Retrognathia, also known as retrognathism, is a craniofacial condition characterized by the posterior positioning of the mandible relative to the maxilla, resulting in a receding lower jaw or chin.[1][2] This malocclusion, often classified as Class II, leads to an abnormal bite where the upper teeth significantly overlap the lower teeth, potentially affecting facial aesthetics, oral function, and airway patency.[3] While mild cases may be asymptomatic, severe retrognathia can contribute to functional issues and is frequently identified during childhood or adolescence through dental evaluations.[1]The etiology of retrognathia encompasses both congenital and acquired factors. Congenital forms often arise from genetic influences or developmental anomalies, such as deficient growth of the mandible due to disruptions in the first pharyngeal arch, and are associated with syndromes including Pierre Robin sequence, Treacher Collins syndrome, and hemifacial microsomia.[2] Acquired retrognathia may result from environmental factors like prolonged thumb sucking, trauma to the jaw, or iatrogenic causes such as surgical interventions.[1][3] Hereditary patterns play a significant role, with familial transmission contributing to discrepancies in jaw size or alignment.[3]Clinically, retrognathia manifests through an exaggerated convex facial profile, with symptoms varying by severity. Common presentations include jaw pain, difficulty chewing or biting, speech impediments, and mouth breathing; in more pronounced cases, it can lead to obstructive sleep apnea due to narrowed airways or temporomandibular joint disorders.[1][2] Diagnosis typically involves a comprehensive physical examination, assessment of occlusion, and imaging such as lateral cephalometric radiographs to measure mandibular position (e.g., SNB angle less than 80 degrees).[2]Management of retrognathia is tailored to the individual's age, severity, and underlying causes, often requiring multidisciplinary input from orthodontists, oral surgeons, and craniofacial specialists. Non-surgical interventions, such as braces or functional appliances like headgear, are effective for growing children to guide jaw development and correct alignment.[1][3] For adults or severe skeletal discrepancies, orthognathic surgery—such as bilateral sagittal split osteotomy—may be necessary after jaw growth cessation, typically around ages 14 to 18, frequently combined with orthodontics for optimal outcomes.[2] Early detection and intervention can mitigate complications, though complete prevention is challenging given the genetic components.[1]
Definition and Classification
Definition
Retrognathism, also known as mandibular retrognathia or retrognathia, is a craniofacial condition classified as a type of malocclusion characterized by the abnormal posterior positioning of the mandible relative to the maxilla in the anterior-posterior plane, leading to a receding chin appearance when viewed laterally.[2] This skeletal discrepancy arises from deficient growth of the mandible, resulting in its retropositioned alignment behind the expected norm.[4]The mandible refers to the lower jawbone, which forms the foundation of the lower face and supports the teeth, while the maxilla is the upper jawbone that anchors the upper teeth and contributes to facial structure. Retrognathism primarily involves mandibular hypoplasia or retrusion, though in some cases, it may include maxillary involvement, such as bimaxillary retrognathism where both jaws are affected.[2] It is distinct from retrogenia, which refers to a receding or proportionally small chin that can occur independently or together with retrognathia and often involves skeletal features.[5]This condition is a common skeletal malocclusion, often contributing to Class II malocclusion, with prevalence estimates for related Class II patterns ranging from 15% to 25% in general populations, particularly in pediatric and adolescent groups; mild forms are more frequent.[6][7]
Classification
Retrognathism is primarily classified into skeletal and dental subtypes, where skeletal retrognathism involves malformation or underdevelopment of the jaw bones, while dental retrognathism refers to abnormal tooth positioning without significant skeletal discrepancies.[2]Within the skeletal category, retrognathism is further subdivided based on the origin of the jaw discrepancy: mandibular-originated (the most common form, characterized by an undergrown mandible), maxillary-originated (due to relative overgrowth of the maxilla), and bimaxillary (involving both jaws).[8]Severity of skeletal retrognathism is graded using cephalometric analysis, particularly the ANB angle, which measures the anteroposterior relationship between the maxilla and mandible; an ANB angle greater than 4° suggests a Class II skeletal pattern.[9]Retrognathism is strongly associated with Angle's Class II malocclusion, where the lower first molar is positioned distal to the upper first molar; this includes Division 1 (with protruding upper incisors and increased overjet) and Division 2 (characterized by retroclined upper incisors and a deep overbite).[2][10]In syndromic cases, such as those involving hemifacial microsomia, the Kaban classification system is used to categorize retrognathism based on the extent of micrognathia, with Type I indicating minimal mandibular deformity, Type II moderate involvement (subdivided into IIa and IIb based on glenoid fossa position), and Type III severe hypoplasia requiring extensive reconstruction.[2]
Etiology
Genetic and Congenital Causes
Retrognathism in congenital cases often arises from inherited genetic factors influencing mandibular development, with familial patterns exhibiting autosomal dominant or recessive inheritance. Genes such as FGFR2 and MSX1 have been implicated in skeletal class II malocclusion, a condition frequently associated with mandibular retrognathism, through their roles in regulating craniofacial morphogenesis and bone formation.[11] These genetic variations disrupt normal jaw growth, leading to posterior positioning of the mandible relative to the maxilla.[4]Several syndromes feature retrognathism as a core congenital manifestation due to specific genetic mutations. Pierre Robin sequence involves retrognathia alongside glossoptosis and potential cleft palate, primarily resulting from regulatory changes near the SOX9 gene, which is essential for cartilage and skeletal development; this can occur in isolated or syndromic forms.[12][13]Treacher Collins syndrome, caused by heterozygous mutations in TCOF1, POLR1D, or POLR1C, presents with bilateral mandibular hypoplasia and retrognathia as part of mandibulofacial dysostosis, following an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern in most cases.[14]Hemifacial microsomia, often sporadic but with rare autosomal dominant familial occurrences, leads to unilateral mandibular underdevelopment and resultant retrognathia due to anomalies in first and second branchial arch derivatives.[1][15]Embryologically, retrognathism originates from disruptions in the ossification and modeling of Meckel's cartilage, a transient structure derived from the first branchial arch that forms between weeks 6 and 10 of gestation and serves as a scaffold for mandibular bonedevelopment via intramembranous ossification.[2] Abnormalities in this process, such as impaired chondrogenesis or collagen crosslinking, hinder anterior extension of the mandible, resulting in its posterior displacement.[16] Congenital retrognathism accounts for a notable proportion of severe cases, particularly those tied to chromosomal anomalies like 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, where retrognathia co-occurs with other dysmorphic features in affected individuals.[17][18]
Acquired Causes
Acquired causes of retrognathism encompass environmental, behavioral, and medical factors that disrupt mandibular development after birth, often during critical growth phases. These influences contrast with congenital origins by being potentially modifiable through early intervention, though they can lead to similar skeletal discrepancies if unaddressed.[2]Habitual behaviors in early childhood, particularly between ages 2 and 6 when mandibular growth is most susceptible to external pressures, can alter jaw positioning. Prolonged thumb-sucking applies forward force on the maxilla and posterior pressure on the mandible, resulting in mandibular retrognathism and increased overjet.[19][20] Similarly, chronic mouth breathing, often due to nasal obstruction, promotes a low tongueposture that fails to support mandibular advancement, contributing to retrognathic mandibular angles.[21] Tongue thrusting, an abnormal swallowing pattern where the tongue presses against the anterior teeth, exacerbates this by inhibiting posterior mandibular growth and fostering open bites associated with retrognathism.[1]Traumatic injuries to the mandible, such as fractures from accidents, can directly cause retrognathism by interrupting growth centers. Condylar fractures, in particular, lead to resorption or remodeling of the mandibular condyle, often resulting in asymmetric retrognathism with deviation toward the affected side.[22][23] Bilateral condylar injuries may produce symmetric retrognathism and anterior open bites due to shortened ramus height.[22]Pathological conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) or systemic growth also contribute to acquired retrognathism. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) frequently involves the TMJ, causing progressive condylar erosion and mandibular shortening; bilateral involvement raises the risk of retrognathia, with studies showing approximately 82% of children with TMJ involvement developing retrognathia.[24][25] Endocrine disorders like hypothyroidism delay overall skeletal maturation, including mandibular growth, leading to retarded mandibular development and a retrognathic profile if untreated during childhood.[26]Iatrogenic factors arise from medical interventions that inadvertently impair mandibular advancement. Premature orthodontic extractions, especially of premolars in Class II cases, can retract the lower lip and soft tissues, mimicking or worsening retrognathism through reduced anteroposterior support.[27]Radiation therapy to the head and neck, commonly used in pediatric cancers, induces osteoradionecrosis and growth inhibition in the mandible, resulting in progressive retrognathia due to impaired condylar proliferation.[2]
Clinical Presentation
Physical Signs
Retrognathism manifests primarily through distinct alterations in facial structure and dentition, often resulting in a characteristic appearance that affects overall aesthetics. A key physical sign is the receding chin, where the mandible is positioned posteriorly relative to the maxilla in the anteroposterior plane, creating a retruded "chin button" appearance. This contributes to a convexfacialprofile, with the lower jaw appearing set back, exacerbating the prominence of the midface.[2][1]Dental features of retrognathism typically align with skeletal Class II malocclusion, where the mandibular teeth are positioned posterior to the maxillary teeth. In Class II division 1, there is often an increased overjet exceeding 4 mm, with the upper incisors protruding significantly beyond the lower ones. In Class II division 2, a deep overbite is frequently observed, where the upper incisors overlap the lower incisors vertically by more than 3 mm, alongside crowding of the lower incisors due to the constricted mandibular arch.[2]Soft tissue signs include incompetent lips, characterized by difficulty in achieving lip closure at rest, often due to the retruded mandible straining the perioral muscles. Prominent nasolabial folds may also appear, accentuating the creases from the nose to the mouth corners as a result of the altered facial contour.[1]Asymmetry occurs in unilateral retrognathism, commonly associated with conditions like hemifacial microsomia, where one side of the mandible is hypoplastic, leading to facial deviation. While Class II malocclusion can involve skeletal or dental discrepancies, retrognathism specifically refers to the skeletal posterior mandibular position, with physical signs varying in prominence based on the underlying etiology.[2][15]
Associated Symptoms
Retrognathism often leads to occlusal issues stemming from Class II malocclusion, where the lower jaw's posterior position causes misalignment of the upper and lower teeth, resulting in difficulty chewing and biting effectively.[1] This misalignment can also contribute to accelerated wear on the upper incisors due to uneven occlusal forces and potential lip incompetence trapping the teeth.[28]In terms of airway and respiratory effects, retrognathism narrows the pharyngeal space by displacing the tongue posteriorly, increasing the risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), particularly in moderate to severe cases where the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) exceeds 5 events per hour.[1] Clinical cases illustrate this association, with severe retrognathism linked to markedly elevated AHI values, such as 37.1 or 77, alongside desaturations and the need for interventions like tracheostomy.[29][30]Speech and swallowing impairments arise from the altered tongue position and reduced oral space in retrognathism. Individuals may experience articulation disorders, including lisps, due to impaired tongue mobility and airflow during phonation.[1] In infants with severe retrognathism, dysphagia manifests as feeding difficulties, complicating breastfeeding or bottle-feeding and potentially leading to inadequate nutrition.[1]Pain-related symptoms are common, with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders affecting 30-50% of untreated adults with Class II malocclusion associated with retrognathism, presenting as jaw pain, headaches, and earaches from joint overload and muscle strain.[31][32] Limited mouth opening further exacerbates these issues, restricting function and contributing to myofascial discomfort.[29]
Diagnosis
Clinical Evaluation
Clinical evaluation of retrognathism begins with a comprehensive patient history to identify potential etiologies and associated factors. The age of onset is assessed to differentiate congenital cases, which are present at birth, from acquired forms that may develop later due to environmental influences. Family history is explored for hereditary jaw discrepancies, as mandibular retrognathism can have a genetic basis.[2] Inquiry into habits such as prolonged thumb-sucking, which can contribute to anterior displacement of the maxilla and relative mandibular recession, is essential, particularly if the habit persisted beyond age 4. Additionally, screening for associated syndromes, including Pierre Robin sequence (characterized by micrognathia, glossoptosis, and cleft palate), Treacher Collins syndrome, hemifacial microsomia, and Goldenhar syndrome, is conducted through review of medical records and symptoms like feeding difficulties or airway issues in infancy.[2][33][34][1]Extraoral examination focuses on facial proportions and soft tissue relationships to detect retrognathism's characteristic features. Lateral profileanalysis reveals an exaggerated convex profile due to the posterior positioning of the mandible relative to the maxilla, often classified as a Class II skeletal pattern. Lip competence is evaluated at rest; strained or incomplete lip closure may indicate underlying skeletal discrepancy, with the lower lip potentially trapped behind the upper incisors. Facial symmetry is measured using calipers to quantify any transverse deviations, such as chin deviation greater than 3 mm from the midline, which can accompany unilateral retrognathism. These observations align with common physical signs like a receding chin and increased nasolabial angle.[2][34][35]Intraoral examination assesses occlusal relationships and dental alignment to confirm mandibular retrusion. Overjet, the horizontal overlap of maxillary incisors over mandibular incisors, is measured using a millimeter ruler and typically exceeds 4-6 mm in retrognathism, contributing to a Class II malocclusion per Angle's classification. Overbite, the vertical overlap, is similarly quantified and often increased to 5 mm or more, potentially leading to deep bite. Dental midline deviation is noted by comparing the maxillary and mandibular midlines to the facial midline, with shifts greater than 2 mm suggesting asymmetry related to the retrognathic mandible.[2][34][36]Screening tools such as the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN) are employed to prioritize severity and guide referral. The IOTN's Dental Health Component assigns grades based on malocclusion features; for retrognathism, an overjet of 6-9 mm scores grade 4 (moderate need), while overjet exceeding 9 mm or reverse overjet with trauma risk scores grade 5 (great need), emphasizing the condition's impact on dental health. This index facilitates objective assessment without advanced imaging.[37][38]
Imaging and Measurements
Cephalometric radiography remains the cornerstone for diagnosing and quantifying retrognathism through lateral cephalograms, which provide a two-dimensional sagittal view of craniofacial structures. Standard analyses, such as those developed by Steiner and Downs, evaluate skeletal discrepancies by measuring angular and linear relationships between the maxilla, mandible, and cranial base.[9] The ANB angle, formed by points A (subspinale), nasion, and B (supramentale), is a critical metric in these assessments; a normal value is approximately 2°, while angles exceeding 4° signify mandibular retropositioning relative to the maxilla, confirming retrognathism.[9]Three-dimensional imaging via cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) offers advanced volumetric evaluation, particularly useful for precise measurement of mandibular length and pharyngeal airway dimensions in retrognathism cases. CBCT scans enable segmentation and quantification of the mandible's effective length from condylion to gnathion, revealing deficiencies in mandibular corpus or ramus height that contribute to retrognathia. Additionally, CBCT assesses airway volume, showing reduced oropharyngeal volumes in retrognathic patients, which can correlate with associated respiratory issues. This modality provides superior accuracy over traditional radiography for complex skeletal asymmetries.Panoramic X-rays complement cephalometric imaging by visualizing dental alignment and root positions in the context of retrognathism, identifying secondary effects like crowding or impactions due to mandibular deficiency. In intricate cases involving temporomandibular joint (TMJ) involvement, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluates soft tissue structures, such as disc position and joint effusion, which may accompany retrognathism-related dysfunction.Key quantitative metrics include the mandibular body length, often measured as the distance from gonion to menton (Go-Me), to detect corpus shortening in retrognathic mandibles. The effective mandibular length, measured from condylion to pogonion, further quantifies anteroposterior mandibular projection; reduced values below normative ranges (typically 120 mm in adults, varying by population and gender) indicate retrognathism severity.[39] These measurements, derived from standardized cephalometric tracings, guide objective diagnosis following initial clinical suspicion.
Management
Orthodontic and Non-Surgical Options
Orthodontic and non-surgical options for retrognathism primarily target growing patients, leveraging mandibular growth potential to correct or camouflage the skeletal discrepancy without invasive procedures. These approaches are most effective during the mixed dentition phase, typically ages 10 to 14, when skeletal changes can be influenced by orthopedic forces.[2]Growth modification using functional appliances, such as the Herbst or Twin Block, promotes mandibular advancement by posturing the mandible forward, stimulating condylar growth and reducing the overjet associated with Class II malocclusion due to retrognathism. The Herbst appliance, a fixed device with telescoping rods connecting upper and lower arches, applies continuous force to encourage mandibular protrusion, while the Twin Block uses removable acrylic blocks to achieve similar effects through intermittent wear. Studies demonstrate that these appliances increase mandibular length by 2-4 mm on average in growing patients, with significant improvements in skeletal relationships observed in 64-93% of cases.[40][41][42]Orthodontic camouflage involves dental movements to mask the underlying skeletal retrognathism, often using fixed braces or clear aligners to retract the maxillary incisors and procline the mandibular incisors, thereby reducing overjet without altering the jaw bases. This technique typically includes extraction of upper premolars to create space for retraction, combined with intermaxillary elastics or headgear for anchorage control. Cephalometric analyses show reductions in the ANB angle and overjet, achieving acceptable occlusion in mild cases, though soft tissue profile changes may include upper lip retraction.[43]Recent advances as of 2025 include the use of clear aligner systems incorporating mandibular advancement features, which can improve upper airway morphology and respiratory function in addition to correcting alignment.[44]Adjunctive therapies, such as myofunctional therapy, complement these interventions by addressing habits like mouth breathing or tongue thrusting that exacerbate retrognathism. This therapy involves exercises to strengthen orofacial muscles and improve mandibular positioning, often integrated with functional appliances to enhance skeletal outcomes in growing children. For mild cases in younger patients, intraoral appliances like headgear can restrict maxillary growth, indirectly supporting mandibular advancement.[45][2]These non-surgical options are indicated for growing patients with mild-to-moderate skeletal discrepancies, such as ANB angles less than 7°, where dental camouflage can establish functional occlusion in mild cases. Treatment is less predictable in post-pubertal individuals, where skeletal changes are minimal.[43][46]
Surgical Treatments
Surgical treatments for retrognathism primarily involve orthognathic procedures to address severe skeletal discrepancies, particularly in adults or older adolescents where non-surgical options are insufficient. These interventions focus on repositioning the mandible and, when necessary, the maxilla to achieve proper jaw alignment, improve facialaesthetics, and enhance function such as mastication and airway patency.[47]Orthognathic surgery commonly employs bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) to advance the mandible, correcting retrognathism by splitting the mandible bilaterally and repositioning the distal segment forward, often fixed with plates and screws. This procedure is frequently combined with Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary repositioning if vertical or anteroposterior maxillary discrepancies coexist, allowing for bimaxillary correction in cases of complex skeletal Class II malocclusion.[47][48]For isolated retrogenia associated with retrognathism, sliding genioplasty provides targeted augmentation by osteotomizing the chin segment and advancing it anteriorly, preserving blood supply through periosteal attachments and offering a natural bone contour without implants. This technique is particularly suitable for mild to moderate cases, with advancements typically ranging from 5 to 10 mm.[49][50]Surgical timing is critical and generally occurs after skeletal growth cessation to prevent relapse, with mandibular growth completing around age 16 for females and 18 for males, though full facial maturity may extend to 17-18 years in females and the early twenties in males. Pre-surgical orthodontics, lasting 12-18 months, aligns teeth into ideal positions to facilitate surgical occlusion and postoperative stability.[51][2][52]In severe congenital retrognathism, such as in syndromic cases like Pierre Robin sequence, distraction osteogenesis serves as an adjunct, involving gradual mandibular lengthening via external or internal devices at a rate of 0.5-1 mm per day to stimulate new bone formation and accommodate soft tissue adaptation. This method is preferred over traditional osteotomies in young patients to minimize scarring and allow for ongoing growth.[53]
Prognosis and Complications
Treatment Outcomes
Treatment outcomes for retrognathism demonstrate substantial improvements in skeletal alignment and facialaesthetics through both orthodontic and surgical interventions, with long-term stability influenced by fixation methods and retention protocols. In distraction osteogenesis cases, the ANB angle shows a mean reduction of 3.5° to 5° post-treatment, indicating effective correction of mandibular retropositioning.[54] Mandibular advancement surgery similarly achieves an average ANB decrease of 3.0°, contributing to enhanced profile esthetics in patients with initial ANB angles of 6° or greater.[55] Patient satisfaction with aesthetic results is reported at 78.7% to 83% in Class II malocclusion cases, including those with mandibular retrognathism, based on long-term follow-up surveys.[56]Orthodontic treatments for retrognathism yield stable overjet reduction when combined with retention appliances, but non-surgical approaches may exhibit relapse in the absence of ongoing orthodontic supervision. Surgical outcomes, particularly mandibular advancement with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation, provide high stability, with relapse limited to 25% in horizontal positioning and clinically insignificant vertical changes of approximately 0.55°.[57][58] For patients with associated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), orthognathic surgery reduces the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) by 50-90%, often achieving values below 20 events per hour.[59]Long-term monitoring is essential, with annual follow-up visits recommended for 2-5 years post-treatment to evaluate skeletal growth, relapse, and functional stability through clinical assessments and imaging.[60][48] This protocol allows for early detection of changes exceeding 2 mm in dental positioning, ensuring sustained outcomes.[48]
Potential Risks
Retrognathism, if left untreated, can contribute to the development of chronic obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) due to the posterior positioning of the mandible, which narrows the upper airway and promotes obstruction during sleep.[61] Untreated OSA associated with this condition elevates the risk of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension (prevalent in 30%–50% of OSA patients), coronary artery disease, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke.[61] Additionally, the aesthetic concerns arising from the recessed lower jaw in retrognathism, as part of Class II malocclusion, negatively impact psychological well-being, with approximately 21% of affected adolescent females with overjet experiencing low self-esteem.[62]Orthodontic treatments for retrognathism carry risks such as apical root resorption, which occurs in up to 82% of patients treated with fixed appliances, though severe cases (>1/3 root loss) affect 1%–5%.[63] Surgical interventions, particularly bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular advancement, pose a risk of inferior alveolar nerve injury, resulting in temporary paresthesia of the lower lip and chin in 9%–85% of cases, with most resolving within months.[64]Relapse following treatment for retrognathism is influenced by factors such as poor patient compliance with retainers and persistent habits like tongue thrusting, leading to skeletal instability in up to 25% of mandibular advancement cases.[57] This risk is heightened in syndromic retrognathism due to underlying developmental factors. Orthodontic appliances also increase the likelihood of enamel decalcification, manifesting as white spot lesions in 45.8% of patients during fixed treatment, primarily from plaque accumulation around brackets.[65]