Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Quantum fluctuation

Quantum fluctuation is a fundamental phenomenon in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory (QFT), arising from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, which prohibits the simultaneous precise knowledge of a system's energy and the time over which it is measured, or its position and momentum. This inherent uncertainty results in temporary, random variations in energy density at any point in empty space, even in the vacuum's ground state, manifesting as the brief creation and annihilation of virtual particle-antiparticle pairs.^[1]^[2] These fluctuations underscore that the quantum vacuum is not truly empty but a dynamic sea of potentiality, with non-zero zero-point energy that permeates all space.^[1] In QFT, quantum fluctuations are intrinsic to every quantum field, where the vacuum expectation value of the field is zero, but the variance—measuring fluctuation amplitude—is non-zero, leading to effects like vacuum polarization and the divergent vacuum energy problem.^[3] Observable consequences include the Casimir effect, first predicted by Hendrik Casimir in 1948, in which two closely spaced, uncharged conducting plates experience an attractive force due to the modification of vacuum fluctuations between them, restricting the wavelengths of virtual photons compared to outside the plates.^[4] This force has been experimentally verified and scales inversely with the fourth power of the plate separation, providing direct evidence of quantum vacuum dynamics.^[4] Other manifestations appear in atomic physics, such as the Lamb shift in hydrogen atom energy levels, caused by electron interactions with vacuum fluctuations.^[5] Quantum fluctuations play a pivotal role in cosmology, particularly during the inflationary epoch of the early universe, where microscopic fluctuations in the inflaton scalar field are amplified by rapid exponential expansion to macroscopic scales, seeding the density perturbations that evolve into galaxies and large-scale cosmic structure.^[6] Pioneering calculations by Viatcheslav Mukhanov and Gennady Chibisov in 1981 demonstrated how these quantum-origin perturbations produce a nearly scale-invariant power spectrum, consistent with cosmic microwave background observations.^[7] In 2015, experiments at NIST using superconducting circuits measured fluctuations in a mechanical resonator cooled to its ground state, revealing half a quantum of motion and bridging quantum theory with macroscopic reality.^[1] More recent work, such as Rice University's 2025 experiments harnessing vacuum fluctuations in cavities to engineer quantum materials, continues to explore these effects on mesoscopic scales.^[8]

Fundamental Principles

Definition and Origin

Quantum fluctuations represent temporary, random variations in the energy at a point in space, stemming from the fundamentally probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics. These fluctuations arise because quantum systems cannot have precisely defined values for both energy and time simultaneously, as dictated by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle.^[9] This principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg in 1927, implies that empty space itself is not static but subject to inherent instabilities on microscopic scales.^[10] The concept originated in the 1920s amid the development of quantum mechanics, particularly through Heisenberg's matrix mechanics, which emphasized non-commuting observables and laid the groundwork for understanding quantum indeterminacy.^[11] It was further refined with Heisenberg's explicit statement of the uncertainty principle in 1927, highlighting how such indeterminacy leads to unavoidable fluctuations in physical quantities.^[12] By the 1940s, these ideas were integrated into quantum field theory (QFT), where fluctuations were formalized as properties of the quantum vacuum, building on the quantization of fields pioneered by Paul Dirac in the late 1920s and advanced through renormalization techniques by Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga.^[13] In contrast to classical fluctuations, such as thermal noise from particle agitation in gases or liquids, quantum fluctuations are not driven by temperature or statistical ensembles but persist even at absolute zero and in the absence of matter.^[14] Classical thermal fluctuations average to zero as temperature approaches zero Kelvin, whereas quantum ones remain due to the zero-point energy of quantum fields, ensuring perpetual activity in the ground state.^[15] A key manifestation is the creation of short-lived virtual particles, which briefly "borrow" energy from the vacuum in violation of classical energy conservation, only to annihilate and repay it within the brief timescale permitted by the energy-time uncertainty relation.^[16]

Relation to Uncertainty Principle

The energy-time uncertainty relation, expressed as \Delta E \Delta t \geq \hbar / 2, where \Delta E represents the uncertainty in energy and \Delta t the uncertainty in time, fundamentally permits brief deviations from energy conservation in quantum mechanics. This relation allows quantum systems to "borrow" energy for short durations \Delta t, enabling transient processes that would be forbidden in classical physics, such as the appearance of virtual excitations.^[17]^[16] The energy-time uncertainty relation arises from the dynamics of quantum systems and is often interpreted as relating the uncertainty in energy to the timescale over which the system changes appreciably, such as the lifetime of an unstable state or the duration of a measurement. This principle is heuristic in nature for many applications, including the existence of virtual particles, and can be formally derived in specific contexts using time-dependent perturbation theory or by considering the spread in measurement times.^[18] A concrete illustration is the creation of a virtual particle-antiparticle pair, where the pair's rest energy provides \Delta E \approx 2 [m](/page/Mass) c^2 (with m the particle mass and c the speed of light). Such a pair can then persist for a time \Delta t \approx \hbar / (2 \Delta E), after which it must annihilate to restore energy balance on average.^[16] Proposed by Werner Heisenberg in 1927, this principle demonstrates why quantum fluctuations are intrinsic and unavoidable, in stark contrast to the strict, deterministic conservation of energy in classical mechanics.^[10]

Theoretical Description

Vacuum Fluctuations in QFT

In quantum field theory (QFT), the vacuum state is defined as the unique state |0⟩ that is annihilated by all annihilation operators â_k, satisfying â_k |0⟩ = 0 for every mode k, representing the absence of real particles.^[19] Despite this, the vacuum possesses a non-zero zero-point energy arising from the sum of ground-state contributions (1/2)ℏω_k over all possible field modes, reflecting inherent quantum fluctuations. This concept of the vacuum as a fluctuating entity was formalized in the late 1920s through the quantization of the electromagnetic field by Paul Dirac in 1927, who introduced the idea of field oscillators with zero-point energies. Concurrently, Pascual Jordan, along with Max Born and Werner Heisenberg, developed the matrix mechanics framework for quantized fields in 1925–1926, while Jordan and Wolfgang Pauli established key commutation relations for field operators in 1928, laying the groundwork for relativistic QFT.^[20] The theory evolved significantly in the 1940s with the reformulation of quantum electrodynamics (QED) by Richard Feynman, Julian Schwinger, and Sin-Itiro Tomonaga, who addressed infinities in perturbation theory through renormalization techniques.^[21] Quantum fields in the vacuum state exhibit perpetual oscillations, characterized by fluctuations δφ(x,t) that denote deviations from the average field value ⟨φ(x,t)⟩ = 0. These fluctuations stem from the Heisenberg uncertainty principle applied to field operators, allowing temporary energy borrowings that manifest as virtual excitations across all frequencies and momenta.^[19] As the ground state of the QFT Hamiltonian, the vacuum's zero-point energy diverges due to the infinite number of modes in continuous spacetime, but physical predictions are rendered finite through renormalization, which subtracts unobservable infinities by redefining parameters like charge and mass.^[21] Unlike descriptions emphasizing transient particle-antiparticle pairs, vacuum fluctuations primarily describe the intrinsic quantum variability of the fields themselves, with particle-like behavior emerging as specific excitations of these fields.^[19]

Mathematical Formalism

In quantum field theory, the mathematical description of quantum fluctuations begins with the quantization of a free scalar field \phi(x), which is expanded in terms of creation and annihilation operators. For a real scalar field in Minkowski spacetime, the field operator is expressed as

\phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3} \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2 \omega_k}} \left[ a_{\mathbf{k}} e^{-i \omega_k t + i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x}} + a_{\mathbf{k}}^\dagger e^{i \omega_k t - i \mathbf{k} \cdot \mathbf{x}} \right],

where \omega_k = \sqrt{|\mathbf{k}|^2 + m^2} is the dispersion relation for a field of mass m, and a_{\mathbf{k}}, a_{\mathbf{k}}^\dagger are the annihilation and creation operators, respectively, satisfying bosonic commutation relations [a_{\mathbf{k}}, a_{\mathbf{k}'}^\dagger] = (2\pi)^3 \delta^3(\mathbf{k} - \mathbf{k}') and [a_{\mathbf{k}}, a_{\mathbf{k}'}] = [a_{\mathbf{k}}^\dagger, a_{\mathbf{k}'}^\dagger] = 0.^[22] These relations ensure the canonical commutation rules for the field and its conjugate momentum at equal times, [\phi(\mathbf{x}, t), \dot{\phi}(\mathbf{y}, t)] = i \hbar \delta^3(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{y}), which underpin the uncertainty in field measurements.^[22] The vacuum state |0\rangle, defined such that a_{\mathbf{k}} |0\rangle = [0](/page/0) for all \mathbf{k}, represents the ground state with no real particles, yet it is permeated by quantum fluctuations as described in the theoretical framework of vacuum fluctuations. The fluctuation operator is \delta \phi(x) = \phi(x) - \langle 0 | \phi(x) | 0 \rangle, and since the vacuum expectation value \langle 0 | \phi(x) | 0 \rangle = [0](/page/0), the mean-square amplitude of these fluctuations is given by

\langle 0 | (\delta \phi(x))^2 | 0 \rangle = \langle 0 | \phi(x)^2 | 0 \rangle = \int \frac{d^3 k}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{\hbar}{2 \omega_k}.

This expression, a sum over all momentum modes, quantifies the zero-point fluctuations and diverges in the ultraviolet due to contributions from arbitrarily high-frequency modes, highlighting the intrinsic quantum noise in the vacuum.^[22] To obtain finite, observable predictions, renormalization is essential, particularly for the vacuum energy density, which formally includes an infinite contribution from the zero-point energies \frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega_k per mode. This infinity is subtracted via normal ordering of the Hamiltonian or counterterms in the Lagrangian, redefining the vacuum energy to zero in the free theory and yielding measurable effects in interacting cases.^[22] Overall, these formalisms demonstrate that quantum fluctuations scale linearly with \hbar and arise from an infinite sum over wavelengths, embodying the Heisenberg uncertainty principle in the field-theoretic context without direct derivation here.^[22]

Experimental Manifestations

Casimir Effect

The Casimir effect manifests as an attractive force between two uncharged, parallel conducting plates placed in a vacuum, arising from the restriction of quantum vacuum fluctuations between the plates. This restriction limits the allowed electromagnetic field modes inside the cavity formed by the plates, resulting in a lower zero-point energy density between them compared to the surrounding vacuum.^[23] The imbalance in radiation pressure from these modified fluctuations produces a net attractive force, pulling the plates together.^[24] The effect originates because vacuum fluctuations with wavelengths longer than twice the plate separation $2a are suppressed between the plates, as they cannot form standing waves within the confined space. Shorter wavelengths can resonate as integer multiples of half the separation, but the exclusion of longer modes reduces the overall fluctuation energy inside, creating the pressure differential.^[24] Theoretically, the pressure P exerted on the plates is given by

P = -\frac{\pi^2 \hbar c}{240 a^4},

where \hbar is the reduced Planck's constant, c is the speed of light, and a is the separation distance; this formula derives from summing the differences in zero-point energies of the allowed modes inside and outside the cavity.^[23]^[25] Predicted by Hendrik Casimir in 1948 based on quantum electrodynamics, the effect was first accurately measured in 1997 by Steven Lamoreaux using a torsion pendulum setup with separations from 0.6 to 6 \mum, confirming the theoretical prediction within 5% agreement.^[23]^[26] A variant, the dynamic Casimir effect, occurs when boundaries such as mirrors move rapidly, converting virtual vacuum photons into real detectable photons; this was observed in 2011 using a superconducting circuit simulating relativistic motion, producing photon pairs at microwave frequencies.^[27] The Lamb shift refers to the small energy difference between the $2S_{1/2} and $2P_{1/2} states in the hydrogen atom, arising from the interaction of the bound electron with quantum vacuum fluctuations in quantum electrodynamics (QED).^[28] This effect was first theoretically predicted by Hans Bethe in 1947, who calculated the shift as a radiative correction where the electron's self-energy is influenced by virtual photon exchanges with the fluctuating vacuum, effectively smearing the Coulomb potential experienced by the electron.^[28] Bethe's non-relativistic approximation yielded an energy shift of \Delta E \approx \frac{\alpha^3 \hbar c}{a_0} \ln(1/\alpha), where \alpha is the fine-structure constant and a_0 is the Bohr radius; more complete QED treatments incorporate self-energy Feynman diagrams to refine this logarithmic divergence cutoff.^[28] Experimentally, the Lamb shift was measured in 1947 by Willis E. Lamb Jr. and Robert C. Retherford using microwave spectroscopy on excited hydrogen atoms, revealing an energy splitting of approximately $4.37 \times 10^{-6} eV (corresponding to about 1058 MHz) that deviated from Dirac's relativistic predictions of degeneracy between these states.^[29] This observation resolved longstanding anomalies in the fine structure of hydrogen's spectrum and provided early verification of QED's treatment of vacuum fluctuations.^[29] For their discovery concerning the fine structure of the hydrogen spectrum, Lamb shared the 1955 Nobel Prize in Physics with Polykarp Kusch.^[30] A related phenomenon is the anomalous magnetic moment of the electron, quantified by the deviation (g-2)/2 from the Dirac value g=2, which also stems from QED loop corrections involving vacuum polarization by virtual electron-positron pairs. These vacuum fluctuations contribute to the electron's effective magnetic moment through similar radiative processes as in the Lamb shift. In QED, vacuum polarization effects, tied to the broader framework of vacuum fluctuations, play a key role in both atomic energy level perturbations and lepton magnetic properties.

Cosmological and Astrophysical Implications

Role in Inflationary Cosmology

In inflationary models, such as the original model proposed by Alan Guth in 1980 and the subsequent slow-roll inflation developed in the early 1980s,^[31] quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field \delta \phi with amplitude \delta \phi \approx H / (2\pi) generate primordial density perturbations with relative amplitude \delta \rho / \rho \approx 10^{-5}, where H is the Hubble parameter during inflation. These fluctuations arise from the vacuum state of the inflaton field and are amplified as the universe undergoes rapid exponential expansion, seeding the initial inhomogeneities that later evolve into cosmic structure.^[32] The resulting power spectrum of these perturbations is nearly scale-invariant, described by P(k) \propto k^{n_s - 1} with a scalar spectral index n_s \approx 0.965 from Planck 2018 data and n_s \approx 0.974 from ACT DR6 in 2025,^[33]^[34] as measured from cosmic microwave background (CMB) data. This spectrum originates from quantum vacuum fluctuations that are stretched beyond the cosmic horizon during inflation, becoming classical perturbations on super-horizon scales. The observed value of n_s aligns closely with predictions from single-field slow-roll models, providing strong evidence for the inflationary paradigm. These primordial fluctuations have an initial amplitude of approximately $10^{-5}, which is too small to directly form structures but grows through gravitational instability after inflation ends, eventually leading to the formation of galaxies and large-scale cosmic structure. This process is supported by observations of CMB anisotropies, first detected by the COBE satellite in 1992, which revealed temperature fluctuations consistent with inflationary predictions, and further refined by WMAP measurements in the early 2000s. The concept of quantum fluctuations seeding cosmic structure traces its historical development to extensions of early work on gravitational perturbations, with the pioneering quantum calculation by Viatcheslav Mukhanov and Gennady Chibisov in 1981, alongside contributions from Starobinsky in the late 1970s and early 1980s, and Hawking's 1982 analysis of irregularities in inflationary models.^[7] In these scenarios, the fluctuations are "frozen" once their wavelength exceeds the Hubble radius during the inflationary phase, preserving their quantum origin on cosmological scales.

Hawking Radiation and Black Holes

Quantum fluctuations near the event horizon of a black hole give rise to Hawking radiation through the creation of virtual particle-antiparticle pairs in the vacuum. In this heuristic picture, one particle of the pair falls into the black hole while the other escapes to infinity as real radiation; the infalling particle carries negative energy relative to an observer at infinity, reducing the black hole's mass and effectively making the process energetically favorable. This phenomenon arises because the intense tidal forces near the horizon separate the pairs, preventing their usual annihilation, and transforms what would be transient vacuum fluctuations in flat spacetime into observable particles.^[35] The rigorous derivation of Hawking radiation employs quantum field theory in curved spacetime, where the vacuum state for an observer far from the black hole differs from that near the horizon. By performing a Bogoliubov transformation between the "in" modes (defined in the collapsing spacetime) and the "out" modes (asymptotic to flat spacetime at infinity), particle creation is revealed: the outgoing vacuum contains a thermal spectrum of particles with temperature inversely proportional to the black hole mass. For a Schwarzschild black hole, this Hawking temperature is given by

T = \frac{\hbar c^3}{8 \pi G M k_B},

where M is the black hole mass, \hbar is the reduced Planck constant, c is the speed of light, G is the gravitational constant, and k_B is Boltzmann's constant. This result was first predicted by Stephen Hawking in his seminal 1975 paper, building on his 1974 announcement.^[35]^[36] The thermal emission implies that black holes have a finite lifetime due to gradual mass loss via Hawking radiation. The evaporation timescale for a non-rotating, uncharged black hole is approximately

\tau \approx \frac{5120 \pi G^2 M^3}{\hbar c^4},

yielding about $10^{67} years for a stellar-mass black hole of order one solar mass—far exceeding the current age of the universe. Detailed calculations of the emission rates, accounting for the blackbody spectrum and greybody factors, confirm this longevity for astrophysical black holes while suggesting that primordial black holes below roughly $10^{15} g could have evaporated by now.^[35] Hawking radiation bridges quantum mechanics and general relativity by demonstrating how gravitational curvature can convert virtual vacuum fluctuations into real particles, highlighting the need for a quantum theory of gravity to fully resolve inconsistencies like the information paradox. Although direct detection remains elusive due to the extremely low temperatures (e.g., $10^{-8} K for solar-mass black holes), indirect evidence has emerged from analog systems. In particular, experiments with sonic black holes in Bose-Einstein condensates have observed correlated Hawking-like phonon pairs and self-amplifying radiation, mimicking the thermal spectrum predicted in curved spacetime. These 2010s laboratory analogs provide qualitative support for the underlying quantum field theory framework.^[37]^[38]

References

[1]
Vacuum Fluctuations: Measuring the Unreal | NIST
Jun 23, 2015 · This animation demonstrates how a micrometer-sized aluminum drum can be used to measure vacuum ("zero-point") quantum fluctuations resulting from the ...
[2]
Quantum mechanics: the notion of vacuum fluctuations
Vacuum fluctuations are the creation and annihilation of particle pairs due to energy fluctuations in the vacuum, governed by the uncertainty principle.
[3]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory - Physics - Boston University
May 16, 2021 · Quantum Field Theory was originally invented as an attempt to combine special relativity ... quantum fluctuations. How can we keep track of the ...
[4]
The Casimir Effect
It is due to quantum vacuum fluctuations of the electromagnetic field. The effect was predicted by the Dutch physicist Hendrick Casimir in 1948. According ...
[5]
Quantum vacuum fluctuations - NASA ADS
The existence of irreducible field fluctuations in vacuum is an important prediction of quantum theory. These fluctuations have many observable consequences ...
[6]
Quantum Fluctuations - Particle Physics in the Early Universe
Quantum fluctuations in the inflaton field during inflation cause energy density fluctuations, which are frozen into perturbations. These fluctuations also ...Missing: definition | Show results with:definition
[7]
[astro-ph/0303077] CMB, Quantum Fluctuations and the Predictive ...
Mar 4, 2003 · Authors:V. Mukhanov View PDF Abstract: I comment on the predictive power of inflation and recent CMB measurements.
[8]
The Uncertainty Principle (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Oct 8, 2001 · The uncertainty principle (for position and momentum) states that one cannot assign exact simultaneous values to the position and momentum of a physical system.Heisenberg · Bohr · The Minimal Interpretation · Alternative measures of...
[9]
[PDF] 1.3 THE PHYSICAL CONTENT OF QUANTUM KINEMATICS AND ...
The Franck-Hertz collision experiments allow one to base the measurement of the energy of the atom on the measurement of the energy of electrons in rectilinear ...
[10]
February 1927: Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle
Heisenberg outlined his new principle in 14-page a letter to Wolfgang Pauli, sent February 23, 1927. In March he submitted his paper on the uncertainty ...
[11]
[PDF] Heisenberg's uncertainty principle - White Rose Research Online
Oct 25, 2007 · In his seminal paper of 1927, Heisenberg gave intuitive formulations of all three forms of uncertainty relations, but it was only the ...
[12]
[PDF] The Search for Unity: Notes for a History of Quantum Field Theory
Quantum field theory is the theory of matter and its interactions, which grew out of the fusion of quantum mechanics and special relativity in the late.
[13]
Quantum versus thermal fluctuations in the harmonic chain and ...
Aug 25, 2020 · Thermal fluctuations increase linearly with distance, while quantum fluctuations increase logarithmically. Thermal fluctuations destroy long- ...
[14]
What is the difference between quantum fluctuations and thermal ...
Nov 11, 2014 · A simple (and quite accurate) answer is that quantum fluctuations are the fluctuations that exist at zero temperature. What it means is that ...Understanding quantum fluctuations - Physics Stack ExchangeIs the term "quantum fluctuation" an aide to understanding?More results from physics.stackexchange.comMissing: authoritative | Show results with:authoritative
[15]
Some Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Particles
The uncertainty principle says that definite momentum is associated with a huge uncertainty in position. A virtual particle with momentum p corresponds to a ...
[16]
A derivation of the time-energy uncertainty relation - IOP Science
In his original paper [1], Heisenberg began by deriving the uncertainty relation for position and momentum on the basis of a supposed experiment in which an ...
[17]
Quantum Field Theory - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Jun 22, 2006 · QFT is the extension of quantum mechanics (QM), dealing with particles, over to fields, ie, systems with an infinite number of degrees of freedom.
[18]
Pascual Jordan's legacy and the ongoing research in quantum field ...
May 9, 2011 · Pascual Jordan's path-breaking role as the protagonist of quantum field theory (QFT) is recalled and his friendly dispute with Dirac's ...
[19]
The Radiation Theories of Tomonaga, Schwinger, and Feynman
A unified development of the subject of quantum electrodynamics is outlined, embodying the main features both of the Tomonaga-Schwinger and of the Feynman ...Missing: renormalization seminal
[20]
[PDF] Quantum Field Theory - DAMTP
This is a very clear and comprehensive book, covering everything in this course at the right level. It will also cover everything in the “Advanced Quantum ...
[21]
[PDF] Casimir1948.pdf - MIT
Hendrik Casimir, On the attraction between two perfectly conducting plates. (reprint from Proceedings 51, (1948), 793-795), in: Gems from a century of ...Missing: effect | Show results with:effect
[22]
The Casimir effect: a force from nothing - Physics World
Sep 1, 2002 · The fact that an attractive force exists between two conducting metal plates was first predicted in 1948 by Hendrik Casimir of Philips Research ...Missing: paper | Show results with:paper<|separator|>
[23]
None
### Summary of arXiv:1312.5174
[24]
[PDF] Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 mm Range - MIT
Jan 6, 1997 · For example, if a thin spherical conducting shell is cut in half, the two hemispheres will experience a mutual repulsive force [7]. These points ...
[25]
None
- **Abstract**: Observation of the dynamical Casimir effect (DCE) using a superconducting circuit, converting virtual photons into real photons via a moving mirror equivalent. First experimental evidence of DCE with two-mode squeezing observed.
[26]
The Electromagnetic Shift of Energy Levels | Phys. Rev.
The Electromagnetic Shift of Energy Levels, HA Bethe Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, PDF Share, Phys. Rev. 72, 339 – Published 15 August, 1947.Missing: original | Show results with:original
[27]
Fine Structure of the Hydrogen Atom by a Microwave Method
Quantum Milestones, 1947: Lamb Shift Verifies New Quantum Concept. Published 24 February, 2025. The discovery of a small discrepancy in hydrogen's atomic ...
[28]
Willis E. Lamb – Facts - NobelPrize.org
Willis Eugene Lamb, Nobel Prize in Physics 1955. Born: 12 July 1913, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Died: 15 May 2008, Tucson, AZ, USA.
[29]
[1807.06209] Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters - arXiv
Jul 17, 2018 · ... spectral index n_s = 0.965\pm 0.004, and optical depth \tau = 0.054\pm 0.007 (in this abstract we quote 68\,\% confidence regions on ...
[30]
Particle creation by black holes | Communications in Mathematical ...
In the classical theory black holes can only absorb and not emit particles. However it is shown that quantum mechanical effects cause black holes to create.
[31]
Black hole explosions? - Nature
Mar 1, 1974 · Black hole explosions? S. W. HAWKING. Nature volume 248, pages 30–31 (1974)Cite this article.Missing: evaporation original
[32]
[hep-th/0409024] Hawking Radiation and Black Hole Thermodynamics
Sep 2, 2004 · An inexhaustive review of Hawking radiation and black hole thermodynamics is given, focusing especially upon some of the historical aspects.
[33]
Realization of a Sonic Black Hole Analog in a Bose-Einstein ...
Dec 7, 2010 · A sonic black hole analog was created by accelerating a Bose-Einstein condensate to supersonic speeds, where sound waves cannot escape, using a ...