Fact-checked by Grok 2 weeks ago

Rim Fire

The Rim Fire was a large-scale that ignited on August 17, 2013, at approximately 3:25 PM in a remote canyon of the , three miles east of , along State Highway 120, due to an escaped illegal set by a hunter. Spreading amid conditions and dense accumulation from decades of fire suppression, it burned a total of 257,314 acres (402 square miles or 104,131 hectares), rendering it the third-largest wildfire in recorded history and the largest in the range. The blaze extended into northwestern , scorching roughly 11 percent of its area, though empirical assessments indicated mixed fire severities influenced by , pre-existing fuels, and historical practices. Suppression efforts mobilized over 5,000 firefighters at peak, supported by hundreds of engines, dozers, and aircraft, achieving full containment by mid-October 2013 after an intense campaign costing $127 million in direct emergency response. The fire destroyed 11 residences, three commercial buildings, and 98 outbuildings, with no fatalities but 10 injuries reported among personnel; it primarily affected federal lands (91 percent) in rugged terrain, minimizing broader structural losses. Post-fire analyses, drawing from satellite imagery and ground surveys, revealed that approximately 40 percent of the burned area experienced high vegetation mortality, attributing elevated severities to fire exclusion policies that permitted unnatural fuel buildup, thereby exacerbating the fire's scale and intensity beyond historical norms. These findings underscored causal factors rooted in land management history rather than solely climatic variables, prompting renewed emphasis on prescribed burns and mechanical thinning to restore natural fire regimes.

Background

Ignition Cause

The Rim Fire ignited on August 17, 2013, in a remote area of the adjacent to , specifically near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers. An investigation by the U.S. Forest Service determined that the fire originated from an illegal campfire that escaped control, started by a hunter in the vicinity. This conclusion was publicly announced on September 5, 2013, as the fire reached approximately 80% containment, dispelling earlier speculation about other potential causes such as activities related to illegal marijuana cultivation. The campfire's ignition during a period of heightened fire danger—characterized by dry fuels and restrictions on open flames in the national forest—exemplifies human-caused wildfires, which account for a significant portion of large-scale ignitions in the region despite natural factors like being more commonly associated with remote starts. No individuals were criminally charged in connection with the incident, though the Forest Service emphasized the role of in violating regulations. The precise point of origin was within the Clavey drainage, where the fire rapidly spread upslope due to favorable and conditions immediately following ignition.

Pre-Fire Land Management and Fuel Accumulation

Prior to the Rim Fire, land management in the and adjacent portions emphasized fire suppression, a policy rooted in early 20th-century U.S. Forest Service directives following major burns like the 1910 fires, which prioritized rapid extinguishment of all ignitions to protect timber resources. This approach deviated from the historical fire regime in mixed-conifer forests, where low-severity surface fires occurred at intervals of 6–20 years, consuming fine fuels and preventing understory density. By 2013, over a century of suppression had allowed unnatural accumulation of surface fuels (, , and fine woody debris), ladder fuels (shrubs and small trees bridging ground to canopy), and overcrowded tree stands, elevating the risk of high-severity crown fires. Fuel loading in untreated areas reached elevated levels; in similar suppressed Yosemite forests, ground fuels averaged 125 tons per acre, compared to historical norms of 10–15 tons per acre maintained by frequent fires. experienced comparable buildup, with dense understories and downed woody material from insect outbreaks and lack of disturbance, as documented in pre-fire assessments showing limited mitigation across the 1.5 million-acre forest. Factors exacerbating accumulation included logging cessation post-1990s under endangered species protections (e.g., California spotted owl), which reduced mechanical thinning, alongside regulatory hurdles like air quality restrictions limiting prescribed burns. Prescribed fire and thinning efforts were implemented sporadically but covered only a fraction of the landscape. Yosemite initiated controlled burns in the , treating thousands of acres annually by the , yet these focused on valleys and sequoia groves, leaving remote Rim Fire-origin areas in Stanislaus largely untouched. Stanislaus treated under 1% of its acreage yearly via prescription prior to 2013, constrained by funding shortages and litigation, resulting in vast untreated wildland-urban interface zones with continuous heavy fuels. Post-fire analyses confirmed that treated stands exhibited 40–60% lower severity during the Rim Fire, underscoring how sparse pre-fire interventions permitted fuel continuity that fueled explosive spread.

Weather and Climatic Conditions

The Rim Fire occurred amid California's severe multi-year , which entered its second year in and ranked as the most extreme in the state's historical record, marked by deficient , diminished snowpacks, and resultant low moisture in both live and dead fuels across forests. This climatic backdrop amplified seasonal aridity in the region's , where hot, dry summers typically desiccate vegetation, but 2013 conditions pushed fuel dryness to exceptional levels, elevating ignition risk and fire intensity. At ignition on August 17, 2013, from an illegal , local featured elevated temperatures, low relative , and southerly that promoted initial uphill into dense . Remote Automated Weather Stations (RAWS) near the area, such as Smith Peak and Mount Elizabeth, recorded data reflecting high release components (ERC) and low , consistent with broader observations of afternoon relative humidities dropping below 40%, which accelerated drying and early establishment. From to 31, during the fire's primary rapid expansion phase, meteorological conditions included persistently warm ambient temperatures, low relative humidity, and high near-surface wind speeds, driving extreme that exceeded the 98th in metrics like the Burning Index () on multiple days. Plume-dominated burning periods, notably –23, saw BI values above 75, fostering intense convective activity, while milder in select sub-areas still yielded mixed-severity effects under the overriding influence. These factors, rather than or alone, dominated severity patterns in untreated stands.

Initial Response and Early Progression

Discovery and First Suppression Efforts

The Rim Fire was reported on August 17, 2013, in a remote section of the near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers, approximately 20 miles southeast of . The ignition point was identified shortly after reporting as stemming from an unattended illegal in a steep, rugged with dense and limited access roads, complicating immediate access for responders. Stanislaus National Forest personnel launched an aggressive initial attack that afternoon, deploying six fire engines, two hand crews, two helicopters for water and bucket drops, two water tenders, and two dozers for line construction. These resources aimed at direct suppression near the origin, including perimeter control and extinguishment, amid challenging that restricted vehicle and foot access. One early incident involved a burn to a from a cooperating engine crew during and initial line work on the fire's upslope flank. Over August 17–18, the fire expanded steadily at low to moderate intensity, covering an estimated few hundred acres while spreading omnidirectionally under light winds and dry fuels, with suppression efforts achieving partial containment lines but unable to fully secure the perimeter due to spotting and resource limitations in the isolated location. By the end of , aerial and ground assessments indicated ongoing challenges from fuel continuity and , prompting escalation requests for additional federal support as the incident transitioned toward Type 2 management.

August 17–20 Expansion

The Rim Fire ignited on August 17, 2013, in a remote area of the near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers, initially covering approximately 200 acres while burning up a north-facing of the Clavey River canyon toward Jawbone Ridge. The isolated location posed no immediate threat to structures, allowing initial suppression efforts to focus on in challenging terrain. On August 18, the fire grew modestly to 250 acres, continuing its uphill movement amid dry conditions and dense fuels typical of the forests. By August 19, growth accelerated significantly, expanding from 450 acres in the morning to 2,500 acres by evening, prompting the activation of the South Central Sierra Incident Management Team due to the fire's potential for further spread in steep, south-facing slopes of the Clavey River drainage. were deployed to support ground crews in holding the fire at Jawbone Ridge, while Highway 120 was closed between Ferretti Road and Cherry Lake Road, and an evacuation center was established at Tioga High School as a precaution. The expansion intensified on August 20, with the fire surging from 4,440 acres to 11,000 acres in a single day, driven by favorable winds and the accumulation of heavy fuels from decades of fire suppression and drought-stressed vegetation. This rapid growth marked the onset of the fire's explosive phase, overwhelming early lines and necessitating increased aerial and ground resources to protect nearby communities and boundaries. Suppression challenges arose from the rugged topography and limited access, which hindered direct attack and allowed spotting across ridges.

Fire Spread and Peak Intensity

August 21–September 6 Growth

On August 21, 2013, the Rim Fire encompassed approximately 16,200 acres with 5% containment, primarily within the . By the following day, August 22, explosive growth occurred, adding over 37,000 acres and expanding the total to 53,887 acres, as the fire transitioned to crowning behavior in dense fuels under dry, windy conditions. This surge marked the onset of the fire's most aggressive phase, with containment dropping to near zero percent amid challenges in accessing rugged terrain. August 23 saw further rapid expansion, with an additional 51,793 acres burned, pushing the perimeter beyond 100,000 acres and breaching into Yosemite National Park's northwestern boundary. By August 24, the fire had scorched 125,620 acres, including about 17 square miles within the park, as northeasterly winds drove flames westward. Growth continued unabated through late August, reaching 184,481 acres by August 27 and surpassing 200,000 acres by August 30, with daily increments fueled by persistent and high fuel loads. Into early September, the fire's expansion moderated but still added significant acreage, totaling 235,841 acres by September 3. Containment efforts gained traction, rising to 32% by August 29 and 35% by August 30, though interior growth persisted in remote areas. By September 6, the blaze had consumed over 240,000 acres overall during this period, representing the bulk of its final 257,314-acre footprint, with fire behavior shifting from perimeter runs to isolated hotspots as seasonal weather patterns began to moderate extremes.

Factors Driving Rapid Spread

The rapid spread of the Rim Fire, which expanded by over 80,000 hectares between and September 6, 2013, was driven by extreme meteorological conditions including a dry lower and low-level thermal lapse rates that fostered and enhanced fire during primary burning periods. These conditions, combined with upper-level dynamics and nocturnal winds, exceeded traditional fire weather indices like the Haines Index, enabling sustained high rates of spread even at night when surface winds typically subside. The fire occurred amid California's severe 2012-2014 , with the preceding winter and spring recording well below average, resulting in fuel moistures below 5% in fine dead fuels by mid-August. Excessive fuel accumulation, resulting from decades of aggressive fire suppression policies that extended fire return intervals beyond historical norms of 10-20 years in mixed-conifer forests, created continuous high-volume fuels averaging 125 tons per acre in untreated areas—far exceeding the natural 10-15 tons per acre. This buildup of shrubs, ladder fuels, and dense canopy layers allowed surface fires to transition rapidly to active crowning, with flame lengths exceeding 30 meters in some sectors and promoting plume-dominated spread rates up to 3-5 km per hour on steep slopes. Topography in the and Yosemite's northwestern ridges amplified these effects through upslope alignment, where steep gradients (often 20-40% slopes) preheated fuels ahead of the flame front via , facilitating uphill runs and spot fires over 1-2 km. Canyons and ridgelines channeled winds, increasing fire intensity and enabling the blaze to breach lines repeatedly during wind-driven runs in late . The interplay of these factors—rather than isolated extremes—underpinned the fire's progression to over 104,000 hectares, highlighting limitations in predictive models reliant solely on surface conditions.

Containment and Final Suppression

September 7–20 Containment Phases

By early September 2013, the Rim Fire had reached approximately 80% containment after burning over 235,000 acres, with firefighters shifting focus from aggressive initial attack to securing and improving lines amid moderating fire behavior. Efforts emphasized burnout operations along the northern and eastern flanks within , where crews deliberately ignited unburned vegetation to widen firebreaks and minimize fuel continuity near natural barriers like granite outcrops. Hand crews and heavy equipment operators constructed and reinforced indirect lines in inaccessible terrain, while identified persistent hotspots for targeted suppression. From September 7 to 10, containment held steady at 80% despite the expanding to 253,332 acres, primarily through smoldering in heavy dead-and-down fuels rather than active perimeter runs. Suppression teams conducted intensive mop-up, digging out roots and duff layers up to 300 feet inside lines to extinguish deep-seated heat sources, supported by structure protection units safeguarding remaining outbuildings in the Groveland area. Cooler overnight temperatures and higher aided line holding, but dry conditions and occasional gusts up to 20 challenged crews on exposed ridges. Mid-month phases (September 11–15) involved phased demobilization of some resources as interior fire activity decreased, allowing reallocation to perimeter patrols and hazard tree removal along access roads like Highway 120. Officials projected full containment by September 20, citing improved weather forecasts and reduced fuel moisture recovery times. However, persistent wind events eroded gains, with spot overs briefly threatening lines on September 16–17, necessitating rapid response with water drops and ground crews. By September 20, containment remained below 85%, with the fire's footprint stabilizing at roughly 256,000 acres as efforts transitioned to long-term holding against seasonal risks. A light rain event on September 21 further suppressed activity, enabling safer access for final line assessments, though full control required additional weeks of monitoring due to entrenched fuels and terrain limitations. These phases highlighted the challenges of containing large-scale fires in fuel-laden wildlands, where over 5,000 personnel had been deployed at peak, incurring daily costs exceeding $1 million.

Resource Deployment and Tactics

At its peak, the Rim Fire response involved 3,752 firefighting personnel, including 64 hand crews, supported by 440 engines, 15 helicopters, and 60 bulldozers for line construction. Earlier in the incident, around August 23, over 2,600 personnel were assigned, with numbers scaling up as the fire expanded into Yosemite National Park. Aerial assets included Modular Airborne Firefighting System (MAFFS)-equipped C-130J Hercules airtankers from the National Guard, which dropped retardant, alongside HH-60G Pave Hawk helicopters for water and bucket operations. Suppression tactics emphasized indirect attack strategies due to the fire's extreme behavior, steep terrain, and dense fuels, focusing on constructing containment lines at defensible locations rather than direct engagement at the fire edge. Bulldozers created wide dozer lines to serve as anchors, supplemented by hand crews building narrower lines in inaccessible areas, while aerial retardant and water drops cooled hotspots and supported ground efforts. Burnout and backburn operations—controlled ignitions to consume unburned fuels between containment lines and the main fire—were critical for securing perimeters, particularly along the northern and southeastern flanks, including south of Hetch Hetchy Reservoir and Highway 120. These tactics shifted toward securing the fire's eastern and northern edges by mid-September, with firing operations timed to leverage favorable winds and reduce fuel loads ahead of advancing flames, ultimately contributing to 87% by September 20. Heavy reliance on persisted to mitigate rapid runs, though smoke inversions and resource fatigue occasionally limited effectiveness.

Impacts

Human and Structural Effects

The Rim Fire destroyed 112 structures in total, comprising 11 residences, 3 commercial buildings, and 98 outbuildings, primarily in the and adjacent areas. Among these losses were most historic buildings in Yosemite National Park's Miguel Meadows area. The fire threatened over 4,500 additional structures, including the Groveland Ranger Station, though many were ultimately protected through suppression efforts. Evacuation orders and advisories affected communities such as Groveland, Tuolumne City, and areas along Highways 108 and 120, leading to the temporary displacement of hundreds of residents. No civilian fatalities or injuries were reported from the fire itself. However, suppression operations resulted in 10 injuries among personnel. The remote location of much of the burn area limited broader human exposure compared to urban-interface fires.

Economic Costs

The suppression efforts for the Rim Fire incurred costs exceeding $127 million in 2013 dollars, covering expenditures on over 5,000 personnel, heavy equipment, retardant drops, and logistical support across federal agencies including the U.S. Forest Service and , as well as state and local partners. These figures represented a significant portion of the ’s wildfire budget reallocations, with initial daily costs reaching approximately $1 million before escalating amid the fire's rapid growth. Direct property damages included the destruction of 11 residences and several commercial buildings, alongside 101 outbuildings such as barns and sheds, primarily in rural areas of Tuolumne County outside . While precise insured or replacement values for these losses were not aggregated in federal summaries, the impacted structures contributed to localized economic disruptions for affected landowners and small businesses, with broader uninsured rural damages unquantified in early reports. Monetized losses to services—encompassing diminished regulation, soil stabilization, , and recreational values—were estimated at $100 million to $736 million by analysts evaluating biophysical functions across the burned public and private lands. A separate rapid valuation by Earth Economics pegged total damages at up to $800 million, factoring in long-term provisioning services like timber and regulatory services such as , though these projections relied on modeled replacement costs rather than market transactions. Such assessments highlighted indirect economic burdens on downstream users, including municipal providers facing elevated expenses from ash-laden runoff. Partial closures in Yosemite National Park's Hetch Hetchy region and widespread smoke reduced visitor access, leading to preliminary estimates of $3.25 million in forgone tourism spending during the peak August-October period, though full-year data indicated limited overall attendance decline due to sustained operations in Yosemite Valley. Broader regional economic activity, including timber harvesting deferrals in Stanislaus National Forest, incurred opportunity costs not fully captured in suppression tallies, with longer-term fiscal impacts such as elevated insurance premiums and property tax shortfalls remaining unevaluated at the time.

Ecological Consequences

The Rim Fire produced a mixed-severity burn mosaic, with 23% high severity (>75% overstory mortality) and 31% moderate severity (25-75% mortality), surpassing historical patterns of 10% high and 23% moderate severity in pre-2013 fires within the region. This affected primarily , , , and forests, where biophysical factors like climatic water deficit and fuel accumulation—exacerbated by prior fire suppression—drove elevated severity, particularly on drier slopes and in denser stands. In , the fire scorched over 75,000 acres at high severity in forests lacking recent moderate or high burns for up to 500 years, heightening risks of canopy loss and structural simplification. Pre-fire treatments, including prescribed burns and that reduced loads by up to 45 tons per acre in some areas, limited complete devastation to giant groves, preserving serotinous cone viability for potential regeneration despite broader threats from buildup and warming trends. Wildlife responses varied; great gray owls exhibited with stable occupancy post-fire, likely due to foraging flexibility in altered habitats, while faced disruptions as the blaze consumed nearly their entire local migratory range, reducing forage availability and prompting shifts in movement. loss in high-severity zones increased erosion potential by exposing soils and elevating runoff, though watershed-specific modeling for the area predicted negligible water quality degradation from ash or sediments due to the fire's patchy pattern and reservoir buffering. Long-term, unburned refugia and recent prior fires promoted lower severity in some patches, fostering , but persistent high-severity cycles risk to shrublands absent mechanical or repeated low-intensity burns to reset fuels and aid reestablishment. Natural seedling regeneration, dominated by pines, has occurred in many high-severity patches, though densities remain variable and locally sparse owing to limits and post-fire competition.

Controversies and Policy Debates

Criticisms of Federal Land Management Practices

Critics of federal land management have attributed the Rim Fire's rapid expansion and high severity primarily to the U.S. Forest Service's (USFS) long-standing policy of aggressive fire suppression, which allowed dense fuel accumulation in the Stanislaus National Forest over decades. Since the early 20th century, suppression efforts have prevented natural low-intensity burns that historically maintained forest health in Sierra Nevada ecosystems, resulting in unnaturally high volumes of dead wood, understory vegetation, and ladder fuels that facilitated crown fires during the 2013 event. The Rim Fire, which scorched 257,314 acres in the Stanislaus National Forest—over 60% of its total 402,468 acres—exhibited uncharacteristically severe effects on USFS-managed lands compared to adjacent Yosemite National Park areas, where prescribed fire restoration had reduced fuel continuity and moderated burn intensity. This disparity underscores broader failures in proactive fuels reduction, as USFS lands in the fire's path lacked sufficient or treatments prior to ignition on , 2013. Studies post-fire confirmed that untreated areas experienced significantly higher mortality rates, with severity indices revealing that suppression-era fuel buildup enabled the blaze to spread at rates exceeding 10,000 acres per day under . Critics, including experts, argue that bureaucratic delays, environmental litigation, and policy emphasis on non-intervention over —such as prescribed burns or commercial —exacerbated vulnerability, despite available from prior smaller fires demonstrating the efficacy of treatments in limiting spread. Further scrutiny targeted the USFS's initial response and , with reports highlighting inadequate aerial and ground resources deployed in the fire's first , allowing it to escape containment lines amid accessible terrain. Internal reviews and external analyses noted that the agency's risk-averse suppression , prioritizing immediate extinguishment over strategic backburning or fuel breaks, contributed to operational inefficiencies, as evidenced by the fire's evasion of early buckets and hand crews. Such practices, rooted in outdated guidelines, have been linked by analysts to systemic underinvestment in forest resilience, where only a fraction of high-risk acres receive annual treatment despite congressional mandates like the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003.

Suppression Strategy Shortcomings

The Rim Fire's initial attack on , 2013, involved deployment of six engines, two hand crews, two helicopters, one air attack plane, four air tankers, one lead plane, two dozers, and an incident commander, with five air tankers dropping over 32,000 gallons of retardant that afternoon. Despite this aggressive response, the fire escaped within hours, growing from 40 acres at to over 150 acres by 1600 hours, driven by steep terrain that precluded safe ground access and forced reliance on aerial operations alone. Critics, including local reporting from The Union Democrat, highlighted inadequacies in the first 48 hours, such as air tankers being grounded after limited drops and the absence of ground crews on August 18, allowing unchecked expansion to 250 acres. On August 19, air support remained constrained, with tankers conducting only two to three drops before being placed on hold, enabling the fire to cross the and threaten structures at Pine Mountain Lake. These delays compounded the fire's momentum under —high winds, low humidity, and drought-stressed fuels—which attributes to the of initial attack in such events, producing uncharacteristically large high-severity burn areas regardless of prior fuel treatments. The U.S. Forest Service's lack of transparency on suppression details and fire origin (a hunter's abandoned ) further eroded , as minimal updates fueled speculation and hindered coordinated response. Subsequent strategy shifted to large-scale indirect containment with over 5,000 personnel and extensive backburning, but early lapses allowed daily doubling of acreage, reaching 10,000–50,000 acres per day and ultimately 257,314 acres before full on October 24. Lessons from facilitated learning analyses emphasized the need for enhanced of "new normal" fire behaviors in overstocked, drought-impacted forests, where personal motivations risked overextension, though no tactical errors were directly faulted beyond terrain and weather constraints. Overall, the suppression approach underscored vulnerabilities in transitioning from initial aerial-heavy tactics to sustained ground operations, with suppression costs exceeding $127 million reflecting the high price of delayed .

Climate Change Attribution vs. Management Failures

The Rim Fire, which burned 257,314 acres from August 17 to October 24, 2013, occurred amid California's severe multi-year drought (2012–2016), characterized by record-low precipitation, high temperatures, and low humidity that dried fuels and promoted rapid fire spread. Proponents of climate change attribution argue that anthropogenic warming exacerbated these conditions, increasing wildfire potential in the Sierra Nevada by enhancing evapotranspiration and fuel aridity, with models indicating human influence on roughly half of observed burned area increases in California forests since the mid-20th century. However, such attributions often rely on broad regional trends rather than fire-specific causal analysis, and empirical studies of the Rim Fire itself highlight limited direct evidence linking long-term climate signals to its unique severity patterns beyond short-term weather extremes. In contrast, analyses of burn severity emphasize forest structure and fuel accumulation—outcomes of decades of aggressive suppression and inadequate hazardous fuels reduction—as dominant drivers of the 's intensity. modeling of Rim Fire effects found that local density, canopy cover, and prior history explained more variance in moderate- to high-severity patches than climatic variables like indices or weather, with dense, multi-layered canopies from exclusion promoting crowning and sustained high-intensity burning. Areas treated with prescribed burns or mechanical prior to 2013 exhibited significantly lower severity, reducing potential by up to 50% compared to untreated stands, underscoring how proactive management could mitigate spread even under extreme conditions. The fire's transition into , where managed fire regimes had restored more resilient conditions, resulted in slower spread and lower severity relative to the Stanislaus National Forest's untreated landscapes, illustrating bottom-up controls from historical practices over top-down forcing. Critics of federal policies, including U.S. Forest Service restrictions on logging and fuels projects due to environmental litigation, note that uncharacteristic fuel loads—built up since the era of total suppression—enabled the Fire's explosive growth, with only 20–30% of forests receiving recommended treatments by 2013. While drought provided ignition opportunities, the predominance of fuel-dominated behavior in simulations and post-fire assessments indicates that restoring frequent low-severity fire regimes through would reduce vulnerability more effectively than mitigation alone, as evidenced by comparative fire histories in the region.

Legal Proceedings

Investigation and Arson Conviction

The Rim Fire ignited on August 17, 2013, near the Rim of the World Vista in the , prompting an immediate joint investigation by the U.S. Forest Service, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), and local authorities. Investigators determined the fire's origin as human-caused, specifically an illegal lit in a prohibited area during active fire restrictions, which escaped control amid dry conditions and winds. Evidence included physical traces consistent with a small campfire site, witness accounts of a bowhunter in the vicinity, and forensic analysis ruling out natural ignition sources like . Focus turned to Keith Matthew Emerald, a 32-year-old resident of Columbia, California, identified as the primary suspect through his presence in the area for bow on the day of ignition. investigators alleged Emerald lit the to attract game or for warmth, despite bans on open flames, and failed to fully extinguish it before leaving. A indicted him on August 7, 2014, on four counts: maliciously setting timber on fire (a carrying potential five-year sentence), that act, to federal agents, and using fire to damage property. The stemmed from Emerald's initial statements to investigators, which prosecutors claimed included a partial later recanted, alongside physical and testimonial linking him to the site. No trial occurred, as the U.S. Attorney's moved to dismiss all charges on May 1, 2015, following the unexpected deaths of two key witnesses whose testimonies were central to proving and causation. The dismissal was without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of refiling, though no further action ensued, and Emerald was released after posting bond. This outcome left the fire officially attributed to human via an illegal but without a judicial conviction for or related offenses, highlighting evidentiary challenges in investigations reliant on perishable witness accounts.

Related Litigation on Recovery Efforts

In September 2014, the John Muir Project, , and filed a in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of challenging the U.S. Service's Rim Fire Recovery Project on the , which proposed salvage logging of approximately 15,000 acres of dead and dying trees, on over 30,000 acres, and watershed restoration to mitigate and improve soil productivity following the 2013 fire. The plaintiffs alleged violations of the (NEPA), Endangered Act (ESA), and National Management Act (NFMA), primarily arguing that the project inadequately assessed risks to northern spotted owl habitat, threatened spotted owl critical habitat, and failed to consider cumulative impacts on and aquatic like Yosemite toads. The Forest Service defended the project as essential for economic recovery, reducing future fire hazards by removing beetle-killed timber before it decayed, and facilitating natural regeneration through site preparation, with salvage limited to areas outside high-severity burn zones and owl core areas where feasible. On September 20, 2014, U.S. District Judge Anthony Ishii denied the plaintiffs' motion for a temporary , finding insufficient evidence of irreparable harm outweighing the in prompt restoration to prevent further degradation. In May 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the district court's decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Skalski, ruling that the Forest Service's biological assessments and incidental take statements for spotted owls complied with ESA requirements and that NEPA analysis adequately addressed alternatives. Subsequent challenges persisted; in October 2019, environmental groups renewed efforts to enjoin ongoing logging under the same project, claiming new evidence of owl occupancy in burn areas contradicted the Forest Service's assumptions. U.S. District Judge Dale A. Drozd denied the motion on October 7, 2019, determining that the claims did not demonstrate likely success on the merits or imminent harm justifying halt of operations already substantially implemented. These rulings enabled the project to proceed, with salvage harvesting focused on commercial timber recovery to fund reforestation planting of over 10 million seedlings by 2020, though critics maintained that post-fire logging exacerbated rather than aided ecological recovery. No appellate reversal occurred, and the litigation underscored tensions between rapid salvage for hazard reduction and precautionary protections for fire-adapted species in high-severity burn scars.

Recovery and Long-Term Outcomes

Forest Service Reforestation and Salvage Projects

Following the 2013 Rim Fire, which scorched approximately 154,000 acres in the , the U.S. Forest Service launched the Rim Fire Recovery Project to address timber salvage and ecosystem restoration. The initiative proposed salvage across up to 48,000 acres of National Forest System lands to harvest dead and dying trees, reducing potential fuel for reburns and recovering economic value estimated at 661 million board feet of timber. Ground-based and helicopter methods were employed, removing an of 64% of snag basal area within 50 meters of salvage sites to prepare ground for replanting and mitigate erosion risks. Reforestation efforts under the project focused on restoring mixed-conifer forests across roughly 42,000 acres, including areas treated for salvage and fuels reduction. Crews planted such as Douglas-fir, incense-cedar, sugar , and ponderosa at densities targeting 200-400 per acre, with treatments extending into burned stands aged 15-25 years post-fire. The 2016 Record of Decision authorized these activities adjacent to salvage zones, emphasizing mechanical site preparation like piling to control competing and enhance survival rates. Revenue from salvage timber sales funded much of the replanting, supporting a restoration approach to bolster wildlife habitat and watershed protection. By 2015, over 1,500 volunteers contributed nearly 20,000 hours, planting more than 56,000 trees as part of coordinated . CAL FIRE provided additional funding for post-fire replanting and vegetation release in Tuolumne County portions of the burn scar, targeting 23,915 acres for mixed-conifer recovery. Early monitoring indicated variable regeneration success, with salvage-adjacent sites showing prepared conditions for higher conifer establishment compared to untreated high-severity burns, though natural reseeding of shade-tolerant persisted in lower-intensity areas.

Post-Fire Ecological Research

Research following the 2013 Rim Fire has examined vegetation recovery dynamics in mixed-conifer and red fir forests, revealing that short-term regrowth (<5 years) is constrained by fire severity, post-fire climate, and topographic factors. Landsat-derived Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) analyses indicated that high-severity burn areas exhibited significantly lower NDVI values compared to low- or moderate-severity patches, with recovery rates insufficient to restore pre-fire levels within five years. In mixed-conifer stands, recovery was particularly sensitive to post-fire wet-season precipitation deficits, exacerbated by ongoing drought conditions, while red fir forests responded more to January minimum temperatures. Topographic variables, such as slope steepness (positively associated with NDVI) and aspect (north-facing for mixed-conifer, east-facing and higher elevation for red fir), further modulated these patterns. Studies on burn severity patterns highlighted how extreme drought altered historical mixed-severity fire regimes, with the Rim Fire producing 23% high-severity and 31% moderate-severity patches—exceeding pre-fire analogs (10% high, 23% moderate). Biophysical drivers, including climatic water deficit, actual evapotranspiration, slope position, and solar radiation, explained up to 55% of severity variance, reversing typical moisture-severity relationships under water-stressed conditions. These findings suggest potential for high-severity patches to self-perpetuate without interventions like prescribed fire or mechanical thinning, informing targeted management. Additionally, recovery trajectories in previously moderately burned areas (e.g., from the 1996 Ackerson Fire) influenced Rim Fire reburn severity, where elevated live white fir basal area (>1.9 /ha) and standing dead (>76.3 /ha) correlated with higher severity outcomes, underscoring the role of post-fire fuel accumulation. Wildlife responses have been assessed through avian community studies, which found that post-fire salvage reduced overall and abundance compared to unsalvaged controls. High-intensity salvage removed 64% of snag basal area near survey points, negatively affecting snag-dependent like black-backed woodpeckers and mature-forest associates such as mountain chickadees, while benefiting open-habitat birds (e.g., western bluebirds). Of 37 analyzed , 13 showed negative responses, 4 positive, and 20 neutral, with live tree basal area and shrub cover as key habitat predictors. Fungal ecology research documented elevated morel ( spp.) abundance in burned white /sugar forests, estimating 1,693 morels per across surveyed plots, with total potential yield exceeding 1 million individuals annually in typical burned extents. Distributions were highly clumped (3-7 meter scales) and peaked in fully burned areas, linking fruiting to fire-induced tree mortality and fuel consumption, though mycelial colony dynamics and precise fire-severity thresholds require further investigation. These patterns support fire's role in enhancing mycorrhizal post-disturbance.

Lessons for Future Wildfire Prevention

Areas subjected to prior low-severity fires within 14 years of the Rim Fire ignition primarily burned at low severity, demonstrating that restoring frequent fire return intervals through prescribed burns effectively limits fuel accumulation and reduces subsequent intensity under moderate conditions. In contrast, stands with extended fire exclusion—exceeding 14 years without burning—experienced moderate to high severity, particularly on days with elevated values, as accumulated surface fuels and shrubs facilitated torching and crowning. These patterns affirm that a century of aggressive suppression without complementary restoration has deviated from historical mixed-severity regimes in forests, amplifying risks from overgrown understories and dense canopies. Fuel treatments, including mechanical thinning and prescribed fire, altered fire behavior in the Rim Fire by disrupting fuel continuity, as evidenced in Yosemite National Park's Hodgdon Meadow where multiyear hazardous fuels reduction created defensible space that contained fire spread and protected structures. Preliminary assessments confirmed that treated units limited flame lengths and spotting distances compared to untreated adjacent areas, though extreme plume-dominated weather occasionally overrode these benefits by driving high-severity patches irrespective of pre-fire conditions. Empirical modeling further indicates that prioritizing treatments on ridge tops and low actual sites—where severity was highest—can enhance landscape resilience by targeting vulnerable topographic positions prone to stress. To prevent recurrence, federal agencies should scale up landscape-level fuel reduction to encompass millions of acres annually, integrating mechanical removal of excess small-diameter trees with broadcast burning to mimic natural variability and avert uniform high-severity outcomes. Legal and procedural barriers to timely implementation, compounded by litigation delays, must be addressed to enable proactive interventions before fuel loads reach critical thresholds, as overstocked forests under exhibit explosive growth rates exceeding historical norms. While extreme fire weather remains a dominant driver during peak events, consistent application of these practices has proven to moderate severity in 70-80% of cases under less severe atmospheric conditions, prioritizing causal dynamics over unattributable climatic attributions alone.

References

  1. [1]
    Rim Fire | CAL FIRE - CA.gov
    Aug 17, 2013 · Incident Maps and Reports. Agency Having Jurisdiction: Stanislaus National Forest/Yosemite National Park. Location: 3 miles east of Groveland along Hwy 120.
  2. [2]
    Rim Fire cause: hunter's illegal campfire - SFGATE
    Sep 5, 2013 · A hunter who lost control of an illegal campfire ignited the massive blaze on the west edge of Yosemite National Park, authorities said Thursday.
  3. [3]
    [PDF] Grantee: California Grant: B-13-DS-06-0001 July 1, 2024 thru ...
    Narratives. Executive Summary: The 2013 Rim Fire destroyed 257,314 acres of land in Tuolumne County and ranks as the third largest wildfire in State.
  4. [4]
    [PDF] Rim Fire - California, 2013 - Headwaters Economics
    The Rim Fire was the third-largest in California's recorded history, burning. 402 square miles and destroying 112 structures primarily in drought-stricken.Missing: facts sources
  5. [5]
    Topography, Fuels, and Fire Exclusion Drive Fire Severity of the Rim ...
    Aug 7, 2025 · Data from 84 plots sampled in 2002 revealed increases in tree density, basal area, and fuel buildup since 1899 due to fire exclusion. A ...
  6. [6]
    [PDF] Action Plan and State of California National Disaster Resilience ...
    The Rim Fire's direct emergency response cost was $127 million and estimates of environmental damage range up to $736 million.
  7. [7]
    Rim fire's effects likely to last for decades to come - Los Angeles Times
    Sep 23, 2013 · Remote sensing satellite images indicate that virtually all of the vegetation is dead on nearly 40% of the area of the 401-square-mile blaze, ...Missing: containment | Show results with:containment
  8. [8]
    The 2013 Rim Fire: Implications for Predicting Extreme Fire Spread ...
    The 2013 Rim Fire, which burned over 104,000 ha, was one of the most severe fire events in California's history, in terms of its rapid growth, intensity, ...
  9. [9]
    [PDF] RECREATION REPORT: RIM FIRE RECOVERY PROJECT - GovInfo
    The Rim Fire started on August 17, 2013 in a remote area of the Stanislaus National. Forest near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne Rivers about 20 miles ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  10. [10]
    [PDF] The Rim Fire - Hetch Hetehy Watershed Effects Report
    Sep 26, 2013 · On August 17, 2013 an escaped campfire ignited what became known as the Rim. Fire. The fire started in the Clavey River drainage along ...
  11. [11]
    California Rim Fire Was Started By Hunter's 'Illegal' Fire | TPR
    Sep 5, 2013 · The U.S. Forest Service said in a statement that its investigators had concluded that the Rim Fire "began when a hunter allowed an illegal fire ...
  12. [12]
    California Rim fire cause identified as 80% of blaze contained
    Sep 5, 2013 · Investigators conclude hunter inadvertently began the fire, putting to rest rumours that illegal marijuana growers were at fault.<|separator|>
  13. [13]
    New USGS Research on 21st Century California Wildfires Examines ...
    The first publication examines selected recent California wildfires, assessing the locations, vegetation types, ignition causes, and other drivers of fire ...
  14. [14]
    The True Story of California Wildfire Rim Fire - Rolling Stone
    Jun 11, 2023 · Officially, the cause of a fire that cost $127.3 million to fight and burned more than 250,000 acres of forest is still unknown. And it made a ...<|separator|>
  15. [15]
    Fighting Fire with Fire - American Forests
    Oct 11, 2013 · Previous fire suppression policies have contributed to more destructive fires in the region. The regrowth and fuel buildup resulting from ...
  16. [16]
    Twenty-first century California, USA, wildfires: fuel-dominated vs ...
    Jul 18, 2019 · We believe that fires clearly recognizable as fuel-dominated vs. wind-dominated provide interesting case studies of factors behind these two extremes.
  17. [17]
    How Ecology Informs Documentary Storytelling and Conservation ...
    20 ago 2019 · Until the Gold Rush, this forest just north of the Stanislaus Complex Fire and Rim Fire burn areas had wildfires every six years on average.
  18. [18]
    Evidence of fuels management and fire weather influencing fire ...
    23 jun 2017 · The 2013 Rim Fire in the Sierra Nevada provides an opportunity to study fuels treatment effects across a large (100,000 ha) landscape that had ...
  19. [19]
    Severity of an uncharacteristically large wildfire, the Rim Fire, in ...
    Sep 15, 2014 · Forests that evolved under the influence of frequent, low-severity fire have undergone dramatic change following a century of fire suppression, ...
  20. [20]
    Fire Management Saves Yosemite's Giant Sequoias
    YNP experienced its largest fire in recorded history, the 2013 Rim Fire, as a result of a combination of factors including the unnaturally high fuel loads from ...
  21. [21]
    [PDF] The economic impact of The 2013 Rim fire on natural lands
    Nov 26, 2013 · This document is a preliminary assessment of the economic impact of the 2013 Rim fire on natural lands, funded by SFPUC.
  22. [22]
    Multiyear Prescribed Fire Treatments Protect Community during Rim ...
    Jan 11, 2017 · Past hazardous fuels reduction treatments and prescribed fire have created defensible space for the Hodgdon Meadow area in Yosemite NP.Missing: extent pre
  23. [23]
    [PDF] Evidence of fuels management and fire weather influencing fire ...
    The objectives of this study were to evaluate the (1) stand-scale effects of past fuels treatments and wildfires on fire severity within the Rim Fire; (2) land-.
  24. [24]
    Controlled burns limited severity of Rim Fire | Penn State University
    Dec 8, 2017 · "We found prescribed burns really reduced the severity of the Rim Fire," said Alan Taylor, professor of geography and associate in the Earth and ...
  25. [25]
    [PDF] Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire - Malcolm North lab
    The Rim fire produced a mix of fire severities, with more moderate and high-severity effects than previous fires, influenced by local environment.Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  26. [26]
    Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire: Relative importance of ...
    Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire: Relative importance of local climate, fire weather, topography, and forest structure.
  27. [27]
    [PDF] 2013 Rim Fire Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite National Park
    Incident management tactics were employed to manage when and how fast these areas burned in order to lesson fire severity and reach incident containment goals.
  28. [28]
    Surface dimming by the 2013 Rim Fire simulated by a sectional ...
    Jun 4, 2016 · The Rim Fire started on 17 August and spread rapidly until 31 August 2013 due to warm ambient temperatures, high near-surface wind speeds, and ...
  29. [29]
    Evidence of fuels management and fire weather influencing fire ...
    We assessed the relative influence of previous fuels treatments (including wildfire), fire weather, vegetation and water balance on fire severity in the Rim ...
  30. [30]
    [PDF] Rim Fire Recovery (43033) - Draft Environmental Impact Statement
    Abstract: This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) describes a proposal by the Stanislaus National. Forest which would include: salvage of dead ...
  31. [31]
    [PDF] Rim Fire Burn Injury Facilitated Learning Analysis - AWS
    Rim Fire on the afternoon of August 17, 2013—the day the fire was reported. The Accident. A Colorado fire department sends an engine and its crew to the Rim ...
  32. [32]
    Evacuation Orders Issued in Rim Fire Path - capradio.org
    Aug 23, 2013 · Cause, Under Investigation. Date of Origin, Saturday August 17th, 2013 ... Fire officials say the availability of fixed-wing air craft is ...
  33. [33]
    Rim Fire Summary Timeline - myMotherLode.com
    The Rim Fire became the 3rd largest fire in the 80 years of records that Cal Fire kept as of 2013. It burned 257,314 or over square miles and damaged 112 ...Missing: sources | Show results with:sources
  34. [34]
    Rim Fire, California - NASA Earth Observatory
    Aug 23, 2013 · Started on August 17, 2013, the fast-moving fire had already charred more than 100,000 acres (40,000 hectares) by August 23, despite the efforts ...Missing: expansion | Show results with:expansion
  35. [35]
    [PDF] Yosemite NP Rim Fire, Burned Area Emergency Response Plan
    Oct 1, 2013 · The Rim Fire began August 17, 2013 on the Stanislaus National Forest in the Central Sierras of California and burned over 255,000 acres.
  36. [36]
    Rim Fire Grows Past 63000 Acres, Containment Elusive
    Aug 22, 2013 · Fire Start Date: August 17, 2013 Injuries: 1. Fire Cause: Under Investigation Total Personnel: 1,849. Cost to date: $5.4 Million. Road ClosuresMissing: timeline | Show results with:timeline
  37. [37]
    NASA image: Rim Fire update—Aug. 30, 2013 - Phys.org
    Aug 30, 2013 · Update for August 30, 2013 - The fire is over 201,00 acres as of 6 am this morning, Aug. 30, 2013 with containment at 32%.
  38. [38]
    Progression of California's Rim Fire - NASA Earth Observatory
    Sep 3, 2013 · The Rim Fire is now the largest in the United States in 2013 and the fourth largest fire in California since records began in 1932.
  39. [39]
    Previous burns and topography limit and reinforce fire severity in a ...
    Nov 29, 2017 · The Rim Fire burned 1040 km2 in August–September 2013 (Fig. 2). Of this total, 322 km2 burned within Yosemite National Park (YNP), 626 km2 ...
  40. [40]
    Rim Fire Is Third-Largest Wildfire In California's History - WYPR
    The Rim wildfire that began three weeks ago today is now 80 percent contained, officials say, but it has burned more than a quarter of a ...
  41. [41]
    NASA image: Rim Fire update—Sept. 6, 2013 - Phys.org
    Sep 6, 2013 · At present, this fire is 80% contained and is expected to be fully ... To date this fire has cost close to $85 million. Over 5,000 ...<|separator|>
  42. [42]
    Full Containment of Rim Fire Expected Next Week, Landscape ...
    Sep 12, 2013 · Fire officials say September 20 is the expected date for full containment of the Rim Fire in Tuolumne County, burning in and around Yosemite National Park.
  43. [43]
    Rim fire near Yosemite grows over weekend; still 80% contained
    Sep 9, 2013 · The massive Rim fire in and around Yosemite National Park remains 80% contained after growing in size over the weekend.
  44. [44]
    9/9/2013 Rim Fire Extended Air Quality Report
    Sep 9, 2013 · Rim Fire, Air Quality Resource Advisor Report Monday, September 9, 2013 ... The fire size remains 253,332 acres and is 80% contained. About ...<|control11|><|separator|>
  45. [45]
    Rim Fire update Sept. 10, 2013 | EurekAlert!
    The fire remains at 80% contained. Even though ... September 09, 2013. Actively burning areas ... rim-fire-update-sept-10-2013. EurekAlert! The ...
  46. [46]
    As Rim fire rages, more than 400 square miles have burned
    Sep 16, 2013 · The Rim fire continues to burn in and around Yosemite National Park, scorching more than 400 square miles, authorities said Monday.
  47. [47]
    Yosemite fire: another two weeks to full containment - CSMonitor.com
    Sep 9, 2013 · Officials now estimate that the Rim Fire will be fully contained by Friday, Sept. 20.
  48. [48]
    Rim Fire winds set back final containment - East Bay Times
    The anticipated containment date has been pushed back to October 1. The fire won't be fully extinguished until fall rains or winter snows. The ...
  49. [49]
    Rim Fire Coverage - capradio.org
    Stories, links and resources associated with the Rim Fire which started on August 17, 2013 in Tuolumne County near Groveland.
  50. [50]
    [PDF] NASA image: Rim Fire update Sept. 9, 2013 - Phys.org
    Sep 9, 2013 · The Rim wildfire that began three weeks ago today is now 80 percent contained, officials say, but it has burned more than a quarter of a ...
  51. [51]
    California: Rim Fire at Yosemite NP - Wildfire Today
    The number of structures burned in the Rim Fire increased to 111 (31 “primary structures” and 80 outbuildings) when the fire burned through the Tuolumne ...
  52. [52]
    National Guard battles Northern California wildfires | Article - Army.mil
    Aug 28, 2013 · Aircrews are using two C-130J Hercules airtankers to fight the Rim fire. Both aircraft are equipped with the Modular Airborne Firefighting ...
  53. [53]
    129th Rescue Wing continues fighting Rim Fire - AF.mil
    Aug 29, 2013 · As of this Aug. 28, the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection reported that the Rim Fire has burned 187, 566 acres and is ...
  54. [54]
    [PDF] FOREST VEGETATION REPORT:RIM FIRE RECOVERY PROJECT
    18 jul 2014 · By the time the fire was contained on October 24th, 2013, the fire had burned over 257,000 acres. The fire burned from the Groveland Ranger ...
  55. [55]
    Rim Fire - Friday Update: Burnout Operations and Air Attack Slow ...
    Aug 30, 2013 · The fire has grown to 201,894 acres, with containment at 32 percent. Three commercial buildings have been lost, along with 97 outbuildings and ...
  56. [56]
    2013 Rim Fire - NASA Scientific Visualization Studio
    2013 Rim Fire. Released Wednesday, February 12, 2020. ID: 31103 ... The Canadian Interagency Forest Fire Center reported there were seven out-of ...
  57. [57]
    Rim Fire - Monday Update: Good Progress Continues, Containment ...
    Sep 2, 2013 · Firefighters are gaining ground on the Rim Fire, as containment has reached 60 percent, although the fire continues to grow, but at a slower ...
  58. [58]
    Rim Fire - Monday Update: Fire Grows Beyond 160,000 Acres ...
    Aug 26, 2013 · Heavy reliance on aviation resources has been critical in an effort to slow the fires progress and allow suppression resources to establish ...
  59. [59]
    [PDF] CAL FIRE Local 2881
    More recently the Rim Fire from 2013 became the third largest fire in California's history having burned over a quarter-million acres in the Sierra Nevada ...<|separator|>
  60. [60]
    [PDF] Emergency Assessment of Post-Fire Debris-Flow Hazards for the ...
    The Rim fire damaged or destroyed 111 structures and cost an estimated $119 million as of September 21, 2013. In addition to the direct effects on nearby ...
  61. [61]
    Yosemite's Rim Fire: California has spent $27M so far to fight wildfire
    Aug 28, 2013 · State officials say fighting the massive Rim Fire near Yosemite National Park has cost at least $27 million. That's about 15 percent of the ...
  62. [62]
    California Wildfires Kill More Than Trees, And That May Help Us ...
    Aug 5, 2014 · Pre-1970s, a no-burn policy in the Forest Service that suppressed all fires led to an increase in fuel loads (flammable material like underbrush) ...
  63. [63]
    Rim Fire Ecosystem Damage Estimated at $800 Million | KQED
    Dec 27, 2013 · A new report on this year's Rim Fire in and around Yosemite National Park estimates that damage to the ecosystem may have cost as much as $800 ...Missing: suppression | Show results with:suppression
  64. [64]
    Wildfire and park shutdown decimate Yosemite tourist businesses
    Oct 24, 2013 · ... effect from the estimated $3.25 million in lost tourist spending during the Rim fire and Yosemite closure. “My gut tells me that (estimate) ...
  65. [65]
    [PDF] Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire - USDA Forest Service
    Sep 8, 2015 · Our modeling found that the burning index, a daily estimate of fire weather, the maximum RdNBR for fires prior to the Rim fire, and years since ...
  66. [66]
    [PDF] Severity of an uncharacteristically large wildfire, the Rim Fire, in ...
    Areas with higher basal area of shade-tolerant species and greater tree density may be more resis- tant to fire effects due to their association with cooler ...
  67. [67]
    Great gray owls unfazed by California megafire - The Wildlife Society
    Feb 4, 2019 · The owls, researchers concluded, “appear to have been largely resilient to effects of the Rim Fire.” It may not be true for other species in the ...
  68. [68]
    Hanson: The Ecological Importance of California's Rim Fire
    Aug 29, 2013 · The Rim fire is a good thing for the health of the forest ecosystem. It is not devastation, or loss. It is ecological restoration. What ...
  69. [69]
    [PDF] What drives ponderosa pine regeneration following wildfire in the ...
    And while some recently burned areas contain abundant regeneration (Savage et al., 2013; Malone et al.,. 2018), in other areas regeneration is sparse (Dodson ...
  70. [70]
    Severity of an uncharacteristically large wildfire, the Rim Fire, in ...
    Plots that burned on days with strong plume activity experienced moderate- to high-severity fire effects regardless of forest conditions, fire history or ...Missing: empirical | Show results with:empirical
  71. [71]
    Federal land management to blame for out-of-control fires, say critics
    Sep 17, 2015 · If Forest Service managers fail, at worst they are transferred to another forest.” In total, the U.S. government owns about 640 million acres of ...
  72. [72]
    Forest Service criticized for early management of the Rim Fire
    The U.S. Forest Service is being criticized for their early suppression attempts of the Rim Fire, as well as their lack of transparency about how it was ...
  73. [73]
    Suppression strategy fueling more destructive wildfires - study
    May 8, 2015 · "Excessively risk averse" federal firefighting has caused Western wildfires that escape initial containment to become far more destructive ...
  74. [74]
    None
    ### Summary of Early Response, Failures in Initial Attack, and Lessons on Suppression Strategy from Rim Fire Burn Injury FLA
  75. [75]
    Rim Fire Revised: Strike While the Iron Is Hot - Firehouse Magazine
    Wildland fire suppression personnel are operating in an environment capable of producing unprecedented fire behavior, and this is precisely where our “new” ...Missing: backburn burnout
  76. [76]
    Observed Impacts of Anthropogenic Climate Change on Wildfire in ...
    Jul 15, 2019 · Human-caused warming has already significantly enhanced wildfire activity in California, particularly in the forests of the Sierra Nevada and North Coast.
  77. [77]
    California's Rim Fire and climate change ... Dots connected ... Or not?
    Nov 14, 2013 · California's Rim Fire, the 4th largest in the state's history ... This Dot Earth post zeros in on past fire suppression policies as ...
  78. [78]
    Mixed severity fire effects within the Rim fire: Relative importance of ...
    In our study area the Rim fire produced a higher proportion of moderate- and high-severity effects than occurred in previous fires. Random forest modeling ...
  79. [79]
    The Rim Fire one year later: a natural experiment in fire ecology and ...
    Aug 5, 2014 · Though it smoldered on into October, by September 3rd, 2013, the Forest Service was reporting that the Rim Fire was 70 percent contained. Most ...Missing: cause | Show results with:cause
  80. [80]
    Tuolumne County Man Indicted For Starting Rim Fire
    Aug 7, 2014 · ... Rim Fire about an hour after the fire was reported. Emerald was ... discovered the origin, cause and identified a suspect for the massive Rim Fire ...
  81. [81]
    Hunter who sparked massive Rim fire to be charged, official says
    Dec 6, 2013 · A Tuolumne County official said this week that federal prosecutors intend to charge a hunter who sparked the huge Rim fire.
  82. [82]
    Hunter charged with setting 2013 Yosemite fire - CBS News
    Aug 8, 2014 · A grand jury returned a four-count indictment against 32-year-old Keith Matthew Emerald alleging he started a fire on Aug. 17, 2013.
  83. [83]
    A decade later, lessons from Rim Fire still burn strong for those who ...
    Aug 17, 2023 · Nearly a year after the Rim Fire broke out, Forest Service investigators said a bowhunter from Columbia named Keith Matthew Emerald confessed to ...Missing: outcome | Show results with:outcome<|control11|><|separator|>
  84. [84]
    Government Moves To Dismiss Rim Fire Indictment
    May 1, 2015 · The indictment alleged that Emerald had caused the Rim Fire, which burned approximately 250,000 acres of land, and that he had made a false ...
  85. [85]
    Deaths of two witnesses result in dropped charges against person ...
    ... Rim Fire about an hour after the fire was reported. He was carrying bow hunting equipment with him and advised authorities that he had been on a solo ...
  86. [86]
    With Witnesses Dead, Charges Dropped Against Rim Fire Suspect
    May 1, 2015 · Criminal charges were dropped against a bow hunter accused of starting one of California's largest wildfires, a blaze that burned parts of Yosemite National ...
  87. [87]
    U.S. prosecutors drop case in massive Yosemite fire after witnesses ...
    May 1, 2015 · Keith Matthew Emerald, 32, of Columbia, Calif., was charged with setting timber on fire and lying to a government agency when questioned about ...
  88. [88]
    Challenges to Destructive Logging Practices on Federal Land
    Rim Fire Recovery Project. On September 4, 2014, the John Muir Project joined two other organizations in seeking an injunction against the U.S. Forest ...
  89. [89]
    Rim Fire Logging Lawsuit - myMotherLode.com
    Several environmental groups have filed a joint lawsuit to halt the Rim Fire salvage logging in the Stanislaus National Forest.
  90. [90]
    Center for Biological Diversity v. Skalski, 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS ...
    ... Rim Fire Recovery Project (“the Project”); specifically Plaintiffs seek to prevent logging within 1.5 km of eight owl territory centers that are part of the ...
  91. [91]
    Forests | Courthouse News Service
    - The U.S. Forest Service's 150,000-acre Rim Fire Recovery Project violates protections for Northern Spotted Owls, the Center for Biological Diversity ...
  92. [92]
    Rural County Representatives of California Report Temporary ...
    Sep 20, 2014 · Rural County Representatives of California Report Temporary Restraining Order Denied in Rim Fire Salvage Lawsuit.<|separator|>
  93. [93]
    Court Rules In Favor Of Rim Fire Logging - The Smokey Wire
    May 28, 2015 · According to Stanislaus National Forest spokesperson Rebecca Garcia, “The Ninth Circuit Court ruled in favor of the US Forest Service on the Rim ...
  94. [94]
    Judge denies request for USFS to halt logging in Rim Fire scar
    Nov 6, 2019 · In an ongoing legal battle over forest restoration efforts in the 2013 Rim Fire footprint in Tuolumne County, a federal judge on Oct. 7 denied ...
  95. [95]
    [PDF] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ...
    Oct 7, 2019 · Service spearheaded the 2014 Rim Fire Recovery Project, a multi-purpose effort to improve the land and local economies most affected by the ...
  96. [96]
    Stanislaus National Forest, CA; Notice of Intent To Prepare an ...
    Dec 6, 2013 · The Rim Fire started on August 17, 2013, in a remote area of the Stanislaus National Forest near the confluence of the Clavey and Tuolumne ...Missing: response | Show results with:response
  97. [97]
    [PDF] Rim Fire Reforestation (45612) - Environmental Impact Statement
    Apr 21, 2016 · Abstract: This Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) describes a proposal for about 48,000 acres of treatments on National Forest System ...
  98. [98]
    Forest Service Proposes Massive Salvage Logging Project in Rim ...
    May 19, 2014 · WASHINGTON— The Forest Service is proposing to log 661 million board feet of timber in the area burned by the Rim fire last summer in ...Missing: outcomes | Show results with:outcomes
  99. [99]
    Short-term effects of post-fire salvage logging intensity and activity ...
    Sep 3, 2022 · We explored the effects of post-fire salvage on the breeding bird community following the 2012 Chips and 2013 Rim fires using a before-after control-impact ...
  100. [100]
    Planting the Shade You'll Never Feel - USDA Forest Service
    Apr 4, 2022 · Crews are planting a mix of Douglas Fir, Incense Cedar and Sugar and Pondera Pine in an effort to reforest areas devastated by the 2013 Rim Fire ...Missing: salvage | Show results with:salvage
  101. [101]
    [PDF] RimFire Reforestation (45612) - Record of Decision
    Aug 17, 2016 · This Record of Decision (ROD) documents the Responsible Official's decision ... beginning 5 years after the 2013 Rim Fire using the founder stand ...
  102. [102]
    In the Wake of the Rim Fire, What Comes Next? A Story of Recovery ...
    Apr 13, 2015 · Current restoration goals include thinning and using fire as a management tool to reduce fuel loads. (Photo by Clint Gould, U.S. Forest ...Missing: buildup | Show results with:buildup
  103. [103]
    NFF Supports Volunteer-based Rim Fire Restoration
    Over 1,500 volunteers provided nearly 20,000 hours of service working on several large-scale restoration projects, including the planting of more than 56,000 ...
  104. [104]
    RIM Fire Reforestation Project - CEQAnet - CA.gov
    CAL FIRE would provide funding to the County of Tuolumne to conduct post-fire replanting and associated release of competing vegetation in the Stanislaus ...
  105. [105]
    Forest Restoration - Tuolumne River Trust
    Through forest planning and community collaboration with Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, the Stanislaus National Forest identified 23,915 acres of the Rim Fire ...Missing: recovery | Show results with:recovery
  106. [106]
    [PDF] Effects of fire severity and post-fire climate on short-term vegetation ...
    The study examines how fire severity and post-fire climate affect short-term vegetation recovery in mixed-conifer and red fir forests, using Landsat data.<|control11|><|separator|>
  107. [107]
    How does forest recovery following moderate-severity fire influence ...
    Aug 30, 2018 · Standing-tree biomass immediately before and one year after moderate severity-fire in the 2013 Rim Fire. These biomass estimates are from 66 ...
  108. [108]
    Researchers Study Morel Abundance After 2013 Rim Fire
    Jul 29, 2016 · The project came together after the Rim Fire in the Sierra Nevada—the third-largest wildfire in California's history—burned through parts of ...
  109. [109]
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.06.005
  110. [110]
    [PDF] Rim Fire – Preliminary Fuel Treatment Effectiveness Report
    This report is intended to provide a very brief and preliminary look at the interactions between the Rim fire and a select number of areas where management ...