have precluded ...
[37]
Productivity-induced redox transition within the Niobrara formation ...
The Cretaceous Western Interior Seaway (WIS) left a sedimentary record that provides insight into the interrelationships that existed between ocean, climate and ...