Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Restriction map

A restriction map is a physical map of DNA that illustrates the positions of specific cleavage sites recognized and cut by restriction enzymes, providing a visual of these sites along the DNA sequence. These maps are constructed by digesting DNA samples with one or more restriction endonucleases, separating the resulting fragments by size using techniques such as , and then deducing the relative locations of the cut sites from the fragment patterns. The technique was pioneered in 1971 by Kathleen Danna and , who first demonstrated its utility by cleaving simian virus 40 () DNA with the restriction endonuclease from , producing specific fragments that allowed mapping of the viral genome. This breakthrough built on the earlier discovery of restriction enzymes by Hamilton O. Smith in 1970 and marked a foundational advance in , enabling precise manipulation of DNA. Since then, thousands of restriction enzymes have been identified, expanding the resolution and applicability of restriction mapping. Restriction maps serve as essential tools in recombinant DNA technology, facilitating the and of DNA fragments into vectors, as well as the localization of genes and other genomic features. They provide landmarks for assembling larger DNA sequences, support genome mapping projects, and underpin applications in diagnostics, such as (RFLP) analysis for forensic identification and genetic disease detection. Although largely superseded by whole-genome sequencing in modern , restriction mapping remains valuable for targeted analyses of shorter DNA segments and in resource-limited settings.

Fundamentals

Definition

A restriction map is a physical map, typically represented as a linear or circular diagram, that illustrates the positions of restriction sites within a DNA molecule. These restriction sites consist of specific nucleotide sequences recognized by restriction endonucleases, allowing the DNA to be cleaved at precise locations. Such maps provide a visual representation of the DNA's structure based on these cleavage points, enabling researchers to understand the arrangement of cut sites relative to one another. The primary purpose of a restriction map is to predict the sizes of DNA fragments generated after enzymatic , which is essential for planning experiments. It aids in developing strategies by identifying compatible restriction sites for inserting foreign DNA into vectors, ensuring efficient and propagation. Additionally, restriction maps facilitate gene localization by correlating restriction sites with known genetic markers, contributing to broader genome analysis efforts, particularly for smaller DNA molecules like plasmids or viral genomes under 50 kb. Key components of a restriction map include the specific restriction enzymes used, such as EcoRI or HindIII, the lengths of fragments in base pairs (bp), and the relative positions of sites measured from a reference point, often the origin of replication in circular DNA. These elements are plotted to scale, with distances indicating the nucleotide intervals between sites. For example, on a 4.9 kb DNA molecule, a restriction map might show EcoRI sites producing fragments of 1.2 kb and 3.7 kb, while a double digest with BamHI reveals additional cuts that refine the positions to specific loci, such as at 0.8 kb and 2.5 kb from the reference.

Restriction Enzymes

Restriction endonucleases, commonly known as restriction enzymes, are proteins produced by bacteria as a defense mechanism against invading foreign DNA, such as from bacteriophages, by cleaving it at specific recognition sites to prevent replication. These enzymes recognize short, palindromic DNA sequences—typically 4 to 8 base pairs long—that are symmetrical when read in the 5' to 3' direction on complementary strands—and hydrolyze the phosphodiester bonds in the DNA backbone. A classic example is EcoRI, which targets the sequence GAATTC, cutting between the G and A on both strands to generate fragments with complementary overhangs. Restriction enzymes are classified into several types based on their structure, cofactor requirements, and cleavage mechanisms, with Types I, II, and III being the primary categories relevant to DNA manipulation. Type I enzymes are complex, multisubunit proteins that combine restriction and modification activities, requiring ATP and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) for function; they cleave DNA at random sites far (often thousands of base pairs) from their recognition sequence, producing unpredictable fragments unsuitable for precise mapping. In contrast, Type II enzymes, the most commonly used in molecular biology, are simpler homodimers or heterodimers that require only magnesium ions (Mg²⁺) and cut precisely within or near their recognition site, yielding discrete, reproducible DNA fragments ideal for applications like restriction mapping. Type III enzymes exhibit hybrid behavior, functioning as large complexes that require two copies of an unmethylated recognition site in opposite orientations on the same DNA molecule; they cleave 20–30 base pairs downstream of the site via ATP-dependent translocation, but rarely achieve complete digestion, making them less practical for routine use. The cleavage patterns produced by restriction enzymes determine the compatibility of resulting DNA fragments for ligation or analysis, with two main types: blunt ends and sticky (or cohesive) ends. Blunt ends occur when the enzyme cuts both strands at the same position, leaving no overhanging single-stranded DNA, as seen with SmaI at CCC↓GGG, which facilitates straightforward but less efficient ligation due to the need for perfect alignment. Sticky ends, more common in Type II enzymes like , feature staggered cuts that generate short single-stranded overhangs—typically 5' or 3'—such as the 5' overhang AATT produced by , allowing complementary fragments to base-pair and anneal stably before ligation. These patterns arise from the enzyme's catalytic , involving a conserved PD…D/EXK motif that coordinates Mg²⁺ ions to hydrolyze the DNA backbone, producing fragments with 3'-OH and 5'-phosphate termini. Enzyme specificity is further nuanced by isoschizomers and neoschizomers, which share sequences but may differ in details or optimal conditions. Isoschizomers are enzymes that recognize and cut the exact same at identical positions, such as HpaII and MspI, both cleaving C↓CGG, though they may vary in sensitivity or reaction buffers. Neoschizomers, a of isoschizomers, recognize the same but cleave at different bonds within it, exemplified by AatII (GACGT↓C) and ZraI (GAC↓GTC), which can produce distinct end types from the same site and offer alternatives when one enzyme is inhibited. These variants expand the toolkit for generating specific DNA fragments in restriction mapping.

Construction Methods

Traditional Agarose Gel Electrophoresis

Traditional agarose gel electrophoresis serves as the foundational laboratory technique for constructing restriction maps by physically separating DNA fragments generated from enzymatic digestions, allowing researchers to infer the positions of restriction sites based on fragment sizes and patterns. This method relies on the migration of DNA molecules through a porous agarose matrix under an electric field, where smaller fragments travel farther than larger ones. Purified DNA is first isolated from cells or organisms using standard extraction protocols, ensuring high purity to avoid artifacts in digestion and separation. The process begins with enzymatic digestion, where restriction enzymes—sequence-specific endonucleases—are used to cleave the DNA at recognition sites, producing fragments in single or double digests to reveal site locations and relative distances. For a typical single digest, 1–5 µg of DNA is incubated with 1–10 units of enzyme in appropriate buffer at 37°C for 1–2 hours, followed by heat inactivation if necessary. Double digests combine two enzymes to generate smaller, overlapping fragments for more precise mapping. Samples are then mixed with loading dye containing glycerol and bromophenol blue for visibility and density. Agarose gels, typically 0.7–2% concentration depending on fragment size range (lower for larger fragments up to 25 kb), are prepared by dissolving agarose in TAE or TBE buffer, heating to boiling, cooling to 60°C, and pouring into a tray with a comb to form wells. The gel is placed in an electrophoresis chamber filled with running buffer, and samples (5–20 µl) plus a DNA ladder standard are loaded into wells. Electrophoresis is conducted at 5–10 V/cm (e.g., 100 V for a 10 cm gel) for 30–60 minutes, driving negatively charged DNA toward the anode. Post-run, the gel is stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 µg/ml) for 10–30 minutes and destained in water, then visualized under UV light to reveal fluorescent bands corresponding to DNA fragments. Fragment sizes are determined by comparing band migration distances to ladder, exploiting the inverse logarithmic relationship between fragment size and —larger fragments migrate shorter distances. Distances are measured from the well to each band, plotted against the log of known ladder sizes, and unknown fragment sizes are interpolated from the linear curve without deriving the underlying equation. This comparison enables construction of the restriction map by summing fragment lengths and aligning patterns from multiple digests. For complex maps, partial digestion strategies employ limiting enzyme concentrations (e.g., 0.1–1 unit/µg DNA) or shorter incubation times (5–30 minutes) to produce a population of molecules cleaved at only a subset of sites, generating overlapping fragments that facilitate ordering of recognition sites. These partial products appear as a ladder of bands on the gel, with sizes indicating distances from one end to each successive site, allowing reconstruction of the full map through overlap analysis. A representative example involves digesting DNA (48.5 kb) with , yielding distinct fragments such as 23.1 kb, 9.4 kb, 6.6 kb, and smaller ones down to 0.125 kb, which serve both as map verification standards and size markers for unknown samples. This pattern confirms known site positions and demonstrates the technique's resolution for fragments from 100 to 25 kb.

Computational and Sequencing-Based Approaches

Computational approaches to restriction mapping, often referred to as mapping, enable the prediction of cut sites directly from known DNA sequences without physical experimentation. Tools such as NEBcutter, developed by , allow users to input DNA sequences in formats like or and select from a comprehensive database of over 15,000 s to generate predicted fragment patterns and virtual gel electrophoreses. Similarly, RestrictionMapper provides an online platform for analyzing DNA sequences by identifying cut sites, sorting results by enzyme specificity, and filtering for maximum cuts or minimum fragment lengths, supporting sequences up to 300 kilobases. Integration of restriction mapping with next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies has revolutionized the process for large and complex genomes. Whole-genome sequencing via NGS platforms generates high-fidelity DNA sequences, which can then be analyzed to derive precise restriction maps; this is particularly useful for rare cutter enzymes like , which recognize 8-base-pair sequences and produce larger fragments suitable for mapping expansive eukaryotic genomes. In optical mapping workflows, NGS data aligns with restriction-derived scaffolds, where enzymes create observable patterns that scaffold contigs and resolve repetitive regions. These methods offer significant advantages over traditional techniques, including rapid analysis—often completing in seconds for sequences up to 1 Mb—and high accuracy through computational simulation of digests, which minimizes experimental errors and enables handling of genomes without requiring physical DNA samples. Virtual digests also facilitate the optimization of enzyme selection for downstream applications, such as avoiding off-target cuts in synthetic constructs. A practical example is the in silico mapping of bacterial plasmids, where software identifies unique restriction sites to pinpoint insertion points for genetic engineering; for instance, analyzing a plasmid sequence with EcoRI and HindIII reveals compatible overhangs for cloning antibiotic resistance genes, streamlining vector design.

Applications

Molecular Cloning

Restriction maps play a pivotal role in molecular cloning by enabling the selection of vectors with restriction sites that align with the desired insertion points for DNA fragments. Plasmids such as pUC19 are commonly chosen for their multiple cloning sites (MCS), which incorporate unique recognition sites for enzymes like EcoRI and BamHI, facilitating the insertion of genes without interfering with critical vector elements such as the origin of replication or antibiotic resistance markers. This compatibility ensures efficient recombinant DNA construction while minimizing the risk of non-functional plasmids. Following , restriction maps guide strategies by predicting the generation of compatible sticky ends from the cleaved insert and . These overhanging ends are joined using T4 DNA ligase, an enzyme that forms phosphodiester bonds to seal the nicks in the DNA backbone, typically under conditions of 16°C overnight incubation for optimal efficiency with cohesive termini. The map's accuracy in site positioning is crucial here, as mismatched ends would reduce ligation yields and complicate downstream applications. Post-cloning relies on restriction maps to diagnostic digests that confirm the of the recombinant construct. Cloned plasmids are isolated from transformed cells, digested with enzymes specified by the map, and the resulting fragments separated by to verify insert size, orientation, and absence of rearrangements—yielding band patterns that match the predicted fragment lengths. This step is essential for validating successful before proceeding to expression or further manipulation. A representative example involves cloning a gene of interest into an expression vector using sites identified on the restriction map. The gene, flanked by EcoRI and BamHI recognition sequences, is excised from source DNA, while the vector is linearized at corresponding MCS sites; the compatible fragments are ligated with T4 DNA ligase, transformed into host cells, and verified by re-digesting the plasmid with EcoRI and BamHI to release an insert of the expected size, observable as a distinct band on gel electrophoresis.

Genome Analysis

Restriction maps play a crucial role in physical mapping of genomes by enabling the creation of ordered sets of overlapping restriction fragments, which facilitate contig assembly in large-scale genome projects. These maps are constructed by digesting genomic DNA with restriction enzymes to generate fragments whose sizes and overlaps are analyzed to determine their relative positions along chromosomes. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), arising from sequence variations that alter restriction sites, serve as markers to identify and order these fragments, providing a framework for aligning contigs into larger scaffolds. This approach was foundational in early genome sequencing efforts, where RFLPs helped bridge genetic and physical maps to achieve comprehensive coverage. In diagnostic applications, restriction maps underpin RFLP analysis to detect genetic variations associated with diseases. For instance, in sickle cell anemia, a in the β-globin gene (A to T at codon 6) eliminates a recognition site for the MstII, resulting in a larger detectable fragment on compared to the wild-type . This RFLP pattern allows for prenatal or postnatal by comparing fragment lengths from patient samples against controls, enabling identification of homozygous and heterozygous carriers. Such techniques have been widely applied in clinical genetics for screening inherited disorders where mutations disrupt specific restriction sites. More recently, restriction endonuclease barcode maps have been used to trace variants by identifying unique restriction patterns in viral genomes. Restriction mapping is often integrated with Southern blotting to enhance localization within genomes. In this process, restriction-digested DNA fragments are separated by , transferred to a , and hybridized with labeled probes specific to target , revealing the position and size of restriction sites flanking the of interest. This combination provides precise mapping of or regulatory elements in complex genomic regions, aiding in the study of organization and expression patterns. A notable example of restriction mapping in genome analysis is its use in the , where rare-cutting enzymes like , which recognizes the 8-base pair sequence GC↓GGCCGC, were employed to generate large fragments for long-range across chromosomes. sites, occurring infrequently (approximately every 300-500 in human DNA), allowed the creation of macrorestriction maps that outlined chromosomal territories and facilitated contig assembly over megabase scales. These maps were essential for validating sequence assemblies and identifying structural features, contributing to the project's goal of a high-resolution human genome reference.

History and Developments

Early Discoveries

The discovery of restriction-modification (R-M) systems in the 1950s marked the initial breakthrough leading to restriction mapping. Salvador E. Luria and Giuseppe Bertani observed that bacteriophages grown on one bacterial host were restricted (degraded) when infecting a different host strain, indicating host-specific DNA modification and cleavage mechanisms. This phenomenon, termed "host-controlled variation," suggested enzymatic processes that protected bacteria from foreign DNA, laying the groundwork for understanding restriction as a site-specific DNA degradation system. In the 1960s, Werner Arber and his collaborators at the University of Geneva expanded on these findings by demonstrating that the restriction effect occurred at the DNA level and involved specific modification of phage DNA to evade cleavage. Arber proposed in 1965 that restriction enzymes were sequence-specific endonucleases, paired with modification enzymes (likely methylases) that protected host DNA, a hypothesis that predicted their utility as precise DNA-cutting tools. These insights shifted the focus from phenotypic observations to molecular mechanisms, enabling the isolation of the enzymes responsible. For their foundational work on R-M systems—Arber's mechanistic elucidation, Hamilton O. Smith's isolation of the first Type II enzyme in 1970, and Daniel Nathans' application to genome mapping—Arber, Smith, and Nathans shared the 1978 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. Early restriction mapping emerged in the early with the availability of Type II enzymes like HindII, isolated by from in 1970, which produced predictable, staggered cuts at specific DNA sequences (GTYRAC). In 1971, Nathans and Kathleen Danna applied HindII (along with HpaI) to the simian virus 40 () genome, cleaving its ~5,200 base-pair circular DNA into 11 discrete fragments separable by . By comparing fragment sizes and using partial digests to generate overlapping pieces, they constructed the first complete physical restriction map of a viral genome, correlating cleavage sites with genetic loci and enabling mutation mapping. This approach demonstrated restriction enzymes' power for ordering DNA sequences without prior knowledge of the order. A pivotal experiment advancing site-ordering principles involved partial digestion of adenovirus DNA. In 1973, Philip A. Sharp and colleagues used (isolated in 1970) to cleave adenovirus type 2 DNA into six unique fragments. These techniques, reliant on limited exposure to generate ladders of fragments, were essential for linear viral genomes and influenced subsequent strategies for larger DNAs.

Modern Advancements

In the 1980s and 1990s, restriction mapping played a pivotal role in the advancement of technologies, particularly during the (1990-2003), where it facilitated the construction of physical maps of large genomic regions. (PFGE), developed in 1984, enabled the separation and analysis of DNA fragments up to several megabases in length, overcoming limitations of conventional electrophoresis and allowing for the ordering of restriction sites across vast chromosomal segments. This technique was integral to projects like (YAC) and bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) contig assembly, providing essential scaffolds for genome sequencing efforts. The 2000s marked a significant shift with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, such as Illumina platforms, which diminished the reliance on traditional physical restriction maps by enabling direct, high-throughput genome sequencing and assembly. In the pre-NGS era, labor-intensive restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) mapping was standard for fine-scale genetic analysis, but NGS reduced costs and time, often supplanting physical mapping for routine applications. Despite this decline, restriction mapping retained niche utility in epigenetics, exemplified by restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS), a method that visualizes thousands of restriction sites to detect DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic variations across genomes. RLGS, particularly its methylation variant (RLGS-M), has been applied to identify hypermethylated regions associated with cancer and developmental processes. Contemporary advancements integrate restriction mapping with precision tools like CRISPR-Cas9 for site-specific validation and enhancement of mapping resolution. CRISPR-mediated DNA labeling allows for targeted fluorescent marking of restriction sites, enabling customized optical maps that confirm enzyme cleavage patterns and resolve structural variants in complex genomes. Software platforms such as Geneious Prime support hybrid mapping by combining computational predictions of restriction sites with experimental data, simulating cloning strategies and visualizing fragment patterns from NGS or gel outputs. To address historical limitations in gel-based resolution for large fragments, optical mapping techniques employing nicking enzymes—such as Nt.BspQI—have emerged, creating single-molecule maps without fragmentation by labeling intact DNA at nicks, thus providing long-range contiguity and higher accuracy for de novo assemblies.

References

  1. [1]
    How restriction enzymes became the workhorses of molecular biology
    Apr 26, 2005 · The restriction enzyme maps also helped in the assembly of DNA sequences by providing useful landmarks and permitting manageable segments of DNA ...
  2. [2]
    Restriction Map - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics
    A restriction map is a diagram showing the location of cut sites on DNA for a variety of restriction enzymes. Restriction maps are deduced by cutting the target ...
  3. [3]
    Specific cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction ... - PNAS
    Specific cleavage of simian virus 40 DNA by restriction endonuclease of Hemophilus influenzae *. Kathleen Danna and Daniel NathansAuthors Info & Affiliations.Materials And Methods · Results · Digestion Of Sv40 Dna By...
  4. [4]
    restriction mapping | Learn Science at Scitable - Nature
    Restriction mapping is a method used to map an unknown segment of DNA by breaking it into pieces and then identifying the locations of the break points.
  5. [5]
    Mapping Genomes - NCBI - NIH
    The simplest way to construct a restriction map is to compare the fragment sizes produced when a DNA molecule is digested with two different restriction enzymes ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  6. [6]
    BSCI 1510L Literature and Stats Guide: Restriction analysis
    Sep 26, 2024 · In order to select an appropriate restriction enzyme, one must examine a restriction map for the DNA sequence to be verified. For genes or ...
  7. [7]
  8. [8]
    Structure and function of type II restriction endonucleases - PMC
    Typical representatives (Table 1) are EcoRI (which produces sticky ends with 5′-overhangs) (13), EcoRV (which produces blunt ends) (14) and BglI (which produces ...
  9. [9]
    Type II Restriction Enzymes: What You Need to Know | NEB | NEB
    ### Summary of Type II Restriction Enzymes
  10. [10]
    Types of Restriction Endonucleases | NEB
    ### Summary of Types of Restriction Endonucleases
  11. [11]
    Isoschizomers | NEB
    ### Definitions and Examples
  12. [12]
    Restriction Digestion and Analysis of Lambda DNA Kit - Bio-Rad
    Students learn restriction mapping by digesting lambda DNA then using DNA gel electrophoresis and standard curves to determine fragment sizes.
  13. [13]
    Restriction Endonuclease Analysis | Thermo Fisher Scientific - US
    Restriction maps are a blueprint of the locations of restriction enzyme cleavage sites within a DNA molecule. These maps provide a visual representation of the ...
  14. [14]
    Ethidium Bromide Staining - National Diagnostics
    Sep 12, 2011 · GEL PREPARATION. Dissolve agarose in the buffer as per the standard protocol for preparing an agarose gel. Allow the gel to cool to 60-70°C.
  15. [15]
    Partial Endonuclease Digestion Mapping of Restriction Sites Using ...
    This segment is partially digested with a restriction en- zyme, and the resulting fragments are electrophoretically separated in an agar- ose gel using a DNA ...
  16. [16]
    Lambda DNA HindIII Digest | NEB
    ### Summary of Lambda DNA HindIII Digest Fragment Sizes
  17. [17]
    NEBcutter: a program to cleave DNA with restriction enzymes - NIH
    NEBcutter, version 1.0, is a program available via a web server (http://tools.neb.com/NEBcutter) that will accept an input DNA sequence and produce a ...
  18. [18]
    RestrictionMapper version 3
    Welcome to RestrictionMapper - on line restriction mapping the easy way. Maps sites for restriction enzymes, a.k.a. restriction endonucleases, in DNA sequences.Missing: NEBcutter | Show results with:NEBcutter
  19. [19]
    Enrichment of megabase-sized DNA molecules for single ... - Nature
    Dec 20, 2017 · Another challenge for enrichment protocols based on restriction enzymes is that they rely on cutting the genome at known positions, so cuts in ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  20. [20]
  21. [21]
    Customizable In Silico Sequence Evaluation for Restriction Sites - NIH
    Apr 12, 2016 · NEBcutter is the most generalized restriction site analysis tool with the others focusing primarily on developing DNA markers. NEBcutter ...
  22. [22]
    Genomics of microbial plasmids: classification and identification ...
    Jorgensen et al. reported an in silico procedure for identifying small plasmids ... Restriction endonuclease mapping and cloning of Mycobacterium fortuitum var.Plasmids In Proteobacteria · Plasmids In Firmicutes · Plasmids In Actinobacteria
  23. [23]
  24. [24]
    Molecular Cloning Techniques - Addgene
    In restriction cloning, scientists utilize specific restriction enzymes to cut dsDNA of interest into fragments containing precise 5' or 3' single-strand ...
  25. [25]
  26. [26]
    Protocol - How to Ligate Plasmid DNA - Addgene
    This reaction, called ligation, is performed by the T4 DNA ligase enzyme. The DNA ligase catalyzes the formation of covalent phosphodiester linkages, which ...
  27. [27]
    Protocol - How to Perform a Diagnostic Digest - Addgene
    The goal of a diagnostic digest is to cut your plasmid into specific sized pieces and analyze the resulting fragments by gel electrophoresis.
  28. [28]
    How to Verify Your Plasmid Using a Restriction Digest Analysis
    Aug 28, 2014 · Diagnostic digests can be used to confirm the rough structure of the plasmid based on the predicted sizes and organization of different features ...
  29. [29]
    Restriction Enzyme Cloning - SnapGene
    Restriction enzyme cloning, or “restriction cloning,” uses DNA restriction enzymes to cut a vector and an insert at specific locations so they can be easily ...
  30. [30]
    Techniques for the Detection of Sickle Cell Disease: A Review - PMC
    Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) is used to detect sickle cell disease based on restriction enzymes, which remove the recognition site at the βs ...
  31. [31]
    Analysis of DNA by Southern Blotting - PubMed
    Jul 1, 2021 · Southern transfer and hybridization are used to study how genes are organized within genomes by mapping restriction sites in and around segments of genomic DNA.Missing: localization | Show results with:localization
  32. [32]
    Mapping and Sequencing the Human Genome - NCBI Bookshelf - NIH
    The most important landmarks in physical mapping are the cleavage sites of restriction enzymes. The maps can be calibrated in nucleotides by measuring the ...
  33. [33]
    [PDF] MORE INFORMATION: Human Genome Project
    Genome Project scissors, have been extracted from bacteria for this purpose. The NotI restriction enzyme, for example, cuts. DNA into large fragments ranging.
  34. [34]
    The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1978 - Press release
    Arber discovered restriction enzymes. He postulated that these enzymes bind to DNA at specific sites containing recurring structural elements made up of ...
  35. [35]
    Highlights of the DNA cutters: a short history of the restriction enzymes
    This review traces the discovery of restriction enzymes and their continuing impact on molecular biology and medicine.Missing: Salvador | Show results with:Salvador
  36. [36]
    The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1978 - NobelPrize.org
    The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1978 was awarded jointly to Werner Arber, Daniel Nathans and Hamilton O. Smith for the discovery of restriction ...
  37. [37]
  38. [38]
    [PDF] restriction endonucleases, simian virus 40, and the new genetics
    Functional Map of SV40. The cleavage map and later the sequence map of the SV40 genome served as a framework for identifying functional elements of the viral ...
  39. [39]
    [PDF] Human Genome Project
    Aug 1, 2024 · Physical mapping. Restriction Map techniques, such as long-range restriction mapping by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, YAC cloning, and BAC.
  40. [40]
    The Human Genome Project: The Formation of Federal Policies in ...
    It also became possible to separate DNA molecules of up to several million base pairs in length using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, first developed by ...
  41. [41]
    Fine mapping and gene cloning in the post-NGS era
    Feb 10, 2020 · In this review, we compare the marker systems used for fine mapping and QTL cloning in the pre- and post-NGS era.
  42. [42]
    Restriction Landmark Genome Scanning
    Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) is a method that provides both a quantitative genetic and epigenetic (cytosine methylation) assessment of thousands ...
  43. [43]
    Restriction Landmark Genomic Scanning (RLGS-M)-based Genome ...
    Restriction landmark genomic scanning for methylation (RLGS-M) was used to detect, and subsequently clone, genomic regions with alterations in DNA ...
  44. [44]
    Customized optical mapping by CRISPR–Cas9 mediated DNA ...
    Nov 24, 2020 · In this report, we present customized mapping strategies that extend the applications of CRISPR–Cas9 DNA labeling.
  45. [45]
    Geneious Prime | Molecular Biology and Sequence Analysis Tools
    Comprehensive suite of molecular biology and bioinformatics tools for protein, Sanger and next generation sequencing analysis.Powerful, Intuitive Sequence... · The Backbone Of Your... · Geneious Prime Has You...
  46. [46]
    Computational methods for optical mapping - PMC - PubMed Central
    Dec 30, 2014 · Optical mapping and newer genome mapping technologies based on nicking enzymes provide low resolution but long-range genomic information.