Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Shield

A shield is a piece of personal armor, typically broad and carried on the arm or held in the hand, designed to protect the bearer from projectiles, weapons, and other attacks by intercepting or deflecting them. Shields have been essential defensive tools throughout , originating in prehistoric practices where they served both for protection and concealment during the pursuit of game. In , shields evolved into specialized forms, such as the large rectangular or tower shields used by Mycenaean warriors around 1600–1100 BCE, which were constructed from layered , wood, and to cover the entire body while allowing thrusts from behind their protection. Early shields were predominantly made from natural materials like , hides, , or , often reinforced with metal bosses or rims for added durability against axes, clubs, arrows, and slings. By the 8th century BCE, forces employed round or rectangular shields of , , or iron, sometimes spiked for offensive use, reflecting the integration of metallurgy in . In , Greek hoplites carried the aspis, a convex en shield about 3 feet in diameter covered in , which not only defended individuals but also interlocked to form the wall, a key tactical formation. Roman legions adapted similar designs, using the scutum, a large curved rectangular shield of layered and leather, optimized for shield walls and formations to withstand missile barrages. During the medieval period (c. 500–1500 ), shield designs diversified to complement evolving armor and combat styles, with kite-shaped shields emerging in the for mounted knights to protect the lower body while on horseback. By the 12th–13th centuries, the —a smaller, triangular variant—became prevalent among and , often emblazoned with heraldic devices that signified , , and in an of feudal warfare and tournaments. As plate armor advanced in the , shields diminished in battlefield prominence due to increased mobility needs and the rise of weapons, though they persisted in ceremonial roles and as symbols of . In modern contexts, shields have reemerged as ballistic or riot gear, such as transparent police shields introduced in the to counter firearms and crowd control threats, adapting ancient principles to contemporary conflicts.

History

Prehistory

The earliest archaeological evidence for shields in human societies dates to the period (approximately 4500–2500 BCE in ), though direct finds are rare due to the perishable nature of organic materials. Inferred from contextual artifacts and ethnographic analogies, these early protective devices were likely constructed from , hides stretched over frames, or woven and reeds, serving as basic barriers against projectiles in interpersonal violence or scenarios. During the subsequent Bronze Age (c. 2500–800 BCE), preservation in waterlogged bogs has yielded more concrete examples, particularly from Ireland and Scotland. Notable wooden shields include the Kiltubrid shield, crafted from yew wood in a simple oval form, discovered in County Leitrim, Ireland, and dated to the early Bronze Age. Similarly, the Cloonlara shield from County Mayo, radiocarbon-dated to around 1200 BCE, features a basic wooden construction reinforced for durability. A rare leather example is the Clonbrin shield from County Longford, Ireland, a hardened hide oval approximately 52 cm in diameter with a central boss and ribs, dated to the late Bronze Age (c. 1300–800 BCE) and likely shaped using hot-stone technology to toughen the material without tanning. These artifacts demonstrate the shift toward more structured designs using locally available organic resources. The Yetholm-type shields, primarily known from bog finds in and (c. 1300–800 BCE), represent ceremonial variants with thin sheet coverings, often decorated with concentric ribs and bosses, suggesting an underlying wooden or hide core for functional use. These decorative pieces, such as those from Yetholm Moor, indicate shields' role in ritual deposition alongside practical protection, with over 20 examples recorded across and . Wicker constructions are less directly attested but inferred from experimental recreations and parallels in contemporaneous sites, where lightweight frames covered in hides provided mobility in forested environments. Inferred uses of these prehistoric shields centered on personal defense during expeditions and small-scale tribal conflicts, where simple rectangular or shapes allowed for handheld portability and coverage of the . Wear patterns on related weapons, such as spear points from Irish sites, suggest shields deflected thrusts in close-quarters skirmishes, emphasizing their tactical value in pre-metalworking societies. The transition from ad hoc natural barriers, such as draped animal hides, to deliberately crafted shields occurred around 3000–2000 BCE, coinciding with the onset of the and advancements in and hide processing across . This development marked a conceptual shift toward specialized defensive tools, evolving further into metal-reinforced designs in subsequent periods.

Ancient Period

In ancient civilizations from approximately 2000 BCE to 500 CE, shields evolved from basic protective devices into specialized tools integral to organized warfare, reflecting advancements in , craftsmanship, and tactical formations across regions like the Aegean, Near East, , and . These shields were often paired with offensive weapons such as spears and integrated with to enhance effectiveness in battles, sieges, and engagements. Archaeological evidence and artistic depictions, including frescoes and reliefs, illustrate their cultural significance, symbolizing warrior status and communal defense in phalanxes or shield walls. Mycenaean warriors of the Late , around 1600–1100 BCE, employed distinctive figure-eight and tower shields, which were large, -faced structures designed to cover the body fully during combat. The figure-eight shield, shaped to fit around the neck and arms, and the rectangular tower , often exceeding 1 meter in height, were crafted with a wooden core overlaid in for durability against edged weapons. These shields appear in and palace frescoes, such as those at , indicating their use by elite in chariot-supported assaults and palace defenses. In the , Egyptian and Mesopotamian forces utilized lighter wicker or leather shields suited to mobile warfare from the third millennium BCE onward. Egyptian warriors, particularly during the New Kingdom (c. 1550–1070 BCE), carried small, rectangular or oval shields made of woven reeds or animal hide, which provided portable protection for archers firing from two-wheeled chariots in open battles like those at Kadesh. Mesopotamian counterparts, including and troops, employed similar wicker shields, often reinforced with leather, to shield drivers and bowmen during rapid maneuvers against infantry lines. Persian armies of the (c. 550–330 BCE) adopted the large wicker gerron, a rectangular or figure-eight shield up to 1.5 meters tall, primarily for archers in formations, where it formed a defensive barrier against projectiles while allowing counterattacks with composite bows. Greek hoplites from the Archaic and Classical periods (c. 700–300 BCE) relied on the , a large approximately 90 cm in diameter, constructed from layered wood with a facing for added strength and shine. Its concave bowl shape, offset rim, central arm band (porpax), and rim-mounted hand grip (antilabe) enabled secure handling in the tight-knit formation, where interlocking shields created an impenetrable front against spear thrusts. This design emphasized collective discipline over individual mobility, as seen in battles like Marathon and . Roman legions adopted the , a rectangular about 120 cm tall and 60–75 cm wide, formed from curved layers glued together and covered in leather or hide for weather resistance, from the through the (c. 500 BCE–500 CE). Its convex curvature allowed it to deflect blows effectively, and soldiers carried it in the —a locked shield roof—to protect advancing from barrages during sieges or assaults. Across these cultures, shields integrated seamlessly with spears and armor to define : Mycenaean and hoplites used them to support overarm spear thrusts in phalanxes, complementing bronze greaves and cuirasses; Roman legionaries paired the with short swords () and pila for thrusting in maniples; while Near Eastern chariot teams combined light shields with scale armor and long spears to exploit speed against slower foot soldiers. This synergy maximized protection and offense, influencing outcomes in major conflicts like the Persian Wars and .

Post-Classical Period

During the post-classical period, shields evolved in response to the demands of feudal warfare, , and emerging ranged weaponry across and beyond. In , Viking warriors from the 8th to 11th centuries employed round shields as a core element of their , particularly in shield-wall formations that emphasized . These shields were typically constructed from lightweight wood planks forming a circle approximately 80 cm in diameter, covered with or rawhide for added durability and often reinforced with an iron at the center to deflect blows. Following the of 1066, kite shields became prominent among mounted knights in , adapting to the needs of cavalry charges and horseback defense. Triangular in shape with a pointed bottom extending to protect the rider's legs, these wooden shields—often about 120 cm long and fitted with a central iron boss—were strapped to the left arm via enarmes and a strap for mobility. Their design drew from earlier Carolingian influences but was refined for the stirrup-equipped heavy cavalry, as seen in 11th- and 12th-century illustrations from the and contemporary manuscripts. By the 13th to 15th centuries, the emerged as a compact evolution of the form, suited to the increasing prevalence of plate armor that covered more of the body and reduced the need for extensive shielding. Roughly triangular with a curved bottom resembling a clothing iron (hence "heater"), these shields measured around 60-70 cm in height, were made of wood with leather or canvas covering, and often featured metal edging and a prominent boss; they were commonly used by dismounted knights in tournaments and battles, such as those during the . Specialized shields also proliferated to support evolving infantry roles, including the large pavise shields wielded by 14th-century crossbowmen in and Central conflicts. These tall, convex rectangular shields—up to 150 cm high and 60 cm wide, constructed from wood planks with canvas and coating—were designed to be planted upright via a spiked base or wheeled for transport, providing cover during the slow reloading of heavy crossbows; Genoese mercenaries famously used them at battles like Crécy in 1346. In contrast, bucklers served civilian and light combat needs, consisting of small, round metal discs (about 15-20 cm in diameter) with a central grip, ideal for parrying in duels and street fights due to their agility when paired with a . Shields persisted in non-European contexts, reflecting diverse martial traditions amid interactions with European powers. forces utilized round shields from the 14th to 17th centuries, crafted from layered or wood with metal reinforcement, carried by Janissaries and cavalry for versatility in sieges and field battles. In , employed tate shields during the (15th-16th centuries), large rectangular free-standing barriers made of iron plates or lacquered wood, positioned on the battlefield to shield archers or infantry against arrow volleys rather than handheld use. The advent of weapons from the onward precipitated the gradual decline of shields in European warfare, as firearms rendered traditional defenses obsolete for massed . While pavises briefly adapted for protecting handgunners into the early , shields largely vanished from regular battlefield use by the , persisting only in actions or ceremonial roles where remained viable.

Modern Period

With the dominance of weaponry in the , traditional personal shields largely faded from European and industrialized militaries, persisting only in non-industrial contexts such as among warriors who employed large cowhide shields for during conflicts like the of 1879. In industrialized warfare, shields transitioned to specialized, static defensive roles rather than portable infantry equipment, reflecting adaptations to trench-based static defense. This shift built on post-classical foundations where shields had already become rare in gunpowder-era battles, but industrial production enabled metal variants for limited protective purposes. By the early 20th century, during , British and German forces experimented with metal trench shields for static defense, particularly to protect and engineers from small-arms fire while digging or maintaining positions. These shields, often made of silicon-nickel about 0.23 inches thick, could withstand machine-gun fire at ranges up to 100 yards and were deployed in sets along lines to create firing ports or cover sappers advancing under fire. Such devices marked a departure from mobile personal shields, emphasizing immobility in response to the stalemated on the Western Front. In colonial conflicts of the early , powers occasionally tested steel shields against indigenous tactics reminiscent of close-combat assaults, though adoption remained experimental and limited due to the superiority of firearms. For instance, forces in East campaigns considered portable metal barriers for urban or bush defense, but these were overshadowed by machine guns and . Post-World War I, shields assumed auxiliary roles, including ceremonial displays in parades, where replicas or preserved examples symbolized regimental heritage, as seen in honor guards carrying ornate shields during state events. Initial adoption of shields in law enforcement emerged in 1920s Europe amid urban unrest, with wooden or early metal variants paired with batons for crowd control. By the 1930s, Polish riot police in Warsaw integrated steel shields into standard kit, providing basic protection during demonstrations while maintaining mobility— a design influenced by World War I trench prototypes. World War II further diminished personal shield use due to fluid, mechanized warfare, but concepts evolved into temporary barricades for defensive positions, such as portable mantlets or steel panels shielding anti-tank crews or command posts from shrapnel. These non-portable structures, often wheeled for repositioning, offered localized cover in urban or fortified battles without reviving infantry-carried shields. Overall, the period underscored shields' relegation to niche, supportive functions amid the ascendancy of armored vehicles and automatic weapons.

Components

Face and Boss

The face of a shield serves as the primary defensive surface, designed to intercept and absorb impacts from weapons. Typically constructed from layered wood, metal plates, or composite materials, it could be flat for maximum coverage or slightly to promote deflection of strikes. In ancient and medieval contexts, the face was often covered with or rawhide to enhance flexibility and weather resistance, while provided additional protection against and allowed for personalization. For instance, post-Roman shields, measuring 70-80 cm in diameter, were commonly built from wood planks glued together and overlaid with . At the center of the face protrudes the , or umbo, a raised metal element that reinforces the vulnerable hand-grip area and facilitates offensive actions like bashing. Usually hemispherical or conical in shape, and made of or , the umbo could feature a rounded dome for defense or a spiked apex for penetration; it was secured via rivets or studs to the underlying structure. This design has been documented since early antiquity, with examples appearing in contexts, though metal umbos became widespread by the early medieval period. In 7th-century Langobardic shields from , umbos measured approximately 18-19 cm in diameter and 9 cm deep, often incorporating decorative engravings such as Christian crosses or pre-Christian spirals inlaid with . Decorative elements on the shield face, including geometric patterns, hunting motifs, or heraldic symbols, served for identification in without compromising functionality. From the onward in medieval , knights painted coats of arms—such as lions, eagles, or crosses—directly onto the leather or wood surface to distinguish allies amid the chaos of combat. Byzantine shields from the similarly bore religious icons like the chrismon for symbolic protection. Shield faces varied between flat designs, which offered broad protection against direct assaults, and forms, which encouraged glancing blows to reduce impact force; these choices integrated with the overall shield shape to optimize maneuverability in formations.

Grip and Arm Straps

Shields have employed various and strap mechanisms to enable secure handling, , and maneuverability during . These features typically include a central hand for direct and arm straps for stabilizing larger shields against the body, allowing the user to maintain defensive postures while wielding weapons. The design of these elements evolved to balance mobility with the demands of shield size and weight, ensuring effective use in both individual and group engagements. In hoplite warfare, the shield featured a distinctive dual-support system. The porpax, a broad bronze or wooden arm cuff positioned at the shield's center, accommodated the left forearm up to the elbow, primarily bearing the shield's substantial weight of around 16 pounds (7.3 kg). Complementing this was the antilabe, or enarmion, a located at the shield's lower , which the left hand grasped to facilitate rotation and precise adjustments. This configuration, evidenced in artistic depictions like the and described in ancient texts by , allowed for dynamic control essential to formations. Roman legionary shields, such as the rectangular , utilized a horizontal central grip for primary hand control, as preserved in the intact third-century example from . An additional inner forearm strap provided supplementary support, securing the shield against the arm to distribute its weight—approximately 5-10 kg, with the example around 6-7 kg—and enable prolonged carrying during marches or battles. This setup promoted close-body positioning, leaving the right arm free for thrusting with the . Smaller shields like the medieval employed a simpler fist grip, consisting of a central wooden or metal handle positioned directly behind the . Unlike strapped designs, this hand-held approach offered high mobility for parrying and close-quarters deflection, with the —typically 8 to 16 inches (20 to 40 cm) in diameter—grasped in one fist for rapid strikes or blocks. Historical fencing manuals from 1100s to 1500s highlight its prevalence among and knights, emphasizing its agility over the stability of arm-strapped larger shields. For heavy medieval shields such as the , often used by crossbowmen, dual straps ensured robust support. Surviving examples feature original staples for leather straps positioned at the upper left side, both sides of the central rib, and the center, suggesting a combination of and hand loops or a for carrying and bracing the tall, form—up to 1.5 meters high—against the body. This multi-point attachment addressed the ergonomic challenges of the pavise's size, preventing slippage during static defense. Over time, shield handling mechanisms progressed from single-hand grips suited to lightweight, mobile designs in early periods to two-point arm-and-hand systems for heavier constructs, enhancing stability and reducing fatigue in sustained combat. This ergonomic shift accommodated increasing shield mass and tactical needs, such as interlocking in formations for collective defense.

Rim and Edge Reinforcement

The rim and edge reinforcement of shields served as critical perimeter elements to bolster durability against impacts from edged weapons, preventing splintering or cracking in primarily wooden constructions. In Viking Age round shields, such as those recovered from the Gokstad ship burial (ca. 900 CE), the edges featured perforations indicating the attachment of leather or rawhide bindings, which were likely stitched or glued to wrap the perimeter and distribute force during combat. These organic materials, common in northern European wooden shields, absorbed shocks and inhibited wood splitting, with rawhide particularly valued for its tensile strength and availability in Germanic traditions. Metal strips, such as iron bands, were occasionally employed for similar binding in later examples, providing rigid support without adding excessive weight. Medieval kite shields, prevalent from the 11th to 13th centuries, incorporated more robust edge reinforcements to counter cavalry charges and sword strikes. Archaeological finds from the 12th-century stronghold in include two shields measuring 125 cm long and 86 cm wide, constructed from thin wooden planks. Layered construction at the edges further improved resistance, with multiple plies of thin wooden boards glued orthogonally—typically or —forming a composite that mimicked for better , as evidenced in experimental recreations informed by Gokstad shield analyses. Maintenance of these reinforcements was essential during extended military campaigns, where exposure to weather and repeated use led to degradation. Leather or rawhide rims, prone to fraying from moisture and abrasion, were routinely inspected and replaced by attaching fresh strips via sewing or adhesive, ensuring the shield's perimeter integrity; metal bindings, if bent or loosened, could be hammered back into place by field armorers. Such practices, drawn from 12th-century warfare contexts, allowed shields to remain serviceable over months of use. This edge fortification complemented the central , forming a unified barrier against and threats.

Materials and Construction

Traditional Materials

Traditional shields were predominantly constructed from materials sourced locally, emphasizing lightness, flexibility, and availability to suit the needs of pre-industrial warfare. formed the core of most shields due to its abundance and workability, often layered or glued for enhanced strength without excessive weight. Animal-derived products like and hides provided coverings that added durability and weather resistance, while limited metal elements offered targeted reinforcement. These materials reflected regional resources and technological constraints, with composites relying on natural adhesives for integration. Wooden cores, prized for their lightweight properties, were typically made from soft, non-splitting species to absorb impacts effectively. In Viking-era , linden (also known as limewood) and were favored for their low density and ease of shaping into round shields approximately 80-90 cm in diameter, allowing warriors to maintain mobility in shield walls. Layering multiple thin planks—often from , , or —further bolstered structural integrity, as evidenced by archaeological remains from sites like and Gokstad. Similarly, ancient Greek shields (aspis) utilized heavy woods like or as a base, providing a stable platform for formations. Roman scuta, rectangular shields, employed glued layers of from local hardwoods such as or , creating a curved surface for better deflection. Animal hides and served as essential coverings, stretched or boiled to create tension and flexibility while protecting the wooden core from moisture and splitting. Boiled rawhide, processed by soaking untanned hides in hot water to harden upon drying, was particularly valued for its toughness; shields, such as those used by Maasai warriors, featured sewn or stretched panels that could withstand thrusts and provided a lightweight alternative to full metal. In medieval , tanned from or was glued over wooden shields, enhancing grip and impact resistance, as seen in the Sutton Hoo burial shield from 7th-century . These coverings often incorporated natural oils or for preservation, sourced from local flora and fauna. Metals were used sparingly for reinforcement due to their weight and cost, focusing on high-impact areas. facings adorned the fronts of and early shields, such as the , where thin sheets were riveted over wood to deflect blades and arrows effectively. In medieval periods, iron bosses—domed central plates—protected the hand grip on wooden round shields, forged from locally smelted ore and attached via rivets, as exemplified by 10th-11th century finds from Anglo-Saxon sites. , woven from flexible osiers or reeds, formed lightweight auxiliary shields like the Thracian pelta, covered in leather for added cohesion in skirmish roles. Natural composites integrated these elements through , derived from boiling collagen-rich hides and bones, which bonded wooden planks and leather layers in scuta and Viking shields for a resilient, unified structure. Regional variations highlighted adaptive sourcing. These materials evolved over time toward synthetic alternatives in the for greater .

Modern Materials

In the 20th and 21st centuries, shield materials have shifted toward synthetic polymers, composites, and advanced alloys to achieve lighter weight, enhanced , and specialized against impacts and projectiles, building briefly on traditional wood-leather hybrids by replacing components with engineered alternatives for superior performance. Polycarbonate, a thermoplastic polymer introduced in the 1950s, revolutionized riot shields due to its transparency, which allows users to monitor threats, and its high impact resistance, capable of withstanding blunt force without shattering. This material's clarity and strength make it ideal for law enforcement applications, where visibility is critical during crowd control. Composite materials, such as layers of (an fiber) combined with ceramics, provide effective ballistic stoppage in modern shields, often meeting or exceeding NIJ Level IIIA standards for rounds. These multilayer designs absorb and disperse from impacts, offering protection against both bullets and fragments while maintaining portability. High-strength aluminum alloys, like 2040-grade, and , such as , are employed in vehicle-mounted shields for their exceptional strength-to-weight ratios and resistance, enabling robust without excessive load on platforms. variants further reduce weight by up to 45% in applications like shields, enhancing mobility in armored . Post-2000 advancements include transparent ballistic , composed of layered and laminates or aluminum oxynitride ceramics, which provide clear visibility alongside resistance to high-velocity projectiles. cores, integrated into composite structures, further promote weight reduction by up to 40% in shield panels while preserving structural integrity and stiffness. From 2020 to 2025, further innovations have included graphene-enhanced composites, such as GC's RF2 , which exceeds NIJ Level III standards for rounds while reducing weight by up to 30%, and shear-thickening fluids integrated into fabrics for flexible, impact-responsive protection. Eco-friendly (UHMWPE) variants, like ECO-UHMWPE, offer sustainable alternatives with improved durability against . These developments emphasize and hybrid polymers for enhanced ballistic resistance and portability in tactical applications. Environmental considerations in modern shield production favor recyclable plastics, such as certain polycarbonates, over traditional disposable alternatives, as they reduce long-term waste and across their lifecycle, though reusable designs amplify these benefits by minimizing single-use production impacts.

Shapes and Types

Common Shapes

Shields throughout history have adopted several common geometric forms, each tailored to provide specific protective advantages in combat while balancing weight, mobility, and coverage. These shapes evolved to suit different tactical needs, from infantry formations to mounted warfare, emphasizing deflection and maneuverability over mere bulk. Round shields, exemplified by the ancient Greek aspis and Viking round shields, typically measured 70–100 cm in diameter and offered balanced coverage for the torso and upper body. The aspis, used by hoplites, provided equal protection on all sides, facilitating tight phalanx formations where shields interlocked for collective defense, while its lightweight wooden core enhanced infantry mobility. Similarly, Viking shields, constructed from thin wooden planks with a central iron boss, prioritized agility in fluid skirmishes, allowing warriors to maneuver quickly without sacrificing essential shielding. Rectangular or oval shields, such as the Roman scutum, stood approximately 100–120 cm tall and 60–80 cm wide, delivering full-body protection ideal for disciplined infantry lines. This elongated form enabled soldiers to form impenetrable walls, like the testudo formation, shielding against projectiles and melee attacks while supporting spear thrusts over the top. The curvature along its length further aided in deflecting blows, distributing impact forces away from the user. Triangular or shields, prominent in during the 11th–12th centuries, featured a pointed base and measured about 90–110 cm in length, extending coverage from neck to knees for mounted combatants. This design protected the rider's legs and horse's flank from ground-level threats, such as lances or arrows, while the tapered lower end minimized interference with stirrups and promoted balance during charges. The shape's asymmetry allowed for effective angling toward opponents without compromising the shield's hold. Small bucklers, ranging 15–45 cm in diameter, served primarily as parrying tools held in the off-hand alongside a sword. These compact, often convex metal or wooden discs excelled in close-quarters dueling by enabling rapid deflections of strikes, prioritizing speed over broad coverage in individual combat scenarios. Many shields incorporated curvature or dishing for aerodynamic benefits, particularly in deflecting projectiles and edged weapons. This convex profile, seen in the scutum and round variants, redirected incoming forces at angles, reducing penetration risk and conserving the defender's energy compared to flat surfaces.

Regional and Cultural Variations

In African traditions, Nguni peoples, including the , employed the ishlangu, a tall shield crafted from , often featuring interwoven strips of differently colored hide for visual distinction in battle; this design facilitated stabbing attacks over the top while providing full-body coverage. The ishlangu's elongated form, typically 1.2 to 1.5 meters in height, symbolized regimental status and was reserved for elite warriors under leaders like King . Among the Dinka of , rectangular leather shields, stretched over a wooden pole and sometimes reinforced with folded edges, served as parrying tools to deflect thrusts in , emphasizing mobility over comprehensive protection. In Asian contexts, the dhal represented a versatile round , usually 30 to 40 centimeters in , forged from or lacquered hide with a profile and central for gripping; it paired with curved swords like the for agile defense in charges and duels. Chinese military forces during the utilized wooden or mantle shields in dense formations, such as the wolf brush tactic, where interlocking shields formed barriers against arrows and ; these lightweight constructions, often lacquered for durability, measured up to 1 meter tall and integrated with polearms for collective advance. Indigenous American cultures adapted shields to their environments, with Pawnee warriors of the Great Plains crafting circular rawhide disks from buffalo hide, stretched taut over a wooden frame and adorned with eagle feathers for spiritual protection and balance in mounted skirmishes. These shields, approximately 60 centimeters across, featured painted motifs like thunderbirds to invoke power, hung from the saddle for quick deployment. In Mesoamerica, the Aztec chimalli combined a lightweight wooden frame—often reed or pine—with layered cotton padding for arrow resistance, forming an oval or round shield about 70 centimeters high, sometimes armored further with mosaic feathers or leather for elite Jaguar warriors. Among Oceanic and Polynesian groups, the Maori of rarely employed dedicated hand shields, favoring fluid staffs for parrying. Heraldic and ceremonial shields transcended combat, as seen in the Scottish —a small, round oak shield covered in leather, fitted with a central spike for offense and enarmes for arm attachment—often emblazoned with clan crests or spikes to denote heritage in non-battle rituals like gatherings. These targes, about 50 centimeters in diameter, evolved into symbols of identity, with brass studs and velvet linings emphasizing status over utility in post-Culloden ceremonies.

Tactics and Usage

Formations in Warfare

In , the formation exemplified coordinated shield use, where hoplites arranged in tight ranks with their large round shields overlapping to create an impenetrable frontal barrier against enemy advances. This tactic, prominent from the 7th to 4th centuries BCE, relied on the argive grip of the , allowing soldiers to lock shields side-by-side while thrusting spears over the top, emphasizing collective discipline over individual action. By the 5th century BCE, particularly during conflicts like the Persian Wars, the phalanx's depth—often 8 to 16 ranks—provided stability, with the overlapping shields protecting the flanks of adjacent warriors and deterring cavalry charges. The Roman legions adapted similar principles in the , where soldiers interlocked their rectangular scuta shields to form a mobile, armored shell, particularly effective against arrow barrages during sieges and advances. Described by ancient historians, this tactic involved front-line troops raising shields overhead in a roof-like structure while those on the sides held them vertically, enabling safe progression under missile fire, as seen in operations against fortified positions. Primary accounts, such as those from the campaigns in , highlight how legionaries knelt to join shields tightly before rising to engage, though the formation's rigidity made it vulnerable to prolonged flanking maneuvers by mobile archers. During the and Anglo-Saxon period (circa 8th to 11th centuries CE), the shield wall served as a linear defensive barrier, with warriors aligning round shields edge-to-edge to absorb or charges, forming a cohesive front that channeled into controlled melee. Literary sources like the and the poem depict this formation at engagements such as the in 1066 CE, where English forces held a ridge-top line to blunt assaults, relying on overlapping shields to protect vulnerable spearsmen. Archaeological from the burial supports the use of lightweight round shields suited for such temporary walls, though their fragility limited sustained without rapid breakthroughs. Scholarly analyses note that while references to skjaldborg (shield-wall) romanticize it, battlefield poetry and chronicles confirm its role in early medieval . In 14th-century European warfare, particularly during the Hundred Years' War and Italian conflicts, pavise lines provided mobile cover for crossbowmen, with specialized pavise-bearers (pavesarii) positioning large, oblong shields upright as screens while reloaders fired from behind. Florentine muster rolls from the late 1300s document equal numbers of pavise carriers to crossbowmen, indicating a tactical pairing that allowed sustained volleys in sieges, such as those during the Hundred Years' War, where they shielded against arrow fire. These convex, often painted shields—up to 1.5 meters tall—were lightweight for portability yet robust enough for group deployment, evolving from earlier mantlet designs to support ranged infantry in open or urban battles. Echoes of these ancient formations persist in modern , where police units form phalanx-like lines with linked transparent shields to create advancing barriers against crowds, drawing on principles of overlapping protection for coordinated containment. For example, U.S. Army training exercises involve soldiers forming lines with riot shields to protect against simulated projectiles, as part of non-lethal weapons practice. This adaptation prioritizes mobility and visibility over the rigidity of historical precedents, allowing officers to push or envelop without exposing individuals.

Individual Combat Techniques

In individual combat, shields served not only as defensive tools but also as instruments for agile offense in duels and skirmishes, allowing fighters to , , , and while exploiting opponent vulnerabilities. Historical fencing treatises emphasize personal speed and deception over static defense, with techniques adapted to the shield's size, shape, and construction. These methods, drawn from medieval and early modern manuals, highlight the shield's role in close-quarters engagements where quick was essential for survival. Buckler parrying, prominent in , involved rapid deflections using a small, round paired with a or shortsword to counter thrusts and cuts in one-on-one fights. Fighters extended the buckler to intercept incoming blades on the face or edge, often winding the weapon to displace it while protecting the off-hand, as described in techniques from the Liechtenauer tradition where the buckler snaps over the opponent's sword for immediate counterstrikes. This quick deflection enabled transitions to thrusts targeting the face or , emphasizing simultaneous and to maintain pressure in duels. Sources like Peter von Danzig's Fechtbuch (c. 1452) illustrate set-plays such as the Oberhau deflection, where the buckler guards the hands during a low thrust to the face. Shield bashing employed the central boss of larger medieval shields to stun or unbalance opponents during knightly skirmishes, leveraging the shield's weight for aggressive close-range disruption. Knights charged forward with the boss aimed at the enemy's or chest, using the impact to create openings for strikes, as evidenced in 15th-century combat manuals depicting offensive shield use to press and overwhelm foes. This technique was particularly effective against unarmored or lightly protected targets, stunning them momentarily to expose vital areas, though it required precise timing to avoid overextension. Medieval books, such as those by Hans Talhoffer, show illustrations of shield-assisted grapples and pushes in judicial duels, underscoring the boss's role in forceful engagements. Targe hooking utilized the spiked edges of Scottish in 18th-century duels to adversaries by catching and twisting their weapons. The concave leather-covered , held by central straps, allowed warriors to an opponent's or axe with its rear , pulling it aside or upward to strip the while advancing with a or broadsword. This disarming maneuver capitalized on the 's for , often followed by a to the exposed side, as outlined in period texts emphasizing . McBane's Expert Sword-Man's Companion (1728) details applications in sword pairings, including to control and neutralize enemy arms during rapid exchanges. Maneuvering with round shields, as practiced by ancient hoplites in individual skirmishes, involved circling to expose the opponent's unshielded right flank, exploiting the aspis's left-side positioning. Hoplites advanced laterally, using footwork to force the foe to rotate and reveal their vulnerable side, then striking over or under the shield with a spear or sword. This tactic addressed the phalanx's inherent rightward drift in looser duels, where the exposed right arm and torso became prime targets. Ancient sources and modern analyses, such as those examining Herodotus and Thucydides, describe hoplite engagements where lateral movement disrupted static defenses, with the shield's grip facilitating pivots for flanking blows. Training methods for these techniques relied on historical manuals like Fiore dei Liberi's Flower of Battle (c. 1410), which taught shield-integrated feints through structured plays emphasizing deception and counters. Practitioners learned to feign thrusts or deflections with the shield to draw reactions, then exploit with binds or thrusts, using "holds of love" for safe repetition before "holds of anger" in full combat. Fiore's system, with its scholar-master illustrations, promoted audacity and speed in one-handed sword work adaptable to feints, preparing duelists for real threats as seen in his of nobles like Niccolò III d'Este. This progressive method built conceptual mastery over rote drills, focusing on initiative in personal confrontations.

Defensive Strategies

Defensive strategies involving shields emphasize positioning to maximize while enabling counteroffensives, a principle evident since prehistoric times through the angled presentation of the shield to glance off incoming blows rather than absorbing them directly. This angle deflection technique, often at approximately 45 degrees, allows the shield's surface to redirect projectiles or melee strikes away from the user, reducing impact force and preserving structural integrity; for instance, in the Greek phalanx, rear ranks elevated shields at increasing to effectively deflect missiles during advances. Shields facilitate both active blocking, where the user dynamically maneuvers the shield to intercept and divert specific attacks—such as thrusting forward to meet an opponent's weapon—and passive coverage, relying on the shield's static positioning for broad-area protection in formations. Experimental reconstructions of round shields demonstrate that active techniques minimize damage by promoting efficient deflection, whereas passive holding leads to greater vulnerability and wear on the shield. In tactics, shields integrate with longer-reach weapons like spears to extend defensive reach and facilitate ranged disruptions; legionaries, for example, used the curved shield held in the left hand to protect against enemy spears while throwing heavy pila javelins with the right, creating openings for subsequent . This approach leverages the shield's one-handed grip for seamless transitions between defense and offense, as described by in his analysis of maneuvers. Shields also serve a psychological role by intimidating adversaries through their imposing size and visibility, often employed in rituals or battle arrays to project unyielding resolve and deter charges. In Mycenaean warfare, the massive tower shield not only enhanced physical defense but exerted a demoralizing effect on attackers by forming an impenetrable visual barrier. Despite these advantages, shields impose limitations through their weight, which induces during prolonged engagements and restricts for extended maneuvers. Historical analyses note that heavier shields, such as the Roman scutum weighing around 7 kilograms, could substantially burden soldiers, reducing endurance in sustained combat. Additionally, shields proved vulnerable to early firearms, as projectiles readily penetrated traditional materials like wood or thin metal, rendering them obsolete in post-medieval warfare by the .

Modern Applications

Riot Control

Riot control shields emerged as non-lethal tools for managing civil unrest and protests in the mid-20th century, evolving from earlier military protective gear to specialized police equipment designed for crowd containment without lethal force. In the United Kingdom, the first riot shields were introduced to police forces in 1977 by manufacturer Arnold PPE for the Metropolitan Police, following civil disturbances like the Lewisham riots, marking a shift toward transparent protective barriers for urban policing. These early shields were often wooden or metal but quickly transitioned to lighter materials to enhance officer mobility during crowd control operations. By the 1960s, riot shields saw significant adoption in France, particularly by the Compagnies Républicaines de Sécurité (CRS), the country's specialized riot police unit formed in 1944. During the May 1968 student and worker protests in Paris, CRS officers deployed "Gaul-style" round shields alongside helmets and batons to confront demonstrators hurling cobblestones, enabling defensive lines amid widespread unrest that nearly toppled the government. This period highlighted the shields' role in maintaining order during mass mobilizations, with the CRS's equipment evolving post-1968 to include better identification features like yellow-banded helmets while retaining core shield designs for group-based containment. Modern riot shields predominantly utilize transparent polycarbonate material, offering clarity for officers to monitor threats while providing protection from thrown objects and physical contact. Typical dimensions are approximately 90 cm high by 50 cm wide, with a thickness of 3-5 mm and a weight around 3 kg, allowing for prolonged use without excessive fatigue and compatibility with batons for non-lethal interventions. Key features include rounded edges to minimize risk during close-quarters pushing or arrests, and ergonomic handles for secure grip in dynamic situations. Innovations incorporated anti-spit coatings on the surface, repelling saliva and other bodily fluids to protect officers from biohazards during heated confrontations, enhancing and safety in prolonged engagements. In tactics, shields facilitate interlocking line formations to contain or disperse groups, often paired with less-lethal weapons like or rubber munitions for . Officers form shoulder-to-shoulder lines or echelons, using the shields' convex shape to deflect projectiles and advance methodically, creating a unified barrier that isolates agitators while protecting the . Wedge formations push crowds back to clear space, while tactical columns enable targeted advances, emphasizing coordinated movement to avoid vulnerabilities in the line. Global adoption of riot shields accelerated during the 1950s-1970s amid civil unrest in and beyond, becoming standard in police forces worldwide for handling protests and maintaining public order. Today, they are integral to in countries from the to , with designs refined for interoperability in multinational operations and emphasis on human rights-compliant crowd management.

Ballistic and Tactical Protection

Ballistic shields represent a critical advancement in for military and (SWAT) operations, emerging prominently from the late to counter lethal projectile threats in close-quarters environments. These shields typically feature a facing constructed from high-strength fibers like , which provide lightweight yet robust resistance to penetration. According to (NIJ) standards, Level IIIA shields are rated to stop handgun rounds such as and ammunition, while Level IV variants offer protection against high-velocity rounds, including armor-piercing types like .30-06 AP. Weights for these shields generally range from 5 to 15 kg, allowing operators to maintain tactical mobility without excessive encumbrance. Key design features enhance operational effectiveness, including transparent viewports made from or similar materials for and weapon ports that enable firing from cover. Wheeled or trolley-mounted models further improve mobility, particularly for larger Level III or IV shields that might otherwise hinder rapid movement across varied terrain. The FBI and teams adopted early Kevlar-based ballistic shields in the , integrating them into high-risk entry tactics following the development of advanced synthetic fibers. These features build briefly on bases but prioritize lethal threat mitigation through layered composites and rigid framing. In military applications, ballistic shields have proven essential in , where they facilitate door-breaching and room-clearing operations by providing immediate cover against fire and improvised threats. Such uses underscore the shields' role in asymmetric conflicts, where close-range engagements demand portable barriers that integrate with breaching tools and team formations. Recent innovations have expanded shield capabilities, with transparent armor developments in the enabling larger, lighter viewports using materials like ceramics that maintain clarity under impact without the bulk of traditional glass laminates. By the 2020s, military-grade shields increasingly incorporate integrated lights for low-visibility operations and sensors—such as cameras or threat-detection systems—for real-time data relay, enhancing coordination in dynamic environments. As of 2025, advancements include AI-driven threat detection integrated into smart shields for improved . These advancements, often tested for compatibility with existing tactical gear, reflect ongoing efforts to protection with information superiority. Compliance with rigorous standards ensures reliability, governed by NIJ Standard-0123.00, which defines protection levels and associated test threats for ballistic-resistant equipment including shields. Testing protocols evaluate performance against fragmentation from blasts or ricochets, simulating impacts at velocities up to 1,400 ft/s, as well as multiple hits to assess after successive rounds—requiring shields to withstand patterned shots without or excessive backface deformation. These benchmarks, drawn from NIJ 0101.07 for ballistic resistance, prioritize real-world durability in prolonged engagements.

References

  1. [1]
  2. [2]
    Military technology - Shields, Armor, Weapons | Britannica
    Shields were used for hunting long before they were used for warfare, partly for defense and partly for concealment in stalking game.
  3. [3]
    (PDF) Mycenaean Warfare and the Mycenaean Tower Shield A ...
    Van Wees writes that the shields described in the Iliad were universally circular, and are most comparable to shields that were used from the Greek Dark Age ...
  4. [4]
    The Story of the Shield: The Ultimate Protective Weapon
    Nov 1, 2022 · In ancient times the shields were designed to protect against weapons such as axes, clubs, slings and arrows. Other materials used included ...
  5. [5]
    [PDF] Ancient Greek Weapons And Armor
    Origins- Greek Marines Prove Mycenaean Suit of Armor Was Fit for Battle Ancient Origins ... Defensive Gear: Shields, Helmets, and Body Armor ... history of arms and ...
  6. [6]
    The Evolution of Shields: From Ancient Soldiers to Riot Police
    Apr 21, 2023 · Throughout history, shields have been an important part of waging conflict. As conflicts evolved, so did the designs of shields.
  7. [7]
    History of Medieval Shields - Owlcation
    Nov 13, 2023 · The early Middle Ages saw a quite crude form of armor and shield. Metal had not begun to be widely used, so both armor and shields were commonly ...
  8. [8]
    Medieval Shields History
    Shields were one of the earliest and most important pieces of defensive armor throughout most of the medieval period.
  9. [9]
    [PDF] The Evolution of Armor and Weapons in Medieval Europe
    Thus, the history of both armor and weapons is essential to a fuller understanding of the history of war. ... ”89 Without armor or shields, these troops stood no ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    Prehistoric shield production, utilizing hides and hot-stone ...
    Prehistoric shield production, utilizing hides and hot-stone technology as an alternative to leather to reconstruct the Clonbrin shield · Highlights · Abstract.
  11. [11]
    European Bronze Age Shields | Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society
    May 27, 2014 · This paper is primarily concerned with the large series of Bronze Age shields known in central, north and western Europe.
  12. [12]
    European Bronze Age Shields - ResearchGate
    Aug 6, 2025 · This paper is primarily concerned with the large series of Bronze Age shields known in central, north and western Europe, but, for purposes ...
  13. [13]
    The Bronze Age leather shield from Clonbrin, Co. Longford
    The Bronze Age leather shield from Clonbrin, Co. Longford, provides significant insight into prehistoric combat practices and social values surrounding ...
  14. [14]
    (PDF) THE FUNCTION OF BRONZE AGE SHIELDS - Academia.edu
    Bronze Age shields, primarily found in the British Isles, indicate diverse combat uses and cultural significance. 86 metal shields are documented, with 50 found ...
  15. [15]
    Hunting Warriors: The Transformation of Weapons, Combat ...
    Jan 9, 2017 · In the Bronze Age many of the weapon forms that were to dominate battlefields for millennia to come were first invented—shields and swords in ...
  16. [16]
    The Shield — The Greek Phalanx: Recreating the Hoplite
    Approximately three feet in diameter, the aspis is primarily identified by its distinctive hollow bowl shape (5 or 6 inches deep), 3” offset rim, and unique two ...Missing: 90 cm band
  17. [17]
    The Roman Army: the Civil Wars, 88-31 BC - Academia.edu
    1) the scutum measured 120cm in length by 75cm in width, and the one example of a scutum of the late republican period, that found at Kasr-el-Harit in Egypt ...
  18. [18]
    Anth.245 Ppt. lecture-15: Late Bronze Age Mycenaeans, Part 1 ...
    SUMMARY: Lecture 15 provides coverage on the art, architecture, state, administration, and economy of the Late Bronze Age Mycenaeans, and a discussion of ...
  19. [19]
    [PDF] shield. 166 is a cavalryman. His horse is decor-ned with a bead ...
    The small round shield, which appears to have been convex with a wide rim, was probably made of leather or wood as no examples have survived. These shields arc ...
  20. [20]
    Ancient Egyptian Weapons, Chariots, Fighting Boats and Fortresses
    Egyptian chariots carried a driver and an archer and were assembled at the battlefield. ... Egyptian chariot-soldier had to cover himself with his own shield. The ...Missing: wicker | Show results with:wicker
  21. [21]
    Achaemenid Military Equipments - Cais-Soas
    Early Achaemenid armies were characterised by a number of interesting and unique shields. A large wicker shield called the gerrha or the Persian word 'spara'. ...Missing: gerron | Show results with:gerron
  22. [22]
    Collections: Phalanx's Twilight, Legion's Triumph, Part Ia
    Jan 19, 2024 · Whereas the hoplite aspis was around 90cm in diameter, the shield of the sarisa-phalanx was smaller. Greek tends to use two words for round ...
  23. [23]
    The aspis - A global shield - Ancient World Magazine
    Jun 25, 2019 · As a symbol of social status, the large round shield was impressive and would remind others on the battlefield of the bearer's position.<|separator|>
  24. [24]
    Shields in Ancient Greek Warfare | Arms and Armor - Mused
    Along with the rise of the city-states evolved a new style of warfare: the hoplite phalanx. Hoplites were armored infantrymen, armed with spears and shields.
  25. [25]
    Warfare | Sparabara - Persian Empire
    Shields: The Sparabara carried large, rectangular wicker shields (called "sparas") that provided significant protection against arrows and other projectiles.Missing: gerron | Show results with:gerron
  26. [26]
    Warfare in Ancient Mesopotamia and Egypt: The World's First Armies
    Dec 13, 2024 · The Sumerians are credited with inventing numerous military technologies, including the war chariot, bronze maces, sickle-swords, socket spears and axes.<|control11|><|separator|>
  27. [27]
    [PDF] Viking Age Arms and Armor Originating in the Frankish Kingdom
    Apr 8, 2011 · shields in 9th century manuscript illustrations depict a round shield with a dis- tinct rim, firmly fixed by rivets. Some images reveal ...
  28. [28]
    Experimental Archaeology with a Viking Age Round Shield ...
    As an integral component of Viking Age combat, the round shield has the potential to offer a particularly revealing account of the combative practices of ...
  29. [29]
  30. [30]
    Shield (Pavise) - possibly Bohemian - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Title: Shield (Pavise) · Date: ca. 1475–1500 · Culture: possibly Bohemian · Medium: Wood, leather, gesso, polychromy · Dimensions: H. 22 1/2 in. (57.15 cm); W. 16 1 ...Missing: 14th | Show results with:14th
  31. [31]
    Sword and Buckler Fencing - Association for Renaissance Martial Arts
    Another advantage of metal bucklers was that unlike wooden shields, the point of an opponent's weapon would not get stuck in the face of the buckler nor would ...
  32. [32]
    The Ottoman Orient in Renaissance Culture. Papers ... - Academia.edu
    ... circular, Ottoman‑style shield called by their Turkish name, kalkan. Considerable numbers of circular shields were imported from the Islamic East ...
  33. [33]
    Tate & Tedate (盾 & 手盾) - Japanese Shields
    Dec 18, 2017 · These shields were either made of wood, iron plates riveted together or several layers of lacquered rawhide. They were almost all of the time rectangular in ...
  34. [34]
    European Warfare and the Rise of the Early Modern State 1300–1490
    This finally led to the abandonment of shields, at least during battle. The use of guns spread, especially to Eastern Europe, where the Bohemian Hussites made ...
  35. [35]
    Guns and Spears: a military history of the Zulu kingdom.
    Oct 22, 2023 · Descriptions of Zulu armies armed with short spears and shields, bravely rushing over open ground in the face of heavy fire in an attempt to get ...
  36. [36]
    Military use of Ballistic Shields: Part 1, ca. 1500–1918
    Oct 26, 2020 · Set shields were predominantly used in support of specific roles, such as to protect soldiers during the digging of a new trench or to provide ...
  37. [37]
    Trench Shield? - Other Equipment - The Great War (1914-1918) Forum
    Aug 2, 2006 · According to some German sources, another important use of the shield was to protect men digging new trenches. The shields were set up on ...
  38. [38]
    Parade Shield | Sigman, Jörg | V&A Explore The Collections
    Mar 30, 2004 · Shield, embossed iron, decorated with a Medusa's head and scenes from the history of Rome, signed by Jörg Sigman, Augsburg, dated 1552.Missing: 20th | Show results with:20th
  39. [39]
    Military use of Ballistic Shields: Part 2, 1919–present day
    Dec 29, 2020 · As shields for soldiers are best employed in static, siege-like battles—and wars dominated by such battles have rarely been fought since the ...Missing: barricades | Show results with:barricades
  40. [40]
    Mantlet - Wikipedia
    A mantlet or mantelet was a portable wall or shelter used for stopping projectiles. Some versions used wheels for enhanced mobility.
  41. [41]
    Shields: Terminology and History
    Pavise: A large oblong shield used mainly by archers and crossbowmen from the 14th century to the beginning of the 16th. It was also widely used by other ...
  42. [42]
    Shields, Targets, and Pavises - Age of Datini
    Jul 27, 2022 · One is made from planks glued side by side into a board which was shaved or carved to shape and then covered with rawhide, tanned leather, or ...Introduction · Source Texts · Collections Of Art
  43. [43]
    Two Shield Bosses (Umbos) - Western European, Langobardic
    Shield bosses were attached to the center of a circular wooden shield. These two are thought to have been made in northern Italy, the heart of the Langobardic ...
  44. [44]
    (PDF) BYZANTINE SHIELD DECORATION FROM - Academia.edu
    This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of Byzantine shield decoration and heraldry. Byzantine shields evolved in motifs and designs from 500 C.E. to 1453, ...
  45. [45]
    The Roman Soldier's Shield - Scutum - Romans in Britain
    Most research seem to point to a horizontal grip, this being inferred by an intact scutum from Dura Europas, but it was 3rd Century. 3rd Century Dura Europas ...
  46. [46]
    pavise | British Museum
    Description: Pavise, of wood, covered with canvas and gesso, painted. It is rectangular with round corners with a broad rib running up the centre and ...
  47. [47]
    Full article: The Viking Age shields from the ship burial at Gokstad
    Mar 24, 2023 · The remains of the reportedly 64 black and yellow painted shields uncovered at Gokstad are amongst the most well-preserved shields of the Viking ...
  48. [48]
    The Viking Age shields from the ship burial at Gokstad - Academia.edu
    ... edge, i.e. before a potential rim reinforcement and the radical tapering of the shield boards. Perforations Small rows of perforations, generally separated ...
  49. [49]
    The Decoration of European Armor - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Oct 1, 2003 · As in antiquity, early medieval shields were invariably of wood, usually covered with leather, and often painted, with paint substituting ...
  50. [50]
    What Woods were Used for Shields in Iron Age Europe?
    May 7, 2022 · “The shield plates themselves are usually carved of one piece of wood, in soft woods such as alder, linden or birch.” but cites no source) A ...
  51. [51]
    CLCV 205 - Lecture 6 - The Greek "Renaissance" - Colonization and ...
    The shield itself, as I've told you is made of a heavy wood, covered by a leather or bronze sheet about three feet across, something in the neighborhood of 16 ...
  52. [52]
    [PDF] The material and cultural dimensions of leather - Sidestone Press
    His results suggest that the cuir bouilli was most likely not boiled leather, as previously believed, but boiled rawhide, which was potentially improved by the ...
  53. [53]
    Shield – Works - Collections - Bowers Museum
    This is a shield made by the Maasai from Tanzania sometime in the 20th century. Maasai shields are typically made from animal hide sewed and/or stretched ...
  54. [54]
    Iron shield boss with wood and leather remains - University of Oxford
    Oct 26, 2021 · Iron shield boss with wood and leather remains ... Shield-boss, height 9cm, diam. 15cm. Rather tall boss with convex dome, topped by small button, ...
  55. [55]
    Shield of an Anglo-Saxon Prince - Part 2 - Thegns of Mercia
    Mar 19, 2022 · Handles of Anglo-Saxon shields were made in-line with the shield planks (rather than fixed onto the back) from wood, with the addition of iron ...
  56. [56]
    [PDF] ART OF THE PACIFIC ISLANDS - Bowers Museum
    In Melanesia, they use clay from the earth, wood from tree ferns and palm trees, and fibers from tropical plants. ... Fiji, Polynesia. Bowers Museum 2009.17.1.
  57. [57]
  58. [58]
  59. [59]
    History of Polycarbonate at Bayer - High-Impact-Plastics
    Dr. Hermann Schnell and his team at Bayer discovered polycarbonate in 1953, forever changing how we live our lives. As the next. 60 years have shown, ...
  60. [60]
    The Evolution, Design, Uses, and Types of Riot Shields - Haven Gear
    Shields have been in use for thousands of years as a military tool for protecting the user. Shields went out of fashion with the mass production of gun powder, ...Missing: early | Show results with:early<|separator|>
  61. [61]
  62. [62]
    Industry Experts Guide of Ballistic Shields - IntelAlytic
    Jun 19, 2023 · ... aramid fiber (Kevlar), and ceramics. These modern materials enhance the protective capability of shields while reducing their weight. The ...
  63. [63]
    NIJ Cerified | Security Pro USA – tagged "Level 3 Ballistic Shield"
    These composites often include layers of polyethylene or aramid fibers and may also incorporate metal or ceramic plates. Polycarbonate or Acrylics: For shields ...
  64. [64]
    U.S. Army Uses Alcoa Defense to Develop Prototype for Lighter ...
    Oct 25, 2010 · The blast shield was designed with Alcoa's 2040 aluminum armor, a high-strength alloy that doesn't fracture and resists blasts without ...<|separator|>
  65. [65]
    Aluminum Alloys in Military Vehicles and Equipment - Total Materia
    Aluminum alloys are used in combat vehicles, armor, ordnance, and equipment like howitzers, amphibious vehicles, and bridge systems.Military Aluminum Armor... · Military Vehicle... · Military Ordnance...Missing: titanium mounted
  66. [66]
    [PDF] ATI 425®-MIL Titanium Universal Pintal Adapter Prototype
    The ATI 425®-MIL titanium adapter is a lightweight UPA for mounting the OGPK's forward gun shield and standard weapons, achieving a 45% weight reduction.Missing: aluminum | Show results with:aluminum
  67. [67]
    Optically Clear Aluminum Provides Bulletproof Protection
    Nov 23, 2021 · Transparent aluminum armor is usually composed of three layers: an outer layer of aluminum oxynitride, a middle layer of glass, and a rear layer ...
  68. [68]
    Factors When Picking Core Material for Your Application
    The role of a composite core material is to provide strength, stiffness and continuity throughout a structure without drastically increasing weight. Whether ...
  69. [69]
    Sandwich panels: The importance of balancing weight and strength
    By adding foam between, both the weight and stiffness increase, but crucially, the stiffness-to-weight ratio increases dramatically as the panel gets thicker.
  70. [70]
    [PDF] Single-use plastic tableware and its alternatives - Life Cycle Initiative
    Hotel: Porcelain plate and bowl, stain- less-steel cutlery. Production and use: USA. Overall, reusable tableware has lower environmental impacts than disposable.<|control11|><|separator|>
  71. [71]
    5 common misperceptions surrounding the environmental impacts of ...
    Oct 26, 2020 · Actually, plastic generally has lower overall environmental impacts than single-use glass or metal in most impact categories. Reusable products ...Missing: modern shields disposables
  72. [72]
    [PDF] Innovation & Hoplite Ideology: The Relation of Martial Equipment to ...
    lighter shield. The dimensions of the average aspis are given by Matthew, who says the wooden shield alone was “between 80cm and 122cm in diameter and 10cm ...
  73. [73]
    Viking shields - National Museum of Denmark
    The shield type used by the Vikings can be traced back to the Iron Age. Thin planking forming a circle. In the middle was a domed shield boss.
  74. [74]
    Construction of the Round Shield Used by Vikings - The Viking Rune
    For defense, Vikings used large circular shields. Usually, the size of the Viking shields varied between 30″ and 36″ (75 – 90 cm). The shield excavated at a ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  75. [75]
    [PDF] Roman Army - Vassar College WordPress
    known as the scutum, about 4 feet (1.2m) long and 2 feet 6 inches (76cm) ... century example found in Egypt, the Roman shield was very heavy, weighing ...Missing: dimensions function
  76. [76]
    Two Twelfth-Century Kite Shields from Szczecin, Poland
    Oct 9, 2019 · The most remarkable artefacts among the numerous finds of arms and armour from the city are two late twelfth century kite shields found in the ...
  77. [77]
    (PDF) The medieval and renaissance buckler Definition and Typology
    The buckler was used in Europe since antiquity but its golden era seem to have been in the late middle ages and early renaissance.
  78. [78]
    The construction of historical shields | Battle-Merchant
    Jul 31, 2024 · Shields were not only protective weapons in the Middle Ages, but also symbols of power, status and identity. Their significance extended far ...
  79. [79]
    Nguni shields
    A recurrent and striking characteristic of these shields were the interwoven hairy strips of differently coloured hide on both halves, drawn through a row of ...Missing: isihlangu | Show results with:isihlangu
  80. [80]
    Michael Stevenson Contemporary
    The Zulu used a variety of different shields for different purposes. The largest types of regimental war shield, known as isihlangu, were the property of the ...Missing: history | Show results with:history
  81. [81]
    Dinka shields
    Their main function - deflecting the blow of one's opponent - became an essential and basic characteristic of the simple pole and parrying shield.
  82. [82]
    Shield – Works - Collections - Bowers Museum
    Shield, 20th Century Dinka culture; South Sudan Wood and leather; 53 × 9. Shield. Dinka. 20th Century.
  83. [83]
    Shield (Dhál) - Indian - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    This 19th-century Indian shield (Dhál) uses koftgari, made of steel, gold, and silk-velvet, and is 14 3/4 inches in diameter.
  84. [84]
    Red dhal (1935.48.29) - Asia
    The quintessential Indian round shield was known as a dhal. Made of steel or lacquered hide (as this one is), they have a convex shape and were held by passing ...
  85. [85]
    Weaponised shields of the Ming Dynasty | Great Ming Military
    Sep 7, 2016 · Shen Xing Po Zhen Meng Huo Dao Pai was a weaponised shield derived from Yan Wei Pai (燕尾牌). It was made of fire-resistant cowhide.
  86. [86]
    The Museum Journal | Some Shields Of The Plains And Southwest
    All the shields dealt with here are made of hide, which was the only material used for shields among the Indians of the Plains.Missing: evidence | Show results with:evidence
  87. [87]
    Shield | National Museum of the American Indian
    Object Name: Shield; Media/Materials: Buffalo hide/skin, hide thong/babiche, hawk feather/feathers, pigment/pigments; Techniques: Perforated, tied, wrapped, ...
  88. [88]
    [PDF] primitive american armor. - Smithsonian Institution
    While the shield on first thought may seem merely intended as a covering for the vulnerable points of the body, its impor- tance is far greater in parrying.
  89. [89]
    The chimalli or shield, a classic Mesoamerican defensive weapon
    The most recent studies of original shields show the frames were made of a very light wood that has yet to be identified, and decorated with bird feathers.Missing: armored | Show results with:armored
  90. [90]
    Rākau Māori – Māori weapons and their uses
    May 12, 2016 · One of the most well-known Māori weapons is the taiaha. It is usually made from wood, though sometimes it is made from whale bone. Due to its ...
  91. [91]
    Highland Targe - Scottish - The Metropolitan Museum of Art
    Highland targes were the last type of European shields to be used actively in battle, remaining a standard part of Highland equipment up to the battle of ...Missing: spikes ceremonial
  92. [92]
  93. [93]
    [PDF] THE EXPERIENCE OF COMBAT IN LATE ANGLO-SAXON ENGLAND
    knowledge of William the Conqueror's character, of the nature of Norman combat, his close relationship with participants in the Conquest, and the possibility of ...
  94. [94]
    The shield-wall - jstor
    shield-wall warfare in general, is limited to only a very few literary sources, and some items from archaeology and art history, such as the Bayeux Tapestry ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] The introduction and use of the pavise in the Hundred Years War
    Later fourteenth- century Florentine documents note the proportion of pavesarii to crossbowmen: in one case they are equally proportioned, and in another eight ...
  96. [96]
    Batons and Riot Shields…Non-Lethal Weapons Training in the Desert
    Mar 12, 2014 · This rigorous two-week course covers training including force continuum, riot control formations and techniques, expandable baton techniques, crowd dynamics ...Missing: Modern police
  97. [97]
    Shield Walls and Spacing: Hollywood Mobs and Ancient Tactics
    Dec 15, 2023 · This week, we're going to take a look at a different aspect of ancient infantry tactics: how heavy infantry shield formations work.A Boy And His Shield · Phalanxes · The Tortoise And The...Missing: mantle | Show results with:mantle
  98. [98]
    [PDF] Fiore Dei Liberi: 14th century Master of Defence
    Unarguably the most important Medieval Italian fighting treatise, the work of Fiore Dei Liberi forms a cornerstone of historical fencing studies.
  99. [99]
    Sword and Buckler of Liechtenaur
    The main principle with the “paired shields” is to couple or “pair” the buckler with the sword when performing the typical “winding” techniques that one learns ...
  100. [100]
    List of Sword and Buckler Historical Treatises for HEMA
    Learn how to fight with a sword and buckler from historical source manuscripts. Instructions for HEMA (Historical European martial arts).
  101. [101]
    Shields in the Middle Ages: protection, symbol and tactic
    Aug 7, 2024 · The Norman kite shield of the 11th century was ideal for mounted fighters. Its elongated shape offered protection for the rider's legs ...
  102. [102]
    Hans Talhoffer's Fight Book, a Sixteenth-Century Manuscript about ...
    Aug 1, 2018 · Talhoffer specialized in a specific type of combat, and his work involves the whole process of battle, from the entry of the contestants ...Missing: Fiore | Show results with:Fiore
  103. [103]
    Scottish Fencing: Five 18th Century Texts on the Use of the Small ...
    30-day returnsA comprehensive collection of five rare 18th century Scottish fencing texts, covering battlefield tactics and the use of various swords including small-sword, ...
  104. [104]
    The "Othismos", Myths and Heresies: The Nature of Hoplite Battle
    1) description of the desire of hoplites to protect their exposed right side by edging closer to their neighbour's shield might seem clear evidence for the ...
  105. [105]
    [DOC] Ancient Greek Phalanx Combat - UNCW
    The rear ranks held their spears underarm, and raised shields upwards at increasing angles. This was an effective defence against missiles, deflecting their ...
  106. [106]
    Collections: Roman Infantry Tactics: Why the Pilum and not a Spear?
    Nov 24, 2023 · The Romans haven't replaced the spear with the gladius, they've replaced it with a pair of the unusual Roman heavy javelin, the pilum.
  107. [107]
    Riot Shields - Arnold PPE
    Manufacturers of riot and personal defence shields since 1977, when Arnolds made for the Metropolitan Police the first shields ever to be used in the UK.
  108. [108]
    At 80, France's notorious riot police, the CRS, remain unloved
    Dec 13, 2024 · In May 1968, the CRS, wearing ties and short jackets and equipped with "Gaul-style" round shields faced the cobblestones thrown by the ...Missing: 1960s | Show results with:1960s
  109. [109]
  110. [110]
    CLB-2: riot control training - Marines.mil
    Feb 24, 2016 · “Riot shields are used to protect the squad and gain ground on crowds through different formations we taught such as wedge, echelon and ...
  111. [111]
    Riot Police and Crowd Control: From Tactics To Equipment ...
    Any rioters who chose to stand their ground would be met with riot shields and batons. ... CS gas was developed secretly by the UK military in the 1950s and is ...
  112. [112]
    Military Shields Made with Kevlar® by DuPont Life Protection
    Military shields made with DuPont™ Kevlar® and DuPont™ Tensylon® provide protection against ballistic, shrapnel, projectile and explosion hazards.
  113. [113]
    What Do The NIJ Protection Levels Mean? - Defenshield, Inc.
    Level IIIA: Level IIIA is soft for easy flexibility but offers excellent protection against .357 SIG and .44 Magnum ammunition from longer-barrel handguns.
  114. [114]
  115. [115]
  116. [116]
    Ballistic Shields Part 2 - Police and Security News
    May 30, 2023 · Transparent armor materials are not weight efficient and small ballistic shield viewports can be heavy. Take one example: A rifle-rated 24 ...
  117. [117]
    Trolley ballistic shields - Integris Composites
    Integris Composites supplies a range of trolley-mounted ballistic shields designed for operational use by police, military, and security teams.
  118. [118]
    The Evolving Role of the Ballistic Shield
    Shields are evolving into a regular piece of kit for law enforcement, security, and even military professionals.
  119. [119]
    Ballistic shield - Army Rumour Service
    May 14, 2010 · They used to use them on hard knocks and house raids in Iraq, not sure if used in Afghan. Reply.
  120. [120]
    Ceramic Transparent Armor May Replace “Bullet-Proof Glass”
    May 15, 2012 · The amazing new “Spinel Transparent Ceramic Armor” is HALF the thickness and HALF the weight of conventional, laminated “bullet-proof glass” with similar ...
  121. [121]
    Smart Bulletproof Shield: Integrating Technology To Enhance ...
    Aug 31, 2025 · These shields may include built-in communication systems, cameras for real-time video streaming, and sensors to detect threats like gunfire or ...
  122. [122]
    Specification for NIJ Ballistic Protection Levels and Associated Test ...
    Jul 8, 2025 · The standard should be used in conjunction with other standards to test and evaluate specific ballistic-resistant equipment, such as ballistic- ...Missing: Kevlar | Show results with:Kevlar
  123. [123]