Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rayleigh length

The Rayleigh length, also known as the Rayleigh range, is a key parameter in optics that quantifies the propagation characteristics of a Gaussian beam, defined as the axial distance from the beam waist (the location of minimum beam radius) to the point where the beam's cross-sectional area doubles due to diffraction, corresponding to an increase in the beam radius by a factor of \sqrt{2}.^[1] For a fundamental Gaussian beam in a medium, it is mathematically expressed as z_R = \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda}, where w_0 is the beam waist radius and \lambda is the wavelength of the light; this formula extends to beams of lower quality via the effective Rayleigh length z_R = \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda M^2}, incorporating the beam quality factor M^2.^[1] Physically, the Rayleigh length delineates the near-field region of the beam, where propagation is nearly collimated and the depth of focus is maximized, transitioning to the far-field where divergence dominates, making it essential for assessing beam stability and focusing precision.^[1] Originating from solutions to the paraxial wave equation in early laser theory, the concept was formalized in the 1960s as part of Gaussian beam and resonator analysis, with the confocal parameter (twice the Rayleigh length) appearing in earlier literature on optical cavities.^[2] In practical applications, the Rayleigh length guides the design of laser systems for tasks such as nonlinear frequency conversion in crystals, end-pumped solid-state lasers, and free-space optical communication, where matching it to system dimensions optimizes power density and minimizes losses.^[1]

Fundamentals

Definition

The Rayleigh length, denoted as z_R, is a fundamental parameter in the propagation of Gaussian beams, which are collimated light beams characterized by an intensity profile that follows a Gaussian distribution and propagate primarily in free space without significant spreading near the beam waist.^[3]^[1] It represents the axial distance from the beam waist—the location of minimum beam radius—over which the beam radius expands to \sqrt{2} times its value at the waist, equivalently the distance at which the beam's cross-sectional area doubles.^[1]^[3] The Rayleigh length is expressed in meters and varies with beam parameters; for instance, a Gaussian beam with a 1 μm wavelength and a 10 μm waist radius has a Rayleigh length of approximately 0.3 mm.^[1] The term is named after the 19th-century British physicist Lord Rayleigh, in recognition of his pioneering contributions to wave theory and diffraction.^[4]

Physical Interpretation

The Rayleigh length serves as a fundamental measure of the collimation length for a Gaussian beam, delineating the axial distance from the beam waist over which the beam maintains a nearly parallel profile with minimal spreading. Within this range, the beam's cross-sectional area increases by only a factor of 2 compared to the waist, allowing it to propagate as if approximately collimated, which is essential for applications requiring sustained beam integrity over moderate distances.^[3]^[1] Beyond the Rayleigh length, diffraction effects lead to significant beam divergence, where the beam radius grows linearly with propagation distance, transitioning from a focused to a spreading profile.^[3]^[1] This parameter provides an intuitive analogy to the interplay between wave optics and geometric optics in beam propagation. In geometric optics, beams are treated as rays that follow straight paths without spreading, but the Rayleigh length quantifies the scale at which the wave nature of light—manifest through diffraction—begins to dominate, causing inevitable broadening even in ideal conditions.^[5] This transition highlights the limits of ray-tracing approximations near the focus, where diffraction determines the actual beam size and behavior.^[5] Furthermore, the Rayleigh length defines the longitudinal extent of the focal region, often equated to the depth of focus, which represents the distance along the propagation axis over which the beam intensity remains sufficiently high and the spot size acceptably small. Typically taken as twice the Rayleigh length for practical purposes, this depth is crucial for maintaining peak irradiance in the vicinity of the waist without substantial loss due to defocusing.^[6]^[1] For instance, a tightly focused Gaussian beam with a small waist radius exhibits a short Rayleigh length, resulting in rapid divergence and a shallow depth of focus suitable for precision tasks but limiting long-range coherence; conversely, a beam with a larger waist yields a longer Rayleigh length, promoting extended collimation and reduced spreading for applications like free-space communication.^[3]^[1]

Mathematical Formulation

Derivation from Gaussian Beam

The derivation of the Rayleigh length begins with the paraxial approximation to the scalar wave equation for light propagation in free space, assuming monochromatic waves and small angles relative to the optical axis. This approximation simplifies Maxwell's equations to the paraxial Helmholtz equation, \nabla_\perp^2 E + 2ik \frac{\partial E}{\partial z} = 0, where E is the electric field envelope, k = 2\pi / \lambda is the wavenumber, and \nabla_\perp^2 is the transverse Laplacian.^[7] Under these assumptions, the fundamental solution for free-space propagation is the Gaussian beam, with the electric field profile given by

E(r, z) = E_0 \frac{w_0}{w(z)} \exp\left( -\frac{r^2}{w(z)^2} \right) \exp\left[ i \left( kz - \eta(z) + \frac{k r^2}{2 R(z)} \right) \right],

where r is the radial distance from the axis, w_0 is the beam waist radius at z=0, w(z) is the beam radius at distance z, R(z) is the radius of curvature of the wavefront, and \eta(z) is the Gouy phase shift. The beam radius w(z) is defined such that the field intensity drops to $1/e^2 of its on-axis value. This form satisfies the paraxial wave equation exactly for Gaussian profiles in free space.^[7] To derive w(z), substitute the Gaussian ansatz into the paraxial equation and solve for the propagation. The resulting beam radius is

w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{z}{z_R} \right)^2},

where z_R emerges as the characteristic length scale. Physically, z_R is the distance from the waist where w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{2}, doubling the beam area and marking the transition from near-field to far-field diffraction. This \sqrt{2} factor arises directly from setting w(z)/w_0 = \sqrt{2} in the equation, yielding z = z_R.^[7]^[3] A more general framework for this derivation uses the complex beam parameter q(z), which encapsulates the beam's width and curvature via the relation

\frac{1}{q(z)} = \frac{1}{R(z)} - i \frac{\lambda}{\pi w(z)^2}.

The parameter q(z) propagates linearly in ABCD optical systems, and for free-space propagation over distance z, q(z) = q(0) + z. At the waist (z=0), R(0) \to \infty and w(0) = w_0, so q(0) = i \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda}. Substituting into the propagation rule and solving for the imaginary part gives the Rayleigh length as

z_R = \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda},

tying the beam divergence directly to the waist size and wavelength. This q-parameter approach confirms the Gaussian solution's consistency with the paraxial assumptions of free-space, monochromatic propagation.^[7]

Key Parameters and Equations

The Rayleigh length z_R, a fundamental parameter characterizing the propagation of a Gaussian beam, is given by the equation

z_R = \frac{\pi w_0^2}{\lambda},

where w_0 is the radius of the beam waist at the focal point (z = 0), and \lambda is the wavelength of the light in the medium. This expression highlights the quadratic dependence on the beam waist radius, meaning smaller waists result in shorter Rayleigh lengths and thus more rapid beam divergence, while longer wavelengths increase z_R, promoting greater beam collimation over distance. The parameter z_R effectively scales the near-field to far-field transition for the beam. The evolution of the beam radius along the propagation axis is described by

w(z) = w_0 \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{z}{z_R} \right)^2},

which shows that at distances much smaller than z_R (the near-field or confocal region), the beam remains nearly constant in size, while beyond z_R, it expands linearly with distance. Similarly, the radius of curvature of the beam's wavefront R(z) is linked to z_R via

R(z) = z \left[ 1 + \left( \frac{z_R}{z} \right)^2 \right],

indicating a wavefront that is flat at the waist (z = 0) and increasingly curved as the beam propagates, with the minimum non-zero curvature occurring at z = z_R. The far-field divergence angle \theta, representing the half-angle spread of the beam asymptote, is expressed as

\theta = \frac{\lambda}{\pi w_0} = \frac{w_0}{z_R},

demonstrating an inverse relationship between the Rayleigh length and divergence: tighter focuses yield larger divergence angles but shorter z_R. Additionally, the confocal parameter b, which defines the total axial distance over which the beam area doubles compared to the waist, is simply b = 2 z_R, providing a measure of the effective depth of focus for Gaussian beams.

Propagation and Behavior

Beam Evolution Beyond Rayleigh Length

In the near field, where the propagation distance z satisfies z \ll z_R, the Gaussian beam exhibits minimal divergence and maintains a nearly cylindrical shape, with the beam radius w(z) approximately equal to the waist radius w_0 and a constant transverse intensity profile along the propagation axis.^[8]^[3] This regime corresponds to the beam behaving as if collimated, with wavefronts that are nearly planar, preserving the peak on-axis intensity close to its value at the waist.^[9] At the Rayleigh length z = z_R, the beam radius expands to \sqrt{2} \, w_0, doubling the cross-sectional area and initiating significant wavefront curvature, which signals the transition from the near-field collimation to broader diffraction effects.^[3]^[9] Here, the intensity begins to noticeably decrease, and the beam's evolution starts to reflect the inherent diffraction limits imposed by its wavelength and initial waist size. In the far field, for z \gg z_R, the beam radius grows linearly with distance as w(z) \approx (\lambda z)/(\pi w_0), driven by a half-angle divergence \theta \approx \lambda/(\pi w_0), resulting in a conical spreading characteristic of diffraction-limited propagation.^[8]^[9] The on-axis intensity I(0,z) decays as I(0,z) \propto 1 / [1 + (z/z_R)^2], halving from its waist value precisely at z = z_R and approaching a $1/z^2 falloff in this regime due to the expanding area.^[3]^[9] The Gouy phase shift further characterizes this evolution, accumulating an additional \pi/2 phase over the confocal parameter $2 z_R (from -z_R to +z_R), arising from the beam's transverse confinement and impacting interference phenomena in focused systems.^[8]^[9] This phase anomaly, distinct from the geometric propagation phase, totals \pi across the full extent from z = -\infty to z = +\infty.^[10]

Effects on Beam Quality

The beam quality factor M^2, a measure of how closely a laser beam approximates an ideal Gaussian beam, directly influences the effective Rayleigh length. For an ideal Gaussian beam, M^2 = 1, and the Rayleigh length is given by z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda, where w_0 is the beam waist radius and \lambda is the wavelength. In non-ideal beams with M^2 > 1, the effective Rayleigh length shortens to z_R^\text{eff} = \pi w_0^2 / (M^2 \lambda), leading to faster divergence and reduced propagation distance before significant beam spreading occurs. Étendu, a conserved quantity in free-space propagation representing the product of beam area and solid angle, connects to the Rayleigh length through Gaussian beam parameters. For a Gaussian beam, the étendue is \lambda^2 for the fundamental mode, derived from the waist area \pi w_0^2 and the solid angle subtended by the divergence angle \theta \approx \lambda / (\pi w_0). Since z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda, variations in z_R reflect trade-offs in étendue conservation, ensuring that beam quality remains invariant over propagation despite changes in focus.^[11] In diffraction-limited systems, the Rayleigh length establishes the depth of focus for a given numerical aperture (NA), setting constraints on minimal focal lengths. The focused beam waist is w_0 \approx \lambda / (\pi \text{NA}), yielding z_R \approx \lambda / (\pi \text{NA}^2), which defines the axial distance over which the beam remains near its diffraction-limited spot size. Higher NA values produce shorter z_R, limiting the effective focal length in applications requiring tight confinement while approaching the fundamental diffraction limit.^[12] Aberration sensitivity in focused beams scales with the Rayleigh length, where shorter z_R corresponds to tighter focuses that exhibit varying tolerance to optical imperfections such as wavefront distortions. Analysis of beam patterns within a few Rayleigh lengths reveals that primary aberrations (e.g., defocus or spherical) alter the focused intensity profile more pronouncedly in short z_R regimes, though the tight confinement can mitigate relative impacts from certain low-order errors in high-NA setups. In high-power laser systems, optimizing the Rayleigh length balances energy density and divergence to enhance beam quality. For instance, reducing the beam waist to shorten z_R increases peak intensity, maximizing energy delivery to targets like plasmas while controlling excessive spreading; however, excessive shortening raises the required input power for stability, necessitating trade-offs via numerical aperture adjustments.^[13]

Applications

In Laser Optics

In laser optics, the Rayleigh length serves as a critical parameter for designing and analyzing Gaussian beam propagation, particularly in applications requiring precise control over beam focusing and stability. First quantified in the seminal work on laser beam theory by Kogelnik and Li in 1966, it provides the distance over which the beam maintains near-constant width before significant diffraction-induced divergence occurs.^[7] This quantification enabled foundational advancements in understanding stable Gaussian modes within optical systems. A primary application lies in beam focusing for laser cutting and welding processes, where the Rayleigh length directly determines the depth of focus—the axial distance over which the beam intensity remains sufficiently high for material processing. For thicker materials, engineers select configurations yielding a larger Rayleigh length, achieved by increasing the beam waist radius, to extend the depth of focus and ensure uniform energy deposition without requiring excessive repositioning of the workpiece.^[14] This approach enhances processing efficiency and cut quality in industrial settings, such as metal welding with high-power continuous-wave lasers.^[15] In laser resonators, the Rayleigh length is integral to mode matching and stability conditions for fundamental Gaussian modes. Cavity designs incorporate the Rayleigh length to align the beam waist and curvature radius with mirror geometries, ensuring the mode remains confined and oscillates stably without excessive losses to higher-order modes.^[7] For short Rayleigh length resonators, such as those in high-power free-electron lasers, perturbations like mirror tilt or focal length variations can critically affect mode stability, necessitating precise alignment.^[16] For pulse propagation in ultrafast lasers, the Rayleigh length delineates the regime where nonlinear effects like self-focusing dominate before linear diffraction takes over, limiting the distance over which intense pulses can maintain their profile in nonlinear media. When the self-focusing length approaches or exceeds the Rayleigh length, catastrophic collapse is averted, allowing controlled filamentation or spectral broadening for applications in pulse compression.^[17] This interplay is vital for mitigating unwanted nonlinearities in high-peak-power systems. Optimization strategies in laser optics frequently trade off the minimum beam waist w_0 against the Rayleigh length z_R, as z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda links spot size to propagation invariance. A smaller w_0 yields a tighter focus for precision tasks but shortens z_R, reducing depth of field, while a larger w_0 extends z_R for longer-range applications at the cost of resolution— a balance tailored to specific engineering needs like welding depth versus spot precision.^[15]

In Microscopy and Imaging

In confocal microscopy, the Rayleigh length z_R plays a critical role in determining the axial resolution, as it defines the depth over which the focused excitation beam maintains sufficient intensity for effective optical sectioning.^[18] The axial point spread function (PSF) width is approximately proportional to z_R, typically on the order of \lambda / (\pi \mathrm{NA}^2), where a shorter z_R achieved through higher numerical aperture (NA) objectives enhances sectioning by rejecting out-of-focus light more sharply.^[19] This enables high-contrast imaging of thin slices in thick samples. In two-photon excitation microscopy, the nonlinear nature of the process confines fluorescence emission to the region where photon density is highest, with z_R limiting the axial extent of this interaction volume and thereby supporting volumetric 3D imaging without mechanical scanning.^[20] For instance, using near-infrared wavelengths around 800 nm, z_R values of 1–5 μm provide sub-micron axial resolution while minimizing photodamage outside the focus, as the quadratic dependence on intensity ensures negligible excitation beyond z_R. This property has been instrumental in deep-tissue imaging of biological specimens, such as neural structures in brain slices.^[21] Optical trapping via optical tweezers relies on the Rayleigh length to govern trap stability, particularly along the axial direction, where the beam's divergence beyond z_R reduces the gradient force holding particles in place.^[22] For Rayleigh regime particles (size << wavelength), stable trapping requires positioning within z_R to balance gradient and scattering forces, with typical z_R of several to tens of μm for near-infrared beams like 1064 nm enabling manipulation of micron-sized objects like cells or nanoparticles over distances limited by this parameter. Adjustments to beam waist can extend effective trap depth, improving stability for prolonged experiments in biophysical studies. Aberration correction in microscopy often involves optimizing z_R to counteract sample-induced distortions, such as spherical or chromatic aberrations that broaden the PSF and shorten the effective focus depth.^[23] Adaptive optics techniques, like deformable mirrors, restore z_R by compensating phase errors, preserving axial resolution in refractive index-mismatched media such as biological tissues.^[24] In super-resolution techniques like stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy, scaling z_R through beam parameter adjustments enhances control over the effective PSF, allowing sub-diffraction resolution by confining depletion to the focal region.^[25] This approach has been key to high-fidelity 3D reconstructions in complex samples.

Beam Waist and Divergence

The beam waist, denoted as w_0, represents the minimum radius of a Gaussian beam at its narrowest point, typically located at z = 0, where the wavefront is planar and the beam cross-section has the smallest area.^[26] This parameter is fundamental to the Rayleigh length, given by the relation z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda, where \lambda is the wavelength, illustrating how a tighter focus (smaller w_0) results in a shorter distance over which the beam remains collimated.^[2] The divergence half-angle \theta quantifies the beam's angular spread in the far field and is defined as \theta = \lambda / (\pi w_0).^[26] This expression reveals a direct interdependence with the beam waist: a smaller w_0 yields a larger \theta, leading to faster divergence, while the Rayleigh length can be equivalently expressed as z_R = w_0 / \theta, highlighting the inherent trade-off between achieving a tight focus and maintaining a long propagation distance before significant spreading occurs.^[2] In the far-field regime, where z \gg z_R, the beam radius w(z) asymptotically approaches w(z) \approx \theta z, describing the conical expansion characteristic of diffraction-limited propagation.^[26] This behavior underscores the Rayleigh length's role as the transition point from near-field collimation to far-field divergence. To determine w_0 experimentally, interferometric techniques, such as shear interferometry, are employed by splitting the beam into reference and sheared components to form interference fringes whose period depends on the wavefront curvature relative to the waist location.^[27] The fringe pattern in a cross-section allows calculation of the distance from the waist using Gaussian beam formulas, from which w_0 is derived, and subsequently z_R is inferred via the standard relation.^[27] For non-ideal beams exhibiting astigmatism, such as those from diode lasers, the effective beam waist varies along orthogonal transverse axes (w_{0x} and w_{0y}), with corresponding Rayleigh lengths z_{Rx} = \pi w_{0x}^2 / \lambda and z_{Ry} = \pi w_{0y}^2 / \lambda. This asymmetry results in separate focal planes and unequal propagation characteristics, reducing the overall effective z_R compared to an ideal circular Gaussian beam unless corrected, as the beam's quality factor M^2 > 1 further modifies the parameters.^[28]

Comparison to Other Length Scales

The Rayleigh length z_R, defined as the axial distance from the beam waist where a Gaussian beam's radius increases by a factor of \sqrt{2}, fundamentally differs from the Rayleigh criterion in imaging optics. The latter establishes an angular resolution limit for distinguishing two incoherent point sources, given by \delta \theta \approx 1.22 \lambda / D, where \lambda is the wavelength and D is the aperture diameter; this criterion applies to far-field angular separation in telescopes or microscopes, yielding a minimum resolvable angle rather than a propagation distance. In contrast, z_R quantifies the longitudinal extent of near-diffraction-limited beam propagation, emphasizing the beam's focal depth without reference to imaging resolution.^[29]^[1] Similarly, the Rayleigh length is unrelated to the Rayleigh scattering length l_s = 1 / (n \sigma), which represents the mean free path for elastic photon scattering by particles much smaller than \lambda in a medium of particle density n and scattering cross-section \sigma. This scattering length governs light attenuation in turbid media, such as liquid argon detectors where values reach approximately 60 cm at 90 K, but it pertains to stochastic particle interactions rather than deterministic beam diffraction. The distinction underscores z_R's role in coherent laser beam focusing, independent of scattering processes.^[30]^[1] In laser physics, the Rayleigh length assumes a monochromatic beam, setting it apart from the coherence length l_c \approx \lambda^2 / \Delta \lambda, which measures the propagation distance over which phase coherence persists given the spectral bandwidth \Delta \lambda. For broadband sources, l_c limits interference and introduces pulse spreading or beam broadening effects that can exceed z_R, as seen in applications like lidar where finite coherence reduces effective probe volumes. Thus, while z_R defines geometric divergence for ideal narrow-linewidth beams, l_c addresses spectral impacts on temporal coherence.^[31]^[1] The Rayleigh length also contrasts with the Fresnel distance z_F = a^2 / \lambda, which delineates the near-field (Fresnel) regime from the far-field for uniform apertures of width a, based on phase variations across the wavefront. For Gaussian beams, z_R = \pi w_0^2 / \lambda (with waist radius w_0) serves an analogous transitional role, marking the boundary between collimated and diverging propagation, but it is intrinsically tied to the beam's Gaussian profile rather than aperture geometry. This specificity highlights z_R's utility in modeling focused laser systems.^[32]^[1] A key scaling difference is that z_R \propto 1 / \lambda for fixed w_0, meaning shorter wavelengths yield smaller Rayleigh lengths and thus more rapid beam divergence, enhancing resolution in applications like microscopy but limiting propagation distance. This wavelength dependence, absent in scale-invariant lengths like certain scattering paths, emphasizes z_R's sensitivity to optical design choices in beam quality optimization.^[1]

References

[1]
Rayleigh length - RP Photonics
The Rayleigh length of a laser beam is the distance from the beam waist where the mode radius increased by a factor square root of 2.Rayleigh Length of Gaussian... · Rayleigh Length of Higher...
[2]
Laser Beams and Resonators - Optica Publishing Group
This paper is a review of the theory of laser beams and resonators. Emphasis is placed on formulations and derivations which lead to basic understanding.
[3]
Gaussian Beam Propagation
### Summary of Rayleigh Length and Gaussian Beams from Edmund Optics
[4]
Rayleigh length – Knowledge and References - Taylor & Francis
Rayleigh length refers to a distance in optics that is named after Lord Rayleigh. It is a measure of the distance over which a beam of light can remain ...
[5]
[PDF] 1 Introduction - Stony Brook University
This sort of ray optics model works well except in the vicinity of a focus, where the size of the beam is determined by its wave nature, through diffraction.
[6]
Gaussian Beam Optics - Newport
The depth of focus for the beam is then: or about 160 µm. If we were to change the focal length of the lens in this example to 100 mm, the focal spot size ...
[7]
https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-5-10-1550
[8]
Gaussian beams - RP Photonics
Propagation of Gaussian Beams ; direction with the wavelength λ ; = 2 π / λ , the Rayleigh length z R ; = 0 in the equation above corresponds to the beam waist or ...Missing: original | Show results with:original
[9]
[PDF] Laser and Gaussian Beam Propagation and Transformation
There also exist some other derived parameters, such as the Rayleigh range, which explains the extension of the beam waist along the propagation axis, and the ...
[10]
https://www.rp-photonics.com/gouy_phase_shift.html
[11]
Étendue of a Gaussian Beam - ResearchGate
Nov 13, 2022 · A simple explanation and interpretation of "etendue" as it is applied in a semi-simplistic fashion to lens design and radiometry.Missing: Rayleigh length
[12]
Impact of wavelength and spot size on laser depth of focus ...
Feb 23, 2023 · The depth of focus (DOF) is twice the Rayleigh length. The DOF of a high numerical aperture (NA) lens is shorter than one with a smaller NA.
[13]
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphy.2022.1072023/full
[14]
Review and Analysis of Modern Laser Beam Welding Processes - NIH
Sep 23, 2024 · The double Rayleigh length (depth-of-focus) of the laser beam, ZR, is directly proportional to the length of the focus, as shown in Figure 1.
[15]
Spot Size, Laser Quality and Welding Performance - TWI Global
For a given spot size, a higher beam quality will produce a greater depth of focus at the beam waist. ... Rayleigh length * (mm), 4.0, 2.5, 2.1, 9.9, 1.2, 4.0 ...
[16]
Stability of a short Rayleigh length laser resonator
Gaussian beam theory. Gaussian beam theory [5] provides another check on the ray technique. A Gaussian beam may be described analytically by its complex beam ...
[17]
Transition from linear- to nonlinear-focusing regime in filamentation
Dec 1, 2014 · When an ultrashort laser pulse propagating in air has a peak power exceeding the critical power for self-focusing (typically in the range of 3– ...
[18]
Combined Confocal‐Atomic‐Force Microscope Setup for Quantum ...
Sep 4, 2024 · The axial resolution limit of such a setup can be estimated using the Rayleigh length—the length of the Gaussian laser beam profile. (4).
[19]
[PDF] Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy - Zeiss Campus
The Rayleigh unit is used primarily for a generally valid rep resentation of the optical slice thickness in a confocal LSM. Resolution, in case of large ...
[20]
Theoretical and experimental determination of the confocal function ...
We fitted Eq. (3) to the measurements to determine the confocal parameter z R . For the second set of measurements ...
[21]
Superficial Bound of the Depth Limit of Two-Photon Imaging in ...
Jan 16, 2020 · ... 2 + z R 2 ) 4 π n z R is the 1 e 2 width, z R = λ n π tan ⁡ 2 θ is the Rayleigh length determined by the NA-derived focusing half-angle.
[22]
Gaussian beam in two-photon fluorescence imaging of rat brain ...
Dec 9, 2014 · Equation (3) shows that a longer wavelength λ λ will lead to a shorter Rayleigh length z0 z 0 ; therefore, an increase of the wavelength from ...
[23]
High-resolution two-photon fluorescence microscope imaging of ...
The axial resolution of the imaging is about 750 nm, which is about 1.4 times higher than the Rayleigh length under the same excitation. The fluorescence ...
[24]
Ultrahigh numerical aperture meta-fibre for flexible optical trapping
Mar 15, 2021 · ... Rayleigh length (z ≫ zR ∼ 10…30 µm in the visible spectrum). Hence ... It should be mentioned that stable optical trapping was ...
[25]
Dynamic correction of optical aberrations for height-independent ...
Jul 21, 2023 · In our case, the spherical aberrations have a stronger impact on the beam radius and the Rayleigh length compared to the correction of ...
[26]
Automatic and adaptive heterogeneous refractive index ... - Nature
Sep 20, 2017 · An aperture at the back of the excitation objective may be manually adjusted to match the Rayleigh length of the exciting light-sheet to the ...
[27]
Correcting spatial-spectral crosstalk and chromatic aberrations in ...
... Rayleigh length. The chromatic aberrations in x- and y-directions behave differently; the former is depth dependent while the latter is not. The maximum ...3.4. Oct Signal... · 4. Results · 4.2. Ex-Vivo Imaging Of...
[28]
STED-SPIM made simple - Optica Publishing Group
This is much more than the expected Rayleigh length for a perfectly focused Gaussian beam. Therefore, this distance shall be named “pseudo-Rayleigh length”.
[29]
Isotropic, aberration-corrected light sheet microscopy for rapid high ...
Feb 21, 2025 · The light sheet properties, such as its thickness, effective length (Rayleigh length), and intensity distribution in all directions greatly ...Results · Online Methods · Field Curvature Measurement
[30]
Extending Single-Molecule Microscopy Using Optical Fourier ...
Apr 18, 2014 · A technique was developed to obtain three-dimensional structural information on a length scale well below the Rayleigh length with conventional ...
[31]
[PDF] Gaussian Beam Optics
Figure 2.5 shows the Gaussian beam propagation equation plotted as a function of w0, with the particular values of l = 632.8 nm and z = 100 m.
[32]
Interferometric Locating the Waist of a Laser Beam
Dec 8, 2024 · The distance from the waist to the plane of recording the period of the interference fringes is calculated using the formulas of Gaussian optics ...
[33]
https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?uri=ao-8-8-1687
[34]
Rayleigh and other resolution criteria - Optica Publishing Group
Abstract. The Rayleigh resolution criterion, which states that two objects are just resolved when the maximum in the focal plane of one Airy pattern falls ...
[35]
Index of refraction, Rayleigh scattering length, and Sellmeier ...
Using this index of refraction, the Rayleigh scattering length in liquid argon at 90 K is calculated to be 60 ± 6 and 55 ± 5 cm. The extrapolation of the index ...
[36]
coherence length
### Summary of Coherence Length from https://www.rp-photonics.com/coherence_length.html
[37]
None
### Definitions and Differences